Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/11/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
no quiero que este archivo participe Florcalcagno (talk) 21:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Guanaco. --219.79.180.50 03:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Joaquin Maria Alogo de Ondo Edu Angono 1er en compagnie de son épouse Maria Soledad Alogo Obono Nsang.jpg
[edit]Image confidentielle. J.A.Junior (talk) 01:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Guanaco. --219.79.180.50 03:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
no quiero que este archivo participe Florcalcagno (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Guanaco. --219.79.180.50 03:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
External source, no license, no permission. B dash (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/whats-on/whats-on-news/x-factor-2017-contestant-gregor-13853444 86.181.111.18 14:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a free to use image, published within the subjects press-pack, for use by any person freely under common use. This is not a copyright violation, the Chester Chronicle used it from the press-pack like other sources have. Wikidocs (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I accidentally made this a page instead of a subcategory. I now made the proper subcategory, so I need to delete this page. CREEES.UVA (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I accidentally made this a page instead of a subcategory. I now made the proper subcategory, so I need to delete this page. CREEES.UVA (talk) 20:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Fair use not permitted in Commons Will upload to en Wikipedia instead. Shankar Raman (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EricWalker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Has promotional descriptions.
theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Reupload, user is indeffed per Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Navnathkene. --Achim (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satyajitpanda93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The first two are identical. The first two and the last are small and have no EXIF, so likely not "own work" as claimed. The third one is large and has EXIF, but it does not look like a selfie, so it is unlikely that the uploader, subject, and photographer are the same person, as claimed. There is no evidence that this person is notable.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted content, not user own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamponycool (talk • contribs) 2017-11-10T12:38:57 (UTC)
Delete as copyvio. Uploader has also failed to respond to queries posted to his talk page. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)- Delete copyvio --Tvcccp (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Not used on Wikipedia, not very good resolution Draftpong (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Not used on Wikipedia not good resolution Draftpong (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Not used and same as File:Consumers Distributing logo.png J Pablo Cablo (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be in use now. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 18:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
2D copying: license should be the same as the license for the book (which is not shown) and the creator (+source) of book are not shown. WikiZeven (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
the relevant PD tag must be added if there is Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The user said to me that he created this file insipired by http://www.signos.net/trabajos/diseno-de-la-marca-del-ayuntamioento-de-oiartzun/ , in my opinion that may be seen as a personal representation of a specific definition of a municipal coat of arm, that may be true because I did not find any prior catch with google, furthermore there is enough difference for not to be considered as a derivative work so " own work " is true too. I added {{Insignia}}.
I withdraw my nomination as my concern was regarding the license Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept. Feel free to renominate if you disagree or if you have other concerns. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File is from here this picture 2003:DE:3EB:DBC:F9FE:D1BC:3C1D:E5E5 15:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
- [1]: "Copyright Sämtliche Daten auf http://www.akron.ch sind urheberrechtlich durch Akron geschützt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass die verwendeten Texte und Bilder nicht ohne weiteres verwendet werden dürfen." All data are protected by Akron - its obvously a copy vio. --Codc (talk) 12:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also sachlich: Es ist zulässig und kann vorkommen, dass Fotografen ihre Bilder neben einer Veröffentlichung unter einer freien Lizenz zusätzlich anderswo unter Copyright veröffentlichen. Um hier Missverständnissen vorzubeugen empfiehlt es sich, eine Freigabemail zu schicken. --Ailura (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis, danke für die Sachlichkeit und Freundlichkeit. Ich schicke die E-Mail-Vorlage mit der Freigabebestätigung jetzt zu meinen Freunden in der Schweiz. Bitte gebt mir etwas Zeit, es kann dauern. Es flossen verdammt viele Tränen bei der Trauerfeier dort unten in St. Gallen, die Leute brauchen ihre Zeit. Ich weiß, wer das Foto gemacht hat und kenne den Webmaster. Aber der Schock über den unerwarteten Tod unseren Künstler-Freundes ist groß. Auf der anderen Seite schlägt mir von Wikipedia ein Hasswelle entgegen und auch bei Wikimedia hagelt es destruktive Kommentare wie dieser hier [2] von User:Xocolatl. Bei Wikipedia hat man mich gegen alle Proteste im Haurucktempo gesperrt, für immerWikipedia_Diskussion:Sperrprüfung#J.C3.BCrgen_Hoppmann. Weitere Details im UsertalkUser_talk:Jürgen_Hoppmann. Ich stehe genau zwischen den Trauernden in St. Gallen auf der einen Seite und den Wiki-Trolls auf der anderen. Bevor jetzt in Windeseile auch meine Wikicommons-Existenz und damit alle hochgeladen Bilder vernichtet werden (User:Xocolatl scheint sich ja reichlich darum zu bemühen, bitte ich höflich, mir die Zeitspanne zu nennen, in der meine St. Galler Freunde ihre Bestätigungs-E-Mail schicken müssen. Vielen Dank! Jürgen Hoppmann Oh je, ist muss das ja noch signieren! Also hier: --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Ailura, ich habe jetzt die "Bildanfrage mit Einverständniserklärung" von Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen genommen und in die Schweiz geschickt. Sollte das die falsche Vorlage sein, dann bitte. melden. Danke, --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Jürgen Hoppmann, Du solltest Dich schon entscheidn, ob ein Bild Dein Werk ist oder Du nur den Fotografen kennst. Bei bereits anderswo veröffentlichten Werken, bei denen Du der Urheber bist, kannst Du auch selbst das Ticket für die Bildfreigabe bekommen. Entscheidend ist die "Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)". Notfalls kannst Du auch ein gelöschtes Bild wieder herstellen lassen, wenn das Ticket bestätigt wird. Weder irgendwelche Emotionalitäten zur Beerdigung noch Vorwürfe an Wikipedianer werden in der Sache weiterhelfen. --Ailura (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Ailura, es ist mein eigenes Werk, aber anscheinen glaubt man mir das nicht, weil es zuvor schon auf www.akron.ch veröffentlicht wurde. Also habe ich Lussia in St. Gallen gebeten, diese Formular per Email loszuschicken. Doppeltgemoppelt, aber es hat wohl geklappt. Auf deine Bemerkung "Vorwürfe an Wikipedianer" muss ich noch mal antworten, weil es auch genau dieses Bild hier betritt. Das tue ich auf deiner Diskussionsseite - hoffentlich der richtige Platz. Wenn nicht, dann lies halt meinen Text und lösche ihn hinterher, wenn das geht. Ich bin gerade frisch verlobt mit Wikimedia und unsere Beziehung ist ... kompliziert ;-) --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 05:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
useless personal page Gzen92 [discuter] 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User's req in own ns. --Achim (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Quite unlikely to be an "own work" of uploader, both by date of creation and as an image previously uploaded on various image boards, e.g. http://www.celebritypix.us/celebrities/duchess-xenia-celebrities-068f8.html and https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593915701614/. With 1940 as a year of creation, I would not consider it a free content without knowing the country of creation (though most likely it was in Denmark) and author of this photo. Tatewaki (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Not aware of the group concerned releasing anything under Creative Commons, Equivalent media at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Royals Lorde.ogg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Text frame from a video, out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Choi Hoonsik, the subject of photographs, strongly wants to delete the photo. he is my close friend and argued that this is published without his consent. this is against his right of publicity and privacy, and also violates wikimedia commons policy. 최광모 (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Choi Hoonsik, the subject of photographs, strongly wants to delete the photo. he is my close friend and argued that this is published without his consent. this is against his right of publicity and privacy, and also violates wikimedia commons policy. 최광모 (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Amber Kinney (talk) 03:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Amber Kinney (talk) 03:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Cheating — Preceding unsigned comment added by Đăng Đàn Cung (talk • contribs) 2017-11-06T16:38:55 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded by the depicted subject himself, as illustration for a self-promotional PR autobiography that's been repeatedly submitted and declined and resubmitted and redeclined at the English Wikipedia's AFC queue. This is an abuse of Wikipedia as a public relations platform rather than an encyclopedia, and once the draft is deleted there's no potential for reuse anywhere else either. Bearcat (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded by the depicted subject himself, as illustration for a self-promotional PR autobiography that's been repeatedly submitted and declined and resubmitted and redeclined at the English Wikipedia's AFC queue. This is an abuse of Wikipedia as a public relations platform rather than an encyclopedia, and once the draft is deleted there's no potential for reuse anywhere else either. Bearcat (talk) 00:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded by the subject himself to illustrate a self-promotional autobiography on EN. Article (and its recreation in draftspace) have both been deleted; no potential for reuse exists elsewhere, and Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which people get to publicize themselves. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
"Internet" and "Google" are not appropriate sources. The uploader also doesn't indicate where they got the CC-BY-SA and public domain licenses they gave the image. It is hard to trace the original source of the image, because it has been distributed via Wikimedia for 3+ years now. So, delete. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Created by a promo account, likely a non-notable person. Out of scope Guanaco (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The image source is deleted and the image was never reviewed Leoboudv (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Keep Finally found here. License review carried out. --Discasto talk 11:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Good work Discasto --Leoboudv (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Un cámara de televisión de Reuters en una vivienda de Barcelona con una pancarta para evitar que los acosen durante el referéndum del 1-O.jpg
[edit]The source for this image seems to have disappeared. Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- 可能是我標記錯來源了，參見此。--KOKUYO (talk) 06:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep My error. I must have been marking too many other images...to miss this. Please close this DR ASAP. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely own work low resolution & image search results 80.235.147.186 07:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
How the thing is in project scope? Why it is categorized as 1488? Taivo (talk) 08:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This photo is a selfie and useless for Wikipedia. Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
File:On Australia Day, 2016, the Roads to Parliament and Australian Government are Grey and Bike Helmet Laws and T-shirts are too.jpg
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This photo is not usefull Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 22:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as no source (No source since) Fæ (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Could add why the no source template was needed on this file and on File:Confucius 02.png? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
{{Vd}} A source is required.The quality is terrible. The bottom of the robe is not visible. — Jeff G. ツ 03:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- "A source is required" is not a valid reason to delete a copy of an artwork that is over 1,200 years old.
