Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 7th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a fake portrait Wihistorian (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ja FebriX (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That is not a DE-9, it is a D-SUB, but it's HD15 or VGA. the 9 indicates 9 pins, this has 15 2601:187:4000:109:F859:733B:7E36:9457 14:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You can change the info. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't look trivial enough to be in PD, no permission for declared CC license rubin16 (talk) 08:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent today according to OTRS rules. Please cancel deletion request after OTRS volunteers confirm sufficient confirmation of the validity of the license --Kostsinich (talk) 08:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

————

OTRS permission received, I close the nomination rubin16 (talk) 06:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carrall Princess of Pop.png Glyn Carrall (talk) 12:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because It is Misleading Princess of Pop is not who I Am Im the Prince of Pop Big Differences


Deleted: copyright violation, speedy deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category, files relocated on Category:T204, the official name for that collection of baseball cards - Fma12 (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cdhdanhgdsagdscdjcudckcb ,c cbkcack fkccLCKCKCKcKkcKCccckckckckckckcokoaCKLCKLKCA 2601:484:8103:3370:54EE:C926:169:CDB2 23:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an F10. Just opening a DR for the records. E4024 (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; probably copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source - https://starpri.ru/koltovoj-aleksandr-lichnaya-zhizn/ . I think, data at this page is copyrighted (see © 2020 on the bottom of the page). Dinamik (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD#F1. --Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 03:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Empire of History (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of project scope - fake election maps. Not for any real-world election or a notable work of fiction. Commons is not free webhosting.

B (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Empire of History (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user has been engaged in creating articles about fictional/alt-history elections in their userspace for a long time on enwiki. To the best of my knowledge (I did not check all ~450 images, but I spot-checked a handful) these images are all related to that "project" and aren't used anywhere else. Since these are somewhere between fictional and disinformation (there's nothing in these images which indicates to an outside observer that they're someone's alternate history game), these are well out of scope and should be deleted (your choice of reasons - COM:NOTHOST, out of scope, etc.).

GeneralNotability (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by شافی اللہ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, appeared elsewhere prior to upload (e.g., File:البرونی ابوریحان محمد.jpg is here), user serial copyvio uploader (see deleted contribs). Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 01:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OSHMONEYJOHN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspicious exif information, seems not is his own work.

-akko (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:17, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flags and coats of arms of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SalmanAsifMir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johanchristell99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gavrin Denis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work

--NoFrost (talk) 12:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glyn Carrall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotional images by an otherwise non contributor to the project.

Herby talk thyme 12:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glyn Carrall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seems to be band members of the Australian rap crew Cult of Mickeys. When googling the members' or the crew's name I find pretty much nothing except a Pinterest page. Hence I think the pictures are not within COM:scope.

Jonteemil (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AzanMalik05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ngochieuvpbq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pop Moutarde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work claim: small size, missing EXIF, the right side of the image is broken, the uploader has uploaded just one image and gone. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnortable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused image of non-notable person. For example, related article, w:Mira DeMartino, was deleted and the undeletion request declined. Эlcobbola talk 17:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made in 1984, not "a work published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal) prior to 1983" Darwin Ahoy! 15:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 김영훈80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:EDUSE due to extremely poor quality. Achim (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandroidemofer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images, uploaded by non contributor

