Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
經緯碑.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
._Raadpensionaris_van_Holland,_SK-A-13.jpg){kind=link}
It was taken from Flickr Extrapolaris (talk) 00:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, non-free license on Flickr. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1150102490165272577/eLr71_if_400x400.jpg Luisalvaz (talk) 04:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sorry! I did something wrong! Chalk19 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net 19113750 2030382720522701 6991384366697281798 n.jpg Pouchkine-center (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 12:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
this was not the picture I wanted to upload GuillemMedina (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Closed: accidental deletion request, removed by user. seb26 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
I confused JulietaDerdoy (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Andrei Icefield.jpg Volcanoguy (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 23:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The file was uploaded with the wrong Creative Common Licence LankasamOT (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- This request was made by error.
- The file should be kept LankasamOT (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
i confused JulietaDerdoy (talk) 12:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Das Bild ist nicht mehr aktuell. Wir, das Büro des Abgeordneten Dorfmann, würden das Bild gerne gegen ein aktuelles austauschen. Vielen Dank Hdorfmann (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Google translation: "The picture is out of date. We, the office of the deputy Dorfmann, would like to exchange the picture for a current one. Thank you very much"
- Keep. The nominator is welcome to upload a more recent picture (as a new file; not to overwrite the nominated file, as they recently attempted before self-reverting), but we do not delete pictures just because they are five years old. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept, Commons hosts old and outdated photos to show history. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Not educationally useful VKras (talk) 15:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This is non-free content:a image of Pokemon. Reiwa period (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the client.--狂々亭駄楽 (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete he/she copied from [1].the original material was published after 1950. --eien20 (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Francis Kramer
[edit]Work by Francis Kramer (1878-1965), undelete in 2036
- File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Dionysius Adrianus Petrus Norbertus Koolen.jpg
- File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Henricus Paulus Cornelis Bosch van Drakestein (cropped).jpg
- File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Henricus Paulus Cornelis Bosch van Drakestein.jpg
_-_Dionysius_Adrianus_Petrus_Norbertus_Koolen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Henricus_Paulus_Cornelis_Bosch_van_Drakestein_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_-_Henricus_Paulus_Cornelis_Bosch_van_Drakestein.jpg){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 22:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 22:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Munyescripts (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Munye scripts biography.pdf
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo last.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo kuminamunana.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo kuminamusanvu.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekumi namukaga.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekuminabitano.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekuminebina.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekunebisatu.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekumi nebibili.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekuminekimu.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyekumi.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyomwenda.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyomunana.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyomusanvu.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyomukaga.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyokutano.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyokuna.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo one.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo one ekyokubili.jpg
- File:Munye Scripts Happy time in hood photo ekyokusatu.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Talokudo-artista.jpg
- File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg
- File:Comediante Talokudo e seus personagens.jpg
Ahmadtalk 19:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- And File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg is (partly) available here. Ahmadtalk 19:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Na foto, File:Comediante Talokudo e seus personagens.jpg todos que estão na foto sou eu, eu sou artista, e faço personagens, todos esses presentes na foto sou eu, eu tirei essa foto com minha camera e usei o temporizador, tirei ela sozinho e fiz a edição, essa imagem é totalmente minha.
Na outra imagem File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg, sou eu também, tirei essa foto no meu estudio, com a camera parada usando o temporizador, sendo assim essas imagens não merecem ser apagadas, pois elas não infringem as regras — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talokudo (talk • contribs) 21:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
These are claimed to be "own work" of the subject. Since none of them appear to be selfies and one was taken during a performance, that seems very unlikely. In order to keep them, we will need free licenses from the actual photographers via OTRS.
