Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 16th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tu'i-tu'i Lase lase (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & OOS. --Achim (talk) 08:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is erroneous MRTFR55 (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is erroneous MRTFR55 (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per E4024. It's not a very good picture, but it's still a picture of a specific place in Bangladesh, even with coordinates. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 06:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Quickly close, if you still have comments on the results, please go to COM:DRV. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentliches Hochladen INTOCAST AG (talk) 12:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Versehentliches Hochladen INTOCAST AG (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by accident. I closed the tab because I decided I did not want to upload the image because I wasn't sure about the copyright. It still uploaded because I was already too far in. AwfulSpy (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate|File:Perseus with the Head of Medusa MET DP249452.jpg}} Joanbanjo (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate|File:Perseus with the Head of Medusa MET DP250603.jpg}} Joanbanjo (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same photo is found on this article: https://www.metroworldnews.com/nuevamujer/espectaculos/2020/05/27/actores-control-z-netflix. The article is dated 27/05/20 while the upload was 02/06/20. discospinster (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 01:05, 18 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 15:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope, blurry Migebert (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and pixelated. Have a bunch of higher-resolution and larger raster, and also SVG, in Category:Hydroxyurea DMacks (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 00:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NatsuHaru5746 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these diverse logos from separate companies cannot all be own works. Also, most of them meet COM:TOO and the companies can thus claim copyright on them.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, it seems like the "perform batch task" tool does not recognize all of this user's uploads, but the concerns mentioned above also apply to:

Perhaps to the file below as well but unlike the above this one might not be copyrightable in the US; unfortunately I don't know about Japanese copyright standards.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Files like logos of companies David Production, Signal.MD, Okuruto Noboru, Ashi Productions, Satelight, Front Wing, and ect. are by default public domain by not meeting the threshold of originality by Japanese standards. This standard is held by the idea that simple geometric shapes and texts, such as in these logos, are not subject to protection by copyright law. These files in particular are simply added under an incorrect license. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Sarcataclysmal, at least some of these are below TOO in Japan and the US, and therefore not copyrightable. This batch should be handled with discretion by the deleting admin (many of the ones below TOO have already had their license info changed to something more proper). — Goszei (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 5, kept the others Per nomination. According to be copyrightable a text logo needs to have artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation (from Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Japan#Threshold_of_originality. The examples on that page are very simple indeed. I looked carefully to the images and only when I was personally convinced of artistic appearance I deleted the image. In other cases they were kept. Elly (talk) 22:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanemdawood2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanemdawood2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 06:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 10:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 10:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apsny2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeynalselver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prburley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion. I uploaded these, it's my error. The entire set may not have the correct CC license, only "public domain", oy vey! Prburley (talk)

Deleted: (already speedily deleted by other admin). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prburley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khunou S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yamacyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I am concerned that these images were only uploaded today, reviewed by the Flickr bot as ok and yet I get a 404 error on each of them. Rather than a deletion request as such I'm suggesting that this warrants some human reviewing. Thanks

Herby talk thyme 12:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yamacyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent license laundering. Watermarks credit "Danila Panfilov," which is not the same person as the source Flickr user "Din Muhammad Sumon"

Эlcobbola talk 20:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yamacyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside project COM:SCOPE, scribbles not useful for Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Google Maps Street View, digitally altered with a fake route number. Precedence set Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Thent1234 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thent1234. –Fredddie 04:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also adding these images as screenshots of Google Maps: –Fredddie 04:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, advertizing Krd 07:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shabbirqamarbokhari4u (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These would appear to be basically self promotional personal images and so outside our scope

Herby talk thyme 08:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Author Arno per exif and a cropped version of her Amazon profile pic.

Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Ray Johnson pix from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed)

[edit]

Dubious claim of PD-congress. Taken from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed. We have no idea if the photographer was an official photographer or if this was a courtesy pic taken by someone else

Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Douglas A. Munro sculptures in the US)

[edit]

No FOP for sculptures in the US

Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Mauro)

[edit]

Photos of some computer screen display. OoS

Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. These appear to be (successively better) photos of a memorial web page for Alexander L. Mauro of the US Army, a Purple Heart recipient, as honored by his daughters Ms. Bettina Maloney and Ms. Loretta Adams. The logo on the right is PD-US-Military-Army. Mauro could be the subject of a biography on Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) Kept: 13:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC) by Fitindia, thanks!   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp 4

[edit]

Photos of copyrighted works

Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 17:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (logos)

[edit]

Complex logos, need permission. Others are unused personal logos and OoS

Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp 6

[edit]

Out of scope images, no EDUSE

Gbawden (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (more logos)

[edit]

Unused logos, some OoS and some too complex too keep without permission

Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp posters

[edit]

Out of scope "posters"

Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by George Chernilevsky. --Minoraxtalk 06:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp from Facebook

[edit]

Facebook Grubu (public sharing) - just because its shared on FB doesn't mean its freely licensed

Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The villages belongs to Turkey's Şarkışla District. These pictures were taken from people for a survey/research booklet about villages. There are permits for public use within the survey. The permits have been taken separately from persons those who have the pictures. I can make the necessary corrections in upload pages. (I thought the facebok reference was sufficient.) And I can send the image of the joint permissions in the book.

For example: The correct permission of this [image] is: "Şarkışla ve Köyleri Kitapçığı (Booklet of Şarkışla and its Villages)" (Kızılırmak Matbaası, 2020) Görsel ve Fotoğraflar Listesi (List of Images and Photos) in the list:

"...
24....
25. Ebubekir Çelik - Yapaltın Sulama Birliği - 18 May 2014, ilk yayın (first publish): "Gümüştepe (Yapaltın)" Facebook Grubu
26....
...."

end of list: görseller önceden izin almaksızın kaynak göstermek kaydıyla serbestçe paylaşılabilir. sahiplerinin açık izni bulunmaktadır (images can be freely shared without prior permission, provided that the source is indicated. It has the permission given by its owners). Given a few days, I'll fix it all.

And sometimes I have original images different the Facebook Groups. Example:

1. Image that I have froom booklet: [1] (unspoilt)

2. Image in the Facebook Group: [2] (torn off)

Exuce for my English, You can ask if anything is not understood --Buzancar (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buzancar: Please read COM:L - the person who took the photograph needs to release it - not whoever has it. Please send permission for each photo via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Thanks for explanations. If I knew it would be like this, I wouldn't waste time uploading photos. It's too complicated for me to do what you say; understanding and applying the explanations on the COM:L and COM:OTRS pages and getting separate permission for each image. Very difficult. These are things that can be bought simply with a request in here. Very simple. We want and people give. Nobody even knows about copyright. On the contrary, they are proud that their photos were posted here. Images about villages. Most of the owners of the photos living in villages.
First I can send the list I have (The permission of the owners of the images is clearly written in the booklet). It will take time to deal with each photo one by one. However, some photos are different. I don't think they will need permission. Selçuk Anatolian High School photographs are the product of a joint work we did with two people. Actually it does not belong to a single person. Eventually I will have to go and take new photos. It will be a waste of time again. I am sorry. Thanks again. --Buzancar (talk) 07:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: I will ensure that the list is mailed to noon tomorrow. Thanks --Buzancar (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: A mail has been sent. But it doesn't matter if you reject, don't accept it. That's all I can do to recover photos. Although most likely not enough.
At least I learned situation, before uploading a lot more photos: Now I will only upload the photos, that I took myself. I have been writing on Wikipedia for over 10 years. But it has only been 3 months since I started adding photos.
Although I have paid attention to the copyright issue and followed the booklet I have, I understand that there is still a risk.
Thank you for your early intervention. Otherwise I could have wasted more time... --Buzancar (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- FitIndia Talk 14:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp (Howard H. Baker Jr.)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, found here https://www.bakerdonelson.com/Howard-H-Baker-Jr-1925-2014

Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gbtemp Flickrwashing

[edit]

