Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_for_horses,_Zhou_Dynasty.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_UE.png){kind=link}
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Nagekhaan (talk) 08:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, it's in violation of copyright. It was created by Digital Woyane Facebook page, you can see the watermark of their page on the top left corner of the image. Reverse image search on Google also proves it. MikiSollo (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anolacrabsss (talk · contribs)
[edit]These photos come with low resolutions and no EXIF data. They are unlikely the work of the uploader as claimed given the history of uploading copyvios.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
AFBorchert (talk) 06:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. One photo has even watermark "www.cinespot.net". Taivo (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Paraguay Ox1997cow (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I made a mistake. Paraguay has FoP. (COM:FOP Paraguay) So
I withdraw my nomination.
Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure) Ox1997cow (talk) 06:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a non-free image of a TV character - Summer Smith, one of the main characters of the animated show Rick and Morty - it is used on Wikipedia with a non-free rational. Krok6kola (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
This was changed, appropriately, to a speedy deletion and has been deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 14:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, because Roblox gameplays and avatars are non-free. Eaaaaugh (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation from ROBLOX game. Out of scope, so please read https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Scope Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Author tweak the color into black and white and claimed as own work. Source from Twice official Japanese account as evidence by the blue tick. Paper9oll (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio. —hueman1 (talk • uploads) 13:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
我不小心上傳它 Ying1989781225 (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture in a very low resolution. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Submitter is a paid editor per [1], by marketing company Zgraph, not the original rights holder for this image. A nonfree use rationale on Wikipedia is required for this image. 35.128.31.8 00:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
The disc cover art takes up most of the screen, and is copyrighted. Eaaaaugh (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
What kind of educational use might this fake flag attributed to some United Kingdom of Judaism fulfil? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
no clarity that this is the contributor's work (no metadata) and it seems more related to paid editing and promotional activity — billinghurst sDrewth 02:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely copyright holder and no proof of permission from the copyright holder. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yuksel Balci Image.jpg. MarioGom (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
no clarity that the contributor is the author, and seems more related to promotional activities at the wikis — billinghurst sDrewth 03:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There's a related discussion at w:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Omar Al Ashi. If the uploader got permission from the copyright holder, it needs a ticket. MarioGom (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violationn of non-free game. Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Emojis likely non free. Also has a water marking indication copyright. This file is also out of scope. Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Minecraft skins are non-free Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons. Also copyright violation. Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 04:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate is at File:Shang Bronze Masks (9930303956).jpg. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The source given by the uploader is not the same image, but a cropped, lower-resolution copy. Tineye found cropped and black & white versions of this image dating back to 2018, indicating a likely copyvio. MjolnirPants (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Not likely own work or CC-licensed. Sumanuil (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope to me. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope? Minoraxtalk 05:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GeorgHH • talk 11:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_for_horses,_Zhou_Dynasty.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_for_horses,_Zhou_Dynasty.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 05:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
_for_horses,_Zhou_Dynasty.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_for_horses,_Zhou_Dynasty.JPG){kind=link}
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo in upper right corner suggests not own work. Lymantria (talk) 05:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
I was testing my wiki editing skills, and decided to use a (quite cringey) picture I have on my computer to use as a photo to put on the sandbox. Sauceboi92 (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
because not relevant WarnaLautku (talk) 06:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Agreed. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
taken from facebook Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Artisatama (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like it. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope and unused
rubin16 (talk) 08:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, appears to be a moulded Lego-brand rabbit (https://www.firestartoys.com/Shop/LEGO-Minifigures/LEGO-Animals/10189-LEGO-Animals-Mini-Figure-~-Rabbit-~-White.html). Lord Belbury (talk) 09:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused redirect. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Surely a copyvio. All other uploads by this user is a copy-vio upload —Vis M (talk) 10:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
File from https://bellagioclimatefutures.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/featured-speaker-mithika-mwenda-from-kenya/ different author name, no copyright notice GeorgHH • talk 10:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sección-20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are all different in quality (some are in great quality and others are poor quality), Judging the EXIF data (as I've used software to restore original data and failed) the user has been trying to remove the data presumerably to avoid detection and to avoid people saying "These were uploaded with different cameras"
FYi a few images are copyvios (see this and this.
