Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/07/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![43 File:Tekinimo stakles "Praktika", modelis CUT-4.jpg](#File:Tekinimo_stakles_"Praktika",_modelis_CUT-4.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![201 File:Bruno Munari "Scultura Inutile" (Davide Casali, 2008).jpg](#File:Bruno_Munari_"Scultura_Inutile"_(Davide_Casali,_2008).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Sarmendra Kumar Swain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
- File:20180624004918!Sarmendra Kumar Swain.jpg
- File:Kulu.jpg
- File:Task friends.jpg
- File:Sarmendra Kumar Swain.jpg
Ies (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Dr hari s chandran1.jpg
Unused photos about non-notable person (not mentioned in en.wiki), probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC) - See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Drhari2002. Looks like the doc or someone who likes him wants to make a bit of his promo. --E4024 (talk) 09:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal/promo photos, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted image replaced by another. I guess the doc continues to be OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 13:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
This video was illiegally taken from The Daily Mail of the UK Leoboudv (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment: Can the Celebrity News youtuube account be blacklisted ASAP please as a youtube video laundering site please? Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)- Comment: See also this case and this case of 2 other videos from the same Celebrity News source. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering. As per the watermark in the video, it comes from the Backgrid news agency. --De728631 (talk) 00:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
This youtube video is a video laundering case taken from Daily Mail of the UK Leoboudv (talk) 20:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: Celebrity News appears to be stealing videos from the Daily Mail and posting it on their youtube account. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Support Appears here without any credit to the YouTube channel in question. De728631 (talk) 00:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
This video was illiegally taken from The Daily Mail of the UK Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. License laundering in a video that was originally taken by the Backgrid news agency. --De728631 (talk) 00:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Celebrity News is a youtube laundering site. Please see this DR Unlikely to be own work. Leoboudv (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.crafts.kg/en/photogallery/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:23, 10 Juli 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Бешик деревянный.jpg --Krdbot 06:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.tradeunion-ed.kg/ru/osnovnyie_razdelyi/profsoyuz_v_regionax/berekenin_sabyirduuluktun_meerimdlktn_majramyi_bolgon_nooruzdu_oshmunun_zhamaatyi_zhakshyi_tilek_menen_tosup_aldyi.html Ytoyoda (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:23, 10 Juli 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Сумолок нооруз.jpg --Krdbot 06:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://ostrov-nevest.ru/blog/item/340-svadyba-v-kyrgyzstane-kak-provodyat-kakie-esty-tradicii Ytoyoda (talk) 00:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:23, 10 Juli 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Молодожены в Киргизии.jpg --Krdbot 06:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct one to be here Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:47, 11 Juli 2018 UTC: I want to upload another file that looks like this one --Krdbot 12:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
too much crests like that already Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:47, 11 Juli 2018 UTC: reason for removal goes here --Krdbot 12:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Low-quality image, uploader had history of blatant copyright violations. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:54, 11 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=lZKe8ROQ9l8 --Krdbot 12:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot containing multiple copyrighted elements. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Watermarked studio image. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taitung County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taitung County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taitung County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taitung County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taitung County into city categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taipei into district categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Taoyuan into district categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Information boards in Hualien into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kenkioledlighting (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:佳嵄LED线条灯,LED办公照明,空间LED照明.jpg
- File:佳嵄LED专门店照明,酒店LED照明,机场照明,医院照明.pdf
- File:佳嵄照明专业感应灯管停车场照明车库照明.pdf
- File:微波感应灯管.jpg
- File:Microwave sensor led t8 tube.pdf
- File:KENKIO LED LIGHTING FOR COMMERCIAL LIGHTING.pdf
- File:PIR Sensor tube lighting.pdf
- File:KENKIO Sensor lamp,sensor led lighting.pdf
- File:KENKIO LED Lighting,Commercial lighting,Industrial Lighting.pdf
- File:KENKIO Sensor LED Tube,led linear lighting.pdf
- File:Infrared Sensor LED Tube for corridor lighting.pdf
- File:5.8G Microwave sensor LED Tube for parking lighting.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Ich habe die Datei hochgeladen und bin unsicher wegen der Lizenz. Bitte löschen, danke. Smart0433 (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC) Ok, jetzt hat der Austausch der Karte funktioniert. Diese Karte ist von der Lizenz in Ordnung. Bitte nicht löschen. Sorry. Smart0433 (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from musically, youtube description even states "We do not own the anime, music, artwork or the lyrics. All rights reserved to their respective owners! This video is not meant to infringe any of the copyrights. This is for promote." Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- {
Delete The nominator is right. I looked at the license and missed the disclaimer here. I have reverted my pass..and ask that this image be deleted ASAP. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploader on youtube doesn't own rights, Commons:License laundering. Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I took it on good faith that the youtube uploader owned the rights but have reverted my review. I have no idea where this video came from but I don't trust this uploader anymore. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploader on youtube doesn't own rights, Commons:License laundering. Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete @Leoboudv: (who reviewed this image) I too doubt Sam's Secret Collection would have the rights for a TV show from ABC.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- There btw appear to be (a lot?) more images uploaded by User:The Salvator which are screenshots of youtube videos and quite surely not avaible under a free license (like File:Laura Marano 2017.png which is just taken from a reuploaded video with added subtitles). I'm honestly not that motivated to go through because there probably also are correctly licensed videos, but would be nice if Leoboudv takes a bit more care reviewing next time, because such cases are really obvious and not hard to catch. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: You are right. This is a Good Morning America video and the youtube uploader would not own the rights. My mistake. The Salvator uploads many images here and almost all are OK until this one. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer @Leoboudv: There of course are ok images, but certainly too many which are copyrighted. For example File:Shay Mitchell 2016.png appears to be an obvious reupload from here, File:Selena Gomez 2018.png clearly is taken from some social media account and File:Rita Ora Grammys 2018.png can be found at dailymail too, same with File:Olivia Wilde 2018.png here. And those are just some random images which got uploaded by The Salvator today, but all got reviewed.--Mondfeuer61 (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: I will file Deletion Requests on the others you mentioned. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
This image is a youtube laundering video from People Magazine Leoboudv (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
See this DR Mondfeuer61 (talk) 22:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Image taken from People Magazine website video. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Previously published image, Flickr user is unlikely to be owner: https://www.dicascartola.com.br/dicas-para-mitar-no-cartola-fc/bons-e-baratos-cartola-fc/cartola-fc-2017-bons-e-baratos-da-rodada-10/ Ytoyoda (talk) 03:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
No Regrets for Our Youth screenshots
[edit]As derivatives of No Regrets for Our Youth, they are copyright in Japan until 2036 (38 years after the death of the director, Akira Kurosawa).
- File:Setsuko Hara in No Regrets for Our Youth.jpg
- File:Waga seishun ni kuinashi(No Regrets for Our Youth).JPG
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 10.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 11.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 12.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 13.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 14.gif
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 15.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 2.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 3.png
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 4.png
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 5.png
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 6.png
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 7.png
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi 9.jpg
- File:Wagaseishun ni kuinashi8.png
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Stray Dog screenshots
[edit]As derivatives of Stray Dog (Nora Inu), they are copyright in Japan until 2036 (38 years after the death of the director, Akira Kurosawa).
- File:'Stray Dog80.png
- File:'Stray Dog96.png
- File:Isao Kimura in Stray Dog.jpg
- File:Keiko Awaji in Stray Dog.jpg
- File:Stray Dog 1-30-27.jpg
- File:Stray Dog101.png
- File:Stray Dog47.png
- File:Stray Dog59.png
- File:Stray Dog65.png
- File:Stray Dog68.png
- File:Stray Dog73.png
- File:Stray Dog75.png
- File:Stray Dog78.png
- File:Stray Dog81.png
- File:Stray Dog85.png
- File:Stray Dog89.png
- File:Stray Dog93.png
- File:Vlcsnap-59578.png
- File:Vlcsnap-61573.png
- File:Vlcsnap-62263.png
- File:Vlcsnap-62455.png
- File:Vlcsnap-63728.png
- File:Vlcsnap-64382.png
- File:Vlcsnap-65260.png
- File:Vlcsnap-67525.png
- File:Vlcsnap-68164.png
- File:Vlcsnap-72187.png
- File:Vlcsnap-72334.png
- File:Vlcsnap-72582.png
- File:Vlcsnap-75791.png
- File:Vlcsnap-76508.png
- File:Vlcsnap-80433.png
- File:Vlcsnap-80801.png
- File:Vlcsnap-82720.png
- File:Vlcsnap-82994.png
- File:Vlcsnap-84315.png
- File:Vlcsnap-84490.png
- File:Vlcsnap-86365.png
- File:Vlcsnap-86671.png
- File:Vlcsnap-87256.png
- File:Vlcsnap-87996.png
- File:Vlcsnap-88299.png
- File:Vlcsnap-88936.png
- File:Vlcsnap-90390.png
— JJMC89 (T·C) 02:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. Note that this is not "all files in Category:Stray Dog". File:Nora inu poster.jpg is not listed above and it is not a derivative of the film. DMacks (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rontechlab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of possibly copyrighted content.
