Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 18th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a school photo. It is of a young girl who was murdered in 2000, and I'll guarantee you the sick fuck that uploaded this does not have rights to it. Delete and oversight asap John from Idegon (talk) 10:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted, clearly copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but they were sent via whatsapp - we need permission from original authors

Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Muhammad toffeq ahmad (talk) 12:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 19:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of being freely licence or permission. Album art. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 06:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:28, 18 Dezember 2019 UTC: Commons:Licensing: album cover --Krdbot 19:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but I can not see any educational possible use for this poor quality porn video. Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This video takes a giant shit all over Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. Deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

(Talk/留言) 04:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 13:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minorax (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 17:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 03:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik ben aan het testen Rots61 (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --JuTa 03:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image — JJMC89(T·C) 04:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 02:36, 19 Dezember 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Minorax/OOS --Krdbot 07:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas dautorisation de lartiste 31.34.70.31 00:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Commentaire: Selon la description sur la page du fichier, on a l'authorisation d'OTRS pour l'image. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 08:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If OTRS confirms permission, there is no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 08:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not exactly sure why Thibaut120094 added the OTRS permission, and likely they don't either given that it was three years ago. But the ticket appears to cover eight files, none of which are this one. GMGtalk 16:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    1) You do realize there's more than one email in this ticket, right? The ticket does cover this file, see the email received the 16th January 2016, at 16:26 (UTC).
    2) This IP is more likely to be the subject than the photographer, if the picture was taken at a public event, there's no reason to delete the file. --Thibaut (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission from the artist cinfirmed in OTRS #2012010510013998. --Ciell (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Moiree pattern suggests that this image a screenshot, for example from TV. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo copyvio https://www.fili-baker.ru/ Drakosh (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: US stamps post-1978 are copyright to the USPS per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Stamps. The Flickr user cannot license this without USPS permission. Ww2censor (talk) 10:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete while this photograph is freely licensed, the main focus of the image, is a 2009 US stamp which is copyright to the USPS per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Stamps and is not de minimis would require their permission that has never been forthcoming. Ww2censor (talk) 10:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i don't still use it and and don't want to show myself on google image. Graichi Toufik (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (user's personal image no longer in use). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://old.nasimonline.ir/Content/Detail/934815/238 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Seemingly random list of dates without meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonas Josh123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo(s) of non-contributors. 12 edits globally (6 here, 5 at da.wiki (blocked) , 1 at wikidata (deleted))

Minorax (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination above. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qingyuan Lyu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Documents of unknown provenance, out of scope.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Documents of unknown provenance, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mwoolliams (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Many obvious copyvio (book covers or scans/photos of other published materials). Other images I found some same/similar on websites and uploader name does not match the author. Without evidence, and with track record of against-commons-policy content, COM:PCP the lot of them.

DMacks (talk) 03:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually >200 of them, not going to bother to list all Special:ListFiles/Mwoolliams individually. But I also note this is almost certainly some sort of bot (scraping uncited origin), given how many images are uploaded so quickly (chunks of a dozen a minute). DMacks (talk) 03:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mwoolliams (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that those files are indeed "own work" and licensed under a free license.

Steinsplitter (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Com:PCP. Copyrighted architectural drawings, visualisations, etc. OTRS validation required. --Hanooz 08:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most files restored per OTRS permission, ticket:2020021410005954 and others. --Krd 14:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikimedian. Unused = Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 17:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 08:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No time is given, no photographer is named, at the end there is nearly no information about this image. Why exactly this image should by free? As long wie don't know about the photographer or at least a time the picture were taken (can be everything from 1910s up to the 1970s) there is no proof for PD through post mortem. Marcus Cyron (talk) 06:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; missing information on photographer, source, date. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sacalhoon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this group notable?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in self-promotion Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry image of subject with unestablished notability. --Animalparty (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. Also likely copyright violation (the cover). jdx Re: 17:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, very small, no metadata Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, not selfie, not in use Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Atomicdragon136 (talk) 01:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS Hanooz 02:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+

