Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/06/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2018.jpg){kind=link}
![72 File:Soldier reading a book from the 1917 poster "The Camp Library is Yours" "Read to Win the War" by C B Falls, American Library Association (cropped).png](#File:Soldier_reading_a_book_from_the_1917_poster_"The_Camp_Library_is_Yours"_"Read_to_Win_the_War"_by_C_B_Falls,_American_Library_Association_(cropped).png){kind=link}
_(c2c)_(Gambit).cbz_-_Page_5_(6530666509).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
test page creation 大诺史 (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam – speedy deleted. --jdx Re: 05:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
test page creation 大诺史 (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted. You may consider propose deletion via COM:SPEEDY in these cases. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 05:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Found as early October 2016 at http://www.vorterixneuquen.com.ar/2016/10/22/ciro-en-freso-y-batata/, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Delete taken from [1], with no apparent release under the license stipulated nor any reason to believe this is the property of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Test page creation 大诺史 (talk) 03:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
was an error Pacopac (talk) 08:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
I made a mistake in the Japanese name I uploaded it with the correct name mararo 09:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, upload mistake; prompt request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the photo is previously published in Facebook. Facebook does not allow republishing its content on other sites, including Commons. OTRS-permission from photographer is needed on such cases. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Wick2015Reading.jpg” under ticket:2019062310002981. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: permission provided. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
per COM:SPAM & COM:NUDITY 大诺史 (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; collage of unfree files. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No information to support that the government license would apply. Jcb (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I made the necessary additional information.--Semenov.m7 (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour, je me suis trompé de photo. Mais je ne sais pas comment la supprimer. Merci de supprimer le fichier Christophe_Martinolli.jpg Merci beaucoup Kharonn (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Not educationally useful because it's a private party photo and not use on one page.
- File:"The only one you need in your life is that person who shows you he needs you in his" - by Oscar Wilde.jpg
- File:"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all." - by Oscar Wilde.jpg
Catherine Laurence 14:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Scope is perfectly OK, but pictures copied from Facebook. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - reverse image search found matching pictures on a news site and the file is missing any metadata. Hmxhmx 16:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.amazon.com/thousands-arthritis-patients-regained-health/dp/0134017609
Debatable as to whether or not the licensing tag is correct. Not clear cut. Refer to DR instead of speedy. Majora (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- The photo comes from an anonymous newspaper clipping I have from my personal collection on naturopathy. I did not take it from Amazon but the same photo appears there in a book. The date is likely to be 1970 or 1971. Probably best to delete it because I can't substantiate the source. 90% of the stuff I upload is before 1923. This was about the only recent one I uploaded. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- If you agree to an "author requests deletion", Psychologist Guy, I can go ahead and process that. Or we can just leave this open in case someone else has an opinion on the matter. Up to you. --Majora (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I agree for an author requested deletion. Thanks. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
non-free, taken from another website, per the source given by the uploader Lugnuts (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
incomplete loading due to software problem; individual who loaded not current wiki member; image has no apparent use Deanlaw (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted glitch incomplete upload; orphan, uncat since May 2018. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect license. As per website, copyright is listed as © International Cricket Council FZ LLC Sreejith K (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Adolf Steuer died in 1960. Undelete in 2031 Abzeronow (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
screenshot of non-free data of google earth - this is now "own" - Полковник - нажать PrintScreen - это не создание собственной работы. На каждом кадре гугл Планеты внизу указан КОПИРАЙТ - это не на викисклад, максимум fair use в ру-википедии. A5b (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. User blocked for copyvios. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
duplicate file Generesearch (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
duplicate usage Generesearch (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
duplicate usage Generesearch (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
duplicate usage Generesearch (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) PD-ineligible? Yann (talk) 10:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by علاء at 11:42, 29 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1) --Krdbot 19:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) PD-ineligible? Yann (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by علاء at 11:42, 29 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1) --Krdbot 19:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) PD-ineligible? Yann (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by علاء at 11:42, 29 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1) --Krdbot 19:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
G7, author/uploader request Nathanberryhill (talk) 02:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حضارة انسانية (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work but claimed as own work
- File:الدكتور محمد فراس النائب أستاذ العلاقات الاقتصادية الدولية.jpg
- File:الدكتور محمد فراس النائب أستاذ العلاقات الدولية.jpg
- File:2زايد في عيون التاريخ بقلم الدكتور محمد فراس النائب.jpg
- File:مقالة الدكتور محمد فراس النائب في مجلة الإمارات الثقافية حول الذكاء الاصطناعي.jpg
- File:زايد في عيون التاريخ بقلم الدكتور محمد فراس النائب.jpg
- File:3مقالة الدكتور محمد فراس النائب في مجلة الإمارات الثقافية حول الذكاء الاصطناعي.jpg
- File:2مقالة الدكتور محمد فراس النائب في مجلة الإمارات الثقافية حول الذكاء الاصطناعي.jpg
- File:مبادرات تكمل المشهد الحضاري الدكتور محمد فراس النائب.jpg
- File:الذكاء الاصطناعي عصب المستقبل الدكتور محمد فراس النائب.jpg
- File:الدكتور محمد فراس النائب سيرة عامة.png
大诺史 (talk) 02:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope, looks like a personal picture. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:26, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio; previously published at https://www.instagram.com/2roudpatogh/ Huji (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Neutral Appears to be the same user, though. If it's a derivative of their own work, no copyvio. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The file should go through COM:OTRS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LuciferDZ31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation, some images have watermarks. Also, per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:FOREST00031.jpg
- File:FOREST31000.jpg
- File:FOREST310.jpg
- File:FOREST31.jpg
- File:SEA.png
- File:NATURE0031.jpg
- File:NATURE31.jpg
- File:SKY31.jpg
- File:NATURE 31.jpg
- File:BEACH.jpg
- File:LuciferDZ31 00.png
- File:SEA31.png
- File:LuciferDZ31.png
大诺史 (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LuciferDZ31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation, some images have watermarks. Also, per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Sea 003100.jpg
- File:Park of the beach.jpg
- File:Beach31.jpg
- File:Mountain31.jpg
- File:Sky and mountain2.jpg
- File:River ,mountain forest.jpg
- File:Beach 31.jpg
- File:River ,mountain forest3.jpg
- File:Sidi frage4.jpg
- File:River ,mountain forest2.jpg
- File:Sidi frage beach.jpg
- File:Sidi frage.jpg
- File:Sidi frage2.jpg
大诺史 (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Foto aus dem Internet, es fehlt die Freigabe durch die Urheberrechtsinhaberin für kommerzielle Weiterverwendung Jbergner (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's name (translation: "taken by Eran Even"). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 12:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Test file. 大诺史 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 12:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
In en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Lee Wilson depicted person was considered non-notable. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
photo of photo
Roy17 (talk) 00:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from an album booklet. --Yasu (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bugs Bunny
[edit]Violates the Bugs Bunny character copyright. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Appreciate America. Come On Gang. All Out for Uncle Sam" (Mickey Mouse)" - NARA - 513869.tif for details. The first film with Bugs Bunny appears to have been en:A Wild Hare from 1940 which had its copyright renewed.[2]
- File:All This And Rabbit Stew (1941).ogv
- File:Anybondstodaybugsblackface.jpg
- File:AnybondstodaybugsPorky.jpg
- File:Bugs, hunter.JPG
- File:Bugsbunnyproto2.jpg
- File:Case Of the Missing Hare 1.JPG
- File:CaseOfTheMissingHare 2.png
- File:CaseOfTheMissingHare 4.png
- File:Falling hare2.jpg
- File:Supper1.JPG
- File:Supper2.JPG
- File:Supper3.JPG
- File:Supper4.JPG
- File:VMTB-242.jpg
- File:Wabbit who came to supper still.jpg
- File:Wabbit Who Came To Supper Towel Slip.png
- File:WackikiWabbit.jpg
- File:Wackywabbit restored.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete It seems it is not needed to review ALL drawings of Bugs to retain the copyright; you just have to keep the copyright of the original drawing "alive".
