Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_소개_포스터.jpg){kind=link}
_USGS_Bulletin_1572.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![146 File:Salko "Tarzan" Crncalo with Haris Medunjanin.jpg](#File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin.jpg){kind=link}
![147 File:Salko "Tarzan" Crncalo with Haris Medunjanin (cropped).jpg](#File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
why this picture is even here? it brings zero value, some guy standing on a rock? delete it. Gregozphotos (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep Users are allowed to illustrate their own pages however they wish, within reason.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: speedily kept as a technically malformed nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yeenosaurus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo clearly copyrighted by AP as stated in metadata May be copyfraud by AP per comment on File talk page. Storkk (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete KCNA photos are non-free. Finnusertop (talk) 07:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Finnusertop - still speedyable. --Storkk (talk) 07:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily, as clear copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
crazy Taxi game download 2409:4052:812:ED1A:4678:3EFF:FE54:950 15:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No clear rationale. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion provided. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amy Jackson shot.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElizabethpringleIP (talk • contribs) 11:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion provided. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Myish_Bogdasarov.jpg Robertbriten94 (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Srittau at 19:15, 15 Juni 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: --Krdbot 00:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
По ошибке загружен. Этот файл уже имеется в Викискладе Umarxon III (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Seite gerade erst erstellt, enthält noch keine Dateien, Weiterleitung ist entbehrlich Im Fokus (talk) 00:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Created this category for a set of images. Discovered an existing category for the company already populated.
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! The reason for deletion is that a duplicate category, [[Category:Lučenec railway station]] exists and it is older. Thanks!--Jetam2 (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Standardizing category names for Category:Pittsburg Shiloh National Military Park.
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This image is beyond the threshold of originality in Taiwan as its graphic part has features similar to the example given in COM:TOO#Taiwan_(Republic_of_China). Wcam (talk) 22:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, user request. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Nonsense/vandalism. --Эlcobbola talk 22:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.facebook.com/Dhariuseloriginal/photos/a.148254878539433.28211.117305124967742/1107920602572851/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos out of scope. Some are used on a vanity WP page but he isn't a valid WP user
- File:Actor monu 004.jpg
- File:Actor Monu school times photo.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU001.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU002.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU.jpg
- File:Actor monu.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU 00.jpg
- File:Actor Monu 01.jpg
- File:Actor Monu & Manoj Kumar.jpg
- File:Actor monu &Amitab.png
- File:Actor Monu.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R 3.jpg
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R 2.jpg
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R.jpg
- File:Actor Monu ,Balram Redhu .jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU503.jpg
- File:Actor Monu and Friends.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
New promotional pictures uploaded by the same user, Actormonu. There are children in some pictures. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Actor Monu- 2.jpg
- File:Actormonu.jpg
- File:Actor Monu with Naina 2.jpg
- File:Actor Monu With Naina.jpg
- File:Actor Monu or Manoj Kumar.jpg
- File:Keep Support Rich Jaat.jpg
--Harlock81 (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:APSRA MONU KE.png
- File:APSRA KA MONU.png
- File:AM = APSRA MONU.jpg
- File:Procedure-for-application-of-marraiage-certificate copy.jpg
- File:APSRA PARCHA WEDS MONU REDHU.jpg
- File:ON WORK IMAGE.jpg
- File:ON WORK.jpg
- File:ON WORK DURANA CSC.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU ON WORK.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
not a web host
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 12:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; again!. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Very low resolution; better alternatives in Category:Butan-1-ol. Leyo 13:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
J ai été a la Sabam organisme de protection de mes oeuvres et ils mon dit quand en Belgique cela n étais plus utile de s'inscrire pour avoir un copyrick car c étais automatique. Mais maintenant a cause de votre partialité injuste a jugé les gens sans preuves j ai perdu deux jours a courir dans les bureaux et j en ait marre alors je vous demande de me supprimer de votre wikimedia. Merci de m'enlever mon inscription chez vous. De staerke Philippe ne le 28/08/1957. Cette Eugene ( je ne sais plus son nom)Ce type, n'a apparemment rien d autres a faire que d empoisonné la vie des gens avec sa méchanceté. Modifier Copyright je ne savais même pas ce que ce mot voulez dire et après avoir été voir sur Google.be je crois avoir compris que pour déposer des oeuvres inédites que j ai réaliser uniquement inedites il y a 40 ans 30 ou 20 ans ou dix ans, et ou j ai participer a des expositions officielle j aurais du payer. Pourquoi devrais je payer puisque je ne vie pas de mes création et que jusqu'à ce jour, j ai toujours offert mes oeuvres inédites. Je ne comprends pas la personnes qui tente de me faire du mal pour ce Copyright qui n a pas de sens pourquoi me contraindre a payer pour plus de 800 oeuvres inédite que j ai créer. Imaginer deux minutes ou j'irais chercher les soux pour faire enregistrée officiellement Plus des 800 oeuvres inédites. Je vie modestement avec des petits revenues financier et j ai pas asser d argent pour faire enregistrée autant de création. Mais demain matin je vais a la Banque et je fais déposé 350 euro sur ma carte bypaie de la poste et je m'inscrirais aussitôt , et un camarade m'a promis de m 'aider pour remplir le document officielles et lui ma dit quand remplissant ce Copyright d une certaines façon il y aurais moyens d officialisé quelques oeuvres pour 35 euro alors je crois qu'avec 350 euros j arriverai a en officialisée une quinzaine. Car ci j ai bien compris... Cela couterais 35 euro pour 5 oeuvres alors sauf erreur de mon raisonnements avec 350 euro je pourrais avoir le Copyright d'une cinquantaine de mes oeuvres. J ai plus de 60 ans de vis et Toutes les oeuvres que j'ai réaliser en 53 ans sont ,sans exception aucune des originaux et de très grand format . Ce type est un malade imaginaire qui m'attaque sans le moindre indice de preuve puisqu'il ait impossibles que lui ce mythomanes qui m accuse i justement et me traine dans la boue puisse détenir ne fus qu'une seul similitudes avec une de mes oeuvres. Moi,j'ai créé mes oeuvres et moi je possède les originaux alors que lui n est pas en mesures de montrer la moindre photos d oeuvres d art ayant la moi des similitude avec mes oeuvres inédites ! Vous m accuser sans le moindre tenants ou aboutissants d indice et je vous invite a montrer des photos d oeuvre ayant la moindre similitudes avec mes création. Et j'ai aussi très difficile de comprendre les Responsable de Wikipedia qui me met directement au pied du mur pour me fusillés sans avoir au préalable demander ne fus que qui un indice de preuve en rapports avec c est accusations diffamante et très blessantes, car inventé de toutes pièces. Monsieur Eugène Zelenko je vous demande de prouver vos accusations profondément injuste. — le commentaire non signé précédent a été écrit par de staerke Philippe allias nom d artiste Lisette wauters Wauters Lisette (talk) 07:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC) Je
Kept: no reason to delete a user talk page. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Commodore Joshua Barney- many interesting facts connected with the life of Commodore Joshua Barney, hero of the United States navy, 1776-1812, also a compilation of genealogical material relating to (14592496618).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
delete|Uploaded by a bot, cover only, blank page, useless Broichmore (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Commodore Joshua Barney- many interesting facts connected with the life of Commodore Joshua Barney, hero of the United States navy, 1776-1812, also a compilation of genealogical material relating to (14592422600).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
delete|Uploaded by a bot, inside cover only, blank page, useless Broichmore (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Blatant spam. jdx Re: 04:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's sandbox was speedily deleted in May 2018 as spam. The contributor was subsequently blocked for promotion. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Blatant spam.