- File:Talokudo-artista.jpg
- File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg
- File:Comediante Talokudo e seus personagens.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think we need to confirm that all images used in File:Comediante Talokudo e seus personagens.jpg are published under a suitable license. This image is, in my opinion, a combination of five images: The background, File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg, and three other images of the other three people in the picture. Ahmadtalk 19:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Flickr license contradicts license at https://www.talokudo.com.br
- File:Talokudo e os seus personagens.jpg
- File:Humorista Talokudo faz sucesso na TV.jpg
- File:Talokudo frente ao espelho.jpg
- File:Talokudo de Joaninha Beyblade.jpg
- File:Talokudo Nordestino comediante.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Talokudo 2019.jpg
- File:Talokudo e os seus personagens.jpg
- File:Humorista Talokudo faz sucesso na TV.jpg
- File:Talokudo frente ao espelho.jpg
- File:Talokudo de Joaninha Beyblade.jpg
- File:Humorista Talokudo show Stand up comedy.jpg
- File:Talokudo Nordestino comediante.jpg
- File:Talokudo-artista.jpg
- File:Talokudo comediante Edson Oliveira.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright issues Heart rounak (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No permission, found elsewhere on the internet, unlikely to be own work. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright issues Heart rounak (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No permission, found elsewhere on the internet, unlikely to be own work. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake TomeryKY (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Has already been deleted on Sep 3. --Achim (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from here: https://iforest.sisef.org/forest@/contents/?id=efor0507-0050008 Carnby (talk) 23:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from here: https://iforest.sisef.org/forest@/contents/?id=efor0507-0050008 Carnby (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation form here: https://iforest.sisef.org/forest@/contents/?id=efor0507-0050008 Carnby (talk) 23:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from here: https://iforest.sisef.org/forest@/contents/?id=efor0507-0050008 Carnby (talk) 23:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Ilovecats516 (talk) 18:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Ymblanter. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I thought this was public domain, but it is not. Ilovecats516 (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Ymblanter. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Invalid file? Commons is not a private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Invalid file. Unused and uncategorised media. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
No description, hence random sound. Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Not in Commons scope. Not used. Sémhur (talk) 13:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Seems to be a logo/id for an artist I cannot find any refs to. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Private information Soyuz12 (talk) 04:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mailanphuong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author is en:Mai Thứ, die in 1980, not cc-by-sa
- File:MAI-THU "La calligraphie" 1956.jpg
- File:"La calligraphie" tableau créé en 1956, reproduit en carte psotale au bénéfice de l'UNICEF..jpg
shizhao (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. These are derivative works of copyrignted files. Masum Reza📞 07:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Author is en:Mai Thứ, die in 1980, not cc-by-sa shizhao (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
No exif, found on alamy, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete {{PD-Iran}} is nonsense here. The image is clearly a recent one. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not in focus, there are 100 similar in the categoy [Category:Weissensteinbahn|Weissensteinbahn] and it is nothing, that cannot be repeated Anidaat (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Still from a Mexican film, bogus license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Screenshot of an 1980's film. Obviously not published before 1924. Speedy delete per F1. Copyvio. Masum Reza📞 17:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Still from a Mexican film, bogus license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for murals and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The map states it is from www.cdm1880.it (an Italian company making lightning protection systems) Carnby (talk) 23:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from here: http://www.klbict.co.uk/interactive/geography/italy/climate.htm Carnby (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately, this is not actually a wall of old books, but a piece of art created in 1997 (the books aren't actually books, but a painted set piece). If Italy had freedom of panorama, it would be covered by that, but sadly there is no FOP in Italy. Kaldari (talk) 20:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nice bit of trompe-l'œil. I was going to put the case against sufficient creativity, but realize now that the books are all fakes and amusingly badly titled on close-up. --Fæ (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from "La nevosità in Italia nel quarantennio 1921-1960" (tavola III cartographic supplement) - Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici (Ministry of Public Works) Carnby (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation from http://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/archivio/immagini-e-allegati/Mercoledi_Lezione_2_2016_1.pdf (La flora dell’Appennino dell’Emilia-Romagna) - Regione Emilia-Romagna (the uploader is not the copyright owner) Carnby (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Mappa dei climi Italiani elaborata secondo il sistema di Wladimir Koppen (fonte- WorldClim.org).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low-qualtity version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Italy_K%C3%B6ppen.svg (the same identical map) and uploaded after the SVG version was already present on Commons Carnby (talk) 22:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Map copied from http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/pdf/kottek_et_al_2006_A4.pdf (crop) and the uploader is not the copyright owner Carnby (talk) 22:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Map taken from http://marcopifferetti.altervista.org/carte%20nuove/61-17-nimbus.htm (part of a publication: these are the first two pages (sort of abstract): http://www.meteoshop.it/meteoshop/Estratti/Nimbus/7707_NeviPadane.pdf) Carnby (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Downloaded from here: http://soilmaps.entecra.it/download/maps/Desertificazione2007GGSecco.png (map by Ministero per le Politiche Agricole e Forestali and Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria). No evidence the uploader is the copyright owner. Carnby (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Bust of György Kulin (Salonta)