- We genereally keep fan art but File:VMTB-242.jpg is probably to "good" to be acceptable. --MGA73 (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bugs Bunny
[edit]Still in copyright [3]
- File:A Corny Concerto (1) (cropped 2).png
- File:A Corny Concerto (1) (cropped).png
- File:A Corny Concerto (1).png
_(cropped_2).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 14:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 06:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality crop, blurred Sandro Halank (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
_2018.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
_2018.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW of https://www.cdiscount.com/maison/decoration-accessoires/sticker-james-bond-007-autocollant-mural-deco-ch/f-117634905-auc2009246191860.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Probably DW of a movie screenshot. Delete anyway. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:51, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Mugshot: according to the uploader it can be deleted. I have no faith in the copyright status, so I agree.
Sofie van den Enk.tif: according to https://pers.kro-ncrv.nl/beeldbank?presentors=55 this photo was taken by William Rutten. But here it's André van den Heuvel. It can only be one of those.
DSC8716 Sofie van den Enk low res.jpg: claimed as own work, but appears to be from a shoot by Stijn Ghijsen based on the setting. In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sofie van den Enk.tif the uploader claims to be married to Sofie, so he should be André van den Heuvel.
- File:DSC8716 Sofie van den Enk low res.jpg
- File:Sofie van den Enk.tif
- File:Mugshot Sofie van den enk.png
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging @Ciell, Tekstman. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Drdreetje: if you are André van den Heuvel, ask your wife to pick up a phone (hold it herself), start recording video, say "Hi Wikipedia!" and upload the video either to Commons (try COM:V2C or the mobile app) or to YouTube and select the Creative Commons license on YouTube. We can extract a still from that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I asked User:RonaldB for a second opinion on the tickets and it seems highly doubtful that User:Drdreetje is the holder of the rights to all uploaded content. Ciell (talk) 14:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 04:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Import automatique fait par osmhydrant.org Il y a eu confusion entre 2 requêtes d'import. Ce fichier ne correspond à l'image du noeud OSM 6563251028 Quentin S33 (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 18:44, 21 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thwekanyaw --Krdbot 00:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, no permission to reuse. (definitely not own work) Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep per COM:TOO. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. But I'll delete it as out of project scope. The uploader was indefinitely blocked in en.wiki as self-promotion-only account. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
A duplicate derived from File:Apostasy laws in 2013.SVG. There is no real reason why this file should be present. Being a map, it is better that the original SVG file be used, because it can be edited. This one has to be replaced whenever the original is changed. Please change the file links on the Wikipedia articles this image is used, in case this is deleted. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; dupe-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
The image was uploaded from (and is still offered on) the Flickr-site of the US Embassy in London, UK. However, on Flickr it is under a Commons-non-compliant CC-BY-ND license. Being offered by an U.S. Embassy it might fall under PD-USGov, provided it had been created by an embassy employee or at least "official photographer". Exactly the latter is not clear, as - contrary to some other images on the same Flickr-site - there is no note "(C) US Embassy" or "(C) US Embassy photographer". So, there is some likelyhood they got the image just from a photographer present at the event of the embassy. Therefore, it seems we need to delete this image per COM:PRP. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- KEEP learn to read the EXIF, if it specifically doesn't link a photographer or Getty, than its OWNED by the US Embassy..--Stemoc 01:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: {{PD-USgov}}. --Yann (talk) 04:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
The screen is a derivative work, and should be cropped or blurred. Yann (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete quality too low of common object to be useful.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I'm the creator of tis file and I want it to be deleted too.
Deleted: per nomination, and above. --Yann (talk) 04:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Canada for two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals... even if they are permanently located in a public place, unless they are in the public domain.
- File:Joker graffiti (8098287676).jpg
- File:Art at the WAG 100 Masters (9246854593).jpg
- File:Art at the WAG 100 Masters (9249640248).jpg
- File:Art at the WAG 100 Masters (9246861269).jpg
- File:Art at the WAG 100 Masters (9249647742).jpg
- File:Skull ornament (10198045685).jpg
- File:Face (10198077246).jpg
- File:Hands (10198144783).jpg
- File:Hands (10198092105).jpg
- File:Hands (10198081505).jpg
- File:Graffiti alien (10585330034).jpg
- File:Skull vampire Winnipeg graffiti (14376046184).jpg
- File:Cyclops potato art (15347145972).jpg
- File:Rainbow Theatre Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (17580221064).jpg
- File:Rainbow Theatre Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (18015109660).jpg
- File:Rainbow Theatre Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (18202836635).jpg
- File:Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (18655712496).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133343 (18559743544).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133411 (18994601570).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133318 (18994602310).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133041 (19182280485).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133250 (18994602400).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 133130 (18996142899).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132938 (19176494872).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132857 (19185868961).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132728 (19176499542).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132308 (18996154879).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132543 (18996151089).jpg
- File:Graffiti IMG 20150626 132213 (19185876531).jpg
- File:A rug (25863976580).jpg
- File:A painting on some school in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (29942245282).jpg
- File:Devil mug (33252106692).jpg
- File:A small portion of a painting in the Winnipeg Art Gallery (33408100875).jpg
- File:At an abandoned waterslide park in Lockport, Manitoba, Canada. (36841434652).jpg
- File:An art piece that is part if the Winnipeg Art Gallery's Canada 150 Signature Project Art Express D'Art Exprime on display at The Forks in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada as part of Nuit Blanche. (37606190122).jpg
- File:Winnipeg's most frightening jackass-o'-lantern. (38287346481).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP for 2-D works in Canada.
- File:1451 Chambord, Montreal (30382393830).jpg
- File:1451 Chambord, Montreal (30382396160).jpg
- File:Une conversation avec Iggy Pop (32241351086).jpg
- File:Mono-Sourcil - Graffiti Montreal 2016 (30898177282).jpg
- File:Tiburon & Mono-Sourcil (30926337031).jpg
- File:Graffiti Métro Beaubien, Montreal 2016 (31078686345).jpg
- File:Labelle Fourrure (31078683875).jpg
- File:ACAB!!! (31078679485).jpg
- File:«Tout le monde a des tatoos. Laisse faire ça.» (30366411664).jpg
- File:Montreal Street Art (31073245491).jpg
- File:Fafinettes (31073248031).jpg
- File:You Won't Be This Beautiful Forever! (30820158710).jpg
- File:Contes & Légendes (31158116386).jpg
- File:Tacos Victor (30462468354).jpg
- File:Frida Kahlo Graffiti (30476406213).jpg
- File:Roy Dupuis Mural (31139850182).jpg
- File:Beauty is only skin deep (30994679640).jpg
- File:When I'll Grow Up, I'll Be A Kid (31486309271).jpg
- File:When I'll Grow Up, I'll Be A Kid (31229724930).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (39875365054).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (39691273805).jpg
- File:Tyler Lemco for mayor (40585789741).jpg
- File:Tyler Lemco for mayor (39691258385).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (26731592458).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (40561058072).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (40561068072).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (40561078522).jpg
- File:Campagne électorale Montréal electoral campaign, 2017 (40561093022).jpg
- File:Anti Breed-specific legislation Sign (40202879902).jpg
- File:Anti Breed-specific legislation Sign (38424985010).jpg
- File:L'art de la magie - The Art of Magic (27691727129).jpg
- File:Dino Bravo Public Art, Montreal (27704385199).jpg
- File:-pussypowerposse (28019497659).jpg
- File:Plume Latraverse par Laurent Gascon (2015) (28205372509).jpg
- File:Fameux oiseaux de Montréal - Montreal's favorite bird (40134092821).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(28205372509).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D artworks.