- File:Amla homepage.png
- File:Artifi shoe correct.png
- File:Artifi Shoe 3.png
- File:Artifi Shoe.png
- File:Provider engine.png
- File:Artifi Home Page.png
jdx Re: 04:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guillermoyt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in June 2017 as spam. Out of project scope.
- File:Fundivicon.gif
- File:Editorialdeivicon.gif
- File:Centrodeestudiosvisuales.gif
- File:Ivicon.gif
- File:Eikongif.gif
- File:550x410.gif
- File:Fundación iViCON.gif
ℯxplicit 04:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks to me unuseable. JuTa 04:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Contains a copyrighted image. Rapsar (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Is there any permission for this image? Leoboudv (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
possible unauthorized copy from https://archivo.elcomercio.pe/blog/vidayfuturo/lo-imperdible/49 Txolo (talk) 05:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
personal notes, out of scope Tine (talk) 06:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
personal notes, out of scope Tine (talk) 06:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
personal notes, out of scope Tine (talk) 06:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
possible unathorized copy from https://seeklogo.com/vector-logo/219244/carmen-de-la-legua-reynoso Txolo (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by अभिलाष कुमार (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Abhilash kumar surya I.A.P Mumbai.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in Delhi.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with professor.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in Delhi 1.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya metro mumbai.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with friends.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with P.P. IN Ganga.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya I.C.UJJAIN.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with friends in conference.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in Allahabad.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with R.B.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with P.P in Allahabad.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with K.K&R.B.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in coastal in Ganga.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in mahakal.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with P.P.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with p.p.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya in Ganga bridge.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with k.k.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya3.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya with K.K&R.B1.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya 5.jpg
- File:Abhilash kumar surya 4.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletePer COM:WEBHOST.
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Direct promo shot from Nike: https://c.static-nike.com/a/images/t_PDP_1280_v1/f_auto/e2rhqveydm0vygvgxwxb/2018-nigeria-stadium-home-mens-soccer-jersey-Jw04N1.jpg Abu-Dun (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Promo shot from Adidas: https://www.soccerdealshop.com/products-12835-2018_World_Cup_Iran_Home_White_Jersey_Shirt Abu-Dun (talk) 07:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Promo shot from New Balance: https://www.newbalance.com.au/pd/panama-home-short-sleeve-jersey/MT830343.html Abu-Dun (talk) 07:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gyanmati001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Gyanmati 06-Jun-2018 11-31-26(4).pdf
- File:Gyanmati 06-Jun-2018 11-31-26(3).pdf
- File:Gyanmati 06-Jun-2018 11-31-26(2).pdf
- File:Gyanmati 06-Jun-2018 11-31-26(1).pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The mark on the photo says kapanlagi.com, a celebrity news website Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a company. Rapsar (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a company. Rapsar (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
No exif for this file storage in a small space (56ko), and present in many website; Suscpicion of copyvio. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
File:% D8% AE% D8% AF% D8% B9% D8% A9+% D8% AD% D8% B5% D8% B1% D9% 8A% D8% A9+% D9% 84% D8% B1% D8% A8% D8% AD+% D8% A3% D8% B2% D9% 8A% D8% AF+% D9% 85% D9% 86+1.50% D8% AF% D9% 88% D9% 84% D8% A7% D8% B1+% D9% 8A% D9% 88% D9% 85% D9% 8A%.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unusual hybrid of diagam styles and poor graphical and chemical-typographic quality...not correct geometry, but not clearly laid out for normal lewis either (missing e- details?). Category:Butan-1-ol has clear all atoms labeled (File:Butanol flat structure.png) and 3D balls (File:Butan-1-ol-3D-balls.png) in high quality. DMacks (talk) 14:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Multiple chemical mistakes: it's not the en:Cannizzaro reaction (it is the Category:Cyanohydrin reaction and hydrolysis, whose cat has several usable-quality images that likewise include the hydrolysis, such as File:Benzaldehyde-chemical-mandelicacid.png), and water is not lost in the first step (it's simple addition) DMacks (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal file. Out of scope.