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1919 work, so fine in the US, but Johannes Safis has no bibliographic data listed or available from the link to a reputable source, and this is too late for a PD-assumed. Known work 1910-1920s, so no help there. German work, so life+70. Prosfilaes (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless reputable source for Johannes Safis' death date provided. 121.120.240.227 06:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Johannes Walter Rudolph Sauer born 3. August 1885 in Leipzig (Standesamt Leipzig I, Nr 3202/85), married Dorothea Charlotte née Mattick 24. December 1912 in Berlin (Standesamt Berlin 5B, Nr. 912/1912), died as Johannes Walter Rudolph Safis 3. Oktober 1957 in Eberswalde (Standesamt Eberswalde Nr. 565/1957). The marriage record contains a note (15. Juni 1928) that the "graphic artist and painter" Johannes Walter Rudolf Sauer changed the family name to Safis. HTH. --Polarlys (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains Personal & Identifying Info. I, as the person this info pertains to, am requesting it's deletion please Bullercruz1 (talk) 00:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded other version of higher resolution here: 100px Flashdart2 (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Screenshot of a webpage "El Ojo de San Vicente Diario."
Evan0512 (talk) 01:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: +. --Polarlys (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character en:Pikachu. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was used personally. FlorinFox (talk) 05:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was used personally. FlorinFox (talk) 05:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unbrauchbar - viel zu unscharf Xocolatl (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", but a derivative of the souvenir badge of the late Soviet period. There is no evidence that this coat of arms was officially adopted as a symbol of a territorial union, therefore it does not fall under the PD-UA-exempt and cannot be published under a free license without the permission of the original author. Yellow Horror (talk) 12:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, see exif data ("screenshot"). Uploader has violated copyright before. Tekstman (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. No educational value. Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, no educational value. Tekstman (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, no educational value. Tekstman (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, no educational value. Tekstman (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature on painting is not the uploader's. Date: 1977. Tekstman (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture, no educational value. Tekstman (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another fake election map from User:The Empire of History. Hog Farm (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatantly false. Appears to be made up. Hog Farm (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map of a 2084 election, of no use here. Commons is not a web host. Hog Farm (talk) 18:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another made-up map. Might just need to nuke everything User:The Empire of History is responsible for. Hog Farm (talk) 18:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be a hoax. Hog Farm (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real user. E4024 (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real user. E4024 (talk) 19:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely tiny resolution, lack of Exif data –> unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 21:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, this file can only be used on en.wikipedia. Thent1234 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know whether it's copyrighted.

See here c:Commons:Deletion policy

Thent1234 (talk) 07:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know that it's copyrighted, you can't claim justify deletion by falsely claimng it's copyright violation. You've also got to use a little common sense here. This and the other images that you've nominated Are plain alpha-numeric designators on a green background. Letters and numbers aren't copyrighted, neither is a rectangle with round corners and neither is the colour green. --AussieLegend () 11:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - only can be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know whether it's copyrighted.

See here c:Commons:Deletion policy

Thent1234 (talk) 07:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know that it's copyrighted, you can't claim justify deletion by falsely claimng it's copyright violation. You've also got to use a little common sense here. This and the other images that you've nominated Are plain alpha-numeric designators on a green background. Letters and numbers aren't copyrighted, neither is a rectangle with round corners and neither is the colour green. --AussieLegend () 11:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation - Should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know whether it's copyrighted.

See here c:Commons:Deletion policy

Thent1234 (talk) 07:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know that it's copyrighted, you can't claim justify deletion by falsely claimng it's copyright violation. You've also got to use a little common sense here. This and the other images that you've nominated Are plain alpha-numeric designators on a green background. Letters and numbers aren't copyrighted, neither is a rectangle with round corners and neither is the colour green. --AussieLegend () 11:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know whether it's copyrighted.
See here
c:Commons:Deletion policy
Thent1234 (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't know that it's a copyvio you can't justify deletion by claiming that it is a copyvio. --AussieLegend () 11:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright on a green rectangle with "A23" in yellow letters. The licencing used for this is valid, it is too simple to have any artistic content. - Floydian (talk) 05:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes there is, our copyright laws are very strict. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Australia#Threshold_of_originality
Thanks,
Thent1234 (talk) 06:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That refers strictly to the Australian Aboriginal flag, not plain alpha-numeric designators that are in their thousands on public roads. --AussieLegend () 07:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We don't know whether it's copyrighted.
See here
c:Commons:Deletion policy
Thent1234 (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't know that it's copyrighted, you can't claim justify deletion by falsely claimng it's copyright violation. You've also got to use a little common sense here. This and the other images that you've nominated Are plain alpha-numeric designators on a green background. Letters and numbers aren't copyrighted, neither is a rectangle with round corners and neither is the colour green. --AussieLegend () 11:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia Thent1234 (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - This file should only be used on en.wikipedia due to Australia's copyright laws Thent1234 (talk) 22:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Noah Wulf (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by colour version in file File:Theophilos George Karaiskakis chasing Kutahi in 1826.jpg Flashdart2 (talk) 01:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- This has been gone over repeatedly: Commons has a graffiti exemption as part of its policies. AnonMoos (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada. They are legally painted mural, not graffiti, and we shouldn't deny the copyright of the painter A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:GRAFFITI does not apply in this case. --MB-one (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 17:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentlich hochgeladen.Richtige Datei bei File:Sigmadivertikulitis AWMF 1b 58W - CT axial KM pv - 001.jpg Hellerhoff (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by mistake. See File:Sigmadivertikulitis AWMF 1b 58W - CT axial KM pv - 001.jpg. --Hellerhoff (talk) 17:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrait dates from 2008. The date and the author's name are clearly visible in the corner. Ghirlandajo (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous and misleading image; The emblem of Rohan is specifically described in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King novel as consisting of "a great horse running free" on a green field, not a prancing horse as shown here. And there really wouldn't be any point in merely editing this already existing file, given that there are already two other SVG versions of the Rohan arms (with running horses) that exist on WC. So sorry about this. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: @Snow Lion Fenian: Please use {{Fact disputed}} instead of a dr in this case. --MB-one (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous and misleading image; The flag of Rohan is specifically described in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King novel as consisting of "a great horse running free" on a green field, not a prancing horse as shown here. And there really wouldn't be any point in merely editing this already existing file, given that there are already two other SVG versions of the Rohan flag (with running horses) that exist on WC. So sorry about this. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: @Snow Lion Fenian: Please use {{Fact disputed}} instead of a dr in this case. --MB-one (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The newspaper is protected till 2027. Enrique Sobisch's mural could be de minimis so far.

