Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 31st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 2

Per COM:TOYS

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete the Harry Potter images. From their description they appear to be taken from a Youtube Video (which is not freely licensed) and also link to other Flickr Albums containing similar images (which are also not freely licensed). As the linked Flickr album and the source Flickr Album are not the same I am concerned these are not freely licensed and could be COM:FLICKRWASHING.

Deleted: per nomination - (File:Easter Egg Nest (26930997217).jpg is also unambiguous - it is a bird's nest; copyright is explicitly granted without consideration of "quality" or "merit"). --Эlcobbola talk 15:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 3

Commons:Derivative works from botanical illustrations. Painters information need to be supplied to find out if illustrations are in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 4

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 5

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 6

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

clpo13(talk) 15:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Clpo13: There’s a same image on enwiki saying the opposite. Any reason why it’s below TOO? -- 1989 (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was going off what the Commons version said, but after a closer look at it and the examples at COM:TOO#United States, I'd say there's probably enough originality there to be copyrightable. clpo13(talk) 15:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F3, two files kept per above. --1989 (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 7

Newer duplicates of files that already exists on commons.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F8. --1989 (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Statues and component of the Independence Monument in Asghabat. The monument dates to 2001 as per w:en:Independence Monument, Ashgabat. Since there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan, commercial license clearances from the monument designer as well as statues' sculptors is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

Violation of architects' copyrights, and Kazakhstan has no commercial freedom of panorama.

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation, ©️2006 Foster + Partners (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palace of Peace and Reconciliation)
KazMunayGas Headquarters, ©️2002 Basis-A construction company (source)
Other modern architecture

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Courtesy of Spirit of Virginia", which is https://www.firstlady.virginia.gov/spirit-of-virginia-award/ ?

500+ more https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Spirit+of+Virginia .

RZuo (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Spirit of Virginia is an award from the State of Virginia executive branch. This is clearly the official Flickr account of the governor and it would follow that in the absence of contradictory statute, the governor would be able to control the type of copyright produced by his executive offices. While there is a personal-use-only restriction, that is overridden by the fact that there is a clear Creative Commons license from a source competent to release its images as such. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it, and discovered it was for non-commercial use only. See here: https://www.bcthic.org/Terms_and_Conditions. It's a shame, because the building has now gone and there are no images of it in the public domain. Smnlvr (talk) 11:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:00, 31 Dezember 2019 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (COM:CSD#F2) --Krdbot 01:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO UK Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 17:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly scratching the surface of TOO. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 17:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bin der Fotograf, die Löschung soll auf Wunsch der abgebildeten Person erfolgen. Dromedar61 (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contra. Nein, nicht ganz. Die abgebildete Person benatragte keine Löschung. Sie will das Foto nur nicht im Artikel über sie haben - und das ist kein Löschgrund. -jkb- (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC) - - - Siehe Diskussion dewiki[reply]
Ich weiss schon, dass die abgebildete Person nur die Entfernung des Fotos von ihrer Seite verlangte. Dennoch wird sie wohl die von mir beantragte Löschung des Fotos unterstützen. Ich bin der Meinung, man soll niemanden zu seinem Glück (in diesem Fall: zu einem ungewünschten Foto) zwingen. Ich wollte der Dame eigentlich eine Freude machen, da es in WP noch kein Foto von ihr gab. Wenn sie nun selbst ein ihr besser gefallendes Foto hat, soll sie doch dieses nehmen. Das mit der Freigabe wird sie hoffentlich schaffen. Dromedar61 (talk) 20:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich widerspreche der Löschung aus grundsätzlichen Erwägungen: Bei Persönlichkeiten des öffentlichen Lebens sollten wir es nicht einreißen lassen, dass nur (quasi) autorisierte Fotos Verwendung finden können - selbstverständlich sollten keine Fotos verwendet werden, die entstellend sind, dies ist aber hier in keiner Weise der Fall, die Dame sieht nur auf dem Foto so alt aus, wie sie ist. Des weiteren kann auch nicht der Wunsch des Fotografen allein bedeutsam sein. --Lutheraner (talk) 21:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
+1. „Ich will es nicht“ ist kein Löschgrund, das Bild verletzt niemandes Rechte und wurde vollkommen legal auf einer öffentlichen Veranstaltung angefertigt. Wir können hier keinen Präzedenzfall schaffen dafür, dass hochwertige Bilder von Commons gelöscht werden, nur weil jemand den Wunsch dazu äußert – oder wie hier sogar in vorauseilendem Gehorsam, bevor dieser Wunsch überhaupt geäußert wurde. Das Bild wurde beim Hochladen ausdrücklich unter einer unkündbaren ewiggültigen Lizenz veröffentlicht. --Kreuzschnabel 00:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
COM:CSD#G7 only works in 7 days after the upload, therefore "Ich bin Fotograf" is not enough for deletion (because it is freely licensed). "Wunsch der abgebildeten Person" would be only a valide reason for deletion, if § 22 would be applicable. But per § 23 § 22 isn't applicable on "Bildnisse aus dem Bereiche der Zeitgeschichte". This picture is a picture in the scope of the "Zeitgeschichte", because it is the picture of an awardee at the award ceremony [1]. An execption is, that "berechtigtes Interesse des Abgebildeten [...] verletzt wird". This isn't viewable for me, because it is a nice picture of a beautiful person born in 1959. Habitator terrae 🌍 22:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose per Habitator terrae. This might generate a leading case to install a scheme of deleting images just because a person depicted "wants it" while the image has been taken fully legally and does not violate anyone’s rights. --Kreuzschnabel 00:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep de:Sabine Scholl ist eine de:Person des öffentlichen Lebens. Außerdem entstand das Foto im Rahmen ihrer Teilnahme bei einer öffentlichen Veranstaltung. Ihr Einverständnis ist daher nicht nötig. Die Löschbegründung ist folglich nicht zulässig. Davon abgesehen sollten wir auf keinen Fall die Büchse der Pandora öffnen und plötzlich Fotos löschen, bloß weil es jemand so will. Chaddy (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 13:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

