Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/16
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Tu'i-tu'i Lase lase (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & OOS. --Achim (talk) 08:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
It is erroneous MRTFR55 (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
It is erroneous MRTFR55 (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Brahmanbaria, Chittagong, Bangladesh. In scope. --E4024 (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per E4024. It's not a very good picture, but it's still a picture of a specific place in Bangladesh, even with coordinates. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 06:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Re-opening an identical DR two weeks after the first is just trying to waste everyone's time. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Quickly close, if you still have comments on the results, please go to COM:DRV. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Versehentliches Hochladen INTOCAST AG (talk) 12:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Versehentliches Hochladen INTOCAST AG (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by accident. I closed the tab because I decided I did not want to upload the image because I wasn't sure about the copyright. It still uploaded because I was already too far in. AwfulSpy (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Perseus with the Head of Medusa MET DP249452.jpg}} Joanbanjo (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Perseus with the Head of Medusa MET DP250603.jpg}} Joanbanjo (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The same photo is found on this article: https://www.metroworldnews.com/nuevamujer/espectaculos/2020/05/27/actores-control-z-netflix. The article is dated 27/05/20 while the upload was 02/06/20. discospinster (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 01:05, 18 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 15:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope, blurry Migebert (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Small and pixelated. Have a bunch of higher-resolution and larger raster, and also SVG, in Category:Hydroxyurea DMacks (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Have File:Hydroxyurea-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version in same orientation. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 00:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NatsuHaru5746 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these diverse logos from separate companies cannot all be own works. Also, most of them meet COM:TOO and the companies can thus claim copyright on them.
- File:Summer Pockets.png
- File:Little Busters.png
- File:LIDENFILMS.png
- File:August logo.png
- File:Lerche.png
- File:Studio Hibari.png
- File:Qruppo.png
- File:MadoSoft.png
- File:Studio Gokumi.png
- File:Feel Animation logo.png
- File:Tezuka Production.png
- File:Asahi Production.png
- File:FrontWing.jpg
- File:Paletto.png
- File:SAGA PLANETS.png
- File:Yuzu Soft.png
- File:Key.logo.png
- File:Visual Arts.png
- File:C2C.logo.png
- File:WHITE FOX.png
- File:SATELIGHT.logo.png
- File:David production.png
- File:Ashi Production.png
- File:Seven Arcs.png
- File:SevenArcs.png
- File:Paletto.logo.png
- File:Palette.logo.png
- File:C2C.Animation.logo.png
- File:TEZUKAPRODUCTION.png
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
So, it seems like the "perform batch task" tool does not recognize all of this user's uploads, but the concerns mentioned above also apply to:
- File:Passione Animation.logo.png
- File:FrontWing.logo.jpg
- File:SAGAPLANETS.png
- File:Yuzusoft.png
- File:Key.VisualArts.png
- File:VisualArts.png
- File:SATELIGHT.png
- File:Ashi.production.png
- File:DavidProduction.png
- File:Davidproduction.png
- File:David.Production.jpg
Perhaps to the file below as well but unlike the above this one might not be copyrightable in the US; unfortunately I don't know about Japanese copyright standards.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Files like logos of companies David Production, Signal.MD, Okuruto Noboru, Ashi Productions, Satelight, Front Wing, and ect. are by default public domain by not meeting the threshold of originality by Japanese standards. This standard is held by the idea that simple geometric shapes and texts, such as in these logos, are not subject to protection by copyright law. These files in particular are simply added under an incorrect license. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Sarcataclysmal, at least some of these are below TOO in Japan and the US, and therefore not copyrightable. This batch should be handled with discretion by the deleting admin (many of the ones below TOO have already had their license info changed to something more proper). — Goszei (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted 5, kept the others Per nomination. According to be copyrightable a text logo needs to have artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation (from Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Japan#Threshold_of_originality. The examples on that page are very simple indeed. I looked carefully to the images and only when I was personally convinced of artistic appearance I deleted the image. In other cases they were kept. Elly (talk) 22:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanemdawood2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:الشاعره هانم داود.jpg
- File:الروائيه هانم داود.jpg
- File:الكاتبه هانم داود.jpg
- File:حين سمعت طلق نارى إختبأت، وبدأت تتسلل حتى ترى ما يحدث مثل ن.jpg
- File:هانم داود فى معرض القاهره الدولى للكتاب2020.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanemdawood2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:صنعها من أوهامه يعدو من خلالها إلى.jpg
- File:هانم احمد.jpg
- File:كاتبه روائيه.jpg
- File:تحول الملثم لعملاق بجسم حيوان ضخم.jpg
- File:هانم صبره.jpg
- File:للكاتبه هانم داود.jpg
- File:روسيا.jpg
- File:حسين احمد.jpg
- File:بن أبو داود.jpg
- File:الاستاذروسيا.jpg
- File:ابتسامه حسين.jpg
- File:حسين عل البحر.jpg
- File:الصقر وحسين.jpg
- File:عل البحر حسين.jpg
- File:السيف وحسين داود.jpg
- File:حسين داودنظاره.jpg
- File:حسين داود.jpg
- File:الحسين داود.jpg
- File:صبره.jpg
- File:1-حسين.jpg
- File:كاتبات أدب الخيال العلمي.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete please delete this one also related to sock for same user: File:ديوان أمل وعتاب هانم داود.jpg --Alaa :)..! 16:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 06:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 10:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 10:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Humanbandfr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with watermark, no metadata.