All files are being nominated as I don't believe these are theirs and are more than likely to have been taken from elsewhere. Thanks,
- File:Vista Panorámica de la Ciudad de Tarija y del Río Guadalquivir.jpg
- File:Monumento de Luis de Fuentes y Vargas - Tarija Capital.jpg
- File:La Cátedral de San Bernardo de Tarija y casas de arquitectura colonial media distorsionadas de la Calle Madrid (Tarija).jpg
- File:Vista Nocturna de la Ciudad de Tarija.jpg
- File:"Cristo de la Loma de San Juan" (Tarija).jpg
- File:Edificio del Concejo Municipal de la Provincia Cercado de Tarija.jpg
- File:Vista Rio Nuevo Guadalquivir de Tarija.jpg
- File:"Mirador de los Sueños, La Copa" (Tarija).jpg
- File:Cantón Yesera Centro - Provincia Cercado de Tarija.jpg
- File:Municipio de El Puente - Provincia José Eustaquio Méndez Arenas - Departamento de Tarija.jpg
- File:Paneles Solares en el Municipio de Yunchará.jpg
- File:Valle del Municipio Cnel. Francisco Pérez de Uriondo.jpg
- File:Óscar Gerardo Montes Barzón, Gobernador de Tarija 2021-2026.jpg
- File:Bandera del Municipio de Padcaya - Provincia Aniceto Arce Ruiz - Departamento de Tarija.png
- File:Municipio de Padcaya - Tarija.jpg
- File:Bandera de la Provincia Gral. Burdett O'Connor y del Municipio de San Luis de Entre Ríos.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio de "Coronel Francisco Pérez de Uriondo".png
- File:Bandera del Municipio de Yunchará (Tarija).png
- File:Partido Político Unidad Nacional (Bolivia).png
- File:Saice Chapaco.png
- File:Yeísmo en el idioma español.png
- File:Mapa del Departamento del Chaco Boliviano.png
- File:Andrea Bruna Barrientos Sahonero.jpg
- File:Mapa de Elecciones Subnacionales Departamentales de Bolivia 2021.png
- File:Oscar Gerardo Montes Barzón.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
–Davey2010Talk 11:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The user is not sincere or clear with the origin and data of the photographs. --P Cesar Maldonado | Tapuykuna? Quellqayǃ 16:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see also COM:PRP. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be a photo of someones Maths homework. Etjanjb (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No realistic use for educational purposes. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: no mention of CC) on the website of La Quinzaine des Réalisateurs CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Picture from xcar.com.cn : https://info.xcar.com.cn/202104/news_2057796_1.html Navigator84 (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Picture from xcar.com.cn : https://info.xcar.com.cn/202104/news_2057796_1.html Navigator84 (talk) 13:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Picture from xcar.com.cn : https://info.xcar.com.cn/202104/news_2057796_1.html Navigator84 (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Picture from xcar.com.cn : https://info.xcar.com.cn/202104/news_2057796_1.html Navigator84 (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation and incorrect license. This image has appeared on a Vulture.com article (https://www.vulture.com/2018/05/retta-has-a-story-to-tell.html) and the images copyright is "Bobby Doherty/Vulture" Vistadan 14:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Digital conversion of copyrighted images, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hot Goddess.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helen Mekonnen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of memes: Commons:Derivative works, unclear authorship.