- "The quality is terrible" is not a valid reason to delete this work unless there is no reasonable expectation for it ever to be used. In this case the exact same image has been widely used on many historical pages and is in very wide use across Wikimedia projects, to be precise in active use on 366 Wikimedia pages.
- Before using the no source template and risking the loss of public domain images like this, there is a responsibility to check whether doing so is logical and that a deletion would be correct against policy, not just based on your personal views about "quality".
- --Fæ (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/77/95/19/7795198cc338e4642d2ce7ac965458b2.jpg satisfies our requirements and is a little better, but I was hoping for a dramatic improvement, perhaps from Brittanica 1912, a Chinese or Korean book, or a book on comparative religions. I withdraw my nomination. — Jeff G. ツ 12:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I suggest you look for sources, but avoid attempting to delete 1000+ year old artworks from Commons. --Fæ (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/77/95/19/7795198cc338e4642d2ce7ac965458b2.jpg satisfies our requirements and is a little better, but I was hoping for a dramatic improvement, perhaps from Brittanica 1912, a Chinese or Korean book, or a book on comparative religions.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yazanshabb2004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal image, not in use. OOS
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW, not de minimis, since it is the main focus. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Connecticut Highway 354.svg, and this version is inferior: if you look closely at the border, there is a weird frosting on the edge. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Connecticut highway shield PNGs. Rschen7754 23:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete—as inferior. Imzadi 1979 → 04:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a picture of me when I was younger and I did not give consent to whoever uploaded it 97.91.152.16 23:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, with the note that there were better, larger images without the young person in question front and center in the foreground. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 03:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 04:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 04:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 04:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Amber Kinney (talk) 04:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Taken from http://emarat-news.ae/en/1485072391865-22-01-2017 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Appleton's annual cyclopedia and register of important events- embracing political, military, an ecclesiastical affairs; public documents; biography, statistics, commerce, finance, literature, (14589812719).jpg
[edit]unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Seems it has been uploaded from the Brigham Young University Library. Don't know if that is relevant. Lotje (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the stamp creator, not the person who scanned it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this.. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a duplicate of File:Selo da Copa de 1950 Cr 1,20.jpg, as I've found out.--Russian Rocky (talk) 14:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
seems to be copied from a textbook.-- Iranoia (talk) 18:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
advertisement, without any usage in Wikipedia.-- Iranoia (talk) 18:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal sketch. Fails COM:EDUSE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Blatant spam jdx Re: 18:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The file has two problems. At first, it is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. At second, article about depicted person en:Mark Hill (celebrity hairdresser) was deleted due to promotionality, probably he is out of project scope too. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. Probably not own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilal Khokhar (designer) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images, self-promotion, Please see project scope.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 12 November 2017 Nick (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:BilAl-KhokhAr-001.jpg (Content is promotional, please see our project scope). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal image closeup. theinstantmatrix (talk) 18:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Software screenshot; see COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Software screenshot; see COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete – the image used is a {{copyvio}} from https://www.facebook.com/astuceetconseil/photos/a.876405182496392.1073741837.484879994982248/1034407060029536/. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work of a poster with uncertain copyright status Discasto talk 20:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator --Leoboudv (talk) 02:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Not uploaders own work. Derivatives of art work by italian artist Pordenone Montanari. Permission is required.
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI DIARY087.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI DIARY051.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI DIARY011.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI Duellanti -2008.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI Il circo 2005.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI Le amiche -1977.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI Il Minotauro e la bella fanciulla-1985.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI CLOWN 1994.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI TORERO NELL'ARENA 1999.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI AMAZZONE 1987.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI PIERINA ALLA FINESTRA 1989.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI MADRE E FIGLIA 1990.jpg
- File:Pordenone MONTANARI RESTA COSI 1990.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 20:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
familiepicture not suitable for encyclopedie Rudolphous (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Possibly out of scope. Only used on the enwiki userpage that's only about this person. Transparent background, which could be a sign that this photo is edited. theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hồ Hữu Trinh, KTS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 27.jpg
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 7.jpg
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 6.jpg
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 4.jpg
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 5.jpg
- File:Hồ Hữu Trinh 1.jpg
Sarah Macias (talk) 21:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Sarah Macias (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Sarah Macias (talk) 21:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Sarah Macias (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Ice resurfacer being used during the Bruins vs Capitals which lead to the advantage for the Bruins because they are Canadian.jpg
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope - maybe above ToO too Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, as a mere holiday-photo. Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:I love the small bridges.jpg
- File:A-Bomb-Dome.jpg
- File:Baseball-Team Hiroshima.jpg
- File:Venise in April.png
- File:Venise 2017.jpg
- File:Holiday in Kyoto July 2017- Cathy Clement.jpg (anyway a copyvio, as there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in Japan for non-buildings)
- File:Cathy Clement in Shinjuku JR Kyushu BLossom Hotel.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The file seems too small for using, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pritamkashyap (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. The photo of him is probably a copyright violation, because he's the subject, not the photographer.