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 15.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 14.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 13.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 12.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 11.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 09.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 10.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 07.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 06.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 05.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 04.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 01.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 02.jpg
- File:ROMTECH KEBUMEN 03.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:PS: personal documents, promotional
- File:Web and IT business.jpg
- File:Newspaperabkar.jpg
- File:Engineers association.jpg
- File:Mehrvarzane javan.jpg
- File:Reporting sports and commenting.jpg
- File:Sazmasn haie mardom nahad.jpg
- File:Dooblaj moghaddamati va takmili.jpg
- File:Tahdidate ejtemaei.jpg
- File:Akhalagh herfeei va osoole ertebat.jpg
- File:Hamaiesh koodakan khiabani.jpg
- File:Dr.Abkar Europe CIP test result.jpg
- File:Dr.abkar branding logo.jpg
- File:Dr.abkar phd.jpg
- File:Germany management award.jpg
- File:Signature of Dr.abkar.jpg
- File:Film Mostanad Award.jpg
- File:Jashn sherkat nafis nakh.jpg
- File:EU cip.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Júpiter y Juno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, paintings and coats of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Queen Elizabeth II Coronation Portrait Herbert James Gunn (1).jpg
- File:Princess Beatrice.jpg
- File:Henry and Ena.jpg
- File:Prince Henry Maurice of Battenberg.jpg
- File:Prince Henry of Battenberg and Princess Beatrice (1).jpg
- File:Beatrice and Henry, 1885.jpg
- File:Princess Beatrice of Great Britain.jpg
- File:Beatrice in wedding dress (1).jpg
- File:Princess Victoria Eugénie of Battenberg, c.1889.jpg
- File:Augusta Vitória em traje tradicional português.jpg
- File:Dom Manuel II e Dona Augusta Vitória.jpg
- File:HIH THE GRAND DUKE WLADIMIR KYRILLOVICH ROMANOV.jpg
- File:Kira Kyrillovna.jpg
- File:Grande-duchesse Maria Pavlovna, née duchesse Marie zu Mecklenburg 1854-1920.jpg
- File:Queen Marie Henriette of the Belgians - Louis Gaillat.jpg
- File:Princesa Irene de Hesse.jpg
- File:Alexandra, Rainha.jpg
- File:Familia Real 1876 (1).jpg
- File:Dona Maria Pia de Saboia.jpg
- File:Infanta Beatriz of Spain - Marcus Adams.jpg
- File:Queen Margherita.jpg
- File:Duchess of Aumale.jpg
- File:Grand Duke Alexander Pavlovich by V.Borovikovsky.jpg
- File:George Alexandrovich.jpg
- File:Guilherme e Augusta Vitória da Prússia.jpg
- File:Imperador Frederico III da Alemanha.jpg
- File:James Jebusa Shannon - Der Herzog und die Herzogin von Edinburgh mit ihren Kindern.jpg
- File:The Family of the Prince of Wales.jpg
- File:DUCHESSE DE SAVOIE.jpg
- File:Françoise Madeleine, Duchesse de Savoie.jpg
- File:Elisabeth Ludovika of Bavaria.jpg
- File:Zoltán Decleva.jpg
- File:Dona Isabel II.jpg
- File:Leopold von Neapel.jpg
- File:Alexandrina da Dinamarca.jpg
- File:Cristiano IX, rei da Dinamarca.jpg
- File:Cristiano IX da Dinamarca.jpg
- File:QUEEN ELIZABETH BOWES-LYON.jpg
- File:Princess Alice in court dress.jpg
- File:KAISERIN WOLFENBÜTTEL ELIZABETH-CHRISTINE.jpg
- File:Kaiserin Sisi von Österreich-Ungarn.jpg
- File:Juliane Marie, Queen of Denmark (Carl Gustav Pilo).jpg
- File:SOPHIE ALBERTINA OF SWEDEN.jpg
- File:Ulrika Eleonora the Younger (Louis Michel van Loo).jpg
- File:Marie Leszczynska, reine de France (Versailles).jpg
- File:MAFALDA DI SAVOIA.jpg
- File:Luisa Isabel de Orleans (1).jpg
- File:LA INFANTA EULALIA CON SU HIJO.jpg
- File:EULALIA DE BORBÓN Y BORBÓN.jpg
- File:LE DUC DE NEMOURS LOUIS CHARLES PHILIPPE RAPHAËL D'0RLÉANS.jpg
- File:QUEEN LOUISE OF DENMARK.jpg
- File:INFANTA BEATRIZ DE BORBÓN Y BATTENBERG.jpg
- File:MARÍA DE LAS MERCEDES DE ORLEÁNS Y BORBÓN.jpg
- File:Queen Victoria of Spain-1910.png
- File:INFANTA MARIA CRISTINA DE BORBÓN Y BATTENBERG.jpg
- File:Dowager Queen María Cristina-1910.png
- File:María de la Esperanza de Borbón.jpg
- File:ELIZABETH WILHELMINA VON WURTENBERG.jpg
- File:MARÍA DE LAS MERCEDES DE BORBÓN DOS SICILIAS Y ORLÉANS.jpg
- File:SAR DON JUAN DE BORBÓN Y BATTENBERG.jpg
- File:Marie-José of Italy.jpg
- File:RAINHA DONA SOFIA DE PORTUGAL.jpg
- File:Reina María Teresa de Austria (1).jpg
- File:Madame Royale in court dress by Jean-Marc Nattier (cropped).jpg
- File:Louise-Élisabeth de France (detail).jpg
- File:Louis, le Grand Dauphin, par Rigaud (cropped).jpg
- File:Polissena Cristina d'Assia with her children Victor Amadeus III and Eleonora of Savoy, Martin van Meytens - (Cropped).jpg
- File:Madame Henriette en Flore - Jean Marc Nattier.jpg
- File:Friederike Luise von Hessen-Darmstadt - Therbusch (cropped).jpg
- File:Maria Theresa of Naples and Sicily (cropped).jpg.png
- File:Duchesse d Angouleme (1).jpg
- File:Madame Royale (cropped).jpg
- File:Empress Eugenie KirkPatrick.jpg.png
- File:Princess Toria of Wales.jpg
- File:Maria Fedorovna by V.Makovskiy (cropped).jpg
- File:Dickie and David.jpg
- File:The Family of George II.jpg
- File:Carolina Leopoldina, Jean-Baptiste Isabey.jpg
- File:D. Luís de Orléans e Bragança e sua esposa.jpg
- File:Louis, le Grand Dauphin, par Rigaud.jpg
- File:D. Maria Pia Orleans e Bragança e os filhos.jpg
- File:PRINCESA D. MARIA PIA DE ORLEANS E BRAGANÇA.jpg
- File:Princesa D. Maria Pia.png
- File:D. Maria Pia de Bourbon e seus filhos.jpg
- File:Infanta Luisa Fernanda, Duchess of Montpensier.jpg
- File:Brasão de armas de D. Maria Leopoldina de Habsburgo-Lorena.png
- File:Brasão de armas de D. Carlota Joaquina de Bourbon.png
- File:Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna wearing the traditional dress of the Russian court (2).jpg
- File:Princess Louise, Duchess of Fife,.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test video. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE, not in project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Instruction sheet for a specific not notable model of lathe. Renata3 (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
![02:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/10#c-Renata3-2018-07-10T02:39:00.000Z-File:Tekinimo_stakles_"Praktika",_modelis_CUT-4.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
![17:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/10#c-George_Chernilevsky-2018-07-17T17:50:00.000Z-File:Tekinimo_stakles_"Praktika",_modelis_CUT-4.jpg){kind=link}
used as part of vandalism 100.35.57.106 04:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RekhtaWiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the user's draft submission was declined in May 2017 per what Wikipedia is not and deleted that December as abandoned. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 04:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Promo image. No educational purpose. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 07:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope unused drawing. E4024 (talk) 12:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lantaikayufergio (talk · contribs)
[edit]
4nn1l2 (talk) 13:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, no significance. All Wikipedia articles that used this image have been deleted for lack of notability of subject. Deryck Chan (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album.Used in self-promotion article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused fictional test map, no educational value, out of scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ocean912345. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amaljoy2011 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type photos, out of scope
- File:Amal joy arukulasseril 04.jpg
- File:Amal joy arukulasseril 4.jpg
- File:Amal joy arukulasseril 3.jpg
- File:Amal Joy Arukulasseril 2.jpg
- File:Amal joy arukulasseril 1.jpg
- File:Amal joy arukulasseril pic.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahron Bregman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Swiss Alps, 2018.jpg
- File:Tel Aviv, 2018.jpg
- File:Negev desert, 2018.jpg
- File:Malta, Valetta, 2018.jpg
- File:Valentta, Malta, 2018.jpg
- File:Ahron Bregman, 2017.jpg
- File:Ahron Bregman.jpg
Hiàn (talk) 21:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie, no educational usage - out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fair use file (see description by uploader and source) D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No evidence that uploader owns this image, appears elsewhere on the internet, like here. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Format suggests this is taken from Instagram, higher-res version available at http://www.pixbam.com/canserbero/ft.-canserbero-(in%C3%83%C2%A9dito-en/158557 Ytoyoda (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 18:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Precautionary principle. Other pictures uploaded by same user are copyrighted files. Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 09:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, all his remaining uploads have different camera in EXIF. Taivo (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