Flickrwashing - account has 1 follower and was created in 2021 for flickrwashing

Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, very small, subject blurred & badly cropped, no use -> outside of Commons scope MPF (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, very small, subject badly cropped, no use -> outside of Commons scope MPF (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, user's only upload Mjrmtg (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dewan Foysal Haque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons scope as no realistic use - low quality, both birds badly cropped MPF (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author. I changed the copyrights "all rights reserved". Since I might have taken the picture a bit too high, I don't want to have that picture floating around too much. Benh (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of authorship by the uploader. EXIF entry is to professional photographer Ana Jovmir. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission from photographer. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in India for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove deletion tag, as it is in Bangladesh where there is FOP exists. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --lNeverCry 23:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating again. COM:FOP Bangladesh only covers 3D works (architecture and sculptures). There's no indication of a Commons-applicable FOP covering non-3D works of Bangladesh. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, listed as valid FoP exception at {{FoP-Bangladesh}}: "Making of a drawing, engraving or photograph of an architectural work of art, or a sculpture kept in a public place,." No mention on other forms of arts most esp. 2D ones. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work and tibits imagery is not allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has anyone found the trademark or copyright regarding photographs of this toy? Spongebob is is a copyright of Viacom right? it's only used on one page and it's on wikipedia, i feel like this could be out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:TOYS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a staged PR shot, and is thus unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Additionally, while I wasn't able to find this exact picture, a Google reverse image search turns up several very similar looking photos that were probably derived from this image. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RVD_Blois-2016_1_(2).jpg L'auteur est Guillaume VIAL, son autorisation est donc nécessaire c:Commons:OTRS/fr Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - very low res, no EXIF, uploader along with related blatant copyvio (File:Ryzen3Box.webp), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робот Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: poor quality, out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: poor quality, COM:DW without source. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, poor quality, not used, out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: poor quality, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal picture, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW, no permission, file not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing/ deleted images used in this collage. Also not confirmed licence. GeorgHHtalk   21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sources of this DW have been deleted from Commons. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to File:Vidya herbs logo.png. DS (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution, no exif, odd crop; very similar image [3] has been previously published in several places; likely taken from a video; unlikely to be own work. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. No permission from artist as well. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pierre-Victor Dautel died in 1951. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:FD10:8A1C:C4BF:1178 22:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([4]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([5]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([6]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([7]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted television advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted television program. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Copy of a recent document with photos and maps (derivated works) / Architect: Sinika Rapponen Poudou99 (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no sources, no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait and the only file uploaded by this user. Krok6kola (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Tropical Tidbits are copyrighted, "Copyright © 2012-2020 Tropical Tidbits, All Rights Reserved" A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - work of Andrej Gabrovec, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 06:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 06:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 07:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no evidence of permission for derivative works. — Yerpo Eh? 07:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a test page. RZuo (talk) 08:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website of the Ministry of Interior of Serbia is copyrihted (http://www.mup.gov.rs/wps/portal/en), also not sure that this fall into PD-Serbia. Smooth O (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of own work. Maybe a case for fair use, but not on commons Hemiauchenia (talk) 08:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Should be fair use on Wikipedia - highly unlikely it is the authors work so probably not for Commons. It should however be okay under fair use criteria on the English wikipedia. I would propose we delete from Commons and upload onto Wiki with fair use licence. --Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Kazakhstan and in Russia for sculpture.

VLu (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of me, don't want it here 158.140.162.209 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, are you the depicted person, who uploaded the image in 2019? It has still 1 external use:[8]. Apart from that I support a courtesy-deletion.--Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pic of me 158.140.187.215 09:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 10:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's an old logo. JRemonB (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are generally not considered own work. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This photo was taken from Facebook." Need information about the photographer and license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no OTRS, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Ms.popsie21

[edit]