Ras67 (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a ceramic art comemorating a popular actor from my place of residence on a private building in Canada.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcGauthier13 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 7 November 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]
@MarcGauthier13: this isn't about physical ownership. This is about if you have the authorization from the artist (who created it, or his heir if he is already deceased) to publish image of that artwork under free licensing. Do you have such authorization? Normal copyright principles of the Berne Convention (of which Canada is one of the signatories) states that only the creators of artistic works (from architects to painters) have economic rights, in particular publication and distribution, of reproductions of their artworks. And photography is one such reproduction under the treaty's language. According to Commons:FOP Canada, only 3D works of art (buildings and sculptures) are covered under this exception of copyright law known as freedom of panorama. The exception seems to be a British heritage in Canada's copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Il s'agit d'une œuvre d'art public. Si ce site officiel la présente, pourquoi pas Wikipédia? Jean Cartier --Guerinf (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 03:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 121.120.240.227 as no permission (No permission since) E4024 (talk) 03:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless more information provided; PD-ineligible is for sure not applicable, PD-Czechoslovakia-anon would only apply if published anonymously before 1945 in Czechoslovakia. 121.120.240.227 04:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

관련된 유튜브 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 확인할 수 없습니다.(Can't find CC-BY-SA 4.0 License in relevant youtube page) ※10분 55초(10m55s) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGuEyyY8BFs -- 메이 (토론) 05:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-SA-4.0 라이선스로 공개된 파일이 아닙니다.(Not a file published with a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license) ※https://namu.wiki/w/%EC%9A%94%EC%9A%94%EB%AF%B8 -- 메이 (토론) 05:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=117&aid=0000043920 -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 요요미의 유튜브에 있는 파일이고 저작권과 출처를 밝혔음. 타 사이트에도 많이 퍼져있는 파일들임. 요요미를 위해 긍정적인 방향으로 저작권을 해석해야 함. 엄격하게 삭제요청을 하는건 위키백과의 흥미성 측면에서 부정적인 권리남용임.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-SA-4.0 라이선스로 공개된 파일이 아닙니다.(Not a file published with a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license) ※https://namu.wiki/w/요요미, https://namu.wiki/w/파일:미스트롯_요요미.jpg -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted coin design (per COM:CUR Slovenia). — Yerpo Eh? 06:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not anonymous at all, contains private information F (talk) 08:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Sulshan is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the person named sulshan is me. Please tell me how to prove that myself is Sulshan Indianfootball98 (talk) 11:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Real photographer must send OTRS-permission. Source "I asked the person in the photo to give his photo which does not have any copyrights to add to Wikimedia commons" hints copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Next day after previous version was deleted, new file was uploaded, again small photo without metadata. I suspect again copyright violation. OTRS-permission from real photographer would be good. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated image as Taivo asked to do. I think everything is fine now.Poppified (talk) 08:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, now I believe own work. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation --NoFrost (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation logo --NoFrost (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation --NoFrost (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation --NoFrost (talk) 11:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation --NoFrost (talk) 11:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free Animation --NoFrost (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Heigo_Teder.jpg Marinurk (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

old photo Marinurk (talk) 11:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 23:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is presented that all the authors of the news stories pictured died at least 70 years ago as claimed Buidhe (talk) 11:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps more relevant is whether it counts as an anonymous work as the articles do not appear to have named authors. Gallica certainly thinks that the newspaper is public doman - see the about field on [2].Nigel Ish (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per arguments in discussion. --Ciell (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Namibia and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the cover of a music album and it is protected by copyright. There is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 12:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where I can write info about a free license ?


