Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![36 File:Abdur Rahman Bikash "The A.R.B.".jpg](#File:Abdur_Rahman_Bikash_"The_A.R.B.".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Grupp_3,_YORKSHIRETERRIER,_NO_UCH_SE_UCH_Oxzar_Amazing_Bel’s_Toffy_(24310212305).jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![78 File:Shawana Francis aka "Dirti Diana".jpg](#File:Shawana_Francis_aka_"Dirti_Diana".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![120 File:"Mes yeux" - Huguette 1992 Claire (23416553893).jpg](#File:"Mes_yeux"_-_Huguette_1992_Claire_(23416553893).jpg){kind=link}
![131 File:Плавуча АЕС "Академік Ломоносов", квітень 2018 року.jpg](#File:Плавуча_АЕС_"Академік_Ломоносов",_квітень_2018_року.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Deletion requests/File:OOjs UI icon advanced.svg
undesirable redirect Suzukaze-c (talk) 03:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: unnecessary redirect after the file was renamed to "File:En-uk-anhedonic.oga". The file was wrongly named as the recording is of a person saying anhedonic, not lorry. — SGconlaw (talk) 03:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy, uncontroversial. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
double. File:Conference Hall yeshuv hadaat.jpg חיים 7 (talk) 06:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
double. File:Conference Hall yeshuv hadaat.jpg חיים 7 (talk) 06:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; scaled-down duplicate. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Low-res unused image of questionable value. Kaldari (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Low res unused image of questionable value. Kaldari (talk) 01:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete: we have better quality educationally useful pictures on this topic. -- CptViraj (📧) 01:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Low quality unused image of questionable value. Kaldari (talk) 01:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) No copy found on the Internet. Yann (talk) 06:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Is a horizontal flip of this picture without Japanese text (third picture in https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/oxygen-destroyer-1-studio-scale-prop-1813726042). --Gusama Romero </talk> 08:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OK. I didn't find this on Google Images. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - LTA. Cross-wiki vandal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Prince-au-Léogâne/Archive Quakewoody (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- requesting SPEEDY DELETE, but the vandal removed the tag. Quakewoody (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Category:Joél Filsaime this Category:Joél Filsaime because it is currently in usage on Simple Wikipedia, Wikidata and should not be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. 172.58.11.33 08:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Promotional spam. Has no place on our projects. Take the garbage out. Hiàn (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
The software in the photo is sendapp, not free software. Violation of COM:SS#Software. Catherine Laurence 13:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As a copyright violation it is a speedy delete. --Herby talk thyme 13:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Commons is not for self-promotion or biographical articles. DMacks (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Article so speedy and gone. --Herby talk thyme 15:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Other, Nonsense Ecritures (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't talk gibberish (NONSENSE, if you do not understand proper English). – Flix11 (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Gif uploaded to be used for nonsens article TherasTaneel (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Content intended as Vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 21:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Kriti Kharbanda at the special screening of the film Guest iin London at PVR Icon (08).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn, the film is called Guest iin London, this does not indicate where the photograph was taken. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept, nomination withdrawn by nominator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Nushrat Bharucha at the special screening of the film Guest iin London at PVR Icon (24).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn, the film is called Guest iin London, this does not indicate where the photograph was taken. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept, nomination withdrawn. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Sanya Malhotra at the special screening of the film Guest iin London at PVR Icon (07).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn, the film is called Guest iin London, this does not indicate where the photograph was taken. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Close as kept, nomination withdrawn by nominator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, not own work, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:L'Épinoche accosté à Cabano.jpg
- File:Parc Clair Soleil Cabano.jpg
- File:Ancienne gare ferroviaire de Cabano.jpg
- File:Couvent de Cabano (rue Bérubé).jpg
- File:Intérieur de l'Église de Cabano.jpg
- File:Ancienne église Saint-Mathias de Cabano.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Owl 5.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Owl 6.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Owl 4.jpg
- File:Pierre bérubé exposition Grey Owl 3.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Owl 2.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Owl 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, clear & blatant derivative work, false info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Old photos, clearly not own work
- File:Cabano Exposition Grey Owl 1976 (3).jpg
- File:Cabano Exposition Grey Owl 1976 (2).jpg
- File:Cabano Exposition GreyOwl 1976.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé exposition Grey Ow septembre 1976.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, record above, and pcp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeunesse44: Thank you for your email. You would need to prove that you took them yourselves. Please comment here Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per Gbawden analysis. --Webfil (talk) 04:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Also please delete File:Église Saint-Mathias brûlée en 1972.jpg, another old photo by the same uploader. FunnyMath (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Started a DR for that image. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Église Saint-Mathias brûlée en 1972.jpg. FunnyMath (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Unlikely claims of own work on documents and photographs.
- File:Luxembourg Allocution P.B.pdf
- File:Allocution de Pierre Bérubé Luxembourg 2005.jpg
- File:BIBLIOGRAPHIE DE PRESSE Pierre Bérubé.pdf
- File:Entête du journal Le Touladi (1987).jpg
- File:Défusion (pétition concernant la défusion de Témisouata-sur-le-Lac).jpg
- File:La plage municipale de Cabano.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé Ph. D.jpg
- File:Pierre Bérubé, Ph. D.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, record above, and pcp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Probable copyvio per previous record.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; user blocked. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Armando Tavera, Ejecutivo, Escrito, Diseñador y Productor de Cine Mexicano.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Escrito, Diseñador y Productor de Cine Mexicano 3.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Escrito, Diseñador y Productor de Cine Mexicano 6.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Escrito, Diseñador y Productor de Cine Mexicano 2.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Artista Mexicano.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Escrito, Diseñador y Productor de Cine Mexicano.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera Escrito y Diseñador Mexicano 1.jpg
- File:Gemelos Tavera.jpg
- File:Armando Vázquez Tavera.jpg
- File:Armando Tavera.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: More unused files. Commons is not a private photo album. NOTE: These files were used in now-deleted hoax articles by uploader and then again by their sockpuppet on en WP.
