Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 28th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid permission after 30 days of the first response by an OTRS volunteer. B dash (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: how can you now that? Please don't interfere with this process. --Jcb (talk) 09:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, no author, no source given. Probably a copvio (or advertising spam). Aristeas (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : personality right isusseshence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : unused upload, personality right isusses, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and blocked - reupload of deleted file by user who was previously warned for the same offense. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the individual pictures Jcb (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have metadata on the all of the original files in collage to support all of my photographs. The one in question, however, is a collage of several. I will be more than happy to delete the collage image and substitute a single image (which will contain verifiable metadata corresponding to that of original file).

With regards,

Robert Sterling Gingher

So you are the photographer of all the individual pictures? Also e.g. of File:1- MG 9168.jpg, that was uploaded without authorship information? Jcb (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed, I am the author of all the uploaded files, but no source information appears as I made a collage from all the individual ones, which effectively masks the individual file metadata. So I propose that the collage file be deleted; I have sent another individual file (NOT A COLLAGE) which shows metadata or source information. Am I missing something? Am not sure where any other authorship information should go on wikimedia template uploads.

Thanks, this is what we needed to know. The collage can stay. I will fix both image description pages. Jcb (talk) 14:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2012-04-11 OSC.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created this image trying to fix a problem I was having editing an article. It was not related to the image. User-duck (talk) 03:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request. --bjh21 (talk) 11:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistaken upload Dans (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Saini.pallian (talk) 11:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in error СССР (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:19, 29 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Album cover --Krdbot 19:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded it. Harms personal rights. Osourdounmou (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the ornament depicted. bjh21 (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 13:25, 29 Oktober 2017 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 19:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Estelada blava.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: recreation of deleted content. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no free licence Thraen (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only for promotion. L3X1 (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing. If this is public domain, it should be marked with the correct license to determine its status. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Religious tract; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 20:07, 3 November 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pankaj Pokhrel.jpeg: Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. --Krdbot 01:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't read Russian, so I don;t know what this is, but I suspect it is out of scope. The person named does not appear in a Google search. It is not in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the image is out of scope. It's a photo of the refrence about legal rehabilitation of a non-notable person. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1937 image is obviously not "own work" as claimed by the uploader. It is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. It also is probably out of scope, as an unused image of a person who does not appear to be notable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I protest against the removal of this photo. This photo is used in articles about the Stalin repressions of 1937 Zeus639 (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Zeus639[reply]


Deleted: the historical photo was uploaded as own modern work by the uploader. Also the image of a non-notable person is out of scope. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine, This sculpture was erected in 2011. see uk:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (Мелітополь) or ru:Памятник Тарасу Шевченко (Мелитополь) Y.haruo (talk) 20:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are the author of this photograph but this is a derivative work. Unfortunately the permission from the author of the sculpture is lacking.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your feelings but we have to observe the law. This file will be deleted without the permission of the author. This matter is out of my hands.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Perhelion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, Ukraine does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. The sculptural work was completed in 2011 and authored by Віталієм Рожиком. No Creative Commons license permit from the sculptor. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I am the author of the image. Not a commercial photo. The monument will be demolished in 2023. Not a copy, this is an original photo. DENAMAX (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DENAMAX the Creative Commons license is commercial. You took a picture of a copyrighted monument, and you need commercial Creative Commons licensing permission from the sculptor. Unless, the Ukrainian government removes the non-commercial restriction for free uses of copyrighted public artworks of Ukraine so Wikimedia Commons can host this image of the copyrighted sculpture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The condition at Article 22(10) of the Law of Ukraine No. 2811-IX of December 1, 2022, on Copyright and Related Rights is what makes Commons not to accept copyrighted public monuments of Ukraine: "creation of images of works of architecture and fine arts permanently located in places accessible to the public on the street, provided that such actions do not have independent economic value." Note that Wikimedia Commons only accepts commercial CC/PD licenses; Ukrainian law on freedom of panorama is not compatible with this licensing policy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The monument has been demolished. At the moment, Melitopol is occupied by Russia. DENAMAX (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DENAMAX no difference, Russia does not allow commercial FoP for non-architectural works (see COM:FOP Russia). Demolition or destruction does not magically take away sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Such is the law. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF data is very clear: this is made from a NON-FREE file from the Russian Wikipedia. GRuban (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stan old (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Com:IDENT, consent required. Further: We are not a web host or social media site. Tinder of Facebook may be the better place. No improvement.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - This editor has plastered his wife everywhere and as such they're essentially treating this as another porno site, We're not a porn site and so these should be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stan old (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