- File:6. Human (Groupe) au SuperSonic, le 2 février 2019. Photographe Infectioos Brain.jpg
- File:5. Human (Groupe) au SuperSonic, le 2 février 2019. Photographe Infectioos Brain.jpg
- File:4. Human (Groupe) au Bus Palladium, le 7 mars 2019. Photographe Pierre Sopor.jpg
- File:1. Human (Groupe) au Bus Palladium, le 7 mars 2019. Photographe Infectioos Brain.jpg
- File:3. Human (Groupe) au Bus Palladium, le 7 mars 2019. Photographe Infectioos Brain.jpg
Cjp24 (talk) 10:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Türkmenbaşy Ruhy Mosque 1
[edit]Unfortunately, no Freedom of Panorama in Turkmenistan. Contemporary building, needs permission by its architect.
- File:Ashgabat mosq IMG 5667 (26111146825).jpg
- File:Ashgabat mosque IMG 5671 (25506384864).jpg
- File:Ashgabat mosque IMG 5673 (26018617392).jpg
- File:Ashgabat mosque IMG 5674 (25838305050).jpg
- File:Ashgabat mosque IMG 5749 (25838304790).jpg
- File:Ashgabat mosque IMG 5757 (26085204666).jpg
- File:Stans08-089 (3134907930).jpg
- File:Stans08-090 (3134087401).jpg
- File:Stans08-091 (3134909008).jpg
A.Savin 13:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Türkmenbaşy Ruhy Mosque 2
[edit]The building was completed in 2004. Unfortunately, there is no commercial FOP in the architectural work's country of origin, Turkmenistan. Ornate interior, especially mosaics on floors and the dome, is also included.
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (1) (45505043602).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (10) (45555365711).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (2) (45505042522).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (3) (45505041552).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (45555365411).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (5) (45505040742).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (6) (45505039952).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (7) (45505038952).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (8) (45505037972).jpg
- File:Turkmenbashi's Mausoleum and Mosque (9) (45505037122).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeynalselver (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from art.
- File:Cleverton Ribeiro XilogravuradeNivaldoOliveira SaoCristovao SE (27252147138).jpg
- File:Cleverton Ribeiro XilogravuradeNivaldoOliveira SaoCristovao SE (40414159484).jpg
- File:Cleverton Ribeiro XilogravuradeNivaldoOliveira SaoCristovao SE (40230325455).jpg
- File:Cleverton Ribeiro XilogravuradeNivaldoOliveira SaoCristovao SE (41125056611).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion. I uploaded these, it's my error. The entire set may not have the correct CC license, only "public domain", oy vey! Prburley (talk)
Deleted: (already speedily deleted by other admin). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I am concerned that these images were only uploaded today, reviewed by the Flickr bot as ok and yet I get a 404 error on each of them. Rather than a deletion request as such I'm suggesting that this warrants some human reviewing. Thanks
- File:Wedding-dress-002.png
- File:White-lingerie-001.png
- File:Pantyhose-001.jpg
- File:White-tights-02.jpg
- File:White-tights-001.png
- File:High-socks-001.jpg
- File:Thigh-high-socks-001.jpg
- File:Wedding-dress-001.jpg
Herby talk thyme 12:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Apparent license laundering. Watermarks credit "Danila Panfilov," which is not the same person as the source Flickr user "Din Muhammad Sumon"
Эlcobbola talk 20:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Outside project COM:SCOPE, scribbles not useful for Wikipedia.