adult content Train256 (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • We have no problem with adult content (we do, but not with this kind of innocent images); however, IMHO, when your model is just an unknown person, for me it is out of scope. A person is out of scope dressed or undressed, from the Subcontinent or Western Europe, beautiful or not.  Delete --E4024 (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Image is high quality and freely licensed. Commons is a repository of freely licensed images. I don't see an issue with this image and its been here since 2014 Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep "adult content" is not a reason for deletion (besides, this image is not pornographic), but I see two other issues: Are the quite prominent posters in the background really de minimis? And there is no {{Consent}} present - although I know that many Commons users have a rather lenient take on personality rights as long as everything is in order copyright-wise... At least {{Personality rights}} should be added if the image is kept. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You say that "the woman depicted is famous" - then why is there no name mentioned? Who is this supposedly famous person? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gestumblindi: I must have expressed badly. I meant we don't need women (or men) in that categories to be "famous" or "notable", as E4024 apparently suggested. Strakhov (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I read your comment wrongly (probably because of the ellipsis dots: ...); thanks for the explanation. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i was porn 117.204.63.140 05:39, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not porn (and even if it was, this is not a reason to delete. Image in scope and kept in previous deletion. And nomination seems to be either a prank or vandalism. Tm (talk) 04:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nonsense. --Strakhov (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie 217.81.162.149 01:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Selfie by non-contributor. --Achim (talk) 19:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie 217.81.162.149 01:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Selfie by non-contributor. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jehanne-Sylvie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://isadora-duncan.over-blog.com/pierre-malinowski.html

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jehanne-Sylvie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook transmission info in metadata; unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amaury67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

some are © ESA-Stephane Corvaja, others © Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, doesn't seem to be the same photographer's works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These photos were taken by photogrpahes of the European space agency, so they are free of rights. Same for the photos taken by Eurockot. However, military launches are not, hence the fact that there are no photos of them. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB10:3A1:A600:D58E:7B94:E926:2E7B (talk) 02:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The ESA website Terms and conditions, under the copyright heading, state

    The contents of the ESA website are intended for the personal and non-commercial use of its users. ESA grants permission to users to visit the site, and to download and copy information, images, documents and materials from the website for users' personal non-commercial use. ESA does not grant the right to resell or redistribute any information, documents, images or material from its website or to compile or create derivative works from material on its website. Use of material on the website is subject to the terms and conditions outlined below.
    All material published on the ESA website is protected by copyright and owned or controlled by ESA or the party credited as the provider of the content, software or other material.
    Users may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, display or in any way exploit any of the content, software, material or services, in whole or in part, without obtaining prior written authorisation.