All images are out of scope and realistically won't be used, I feel this editor is here for one reason and that reason is to upload "erotic/porno" images ..... Whilst they have uploaded other images they used to primarily focus on these sorts of images before being repeatedly blocked for the erotic images, IMHO there's no educational use for any of the erotic images and we already have better and more appropriate images of everything in this list, Thanks,

Davey2010Talk 00:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is mass DR nominating compatible with the etiquette of Wikimedia? Is eg these photos are erotic / pornographic File:Telangiectasia left thigh.jpg File:Kravica waterfall on Trebižat river.jpg? Is the preventive censorship of articles in polish Wikipedia consistent with good customs? Should not we wait to remove the contested photos from Wikimedia Commons? I wonder if Davey2010's actions are being taken in the interest of Wikimedia's quality or is it his personal crusade? Nominating photos for removal is acceptable. But I do not agree with the removal of editing Wikipedia articles that have been accepted by other administrators. And the last question, why this photo is DR re-nominated File:Menopause and before.jpg? Regards Stan old (talk) 22:07, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes it is, Nope no crusade here - Whilst we appreciate all images here some aren't compatible with this website - Many many images here are of better quality than the ones you've uploaded and in that respect are easily replaceable. –Davey2010Talk 00:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stan old (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Out of scope images, User has repeatedly been told not to upload these sorts of images due to previous problems where they were treating this as a pornography site, That aside IMHO we have much better quality images in the respective categories, Thanks

Davey2010Talk 21:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - Per nom (and this is not CindyPedia). Wutsje 23:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination which is trying to say "Commons is not an amateur porn site". --Mhhossein talk 17:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stan old (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

User is banned from uploading images of their wife (sexual or not), Out of scope, Thanks,