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status is dubious. CarlaBourguignon75 claims it's her own work, but in en:Draft:Mu Pan says it's by Mu Pan. Something's fishy here. (For a bit of background, see this.) Hoary (talk) 12:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verbcatcher (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status is dubious. CarlaBourguignon75 claims it's her own work, but in en:Draft:Mu Pan says it's by Mu Pan. Something's fishy here. (For a bit of background, see this.) Hoary (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verbcatcher (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status is dubious. CarlaBourguignon75 claims it's her own work, but in en:Draft:Mu Pan says it's by Mu Pan. Something's fishy here. (For a bit of background, see this.) Hoary (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a mass deletion request when nominating a set of related files. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 27.125.249.119 as no permission (No permission since) E4024 (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless more information provided which supports the fact that the image is PD or under any other licence compatible with Wikimedia Commons; PD-ineligible is for sure not applicable, PD-Czechoslovakia-anon would only apply if published anonymously before 1945 in Czechoslovakia, guessing the age of the the person in the picture, it was taken after. Therefore, it seems that the licenses were only chosen by guessing. 121.120.240.227 13:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I suspect there has been confusion between 'created' and 'published' and between 'anonymous' and 'unknown author'. The declared source is a 2015 thesis[7], and we have no evidence of publication before 2015. The author is declared as 'autor neznámý (Fotografie v rodinném albu Lenhartových)', Google translate from Czech gives this as 'author unknown (Photographs in the Lenhart family album)'. The {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} template requires publication before 1989, for which we have no evidence. We would also need to establish that this was public domain in Czechia and/or Slovakia in 1996, and I can see no rationale for this in COM:CZECH or COM:SLOVAKIA. {{PD-ineligible}} is clearly not applicable. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photograph was published at least 70 years ago as required by the claimed public domain license tag to be valid Buidhe (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep If it was published by Stapf Bilderdienst, that was before October 1944, when their assets were seized by the Dutch Government. Even if it hadn't been published at all, the copyright to it would then be a Dutch government copyright, which I understand would have entered the public domain by now, from that route. I can see no serious question as to this being PD. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Andy Dingley. Vysotsky (talk) 20:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ciell (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not have educational purpose image. Out of project scope. -akko (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicado Stinsky (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation - marked as "own work" from 2020, but the subject has been dead for nine years. Larry Hockett (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excedes the COM:TOO threshold due to shading. This appears to be a screen capture rather than a simple drawing. AussieLegend () 16:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I do not believe this file exceeds the COM:TOO threshold of originality. While I am not familiar with the copyright laws in Ethiopia, based on the threshold of originality of other countries it would seem that the file is simple enough to be below.ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 13:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially, the image has to be something that you could draw in Microsoft Paint. This is obviously cropped from a screencapture so it is well beyond the COM:TOO threshold. --AussieLegend () 16:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I based my decision on images like [[8]] and [[9]]. Both these images were previously determined to be below the threshold of originality and therefore not covered by copyright. There is shading present in the first example (Discover), but it was still determined to not be copyrightable. Maybe my skills are a bit lacking, but I don't believe I could create the Discover image in Microsoft Paint with its complex shading and all. ;) ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 01:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The uploader has now uploaded File:Sew le sew.png, apparently for use in the event that this image is deleted. While slightly different, it is essentially the same image, but the uploader has claimed he is the author of the image. The same image can be seen here so it appears both are copyvios. --AussieLegend () 16:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The uploader refers to the English Wikipedia article in the author field, in the first image. So assuming good faith, he/she just wants an illustration with the article. Ciell (talk) 23:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ciell. --Minoraxtalk 02:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superfluous with File:ERR (Eesti Rahvusringhääling) logo.svg Olou (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo seems to be above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 17:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DERIV. Wouldn't consider this de minimis when the focus of the photo is the advert itself rather than the bus. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Très mauvaise qualité, par ailleurs je suis l'auteur de cette photo et constate qu'elle ne sera finalement pas utile sur les différents projets auxquels je contribue. Merci donc de bien vouloir la supprimer. Bien à vous, Caux9 Caux9 (talk) 20:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo dont la luminosité est mauvaise, par ailleurs il s'agit d'un doublon - inutile donc de la conserver. Etant l'auteur de ce cliché, je l'ai republié en bonne qualité (à peu près sous le même nom). Je vous remercie de bien vouloir la supprimer. Bien cdlt, Caux9 Caux9 (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This raster image of DejaVuSans typeface was superseded by File:DejaVu Sans Mono (typeface name).svg, with code that Wikimedia servers can render correctly. Joaopaulo1511 (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Slovak counties of 1918.png, This one is uploaded via en.wiki (in 2006). the other one few months earlier by the author. Aʀvєδuι + 23:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate files

