Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Old & unused chemical structure; superseded by File:Structural formula of 2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 08:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 08:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 08:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotion of another famous youtuber, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project. Achim (talk) 10:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:ADVERT. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; deleted as speedy. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --Wdwd (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 11:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 11:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 11:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --Wdwd (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 11:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 11:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 11:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --Wdwd (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 15:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 15:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted as per CSD F10 by 1989. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 00:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:NUDE. This mislabeled file has no educational value. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
this is real picture of yash gawli it will will be use in wiki Yash gawli (talk) 20:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; deleted as copyvio, no free license at sourec. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation - See source: ign.com where i found ©1996-2019 Ziff Davis, LLC. IGN® is among the federally registered trademarks of IGN Entertainment, Inc. and may only be used with explicit written permission. - No permission - Also per COM:POSTER. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 17:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:21, 8 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Game artwork --Krdbot 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yash gawli (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete self promo. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: All recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 21:33, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yash gawli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete self promo. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
{{Copyviol}} (msali raso 22:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 22:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 21:05, 8 August 2019 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 01:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I no longer want my file, duplicata of [[:File:Consumers Distributing original logo.jpg Le moulin de la sorcière (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Dabayl (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 14:10, 9 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 15:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 15:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:XXIX Promoción.jpg
- File:Anuario 1980 1981.jpg
- File:XIII Promoción "Tcnel Juan Manuel Cagigal".png
- File:Neptalí Balza.png
- File:Neptalí Balza Ayaach.png
- File:Mario Camacho Carbone.jpg
- File:Anuario 1979 1980.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Falses dates, not own works. Please modify the dates of shooting and explain why images are public domain in Venezuela.
- File:XIV Promocion.jpg
- File:XII Promocion.jpg
- File:XI Promocion.jpg
- File:VII Promocion.jpg
- File:V Promocion.jpg
- File:III Promocion.jpg
- File:II Promocion.jpg
- File:19 Jesus Alberto Lozada.jpg
- File:18 Oscar Mendoza Santos.jpg
- File:14 Luis Romero Rigual.jpg
- File:13 Oscar Alberto Castro Sanchez.jpg
- File:Anuario 1959.jpg
- File:17 Morales Nieves.jpg
- File:Anuario 1975 1976.jpg
- File:Anuario 1971 1972.jpg
- File:Anuario 1977 1978.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Falses dates, not own works. Please modify the dates of shooting and explain why images are public domain in Venezuela.
- File:IV Promocion.jpg
- File:06 Jaime Padron Lozada.jpg
- File:04 Jose Dellan Estaba.jpg
- File:03 Freddy Malpica Perez.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Not own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
This photo is a"Photo from South Asian cartoon congress 2008: but who owns the copyright?. 2008 is just 11 years old. Leoboudv (talk) 02:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC) The copyrights owns by Arifur Rahman. I have recently uploaded to Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/arifur/48465626852/in/dateposted-public/ Photo was taken on my old camera. I have also posted in my blog https://cartoon1.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/photo/ I hope you will consider it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartoonistarif (talk • contribs) 03:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Cartoonist_Ranan_Lurie_in_Nepal_2008.jpeg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019080710001491. Ruthven (msg) 09:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 19:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use Иван Дулин (talk) 06:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Unidentified people (almost certainly non-notable). The image is not useful for illustrating anything, and is thus out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayende-Oficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal Photos
- File:Victor Gomez en vivo.jpg
- File:Victor Gomez sesion de fotos.jpg
- File:Frankk Lionn.jpg
- File:Victor Gomez, Frnakk Lionn Ayende 2.jpg
- File:Victor Gomez, Frankk Lionn Ayende.jpg
- File:Hugo Ayende.jpg
- File:Ayende Victor .jpg
- File:Logo ayende.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Franklin Singh Oyet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:User:Franklin Singh Oyet).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot, Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ManomayLLP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST
- File:Muddhu Muddagi.jpg
- File:Lacchhavva.jpg
- File:Paduvarahalli.jpg
- File:Ganga Kannada Short Film.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
unidentified, out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PORN I don't think they are high quality enough as well as educational enough to warrant inclusion.
- File:中国人种阴茎疲软图（无包皮）（chinese penis without foreskin）.jpg
- File:中国人种阴茎勃起图（Chinese penis）.jpg
- File:中国人种阴茎勃起图（chinese penis）.jpg
- File:中国人种阴茎.jpg
Cohaf (talk) 13:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No obvious value.--Hamish (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
неверный редирект 79.126.56.215 13:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, wrong redirect. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Алексей Навальный и Иван Жданов на заседании Центральной избирательной комиссии, 25 декабря 2017 года,.jpg
[edit]
опечатка в редиректе 79.126.56.215 13:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I made a typo and seemingly forgot to csd. –Davey2010Talk 16:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: bad redirect. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope; no practical use. Pbrks (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 01:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
неверный редирект 79.126.56.215 14:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, wrong redirect. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused image of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:57, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS. Commons already have a vast coverage of this topic.
- File:Untrimmed flaccid male penis 03.jpg
- File:Untrimmed erect male penis 02.jpg
- File:Untrimmed flaccid male penis 01.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:15, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Jewish Heritage Museum in Heichal Shlomo IMG 7765.jpg
- File:Jewish Heritage Museum in Heichal Shlomo IMG 7766.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I was asked to provide a photo of myself in order to attend Wikimania.
Please do not delete this photograph. What can I do to make this photo a valid upload?