Guanaco (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal low-quality photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Model requested deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete the previous version due to personality rights (I would delete both indeed). See previous discussion please. E4024 (talk) 19:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
E4024 is constantly harassing all uploads. As the only requester ever of having the pictures removed and several other members have already spoken out against his actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion the woman is not identifiable, so here's no privacy problems. Taivo (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Taivo, you are an admin and I guess you may see the previously deleted item. I don't remember any more, was it one of these two images? If yes, are we discussing the deletion of a file previously deleted per a DR? (Then maybe I should have asked for a speedy?) What may be the reason for the "update"? As I have my own restraints about the files around this woman (sorry, I see it natural to have suspicions when you see an uploader only contributing with one person's images) I cannot help thinking why upload an image in two stages? Could it be to "keep indirectly" an image not wanted -maybe by the interested "person"-, see the discussion above); I thought about all those before I opened this DR. I have more thoughts about this case but prefer to keep them to myself. Regards. Note 1: Taivo my questions forwarded to you end at "a speedy?)". Note 2: Thanks Taivo for helping me to prevent that the images of this lady appear in almost all nude or partially nude women cats we've got. Maybe you can give a helping hand at cleaning up File:100 0852b.jpg also. --E4024 (talk) 13:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
I think tjhis proves the point of E4024 keeping to target all the uploads I make. In several other cases other users have objected against it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: after having a second thought, you are right. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
No licence, I think it is a Google maps photo Carl Ha (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio; Source AP Photo Xgeorg (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/images/turkey-wall-2016-08-22.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/ copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://images.seneweb.com/dynamic/modules/news/images/gen/fb/f3d8a25cbacbfa7c95802f91354e08d2f71490cc.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wbZjSAPNhp8/V0yDmcuTORI/AAAAAAAADHQ/yLLTqtCUxkMd9GZBJVpfGLus_QQw2B8oQCLcB/s1600/Shei%2BMeyeta%2BTitle%2BSong%2BLyrics%2B-%2BTahsan.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I do not see a reason to delete this picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.20.27.95 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Question can anyone see where this is or could realistically be used in a project? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- File is in use on Category:Photographs by Greg Schechter. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also there would be a need OTRS confirmation for the photographer since it was a picture of Greg, uploaded from Greg's Flickr. Clearly not own work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Sarah Macias (talk) 22:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Not used on Wikipedia, not very good resolution 76.66.194.134 23:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- In use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Ellin. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Not used on Wikipedia, low resolution Omergreat (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Consumers_Distributing_logo.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Album covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Túlio Borges.jpg
- File:Batente de Pau de Casarão.jpg
- File:Cutuca meu peito incutucável.png
- File:Eu venho vagando no ar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
These images have been posted in the artists website with note saying anyone's free to use them, when referenced to the artist FRS2 (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Appear to also be out of scope as a non-notable artist. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unsuitable for an encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unsuitable for an encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by North Siliguri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller files, three have over printing showing they were copied from somewhere else, the other one, COM:PRP, no metadata.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-ineligible}} does not apply here. JuTa 02:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hochlader dürfte nicht der Urheber sein, daher fehlende Freigabe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Gruber (talk • contribs) 2017-11-04T13:35:26 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jay Vinchi
[edit]non-notable artist with no encyclopedic article. out of project scope
- File:Jay Vinchi - Bounded Vision CEO.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Assemble Sound.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Church.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Corktown Detroit.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi FCC.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Financial District.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Helping People Down.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Movement 2016.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi November 2015.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Oldschool.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Ponds.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Roosevelt Bridge.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Side Face.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Smoke.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi street steps.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Studio 2.jpg
- File:Jay Vinchi Studio.JPG
- File:Jay Vinchi Urban Exploration.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
non-free license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan Kühn (talk • contribs) 2017-11-11T21:47:49 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Image is sourced to a web page with a Non-Commercial Commons restriction. This is the uploader's only image here. Leoboudv (talk) 03:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
uncopyright unload internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2017-11-03T11:59:08 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
uncopyright unload internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2017-11-03T12:02:47 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
uncopyright unload internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2017-11-03T11:58:46 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
uncopyright unload internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2017-11-03T11:57:53 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
It could be taken from http://www.gilfun.ir/%D8%B9%DA%A9%D8%B3%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AC%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%B3%D9%87%DB%8C%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF-94.html. The uploader's only act in Commons. E4024 (talk) 10:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:Hiramatsu_Konancity_Shigapref.JPG (Not found source)
- File:Aogashima village streets.JPG
- File:Koishihara elementary school.JPG
- File:Ujitwaratown Kyotopref Woodland.JPG (Not found source)
- File:Minamino Shijonawatecity Osakapref.JPG
Copyright violation. Non-free licence file from Flickr. See also User_talk:Mti#著作権侵害について (Japanese language). --Batholith (talk) 10:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Not Own Work YenWitch (talk) 10:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AltafunNesaGeneralHospital (talk · contribs)
[edit]Project scope and copyright concerns.
- File:AltafunNesaGeneralHospital123.jpg – unidentified people with flowers at a podium at an unidentified event. Too blurry to be realistically useful.
- File:AltafunNesaGeneralHospital369.jpg – as above (though slightly less blurry)
- File:Altafun Nesa General Hospital.jpg – advertising flyer or similar. Questionable authorship claims and likely outside of our project scope.
- File:AltafunNesaGeneralHospital.jpg – low-quality photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and watermarking.
- File:AltafunNesaGeneralHospital11.jpg – low-quality photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability.
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright - Probably non-free to share YenWitch (talk) 11:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
URV von https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/profile/martin-sichert. Dort ist keine CC Lizenz ausgewählt. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
We need proof of permission from Sébastien Chenille.
Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
As filename says, main object here is a poster. There is no freedom of panorama in Denmark for posters. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The source for this photo is [3]. Usually, if the photographer is someone from the military, (s)he is credited with rank and name. Not in this case, it says there the photo is a "courtesy photo". We have to assume it was provided to this military news site by the organizers of that (civilian German) event, which means the photo is not PD-USGov-Mil and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 15:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CatherineHabbie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Fairytales.pdf
- File:The Tryptych.jpg
- File:The Adventures of a Volunteer.jpg
- File:The Adventures of a Supply.jpg
- File:CatherineHabbie.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
These are the book covers of books designed by me, Catherine Habbie and I hold the rights to the same.
- Please confirm your authorship/copyrights ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CatherineHabbie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Paperback cover.pdf
- File:New book cover.jpg
- File:The Adventures of a Supply.jpg
- File:The Tryptych III.jpg
- File:Profile author.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close to and with the artist and novellist. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Protest gegen Hacker-Methoden destruktiver WikipediaWikicommons-Mitarbeiter - Bitte um Mediation und Unterstützung durch Personen, die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ernst nehmen:
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Pixelhaufen, nicht sinnvoll nutzbar --Magnus (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close to and with the artist and novellist. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Protest gegen Hacker-Methoden destruktiver WikipediaWikicommons-Mitarbeiter - Bitte um Mediation und Unterstützung durch Personen, die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ernst nehmen:
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close to and with the artist and novellist. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Protest gegen Hacker-Methoden destruktiver WikipediaWikicommons-Mitarbeiter - Bitte um Mediation und Unterstützung durch Personen, die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ernst nehmen:
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close to and with the artist and novellist. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Protest gegen Hacker-Methoden destruktiver WikipediaWikicommons-Mitarbeiter - Bitte um Mediation und Unterstützung durch Personen, die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ernst nehmen:
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Image shows notable person, low resolution is no reason for deletion nor are missing exif data. --Ailura (talk) 14:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Celina La Fuente de Lavotha is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality penis photo.
-mattbuck (Talk) 08:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not an amateur porn site PierreSelim (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of products/packaging/promotions/posters/similar
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 06.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 12.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 11.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 10.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 08.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 09.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 07.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 03.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 05.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 04.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 02.png
- File:Camel Blue - Inspired by music 01.png
- File:Disposable lighters 12.png
- File:Disposable lighters 10.png
- File:Disposable lighters 08.png
- File:Disposable lighters 09.png
- File:Mosaico in Santa Maria del Soccorso.jpg
- File:Simpson's Guitar pick.png
- File:Disposable lighters 06.png
- File:Disposable lighters 01.png
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 23.png
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 21.png
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 22.png
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 20.png
- File:Limoncello 67.JPG
- File:Chocolate eggs in Rome 04.JPG
- File:Chocolate eggs in Rome 03.JPG
- File:Chocolate eggs in Rome 01.JPG
- File:Chocolate eggs in Rome 02.JPG
- File:Sugar packet 04.jpg
- File:Sugar packet 03.jpg
- File:Sugar packet 05.jpg
- File:Sugar packet 02.jpg
- File:Artificial sweeteners 02.jpg
- File:Sugar packet.jpg
- File:Sugar packet in Italy.jpg
- File:Cosmoprof 15.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 12.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 11.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 10.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 09.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 08.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 06.JPG
- File:Cosmoprof 02.JPG
- File:Romics 2014 - Edizione Primaverile 01.jpg
- File:Camel (cigarette).jpg
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 08.png
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 04.jpg
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 02.jpg
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana 03.jpg
- File:Scheda telefonica italiana - 10.000 Lire - 1994 02.jpg
- File:Christmas decorations in Rome 20.JPG
- File:Christmas decorations in Rome 19.JPG
- File:Tex Willer 2.JPG
- File:Tex Willer.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 19:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all as apparent copyright violations. -Pete F (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. --Krd 08:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fan arts and derivative works. Subjects shown on the photos are copyrighted.