All rights reserved on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/danieldiaz-sickmind/7281129174/in/dateposted/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Reverse image search shows photo has been published elsewhere, needs OTRS ticket: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuqfxNgyFWwrR9Mlznrx9BzKCqi7Sdw926Fkvy0BQinusFQQTk1YtY51ftW8yez8hKrvJ5CO2wOWkRa3Kx56oihTzDGun8tqEv2V6RvEB-7e4hDpaVOzBKK9yLc15MuwPaIEBQIphtgHeRdq7lwk68888du_1iBe4ZpjV5gRI3YZEJSGjsIaBKlWhbnt4rKRaak50CRVakOca23BeFOxcWS7hqQA3jCRLc-qJPhHqT4LR40fG_1j3hW_1koowq6hR_1AXcdpmBx9G7KqMuAK3Nayx2wpham5wBeFGveCRqElZiV3ZQaMGhqx5cK-EQ2rCqbA8X6GMTS4M2J7w9yUpi6PxKO58bk7g Ytoyoda (talk) 01:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Text in the image suggests this is not an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 00:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/_9s7aHGpkQ, not taken by uploader or licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 AgWoolridge (talk) 02:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from video, not taken by uploader or licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 AgWoolridge (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, no usable EXIF, a similar image [1] can be found on the web 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
![[1]](https://www.gcm.be/files/photoalbums/stofzuigsystemen/gcm_stofzuigsystemen3.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, definitely not own work. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عـلاء سـامـى (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:شركة ASGfirm.jpg
- File:حوار علاء سامي في سينما كوم.jpg
- File:صورة لـ علاء سامي.png
- File:علاء سامي.png
- File:علاء سامي صفحة فيس بوك.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernandacosentino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Tren a toledo 05.jpg
- File:Tren a toledo 04.jpg
- File:Tren a toledo 02.jpg
- File:Tren a toledo 01.jpg
- File:Tren a toledo 03.jpg
- File:Libro rojo.jpg
- File:Sobre la naturaleza cercana.jpg
- File:Sobre los limites y el horizonte.jpg
- File:Sobre la incertidumbre.jpg
- File:Fuera de foco.jpg
- File:Sobre la mirada del viajero que huye 1.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino.jpg
- File:Paisajito Giardino.jpg
- File:Sobre la fugacidad.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernandacosentino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Art works by living artist Héctor De Benedictis. Permission is necessary.
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 78.jpg
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 79.jpg
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 80.jpg
- File:Antropología de lo inútil81.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino5.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino6.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino3.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino4.jpg
- File:Paisajito Rosarino2.jpg
- File:Samara Sonalí y los otros 01.jpg
- File:Samara, Sonalí y los otros. Muestra 2014.jpg
- File:Postal 1.jpg
- File:El descanso.jpg
- File:Postal 2.jpg
- File:Lo urgente generalmente atenta contra lo necesario..jpg
- File:Sobre el fin del otoño.jpg
- File:Postales.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination --JuTa 09:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernandacosentino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, which seem to be derivative works. No permission.
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 17.jpg
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 16.jpg
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 15.jpg
- File:Antropologia de lo inutil 14.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Legendary kim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data. Please upload the original images, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Fictional test map, no educational value, out of scope. Only used in personal sandbox. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ocean912345. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused low-quality raster copy of File:Magnetic declination.svg with lots of whitespace. I fail to see how this is useful. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haris Aziz Bloch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:New Jersey Route 21
[edit]Not of a sufficient quality to be educationally useful, either blurred or out of focus.
- File:New Jersey Route 21 Look at Exit 8 sign from SB lanes (3336105473).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0060 (3014018913).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0061 (3014018961).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0062 (3014019011).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0066 (3014853790).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0067 (3014853838).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0068 (3014853910).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0074 (3014019597).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0075 (3014019657).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0076 (3014854260).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0078 (3014854364).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0083 (3014019989).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT0086 (3014020119).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1380 (3336103605).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1385 (3336939492).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1386 (3336939552).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1388 (3336104079).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1389 (3336939746).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1390 (3336939808).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1392 (3336104279).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1393 (3336104331).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1395 (3336104489).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1397 (3336940220).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1399 (3336940316).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1401 (3336104771).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1404 (3336940550).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1406 (3336104999).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1408 (3336105073).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1411 (3336105259).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1425 (3336941816).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1469 (3336944310).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1470 (3336944338).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1474 (3336108843).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1482 (3336944990).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1486 (3336109419).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1487 (3336945220).jpg
- File:New Jersey Route 21 PICT1488 (3336109499).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hiàn (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Probablemente no es el titula y no tiene los derechos, imagen genérica de Google Geom (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:New Jersey Route 94
[edit]Not of a sufficient quality to be educationally useful, either blurred or out of focus.
- File:New Jersey State Route 94 PICT0044 (2970643860).jpg
- File:New Jersey State Route 94 PICT0114 (2891431670).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hiàn (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a duplicate file. Jpetracek (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Is that within the scope? Sanandros (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter, not licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 AgWoolridge (talk) 01:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/BBvDiI9mpjb, not taken by uploader or licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 AgWoolridge (talk) 02:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook download, original source not indicated Ytoyoda (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Marked as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the graphic of the pinball is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. ℯxplicit 04:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 197something (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Wiki photo.pdf
- File:Smile baba.jpg
- File:Maynor.jpg
- File:Ypee.jpg
- File:Maame Serwaa with the BBC crew.jpg
- File:Edem.jpg
- File:Erskine.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all Note also that yesterday on the English Wikipedia 197something was indef blocked and confirmed as a sock [2] of User:Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr who is indefinitely blocked both on Commons and on the English Wikipedia. 197something should be indef blocked here as well. It is highly unlikely that any of these files are his own work. File:Wiki photo.pdf and File:Erskine.jpg are definitely not, by his own admission [3]. File:Ypee.jpg is watermarked. None of the files have EXIF camera data, apart from File:Maame Serwaa with the BBC crew.jpg which is explicitly sourced to ghanaweb.com via dailyviewgh.com [4]. Voceditenore (talk) 08:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Two other files. EugeneZelenko, there are two other images uploaded by this user which should be deleted. File:Alesandra-Seutin.jpg is sourced from yorkshiredance.com [5] and the image is watermarked. File:Maame serwa.jpg has been languishing at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maame serwa.jpg since May. It can be found online in multiple locations, e.g. here and here. Voceditenore (talk) 09:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
User with 16 global edits since two and a half years. E4024 (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Who's she? Is she in scope? E4024 (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Images missing COM:PERMISSION
- File:Leuit si Jimat.jpg
- File:Kampung Ciptagelar.jpg
- File:Seren Taun.jpg
- File:Kentang mustofa.jpg
- File:Rarawuan.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 13:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logos.