    These terms are clearly not compatible with Commons licencing policy.  Delete per COM:L. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 21:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amaury67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Very close shots of rocket launches, some very small files, others low quality but slightly larger.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is a derivative work of a contemporary work of art, the most likely by Claudia "MadC" Walde (b. 1980; Q15110006), located in Oulu, Finland. The author of the original work (the work of art) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola tc 00:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improperly licensed. This appears to be a still from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cRPqIROhk4, which has no indication that it's properly licensed. RoySmith (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AekwatNs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vallabhas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation; uploader even admits the author is "Oficial Microsoft" – PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio, no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the GIF file. An unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of score: unused. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

invalid video Estopedist1 (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a work of video art: the compression artefacting is intentional. See the original upload and the uploader's other work. Has educational purpose as a free-use example of datamoshing. czar 18:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Czar. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark indicates this is not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be the official club photo - see also https://www.instagram.com/p/B29sDK8IBAN/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of low quality with a large number of possible replacements. Iruka13 (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused &small picture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The monument is located in Russian Federation and freedom of panorama here includes buildings only, not monuments. Stoxastikos (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per de minimis. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The monument is located in Russian Federation and freedom of panorama here includes buildings only, not monuments. Stoxastikos (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; 2008 sculpture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [2] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 19:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploaded ’https://www.ruorchids.ru/fora/viewtopic.php?t=972&start=30#p61847 here] in 2011. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [3] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 19:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; upload date not mentioned on the website mentioned. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [4] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 19:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploaded here with EXIF. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [5] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 19:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; used here in 2014. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [6] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 19:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; used here in 2009. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [7] No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 20:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; used here in 2014. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 20:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 20:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Found here but the picture has been uploaded in 2015. Website seems more recent. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 20:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; not found elsewhere on the internet. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The symbol © (letter C in a circle) by "Brown & Bigelow" in image Tibet Nation (talk) 21:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol from http://www.leastworstoption.com/category/ruggero-miti/ Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 23:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; please read licence tag. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete the image. I am the owner of the image. G7 Youngmanstop (talk) 23:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this photo as I am the owner of the image. Owners request. Youngmanstop (talk) 23:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/diplomatie.gov.mg/posts/2692693724391519 without permission Hr. Satz 23:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/diplomatie.gov.mg/posts/2692693724391519 without permission Hr. Satz 23:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo probably taken from Google Earth. Fralambert (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This picture is exclusively clicked by MH Redoy of Goal Bangla." in image description Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has since edited the description but the website logo still indicates this is a copyrighted photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by PierreSelim. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katherinegelsey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Bibisora Oripova).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de la part du téléverseur = doublon avec File:Immeuble rue de la Madeleine,27 (1).jpg Finoskov (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigcrip2005$ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hoax probably.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 15:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photos Lia.ghpr (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request and not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, just derivative of a non-free photo VLu (talk) 04:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 18:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work, looks like a promotional image, and Facebook sized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Right. https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/caen-14000/tramway-de-caen-le-design-est-choisi-ce-sera-un-vision-gris-4694055 --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and useless test file, New Isleland does not exist Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and useless test file, Isle Newland does not exist Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist died in 1954, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn die Fenster, wie im Artikel steht, von Albert Figel (1889-1954) stammen, ist das natürlich eine (fahrlässige) URV. Das Bild ist zu löschen. In 5 Jahren komme ich damit evtl. wieder. --Rufus46 (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist died in 1954, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

True, I did not think about that taking the picture. Please delete --XoMEoX (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist died in 1954, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist died in 1954, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist died in 1954, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. No free license. Screenshot from this video Frodar (talk) 01:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:11, 10 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia.

VLu (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 09:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Notability of this animation serie? Mentioned in YouTube: ([8]). The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 09:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly dubious claim of own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Lo res duplicate of File:Charles Étienne Gudin.jpg. --Achim (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks a valid license Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hideously inaccurate! Bears no resemblance to the real location whatsoever. MPF (talk) 00:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description of the photo in Serbian says it is taken from the photo archive. There is no information when it was first published. 1933 is the time when the photo was taken GAndy (talk) 02:39, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of own work, as the photograph is part of the art of the album Live in Japan as can be seen here. Frodar (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vahram1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images taken from the Web, all claimed to be own works.