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 14.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 13.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 10.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 11.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 12.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 9.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 2.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8- - 3.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 8.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 5.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 4.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition - 1.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters.
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 32.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 31.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 29.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 20.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 19.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 18.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 15.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 17.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 16.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 14.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 13.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 12.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 11.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 10.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 09.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 08.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 04.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Autumn Edition 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholas Gemini (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Italy, artists' permissions needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 118.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 63.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 61.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 59.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 60.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 58.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 90.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 89.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 49.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brendar 1214 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Tiny size Glam Shots (possibly album cover, promo shots, etc). At this size and with no metadata, it's highly unlikely that all these different sizes of images and different styles, were all taken by single person. Two have overprinting, both of those indicate external sources.
- File:Trinableu.jpg
- File:Ms.Toi.jpeg.jpg
- File:Lareece.jpg
- File:CharliBaltimorediary.jpg
- File:CharliBaltimore.jpeg.jpg
- File:Lady.jpeg.jpg
- File:GoodieMob.jpeg.jpg
- File:KiloAli.jpeg.jpg
- File:LaChat.jpeg.jpg
- File:Diamond.jpeg.jpg
- File:Tink.jpeg.jpg
- File:Shawnna.jpeg.jpg
- File:Jacki-O.jpeg.jpg
- File:LadyMay.jpeg.jpg
- File:Amil.jpeg.jpg
- File:Solé.jpeg.jpg
- File:Cha Cha.jpeg.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 2003:DE:3EB:DBC:F9FE:D1BC:3C1D:E5E5 15:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Protest gegen Hacker-Methoden destruktiver WikipediaWikicommons-Mitarbeiter - Bitte um Mediation und Unterstützung durch Personen, die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ernst nehmen
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander Golov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots of presumably non-free computer software, not simple enough to be covered by {{PD-ineligible}}.
- File:Agat-9 MouseGraf.png
- File:Agat 256x256 color 2.png
- File:Agat-9 KPON IV.png
- File:Agat-9 KPON II.png
- File:Agat-9 KPON.png
- File:Agat-9 IKP.png
- File:Agat 256x256.png
- File:Agat 128x128.png
Underlying lk (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Reported at OTRS 2017111210004975. Image taken May 23, 1963, and is a Getty Image file (http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/cuban-prime-minister-fidel-castro-is-shaking-hands-with-news-photo/104405054#cuban-prime-minister-fidel-castro-is-shaking-hands-with-nikita-picture-id104405054). It appears that the person second right has been PhotoShopped to show a different face (maybe the uploader?) Ronhjones (Talk) 21:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IProspectIE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely false authorship claims based on inconsistent resolutions and missing/inconsistent metadata and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Clayton Hotel Cork City From Outside.png – non-free Shutterstock photo by Patryk Kosmider
- File:Jameson Experience Entrance.jpg – photo by Gabrielle Morehead according to metadata
- File:JJ's Reception Area at the Old Jameson Distillery.jpg
- File:Set Table from Barrelman's Feast at the Old Jameson Distillery.jpg
- File:Old Jameson Distillery Gift Shop.jpg
- File:Old Jameson Distillery Still Room.jpg
- File:Jameson Whiskey Display.jpg – photo by Chris Bellew/Fennell Photography according to metadata
- File:Bow Street Old Jameson Distillery Entrance.jpg – photo by Chris Bellew/Fennell Photography according to metadata
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused, with poor geometry and distracting (non-chemically-relevant) coloring. Have File:Sodium phenyl-acetate.png as alternative. DMacks (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Fancruft: out of scope (COM:EDUSE) of Commons.-- Iranoia (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unsuitable for an encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unsuitable for an encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unbsuitable for encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
family picture unsuitable for encyclopaedia The Banner (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
familiepicture unsuitable for encyclopedia Rudolphous (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
familiepicture unsuitable for encyclopedia Rudolphous (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
familiepicture unsuitable for encyclopedia Rudolphous (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
familiepicture unsuitable for encyclopedia Rudolphous (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Acjcian2 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: inaccurate info Guanaco (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: If it indeed a movie screenshot then it needs a license from the producer, which it seems the uploader is not. Green Giant (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rob984 as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Iraq location map.svg|Later upload
Not an exact duplicate. The borders of Iraq are different. Spesh531, do we need both of these? Guanaco (talk) 02:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Aside from some minor differences in thickness, I believe the borders are identical. We also already have File:Iraq location map (2015).svg which includes the regionally recognised (but federally unrecognised) Halabja Governorate; which I think was originally reason behind the creation of this file (the original revision included incorrect borders of the Halabja Governorate). Rob984 (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am trying to piece together the reason I had created this file. The only difference that exists is that the thickness of the international borders and rivers are thinner. I believe I created the file to use on Template:Iraqi insurgency detailed map. Due to the size of the image, I thinned the borders a bit so it wouldn't crowd the template. At least using context clues that's what I can figure. It's main usage was strictly for the Template I believe.—SPESH531Other 08:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- As it's in use and we have a specific reason for the separate image, I see no problem with Keeping it. Guanaco (talk) 09:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- As it's in use and we have a specific reason for the separate image, I see no problem with
- I am trying to piece together the reason I had created this file. The only difference that exists is that the thickness of the international borders and rivers are thinner. I believe I created the file to use on Template:Iraqi insurgency detailed map. Due to the size of the image, I thinned the borders a bit so it wouldn't crowd the template. At least using context clues that's what I can figure. It's main usage was strictly for the Template I believe.—SPESH531Other 08:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Guanaco’s conclusion. Green Giant (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I can not find info how it is licensed. It looks like a professional Photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yger (talk • contribs) 2017-11-05T19:39:27 (UTC) The photo was taken by a local-newspaper. The person in the photo has been granted access to use it. Maybe the license should be changed tp use only, and not edit and such, can someone help with me with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wljungbergh (talk • contribs) 2017-11-14 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:L requires images to be free to reuse including editing. Green Giant (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Cheating — Preceding unsigned comment added by Đăng Đàn Cung (talk • contribs) 2017-11-06T16:39:24 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Fair-use image (logo) ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want just delete it. I don't own this image. Can you please teach me how to upload images for common pages like this one without any deletion requests?
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tsukuyo-yomi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fair-use logos.