[edit]- File:Kulin György mellszobra Nagyszalontán - 1.jpg
- File:Kulin György Nagyszalonta.JPG
- File:Kulin György.jpg
- Category:Bust of György Kulin (Salonta)
This statue was erected in 2001 in Romania where is no FOP. The sculptor is Béla Domonkos (1934–). --Regasterios (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and no license since 11 November 2019. -— Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
YouTube Lassie JosephGibson 172.220.189.191 22:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: implausible redirect. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Nice photo, dubious claimed source and license. A reverse image search found a number of different versions, but no useful original source info. (One from NPR said "Courtesy of the Artist", suggesting it may have been one of Cantiflas' standard publicity photos.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source is an online newspaper without a free license. No direct link to the file, not license reviewed. COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:ALEJANDROVR.jpg}} Nekixito (talk) 05:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep not an exact duplicate. No valid reason for deletion. Masum Reza📞 05:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 1zackaryarthur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos, only uploads of the user. Unlikely to be own work as claimed
Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daryakaras (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers, no permission
Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The author is written on the image, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 15:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The text on the image says "Paul's Studio". The Exif author is "PAUL SAAD", and the user who uploaded the picture was Cksaad. It seems entirely believable to me that these are all the same person. --bjh21 (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I paul saad creator of these images and own them, they should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cksaad (talk • contribs) 16:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21 and Cksaad. --Strakhov (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The author is written on the image, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The text on the image says "Paul's Studio". The Exif author is "PAUL SAAD", and the user who uploaded the picture was Cksaad. It seems entirely believable to me that these are all the same person. --bjh21 (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
i paul saad own the photos under cksaad user name and my business paul studio are all the same they should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cksaad (talk • contribs) 16:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21 and Cksaad. --Strakhov (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The author is written on the image, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The text on the image says "Paul's Studio". The Exif author is "PAUL SAAD", and the user who uploaded the picture was Cksaad. It seems entirely believable to me that these are all the same person. --bjh21 (talk) 15:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I paul saad is the creator of all these images under my account cksaad, why should they be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cksaad (talk • contribs) 16:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21 and Cksaad. --Strakhov (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The photo was created circa 1950. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Also listing:
Per COM:DW/COM:FOP, photographs of trophies are considered to be under copyright, as they are two-dimensional recreations of three-dimensional art. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously is not free content. look MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia, permission of Nadezhda Vostrikova and Pavel Shevchenko needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused line of code. No meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
This image is tbe basis of a CD cover (albeit flipped) but unlikely to be own work - https://www.amazon.com/Ruta-Sin-Fin-Oliver-Urdaneta/dp/B073PC6BV2 Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Антон Вечтомов (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not in use. Part of an advertising campain (see user:Vegensy's contribution)
Bilderling (talk) 11:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Cette photo est une photo volée. It's a stolen picture, from Catherine Dorion's Facebook page Idéalités (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
%E7%B6%93%E7%B7%AF%E7%A2%91.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E7%B6%93%E7%B7%AF%E7%A2%91.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
經緯碑.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
經緯碑.JPG){kind=link}
copyvio of https://www.facebook.com/2098212090256040/photos/a.2098212130256036/2105789469498302/? NAH 14:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
low quality and no educational use Clarinetguy097 (talk) 00:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work"; the size (960px) is the standard for Facebook images; moreover, the legend at bottom and the lack of EXIF data. Fma12 (talk) 01:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Low-quality file. Better image used: File:Resultados por departamento Salta, Argentina, 2019.svg Yilku1 (talk) 01:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
False license, unfree work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 07:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:TROPHY. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Not in use. Part of an advertising campaign.
- File:Вегенсы морковь, свёкла, картофель, редька.jpg
- File:Вегенсы морковь и свёкла в расфасовочном оборудовании.jpg
- File:Свежая свёкла до переработки.jpg
- File:Вегенсы морковь и свёкла.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 11:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
No permission/DW no source.
- File:פוסטר מטקס חץ הדורות בקריה - הוועדה הצבאית המשותפת עם מצרים.jpg
- File:דמויות קשח היסטוריות המונצחות במחנה אביב.jpg
- File:פוסטר מטקס חץ הדורות בנתבג.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה שדה תעופה חיפה.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה רמת יוחנן 2.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה רמת יוחנן 1.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה מקווה ישראל.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה ניצנה.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה אחוזה.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה בית המכס.jpg
- File:חץ הדורות הזמנה יפו.jpg
- File:לוגו חץ הדורות גרסא 2.jpg
- File:פנקס מורשת "חץ הדורות".pdf
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 15:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images: unlikely to be own works + COM:SCOPE?