- File:Sidang Umum Hima Pensatrada.png
- File:Riksa Budaya Sunda.png
- File:Mitra Sunda.png
- File:Bende Rancage.png
- File:Turus.png
- File:Sambada.png
- File:Hima Pensatrada.png
- File:Pancaksuji.png
- File:Lisenda.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be educationally useful. Hiàn (talk) 19:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Watermarked studio image. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE, Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in December 2010 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 23:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Hard to see how this could not be a copyright violation. That sculpture is almost certainly recent enough to be copyrighted, and there is no freedom of panorama for sculpture in the U.S. Jmabel ! talk 05:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP#United States. – Kwj2772 (talk) 13:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate. Mistake made. Same file uploaded with slightly different name EasyKL (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 18:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Extremely low quality, user has history of copyright violation, unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 16:21, 18 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
File seems to originate from https://www.flickr.com/photos/southerncrossgroup/33161621966/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- The picture is original photoshoot. May I know the reason of deletion request? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 180.151.49.186 (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- @180.151.49.186: @Ganapathy.rangappa: Part of the issue is that the image was published on Flickr under an "All rights reserved" license 2 months before it was published here. Because it was published elsewhere before, the owner is asked to contact Commons:OTRS and show some sort of evidence that they are the copyright owner, along with a statement releasing the image from copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussions, no proof of free licensing. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
The Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail screenshots
[edit]As derivatives of The Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail (Tora no O o Fumu Otokotachi), they are copyright in Japan until 2036 (38 years after the death of the director, Akira Kurosawa).
- File:Benkei acessor 2.png
- File:Benkei acessor.png
- File:Benkei resignado.png
- File:Benkei togashi.png
- File:Carregador dançando.png
- File:Grupo partindo.png
- File:Grupo sacerdotes.png
- File:Kenichi ajuda.png
- File:Kenichi centro.png
- File:Kenichi Enomoto 1945.jpg
- File:Kenichi.png
- File:Seis sacerdotes.png
- File:Susumu Fujita 1945.jpg
— JJMC89 (T·C) 03:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - file from internet IOIOI (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Unfree logo, unlikely to be own work or below threshold of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- this logo belomgs to the arab table tennis federation , so where's the wrong ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehab refaat fawzy (talk • contribs) 23:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- There's no evidence that the federation has given you permission to publish the logo under a Creative Commons license. HOWEVER, it's possible the logo is not eligible for copyright since all the elements are text or simple shapes and can be given the {{PD-Textlogo}} license. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Arabic calligraphy appears too complex to fit COM:TOO. As pointed out above, this is unlikely to be the uploaders own work. --Green Giant (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
It can read copyrighted writings. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work by 岩田孝三 (1907 - 1994). LudwigSK (talk) 05:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 00:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Can be traced back to at least 2014 on the web [6] + small size + poor upload history for both users (the original uploader has uploaded only one file, the second uploader has uploaded several copyvios) 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Failed licence review. This is available at Flickr under a Public Domain Mark 1.0 but no reason has been stated why it is in the public domain. A verification through OTRS is needed to keep it. De728631 (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
bad quality crop Sandro Halank (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
bad quality crop Sandro Halank (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping the better of the two crops because otherwise this image is lost to the category. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. Created 2000, скульптори М. Самарик і М. Обезюк. No Permission from the sculptors. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Cannot be an own work, you should be too old to take this historical pic. Please use correct licenses. E4024 (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook at the MD. I think the uploads of this colleague must be reviewed entirely. E4024 (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement https://youtube.com/watch?v=AvOVQlkXygA&t=1m18s Skepsiz (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong colors and orphan. New correct SVG version available (File:LiberazioneSicilia1860.svg). Afnecors (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:FDR Drive - New York City, New York.jpg epicgenius (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of a photo not published 2014. Public domain if evidence that published 25 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of a photo not published 2014. Public domain if evidence that published 25 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Image previously published at http://golsmedia.com/cd-acero-cierra-plantilla-dos-refuerzos-lujo/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Non-free television screenshot. At the 2:55 of the video, it can be noted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ4uHSQo9cg TricoWiki (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alevtina2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings and small images without EXIF data. COM:OTRS permission is needed.
- File:Alena Vasilyeva.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Фарфор. Серия Петергоф. 2016.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Семейные реликвии. 2008. Бумага, акварель. 53×70.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Регата Паруса белых ночей. 2016. х.м. 50х80.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Канун Рождества. 2009. Бумага, акварель. 54х76.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Петергоф. 2015. х,м., 50х100.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Национальный музей Пном-Пень. 2014, х.м., 50х70.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Соловецкий монастырь. 2012. Холст, масло. 40×60.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Монмартр. Весенний дождь. 2015. 50×50.jpg
- File:Васильева Алена. Ихэюань. Мост Пасторальных поэм. 2015, х., м. 50х70.jpg
- File:Алена Васильева для РЖД.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Respected Yann, the article was created by me on behalf of the heroine of the article - the artist Alena Vasilyeva. I really have the right to publish photos published in this article. Thank you very much for your feedback! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alevtina2018 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alevtina2018: above comment copied from the talk page. Please contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Поняла, файлы можно удалить до решения вопроса с оформлением авторского права. Большое спасибо! Alevtina2018 (talk) 13:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Despite discussion, adding items to Commons, claimed as own work, but created by others is against the spirit, guidelines and policies of the project. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Didn't want to tag with {{Logo}} since I wasn't sure if the eagle design is above the threshold of originality, but this is definitely not "own work". Ytoyoda (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NextpowerLPM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims to have personally created both of these photos, but according to the metadata, one was created by Patricia Rodrigues, and the other by "manuelteixeira". It seems unlikely that they are the same person. Since the uploader appears to be a paid editor, he or she may wish to read Commons:Guidance for paid editors.
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
External (copyrighted) source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Copied from publisher's website of the second edition (published in 2009) without attribution; non-free book cover. Mliu92 (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
This image was illegally taken by means of criminal trespass, by an admitted repeated criminal trespasser in lds temples (recently arrested, link provided), who openly goes by the name "newnamenoah" and openly admits to be named Mike Norton. This image contains temple clothing believers keep from public view, thus proving this image to having been taken by illegal means. 67.2.18.236 19:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
https://s22.postimg.cc/p9jf6q735/newnamenoah_booking.jpg
- Keep' Taken by illegal means is not a valid deletion criteria. There are a bunch of cold war eastern block images that weren't technically legal.Geni (talk) 04:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete comparing this to the cold war is incredibly intellectually dishonest and deeply offensive. This image is not warfare against a government tyranny and it is not comparable to getting information out from behind an iron curtain (I can't believe I just had to say that). This profoundly disrespectful image is meant to be disrespectful against the religious beliefs of others by exposing their ceremonial clothing, from inside their own temple, without their permission or knowledge while committing criminal trespass. This is the equivalent of urinating on a picture of Mohammad in a mosque to take a picture. Everything going on in this picture is unauthorized by the religion in question and is specifically prohibited by it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.18.236 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons is not beholden to Mormon practices and polices and doesn't delete something simply because it offends religious sensibilities. See COM:CENSORSHIP. Additionally, I don't know of any policy on Commons that forbids photographs taken in an illegal manner so long as the content of the photograph is not illegal. There are no identifiable people present and the photography rules appear to be a non-copyright issue that doesn't warrant deletion. clpo13(talk) 18:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Photos should not be taken inside temples out of respect. Especially that of clothing warn in temples. 198.167.242.32 19:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Commons is not censored. It will not be deleted solely on the grounds that it may cause offense to you for religious reasons or that it's "sacred". Whenever the temple forbids photography or not does not matter here - the image is already here, and it's here to stay. The conflicts between the photographer and the temple itself is irrelevant.
- See also the previous discussion of this file. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
This picture is of a sacred religious ordinance that members of the Church of Jesus Christ participate in and should be respected as such. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints do not take or share images of temple ordinances. This picture is disrespectful to faithful members of the Church. 2601:680:8000:2760:A06D:2D9C:FA00:4B6F 04:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:CENSOR. Thuresson (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Suspected copyright violation: only contribution by the uploader, no EXIF, small resolution version credited to John Collings in https://architectureau.com/articles/laminations/#img=2 MKFI (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image in question looks to have been scanned from a magazine or newspaper and then uploaded under a CC license, As there's no proof that the Flickr uploader is the photographer or that the photographer of the vehicle ever gave permission for these to be under a CC license I would say these are copyvios ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Therescassini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Theres Cassini, missing permission.