--Climadeo (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sanjaymeeena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, possible self-promo Ahmadtalk 19:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
неверный редирект 79.126.56.215 19:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Андросов Сергей Павлович.jpg
- File:Сергей Андросов - Финансовый Гений.jpg
- File:Андросов Сергей - джентльменские поступки.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 21:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 21:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose(msali raso 21:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 21:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Elijajames456 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE
DannyS712 (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- For context, see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Gardner (Actor). Uncle G (talk) 00:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nowforever (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:PORN, COM:PENIS, etc - user has uploaded other images that could qualify, but since they ~may~ have educational value I didn't tag them
- File:Sexual intercourse with condom.jpg
- File:Breast of Asian pregnant woman.jpg
- File:Aroused female genitalia.jpg
- File:Labia sexual arousal.jpg
- File:Retractile testis.jpg
- File:Front view of male penis.jpg
- File:Front view of shaved vagina.jpg
DannyS712 (talk) 23:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional for a non-notable person. Ahmadtalk 17:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
antinatural 181.91.56.123 17:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulwiki2019 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:57, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeanz JC Cyaborg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Possibly out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Kiki muchtar kapten berfoto dengan baju putih mantap betul.jpg
- File:Kharisma Pangeran Lanang.jpg
Ahmadtalk 19:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Personal/promotional photos
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 22:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 22:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep: User page image, used in arwiki userpage. I've added user page image template. -- CptViraj (📧) 09:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal/Private photo(s) of non-contributors. --Alaa :)..! 20:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Entremilpas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ricardo Hernández Guerrero 1.jpg
- File:RicardoHernandezGuerrero.png
- File:Radames Douriet Soto.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Seem to duplicate SVG versions uploaded early.
- File:SNJFig9b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig6b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig8b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig7b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig5b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig1b.pdf
- File:SNJ Fig4b.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
An advertisement drawing of an automobile, of which we have photographs. It doesn't seem to be valid presumption of public domain, that DeSoto ceased to exist in 1961 (besides, I guess, that Chrysler is its successor). Pibwl (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:From Sabri's paints 13.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints 05.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints 6.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints 5.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints 14.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints.jpg
- File:From sab's paints12.jpg
- File:From Sabri's paints. 12.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of permission of the (still living) artist to upload images of his artwork.
DMacks (talk) 07:07, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:OOS 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be used on en.wiki for self-promo. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harisangeet (talk · contribs)
[edit]low res files, unlikely to be own work. 1 taken from facebook (per exif)
- File:Salini's Performance .jpg
- File:Salini as Damayanthi.jpg
- File:SaliniProfilePic.jpg
- File:SaliniHari .jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
low res, unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pressestelle PTB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. No EXIF
- File:Cover mst14.png
- File:Cover mst13.png
- File:Cover mst12.png
- File:Cover mst11.png
- File:Cover mst10.png
- File:Cover mst09.png
- File:Cover mst08.png
- File:Cover mst07.png
- File:Cover mst06.png
- File:Cover mst05.png
- File:Cover mst04.png
- File:Cover mst03.png
- File:Cover mst02.png
- File:Cover mst01.png
- File:Cover Massstaebe 14.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolasdicaprio03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://twitter.com/eshistoria32/status/975491715405664258, Low-re images: unlikely to be own works. Besides not public domain in El Salvador yet.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Low-re screenshots.
- File:Al Zamalek club the Champion of African confederation cup.png
- File:Dr.Kamal Darwish the president of Zamalek club .png
- File:Zamalek sc the Champion of African Champions League in 2002.png
- File:Highlight from the Egyptian giant al Zamalek club and Palestine national team .png
- File:The first african trophy for the royal club.png
- File:Mohamed Hassan Helmy The icon of Zamalek club through history .png
- File:Zamalek sc and real madrid club match.png
- File:Mohamed Haidar Pasha president of Zamalek club .png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of them are even copyrighted such as the the first one. Ben5218 (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2019 CCDL. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shubhamghodke3904 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. (en:Draft:Shubham Ghodke)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
© 2014 Federal Judges Association Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
From http://docplayer.fr/56860487-Jardin-de-sculptures-musee-pierre-salinger.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2019 IMR PRESS. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Copyvio. Photo by professional photographer Christian Blais. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Distelfalter im Garten.jpg. LamBoet (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
il a été utilisé sans mon autorisation Bmarceau (talk) 21:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image utilisée sans mon autorisation Bmarceau (talk) 21:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Cette photo doit etre supprimé car Olivier Minne ne veut plus que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Wikipédia, il ne veut pas qu'elle soit utilisée de façon officielle. Bmarceau (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, my French is too bad to say what I want to say, but I can understand this DR: As Olivier Minne seems to be a public person, I see no real reason to delete unless we have better photos of him. If he wants some official photo to appear on Wikipedia, he will need to have its photographer release it under a free license so it can be uploaded here. darkweasel94 20:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm Bertrand Marceau, I took this photography in 2007, and I ask : delete this photo, Olivier Minne himself asked me this. Thank you (excuse me if my english isn't good)--Bmarceau (talk) 23:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- English: The uploader and the subject ask for a courtesy delete. My feelings are mixed, as we don't have another picture of this person, who is the host of Fort Boyard, a long running french tv show.
- Français : Le téléverseur et le sujet demandent une suppression de courtoisie. Je suis un peu gêné, puisque nous n'avons pas d'autres images de ce présentateur.