- File:11 אבי פלד.png
- File:12 ארז דוד מייזל.png
- File:10 אסף אוריון.png
- File:9 יוסי היימן.png
- File:7 דני ארדיטי.png
- File:6 דודו צור.png
- File:6 ניצן נוריאל.png
- File:5 ברוך שפיגל.png
- File:אודי דקל 8.png
- File:4 יפרח חיים.png
- File:2 אורן שחור.png
- File:1 דב שיאון.png
- File:3 יקותיאל מור.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- There is no problem of scope but copyright issue. -- Geagea (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission/DW no source. -- Geagea (talk) 06:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Screenshots.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I want to delete my own photo. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Kept: CC license is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: You forget to remove the del req template Encik Tekateki (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2600:1700:CCD0:5790:FC16:8022:747F:D122 00:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Came via Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cherry.englishbright/photos/a.645022535606542/2302013369907442/?type=3&theater. --Regasterios (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2600:1700:CCD0:5790:FC16:8022:747F:D122 00:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Came via Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cherry.englishbright/photos/a.645022535606542/2302013306574115/?type=3&theater. --Regasterios (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2600:1700:CCD0:5790:FC16:8022:747F:D122 00:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Came via Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cherry.englishbright/photos/a.645022535606542/2302013406574105/?type=3&theater. --Regasterios (talk) 13:16, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2600:1700:CCD0:5790:FC16:8022:747F:D122 00:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Came via Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cherry.englishbright/photos/a.645022535606542/2302013469907432/?type=3&theater. --Regasterios (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Is the mere close silhouette of the sculpture close enough to the real "design" (contoured around it exactly) to be considered a COM:DW of the artwork the silhouette is trying to hide? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think there is a good chance that could be considered a derivative work because it still contains an element of the original sculpture (its outline) that would be sufficient for copyright on its own. Therefore, Delete. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep There are many similar pictures on Commons since years[1]. ~ R.T.G 21:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Many of the ones you've "cited" are eiher really censored to the point that it isn't just an outline of the actual work[2] or blurred to the point no faithful reproduction can be made from it[3] in order for it to qualify as a COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Okay I've removed the two blurry ones (and the one I didn't check, I thought was a silhouette). According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Denmark#Threshold_of_originality, Denmark considers simple line work below the threshold. ~ R.T.G 08:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- The fact that we've had these images for a while is suggestive but isn't an actual reason why they are legal - ideally we can find one. Only one of them has been involved in a DR, and that was as part of a massive FoP DR where it did not receive any specific discussion. Here a natural silhoutte of a sculpture was deleted, though without much discussion. Here we kept such an image on the ground that the outline was much rougher than the actual sculpture, which I think is a safe approach we could move forward with. Here we kept some building silhouttes on the grounds that they were simple shapes (which I don't think this one is). – BMacZero (🗩) 16:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Mildly related: the statue's copyright holder has been enforcing his copyright[2]. – BMacZero (🗩) 17:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Okay I am just going to say that the difference between this silhouetted image and the others are that this one is attractive in a purely artistic sense because of the scene around the statue. I am going to say the silhouetted buildings given as an example are copies, designed to perfectly replicate the buildings design, whereas the silhouette is an emphasisedly imperfect attempt to blot the thing out of the scene and transorfm its appearance (which I thought is working quite well as it doesn't look to me quite the same statue though it is a very close silhouette, I thought it was going to make a great educational example of how silhouette can effect transformation). ~ R.T.G 02:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Many of the ones you've "cited" are eiher really censored to the point that it isn't just an outline of the actual work[2] or blurred to the point no faithful reproduction can be made from it[3] in order for it to qualify as a COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
References
- ↑ File:Hansen, Johannes - Mor og barn - censored.jpgFile:Liberte panorama - Clemenceau.jpgFile:Liberte panorama - Jean Jaures Suresnes.jpgFile:Dijon - Liberté de panorama.jpgFile:L'athlète après l'effort .- Martin Raymond.jpgFile:Villeneuve d'Ascq Le Chat Botté, Stéphane Deleurence, 1983.jpgFile:Villeneuve d'Ascq « Petite scène improbable au-dessus de l'eau ».jpgFile:Kafka statue Prague-FoP-Censored.jpgFile:GiantPoolBallsBlack.jpgFile:Pesti srác (1) (FoP-censored).jpgFile:National Theatre, Budapest-FoP-Censored.jpgFile:Hungary-0057 - Shoes on the Danube (7263603836) (FoP-censored).jpgFile:Theaterplaz Luxemburg zensiert re.jpgFile:Theaterplaz Luxemburg zensiert.jpg
- ↑ File:Bundeskanzleramt Berlin 3 - blacked out art.jpg
- ↑ File:Tombe de Georges Melies (cimetière du Père Lachaise).JPG
_(FoP-censored).jpg){kind=link}
_(FoP-censored).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: This is not even a close question. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Incorrectly labelled duplicate of File:JantheclaLeeaMUpUnAC1638 1639.jpg LamBoet (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Not his own work. As per watermark foto:Sergio Di Francesco Bijay chaurasia (talk) 07:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Italy
- File:Bronzo femminile.jpg
- File:Disegno di nudo femminile.jpg
- File:Il decoratore monumento al ceramista a Nove.jpg
- File:Busto di Socrate.jpg
- File:Bronzo figura femminile su sedia.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bassano Don Gnocchi.jpg
- File:Monumento a Salvo d'Acquisto.jpg
- File:Monumento a Madre Teresa di Calcutta.jpg
- File:Monumento a Don Gnocchi.jpg
- File:Monumento all'alpino Il Bacio.jpg
- File:Monumento al ceramista a Nove.jpg
- File:Monumento al prof. Renato Cevese.jpg
- File:Monumento al Carabinieri a Bassano.jpg
- File:Nudo maschile.jpg
- File:Monunento al Carabiniere a Bassano del Grappa.jpg
- File:Monumento Il Bacio a Bassano del Grappa.jpg
- File:Monumento caduti a Bassano (Marchesane).jpg
- File:Studio dell'artista Morlin.jpg
- File:Studio dell'artista Morlin 2.jpg
- File:Salvo d'Acquisto monumento.jpg
- File:Quadro la Crocefissione.jpg
- File:Pannello decorativo casa Compostella a Nove.jpg
- File:Testa in bronzo.jpg
- File:Testa terracotta.jpg
- File:Testa di donna al Parco del Sojo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello there, I own the rights on everything shown on these pictures. Should I prove it? How can I do it?