- File:Frida Kahlo (5699185162).jpg
- File:Painting the walls (5710276820).jpg
- File:Fresh Coat (7040560123).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FOP in Canada for 2-D works.
- File:Ontario Place 2016 (29250973753).jpg
- File:FAMILY FEUD IGNITES BLOODBATH. (3612909068).jpg
- File:ONE DESTINATION (3644863251).jpg
- File:GOTTA PLASTIC BAG (3644863245).jpg
- File:PARKETTE PIC (3134366770).jpg
- File:CROWD CONTROL (3039526184).jpg
- File:ANYWHERE BUT HERE (3055150810).jpg
- File:VIC PARK BELOW EGLINGTON (357763127).jpg
- File:GARAGE ART 2 more detail (362032136).jpg
- File:SA 1 (318267456).jpg
- File:ARTY (254633711).jpg
- File:ON THE WALL (298191856).jpg
- File:WELCOME (298191862).jpg
- File:Goethe for it (281956156).jpg
- File:PEACE OF ART (293314485).jpg
- File:Flickr convention (269725404).jpg
- File:Tag 5 (269727687).jpg
- File:BE HERE.........for a price (269725402).jpg
- File:Tag 4 (269727691).jpg
- File:Tag 1 (269727698).jpg
- File:DOORART (236626319).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- The artwork in File:CROWD CONTROL (3039526184).jpg is secondary to the principal subjects (police, sitting woman, and five chairs). The photo depicted in File:Flickr convention (269725404).jpg is from the 1920s and PD-Canada. And File:FAMILY FEUD IGNITES BLOODBATH. (3612909068).jpg depicts only a small portion of the artwork. (Is there a policy regarding parts of works?) Mindmatrix 01:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- As an aside, will the deleted files (and those from earlier sets) be marked for undeletion when their copyright period expires? Mindmatrix 01:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but CROWD CONTROL (3039526184).jpg (de minimis). "FAMILY FEuD..." is deleted also per TOY, and no date is provided for the reproduced photo (which looks also out of scope). Undeletion in 120 years. Ruthven (msg) 07:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D works.
- File:Canadian Legion No. 001 (543105541).jpg
- File:Canadian Legion No. 001 (543106125).jpg
- File:Canadian Legion No. 001 (543106905).jpg
- File:Canadian Legion No. 001 (543000334).jpg
- File:Canadian Legion No. 001 (543000886).jpg
- File:Sir Walter Scott (3080563579).jpg
- File:Premier Allen Blakeney (3080563989).jpg
- File:Window and Graffiti - Fenêtre et graffiti (417179441).jpg
- File:Paint on the wall - Tesalyn 1984-2002 (417166090).jpg
- File:Sheep on the Bricks - Mouton sur la brique (417168442).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535147382).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535291853).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535289347).jpg
- File:Window and Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535173108).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535172892).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535301013).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535298713).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535311447).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535194702).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535334319).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535362599).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535248708).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Cathedral Village Regina (535248922).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mindmatrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D works.
- File:Museum of Canadian History (36606806946).jpg
- File:Museum of Canadian History (36606799676).jpg
- File:Children's Museum at the Museum of Canadian History (35843834663).jpg
- File:Museum of Canadian History (35843759493).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Museum of Canadian History (36606799676).jpg is not a 2D work. Mindmatrix 16:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except for the one which was 3D. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Image files of Kansai Airports
[edit]- File:Kansai_Airports_Logo.gif (uploaded by User:Minatsu)
- File:Kansai_Airports_Logo2.gif (uploaded by User:Banku)
- File:Kansai_International_Airport_Logo.gif (uploaded by User:Banku)
- File:Osaka_International_Airport_Logo.gif (uploaded by User:Banku)
- File:Kobe_Airport_Logo.gif (uploaded by User:Banku)
- File:New_Kansai_International_Airport_logo.jpg (uploaded by User:Banku)
- File:Kansai_International_Airport_Logo.png (uploaded by User:John123521)
- File:ITM_airport_logo.jpg (uploaded by User:John123521)
- File:ITM_Airport_Logo.png (uploaded by User:Hans135797531)
I believe that they should be deleted because of copyright violation. The details are described below.
Images #1 to #5 are the brand logos of Kansai Airports Co., Ltd. They are the current operator of Kansai International Airport, Osaka International Airport, and Kobe Airport. Their copyright policy is declared in [4]. Please, note that their policy is not based on the license-free standard. Every time we would make copy of these logos, we should beg their permission (except for personal use or quotation purposes to make one). The original logo files are from [5], in which the meaning and design concepts of the images are written in detail. That is, they are not mere “simple geometric shapes or text”.
Images #6 to #9 are the brand logos of New Kansai International Airport Co., Ltd. They are the former operator of Kansai International Airport and Osaka International Airport. Their copyright policy is declared in [6]. I am sorry that there is no English page. However, their policy is completely same with that of Kansai Airports Co., Ltd. ([7] in Japanese) It means that the copyright policy for the images #6 to #9 is also same as [8] (in English). That is, their policy is also based on the no license-free standard. The original logo files are from [9], in which the design concepts of the images are also described in detail (concerning of mottos written above the 3-letter logos and meaning of font and colors used there). They are not mere “simple geometric shapes or text”, too.
Adding to say, the images #8 and #9 are duplicates.
Above are why I believe they should be deleted. --エア修士 (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC) corrections.--エア修士 (talk) 12:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC) additional correction. --エア修士 (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think these logos aren't copyrighted because it's applied arts and text logos. At least in Japan, most lawyers think applied arts aren't copyrighted. --Banku (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- (Reply) Thank you for your polite replying on your talk page and participating in the deletion discussion. I leave some comments on your copyright policy as following. --エア修士 (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- (Comments) First of all, Mr./Ms. Banku and I are in agreement that Kansai Airports Co., Ltd. and New Kansai International Airport Co., Ltd. clearly claim their copyright of the images listed above in their web sites (Please, note that Mr./Ms. Banku comments concerning for this issue in his/her talk page on the basis of next condition, “I (Mr./Ms. Banku) avoid to comment on the individual case in this deletion requests. But, I show my policy on the materials (with copyright claimed by the owner in their web sites) as following...”, which are written in Japanese).
Second, in the web sites I showed as the original sources of the image files, the design concepts are described in detail with intension for the creations. Some of them are shown as followings. (I) As for the images #1 to #5, the blue and red cross-linked ellipses symbol is expression of comfortable stay in the airports and enjoyment in the journey, which are the corporate motto. Additionally, the two ellipses indicate the real directions of runways in the airports that Kansai Airports Co., Ltd. operates. That is, this symbol is designed for showing their company policy by using characteristics of their own airports. (II) Concerning of the images #7 to #9, the sentences placed above the 3-letter logos are catchphrases and advertising slogans that depict each benefits of their own airports. (III) The symbol in the image #6 shows the integration of the two airports, which are expressed as green and blue shapes. These colors respectively correspond to those in the images #7 to #9. (Note that the corporate goal of New Kansai International Airport Co., Ltd. is management’s unification of Kansai International Airport and Osaka International Airport).
I think these facts support that the uploaded image files are not mere simple geometric shapes/text nor under threshold of originality.