*User account has 45 global edits
Zaccarias (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Current in use on eswiki. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted file, 2806:105E:1:968E:989F:C4C4:B3E4:4695 21:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Part of a hoax: fr:Laurent Cunasc. Yann (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 01:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Part of a hoax: fr:Laurent Cunasc. Yann (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 01:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Part of a hoax: fr:Laurent Cunasc. Yann (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. This publicity photo is all over the internet. Skivsamlare (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's from Getty Images. Gastón Cuello (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The photos are blurry, out of project scope. We have hundreds of photos in category:Night in Chicago (and over thousand with subcategories). Taivo (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Frame from a video resulting in a bad quality image of random clouds. Contains no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No significance. Or just spam :) Deid2 (talk) 12:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not educationally useful. Uploaded by vandalism only account on zhwiki. See also: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:莊冠鷹z4264747愛朴妍1314直到死也愛朴妍老婆1314.jpg Xiplus (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- And contains screenshot of Facebook App.--Xiplus (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijaysuthar008877 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 12:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
promotional, not own work, no repository Triplecaña (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio. This is a composite of several images from the company web site, passed off as "own work" RoySmith (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
promotional Triplecaña (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Spam / copyvio from https://dispatch.barbersurgeonsguild.com/ RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
promotional, probably not own work Triplecaña (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
spam / copyvio from https://dispatch.barbersurgeonsguild.com/ RoySmith (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
spam / copyvio from https://dispatch.barbersurgeonsguild.com/ RoySmith (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- The edit summary in which this image was added says: I added a photo of Zak Ringelstein. FULL DISCLOSURE: this account is run by the Zak Ringelstein campaign. We released this photo to improve the quality of this Wikipedia page and allow people to see what Zak looks like. Mélencron (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment @Mélencron: And this account has been blocked yesterday because Wikipedia in English is not sure this user really works on behalf of Zak Ringelstein. Same thing for the picture : a Facebook picture is not free of use moreover if the Commons user is not who he claims to be. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
spam / copyvio from barbersurgeonsguild.com RoySmith (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 13:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright viol Thraen (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't look like an own work. Low resolution, lack of EXIF. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: used on eswiki. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Image is previously published at least on this page. Unlikely to be own work and if it is it probably requires OTRS permission or some other proof that it has a free license. kyykaarme (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo of user with no global contributions, out of scope Tine (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Apparently it was uploaded on the English Wikipedia as a proposal to replace Wikipedia's logo, which can be nothing but trolling. I see no potential educational use of this file. Nardog (talk) 17:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, still in use in talk page archive. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Obvious nonsense/troll that English Wikipedia didn't want back in 2007. I've no idea what purpose moving this to Commons ten years later(!!) was meant to serve, all that did is make it our problem was well as theirs. Technically, this is in use at the en.wikipedia discussion (which strongly rejected it), but I'm not sure that actually counts. Ubcule (talk) 12:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Previous deletion discussion was closed in error; images which are only used in talk pages are specifically not protected by COM:INUSE. Omphalographer (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Thanks for the link, and yes, for the record, it reads:-
- If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope.
- Emphasis on the exception in bold.
- I'd have been more surprised if merely referencing something in order to discuss if they wanted it kept and deciding they didn't(!) would have forced it to be kept.
- (Hadn't noticed this had been previously nominated either. Now that I think of it, I'm slightly surprised that we don't already have some sort of automatic notice before submission to draw cases like that to an (inadvertent) re-nominator's attention, but that's another issue).
- Ubcule (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Thanks for the link, and yes, for the record, it reads:-
- Delete per above. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Vanity selfie, used for weird spam on en.wp, outside of project scope. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no encyclopaedic, educational use whatsoever. Also, totally outside project scope per Beeblebrox. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Invalid license. Below the TOO? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. License review NOT passed: No evidence of the claimed license at the claimed source. Tagged as such. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as copyvio by Moheen Reeyad. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploader (User:Rocky231293) tried unsucessfully to add a DR with rationale Old image to this image. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, added to appropriate category. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Coplex logo which is clearly copyright protected.
*see also Commons:Threshold of originality
*Can only be kept with official permission from the copyright holder via Commons:OTRS to use it under a free license
Zaccarias (talk) 18:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploader manually put it in Category:Non-free logos Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kogbagidi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:Kogbagidi & Small Doctor.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi, Mercy Aigbe and Friend.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi + Teni.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi's padis.jpg
- File:OBO and kogbagidi1.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi-Friends.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kogbagidi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Prive / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
- File:KOGBAGIDI10.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI9.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI1.jpg
- File:KOGBAGIDI.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi & Small Doctor.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi, Mercy Aigbe and Friend.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi + Teni.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi's padis.jpg
- File:OBO and kogbagidi1.jpg
- File:Kogbagidi-Friends.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The water mark of the original photo indicates a violation of copyright. Luisalvaz (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Probable copyvio- regardless of your opinion of the aesthetics, this is complicated enough to probably be copyrightable. Ubcule (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of person. It was in Category:Frere Hall at night (Karachi) which is obviously wrong. Kalbbes (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3.Jesstan01 (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The website source says DO NOT Reupload which implies No Uploads to any other web site. Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: The video is released under Creative Commons. I spoke to an Agent from BugabooTV and he told me that it was okay to upload screenshots from the video. Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3. Jesstan01 (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too much ambiguity there. "No you can't upload the whole thing" is a direct contradiction of the Creative Commons terms. If they want to release specific portions of the video that is within their prerogative but they would have to be explicit and we would need OTRS permission as to its validity. --Majora (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Actually, please delete the images. I have other images I would like to upload in place of these. ^^ Jesstan01 (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unacceptable form of derivative work. ℯxplicit 06:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The file is an image of two graffiti in a city of Morocco. As Morocco do not grant FOP for photos if the artwork is the main subject of the photo. As the main subject of the photo is probably the yellow graffiti, the file may be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Les fichiers versés représentent des œuvres en trois dimensions et non deux comme mentionné dans le bandeau de licence. L'uploader n'est pas le photographe qui lui est inconnu. De plus ces fichiers ont été récupérés d'un site de vente sans mention de licence adaptée à un versement sur Commons.