- File:Seyoum Mesfin.jpg
- File:Tegaru protesting against the war in Tigray.jpg
- File:Debretsion Gebremichael Hero.jpg
- File:Tigray Genocide.jpg
- File:Debretsion Gebremichael 1.jpg
- File:Tigray Genocide 1.jpg
- File:Abiy Ahmed and Isaiass Afwerki.jpg
- File:Debretsion Gebremichael.jpg
- File:Seyoum Mesfin Hero.jpg
- File:Isaias Afwerki the terrorist.jpg
- File:Sahle Work Zewde.jpg
- File:Eritrean and ethiopian soldiers stealing in Tigray.jpg
- File:Tigray State.jpg
- File:Abiy Ahmed the liar.jpg
- File:TPLF Leaders.jpg
- File:Terrorists for the genocide in Tigray.jpg
- File:Abiy Ahmed and Isaias Afwerki.jpg
- File:Abiy Ahmed.jpg
- File:Tigray Lion.jpg
- File:They are fighting for the genocide of the people of tigray.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Very likely a copyright violation. The picture is part of the expedition Gombessa 1, and it seems unlikely that the original uploader has taken the picture or owns it in any way. According to their website, Gombessa Expeditions keep all rights to their pictures. Paranaja (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:سعيد العوادي.jpg
- File:Adil Elsamiti.jpg
- File:Hicham 3alwan.jpg
- File:Samih Fayz.jpg
- File:Bouchnikha.webp
- File:Couscous baddaz de fruits de mer.jpg
- File:Couscous baddaz au poisson.jpg
- File:Le Couscous marocain Tfaya.jpg
- File:Targhiwin atlas.jpg
- File:Targhiwin .jpg
- File:Crown Tawanza.jpg
- File:Tawanza Crown.jpg
- File:Tanbayyilt souss.jpg
- File:Sous nbalat.jpg
- File:Nbala sous.jpg
- File:Sous nbala.jpg
- File:Tanbayyilt sous.jpg
- File:Tanbayyilt Amazigh bracelet .jpg
- File:Tanbayyilt.jpg
- File:نبالة من قبائل جبال الأطلس المتوسط.jpg
- File:نبالة أطلسية .jpg
- File:نبالة مغلقة.jpg
- File:نبالة.jpg
- File:نبالات.jpg
- File:تنبالت .jpg
- File:صورة ليد إمرأة ترتدي النبالة السوسية.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ana Alvarez Cruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
- File:Visitors by country 02.png
- File:Most read articles by title 04.png
- File:Most read articles by title 03.png
- File:Most read articles by title 02.png
- File:Visitors by country .png
- File:Most read articles by title.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fredericko Curtiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Imperial Seal of Japan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Beverage cans with copyrighted art work.
GeorgHH • talk 20:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by a Portuguese spammer, who showed that he worked for a publicity company: Moreira Comunicação. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Moreira.png
- File:Telma Abrahão.png
- File:Design sem nome.png
- File:MaykonDeXangô.png
- File:LojaViaSol.jpg
- File:ViaSolBrazil.png
- File:DrPedroMiranda.jpg
Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
No license at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marko671919 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images seem more like professional or internet images than own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:32, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found elsewhere on internet. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marko671919 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are facebook size/quality or smaller. If they are your own facebook files, please fill in the email at COM:OTRS. Else cannot be retained as previously published.
- File:Xhyrakasaba2.jpg
- File:Xhyrakasaba.jpg
- File:Bajsbn686.jpg
- File:Nekdbdn34.jpg
- File:Ahebekn234.jpg
- File:Gjjk89.png
- File:187bjendbms.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20210522-182803 Maps.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, looks like a professional portrait, but this copy is small and of low quality suggesting harvest from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: the picture already existed the 3 July 2014 on the website Remix-Nation without indication of Creative Commons https://web.archive.org/web/20140703130056/http://www.remix-nation.com/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrights not shown. Maikê (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication of licence on the linked site. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, as explained in descriptio Ciaurlec (talk) 23:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please delete. Just fiction, no real election. OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 22:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality and no permission, DELETE it. --182.239.117.94 16:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
incorrect or absent attribution of authorship, not self-made
- File:Денисов вл5.jpg
- File:Денисов вл1.jpg
- File:Леон Закс 3.jpg
- File:Леон Закс 4.jpg
- File:Leon Sachs 1.jpg
rubin16 (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dealdropimages (talk · contribs)
[edit]While these images are indeed from flickr, they depict items not created by the flickr photographer such as Computer and Mobile Phone Applications, BitCoins of various types, and apparently stock photos (on the computers/phones). The gallery appears to be promotional as the name of the uploader here is same as the flickr uploader and the topic is singular.