By the way, Mr./Ms. Banku said to us, ”Most lawyers (in Japan) think applied arts aren't copyrighted”. I do not think so because of following reasons. (1) These logos are not “applied arts”. (2) Production in which thought is expressed in a creative way including literary and art can be protected by Japanese copyright law (See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Japan). --エア修士 (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC) corrections.--エア修士 (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: all logos fall below the threshold of originality. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copied as it appears in at least one other place on the web, with a credit there (in Hebrew) to Noam Galay. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright-protected logo (must have been uploaded on the Wikipedia based on fair use) Huji (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
porque no me gusta Vale paron (talk) 00:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:OOS 大诺史 (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Emmatoren - maquette.jpg Hardscarf (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Unuseful redirect resulted from a move that fixed a typo. SirEdimon (talk) 03:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely created by Amazon, not the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete I believe it was deleted under copyright violation before. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Older version (from at least 2018) found elsewhere online: https://gfycat.com/euphoricamazingdotterel. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Soldier reading a book from the 1917 poster "The Camp Library is Yours" "Read to Win the War" by C B Falls, American Library Association (cropped).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate I created in error Tibet Nation (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Reverse Deletion
- Hello Patrick Rogel,
- This is an image of a Ghanaian journalist given a talk at a discussion in a Summit in Accra. She is a notable person who will have her article created soon. I believe her image is unique and diverse which can be used.Aliscopa (talk) 08:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Article(s) exists on Wikipedia (see d:Q23883006). So, this is now in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted image by South Korean news outlet. http://news1.kr/photos/details/?3403969 Christian Bolz (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:21, 10 November 2019 UTC: Copyrighted image by South Korean news outlet. http://news1.kr/photos/details/?3403969 --Krdbot 01:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- also file:VCUHS AOF Schematic Design C S Plans.jpg.7b022b44854eb71c3af8db008d8bfc0c.jpg
Small photos without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contributions. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fizzahaider1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small photos, mostly with EXIF suggesting they are from Facebook, unlikely to be uploader's own work.
- File:Tourist opportunities .jpg
- File:Locals of Kashmir.jpg
- File:Northern mountainous trek.jpg
- File:Mountainous terrain.jpg
- File:Northern Pakistan sky line.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Not educationally useful because it's a private residence photo and not use on one page. Catherine Laurence 04:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://www.senado.es/web/composicionorganizacion/senadores/composicionsenado/fichasenador/index.html?legis=12&id1=16586 without apparent permission Asqueladd (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
duplicated (cf File:Pisanc_58.jpg) Hladnikm (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Sitacuisses (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Sitacuisses (talk) 08:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal image, COM:SCOPE. Also EXIF data is missing. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 09:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
unused lower resolution version of File:5671538885111 .pic hd.jpg DannyS712 (talk) 09:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, personal. unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
File is all over the web, COM:OTRS permission needed. Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.dopecausewesaid.com/dope-features/interview-pop-singer-songwriter-and-producer-jackie-faraoui-talks-about-her-new-single-kiss-goodbye
Converted by me to DR, as the external hit can't be the source, as it is 4 days younger than our upload and it's cropped. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unused (currently used on enwiki draft, but draft is been nominated for deletion) and Personal photo (Own work?) -- CptViraj (📧) 09:31, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:CptViraj. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful contributions by this uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I made a mistake on the name of the fossil Archaeaspis is a typo Archaeaspinus correct mararo 10:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I can't see anywhere that says "Archaeaspis". If there are any, they can probably be corrected. --bjh21 (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
I made a mistake in the deletion request image The name of this photo is correct The names of the 2 posted photos older than this image are incorrect I withdraw the request to delete this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masahiro miyasaka (talk • contribs) 10:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of rose. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ROHIT SINGH RAJA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE images.
- File:ROHIT SINGH ,.jpg
- File:ROHIT SINGH ..,.jpg
- File:ROHIT SINGH.`.jpg
- File:ROHIT SINGH.jpg
- File:ROHIT SINGH .,.jpg
- File:ROHIT SINGH .,.,.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete just came to make this nomination myself --DannyS712 (talk) 20:05, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Patrick this image was taken in Kenmore Brisbane near the Physiotherapy clinic, it was precisely taken at Akuna Street Park in Kenmore, Brisbane Australia. The image is rightfully owned by Ventelite Physiotherapy hence the caption. Please keep my image as I believe it does not violate wikipedias criteria, if you want to suggest edits please do so if informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.71.243.124 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TowfiqSultan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some files are out of scope (Personal/Private photos). Others should have OTRS ticket even though the images seem to belong to the uploader.
- File:Beautiful Place Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Some Beautiful Place Bangladesh 20.jpg
- File:Some Beautiful Place Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Bangladesh history.jpg
- File:Bangladesh History Museum.jpg
- File:Bangladesh history cal.jpg
- File:Bangladesh History Museum 22.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ~১.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Historycal Place.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা -৩.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ~৪.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা -৫.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ~৭.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ~৮.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ৯.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ১০.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ১১.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা.gif
- File:বাংলাদেশের কিছু সুন্দর জায়গা ~.jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~মানব কল্যাণ সংঘ .jpg
- File:Barishabo Union.jpg
- File:Dhaka Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Kapasia Gazipur.jpg
- File:Public Place.jpg
- File:Asia Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Earth World.jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~ মানবকল্যাণ সংঘ ২নং.jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~ মানবকল্যাণ সংঘ। যা বিশ্বের কল্যাণকামী মানুষের একটি সম্মিলিত সংগঠন। ওয়েলফশন.jpg
- File:WELFTION - Human Welfare Association.jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~ মানবকল্যাণ সংঘ ১.jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~ মানবকল্যাণ সংঘ .jpg
- File:বারিষাব ইউনিয়ন .jpg
- File:ওয়েলফশন ~ মানবকল্যাণ সংঘ.jpg
大诺史 (talk) 15:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: if "the images seem to belong to the uploader", then no OTRS is needed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused low resolution personal image — Rhododendrites talk | 18:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete blurry/low res with no evident compensating unique importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No value, low quality, potential personality rights issues. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
School work; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, out of scope. Wouldn't have a problem if it was a freely-available guide to such work, but appears to just be some text that might comprise an example or coursework. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [10] — Racconish 💬 19:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I think as a result of CTEA still in copyright for another good few years. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal pictures; out of project scope.
XXN, 16:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Only used for repeatedly-deleted (as self-promotional and non-notable-subject) article on en.wp.
