Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/12/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 8th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est le Chateau de Mille à Apt, pas le Chateau de la Canorgue. 188.63.28.206 04:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Il s'agit bien du château la Canorgue, au début du XXème siècle. Cela m'a été confirmé par le propriétaire du château, Jean-Pierre Margan. Cela rien a voir avec la famille Pinatel ! Tu aurais pu me poser la question avant de lancer la procédure de suppression. Marianne Casamance (talk) 07:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we don’t delete images if the title and/or description is wrong. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; possibly intended to be used for promotional purposes theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation and spam. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ggtgregrtge 188.26.106.128 10:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 10:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non trival logo design, not own work as claimed, Equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free wLFile:YokohamaWCH2018.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Non trival logo design, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:HamamatsuWCH2018.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Non-trival logo design , Non-free at English Wikipedia w:File:OsakaWCH2018.png. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Non-trival logo design, Non-free at English Wikipedia w:File:KobeWCH2018.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Non-trival logo design, Non-free at English Wikipedia w:File:NagoyaWCH2018.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Non-trival logo design, Equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:SapporoWCH2018.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work, appears to be a third party logo/flyer design. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 11:21, 8 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 13:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ne convient pas avec la religion islamic 197.1.117.121 16:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • How do you like File:Siyah Qalem - Hazine 2153, s.33a.jpg for instance? We cannot delete files for subjective arguments not written in the Commons guidelines. If an image has been created four centuries ago, it has been created; now, whether it complies with religious concepts or not is an important issue that has to be kept and dealt out of this place. --E4024 (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is absolutely no reason to delete this file. --Lebob 18:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Kept according to established policies and overwhelming established consensus, Commons is not censored based on your religious beliefs. Please refer to en:Talk:Muhammad/FAQ, File talk:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mohammed kaaba 1315 bew.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mohammed kaaba 1315.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mahomet.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Muhammad 1514.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mcrop.JPG (concerning the same file), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed kaaba 1315.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed by Hlkolaya.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg (2nd nomination), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beheading Prophet Muhammad. Muhammads cousin.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burning.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:An angel presenting Mohammed with a town.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Splits the Moon.jpg for example. At this point, endlessly nominating these images without the slightest attempt at bringing any new arguments whatsoever to the table is purely disruptive. If you are offended by depictions of Muslim characters created by Muslim artists, don't look at depictions of Muslim characters created by Muslim artists. Speedy non-admin closure, because there is plenty of precedent here. LX (talk, contribs) 18:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image represents a lack of respect for the Muslim community and especially for the person represented (Muhammad). This is an offence to Muslim, We therefore ask for this image to be deleted as soon as possible. Thank you in advance. 2A01:CB1D:8CD6:1700:593E:DA7C:1E01:8476 12:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non administrator closure) Slam dunk per previous several closures linked above. How can you (or several yous?) claim to speak in name of "the Muslim community"? If it offends you ("offence to Muslim"), dont look at it but dont try to impose your religious convictions on other people, be it muslims or non-muslims or claim to a enourmous and heterogeneous group. In fact this is a ottoman copy of an original iranian copy, clearly muslim countries then and now. Tm (talk) 13:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensive to Muslims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost of Kiev (talk • contribs) 19:46, 15 November 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: (non administrator closure) per previous sections.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

our prophet SHOULDN'T be illustrated !!!! 31.33.138.9 01:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see the requests above. --Wutsje 03:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