- Pleclown (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Je peux comprendre que vous n'avez pas d'autres images de cet animateur mais : 1) il ne veut pas que cette image illustre sa page wikipédia 2) c'est moi qui ai fait cette photo et je demande à ce qu'elle soit supprimée. Donc merci à vous de bien vouloir supprimer cette image, c'est un respect de droit à l'image et de droit d'auteur — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.38.56.199 (talk) 21:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Comment, en matière de droit d'auteur ce ne serait pas une raison suffisante en raison de la licence, le CC-BY-SA aurait pu permettre jusqu'à présent que n'importe qui sur Internet exporte la photo et la diffuse ailleurs que sur Commons avec la même licence. Idem le droit à l'image et les demandes de la part de la personne prise en photo n'aboutissent pas toujours à une suppression (il y a déjà eu des cas où la demande soit refusée, en particulier quand la source de la demande n'est pas vérifiable). Mais comme c'est l'auteur de la photo qui fait la demande, elle peut être acceptée par le droit de retrait, à la condition que la photo ne soit pas utilisée ailleurs sur Internet (c'est la base du principe de droit de retrait...). Jeriby (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
L'image n'est utilisée que sur Wikipédia et Wikimedia Commons ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmarceau (talk • contribs) 12:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The licnese given when the image was uploaded cannot be revoked. We have no other image of this person. We do not generally delete images at the request of their subject. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Cette photo m'appartient, et il me semble être mon droit de décider ce qu'il en est, du fait de son utilisation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmarceau (talk • contribs) 21:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- No. When you licensed it with CC-BY-SA and GNU licenses in 2010 you gave up the right to determine what use is made of it. You can require that users credit you and share alike, but you have no other rights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Il faut un retour en arrière, il le faut absolument, je repète que cette photo ne doit plus apparaître. En 2010 ça ne posait pas de problème mais maintenant ça en pose un, cette photo doit etre enlevée immédiatement. Merci
C'est peut-etre comme ça mais ce n'est pas normal, quand une photo pose problème on doit etre en mesure de la retirer. Si c'etait une photo avec quelque chose finalement de grave, comment ferait-on ?
Cette photo doit être supprimée, car Olivier Minne lui même ne veut pas que cette photo serve à illustrer sa page Wikipedia. C'est moi même qui ait fait cette photo et je demande à ce qu'elle soit retirée ! Merci Bmarceau (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. C'est une photo d'une personnalité publique prise dans le cadre de ses « fonctions » (animateur de télévision), donc si je me souviens bien de mes cours de droit de la presse, l'autorisation de la personne photographiée n'est pas nécessaire. Cordialement, Jules78120 16:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: CC-By-SA licence can't be removed. If Bertrand Marceau or Olivier Mine can provide a good picture of him (with right licence and authorization), probably this (bad) one will not appear again... ----MGuf (d) 18:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oui là je suis bien d'accord mais Olivier Minne lui-même considère que cette photo est à caractère privée, ce que je comprends puisqu'il n'est pas en tenue pour présenter l'émission. Du moins il ne veut pas que cette photo soit utilisée pour les autres sites. Alors mettez un filigrane ou supprimez-la je veux pas le savoir mais faites quelque chose ! Cordialement
- Peu importe ce qu'il considère lui. Je vois mal comment un juge pourrait ici considérer qu'il y a atteinte à la vie privée de M. Minne, personnalité publique photographiée sur son lieu de travail et dans un contexte public (il n'est pas en train d'embrasser sa compagne, par exemple). Cordialement, Jules78120 (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Je suis d'accord, moi-même considère ainsi que beaucoup d'autres qu'il s'agit d'une photo sympa. Je le revois au mois de Juin, j'espère juste qu'il n'y aura aucun problème. Il serait juste possible de la verrouiller ou je ne sais quoi pour éviter qu'elle soit copiée sur d'autres sites ? Cordialement
- Ben euh... la photo est sous licence double GNU et CC-BY-SA, et donc dans ces deux licences on peut (c'est marqué sous la photo): respectivement copier, distribuer, modifier pour GNU, partager et adapter pour CC-BY-SA. Donc éviter qu'elle soit copiée alors qu'elle est sous une licence où on peut copier, c'est un peu comme reprendre un cadeau qu'on a offert à Noël^^ en gros... Je ne sais pas si c'est possible. Je laisse ça aux spécialistes des licences. Jeriby (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- A mon avis non, on ne peut pas. Comme je l'ai déjà écrit, une meilleure photo éclipsera celle ci, et on n'en parlera plus. Si Mine est si mécontent de cette photo, qu'il fasse en sorte qu'un photographe de sa connaissance mette une bonne photo de lui sous licence libre, et nous le fasse savoir. ----MGuf (d) 09:53, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept The license is irrevocable. If you insist on keeping control over your images, then put them on Flickr, but do not bring them to Commons. No new reason appears in this second DR.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
image utilisée sans mon autorisation a nouveau Bmarceau (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:Copy viol (msali raso 22:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 22:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aurèle Ricard
[edit]Aurèle Ricard is born in 1963. No OTRS.