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of Google Maps Street View, digitally altered with a fake route number. Precedence set Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Thent1234 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thent1234. –Fredddie™ 04:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Also adding these images as screenshots of Google Maps: –Fredddie™ 04:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all per precedent. Imzadi 1979 → 04:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- File:C370.jpg is a blatant copyvio and has been speedied accordingly. The others are below the US TOO, so I'll leave the request open. Even if they are not a copyright problem, they are much too low quality to be of use and are out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope, advertizing Krd 07:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shabbirqamarbokhari4u (talk · contribs)
[edit]These would appear to be basically self promotional personal images and so outside our scope
- File:Shabbir Qamar Bukhari photo.jpg
- File:Maulana Shabbir Qamar Bukhari Wikipedia.jpg
- File:شبیر قمر بخاری.jpg
- File:Muhammad Shabbir Qamar Bukhari Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Shabbir Qamar Bukhari Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Shabbir Qamar Bukhari.jpg
- File:Muhammad Shabbir Qamar Bukhari.jpg
Herby talk thyme 08:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Author Arno per exif and a cropped version of her Amazon profile pic. Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp (Ray Johnson pix from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed)[edit]Dubious claim of PD-congress. Taken from Liz Cheney's Facebook feed. We have no idea if the photographer was an official photographer or if this was a courtesy pic taken by someone else Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp (Douglas A. Munro sculptures in the US)[edit]No FOP for sculptures in the US
Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp (Mauro)[edit]Photos of some computer screen display. OoS
Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Kept: 13:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC) by Fitindia, thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp 4[edit]Photos of copyrighted works
Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 17:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp (logos)[edit]Complex logos, need permission. Others are unused personal logos and OoS
Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp 6[edit]Out of scope images, no EDUSE
Gbawden (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp (more logos)[edit]Unused logos, some OoS and some too complex too keep without permission
Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp artworks[edit]Modern art, no FOP for artwork in US, needs permission from artist
Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp posters[edit]Out of scope "posters" Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by George Chernilevsky. --Minoraxtalk 06:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Gbtemp from Facebook[edit]Facebook Grubu (public sharing) - just because its shared on FB doesn't mean its freely licensed
Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC) The villages belongs to Turkey's Şarkışla District. These pictures were taken from people for a survey/research booklet about villages. There are permits for public use within the survey. The permits have been taken separately from persons those who have the pictures. I can make the necessary corrections in upload pages. (I thought the facebok reference was sufficient.) And I can send the image of the joint permissions in the book. For example: The correct permission of this [image] is: "Şarkışla ve Köyleri Kitapçığı (Booklet of Şarkışla and its Villages)" (Kızılırmak Matbaası, 2020) Görsel ve Fotoğraflar Listesi (List of Images and Photos) in the list: "... end of list: görseller önceden izin almaksızın kaynak göstermek kaydıyla serbestçe paylaşılabilir. sahiplerinin açık izni bulunmaktadır (images can be freely shared without prior permission, provided that the source is indicated. It has the permission given by its owners). Given a few days, I'll fix it all. And sometimes I have original images different the Facebook Groups. Example: 1. Image that I have froom booklet: [1] (unspoilt) 2. Image in the Facebook Group: [2] (torn off) Exuce for my English, You can ask if anything is not understood --Buzancar (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Gbtemp (Howard H. Baker Jr.)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, found here https://www.bakerdonelson.com/Howard-H-Baker-Jr-1925-2014
Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gbtemp Flickrwashing
[edit]Flickrwashing - account has 1 follower and was created in 2021 for flickrwashing
- File:Hyungwon tour monsta x.jpg
- File:IM FANSIGN.jpg
- File:IM the connect tour.png
- File:Joohoney.jpg
- File:Lee Minhyuk fansign.jpg
- File:Lee Minhyuk Monsta X follow.jpg
- File:Monsta x minhyuk.jpg
- File:Monsta x Tour.jpg
- File:Tour The connect.jpg
- File:We are her tour minhyuk.png
Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, very small, subject blurred & badly cropped, no use -> outside of Commons scope MPF (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Low quality, very small, subject badly cropped, no use -> outside of Commons scope MPF (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Useless personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, user's only upload Mjrmtg (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dewan Foysal Haque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
