Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Unused portrait of non-notable person, outside commons scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted Snowflake91 (talk) 10:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 15:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely own works, variable sizes, no meta data, apparently copied from other sites and claimed as own work.
- File:বিথঙ্গল আখড়ার সামনের অংশ.jpg
- File:পুরাতন আখড়ার ভিতরের অংশ.jpg
- File:পুরাতন আখড়ার পিছনের অংশ.jpg
- File:আখড়ার সামনের দিঘি.jpg
- File:মনসা মুড়ার সামনের অংশ.jpg
- File:জাকারিয়া চৌধুরী.jpg
- File:মাদ্রাসার মূল ভবন.jpg
- File:লতিফগঞ্জ ইসলামিয়া ফাজিল(ডিগ্রী) মাদ্রাসা.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a computer screenshot of a product, unsure of copyright status. Regardless, out of scope, and used for spam at enwiki. Home Lander (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 85.141.151.152 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 17:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sneeuwschaap as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: practically copy of File:KPPO Observing the Milky Way.jpg Yann (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Above all, this file was marked "To be removed" by its uploader. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This is my old picture and I decided to remove it from Wikimedia. Amirdevil (talk) 19:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Panoramio photos by ThisTieDye
[edit]Photos by panorammio user ThisTieDye:
- File:Central Park, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (74).jpg
- File:Financial District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (38).jpg
- File:Garment District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Garment District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Lower Manhattan, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Midtown, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (42).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (21).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (22).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (24).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (25).jpg
- File:Theater District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (26).jpg
- File:Times Square Manhattan New York City 2014 - panoramio.jpg
Badly photoshopped with porn. Yann (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment Added other similar photos by same user. Platonides (talk) 20:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Might be quicker to tag them all with DW No source ?--BevinKacon (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Good point, all deleted. Yann (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles Friendly (talk · contribs)
[edit]See also [1] and User talk:Tom Colne. Yann (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all content as G3, Googling subject name shows online hate campaign, likely this is part of it.--BevinKacon (talk) 23:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Private party photo, thus out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 00:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep in scope. --Ralf Roleček 00:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- No valid reason provided.-Siyuwj (talk) 04:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete It's a random snapshot of an irrelevant group of people, and even the geocode don't help any way. --A.Savin 21:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: movie poster 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 22:41, 19 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 00:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this image believing it was free, however, i later noticed it is not. Image violates copyright: https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/component/content/article?id=12 & https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/faq so it should be deleted. The images need to be paid for to be used for single publication. Author is wrong to. So there are many errors and violations. Dragnadh (talk) 11:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this image believing it was free, however, i later noticed it is not. Image violates copyright: https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/component/content/article?id=12 & https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/faq so it should be deleted. The images need to be paid for to be used for single publication and thus are not free. Author is wrong to. So there are many errors and violations. Sorry for the trouble. Dragnadh (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this image believing it was free, however, i later noticed it is not. The image violates copyright: https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/component/content/article?id=12 & https://nimh-beeldbank.defensie.nl/faq so it should be deleted. The images need to be paid for to be used for single publication. Author is wrong to. So there are many errors and violations. Dragnadh (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Contested "speedy" deletions on RFA Jeff G. 2
[edit]These files were "speedy" deleted by Jcb as "potential underage porn -", after the original DRs were closed as Kept. The speedy deletion rationale was contested multiple times at RFA Jeff G. 2, and thus the due process here, on whether the images are legal and in scope or not. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- CC uploader @Onoyroh: , nominator / commenter / closer of the original DRs @AshFriday, Tgeorgescu, Mendaliv, Jeff G., and Davey2010: @MjolnirPants, Yann, Fæ, Cullen328, and Senator2029: , deleter @Jcb: , commenter on the RFA @Magog the Ogre, Srittau, and T Cells: --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'll note that I do not object to their deletion. There are definitely valid concerns with the images raised in the original DRs. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tubuh Laki-Laki.jpg (Original DR) is a related file. Considering this DR has already started and this particular deletion was not 'contested', I haven't undeleted it and add to the list of files above. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Thank you Zhuyifei1999, for giving this due process. That said, delete per COM:PENIS. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of process deletion is unacceptable. Nonetheless, delete per COM:PENIS. T Cells (talk) 11:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Both images are out of scope, completely lacking in educational value and quite possibly illegal. Should never have been kept in the first place. AshFriday (talk) 11:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Volunteers on this project are not here to assess whether an image is "illegal" or "underage porn". Volunteers are not here as lawyers or the police. If anyone believes that an image is child abuse they should contact legal-reports
wikimedia.org and avoid drawing attention to the content on-wiki, in particular a DR should be avoided. For reference, the WMF policies that govern suspected child abuse are at m:Legal/Legal_Policies. - Images of children, including child nudity, may be in scope for this project, for example cases of medical images of children within the Wellcome upload project or images of cultural or historic value that contain nudity.
- Care should be taken to avoid speculating or exaggerating nudity or sexual images as being either pornography or child abuse. It is worth keeping mind that the original nominator has a stated mission on this project of "Planning to clean up en.Wiki and Commons of copyright vios and smut", refer to their user page. --Fæ (talk) 12:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- +1. But Delete as out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- +1. But
- Delete out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope, and the first is out of focus. Cullen328 (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete both out of scope and disgusting. --küñall (nütramyen) 22:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as per above, quite a consensus. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
The picture is suspected to come from http://www.lifetv.org.tw/downlond/downlond_1-4.htm, although the page is written below, "welcome to reprint and circulate and be meritorious" (歡迎翻印·翻錄·轉載流通·功德無量), but I do not know the actual copyright. Thyj (talk) 05:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:13, 21 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.lifetv.org.tw/downlond/downlond_1-4.htm --Krdbot 12:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I cannot see how the uploader can hold the copyright to this poster. This is not the first time he has done this Domdeparis (talk) 04:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:30, 21 Juni 2018 UTC: Commons:Licensing: Movie poster - --Krdbot 18:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kogbagidi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:Kogbagidi & Small Doctor.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi, Mercy Aigbe and Friend.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi + Teni.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi's padis.jpg
- File:OBO and kogbagidi1.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi-Friends.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kogbagidi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Prive / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
- File:KOGBAGIDI10.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI9.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI1.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi & Small Doctor.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi, Mercy Aigbe and Friend.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi + Teni.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi's padis.jpg
- File:OBO and kogbagidi1.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi-Friends.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
se subió por error Gato49 (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
se subió por error NoelPm (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Not used anywhere. The 2 user pages are substituting the Wikiproject page and there the images are gathered by Listeria. Item has been deleted, so on update the image will disappear from that page too Mbch331 (talk) 09:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ali Abdul Majid
[edit]Out of Scope. Commons is not personal webhost.