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture1.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture2.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture3.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture4.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture5.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture6.png
- File:Edelinne Pierre pendule Sculpture & Architecture7.png
Thesupermat (talk) 07:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
_%EC%86%8C%EA%B0%9C_%ED%8F%AC%EC%8A%A4%ED%84%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%EC%86%8C%EA%B0%9C_%ED%8F%AC%EC%8A%A4%ED%84%B0.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright Violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 08:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
_소개_포스터.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
_소개_포스터.jpg){kind=link}
Unused and of poor cartographic quality: Using the states as borders makes the map very inaccurate. --Eatkarus (talk) 09:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josianerezendevieira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.
- File:10- Sistemas operacionais para sistemas embarcados- aplicabilidade em sistemas.pdf
- File:9- Projeto e desenvolvimento de sistemas em tempo real sobre sistemas embarcados-correto.pdf
- File:8-Especificação, modelagem e técnicas de projetos de sistemas embarcados e de SoC.pdf
- File:7- Arquitetura de unidades funcionais computacionais- microprocessadores.pdf
- File:5-RTL.pdf
- File:4- Validacaodesistemas.pdf
- File:3-Linguagens de descrição de hardware.pdf
- File:6-Arquitetura, programação e aplicações frente a microcontroladores e processadores.pdf
- File:1- Sistemas digitais.pdf
- File:2-Dispositivos lógicos programáveis.pdf
- File:4- Tecnicase FerramentasdeValidacaodeSistemasDigitais.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Wrong black background, smaller duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Horní Slavkov.png. Gumruch (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
No source given, unknown copyright -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photo is in public domain, reprinted in many books and on many websites. LadyDaggy (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, as much as I'd like to retain the photo, just because many others have failed to observe copyright law doesn't mean it can be used on Wikipedia. It must be overtly released by the copyright holder. Can you provide the URL of the website you found it on? -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The author is unknown. The Museo Andes publicated it on the fanpage on Facebook. Afterthem was it in many book publications and websites. LadyDaggy (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, as much as I'd like to retain the photo, just because many others have failed to observe copyright law doesn't mean it can be used on Wikipedia. It must be overtly released by the copyright holder. Can you provide the URL of the website you found it on? -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission provided, please provide evidence of the file being in public domain. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
_USGS_Bulletin_1572.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_USGS_Bulletin_1572.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Misspelled filename (unneccesary double occurence of abbreviation "USGS") -- file was moved immediately after upload --> no need for keeping the redirect Gretarsson (talk) 11:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
_USGS_Bulletin_1572.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
_USGS_Bulletin_1572.png){kind=link}
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work + Sameseries as https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/998873591067242496/wobWRO1J_400x400.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
© Facebook David Lorion, https://www.zinfos974.com/David-Lorion-Non-a-la-fermeture-de-lits-en-chirurgie-infantile-Sud_a126194.html, missing permission Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
http://www.ubba.eu/fiche.cfm/556811_136759_115-2_hicham-nazzal.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 21:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Fop - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Azerbaijan Ronhjones (Talk) 22:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajasrour2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.
- File:Janna Sur Mer Beach Resort Lebanon.jpg – taken with a Canon EOS 5D on 2006-06-08
- File:Lebanese Wedding at Janna Sur Mer.jpg – less tightly cropped version published at http://www.jannaresorts.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/1-DSC_71666-2000X1333-1-1.jpg more than two years before the uploader claims to have created it
- File:MTV at Janna Sur Mer.jpg – taken with a Nikon D5200 on 2016-06-27
- File:Sunset at Janna Sur mer.jpg – taken with a Canon EOS-1D X on 2016-08-16 by Charbel Toubia
- File:Janna's Hotel.jpg
- File:Janna Sur Mer.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 23:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
no EXIF, probably taken from somewhere else küñall (nütramyen) 23:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Nope, this is mine. I took the picture this spring 2018. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmosDoyle (talk • contribs) 00:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: AGF - no prior results with google and uploader without antecedent. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/7793/screenshots/411810/playground_icon.jpg.
- File:Play area of nss school dildarnagar.jpg
- File:S.KB.M. Degree college-Dildarnagar.jpg
- File:NSS School Dildarnagar.jpg
- File:S.K.B.M Degree College Dildarnagar.jpg
- File:Kamakhya Temple Dildarnagar.jpg
- File:ADARSH VIDHYALAYA INTER COLLEGE DILDARNAGAR.jpg
- File:Kamakhya-Temple2 Dildarnagar.JPG
- File:Kamakhya-Temple Dildarnagar.JPG
- File:SKBM DEGREE COLLEGE LOGO.png
- File:Shahzada Industrial Training Institute,Dildarnagar.jpg
- File:Shahzada Industrial Training Institute.jpg
- File:Phooli village3.jpg
- File:Phooli village2.jpg
- File:Phooli village.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:Bhuvan bam in kerala.jpg
- File:Bhuvan ban in kerala during shooting of his song safar.jpg
- File:Bhuvan Bam and his Fans during Safar Shooting in Kerala.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Although the video is licensed under Creative Commons, the video consists of about a minute and a half of another video from shown in the presentation which is likely copyrighted. ℯxplicit 08:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
No FoP Ukraine. No permission of the sculptor. Created 1991. See.
And also
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку 1991.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку м.Борщів.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, центр, вул. Шевченка.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку у Борщеві (Тернопільська область).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
And also. No FoP Ukraine. No permission of the sculptor. Created 1993.
Микола Василечко (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
own uploader's petition. Looks to promotional to me on a second thought. It's an ad on the subway Triplecaña (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused, uploader request. No objections raised. --Storkk (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Marcoalejo7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small sizes, no EXIF, inconsistent quality, some obvious screen captures, photos of artwork without artist name. Likely copyright violations.
