Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![176 File:"Sanctuary Tree" by Thomas Ossner was installed in 2014. (29334031806).jpg](#File:"Sanctuary_Tree"_by_Thomas_Ossner_was_installed_in_2014._(29334031806).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4954228764).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![250 File:Under "The Bean" Chicago.jpg](#File:Under_"The_Bean"_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(32877224893).jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:55, 15 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.arthursalerno.com/bio.html © COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED --Krdbot 19:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Violation of copyright in the depicted information board. There's no Freedom of Panorama for graphical works in the UK, and the information board fills the whole frame so it's not de minimis. bjh21 (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; tagging {{Copyvio}} is usually quicker. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably copyrighted toy. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; {{Copyvio}} per COM:TOYS. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:18, 15 Februar 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Александр Юрьевич Кинёв.jpg --Krdbot 01:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy here: https://www.rfa.org/vietnamese/in_depth/senior-political-prisoner-moved-t-qnam-gm-01132015142620.html Yann (talk) 06:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:22, 15 Februar 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:NgoHao-Traigiam-.jpg --Krdbot 01:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Sciences Po Bordeaux
[edit]All the images on the page fr:Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux are problematic, coming from the two users below.
On 16 November 2017 the user Hambucker (talk · contribs) uploaded the series of images below, all classified as CC-BY-SA-4.0.
- File:Façade Sciences Po Bordeaux.jpg
- Copied from https://twitter.com/scpobx/status/831447878728089600?lang=fr (image published in source on 14 February 2017)
- File:Sciences Po Bordeaux.jpg
- Copied from https://www.scoop.it/t/sciences-po-bordeaux/p/4072925669/2016/12/16/sciences-po-bordeaux-fait-peau-neuve-bordeaux-tendances (image published in source on 16 December 2016)
- File:Atrium_IEP_Bordeaux.jpg
- Copied from https://www.20minutes.fr/bordeaux/1977631-20161209-bordeaux-sciences-po-nouveau-inaugure-bernard-cazeneuve (image published in source on 9 December 2016).
- File:Logo IEP Bordeaux.jpg
- Clear copyvio of the institute's current logo. Could be uploaded in local Wikipedias in low-res fair-use version (see here [1]).
- File:Ancien logo IEP Bordeaux.svg.png
- Clear copyvio of the institute's old logo (see here [2]).
- File:Logo AS Sciences Po Bordeaux.png
- Clear copyvio of the institute's sports association logo (see here [3]).
On 21 March 2017 the user Charles.567 (talk · contribs) uploaded the image below, classified as CC-BY-SA-4.0.
- File:CzPnYHmXAAA3wPN.jpg
- Image claims itself to be a copyvio of https://twitter.com/ausoneconseil, but I could not find it there. It seems to be however a copyvio of https://twitter.com/NvelleAquitaine/status/806141446302666752 (image published in source on 6 December 2016)
--DiGalaBur (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- All images here are concerned by the speedy deletion process, so I have added that tag to each file page. DiGalaBur (talk) 09:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Found on Imgur 6 months ago with 28 views. Dispenser (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Found on Imgur 6 months ago with 16 views. Dispenser (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own work
- File:الموعد الثقافي يستضيف المخرج مرزاق علواش.jpg
- File:الإعلامي محمد علال يحاور النجمة هند صبري.jpg
- File:La littérature et le cinéma.jpg
- File:محمد علال يقدم برنامج الموعد الثقافي.jpg
- File:Mohamed allal festival dubia.jpg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Mohammed allal.jpg
- File:محمد علال.jpg
- File:Mohamed allal.jpg
- File:محمد علال عضو لجنة تحكيم مهرجان الرباط.jpg
hiàn 00:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Habeeb Mohmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (personal image[s] of uploader). Uploader has no significant contributions to Wikimedia projects.
- File:Rah12.jpg
- File:Rah7.jpg
- File:Rah6.jpg
- File:Rah5.jpg
- File:Rah4.jpg
- File:Rah2.jpg
- File:Rah3.jpg
- File:Rahaman Ali 2.jpg
- File:Rahaman Ali.jpg
hiàn 00:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Almost deleted because they are DW of other photos, two are kept because they are used in articles (therefore are in scope), and I did not find any catches with google. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Habeeb Mohmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text images, out of scope.
- File:Tenn.jpg
- File:Ninee.jpg
- File:Eightt.jpg
- File:Sixx.jpg
- File:Sevenn.jpg
- File:Fivee.jpg
- File:Onee.jpg
- File:Threee.jpg
- File:Twoo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 00:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
And also: File:Fsproducoes.png
Self promotion of non relevant person Stego (talk) 00:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
And also: File:Fsproducoes.png
Self promotion of non relevant person Stego (talk) 00:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stefanie.santos.12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 00:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adoroyalss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
hiàn 01:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UMANG SHAH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 01:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - one is used, but the user is not an active one. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
The house pictured is NOT the Alexander G. Clark House! Rather, it is a house next door. I am a board member of the Alexander G. Clark Foundation and its webmaster, etc. I will happily supply any number of correct photos! (Daniel G. Clark, Muscatine, IA dclark@muscanet.com) 66.207.23.33 01:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- While I concur that the house depicted is not the one described, deleting the image is not the correct thing to do. I will correct the description of the image appropriately. Please do upload pictures of the correct house to Commons. Magic♪piano 02:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the title, description and categories can always be amamded if necessary. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:09, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikassultanpuriofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 01:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader; uploaded solely for a promotional purpose; Commons is not Facebook). Only use is on promotional draft. hiàn 01:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Vkraja..jpg
- File:Vaikundaraja.s .jpg
- File:Vaikundaraja.s--moolakkarai.jpg
- File:Vkraja.jpg
- File:Vaikundaraja.s.jpg
- File:Vaikundaraja.jpg
hiàn 01:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Vaikundaraja.s.jpg
- File:Moolakkarai Rajesh kumar.jpg
- File:Moolakkarai Rajesh.jpg
- File:VKRAJA.jpg
- File:VKR.jpg
- File:VAIKUNDARAJA.S.jpg
- File:VAIKUNDARAJA.S OOTY.jpg
- File:Vkr. vaikundaraja.s.jpg
- File:Moolakkarai vaikundaraja.s.jpg
- File:Vaikundaraja.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mobabansos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 01:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thewaqarahmad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Waqar Ahmad Poetry.jpg
- File:Waqar A.jpg
- File:Waqar Ahmad.jpg
- File:Waqar Ah.jpg
- File:Waqar.jpg
- File:Waqar Ahm.jpg
- File:Waqar Ahma.jpg
Nakendra Black (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
no FOP in the USA Nakendra Black (talk) 02:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
no educational value Nakendra Black (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Nakendra Black (talk) 02:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nastin9286 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alok Chaudhary Sahuadih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope surely Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, merely promotional upload; no encyclopedic value. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of a new user
Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Almost for sure not own work of the uploader, most likely found somewhere on the Web, e.g.: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kNPhmflh46Y/UdjxZpKxplI/AAAAAAAABGo/YwQ9BnxqwvE/s400/Sevenes.jpg jdx Re: 10:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation, image credited to FARS news agency https://news.usni.org/2012/06/17/north-korean-connection. MKFI (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Found on Imgur, first upload there on September 14, 2017. Dispenser (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Found on Imgur, uploaded Jan 2014 with 852 views to date. Dispenser (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/braziliangeojournal/about/submissions Reproduction of images for non-commercial use is allowed IJReid (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No simple logo from Spain. OTRS permission needed by the faculty. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scottandassociates (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, unused photographs.
Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Nada 20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.illwriteit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/maxresdefault-650x448.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Available at http://leftysfoundation.com/media-2/, requires OTRS Ytoyoda (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: hoax flag of a hoax state (see en:w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultanate-e-uzma of Khora Seyal and en:w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial house of Khora Seyal). Related to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sultan Shah Jahan Bahadur.jpg. HyperGaruda (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mippzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logotype PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete {{PD-textlogo}}, yes... but it's an unused logo and therefore probably out of scope as not realistically educationally useful. Storkk (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Poorly named and unused potentially copyrighted file. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 21:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
SVG version available. Fry1989 eh? 20:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no locense at all. --JuTa 10:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google earth's images are copyrighted. 219.79.126.117 03:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fails COM:NUDITY.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and copyvios. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Furtado (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work by user with about a dozen problematic uploads. I tagged the files needing permission and fixed the licensing of the NASA and SDASM images. The files nominated here are left marked as "own work" although they likely come from space agencies or books.
Ariadacapo (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvios Files uploaded by Manikantanva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Maybe OK on WP under fair use but not here.
P.g.champion (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by John Roland Mew (talk · contribs)
[edit]Multiple photos tagged as own work, but most exist on Google search. Others are definitely not own work because of other obvious reasons, like depicting self promoting uploader as a child.
- File:John Mew with President of IAFGG.jpg
- File:The car I built and won with.jpg
- File:Success Brands 1962.jpg
- File:Prof John Mew.jpg
- File:My Lagonda 3 Litre 1933.jpg
- File:John Mew with children.jpg
- File:JM-Lotus22-Christmas.jpg
- File:JM B & W.jpg
- File:F1 CAR 1963.jpg
- File:1904 de Dion withBunny Clarke.jpg
- File:John Mew receives Award.jpg
- File:The Tropic Premise.jpg
- File:Prof. John Mew.jpg
- File:Johnmewprotest.jpg
- File:John Mew age 4.jpg
- File:John on bridge Horrabin.jpg
- File:Dr. John Mew cut out.png
- File:Braylsham Castle.webp
- File:JM in his house.jpg
- File:John and Mike Clinic.jpg
- File:John Mew On Bridge.tif
- File:Braylsham-Castle Sussex-UK.jpg
- File:Castle in summer, Sussex.jpg
- File:Sailing on a boat.jpg
- File:Professor John Mew.tif
~Cybularny Speak? 19:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Capture of a tv show. Definitively not under CC Rhadamante (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYVIO. But I can't find it anywhere online and it seems to be free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep It seems to be own work, indeed. No valid reason for deletion. --Regasterios (talk) 18:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The EXIF says it comes from Facebook. Yann (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It comes from facebook. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
wurde nicht vom Inhaber dieses Accounts angelegt Xocolatl (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Created accidentally, content moved to talk page. --Achim (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
unused, bad-quality upload of assumably personal files, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:2014-365-124 Musician in the Making (14105972112).jpg
- File:2015-365-177 Happy Kailey (19008694818).jpg
- File:4JpR5ZYmVGY.jpg
- File:Alan and Gryyzlo (3299056823).jpg
- File:Alan and Mickey (3296802).jpg
- File:Alli and Mickey (3296421).jpg
- File:Also found in going through some boxes was this photo of me and my Dad, taken at his home on Florida sometime in the late 1990s, judging from I am still sporting a pony tail. (3137550045).jpg
- File:Am I Michael Carlos Hughes? Ken Karger? Mohammed Parvez? Scott Douglas? (22328418744).jpg
- File:Baselseif.jpg
- File:Ben Gets Shelli's Approval (20992465764).jpg
- File:Ben Working the Twitter Stream (21615343255).jpg
- File:Car Free Day on Commercial Drive in Vancouver (7403767568).jpg
- File:ClovinhoMC.jpg
- File:Djasen Sleeping On The Way To Two Mango.jpg
- File:Dog on the Rails (8849730230).jpg
- File:Family Photo, Christmas 2003 (3297369).jpg
- File:H.W.L.N.S.jpg
- File:He is in the Anthropology of the Crowd course, and we talked to him today a bit about his course and part in the VCU Great Bice Race Book Project (20992508204).jpg
- File:He's Got Answers (21400315568).jpg
- File:If it wasn't for my nana & family.jpg
- File:It's the annual storytelling event in Pine, AZ (11023494913).jpg
- File:John and the Rock (4216434412).jpg
- File:Kerube Ortiz y su esposa Ana Iris Pérez.jpg
- File:Maggie Tells Me About the Mural Project (8749992766).jpg
- File:MegoYRN Picture.png
- File:Miles and Tomaso provide me the shot for today's Daily Create "Take a picture that represents or expresses something loud" (6820499863).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:NovA Ransom Loyal.jpg
- File:On Milford Beach (15171595488).jpg
- File:On the way towords fun collection.jpg
- File:One of the VCU Great Bike Race Books students, in the Crowdsource Journalism Course (21589083526).jpg
- File:Rusty ship on Lake Ontario, near Vineland (6890159214).jpg
- File:Shall I Eat it? (15435639782).jpg
- File:SonnyDavidson.jpg
- File:Technically my father's cousin and one of the most wonderful persons I know. (19162874952).jpg
- File:The Disheveled I Made It From Down There Look (16599691223).jpg
- File:The Flower Guy Is Pushing the Sale (17270793096).jpg
- File:The Hike Starts in an Aspen Forest (9050566793).jpg
- File:The Taco Hombre (17284089452).jpg
- File:Todd and Me - Let's Go! (17012201747).jpg
- File:Todd in Thought (6747207997).jpg
- File:Top of Buck Mountain (13455320455).jpg
- File:Tracy05-22.jpg
- File:Tuatara Welcome (15349847286).jpg
- File:Uwe Fills Up on Lunch- Cold Chicken (9052772816).jpg
- File:Vic Vote.jpg
- File:Why is this kid so happy? (2607207817).png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:Comedian and Songwriter Troynae George.jpg
- File:Eddy k.jpg
- File:Eddy kk.jpg
- File:Eddy korletey.jpg
- File:In-d.jpg
- File:NPS-NASA MJ-04272016-002 (26091804363).jpg
- File:NPS-NASA MJ-04272016-003 (26602919962).jpg
- File:SHEN-20070628093024 (5658578299).jpg
- File:Shreyas shringarpuree.jpg
- File:Shreyas Shringarpureee.jpg
- File:Shreyas01.jpg
- File:Sukhdev's photo.jpeg
- File:Wiki Prof.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Ultraman The Adventure Begins poster.jpg 42.113.156.213 17:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 02:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
All files are unused; seem like part of a series, however, images serve no purpose at present. Out of scope.