- File:Aurèle et "The LostDogCO2", sculpture en plantes dépolluantes présentée au pavillon français de l'Exposition universelle de Shanghai, Chine, 2010.jpeg
- File:The yellow LostDog d'Aurèle à Art Paris, Grand Palais, 2006.jpeg
Chassipress (talk) 22:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
The user uploaded several images that have been tagged for speedy deletion as copyright violation. And because of that I doubt it's an Own work. Masum Reza📞 22:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete looks like a photo of an old photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Logo of an organisation so almost certainly a non-free image (it has this status on en.wiki). Number 57 (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Failed to find the image from the given source. Use Google to find the source of the image: https://ko-kr.facebook.com/LIVEKINGisLife/posts/2116123565304431 , however, it was not found to be released under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license agreement. Catherine Laurence 01:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Failed to find the image from the given source. Use Google to find the source of the image: https://www.facebook.com/151336072399156/photos/a.151336135732483/383658782500216/?type=3&theater , however, it was not found to be released under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license agreement. Catherine Laurence 01:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This is based on a map of actual Europe; if this is Google Maps, it should be deleted, if it is OSM, we still need to correctly credit them as a source. Prosfilaes (talk) 06:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Looks like Google to me: the blue line showing a planned route (and grey lines showing alternatives) is a giveaway. --bjh21 (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 05:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This museum has moved into a new location and new building. This photo is out of date and no longer shows what is says. 72.27.238.148 16:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Keep as a historical record. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Changed file name and description to reflect current status. --Ebyabe (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Not public domain in Bosnia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 22:38, 16 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
My own work, embarassingly enough - replaced since with better quality image in the articles Esprit Fugace (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep not universally replaced. 12:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it is, user:Kathisma. I've checked every article, and I'm the uploader. It's been replaced by File:Blason ville fr Eth (Nord).svg, which is up to Commons' standard instead of this poor substitute. Esprit Fugace (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- According to Special:GlobalUsage/Blason de Lesquin.png it's in use on hu:Lesquin and ro:Lesquin, but I can't see it on those pages. --bjh21 (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Update lag, probably, since those articles use the image from wikidata. Esprit Fugace (talk) 21:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- According to Special:GlobalUsage/Blason de Lesquin.png it's in use on hu:Lesquin and ro:Lesquin, but I can't see it on those pages. --bjh21 (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it is, user:Kathisma. I've checked every article, and I'm the uploader. It's been replaced by File:Blason ville fr Eth (Nord).svg, which is up to Commons' standard instead of this poor substitute. Esprit Fugace (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept, the file is used. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Deleted. The file isn't used anymore. Due to uploader's request on my userpage I'll delete the file. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
This page was created by mistake Macondo (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
this isnt the file I was intending to upload Aldo Dávalos (talk) 02:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: upload is recent enough that COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hình ảnh kém chất lượng Người Miền Nam (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Google translates the given reason for deletion as "Poor quality image", but it is in use in English and French Wikipedia, so kept per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hình ảnh kém chất lượng Người Miền Nam (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Google translates the given reason for deletion as "Poor quality image", but it is in use in Vietnamese Wikipedia, so kept per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hình ảnh kém chất lượng --Người Miền Nam (talk) 04:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Duplicate request, see above. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted by the Canadian Heraldic Authority DiegoAma (talk) 06:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Obvious copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio. 12:53, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use in en:Commercial Spaceflight Federation, therefore in scope and kept per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be from http://www.velasquezsanvicente.cl/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
From http://www.velasquezsanvicente.cl/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Appears to have been previously published: https://columbia.co.cr/images/FOTOS/DEPORTES/ESTADIO_ACTUAL_JICARAL.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm the photographer and I own this image. Whoever put it up here didn't own the rights to be able to give them away for free. I must ask that I either be compensated for this image or that it be taken down immediately as it's a violation of usage rights. MikeyLPT (talk) 06:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not own work of uploader. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
came to know about copyright violation Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
came to know about potential copyright violation Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
came to know about potential for copyright violation Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
came to know about potential copyright violation Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted covers in 1970 and 1991. Regasterios (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Photo metadata says copyright Tito Guzman, a photographer for the newspaper El Nuevo Día. —Mikemoral♪♫ 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Virajsingh7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - higher resolution images are available on google.
- File:Ramparts.jpg
- File:Rohtas glory.jpg
- File:Devi temple 2.jpg
- File:Rohtas 2.jpg
- File:Hanging house rohtas.jpg
- File:Enroute 2.jpg
- File:Enroute 1.jpg
- File:Diwan e aam rohtas.jpg
- File:Ganesh temple.jpg
- File:Devi temple.jpg
- File:Chaurasan temple.jpg
- File:Barracks rohtas.jpg
- File:Diwan e khas.jpg
- File:Hathiya pol.jpg
- File:Rohtas fort 1.jpg
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose (msali raso 13:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 13:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 13:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
too much pictures Pacopac (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
No interested enough Pacopac (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- (transfered) I do not understand why this image has been marked for deletion. The photo belongs to the subject about whom the wiki page is being constructed. He owns it and there are no copyright issues. Can you be more explicit as to what Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.means. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoriansUK (talk • contribs)
- @HistoriansUK: Please click on the blue links. Besides if image is the ownership of the subject he must himself send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
OK, thank you, I will get the owner to send permission via COM:OTRS.