- File:العراق النجف 01.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 02.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 03.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 04.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 05.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 06.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 07.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 08.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 09.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 10.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 11.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 12.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 17.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 18.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 19.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 20.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 21.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 22.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 23.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 24.jpg
- File:العراق النجف 25.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by শাওন আচার্য্য (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted image of non notable people.
Afifa Afrin (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, unlikely to use in any project. Commons is not a webhost.
Afifa Afrin (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement for Ruklhue hotel. (COM:ADVERT) EdTre (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nuñeztutoriales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pure advertisments with no educational value. Out of scope.
- File:Reemplazar chip de audio SONY BRAVIA FALLA DE SONIDO electrónica nuñez.png
- File:PANTALLA SONY BRAVIA SIN SONIDO falla resuelta vídeo 1 de 2 electrónica nuñez.png
- File:PANTALLA SONY BRAVIA SIN SONIDO falla resuelta vídeo 1 de 2 electrónica nuñez ver.png
- File:Pantalla smart lg falla termica electronica nuñez.png
- File:PANTALLA LG SIN VIDEO SOLO PANTALLA AZUL electronica nuñez tutoriales.png
- File:FALLA EN PLASMA SAMSUNG NO ENCIENDE SOLO LUZ DE ESTANBY electronica nuñez.png
- File:FALLA DE LINEAS Y RAYAS VERDES EN PANTALLA LG electronica nuñez.png
- File:Falla de color verde pantalla sony bravia electronica nuñez tutoriales.png
- File:FALLA EN PLASMA SAMSUNG NO ENCIENDE SOLO LUZ DE ESTANBY electronica nuñez tutoriales.png
- File:Electrónica Nuñez Tutoriales.png
Zaccarias (talk) 10:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- DeletePer nomination and COM:ADVERT.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Promotional content: As this image is primarly an advertisment for a company it is out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 11:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Habertix (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Also: copyrighted image, not "own work".
Ies (talk) 13:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by User:EugeneZelenko. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khương Itvtbadboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope – no educational purposes, was used on user and talk page as webhost
1989 (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album/file storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of domesticated dog. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Debt held by public as percent of GDP before and after Reagan tax cut.png
- File:Inflation and oil price 1969-1989.png
- File:Annual percent change in nonfarm payroll employment — 1972 through 1988.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images by Nick Savchenko
[edit]Out of scope personal portrait photographs.
- These images are part of a flickr mass upload performed by User:Artix Kreiger 2.
- Either close-up portraits or a person is placed prominently in a photograph so that the photo can't be used (no cropping applicable)
- File:Ania (6014603167).jpg
- File:Ania (6015138954).jpg
- File:Brutal Nerd (9364984405).jpg
- File:Girl (9422342785).jpg
- File:Girl in Wien (36848685774).jpg
- File:Happy nerd (9396111192).jpg
- File:Pretty girl (9376859389).jpg
- File:Pretty girl (9393390923).jpg
- File:Rovinj (19990893040).jpg
- File:Rovinj (25550803873).jpg
- File:Vrsar (26060992502).jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
- File:Boxer briefs penis emerging from fly 2.jpg
- File:Boxer briefs penis emerging from fly 4.jpg
- File:Boxer briefs penis emerging from fly.jpg
- File:Boxer briefs 3.jpg
- File:Boxer briefs 2.jpg
- File:Boxer briefs.jpg
- File:Jeans fly open.jpg
- File:Male abdomen.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 9.jpg
- File:Jeans fly.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 8.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 6.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 7.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 5.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 1.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 3.jpg
- File:Male torso with body hair 4.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Low quality nonsense image, see nonsense description and nonsense categories.
Ies (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Axel Medina Fernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:OOS. We aren't a personal webhost for your family photos.
- File:New Year 2017.jpg
- File:En el Cole.jpg
- File:Axel En Navidad.jpg
- File:Axel Medina en Santo Cerro.jpg
Majora (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game screenshot 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Slzlldnsbdbsms Akifcihanli (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominate for Deletion Vidadibayramov (talk) 10:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, photo by Yusuf Canöz. No OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 06:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergeklopp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be COM:NETCOPYVIO - previously appeared on Facebook - for example, File:SaQi's 萨奇 Zato Fashion Show2.jpg was here approximately one year before upload to Commons. COM:OTRS needed.
- File:SaQi 萨奇.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Zato Fashion Show2.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Zato Fahion show.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Fashion show zato.jpg
- File:SaQi 萨奇 Fashion show china.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Fashion show shenzhen china.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Fashion Show Shenzhen.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Performance.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 Tai Ji.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 with Stone Warley.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 in Redrecord.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Edalam.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 hong kong.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Kong Linna.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and parents.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Kong Linna 2.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and his father Fred Aucagos.jpg
- File:SaQi 萨奇 withTV MC. Wu Qing Jie.jpg
- File:SaQi 萨奇 with TV MC Hong Tao.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Xu yi na (china voice).jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 with Changwei Gu.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Zhen yu Ling.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and 7942 Korean Boys Band,.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Kiki Wu. Momo Wu, SaQi.jpg
- File:SaQi's 萨奇 and Cheng le ji.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload on my part of really poor quality :( My apologies. LauraHale (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload on my part. low quality image of screen behind a field. LauraHale (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload on my part. low quality image of screen behind a field. LauraHale (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload on my part of low quality image. :( LauraHale (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload on my part of low quality image. :( Worse yet, duplicate. :( LauraHale (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:April (band) in 2018
[edit]per this discussion, I nominate this files for deletion. when I uploaded the files, though I wasn't aware of this situation and have no bad faith.