File:Grammar point - 1.png

Hanooz 02:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 06:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Formula with no context. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Formula with no context. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Formula with no context. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS, only used in a promotional draft that will never get to mainspace Gbawden (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - per nom. As you say, found elsewhere, no EXIF, no evidence of compatible license, from user who persistently uploads copyvio, despite clear explanations. -- Begoon 23:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work is a college logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, and above threshold of originality. --Tomer T (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

what? Arulpragassam (talk) 23:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Tomer T (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo incorrectly and would like to reupload it again at a later date. HarrisonJ09 (talk) 21:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:57, 4 Januar 2020 UTC: The copyright was uploaded incorrectly and I would like to correct it so need to take it down first --Krdbot 01:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

created by mistake PARIDHKARIWALA (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

created by mistake PARIDHKARIWALA (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created multiple pages by mistake 115.96.127.181 17:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 横山美奈 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously published on Instagram, no permission.

Minorax (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyvio. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that is a fake flag / this flag not represent any Berber mouvement / it just an artistic creation Bachounda (talk) 13:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling this flag as "artistic" is somehow euphemistic, I'd simply call it: trolling (Israeli flag with ⵣ instead of ✡). Sami At Ferḥat (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD. ~riley (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple breaches of Commons rules: The book cover is copyrighted and there is no OTRS ticket attached; uploader Darldarl doesn't state that he is Jürgen Theobaldy (the author) himself but even if: Not the author but the publishers are the copyright owners. Therefore, this file has to be deleted. Best regards, GeoTrinity (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This is a very simple book cover. The only thing that might be copyrightable is the background pattern, the rest is simple text (author, title, and publisher) which is not copyrightable. But is this simple marbling-like pattern really enough to meet COM:TOO? I think I'm leaning towards keep. Uploader didn't claim to own any rights, but used {{PD-ineligible}}, which may be fitting (just as for typical book title pages without particular elements of design). Gestumblindi (talk) 00:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Simple book cover below COM:TOO. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, looks like a screenshot taken with a camera Atomicdragon136 (talk) 01:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader isn't the copyright holder, however PD-Logo may apply. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple logo below COM:TOO in the US. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zie beschrijving bij de foto: P2060170 - This upload was in error; unintended upload. Please remove. Eriksw (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The uploader is not the author of the picture. The picture was published on Flickr under a compatible licence. The image is in scope (public transport in Amsterdam), so no reason to delete it. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only uploader's contribution, low resolution, watermarked "Ж." ("Zh"). Looks like a crop of professional photo. VLu (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a message that the uploader wrote on the file page. BrightRaven (talk) 14:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
minificus, 2019-12-18: Hi, I'm very sorry for I can't understand how to respond to this nomination the right way here, because I couldn't find any comments or discussion available to reply. I am not sure if I get the reason you want to delete this photo. This is not a crop from a large image, unfortunately back in the year of 2006 this was the available quality from my mirror camera. This exact picture has been uploaded here because the subject, I mean Alexander Tarasov, had asked me to do so as he had really liked this shot at that time and had appreciated it to appear at this page. Maybe you know him, too, and he is ok with this deletion now, but I just wanted you to know this before the deletion

Kept: The image was initially uploaded in lower resolution with a "minificus" watermark (the name of the uploader). The watermark in the second version could be an "M" (for Minificus). The picture has its metadata. The uploader confirmed that he took the picture. So I think there is no serious doubt about the authorship. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a family photo and not related to the wikipedia article, uploaded by a known sock puppet account (possibly with COI) Jooojay (talk) 05:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A 1942 photograph is unlikely to be own work. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar images previously published on various websites, see TinEye. Permission needed. Minorax (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: published previously http://www.olivieris.fr/knowMore/enigme-de-Stanford-1.html. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mourns (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author's name visible in EXIF (Анатолий). Permission needed.