Dozarte (talk) 05:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: It is hard to believe that you actually were the creator of all the copyrighted works shown here, or that you have written free licenses for all of them. In order for them to be restored to Commons, either (a) the actual creator of each work shown must send a free license using OTRS or (b) someone else may send a free license together with a copy of the written licenses from the creator(s) allowing that person to freely license the works. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
We are the company whose logo was uploaded without our knowledge and permission. Please delete it because it. The user violates the copyright. If you have any questions, please contact us directly: marketing@prianto.com 213.179.135.138 09:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- The uploader falsely claimed own work. I have changed it's license and attributed the original source. It should be ok now as the logo does not meet threshold of originality required for copyrignt protection. So Keep it. Masum Reza📞 09:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Might not be in COM:SCOPE. No Wikipedia article. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I'd guess the company is in scope even though there is no article. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
The image is property of Simon C. Dickinson Ltd and we need it to be removed immediately. 87.224.27.74 10:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- 'KEEP' Mondrian died in 1944, therefore his artworks are public domain. The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".Wmpearl (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Only if it was never published before 2003. Any evidence it wasn't? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is impossible to prove that something was never published. However, it would still be public domain unless it was FIRST published from March 2, 1989 through 2002. This seems unlikely.Wmpearl (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Only if it was never published before 2003. Any evidence it wasn't? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
KEEP Clearly public domain.Hiart (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Same subject as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roskilde - Roskildekrukkerne - 2007.jpg Hjart (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is borderline case of 'minimis'. The artwork is not detailed and there are a lot of other elements in the picture. I also am uncertain if the 'grafiti' on the vase is part of the artwork.Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - without the vases, one category is wrong and the image is poorly composed, not useful. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
In my view, the threshold of originality is passed in this logo, and so I don’t believe it qualifies for PD-simple. I am ready to stand corrected, however, so I would welcome input from other editors on this. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - If this were a USA company, this would be PD, because there is no copyright for logos that are only letters, no matter how complex the typeface. However, it is a UK company and the UK has an explicit copyright for typography. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
This formal PR picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (such as this and this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The two cited images are B&W and much smaller, although they probably come from the same negative. This image is 3,648 × 5,472 pixels, and has full EXIF, so I assuming good faith. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture that appears in several places online (this one and this one, for example - appearing online before the upload to the Commons). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Fair use (Fair use). This is almost certainly {{PD-old-no notice}}. Storkk (talk) 12:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Question: why it is tagged with a CC license and why it's the uploader's own work? Didn't the author die or something? Masum Reza📞 12:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Although this now appears in many places on the web, we don't know when or where this was first published. Almost all publication during the "notice required" period had notice, so the chances that it is PD-no-notice is less than 50/50. It is also entirely possible that it was in someone's album until it surfaced after 1989. The claim of "own work" is unlikely. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giaphongvstar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE?
- File:Mc-gia-thanh-American Idol Myra Minh Nhu Tran.jpg
- File:MC-Gia-Thanh-US Army Major General Frank Muth.jpg
- File:MC-Gia-Thanh-TV-show.jpg
- File:Mc-gia-thanh-thieu-ta-quan-doi-hoa-ky-thuc-doan.jpg
- File:MC-Gia-Thanh-MC-Ky-Duyen.jpg
- File:Mc-gia-thanh-Police Foundation Eagle Awards.jpg
- File:MC-Gia-Thanh-Hollywood Hank Garrett.jpg
- File:MC-Gia-Thanh-California's 40th Governor Gavin Newsom.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, not Commons 186.247.181.233 14:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Possible unfree image. Catherine Laurence discussion 14:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- Almost certainly not Own work as claimed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
The author is written on the image, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 15:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images with early date. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Likely not own work VKras (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Strange statement at the website "© Content may be reproduced. All published documents are publicly owned" since works of the Slovenian government are not supposed free. Besides no mention of first publication too. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no license review and source is gone. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heinrich Himmler v Mariboru.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Mich12345678 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
http://collectionscanada.gc.ca/pam_archives/index.php?fuseaction=genitem.displayItem&lang=eng&rec_nbr=3837041. Please explain why image is public domain in Canada. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- For the reason #1 listed here. - Simon Villeneuve 16:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Simon Villeneuve: As mentionned on the link it's not a Government work ("Copyright assigned to Library and Archives Canada by copyright owner Walter Curtin.") and photographer Curtin, Walter, 1911-2007 died less than 50 years ago. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- "Copyright assigned to Library and Archives Canada" means that the author have given the copyright to Library and Archives Canada. So it's why I think the #1 reason apply here. - Simon Villeneuve 18:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Simon Villeneuve: Archive Canada doesn't say their content is out of copyright, especially commercial use seems not allowed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- This is for the content who isn't 50 year old (or where LAC didn't have all the rights on it). This is not the case here. - Simon Villeneuve 22:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Bzuk: - Simon Villeneuve 22:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- If Crown copyright works the same in Canada as it does in the UK, then assigning ordinary copyright to the Crown does not magically turn it into Crown copyright. Crown copyright applies to works created by the Crown (and continues to apply even if the copyright is assigned to someone else), and ordinary copyright applies to ordinary works even after copyright is assigned to the Crown. A quick glance at the Canadian Copyright Act seems to support this. --bjh21 (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Simon Villeneuve: Archive Canada doesn't say their content is out of copyright, especially commercial use seems not allowed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- "Copyright assigned to Library and Archives Canada" means that the author have given the copyright to Library and Archives Canada. So it's why I think the #1 reason apply here. - Simon Villeneuve 18:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Simon Villeneuve: As mentionned on the link it's not a Government work ("Copyright assigned to Library and Archives Canada by copyright owner Walter Curtin.") and photographer Curtin, Walter, 1911-2007 died less than 50 years ago. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Crown copyright applies only to works created by the government. This work's cpyright is owned by the government, but it still lasts for 50 years pma. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Momo Raymon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Wakil Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah.jpg
- File:Panorama Bukit Lenyek.jpg
- File:Air Terjun Salodik, Luwuk Utara.jpg
- File:Pemandangan Desa Lalandai.jpg
- File:Tarian Balatindak Suku Banggai.jpg
- File:Foto Bupati Banggai.png
- File:Pantai Kilo Lima.jpg
- File:Sungai Sandakan.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
No evidence this image is PD. Source is merely a raw link to the image itself and, indeed, the uploader listed the date as "ignota" (unknown). Images must be PD in country of origin (here, Italy) and the US. While this is {{PD-Italia}} per subject's death in 1986, the US situation has been ignored. As PD-Italia is creation +20 years, this image would need to have been made 1975 or before (1996 - 20 - 1) to qualify for {{PD-1996}}. Visually, it is very possible the subject is at least 48 here (1975 - 1927 birth date), which would make this image not PD in the US. There is, at best, significant doubt (COM:PRP) and "appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain" (COM:EVID) has not been provided. Эlcobbola talk 15:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: uploader has now amended the creation date to be 1986. This would make the image PD in Italy on 01.01.2007 (1986 + 20 + 1), so unambiguously not PD in Italy on 01.01.1996, and thus not PD in the US. Эlcobbola talk 16:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is URAA the only reason for deletion? The file is PD-ITALY, and reading Commons:URAA-restored copyrights and Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA I am not sure that failing the URAA test (especially as the image could well be pre-1976) is enough for deletion. --151.54.255.243 11:49, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- The cited policy requires a "careful evaluation", which we have here. It prohibits only mass deletions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete: Fictitious flag by a disruptive editor on the English Wikipedia. hueman1 (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vila Phounvongsa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 8.jpg
- File:LuangPrabang City.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 14.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 12.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 4.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 27.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 26.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 21.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 23.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 5.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 6.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 20.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 17.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 15.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 16.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 18.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 19.jpg
- File:New Doc 2019-05-22 11.42.54 22 (1).jpg
- File:ເຈົ້າກິ່ງກິດສະຣາດ.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
This was nominated as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Soft toys due to a concern of being derivative of the soft toys. This image, however, seems to be a borderline case requiring more specific discussion. Are the soft toys merely incidental to the true, greater subject of a baby in a "gym"? Is the "gym" itself a toy (i.e. copyrightable under US law)? Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think a baby "gym", as the name suggests, is somewhat different from the types of toys which could be considered "sculptures" or models of something: this object is intended to encourage a child's physical development and could thus be considered a "useful article". Though it also includes detachable "soft toys" these are a part of the larger article, and are not seen in much detail from this angle (being intended, of course, to be viewed more effectively from the baby's perspective), so if they would even theoretically qualify for copyright protection in derivative photos (which is questionable partly because they are likely to include non-sculptural functions such as rattles as a significant part of their design) I think their inclusion in this photo should be considered de minimis. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 08:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Agree it's borderline. The baby and the toys look more like the focus of the photograph rather than the babygym itself. It's a somewhat uncomfortable photograph to judge, I would prefer to see a deletion per precautionary principle unless there was a good rationale of educational value and scarcity. --Fæ (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Three of the categories involve the sculptures. They surround the babiy's head. I don;t think a claim of dm or utilitarian can work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Bach S(chuurmans) died in 2001 Tekstman (talk) 17:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 2017 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 2017 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 2017 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
most probably copyvio; see similar photos online; png; first time uploader JD {æ} 19:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Guten Abend, tatsächlich arbeite ich seid 2016 bei KenFM und bin derjenige der dieses Bild produziert hat. Die Urheberrechte liegen daher bei mir und wurden nicht verletzt. Es handelt sich dabei um die Sendung "Positionen - Politik verstehen" Gerne auch nach sehbar in den Credits der entsprechenden Sendung. Für weiter Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. Schönen Abend noch __JoshSchwarz (talk)