[edit]

These file is all Duplicate. I can't hang the templates to these file one by one (2000+ files in all), So I put all those files together, and let administrator deleted them, thanks.--IN (talk) 12:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: While I understand that would not save any server space for files already uploaded, would it save any for future filespace pages?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: It might, clicked a few dupes at random and the most recent one was only 6 months ago. Since some books have blank pages to separate chapters and more books can be uploaded here for years to come, it might be a better option overall. --Minoraxtalk 14:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the file pages are chained, so we cannot replace them by redirects without breaking the chain leading from one page of the book to the next. Or we had to adjust numerous links on previous and following pages. --Achim (talk) 21:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by Greater coat of arms of Suède Palatinat.svg, this PNG version was made from the SVG and is no longer needed. Ras67 (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete useless (and unused) rasterization of a svg file. Kathisma (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Providence RI flag images

[edit]
See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/10#Colorization for further reference, but I think the licensing of each of these files needs to be discussed.
The gif file of the flag was uploaded under a claim of "own work", but that seems highly unlikely given that it's supposed to be the official flag of en:Providence, Rhode Island and the poor quality of the file. The same file can be seen here on en:Flags of the World so I think there's a good chance that is the source of the file. A claim of copyright is being made on the FOTW page, but I'm not whether that's valid and isn't just a case of COM:LL. Regardless, I don't think this can really be kept per COM:PCP unless it turns out the flag imagery is PD for some reason or another. Rhode Island doesn't appear to be a US state like California and Florida where official works by state or municipal government employees as part of their official duties are PB; so, I guess it depends upon the age of the flag imagery itself.
The second file has basically the same concerns except the part about FOTW. It does appear to be a user-created vector version derived from the the png version of the city seal; the "problem" then is whether the colorization of the seal makes this a COM:DW. The png file of the seal is black-and-white and there's no indication as to whether a colorized version also dates back to 1878. The vector version probably has its own copyright per COM:SVG#Copyright, but again I'm not sure how the colorization affects that. If the original seal imagery is PD regardless and the choice of colors used in the vector version were made by the uploader, then I guess the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} the file was uploaded under covers everything. However, if the colorized version also came from somewhere else and the uploader just vectorized it, then that might be of a concern.
The last file is the png of the seal itself. It seems to be fine per {{PD-US}}, but the en:provenance is a bit unlcear because the url provided as a source is dead and there doesn't seem to be any archived version of it anywhere online. Since the two flag images seem to be primarily based on the seal's imagery, they almost certainly can't be kept if the seal file can't be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No one seems to care enough to participate in the discussion so I'm just going to delete per the request of the nominator. --Missvain (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Iamfarzan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Does not look too promotional, needs discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Doesn't appear to violate anything policy wise. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Iamfarzan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Does not look too promotional, needs discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Doesn't appear to violate anything policy wise. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work/s (an image/images) of a billboard, poster, and/or ad. Such objects are copyrightable as said by Ms. Emmelina Masanque (Assistant Division Chief, Information Dissemination and Training Division of the Documentation, Information and Technology Transfer Bureau, who is charged with the intellectual property education and awareness programmes of the IPOPHL) who was one of the principal guests at the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR). These fall under "pictorial illustrations and advertisements" (point 40:27 of the video), especially if intended to promote a particular brand or object or product. There is no mention of either "threshold of originality" or "de minimis", only that if it involves the hardworking efforts of the creators (here the visual/graphics artists), these are automatically copyrighted from the moment of their creation. Discerning from the discussion, the creators have the exclusive economic rights for reproduction, transformation, distribution, and display of the said object/s. Thus these images infringe the copyright of the visual artists. Prior permission from the visual artists, preferrably via Commons:OTRS email system, is required for such images to be hosted here on Commons, which requires all files to be freely usable, even for commercial reuses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; No objection to the deletion, sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work/s (an image/images) of a billboard, poster, and/or ad. Such objects are copyrightable as said by Ms. Emmelina Masanque (Assistant Division Chief, Information Dissemination and Training Division of the Documentation, Information and Technology Transfer Bureau, who is charged with the intellectual property education and awareness programmes of the IPOPHL) who was one of the principal guests at the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR). These fall under "pictorial illustrations and advertisements" (point 40:27 of the video), especially if intended to promote a particular brand or object or product. There is no mention of either "threshold of originality" or "de minimis", only that if it involves the hardworking efforts of the creators (here the visual/graphics artists), these are automatically copyrighted from the moment of their creation. Discerning from the discussion, the creators have the exclusive economic rights for reproduction, transformation, distribution, and display of the said object/s. Thus these images infringe the copyright of the visual artists. Prior permission from the visual artists, preferrably via Commons:OTRS email system, is required for such images to be hosted here on Commons, which requires all files to be freely usable, even for commercial reuses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your visit and messages ... I leave these grey area finer points of law on FOP as I ponder to be, to the consensus of Commons more expert editors on this; although I opine that, even if those for deletion editors would, only only and only those heirs, assigns and creators have locus standi or the right to question these matter of FOP in Court or other forum including Commons and other media; as the law and jurisprudence remains that - what is not prohibited clearly in the 4 corners of the Copyright law, is permitted and one or all have to wait for the SC final say on the matter; No objection to the deletion, sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

