Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(6237617916).jpg){kind=link}
-Torus_Link.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Obviously a scan from a book. Doubtful it is the uploader's own work. Another file of the uploader's got DMCAed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Non-Admin close: Accidently created an extra DR . Abzeronow (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
上傳者請求刪除。 顏嘉佑 (talk) 06:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, as per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Hoax. Yann (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Keep this cross-section drawing of a wall. There is nothing inherently vandalistic in the image, but it probably should be renamed and hoaxes expunged from the description page. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)- Is this a depiction of any identifiable type of wall that actually exists? If so then yeah. But if not, I'm not really seeing what the educational value of the diagram is if the nature and arrangement of the drawing are basically arbitrary. I mean, we don't really keep random drawings some guy did on MS Paint merely because the image itself is not vandalism. Obviously vandalism is a reason to delete, but not being vandalism doesn't make it automatically in scope. GMGtalk 19:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete– not a vector graphics. Don’t know what the hell it is, but my GUI environment crashed after browser tried to read the SVG. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)- Delete not a real vector image, as Incnis Mrsi pointed out. It's just three embedded raster images, so it may as well just be a PNG. But without any foreseeable educational use, per GMG, there's no benefit in keeping it. clpo13(talk) 19:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete– No use outside thr vandalism it was created for. Qwirkle (talk) 22:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete @Incnis Mrsi: the SVG contains 3 jpeg images with a resolution of 6997×6997. One shows the image without text, the other two are all black with one gray line. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and above comments. --Yann (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
I think it's a derivative of others' works. Mhhossein talk 12:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is an object that is permanently outdoors in Spain, therefore subject to freedom of panorama. B25es (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per B25es. The work is permanently in public and hence is free per COM:FOP. (pinging @4nn1l2: to close the discussion). --Mhhossein talk 16:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Letícia Contier (talk · contribs)
[edit]The paintings are protected by copyright and hence these files are considered as derivative of the painter's work. However, there would be no issue if the works were in public place (Per FOP).
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 11.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 07.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 04.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 05.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 02.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 03.jpg
- File:Traços das Populações Brasileiras (Painel 5) 01.jpg
_11.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Mhhossein talk 13:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. These pictures were taken in the context of an education program in Brazil to document public sculptures and monuments in São Paulo. Reference: [1]. On the top of the website, "Monumentos em lugares públicos" means "Monuments in Public Spaces" in Portuguese. Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per Joalpe. The works need to be tagged with {{FoP-Brazil}} so that others know the works are permanently in public and hence is free per COM:FOP. (pinging @4nn1l2: to close the discussion). --Mhhossein talk 16:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 19:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Imagen con derechos de autor Dreamer plox (talk) 03:48, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:50, 18 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/2018-05-21/gallery/roman-reigns-seth-rollins-vs-kevin-owens-jinder-mahal-photos#fid-40226714 --Krdbot 01:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Imagen con derechos de autor Dreamer plox (talk) 03:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:50, 18 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.wwe.com/shows/moneyinthebank/2018/gallery/seth-rollins-elias-photos#fid-40233052 --Krdbot 01:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Defect image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raymond5891 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
personal photo, Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roja Barry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Roja Barry 1.jpg
- File:Roja Barry 2.jpg
- File:Rojabarry.jpg
- File:Roja Barry rb.jpg
- File:Roja Barry Style.jpg
- File:Roja Barry Singing.jpg
- File:Roja Barry At Park.jpg
- File:Roja Barry Purpose.jpg
- File:Roja Barry at Collage.jpg
- File:Roja Barry.2.jpeg
- File:Roja Barry.jpeg
Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoseinkhoshgoftar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, unused files (1), and unused out of COM:SCOPE logo.
Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juudjethailand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juudjethailand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Kerncijfers diverse bevolkingsprognoses 12122018 093249.png
- File:Kerncijfers diverse bevolkingsprognoses 11122018 113846.png
- File:Bevolking kerncijfers 2017 2060 21112018 102331.png
- File:Asielverzoeken vanaf 1975 19112018 114416.png
- File:Overlevingskansen geslacht leeftijd 31102018 103619.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I do not understand why you say that these charts are "of questionable notability". These are charts from or based on statistics of the CBS, the national bureau of statistics of the Netherlands. I do not know a more reliable source of statistics for the Netherlands. And I do not understand why these charts should be deleted because they are unused. There are many unused charts AND I find these charts educational, an important goal of Wikimedia Commons. So I do not agree with this deletion request. JopkeB (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - with one or two word descriptions and no useful categories, they are useless, lost among our 50+ million images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete turned duplicate of this one! --Ras67 (talk) 11:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial symbols of fictitious state of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Benavides Parra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional pic Godric ki Kothritalk to me 16:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Da Broski Kay .jpg
- File:Da Broski Kay 2017 Augusta Ga.jpg
- File:Da Broski Kay 2017.jpg
- File:Da Broski Kay on his way to Augusta Ga to rehearse .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Darrville Alexanda .jpg
- File:Darville ISsabella.jpg
- File:Issabella Darville.jpg
- File:СС 3943923.jpg
- File:CC O39432.jpg
- File:CC O394.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michel Bouillon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Bouillon nu.jpg
- File:Michel Bouilln.jpg
- File:Michel nu.jpg
- File:Michel Bouillon nu.jpg
- File:Michel BOUILLON.jpg
- File:Michel montre sa quéquette.jpg
- File:Michel Bouillon 02.jpg
- File:Michel Bouillon 03.jpg
- File:Michel Bouillon 01.jpg
- File:Sexe.jpg
- File:Michel Bouillon.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michel Bouillon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (NSFW).
Yann (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Timur Remizov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:NECRONOMIDOL wiki.jpg
- File:NECRONOMIDOL2014Logo.gif
- File:NECRONOMIDOL2015Logo.gif
- File:NECRONOMIDOL2017Logo.gif
Copyright violations. The first one was previously uploaded on Twitter. The rest three ones are non-free logos, above threshold of originality, having "artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation" (COM:TOO#Japan). --153.203.32.29 04:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- I wish it had some exif data, as it does not look like the quality that a car manufacturer would produce, but more along the lines of what an energy department intern might produce at a car show, taking a rapid approach to get all the cars at an event, but I won't protest it if you want to err on the side of caution. I honestly did not see that little part of the descriptions when I initiated the uploads. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's worth noting that some images in this set are indeed produced by the Dept of Energy, File:Toyota Mirai (29414863042).jpg for example. In these cases, the author is "Simon Edelman, Energy Department". Badzil (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I wish it had some exif data, as it does not look like the quality that a car manufacturer would produce, but more along the lines of what an energy department intern might produce at a car show, taking a rapid approach to get all the cars at an event, but I won't protest it if you want to err on the side of caution. I honestly did not see that little part of the descriptions when I initiated the uploads. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Hyundai. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yep, no doubt that this one was a screw up by the energy department. That is not the work of an energy department staffer, not to denigrate those working in the energy department. DELETE Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Nissan. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yeah I would have to agree when comparing this one to the others that this photo is likely provided by Ford; as judged from the highly retouched city scene around the car vs. the car show style photos that seem questionable. I agree that this one should be deleted as a safe precaution. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Ford. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This work was publicated in 1990 posthumously by Ю. Росциус in «Дневник пророка». It will be protected to 2065. Alex Spade (talk) 14:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Comment: This work was published posthumously before Jan.1,1998 (54 copyright term from death date of author, who participateв in Great Patriotic War), so it would be copyrighted to Jan.1,2045, but because it was not in PD on Jan.1,1993 - copyright term was extended to 74 years (to Jan.1,2065) from date of post morten publication. Alex Spade (talk) 14:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Smmsæomfrmdlpb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
probably copyright violation MisterXS (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Incorrectly drawn structure of prenyl group, no indication that there is any attachment point. It cannot be renamed to 2-methylpent-2-ene, because it lacks CH3 at one terminal. Two other versions are available: File:Prenyl group.png and File:Prenyl group.svg. Wostr (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Upload different type of file. Ykhan5 (talk) 07:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete CSD G7. Also the replacement is at File:Muslim Population by Percentage in United States, 2014.svg. --bjh21 (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
dehufufuqhfwegf 2003:5C:6B09:3B00:85CB:9EF7:4A7C:5D08 07:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense DR. --bjh21 (talk) 13:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep pets walking on keyboards are not allowed to nominate pictures. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
This is called 2017 painting. That case it needs OTRS-permission from artist. No evidence of own work. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope and only used for self-promotion. Sam Sailor 17:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope and only used for self-promotion. Sam Sailor 17:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely not own work but DW - look at the watermark under the text in the bottom left corner. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aperestyagin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images uploaded by user for self-advertizing article in RuWP, with non-selfie portrayal of himself on the, consequently - false "own work". One of them (a cartoon "logo") is even marked both by real author nickname анич and "own work".