Davey2010Talk 22:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 "there seems to be a strong bias here for "attractive" young women unless it's an older work of art " - You couldn't be any more wrong here - If this was a young blonde we'd still be here now, Stan for years has used this site as an amateur porn site and he's done the exact same with his Flickr page. I'm certainly not on a crusade against Stan or porn images - This is purely because as I said Stan uses this site as a amateur porn site. Realistically I don't believe his images will be used and if they were they'd IMHO be used on a porno site. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete per the history and per everybody else. Donald Trung can use Google search to see "scarred Slavic women in their 50's" if that is such a meaningful context. Stop treating every naked image as a sacred bone please. There is no anti-nudity crusade here but only an exhibitionist old man. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • I took a pre-emptive measure. :) You will know better your past edits about nudity issues. Here not, but..? BTW the said thing ("scarred Slavic women in their 50's") has no educational value. It does not. BTW, remember, this old man had a sock, Mark something? "If I remember well", you defended one of their deleted nudes for middle age fat whatsoever woman (anus) image. (I added the "anus" part. I am still trying to understand the educational value. Perhaps she had hemorrhoids... :) E4024 (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010, I could bet this uploader was barred from editing... Thinking of asking him a permanent block? E4024 (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi E4024, I had asked at ANU for an indef block but so far haven't received a reply. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete As he is known to psychologically mistreat his here pictured wife(?) with those Images. I.e. creating montages on flicker with her next to a younger semi nude man, captioning it as "Mother f...s her son" and alike. Sorry to be this rather graphic, but I don't want anyone to make their own stuff up.--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I was pinged in a related DR and ended up here. To be very clear, i.m.o. there’s only two ways about this:
  • Either there is any sort of evidence (and the threshold is low — I didn’t check all these photos nor their Flickr originals, but the filenames alone here on Commons give out a sizeable creep vibe) that this photographer/uploader is in any way infringing on the rights of these models, either at the time of photographing or later on, and therefore these should be  deleted speedily by an admin, trumping any matters of scope and/or reuse,
  • or not, and therefore these should be  kept and the usual assortment of anti-nudity crusaders and kibitzers in general should stop misrepresenting policy and wasting everybody’s time.
-- Tuválkin 15:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Or the third option: Stan should stop socking and most certainly should stop treating this project like an amateur porn site. My biggest guess is that none of the models here probably ever consented to having their images uploaded here anyway.
As I've stated on the other DR I'm all happy for nudity to be here I've never once gone on a crusade and I would hope people who participate here previously aren't on one either as that's not why I'm/we're here. –Davey2010Talk 17:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Through enough investigation, good timing, and rearrangement, I found enough images to make an OK-size category containing facial masks. To be honest, though, the problem is that for such a popular type of product, both the imagery on Commons and the articles on Wikipedia are utterly lacking. I was worried that a different-but-related image, File:Decolette mask.jpg, may have been uploaded in violation of the model's privacy, but the Flickr posts and long-term sockpuppetry ease me of those concerns (a cropped version is directly in use on the English Wikipedia). I take no position on the remaining images. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised we don't have a lot more images either to be honest. Unless it's a copyvio or the model requests deletion then if it's COM:INUSE it has to stay. Given there's no replacement available here it'll have to stay so I've struck that file too, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I kept some that could conceivably be used or where we don't have many like them and deleted others where he could be taking advantage of the person depicted (per Tuvalkin). --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A small, low quality, and unused image. B dash (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC) File:Roke 2017-07-22 0800Z.png is much bigger and better. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

{{speedy|Better Color No B&W}} 위키광역시 (talk) 05:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - previously deleted. --Guanaco (talk) 06:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spambot likely this page was deleted for advertising. 99.109.85.105 06:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, out of scope Guanaco (talk) 09:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, used only for undisclosed paid promotion on Wikipedia. Otherwise no evidence of permission. Guanaco (talk) 09:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope. JacktheHarry (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cem Altınel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cem Altınel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edirne Belediye meclisi üyeleri 1930.jpg information was updated and seems OK now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License is OK now. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test (or vandalism). jdx Re: 18:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test (or vandalism). jdx Re: 18:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, blurred and distorted, animal not recognizable Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, unused file. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused, animals not recognizable. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused. animals not identifiable Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused. animals not identifiable Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused diagram, also uncategorized since upload in 2014, perhaps out of COM:SCOPE due to lack of use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This diagram dates back to 2012 with no utilization. It's also uncategorized, and perhaps not within COM:SCOPE as it is not in use and not well described. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This math diagram is not in use, has been here since 2012, is not well described and uncategorized. Perhaps it is out of COM:SCOPE? Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused, uncategorized, undescribed and location-less image of the sky through unnamed conifer and deciduous trees. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized very small diagram of no apparent notability, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cphamandla Gina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Guyana.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MetaBankCC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF; OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:CDEA:6238:CD3B:484E 20:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MetaBankCC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently scannen from a book. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer like the old embarrassing picture


Deleted: per nomination and out of scopr. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very tiny, unused image of the letter "1" in a fuzzy blue dot. Probably out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized and unused image of a sunset, uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Photograph probably not own work, no exif and small resolution. Jcb (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata and the size of this image shows it was in and out of Facebook prior to upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata and the size of this image shows it was in and out of Facebook prior to upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright situation. Probably not PD-1923, because Gray was active from 1925 according to EN wiki article. Not enough information to determine whether this could be PD or not. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, but of doubtful "own work" of uploader, appears to be reprinted from a handout or poster. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from cup design. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 23:17, 4 November 2017 UTC: Missing license as of 28 October 2017 - --Krdbot 01:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern artwork from an unknown source. Seemingly a copyvio.