- File:Cassini realitaet.jpg
- File:Cassini Musil Wirklichkeiten.jpg
- File:Cassini lichtspeisen kunstforum.jpg
- File:Cassini gluehend eis sammlung Belvedere.jpg
- File:Cassini moos kuenstlerhaus klagenfurt.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping "11 July 2018 Ronhjones (talk | contribs | block) deleted". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The user DoktorJaner is not the author of this image and has not the right to publish this image under Creative Commons. The real author is the photographer Marc-Oliver Schulz, as given in the metatags of the photograph. Cryptorebel (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that all the photographers would have died before 1938 (copyright is PMA+80 in Spain) Jcb (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
http://farmas.net/patronato.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
http://ivgpu.com/news/glavnye-novosti/997-novyi-rektor Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
(c) Assemblée nationale. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
(c) Assemblée nationale. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Not the correct one to be here Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct one to be here Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct one to be here Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct one to be here Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
not the correct one Viniciuscarvalho900 (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Image of unverifiable copyright status. It's claimed as CC/own work, but the exact same photo turns up in media coverage of the subject with the photo credit given to Facebook. So absent a proper OTRS confirmation, it's impossible to determine whether the uploader is the rightful copyright holder, or just grabbed it from the subject's campaign materials without the proper permissions. Bearcat (talk) 23:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina, unable to determine copyright status of original work. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Argentina for artworks. Unable to determine original copyright status. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Villanueva is not sufficiently precise to determine location of photograph. Consequently, freedom of panorama cannot be determined. Derivative work. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". Also out of scope as personal photo with no other project edits. GermanJoe (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Image from twitter. Luisalvaz (talk) 00:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Nearly identical to File:شیخ_جعفر_مجتهدی.jpg which is not claimed as own work, but has no evidence of permission. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Nearly identical to File:شیخ_جعفر_مجتهدی.jpg which is not claimed as own work, but has no evidence of permission. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Odd watermarking at upper left and large number of jpg artifacts make me suspect that this is not "own work". IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Missing metadata, unlikely own work. Uploader's name is the same of the subject of the picture. Jamez42 (talk) 01:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Missing metadata, unlikely own work. Author's name is the same of the subject of the picture. Jamez42 (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Promotional image, claimed own work but file metadata claims author as "Roger". IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
As a member of the production company Rusalka Pictures I can confirm that the picture was created by us and uploaded to the site as a promotional material upon the films release. we own the rights to this image and gave permission for the picture to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JezMichaels (talk • contribs) 01:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Original research & no cited sources. While many speculate and try conceptualize "Vilnius metro area", there is no such widely accepted thing. Renata3 (talk) 01:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of a copyrighted work. Original uploader claims to have taken this photo from J. J. Singh's autobiography. Gazoth (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
As a derivative of Ikiru, it is copyright in Japan until 2036 (38 years after the death of the director, Akira Kurosawa). — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Copy to en.wp (and possibly other local sites that allow fair-use). en:Ikiru describes this scene as "iconic" (with cites). Then delete it here per nom. DMacks (talk) 05:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I copied it, and tagged fair-use for the film and also the actor (again, iconic scene and critical to his reputation/notability). DMacks (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
_1951.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1951.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As a derivative of The Idiot, it is copyright in Japan until 2036 (38 years after the death of the director, Akira Kurosawa). — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
Taken from Facebook; not uploader's own work; would require OTRS authorization anyway küñall (nütramyen) 03:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Image credited to Ole Johan Wiik, permission not indicated Ytoyoda (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in May 2018 as spam. The contributor was subsequently blocked for promotion. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Doug Friedline is the subject of photography. Copyright holder is usually the person who takes the photograph. Who is the photographer? These problems should be addressed through COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from copyrighted web site: spicemoney.com. Complex enough to qualify as copyrightable. Jmcgnh (talk) 07:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
il s'agit d'une image test Henry Bostorrhus (talk) 07:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
https://www.facebook.com/RiverMasonEromosele/photos/a.762047753880208.1073741826.762046783880305/1614397801978528/?type=3&theater (upload here 7 January, cropped photo on FB posted 2 January) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Very small thumbnail of Category:Mushroom cloud over Nagasaki (by Charles Levy). Not used, no source, no author, wrong license. Yann (talk) 08:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The source says "Foto: EUROPA PRESS" but is that a free source or a copyrighted source? Leoboudv (talk) 08:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete {{Speedydelete}} should have been used instead 
--Discasto talk 08:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook photo according to metadata, resolution 2048 is also typical for Facebook. ~Cybularny Speak? 08:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work, does it? OTOH, several one-man-cats have recently been opened for Mr. Sebastián Palma; I would consider eliminating some of them also. E4024 (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
PROMO image and non-free content. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded with error (part of image is missing) UBKsro (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
http://www.danzaeffebi.com/danza-work/nederlands-dans-theater-2-audizione-per-danzatori-e-danzatrici-tra-17-e-21-anni/nederlands-dans-theater-2-ph-rahi-rezvani-6/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
(c) Vanguard Allure, http://folapfashion.blogspot.com/2017/03/shirley-igwe-is-smashing-on-cover-of.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Not used, out of scope. What is the source? E4024 (talk) 11:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Modern painting taken from Twitter. Requires permission of the author through OTRS. E4024 (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The licensing is not correct and the so-called "author" is aimed at defamation rather than informing the author of the pic. E4024 (talk) 13:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- User:Takabeg, you must know better than me what © DêrsimInfo | Keyepelê Kirmanckî (Zazakî) means (look at the end of the linked webpage). Therefore please do not use this internet site any more for uploads to Commons. --E4024 (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF.
- File:Советкая гавань.с.jpg
- File:Советская гавань.сбербанк.jpg
- File:Советская гавань.пл.Победы.jpg
- File:Советская гавань.Пионерский проспект — копия.jpg
- File:Советская гавань маяк.jpg
- File:Советская гавань упраление МЧС.png
- File:Советская гавань ДК.jpg
- File:Советская гавань.ТЭЦ.jpg
- File:Советская гавань храм.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandre Fiori (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and book covers. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:A Lua nos Espera Sempre... (Telmo Vergara, 1946).png
- File:Estrada Perdida (Telmo Vergara, 1939).png
- File:Seu Paulo Convalesce (Telmo Vergara, 1934).jpg
- File:Telmo Dias de Castro Vergara 2.jpg
- File:Telmo Dias de Castro Vergara.jpg
- File:Cadeiras na Calçada (Telmo Vergara, 1936).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: restored the two photos, as they are PD in Brazil. Dates and licenses corrected accordingly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Unvollständige Anzeige Bernd Klomann (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen Reeyad at 15:40, 28 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 18:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
The file is a photograph which claimed to be published in Japan. As the file is a photographic work, Template:PD-Japan is inapplicable here. Also, as the uploader claimed that the file is photographed in 1966, the file does not meet the requirement provided in Template:PD-Japan-oldphoto, which requires that the file must be published before 1956-12-31. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
I misunderstood the rule and posted an image.I deleted the file from the related Wikipedia page.--OclamD (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://indiebandguru.com/josh-pfeiffer-life/. Converting to DR per claims on file talk page. @Jpcrooner: since we cannot verify your authorship of the photo on a public forum such as this one, please follow the instructions on OTRS to confirm you hold the copyright. Thanks. Storkk (talk) 09:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- The web site linked above has the notice "© 2018 Indie Band Guru". It seems improbable that the image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, as claimed by the uploader. In the absence of clear evidence that it is so licensed we should delete it. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a link to the Verified Facebook page of the Subject (Josh Pfeiffer) of the image in question showing this photo dated November, 2010. The description includes the HTML text establishing the image has been donated to creative commons and public domain. https://www.facebook.com/joshpfeiffermusic/photos/a.10150346843225301.575310.342578065300/10150346844090301/?type=3&theater My apologies for not knowing the proper requirements for adding images to public domain. Please advise if this is not sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpcrooner (talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Permission from the subject is pretty much irrelevant. The copyright belongs to the photographer, in this case Tara Pfeiffer. I believe that the CC-0 statement on that page is sufficient. Storkk (talk) 21:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
メタデータに作者の個人名が入ってしまっています。 Lanlan0122 (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader requested day of upload. --Majora (talk) 22:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bruno_Munari died in 1998. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
![05:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/10#c-Ellin_Beltz-2018-07-10T05:54:00.000Z-File:Bruno_Munari_"Scultura_Inutile"_(Davide_Casali,_2008).jpg){kind=link}
- Hello! I'm the author of the photo. I'm not sure what's the reason for deletion. Can you expand? --Folletto (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Folletto: : The author of the artwork retains copyright for a span of time post mortem, please see COM:L. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: : Of course! I know the author retains copyright. I didn't expect to be a copyright issue as this is a photo done in a museum where photography was allowed, and I expected that to be a sufficient permission. I've read the page you linked and it seems to me there's no such consideration then as it's considered derivative under US law regardless, right? Anyhow, I've contacted the association to see if they can give permission. If they agree, how should the permission be granted in that case? Does an email reply suffice? Folletto (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Folletto: Please have them use the email form at COM:OTRS. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Update: after a few emails and follow ups, I might have tracked down the person managing the copyright in Corraini. I'm waiting reply. Folletto (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It has been over a month now with no indication that this has been resolved. The image can always be undeleted if verification is received by our OTRS team. --Majora (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
![22:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/10#c-Majora-2018-08-24T22:47:00.000Z-File:Bruno_Munari_"Scultura_Inutile"_(Davide_Casali,_2008).jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation Solomon Dandy (talk) 06:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from https://jmage.ilt.kharkov.ua/mag_e.html, no indication that this is CC-licensed It might be {{PD-ineligible}} as it's extremely simple with minimal design elements. Guanaco (talk) 07:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible indeed. License changed. --Majora (talk) 22:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Porn Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep - "Porn" is not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)- Keep Per above. Beta M (talk) 04:54, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep once more a annoying nonsense deletion request. --Saibo (Δ) 01:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per Saibo and mattbuck, porn is not a valid reason for deletion. PierreSelim (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
please delete. pornographic Marie Adelaide (talk) 07:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per previous. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
This is a new graffiti in Budapest painting by the Hungarian joke party. But it derivate from a copyrighted photo, see here (click on the photo to open gallery). Similar DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bud Spencer graffiti.jpg. Regasterios (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
PD-shape. "Simple geometry"? Is that true? The users who categorized this file have agreed to that? I mean are "eagles" simple geometry? E4024 (talk) 11:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- I don't remember why I categorized it that way, maybe because I uploaded it while uploading several works in which were geometric figures and I could have been confused. Maybe the problem could be copyright. And there I have a question.