- File:2017 corgi ruby logo.png
- File:2017 Corgi Logo.png
- File:2017 In A Review.png
- File:TSA Icon.png
- File:TSA Waavegod Mascot.png
- File:VEX INSPECTIONS.jpg
- File:VEX CONES.jpg
- File:STATE TSA BHS.jpg
- File:State Leadership BHS TSA.jpg
- File:TSA BOard.jpg
- File:MR Board 2.jpg
- File:Anna PRES.jpg
- File:Ilene MAL.jpg
- File:Kevin MAL.jpg
- File:Ruby VICEPRES.jpg
- File:Quincy REPORTER.jpg
- File:Trung MAL.jpg
- File:Angel SAA.jpg
- File:Tanim TREASURER.jpg
- File:Kevin SECRETARY.jpg
- File:Nancy MAL.jpg
- File:TSA Board.jpg
- File:Bowling Social BHS TSA.jpg
- File:BOWLING TSA.jpg
- File:Steve TSA.jpg
- File:CORE MR Board.jpg
- File:Fluffy TSA.jpg
- File:TSA IG Fliers.jpg
- File:Anna TSA.jpg
- File:Ruby TSA.jpg
hiàn 01:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Same rationale as above.
hiàn 01:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, but a screenshot. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jurnalisna (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images have a source but there is no proof that the copyright holders have given COM:PERMISSION to have these images uploaded to Commons under their present license. To uploader: please follow procedures set out in COM:OTRS.
- File:Taman-gembok-cinta.jpg
- File:Rumah-hobbit-matama-new-zealand.jpg
- File:Souvenir1.jpg
- File:Kadaharannnn.jpg
- File:Farm House Susu Lembang Bandung.jpg
- File:Farm House.jpg
- File:Jeruk-Keprok.jpg
- File:Bawang dayak 4.jpg
- File:Babawan.jpg
- File:Cikaso.jpg
- File:Sukabumi1.jpg
- File:Labuh Saji.jpg
- File:Dogdog Lojor 2.jpg
- File:Cosmos caudatus - Ulam Raja.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 11:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jurnalisna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing COM:PERMISSION
Takeaway (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jurnalisna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing COM:PERMISSION
Takeaway (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darek.rybak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings, brochures, photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:PRZY FORTEPIANIE 1904, olej.jpg
- File:KOGUT 1913.jpg
- File:SARNA 1913.jpg
- File:DESZCZ 1910.jpg
- File:KOT 1910.jpg
- File:RYŚ I SARNA 1936.jpg
- File:KONIE W MORZU 1936.jpg
- File:POLOWANIE NA DZIKA Z PSAMI 1936.jpg
- File:SOWA W GNIEŹDZIE NA SKALE 1936.jpg
- File:STO LAT TEMU 1936.jpg
- File:DWOREK PRZY KSIĘŻYCU 1935.jpg
- File:KUROPATWY POD BRODŁEM 1935.jpg
- File:ODPOCZYNEK 1935.jpg
- File:KACZKA 1935.jpg
- File:O ŚWICIE W PUSZCZY 1932.jpg
- File:RYŚ NA DRZEWIE I WIEWIÓRKA 1932.jpg
- File:KOTEK 1930.jpg
- File:DWÓR W BRZEZIU 1929.jpg
- File:ZALOTY 1929.jpg
- File:KRAJOBRAZ ZIMOWY POD SŁOŃCE 1922.jpg
- File:WRÓBLE 1922.jpg
- File:JABŁOŃ 1916.jpg
- File:SARNY NAD WODĄ 1916.jpg
- File:DUMKA 1916.jpg
- File:ARAB BAKSZYSZ 1915.jpg
- File:POLOWANIE 1914.jpg
- File:POLOWANIE ROCOCO 1914.jpg
- File:POLOWANIE NA DZIKA 1914.jpg
- File:WIEWIÓRKI 1913.jpg
- File:MEWY 1912.jpg
- File:WIDOK Z NORMANDII 1912.jpg
- File:PIORUN 1912.jpg
- File:PODJAZD 1911.jpg
- File:KWITNĄCY STEP 1910.jpg
- File:ORKA O ZACHODZIE III 1905.jpg
- File:ORKA O ZACHODZIE II 1905.jpg
- File:ORKA O ZACHODZIE I 1905.jpg
- File:Warszawa - Zachęta - 1913 r.jpg
- File:Czas, Kurier Warszawski, 1911r.jpg
- File:KATALOG Zachęta 1911 Kwitnący step W.Kugler poz 136.pdf
- File:Słownik Artystów Polskich - Włodzimierz Kugler.jpg
- File:Włodzimierz Kugler ok. 1932.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darek.rybak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrights status of Polish stamps is unclear.
- File:Znaczek i obraz Wł. Kuglera -Sto lat temu- 2001 r.jpg
- File:Znaczek pocztowy 3+0,75 zł 2001 r.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. (Also we have another very similar one.) E4024 (talk) 08:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao at 08:14, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. (BTW the file is titled "Waterfall of Tortum" but we don't see it in the image.) E4024 (talk) 08:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Shizhao at 08:02, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Vinu Sujitha Michael (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images have a source but unclear if the uploaders has COM:PERMISSION to upload them to Commons under their present license. To uploader: please follow procedures set out in COM:OTRS.
Takeaway (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment Uploader has been warned and blocked before for uploading copyright violations and files missing permission. - Takeaway (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:56:05 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake Silaupura (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
photo of wrong person uploaded Silaupura (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:54:25 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
photo of wrong person uploaded Silaupura (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:55:11 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
photo of wrong person uploaded Silaupura (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Can be written as CH2=CCl-CH=CH2; no need for an image; unused Jahobr (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Can be written as CH2=C(CH3)-CH=CH2; no need for an image; unused Jahobr (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
logo. not own work. no permission Tomtom (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
logo, not own work by the uploader, no permission Tomtom (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Apparent copyvios Files uploaded by Edoardo Velo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non of these images are likely to be own work. Francesca Battista is an actress he performed with. Other image being a still from a film where he played along side [Marianne Sägebrecht. Uploads appear not to be for educational purposes but self promotion.
P.g.champion (talk) 15:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lesnik2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Gabriel Montenegro Gutiérrez.jpg
- File:Ricardo and Gabriel Montenegro Palomo.jpg
- File:Ricardo Montenegro 1992 Tratados de Paz.jpg
- File:Familia Montenegro Palomo.jpg
- File:Ricardo Montenegro Palomo - FECAMCO President 1992.jpg
- File:Familia Montenegro 1950s.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Descartes MONDOTE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work.
~Cybularny Speak? 20:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyvios Files uploaded by SemionKargashencev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Test uploads. Non of these images are likly to be own work. [4], Logo is unlikely to be own work. Золото means gold and is of no use on WC.
P.g.champion (talk) 20:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
3 montages uploaded by Anandkshitij (talk · contribs)
[edit]three montages missing links to images used from Wikimedia Commons, hence, potentially copyright issues ?