Ies (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Private images of people. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please define clearly "Project Scope" for photographs to be submitted to Wikimedia Commons. Bengt Nyman (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PS and COM:PEOPLE. --Hystrix (talk) 18:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

The focus is a toy for which there is no evidence of copyright status.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests:

  1. Petit tigre
  2. Erminig
  3. Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush
  4. Wikimania 2014 Day 1
  5. Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin

-- (talk) 10:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point out that the focus of the first, fourth and fifth picture is not on the toy, but on the licence free material from the strategy discussion. On the third picture, most of the toy is covered by the handwritten signs. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.cvartet.ro/formatii/cvartetul-arpeggione/despre-noi/biografie.html .All the images uploaded by user Marian Ciobanu seems to be copied from this site. --Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stalygreen (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died in 1947, depicted person died in 1950. Jcb (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also properly sourced SVG available at File:Bandeira de Volta Redonda.svg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 10:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thierry Maelis (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in fr.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schwarz died in 1906 and the photo was taken end of the XIX century, that means 120 to 140 years ago. It would be a miracle that the photo be still under copyright. I don't believe in miracle. Keep it. --FLLL (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be unaware, but the community recently decided where to draw the line for images from PMA+70 countries if the author is unknown. We decided to draw that line at 120 years. Not about 120 years, but at least 120 years. The vague 'end of the XIX century' guess, could be anywhere between 1890 and 1905, so that {{PD-old-assumed}} cannot be applied to this image for the next 8 years. Jcb (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scan from a book rather than own work. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Agree; thanks. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern artwork from an unknown source. Seemingly a copyvio.

Ies (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. The drawing on the left and obelisc on the right are in public domain due to age, but the photo has unknown photographer and text is surely created after WWII. The photo violates text author's (and maybe the photographer's) copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information on both the photographer and the depicted artwork. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hkhurram122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, watermarks, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history (uploading a photo with AFP metadata as "own work").

LX (talk, contribs) 14:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with web link. Irrelevant for article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miciannelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i1.wp.com/womensmentalhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/depressed-mother.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8LLne6NXuuA/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mbbonheur0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-19/s150x150/20905203_176425202900559_6130104274941640704_a.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.pinimg.com/originals/34/1a/67/341a67372d658e8d4d32ee2a8169dbce.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick Haischberger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution and the uploader's history (all the other files that they uploaded were copyright violations, including ones with false authorship claims). LX (talk, contribs) 15:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata and the watermark. This is the only file uploaded using this account. LX (talk, contribs) 15:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my work and y don't want to share it. Uplaoding was a mistake Errorist (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you released it nearly 2 years ago under a free license, which is not revokable. That means, even if we delete it from Commons, anybody who has already downloaded it, can use it as long as he/she wants under the original license. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What is going on here? Page history suggests that this request was file on December 2009, nearly 2 years ago! --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Good-faith request filed by uploader 6 hours after upload, but went unnoticed for 22 months :-( Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused (the only contribution of uploader is his user page on en-wiki, without this photo) Pibwl (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: unclear source ("Electrical Engineer") and authorship ("PTU") information. LX (talk, contribs) 15:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 15:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, rather a screenshot of a tv broadcast. No exif, small resolution. Jcb (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, originally uploaded with watermark and no exif. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jyoti halder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files, outside the project scope. Also, it's likely that the uploader is a subject in these photos, and we need permission from the photographer.

Guanaco (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently the uploader owns a copy of this picture with an autograph on it, which doesn't mean he's got the right to use that picture. Other uploads by him may also be questioned... TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bellezze_in_cielo_(Down_to_earth)_(1m).jpg) Karsten11 (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Coolgenx1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdulrafey97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating some of the images were grabbed from social media), watermarks, and the uploader's history (their only other two uploads have been deleted as copyright violations).

LX (talk, contribs) 16:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS, OTRS-permission from toymaker is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinkumani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

your opinions are asked : as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:P.K.GOPI WITH MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR.jpg small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?

Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently uploaded for use in no:Grandiskanapé, which has been deleted. Appears to be some kind of unfunny joke, hoax or vandalism. Outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 19:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of the artist's video at http://annebean.net/redress/ so I'm guessing she owns the copyright, not Keighronpeter. GRuban (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kdalisay143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing metadata (except for metadata indicating that several of the files were grabbed from social media sites), the nature of several of the images (official logotypes, unlikely to have been designed by the uploader) and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously a TV screenshot. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmg 2006 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure to be own work. Images were uploaded to ilustrate a self promo article on plwiki and can be found e.g. here.~Cybularny Speak? 20:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerardolagunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There appear to be images of a guitar on the case of this cellphone sim card which was not created by uploader. If these are COM:DW, the permission of the actual copyright holder is needed to retain.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerardolagunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal vacation photos, no context, COM:WEBHOST, unusable and out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gerardolagunes (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Blurry out-of-focus photos, unusable.

P 1 9 9   16:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright [1] Pitpisit (talk) 03:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C)2007 Bertrand Rieger, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C)2007 Bertrand Rieger, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not find free license from source site http://www.naijaperminute.com.ng/2017/06/04/exclusive-gov-udom-emmanuel-commission-urua-anwa-international-market-wednesday-hon-idy-raphael/ . Likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

help to check

Pls, i hav set the derivative link for the image. Thanks! Visionjohnny (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-vx51660l_NQ/WckKOhL-urI/AAAAAAAAAA8/uad0kIEs3xMu7Ax2VZtow-1M8SsMf6bJQCLIBGAYYCw/w164-h160-k-no/ 240B:253:40E0:800:A8FE:BDDA:E5C5:C7D4 13:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a painting by Charles L. Smith. The uploader is not the copyrightholder, and cannot licence it under the creative commons. Luke (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, painter died in 1982. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of being CC BY-SA. A version can be found on the subject's Twitter account, putting the claim of "own work" into doubt. We'll need OTRS permission to establish that it's indeed freely licensed. Huon (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no wiki data, maybe not his or here own work Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + FBMD in meta. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no wiki data, maybe not his or here own work! Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + FMBD in the meta. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of painting by Czech artist Vratislav Jan Žižka (d. 2011), hardly "own work" as claimed or free image. Other uploads by Lu422 (talk · contribs) similarly problematic. JGHowes talk - 15:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no wiki data, maybe not his or here own work! Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + FBMD in meta. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original vector version exists at File:ApJL 848 L12 Fig2 Timeline of the discovery of GW170817, GRB 170817A, AT 2017gfo.svg. It has smaller file size and better resolution. There is no reason to keep this version with inapropriate JPEG compression. Geek3 (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original vector version exists at File:ApJL 848 L13 Fig2 Multi-messenger detection of GW170817 and GRB 170817A.svg. It has smaller file size and better resolution. There is no reason to keep this version with inapropriate JPEG compression. Geek3 (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author stated. May not be a work by VOA. QBear (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused copy of File:Rib Medal For his contribution to the creation of the EEU.png. -- 109.238.80.85 17:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gregm26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature and apparent age of several of the images, and the uploader's history. The two most recent uploads may be in the public domain if the copyright has expired, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that, as previously unpublished photographs may be protected by copyright for longer than expected.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: File:Bernard Pinet.jpg was previously deleted and restored as a result of an undeletion request. In the undeletion request, the uploader asserts that "this picture is totally free of law and public domain" but doesn't explain why and doesn't comment on the file's authorship. The undeletion request does not explain why something that is supposedly the uploader's own work has such a low resolution and no metadata. LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other version of the pic (File:LILIANA LAZAR photo wikipedia.pdf) says author is Florian Fontrouge. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image seems a selfy from her personal Facebook account, and the rights hardly belongs to the uploader. Docosong (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawings by 2 different artists, so probably copyvio. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine, This sculpture was erected in 2011. see uk:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (Мелітополь) or ru:Памятник Тарасу Шевченко (Мелитополь) Y.haruo (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are the author of this photograph but this is a derivative work. Unfortunately the permission from the author of the sculpture is lacking.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine, This sculpture was erected in 2011. see uk:Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку (Мелітополь) or ru:Памятник Тарасу Шевченко (Мелитополь) Y.haruo (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are the author of this photograph but this is a derivative work. Unfortunately the permission from the author of the sculpture is lacking.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free license; content at Speakerpedia is not under a free license per their TOS C.Fred (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 20:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://assarafalbert.free.fr/img/ligasigne_prier.gif Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of the State of Alabama with no indication of PD release. MB298 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://assarafalbert.free.fr/img/ecart_positionnel.gif Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, I don't think this is the uploader's own work. If you look at http://www.firstpost.com/photos/india-gallery/on-second-day-of-uttarakhand-visit-narendra-modi-addresses-ias-probationers-practices-yoga-with-them-4179003.html the second photo is clearly a different crop of this same image, and credited to PTI which is Press Trust of India the largest India news agency. GRuban (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a copyright violation of a non-free postcard (taken from a scan at http://cinematreasures.org/theaters/824/photos/37641 ) Anvilaquarius (talk) 23:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scale map - no indication of the source of the base map Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright license not support Pitpisit (talk) 03:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably non free screenshot. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