- File:Color Rosado Litúrgico.jpg
- File:Diócesis de Buenaventura.png
- File:Color Negro Litúrgico.jpg
- File:Excelentísimo Monseñor Pedro Manuel Salamanca Mantilla.png
- File:Excelentísimo Monseñor Luis Manuel Alí Herrera.png
- File:Instituto Católico de París.png
- File:Escudo Obispo Francisco Nieto.png
- File:El Gran Papa Benedicto XVI el Grande.png
- File:Santo Padre Benedecto.png
- File:Noviciado.png
- File:Monr. Alfred Xuereb.png
- File:Cristo-rey.jpg
- File:Jesus mi maestro.jpg
- File:Escudo Mons. Francisco Antonio Nieto Sua.png
- File:Fray marcos.jpg
- File:Escudo Marcosiano.jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holders should confirm licenses by following the instructions at OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
H. K. Corning died in 1951, so this work is still copyrighted until 2021 in the country of origin (Germany). The book where this comes from was first published in 1907 but this was either in Germany or Switzerland, so PD-1923 does not apply. De728631 (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Mi dispiace per l'inconveniente. Ho ripreso l'immagine da un testo del 1923 liberamente scaricabile on-line da Internet Archive e non pensavo che fosse ancora protetto da copyright.--ALEISF (talk) 05:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Adding these files too:
- —Green Giant (talk) 12:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lexa in Disponível Tour (2).png Lexa facts (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Smelling license laundry here: Youtube account was 'suspended' for multiple DMCA notices. — regards, Revi 01:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- For the record: the deletion request template on the deleted file at the time of deletion had following reason: The author did not authorize the image. — regards, Revi 02:00, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Misterpither as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G6. Not uncontroversial maintenance. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment & Delete Whoops - I meant that the file itself is redundant; the file is no longer in use with the corresponding article of the subject on Wikipedia. The fact that it is uploaded here without use in the Wiki projects (I took the subjected JPG image off and replaced it with a new vector version) constitute the file as uselessness. Rationale should have be G7 instead, as I originally uploaded the image on English Wikipedia initially. --Misterpither (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
logo forbidden in wikimedia commons Tiraden (talk) 18:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: A close call, but in the absence of responses I judge it to be above TOO. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio; derivative work of copyrighted statue (created 2005). Sandstein (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep {{FoP-UK}}, photographs of 3D works located in places open to the public in the UK are okay on Commons. clpo13(talk) 21:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- That would work, but how do we know that it is located in a place open to the public? Sandstein (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The statue is outside the main entrance to Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, and it is in an open area, accessible to all public, whether patients at the hospital or passersby.--Stelmaris (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- That was my assumption based on other photos of the statue online, like this one. clpo13(talk) 17:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep IANAL. I don't even remember moving image to commons (~10 years ago). I hope Clpo13 is correct. DCDuring (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a faithful (albeit incomplete) representation of a work under copyright. The "public domain" licensing is therefore invalid. It might qualify as Fair Use on the EN wiki. -JasonAQuest (talk) 02:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion, it would be fair use as the statue itself is in a place open to the public, and the image is not used for commercial gain. It's been on the Tinker Bell page since 2005 and there has been no objection from whoever owns the copyright (whether the sculptor or the hospital). A photograph of the statue itself features on Peter Pan's page, again without any objections.--Stelmaris (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear OTRS volunteers and administrators,
The original OTRS affirmations which were signed by both Ms. May Moran and Mr. Alex Fridman are at Ticket Number=2018061010004218.
May Moran did this film as her matriculation work, as shown at her diploma which she had got from her high school, and granted her film as the best documentary film of 2018. The diploma is also at Ticket Number=2018061010004218.
It is written also in the end of her film: "Produced as a part of New Media and Advertising Trend, Ort Shapira Kfar Saba, 2018".
The Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license of this creation is based upon The Israeli Copyright Act of 2007 which says upon Section 19:
"(a) Fair use of a work is permitted for purposes such as: private study, research, criticism, review, journalistic reporting, quotation, or instruction and examination by an educational institution.
(b) In determining whether a use made of a work is fair within the meaning of this section the factors to be considered shall include, inter alia, all of the following:
(1) The purpose and character of the use;
(2) The character of the work used;
(3) The scope of the use, quantitatively and qualitatively, in relation to the work as a whole;
(4) The impact of the use on the value of the work and its potential market."
As it is shown in the film, the use is short and is credited. Dgw (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete You cannot combine fair use and the Creative Commons 3.0 licence. "Fair use" is an exceptional use of a non-free work under limited circumstances in a limited number of jurisdictions while Creative Commons 3.0 is a licence for anyone to use the image anywhere for any purpose. So either the original author May Moran has released this under a Creative Commons licence herself which would include commercial re-use of the image and the making of derivatives, or it is not free at all for the purposes of Wikimedia Commons. We don't accept fair use material here nor do we accept limited permissions like "for use at Wikipedia". As I can't see the permission text that was sent to OTRS I trust in the OTRS staff's assessment that the current permission as such is insufficient. De728631 (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- This video file handled in Ticket:2018061010004218. I raised few copyright problems:
- - The Israeli Channel 1 is closed down on 14 May 2017. I can understand the frustration of getting permmision from them as we don't know who owns the copyright now. The user claimed that some voluntary association declared that they own the copyright of these frams. I asked how they got the copyright but the user doubting my right to ask him this question.
- - Frams including text from Ynet newspaper are not ok as well. The copyright owner is the newspapaer or the author אמיר אלון
- - As it already mentioned fair use - not in Commons.
- The basic calim of this user that he heve permission from the movie director that claims that he owns the copyright for all in the movie. So according to this logic I dont have to ask anything. I don't agree with that. The director own the copyright of the derivative part but he dont own the copyright for the original works and OTRS volunteers can ask anything to clearify the copyright status. For now, as it was nominated to deletion please Delete. -- Geagea (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- I did not understand why it took almost five days to respond my post. If the file really had to be deleted, the post could be answered much earlier.
- De728631, it is pitty that you cannot see the ticket. I am avoided to tell its content, due to privacy restrictions.
- If I took a screenshot of the newspaper or of Channel 1, and uploaded it alongside the film, it was a fair use which was not allowed.