- File:Hampta Pass Bird Types 3.jpg
- File:Hampta Pass Bird Types 1.jpg
- File:Hampta Pass Bird Types 2.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Holy cards from Italy
[edit]No source information is provided. Thus, it's not possible to assert they're in the public domain (cc license is pointless)
Discasto talk 22:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Jean-Pierre Degas, missing permission. Authorization must be sent via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Jean-Pierre Degas, missing permission. Authorization must be sent via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Licence à vérifier : photo déjà publiée sur https://www.ecs-screening.ch/ (comité scientifique en bas de page ) Habertix (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas le problème. Il s'agit de la photo pro de Dominique Joubert Floch. Cette photo est effectivement utilisée sur le site ECS-screening comme photo de profil. Les données exif de cette photo atteste de son origine. Que souhaitez-vous exactement de notre part pour permettre à cette photo soit acceptée ? Dominiquejoubertfloch (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- L'image a été ré-uploadée après la suppression. Un ticket OTRS est en cours : ticket:2018030810009938. Zetud (talk) 17:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- The picture is overwritten on another image. If that one has a problem, please split and delete it. If not, split and add it to her category, which is red: Category:Dominique Joubert Floch. Merci. --E4024 (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- With "split" I'm referring to the previous file, not the collage, FYI. --E4024 (talk) 06:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: un ticket OTRS a été reçu et, s'il n'est pas confirmé, le fichier sera effacé dans un mois. Ruthven (msg) 09:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Test uploads. Non of these images are likly to be own work. [5], Logo is unlikely to be own work. Золото menas gold and is of no use on WC. P.g.champion (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley at 03:23, 24 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SemionKargashencev --Krdbot 07:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
According to EXIF data, photographer is not uploader. No permission. A.Savin 18:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. Nik Deleter (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very low quality and blurred, no educational value and unusable, numerous better images of Halifax available. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
From Facebook somewhere. Cutting and pasting the link doesn't bring any results anyway. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gareth as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: exceeds Australia's very low threshold of originality Yann (talk) 05:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Pd-text AMHA. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per D Y O L F 77. Ruthven (msg) 00:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There seem to be 2 problems with this image:
1)
|
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 14 February 2018 by the administrator or reviewer Well-Informed Optimist, who found that it was available on Flickr under the license Public Domain Mark, which is incompatible with Commons. It is unknown whether the license was valid when the image was uploaded to Commons. |
2) the depicted "Sanctuary Tree by Thomas Ossner" might be considered a project of art and therefore copyrighted. Regrettably there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in the US for such works (non-building). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
![08:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/02/15#c-Túrelio-2018-02-15T08:02:00.000Z-File:"Sanctuary_Tree"_by_Thomas_Ossner_was_installed_in_2014._(29334031806).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, image in public domain. --B dash (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete That's clearly sculpture and the US doesn't have FoP.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete FOP reason, as well as Well-Informed Optimist review of the image. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 00:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
![00:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/02/15#c-Ruthven-2018-02-28T00:10:00.000Z-File:"Sanctuary_Tree"_by_Thomas_Ossner_was_installed_in_2014._(29334031806).jpg){kind=link}
Image non libre car il s'agit d'un travail dérivé d'un fond de carte qui semble être celui de l'IGN français dont dont voici la version la plus récente. -- Habertix (talk) 08:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
One-time upload. Not used. Does anybody know him or just a personal file? E4024 (talk) 08:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced collage used on a WP user page. The user has not realized 10 edits in two years. E4024 (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
La personne concernée n'a pas donéne son autorisation pour l'utilisation libre de droit de cette photo, qui a été utilisée contre son gré. 86.65.13.122 10:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Ça reste à prouver. Écrire à COM:OTRS/fr. Ruthven (msg) 00:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File moved and replaced the file: Location_map_of_IonianIslands_(Greece).svg (because it was wrong) Nikospag (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
new upload Antoniovalenzuela (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
new upload Antoniovalenzuela (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 00:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 00:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
out of scope due to extreme blurryness. 2003:D2:1BD9:C022:FFB2:3AFF:E00B:1AE 19:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
unused thumbnail of doubtful eminence ? Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
il ne sagit pas du village de Corenne, mais du village voisin de Flavion 2A02:2788:8A4:A4:C57C:2CD3:C830:28A4 21:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Demander de renommer le fichier. Ruthven (msg) 00:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This map seems to be a copyvio, maybe from luxtram.lu. And by the way, it's an obsolete map. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:17, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs authorization via COM:OTRS. This photo was taken in 1964--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs authorization via COM:OTRS. This photo was taken in 1964--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs authorization via COM:OTRS. This photo was taken in 1965--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 00:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Unknown source, dead link 83.135.165.81 15:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- The link certainly worked when the image was uploaded. As far as I remember, the image was credited as US Army photo. Bukvoed (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfortunately without a license review at that time of upload, we can't keep it now. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Italy}}. Ruthven (msg) 00:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikly to be own work. Maybe OK on WP under fair use but not here. P.g.champion (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Da ist wohl beim Hochladen etwas schief gegangen? Lizenz ist zwar noch da, aber Quelle, Urheber und OTRS sind verschwunden... Gruss, --Markus (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- As the nominator, I ask admins to hang-fire before deleting this image. Apparently, an OTRS is in existence but something has gone wrong. These problems often takes more than 7 days to sort out. --P.g.champion (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- OTRS Freigabe drin. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Confirm that OTRS permission has been added to file. All it needs now is the description, source and author information to be added so that is is of use to other projects. P.g.champion (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Done - Can now be Kept : I gladly withdraw my nomination. --P.g.champion (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wieso hat dann das Bild immer noch einen Löschantrag? Gruss, --Markus (talk) 08:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- It is still nominated because we are all volunteers with only so many hours in the day free to do editing and I am extremely lazy. --P.g.champion (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wieso hat dann das Bild immer noch einen Löschantrag? Gruss, --Markus (talk) 08:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
We have many pictures of women and girls of all ages in bikinis. No need for a pic with the head of the person half cut. This is bad quality, therefore OoS, photography. Unused. E4024 (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Dear E4024, if the poor picture quality results due to the cut the model's head, You can change the photo for better quality. The original photo can be found at Regards Stan old (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
,
Deleted: Out of project scope. We do not keep uneducational personal images by non-notable photographers. And as E4042 wrote, we have already a lot of generic bikini images so there is no need for this particular one. --De728631 (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
This was National Geographic's Photo of the Day on 1 April 2015. Readers who submit photos selected for the Photo of the Day, such as this, retain the copyright to their photo per National Geographic policy. The link to some random Google user given by the uploader is not relevant. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of existing image SecretName101 (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate of File:Super Bowl LII pregame.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the image already exists on Wikimedia Commons - MECHELIN(1894) p247 SCIENCE AND ART.jpg Seauton (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:MECHELIN(1894) p247 SCIENCE AND ART.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
_p247_SCIENCE_AND_ART.jpg){kind=link}
File:Caribbean, the Caribbean Sea, more than 7,000 islands, islets, reefs, and cays - the West Indies (5887265192).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A blurred image, cannot see the object clearly 219.79.126.117 03:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Is the educational value around what they call "puntería" in Spanish? (Sorry my English is worse than my Spanish.) E4024 (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep no valid reason for deletion. Punteria means to aim in Spanish so very unsure of user E4024's comment. Educational value is the image of the vulvas, buttocks, feet, and toes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:94A7:7153:B02A:3C51:7A69:8A6B (talk • contribs)
Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.103.66 (talk • contribs)
- When you want to see a vulva pic you look into vulva pics, we have a cat for that, you don't look into the Category:Toes. I hope I'm clear enough. --E4024 (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep no valid reason for deletion. Image is correctly categorized as "vulvas", "female buttocks", and "toes". All three of which this image clearly shows. Tbolttrain
- Tbolttrain, two IPs were even faster than you in defending your pic. Good. --E4024 (talk) 08:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per foregoing. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ebrahim. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
N'apporte rien, c'est une photo personnelle. Thesupermat2 (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused image of a person whose notability does not look sound to me. I could not find it in internet but possibly not an "own work" either. E4024 (talk) 08:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Own work? Two of the pictures are found here and here with Ragnar Mikaelsson stated as photographer, and the third image is marked Per T. Nilsen - Multiconsult AS in lower right corner. No proof of uploaders own work or permission to release under this license. --Ooo86 (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Unlikly to be own work. Difficult to see how it can be usefull here nor eductional. Test upload perhaps. P.g.champion (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Per User:Jeff G. here it's not at all clear that this is an old image. GRuban (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- And it's not at all clear that this is not an old image. — Bukhari (Talk!)