模糊不清低质量的文件 Tyg728 (talk) 07:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnage + plaques d'immatriculation visibles http://cahiersduvaldebargis.free.fr/ (talk) 09:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non voglio che venga reso pubblico AngeC04 (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a Book cover. According to the Copyright rules, it should be deleted. Dirac (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Below COM:TOO, surely? --bjh21 (talk) 21:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

added this

{{Trademark}}

this is an important book. with no reference in wikipedia. zero. so i took a photograph of my book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century Book by Thomas Piketty.

maybe the license can be changed. have a nice day — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Adam Kess (talk • contribs) 15:41, 4 November 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


thanks for your postiive comment....i think when they delete the photo... i will take one more and then make edits to the user file like this

when you delete this.. i will upload again with a new licence...wiki...the thankless community that ranks great in Alexa ratings


Licensing

{{Non-free book cover|image has rationale=yes|category=Non-fiction book cover images}}

is this theu licence..ǃǃ i am sure we can fix the licence {{Non-free use rationale album cover|Article = Mr. Jones (Counting Crows song) |Use = Infobox |Name = "Mr. Jones" |Artist = Counting Crows |Label = Geffen Records |Item = front cover |Type = single |Source = Derived from a digital capture of the single cover (creator of this digital version is irrelevant as the copyright in all equivalent images is still held by the same party). Copyright held by the record label or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless. }}

have a great dayǃ


Deleted: by Jcb. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not the uploader's own work but Facebook image. OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not the uploader's own work but Facebook image. OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy requested Advertising pdf, of the website from which it claims to be sourced. No indication uploader holds copyright even if it wasn't a blatant advertisement Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of project scope. Per COM:EDUSE, Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose -- DanielPenfield (talk) 22:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by COM:CSD#G7 Wikiuser15442 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos taken from a single external website, author name and uploader name are not similar, possible COM:COPYVIO.

114.26.147.35 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Restored per https://musou.tw/statement Alan (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of © files. IMHO not valid de minimis

Alan (talk) 22:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some photos apply Commons:De minimis and Template:PD-textlogo, like File:潘建志 (4).JPG, File:潘建志 (7).JPG.--KOKUYO (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In my humble opinion, I think File:柯建銘 (4).JPG is very similar to File:Museu_Valencià_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.jpg. While in the mean time, the work of File:潘建志 (8).JPG is also incidental work. One of the UK's law clearly stated: Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion in an artistic work. --Shangkuanlc (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, photo 4 is kept, because map is not seen in full and text is not readable. The others are deleted, for example, there is no freedom of panorama in Taiwan and text in photo 7 is enough long for copyright. There is no incidental inclusion in file 8. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos about PLA Navy from flickr user Simon YANG's , many found in google Image search. These photos maybe copyvio.