- The flag belongs to an organization considered terrorist by the Turkish government, it does not have legal jurisdiction. Can an outlawed organization claim copyright?
- Mikelelgediento (talk) 13:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- I cannot respond to your strange question on copyrights. (Ask an admin please.) I also prefer not to comment on it because I'm afraid of saying something you may misunderstand. (As regards terrorism, it is an issue out of the DR discussion; but as you are interested in terrorist groups, let me tell you that they are not only considered terrorists by the Turkish Government, Parliament and Judiciary but considered as such by the entire society; perhaps with the exception of the few terrorists themselves, but that does not mean anything, either. This is in parentheses.) --E4024 (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Regardless of its status in Turkey it would be copyrightable in the US as well so it can't be here either way. --Majora (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forth lake (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative work from commercial design.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
This is in clear violation of the US Flag Code. §176 (g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature. And: §176 (i) The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown. 24.255.97.221 16:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The Flag Code is a suggestion, not a law. Fry1989 eh? 19:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The US Supreme Court ruled in 1990 (United States v. Eichman) that "While flag desecration — like virulent ethnic and religious epithets, vulgar repudiations of the draft, and scurrilous caricatures — is deeply offensive to many, the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.". --Pkanella (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- 24.255.97.221 -- the image isn't a modification of the U.S. flag, it's an alternative graphic constructed out of scan codes with a certain superficial visual similarity to the U.S. flag... AnonMoos (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- The QR-code points to the US federal government's own homepage — www.usa.gov. What the image is "advertising" is simply the US government. --Pkanella (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing Celesteela (talk) 22:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader requested day of upload. Incorrect source anyways. --Majora (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jarosław Józef Szczepański (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Przebieg służby 2.pdf
- File:Opis służby.pdf
- File:Pułkownik Wincenty Podgurski legitymacyjne w mundurze.jpg
- File:Pułkownik Wincenty Podgurski.jpg
- File:Przebieg służby .pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
"Own work" by a one-time visitor. No original source, no date, no use. Better delete it. E4024 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture apparently taken from a train in a poorly specified location - it's not the city of Solothurn where it was categorized, probably nearby, but even though I live very close to Solothurn, I'm not sure where it is. Don't think it would be useful even with better description/categorization. Gestumblindi (talk) 02:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request: low quality unnecessary upload. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Blurry picture apparently taken from a train in a poorly specified location. It's certainly not in the city of Solothurn where the image was categorized - maybe on the train line Solothurn-Moutier? With a correct description and category, maybe it could be kept. Gestumblindi (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, I think that now I recognize the location. I think it's on the railway line Solothurn-Olten at a point between Niederbipp and Wangen an der Aare. But I'm not 100 % sure. And it's still a rather poor photo... Gestumblindi (talk) 02:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it's somewhere in the first half of the Solothurn-Olten line (perhaps around Riedholz where the railway and electroduct are near?). I'm sorry if the names and categories were misleading, I was uploading a backlog of photos and my memory was blurred too. The photo is certainly low quality and could be deleted without problems, but I thought it could be one of the few available for that area and subject (cattle). --Nemo 07:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Nemo bis: No, it's certainly not at Riedholz, that's a different railway line there (the narrow gauge line Solothurn-Niederbipp). If your photo was taken from the Solothurn-Olten line, then I think the point is pretty exactly here, I'm now quite sure (I'm travelling on that line often). You see the pasture at the marker, and the power line not far from the railway line, too. So, we have now a clearly identified location and could even add quite accurate coordinates to the photo, I think, but I'm still not convinced by the quality... Gestumblindi (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it's somewhere in the first half of the Solothurn-Olten line (perhaps around Riedholz where the railway and electroduct are near?). I'm sorry if the names and categories were misleading, I was uploading a backlog of photos and my memory was blurred too. The photo is certainly low quality and could be deleted without problems, but I thought it could be one of the few available for that area and subject (cattle). --Nemo 07:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete If Gestumblindi travels on the line often, he can take a better photo than this with less effort than it takes to improve the description. :-) Feel free to speedy delete as author request as well. --Nemo 05:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well, it's not that easy to take a good photo from that specific location from a moving traing (after all, you can't open the windows in modern trains). I think, if I really wanted to do that, I wouldn't use the train but walk there from Wangen an der Aare or Niederbipp and try to find a good spot. But then, I don't really think it's that interesting a location after all? Granted, I think we have no other photos from that exact place, but enough of cattle in Switzerland, pastures in Switzerland, Jura mountains... Myself, I'm now quite neutral regarding deletion of the picture. My main concern was that its location was unclear, but that's not the case now. I added a location and fitting categories to the image, but I'll leave it to the next admin to decide. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Author request: low quality unnecessary upload. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Is this covered by freedom of panorama or is this art? 79.228.80.246 15:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: FOP. --Krd 13:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Indian stamps are copyrighted for 60 years from the date of publication. Please see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#India for details. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Historical coat of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
This work was first published on Twitter, making it first published in the US, and quite possibly simultaneously any other country that Twitter hosts servers in. It's surely not PD in the US, or basically anywhere else in the world except Eritrea. Prosfilaes (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Same for almost every picture in Category:2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summitCoffeeandcrumbs (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Incorrect. The pictures were first published on the website of the the Eritrean ministry of information. --Varavour (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: Furthermore, pease explain to me the Wikimedia Commons precedent under which a photo taken in a given country, by a national of that country whilst in that country is considered to have been published in a third country just because the server is located in the third country. Perhaps there is a legal doctrine here I'm unaware of-- and correct me if I'm wrong-- but following this logic if I were to upload a photo to a photo hosting service, this would constitute publication in the country in which the photo is hosted. --Varavour (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- The Berne Convention says "A work shall be considered as having been published simultaneously in several countries if it has been published in two or more countries within thirty days of its first publication. ... The country of origin shall be considered to be: ... (c) in the case of works published simultaneously in a country outside the Union and in a country of the Union, the latter country;Articles 4 & 5. Thus the "country of origin", for Berne Convention purposes, is surely a Berne Convention nation.
- Where a photo is taken and by whom, has nothing to do with where it was published. If an Indian took a picture of his house in Calcutta and then went to college in the US, where he published it in the school newspaper, the country of origin would be the US. By analogy, if the "printing press" is a server, and it's still distributed to US nationals in the US, it seems the country of origin would be the US.