- File:Cryptocurrency & Blockchain in Virtual Reality.jpg
- File:Online Flower Shopping - Buying Flowers Online - 51102903099.jpg
- File:Paying with Dogecoin Cryptocurrency - 51102829341.jpg
- File:Paying with Dogecoin Cryptocurrency - 51103933040.jpg
- File:Paying with Ethereum Cryptocurrency - 51103933085.jpg
- File:Paying Online with Cryptocurrency - 51103933210.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later with Afterpay - 51102829586.jpg
- File:Social Media Shopping - Shopping on Facebook - 51103066828.jpg
- File:Social Media Shopping - Shopping on Instagram - 51103066878.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later Payment Options on Mobile Phone - 51102930182.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later with Sezzle App - 51103933555.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later with Split It App - 51102930507.jpg
- File:Split It - Buy Now Pay Later - 51102903904.jpg
- File:Sezzle - Buy Now Pay Later - 51102830141.jpg
- File:Buy Now pay later using Zip - 51102930832.jpg
- File:Laybuy - Buy Now Pay Later App on Mobile Phone - 51102930922.jpg
- File:Pay with Clearpay - Buy Now Pay Later - 51102904259.jpg
- File:Furniture Shopping Online - 51102931027.jpg
- File:Furniture Shopping in Virtual Reality - 51103934045.jpg
- File:Paying Online with Ethereum Cryptocurrency - 51103067583.jpg
- File:Paying Online with Bitcoin - 51102830686.jpg
- File:Bitcoin Payments Online - 51102904424.jpg
- File:Online Payments with Bitcoin Cryptocurrency - 51103067663.jpg
- File:Grocery Shopping Apps on Mobile Phone - 51102904679.jpg
- File:Grocery Shopping Online - 51102904749.jpg
- File:Grocery Shopping on Mobile Phone - 51103934535.jpg
- File:Social Media Shopping on Instagram.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later App - Butter.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later App - Zip.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later with Klarna - Dates marked on Calendar - 51103934850.jpg
- File:Buy Now Pay Later App - Klarna - 51102931657.jpg
- File:Desktop Online Shopping With Sale tags.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dealdropimages (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Buy Now Pay Later Payment Options for Online Shopping - 51102929822.jpg
- File:Discount Codes Online.jpg
- File:Online Shopping Payments in Virtual Reality.jpg
- File:Virtual Reality Shopping Experience.jpg
- File:Social Media Shopping on Facebook and Instagram - 51102930037.jpg
- File:Instagram Shopping - Social Media Shopping - 51102903464.jpg
- File:Facebook Shopping - Social Media Shopping - 51102903484.jpg
- File:Codes for discounts - online shopping - 51102903994.jpg
- File:Online Discount Codes - 51102930747.jpg
- File:Online Payments - Shopping Online.jpg
- File:Grocery Shopping Online using Mobile Phone.jpg
- File:Supermarket Apps for Online Grocery Shopping.jpg
- File:Online Shopping Payments with Card.jpg
- File:Grocery Shopping On Laptop - 51102904724.jpg
- File:Desktop Online Shopping With Sale tags in Cart.jpg
- File:Online Shopping Apps on Mobile Phone.jpg
Same rationale as for the already deleted items above. Marbletan (talk) 19:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iloveindia444 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope
Didym (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
The disc cover art takes up most of the screen, and is copyrighted. Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Roundel of Sweden.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Description is blatantly promotional. Promotional, non-educational activity is outside of COM:SCOPE. Seraphimblade (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
По желанию правообладателя TranekBatler (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
== [[:File:Rolelushanimepiano.jpg]] ==
|
File:Rolelushanimepiano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Шаблон Применение Для быстрого удаления TranekBatler (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- По желанию правообладателя TranekBatler (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Шаблон Применение Для быстрого удаления TranekBatler (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- по требованию исполнителя TranekBatler (talk) 22:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, seems out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Remove duplicated DR templates, causing archiving issues. --Minoraxtalk 03:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.ge.ch/conditions-generales) Sherwood6 (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Poor-quality hand-drawn chemcial structure. Have File:Sodium orthosilicate.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. This type of shaky hand-drawn diagram isn't usable and there is a high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
logo in copyviol: a trademark, not a free-licence file — danyele 15:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
file in copyviol: a trademark, not a free-licence logo — danyele 15:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
fake license YarikUkraine (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo. --✗plicit 06:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
change name HermanPedia (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 02:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Very likely no publication under a free license; actually no licensing given. Mosbatho (talk) 09:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- This depicts artwork not created by uploader. Small file size, poor quality, unlikely own work/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- This file was initially tagged by Complementos6 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken from the internet|https://catedralcalahorra.org