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (1).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (10).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (11).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (12).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (13).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (14).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (15).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (16).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (17).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (18).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (19).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (2).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (20).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (21).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (22).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (23).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (24).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (25).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (26).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (27).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (28).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (29).jpg
- File:180526 화성 뱃놀이축제 에이프릴 윤채경 레이첼 (3).jpg
Puramyun31 (talk) 02:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- The files in question here were posted on the blog prior to the declaration on the guestbook. So per that discussion these are actually ok. Whether other members of the community feel differently is still a question though. --Majora (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination @Majora: Ooops, the files was posted on the blog at may 26 2018. so the declaration on the guestbook (june 13 2018) doesn't apply to this files (since cc-by license is irrevocable). Puramyun31 (talk) 02:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)(
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
The image is available on news and older media and doesn't have the proper license permission. Luisalvaz (talk) 03:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Source of original was "Stewart Skloss" Ronhjones (Talk) 02:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This was previously uploaded by client, but as Creator of the image I have re uploaded it to satisfy the copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natemessphoto (talk • contribs) 02:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - please contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Instituto brow (talk · contribs)
[edit]User uploaded various video screenshots, File:Danilo Montero.jpg and File:Coalo Zamorano.jpg are the most obvious. Lack of correct sourcing, correct author information, correct description and valid licensing.
- File:L. Genaro.jpg
- File:Pastor Vega.jpg
- File:Danilo Montero.jpg
- File:Coalo Zamorano.jpg
- File:Snyder.jpg
- File:Martinho Carmona.jpg
- File:Stéfano Aguiar.jpg
- File:Pr. Roberto Francisco Ramos.jpg
- File:Rev. Antonio Genaro.png
Martin H. (talk) 09:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
definitely not own work, the painter having died in 1986 Joostik (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
It is not my work but I'm the owner of this work and I took the picture of it. So what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannoline (talk • contribs) 14:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gregpeck1982 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Erwin Lasshofer final judgement US District Court.pdf
- File:Erwin Lasshofer US arrest warrant.pdf
- File:Erwin Lasshofer anklageschaft.pdf
- File:Erwin Lasshofer ammended complaint US District Court.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no EXIF, on other sites prior to upload; e.g., File:Енн із Острова Принца Едварда (обкладинка книги).jpg is a book cover; File:Лука Циндріч.png is here; File:Євреї в Ізраїлі.jpg is here; etc.
- File:Собор Пресвятої Матері Терези в Пріштіні.jpg
- File:Міст через Білий Дрін.jpg
- File:1316189 n.jpg
- File:Олівера Лазаревіч.jpg
- File:Євреї в Ізраїлі.jpg
- File:Музей дизайну Холон.jpg
- File:Museum holokost ierus.jpg
- File:Кроуфорд.jpg
- File:Енн.jpg
- File:Енн Кроуфорд.jpg
- File:Нінетт Тайеб.jpg
- File:Лука Циндріч.png
- File:Саами.jpg
- File:Нідароський собор.jpg
- File:Вера Генриксен.jpg
- File:Енн із Острова Принца Едварда (обкладинка книги).jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Які ж фото можна завантажувати, якщо я, наприклад не маю змоги сфотографувати якусь пам'ятку? То чи не можна користуватися фотографіями з Інетернету? — User:ДораСайд
too blurry to be useful, making it outside of scope BevinKacon (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Needless raster duplicate of File:N1-(2-aminoethyl)-N2-(2-((2-aminoethyl)amino)ethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine 200.svg, taken from http://www.wikiwand.com/de/Tetraethylenpentamin, which is a mirror of de:Tetraethylenpentamin, containing the original version. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. Ed (Edgar181) 20:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation of Google Earth (we can see the Google logo on the image). Sebleouf (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 20:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Private group photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Now it can be replaced with File:Yuanshan Sports Complex sign 20171111a.jpg.--Solomon203 (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 20:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Doit être supprimé 67.230.141.8 21:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
i want to delete this Kalyptik (talk) 23:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep original image, no good reason for deletion has yet been presented. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: It's an unused personal image that the uploader has requested to be deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 20:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Insufficiently described and unused private personal photo, out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 20:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game screenshot 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:26, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game screenshot 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:28, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game screenshot 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:33, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game screenshot 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:28, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game logo 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:23, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation: video game logo 2A02:1812:41D:B800:D80B:1058:C079:CB5 21:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:23, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
And others for same reason
Contains derivative of copyrighted work held by LucasFilm Ltd, as at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DeathStar2.jpg BevinKacon (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I think they can be considered de minimis --küñall (nütramyen) 18:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- The logo should be Delete though --küñall (nütramyen) 19:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- I fully agree with your position considering the main page screenshots. However I do not remember any limitations on ability to modify de minimis images, and both logos are clearly derivatives of these screenshots (see description of File:WookieepediaLogoEng.png). Even if there are another reasons to be found, that support the deletion of logos, it would still be possible to recreate them using only templates and the de minimis screenshots like this:
- The logo should be
.png)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-N2-(2-((2-aminoethyl)amino)ethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine_200.svg){kind=link}
Keep screenshots, because of de minimis, and logos, as their derivatives. Ігор Пєтков (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Logo is deleted, but the screenshots are kept because I believe this constitutes de minimis. — regards, Revi 10:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by InstituteDN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Daniela Danica Tepes, missing permission.