VLu (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free photographs. VLu (talk) 04:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free photographs. VLu (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free photographs. VLu (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the uploader insists on a DR. I'll just create one. This is obviously not a text logo and requires permission. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, grabbed from Facebook (see EXIF) VLu (talk) 04:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free book cover and map. VLu (talk) 04:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, just derivative of a non-free photo / out of scope because of bad quality VLu (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, just derivative of a non-free photo VLu (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a collage with no evidence that all its parts are free VLu (talk) 04:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, grabbed from Facebook (see EXIF) VLu (talk) 04:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gardmanahay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is not enough source information to prove the license.

http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25463/19796/thumbs/vb030212_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25453/19786/thumbs/vb030202_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25466/19799/thumbs/vb030215_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25470/19803/thumbs/vb030219_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25470/19803/thumbs/vb030219_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25465/19798/thumbs/vb030214_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25468/19801/thumbs/vb030217_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16504/10867/thumbs/gs009584_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/11002/5365/thumbs/vs001046_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16000/10363/thumbs/gs009081_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/5744/117/thumbs/vb000909_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo3/109500/102843/thumbs/vs136809_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/15974/10337/thumbs/gs009055_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/5770/143/thumbs/vb000937_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16504/10867/thumbs/gs009584_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo1/47870/41653/thumbs/hb069333_med.jpg

Elisfkc (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The director of RAA said that we can use any photo of their archive free, if we will mention the source. He said that there is no problem. I will ask him to send you a letter such as here is... (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS).--Gardmanahay (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The director of RAA archive said that he will send a message ((https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS)). Please, don't delete these photos.--Gardmanahay (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To Closing Admin: please also see User talk:Elisfkc#About photoes. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gardmanahay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of maps, decorations and other content grabbed from the net with no evidence of freedom.

VLu (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I get these maps from? Can you show the source? As far as I can remember, I made them myself․
Gardmanahay, I don't have to look for sources, you must give them (see COM:EVID). People who use free maps for making their derivatives, show their sources at the Information box. You are massive copyvio uploader, "your" maps differ one from another and don't look like derivatives of well-known free maps. There's a significant doubt that you are the author, so files are to be deleted (see COM:PRP). --VLu (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
VLu Ok, I wont do it again.--Gardmanahay (talk) 11:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative, the Kalashnikov image has traces of watermark on it. VLu (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative, the Kalashnikov image has traces of watermark on it. VLu (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res collage, no indication all of it's parts are free VLu (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res collage, no indication all of it's parts are free VLu (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed, the real copyright status is to be clarified. VLu (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This man was died in 1905, so I have the right to use photo.--Gardmanahay (talk) 16:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed, the real copyright status is to be clarified. VLu (talk) 04:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no information about the publication of the photo, the author and the source. There is no evidence that the photo went into the public domain GAndy (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Author is unknown. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fits PD-Russia, cause first publication date is provided. --Sealle (talk) 12:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivanovnik45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work - instead it looks like a gallery of images collected from all over the internet, and licensed incorrectly. Sizes are variable, quality ranges from terrible to merely dreadful, one is an artwork, but there is a unifying theme, so I suspect this is a promotional gallery - not an own work contribution.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 32

Nominating all files where the mosque's architecture is the main subject. Per previous deletion requests: no COM:FOP Morocco, so copyrighted until 2070 (architect Michel Pinseau died in 1999).

HyperGaruda (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent work of architecture by Michel Pinseau, not allowed in Commons because no FOP in Morocco.

Darwin Ahoy! 19:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Three photos showing mosaics and two showing interior architecture. Commercial freedom of panorama is not allowed in Morocco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg Per COM:FOP Morocco:"It shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes." The main subject of File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg is the person. Also, Michel Pinseau is not the author of the mosaics. إيان (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@إيان: Commons does not host files that are not resuable for commercial end-users. Per COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses, non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Moroccan FOP is simply unacceptable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What about File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg? If its main subject is the person, then the image can be used also for commercial purposes, if I understand the quote correctly (I cannot see the image as the file was deleted a few days ago). –LPfi (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Morocco

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Wolfgang8741 (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So what? There are tenthousands of logos stored here on Commons. --Achim (talk) 10:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie. Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie. Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:39, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Let me inform (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.eonline.com/fr/news/931845/pourquoi-le-prince-harry-portera-une-alliance-contrairement-au-prince-william Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aghya Goel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE and copyvios.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aghya Goel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manhal Hakr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is the painter? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manhal Hakr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by user is copyvio. Low-re images or screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manhal Hakr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 16:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comes from Al-Arabya channel according to the file description. COM:SCOPE? Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laurelerouzic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://elyx.net/home-3/fondation-elyx/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laurelerouzic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of own work on images. Appear to be slides from a promotional show, or ???