PD-old (and PD-art after removing the frame) may apply. This may be useful. Strakhov (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- I see the title/author as APPROACH TO THE IMAGE OF LOS SANTOS EMETERIO AND CELEDONIO IN LA RIOJA AND NAVARRA by Javier Fernandez Cascante, but I don't see any dates for the painting. I can't find a larger or better image on the internet and would agree with Complementos6 that this is the one from the cathedral's website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is a work in the Cathedral of Calahorra. There is a section in that paper (p. 126) dedicated to works depictings this pair of saints in that cathedral and it cites several dates ranging from the 16th century to 1902. I don't have time now to find out what one is this file. (I see now it it may be only about sculptures though). If this painting were in the public (it looks indeed old), it's not very significant whether it's taken from the cathedral's web or not. Strakhov (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Here (pp. 794-795, footnote) there is a mention about a painting of the "Santos Emeterio y Celedonio" in the Cathedral of Calahorra (from Rome) from the first half of the 17th century. Strakhov (talk) 06:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe the photo was taken from here? https://catedralcalahorra.org/capillaBautismal.html--MateoSag (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
unused picture of math equations that should better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This work is not a picture of a painting that is located in Mexico. It is located in New York and Mexican FoP doesn't apply to works located in American sole. Further, there is no license for the subject. It merely includes a license for the picture and it lacks a proper license for the painting, which will be PD until 2111. Tbsock (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No FOP for 2D works in USA. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If one looks at the largest file size, it is clear to see this is from a published source, as it is made entirely of half-tone dots. Previously published works require a source, correct date, author & license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Still from "The Invisible Man" and available all over the internet, but unlikely to be own work of the creator as stated in the license Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
No permission from the artists whose works are reproduced here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, the same applies to all of these uploads. NB this is apparently undisclosed paid editing in violation of the Foundation's Terms of use. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Yarışma için yüklemiştim fakat herkesin kullanımına açık olduğunu gördüğüm için dosyayı kaldırmak istiyoruım. Gsahin17 (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- {{SDG7|I am taking back my request}} {{unsigned2|18:59, 2 August 2021|Gsahin17}}
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, signature of J. A. Knapp in the bottom right corner. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep John Augustus Knapp (1853 - 1938) was an American painter and illustrator who died plenty long ago to have this have a free license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)- Most likely from The Secret Teachings of All Ages : An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy, by Manly P. Hall, John Augustus Knapp Illustrator. The book seems to have been privately published in 1928 or 1929 ("before the 28th birthday of Manly Hall" at one source). Several sources refer to the illustrations being older than the book and some may have been published as posters. I found one dated 1926 on Amazon. Also see https://scottishrite.org/scottish-rite-myths-and-facts/most-requested-book/ as well as https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/30318992060_5.jpg which shows the image in location in the book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed, still not own work. This File:Illustration of Pythagoras.png seems to be the same btw, well without the colour and so on. TherasTaneel (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Ellin Beltz. Ruthven (msg) 11:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Due to the caterpillar illustration and the colors being mixed, it cannot be labeled as having shapes and text only. The illustration for records by Elektra in the 70s is still copyrighted and therefore should be deleted. Rheathesecond (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Due to the caterpillar illustration and the colors being mixed, it cannot be labeled as having shapes and text only. The illustration for records by Elektra in the 70s is still copyrighted and therefore should be deleted. Rheathesecond (talk) 04:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Due to the caterpillar illustration and the colors being mixed, it cannot be labeled as having shapes and text only. The illustration for records by Elektra in the 70s is still copyrighted and therefore should be deleted. Rheathesecond (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant copyright infringement uploaded by a globally blocked user. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
unknown paper photo, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Этот текст доказательство того, что вы покрываете и защищаете лживые и грязные статьи, которые оклеветали и опозорили людей. Поэтому, конечно публикуйте его в контексте с моим текстом, к которому он привязан.