Minorax (talk) 03:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only item protected by copyright is the photograph of the house, but it is de minimis. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Lucphan (talk) 09:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 10:33, 2 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Lucphan (talk) 08:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I suspect these images are copyvio based on the lack of metadata and the copyvio record of the uploader. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Lucphan (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I suspect these images are copyvio based on the lack of metadata and the copyvio record of the uploader. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Lucphan (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I suspect these images are copyvio based on the lack of metadata and the copyvio record of the uploader. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Atomicdragon136 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3. If this is really own drawing by Peter G Pereira, then no copyright is violated. This is simply unused personal file, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work 4oZEF (talk) 08:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)This is public knowledge. https://www.rapid7.com/globalassets/_files/Rapid7_BrandGuidelines.pdf And as I am an employee of Rapid7 Japan K.K. I would like to contribute to make the page as reliable as possible.User:Natalieyoshida (talk) 13:40, 19 December 2019 (JST)[reply]

The logo was already deleted, but this is the logo of an American company and it is below COM:TOO in the US imho. It also seems to be in scope (see en:Metasploit Project), so I would back an undeletion of the file. BrightRaven (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works of Charles Maillard, who died in 1973. Some files are scans from books, and other photos are shot in France, where there is no Freedom of panorama.

Ruthven (msg) 09:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; undelete if further OTRS received. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 10:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Terencetao3000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

EXIF data indicate images were downloaded from Facebook. Please provided detailed source information and submit an OTRS request.

Ytoyoda (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indiamarch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission from Portland Trail Blazers needed via OTRS

Minorax (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar images published on other websites, see TinEye. Permission needed. Minorax (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader - refer https://twitter.com/AeroimagesChris/status/1198432094231224320 and in-image credit partly cropped for Woodys Aeroimages MilborneOne (talk) 13:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Licence fixed. --VileGecko (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why law of Ecuador was applied to symbol from Pakistan? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed The License ShahabKhan2020 (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tag is still incorrect. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T3SU 7001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is British Ceremonial Arts Ltd per Metadata, not own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G1 - Accidental creation (not valid as per COM:FOP Japan) Cabeza2000 (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to SD:G1 as I am the uploader.--Cabeza2000 (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Taivo. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, redundant, and out of scope. LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original author request ჯაბა ლაბაძე (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this request, I am canceling this request.--ჯაბა ლაბაძე (talk) 13:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per author second request and bearing in mind that the file is used on ge.wikimedia.org, please don't delete the photo. --Mehman 97 14:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metalmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be promotional gallery of works by a contemporary artist/artists... unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the file comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Musical album cover, non-free media. I cant find any SickSwiff that got a Grammy. Looks like advertising. Akela NDE (talk) 12:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial logos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:07, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:07, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilarayawe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: watermark credit doesn't match uploader. P 1 9 9   17:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original author request ჯაბა ლაბაძე (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original author request ჯაბა ლაბაძე (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused complex logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edwige9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on these three images. Two look like rephotographs, third one appears to be copy.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work and some lovely edge striping Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication at source site that the logo is licenced under a Creative Commons licence Nthep (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom, also the TOO in the UK is very low. - Fma12 (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication at source site that the logo is licenced under a Creative Commons licence Nthep (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author asks via OTRS 2019121810005109 the deletion of this file. He made an error when choosing the licence on Flickr and sees it only now. The image has been deleted on Flickr and is not used on Wikimedia wikis, so I think we could delete it by courtesy. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer does not give permission for publication with the CC-BY-SA, as follows from ticket:2019121710003631 Elly (talk) 22:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