Tatewaki (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Low-quality file. Tar Lócesilion (queta) 20:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it's not a simple geometric work and (C) is present also in the description of the file. Gce (talk) 21:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
An image containing nothing but tabular text is manifestly not the way to create a table in Wikipedia. Mathglot (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Among other things, an image of tabular data tends to freeze the data in place even if incorrect, irrespective of whether other editors find reliable sources indicating a different value, or as data values change over time. Mathglot (talk) 00:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Bad copy of this photo (no information about GFDL) https://www.gdw-berlin.de/vertiefung/biografien/personenverzeichnis/biografie/view-bio/magnus-poser/?no_cache=1 Tohma (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing exif, blocked user, source might be http://guideiran.com/portfolio/imam-reza-holy-shrine/ Vera (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:44, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Cropped version of a copyrighted image. There is no indication there is CC licensing. Also, the user has several copyright violations. cubic[*]star 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
No Fop for 3D artorks in France Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#France Ronhjones (Talk) 18:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but the castle drawing is clearly sufficienty creative for copyright protection unless evidence can be provided that this is an old drawing/logo whose copyright has expired. B (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Patently incorrect PD-ineligible tag. If this is from 1982, it is almost certainly copyrighted. B (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
From a 1970 book. Tagged as the uploader's own work, but presumably meaning that the uploader scanned it, not that the uploader wrote the book. The copyright belongs to whoever wrote the book. B (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-self but appears to be scanned from a book. Presumably the uploader is the scanner, but the copyright belongs to the author of the book. B (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-self, but the copyright holder is the author of the scanned work itself, not the person who did the scanning. B (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Scans from Bulgara Konversacilibro
[edit]
- File:1972 Bulgara konversacilibro 12-13.jpg
- File:1972 Bulgara konversacilibro 14-15.jpg
- File:1972 Bulgara konversacilibro 144-145.jpg
Tagged as PD-self, but the copyright holder is the author of the book, not the person who scanned it. B (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
chain was digitally removed, cf. File:Sheeba the Cheetah-1and (4621435326).jpg Veliensis (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep but could possibly do a better job at chain removal. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, wouldn't it be easier to note that this image is {{Inaccurate}}? Sure it would be useless for a Wikipedia or other Wikimedia project, but it could be used by an educator who want to showcase how a Cheetah looks which might look better for them without the chain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment actually a better job is not really possible because File:Sheeba the Cheetah-1and (4621435326).jpg is a different photo, not just a crop. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's unfortunate that the photographer didn't upload originals of the images they retouched, at least not that I can see. I don't think the retouching is necessarily a reason to delete by itself, but there may be better alternatives in the same photostream, such as File:Cheetah Australia Zoo-09+ (529222020).jpg (which is also modified, compare File:Cheetah Australia Zoo-06+ (526899953).jpg). clpo13(talk) 19:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Tagged as PD-self, but the copyright holder is the author of the book, not the one who did the scanning. B (talk) 19:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but the logo artwork is most certainly eligible for copyright unless it can be demonstrated to be sufficiently old as to be PD B (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but it's a letter from 1973 and clearly sufficiently creative for copyright. B (talk) 19:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but it's a letter from 1973 and clearly sufficiently creative for copyright. B (talk) 19:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but it's a letter from 1973 and clearly sufficiently creative for copyright. B (talk) 19:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but the drawing on the front is sufficiently creative for copyright protection and would need to be shown to be PD. B (talk) 19:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but the butterfly is sufficiently creative for copyright protection. The author died in 2017, so this will be copyrighted until January 1, 2088. B (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but it's from 2009 and the artwork is obviously sufficiently creative for copyright protection. B (talk) 19:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-ineligible, but it contains a photo. Someone would need to show that the photo is PD in order to accept this. B (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
There's no reason to use this file over File:United States Soccer Federation logo 2016.svg. This file has a bit of white tinge around the edges left over from removing a white background (try looking at it against a black background), and is not very high resolution. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by آیناز تدین (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these uploads were claimed by the uploader to be their own work ({{Own}} was given as source) which appears not only unlikely but led to a DMCA takedown of one of their uploads. We should delete all remaining files by this uploader per COM:PRP unless they can be proven to be free.