- @BukhariSaeed: The onus is on you, the uploader, to ensure (among other things) that you show that any file you upload is legally allowed to be hosted in the U.S., including derivative works and commercial use, per COM:L. You have not done so in this case. Thus, this file must go. Why have you not done so for all your uploads? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I asked "where is the United States public domain tag to indicate why File:Our Lady of Laus.jpg is in the public domain in the United States?" and got no answer. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- I upload this image from this source. There nothing is mentioned about "©". We should use another Template (not PD-70) instead of deletion. — Bukhari (Talk!) 14:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- @BukhariSaeed: Since 1996, there is no longer a requirement for copyright registration formalities in countries which signed URAA, and copyright is retroactively assumed to exist for any work at creation or first publication (depending on jurisdiction). We don't need a "©" symbol, "Copyright", a year, "All Rights Reserved", or registration with a copyright office any more. Everything on the Internet is assumed to be copyrighted. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- sorry! i'm new here so i really do not about "PD-70" (sorry i was thinking it will be 70 years old image). You Joined 11 years ago, so you are older than me and experienced user and i am new here. I agree with you! Admins please delete this. Thanks — Bukhari (Talk!) 15:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- @BukhariSaeed: Thank you. Please read every template you use at least once. You are responsible for what you post and upload. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- sorry! i'm new here so i really do not about "PD-70" (sorry i was thinking it will be 70 years old image). You Joined 11 years ago, so you are older than me and experienced user and i am new here. I agree with you! Admins please delete this. Thanks — Bukhari (Talk!) 15:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- @BukhariSaeed: Since 1996, there is no longer a requirement for copyright registration formalities in countries which signed URAA, and copyright is retroactively assumed to exist for any work at creation or first publication (depending on jurisdiction). We don't need a "©" symbol, "Copyright", a year, "All Rights Reserved", or registration with a copyright office any more. Everything on the Internet is assumed to be copyrighted. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- keep it . no good reason for deletion .this site didn't mentioned any copy right on the pictures. http://www.catholictradition.org/ Maahmaah (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Maahmaah: Whether or not a site mentions copyright has been immaterial since 1996. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Maahmaah.
- @Maahmaah: She doesn't work here, please clean up after yourself. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Clear-case request. hiàn 01:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. A copyright notice is not necessary for a file to be in copyright. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Collage with no reference to the used sources. Possibly copyvio from research paper. Ruthven (msg) 14:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Several copyrighted logos here. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted: game screenshot (from: en:Vietcong_(video_game)) Vachovec1 (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Photo of a magazine, deriviative work. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Based on this user's other uploads and the lack of EXIF data, I doubt this is own work Elisfkc (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too unclear to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks likes a photo of TV screen showing a movie, which is probably not with CC license. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal file, but also personality and copyright issues, hence, ouf of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Promotional image with no chance of being useful for an educational purpose. hiàn 23:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Hystrix at 21:47, 6 März 2018 UTC: Uploaded files of a blocked user. To prevent harm from new tenant. - --Krdbot 01:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Hystrix at 21:47, 6 März 2018 UTC: Uploaded files of a blocked user. To prevent harm from new tenant. - --Krdbot 01:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
We have wonderful images of hair rollers, all alone and on women's heads. No need for exhibitionist files. (BTW I believe who upload these files to internet, and I'm not referring to Commons, might be people who take pictures without the consent of the women depicted. Do you think she has eyes at the back? This is in parentheses but something important if we wish to be a respected institution.) E4024 (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, Dear E4024, please, limit yourself action to the objective reasons for removal requests. Most of your speech is an expression of your personal views and is therefore highly subjective. I ask you for more NPOV. Regards Stan old (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Sir, I respectfully do not agree with you about "most of my speech", even in this one DR. I cherish NPOV as much as anyone else in Commons. I would appreciate if you avoid speaking about people at least while you yourself are doing what you rightly criticise. Having said that, as regards my words about internet uploads, indeed I was trying to protect you because I had only noticed that the file was not uploaded as an "own work", but from another site. Neither I felt the need to look at the original image nor my internet connection allows me to visit every site. Therefore there has been a misunderstanding -on my part- about the original source of the image and I'm sincerely sorry about that. As a sign of apology, I will not DR any other files uploaded by you, for a reasonable time. In respect to this file, I see that you have not pronounced any pro-keep arguments. For me it's a sure-to-delete item. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 07:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Dear E4024. The fact that we do not agree in this particular case does not mean that I do not respect your opinion. I do not consider this to be a manifestation of your hostility towards me. I know that your actions are dictated by the concern for the quality of the Wikimedia. Each of us has spoken about this photo and now let the Wikimedia Community decide. I wish You a nice weekend and best regards Stan old (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Sir, I respectfully do not agree with you about "most of my speech", even in this one DR. I cherish NPOV as much as anyone else in Commons. I would appreciate if you avoid speaking about people at least while you yourself are doing what you rightly criticise. Having said that, as regards my words about internet uploads, indeed I was trying to protect you because I had only noticed that the file was not uploaded as an "own work", but from another site. Neither I felt the need to look at the original image nor my internet connection allows me to visit every site. Therefore there has been a misunderstanding -on my part- about the original source of the image and I'm sincerely sorry about that. As a sign of apology, I will not DR any other files uploaded by you, for a reasonable time. In respect to this file, I see that you have not pronounced any pro-keep arguments. For me it's a sure-to-delete item. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 07:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. (Embarrassing) personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Suggestion Stan_old, please every time you upload/import an image think "If I were writing a Wikipedia article, how would I utilise this image?" Or "If I were writing a book on this subject, how could I implement this image?" If the answer is "I can't" then the image is out of scope, believe me I want to say Keep but you have to demonstrate how this image could be educational and that there is no better alternative available. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - with two votes to delete and one vote to keep (with no reason given to keep the image, just an argument with the nominator) I believe consensus is to delete the image. --Nick (talk) 11:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Hanbury died in 1907 (born 1832). Another version of this same photograph was published in Hortus Mortolensis by Alwin Berger (London, West, Newman & Co, 1912). Photographer unknown; photo probably taken in the 1880s or 1890s. No copyright violation. Vysotsky (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- As you know, the date of death of the depicted person is irrelevant. No indication at all that the photographer would have been unknown at the time. Jcb (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Of course I know that the date of death of the depicted person is irrelevant. But that date indicates the date the photograph was taken: way before 1900. So: unknown photographer, photo taken years before 1900, in the UK. Moreover: photo published in 1912. Stop wasting precious time. Read the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 instead. Vysotsky (talk) 14:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Person looks old at the foto, you provided no information why the picture could not have been taken e.g. in 1905. Jcb (talk) 14:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Of course I know that the date of death of the depicted person is irrelevant. But that date indicates the date the photograph was taken: way before 1900. So: unknown photographer, photo taken years before 1900, in the UK. Moreover: photo published in 1912. Stop wasting precious time. Read the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 instead. Vysotsky (talk) 14:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- As you know, the date of death of the depicted person is irrelevant. No indication at all that the photographer would have been unknown at the time. Jcb (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
You are just hair-splitting. His hair is partly black, more like hair of a 50 year old than of a 73-year old. (Hanbury was born in 1832!) But seriously: you really don't seem to listen to my arguments or understand UK copyright law. Please read UK law 12.3.b.:
- If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires— (a) at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work was made, or (b) if during that period the work is made available to the public, at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which it is first so made available.