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:NickLipscombeValencia.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019080810004137. --Ww2censor (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Already uploaded company logo under Native Union Logo.png Soyoungpark.nu (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
this has no use KoprX (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
"Wyndham Hotels and Resorts is public domain as a text logo, consisting only of text and simple geometric shapes" – that's a dubious claim at best. This is certainly more complex than several of the examples listed as "not OK" under COM:TOO US. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Bogus license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Logo of a seeemingly governmental agency, certainly not own work. With the right license perhaps could be PD. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo assumedly from 1926; not 2011 own work; could maybe fit into a PD-Old license Kissa21782 (talk) 11:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Bogus license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 11:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Not used on any page. Useless. 62.96.137.138 13:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept While I agree it doesn't look like one of Commons' better cat photos, it is in use in uk:w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Sculpture in Italy, which has no Commons:FOP. FunkMonk (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Missing source for the painting in the photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I took this photo at the James and Abigail Campbell Library, University of Hawaii, West Oahu. I do not know how the stuff about Flickr got added.Wmpearl (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Wmpearl: The license of the photograph isn't in question, so you're fine on that front. However, since the photograph essentially recreates the oil painting, the copyright owner of the painting can assert their rights to the photograph as well, so we need to know who created the painting and who owns the rights to it. The only thing I know is that it was unveiled in 2017 when the library opened. If it was created for the library, then it's recent enough to be under copyright. But if the painting was created during Abigail Campbell's lifetime, then it's old enough to be in public domain. Do you have additional information about the painting? Ytoyoda (talk) 19:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Information lacking to determine if the painting shown is PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Assyhottin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep first file : source website is a public library which dates it from 1660. Kathisma (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I kept the first one, per Kathisma. Strakhov (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept clear public domian -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Assyhottin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Coat of arms of Charlotte de La Tremoille.svg
- File:Grandes armories de la famille de La Trémoille.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete erroneous (if not willingfully misleading) coats of arms part of a hoax initiated on fr:wiki. Kathisma (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Either the description or the license is false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Request removal of "own" photo. Unused photo and the owner of the house is unhappy with it being on Commons. The Banner (talk) 16:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Courtesy deletion by request of uploader; was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This picture depicts a Swedish military installation which is illegal to photograph by Swedish law, as evident by the yellow sign in the picture. See Skyddsobjekt. //Joshua (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- DeleteAlthough Wikimedia might have the rights on their side when publishing the picture, the creator of photography might risk heavy penalties, according to recent media reporting i Sweden. We should take care of our contributors, and if as in this case the the creator is asking for a deletion I think the community should support that. --I99pema (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Too old to be prosecutable. Edaen (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Courtesy deletion per uploader request; image was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This picture depicts a Swedish military installation which is illegal to photograph by Swedish law, as evident by the yellow sign in the picture. See Skyddsobjekt. //Joshua (talk) 18:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- DeleteAlthough Wikimedia might have the rights on their side when publishing the picture, the creator of photography might risk heavy penalties, according to recent media reporting i Sweden. We should take care of our contributors, and if as in this case the the creator is asking for a deletion I think the community should support that. --I99pema (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Too old to be prosecutable. Edaen (talk) 18:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Courtesy deletion per uploader request; image was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This picture depicts a Swedish military installation which is illegal to photograph by Swedish law, as evident by the yellow sign in the picture. See Skyddsobjekt. //Joshua (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The yellow sign in this picture is impossible to read, but it's clearly not the same yellow sign as is shown in sv:Skyddsobjekt, since the only symbol on it is a warning triangle on the left. Also the file is in use on sv:Örebro garnison and anyway this is a non-copyright restriction that doesn't affect Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 19:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It's the same building as shown in the other deletion requests [2] [3] Just that you dont see the sign! //Joshua (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The picture is no longer in use on sv:Örebro garnison //Joshua (talk) 12:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F%C3%B6rsvarsmaktens_telen%C3%A4t-_och_marktelef%C3%B6rband_1.JPG){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F%C3%B6rsvarsmaktens_telen%C3%A4t-_och_marktelef%C3%B6rband_2.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Although Wikimedia might have the rights on their side when publishing the picture, the creator of photography might risk heavy penalties, according to recent media reporting i Sweden. We should take care of our contributors, and if as in this case the the creator is asking for a deletion I think the community should support that. --I99pema (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep To old to be prosecutable. Edaen (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Courtesy deletion per uploader request; image was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. Previously nominated for speedy deletion, but this has been challenged. Image is now claimed to be a still from 1958 Indian film, which would be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- See the note from the uploader at User talk:ZI Jony#File:Nutan Hindi Movie Actress (14).jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There can always be a chance of someone reusing it. Any image which comes in public domain (as in this case) loses its copyright. The still was actually a screenshot from the film which was converted into a jpeg file. After finding a similar image, I indicated that as my source being unaware of how to indicate the source of this file. If required, the source can be changed to something like screenshot from the 1958 film Dilli Ka Thug but then no link can be provided (as in this case, the image opens in a different link). Kindly let me know about the same. Vrishchik (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2019 (UTC)Vrishchik