- But I uploaded only the film itself, which was totally allowed by the Israeli law, as stated above. The Israeli law permits a use of pictures which were taken in Israel 50 years ago, and permits also a use of a creation which was an examination by a certified education institute.
- The film was not about channel 1 nor about the newspaper, but about a disabled man whose name was Alex. The film took five minuts (300 seconds), and the title from the newspaper was shown for a second. Channel 1 dealt with a woman who wanted to commit suicide, and it was written in the article about Alex, both in Hebrew and English Wikipedia. When he saw her at news, he made up his mind to establish his organization.
- The newspaper also published a photograph which it got from Alex himself. This picture was not mandatory, because it did not deal with the agreement between Alex and the Israeli government, but only showed Alex on the road. The whole article is still here, and everybody may see it and see the film. The newspaper had already done a commercial use of Alex's picture, displaying it for collecting advertisement revenues.
- Please see also Copyright Paranoia as described here.
- Whoever has a full access to OTRS tickets, may read everything which has been written there. Please Keep. Dgw (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please read the comment right above. Geagea does have access to the OTRS ticket and is also from Israel. Still, they recommend deletion. As to perceived copyright paranoia, you're welcome to start a community discussion to change the precautionary principle. De728631 (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- This time I did not get why it took more than a week to reply, because my reply had been written on 20 June 2018 at 01:34 UTC. Was deletion REALLY needed?
- Geagea is a single person, as you stated: "does have access...", so I do not know who are "they". I welcome Hanay and David Shay to vote here as well.
- I also read precautionary principle. It talks about a file, not about a very short scene in a whole movie.
- If the film shot Ynet whole article for five continuous minutes, it should violate Commons standards, but it did not. It shot only the headline of the article with its author name and date, just for a second, and just for saying that there was an agreement about raising the disability pension. It shot nothing else from the long and comprehensive article of Ynet. It is an accepted citation in a movie, which was made for an educational purpose, and was a matriculation work, as the law said. Why are Israeli photos free after 50 years, and a matriculation work is not? If somebody wrote on a paper "There was an agreement", it was not a reliable citation, which should not be included in a documentary movie. I have already written here that the movie was about a disabled man whose name was Alex, and much less about news sources. Ynet headline takes 3 per milles (3 ‰) of the movie. Dgw (talk) 11:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- We are all volunteers at this project who may have other more urgent things to do, so this is why responses to discussions may sometimes take some time. Also, deletion discussions like this are not votes (i.e. polls) where the number of people voting 'keep' or 'delete' is counted. Instead, the closing administrator has to evaluate the arguments made by all sides, and even if the majority "votes" to keep a file it may still be deleted for legal reasons. There are also several original and non-free posters or front covers shown around 2:05, 2:18 and 4:32. These may be covered by fair use for the whole film under Israeli law, but at Commons we don't allow fair use even in tiny bits. The entire upload with all of its components has to be free for reuse. Even if these scenes are of short duration, for a free licence like Creative Commons, users of the video would need to be able to extract any of these frames and make commercial derivatives of them. This is certainly not covered by the fair use clauses for including the material into the entire film. De728631 (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind reply. As I have said, Alex has also signed an OTRS confirmation at this ticket, and you might not see it. All the posters belonged to him, and he signed all of them. He signed everything which appeared in the movie, including Ynet headline, and showed clearly that it was only a very small and short citation of the whole Ynet article. I did not find a reply why pictures in Israel were free after 50 years by the Israeli law, but a matriculation work was not free, in spite of the Israeli law accepted it. Commercial derivations from a matriculation work are also free, mainly when it is double signed. May created the movie as a matricultion work, and signed OTRS on it. Alex also signed OTRS on every part which appeared in the movie. Dgw (talk) 23:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Alex also signed OTRS on every part which appeared in the movie. But he do not own the copyright for all parts of the movie. If he owns the copyright of the newspaper article please send us clerification from the author אמיר אלון (or YNET). Also if he owns the copyright from Channel 1 fram, please send us court decision that says so or other proof that clarify it.
- Everybody can make a work including obvious derivative parts and claim he is the owns the copyright. This is the job of OTRS volunteers to check this claim and to ask for more clarification evidences. Otherwise we don't need human volunteers and use bot instead.-- Geagea (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind reply. As I have said, Alex has also signed an OTRS confirmation at this ticket, and you might not see it. All the posters belonged to him, and he signed all of them. He signed everything which appeared in the movie, including Ynet headline, and showed clearly that it was only a very small and short citation of the whole Ynet article. I did not find a reply why pictures in Israel were free after 50 years by the Israeli law, but a matriculation work was not free, in spite of the Israeli law accepted it. Commercial derivations from a matriculation work are also free, mainly when it is double signed. May created the movie as a matricultion work, and signed OTRS on it. Alex also signed OTRS on every part which appeared in the movie. Dgw (talk) 23:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- We are all volunteers at this project who may have other more urgent things to do, so this is why responses to discussions may sometimes take some time. Also, deletion discussions like this are not votes (i.e. polls) where the number of people voting 'keep' or 'delete' is counted. Instead, the closing administrator has to evaluate the arguments made by all sides, and even if the majority "votes" to keep a file it may still be deleted for legal reasons. There are also several original and non-free posters or front covers shown around 2:05, 2:18 and 4:32. These may be covered by fair use for the whole film under Israeli law, but at Commons we don't allow fair use even in tiny bits. The entire upload with all of its components has to be free for reuse. Even if these scenes are of short duration, for a free licence like Creative Commons, users of the video would need to be able to extract any of these frames and make commercial derivatives of them. This is certainly not covered by the fair use clauses for including the material into the entire film. De728631 (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please read the comment right above. Geagea does have access to the OTRS ticket and is also from Israel. Still, they recommend deletion. As to perceived copyright paranoia, you're welcome to start a community discussion to change the precautionary principle. De728631 (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Here I add some significant details about Alex and Ynet:
- On July 3, 2018, Ynet published May's movie about Alex. Ynet put its own logo upon the whole film, did not credit May for the film, nor Alex for the photos, and published the whole film, including Channel 1's short shots and Ynet's one second headline.