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.vd.ch/toutes-les-autorites/chancellerie-detat/bic/mentions-legales/) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Toute reproduction, utilisation ou modification à des fins publiques ou commerciales du contenu protégé par les droits d’auteur est interdite sans l’autorisation du détenteur des droits.. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.jura.ch/fr/Accueil/Conditions-d-utilisation.html) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Toute reproduction, utilisation ou modification à des fins publiques ou commerciales du contenu protégé par les droits d’auteur est interdite sans l’autorisation du détenteur des droits.. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur les droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies : la photo officielle n'est pas un rapport ou autre Sherwood6 (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sue le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.ge.ch/conditions-generales) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.cvp.ch/fr/conditions-dutilisation) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.ge.ch/conditions-generales) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.ge.ch/conditions-generales) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi sur le droit d'auteur ne sont pas remplies. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où l'image est tirée (https://www.ge.ch/conditions-generales) Sherwood6 (talk) 09:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
image non libre de droits WikiwriterIT (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC) / private image, not free Estrela79 (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per French FoP. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
private image, not free Estrela79 (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC) / image non libre de droits WikiwriterIT (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
image non libre de droits WikiwriterIT (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC) / private image, not free Estrela79 (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
oui c'est vrai, l'image n'est pas de moi, nous pouvons la supprimer Template:Suppression image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Técinka (talk • contribs) 16:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
no license احمد سامي (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
uncited and out of date Chidgk1 (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
uncited and out of date Chidgk1 (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
uncited and out of date Chidgk1 (talk) 19:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of file:Okanagana fumipennis - Flickr - aspidoscelis (3).jpg Arlo James Barnes 21:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was added from the Wikitongues YouTube channel. At the request of the featured speaker, we have since removed it, and we would like to remove it here. Bogreudell (talk) 03:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note from VRT volunteer: see also ticket:2021110210003843. JavaHurricane 09:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 12:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. Possible copyvio, @Liuxinyu970226: Most likely previously published there, and proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - FoP is completely irrelevant, but it's a FAcebook image -- copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. Possible copyvio, @Liuxinyu970226: Most likely previously published there, and proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination FoP is completely irrelevant, but it's a Facebook image -- copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. This is a distant view of a structure. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. See my input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Station Pesantren bij Toeban.jpeg, which includes a possible remedy to be undertaken by the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Facebook image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. See my input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Station Pesantren bij Toeban.jpeg, which includes a possible remedy to be undertaken by the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.
David: Your repeated comments are not helpful. This image was not in use, so its deletion does not harm WP in any way. "The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic" is directly contrary to Commons policy which is that all images must be free for commercial use. It's also irrelevant in this case, because there is nothing in this image that could not be used commercially, except for the fact that the image is a copyright violation.