- File:Zee-Bangla-new-logo.png
- File:Zee-Anmol-New-Logo.jpg
- File:Zee-Salaam-new-logo.png
- File:Zee-Kannada-new-logo.png
- File:Zee-Telugu-new-logo.jpg
- File:Zee-Tamil-New-Logo.png
- File:Aapka-Colors-Logo.jpg
- File:Colors-tv-logo.jpg
- File:Colors-Super-Logo.png
- File:Colors Kannada.jpg
~AntanO4task (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. These logos might be allowed on a local Wikipedia if they meet the requirements. Green Giant (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
No wiki page uses this file & only two inactive uses this file. 5.135.76.7 05:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
{{Vd}} per nom, lack of source, and superseded by PNG. — Jeff G. ツ 16:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)- Note the image was uploaded in 2005. Consequently COM:Grandfathered old files applies and "lack of source" is irrelevant. --Fæ (talk) 13:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep "superseded" does not meet the listed guidelines. "lack of a source" is never a reason to delete a public domain file, let alone one that is 1,200 years old. --Fæ (talk) 12:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- There are no uses for which it is in COM:SCOPE. — Jeff G. ツ 13:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like you are arguing to delete the PNG version too. The PNG version is losslessly identical apart from having the frame cropped off. It is in use on 321 Wikimedia pages globally. Consequently the reasoning that the image is out of scope, is logically and demonstrably false. --Fæ (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- There are no uses for which it is in COM:SCOPE. — Jeff G. ツ 13:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This one (and its PNG version not mentioned for 11 minutes today on its file description page) at least has high contrast and could be useful for commercial purposes such as single-color printmaking. — Jeff G. ツ 14:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- diff shows that the PNG version was linked on the image page from 2006, and was prominently displayed at the top of the image page from that date until today, when I made this edit and then created a gallery where it is displayed. --Fæ (talk) 14:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I looked in the 11 minutes between your two edits, sorry. — Jeff G. ツ 14:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Fæ. Green Giant (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
a free source for each images must be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Skeleton Ghost photo taken during Halloween. I am enlightened and can constructs to build images through thought.jpg
[edit]It appears to be a Photoshopped hoax. 68.186.13.20 08:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Maybe a personal artwork or an unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This Isnt Own Work, Its An Logo With copyright 2.190.224.95 10:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 12:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
non-free use file. Namoroka (talk) 06:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Utopia on Wheels.jpg
Unused files about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source, no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder (and seems quite unlikely) or that the portrait is otherwise free to use. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Screenshots of commercial website and publicity. Pierre cb (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
probably copyright infringement to https://www.tib.eu/de/die-tib/presse-und-informationen/fotos-und-logos/ [4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wibramuc (talk • contribs) 2017-11-04T16:41:36 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received. --Guanaco (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
No permission given from Facebook. B dash (talk) 03:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter: Created by an employee of the Army Corps of Engineers, so it's Public Domain.--Iranoia (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: US government works are public domain. --Guanaco (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
bad quality Ralph Hammann (talk) 07:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: bad quality, many good images of the same in Category:Pipe organ of Jesuit Church, Molsheim. --Guanaco (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
The map (borders of red area) seems to me incorrect and, really, it is unused. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; also questionable copyright status. --Guanaco (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
I propose to delete this image, because is blur. There are other images of this monument.--Juandev (talk) 21:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Maybe not the sharpest photo, but its angle and composition are unique among the photos we have of the monument. --Guanaco (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
تصویر برای مقالهای بود که حذف شده Ehsartem (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. −ebrahimtalk 11:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
baja resolucion Giselpda (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
This This image is not Marie Mancini. This image is part of the portrait of LA MARQUISE MARTA GHEZZI BALDINOTTI drawn by Jacob Ferdinand Voet. Oeuf dur (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, Oeuf dur. Thank you for the correct identification ! But there's no need to delete this file, it is sufficient to rename it. Thanks again. Regards. --Guise (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, Guise. Thank you. However, could I rename it ? --Oeuf dur (talk) 20:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Oeuf dur: Hey, any sources showing the real name? --Mhhossein talk 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Mhhossein talk : Artnet and Sothebys. --Guise (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Guise, the rename is already done by a colleague. --Mhhossein talk 05:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Mhhossein talk : Artnet and Sothebys. --Guise (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Oeuf dur: Hey, any sources showing the real name? --Mhhossein talk 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 22:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Ellin Beltz. Ruthven (msg) 22:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Image copyrightée (GEPA-05021556033 http://isave.gepa-pictures.com/index.php) Bounè rodzo (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Image copyrightée (GEPA-07021556068 http://isave.gepa-pictures.com/index.php) Bounè rodzo (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy.[5] FunkMonk (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Image copyrightée (GEPA-07021556085 http://isave.gepa-pictures.com/index.php) Bounè rodzo (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, there are many other pictures of Icelandic plates in Commons Upwinxp (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I published this image. I accept the deletion. I cropped a photo in order to have something in the Vehicle registration plate article. But now better images are available.--BIL (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Old name was "Screenshot". So - taken from where? Free movie/site? Proof. But just a Google search shows this. Seems to be taken from there. No proof for a free license. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am the autor of the picture in shared web-site Anarchazys (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC).
Kept: Per author statement of own work, 15 November. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
This file is not useful Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 22:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Image shows notable person, low resolution is no reason for deletion nor are missing exif data. --Ailura (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, notable. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Per description, photo is taken from the subject's Instagram; not clear if it is CC-licensed. Trivialist (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -> also author's name in metadata. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Artinpl as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: File not in use, unjustifed renaming by Shakko (11:22, 1. Sep. 2014), improved file uploaded under previous name in line with MNW naming convention - compare with Category:British paintings in the National Museum in Warsaw. But if the file will be deleted, then its history will be lost. Regular deletion request is created. And I am not sure, which filename is better. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- A good quality file was deleted without apparent reason - File:Ingres Academic Study.jpg, there's no trace of it's history, so why not here? since it was renamed against the rules, without apparent reason and better quality image under initial file name was uploaded. Artinpl (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Additionally argument makes no sense, the high quality image persists in Category:Academic Study of a Male Torso by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Artinpl (talk · contribs) nominated the file for speedy deletion, because in his/her opinion file:Scorel St. Mary Magdalene.JPG has better name. I'm not sure. If this file is deleted, then its history will disappear. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Artinpl: (1) Do you know the "move" button (it exists since a few years)? It is much easier than this procedure. (2) "Scorel St. Mary Magdalene" has better name? No, that's a crap name. Start a discussion first if you want, and I tell you the reasons. DR is not about naming of files. Keep because invalid and useless. --Mattes (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, of course, just to be declined like in this case. You are so nice. Someone is doing nothing to improve the file and its description and knows the best what's the proper file name. Please delete this file. Artinpl (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment @ Artinpl 
: With that magic button "move" any registered user can move the file name himself (I still don't know why this should be done with this file) > no DR necessary. Cancel this DR. --Mattes (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- For example to show that Commons renaming rules are applicable to everybody. I cannot change file name, my request for rights was declined and I am sure that my request for renaming would be also declined in this case for not sticking to the rules. As for file history - a good quality file was deleted without apparent reason - File:Ingres Academic Study.jpg, there's no trace of it's history, so why not here? since it was renamed against the rules, without apparent reason and better quality image under initial file name was uploaded. Artinpl (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -> and someone had overwritten a better quality and larger file size image with a poor one... so now this one kept is larger than the other one and better quality. I changed the name so it sorts next to the other one in all categories. I can't wait to see the nomination in reverse, please ping me if you nominate it. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Unneeded redirect left after page move. Zaenon (talk | contribs | CA) 18:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio (https://www.google.com/search?q=%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%82%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B6&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJuz8t5V4tl2UaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgUCAoMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiiPE_1gHnwjCHccdjhOgCOMTkBPkE840zzTbPec9gDjmPcM04j3cPf08GjDpYf-Su4xEW_1f-lWuJAE3D7oBv7iobkNLV-1EoDzOapSLVbCpqD5DwLxZ56OQ3F70gBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBHjjob0M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJxszs17nXAhUEpo8KHTm6BqcQ2A4IIygB&biw=1366&bih=669) Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Photographie copyrightée (GEPA-18031756033 http://isave.gepa-pictures.com) Bounè rodzo (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, a map from a set of 4 maps, I have created at the early stages of the event, later replaced in Wikipedia articles by a superior map. Partially redundant, No source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexpl (talk • contribs) 2017-11-09T18:01:07 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, a map from a set of 4 maps, I have created at the early stages of the event, later replaced in Wikipedia articles by a superior map. Partially redundant, No source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexpl (talk • contribs) 2017-11-09T18:01:30 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, a map from a set of 4 maps, I have created at the early stages of the event, later replaced in Wikipedia articles by a superior map. Partially redundant, No source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexpl (talk • contribs) 2017-11-09T18:01:38 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, a map from a set of 4 maps, I have created at the early stages of the event, later replaced in Wikipedia articles by a superior map. Partially redundant, No source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexpl (talk • contribs) 2017-11-09T18:01:22 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