- Whether an image on the net is published is hard to tell; see https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap1000/ch1000-websites.pdf for the US Copyright Office's discussion. Unpublished works of any nation are copyrighted for life+x in any Berne Convention country. But if it is published, then a book printed in the US for US distribution is published in the US, so why wouldn't an image on a US server copied and distributed for people in the US be published in the US? Publication is always distinct from nationality of the author.
- The Compendium says (1009.4(B)):
- "As a general rule, the nation of first publication is the country where copies or phonorecords of the work were first published with the authorization of the copyright owner. This determination may be difficult when the applicant intends to register a website or website content, because the law in this area is unsettled. If the website was directed at users in a particular country (e.g., a website written entirely in Danish with a domain name ending in the suffix .dk), that country could be deemed the nation of first publication for purposes of copyright registration. The location of the server where the work resides and/or the scope of the intended audience may also be relevant to this issue."
- It's complicated, but I'm pretty sure Berne Convention countries should generally treat this work as unpublished or published in a Berne Convention country.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Interesting, I agree that the legal issues here are complex. It does not help that the relevant parts of the Eritrean Commercial Code, at least its English translation, is poorly and riddled with grammatical and spelling errors (one article refers to "Bublic speeches"). We should consider the possibility that the code as presently written thus provides a large loophole under which most pictures published in Eritrea fall into public domain. If we can establish that, we can proceed to the question of the location of publication.
- Interpreting the section of the Compendium you provided, I would argue that-- given the fact the pictures were published by a government official on a government website (the Ministry of Information, no less)-- that constitutes direction toward an Eritrean audience before all others. There is no indication that it was particularly targeted towards an American audience. As for the question of the server that seems the be the defining one, but the information you've provided is equivocal on the relevance on the location of the server, categorically stating that "the law in this area is unsettled" and that it merely may be relevant. If simultaneously posting the pictures on Twitter constitutes publication in the United States, I would probably agree that they are subject to copyright protections and should be deleting, but if not they'd fall under Eritrean jurisdiction and almost certain fall under public domain. --Varavour (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note we can't even say where they've been simultaneously published yet, as the thirty days haven't run out. If in the next couple weeks, it's published with permission in a newspaper in Italy or the US or China or Egypt or Djibouti or Sudan, that nation would supersede Eritrea as the country of origin for Berne Convention purposes. A US court has ruled that publication on the Internet is publication in the US. Any case like this really should wait 30 days, because it can't really be PD under Berne Convention until then. Even then, I don't think we can say for sure that the Internet publication, especially in English on Twitter, can't be taken as US publication.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hm. Understood. I plead no contest in that case. --Varavour (talk) 02:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note we can't even say where they've been simultaneously published yet, as the thirty days haven't run out. If in the next couple weeks, it's published with permission in a newspaper in Italy or the US or China or Egypt or Djibouti or Sudan, that nation would supersede Eritrea as the country of origin for Berne Convention purposes. A US court has ruled that publication on the Internet is publication in the US. Any case like this really should wait 30 days, because it can't really be PD under Berne Convention until then. Even then, I don't think we can say for sure that the Internet publication, especially in English on Twitter, can't be taken as US publication.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Incorrect. The pictures were first published on the website of the the Eritrean ministry of information. --Varavour (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Actually this image is not in the public domain of Eritrea as its author, Yemane Gebremeskel, is still alive yet Varavour claims he died. Turtlewong (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nowhere do I claim that he has died. --Varavour (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, the wording of the license is confusing as it starts off with "This is because its author has died, and 50 years have passed since publication, by the virtue of Articles 1653 and 1670 of the Eritrean Civil code. In the case of anonymous works, the publisher becomes the copyright holder per Article 1667." However as these images were published as a collection of photos from one day on the Eritrean Ministry of Information website it is not in the Public Domain. Turtlewong (talk) 13:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nowhere do I claim that he has died. --Varavour (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- The images were first published as a collection on the Eritrean Ministry of Information website. Turtlewong (talk) 06:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per dicussion. --JuTa 14:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
作者（著作人格権者、著作権者、著作権の継承者）によるライセンスの許諾が無い他人の写真作品を撮影（スキャン）してしまいました、ライセンスの整合性もありません。 栗原 岳 (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
作者（著作人格権者、著作権者、著作権の継承者）によるライセンスの許諾が無い他人の写真作品を撮影（スキャン）してしまいました、ライセンスの整合性もありません。 栗原 岳 (talk) 11:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Source is Salzburgwiki where the source is mozarteum.at, where it however states under the section Pressebilder (press photos) "Die Verwendung für kommerzielle oder andere Zwecke ist nicht gestattet" which translates to "usage for commercial and other purposes is not permitted". Additionally, the photo can't be even found at the given source link Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo @Mondfeuer61: , nach deinem Benutzernamen zu schließen, kannst du auch deutsch lesen. So wirst du bemerken, dass im Salzburgwiki auch zahlreiche CC BY-SA Fotos hochgeladen wurden, so auch das von dir bemängelte Foto das Wolfgang Lienbacher unter CC BY 3.0 hochgedladen hat und es damit doch frei ist, oder? --K@rl (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo @Karl Gruber: , soweit ich sehe, wurde das Foto im Salzburgwiki von dem dort aktiven Benutzer Peter Krackowizer hochgeladen, der es wiederum von dem damals noch funktionierendem Link gehabt haben wird. Ich sehe also keinen Hinweis, dass der Fotograf Wolfgang Lienbacher das Bild selbst unter der genannten Lizenz freigegeben hat. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Das ist aber nicht unser Problem, auch bei Flickr siehst du keinen Fotografen. Wenn das Foto dort frei ist, so ist auch für uns frei - wir haben da nichts zu urteilen, du kannst ja gerne Krackowizer anschreiben, ich kenne das, da ich selbst auch im Salzburgwiki registriert bin. Also nicht päpstlicher als der Papst wäre angebracht. --K@rl (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- PS: Außerdem weißt du schon, dass jemand Fotos unter verschiedenen Lizenzen freigeben kann, die nicht alle frei sein müssen. --K@rl (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nö, nicht umsonst gilt Commons:Lizenzwäsche. Oder deinem Beispiel folgend: Wenn jemand auf Flickr ein Foto hochlädt und mit einer freien Lizenz austattet, aber offensichtlich nicht Urheberrechtsinhaber ist, ist das Foto natürlich nicht frei und dürfte nicht hier bleiben, nur weil es jemand willkürlich so behauptet hat.
- In dem hier vorliegendem Fall ist es ja sogar recht ziemlich offensichtlich, denn es ist sogar der orginale Urheber+die Quelle angegeben. Entweder hat also der Nutzer Krackowizer das Bild - vielleicht in Fehlinterpretation dessen, was auf der Mozarteum-Seite zu den Pressebildern angegeben ist - irrtümlich unter einer freien Lizenz hochgeladen oder er hat tatsächlich Kontakt zum Fotografen und die Erlaubnis bekommen, das Bild unter einer freien Lizenz hochzuladen. Das ist aber nirgendwo vermerkt und müsste zumindest hier (weiß nicht wie es im Salzburgwiki liefe) per OTRS hinterlegt werden. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wir kennzeichnen das mit OTRS - wie das Salzburgwiki macht, ist ganz allein deren Kaffee und nicht unserer. Krackowizer bekommt immer wieder Fotos von anderen, dei selbst nicht in der Lage sind hochzuladen. Aber wenn du meinst - ich streit mich wegen dem Foto sicher nicht herum. --K@rl (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Das Problem ist eben, dass das Salzburgwiki auch nur ein Wiki ist und damit dort eben auch jeder angeben kann, was er will. Natürlich wäre es etwas anderes, wenn das Bild z.B. in einem Flickr-Stream vom Mozarteum mit einer freien Lizenz hochgeladen wurde, dann könnte man sich zwar rein theoretisch auch noch fragen, ob der Fotograf das Bild auch tatsächlich so lizensiert haben wollte, aber rein praktisch würde man natürlich davon ausgehen, dass das auf Grund der bestehenden Verbindung schon seine Richtigkeit hat.