out of commons scope as no realistic use - low quality, both birds badly cropped MPF (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm the author. I changed the copyrights "all rights reserved". Since I might have taken the picture a bit too high, I don't want to have that picture floating around too much. Benh (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of authorship by the uploader. EXIF entry is to professional photographer Ana Jovmir. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission from photographer. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in India for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Remove deletion tag, as it is in Bangladesh where there is FOP exists. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --lNeverCry 23:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Nominating again. COM:FOP Bangladesh only covers 3D works (architecture and sculptures). There's no indication of a Commons-applicable FOP covering non-3D works of Bangladesh. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Also, listed as valid FoP exception at {{FoP-Bangladesh}}: "Making of a drawing, engraving or photograph of an architectural work of art, or a sculpture kept in a public place,." No mention on other forms of arts most esp. 2D ones. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
not own work and tibits imagery is not allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Has anyone found the trademark or copyright regarding photographs of this toy? Spongebob is is a copyright of Viacom right? it's only used on one page and it's on wikipedia, i feel like this could be out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOYS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a staged PR shot, and is thus unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Additionally, while I wasn't able to find this exact picture, a Google reverse image search turns up several very similar looking photos that were probably derived from this image. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Same https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RVD_Blois-2016_1_(2).jpg L'auteur est Guillaume VIAL, son autorisation est donc nécessaire c:Commons:OTRS/fr Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - very low res, no EXIF, uploader along with related blatant copyvio (File:Ryzen3Box.webp), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робот Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality, out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality, COM:DW without source. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, poor quality, not used, out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: poor quality, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: personal picture, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
перевищіла кількість робіт від одного учасника Катерина Коритна (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW, no permission, file not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Missing/ deleted images used in this collage. Also not confirmed licence. GeorgHH • talk 21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sources of this DW have been deleted from Commons. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
image used only by spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also applies to File:Vidya herbs logo.png. DS (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Lower resolution, no exif, odd crop; very similar image [3] has been previously published in several places; likely taken from a video; unlikely to be own work. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. No permission from artist as well. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Pierre-Victor Dautel died in 1951. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:FD10:8A1C:C4BF:1178 22:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([4]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([5]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([6]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Not licensed CC-BY-SA according to the source ([7]). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art. Artist from the US, died in 1940. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted television advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted television program. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio: Copy of a recent document with photos and maps (derivated works) / Architect: Sinika Rapponen Poudou99 (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no sources, no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Self portrait and the only file uploaded by this user. Krok6kola (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Images from Tropical Tidbits are copyrighted, "Copyright © 2012-2020 Tropical Tidbits, All Rights Reserved" A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States.
- File:Gta-4-billboard-evolution 1567067208 o.jpg
- File:Gta-4-billboard-evolution 1567071776 o.jpg
- File:Gta-4-billboard-evolution 1580602601 o.jpg
- File:Gta-4-billboard-evolution 1589095276 o.jpg
- File:Gta-4-billboard-evolution 1658620018 o.jpg
- File:Gta4-wanted-1 2324852677 o.jpg
- File:Gta4-wanted-3 2325673292 o.jpg
- File:Gta4-wanted-4 2325673992 o.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation - work of Andrej Gabrovec, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 06:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 06:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 07:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation - modern sculpture by Andrej Grabrovec, no evidence of permission for derivative works. — Yerpo Eh? 07:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
looks like a test page. RZuo (talk) 08:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Website of the Ministry of Interior of Serbia is copyrihted (http://www.mup.gov.rs/wps/portal/en), also not sure that this fall into PD-Serbia. Smooth O (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of own work. Maybe a case for fair use, but not on commons Hemiauchenia (talk) 08:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Should be fair use on Wikipedia - highly unlikely it is the authors work so probably not for Commons. It should however be okay under fair use criteria on the English wikipedia. I would propose we delete from Commons and upload onto Wiki with fair use licence. --Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gentlemen of Fortune
[edit]No FoP in Kazakhstan and in Russia for sculpture.