No idea what this image is supposed to show (art? digitally manipulated photography of plants? something else?). There is also no obvious connection to the various keyword tags given (random places all over Mongolia). It may well have ended up in the original panoramio gallery by mistake. No recognizable encyclopedic use. Latebird (talk) 11:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.hylachory.com/plants. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I Own Hylachory, it is a registered LLC in the state of Washington under my name (which is published on the image) my username is Hyladean. My last name is Dean not sure how you wouldn't have put those two together considering the images has my full name + username and the only other website it appears on is www.hylachory.com, do a whois on the site if you are unsure. I took this photograph, remove this nomination. talk]])
Why is this still on here? How do I contact an admin to remove this false accusation and why are users allowed to nominate images for deletion and not required to respond? 11/28/2017 Hyladean ([[User talk:Hyladean|
Kept: Only part of the image was found on the web, suggesting that the one here at Commons is the original. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, work by author, has OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data, out of scope 79.230.88.167 15:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This is my own foto, I've worked 25 years close the Akron. More informations on my website ArsAstrologica.com/Akron
Ich komme gerade von den Trauerfeiern für Akron in St. Gallen, wo ich die Laudatio gehalten habe und ich finde es ungeheuerlich, wie irgendwelche Wikipedia-Nutzer, die sich hinter anonymen Kürzeln verstecken und keinerlei Kontakt zum Künstler Akron oder dessen große Freundes- und Mitareiterkreises hatten/haben, hier einfach irgendwelche Beiträge oder Fotos von mir bezweifeln und auf Löschung dringen - ohne irgendwelche Sachkenntnis, irgendwelche Rückfragen. Ich habe in Wikipedia meinen Klarnamen, meine Vita und meine Kontaktdaten angegeben. Offener geht es wirklich nicht. Wenn dass, wenn es ständig von Laien, die keine Ahnung von Kunst und Literatur im Allgemeinen und Werk und Leben des Verstorbenen Künstlers Akron in billigster Hackermanier hier hineingrätschen und meine sorgfältig recherchierten Beiträge weglöschen, ist das gegen jegliche Ansprüche an Seriosität, die Wikipedia nach außen hin postuliert. Als Anfänger, der zum ersten Mal auf Wikipedia publiziert und schockiert ist von so viel Primitivität und Dreistigkeit, bitte ich hiermit alle Wikipedia- und Wikicommons-Mitarbeiter, die schön länger dabei sind und die Qualitätskriterien von Wikipedia und Wikicommons ernst nehmen, um Hilfe, Mediation und Ablösung der bislang für den Artikel Administratoren durch fachkundigere Administratoren/Lektoren, die ein Mindestmaß an Bildung in den Bereichen Literatur und Kunst mitbringen. Jürgen Hoppmann, den 13. November 2017
Dieses Foto haben wir im im Frühjahr 2002 Probefotos für das Kurzfilmprojekt "Der Magus, Beherrscher des Chaos" http://www.arsastrologica.com/magus.htm am Ruhberghaus in St. Gallen schossen. Ich hatte die Fotos schon viele Jahre auf meinem Server, allerdings sehr klein und in sehr schlechter Qualität, da wir in den Drehvorbereitungen waren, die Website nur intern im Filmteam brauchten und die Download-Kapazitäten vor 15 Jahren noch so gering waren, dass die Fotos sehr stark komprimiert und auf Icon-Größe geschrumpft wurden. Anfang November 2017 hatte ich auf meinen Festplatten und Backups aus alten Zeiten nach den Originalbildern gesucht, leider sind sie nicht mehr vorhanden. Und so habe ich das schlechte, aber vorhandene Bildmaterial mühsam überarbeitet, mit den den komplizierten Copyrightfreigaben versehen, die Wikipedia in Deutschland verlangt, auf Wickicommons hochgeladen und auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akron_(Okkultist). Dass die Fotos nach mehrtägiger Vorarbeit dann binnen Minuten von irgendeinem Benutzer von Wikipedia/Wikicommons ohne Rückfrage dort gelöscht und gesperrt wurden, ist m.E. ein absolutes Unding allein durch interne Vorgaben von Wikipedia/Wikicommons nicht erklärbar. --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Das ist mein eigenes Werk. Weitere Informationen siehe meine eigene Website. Sollten dennoch Fragen offen sein, stehe ich jederzeit zur Verfügung! Jürgen Hoppmann, Görlitz, den 15. November 2017 https://www.arsastrologica.com/akron --Jürgen Hoppmann (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, work by author, has OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
上传版本有误作者申请删除 Tyg728 (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 01:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Taiwan doesn't have such a road sign. TimChen (talk) 10:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Go ahead and delete (file creator here), but create a redirect to File:TW THWtn182-1.svg in its place. –Fredddie™ 02:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
JPG is not the right file type for this content. I've made a SVG for that. Ras67 (talk) 15:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since). It does not seem available at gencat.cat sites, but it can be found (with higher resolution here). It's impossible to determine its actual copyright status Discasto talk 11:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Found this pdf on gencat.cat, page 168 shows the image with low resolution. --....HMS (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Maybe this image can be kept. The image is on the cited page but perhaps an Admin (Jcb, Lymantria or Cookie?) should mark this image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Source found in the PDF on the gencat site, so it can be kept. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
I deleted this file as a duplicate of File:Glorious Day for a Spacewalk.jpg. I undeleted, and I'm converting the issue to a DR due the following discussion, which I've moved from my user talk page:
Hi, my version was in a better quality, without taking into account that it was uploaded 15 days later. Opinions please
| Prismo (talk. | contr.) 02:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Prismo345: I've temporarily undeleted File:Space Sunrice.jpg. I don't see how it's a better quality. It's 1,041 × 693 while the one I kept is 4,928 × 3,280. If I made a mistake let me know; otherwise I'll re-delete it. Guanaco (talk) 03:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The preview & thumbnails of the lower-resolution image might be slightly sharper, because they haven’t been downsampled as much. But that’s not a very good reason to keep the file IMO.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC) Guanaco (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: I don't knoow what to say about.... --Prismo (talk. | contr.) 21:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete downsampled and later uploaded, there is no raeson to keep it. --Ras67 (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep @Guanaco: what I was referring to is that mine although it is in lower resolution, compared to the other is not so blurry, and to check, have the windows open and you pass one and then the other without moving down the mouse so you do not move, the other version is blurred and it is not seen clearly. Prismo (talk. | contr.) 00:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Prismo345: Did you do any enhancement work on your version, such as sharpening? Guanaco (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: Nop, just download it directly from the NASA website and upload it, with the respective license, that's all. Prismo (talk. | contr.) 04:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: So? Which one stays Prismo (talk. | contr.) 00:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: Nop, just download it directly from the NASA website and upload it, with the respective license, that's all. Prismo (talk. | contr.) 04:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Prismo345: Did you do any enhancement work on your version, such as sharpening? Guanaco (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Well, File:Glorious Day for a Spacewalk.jpg is the full resolution, and it appears to be what's at the source. I think you may have used a downscaling algorithm different from MediaWiki. The difference is slight, and we definitely do want to keep the original. Guanaco (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- All right then @Guanaco: , :) Prismo (talk. | contr.) 20:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Now it is a 100 % duplicate, please Delete it immediately. --Ras67 (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Now it is a 100 % duplicate, please
Deleted: per discussion. --Guanaco (talk) 06:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
likely above ToO see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Magnavox_Odyssey_2_logo.svg Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 01:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by S099001 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: (G7) I'm the uploader. We have some other pictures can use.. Needs discussion. I do not see replacement file. Uploader's request is valid reason during first week after uploading; here whole month has passed. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- No replacement picture yet. However, there are still some pictures about reeds of sheng. We can use those files but not this - S099001 (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. Green Giant (talk) 01:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
diffrent scift, i made the logo but this is not good scrift.thank you.Olasyar (talk) 12:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment This DR is by the uploader within days of uploading, so should be speedied - but it is in use, whcih causes some issues for me. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Author request. Only used in three user talk pages and one OgreBot page. Green Giant (talk) 01:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Оbscene and offensive words (in Russian language) -IEPCBM (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: or @Butko: please could you confirm this and close the DR as appropriate? Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 01:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in usage. --A.Savin 01:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Unclear source, suspicious own work claim - possible copyright violation. It was an internet meme spread circa 2009 on Japanese-language websites. (See http://birthofblues.livedoor.biz/archives/50902514.html for example.) It seems unlikely that the originally anonymous author suddenly decided to release it under a license that requires attribution 7 years later. Despite the embedded text saying "無断転載・掲載 OK" ("no permission needed to redistribute"), it's not clear if it includes permission to commercial use and redistribution with modification, not to mention that we have no way to prove whether the embedded "permission" mentioned above is genuine or photoshopped. whym (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 01:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Argentine for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Durante el evento de Open House los dueños de las casas que se visitan indican a que se le puede sacar fotografías y a qué no. En el caso de este pasaje, la visita incluia una galería de arte y nos permitieron sacar fotos a estas esculturas. Marutagliani 01:04, 16 nov 2017