CactusWriter (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I fail to see how these documents about investments can have any relevance to the scope of this project.
- File:Jimenez Torres Investments.pdf
- File:Investments Vanguard Jorge Jimenez 15.pdf
- File:Acquisition.pdf
Herby talk thyme 08:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all. These appear to be part of an elaborate joke / hoax being perpetrated by the uploader to claim that Torres is the richest man in Puerto Rico. (See en:Draft:Jorge A. Jimenez Torres.) If the numbers in these documents were to be believed, they would make Jimenez the wealthiest man in the world; a claim which surely would have been uncovered by now and not need a new draft article. WikiDan61 (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Aaah and that draft has gone so "out of scope" too. Thanks for the link. --Herby talk thyme 16:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Lo subí por error CentralTime301 (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Lo sentimos, esta imagen no es interesante para una enciclopedia CentralTime301 (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Lo subí por error CentralTime301 (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Magazines of Japan
[edit]Images from copyrighted magazine.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe delete as low-quality and fuzzy, outside COM:SCOPE. But there is no copyright-base reason to delete these, as claimed. These bogus DRs from Yuraily Lic nee to stop, or be stopped. They're becoming a serious time-sink for other editors. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Yuraily_Lic Andy Dingley (talk) 23:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Obvious copyvios. --Yann (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no exif. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Content created as advertisement (G10). --Эlcobbola talk 15:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shemar8810 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly OOS
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shemar8810 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.
- File:Shemar Childs.jpg
- File:Shemar Childs header image.jpg
- File:Shemar Childs photoshoot image 2.jpg
- File:Shemar Childs shirtless posing with flowers.jpg
- File:Shemar Childs photoshoot image 1.jpg
- File:Shemar Childs smiling in black and white.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 14:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Say Thu Htet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:ေစသူထက္ ျျမန္မာအဆိုေတာ္.jpg
- File:ေစသူထက္ အဆိုေတာ္ ေေစာင္းပညာရွင္.jpg
- File:ထင္း႐ႈး၇ိပ္.jpg
- File:သီဟေက်ာ္ျမန္မာမႈေတးဂီတအဖြဲ႕.jpg
- File:ေစသူထက္.jpg
- File:ေစသူထက္ ငယ္ဘ၀.jpg
- File:Say Thu Htet.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Say Thu Htet (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:University of Culture.jpg
- File:Kachin State Myanmar Traditional Arts Competition .jpg
- File:Myanmar Traditional Arts Competition .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete all per nom. And also File:Mahagita Vocal Competition .jpg
Deleted as copyright violations. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Tons of similar images (often with different cropping) all over the web. No evidence this uploader owns the original (or even if it's an original photo vs a screenshot from the program DMacks (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 09:23, 27 August 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:หน้ากากเป็ดน้อย.jpg: Tons of similar images (often with different cropping) all over the web. No evidence this uploader owns the original (or even if it's an original photo vs a screenshot from the program --Krdbot 13:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 () msali raso 14:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 14:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
![14:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-أحمد_الحيدي_القرمودي-2019-08-22T14:34:00.000Z-File:Abdur_Rahman_Bikash_"The_A.R.B.".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete and likewise:
Deleted: per COM:CSD#F10 by DMacks. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
![03:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-Tulsi_Bhagat-2019-08-29T03:26:00.000Z-File:Abdur_Rahman_Bikash_"The_A.R.B.".jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Based on filename, it's a screencap or web-download from an uncited source. "Not own work as claimed" is a separate concern from COM:EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shiva pandit ABVP (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:प्रदेश सह मंत्री जी के साथ.jpg
- File:भाई चारा.jpg
- File:Dr.Mahesh Sharma सांसद गौतमबुद्ध नगर.jpg
- File:प्रिय मित्र अंकित जी.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and metadata says those are from Facebook. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS. Out of scope. User has warnings for similar uploads. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, Tinyeye showed a ton of results. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable person, likely to be self promotion. Themightyquill (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal/promotional image (digital signature). 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nakul Chandra Barman (talk) 10:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nakul Chandra Barman (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, redundant image of questionable educational value. AshFriday (talk) 04:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
{{Db-author}}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Looks to be personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Elle est de mauvaise qualité, et n'est pas à jour. Montréal-Est (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is used on many pages, from ar:مونتريال إيست (كيبك) to sv:Montréal-Est (ort) and on Montréal-Est (Q139040). Under Commons policy (COM:INUSE), poor quality (of which outdatedness is a part) is not a reason to delete files that are in use. --bjh21 (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)- Keep, per Bjh21. Ground Zero (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Deku-shrub as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Misleading nonsense In use. Yann (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment In use in multiple projects; not a speedy candidate -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure what exactly is wrong with this simple item. Attempted to ask the deletion nominator multiple times.[1][2][3]. X1\ (talk) 00:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Clearnet_(networking)#File:Deepweb_graphical_representation.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This is misleading nonsense Deku-shrub (talk) 12:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