- File:Statue by the New Bazaar (5522289754).jpg
- File:Памятник Джентельменам удачи (Monument to the heroes of the Soviet mega-popular movie "Gentlemen of Fortune") - panoramio.jpg
- File:Памятник Евгению Леонову на Мосфильмовской (2014) - panoramio.jpg
VLu (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Photo of me, don't want it here 158.140.162.209 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, are you the depicted person, who uploaded the image in 2019? It has still 1 external use:[8]. Apart from that I support a courtesy-deletion.--Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
pic of me 158.140.187.215 09:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 10:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
It's an old logo. JRemonB (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Posters are generally not considered own work. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
"This photo was taken from Facebook." Need information about the photographer and license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no OTRS, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Files of User:Ms.popsie21
[edit]- File:TIDE RISING AT BASCO BATANES.JPG
- File:BEGINNING OF A NEW DAY.JPG
- File:THE PEASANT.JPG
- File:SUNRISE AT SABTANG ISLAND.JPG
Photographs of paintings by an artist who is still alive. It is not clear the uploader is the artist; the uploader's 5th file is a photo of the artist. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of an advertisement published in a fairly recent magazine (1990s-2012). Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
This file is very blurry and therefore I would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Very blurry picture, we would like to remove it. Nicole Waleczek (WMDE) (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Agreed, please delete Lucia Obst (WMDE) (talk) 15:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
professional posed photo with low resolution, user single upload as own work, dubious exif data, probably copied from Twitter [9] C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Prank/joke file Leptictidium (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Antoni Pérez Moya died in 1964. CC license is incorrect. GeorgHH • talk 17:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gryffindor as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: information now in caption. I do not understand, why the file should be deleted: due to copyright or scope problems? It seems, that the plaque is ineligible for copyright. Educational value maybe exists as well. Explanation is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Seems to have been kept. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely that the fan who took this picture is also the copyright owner of the depicted artwork. Hiro (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
The copyright owner has given me permission to post this depicted artwork on Wikimedia Commons. Industrees (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Industrees: Please read COM:OTRS. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Industrees: (The user seems to be Dutch, I'll continue in my native language to explain it more verbosely) Copyright oftewel auteursrecht is een verdomd vervelend iets, je moet expliciet toestemming hebben van de makers -dus degenen die het artwork hebben getekend- voordat je het mag vrijgeven voor commercieel gebruik. Het kan zelfs zijn dat de band het copyright niet heeft en een klein bedrag moet betalen voor iedere kopie die ze verkopen. Op COM:OTRS staat uitgelegd hoe je eventuele permissie kenbaar kunt maken. Heb je hulp nodig in deze kwestie, ga naar mijn overlegpagina en laat een bericht achter. Ik had nog nooit van de band gehoord trouwens, nu wel, letterlijk :-) --Brinkie (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Gbawden. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Although there is COM:FOP in Malaysia, it is limited only to "artistic work permanently situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public." Election-related posters are not permanent since they are displayed only for the duration of an election campaign. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Reproduction d'une carte de l'IGN (Copyvio) Poudou99 (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, from a copyrighted Elsevier paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667120302603?via%3Dihub Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No metadata, uploader was unsure of author at time of upload (see Special:Diff/275779011/275780318). If you don't know if you created a work or not, you can't hardly agree to a copyright license over it. Copyright holder should contact COM:OTRS. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Images from Tropical Tidbits are copyrighted, "Copyright © 2012-2020 Tropical Tidbits, All Rights Reserved" A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Really? This is my first time using the file uploader, i'm not familar with the copyright laws. My bad, I've seen others use it and I thought it'll be fine. ARegularWisconsinite (talk) 03:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @ARegularWisconsinite: Commons only accepts free content, see Commons:Licensing. That is, those marked as "some rights reserved" (freely-licensed, preferrably Creative Commons) and/or "no rights reserved" (public domain). All rights reserved means the author of the image or work in the image has exclusive economic rights over all manners of reproduction and distribution. For the image, I lean to Delete JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, but TTidbits's images are copyrighted. Destroyeraa (talk) 19:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Cjp24. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and just really fucking creepy. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D artworks in Russia. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The better version is File:Mouchoirs comparés2.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Concert poster with portraits. Cjp24 (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Satellite imagery likely from Landsat or Sentinel-2, but missing attribution Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete: surely this coat of arms cannot remotely be considered being in the public domain for a person who came to the office in 1997. How can the author of the arms be dead 70+ year yet have created this in 1997?. Beside which, this file stated to be and named as the arms of Mary Robinson, who became president in 1990, not Mary McAleese where it is used in w:List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Ireland. The copyright applied make no sense at all. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Wrong flag; the right one has six crosses ( File:Bandeira de Mondoñedo.svg) Estevoaei (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Although there is COM:FOP in the Czech Republic, it is limited only to works permanently located in a public space per COM:FOP Czech Republic. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