- File:IsaaKaRs Wiki 2018.jpg
- File:IsaaKaRs Signature.png
- File:IsaaKaRs.jpg
- File:IsaaK KaRslian.jpg
- File:Mountains Time.jpg
- File:PROFIK.jpg
DMacks (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Support, deletion discussion about the self-promotional article draft. —andrybak (talk) 07:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Includes a logo that is copyright protected Huji (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; low quality and out of project scope. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
wohl URV, siehe https://www.aachener-nachrichten.de/nrw-region/stolberg-mordanschlag-auf-journalisten_aid-34924335 Xocolatl (talk) 00:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, we'd need OTRS permission to keep this file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Uploader needs to provide explanation on how s/he knows this was not renewed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyright renewed [11]. Previously deleted [12]. — Racconish 💬 10:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
likely copyvio; proshot image with no clear license by user with only one upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright renewed [13] — Racconish 💬 10:28, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
No indication why it would not be still in copyright as it appears to be here. — Racconish 💬 10:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thugs with Dirty Mugs.webm Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Previously deleted [14] and appears to be still in copyright [15]. — Racconish 💬 10:42, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be still in copyright [16]. — Racconish 💬 10:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be still in copyright [17]. — Racconish 💬 10:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps the cartoon is in PD, but for sure the licence tag is wrong. Shouldn't it be {{PD-US-not renewed}} or something like this? jdx Re: 17:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- The Sheepish Wolf is a cartoon of the public domain in 1971. 455jiujo (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader changed the licence while I was filling the DR so I withdraw my nomination. --jdx Re: 18:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal found. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be still in copyright [18]. — Racconish 💬 10:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I can tell, that document is about a transfer of a huge number of copyrights. Corporation A is transferring their interest in a huge number of works to corporation B. As part of these bulk sales, it behooves neither company to question deeply the amount of copyright that is still valid in these old works.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- See here and here. — Racconish 💬 04:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be still in copyright [19]. — Racconish 💬 10:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I can tell, that document is about a transfer of a huge number of copyrights. Corporation A is transferring their interest in a huge number of works to corporation B. As part of these bulk sales, it behooves neither company to question deeply the amount of copyright that is still valid in these old works.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- See here and here. — Racconish 💬 04:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be still in copyright [20]. — Racconish 💬 10:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I can tell, that document is about a transfer of a huge number of copyrights. Corporation A is transferring their interest in a huge number of works to corporation B. As part of these bulk sales, it behooves neither company to question deeply the amount of copyright that is still valid in these old works.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- See here and here. — Racconish 💬 04:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- The first link is just noise. There's only one hit in the copyright database that could matter, the one 28 years after publication that's a renewal notice (an ID of R...). COM:PCP does not say that we shouldn't upload public domain works because someone once made noise about maybe owning copyright in them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright assignment V3492 D216-298 P1-891 is referenced in an opinion from the Stanford University to the Copyright Office as a positive hit in a copyright search [21] and here, as an evidence of copyright ownership. This film is also part of V1933P347 by which a group of copyrights were assigned by United Artists to Bank of America as collaterals to a loan [22] and COM:PCP would imply IMO to assume BOA lawyers considered such assets as more than 'just noise'. — Racconish 💬 08:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Who is www.copyrightencyclopedia.com, and why should I care about their mechanical dumps? You're pointing to a completely random website and acting like they're authoritative.
- If the w:Financial crisis of 2007–2008 taught us anything, it's that banks don't always carefully and correctly value their assets. And what value is it to BoA to rubbish the value of their customer's property? The question BoA would have asked itself is if there is enough value in that collection as a whole to back the loan, not whether there existed some part of that collection that, provided there existed some group who was brave enough to argue the point, the copyright could be established as not valid. You're justifying their decision; clearly even if they couldn't win in court, United Artists and BoA are intimidating enough that you're unwilling to accept that they may have lost the copyright.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright assignment V3492 D216-298 P1-891 is referenced in an opinion from the Stanford University to the Copyright Office as a positive hit in a copyright search [21] and here, as an evidence of copyright ownership. This film is also part of V1933P347 by which a group of copyrights were assigned by United Artists to Bank of America as collaterals to a loan [22] and COM:PCP would imply IMO to assume BOA lawyers considered such assets as more than 'just noise'. — Racconish 💬 08:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- The first link is just noise. There's only one hit in the copyright database that could matter, the one 28 years after publication that's a renewal notice (an ID of R...). COM:PCP does not say that we shouldn't upload public domain works because someone once made noise about maybe owning copyright in them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- See here and here. — Racconish 💬 04:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, in doubt the COM:PCP applies. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
com:PCP: family photo without attribution to Fars news photographers. Hanooz 11:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Under "Color by Technicolor", there is a Copyright notice Escudero (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously non-free, taken by someone else, per the watermark Lugnuts (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Tatu Pekkarinen died in 1951. Geohakkeri (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Undelete in 2021 —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 15:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [23] — Racconish 💬 13:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [24] — Racconish 💬 13:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [25] — Racconish 💬 13:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [26] — Racconish 💬 13:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [27] — Racconish 💬 13:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [28] — Racconish 💬 13:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [29] — Racconish 💬 13:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [30] — Racconish 💬 13:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [31] — Racconish 💬 13:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [32] — Racconish 💬 13:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [33] — Racconish 💬 13:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [34] — Racconish 💬 13:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [35] — Racconish 💬 13:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [36] — Racconish 💬 13:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [37] — Racconish 💬 13:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [38] — Racconish 💬 13:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [39] — Racconish 💬 13:26, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [40] — Racconish 💬 13:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [41] — Racconish 💬 13:28, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [42] — Racconish 💬 13:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, sculptor died in 1971, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [43] — Racconish 💬 13:30, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
For the same reason, delete also File:An Itch in Time 1.jpg and File:An Itch in Time 2.jpg. — Racconish 💬 14:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This document linked to has no legal effect. It is one company declaring that it has bought the rights to these works, and any public domain works that got swept up in the collection, this document asserts the buying company gets to argue the legal case, if more than intimidation is necessary. It's cheaper and easier to buy the whole set then nitpick such details and leave any possible rights (including foreign ones, like in France and Germany) with the seller.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- See [44]. COM:PCP should apply here. — Racconish 💬 12:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
its incomplete Fanee369 (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [45] — Racconish 💬 13:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [46] — Racconish 💬 13:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [47] — Racconish 💬 13:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [48] — Racconish 💬 13:42, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [49] — Racconish 💬 13:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Bad quality Wpcpey (talk) 13:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
不清楚您所謂的品質不佳是從何定義，以此標準是不是百分之九十的維基圖庫都該刪除？ Cyc89145302 (talk) 21:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
不要有汽車阻擋，在晴天下拍一些角度好的圖片 如此圖和此圖，晚上拍也許更好。多年來維基圖像品質不佳的情況應該要改變，不應該馬虎拍就上載。--Wpcpey (talk) 02:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:السيد محمد ملحم يصافح الرئيس الراحل صدام حسين ببغداد.jpg
- File:الرئيس الراحل ياسر عرفات ومحمد ملحم عضو اللجنه التنفيذيه لمنظمة التحرير الفلسطينيه ورئيس بلدية حلحول سابق.jpg
- File:محمد ملحم سياسي قيادي ومناضل فلسطيني.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Moebius 03 - The Airtight Garage (Epic Graphic Novel) (c2c) (Gambit).cbz - Page 5 (6530666509).jpg
[edit]_(c2c)_(Gambit).cbz_-_Page_5_(6530666509).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(c2c)_(Gambit).cbz_-_Page_5_(6530666509).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright work by Jean Giraud (d. 2012), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Hekerui (talk) 23:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
uploader claims that this was theirs to release under a Creative Commons licence, but the image file does not include any metadata as you would expect from an image they took themselves; the photo was taken at the Premier League Productions office, which I doubt the uploader had access to PeeJay2K3 (talk) 14:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Selfie : unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Selfie : unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a photograph I have taken and I would be grateful if it remains. Not every photograph is a selfie when taken with a mobile phone. I know the subject well and have taken many photographs of him. Norah Pamela (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious selfie. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [50] — Racconish 💬 14:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
This person is a notable public figure. Permission to use this photo has been given. I will add the evidence here. (talk) Tarun.udayaraj (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Case of the Missing Hare
[edit]Still in copyright [51]
- File:"Case of the Missing Hare" title card.jpg
- File:Case of the Missing Hare (1942).ogv
- File:Case of the Missing Hare 190611 LTGC.webm
- File:CaseOfTheMissingHare 3.png
- File:CaseOfTheMissingHare Title.png
— Racconish 💬 14:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
See also here. — Racconish 💬 16:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Same problem with:
--Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [52] — Racconish 💬 15:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [53] — Racconish 💬 15:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [54] — Racconish 💬 15:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [55] — Racconish 💬 15:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [56] — Racconish 💬 15:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, no permission to reuse. (definitely not own work) 大诺史 (talk) 15:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [57]. — Racconish 💬 15:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [58] — Racconish 💬 15:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
There's a duplicate and better version of the file here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Puerto_Rico_Highways_1111,_128,_111_Intersection,_Lares.jpg The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [59] — Racconish 💬 15:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Dover Boys
[edit]Still in copyright [60]
— Racconish 💬 15:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [61]. Yann (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Why ? Above COM:TOO. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, no permission to reuse. (definitely not own work) Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO, but warn user about attribution and correct. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: license correct now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
No source that the author released the image with that license Yilku1 (talk) 16:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Old file no longer in use on Wiki projects. Histoiremarbot (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, files are not only for use in Wikimedia projects. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Old file no longer in use on Wiki projects. Histoiremarbot (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Agreed. Wikimarbot (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
No permission. Jcb (talk) 17:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
An incorrect pronunciation was recorded, ['pjede] instead of ['pjɛde] --94.39.220.96 17:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
source/author missing, I does not look like the person on the photo is the photographer — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Probably out of scope, as a "sport of Coro" doesn't seem to exist, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corofield.jpg Gestumblindi (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