- File:Melinkof.jpg
- File:نیچه.jpg
- File:Colombian Emeralds.jpeg
- File:اختلاف رنگ.jpg
- File:شدت بخشی به کنتراست.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 20:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Melinkof.jpg appears to be a plan by the Russian architect Konstantin Melnikov (1890–1974), created in 1929, see this posting on archdaily.com. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:شدت بخشی به کنتراست.jpg has been posted elsewhere in 2009 by a photographer with the user name Guardi. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:اختلاف رنگ.jpg has been posted elsewhere in 2010 with a watermark at the bottom naming Samantha Theriault. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete on all of them per nomination. (Didn't see that File:Melinkof.jpg already got a DR. I'll do a non-admin close my extra DR.) Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Question, isn't File:نیچه.jpg just a photograph of Friedrich Nietzsche? Although it looks like a duplicate of File:Nietzsche187a.jpg from around 1875 and is in the public domain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are right, this appears to be a retouched variant of Friedrich Hartmann's photo which is in the public domain. It is however questionable whether we really want to keep this badly retouched photo. Currently it appears to be unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: although I'm usually an inclusionist I honestly can't see why we should keep that obviously inferior photograph of Friedrich Nietzsche, @Yann: do you see any use for it? It it were a different photograph of a building from a different angle or on a different day it would be different but this just looks like a blurry version of the one used on most Wikipedia's. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are right, this appears to be a retouched variant of Friedrich Hartmann's photo which is in the public domain. It is however questionable whether we really want to keep this badly retouched photo. Currently it appears to be unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Colombian Emeralds.jpeg appears to be image number 95-40549 of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, see this archived page from 2011. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I deleted all obvious copyright violations. Yann (talk) 06:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete File:نیچه.jpg as inferior. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
_(6237617916).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6237617916).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I went through the whole book and didn't find this picture. Kersti (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
_(6237617916).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete This is an odd indexing error by BHL. It is from "ABC of fox hunting", 1871, OCLC 727144853. This is an inferior duplicate of File:ABC of fox hunting (Plate 8) BHL22810415.jpg, so can be deleted rather than repaired. --Fæ (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
_BHL22810415.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
_(6237617916).jpg){kind=link}
Empty and has no significant history Vrfm (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational purpose, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Low-resolution duplicate of File:BYU vs Utah 2009, post-game.jpg IagoQnsi (talk) 21:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete COM:CSD#F8 CSD F8. @IagoQnsi: You can tag duplicates for speedy deletion using {{Duplicate}}. --bjh21 (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: Oops, my bad; don't run into duplicates often so I forgot there was a CSD for them. Thanks! –IagoQnsi (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't see an educational purpose — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Double of File:Sls1849 1.jpg Mef.ellingen (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. ––Apalsola t • c 12:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
-Torus_Link.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Torus_Link.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A SVG version is now available, and no page is using this PNG version anymore. Link Mauve (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
-Torus_Link.png){kind=link}
- Agree. // Liftarn (talk) 07:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
-Torus_Link.png){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/insource:panoramio.com/user/3014388
[edit]Bad panoramio, all low res, no meta data, different resolutions etc. Clearly not own works.
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (8).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p.jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (3).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (1).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (2).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (9).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (5).jpg
- File:Zheleznodorozhnyy rayon, Samara, Samarskaya oblast' Russia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (7).jpg
- File:Untitled - panoramio - vladimir.p (6).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:panoramio.com/user/3547676
[edit]All low quality personal images, uploaded by bot, no use.
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio - BandaFriendshipNever….jpg
- File:- panoramio (4224).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio - BandaFriendshipNever… (2).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio - BandaFriendshipNever… (6).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio.jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio - BandaFriendshipNever… (1).jpg
- File:Friendship Never Die - panoramio (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:panoramio.com/user/1465371 -canon
[edit]Bad panoramio user, owns a Canon DC50, but these uploads are not own work. Higher res online, watermarked, and or low res no meta data.
- File:Feraşet oğlu mehmet macit - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kurt - panoramio - celalettin macit.jpg
- File:Kurt - panoramio.jpg
- File:Karga kuşları - panoramio.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I the owner of this image I nominted for speedy deletion without any specific reason. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete CSD G7. @Mr. James Dimsey: For cases like this you can just put {{SD|G7}} in the file description. --bjh21 (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own creation, available on internet, https://www.untarda.com/p/blog-page_4.html suggests images by "anandkrish16" Dsvyas (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Not his/her own creation. Image has website url on it, visiting that URL (https://www.untarda.com/p/blog-page_4.html) suggests images are by "anandkrish16" Dsvyas (talk) 11:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW. Being uploaded to Flickr should not change that fact. Does it? E4024 (talk) 13:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
do not want 71.77.58.199 13:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Subject died in 1989, so no chance this is a 2017 photo. Almost certainly newspaper archive or something like that. GRuban (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Just noticed uploader has no other remaining upload, but does have a talk page note that they once had one …. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert Spaggiari.jpg --GRuban (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
com:DW of copyrighted label Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Didn't notice I had selected the file beside the one I wanted -this is the whole pdf. Antiqueight (talk) 14:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:BISCOSMITH JOURNEY Berlin PC-Jasmine-Angelique.jpg
- File:BISCOSMITH JOURNEY Berlin PC-Jasmine-Angelique 2.jpg
- File:Bisco-Smith UrbanSpree-Berlin-PC-Jasmine-Angelique 1850px.jpg
- File:Bisco-Smith NYC-Studio PC-Jasmine-Angelique 1024x1024.jpg
- File:BiscoSmith-Wiki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from album cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyright violations, so suspicious files.