The work was published and thus made available to the public in 1912. I rest my case. Vysotsky (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- See the second sentence of my 12:43, 20 February 2018 response. Please don't run in circles. Jcb (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- That second sentence is of no importance whatsoever: UK copyright law is leading (and because pre-1923: US copyright is no problem). Vysotsky (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- You cite from the UK law: "If the work is of unknown authorship" and I draw your attention to the fact that you did not provide any evidence that this would be a "work of unknown authorship". Is it a problem with your understanding of English maybe? Jcb (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I like your Dutch courage, but you don't seem to have read UK copyright laws. Please look at the facts: unknown author, UK law applicable. Copyright of this photograph expired in 1982. Vysotsky (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Like I said, please don't run in circles. Jcb (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- I like your Dutch courage, but you don't seem to have read UK copyright laws. Please look at the facts: unknown author, UK law applicable. Copyright of this photograph expired in 1982. Vysotsky (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- You cite from the UK law: "If the work is of unknown authorship" and I draw your attention to the fact that you did not provide any evidence that this would be a "work of unknown authorship". Is it a problem with your understanding of English maybe? Jcb (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- That second sentence is of no importance whatsoever: UK copyright law is leading (and because pre-1923: US copyright is no problem). Vysotsky (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Better running in the right circles than barking up the wrong tree: your only remaining argument ("No indication at all that the photographer would have been unknown at the time") is out of scope. The photographer is unknown (then and now) - so UK copyright law 12.3.b. is applicable. Vysotsky (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Repeating your claim over and over again without providing evidence is pointless. Jcb (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not per nomination but because it was a horrible quality copy of File:Thomas Hanbury from Hortus Mortolensis 1912.jpg. The entire discussion is moot, anyone could have looked up Thomas Hanbury's en:wiki page and found the better quality image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 22:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Based on this user's other uploads and the lack of EXIF data, I doubt this is own work Elisfkc (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong PD-1996 : image from Italian private collection, missing permission, authorization via COM:OTRS needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think no needs for this photo authorization via COM:OTRS--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Department of Energy - Mound Plant - Electronics Laboratory Building.jpg Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Logo déjà présent sur Wikipédia Fr JessydeVilly (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The oficcial site of the company to which the logo belongs informs you that "all rights are reserved" in your footer. Leon saudanha (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 21:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
File:La_dieta_de_la_alcachofa.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=287268923 Yoelmorillo (talk) 06:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- What is the reasoning for deletion? Who made the collage, yourself? --E4024 (talk) 09:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Achim (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image taken from the subject's social media account. Mark the train (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I took that image to create his Wikipedia profile. I didn't uploaded it as my own work. Please consider this and keep that image undeleted. Jithinrajtk (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The image belongs to the original photographer and you can't use it here without their permission, irrespective of credits or attribution. Mark the train (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Achim (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
CopyVio from varoius sources Xgeorg (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Please also delete all other files from Special:Contributions/Matth3w303 --Xgeorg (talk) 15:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Achim (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leyo as no permission (No permission since).
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as this file was transferred from :de. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment: This image is obviously a scan of page 7 of a precursor version of the "HORSE TRUCKS" catalogue of the German company Böckmann. Its current version is available under: http://images.boeckmann.com/im/pdf/pboxx-pixelboxx-16156/datei.pdf
The website's current impressum[6] states "Downloads und Kopien dieser Seite sind nur für den privaten, nicht kommerziellen Gebrauch gestattet.", which might be interpreted as allowing personal use, but exclude commercial use. Thereby, the material is not allowed on Commons.
The initial upload of this file on :de under a CC-by-sa 3.0/de license might result from an misunderstanding by the uploader thinking that his scan was his own work, when it actually was simply a copy (or a derivative) of someone'e elses work. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
The same problem with File:Boeckmann Stellung diagonal.jpg, which is a copy of page 6 of a precursor version of the above linked pdf. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment: The Böckmann Fahrzeugwerke GmbH provided the catalogue pages to illustrate the atricle and allowed to use it under the rules of Wikipedia commons. --Horseexperts (talk) 23:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- COM:ET/de#ERI is probably needed. --Leyo 23:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination as copyvio/no permission. --Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of the same file without margins ("jpg") Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Delete Taken from this location with no indication this is released under a license compatible with Commons nor any evidence this is the work of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
A common photo of the president of Ecuador. It is on millions of websites by now, so it is hard to track down the original author and copyright holder. This website, for instance, just says "Foto: Archivo." To keep it we would need the original information about the photo and to make sure it has a usable license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
_(4954228764).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4954228764).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request deletion: Single frame from the video, no educational value. B dash (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Image from this video, probably not free Shev123 (talk) 11:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. In the footer of this site, of the company to which the logo belongs, there is a notice stating that all rights reserved. Leon saudanha (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong OGL-C template, © Senate of Canada, commercial use forbidden (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong OGL-C template, © Senate of Canada, commercial use forbidden (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong OGL-C template, © Senate of Canada, commercial use forbidden (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong OGL-C template, © Senate of Canada, commercial use forbidden (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wrong OGL-C template, © Senate of Canada, commercial use forbidden (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Statue is a copyright-protected artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
![13:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/02/15#c-SecretName101-2018-02-15T13:56:00.000Z-File:Under_"The_Bean"_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
![01:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/02/15#c-Ronhjones-2018-03-19T01:42:00.000Z-File:Under_"The_Bean"_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 79.55.175.100 as Copyvio (Copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: delete personality rights violation privacy
the file is used in a lot of pages Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept - Troll nomination by an IP. --Denniss (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- User never made any edit other than uploading this picture, so we have no way to verify this is her.
- User first registered for eswiki, but their first (and only) action is uploading an image, which is odd.
- "Ameily" appears to be a really rare name. Made up? Unique?
- Only 157 people in Mexico carry the surname "Radke". Assuming half of those are male, we have already narrowed this down to less than 100 people just by country and surname!
- How do I know she's from Mexico? I will tell you my dear vato.
Description: "esto se trata de que diga wikipedia que soy vato :D" Automatic translation: "This is about me saying Wikipedia that I'm vato" (probably comes down to "This is me telling Wikipedia I'm vato")
vato: "Ámbito: México, Sinónimos: tío (España), hombre, amigo" (scope: Mexico, synonym for friend)
But I suspect she wasn't announcing her friendship towards us..
vato: "This term may be used with intimate friends or as a derogatory reference. In some contexts, the term has gang connotations. The feminine form, vata, is also used by Chicano prostitutes to refer to a female who owes them money. Sentence usage: The vato Harry Gonzalez is an idiot!"