duplicate usage Generesearch (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: unclear deletion rationale. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
duplicate usage Generesearch (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: unclear deletion rationale. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate: File:Building of Turkish Supreme Electoral Council.jpg 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: other version is in use and a slightly cropped version of this image. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Import automatique fait par osmhydrant.org Il y a eu confusion entre 2 requêtes d'import. Ce fichier ne correspond à l'image du noeud OSM 6563182093 Quentin S33 (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: bot upload, most likely requested by Quentin S33. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot in a political demonstration (Hungary). Regasterios (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot in a political demonstration (Hungary). Regasterios (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
lt. Website der Gemeinde und Haus der Bay. Geschichte, Abt. Wappen, ist die Darstellung des Bibers (Schnauze, Schwanz) falsch. Eine korrekte Darstellung ist in einer jpg-Version vorhanden. I. Berger (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D works. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bâtiment récent : Œuvre : Atelier d'architecture Chaix & Morel (http://www.chaixetmorel.com/fr/cat/4/23/) Poudou99 (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no FOP in France. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Promotional. Vanity. Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Es totalmente legítimo Por que? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvar2001 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot of photo in an app, no EXIF data. If you're the one who took the original photo, please upload the original. Hmxhmx 21:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Import automatique fait par osmhydrant.org Il y a eu confusion entre 2 requêtes d'import. Ce fichier ne correspond à l'image du noeud OSM 6563249994 Quentin S33 (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request (via bot). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Inviernoenmadrid (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of permission
- File:Inverfest. Cartel 4ª edición. año 2018.webp
- File:Inverfest. Cartel 3ª edicióm. Año 2017.webp
- File:Inverfest. Cartel 2ª edición. Año 2016.webp
- File:0b544c 3b36ef7ef8fb46298b40782b787835bf.gif
Discasto talk 22:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
All content © 2006-2019 Napa, CA and its representatives. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://yolo.lv/en/movie/1566 Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.eventyas.com/DE/Stolberg/149755215073932/tv-produzent.de - wer hat da von wem geklaut? Xocolatl (talk) 00:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by User:175.125.50.183 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.otr.co.kr/audition/casting_view?user=J3SJ-V0MM16082800000005 JuTa 01:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Pleas don’t delete this picture it’s me(jimmy.jeon) And i have copyright this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy.jeon (talk • contribs) 2019-06-21T15:07:49 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE. ~riley (talk) 01:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I made a mistake in naming some of the Files of Harz-Berg-Kalender 1919. Starting from 036, 038 and so forth I need to move 040 to 038, 042 to 040 and so on. Ogmios (Talk) 17:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment Images can be renamed without deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: Then pleas rename File:Harz-Berg-Kalender 1919 040.png to File:Harz-Berg-Kalender 1919 038.png Ogmios (Talk) 12:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, use Template:Rename. ~riley (talk) 01:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yilku1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The site is www.hcdiputados-ba.gov.ar (chamber of deputies of buenos aires), not www.hcdn.gob.ar (national chamber of deputies) — billinghurst sDrewth 04:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Image is from here, the chamber of deputies of buenos aires has all rights reserved. --Yilku1 (talk) 16:10, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nigos as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: LTA made the original design. may be PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep but change license. 大诺史 (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Various derivative works of unclear copyright status, some old photos or maps may be in Public Domain, but 1/ it is currently quite unclear and 2/ the modern texts shown on the description plates may also be copyrighted. No FoP in Philippines
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 06.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 07.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 08.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 09.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 10.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 11.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 12.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 13.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 14.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 15.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 16.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 17.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 18.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 19.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 20.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 21.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 23.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 24.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 25.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 26.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 27.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 28.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 31.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 32.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 33.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 34.jpg
- File:1035University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 36.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 14.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 19.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 21.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 27.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 28.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 30.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 38.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 39.jpg
- File:1085University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 40.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 02.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 04.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 05.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 06.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 07.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 08.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 10.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 12.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 14.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 15.jpg
- File:1135University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 16.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 20.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 21.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 22.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 23.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 24.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 25.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 27.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 29.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 30.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 38.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 39.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 40.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 41.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 42.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 43.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 44.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 45.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 46.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 48.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 49.jpg
- File:1186University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 50.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 01.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 04.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 05.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 06.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 07.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 08.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 09.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 10.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 13.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 14.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 15.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 16.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 17.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 18.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 19.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 20.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 21.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 22.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 23.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 25.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 27.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 29.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 30.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 31.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 32.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 33.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 34.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 35.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 36.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 37.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 38.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 39.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 40.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 41.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 42.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 43.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 45.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 46.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 47.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 48.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 49.jpg
- File:1237University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas 50.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 01.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 02.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 03.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 04.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 06.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 07.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 08.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 09.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 10.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 11.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 12.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 13.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 14.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 15.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 16.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 17.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 18.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 19.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 20.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 21.jpg
- File:1288Padre Faura Street 22.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
- With all due respect, I am submitting here the Finer points of Philippine Copyright on the matter, to wit:
- Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Category:University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas was granted to herein photographer editor by the OIC, head, Supervisor or Curator of the Museum, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the subject Museum, as I was even assisted in the taking of Pictures;
- Incidentally, there is an ongoing event or Dinner reception when I took the photos with Permission;
- Upon a careful review and look at the Displays, like the History of the Museum, almost all of the photos are pictures of Reproductions by Category:University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas of very very Old Originals dating from 1900 to 1920, Courtesy of a deceased Member of the University and Hospital; they are like Tarpaulins or Xerox of the Very very old Original like this and the many
Please consider the Legal lecture and explanations delivered to me by the very high ranking officers of the Past Blancaflor Office March 7, 2014: on the Code Republic Act No. 8293
[edit]
- Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL, in this building which I photographed including the 16th floor office of Director Blancaflor, I discussed the matter of my Petition on FoP with Atty. Limbo who said that the newly created on 2013 Bureau of Copyright will be the one under Director Blancaflor who is abroad but will be back soon to render and release a legal opinion on my Petition, Letter. : Considering that until now they failed to issue the promised Reply to Solve all the legal ramifications of the FoP, in good faith, I uploaded photos, understanding that I leave the matter of deletion to any and all editors who deem it proper to raise these issues; suffice it to say that I was granted express but verbal permission to photography these photos for deletion, hence,
- All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx
- Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
- In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark spots; references
- Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 04:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Additional references and legal, finer points on the express limitations of Copyright:
All the the museum's collection explores the ideas the university was associated with during the period of its establishment in the early twentieth century (1900 to 1920s), hence expressly exempted by Sec. 198. Term of Moral Rights. 198.1. from coverage of Copyright Law due to Prescription
[edit]- It was declared as a heritage building by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines.