actualizacion BLUE ONE BANDERAS (talk) 23:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivativr work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:DW. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. Maybe the photo violates artist's copyright, maybe not. Where the graffiti is situated and how old is it? Taivo (talk) 10:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: picture taken in Paris according to ru:Абстракционизм. There is no FOP in France and author didn't provide permission from the author. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesnt appear to be the work of the uploader - due to the fonts and word choices appears to be copied from somewhere MilborneOne (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly copied from https://www.piac.com.pk/where-we-fly/route-map] MilborneOne (talk) 11:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://twitter.com/tiburondeportes/status/1084142563358097408, requires more detailed source info and OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 11:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio; no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published at http://ciudadvalencia.com.ve/estadio-carlos-cafe-martinez-listo-para-inauguracion/, does not appear to be own work, requires more detailed source info. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely to be copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Minorax (talk) 13:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep I see what the uploader was trying to do. Google translates the description as "The photographs were taken to demonstrate the sun's movement over 6 months thereby demonstrating the variation in shadow length." If you extract the individual files from the animation (using IrfanView, for example), you get nine images taken at about the same time of the day over several months. So, this has quite clearly an educational purpose (makes it in scope) - but it's poorly done. The GIF animation is flashing too quickly. Maybe it was different on the uploader's computer and the way we see it is not how it was intended. It could be fixed, obviously a lot of effort went into making this. On the other hand, the scientific/educational value is also lessened by the fact that the images were not taken at exactly the same time of the day, which probably also influences shadow length. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the GIF is too quick making the file poor quality and out of scope. Really unsure how it could be used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW with improper attribution. "Canva" does not seem like a site for sharing copyright-free images, and the uploader also failed to provide a direct link to the exact page where he found this. "Free photo" ≠ "photos released under copyright-free licenses". TechyanTalk14:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete:原始图片来自Lukas Kloeppel in Pexels,根据作者声明图片以Pexels 社区的“免费使用”授权发布,但根据Pexels社区的“免费使用”版权说明其不允许:
•不得醜化或以冒犯方式呈現可識別身分的人物。
•不得銷售未經處理的相片,例如:不得以圖庫相片、海報、印刷品或未附加價值的實體產品形式銷售。
•不得暗示影像中的人物或品牌為你的產品背書。
•不得重新散佈或銷售其他圖庫相片或桌布平台的相片。”

因此,我认为该图片不符合Commons的版权政策。(Google Translate:Original picture from Lukas Kloeppel in Pexels, according to the author's statement, Images published under a "free use" license from the Pexels community according to the author's statement, but according to the "free to use" copyright of the Pexels community it is not allowed:“

•Identifiable people may not appear in a bad light or in a way that is offensive.
•Don't sell unaltered copies of a photo, e.g. don't sell it as a stock photo, poster, print or on a physical product without adding any value.
•Don't imply endorsement of your product by people or brands on the image.
•Don't redistribute or sell the photos on other stock photo or wallpaper platforms.“

Therefore, I think the image does not comply with Commons' copyright policy.)--舞月書生(JoyeZhang)👉☎️👈∮My Heart Will Go On 07:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per author request. Following the G6 criteria at Wikipedia. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used to illustrate sh:Sabapathy. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless derivative work, out of project scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pelosi stands up to Trump (public domain).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright information in the meta data does not appear to match the identify of the uploader. I believe we need further clarification and likely permission sent via OTRS in order to clarify the copyright status of this image. GMGtalk 14:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paulo.ristum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value: personal photo of a tank tourist. Such stuff should be thrown to instagram or facebook. Here, there are better quality photos of encyclopedic value . 188.110.173.101 14:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the size of that tank, as well as it was 'encyclopedial related' to 'german army exhibition show. --Rüdiger Müller (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep can be used to illustrate various topics. --14:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 21:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright watermark in bottom right of image. No evidence that uploader holds the right to this image. Huntster (t @ c) 15:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was nominated for a speedy deletion. Actually it was posted to vimeo here under CC BY 3.0 by Crooked House Films, who are the publishers of the clip, as you can see it here. So I do not see any reason for deletion.-- Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added the original source and all neccecary stuff. So we can  Keep this.--Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 16:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to have a filter added (as well as possibly other manipulation) that distorts the perspective, also no clear permission to post Cherrychapstick (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per nonsense reasoning. Having a filter is no reason to delete, and the permission is said to be a user's own work. From a reverse search the image was first published on the internet here, so there's no evidence to suggest that the user is lying. Kingsif (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Kingsif and bad faith nomination, deletion requests should deal with copyright issues. No link has been provided on a source that predates the upload. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Source "own work" was added by bot, not by uploader. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marketing children, and copywriting Diane Arbus 2607:F010:2E9:12:557A:8FB1:7692:47EC 17:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. Real author and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDM 1.0 is not a legal notice, thus not acceptable in Commons A1Cafel (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jiaifer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). The author, w:ru:Треммери, Лидия Альбертовна, dies in 1996, and thus the file remains copyrighted until 2066 - unless OTRS permission is forthcoming Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of publication with timing corroborating PD claim PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image 188.110.173.101 15:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have plenty of people using my socialnet's account, and i am a character in so many computersimulations. You can't deny that this maybe looks useless for you, while you don't know if it's used also in the future, not only on my personal account! So? Stay away! --Rüdiger Müller (talk) 20:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Images of well known people should be kept. Even if they are well known Nazis. --Achim (talk) 17:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The image File:Rüdiger Müller.jpg is in fact a gallery of 100 photographs, so we don't need just one more. --Achim (talk) 22:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this is not a simple logo. The logo is in en.wiki (en:file:Felda Global Ventures Logo.svg) as fair use, which is prohibited in Commons. Source country is Malaysia, former British colony, so maybe British low threshold of originality applies. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure of origin Serterr (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and text only, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed photo (mislukte foto). See File:Kerstfeest op Drakesteyn. Prins Alexander met de zuster bekijkt het feest van ac, Bestanddeelnr 920-9479.jpg for a better one JopkeB (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Babalo12