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:33, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- I am not an expert on Indian copyright law, but if a film is public domain then we usually assume that any still from the film is also public domain. This is supported by Commons:Screenshots#Audiovisual works. ZI Jony, what is your basis for deletion? Are you saying that there is significant doubt about whether this is a still from Dilli Ka Thug, or are you saying that a still from this film would not be public domain? Verbcatcher (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- This couldn’t publish under public domain unless there is no proper source claim for copyright. It’s copied from a blog. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- I am not an expert on Indian copyright law, but if a film is public domain then we usually assume that any still from the film is also public domain. This is supported by Commons:Screenshots#Audiovisual works. ZI Jony, what is your basis for deletion? Are you saying that there is significant doubt about whether this is a still from Dilli Ka Thug, or are you saying that a still from this film would not be public domain? Verbcatcher (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I changed the license. Yann (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept per Yann; problem seems resolved.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No information why this automobile drawing should be public domain, apart from Filckr user's declaration... There are free photographs instead. Pibwl (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- KEEP: PD for non-renewal of copyright, as stated in the license. Such advertisements were almost never renewed. Plus, no copyright "bug" is visible in the image. Quoting from the Cornell copyright page, https://copyright.cornell.edu/publicdomain "1924 through 1977. Published without a copyright notice. None. In the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities". --Pete Tillman (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe there was a copyright notice on a whole page, from which the picture was cut off?.. Pibwl (talk) 18:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted While much US material like this has fallen into public domain, without better source info such cannot be determined for this particular image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Not used , uploaded framed file Le moulin de la sorcière (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept Simple text, looks to be correctly tagged. (No deletion request seems to have been placed on photo page.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Only a redirection not essential 78.138.52.31 17:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as it's a harmless redirect ?, Without being disrespectful this DR is rather pointless? –Davey2010Talk 18:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Copryrighted indoor artwork in Hungary. The artists were Barcsay Jenő (1900–1988) and Csákvári Nagy Lajos (1923–2014). Regasterios (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Artworks by Jenő Barcsay
[edit]
Copryrighted indoor artworks in Hungary. The artist was Barcsay Jenő (1900–1988). --Regasterios (talk) 07:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Indoor artworks by Endre Domanovszky
[edit]- File:Debrecen allomas.JPG
- File:Domanovszky Disputa 01.jpg
- File:Domanovszky Disputa 02.jpg
- File:Dorm Mosaic UM.jpg
- File:Eger, Kossuth Lajos utca 9. Megyeháza (ekkor Megyei Tanács) díszterme. A gobelin Domanovszky Endre alkotása- Fonó, 1971. Fortepan 1302.jpg
_d%C3%ADszterme._A_gobelin_Domanovszky_Endre_alkot%C3%A1sa-_Fon%C3%B3,_1971._Fortepan_1302.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Copryrighted indoor artworks in Hungary. The artist was Domanovszky Endre (1907–1974). --Regasterios (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Indoor artwork by János Majoros. He is alive see here. Regasterios (talk) 08:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Diese Datei wurde von mir für einen Artikel über den WEG DES HARZES in Markt Piesting hochgeladen, aber nie verwendet. Ich ersuche daher um Löschung. Danke! Geko08 (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
URV https://www.zauner.at/deutsch/zaunerstollen.html RoBri (talk) 11:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Tingalan Dalem Jumenengan kaping XIV Pakubuwono XIII.png
- File:Uskup Ruby.jpg
- File:Yuni sukowati.jpg
- File:Romo Kendar.jpg
- File:Robertus Rubiyatmoko.jpg
- File:Romoruby.jpg
- File:Pejabat tinggi mengheningkan cipta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the pictures of Rubiyatmoko can be found here, certainly not own work. Weak Keep for File:Yuni sukowati.jpg, it is an official photo belong to the Indonesian government, similar to File:Gubernur NTB Zulkieflimansyah.png, File:Wakil Gubernur NTB Sitti Rohmi Djalillah.png etc. Indonesian government photos of office-holding politicians are released to the public domain. If anything the Yuni Sukowati file should be re-uploaded, perhaps as a png, with the rightful author (the Indonesian government) attributed. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kenrick95 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Definitely not own work, but may be applicable using PD-old Copyvio and Speedy tags should only be used for clear cases. Rationales that include language suggesting a file might be Public Domain are obviously not clear copyright violations, and a full DR is warranted. Storkk (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry for tagging it as speedy, I should've opened a deletion request. Thanks for helping. ...Kenrick95 12:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 13:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This picture depicts a Swedish military installation which is illegal to photograph by Swedish law, as evident by the yellow sign in the picture. See Skyddsobjekt. JayC (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete //Joshua (talk) 18:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I99pema (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: That falls into the category of Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. In particular, a restriction on taking the photo need not translate into a prohibition on hosting it. The picture is in use on de:Marinehafen Muskö and sv:Muskö, so we should be reluctant to delete it. --bjh21 (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- That might be true, but the deletion is in this case also requested by the creator, who in this case is the one risking heavy fines (in worst case according to recent media reports). The community should show some good-will towards the contributors in cases like this, regardless if Wikimedia has the rights on their sideI99pema (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The statute of limitations is two years in this case. Edaen (talk) 05:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The picture is no longer in use on de:Marinehafen Muskö and sv:Muskö.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- That might be true, but the deletion is in this case also requested by the creator, who in this case is the one risking heavy fines (in worst case according to recent media reports). The community should show some good-will towards the contributors in cases like this, regardless if Wikimedia has the rights on their sideI99pema (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Iantriks (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason for deletion would have been as a service to the uploader, but since the act is no longer prosecutable that is no longer of practical significance. Edaen (talk) 06:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edaen Where can I learn more about the statute of limitations in this case? I99pema (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @I99pema In Skyddslagen, 30 a § Den som uppsåtligen eller av oaktsamhet bryter mot ett förbud mot att göra avbildningar, beskrivningar eller mätningar som avses i 7 § andra eller tredje stycket döms för olovlig avbildning av skyddsobjekt till böter eller fängelse i högst ett år. Lag (2018:611). read together with BrB 35:1, 1 § Påföljd må ej ådömas, med mindre den misstänkte häktats eller erhållit del av åtal för brottet inom 1. två år, om å brottet ej kan följa svårare straff än fängelse i ett år Edaen (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tack, Edaen, det var ju bra att veta! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @I99pema In Skyddslagen, 30 a § Den som uppsåtligen eller av oaktsamhet bryter mot ett förbud mot att göra avbildningar, beskrivningar eller mätningar som avses i 7 § andra eller tredje stycket döms för olovlig avbildning av skyddsobjekt till böter eller fängelse i högst ett år. Lag (2018:611). read together with BrB 35:1, 1 § Påföljd må ej ådömas, med mindre den misstänkte häktats eller erhållit del av åtal för brottet inom 1. två år, om å brottet ej kan följa svårare straff än fängelse i ett år Edaen (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edaen Where can I learn more about the statute of limitations in this case? I99pema (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --A.Savin 14:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Gynodiversity
[edit]The source for all links to https://www.flickr.com/photos/gynodiversity/ instead of the actual image. It's all PDM though, not CC0 as Wilfredor claimed.