The dark and deep web are being conflated. This is a common error Deku-shrub (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- What is the problem with the picture. Can you explain in details. conflated is not a clear thing. You must explan what is the problem. Strongly oppose against the deletion --Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've written about this both for Wikipedia and at length. Here's a simpler one from dictionary.com. Deku-shrub (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep absolutely nothing wrong with this image. AshFriday (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on it:Web sommerso, ru:Глубокая сеть, ru:Даркнет, and vi:Dark web. Under COM:NPOV, files that are in use on other projects should not be deleted from Commons for being inaccurate, or even for being misleading nonsense. --bjh21 (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Cheers, deleted there too Deku-shrub (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- ... and ml:ഡാർക്ക് വെബ് and wikibooks:Lentis/The Deep Web. --bjh21 (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Cheers, deleted there too Deku-shrub (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Image is simplistic, to be metaphorical: it has an iceberg, i.e. much below the surface. Not a definitive image, but has its uses. X1\ (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- That's correct for the deep web, but the image contains dark web content that's why it's misleading Deku-shrub (talk) 15:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: Elaborate here about the en:dark web regarding the image, as I am not going to an essay at
pirate.london. It feels you are too close to the subject to see the cartoonishness and (albeit limited) usability of the image. You express unnecessarily intense emotions about the image being "wrong, wrong, wrong". If the image is so fatally flawed it would be easy for you to describe that here... X1\ (talk) 23:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC) - @Deku-shrub: Dear friend this is an svg image. I welcome you to fix the conflicting part in this svg and reupload it as a new version instead of completely deleting it. You only saying that this is wrong and you are not explaning what was the problem. I think this is not good. And I feels like you are attacking me continuously. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Just read this https://www.dictionary.com/e/dark-web/ Deku-shrub (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: No. (Again), elaborate here. You have all (3) Keeps, and your last attempt to delete failed. I plan to restore the images at the articles in which you failed to do BRD soon, if the group is not convinced the image is so "wrong, wrong, wrong" that it must be deleted without modification. X1\ (talk) 23:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Just read this https://www.dictionary.com/e/dark-web/ Deku-shrub (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: Elaborate here about the en:dark web regarding the image, as I am not going to an essay at
- That's correct for the deep web, but the image contains dark web content that's why it's misleading Deku-shrub (talk) 15:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Same as https://stalkpub.com/media/2088155239783252618/Bz6niCHJsKK えのきだたもつ (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Comedia
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:Cholo Juanito y Richard Douglas.jpg
- File:Comedia mal-asana.jpg
- File:Diego Hernández .jpg
- File:Una Vida ORIGINAL.png
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality, too dark Olybrius (talk) 13:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private photo, out of project scope and no use on any page. Catherine Laurence 13:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beiji
[edit]- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1798573468).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1797732263).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1797733531).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1797733335).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1797732669).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1798576262).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1798576092).jpg
- File:漠河景色 Northernmost China--Mohe (1798575498).jpg
- File:留下我的气味 - panoramio.jpg
- File:终于找着北了！-) - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These images are small size and unused files. Also private photos. --颜邯 (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Honghe Farm
[edit]
Totally irrelevant to this category. Also unused and small size. --颜邯 (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnwest21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:John West & Martin Lawrence.jpg
- File:John West's Film A Sista's Revenge.png
- File:John W & Robert Lawrence Martin Brother.jpg
- File:John West in Waist deep scene front passenger.jpg
- File:John West on set Filming his scene.jpg
- File:John West ready for scene.jpg
- File:John West in Work out Training.jpg
- File:John West waiting on flight.jpg
- File:John West Filming.jpg
- File:John West with 2pac Look a Like.jpg
- File:John West film BarBQ.jpg
- File:John West & a fan.png
- File:John West Focus.jpg
- File:John West on Film set.jpg
- File:John West & Robert Lawrence ( Martin Lawrence).jpg
- File:John West aka J.J.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lawliet132 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. Possible copyvio.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fantastic Tamila (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be used for self promo.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author can not be Director Surendra Reddy. His facebook post can not be source for license. Apart from there is no surviving photo of Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy who died before 1850 as photography came to India much later. This is a false picture. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; we need more info about date taken etc. Until then this could be used as fair use on WP but not here. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted image from http://www.jgroup-me.com/aboutus.aspx?code=IMADJOMAA Tracy Von Doom (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
File:(2 version) Grupp 3, YORKSHIRETERRIER, NO UCH SE UCH Oxzar Amazing Bel’s Toffy (24310212305).jpg
[edit]_Grupp_3,_YORKSHIRETERRIER,_NO_UCH_SE_UCH_Oxzar_Amazing_Bel%E2%80%99s_Toffy_(24310212305).jpg){kind=link}
_Grupp_3,_YORKSHIRETERRIER,_NO_UCH_SE_UCH_Oxzar_Amazing_Bel%E2%80%99s_Toffy_(24310212305).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the dog is a mop! what more do you need!! 204.111.204.170 18:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep inappropriate nomination, useful photo of this breed of dog and of dog grooming, used in several Wikipedia articles. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, that is what Yorkshire Terriers look like. Cavalryman (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC).