Deleted: per nomination - Small image, no EXIF -- either (a) send a free license using OTRS or (b) upload the image at full camera reolution with full EXIF using the same file name. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 2017 / photographer might still be living Martin Sg. (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Source is a Google search, does not appear to be own work - published at https://www.nawaret.com/%d9%81%d9%86/%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%af%d9%8a%d9%88-%d9%87%d9%83%d8%b0%d8%a7-%d8%aa%d9%81%d8%a7%d8%b9%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%85%d9%87%d9%88%d8%b1-%d9%85%d8%b9-%d9%86%d8%ac%d9%88%d9%89-%d9%83%d8%b1 Ytoyoda (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|copyright}} 8.7.228.252 20:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep and undelete. CC licenses are irrevocable. Tm (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- It has a review. Probably the user has changed te licence on flickr. --Emha (talk) 09:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - if user changes the licence on flickr thats its decision. --Emha (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
This Image has my Identifiable Image which is my private property moreover it talks about my religious Identity which is again private as "A hindu baby" and I am not comfortable with Hnagar (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The llicense you gave is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Government work of Comoros. A few days ago another picture of a Comorean visa was deleted as it was deemed copyrighted. Botev (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Juta, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Probably not an own work (low resolution, no exif). Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Same request for:
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone has used my photo without following the copyright license and refused to apologies. So, I don't want to share my photos on wiki commons anymore. Stitch0718 (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Original author or uploader requests deletion Stitch0718 (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
구로고라서 삭제를 원함 해원이 (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|해원쇼핑 공식 CI가 아니라서}}
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
이것도 구 로고라서 삭제를 원함 해원이 (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|해원쇼핑 공식 CI가 아니라서}}
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
이것도 구 로고라서 삭제를 원함 해원이 (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
{{speedydelete|해원쇼핑 공식 CI가 아니라서}}
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
이것도 구 로고라서 삭제를 원함 해원이 (talk) 02:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|해원쇼핑 공식 CI가 아니라서}}
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
photos par Eddy Mottaz, dont au moins une a déjà été publiée https://www.letemps.ch/monde/tribulations-nordcoreennes-dun-lausannois
Habertix (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The first is a copyvio. The second and third are an image and a crop of it. The subject is not notable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Shoulder straps with graphic error
[edit]- File:1904kavg-p17-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-p17-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-p18-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-p18-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-p19-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-p19-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-p20-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-p20-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-p21-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-p21-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-pv17-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-pv17-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-pv18-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-pv18-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-pv19-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-pv19-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-pv20-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-pv20-es1r.png
- File:1904kavg-pv21-es1.png
- File:1904kavg-pv21-es1r.png
These images were all uploaded by User:Polygon_v. I believe they should be deleted because shoulder straps with graphic error. Exposed for deletion at the request of the author. — Niklitov (talk) 05:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
An inferior version of File:Serbia adm location map.svg. Unused redundant file. Ratherous (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in U.A.E, This image will be in question in accordance with w:de minimis and w:Threshold of originality, so a consensus is required to clear-out all the possible FoP problems...COM:FOP#United_Arab_Emirates ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept: All inidividual buildings are DM Jcb (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The buildings shown are all copyrighted. The de minimis test requires that if the copyrighted works were removed that the average viewer would not notice the difference. That is obviously not the case here, as the only things of interest in the image are the copyrighted buildings. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:De minimis in its current interpretation (and not in the one "invented" by Jameslwoodward), and the previous request just above. --A.Savin 18:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
"Invented"? I suggest a careful read of Commons policy on de minimis where it says:
- "Variations in laws and in uses of works mean that firm rules are not possible. As a general guideline, however, a file containing copyrighted work X is less likely to satisfy de minimis the more of these it meets:
- the file is in use to illustrate X
- the file is categorized in relation to X
- X is referenced in the filename
- X is referenced in the description
- X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless
- from other contextual clues (eg by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader), X is the reason for the creation of the file."
The first four of the six points all apply to this image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- If you think that the file should not be named "Burj Khalifa", feel free to rename it, but that's not a reason for deletion. Otherwise no new arguments since the previous RfD are added. --A.Savin 15:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per A.Savin. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
The buildings shown are all copyrighted. The de minimis test requires that if the copyrighted works were removed that the average viewer would not notice the difference. That is obviously not the case here, as the only things in the image are the copyrighted buildings. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:De minimis in its current interpretation (and not in the one "invented" by Jameslwoodward), and the previous request. --A.Savin 18:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Alexander, I suggest you read COM:De minimis more carefully. It is true that I have restated it in a simple to understand way, but consider:
- "So, for example, if the [copyrighted work] forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the [copyrighted work], there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the [copyrighted work] was 'just in the background'."