- File:Nothing Can Suprise Us, 1979,a collage by Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:La Bienale di Venezia 2017, Kiribati Pavilion, Interactive Installation 1 by Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:Daniela Danica Tepes,Who Is Brainwashing Us, 2009.jpg
- File:Daniela Danica Tepes, DKT Delux, Installation by Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:La Bienale di Venezia 2017, Kiribati Paviljon, Interactive Installation by Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:Daniela Danica Tepes,Baseco Die! So That I may Live, Installation by Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:57th La Biennale di Venezia 2017,Kiribati Pavilion,Interactive Installation,Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
- File:DKT DeLux , 2011, 2014,Daniela Danica Tepes.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Inconsequential imagd SecretName101 (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (unknown people in a pub). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Inconsequential image SecretName101 (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (unknown people in a pub). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of permission or copyright ownership. Image is clearly marked as being produced by the organisers of the Vodafone Ghana Music Awards. CentreLeftRight ✉ 07:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
satellite shot, unlikely to be own work Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Rear view of two unidentified people, cluttered with mobile phone nonsense. Out of COM:SCOPE Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
low quality, incomplete upload, broken Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Either unwanted out of scope advertisement or content uploaded in the wrong format.
*see Commons:Project scope
*pdf-files only allowed in some cases: Commons:Project_scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats
*must meet notability criteria to be considered educationally useful at least in one wikipedia. If notable (en:Wikipedia:Notability) create a wiki article instead.
Zaccarias (talk) 10:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
no indication that the image is really free on the link Snowflake91 (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
this image distributed to promote the game (PromotionPage- http://preregister2.vespainc.co.kr/#kingslady) Sohyerang (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by other admin. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
de:Max Oppenheimer ,1885-1954, no permmission Mutter Erde (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Rose Quartet by Max Oppenheimer, 1924, oil on canvas - Germanisches Nationalmuseum - Nuremberg, Germany - DSC02443.jpg
[edit]
de:Max Oppenheimer ,1885-1954, no permission Mutter Erde (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ooops! Right you are - sorry about that. It should be deleted. Daderot (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This graphic images of an East-German car is hardly created by the american "author", who has never seen another one of it. 32X (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete the claim of authorship is not credible. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
2ce56d0tbgmx Khương Itvtbadboy (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
i want to delete 2ce56d0t Khương Itvtbadboy (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by other admin. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Flag of a political party, not own work of uploader (or at least very, very unlikely) Courcelles 01:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've never commented on a deletion discussion here before, so apologies if I'm missing something. I've worked on this topic extensively on en.wiki, and I concur that the flag cannot conceivably be the work of the uploader, even if they created the PNG file themselves. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Small and unused image B dash (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation EROY (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation EROY (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted project. Solomon203 (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carwell India (talk · contribs)
[edit]Content about an Indian car wash franchise. Appears to be a startup with no indication of notability. see http://carwellindia.com/about-us.php
- User:Carwell India - misuse of user namespace
- File:Mercedes .jpg - image with company watermark.
- File:Carwell India.png
--Zaccarias (talk) 11:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Foto wurde trotz Untersagens gemacht und veröffentlicht, es ist Privatgrundstück abgebildet Arca500 (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep
Dieser 200 Jahre alte Baum, im ehemaligen Klostergarten, wurde von mir am öffentlichen Weg "Klosterhof" photographiert.
This twohundert year old tree, which is situated within the former garden of the monastery, has been photographed by me from the public path "Klosterhof".
Baummapper (talk) 16:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC) - Keep Tree is in focus and not a private property. FOP in Germany applies. --Migebert (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep --ChristianSW (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
likely take from copyrighted Pokemon game or other website, users only upload BevinKacon (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
{{Db-user}} nerv syndicate (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages are not deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Logo for a company that was obviously taken from http://www.barcindia.co.in, and is definitely not own work. 49.181.228.192 15:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Logo for a company that was obviously taken from http://www.barcindia.co.in, and is definitely not own work. RetroCraft314 (talk) 03:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- May be below the Commons:Threshold_of_originality#India? Storkk (talk) 07:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. Although this is now obsolete as I have uploaded a .PNG version with a transparent background (File:BARC logo.png). --Majora (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:BARC logo.png. --Guanaco (talk) 23:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
No longer in use, except as an example. Jc86035 (talk) 12:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:26, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
[2] multiple matches on the net, no exif, small image, pattern: single upload by new user. Unlikely to be own work. Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sharam
[edit]Image without EXIF data, which seems to be too professional (but at the same time low resolution (perhaps big at the time of upload, depending on camera)). Username suggests being perhaps the subject.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The image has a copyright logo of Atlas Česka and Tomáš Andreas. Copied from http://www.images.atlasceska.cz/images/pamatky/velka/15667/v27484_zricenina-hradu-svrcov.jpg (http://www.atlasceska.cz/olomoucky-kraj/zricenina-hradu-svrcov/). The real source is not declared here. -- ŠJů (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC) User:M.lymarev seems not to be identical with the signed author Tomáš Andreas and the source declaration {{Own}} seems to be untrue. --ŠJů (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (copyvio). --BrightRaven (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
non free picture http://www.revuepinaultcollection.com/fr/numero_10/bourse-de-commerce/restauration Tiraden (talk) 09:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dans la mesure où l'auteur, ClemLaudeCa (qui serait donc Patrick Tourneboeuf) a placé cette photo avec une licence Commons, n'est-ce pas suffisant pour l'utiliser sur Commons ? Si la réponse est non, quelles sont les conditions pour qu'un auteur puisse placer ses créations sous licence Creative Commons ? --Pa2chant. (talk) 09:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dans ce cas, l'auteur de la photo doit adresser un courrier selon la procédure décrite ici Commons:Messages type/Déclaration de consentement. Tiraden (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission is needed. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
non free picture http://www.revuepinaultcollection.com/fr/numero_10/bourse-de-commerce/restauration Tiraden (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
non free picture http://www.revuepinaultcollection.com/fr/numero_10/bourse-de-commerce/restauration Tiraden (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
non free picture Tiraden (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (see metadata). --BrightRaven (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No permission. Uploader clandestinely added a 2008 OTRS ticket to the file description page. There is no new message in that ticket.
Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- These three photos were graciously donated to me by Louis Sorel (who made these photos, as stated on the backside of the photos). If you want, I can also upload a photo of the backside of these photos as proof. He is the son of the painter Gustaaf Sorel. These photos are meant to replace another photo whose deletion was requested because of what afterwards appeared to be an uncertain license
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gustaaf Sorel in atelier.jpg
Louis Sorel (together with his brother) signed the contract with the OTRS about his father. In the previous discussion it was stated "If it was taken by a family member we should be in the clear with OTRS." These photos were made in the late 1970s. I made a digital image of these photos, at his request, as Louis Sorel is in his 80s and has practically no knowledge of handling a computer. I hope this settles the question. JoJan (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Take this up with OTRS. Permission from third parties always needs to go via OTRS. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- An email has been sent to OTRS. JoJan (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Ticket: 2018080110004571. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Permission has been received on August 1, 2018. This appears okay to me, as well as to collegue User:Edoderoo. We both added notes to the ticket. I added permission template to the images, no reason to delete these. Elly (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Resolved in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tristanmulhall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small sizes, no EXIF, unlikely to be own work
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
One boot loader, different authors, different cameras. No Permission on OTRS.
- File:Khrystyna Stebelska&Filaret.JPG - autor Олександр Бурковський.
And see also
- File:Українці, станьмо ПЕРШИМИ! (Донецьк).JPG - uploaded Nadia Petrunok, autor recorded as Христина Стебельська. But obviously not one or two. Others camera.
- File:Христина Стебельська.JPG - uploaded Nadia Petrunok, autor Марина Карпій. Others camera - NIKON D3.
- File:Presentation of the 1st Channel 2010.JPG - uploaded Nadia Petrunok, autor recorded as Христина Стебельська. But obviously not one or two. Others camera - NIKON D3. As above where autor Марина Карпій.
- File:Lvivske chastuvannia.JPG - uploaded Nadia Petrunok, autor recorded as Христина Стебельська. But obviously not one or two. Others camera - Canon EOS 550D.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Микола Василечко (talk) 21:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:Arabian leopard in Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Traditional dress of Madinah, Hijaz.jpg
- File:Haql, old shipwreck.jpg
- File:Snowy mountains, Tabuk Province.jpg
- File:Mountains in the desert, Tabuk Province.jpg
- File:Mada'in Saleh complex.jpg
- File:Volcano Madina Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Red Sea Island (Farasan islands), Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:KAFD Skyline II Dec-2-16.jpg
- File:Saudi Arabian cuisine.jpg
,_Saudi_Arabia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Those are indeed not photos taken by me but I thought that I should state who uploaded them, in this case myself.
How do I change this now that I know that the original uploader should be mentioned?
Thanks in advance.--OxfordLaw (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko can you help me here?--OxfordLaw (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I have corrected on of the photos (Saudi Arabian cuisine photo). I want to correct the other ones as I misunderstood how to upload photos back then (April 2017).
Can you help me find the original photos via Google and attribute them as I just did with one of the photos in order for them to be used again on the Saudi Arabia Wikipedia page and potentially elsewhere?
I think I did it as it should be done now.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Examples_of_various_Saudi_Arabian_dishes.jpg
Thanks in advance.
--OxfordLaw (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
All 10 photos have now been corrected by me and the authors have been credited and links to all photos have been provided as well. This was my fault initially as I misunderstood how to upload photos back in April 2018. There should no longer be an issue in this regard.--OxfordLaw (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- @OxfordLaw: : Thank you for identifying all the sources. That reveals a much more serious problem, which is that none of the images seem to have been released by their authors under the CC license that you claim. That means that their creators haven't given us (or anyone) permission to use the pictures. Commons only hosts freely-licensed pictures (see Commons:Licensing), so unless you can show where the authors have given permission for their pictures to be used, they will have to be deleted. That's Delete for anyone counting. --bjh21 (talk) 14:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
The photos have all been shared on public forums (such as FLICKR) and have been widely used by several users without a single complain outside of Wikipedia with the owners of those photos being well-aware of this. Some of the photos derive from the Saudi Commission for Tourism & National Heritage that in the past have given permission for people to use their photos on social media, in fact encouraging them to do so. All the photos with 1-2 exceptions have been taken by Saudi Arabians that were and are eager to share the beauty of Saudi Arabia. The photos taken by non-Saudi Arabians are also taken with this purpose in mind seeing that they are shared on travel blogs. Those photos can and should thus be considered as free-license photos.
However if you insist I can contact all of the sources (most have FLICKR users as I do) and I have no doubt in my mind that they will share their photos (which they are doing already!), especially as it serves a good purpose for Saudi Arabia.--OxfordLaw (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- @OxfordLaw: Yes, Commons insists on having its permission to use images spelled out. On Flickr, this is quite easy: ask the authors to change the licenses of the photos on Flickr to either "Public Domain Dedication (CC0)", "Attribution", or "Attribution-ShareAlike". There are instructions on how they can do this here. Once they have done this, you can add the {{Flickrreview}} template to the file on Commons to get it automatically checked. If the files have been deleted, you can ask for them to be undeleted at Commons:Undeletion requests. See Commons:Flickr files for much more detail about getting files from Flickr.
- For pictures that aren't from Flickr, we either need the source Web site to indicate that the pictures are freely licensed for anyone to use, or the original author needs to send email to OTRS saying the same thing. See Commons:OTRS for the details. --bjh21 (talk) 16:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you a lot for you informative and detailed reply.
4 of the 10 photos do not originate from Flickr.
- File:Arabian leopard in Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Snowy mountains, Tabuk Province.jpg
- File:Red Sea Island (Farasan islands), Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Saudi Arabian cuisine.jpg
The third photo (Farasan Islands) has been published by Sabq (their logo can be seen on the photo) and this photo has been freely used by other media in KSA and individual persons and this was allowed as those photos are also used by the Saudi Commission for Tourism & National Heritage.
It has also been published (the photo and many others taken by Sabq from air) by other Saudi Arabian newspapers. Those one must conclude that it is impossible for their to be any copyright infringement and that Sabq have given permission for sharing this and similar photos.
The snowy mountains, Tabuk Province, photo was taken by a person who uploaded the photo on a forum designed for sharing photos. Here too it must be naturally assumed that there is no copyright infringement as the photo has also been used by Saudi Arabian newspapers. It will be very hard for me to contact that user and for him to show explicit support.