- Keep: This file is used on ca:Terrier de Yorkshire, en:Terrier, en:Yorkshire Terrier, pt:Yorkshire terrier, and Yorkshire Terrier (Q39330). Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete used files for quality reasons. --bjh21 (talk) 13:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
the image from Internet. Copyvio? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Not used. Self-promotion. Also there are persons of the same name, like here ([4]) Estopedist1 (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Not used. Self-promotion. Also there are persons of the same name, like here ([5]) Estopedist1 (talk) 19:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of the project scope? Little or no educational value. Not used Estopedist1 (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep Useful to ilustrate dust on objects (remote control keys, specifically - only picture of the kind in that category), in particular using a 105mm lens focal length on a NIKON D5300.-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, nonsense file name, nonsense description Estopedist1 (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep non sense request. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, nonsense file name, nonsense description Estopedist1 (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep non sense request. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
This is not Thomas Molson, this is his son, John Thomas Molson. (http://collections.musee-mccord.qc.ca/en/collection/artifacts/I-12097.1) 128.100.218.196 19:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion;; feel free to rename. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unwanted material 73.161.139.229 23:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 00:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Image in scope and educationally worthfull. There is an World Naked Bike Ride articles in 22 languages, besides the use of nudity as an form of demonstration, "political protest, street theatre, party-on-wheels, streaking, public nudity and clothing-optional recreation". No valid reason given to delete. The IP is the one that considers this image and unwanted image. And besides, as many other times, how those IP´s seem to always find this kind of imagery,if they consider it unwanted? The filename and categories all point that this image contains nudity! Was it an regret on seeing this image? An accident it wasn't for sure. If you consider this material as "unwanted material" don´t look at it, specially if it is clearly marked as an image containing nudity.
- Also AshFriday, an user almost entirely devoted to comment or open DR´s related with nudity, or what he calls "smut" in is user page, doesn't expand besides the usual two words "rationale". Why is this image "educationally worthless"? Tm (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per as Tm said, the photo is taken at a public social-movement event, not merely a private situation. Also the user AshFriday apparently makes his/her comment like a copy/paste of few sentences on this DR page, so the argument of deletion is void and invalid. Puramyun31 (talk) 09:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep nothing wrong with this picture and has educational value --Hannolans (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It's a photo of two random people standing in front of a bike. We already have much better images illustrating the World Naked Bike Ride. The file is redundant as well as educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- File in Commons is not necessarily required for illustrating pages on Wikimedia projects exclusively but can be used in outside of them. (That's why Commons files are freely-licensed.) once the photo is obviously taken at public social-movement event and categorized, the photo can't merely be called "smut". Also per AshFriday's user page, the user apparently seems to be anxious and has a routinely hostile manner about nudity-related topic. Threatening with excessive DR against nudity even "political protest, street theatre, party-on-wheels, streaking, public nudity and clothing-optional recreation" as AshFriday does is not good. Puramyun31 (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Subject is off centre and cannot be straightened without significant loss; not an effective illustration of the subject matter at any rate. Verne Equinox (talk) 01:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; orphan very poor photo of common object. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Rsteen (talk) 04:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HagerGroup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Wrong license, no permission.
Yann (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Orphan personal photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad Yungelita (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep (again it was nominated before but kept). Not sure what above means, but it is part of a human body. --Hannolans (talk) 06:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: rationale appears to involve privacy issues. AshFriday (talk) 07:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Obvious Flickr-washing from an obvious paid editor. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
![23:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-World's_Lamest_Critic-2019-08-22T23:03:00.000Z-File:Shawana_Francis_aka_"Dirti_Diana".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
![08:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-Gbawden-2019-08-29T08:00:00.000Z-File:Shawana_Francis_aka_"Dirti_Diana".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by KuznetsovMS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Ivan Razumov, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Ivan Razumov. Hard Patient, 2019.jpg
- File:Ivan Razumov. Little Mozart, 2019.jpg
- File:Ivan Razumov. Lunatics, 2019.jpg
- File:Ivan Razumov. Jung or Freud, 2019.jpg
- File:Ivan Razumov. Napoleon and Muses, 2019.jpg
- File:Ivan Razumov. Empty Throne, 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
(changing from {{Copyvio}}) What is happening here? This file is distributed under Free Art Licence 1.3. This file has been reviewed by a reviewer. How on Earth is this image anything even remotely something that "does not have sufficient information on its copyright status"? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre and Jcb: Please comment on this. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- The current license template is not recognized by the system as a license. (As far as I can see this is the only file using this FAL 1.3 template). So there are basically two options if we want to keep this file:
- Getting the FAL 1.3 license accepted by the system (the content of the license is probably fine, so that just somebody who is familiar with the coding will have to make this template recognized.)
- Finding another suitable license that is recognized by the system.