- File:Labia minora variation.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 01.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 02.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 03.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 04.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 05.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 06.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 07.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 08.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 09.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 10.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 11.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 13.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 14.jpg
- File:Vagina collage 15.jpg
- File:Vulva collage 12.jpg
- File:Vulva collage.jpg
- File:Vulvae with protruding labia.jpg
- File:Ausprägung der Klitorisvorhaut.jpg
- File:Ausprägung der Labia Minora.jpeg
- File:Brazilian Waxing.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I asked the Flickr user to change the license. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- According to http://gynodiversity.com/shooting-guide.html each photo was taken by the woman herself.. Unclear if they waived/transferred the copyright. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think there is individual copyright as those pictures are made with strict instructions about lighting, degree angle, distance, focal length in the shooting guide. Same like instructions for passports. This means in many countries there is not enough creativity involved to claim copyright. --Hannolans (talk) 06:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- According to http://gynodiversity.com/shooting-guide.html each photo was taken by the woman herself.. Unclear if they waived/transferred the copyright. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- What is the reason to doubt the free license status? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: Hannolans made a good point about the copyright of individual photographers likely not applying in many cases as they were following instructions, but do we accept PDM? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Why not use this template? {{PD-author|...}} --Buster Baxter (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Buster Baxter: See {{Flickr-public domain mark}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: Hannolans made a good point about the copyright of individual photographers likely not applying in many cases as they were following instructions, but do we accept PDM? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment Actually it seems that all the photos have been removed from Flickr and that the submission form is apparently missing. We shall ignore Flickr then (unless the files are restored), and consider https://gynodiversity.com/ only. --Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- They have the 'Safety level:Restricted' you should enable safe search off in your Flickr-account settings. --Hannolans (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Confirming they are still there. The Flickr photos may not be visible unless one is logged in to Flickr with setting that "restricted" (eg sexually or anatomically explicit) media is ok to be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation and Hannolans: My mistake, sorry. Do you have access to the Google doc above? Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears in a scientific paper in which Mr. Henych is not listed as a contributor, likely not own work TFerenczy (talk) 10:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted trophy.
- File:Copa de la UEFA.JPG
- File:Galatasaray Uefa Kupası 1999-2000.jpg
- File:Tymoschuk with UEFA Cup in Lutsk.jpg
- File:Tymoschuk with UEFA Cup.jpg
- File:UEFA Cup 1.jpg
- File:UEFA Cup in Manchester.jpg
- File:UEFA CUP.jpg
- File:UEFA Cup.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 01.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 02.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 03.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 04.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 05.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 06.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 07.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 08.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 09.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 10.jpg
- File:UEFA cups - 2009-04-08 - 11.jpg
- File:UEFA-Cup.jpg
- File:UEFA-Pokal.jpg
- File:Wiel Coerver coupe UEFA 1974.jpg
- File:Willy van der Kuijlen.jpg
- File:ZenitCups.JPG
LGA talkedits 10:30, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Why is it copyrighted? Please provide proof.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Proof not necessary, the trophy is a work of art why would it not be copyrighted ? LGA talkedits 10:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- We should know who is author or copyright holder. Copyright protection ends after 50 or 70 years after authors death, so we should know author.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- The trophy was designed by Silvio Gazzaniga (who is still alive) and is less than 50 years old. LGA talkedits 10:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- We should know who is author or copyright holder. Copyright protection ends after 50 or 70 years after authors death, so we should know author.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Proof not necessary, the trophy is a work of art why would it not be copyrighted ? LGA talkedits 10:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
It was designed by Alex Diggelmann who died in 1987 but was made by Silvio Gazzaniga.--62.159.116.133 11:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Either way still in copyright. LGA talkedits 20:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Tymoschuk with UEFA Cup in Lutsk.jpg, File:Tymoschuk with UEFA Cup.jpg, File:Wiel Coerver coupe UEFA 1974.jpg and File:Willy van der Kuijlen.jpg per COM:DM as focus is not on the cup as a work of art but on the event (a footballer holds a cup he has won). Concerning Tymoschuk, this is particularly covered by de minimis exception of Ukrainian copyright law (Article 21.4 allowing reproduction of works for illustrating events). Those photos do not lose value if we replace work of Silvio Gazzaniga with the work of any other sculptor, as they illustrate a particular player with a particular trophy, no matter who designed this trophy — NickK (talk) 02:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Article 21 of Ukrainian copyright law is their Fair Use section, section 4 is limited only to "present current events" and "to the extent justified by the informational purpose;" which are not compatible with the requirements of COM:L so we cant rely on it as we cant host a file here (maybe over at enwp). Overall the images you list don't meet the De minimis Guidelines, specificity "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different" and of the five "test" listed all but one of the ones you list tick four (the except File:Willy van der Kuijlen.jpg which does not have the name in title but other wise ticks three out of five). LGA talkedits 03:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- I do know that this is limited to informative purposes. Could you please explain for which purpose you can use this particular trophy in this particular contest? This is not about UEFA Cup as a work of art. This is about UEFA Cup as a trophy for winning the tournament called UEFA Cup. In the context of those pictures the trophy serves exclusively to information purposes: to inform that this particular player has one the trophy for the particular tournament (UEFA Cup). You cannot use this trophy as a work of art for any other purpose as it is completely impossible (insufficient resolution, not in focus poor quality, important part covered by the player). You can use this picture for any purpose as COM:L requires, but the trophy can hardly be used for any purpose than informative. If you replace the work by Gazzaniga by any other trophy that would have been awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup, these photos would pefectly fulfill its purpose, which perfectly corresponds to the informative purpose — NickK (talk) 05:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- As the Ukraine FOP page points out article 21 