Yann (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete File:MACERATACENTRO.jpg was apparently a crop made from the original of File:Maceratanight.jpg which leaves the true origin of both of them unknown. De728631 (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Badly copied from File:Man in the High Castle Map.png, with arbitrary choices. Most places are not mentioned in the book and their status was invented, resulting in false information. Bultro (talk) 00:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on en:In the Presence of Mine Enemies. Since English Wikipedia is of the opinion that this file is useful, we on Commons should not overrule them. See COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. --bjh21 (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Amada44 talk to me 08:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Low res, possible press image? ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Amada44 talk to me 08:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yep, DELETE this one, no doubt about this with the fake skyline in the background. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Audi. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 07:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to BMW. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I can't tell if this is a photo or a rendering, but either way it wasn't made by the energy department, good catch. DELETE Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Honda. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Beautiful picture, but sadly yeah it should be deleted. Too bad. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to McLaren. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yep, DELETE, as it is ambiguous and looks rendered and not photographed; something only the manufacturer could produce with Maya. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Mercedes. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Clearly PR photo not own work, such photos should have more supplementary information for release the photo to public domain or CC license Matthew hk (talk) 09:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 09:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Clearly PR photo not own work, such photos should have more supplementary information for release the photo to public domain or CC license Matthew hk (talk) 09:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 09:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Please remove the first revision of this file. Piotrs (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Piotrs: It would be better if you could upload a new version first, using the "Upload a new version of this file" link in the "File history" section. The old version can then be deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: removed version in file history. --Amada44 talk to me 09:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
mauvais format Jeanne Pham Tran (talk) 12:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: CSD G7. --bjh21 (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 09:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - blurry, much too dark Xgeorg (talk) 12:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File is, astonishingly, in use on en:Devils & Dust Tour, and has been for years. Commons policy (COM:INUSE) is that a file in use on another project is deemed to be of educational use however bad it is. --bjh21 (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The dark aspect is appropriate, because that's how much of this tour's show looked to the audience – darkly lit for dark material. The blurry aspect is unfortunate, but when you view it at thumbnail size as part of the article, it looks okay enough. Jonathan Schilling (talk) 02:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44 talk to me 09:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
I work in the Brand team at National Grid. This is an incorrect / unofficial logo and an infringement on our intellectual property. Please contact me at anton.thomas@nationalgrid.com to confirm deletion. Anton thomas100 (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44 talk to me 10:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
image already exists in the commons Y-gleweed (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44 talk to me 10:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Fake logo for an organization with no legitimate educational use (and thus outside of project scope). The real logo is at [2]. This logo replaces their flame (which is presumably copyrighted) with a public domain flame. But that makes it not an actual organizational logo - just something Commons made up one day. B (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is currently in use on es:Acción Chaqueña. Commons policy is that files that are legitimately in use on another project are considered automatically of educational use even if they're inaccurate (see COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV). --bjh21 (talk) 17:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is/was in use only because the uploader put it there. The image was uploaded today. It's not a real logo and shouldn't be in use. --B (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- ... and now it isn't. As long as it stays unused, then obviously COM:INUSE doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is/was in use only because the uploader put it there. The image was uploaded today. It's not a real logo and shouldn't be in use. --B (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. Also, not all flames are the same 1, 2. --Yilku1 (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Not the organization logo. By keeping this file we are actively promoting false information, that's the exact opposite of our goals. The inuse argument is silly, it's like if I drew a picture of some other mouse, called it Mickey Mouse, and stuck it on the Mickey Mouse article. GRuban (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as before. The Spanish Wikipedia does not accept images used under a claim of fair use, but that doesn't mean that making up a fake logo is a good idea. --B (talk) 02:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is still in use on es:Acción Chaqueña. It was removed by es:User:B and reinstated by es:User:Yilku1. Deletion on Commons should not be used to bypass the need for consensus on Spanish Wikipedia. --bjh21 (talk) 14:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- But this isn't the Action Chaqueda logo! Isn't that the most important thing? --GRuban (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's "realistically useful for an educational purpose" per COM:NOTUSED --Yilku1 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sheesh. Then we should at least rename it to "Feeble imitation of AC logo.png", and make as much clear in the description. But honestly, I think it should be deleted; we are not benefiting our users by making our own versions of logos. --GRuban (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- You can, of course, request renaming of the file on Commons (see COM:FR). The file is already marked with {{Factual accuracy}}. --bjh21 (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sheesh. Then we should at least rename it to "Feeble imitation of AC logo.png", and make as much clear in the description. But honestly, I think it should be deleted; we are not benefiting our users by making our own versions of logos. --GRuban (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- @GRuban: The most important thing (in this case) is to serve the needs of Spanish Wikipedia. If there is a consensus on Spanish Wikipedia that this file is inappropriate for use on es:Acción Chaqueña, then it would probably be reasonable to delete it from Commons. The place to have that discussion is on Spanish Wikipedia, at es:Talk:Acción Chaqueña, not here. --bjh21 (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that
- there is no such talk page. We could certainly create it, I guess, but
- the only people who have ever edited es:Acción Chaqueña are Yilku1, and B, who are already here. Is there such a thing as a Request for Comments on the Spanish Wikipedia?