- All the the museum's collection explores the ideas the university was associated with during the period of its establishment in the early twentieth century (1900 to 1920s). The photos here state and indicate that all the collections came from the defunct [62] Maria Paz Mendoza Philippine Medical Museum (second and third floors of the same Guazon Building) which has been turned over to and accepted by the PGH Resident’s Association; [63] Maria Paz Mendoza-Guazon memorial
- Limitations on Copyright Republic Act No. 8293
- 176.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or republication by the government in a public document of any work in which copy right is subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use or appropriation of such work without the consent of the copyright owners. (Sec. 9, Third Par., P. D. No. 49)
- The reproduction and communication to the public of literary, scientific, or artistic works for reporting current events.
- The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use.
- The public performance of a work in a place without admission fee and for other purposes that does not include profit making.
- Any library or archive with non-profit purposes may make a single copy of the work without the authorization of the author given that: The making of a copy is for the purposes of preserving or replacing the original in situations that it is destroyed or lost;
- Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.
- Fair Use by UP Archives Museum, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement
- Works of the Government, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. It is not required to seek prior approval or conditions for the use for any purpose of statutes, rules and regulations, and speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered in courts of justice, before administrative agencies, in deliberative assemblies and in meetings of public character.
- ;Sec. 198. Term of Moral Rights. 198.1. The rights of an author under this chapter shall last during the lifetime of the author and for fifty (50) years after his death and shall not be assignable or subject to license.
- As additional reference proof of the UP Manila Museum of a History of Ideas houses the intangible wall screens project images of the vibrio cholerae, a comma-shaped bacterium that causes cholera, a gallery of photos of the Philippine-American War; the Museum chronicles the role and contributions of the state university to the intellectual life and critical imagination of an emergent nation since their concurrent establishment at the turn of the 20th century; Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 04:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: This is copyrighted material. If the director of the museum signed you a permission to publish their collection under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license, please forward it to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org, otherwise, ask them to send us a permission in, releasing their collection under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication (or Public domain, if the Philippines law says so). Thank you. Ruthven (msg) 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: This is copyrighted material. If the director of the museum signed you a permission to publish their collection under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license, please forward it to permissions-commons
- As additional reference proof of the UP Manila Museum of a History of Ideas houses the intangible wall screens project images of the vibrio cholerae, a comma-shaped bacterium that causes cholera, a gallery of photos of the Philippine-American War; the Museum chronicles the role and contributions of the state university to the intellectual life and critical imagination of an emergent nation since their concurrent establishment at the turn of the 20th century; Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 04:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
![[62]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1085University_of_the_Philippines_Manila_Museum_of_a_History_of_Ideas_30.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. All we need is a simple email outlining the copyright situation. What we do not need is an essay on different laws. --Green Giant (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Permùission of the respective designers needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Ciudad Lineal recibirá el verano con unas Fiestas de San Juan en tres escenarios diferentes 01.jpg
- File:Comienzan las fiestas del barrio del Pilar 01.jpg
- File:Fiestas de Dehesa de la Villa 2019.jpg
- File:Vuelven las fiestas del distrito de Usera 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: Why do we need a permission? The images come from the City Council of Madrid, the source provides a valid CC license and the works has been obviously made for the City Council of Madrid (all of them carry the City Council of Madrid web site and logo). Thus, I can't see the problem. Although I appreciate the precautionary principle, whether the City Council of Madrid owns the copyright of the works it orders is exactly as with any other city council, government or supra-national organization. Do they have the rights of the photographs? --Discasto talk 20:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- That the work is commissionned or sponsored by the City Council of Madrid does not mean they have the rights to the drawings which belong to the illustrators. Indeed it's very rare that authors transfer their rights. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- From experience, I wouldn't find particularly odd they may have rightly released these files under a compatible license. For example, the City Council explicitly released some of the most outstanding posters (I particularly remember this awesome series about happy women to celebrate San Isidro) under a CC-BY-NC and publicised it in the same media outlet mentioning the will of the artist (Mercedes deBellard) to release it that way (in this case, sadly a non-compatible cc-by-nc). Ok, this does not prove anything but that they have some authorship control over the commissions (so not that rare).--Asqueladd (talk) 20:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Public bodies often think they own the rights but quite rarely they do. In this case we need permission from the original authors. --Green Giant (talk) 01:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Still in copyright [64] — Racconish 💬 15:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Racconish, please interpret that list for us. That's a current document, and all the titles on the list are currently copyrighted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Likely yes. This document is part of a set of copyright transfer notices postdating 1978 accessible on the web site of the US Copyright Office [65]. In 1982, the copyright of the film was transferred by United Artists to Bank of America as collateral for a loan ; in 1983, the collateral was released by Bank of America back to United Artists ; in 1986, the copyright was transferred to MGM ; in 1999, to Warner Home Video ; in 2003 to Warner Brothers Entertainment. The last transfer, referenced in the nomination, is mentioned in a 2014 Response from the Law and Policy Lab of Stanford law School to the Copyright Office’s as an example of evidence on copyright [66] and by a secondary source as an example of existence of copyright [67]. Furthermore, I doubt Bank of America lawyers would have accepted as collateral a non existing asset. IMO we should at least apply COM:PCP here. — Racconish 💬 11:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- That sounds right to me. If it is under copyright, I would think a lawsuit would be fairly likely, if a cease and desist letter were ignored. Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- The "secondary source", www.copyrightencyclopedia.com, doesn't seem to be citing it as anything; it seems to be a dump of records with some indexes. I don't see anything in that Stanford Law School document that mentions it as an example of evidence on copyright; it is mentioned as an example of a copyright document.
- The Bank of America accepted as collateral 30,000 titles. What's the motivation for digging into the fine details of every single title on that list? A lack of US copyright would not mean that it has no copyright elsewhere in the world.
- COM:PCP demands significant doubt, which in my mind is more than a half-assed claim of copyright for a work that's clearly out of copyright.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
en dehors du fait que la photo est complètement moche, je ne suis pas sûr que Wikipédia ait vocation à recenser les plaques d'immatriculations des ambassadeurs (voir aussi tout ce qui est dans Category:Diplomatic license plates in France Tiraden (talk) 15:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, there is nothing wrong with cataloging official number plates. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Potential invalid self-made copyright claim. Certainly looks to be an official map, variations are in use elsewhere attributed to the Ministry of Transport and Communications, and also seeing crops of it a long time before the creation date listed in the tag. Worth discussing. AtomCrusher (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, if this does indeed originate from the MOTC, then it should be available under CC-SA 3.0 according to the MOTC's website (see tag bottom of their homepage), no? As long as the author is correctly attributed of course. Elspamo4 (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: invalid copyright claim. The watermark at left foot of the image suggests it came from qr.com.qa. The onus is on the uploader to prove it is their own work or that it is under a free license as suggested in the discussion. --Green Giant (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Collage appears to be a mix of copyrighted and public domain images. From the website, it looks like the author doesn't claim to own all of the original copyrights. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was given permission by Ms. Goldin's daughter. I have copied and pasted in response to yahoo correspondence from Sept 26, 2016, at 7:25 PM below:
- Hello again, Stephen,
- Thanks for your clarification.
- It is fine for you to create a montage of images of our mom. I would love to see what you come up with.
- We would not want you to submit them to the “Jesus in love” blog, or any other similar sites.
- Thanks,
- Sally
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- I help people make books about their lives!