PS: if these Photos copyvio, plese add Simon YANG to flickr blacklist

shizhao (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Google Image search can be found earlier than the flickr upload time the same picture --shizhao (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are possibly not covered by eldiario.es licensing conditions. Main issue is that the images are not the ones actually published in the URL provided as source. They're higher resolution images that does not come from the allegued source and therefore cannot be covered by the license (it is possible to release a lower resolution image under a CC license while assigning a more restrictive license to higher quality images). Secondly, many of the images contain a clear copyright notice in the EXIF information, thus stating that such a specific version is copyrighted (see this or this). Finally, even the actually published versions keep a copyright notice, possibly invalidating the eldiario.es licensing conditions (see this or this). IMHO, the copyright status of these images is dubious

Only Tag "SANDRA LÁZARO" (example):

Tag "©SANDRA LÁZARO" (example):

Discasto talk 20:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

非常有趣的觀點,但是這分成兩部分:

  1. 這些照片當然都是從eldiario.es上來的,和美國之音相同,eldiario.es是從圖片網址細部修改來決定檔案大小和裁切方式,例如這篇新聞的照片,可以有原網站裁切最大圖片最小圖片。如果以File:Cargas-Sardenya-Diputacio-Ramon-Llull EDIIMA20171001 0193 19.jpg來說,亦能取得較小的原始圖片的檔案,所以你的第一個理由並不存在。
  2. 而關於網站使用©SANDRA LÁZARO和SANDRA LÁZARO兩種標記方式,網站並沒有說明原因,但似乎是要跟EXIF是否標記作者脫鉤,參見這篇網頁與其原始圖片

因此要有更詳細的確認方式,應該去詢問eldiario.es。 --KOKUYO (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting point of view but the licensing conditions apply to "published contents". We can argue a lot about what "publication" means, but it's simpler and safer to consider the obvious meaning: something that is published as part of a piece of news on the web. Not something with a non public URL you have to guess and build (and you deliverately omit, thus forging the source you provide). --Discasto talk 21:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is like VOA, VOA even could change URL to add logo:
website: https://www.voachinese.com/a/KMT-COMMENORATES-72ND-ANNIVERSARY-OF-WWll/4085286.html
website image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1_s.jpg
no logo image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w1023_r1.jpg
full image URL: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA.jpg
other image size 123: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w123_r1.jpg
other image size 456: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w456_r1.jpg
other image size 789: https://gdb.voanews.com/F51935FC-969D-48BF-A4BE-16C78C0C48DA_w789_r1.jpg
--KOKUYO (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And in this page (http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/), I think it means all website content/contenido (. except content from EFE...., or comic) use CC-BY-SA. This page use "contenido", no "published content".--KOKUYO (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
事情分成三個部分,而 User:Discasto卻把這些弄混在一起:
  1. 只標記"SANDRA LÁZARO"的照片,應該如同Robert BonetRobert Bonet)等人,視為專屬的攝影師
  2. 標記有"©SANDRA LÁZARO"的照片,CC BY-SA似乎與©標記作者沒有衝突,應參考Commons:Credit line
  3. User:Discasto主張只能使用網頁提供的縮小圖片,忽視eldiario.es的CC BY-SA授權是指網站內容、而非只有發布內容,原始圖片同樣屬於網站內容。
--KOKUYO (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep As I understand it, all material on the website eldiario.es is covered by the license. This includes the above images. Lymantria (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Normally I pass higher resolution images too as long as the author is correctly attributed. In a few OTRS cases, a flickr author does specify the use of a certain image resolution only but I don't know if eldiario.es says this in their permission statement. This eldisario permission statement does not mention image resolution unless Jcb, Jameslwoodward or Yann knows the answer. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The only exceptions are third party material (attributed as such at their website) and comics (available with NC restriction). And they state that their license, CC-BY-SA, is the most open CC license of all, which is not true of course, CC-BY is more open. Anyway, CC-BY-SA is fine for us. Jcb (talk) 22:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a CC license is for a picture, not for one specific resolution of that picture. Also in their own licensing information, there is no indication that eldiario.es wants to restrict the resolution available under the CC-BY-SA license. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KOKUYO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative work from modern art/photos/books/TV. Some may be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images were cropped from a video. But the video may include materials from third party sources which are not PD.