- It is also written in Alex's OTRS signature. Alex took a full responsibility upon the whole film, and it is clearly evident by publishing the film by Ynet. Alex did not violate anything, because Ynet did publish the film. This film also goes to the Haifa International Film Festival, and takes a part in its international contest, as written by Ynet.
- As May told Ynet, her father has also been disabled for a while, due to a road accident. It was the reason for her choice at Alex as her final project / matriculation work. Dgw (talk) 13:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- The newspaper Ynet does not claim that the content (text, photos or videos clips) are free. Our requirements are stricter. We are claiming that files in Commons are released from copyright (by OTRS process) or they are free of copyright by law.-- Geagea (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- For a week I got no reply for my words on June 28, 2018, and did not intend to repeat my words.
- Putting a Ynet logo upon a whole film, which Ynet did not create, is unlawful. Here I add that Ynet uses May's film commercially, because Ynet added commercial ads to the film's web page as well as before the film itself. Today I saw before May's film an ad by Dorin Atias, which was made by IKEA and published by Ynet. Before the page with May's film, another page pops up with an additional ad by Dvir Benedek, advertising a bank.
- Commons does not have FBI agents, thus Commons may not inquire Alex nor May. They both signed OTRS confirmations. May created the film, and Alex owned the rights of its content.
- Commons permits publishing an Israeli photo fifty years after it was taken (created), in spite of a longer period is requested in other states.
- I have not seen any verdict of the court, Israeli or American, which prohibited a publishing of a film which was made by a student in an educational institute and was made for an educational purpose. OTRS is exist, because May signed it. Dgw (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- The newspaper Ynet does not claim that the content (text, photos or videos clips) are free. Our requirements are stricter. We are claiming that files in Commons are released from copyright (by OTRS process) or they are free of copyright by law.-- Geagea (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
The uploader placed a NASA tag but this image was not created by the NASA. The 2002 NASA page from where the 2009 copy was taken labels the image "raft_bbc_med.jpg", hinting that it was taken from the BBC, possibly from this 2002 page (which itself labels it "_1938856_kon-tiki_afp_300.jpg", hinting that it was taken from the AFP). It is a colour version of an image from the 1950 Norwegian-Swedish film Kon-Tiki. The film's director, Thor Heyerdahl, died in 2002. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Dereckson (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Logo for a company that was obviously taken from http://www.barcindia.co.in, and is definitely not own work. 49.181.228.192 15:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Logo for a company that was obviously taken from http://www.barcindia.co.in, and is definitely not own work. RetroCraft314 (talk) 03:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- May be below the Commons:Threshold_of_originality#India? Storkk (talk) 07:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. Although this is now obsolete as I have uploaded a .PNG version with a transparent background (File:BARC logo.png). --Majora (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:BARC logo.png. --Guanaco (talk) 23:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marchjuly as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason= File can be seen used here as well as on the station's Facebook page. Facebook images are, however, not released under a license compatible with COM:L and there's no indication provided that the station has released this under a Creative Commons license accepted by Commons. It's possible though that this might be {{PD-logo}} depending upon how liberally you want to interpret COM:TOO#Canada.
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this logo is above threshold for originality and thereby copyrightable at all. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Very simple logo, only text and a rounded rectangle. --Guanaco (talk) 23:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
right to the image, my friend upload this without my agreement 212.203.82.1 08:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, vandalism image. --Guanaco (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
An old photo of me, which i posted here, that i now regret. Kakident95 (talk) 09:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
![09:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/15#c-Kakident95-2018-06-15T09:44:00.000Z-File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request; unused personal photo. --Guanaco (talk) 23:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
![23:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/15#c-Guanaco-2018-07-20T23:08:00.000Z-File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Its a private photo that i posted which i now regret havin on internet Kakident95 (talk) 09:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
![09:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/15#c-Kakident95-2018-06-15T09:49:00.000Z-File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request; unused personal photo. --Guanaco (talk) 23:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
![23:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/15#c-Guanaco-2018-07-20T23:08:00.000Z-File:Salko_"Tarzan"_Crncalo_with_Haris_Medunjanin_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Unused and of poor cartographic quality: Using the states as borders makes the map very inaccurate.-- Eatkarus (talk) 09:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
No longer be valid Savannah G. Stapleton (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, questionable scope and copyright status. --Guanaco (talk) 23:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Expired in the past 2 years Savannah G. Stapleton (talk) 10:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I don't understand the reason given. Only image we have of its kind. --Guanaco (talk) 23:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
No longer be valid Savannah G. Stapleton (talk) 10:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request; unused personal photo. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Expired or obsolete in the past 2 years Savannah G. Stapleton (talk) 10:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request; unused personal photo. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a non-permanent artwork. Freedom of panorama does not apply Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: See COM:FOP#Permanent vs temporary. --Guanaco (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not an exact duplicate due to lesser quality but can we replace this with File:San Gabriel Mtns & Los Angeles Skyline (3699427354).jpg, which is the same photo. Thanks. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own wor + similar to https://www.lopinion.fr/edition/politique/huguette-tiegna-destinee-politique-140874 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Expired in the past 2 years Savannah G. Stapleton (talk) 10:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Very low TOO in China: COM:TOO#China_(PRC). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shanghai Metro logo.svg, Special:diff/306558594#File:Shanghai Metro logo.svg. Wcam (talk) 17:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Can the "SM"-only logo (without texts "上海地铁" and "Shanghai Metro") be saved here or not? If not, just delete, but if yes... --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)- psst no (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shanghai Metro logo.svg), Delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo veraltet, die Firma Waelzholz hat nun eine neue Schreibweis (s. Wikipedia-Eintrag) und ein neues Logo. Binkaro (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: A change of logo is no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 22:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader, User:Rocky231293 unsuccessfully tried to nominate this file for deletion using the rationale Not used. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Re-uploaded with a new nomenclature to become part og the "Uploaded files from the School of music...". Pages that use this audio file are also updated. Thanks! Enricguaus (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the system does not detect a duplicate - if the file name would need to be changed, use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, You mentioned "system do not detect duplicate". Right: I changed the codification setup at the .ogg in order to re-upload it! It was my first upload and I didn't know how exactly it works... Right now, its duplicated until it's deleted. Enricguaus (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to the other file. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I took a couple of minutes trying to find the duplicate, but was unable to. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, in that case it will be a keep for now. Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