- Jcb (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- What "system"? Commons is here to collect educationally useful content available under a free licence. Ok, there was a disaster when a community has decided to abandon GNU FDL, but there was no such concensus against FAL ever. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Every new license template needs to be registered as an official license before it can be used. (I am unfamiliar with that part of the process). The file is now in the Files with no machine-readable license problem category. Jcb (talk) 09:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm not only unfamiliar, but didn't even know that there was some process to accept the files apart from OTRS/licence review. I guess... thank you for teaching me something new. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: see COM:MRD#Machine readable data set by license templates. You will notice several hidden spans on Template:FAL which contain the data. Your template should do the same. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm not only unfamiliar, but didn't even know that there was some process to accept the files apart from OTRS/licence review. I guess... thank you for teaching me something new. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Every new license template needs to be registered as an official license before it can be used. (I am unfamiliar with that part of the process). The file is now in the Files with no machine-readable license problem category. Jcb (talk) 09:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- What "system"? Commons is here to collect educationally useful content available under a free licence. Ok, there was a disaster when a community has decided to abandon GNU FDL, but there was no such concensus against FAL ever. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- The current license template is not recognized by the system as a license. (As far as I can see this is the only file using this FAL 1.3 template). So there are basically two options if we want to keep this file:
Deleted: still no readable license. Please feel free to request undeletion as soon as either the license is fixed or another valid license can be applied. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juman dundees (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded by Essam abd elfattah elwakil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not free and unhelpful
- File:121سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:101سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:111سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:91سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:71سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:61سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:51سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:41سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:1سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:3 (1)1سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:21سبب مغناطيسية الأرض.jpg
- File:Doc1 (1) علم الأنسان ما لم يعلم2.pdf
- File:جواز السفر الخاص بي.jpg
1%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%A8_%D9%85%D8%BA%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%8A%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B1%D8%B6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hungarian forint (coin) images uploaded by Timur lenk
[edit]- File:HUFf 2 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 2 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1948 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1948 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1948 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1948 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1946 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1946 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1947 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1947 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 20 1948 szabharc reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 20 1948 szabharc obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1948 szabharc reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1948 szabharc obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1948 szabharc reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1948 szabharc obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 2 1963 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 2 1963 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1965 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1965 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1950 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1950 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1976 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1976 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1961 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1961 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1987 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1987 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1966 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1966 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1987 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1987 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1949 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1949 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1966 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1966 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1989 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 1 1989 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1952 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1952 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1960 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1960 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1965 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1965 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1977 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 2 1977 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1967 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1967 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1979 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1979 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1989 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 5 1989 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 200 1994 reverse.jpg
- File:HUFcoin 200 1994 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 200 1992 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 200 1992 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 100 1995 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 100 1995 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 2 1990 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 2 1990 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1990 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 5 1990 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1990 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 10 1990 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1990 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 20 1990 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1990 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFf 50 1990 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1972 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1972 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1985 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 10 1985 obverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 20 1989 reverse.JPG
- File:HUFcoin 20 1989 obverse.JPG
Image of 3-dimensional objects (coins) require license of the image, which the uploader provided on all of these, and of the object. A couple of these have been edited to remove that license and replace it with {{HU banknote}}, which specifically excludes coins. COM:CUR Hungary states "The copyright status for designs of coins should be researched individually. Out-of-copyright banknotes and coins can use {{PD-old}}." There is no evidence that such research has been done on these. --BigrTex (talk) 22:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tokyo Metro
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted posters or advertisements.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Good point; I reviewed the image license, but missed the London bit. --GRuban (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Good point; I reviewed the image license, but missed the London bit. --GRuban (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 01 Chiyaan Vikram, Lakshmi Rai.jpg
[edit]
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Confirmed by https://bollynewsuk.com/2012/06/14/thaandavam-press-conference-in-london/ Verbcatcher (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Confirmed by https://bollynewsuk.com/2012/06/14/thaandavam-press-conference-in-london/ Verbcatcher (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Confirmed by https://bollynewsuk.com/2012/06/14/thaandavam-press-conference-in-london/ Verbcatcher (talk) 22:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Confirmed by https://bollynewsuk.com/2012/06/14/thaandavam-press-conference-in-london/ Verbcatcher (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The description indicates that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The description indicates that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The description indicates that this was taken in London. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in New York. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Catalonian police (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Mossos d'esquadra UMAE.JPG
- File:Unitat de mitjans aeris.jpg
- File:EC-135 mossos d'esquadra.JPG
- File:Mossos desquadra helicopter.JPG
- File:Mossos d'esquadra jornada emergencies pirineu 2013.jpg
- File:Mossos unidad de helicópteros.JPG
- File:Mitjans aeris mossos desquadra helicopter.jpg
- File:Helicopteros Mossos Montserrat.JPG
- File:Unitat de Mitjans Aeris Mossos d'Esquadra.jpg
Didym (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in France. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in France Verbcatcher (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in France Verbcatcher (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The title and description indicate that this was taken in France. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Shanze1 (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 12:09, 1 September 2019 UTC: No source since 22 August 2019 --Krdbot 19:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation of a Getty image - see https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/jofra-archer-of-sussex-poses-for-a-portrait-in-the-vitality-news-photo/939227930 and https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/jofra-archer-of-sussex-poses-for-a-portrait-in-the-vitality-news-photo/939230718 Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Obviously non-free software screenshot, violation of COM:SS. Catherine Laurence 13:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a scan from an illustrated magazine and not own work! Photographer seems to be Joshua Davis (faintly seeable), COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Commons:Derivative works from poster. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright of a TV station (lower right in pic) Wedjet (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Seems to be some sort of personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1970s 2D work, not PD. This was uploaded in a batch Flickr upload. Mindmatrix 16:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Access rights owned by Xilinx. File copied from here: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/lec23-130220031438-phpapp01/95/fpga-32-638.jpg?cb=1361961569 Yuriz (talk) 09:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Image copied from here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/configurable-logic-block Yuriz (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: seems to be a derivatiev work of [6] 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from author Romualds Gibovskis is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:حمودي النداوي