- ¡Hola @Marutagliani: ! Se necesita la autorización escrita (y enviada a OTRS) de los autores o de los que encargaron las obras. --Ruthven (msg) 22:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Ruthven. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
It is wrong that is a Muraenidae 81.44.68.207 17:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Then please use the {{Rename}} template to suggest a correct name. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
This file cannot be updated and the delimitation of Caribbean Colombian Spanish is inaccurate, as the author shows parts of the interior that are by no way Caribbean, as if they were. Alvaro 1901 (talk) 23:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The map is completely unsourced and should not be used in any Wikipedia articles as if it were fact, full stop. This is, however, a matter for decisions on content for sister wiki projects, not a determining factor for the existence of the image on commons. Your 'replacement' map in the form of File:Español caribeño1.png is equally original research. Preference over one unsourced map for another doesn't make sense. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Iryna. Green Giant (talk) 01:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by B dash as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope and COM:PORN.. I am not sure. It is categorized into category:Scarification process, maybe it has some educational value. Needs discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Scarification process is one thing, exhibitionism is another. If you had a scarification in your belly, would you take off your pants for a pic? I wouldn't; and I don't think anybody contributing to Commons in goodwill would. (It is enough to pull your shirt or blouse upwards, FYI. :) If anyone wishes to categorize this image, Category:Female exhibitionism would suit more. Still it is an OoS UPF. COM:PORN is also valid. Delete --E4024 (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, have you ever contemplated the meaning of the word 'pornography' before dropping this term: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography ? It seems like you didn't. If you had a scarification in your belly, would you take off your pants for a pic? I wouldn't... First: this seems like a clear case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_consensus_effect and second: its not about the belly here ;-) Keep --Lamilli (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep If this is porn, anything here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nude_women_with_abdominal_tattoos would be porn as well. --2A02:8109:8CC0:3280:597B:CD14:5407:8697 08:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- User:B dash why do you call exhibitionism "porn" and confuse me? :) It is very normal practice to exhibit your reproductive organs (I mean the exterior part :) even if you're not at the office of the urologist or gynecologist... --E4024 (talk) 08:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use and seems to be educationally useful. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Die Stadt Nucet in Rumänien hat kein offizielles Wappen, siehe hier die Website der Stadt Nucet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoschmidt (talk • contribs) 2017-11-05T14:59:24 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - This image is widely used, so it cannot be deleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Cut from magazine or website,copy right YenWitch (talk) 10:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I did not cut this photo from no magazine / website. I took this photo myself. Vathlu (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Vathlu: I see that there is whitespace along the edge of the photo. It appears to be from rotation, rather than an artifact of scanning or other copyright violation, but this may be the reason for the DR. Would you crop the image? Guanaco (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: EXIF shows "Picasa". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Stolen from a magazine or scarpbook, obviously scanned from an unknown source. 37.119.67.14 15:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
برش دادهشده از مجله یا تصویر اینترنتی، کار شخصی نیست YenWitch (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @YenWitch: Can you prove your claim?--Mhhossein talk 17:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, Yes. Orginal Image: This Website YenWitch (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- That version don't seem to be older. --Mhhossein talk 07:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, Yes. Orginal Image: This Website YenWitch (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Mhhossein. Green Giant (talk) 18:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
دزدیدهشده از مجله یا وبسایت (copyright) YenWitch (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
خیر قربان این عکس را خودم در ورزشگاه گرفتم. عکسهای قبل و بعد از این عکس موجود هست، لطفا بیدلیل تهمت نزنید. با تشکر Vathlu (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a name of a magazine or a link to something that shows this is copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
the image is not free to use. this coloured version is copyrighted. ColourbyRJM (talk) 11:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question Is is the recolored version of this free file: File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-487-3066-04,_Flugzeug_Messerschmitt_Me_109.jpg. Do you have any prove that it is copyrighted? (Just claiming you have copyright does not count ) --Jahobr (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep until some kind of prove of the copyright is provided. --Jahobr (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I have found ColourbyRJM's version at: https://www.facebook.com/colourbyRJM/photos/a.1242874395820924.1073741828.1242868979154799/1242881935820170/?type=3&theater it was uploaded at 17. Juli 2017. The version here was uploaded at 26. Mai 2017. But if you flip between the black&white version and our colored version you can see that it is not just colored but also modified (especially on the cockpit hood). ColourbyRJM's version looks more like the original. On www.pinterest.se I found an even older version crawled on Jan 19, 2017. Hard to say what is going on... --Jahobr (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I have the original photoshop files and can prove this is my work - please advise how I can do this so this issue can be resolved
Please advise who / and how I supply the prove required to have this image removed, I have my working PSD files and can prove beyond doubt - to answer your questions on dates - my facebook page was set up after this image was colourised - I waited until I had enough content before launching a page. the image however appeared here first _ https://www.facebook.com/worldwarincolor/photos/a.393169424146189.1073741828.393166910813107/1089513511178440/?type=3&theater on the 30th of December 2016! you can clearly see it mentions who coloured it too which is me - my full name btw, before anyone asks later became just ColoutbyRJM sure I have proved this is my colourised version of this image and it can now be removed?
- Delete per nom. The link shows an uplod date of 2016-12-30. --Jahobr (talk) 13:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Theinstantmatrix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Invalid source and author. Non-free logo. See File:YouTube Rewind.png's deletion log.
I believe this is below COM:TOO in the US. If this is kept, I will request COM:UNDEL for File:YouTube Rewind.png. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Josve. Please correct the file summary as appropriate. Green Giant (talk) 18:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I have added {{PD-SpanishGov-money}} Txitxo1 (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's nice, but it won't make any difference, because this does not address the nomination reason. Jcb (talk) 16:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted. This template concerns euro bank notes, not pesetas coins. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:100 pesetas-reverse.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- For an historic flag? This is like asking authorship information if someone draw an image of the Spain flag. It sounds excessive to me. In this case, it is also a simple design, a well known cross shape and two colors.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's not below TOO and as long as we don't know how "historic" this depiction of the flag is, we cannot determine whether it could be out of copyright or not. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- it's far below TOO... it's a universal symbol of the cross. there are many type of cross and this is one. Interesting anectode, thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- The cross itself may be below TOO but this depiction obviously isn't. Jcb (talk) 17:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- To me it obviously is... come on what is original? Not the color, to the shape... a shadow? I don't think so.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- The cross itself may be below TOO but this depiction obviously isn't. Jcb (talk) 17:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- it's far below TOO... it's a universal symbol of the cross. there are many type of cross and this is one. Interesting anectode, thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's not below TOO and as long as we don't know how "historic" this depiction of the flag is, we cannot determine whether it could be out of copyright or not. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The flag is old, see http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/it-pisa.html. However, it is firm policy here that while the blazon (the written description of the flag) does not generally have a copyright, individual creations from the blazon do. Since we don't know when or where this version was created and it clearly is not a "standard" version (see cited flag), we can't keep it without a license from the creator or proof that it is PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Also File:Justizvollzugsanstalt Bernau (Luftbild).jpg has the very same issue being from the same source.
Delete: the image source has a clear copyright notice at the bottom right of the full image page and this page from the source website claims copyright to all images and text plus says that third-party copyright may also apply. The image itself looks like a Google satellite image is the original source and their images are copyright too, so PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Hmm, I just looked to the intro text here @ Commons:
- Deutsch: Die staatliche Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung hat im März 2011 ihre Digitalen Orthophotos mit einer Bodenauflösung von 2 Metern (WMS DOP 2m) als "OpenData-Produkt" freigegeben und unter Creative Commons Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland Lizenz gestellt. Im Dezember 2011 folgte die Digitale Topographische Karte 1:500.000 (DTK500). Als Autorenattribution wird die Angabe "Datenquelle: Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung – www.geodaten.bayern.de" gefordert. Diese Kategorie enthält Dateien, die auf Basis dieser Freigabe nach Commons hochgeladen wurden. Weitere Ausschnitte können über den "Bayernatlas" im Geoportal des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums der Finanzen erstellt werden.
- https://www.google.de/maps/place/Bahnhofpl.+1,+80335+M%C3%BCnchen/@48.1397073,11.5611758,144m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x479e75f9e9fbeed1:0x84773056350ba6e2!8m2!3d48.1397239!4d11.5616385?dcr=0 the capture by Google Earth] is not congruent, seee the light colored cars in the bottom of the nominated image for example.