[edit]
File:Awangua.png

All the files User:Babalo12 uploaded have meaningless descriptions (copied from boilerplate text) and look like possibly copyrighted screenshots of malware/phishing eMails or legitimate online banking eMails. None of these is used anywhere, as long as I can see.

There is already a number of deletion request notifications on that user's talk page. Maybe an experienced user decides to block him ? -- Juergen 217.61.199.163 22:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where is the evidence that this film is not copyrighted anymore ? Its co-director Boris Kaufman died in 1980. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the author and therefore no evidence that this photo is not copyrighted anymore. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, contains the same info as the other file. See the other file. Wikis that use this file should replace the logo, maybe.

Attribution for deletion templates and for other templates. Name of the Works: Template:Delete, Template:Idw, Template:Trademark, Template:PD-textlogo. Licensing: CC BY-SA 3.0, source: Wikimedia Commons, authors - Special:History/Template:Trademark, Special:History/Template:PD-textlogo, Special:History/Tempate:Delete, Special:History/Tempate:Afd. Note: there are translated versions. To see the page of a translated version, go to Template:Delete/xx, Template:Idw/xx and change the XX in the URL bar to the language code. To see the authors of translations, go to Special:History/Tempate:Delete/xx, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/xx and use the URL bar to change the XX to language code. Examples: Template:Delete/ru, Template:Idw/ru, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/ru,Special:History/Tempate:Delete/ru for RU language code. Translations of Trademark and PD-textlogo aren't shown because only English version was used (with changes) ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License updated. Choice of logo to use is an editorial decision of each sister project. Convince them to update first, then we can revisit deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Henry Moore Kew Exhibition

[edit]

Photographs of sculptures by Henry Moore exhibited at Kew Gardens. As Moore died in 1986, his work remains in copyright in the UK until 2056. For sculpture permanently sited in a public place, Freedom of Panorama applies, but the Kew exhibition was temporary and so the works displayed there are not protected by FoP.

--Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There is no commonly understood definition of 'permanently exposed'. Moore's sculptures are significant installations, they are not movable by a couple of folks with a van, because they are normally bolted down into cement. Though they are on display for less than a year, it is a matter of debate as to whether for copyright purposes they are sufficiently permanently placed. -- (talk) 08:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • COM:FoP says: Whether a work is installed at a public place permanently or not is not a question of absolute time, but a question of what the intention was when the work was placed there. If it was put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work, then it is "permanent".
      A sculpture is typically placed with the intent of leaving it for an indefinite time. But if it was clear from the beginning that it would be left there only, say, for three years and then be moved to a museum, then the placement was not "permanent". On the other hand, if a sculpture was placed with the intent of leaving it "open end", but is then removed due to new construction plans some time later, its placement remains "permanent" even if the sculpture is eventually removed.
    • Under that definition, it is clear that the installation was not permanent. And if you argue that this is, in fact, contra COM:FoP, permanent, then what the hell counts as temporary? All artworks are installed in such a way that a random member of public can't just pick them up and walk away with them. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 22:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Caeciliusinhorto. Kept the likely COM:DM ones identified above. --Storkk (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD in US+Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of pre-1917 publication required for the claimed PD-RusEmpire status. No evidence of pre-1946 publication that would render item PD-Russia-1996 either. Simple website as only source information is absolutely insufficient to determine copyright status since copyright here is based on PUBLCIATION date. Previous deletion request handled by admin who clearly misunderstood the requirements at hand here. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]