Liuxinyu970226: Your repeated tags of No FOP in Indonesia on this long series of images is not useful. None of the images have anything in them to which the tag might apply. Except perhaps in France, bridges do not generally have a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. See my input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Station Pesantren bij Toeban.jpeg, which includes a possible remedy to be undertaken by the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Practically useless and liable to litigation because of the watermark. These kind of images should be stopped from appearing in this platfrom. The author needs to be send a mail to remove the watermark faling to do so WIKIMEDIA editors should remove this image. Daniel Romanson (talk) 10:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from broadcast. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Bei der Suche nach dem Naturdenkmal Duisburg 1.2.27 bin ich auf diesen Baum gestossen und habe ihn aufgrund der Koordinaten diesem Naturdenkmal zugeordnet. Nach einer weiteren vergeblichen Suche habe ich mich an die Untere Naturschutzbehörde der Stadt Duisburg gewandt und folgende Nachricht erhalten: "Sehr geehrter Herr Simon, leider ist es, wie Sie vermutet haben: der Baum ist vor einiger Zeit abgestorben und umgestürzt. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, dass unsere ND-Liste noch nicht angepasst wurde (ich gehe davon aus, Sie meinen die Liste auf unserer Homepage Duisburg.Grün). Wir werden das im Rahmen der Neugestaltung unserer Homepage, die aktuell geplant wird, nachholen." Aus diesem Grund bitte ich um Löschung dieses Files, da es auch keine Aufnahme des ehemaligen Naturdenkmals ist. Rolf Simon (talk) 10:23, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Bei der Suche nach dem Naturdenkmal Duisburg 1.2.27 bin ich auf diesen Baum gestossen und habe ihn aufgrund der Koordinaten diesem Naturdenkmal zugeordnet. Nach einer weiteren vergeblichen Suche habe ich mich an die Untere Naturschutzbehörde der Stadt Duisburg gewandt und folgende Nachricht erhalten: "Sehr geehrter Herr Simon, leider ist es, wie Sie vermutet haben: der Baum ist vor einiger Zeit abgestorben und umgestürzt. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, dass unsere ND-Liste noch nicht angepasst wurde (ich gehe davon aus, Sie meinen die Liste auf unserer Homepage Duisburg.Grün). Wir werden das im Rahmen der Neugestaltung unserer Homepage, die aktuell geplant wird, nachholen." Aus diesem Grund bitte ich um Löschung dieses Files, da es auch keine Aufnahme des ehemaligen Naturdenkmals ist. Rolf Simon (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Bei der Suche nach dem Naturdenkmal Duisburg 1.2.27 bin ich auf diesen Baum gestossen und habe ihn aufgrund der Koordinaten diesem Naturdenkmal zugeordnet. Nach einer weiteren vergeblichen Suche habe ich mich an die Untere Naturschutzbehörde der Stadt Duisburg gewandt und folgende Nachricht erhalten: "Sehr geehrter Herr Simon, leider ist es, wie Sie vermutet haben: der Baum ist vor einiger Zeit abgestorben und umgestürzt. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, dass unsere ND-Liste noch nicht angepasst wurde (ich gehe davon aus, Sie meinen die Liste auf unserer Homepage Duisburg.Grün). Wir werden das im Rahmen der Neugestaltung unserer Homepage, die aktuell geplant wird, nachholen." Aus diesem Grund bitte ich um Löschung dieses Files, da es auch keine Aufnahme des ehemaligen Naturdenkmals ist. Rolf Simon (talk) 10:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another photo I have in this album, and this copy has website information that is outdated and refers to sites no longer in existence. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: The biggest version I could find was here (image link. That site is marked as "© 2021 Nawrot Brothers", making permission via WP:OTRS required. 14:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Schmidt (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 21:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Black and white version of a picture on their Facebook page. CC-BY-SA seems an assumption, nothing more. Hiro (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Likely copyvio of the 2013 Facebook photo -M.nelson (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Duplication de fichier Mucklagh (talk) 19:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Mucklagh: de quel fichier est ce qu'il est un double? -M.nelson (talk) 18:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the user who is requesting deletion of his own file here uploaded File:Meán Scoil Nua an Leith-Triúigh.ogg a day later, which is basically the same except it's a proper audio file instead of a video file showing an empty wall while the name is pronounced. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
fake, file for vandalism Lesless (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not the uploader's own work; the painting might be PD-Old but there's no indication that the photo/painting is notable. -M.nelson (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