qrulufmfjrdtrmudmiyhtudmmdgulfmgududgrssusrtmidttdipdrrzzrutkdimtrusrvvuldtudrdtuixtmfiptidttdtitiditdcihiggiyfiffyouiddu4rddôtimtdmdgiifyfpdpyiffyffifyihxygtroysupddtdtpdtudptpuddttteorudorudrrljfwougwgouxoxgupxihpigg 196.71.82.190 16:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion;vandalism. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover-art, Equivalent media at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:BasedonaTRUStory.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover-art, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Eminem Revival.png and definitely not own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work, Album cover art- Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the 1911 original but, a 1939 revison for which a renewal record was found (R404916) - https://exhibits.stanford.edu/copyrightrenewals/catalog?utf8=%E2%9C%93&forward=home&exhibit_id=copyrightrenewals&search_field=search&q=Handbook+Of+Nature+Study ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • It would seem this is a revised edition of the original made by the publisher, it includes a publishers foreword, new images and some textual alterations. As above, the copyright was renewed and won't expire for some years yet. The Internet Archive marks it as "1911", but the copyright page in this work says otherwise. Clearly the IA made an error, it was uploaded by a user new to these things, easy error to make, etc. Arthur Kerensa (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "Copyright 1939 by Comstock Publishing Company Inc." on page 7, renewed as per OP. Thus, according to US copyright, it is copyrighted for another 95 years (undelete on 2035). --Platonides (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation of http://www.wiltshirelife.co.uk/general/news-from-around-the-county-wiltshire, which shows it isn't even a photo of what the title here says it is. Largoplazo (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:35, 9 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: Source shows clear copyright violation: http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/15579505.Monster_of_a_discovery/ --Krdbot 07:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like a clear copyright violation. --JuTa 03:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was simply a test RCastilla (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:8rtgfdgfdg.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ibrahimibrahimov.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file Mary142974 (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, this request was made by INeverCry who will obviously continue making these deletionist requests until Wikimedia Commons as a community decides that these deletion requests are unacceptable. If a user in the same circumstances as INeverCry would upload a file 📁 the file would instantly get nuked, but for some reason deletion requests are acceptable while Russavia’s content additions get deleted on sight. No double standards, and if a legitimate user would want this file 📁 to get deleted they could request deletion themselves but after everything INeverCry has done this shouldn't be acceptable. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 13:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see educational value. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joel Campbell VR.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+DW issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Playgirl model (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Mary142974 (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is John Brooks a Chicago Bulls player or something? If not, this is an OoS personal file and should better be deleted. --E4024 (talk) 07:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator is a well-known deletionist troll, they've deleted thousands of useful education images over the years claiming them as "personal files", this DR should be rejected on the nominator alone. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 13:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, this request was made by INeverCry who will obviously continue making these deletionist requests until Wikimedia Commons as a community decides that these deletion requests are unacceptable. If a user in the same circumstances as INeverCry would upload a file 📁 the file would instantly get nuked, but for some reason deletion requests are acceptable while Russavia’s content additions get deleted on sight. No double standards, and if a legitimate user would want this file 📁 to get deleted they could request deletion themselves but after everything INeverCry has done this shouldn't be acceptable. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 13:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no Chicago Bulls in en:John Brooks. Unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal image that is of no educational use. Gabriella Ruiz-Campos (talk) 07:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, this request was started by banned troll INeverCry/Daphne Lantier who should be denied recognition. How long should Wikimedia Commons dance to their heels? If a legitimate user would want to nominate this file 📁 for deletion they could, but INeverCry/Daphne Lantier has deleted just as much DR’s started by Russavia solely based on the reason that he was banned, so why make an exception here? Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Mary142974 (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In scope. But copyvio: http://jamthehype.com/john-givez-writes-letter-to-christian-hip-hop-speaks-on-his-motives/ Ankry (talk) 10:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio: speedy. --Ankry (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Mary142974 (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know him? Uploaded by a one-time visitor with the same name as the subject. If nobody knows who he is we should simply delete their unused personal image and end the saga (third DR) of this OoS pic. Do you agree with me? --E4024 (talk) 06:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's not a personal picture as such. John Hwang seems to be a tech entrepreneur type of medium note, insufficient for an article on the English Wikipedia at this time but not of inconsequence. Perhaps he will have one eventually? Arthur Kerensa (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status in the US is unclear: Was this work in the public domain on the date of restoration for Lebanon (1 Jan 1996)? 