- " If the existence of the [copyrighted work] was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area. "
- "It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster" and is placed within the category Advertising posters."
- "A useful test may be to ask whether the photograph would be as good or as useful if the [copyrighted work] were to be masked out. If no, then it is difficult to argue that the [copyrighted work] is actually de minimis, even if the poster is small and is "in the background".
- The last of these is particularly relevant -- if you masked out all the buildings in this image, would the image be useful?
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- As stated several times, there is COM:DM policy with the "examples" section where there is explicitly stated that Burj Khalifa is DM in a Dubai cityscape. And that is the long-term practice on Commons regarding the non-FoP deltion requests. If you wish to change the policies, you have to start a proposal and gain sufficient support; because you are, just like me, only a Commons user, and not the police or something. And regarding the sentence with the masked poster, consider the "may be": it is possible, but not mandatory. What they mean is, that if the poster is retouched and no one notices the difference, then the poster certainly is DM. But that's not the same as "If the poster is retouched and everyone notices the difference, it is certainly not DM". --A.Savin 14:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There is no COM:FOP in UAE. How can the Burj Khalifa be DM? Its slap bang in the middle of the photo. And the other buildings are copyrighted too Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Another one who wants to change the policy without community consensus. --A.Savin 15:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete As I've mentioned in the previous request, if the image is full of copyrighted objects, I don't see how DM can apply. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- So if a city contains of 100 copyrighted buildings, that means that the 100 architects possess joint copyright over the city, I guess )) --A.Savin 15:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- If you want to interpret it this way, then yes. But what I meant was that lacking focus on a single copyrighted object doesn't immediately make the image a DM. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史)
- Missed the irony? --A.Savin 17:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- If you want to interpret it this way, then yes. But what I meant was that lacking focus on a single copyrighted object doesn't immediately make the image a DM. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史)
- So if a city contains of 100 copyrighted buildings, that means that the 100 architects possess joint copyright over the city, I guess )) --A.Savin 15:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: de minimis: the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Image en double, de la même origine, voir > File:GARNIER-Tony Une-cite-industrielle-usine-metallurgique.jpg Gnrc (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: l'un est un redirect de l'autre O_o. Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
J'ai publié un autre schéma similaire à celui-ci. L'erreur de ces deux schémas est de mélanger les professions et les concepts. SylvainChavas (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 16:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiefff666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://zabinstivlci.webnode.cz/o-klubu/
- File:RIO 2008.jpg
- File:ŽV 1993 Obřany.jpg
- File:ŽV 1988.jpg
- File:ŽV 2018-19 3.místo CL.jpg
- File:KRAJ pohár 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)--Chiefff666 (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Webová stránka https://zabinstivlci.webnode.cz/o-klubu/ ze které jsou příslušné fotografie použity je stránka, které jsem já editorem a na kterou píšu všechny příspěvky a využívám fotografie na které mám vlastnické právo, jelikož všechny patří do historického archívu sportovního klubu jehož jsem majitelem. Díky.--Chiefff666 (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Na všech použitých fotografiích jsem zobrazen i já sám osobně fotografie jsou mým vlastnictvím!--Chiefff666 (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Adriaen Backer - Daniel Niellius staalmeester van Alkmaar.jpg, but lacking full color information. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- You don't need to delete the file, just use the template for "superceded". This leaves all links (including external links) intact. Jane023 (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- What (external) links? Vincent Steenberg (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I left a redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Nederlandse schepen op de rede van Texel in het midden de 'Gouden Leeuw', het vlaggeschip van Cornelis Tromp, SK-A-8.jpg
[edit]
Earlier version of File:Nederlandse schepen op de rede van Texel; in het midden de 'Gouden Leeuw', het vlaggeschip van Cornelis Tromp Rijksmuseum SK-A-8.jpeg. From the same source. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, left a redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Woelige zee met een Nederlands jacht Woelige zee met Nederlands jacht onder zeil, SK-A-11.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Woelige zee met Nederlands jacht onder zeil. - Rough seas with a Dutch yacht under sail (Ludolf Backhuysen, 1694).jpg, from the same source, but lacking full color information. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, left a redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
._Raadpensionaris_van_Holland,_SK-A-13.jpg){kind=link}
._Raadpensionaris_van_Holland,_SK-A-13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Grand Pensionary Johan de Witt.jpg, from the same source, but lacking full color information. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
._Raadpensionaris_van_Holland,_SK-A-13.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, left a redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
._Raadpensionaris_van_Holland,_SK-A-13.jpg){kind=link}
图片下方写着“版权所有，侵权必究！”。 Enmingyan (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