no FoP in Ukraine. Architector - uk:Багенський Іван Олександрович, died in 1967, not PD-Old yet, too rubin16 (talk) 09:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no COM:FOP Ukraine, and not yet 70 years pma per COM:UKRAINE. -M.nelson (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2038. —RP88 (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The space background is from the Lego Star wars series, and the torch is from Minecraft. Eaaaaugh (talk) 03:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- The space background was created by me to look like the Lego Star Wars background and the torch is from my own resource pack. DeeFeeCee (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep User page image, I am satisfied by DeeFeeCee's explanation. I do not believe that this is a derivative work, as the general form of a Minecraft torch and a star-studded night sky are uncopyrightable ideas. Mysterymanblue 09:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader remark. Thank you Fido Cahya for your honesty. -M.nelson (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Question @Fido Cahya - are you the same person as Wong Langsep, who uploaded the image? -M.nelson (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Perhaps uploader forgot their password, unclear situation. Therefore deleted per COM:PRP. Photo is not in use. --Ellywa (talk) 13:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Pengabdian Selama Perang Kemerdekaan Bersama Brigade Ronggolawe; Jembatan kereta api Kaliketek di atas sungai Bengawan Solo.jpg
[edit]
Saya sebagai Pengunggah melakukan kesalahan dalam memilih gambar yang akan saya unggah (bukan gambar/file ini) Fido Cahya (talk) 14:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. --Эlcobbola talk 16:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Pengabdian Selama Perang Kemerdekaan Bersama Brigade Ronggolawe; Jembatan kereta api Kaliketek di atas sungai Bengawan Solo.jpg
[edit]
Deleted: per nomination. The file description reads in translation: The Kaliketek railway bridge over the Bengawan Solo River was the main link from Bojonegoro to Tuban and vice versa before it was destroyed (before the war of independence II/Dutch military aggression II). So this is an old image. Nothing is known about publication date or author. Possibly copyrighted, therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Replaced used on two language WP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Derivative work of an image in PD can be maintained on Commons. Not Redundant, because in use on many articles in Wikipedia in several languages. --Ellywa (talk) 13:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
_in_UE.png){kind=link}
_in_UE.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
_in_UE.png){kind=link}
- I assume good faith of the uploader and I can follow your thought. It is a hard case, but my principle is simple. We don't have anything to loss to hold this unused chart here. Maybe you can educate me more about where I can find the manual of style for this chart that it 'Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG', so that I can improve my Wikimedia judgment for adding even more effective value, thanks in advance. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unused on its own is not a reason to delete. The chart has a reasonable educational purpose so meets COM:SCOPE. If there is a better quality version it could be COM:REDUNDANT. -M.nelson (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per various arguments in the discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 13:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
_in_UE.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no permission (No permission since) MGA73 (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
It is correct that username and "courtesy of Nicolae Bisoceanu" could indicate that it is not own work. But on en:File:Tarom.atr42-500.cristibur.jpg it says "own work, courtesy of Nicolae Bisoceanu" and "Author=Cristibur". Another file en:File:Romavia1.jpg says "Cristibur 03:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC) courtesy of Nicolae Bisoceanu" and have a self template. --MGA73 (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It seems like the photographer is Nicolae Bisoceanu, not the uploader Cristibur. We need more explicit permission from the photographer that they are releasing the image under a free license, e.g. via COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Is an old version of a logo that was actually never used. And it has no usage in commons. Reddow (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear notability; doesn't seem to meet COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above, and no proof the Studio freely licensed the logo anyway. Wizardman 15:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