- Meanwhile Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Colorado.png which is an almost exact parallel to this situation: an image, uploaded by Yilku1, who apparently made another political logo on their own, incorrectly, which was deleted for being incorrect. @Taivo: who deleted that file - could you please weigh in here? --GRuban (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's "realistically useful for an educational purpose" per COM:NOTUSED --Yilku1 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- But this isn't the Action Chaqueda logo! Isn't that the most important thing? --GRuban (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The file is used and obviously in scope, but I'll delete it as copyright violation. The logo is complex and needs OTRS-permission from organization representative. The file has incorrect Pixabay license: source link is not into Pixabay and license review failed (source site is "Todos derechos reservados", which means "All rights reserved.") "License review failed" is enough for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
autor nieznany, plik zostanie przesłany ponownie po uzyskaniu pisemnej zgody na wykorzystanie Cerberus1337 (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:H2254625
[edit]
Helianthus丨杨超越 uploaded this photo with the watermark in the weibo(the third photo) on June 30 2018. We can get the larger version by pressing 查看大图.--Gda0608 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Gda0608: The one on Weibo is processed with watermark and color adjustment(which is given out by me), this is the original photo. You can not revert the process, use your common sense. -H2254625 (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: claimed as own work by uploader, no reason to doubt it for now. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Please see COM:OTRS: "I am the copyright owner but my file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter", in which case the uploader must send an email to OTRS to verify the free license.
Wcam (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Wcam: Please provide a site with date of this image with no watermark before claiming the image was "previously published".--H2254625 (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- With all due respect, you already said that the Weibo images were given out by you. Given that you claimed to be the copyright owner, you are expected to follow the rules and verify the copyright claims (COM:EVID) by contacting OTRS, or these images should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- I was trying to make the point that the non watermarked image was first published in common. But I guess this is what I have to do. So base on my understanding, all I need is to email a statement generated by release generator?--H2254625 (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- With all due respect, you already said that the Weibo images were given out by you. Given that you claimed to be the copyright owner, you are expected to follow the rules and verify the copyright claims (COM:EVID) by contacting OTRS, or these images should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Yang_Chaoyue_杨超越.jpg” under ticket:2018111610008024. --Jimmy Xu (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Yang_Chaoyue_杨超越2.png” under ticket:2018111610008024. --Jimmy Xu (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Verified by Jimmy Xu. --WQL (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
没有对焦，图像模糊不清 Tyg728 (talk) 04:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: yes but it has informative value on the appearance of this stair entry. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation RedWalls (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: below ToO, but it have many replacments. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of the logo. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
This is not only a trademark issue, but also an issue of copyright. Who designed this logo and did that person die 70 years ago? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Applies also to: (same logo)
Info: de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Metilsteiner#Logo_des_AWE_in_Eisenach (in german).--Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ich habe Antwort vom AWE-Museum in Eisenach für das AWE-Signet (das zeigt die betreffende Datei). Für das Signet wurde zur gewerbsmäßigen Nutzung (merchandisimg) beim Patentamt Gebrauchsmusterschutz angemeldet. Somit kann dieses Logo künftig nicht mehr gemeinfrei verwendet werden. Dies gilt ebenso für die in mehreren Varianten existierende Zierleiste mit dem Schiftzug Wartburg.Metilsteiner (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Request from the person in the photograph - IndrajitDas 06:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - where did he request? -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:Xhani Demika Dhe Majk.jpg
- File:Xhani Demika Dhe Dafina Zeqiri .jpg
- File:Xhani Demika Dhe Ledri Vula.jpg