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: Then, Can you tell me why we are keeping this template in the Commons while we can't use it? you are saying we have use it for a file just when it's in public domain in both country (where published, and the U.S)? --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 02:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rafic.Mufid: Hi. For files to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, they should be either freely licensed or in the public domain in both the country of origin (Lebanon in this case) and the United States (where Wikimedia servers are hosted). Since the US copyright law does not follow the rule of the shorter term, a work may fall in the public domain in the country of origin, but still be protected in the US. I suppose the cover of this magazine is protected by the US copyright law until at least 1 January 2036.
And regarding Template:PD-Lebanon, if you look at the bottom of the template, you will see the following caution: "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States". 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@4nn1l2: I saw that before, but i was reading " must also" as "... better to be...". but now you saying it clearly, so we should make a list from my uploadings, because i uploaded many pictures based on just passed 50 years. What kind of rule is this! NO! --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 06:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, all files in Category:Al Chabaka covers + File:Jacqueline on a magazine cover, issue 288, 28 May 1965.jpg should be deleted in my opinion. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've submitted a DR for the remaining Al Chabaka files here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Al Chabaka covers. --bjh21 (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we don't do URAA deletions, see here. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nowhere in the source does it say the file is under CC BY 4.0 Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 03:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; looks like a personal photo theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 03:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 00:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination--miya (talk) 04:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 04:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 00:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, bad format Apocheir (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from google images 191.85.53.75 02:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 02:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry and bad quality, not free frames, enough excellent files: File:Lucas Cranach the Elder - Portrait of Johann the Steadfast - Google Art Project.jpg File:Lucas Cranach the Elder - Portrait of Johann the Steadfast 1509.jpg File:Lucas Cranach the Elder - Portrait of Johann Friedrich the Magnanimous - Google Art Project.jpg File:Lucas Cranach the Elder - Portrait of Johann Friedrich the Magnanimous.jpg lacking description and categorization Oursana (talk) 03:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of unfree content. A.Savin 04:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ru: Там только, полагаю, логотип ЧМ-2018 — unfree, фотографии игроков (как я понимаю, французской сборной?) — свободные. Фотография находится в общественном месте, во многих вагонах метро ещё не снята. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
en: I think that only the logo of WC-2018 in unfree, the photos of football players (French national football team, I suppose) is free. The photo is in public place, and still exists in trains of Moscow Metro. --Brateevsky {talk} 11:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Кто автор фотографии французской сборной, и где я могу прочесть, что она под свободной лицензией? --A.Savin 15:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Я не могу точно сказать, кто автор. Наверно автор фото тот — кто запечатлил фотографию сборной Франции в момент победы на чемпионате мира по футболу 1998 года. Раз фотография игроков используется в качестве рекламы жеребьёвки в вагонах метро — значит правообладатель уже хотя бы один раз дал права на распространение части своей фотографии. Вообще в моём фото игроки французской сборной — не основной объект, основное — что финальная жеребьёвка была 1 декабря и текст «Смотри как сойдутся звёзды». Из файла фотографию игроков сложно выкинуть, можно «замылить», но как сделать — не могу сказать. Либо могу сильно уменьшить размер файла — чтобы был как fair use. <переведу на английский потом, либо прошу перевести> --Brateevsky {talk} 11:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Вы же вроде бы давно на викискладе и должны знать базовые правила, а аргументируете как новичок. --A.Savin 15:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • ru: Провёл обработку фотографии: сделал «размытие» центральной части фото. en: I made a photo processing, blur the center of photo. --Brateevsky {talk} 12:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - even blurred it is still a derivative work, as the poster is clearly the main subject of the photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal unused image. Дима Г (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal unused image. Дима Г (talk) 04:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wish02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various professional images previously published in social media and other celebrity-related sites. Insufficient EXIF and generic filenames. Unlikely to be "own work".