Photographs of paintings by an artist who is still alive. It is not clear the uploader is the artist; the uploader's 5th file is a photo of the artist. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of an advertisement published in a fairly recent magazine (1990s-2012). Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is very blurry and therefore I would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional posed photo with low resolution, user single upload as own work, dubious exif data, probably copied from Twitter [9] C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prank/joke file Leptictidium (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Antoni Pérez Moya died in 1964. CC license is incorrect. GeorgHHtalk   17:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gryffindor as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: information now in caption. I do not understand, why the file should be deleted: due to copyright or scope problems? It seems, that the plaque is ineligible for copyright. Educational value maybe exists as well. Explanation is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems to have been kept. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that the fan who took this picture is also the copyright owner of the depicted artwork. Hiro (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has given me permission to post this depicted artwork on Wikimedia Commons. Industrees (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Gbawden. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although there is COM:FOP in Malaysia, it is limited only to "artistic work permanently situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public." Election-related posters are not permanent since they are displayed only for the duration of an election campaign. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction d'une carte de l'IGN (Copyvio) Poudou99 (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, from a copyrighted Elsevier paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667120302603?via%3Dihub Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, uploader was unsure of author at time of upload (see Special:Diff/275779011/275780318). If you don't know if you created a work or not, you can't hardly agree to a copyright license over it. Copyright holder should contact COM:OTRS. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Tropical Tidbits are copyrighted, "Copyright © 2012-2020 Tropical Tidbits, All Rights Reserved" A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Really? This is my first time using the file uploader, i'm not familar with the copyright laws. My bad, I've seen others use it and I thought it'll be fine. ARegularWisconsinite (talk) 03:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ARegularWisconsinite: Commons only accepts free content, see Commons:Licensing. That is, those marked as "some rights reserved" (freely-licensed, preferrably Creative Commons) and/or "no rights reserved" (public domain). All rights reserved means the author of the image or work in the image has exclusive economic rights over all manners of reproduction and distribution. For the image, I lean to  Delete JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and just really fucking creepy. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for 2D artworks in Russia. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better version is File:Mouchoirs comparés2.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert poster with portraits. Cjp24 (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Satellite imagery likely from Landsat or Sentinel-2, but missing attribution Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: surely this coat of arms cannot remotely be considered being in the public domain for a person who came to the office in 1997. How can the author of the arms be dead 70+ year yet have created this in 1997?. Beside which, this file stated to be and named as the arms of Mary Robinson, who became president in 1990, not Mary McAleese where it is used in w:List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Ireland. The copyright applied make no sense at all. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong flag; the right one has six crosses ( File:Bandeira de Mondoñedo.svg) Estevoaei (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although there is COM:FOP in the Czech Republic, it is limited only to works permanently located in a public space per COM:FOP Czech Republic. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After reviewing the photo I've noticed that the head of has been cut from another photo and placed onto a photo of another footballer. This is clearly fake. Govvy (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan d'un article de presse sous copyright Bertrand Labévue (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Metadata - from facebook