- File:Xhani Demike And Capital T.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- They are actually all in use.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I found prior non free publications for two images, the rest is likely copyvio too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Bad jpg name Peter Glyn (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Peter Glyn: You can ask for a file to be renamed by choosing "Move" from the "More" menu at the top of the page. There's no need to delete it just for that. See COM:FR for more details. --bjh21 (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The text is copyrighted and copyright probably belongs to British Crown. But maybe it is in public domain due to age? When the plaque was erected? Taivo (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Unknown when the plaque was erected, but if it is deemed copyright, then all blue plaque images and noticeboards outside churches will have to go too. I'm not a legal expert by any definition, but if it is on the street and anyone can photograph it, surely that means public domain? If I copied the text and inserted it into a Wiki, then that might be...? Still, if deletion it is, then so be it; it was just a quick take image to illustrate something. I will not kick the teddies out of the cot if it goes, I reserve that right for the really interesting options! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 12:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @The joy of all things: Just putting something on the street does not stop it being subject to copyright (though there are exceptions: see COM:FOP). I think most blue plaques are considered to be below the threshold of originality, in that "Joe Bloggs lived here 1942-1946" is not a piece of original writing. This plaque, though, has a substantial piece of writing on it, and I think it's arguably original. Wikipedia might allow the text (and maybe the picture) under "fair use", but Commons is slightly stricter about copyright. --bjh21 (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: Good points, well made! Regards.The joy of all things (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @The joy of all things: Just putting something on the street does not stop it being subject to copyright (though there are exceptions: see COM:FOP). I think most blue plaques are considered to be below the threshold of originality, in that "Joe Bloggs lived here 1942-1946" is not a piece of original writing. This plaque, though, has a substantial piece of writing on it, and I think it's arguably original. Wikipedia might allow the text (and maybe the picture) under "fair use", but Commons is slightly stricter about copyright. --bjh21 (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
com:DW of the designe of a seal. Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- First of all, I'm not familiar with the meaning of "relevent project." I am retired, amateur, & uncredentialed in Philosophy. I am a fan of the Scottish Philosopher, James Frederick Ferrier. About a year ago, I found that Ferrier's Wikisource author page had NO entries. Over the next couple months I populated it with ALL of its current 60+ "Works" and a couple of it's "Works About the Author." If any other works are discoverable I would like to include them as well. In addition, Ferrier's Author Image was discovered to be in fact Christian Felix Weisse, NOT Ferrier. As a consequence of my efforts, Wikimedia Commons properly removed Weisse's picture and acquired an image of Ferrier. In this process I discovered that the earliest known instance of the word "epistemology" was from an article entitled "Jean Paul" from English Review, Volume 7, issue 14, June 1847. Having read this article repeatedly (plus all of the works of Ferrier I have so-far discovered, multiple times and audibly through the computer), I find it extremely believable that Ferrier is the Author of "Jean Paul."
- I make no presumption upon anyone else's conclusion. I composed this brief essay specifically to reflect that... This authorship can never be made certain pending discovery of an index of the anonymous authors whose compositions comprised that short-lived periodical English Review In this essay I feel that I have concisely and accurately presented evidence in an unbiased manner.
- Before uploading to Wikimedia Commons I requested opinion from a recognized authority, a professor and author of works on Scottish Philosophy. Her/his email states: Thanks for sharing your paper, which I enjoyed reading. It contains a very interesting discussion of the issues, which shows an intimate knowledge of the details of Ferrier's lesser-known works. After reading your paper and thinking things over, I believe I would put my money on Option I: that Ferrier more-likely-than-not is the author of "Jean Paul." I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though. That's nice but the whole point is that my essay is addressed to each reader. Even if I lived long enough that to hope its message found it's way through he maze of peer-reviewed, Oxford-published journalism, even those so-reviewed-and-so-published journals invite-but-cannot-compel belief.
- It's not a long essay. Have you read it? Do you not find it complimentary to your intelligence? Is there a "relevant project" for such an outlaw essay?
- Before uploading to Wikimedia Commons I requested opinion from a recognized authority, a professor and author of works on Scottish Philosophy. Her/his email states: Thanks for sharing your paper, which I enjoyed reading. It contains a very interesting discussion of the issues, which shows an intimate knowledge of the details of Ferrier's lesser-known works. After reading your paper and thinking things over, I believe I would put my money on Option I: that Ferrier more-likely-than-not is the author of "Jean Paul." I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though. That's nice but the whole point is that my essay is addressed to each reader. Even if I lived long enough that to hope its message found it's way through he maze of peer-reviewed, Oxford-published journalism, even those so-reviewed-and-so-published journals invite-but-cannot-compel belief.