- Check out my website: Tell Me A Story – Oral and Written Histories
- www.sallygoldin.com
- Sally Goldin, Personal Historian
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriation_(art)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenmeadart (talk • contribs)
- @Stephenmeadart: Thanks. The issue is that this sort of permission isn't enough to host images on Wikimedia Commons. Basically, anyone needs to be able to use or modify any image hosted here for any purpose forever (more or less). That means releasing all of the original images in the collage as well as the collage itself with a free license. That can only be done through formal documentation submitted by the copyright holders of each, sending documentation to COM:OTRS. In other words, there's a good amount of paperwork involved to upload images where there are copyrights the uploader doesn't own involved. It's a hassle, but it's how we ensure people who reuse images hosted here know they're doing so safely. — Rhododendrites talk | 04:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete Unused, potential necessary involvement of original author via OTRS. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Rhododendrites: Are you saying the artwork is weak and thus deserves deletion? If so is is it weak in your opinion due to composition or the fact that it is a digitally based medium? OR do you just think any argument I (or others) might make for not deleting it would be weak?
When I happened to see the "Upload for Pride" announcement I did not really see much in the way of guidelines of what content would be deemed a "no no" and why. (Perhaps the terms were there and I missed them. If so, I apologize.) It said to submit your art, your writing etc. in the spirit of Pride and that was/is the whole point of the image I chose, a piece depicting the loving pride and support of a political activist mother superimposed with a big boot stamping on a rainbow flag as an obvious symbol for the reality of oppression. The instructions from WIKI were to write one sentence basically as a title, and then a short paragraph for "judges" to put the image in what might be helpful context. That was it.
Again, if there was a caveat against the medium of the entry that should have come from one of the judges right at the receiving end from the get go and with a clear, concise thoughtfully worded explanation as to why. All I received from WIKI was a message that image was earmarked for deletion with no explanation as to why.
Rhododendrites, are you one of the judges? Is there some place on Wiki in conjunction with this contest which gives actual names for the judges, (not anonymous usernames), with perhaps details about their (fairly subjective) artistic/cultural expertise to qualify them as judges? Furthermore, couldn't this whole debate of to delete or not to delete occur on some less public platform but as clear one-on-one communication in private emails between the artist and said judges?
Art & Appropriation: There are over 500 images for the series this Ms. Goldin piece is a part of. The overall scope is to also to be educational for LGBTI history is not taught in school curriculums on the whole, thus a person (student) might like the way an image is presented and want to learn more about who/what is represented.
Thank you for writing the following valid point: "there's a good amount of paperwork involved to upload images where there are copyrights the uploader doesn't own involved. It's a hassle, but it's how we ensure people who reuse images hosted here know they're doing so safely."
When it came to me trying to contact people in conjunction with the origins of these images very rarely was there even a name given as creator/copyright holder and so I made every effort of trying to contact those who might know of who the creator was (such a the daughters of Ms. Goldin), including estates where both subjects and most likely unknown photographers were deceased. Yes, it has been a very time-consuming, frustrating hassle which for the most part wound up in further dead ends: people not responding or people having no idea who owns copyright and who I should contact.
The point is I felt and feel so strongly about this series and what it is attempting to do (educate in addition to paying homage) that I maintain how images are used creates an entirely new piece of artwork(s). I take pride in that and encourage other collage/montage artists to go on confidently making art, including LGBTI art for Pride with confidence, courage and heart despite subjective draconian arguments regarding copyright infringement. Google the many court cases involving this argument and hear the validity of the voices of the artists vs. the reasons others try to judge and suppress the integrity of that art.
Please note: all the above paragraphs have been written due to the following statement I received from WIKI which is basically an invitation for dialogue.
Again, I would prefer if this did not take place in such a public forum and I believe WIKI should be upfront about how this may become the case for any well-meaning person who attempts to contribute non-harmful non-libelous information to the site.
"If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenmeadart (talk • contribs) 16:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Stephenmeadart: Are you saying the artwork is weak - ? I'm not certain how my comments could be understood that way, but I apologize if I wasn't clear. I suspect you're referring to AtomCrusher's comment starting with "weak delete"? That only means he/she is "weakly" of the position that the file should be deleted. It, too, is not a judgment of the work but jargon regarding this process (which I appreciate is difficult to jump into for the first time). Nothing about this is a judgment of the artwork/artistic merit, and I can understand your frustration if it seemed that way. This is strictly a copyright matter. Wikimedia Commons only hosts media which owners have legally released (as in with explicit documentation of licenses rather than simply granting permission) with a free license (like Creative Commons). When you make a collage, there is a copyright for the creative work of the collage, but all of the original copyrights are still intact. One work can have many copyrights, and all of them need to be free to be hosted here. Collages as a medium are perfectly welcome on Commons, but they pose these challenges regarding copyright. As far as who is judge, this discussion is kept open so that arguments can be made about, for example, the copyright status(es) of the work(s), and then is closed and acted upon by an administrator (I am not an administrator FWIW). If you mean a judge for the Wiki Loves Pride initiative in particular, then I am not one of those judges either. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Rhododendrites: Thank you for taking the time and for your courtesy is providing clarity regarding your response and the response of others. "Weak" sounds like the vernacular from the kids of "South Park". So should I delete my entry if that's what the judges/administators are ultimately going to do? Are judges/administrators viewing this thread and will they weigh in or where how I could contact them? Or should I just see how it plays out? I believe at this point it is too late to submit anything else. Appreciating your patience, Stephen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenmeadart (talk • contribs) 18:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. "Weak, dude". :) I see. No, I'm quite certain that's not what AtomCrusher meant. "Weak Delete" is a shade less convicted than "Delete" and two steps removed from "Strong Delete". As for what to do from here, if you can secure written license releases from all copyright owners, they can be sent to COM:OTRS (click for more information). If you do so, leave a message here saying so. Otherwise, it will wind up deleted in a matter of a few days or possible a few weeks, depending on deletion backlogs (we need more volunteers!). This is the only page you need comment on -- other people can/will see this, and this is the thread the administrator who closes the discussion will read before making his/her determination. I know it can be a cumbersome process, and I think you for working to contribute to the project. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please use the COM:OTRS route if you wish to demonstrate permission has been given by relevant rights holder(s). --Green Giant (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mezerville (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical book pages, photos, drawings, coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:La Guerre de 1557 en Picardie.jpg
- File:Etude à Saint-Quentin d'Abel Patoux.jpg
- File:La petite maison de Jean-François de Bastide (1724-1798) édition de 1905.jpg
- File:Abel Patoux d'après Francis Tattegrain.jpg
- File:Abel Patoux.jpg
- File:Alliance de Freville et Monfort.jpg
- File:Baldwin de Freville , History of the ancient family of Marmyun.jpg
- File:Alliance de freville et De Cromwell.jpg
- File:Blason de Freville.jpg
- File:Liste à Dives sur Mer des compagnons de Guillaume le Conquérant.jpg
- File:Blason Fossard de Mezerville - Vicomte-.jpg
- File:Acte de mariage Pierre Fossard et Marie Marthe Vion de Monchesné.jpg
- File:Acte de mariage Pierre Fossard et Anne de Fréville.jpg
- File:Abbé Fossard.jpg
_%C3%A9dition_de_1905.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- These are in French in origin. Will look through all but definitely Keep File:La petite maison de Jean-François de Bastide (1724-1798) édition de 1905.jpg as the artist Alphonse Lalauze died in 1941. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonse_Lalauze Also Keep File:Abel Patoux d'après Francis Tattegrain.jpg as PD-France and PD-US-expired Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
APictche (talk) 09:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most still incorrectly licensed files, kept two now correctly licensed ones. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)