- One should check all 110+ images under Category:Images from Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung --Mattes (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting but that statement seem to be in contradiction to the fact that a copyright notice appears on the source page for the image, which can of course mean they retain copyright but under a free Creative Commons license, but their impressum page appears to state something different. We will need to get some other editors to look at this. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- See https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/weitere/opendata.html (in German), which lists all data under CC BY 3.0 DE. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 20:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- That link does not work. Did you read this page from the source website as suggested above? Ww2censor (talk) 22:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Link works for me (and obviously others). As stated above, the aerial imagery is licensed under CC-BY (Category:Images from Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung). Your link tells about the content of the website itself as texts, images, graphics. The terms of use for the map service "BayernAtlas" are https://geoportal.bayern.de/geoportalbayern/seiten/nutzungsbedingungen.html . --тнояsтеn ⇔ 22:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- None of my browsers allow me to connect to your link and most tell me that the site has a bad certificate, so prevent me from opening it. However, the page I link to is the terms of use page for the Geoportal Bavaria and the BayernAtlas, where it clearly states each provider of resources has their own rights and independently offers their use conditions. Specifically the BayernAtlas section, where these images come from, allows personal use of the material in # 3.1 and in # 3.3 prohibits duplicating, sceenshots or making them publicly available. What is important is not what is stated at Category:Images from Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung unless it is verifiable and the one link provided does not do that. Unless we can verify the text added to that category page by Rudolph Buch, and I don't know if link you provided does that, then the copyright status of all those images is questionable. Even if it confirms the statement on the category page it will then be in contradiction with its own terms of use statement. Maybe you can post the text from that page into a user page here on a temporary basis so it can be reviewed. Ww2censor (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Your first link was the "Impressum" (imprint), I gave the link to the "Nutzungsbedingungen" (terms of use).
- The page on OpenData clearly puts aerial imagery under CC-BY license. Can you open the page using Google Cache ([6]) or Internet Archive ([7])? It says Nachfolgende Geodatensätze und -dienste der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung stehen unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland Lizenz. Die Namensnennung der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung als Rechteinhaberin hat in folgender Weise zu erfolgen: "Datenquelle: Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung – www.geodaten.bayern.de". and lists DOP80 and DOP200 (en:Orthophoto). --тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- The Link works fine. The specified license CC BY 3.0 DE is correct. --Reneman (talk) 09:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for the links. I see that page now and you are correct that it states the license is {{Cc-by-3.0-de}} but the specific BayernAtlas page "terms of use page" has many restrictions that contradict it, so we have a problem as to what is correct. Ww2censor (talk) 11:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The Link works fine. The specified license CC BY 3.0 DE is correct. --Reneman (talk) 09:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- None of my browsers allow me to connect to your link and most tell me that the site has a bad certificate, so prevent me from opening it. However, the page I link to is the terms of use page for the Geoportal Bavaria and the BayernAtlas, where it clearly states each provider of resources has their own rights and independently offers their use conditions. Specifically the BayernAtlas section, where these images come from, allows personal use of the material in # 3.1 and in # 3.3 prohibits duplicating, sceenshots or making them publicly available. What is important is not what is stated at Category:Images from Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung unless it is verifiable and the one link provided does not do that. Unless we can verify the text added to that category page by Rudolph Buch, and I don't know if link you provided does that, then the copyright status of all those images is questionable. Even if it confirms the statement on the category page it will then be in contradiction with its own terms of use statement. Maybe you can post the text from that page into a user page here on a temporary basis so it can be reviewed. Ww2censor (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Link works for me (and obviously others). As stated above, the aerial imagery is licensed under CC-BY (Category:Images from Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung). Your link tells about the content of the website itself as texts, images, graphics. The terms of use for the map service "BayernAtlas" are https://geoportal.bayern.de/geoportalbayern/seiten/nutzungsbedingungen.html . --тнояsтеn ⇔ 22:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- That link does not work. Did you read this page from the source website as suggested above? Ww2censor (talk) 22:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- See https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/weitere/opendata.html (in German), which lists all data under CC BY 3.0 DE. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 20:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep it's CC --Ralf Roleček 09:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
You can find Open Data and protected Data on the server of Geoportal and in BayernAtlas. The aerial pictures with resolution of 80cm are free [8], the pictures with 40cm and 20cm resolution are not. If you click on the BayernAtlas link on Geoportal [9] you can add the 80cm resolution picture (DOP 80 (Farbe) -> Layer hinzufügen). Zoom to the Munich Hauptbahnhof and compare the details of this image to the "Basiskarte Luftbild" in the left menu. The currently discussed picture is not based on Open Data. The second question is, whether it is possible to pubish screenshots from a protected service like BayernAtlas if the underlying data are free even if it is forbidden within the terms of use of the service. --Ailura (talk) 08:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- The picture of Bernau is taken at a different zoom factor, i think the resolution is less than 1Pixel/80cm. --Ailura (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The zoom factor is irrelevant because you can always zoom in and out of the 80 cm DOP layer. It's the 80 cm basic resolution map layer as such that is free to use, and not any zoom factor 200 or 80. The difference between 80 cm, 200 cm, etc. layers is just the level of detail you get at full zoom, i.e. the scale at which the image becomes too pixelated. The 80 cm DOP does correspond though with the image at Commons. See e.g. "DOP 80 (Farbe)" selected at zoom 14, or DOP 200 (Farbe)" at zoom 14. Again, the zoom factor is not subject to the CC licence granted, but the licence refers to the base map layer. De728631 (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- DeleteThis is wrong. The level of detail of the 80cm DOP layer is less than in the currently discussed image. Look at the cars on the bottom of the picture [10]. Compare it to the unfree Luftbild Layer. The licence refers to the 80cm DOP and does not apply to this image. The zoom factor of the Bernau picture is relevant because it shows less detail than the 80cm resolution (=> keep Justizvollzugsanstalt Bernau (Luftbild).jpg). --Ailura (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
-
File:München — Bahnhofplatz 1 (Luftbild).png
-
OpenData: 80cm resolution
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4619158028).jpg){kind=link}
![47 File:HUGO INTERPRETANDO "CASTILLO" EN EL "JURAMENTO".png](#File:HUGO_INTERPRETANDO_"CASTILLO"_EN_EL_"JURAMENTO".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![229 File:Maurice "Big Mo" Huffman.jpg](#File:Maurice_"Big_Mo"_Huffman.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_000001Aa·escultura_BG03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_20080320.jpg){kind=link}
,_pomník_WWI.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:2009_Akron_Bergwanderung.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(4619158028).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4619158028).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(4619158028).jpg){kind=link}
_(4619158028).jpg){kind=link}
![03:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/12#c-Amber_Kinney-2017-11-12T03:17:00.000Z-File:HUGO_INTERPRETANDO_"CASTILLO"_EN_EL_"JURAMENTO".png){kind=link}
![04:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/12#c-Jon_Kolbert-2017-11-19T04:51:00.000Z-File:HUGO_INTERPRETANDO_"CASTILLO"_EN_EL_"JURAMENTO".png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/12#c-Sarah_Macias-2017-11-12T22:12:00.000Z-File:Maurice_"Big_Mo"_Huffman.jpg){kind=link}
![01:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/12#c-76.20.27.95-2017-11-13T01:15:00.000Z-File:Maurice_"Big_Mo"_Huffman.jpg){kind=link}
![06:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/11/12#c-Jon_Kolbert-2017-11-19T06:24:00.000Z-File:Maurice_"Big_Mo"_Huffman.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_000001Aa%C2%B7escultura_BG03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_000001Aa%C2%B7escultura_BG03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_000001Aa·escultura_BG03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_20080320.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_20080320.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_20080320.jpg){kind=link}
_-_20080320.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://www.tib.eu/fileadmin/Daten/presse/bilder/pressefotos/TIB_Auer_Soeren_Pressefoto_RGB.JPG){kind=link}
,_pomn%C3%ADk_WWI.jpg){kind=link}
,_pomn%C3%ADk_WWI.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_pomník_WWI.jpg){kind=link}
,_pomník_WWI.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted File:München — Bahnhofplatz 1 (Luftbild).png. According to the image comparison this image is not based on the free layers "Digitales Orthophoto 80cm Bodenauflösung" (DOP80) or DOP200 but another layer which maybe is published under different licensing conditions according to http://geoportal.bayern.de/geoportalbayern/seiten/dienste.
Kept File:Justizvollzugsanstalt Bernau (Luftbild).jpg which uses the free layer and some ineligible labeling. --Martin H. (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}