- I make no presumption upon anyone else's conclusion. I composed this brief essay specifically to reflect that... This authorship can never be made certain pending discovery of an index of the anonymous authors whose compositions comprised that short-lived periodical English Review In this essay I feel that I have concisely and accurately presented evidence in an unbiased manner.
Klarm768 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Before I received notice of deletion request or composed the first reply, I had already created a link to the outlaw-file at the bottom of https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Author:James_Frederick_Ferrier under Works about Ferrier. Was that illegal? Does that qualify as a relevant project? Klarm768 (talk) 17:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Historical paintings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The packaging meets the threshold of originality and so this photo is a derivative work of the copyrighted packaging. B (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The packaging meets the threshold of originality and so this photo is a derivative work of the copyrighted packaging. The encyclopedic purpose for this image could probably be met by cropping out the packaging and rev-deleting this original image. B (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
These "mountains" have been created for a theme park and are therefore 3D sculptures, and no FoP in the US. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, but it is possible for cast members to get inside of them, making them buildings, so they are covered under FoP. Elisfkc (talk) 21:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Being able to "get inside" a structure doesn't automatically make it a building. COM:FOP#United States states that "building" is defined in a very specific way, and I'm not sure if this would be classified as such. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- They have to be "habitable for humans and intended to be both permanent and stationary" or "other permanent and stationary structures designed for human occupancy" according to FOP. If gazebos and garden pavilions fall into the category, surely this fits in, considering it has places for humans to go into (I haven't been inside, since it isn't open to the public, but I understand there is at least one room inside each of them). The examples for things that are not buildings are all outdoor structures with no roof. Elisfkc (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Being able to "get inside" a structure doesn't automatically make it a building. COM:FOP#United States states that "building" is defined in a very specific way, and I'm not sure if this would be classified as such. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The packaging meets the threshold of originality and so this photo is a derivative work of the copyrighted packaging. B (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An SVG version will be uploaded and will replace this file Allice Hunter (talk) 17:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An SVG version will be uploaded and will replace this file Allice Hunter (talk) 17:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An SVG version will be uploaded and will replace this file Allice Hunter (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An SVG version will be uploaded and will replace this file Allice Hunter (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Has it been replaced already? --E4024 (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Versé accidentellement Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 17:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous expliquer un peu plus svp ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon de photo Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- De quel fichier serait-ce un doublon, selon vous ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- A month since nominated. I know admins are too busy but people tend to open duplicate DRs when this (thinking that they have been ignored) happens. --E4024 (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please do not open duplicate DRs, just wait patiently. Merci. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous expliquer un peu plus svp ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon de fichier Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- De quel fichier serait-ce un doublon, selon vous ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous expliquer un peu plus svp ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon de photo Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 18:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- De quel fichier serait-ce un doublon selon vous ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous expliquer un peu plus svp ? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Indonesia. ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings by François Reynaert
[edit]This picture depicts a monument designed by François Reynaert (1887-1958), a French architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared before 1st January 2029. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:120 rue Martin Luther King.jpg
- File:25 rue André Chenier.jpg
- File:57 rue Martin-Luther-King.jpg
- File:63 rue Martin Luther King.jpg
- File:Clôture de l'excentric Moulins 63 rue André-Chénier Dunkerque.jpg
- File:Les Cigognes Dunkerque.jpg
- File:Les Cubes Dunkerque.jpg
- File:Les Roses et l'Escargot, 145-147 rue Carnot Dunkerque.jpg
- File:Rue André Chenier.jpg
- File:Suzette 96 rue Martin Luther King Dunkerque.jpg
- File:Les disques 30 rue Eugène Dumez.jpg
- File:Les Anneaux, 41 rue André Chenier.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 23:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- "This photo is often mistaken for Lightoller but it is instead a man by the name of Cater." Looks like the gent is OoS anyways. --E4024 (talk) 14:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
copyvio [3]. out of scope. Kanisfluh (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
![[3]](https://www.modelwerk.de/file/503295.jpg?size=rmportfolio){kind=link}
- File:Victoria_Jancke,_2018.jpg another image, same camera
Deleted: per nomination; studio images of subject, unlikely to be selfies. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:48, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Departament de Cultura (talk · contribs)
[edit]very small files without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Sometimes new users upload files at the wrong resolution. This was especially true 10 years ago. I can't find any of these elsewhere on the net except a few downstream sources. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per Magog. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)