If I'm not wrong, 1973 is PD for Iran, therefore if the magazine cover is in the Facebook page of someone (or not) should not be important in this case, IMHO. Even if I'm wrong we can give the file a chance to be discussed instead of being speedily deleted. E4024 (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr photostream from which this came consists of vintage published matter from a wide variety of sources. This makes it doubtful that the uploader on Flickr is the copyright holder. This photo is obviously a postcard. Unlike most of what is scavenged from eBay, only the front of this postcard is available for inspection. The reverse or any retail packaging would contain the necessary clues to ascertain the copyright status of the image. Therefore, the claimed licensing cannot be proven as it stands. RadioKAOS (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angmador (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Commons:Derivative works from posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of pers. rights Nolispanmo 16:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DIFUNCAO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader (DIFUNCAO) apparently purports to be subject (Di função). As copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject, evidence of permission from the actual author (or a written document evidencing the transfer of copyright) should be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. Also uploaded among unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO with same subject, characteristics, metadata, etc. COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 17:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license for this image is of dubious credibility. The uploader only has one contribution. This photo was taken in 2008 but was uploaded to Commons three years later. I seriously doubt the photographer is the same person as the Undercover123SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 15:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do all the posters entered PD in France (published more than 70 years ago)? A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   21:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cjp24: "If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted." Most of the content of this photo is copyrighted. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"NOTE: Please do not use this template directly! This is just for translation. Use NoFoP-France instead!"
Français : [...] "la jurisprudence française admet qu'il peut ne pas y avoir de contrefaçon, quand l'œuvre exposée n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
This photo shows many posters/works:
  • the one on the left is a small photo with very low quality (only silhouettes): this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
  • next poster: it shows a small logo, band names ("Stray Cats"...) and a small drawing (a rude aircraft): this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
  • next poster: it shows especially four (very small and unreadable) portraits: this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
  • next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable...
In summary, low quality and size of each poster. --Cjp24 (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Cjp24. Individual images are sufficiently distorted and low quality to render any reproduction impossible. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of image in the window display. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
In this photo the glass obstructs the tarpaulin copy hence no copyright exists; this is what legal experts like from Sycip Law office call De Minimis, the Philippine laws do not deal with trifles
Two bags of American-style marshmallows on a lawn Commons has tons of these kinds of copyright alleged infringements, and many editors know that they are De Minimis;
Addendum: In addition, may I reiterate my plea to Commons editors to finalize and finish the draft letter to submit the same to the IPO or DOJ for issuance of Reply, to put a rest on all these, instead of Undelitions which are so hard and time wasting; with these I respectfully submit to sound discretion of older editors very sincerelyJudgefloro (talk) 06:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of image inside the window display. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
In this photo the glass obstructs the tarpaulin copy hence no copyright exists; this is what legal experts like from Sycip Law office call De Minimis, the Philippine laws do not deal with trifles
Addendum: In addition, may I reiterate my plea to Commons editors to finalize and finish the draft letter to submit the same to the IPO or DOJ for issuance of Reply, to put a rest on all these, instead of Undelitions which are so hard and time wasting; with these I respectfully submit to sound discretion of older editors very sincerely
Two bags of American-style marshmallows on a lawn Commons has tons of these kinds of copyright alleged infringements, and many editors know that they are De Minimis;

Judgefloro (talk) 06:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. @Judgefloro: , this is a "misuse" of the concept of Commons:De minimis. A simple DM test (per my understanding on FOP related deletion requests most especially the U.S. and French ones) is that if you cropped the copyvio part (i.e. a copyrighted building, sculpture, advertisement, etc.) away, the file is still usable, at least 5-10% usable. The fact that both unambiguously focus on the image means de minimis cannot be applied. De minimis doesn't mean "unimportant" in Commons concept — it means a copyrighted work is de minimis when it is "incidental" or "accessory" to the main subject depicted. Hence "it is trivial or unimportant" to the whole object depicted, not that the file itself is de minimis. The displays with images aren't accessory. Instead, the "safer subjects" like mannequin models appear de minimis instead, and the display with images the main focus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   21:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSTUME.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a non-free poster, no FoP in Russia for artworks like this. VLu (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to article 1276 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation: 1. Permitted without the consent of the author or other rightholder and without payment of remuneration for the reproduction and distribution of made copies, broadcast or cable, making available works of fine art or photographic works which are permanently located in place open for free attendance, except if the image works is the main object or picture is used for purposes of profit.

The poster is located in a place that is open to the public. The photo is not the main object of use in the Wikipedia article https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA_%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8B_%D0%B8_%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B4%D1%8B%D1%85%D0%B0_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%AF%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 . In addition, the photographic work on the left, intended to illustrate the Wikipedia article, was created before November 7, 1917 and is not subject to copyright. There is no reason to delete it. Азимут-К (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Азимут-К, as for article 1276, see COM:FOP Russia. And familiarize yourself with COM:L: Commercial use of the work must be allowed. --VLu (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although there is COM:FOP in Austria, it is limited only to "works created to remain permanently at a public place" and does not include "advertisements including election posters" per COM:FOP Austria. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Howhontanozaz; Information board is located at the bridge of B89 Tiroler Strasse in Villach, in the area of Fellach in a public space.

Thank you for your consideration. --Naturpuur (Diskussion) 12:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC) --Naturpuur (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am a little concerned that the hue of the lettering here may constitute an element of originality under French law, and I am not sure if it would make problems under US law either Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Elly (talk) 08:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]