GermanJoe (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice family pic, regrettably out of our scope. E4024 (talk) 07:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • More:The file description says "big family" but this is "not" a big family; perhaps for that reason no WP used it to illustrate a big family. OTOH the husband looks too young, almost like a boyfriend of one of the two older daughters. Therefore the pic is not very representative. I am writing all these to explain the motives that drew me to DR the pic, instead of just saying "private photo". I have no more arguments to add nor any strong feelings to delete this or any other file. Bye. --E4024 (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination+unlikely to be own work but grabbed from a social media. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still watermarked, unlikely own work Ariadacapo (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not for deletion, but modification: this specimen is a male, not a female 194.4.7.132 09:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. New legend. problem solved. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LionMerkulov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in December 2015 as non-notable. Out of project scope. Additionally, as a professional photo and logo, these would require COM:OTRS permission.

xplicit 10:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an incorrect, unused copy of File:Countries that use Fahrenheit.svg. Delsion23 (talk) 10:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Apart from being a duplicate, it is totally unsourced and Germany, France, French Guyana, the Netherlands and the Netherland Antilles are wrongly depicted as using the Fahrenheit scale for their temperature measurements, and the Republic of Ireland is wrongly depicted as using the Kelvin scale for all its temperature measurements. A2D2 (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image from deleted spam page on ruwiki WindEwriX (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+above ToO anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image from deleted spam page on ruwiki WindEwriX (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination - one is indeed a copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.74 11:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.74 12:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.74 12:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist is still alive, IMO not de minimis. Achim (talk) 12:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a PDF printout of es:Usuario:Camilo Carvajal, a user page which was deleted for violating user page guidelines. Commons does not host primarily text content or PDF pages of deleted content seb26 (talk) 12:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was uploaded by error from me, in the place of uploading my own image i uploaded by error the wrong image, its not mine. ElWaliElAlaoui (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Destructive watermark Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no title or description, out of scope. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope; personal art work  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no title or description, out of scope. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no title or description, out of scope. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no title or description, out of scope. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no title or description, out of scope. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Volkone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doaa dodi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-g03UTTaniAQ/WHROQC4FL5I/AAAAAAAAATw/QVdsuabwrQUdh0lP6PSCGqL3FRDrywS6gCJoC/w530-h487-n/2017%2B-%2B1.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ads695 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality graphic: Text and a few logos only, same as en:User:Facebook world/sandbox, As image no educational value. Achim (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of scope. Achim (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Huawei wallpaper http://www.newsgoals.com/huawei-p9-spotted-full-specification-features-release-date-and-news/wallpaper_37/ MNXANL (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article as jpg image. Achim (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oscar Myles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artworks. If in scope then they lacks of permission(s) from the copyright holder(s). See OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Larrybierce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works or/and lacks of permissions. The images can be found in the web, example : https://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=https://www.bassakaair.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Cabin-Crew-5.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.bassakaair.com/about/&h=350&w=600&tbnid=6hMQ4Zb0NVNYVM&tbnh=171&tbnw=294&usg=__6VKjuiWlaC6ukPnBXw-_1AaamNg=&docid=ax1egh6D5Q_PEM

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Relianxiety (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright doubt. While these images don't match any others immediately via reverse search, their (1) low resolution, (2) lack of camera EXIF data, and (3) the uploader's only other upload was a copyright violation from Flickr, it suggests that these are not own work and have unknown copyright status. To uploader, please upload the original camera files to demonstrate you took them, or write a permission email to OTRS

seb26 (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicoadelpino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works : various sizes without EXIFs, the uploader already uploaded copyright violations

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nicoadelpino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works : free sources and attributions must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to http://am.adlibhosting.com/amonline/details/collect/6130 Elie Neuburger died 1972-10-08 Multichill (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file seb26 (talk) 20:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Almost an exact copy of File:599px-US-AlcoholTobaccoFirearmsAndExplosives-Seal.JPG. -- 109.238.80.74 21:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like this image is a derivative work of this one (http://parlamento.eleaweb.com/index.php?idi=cas&sec=1) IngenieroLoco (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator's. --Discasto talk 20:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the Flickr license is compatible but "All Rights Reserved. No usage allowed including copying or sharing without written permission" in the image description is pretty unambiguous about the photographer's intent. And the watermark suggests the image is definitely not for sharing.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF showing primarily text content seb26 (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture of this 3D object is probably not own work. Low resolution and missing exif. Given the history of this uploader, this has probably been scanned from a book. Jcb (talk) 23:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WanyeBenton04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope uploads of made-up covers for user's own music, see also Special:Contributions/Wanye2004 and Special:Contributions/Wayne04.