является дубликатом этого файла File:Flag of The Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.svg Белорецкий (talk) 10:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy oppose, this user modified File:Flag of The Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.svg to match the Kirghiz ASSR and then nominated this file for deletion because it's a "duplicate file". Cards84664 (talk) 15:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cards84664, Soviet Kazakhstan Белорецкий (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I reverted the other file again to the old version. --JuTa 10:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
why File talk:Flag of The Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.svg 92.245.34.95 14:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is the flag of the Kazakh autonomy, rename it to the flag of the Kazakh autonomy (1920-36) ВотанБатан (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Just rename it please and we can proceed after that. --Missvain (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at [10]. Dubious own work claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasu (talk • contribs)

 Comment It does have full Metadata though, so it is not an obvious download. I do not speak the language: is it possible they found this picture in our database, since it's been on Commons for over 3 years? Ciell (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears fine to me. Request permission if concerned. --Missvain (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know who is the creator of the image on the stamp to know when it will be in public domain. Own work more than likely false. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 17:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These stamps are in the Public Domain in Germany according to this template: {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that you are correct and we can apply this template and update Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Germany. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 03:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since the author is known and only died in 1972, it is unclear if PD-Germany-§134-KUG does apply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MB-one (talk • contribs) 2020-11-14T18:03:59‎ (UTC)
That isn't unclear. The copyright rule is clear: If the author isn't indicated on the stamp, then the copyright term is 70 years from publication. It doesn't depend on whether the author is indicated elsewhere. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Robert. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Travail dérivée : photo d'un panneau d'information montrant des photos et un plan non libres de droits. De minimis ne peut pas être invoqué ici. Poudou99 (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture of d:Q4073065: you could argue whether the person is the picture might be the same person as the uploader, considering the uploaders username, and therefore if there is permission for the release. Ciell (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ragueneau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promo images

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Please request permission before uploading when it's a notable subject, especially. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HOAX, this is picture of another composer - Franz Benda, see File:Frantisek Benda 2.jpg Hoa binh (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This picture seems to be found in the internet variously with Benda's and Graun's name. If it can be stated that the picture isn't of Johann Gottlieb Graun, it should of course be deleted, and preferrably replaced with an authentic picture. 2i467 (talk) 12:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Both pictures are used in a lot of projects, so yes: please look into this further before deleting either. Ciell (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The metadata show: File source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frantisek_Benda_2.jpg Perhaps User:2i467 made a smaller version of File:Frantisek Benda 2.jpg. That it appears on the internet with the name of Graun after 3 years is no mistery, it is taken from Wikidata. Elly (talk) 21:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]