"Hello Wikipedia, I am an idiot! :D Was signed, Ameily Radke" - Alexis Jazz 14:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete due to File:Ameily radke es vato!!.jpg (hist • logs • abuse log). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I understand, even though there are other photos like it on Wikimedia Commons.--Rockclaw1030 (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
World map without educational value or purpose, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
World map without educational value or purpose, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Account is named after subject of image, likely Flickr washing Elisfkc (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Support --Mehman 97 17:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in the United States for artwork Elisfkc (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Past the point of simple geometry Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Past the point of simple geometry Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Previously published photo, available at higher res at http://leftysfoundation.com/. At the very least needs an OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This picture are from Rapid Penang and not useful as now Rapid Penang use new coding system *angys* (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
lack of source and reference Sourenaaa (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
That stained-glass window in a German building (church most likely) is from 1945 at the earliest (referenced in the inscription), and it is signed as Glasmalerei P. Meysen Heidelberg. That company seems to still exist. So the artwork is most likely still protected by copyright because the artist is not yet dead for at least 70 years. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. So the file will have to be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless it is shown that the author of the artwork died at least 70 years ago or has given permission to upload to Commons under the CC license chosen. Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wenn es helfen kann, könnt ihr die CC Lizenz in eine passende ändern!? hehü 07:59, 27 Februar 2018 (UTC)
- Es gibt keine passende Lizenz. Was man bräuchte, ist eine Freigabe des Urhebers (des Glasfensters, also des Künstlers) bzw. eines Rechteinhabers, s. COM:OTRS/de. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
The image was taken from the link in the description, but it was posted to that website by someone other than the original artist, who has his work here and appears to copyright it. There is no indication that the re-poster has the rights to the image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
{{Vd}} per COM:PCP.— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
> Hello, I am Tim Morris AKA Pristichampsus. The Ergilornis drawing was commissioned by Mullerornis AKA Carlos Miguel the original poster of the image, he owns the rights to the image because the commission was done for him, fully paid, with the intention of putting it on wikipedia to improve the page. He has my permission to use it, and he basically has the rights to it if he wishes, so please do not take it down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.188.204 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, you have to prove the free CC licence by sending an email as described here:[7] FunkMonk (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- See Ticket #2018021610001815. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 01:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- I accepted the permissions statement.--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- See Ticket #2018021610001815. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 01:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Sphilbrick. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission confirmed. --Sealle (talk) 10:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
blason is wrong color MairieSLR (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Sealle (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Le sujet photographié n'est-il pas mineur ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The only question is : "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:COSTUME. This cosplay does respect Commons:Project scope, and is one of the main characters of a major video game : en:Chrono Trigger. This file is aslo used on Wikipedia in french. --Archimëa (talk) 13:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As Archimëa. Kigsz (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The alone answer for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg (Archimëa and Kigsz) is « COM:COSTUME ».
According to this element the answer is: “no valid reason for deletion”. Sealle 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
But there is only one question: "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?"
So the discussion did not take place.
Could you make it happen?
Thanks
PS I have already spoken to Sealle : [8] Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:COSTUME. Aas said User:De728631
[9], the age is not a problem as long as the girl is not a small child. The file does not depict any sexuality too. --Archimëa (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Chrono_cosplay_10.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete because in my opinion, this subject is really very young - maybe he is a child. It is impossible to say that he is over the age of legal majority. --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- 6PO, not he but she. Smiling young girl; must not be a problem. (BTW sorry for reverting you by mistake earlier. :) --E4024 (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - There's nothing sexual image with this image, It's just someone in a costume ? .... As we have Category:Children I'm not seeing any sort of valid reason for deletion........ –Davey2010Talk 15:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- –Davey2010, there is just ONE question "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" She or he is not a problem. You don't answer. --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- @User:6PO : I'm sorry, but when will you stop this en:cabal ? --Archimëa (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority? - Well that depends on where the image was taken and it depends on her date of birth doesn't it? .... both of which we cannot prove ..... –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- When we are not sure of something, we use the precautionary principle. Don't we? --E4024 (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- –Davey2010, there is just ONE question "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" She or he is not a problem. You don't answer. --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Archimëa and De728631, I see no reason for deletion. In my opinion it is very nice photo of a smiling girl in a costume. I see nothig wrong in it. Electron ツ ➧☎ 13:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: User:6PO has given no valid reason for deletion, only asking if the person is a minor or not. Even if she is, so what?. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Le sujet photographié est-il majeur ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The only question is : "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hello 6PO, this is a cosplayer that has dressed up as the character Ayla from the video game Chrono Trigger. It is a relevant photograph and I do not see any reason to delete it. --Kigsz (talk) 13:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:COSTUME. This cosplay does respect Commons:Project scope, and is one of the main characters of a major video game : en:Chrono Trigger. This file is aslo used on Wikipedia in french.
Kigsz : See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg , wich is in my opinion a deletion request really not revelant. --Archimëa (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
The alone answer for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg and File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg. (Archimëa and Kigsz) is « COM:COSTUME ».
According to this element the answer is: “no valid reason for deletion”. Sealle 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
But there is only one question: "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?"
So the discussion did not take place.
Could you make it happen?