Train2104 (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xanti- Alex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The text "Hegalarien erritu zeremonia" will contribute to increasing the quantity of articles of the Basque Wikipedia, a relatively low quantity despite the high number of Basque Wikipedia users (81 000 people). Additionally, the text can provide insight into American Ancient culture to Basques all around the world, such as the Basque-Mexican diaspora. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanti- Alex (talk • contribs) 19:39, 8 December 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 15:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 15:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. http://www.infinity-sound.com/news-feed/2016/10/27/rick-reedy-high-school# John from Idegon (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mooeena

[edit]

Artwork files uploaded by Mooeena (talk · contribs):

These are all derivative photographs of modern, living, or only recently dead artists. I have listed the artist and life span next to each image. None appear to have been published prior to 1923 --Animalparty (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of com:scope: advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of com:scope: advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contributions of Daniela Sedelke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional; photos are professional, not own work.

  — Jeff G. ツ 23:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not in scope and for the other reasons above P.g.champion (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"= I am against the deletion of my page =" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniela Sedelke (talk • contribs) 09:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Daniela Sedelke: This can easily be sorted out but you need to give reasons. (1) We only have your word for it that you are (as an editor) who you say you are. We have to be wary of impostors. (2) You need to declarer your [Conflict of interest]. (3) You have to observe the laws of copyright. As a contributor 'you' are legally responsible to get this right – not Wikimedia Commons nor Wikipedia. In your position you should know you are not above the law nor can run roughshod over an other organizations policies. Please read through our policies before editing further to avoid getting blocked for spamming. P.g.champion (talk) 12:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse my mister but these criteria I fulfill you have no reason to block or delete my page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniela Sedelke (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 December 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Daniela, both of the images are obviously not own work but shot by a photographer. One could undelete them easily if the circumstances (author, permission, license) became clear, please tell our OTRS team if you like. The user page User:Daniela Sedelke is out of project scope because a) it is an article (Commons doesn't host articles) and b) it has to be treated as promotional because of its content and being the user's only contribution to our project. Das hat jetzt nichts damit zu tun, dass die Seite de:Benutzerin:Daniela Sedelke dreimal gelöscht wurde. Die hiesigen Spielregeln knapp zusammengefasst: Commons:Was Commons nicht ist. --Achim (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Achim (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of file with low quality File:SBandera 2.png Mitte27 (talk) 02:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been used on multiple android (rooting) related websites. However, there is no information about who is the actual author and whether it was ever released under a CC license. DreamLinker (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not marked CC on source page. Terms of Use read "Materials licensed to Wildscreen under a Creative Commons licence are clearly marked with Creative Commons buttons". Achim (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Electronic music group (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright status unclear. Own work is claimed, but some are obvious screenshots from TV broadcasts, other look like random images taken from the web, some with strange aspect ratios. AFAICT, all lack EXIF data.