- In dem Fall hier liegt allerdings überhaupt kein Hinweis vor, dass die Lizensierung korrekt erfolgt ist. Vielmehr impliziert die Dateiseite eigentlich recht eindeutig, dass das Bild aus einer externen Quelle stammt und der Hochladende davon ausgeht, dass die Datei unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlich wurde. Wenn du also davon ausgehst, dass Krackowizer im Gegensatz dazu das Foto "bekommen" habe, liegt dafür überhaupt kein Hinweis vor, ganz egal wie das Salzburgwiki solche Fälle regelt (also nicht einmal irgendetwas Richtung "persönlich die Erlaubnis bekommen"). --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Was soll der Anwurf, dass im Salzburgwiki ist, wo jeder angeben kann was er will - das ist im Gegensatz zu Wikipedia der größte Unsinn, denn das SW ist ein geschlossenes und nicht so offen für jeden Unsinn. --K@rl (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- PS: Außerdem ist jeder User, den SN bekannt, im Gegensatz zur Selbstregistrierung dich dort nicht möglcih ist - das ist eine Überheblichkeit als WM User --K@rl (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Aber noch einmal - lass löschen und für mich ist EOD --K@rl (talk) 15:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ich Gegensatz zu dir, der sich scheinbar persönlich angegriffen sieht, kenne ich mich im Salzburgwiki überhaupt nicht aus, sehe aber dass man sich normal registrieren kann und dann, soweit ich den mir unregistriert zugänglichen Hinweisen entnehmen kann, auch editieren darf. Völlig davon abgesehen bleibt aber festzuhalten, dass die Lizenzierungsinformationen, so vertrauenswürdig und kompetent ein Nutzer deiner Meinung nach auch sein mag, im Salzburgwiki nicht mehr hergeben als bereits beschrieben, sodas dann eben ein Hinweis jeglicher Art fehlt, dass die freie Lizenz tatsächlich so korrekt ist. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Okay in dem einen Punkt hast du recht. Dei Registrierung wurde umgestellt, sodass selbstreg möglich ist. Aber das ist bei vielen Wiki wie dem Wien-Geschichte ebenfalls möglcih und das wird als Lexikon anerkannt. Anonym wie hier darf sonst nirgends jemand K@rl (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Aber nocheinmal: Die URV kann höchstens der Uploader vom SW machen - sicher nicht wir, denn stell dir vor, ich hätte es von einer anderen Quelle, die sichs ihrerseits vom SW hochgeladen hat, so bleibt immer nur der über, der die Lizenz falsch erweitert hat, nicht die ganze Kette - K@rl (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Mag sein, aber es geht ja hier gerade nicht darum, dir persönlich eine URV zu unterstellen (der Hinweis auf der Diskussionsseite erfolgt automatisch), sondern nur darum, dieses Kette zurückzuverfolgen und so zu schauen, ob das Bild hier dann letztendlich unter einer korrekten Lizenz steht (bzw. korrekt nach dem, was man eben verfolgen kann. Falls die Lizenzierung korrekt ist, ist es eben nirgends vermerkt). --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ich habe die URV auch nihct auf mich bezogen, aber ich beziehe mich auf eine auufrechte Kizenzvergabe, die ich nicht verpflcihtet bin zurückzuverfolgen. Wenn du jetzt also einen Löschanrtag stellst, so unterstellst du mir eine URV, denn weiter zurück geht uns nichts an. --K@rl (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Natürlich geht uns das was an, sonst wären die Hälfte aller Löschanträge hier und Commons:Lizenzwäsche sinnlos, weil theoretisch deiner Logik nach dann auch der offensichtlichste CC-Flickr-Reupload eines geschützten Bildes korrekt sein könnte. Wenn ich also mal kein Bild finde, aber gerne eins hätte, lade ich nächstes Mal einfach irgendein Bild von google auf Flickr oder im SW hoch und transferiere es dann hierher, weil weiter zurück geht uns ja nichts an. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ich habe die URV auch nihct auf mich bezogen, aber ich beziehe mich auf eine auufrechte Kizenzvergabe, die ich nicht verpflcihtet bin zurückzuverfolgen. Wenn du jetzt also einen Löschanrtag stellst, so unterstellst du mir eine URV, denn weiter zurück geht uns nichts an. --K@rl (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Mag sein, aber es geht ja hier gerade nicht darum, dir persönlich eine URV zu unterstellen (der Hinweis auf der Diskussionsseite erfolgt automatisch), sondern nur darum, dieses Kette zurückzuverfolgen und so zu schauen, ob das Bild hier dann letztendlich unter einer korrekten Lizenz steht (bzw. korrekt nach dem, was man eben verfolgen kann. Falls die Lizenzierung korrekt ist, ist es eben nirgends vermerkt). --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Aber nocheinmal: Die URV kann höchstens der Uploader vom SW machen - sicher nicht wir, denn stell dir vor, ich hätte es von einer anderen Quelle, die sichs ihrerseits vom SW hochgeladen hat, so bleibt immer nur der über, der die Lizenz falsch erweitert hat, nicht die ganze Kette - K@rl (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Okay in dem einen Punkt hast du recht. Dei Registrierung wurde umgestellt, sodass selbstreg möglich ist. Aber das ist bei vielen Wiki wie dem Wien-Geschichte ebenfalls möglcih und das wird als Lexikon anerkannt. Anonym wie hier darf sonst nirgends jemand K@rl (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ich Gegensatz zu dir, der sich scheinbar persönlich angegriffen sieht, kenne ich mich im Salzburgwiki überhaupt nicht aus, sehe aber dass man sich normal registrieren kann und dann, soweit ich den mir unregistriert zugänglichen Hinweisen entnehmen kann, auch editieren darf. Völlig davon abgesehen bleibt aber festzuhalten, dass die Lizenzierungsinformationen, so vertrauenswürdig und kompetent ein Nutzer deiner Meinung nach auch sein mag, im Salzburgwiki nicht mehr hergeben als bereits beschrieben, sodas dann eben ein Hinweis jeglicher Art fehlt, dass die freie Lizenz tatsächlich so korrekt ist. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Was soll der Anwurf, dass im Salzburgwiki ist, wo jeder angeben kann was er will - das ist im Gegensatz zu Wikipedia der größte Unsinn, denn das SW ist ein geschlossenes und nicht so offen für jeden Unsinn. --K@rl (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wir kennzeichnen das mit OTRS - wie das Salzburgwiki macht, ist ganz allein deren Kaffee und nicht unserer. Krackowizer bekommt immer wieder Fotos von anderen, dei selbst nicht in der Lage sind hochzuladen. Aber wenn du meinst - ich streit mich wegen dem Foto sicher nicht herum. --K@rl (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo @Karl Gruber: , soweit ich sehe, wurde das Foto im Salzburgwiki von dem dort aktiven Benutzer Peter Krackowizer hochgeladen, der es wiederum von dem damals noch funktionierendem Link gehabt haben wird. Ich sehe also keinen Hinweis, dass der Fotograf Wolfgang Lienbacher das Bild selbst unter der genannten Lizenz freigegeben hat. --Mondfeuer61 (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copy of a cpvio. --JuTa 14:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from commercial packaging. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
I think that this is, not like the Benrath cow a memorial, art. Like the rhine viewer and others of Mr Wimmer. See Stierstelle-II 79.228.80.246 15:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
I got only vague results to my inquireies so i vote, to avoid any kind of legal problems, to delete this picture and 2017-10-02-Düsseldorf-Urdenbach-Stierstele-II.jpg
I am sorry for the inconviences. Please accept my apologies!
Kind regards
Daskupa --Daskupa (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 14:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
The Southern Railway was a private company, and not as such part of the UK government. On a simmilar note the British Railways Board was also largely independent of Government (albiet it was a nationalised entity). Copyrights it would have inherited from the railways concerns merged into it would not have changed from being standard ones into Crown ones.. However, other than the listed photogrpahic unit, it would I think be difficult to determine an exact author for an image from 1941 (taken under wartime conditions) and thus a PD-UK-unknown situation may apply. Please consider carefully before deleting. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Seconded the above. Would be great if someone more knowledgeable on the railway and/or UK law could weigh in. Without that may be best to delete precautionarily. —innotata 16:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- You could try asking the National Railway Museum or the Department of Transport ( who ended up being the successor rights holder to whatever BR held).ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's well worth taking Iridescent's comment on the enwiki FFD into consideration before reaching a decision whether to keep/delete this file. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- You could try asking the National Railway Museum or the Department of Transport ( who ended up being the successor rights holder to whatever BR held).ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still unclear copyright situation. --JuTa 14:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://themasonorganization.com/who-we-are.html However, this is likely {{PD-USGov-POTUS}} JGHowes talk 19:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --JuTa 14:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