Thanks
PS I have already spoken to Sealle : [10] Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- I understand COM:COSTUME is about the copyrights of costumes. The DR-opener, I imagine, is more concerned about personality rights of non-adults. Commons:Child protection makes an open reference to "obscene" images; IMHO, if this girl is under-age (-18 where I write from) "deletion" is justified. I cannot say the same for the other DR though. --E4024 (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:COSTUME. Aas said User:De728631 [11], the age is not a problem as long as the girl is not a small child. The file does not depict any sexuality too. --Archimëa (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Personality rights: "A child or a person judged incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction should be considered with even greater care, as they probably cannot give valid consent even if they appear to." + Identifiability. --E4024 (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- E4024 : How can you confirm this girl is a "A child or a person judged incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction" ? --Archimëa (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- "Identifiability" is more than enough. (If you mind going to the policy page you can also have a look at where it talks about "smiling". :) --E4024 (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Archimëa, I see no reason to deletion. Electron ツ ➧☎ 15:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I do not see any reason for deletion. --Kigsz (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Question to User:Archimëa: What do you mean when you say "The file does not depict any sexuality too." You mean no depicted sexual relations? Obscenity is "only" that for you? Have you had a look at our files in Category:Nude or partially nude females and their so many subcats? I am not referring to a small girl making ballet or in a swimming course; here we have an underage adolescent exposing her body more than generously. This hurts personality rights; hers and the parents'; because she is an identifiable person and not in legal age yet to decide what to do with her body. "My body my decision" is valid after certain age. --E4024 (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - The woman looks to be in her 20s tho ? .... Ofcourse if she was or looked like a child then this would've been speedied years ago, If I were to guess I'd say she was 25-28 somewhere there ..... So the whole child thing doesn't even come in to it for me. –Davey2010Talk 11:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here, I added upstairs a picture of Sophia Loren when she was 17; if you think she was an exception, or that 17 is the top age before 18, you can have a look at the girls in Category:16-year-old human females, the first individual file in there at this moment would be more than enough to change your mind, Davey. Best. --E4024 (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yet again the image you link doesn't like a 17yo (My guess would've been 20 tops), I personally see the DR image as a woman in a costume pulling sort of a tiger pose ..... If proof came to light that she was a child/teenager (ie she's not 25-28) then I (like anyone on this project) would without a shadow of a doubt endorse deletion and would do everything in my power to have it deleted but as I said I'm simply seeing an adult in a costume .... and I'll also say that if she was 25 but looked under 18 then again it would be a delete from myself and I'd imagine others.... –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- When we are not sure of something, we use the precautionary principle. Don't we? --E4024 (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yet again the image you link doesn't like a 17yo (My guess would've been 20 tops), I personally see the DR image as a woman in a costume pulling sort of a tiger pose ..... If proof came to light that she was a child/teenager (ie she's not 25-28) then I (like anyone on this project) would without a shadow of a doubt endorse deletion and would do everything in my power to have it deleted but as I said I'm simply seeing an adult in a costume .... and I'll also say that if she was 25 but looked under 18 then again it would be a delete from myself and I'd imagine others.... –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here, I added upstairs a picture of Sophia Loren when she was 17; if you think she was an exception, or that 17 is the top age before 18, you can have a look at the girls in Category:16-year-old human females, the first individual file in there at this moment would be more than enough to change your mind, Davey. Best. --E4024 (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: consensus is to keep. It's my opinion also that she is a (young) adult. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
This license is not correct, parlaiment.uk states: "All photographs of individual MPs and Peers on the biographical pages and Committee pages are the exclusive property of Dods and are protected under international copyright laws. The photographs may not be reproduced, copied, stored or manipulated in any form without the written permission of Dods unless for non-commercial purposes, provided permission is sought beforehand and the photo is credited." (https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/use-of-parliamentary-photographic-images/) Vätte (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Adding File:Baroness mobarik.jpg to this discussion as well. George Ho (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
By the way, I emailed the copyright holder about this and am awaiting response. George Ho (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Allowed under [12] JimmyJoe87 (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- @JimmyJoe87: In what way is this photo of an individual MP expressly made available under Open Government License? The above information from parlaiment.uk (where the picture is taken from) states something completely different. //Vätte (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- It also states on this page that OGL "does not cover material published by Parliament as this is licensed under Parliamentary Copyright rather than Crown Copyright".
- Also adding File:Alan Brown MP.jpg and File:IanBlackfordMP.jpg to this discussion. //Vätte (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note to Closing Admin: this file is also on Wikipedia, uploaded a month after the one on Commons. File:BaronessmobarikMEP.jpg as well. Corky 03:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Similar for File:EleanorlaingMP.jpg Keith D (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Which has just been deleted. Keith D (talk) 12:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Similar for File:EleanorlaingMP.jpg Keith D (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably copyrighted toy. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No data EXIF, use for promotion in Wikipedia (Portuguese and Spanish). Gastón Cuello (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
No permission from Danielle Menuhin. Not eligible for {{Grandfathered}}, because there is no quote of a permission. Jcb (talk) 22:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Soy el creador del archivo y quiero que este sea eliminado. Franar8 (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, uploader requested deletion. --Sealle (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
3rd upload, to delete as per File:Kannur District Tourist Map.png respectively User talk:Arogon05, or not ?? Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I made this map on my own. I can show the process I followed to make it in illustrator. I used google maps as a ref for tracing the map I created. I did not edit an existing map. I had made this as part of my academic module. I also intend to make similar maps for all districts for the state of Kerala, India.
These are the process steps in creating the map. I hope this proves that I have created the map myself. Please follow the link for image showing the process of making it
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17se2pMZCqYWvsUyeVh6Sbahj3DW5bDEy/view?usp=sharing
- {moved from my talk, as started here, quotation start:}
- == Wrongful nomination of of file for deletion. == == File:Kannur Tourist Map.png == {Autotranslate|1=File:Kannur Tourist Map.png|2=|3=|base=Idw}} You had nominated the above file for deletion. I'm new to wiki. So I couldn't disprove the deletion request for the earlier post. But this is an updated version of the same map which I have made without infringing on any copyrighted content.
I made this map on my own. I can show the process I followed to make it in illustrator. I used google maps as a ref for tracing the map I created. I did not edit an existing map. I had made this as part of my academic module. I also intend to make similar maps for all districts for the state of Kerala, India.
These are the process steps in creating the map. I hope this proves that I have created the map myself. Please follow the link for image showing the process of making it
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17se2pMZCqYWvsUyeVh6Sbahj3DW5bDEy/view?usp=sharing
User:Arogon05 - {quotation end} Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Tracing a copyrighted map does not lose the original copyright. It needs to be traced from a free base map. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ronhjones. --Sealle (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of File:Horse shoe Falls Alberta Canada (33367088094)-video.webm, known issue with Flickr2Commons Elisfkc (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: just because it's a screenshot of a video file that has a proper and acceptable license is not a good reason to delete, ever if there is a Flickr2commons upload problem. Just give it the good review it warrants. Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This is a simple map outline. Per COM:DW: Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable.. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Renominating after consulting with closing admin. Apparently closing admin is unfamiliar with the complexity of en:map projection. This image is not 'simple facts'. Maps are copyrighted. The earth is more or less spherical, while maps are flat. Map makers have to make several choices to bring the advantages and disadvantages of several approaches (e.g. constant angle, constant distance) in a balance, so that the combination of those factors leads to a map that is the most suitable for a certain purpose. A map like this one is really not something you draw on a rainy afternoon. Jcb (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Means and methods of map making are not the issue. DW are based on the final result. Suppose this map was indeed based on a non-free image and we asked the author to redo it based on File:BlankMap-World-large.png, it would look exactly the same! So this is a simple map outline, showing nothing proprietary. As per COM:DW: The factual information, such as boundary lines and locations of landmarks, is supposedly unprotected. Moreover, the colors and look clearly match many other Commons maps, such as File:BlankMap-World-large.png, which means that this base map is already free. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- (As I already told you before) this is definitely not true for suchs maps, there is big variety of possibilities and there are many different results possible. See also en:Map projection. Jcb (talk) 11:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is pointless. The base map is already free, as I said above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- You claimed that the base map would be free, but you did not found this claim with any source/authorship information. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is pointless. The base map is already free, as I said above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- (As I already told you before) this is definitely not true for suchs maps, there is big variety of possibilities and there are many different results possible. See also en:Map projection. Jcb (talk) 11:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Both users are advised that this file was clearly derived from the same base map used almost everywhere on here, which could have been determined with minimal effort. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
No metadata, google search shows https://twitter.com/hashtag/liberenascarano as source Jamez42 (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Children, hence personality right isusses, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- This picture was taken when the students were rallying to promote book reading in Vijayawada. Its a public event. Its used in the event page too. --రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 09:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: There is no prohibition of images of children, especially when photographed in a public place with no reasonable expectation of privacy. This image is in fact in use, and thus in scope. --Эlcobbola talk 22:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
_(32877224893).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(32877224893).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
your opinions are asked : unused flickr upload of personal files, personality right isusses, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unused image of non-notable person(s). --Эlcobbola talk 22:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)