Andrei S. Talk 16:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; no permission; used on promotional draft on en.wiki TJH2018talk 16:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 16:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 16:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: elle a été téléchargée en 2015. Les licenses ne peuvent pas être retirées. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite que ma photo soit retirée. Merci. Alspace56 (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from http://www.vedettes-du-golfe.fr. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant.Unused file, superseded by File:Flag of Buren.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 13:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused file, superseded by File:Burger King 1994.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused flag map, superseded by File:Flag map of Burma (Myanmar) (1974-2010).svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Blason famille Bourbon-Busset moderne.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:CA1C.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 21:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بایابیابیبایب Mortezashafieian (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ایبایایایایا Mortezashafieian (talk) 22:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 13:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نلمغتلغملته Mortezashafieian (talk) 22:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 13:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover. Uploader claims to be connected to the artist but we probably need an OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ab-bs as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader hat nicht die erforderlichen Rechte Google translation: "Uploader does not have the necessary rights" Ruthven (msg) 13:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Es ist schade, dass hier mehrere Einzweckkonten (Zitronenkuchen, Zitronenquark, Nudelholz99 und Ab-bs) zusammenkommen und jeweils meinen, sie hätten Recht und alle anderen Unrecht. Änderungen und Anfragen solcher Art sollten nur noch auf offiziellem Weg (OTRS oder zumindest verifizierter Account) gemacht werden. --Magnus (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ich weiß leider nicht, wie ich das Konto verifizieren kann. Dieser Account läuft über das Sekretariat von Prof. Nina Kolleck, gerne kann das über eine E-Mail an das Sekretariat (Link oben) verifiziert werden. Frau Kolleck hat der Veröffentlichung dieses Fotos nicht zugestimmt, es nie unter CC BY-SA 4.0 veröffentlicht worden. Daher bitte ich erneut darum, es zu löschen. --Ab-bs (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I don't think that such a request is accepteble, because Ab-bs can be anyone (and she's not the photographer, and the photo was taken clearly with the approval of Frau Kolleck). A put down request should be handled by OTRS.
    Deutsch: Schreib eine E-Mail an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
    --Ruthven (msg) 17:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I said (in German), I am working for Prof. Kolleck and the request comes directly from her. The upload was not done with Prof. Kollecks approval. If you want to have proof that the request comes from us write an E-Mail to sekkolleck@erzwiss.fu-berlin.de (http://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/einrichtungen/arbeitsbereiche/bildungsfor_modell_analyse_soz_systeme/index.html) and I will answer you there. If that is not a acceptable request, I don't know what would be.--Ab-bs (talk) 09:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If there is some privacy right issues Nina Kolleck must make the request herself from a verifiable email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was uploaded without the consent of the subject. Subject requests deletion on verified e-mail address at OTRS 2017120610006929 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing of an non-notable artist, article de:Eberhard Patalas has been deleted, and I don't think this image is useful for any other purpose. PM3 (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Supreme Court of the United States - Roberts Court 2017.jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.