The Saudi Arabian cuisine photo was taken by Elizabeth Atalay and posted on a travel blog. Not sure how to contact her either within 6 days.
The Arabian Leopard photo was published by Swiss School website but not sure who the author was/is exactly as it is not stated.
Anyway am I the only one thinking that if all photos were scrutinized this way on Wikipedia we would be left with hardly any photos to show for?
It's just unfortunate to spend a few hours trying to improve Wikipedia pages for it all to be wasted.--OxfordLaw (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- @OxfordLaw: The fact that some people have used a picture does not mean that the copyright owner has permitted everyone to use the picture. The copyright owner might only permit certain people to use the picture, or might require payment first, or might only allow certain kinds of use. Or the people using the pictures might not have permission at all (a common problem with certain British newspapers). This is why we need our permission to be explicit. If a picture gets deleted before you can sort out permission, you can always ask for it to be undeleted later. There are plenty of pictures on Commons that would survive this level of scrutiny: most of the pictures uploaded to Commons by their creators, everything reviewed by FlickreviewR and its friends, everything from Geograph Britain and Ireland, and many others. --bjh21 (talk) 18:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no free licenses. --Lymantria (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
They all have a free license as they have all been used by newspapers and on forums in Saudi Arabia and the sources are clearly available. I don't understand why you deleted those photos.--OxfordLaw (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Asmforce as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: historic image|image has rationale=yes User not informed. Yann (talk) 17:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: false license, not free. --Sealle (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo is above threshold of originality, clearly not a standard font BevinKacon (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works without sources for the base files.
- File:بداخل اسبانيا بنو كعب.jpg
- File:76 ملك العرب.jpg
- File:مقاطعات إسبانيا.svg.png
- File:بنو كعب وبنو كلاب في اسبانيا.png
- File:الحصين بن الدجن العقيلي - ويكيبيديا، الموسوعة الحرة.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bstojanovski (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
A reproduction of a work of Bikky Sunazawa (1931-1989). Those who just reproduced it would not hold copyright. Such copies were deleted in 2014. Please refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Work of Bikky Sunazawa. Nanshu (talk) 14:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/138035511@N02
[edit]The Flickr user seems to be COM:License laundering. Please refer to en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_June_17#File:Erin_in_White_Blouse.JPG.
The file en:File:Erin in White Blouse.JPG (Commons version: File:Erin Aubry Kaplan (24920150785).jpg) was uploaded on enwp with the edit summary:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Photographer, Marilyn McLaughlin "She does not care if she receives credit for it. I just uploaded it to flickr into the public domain" Flickr ID:138035511@N02 Url:https://www.flickr.com/photos/138035511@N02/24920150785/in/dateposted-public/
Indicating that the uploader to Flickr isn't the photographer.
- File:Suzanne Gordon (26047339472).jpg
- File:RalphRFrerichs SanMiguel (25353782770).jpg
- File:Kochan photo 3 (25654705335).jpg
- File:RenaudPiarroux Wiki1 041412 1010533 (26245650906).jpg
- File:Erin Aubry Kaplan (24920150785).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Better file is "TV Herkenrath 09.png" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elvaube (talk • contribs) 2018-06-12T15:56:45 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Wikijunkie (talk) 01:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
The licensing tag is incorrect. This is a modern photograph of a 3D object and copyright is held by the photographer. There is no evidence of release into PD. (In fact I am personally familiar with the background of the source website and can state with certainty that no such release has been made.) EEng (talk) 05:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
The picture on the cover may be copyrighted. --ghouston (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work lacking information on legislation. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
identical duplicate Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, better file File:1944 Missouri license plate 30-635.jpg of the same theme was uploaded. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaintanmay9001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly a copyvio: Image taken from a copyrighted newspaper or magazine.
- File:04 JUNE 2017 - Bhopal to have the first Readers' Park in Madhya Pradesh.jpg
- File:Readers Park BHOPAL.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: probably self-promotion. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
mögliche URV. Siehe Metadaten. Keine Freigabe dokumentiert Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 22:43, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, no license, source, or permission stated. Sparkl (talk) 01:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, uploaders only other upload is of same subject stolen from a news website, whch was also calimed to be own work BevinKacon (talk) 12:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; search shows this was available on the web before its upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
si ErichGut (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Exact copy of https://i.pinimg.com/originals/22/d5/9a/22d59a942e20c7e48819297809061633.jpg DELETE. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio grabbed from the web, multiple Google Images hits. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
broken image Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo is above threshold of originality, contains hand drawn contents BevinKacon (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't agree more. — regards, Revi 14:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per user BevinKacon. Thanks. --Garam talk 09:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no objections raised. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RepRap Cuba 1.0 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative work from newspaper. Should be blanked to keep.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a unit screen capture from a video game like Rome Total War or something similar. Doubtful if it's own work. Glorious 93 (talk) 10:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image from en:Rome: Total Realism. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Semantic duplicates of four other files in the same category, whose names should be fairly obvious. I have moved all eight of the files (all of which were uploaded by Useddenim) and retargeted the resulting redirects of these four files to point to the older four files, so no replacements of the files to be deleted should be necessary.
- File:BSicon vÜWBl+l 2.svg
- File:BSicon vÜWBl+r 2.svg
- File:BSicon vÜWBr+l 2.svg
- File:BSicon vÜWBr+r 2.svg
Jc86035 (talk) 12:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- No objection. Useddenim (talk) 12:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The original uploader itself requested this file to be deleted (see the file description), and a superior SVG version has been uploaded, so this file does not have any encyclopaedic value above the SVG file. For those two reasons, the file is superfluous and should be deleted. VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joseariasmor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:23 Parc Eglos, St. Merryn (280150) (16099644536).jpg, which is a earlier flickr upload and has more detailed information about the author. Tine (talk) 14:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
_(16099644536).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: deleted and redirected by User:Túrelio. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No metadata, the image is found in Internet with earlier publishing date. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The picture seems to be 100 years old and it looks dubious that the work was performed in 2012. Since there is no attribution to the original work, the moral rights of the original author are not respected. Difficile de croire que la photo date de 2012. Vêtements complètement démodés. Malosse (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Currently this tiny file bears no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "Software used Google". --Y.haruo (talk) 19:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No indications of own work, or notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. There is no article and it is not used anywhere. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of permission Jc86035 (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The file was uploaded with permission of Mr. Michele Spanghero Hvidrose (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Hvidrose: All images on Commons need to be freely licensed. Since the source website you provided for the photograph is not explicitly labelled as freely licensed, there is currently no proof that you have permission. You will need to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder of the image through the permissions system (follow the instructions on that page; I am not an OTRS volunteer so I will not be able to help you further). Jc86035 (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elisha the great (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of own work, closing administrator please check total contributions of this uploader and see if they qualify for the user image as a User, or merely someone creating a vanity page.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucamodena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fan or promotional gallery, not own work, small sizes, etc.