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (70pma > maker died in 1993) Ecritures (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use file. Permission needed. The account name can't verify or proof anything. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same image (although edited) can be found in this article posted on July 6, 2012, so this might not be user's own work. Mannivu · 13:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a Google Street View image Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable source, though the image has EXIFs, I found a prior (though a different crop, lower but wider) publication in 2013, while the file in Flick was uploaded much later, and the account has no other images, see http://clericalwhispers.blogspot.com/2013/10/franciscan-reform-seen-in-papal.html Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyright violation, cut & past, from Find a Grave Woodlot (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from [9] or other Internet website. No exif = not own work. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 20:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Unsure that [10] has been written before photo was uploaded on Commons. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The webpage has been written on 2012 or earlier: web.archive. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 14:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information about source, author and license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed CC0 Creative Commons on Pixabay but under Pixabay license which is incompatible with Commons. Pixabay has (or had?) CC0 content, documented at this file via wayback machine. However, this is not true for this file. Martin H. (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: License is OK per upload 2018-04-07 to pixabay. But: If one is checking pixabay files one should look at the data shown at the right of the pixabay page. If it's a photograph and no data like camera etc. is given it requires a closer look. Either metadata is missing or the photograph is not uploader's own work but grabbed from pexels or the like (we've had such cases in the past). Well, the other photographs shot by SadahamYathra (see this one for example) look fine. Why is there no EXIF? It's a montage, the girl has been put into the image afterwards and this way the EXIF has accidentally gone lost, see also fotoforensics. So it is some kind of DW and if we assume that the photo of the girl is by SadahamYathra, too, we can keep the image without problems. --Achim (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info, Pixabay indeed has/had a few users which simply copy-paste other people's work in bulk on there. Finding the ultimate source of a work remains a hard problem. --Commons2020 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Valid pixabay CC0 license. --Achim (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seem to be taken from Google Earth. Fralambert (talk) 14:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low resolution, no camera EXIF tag. --Dereckson (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since 1949, the Reichstag is named Bundestag. The DKP and the Zentrum never got more than 1 % of votes in recent years. Misleading diagram, fake data Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since 1949, the Reichstag is named Bundestag. The DKP never had those seats, since the 1950s the Zentrum never got more than 1 % of votes, etc. Misleading diagram, fake data Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 07:06, 25 Februar 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Parliament diagram tool test uploads --Krdbot 13:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vintage low-re image, unlikely to be uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 15:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarEditor1000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source for these signatures. Hoax?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 15:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/Copyright items in images

DWheels (talk) 22:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything that is not tennis is not just out of scope. Why delete airplane parade, result boards or view on spectators? --Sporti (talk) 06:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most, deleted five -- two copyvio of billboards and three irrelevant images. It is possible that a few of the persons pictured are not notable (they need identification) but they are wearing badges. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

newer duplicates of files that are already on commons.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 10:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Werner Rohde died in 1990. Copyright violation. 86.249.114.237 12:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Source says "unbekannt" (unknown). --Thibaut (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentWerner Rohde, as a photographer, studied with Laszlo Moholi Nagy from the Bauhaus, worked in the style of new objectivity and surrealism, shot portraits only in 1934 by order of Karl Nierendorf, who died in 1947, the portrait of the last director of the Bauhaus was most likely performed of this order. Therefore, the image today is in the public domain:

Rohde, Werner In 1934, he commissioned Berlin gallery owner Karl Nierendorf (1889–1947) to portray some gallery artists, such as Georg Schrimpf and Georg Muche. His recordings have been published in numerous magazines of the time. ... After the war he did not resume photography and worked exclusively as a glass and reverse glass painter. https://www.deutsche-biographie.de/sfz106293.html Vasilf (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rass Johnflames (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, limited educational use.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 12:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tmohammed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The majority of the user's uploads are obvious copyvios, screenshots or 3rd party photos without permission. No evidence that these are any different.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lukasz2 as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: zbędny nieużywany plik
Converted by me to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. A courtesy-deletion might be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lukasz2 as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: zbędny nieużywany plik
Converted by me to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. A courtesy-deletion might be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lukasz2 as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: informacja w nazwie plik do usuniecia załadowany przez moją pomyłkę Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lukasz2 as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: zbędny nieużywany plik
Converted by me to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. A courtesy-deletion might be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bin der Fotograf, Löschung wird von abgebildeter Person gewünscht, bitte dies respektieren, danke! Dromedar61 (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason fo deletion given --LexICon (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image needs proper date, author and license to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think more information is needed about this drawing which is obviously from a book. there is no date. There is no actual author. It is very light on information but has a definative license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly pixelated, low quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DVLP and FVP only existed until 1918, DRP was founded in 1950. This diagram does not show the NSDAP in 1932. Misleading diagram, fake data. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not in meaningful use. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata suggests that the photo is ©2015 DND-MDN Canada Dormskirk (talk) 09:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant automated scale down and crop of File:Milky Way 2008.jpg to arbitrary wallpaper resolution, this file is in use. Not only that, as the file has not been clearly marked as artists impression and given a proper source, it may have been used incorrectly. Same complaint is made on talk page. To deleting this admin this should be deleted and redirected to File:Milky Way 2008.jpg as duplicate, not left as redlink! I will leave duplicate template on the page. BevinKacon (talk) 09:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. An advertisement Estopedist1 (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of identified person from Sweden. Not notable. No clear educational value to Wikipedia. No pages are using this image. This image has no purpose. Delete. Ketil3 (talk) 12:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted materials : owned by Envibus and Agglo Sophia Antipolis Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 13:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep unless you can point me to where "File was removed from Flickr" is an actual deletion reason rather than a non-existent policy you've just made up. (Files that were removed from Flickr before the bot had a chance to review them are a different matter.) The entire point of importing these albums from Flickr in bulk, rather than leaving the images on Flickr and only bringing them across once a specific use on one of the wikis is identified, is that Flickr's new owners at SmugMug have now imposed a 1000-file limit (and if rumours are to be believed, are about to close down altogether); if they don't already, then files that have subsequently been removed from Flickr will very soon outnumber files that remain hosted by Flickr. Given that the photo was obviously uploaded to Flickr by me, imported from Flickr to Commons by me, and taken with the same camera used for every other photo I took during this period, I think you can safely assume that my Flickr account is not going to sue my Commons account.iridescent 15:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete, disregard the above; I now see from the history that Flickr's deletion script caught up with this one between its Commons upload and the Flickrreview bot reviewing it, so it never had its status correctly reviewed. I do still have the original file somewhere should it ever be needed in future.iridescent 16:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment @Iridescent: The user name on Commons and the user name on Flickr seems to be the same. If it is own work then it should be possible to fix. --MGA73 (talk) 20:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It is now confirmed that Flickr user and uploader is the same person per https://www.flickr.com/people/156154181@N07/ where it says "Also User:Iridescent on Wikimedia projects" and User:Iridescent is the uploader. --MGA73 (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Author is unknown. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Author and date of first publication are unknown. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless parts

Mutter Erde (talk) 10:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please consider these two DRs merged. They are open at the same time on the same category of files, something that should be avoided.
  •  Keep All on this list are index pages, so all are useful. -- (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless and incomplete dupes

Mutter Erde (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 13:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Connor Straube has uploaded images taken by other photographers, some big, some thumbnails. This is a copyright protected image from https://www.vagonweb.cz/fotogalerie/D/DB_Apmmz118.php I have write to him at de:Benutzer Diskussion:Connor Straube Nordlicht8 (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC) In addition:[reply]

and so on... --Nordlicht8 (talk) 10:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Betrifft alle seine Bilder. Habe für alle seine Bilder eine Genehmigung angefordert, da nicht klar ist, ob er der Betreiber der Website ist, auf der die Bilder veröffentlicht sind. Klingt zwar nicht so, aber das kann er ja jetzt aufklären. Nach 7 Tagen werden die Bilder automatisch gelöscht. --Indeedous (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this is copyrightable per COM:TOO China. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice, but I'd consider it is not copyrightable though there is COM:TOO China, please review File:Xiaomi logo.svg. Or you may say that is also copyvio, and another administrator on Commons didn't notice it. --Hamish (talk) 05:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete more complex than https://archive.is/wTsfl .--Roy17 (talk) 13:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete See also:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Agricultural_Bank_of_China_logo.svg Larryasou (talk) 15:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 07:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]