duplicate and deprecated Enricguaus (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - don't renominate!. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Punschrauer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Wiki3 Titelblatt 1941.jpg
- File:Wiki2 Titelblatt 1926.jpg
- File:Wiki1 Titelblatt 1896.jpg
- File:Wiki7 Friedemann von Münchhausen.jpg
- File:Wiki5 Otto Kabisch.jpg
- File:Wiki4 Johannes Allhin.jpg
- File:Wiki6 Louis Naumann.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for inside of Italian Museams Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Italy Ronhjones (Talk) 17:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Freedom of panorama has nothing to do with interiors. --Marcok (talk) 08:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Insufficient source and license information: no good source given; internet image Doldenhonigkönig (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've left a note at the ukwiki Administrators' noticeboard for the time being, currently awaiting a response. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Answering that note, I have fixed the description. The image was uploaded by uk:User:Вєталь as own work. Looking through his contributions, he clearly distinguished images he has taken himself (he clearly stated that he is the author) and images he has taken from the Internet (fair use, he provided source website). This image is attributed as own work. Bear in mind that it was 2008 and he seemed to have some really poor camera at that time. For example, this photo seems to be of similar quality to uk:Файл:IMG 1193.jpg which is clearly an own work (filename does not lie) and pretty impossible to be stolen from the Internet in 2008 (a shop in a town of 3 thousand inhabitants). I tried to find this photo (File:Kraz 6446.jpg) on Google Images and everything I find was published after 2008. Thus I would assume it is an own work taken with some bad camera back in 2008 unless anything proves the opposite — NickK (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- It seems that File:Kraz 6446.jpg photo was shot on film first - it's not a low-quality digital shot. Moreover, uk:User:Вєталь had uploaded uk:File:Kol4yga.jpg as his own work despite it was shot and edited by an experienced photographer, and had a text label, typical for exhibition photos. --VoidWanderer (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Answering that note, I have fixed the description. The image was uploaded by uk:User:Вєталь as own work. Looking through his contributions, he clearly distinguished images he has taken himself (he clearly stated that he is the author) and images he has taken from the Internet (fair use, he provided source website). This image is attributed as own work. Bear in mind that it was 2008 and he seemed to have some really poor camera at that time. For example, this photo seems to be of similar quality to uk:Файл:IMG 1193.jpg which is clearly an own work (filename does not lie) and pretty impossible to be stolen from the Internet in 2008 (a shop in a town of 3 thousand inhabitants). I tried to find this photo (File:Kraz 6446.jpg) on Google Images and everything I find was published after 2008. Thus I would assume it is an own work taken with some bad camera back in 2008 unless anything proves the opposite — NickK (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete the same photo is on the official missile shooting range homepage of russia ([1]). I do doubt that the Wiki user is the photographer of it. It shows a russian system in russia (Kapustin Yar). Going there to take photos is for non military personnel impossible. Furthermore you can find the same image here with the same resolution. The fact that the original uploader had many copyright problems with his/her photos, I assume that this one is a copyright violation. Arguments I have pointed out are reason enough to delete it.
And by the way: the argument "has used an old camera" and the supermarket photo are really not striking. If we act like this, anything of doubtful origin should be kept if it s a typical web pic-resolution here. --Doldenhonigkönig (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Doldenhonigkönig: kap-yar.ru is not an official page. The page clearly says it is a private website ("Капустин Яр: история, техника, люди" является частным некоммерческим проектом) and deliberately states that its owner sometimes violated copyright by copying materials from open sources without attribution (все базовые сведения на начальном этапе добывались из разных открытых источников и далеко не всегда я указывал их авторов, что является прямым нарушением их авторских прав). The second website was created only in 2012, thus the photo uploaded to Wikipedia in 2008 could not be copied from there.
- I do understand that web pic-resolutions are not cool. Still they were still common in mid-2000s (I also uploaded a few, like File:Kyiv-T3-Kiltseva-Doroha1.jpg, simply because that was the best resolution I could get at that time). I do not see any evidence this particular photo was published anywhere before 2008. This does not mean it definitely was not, but Wikipedia photo being copied to other websites is not something completely unlikely either — NickK (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep More than sufficient evidence that it is own work. Somebody else copying it after it was uploaded to Wikipedia is not a reason for deletion. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The picture is a clear copyright violation. A user who had uploaded this photo first to Ukrainian Wikipedia back in 2008 have his own photos of this quality: link. --VoidWanderer (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
JPEG graph, replaced by inline data in en:California housing shortage. grendel|khan 23:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - As the user who uploaded the image, I vote to keep the image. For now, the image has been replaced by an inline graph in the article it was intended to be used in, en:California housing shortage, but since it is a good graph from a well-known and respected research group (en:California Legislative Analyst's Office), it may still be a valuable addition to the article, depending on how the article evolves.
- Is it harmful to keep something that may be used in the future? I think the name is so specific that it isn't blocking anything from using that name.
- This is my first addition to Wikimedia commons, so I don't know anything about what the criteria are for images to be kept here, maybe the admin making the decision could explain? Thanks ---- Avatar317 (talk) 05:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Avatar317
- Keep "Not used" is not a reason for deletion. The fact that it was used at one point shows that it is in scope. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Thai Tribune is not the original creator of this image thus cannot license it under CC-BY. Wcam (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Definitely not 'own work', but I do not know about possible COM:TOO rationale to keep. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: We have very little information on Thailand and its TOO (nothing is listed at COM:TOO). So to be sure it is prudent to delete this until it can be shown that Thailand has a higher threshold. In addition, this logo was unused so a PCP delete will not harm the projects. --Majora (talk) 22:06, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