- File:Roberto Brambilla and Peter Maxwell Davies.jpg
- File:Roberto Brambilla al teatro Coccia di Novara.jpg
- File:Roberto Brambilla, compositore.jpg
- File:Roberto Brambilla, compositore, Microludi 2017.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Ellin Beltz,
I read your doubts about this pictures. I am a rookie and so I can understand that something I do is not good. I added these photos to be able to work soon, They are linked to the Roberto Brambilla wikipedia article. If possible I would like to ask you, before answering, if you can direct me to the guide page for the points you have listed. This is not a problem but I would like to understand. thank you,Lucamodena (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am moving discussion from my talk page to this nomination: "I have read your doubts about the copyright of the photos Roberto_Brambilla and simil. I took these photos from the official website of the composer (https://www.robertobrambilla.it/fotografie/) because in the page clearly expresses a declaration of No copyright: "Nella presente pagina sono contenute le foto del compositore Roberto Brambilla. Le fotografie non sono soggette a copyright e sono di libero utilizzo" This page contains the photos of the composer Roberto Brambilla. The photographs are not subject to copyright and are free to use. Can you remove with this declaration the copyraght violation? All the best, Lucamodena (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)"
- Hi Lucamodena: I'm very sorry, but you forgot to put the entire declaration, which translated reads "No Copyright This page contains the photos of the composer Roberto Brambilla. The photographs are not subject to copyright and are free to use. The improper use of these photographs, in order to offend or defame the composer or the companies associated with him, is forbidden. It is allowed to be used for uses related to the production of articles, of encyclopedic value or of press release. For any other authorization or questions, please contact the composer at info@robertobrambilla.it." This license is incompatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ellin Beltz, i'm so sorry I made trouble for everyone, I want to be clearer. I understood that the musician freely offers these photos to newspapers and others. He asks not to use them to offend him. So I thought that these photos are copyright free (or No copyright). Actually I deduce this because the newspapers that talk about him use these photos. Finally he says that if they are not used for media (articles or enciplodies), you can contact the musician for doubts. For me this was a CC0. But I wait to hear your opinions... if you're convinced that it's not okay what can I do? Can I request an authorization to musician? In this case could you tell me how to make or link the guide? Or do you consider do it useless? Thank you so much! All the best,Luca Modena — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucamodena (talk • contribs) 15:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC).
- Ops, and sorry for the sign. --Lucamodena (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the restrictions are incompatible with Commons. See also the discussion of the monster misplaced gallery of these photos at Commons:Deletion requests/Data:Roberto Brambilla. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
This license is OK for the pictures, but not for the newspaper article. At the very least, this needs a crop. However it would be better to upload the original pictures. Yann (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Cropped. TricoWiki (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
This image is too complicated to qualify for {{PD-shape}}. Jc86035 (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
To admins and other users, please check the other uploads by Team GOGI (I have only nominated this one). Jc86035 (talk) 11:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Logo above TOO. --Majora (talk) 22:14, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata shows this image was swiped from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW. Yann (talk) 20:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW. Yann (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW. Yann (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Will we accept https://www.flickr.com/photos/124162209@N04/14940461666/ as a valid release statement? No link to the actual image in those messages. In the message where she agreed on the specific license version, no sender name can be seen (covered up by another message window). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed, that license statement is not specific enough in scope to be valid. We would need, at very minimum, that statement to include what it applies to, specifically. It does not currently do that. The bottom-right screen kinda reaffirms that the license is correct, but I'm not sure that's direct enough. Of course, we're talking about Flickr, so standard practice is to have the Flickr uploader change the license, which solves all these problems. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- The important data is hidden - in any case it's too easy to fake such messages (OTRS won't accept forwarded messages - we should do same here). The Flickr owner should change the license on the Flickr page, otherwise Delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: We don't accept permissions like that. If the actual source licensed is changed that would be different but as it stands that isn't acceptable. --Majora (talk) 01:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio - uploader's own scan not own writing, hence copyright not expired yet PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright of newspaper not expired yet (expires in 2040), clearly not own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not old enough for copyright to expire (copyright expires in 2043), uploader clearly not writer (just scanner) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copied from Facebook. Please upload the original picture, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received and added. --Majora (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work. --Majora (talk) 01:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Onur Demirdağ, the photographer, should contact OTRS. Delete --E4024 (talk) 06:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, false date : found as early as 2017 at http://www.bhol.co.il/124413/%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%94-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%A2%D7%A9%D7%95-%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%99.html, missing pêrmission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
duplicate of File:2018-05-28 19 12 30 IMG 1276 will rename and categorize soon.jpg Famartin (talk) 21:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:2018-05-28 19 12 30 View east along Monmouth County Route 520 (Rumson Road) at Buena Vista Avenue in Rumson, Monmouth County, New Jersey.jpg. --Majora (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
_at_Buena_Vista_Avenue_in_Rumson,_Monmouth_County,_New_Jersey.jpg){kind=link}
MizMacMarketing © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2017, http://www.mizmacmarketingllc.com/bashir-hogue.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission, not a work of Republic of Moldova. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Can you help me to resolv the problem? I have problems with files in which portraits of Moldovan personalities are portrayed. Борис Гончар (обс.) 20:43, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Lo publique de la manera equivocada, y tambien por accidente Emil174 (talk) 20:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
lo quiero poner sin marco pero no me deja Emil174 (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate nomination. Image G7'ed. --Majora (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work . This screen appears to be de minimus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Category files are not free.If the image has another benefit, it can be cropped.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Obvious de minimis is obvious. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
"before 1963" and "Unknown" cannot be added together to arrive at the license given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
"Circa 1957" and "Unknown" do not add up to the license provided by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