[edit]Unhelpful and seemingly derivative works
- File:Back from earth.jpg
- File:Dark city.jpg
- File:Hope Butterfly.jpg
- File:Lost way.jpg
- File:Southpaw.Des.jpg
- File:Wating.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
unused handwritten sketch with no obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; uncat since Oct 2015. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not used. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
![09:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-Estopedist1-2019-08-22T09:00:00.000Z-File:"Mes_yeux"_-_Huguette_1992_Claire_(23416553893).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
![18:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/08/22#c-Ymblanter-2019-09-04T18:11:00.000Z-File:"Mes_yeux"_-_Huguette_1992_Claire_(23416553893).jpg){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:6792Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 10.jpg
- File:6804Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 01.jpg
- File:6804Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 02.jpg
- File:6829Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 12.jpg
- File:6829Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 13.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Philippines; my sibling came from abroad and bestowed upon me this food gifts for which reason I want memories, hence, I have no objection to the deletion and respectfully submit, very sincerely Judgefloro 07:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Response: You can delete, It's no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eatsnacklins (talk • contribs) 12:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
keine Rechte-Freigabe ersichtlich Grundsatz (talk) 08:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Keine Rechte-Freigabe ersichtlich Grundsatz (talk) 08:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused screenshot with no obvious educational value. Only upload by this editor. Malcolma (talk) 08:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Flag with no meaningful description, should be SVG if useful. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Possibly OOS. Group photo seems to be derived from somewhere (word at the bottom right)
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 09.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 08.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 07.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 04.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 06.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 05.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 01.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 03.jpg
- File:Los del Olivo - Folklore 02.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Small size. The only file uploaded by uploader. Can be seen her (from 14/03/2018). The file uploaded in 21 May 2019. -- Geagea (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, it has been published before it was uploaded. Source: here User3204 (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution file without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. The uploader have copyvio warnings. -- 83.220.239.77 12:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think, that it is copyvio. Very similar image can by founded here. --Patriccck (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The company disagrees that its logo does not meet the threshold of originality. In addition, people may confuse copyright clearance with trademark clearance. We ask that our logo be removed from your project please. 165.249.0.41 20:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO. The plea by the company is irrelevant to Commons. --Leyo 20:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Leyo, the licensing is correct, since over 10 years. -- User: Perhelion 21:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no FoP for 2D works in UK, and not de minimis Yann (talk) 04:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Clear DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alinea as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no source, no photgrapher mentioned. Quite possibly PD, so speedy not warranted. Storkk (talk) 09:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, false source, false date, false license. Seen uncropped eg at [7]. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion the file is out of project scope. You can change MET in center with any big company's name in the world, here's nothing specific to MET. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; orphan, ucat since Feb. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama permission only applies to photographs taken in India. The description indicates that this was taken in Morocco. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Indeed, I can see the Arabic text on the background. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019082210003763 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Ephraim Nyaganga). Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture is not used in any article on Wikipedia and is therefore not needed anymore. It can be deleted. Tatjanagr (talk) 22:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Is this the same Wolfgang Bremer who has an article in de:wikipedia? If so, it is in project scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Based on the age mentioned in the article and based on the person shown in the picture, there seems to be an age discrepancy. Therefore assuming it's not the same person. -- Tatjanagr (talk) 04:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS, selfie of the flickrstream author. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Watermarked, possible copyvio. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of paronama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- But freedom of panorama in Spain. This photo was taken in Burgos, Spain Zarateman (talk) 08:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW, no FoP for 2D works in UK, and not de minimis. Yann (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Not own works, but derivatives of historical photos [8], copyright status is unclear.
Sealle (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Зеница 20180729 220725.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214153.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214608.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214128.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212552.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212542.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211835.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212252.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211607.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211024.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211557.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 210937.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 210054.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 204804.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180728 095815.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210909.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210927.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210955.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 211904.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 211013.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180724 223545.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180724 223604.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180712 220510.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ies: Many images can be seen as with grain-like effect and not with low quality.
- Could you check File:Зеница 20180728 095815.jpg again? --Obsuser (talk) 10:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also, low quality to be useful for an educational purpose is not correct for probably all of the images uploaded (it can be clearly seen what is represented and can be used for educational purposes, e.g. geography, indeed). Out of project scope is a very funny joke. --Obsuser (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works of recent maps, texts, and other documents, and no FOP.
- File:Зеница 20190821 175555.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175536.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175526.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174951.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174937.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174920.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174857.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174846.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174831.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174820.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174802.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174318.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174140.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 173137.jpg
Yann (talk) 04:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Could you give detailed rationale and cite Commons copyright guidelines for deleting File:Зеница 20190821 175526.jpg, File:Зеница 20190821 174318.jpg, File:Зеница 20190821 174140.jpg and File:Зеница 20190821 173137.jpg? It's general history text (simple sentences), nothing such as essay or literary/poetic work!? Same applies for File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg which is just a short description of images. Thank you.
- I see now problem with other images (Bosnian Kingdom mostly, and recent maps), graphical content is present instead of historical image content so I agree with deletion (except for those cited right above in my comment). --Obsuser (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bosnia and Herzegovina#Freedom of panorama. The texts here are recent and too long, so they have a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: The free use of the works permanently located in squares, parks, streets or other places accessible by the public shall be permitted. – These cited files in my comment above are permanently located in the Museum of Zenica City and accessible by public. Should they stay then?
- Per shall not be reproduced in three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work or used for gaining economic advantage, can I "reproduce" the files in order not to break FoP rule by retyping the text in simple free font on a white background? Not important if they are recetly created and "too long" (whatever it meant, on File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg they are not too long, are they!?) if they are not essays or literar works (per Template:PD-text and/or Template:PD-textlogo), so I think you missed a point here.
- Please answer both questions. Thank you.