Reason to use the other file: "Larger, sourced from the official Collection rather than the website"
new file
Arlo James Barnes 04:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An updated higher quality svg file exists here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Ministria_e_Kultur%C3%ABs.svg Kj1595 (talk) 04:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This outdated image is not being used in any articles Kj1595 (talk) 00:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is still realistically usable for an educational purpose, for instance on a page discussing the former Ministry, or the general style of ministry logos. Note: I think the three different versions should really be split into separate files, but I won't do that while the DR is open. --bjh21 (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is not being used in any articles 167.187.100.206 12:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Regasterios (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio from http://chessman.com.mo/?q=chessman-mo-artist-detail-vivian B dash (talk) 07:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Author Rex Chang. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the upload is licensed under Creative Commons, there are two issues with this video. First, " music licensed from themusicbed.com". The site does not appear to mention any sort of license for its music files. In fact, its license terms read, for example, "Any use of the Recording after termination of the license is prohibited and may be actionable as an act of infringement of copyright owned by the Artist or Licensor or for any other applicable cause of action." This restricts its use. Second, " All the timelapse visuals are subject to copyright." This Vimeo uploader appears to create the reels, but not the content in them. It does not appear she has the authority to release its contents (both visual and auditory) under a free license. xplicit 07:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV siehe Metadaten des Fotos Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 10:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright holder Tobias Koch / www.tobiaskoch.net. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader had included copyrighted text in the French WP article about Camille Lellouche (now hidden. It's her only contributions with this upload. Therefore, there are doubts about the rights for this picture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Google doesn't find it. It's big and has EXIF. Therefore I thinik we must assume good faith. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No unknown photographer. Picture by austrian photographer Otto Zell († 1964) - not public domain. Current holder of rights is known but he doesn't provide material under open licenses. Date ca. 1915 is wrong since vehicle was built in 1935. Herby (Vienna) (talk) 11:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Русский: Это изображение рекламирует мусоросжигательные заводы. По данным поиска по картинкам Яндекс и Google, изображение находится только здесь, и оно похоже (одинаковые облака и расположение дорожек, совпадает по размеру) на другое изображение, находящееся на сайтах о строительстве, где рекламируют, например, земельные участки. Скорее всего, они происходят из одного источника, лицензионный статус которого нам неизвестен.
AVRS (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
English: This image advertises incinerators. According to Yandex and Google image search, it can only be found here, and it is similar (same clouds and way graph, same dimensions) to another image, which can be found at construction-themed websites, some of which advertise land or construction. Both must come from the same source, whose license is unknown to us.
--AVRS (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clearly derivative of an image that appears widely on the web without a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In copyright. Licence and author are not correct.I have found the photo in ELIA repository [1] and the rights statement is "In Copyright". Geraki TLG 16:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source it is not cc-by-sa-4.0. Geraki TLG 16:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The souce this picture was copied from does not have a license granting its re-use. It was copied from here. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 18:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio: http://danviet.vn/van-hoa/lan-dau-tien-hoa-hau-dai-duong-len-truyen-hinh-van-noi-dep-tu-nhien-818658.html DHN (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source http://www.tropicos.org/Image/100168155 is tagged Cc-by-nc-sa. So this file is out of scope.. GeorgHHtalk   19:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted on it.wiki (and probably copyviol). Melquíades (msg) 20:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of the copyright in the original sign (text and picture). Freedom of Panorama doesn't apply to graphic or literary works in the UK, and the photo only consists of the sign so de minimis doesn't apply. bjh21 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Uploader's username matches with author's name but is this enough to confirm that this is the uploader's own work? The uploader has only a few images on Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Large image, full metadata. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a high resolution photo of a copyrighted public sculpture, which commons does not allow. My mistake. This photo is no longer used in any articles. Comfr (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not think this picture represents John j Cavanaugh (he is very different in all other online pictures I have seen). It was uploaded with little-no information. I don't even think this is in the Public Domain, since I don't know where the uploader got it. Eccekevin (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That it might be a photo of the wrong person is not a reason for deletion as long as it's in use on both English Wikipedia and Wikidata. See COM:NPOV for details. On the other hand, I have no confidence in the claim of "own work". --bjh21 (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probable copyvio. Also, while being in use ordinarily precludes deletion, that rule applies only when NPOV is an issue. Here, it is certainly in use because Commons said it was Cavanaugh. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - author is almost certainly not unknown -- see illegible text at the bottom. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Factually inaccurate - Asia/Kashgar,Chongqing,Harbin are zones that exists only in the backzone file of the IATA tz database that should not be listed in the image, and area of Tibet, Southern Guangdong are not (and never in history, at least to the extent relevant to the tz database identification scheme) use the Asia/Urumqi as the image implies. The original source have stopped maintain the image, and while there is other repository that produce an updated and correct version of timezone map image ([2]), the image produced from the site are not suitable to replace the file being used on this graph because it have also included oceanic zone claims by countries instead of land territory which are bad for visual identification purpose and might not necessarily apply in different situations. C933103 (talk) 11:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + unused. Ruthven (msg) 12:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused (in mainspace) emblem, superseded by File:Medium emblem of the Космические войска Российской Федерации.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 14:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused emblem, superseded by File:Gerb MinfinRu.png. -- 109.238.80.74 14:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion : use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Bandeira caetite.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: kept the SVG file. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV u.a. von hier: http://www.bundestag.de/abgeordnete/biografien/B/binding_lothar/518422 siehe Copyright Vermerk Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Escudo de Calamonte.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 21:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per donald. --Sanandros (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Недостоверные сведения об авторе, фото из интернета https://ru.linkedin.com/in/guseved -- Tomasina (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:А. В. Гусев.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the Flickr license checks out, it doesn't look like the Flickr account has the rights to relicense the image on behalf of Glenn Francis/PR Photos Ytoyoda (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But then now I see that Glenn Francis uploads files here as Toglenn so now I'm not so sure. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Toglenn: Maybe Toglenn can tell us more about this case.--Sanandros (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Flickrwashing. The file has clear watermarks "exposay.com" and "Glenn Francis". If Toglenn wants to give the photo into public domain (I'd like that, the photo is good and has educational value), he must re-upload it himself. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is in public domain in source country Bolivia, if it is anonymous or if photographer is dead more than 50 years. I am not sure, that the file is in PD. At least better source is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What means "propio", which is written as sourc, exactly?--Sanandros (talk) 21:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"own" in Spanish. As this is 1935 photo, it is clearly not own work. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: the user has a story of doubt uploadings and per PRP we must assume this is not free, too. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]