"Before 1963" and "Unknown" do not add up to the license applied to this file by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Possible copyrighted photo with no proof of ownership/permission from the uploader Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 17:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Informed by User:Yann. Probably copyvio, similar images are found on the web and this image size is small. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ricardalovesmonuments as Speedy (Speedy) No reason provided. Yann (talk) 17:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Das genau selbe Bild habe ich bereits vor einer Woche hochgeladen, die Commons App spielte verrückt, sollte eigentlich ein Diözesanmuseum-Foto hochladen.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Microsoft product screenshot Eyesnore (talk) 19:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Triplecaña as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work, no clear source, scan? . Not blatant enough to speedy, IMO. @FJ19: please upload the original with metadata, or contact OTRS to confirm your authorship. Storkk (talk) 21:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, the image is a work created by @FJ19: with an image editor, because it represents something that physically does not exist. MONUMENTA Discusión 19:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Given that the uploader has just credited a third party, you plain assertion appears to have been an assumption with no basis in fact. Dario Sirna will have to confirm the license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Derived from image number 46 from http://camminoin.it/torrente-san-fratello-tratto-centrale-parte-prima/torrente-san-fratello-tratto-centrale-prima-parte-46/ ([3]). -Aleator (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Given that the uploader has just credited a third party, you plain assertion appears to have been an assumption with no basis in fact. Dario Sirna will have to confirm the license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work with no proof of acceptable license on the original. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
The file is an image of multiple stacks of 100 US dollars notes. According to COM:CUR, the copyright status of US dollars banknotes are disputed, as a deriative work of US dollars banknotes, the file has a chance to be unfree, even that the file's source page stated that it is licensed under a Template:cc-0. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
It is not stated what the red and the green line mean. Torsch (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Page not found at source, "high-res" version at https://www.flickr.com/photos/40178364@N06/3695142237/in/set-72157621056870900, clearly marked copyright. No indication why that (C) is invalid. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio. --Majora (talk) 03:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploader seems to be a depicted person according to username, photo is not a selfie, so permission from the real author is necessary. ~Cybularny Speak? 18:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free work. Wcam (talk) 22:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep：Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China Article 22: In the following cases, a work may be exploited without the permission from, and without payment of remuneration to, the copyright owner, provided that the name of the author and the title of the work are mentioned and the other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner by virtue of this Law are not infringed upon: .... (Ⅹ) copying, drawing, photographing, or video recording of an artistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place. It is an artistic work put on the wall on Fujian Rd.(M), an outdoor public place and has been existed for several years. --WQL (talk) 00:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why is a subway station an outdoor place? --Wcam (talk) 02:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have ensured that it is the outdoor part of the exit of a Subway Station. The wall on which the poster was placed was facing the street and was not blocked by any wall, so it was an outdoor space. Please, read my file description if you can read Chinese, thanks. WQL (talk) 03:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why is a subway station an outdoor place? --Wcam (talk) 02:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- If it is located inside a building or under cover, it qualifies as indoor. --Wcam (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: A subway station is not an outdoor place, no FoP in this photo. --B dash (talk) 02:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and our template on the matter, {{FoP-China}}. If our template is wrong that needs to be fixed but as of right now that is what I'm going off of. --Majora (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
contained propaganda of violence, terrorism. 46.211.194.27 21:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Commons is not censored. Natuur12 (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Not a case for semi-speedy. The video has been kept before though copyright concerns weren't taken into account. Also the file is licensed reviewed. However, the video contains a lot off shots off copyrighted works that can't beling to the creator off the video. I doubt they are de minimis. Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I tagged it because it contains copyrighted anime artwork, Vash the Stampede in the thumbnail.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Info Photographs of soldiers' used in video have been taken by Gennadiy Dubovoy (owner of channel). --Butko (talk) 07:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP - no evidence that Gennadiy Dubovoy is the sole author of all the depicted content. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Invalid PD rationale. The 3D effects, lighting and unique texture of each letter goes beyond {{PD-textlogo}}. The image was clearly marked as non-free (fr:Template:Marque déposée) before being copied here via Wikiwand (which is a Wikipedia mirror). —LX (talk, contribs) 17:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
False licensing claims. ku:File:Hawar.jpg (which is the file used in Wikiwand, the Wikipedia mirror provided as the source) is clearly marked as non-free (and yes, the existence and widespread use of ku:Template:Copyright means the Kurdish WIkipedia is blatantly flaunting wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy, but that doesn't mean that we do). —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
File:The Mary White life boat rescuing the crew of the American Ship the Northern Belle RMG PY8529.jpg
[edit]
Tiff and jpg versions here already Broichmore (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm? I suppose I assumed the color swatches at the top could potentially be useful for some sort of color correction or other computer magic. If not, fine by me. GMGtalk 13:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- They are on the tiff too. Broichmore (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- True. I guess I'm not all that technically inclined, so I tend to defer to keeping anything that could be conceivably useful without outside input. But you seem confident that it's not useful, so it's not gonna hurt my feelings or anything. GMGtalk 12:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- They are on the tiff too. Broichmore (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: the tiff and the jpg can coexist. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Images contain images of "Minecraft PI edition". Minecraft is a copyrighted game, I find no evidence this specific version has been released under a free license. Uploader disputes this, so listing here. BevinKacon (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Unjustified request by 2-months inexperienced and careless user not understanding what he see. Minecraft PI edition is the internal part (not external image/app) of the open source Raspbian OS based on Debian which is licensed under GNU/GPL. Earlier discuss here. --Jasc PL (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Minecraft is not GPL, what we see is clearly DW of a copyrighted video game, way beyond de minimis. --Jcb (talk) 11:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}