section 4 is is not general freedom of panorama but a "fair use"-like provision and commons can't rely on it for hosting. The trophy is not incidental in any of the pictures and it is the reason for why the pictures were taken. LGA talkedits 09:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- A trophy as a work of art is incidental: there was no intention to picture this particular work by Gazzaniga. An object awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup, however, is not incidental and this photo is focused on informative side of the UEFA Cup trophy instead of artistic side. There was no intention from the photographer to picture this particular trophy, his intention was to picture an object awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup. If not a trophy designed by Gazzaniga, but, say, Viktoria-Pokal had been awarded for the victory, the photo would not have lost its value — NickK (talk) 15:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that a work of art is used as an award in no way detracts from the fact it is a copyright work of art and to host a image of it as free on commons we need the permission of the copyright holder, which I assume is UEFA. LGA talkedits 21:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- This is important for COM:DM: if this work of art would have been replaced with another object awarded for victory, this picture would not have lost its value. If these players were displaying the work of art, they would have done it differently, and photographer would have focused on the work of art instead of the player. This perfectly fits Ukrainian exception for informative purposes in case of Tymoshchuk and COM:DM for Coerver and van der Kuijlen, as all these photos do not display work in sufficient detail — NickK (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- As the trophy is a key part in all of these images the trophy can not be considered De minimis. The fact that the governing body chooses to award a copyright trophy is up to them. LGA talkedits 01:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- A key part is a player, not a trophy (all pictures contain names of the relevant players), a cup is an attribute of the player which is used here for informative purposes. I hope you would not delete a picture of a king or a queen because his/her crown is copyrighted, as this would be a picture of a king or queen, not a picture of the crown. This is the similar case: a player is pictured with copyrighted attribute which is COM:DM to the player. Without this, how can you picture the fact that a player or a team has won the trophy? — NickK (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's why there are fair use rules to allow such images to be captured, however such fair use pictures can't be hosted on commons due to COM:L. LGA talkedits 19:59, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- No, that's why COM:DM exists that effectively allows to picture people even if a small part of picture is taken by a copyrighted object, if this object is in insufficient detail and/or quality and/or is out of focus. These four images satisfy this requirement — NickK (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's why there are fair use rules to allow such images to be captured, however such fair use pictures can't be hosted on commons due to COM:L. LGA talkedits 19:59, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- A key part is a player, not a trophy (all pictures contain names of the relevant players), a cup is an attribute of the player which is used here for informative purposes. I hope you would not delete a picture of a king or a queen because his/her crown is copyrighted, as this would be a picture of a king or queen, not a picture of the crown. This is the similar case: a player is pictured with copyrighted attribute which is COM:DM to the player. Without this, how can you picture the fact that a player or a team has won the trophy? — NickK (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- As the trophy is a key part in all of these images the trophy can not be considered De minimis. The fact that the governing body chooses to award a copyright trophy is up to them. LGA talkedits 01:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is important for COM:DM: if this work of art would have been replaced with another object awarded for victory, this picture would not have lost its value. If these players were displaying the work of art, they would have done it differently, and photographer would have focused on the work of art instead of the player. This perfectly fits Ukrainian exception for informative purposes in case of Tymoshchuk and COM:DM for Coerver and van der Kuijlen, as all these photos do not display work in sufficient detail — NickK (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that a work of art is used as an award in no way detracts from the fact it is a copyright work of art and to host a image of it as free on commons we need the permission of the copyright holder, which I assume is UEFA. LGA talkedits 21:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- A trophy as a work of art is incidental: there was no intention to picture this particular work by Gazzaniga. An object awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup, however, is not incidental and this photo is focused on informative side of the UEFA Cup trophy instead of artistic side. There was no intention from the photographer to picture this particular trophy, his intention was to picture an object awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup. If not a trophy designed by Gazzaniga, but, say, Viktoria-Pokal had been awarded for the victory, the photo would not have lost its value — NickK (talk) 15:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- As the Ukraine FOP page points out article 21 section 4 is is not general freedom of panorama but a "fair use"-like provision and commons can't rely on it for hosting. The trophy is not incidental in any of the pictures and it is the reason for why the pictures were taken. LGA talkedits 09:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- I do know that this is limited to informative purposes. Could you please explain for which purpose you can use this particular trophy in this particular contest? This is not about UEFA Cup as a work of art. This is about UEFA Cup as a trophy for winning the tournament called UEFA Cup. In the context of those pictures the trophy serves exclusively to information purposes: to inform that this particular player has one the trophy for the particular tournament (UEFA Cup). You cannot use this trophy as a work of art for any other purpose as it is completely impossible (insufficient resolution, not in focus poor quality, important part covered by the player). You can use this picture for any purpose as COM:L requires, but the trophy can hardly be used for any purpose than informative. If you replace the work by Gazzaniga by any other trophy that would have been awarded for the victory in UEFA Cup, these photos would pefectly fulfill its purpose, which perfectly corresponds to the informative purpose — NickK (talk) 05:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Article 21 of Ukrainian copyright law is their Fair Use section, section 4 is limited only to "present current events" and "to the extent justified by the informational purpose;" which are not compatible with the requirements of COM:L so we cant rely on it as we cant host a file here (maybe over at enwp). Overall the images you list don't meet the De minimis Guidelines, specificity "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different" and of the five "test" listed all but one of the ones you list tick four (the except File:Willy van der Kuijlen.jpg which does not have the name in title but other wise ticks three out of five). LGA talkedits 03:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The cup is clearly not DM in any of these images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy
[edit]COM:DW, derivative work of a possibly copyrighted 3D object
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:15.05.29-Recepción Sevilla FC-3 (18242553251).jpg. Per Commons:De minimis. In any case I am not opposed to a crop cutting off half trophy if the point can come across more nicely.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Com:DM can't be applied, the trophy is a major part of both photographs. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)