- PS Also note Template:PD-ineligible says about "common property and contains no original authorship" and here this is the case because no author would be possibly given for a museum work/collage and its description, and text/sentences are of general historical nature. --Obsuser (talk) 07:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bosnian law allows only non-commercial reproduction, as explained on that page. For Commons, we need a permission for any use, including commercial ones. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Yes. But aren't both history as a science and public museum content non-comercial? I don't see anything comercial in this, so can I retype it and if not why exactly? Thanks. --Obsuser (talk) 09:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bosnian law allows only non-commercial reproduction, as explained on that page. For Commons, we need a permission for any use, including commercial ones. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The authors of these works hold the copyright. B&H has FOP only for non-commercial use. Commons requires that any work hosted here must be free for any use by anybody anywhere. Anything on Commons must be free, so that you could copy it and sell the copies, which is clearly not the case for works from B&H. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
not used. Bad pdf. Uncategorized. Can be easily recreated if needed Estopedist1 (talk) 06:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This is an image of a whole museum display, of which the background mural is an intrinsic part. FoP-UK does not apply to 2D works. DMacks (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Viewer people (talk · contribs)
[edit]dubious claims of own work.
- File:Yvan Attal et Léolo Victor-Pujebet.jpg
- File:Denis Podalydes et Léolo Victor-Pujebet.jpg
- File:Léolo Victor-Pujebet - Dark Eyes.jpg
- File:Léolo Victor-Pujebet - Avant-Première "Apothéose".jpg another version was published before the commons file at https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/fr/projects/apotheose/tabs/news .
Roy17 (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ahmad252 as no permission (No permission since) No copy found on the Internet. Yann (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Hi Yann. Please check this website, I think it can be found there (not the same quality but the same image). Ahmadtalk 08:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- This web page is more recent that the image on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not used. Out of the project scope? Little or no educational value. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From Facebook. No permission. Plausibly PD, not a speedy candidate. More information on date and authorship needed to determine copyright status. Storkk (talk) 09:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed alhayderi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:تكريم مدير القناة بشار الساعدي من قبل ابو مهدي المهندس.jpg
- File:صورة ارشيفية لأول افتتاح لمؤسسة الخليج.jpg
- File:الاستاذ بشار الساعدي مدير قناة الفرقدين في مؤسسة الخليج.jpg
- File:بشار الساعدي في مقر القناة.jpg
- File:الاستاذ بشار الساعدي مدير قناة الفرقدين مع والده.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only used on a personal page but no meaningful contributions by this uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Space Battleship Yamato
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
No permission (same photo on Facebook [9]) Tyseria (d) 14:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Logo is considered a complex one per COM:TOO China, cropping might be ok. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --予弦 04:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Church built in 2002-2004 by Igino Pineschi, which is still alive: therefore the building is being subject to copyright. 3knolls (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Wrong licence. It derives from a literary (not legislative) work of the Greek Parliament which was published in 2008. Texniths (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
The license linked from this template is incompatible with Commons:Licensing since it requires the material "being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context", which amounts to prohibiting derivative works, at least ones the Indian Army might consider inaccurate or misleading. I also see no evidence that it's irrevocable. Huon (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Last time my files were removed from Wikimedia-commons with the exact same reason. HIAS (talk) 09:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "Copyright © 2019 All rights reserved." is the key, mentioned at the bottom of page. HIAS (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @HIAS: It seems you didn't even read the policy on the Indian Army website. :( Basically, images authored by the army are under the specified license. The rest of the website is ARR. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @HIAS: From what I can see, the files you uploaded were from Pakistan's ISPR website, whereas this is from Indian Army's website. What is the connection between the two? Or am I missing something here? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 12:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "Copyright © 2019 All rights reserved." is the key, mentioned at the bottom of page. HIAS (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep We already have had this discussion countless times. :( It was resolved that the restrictions are not copyright related. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann and earlier discussion. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - the template currently does not contain a license (if the template is supposed to be a license itself, a much better text is needed) - Jcb (talk) 16:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a copy of the permission from the Army website. What do you want else to be? As usual, nonsense comment. Yann (talk) 08:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you really think "it is allowed" sounds professional as a license? Well, if you think that your reactions to me are suitable, you probably won't understand the problem with this poor text either. Unfortunately you are completely loosing it apparently. Jcb (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- You have no credible argument whatsoever. This is only a revenge vote, because I accused you earlier of doing a very poor admin job. Yann (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Don't reflect your own way of handling things on me. Jcb (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have never done revenge voting. Yann (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- I came accross this supposed "license" because you did half work as usual. That's not revenge voting. The sole fact that you are so resentful does not make that you victims are too? Jcb (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Yann or 1997kB, where were those previous discussions? The template was created today and its talk page was empty. Even if we accept that "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately..." in a copyright policy is not "copyright related" (why wouldn't it be?), I don't see anything in the wording that says the license is irrevocable. Huon (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: Please see [10] and [11]. That's only the 2 of the more recent discussions. I am quite sure they were more earlier. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see a consensus regarding the implications of the "reproduced accurately" requirement there, and I see nothing at all about whether or not the license is revocable. Huon (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: Carl Lindberg, certainly one of the most knowledgeable contributors on copyright here, wrote: we've had many similar discussions on the "accurately" wording (or maybe it's "distortion") which also appears in the FoP clauses of some countries (Germany, Mexico) and decided that was about moral rights. The mention of "derogatory" also points that way, strongly. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, from India, said a similar thing. Blue Rasberry also agrees, as well as Jee, also from India, who also mentioned that we have had similar discussion earlier. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The Berne Convention, in its moral rights section, says Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation. The "free" status is based on the economic rights alone; moral rights are a Commons:Non-copyright restriction (in some countries, such rights never expire and cannot be transferred or given up). The Indian Army license seems to be claiming those moral rights to me -- the language matches up with that type of usage. Those are *always* restrictions, in many places in the world, even for "public domain" works. It would seem to be the "accurately" would be more in that sense (i.e. more of "not misleading"), and not in a "no derivative" economic rights sense. The wording is essentially the same as the original version of {{Attribution-IAF}} (the Air Force variant of this, and the subject of the previous discussions), which has now been redirected to GODL-India but that should be undone. The talk page of this new template should probably reference the other templates, since the "previous discussions" were for those and not this one particularly, and there are no pointers from here to find those. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg, how would, in your opinion, the Indian Army have to word that part of their copyright policy if they meant to make that a copyright restriction and not a "moral right" one? Can you please also explain why you think this license is itrevocable? Huon (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- They would explicitly mention derivative works, I would think, and at least restrict the term "reproduction". In the Indian law, most derivative works are included in the term "reproduction". It seems to be part of the same thought as "not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context", which is clearly moral rights, and not a separate restriction. As for revocability, there is nothing to say it's revocable, which generally means if you got it by an unlimited license, you still have it under that license. Much like if they don't mention any commercial use restrictions, then it's OK for commercial users too. We usually prefer more clarity on a quick license given by someone without much thought, but for a major governmental institution that would have gone through lawyers etc. The intent seems pretty clear. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- So in your opinion every license that doesn't explicitly mention that it's revocable is irrevocable? I would have thought that the opposite holds - if the Indian Army changes its copyright policy tomorrow, I don't think I can still continue to use their stuff because the policy today allows me to use it. Huon (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- You can no longer copy stuff off their page if they do that, certainly. Stuff already copied may still have the same license -- that was the legal agreement under which copying/reproduction was allowed. Courts could rule either way if neither "revocable" nor "irrevocable" are mentioned in the license -- historically, for simple non-exclusive licenses to particular people, I think it probably defaults to revocable. The usual understanding with "free" stuff these days may be different though, which could lead to different court results/expectations for licensing statements like this one. I'm not sure if there is a precedent along these lines. It's best to specify of course, but I don't think we should delete everything where we don't have full certainty. We have allowed stuff like {{Copyrighted free use}} since the beginning. For a major governmental entity, which should have carefully considered a licensing statement like that, and which government is moving in the direction of open licenses anyways, I don't think it's worth deletion over that point. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- So in your opinion every license that doesn't explicitly mention that it's revocable is irrevocable? I would have thought that the opposite holds - if the Indian Army changes its copyright policy tomorrow, I don't think I can still continue to use their stuff because the policy today allows me to use it. Huon (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- They would explicitly mention derivative works, I would think, and at least restrict the term "reproduction". In the Indian law, most derivative works are included in the term "reproduction". It seems to be part of the same thought as "not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context", which is clearly moral rights, and not a separate restriction. As for revocability, there is nothing to say it's revocable, which generally means if you got it by an unlimited license, you still have it under that license. Much like if they don't mention any commercial use restrictions, then it's OK for commercial users too. We usually prefer more clarity on a quick license given by someone without much thought, but for a major governmental institution that would have gone through lawyers etc. The intent seems pretty clear. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg, how would, in your opinion, the Indian Army have to word that part of their copyright policy if they meant to make that a copyright restriction and not a "moral right" one? Can you please also explain why you think this license is itrevocable? Huon (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Looking further, there is this stackexcange question "Are licenses irrevocable by default?" where the main answer says:
- A non-exclusive copyright license (such as most FOSS licenses) can be revoked at any time only if there was no consideration involved. The United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeal took this on in Jacobsen v. Katzer in 2008 and ruled that there is consideration exchanged in the use of FOSS by a licensee. This indicates that an FOSS license that's silent on revocation is likely revocable only for violation of it's conditions.
- While the court case doesn't specifically mention revocability, it may not be possible for existing uses since they author has gotten some consideration back (acknowledgement of the author, etc.) provided the terms of the license was followed. Neither of the acknowledged-free licenses {{MIT}} and {{BSD}} mention revocability either, and those are generally considered irrevocable (again, provided the conditions are adhered to). Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Looking further, there is this stackexcange question "Are licenses irrevocable by default?" where the main answer says:
- Keep Mostly per the discussion and my own comment at a similar 2016 conversation. I see a two objections here - that "being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner" is in conflict with Commons' requirement to allow derivative works, and that there is no mention of irrevocability. For the first point I interpret this to mean that they want attribution of the original work and also for an attribution to carry into derivative works, which is a normal request. For the second part the Creative Commons license does explicitly offer irrevocability, but we have not demanded such an explicit statement from other free culture licenses. Commons has never deconstructed the various licenses that we do allow and listed their essential and nonessential components; and if we ever did that, then based on precedent and allowing licenses without this part through so often that we would require it. I can support anyone raising the issue of irrevocability higher than this discussion but within this discussion, the status quo that I see is that there is nothing unusual about this license in that regard. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - "Commons has never deconstructed the various licenses that we do allow and listed their essential and nonessential components" - Yes, it has. See Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, fourth bullet point: "The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable." (Emphasis in the original.) Huon (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed, if a license is explicitly revocable, that is an issue. But for this template to be a problem, you would have to explain why the known-free license {{BSD}} is irrevocable while this one is not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The consensus appears to be that the license is valid, particularly per the arguments put forward by Yann, Carl and Blueraspberry. The license statement does need rewriting though. --Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)