After reviewing the photo I've noticed that the head of has been cut from another photo and placed onto a photo of another footballer. This is clearly fake. Govvy (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Scan d'un article de presse sous copyright Bertrand Labévue (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Metadata - from facebook
If I'm not wrong, 1973 is PD for Iran, therefore if the magazine cover is in the Facebook page of someone (or not) should not be important in this case, IMHO. Even if I'm wrong we can give the file a chance to be discussed instead of being speedily deleted. E4024 (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The Flickr photostream from which this came consists of vintage published matter from a wide variety of sources. This makes it doubtful that the uploader on Flickr is the copyright holder. This photo is obviously a postcard. Unlike most of what is scavenged from eBay, only the front of this postcard is available for inspection. The reverse or any retail packaging would contain the necessary clues to ascertain the copyright status of the image. Therefore, the claimed licensing cannot be proven as it stands. RadioKAOS (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Commons:Derivative works from posters.
- File:Angelo d'Orsi, direttore, con Gian Mario Bravo e Francesca Chiarotto (Coordinatrice).jpg
- File:PRESENTAZIONE DELLA BIOGRAFIA DI GRAMSCI.jpg
- File:PADOVA TEATRO VERDI 2017.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- also redirect file:পটুয়াখালী সরকারী বালিকা উচ্চ বিদ্যালয়.jpeg.jpg
Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the file is previously published in Facebook. Previously published files need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC) - Delete Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
violation of pers. rights Nolispanmo 16:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Uploader (DIFUNCAO) apparently purports to be subject (Di função). As copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject, evidence of permission from the actual author (or a written document evidencing the transfer of copyright) should be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. Also uploaded among unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO with same subject, characteristics, metadata, etc. COM:PRP issue.
Эlcobbola talk 17:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The license for this image is of dubious credibility. The uploader only has one contribution. This photo was taken in 2008 but was uploaded to Commons three years later. I seriously doubt the photographer is the same person as the Undercover123 —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 15:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Do all the posters entered PD in France (published more than 70 years ago)? A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I adjusted the resolution to make each poster unusable. --Cjp24 (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- See NoFoP-France: French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work (in that case each poster) is an accessory compared to the main subject. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Cjp24: "If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted." Most of the content of this photo is copyrighted. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- "NOTE: Please do not use this template directly! This is just for translation. Use NoFoP-France instead!"
- Français : [...] "la jurisprudence française admet qu'il peut ne pas y avoir de contrefaçon, quand l'œuvre exposée n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
- This photo shows many posters/works:
- the one on the left is a small photo with very low quality (only silhouettes): this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
- next poster: it shows a small logo, band names ("Stray Cats"...) and a small drawing (a rude aircraft): this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
- next poster: it shows especially four (very small and unreadable) portraits: this work "n'est pas le sujet principal de la photographie."
- next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable, next poster: unreadable...
- In summary, low quality and size of each poster. --Cjp24 (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Cjp24: "If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted." Most of the content of this photo is copyrighted. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Cjp24. Individual images are sufficiently distorted and low quality to render any reproduction impossible. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of image in the window display. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
- In this photo the glass obstructs the tarpaulin copy hence no copyright exists; this is what legal experts like from Sycip Law office call De Minimis, the Philippine laws do not deal with trifles
- Two bags of American-style marshmallows on a lawn Commons has tons of these kinds of copyright alleged infringements, and many editors know that they are De Minimis;
- Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
- Addendum: In addition, may I reiterate my plea to Commons editors to finalize and finish the draft letter to submit the same to the IPO or DOJ for issuance of Reply, to put a rest on all these, instead of Undelitions which are so hard and time wasting; with these I respectfully submit to sound discretion of older editors very sincerelyJudgefloro (talk) 06:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama finally exists in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017-era UAE FOP-related deletion request targetting a Dubai building), "deletion first is the right approach", even during discussions or dialogues, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of image inside the window display. There is no COM:FOP in the Philippines.
Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
- In this photo the glass obstructs the tarpaulin copy hence no copyright exists; this is what legal experts like from Sycip Law office call De Minimis, the Philippine laws do not deal with trifles
- Addendum: In addition, may I reiterate my plea to Commons editors to finalize and finish the draft letter to submit the same to the IPO or DOJ for issuance of Reply, to put a rest on all these, instead of Undelitions which are so hard and time wasting; with these I respectfully submit to sound discretion of older editors very sincerely
- Two bags of American-style marshmallows on a lawn Commons has tons of these kinds of copyright alleged infringements, and many editors know that they are De Minimis;
- In this photo the glass obstructs the tarpaulin copy hence no copyright exists; this is what legal experts like from Sycip Law office call De Minimis, the Philippine laws do not deal with trifles
- Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; Rules of Procedure for Intellectual Property Rights Cases - WIPO Prescriptive period of 4 years the Supreme Court and the Copyright Law strongly, heavily and without any iota of doubt by its latest circulars, require the Complainant or any person who questions or allege copyright infringement to specify and allege his or her rights to file the Complaint in the newly created courts; with Logic, how can anybody who has no Locus standi question any Uploading in Commons, Flickr or internet sites ?
Judgefloro (talk) 06:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. @Judgefloro: , this is a "misuse" of the concept of Commons:De minimis. A simple DM test (per my understanding on FOP related deletion requests most especially the U.S. and French ones) is that if you cropped the copyvio part (i.e. a copyrighted building, sculpture, advertisement, etc.) away, the file is still usable, at least 5-10% usable. The fact that both unambiguously focus on the image means de minimis cannot be applied. De minimis doesn't mean "unimportant" in Commons concept — it means a copyrighted work is de minimis when it is "incidental" or "accessory" to the main subject depicted. Hence "it is trivial or unimportant" to the whole object depicted, not that the file itself is de minimis. The displays with images aren't accessory. Instead, the "safer subjects" like mannequin models appear de minimis instead, and the display with images the main focus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shrek (character)
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character, and COM:COSTUME.
- File:LA Animation Festival - the line for the opening night party (6998531625).jpg
- File:Oh no, an ogre.jpg
- File:Universal Studios Grand Opening - 28 May 2011 (5767461022).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free poster, no FoP in Russia for artworks like this. VLu (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
According to article 1276 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation: 1. Permitted without the consent of the author or other rightholder and without payment of remuneration for the reproduction and distribution of made copies, broadcast or cable, making available works of fine art or photographic works which are permanently located in place open for free attendance, except if the image works is the main object or picture is used for purposes of profit.
The poster is located in a place that is open to the public. The photo is not the main object of use in the Wikipedia article https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA_%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8B_%D0%B8_%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B4%D1%8B%D1%85%D0%B0_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%AF%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 . In addition, the photographic work on the left, intended to illustrate the Wikipedia article, was created before November 7, 1917 and is not subject to copyright. There is no reason to delete it. Азимут-К (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Азимут-К, as for article 1276, see COM:FOP Russia. And familiarize yourself with COM:L: Commercial use of the work must be allowed. --VLu (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Although there is COM:FOP in Austria, it is limited only to "works created to remain permanently at a public place" and does not include "advertisements including election posters" per COM:FOP Austria. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Howhontanozaz; Information board is located at the bridge of B89 Tiroler Strasse in Villach, in the area of Fellach in a public space.
- @Howhontanozaz; Information board is located at the bridge of B89 Tiroler Strasse in Villach, in the area of Fellach in a public space.
Thank you for your consideration. --Naturpuur (Diskussion) 12:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC) --Naturpuur (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
I am a little concerned that the hue of the lettering here may constitute an element of originality under French law, and I am not sure if it would make problems under US law either Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Elly (talk) 08:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)