QBear (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: File:General Secretary Xi in the 19th National Congress of CPC (2).jpg is from [3] 42:44 File:Opening ceremony of 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (VOA).jpg is from [4] 43:20--QBear (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no consensus in this discussion, The request should not be adopted.Jyxyl9 (talk) 05:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You reasons are invalid. Some of the pictures in Category:2015 Moscow Victory Day Parade have cc licenses from kremlin.ru or vitalykuzmin.net. But there is no such licence from CCTV or the Chinese government. Even though CCTV or the Chinese government may have authorized VOA to use their materials, this does not mean they can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Also, from Commons:Deletion requests: "...consensus can never trump copyright law nor can it override Commons Policy. If the closing admin is unable to say with reasonable certainty that the file can validly be kept, it should be deleted in accordance with Commons' precautionary principle."--QBear (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Wdwd, Green Giant, Jameslwoodward, Krd, and Guanaco: @Taivo, George Chernilevsky, Christian Ferrer, JuTa, and Magog the Ogre: Dear administrators, please consider closing this deletion request. Thank you!--QBear (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The VOA changed its license to NC as of 30 March 2016, see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third-party footage not created by the VOA. No specific Voice of America photographer is identified from the source (English, Chinese). Other photos covering the same event on the source pages are credited to the AP.

Wcam (talk) 12:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. There are more accurate and used versions: PNG, SVG. -- 109.238.80.85 11:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. There are more accurate and used versions: PNG, SVG. -- 109.238.80.85 11:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. There are more accurate and used versions: PNG, SVG. -- 109.238.80.85 11:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Copy of File:800px-ActiveBlocs 2008.PNG. -- 109.238.80.85 12:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not same and in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ellin Beltz. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument creator: Paul Neagu (1938 – 2004) [5]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument creator: Paul Neagu (1938 – 2004) [6]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 13:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, no metadata, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, je viens de voir qu'un de mes fichiers est proposé à la suppression. Je m'en étonne car j'avais précisé que ce fichier était entièrement libre de droits et que chacun est libre de l'utiliser comme bon lui semble. Je suis l'auteur du cliché et je l'ai souhaité ainsi. Qui plus est, l'auteur de la page "Vincent (chanteur)" m'avait, il y a quelques jours,adressé un mail afin que je le lui confirme, ce que j'ai fait.
Je reste à votre disposition pour toute autre question.
--Steven Deegler (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Steven Deegler: Il serait bien de télécharger le fichier à sa résolution maximale. Comme elle est maintenant, l'image est d'assez mauvaise qualité. --Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copyright violation (copvio). The file comes from the website of a newspaper, and I see no sign that the newspaper or the photographer, Sandra Lázaro, has allowed the use of this image for Commons. The EXIF data say “All rights reserved” (Spanish: “Todos los derechos reservados a Sandra Lázaro www.sandralazaro.com”). So I am sorry but I fear that we must delete this file. What do other people think? Aristeas (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

我認為Sandra Lázaro是eldiario.es專屬攝影師,而eldiario.es 採取BY-SA 3.0,所以我就上傳了(類似攝影師還有Robert BonetMarta Jara)。不過Sandra Lázaro的標記有兩種,一種是©SANDRA LÁZARO(如[7]),這種似乎會有EXIF檔。另一種則只有標記SANDRA LÁZARO(如[8]),這種就不會有EXIF檔。Sandra Lázaro在eldiario.es工作至少有一段時間,理論上沒有道理服務同家公司、卻同時採用不同授權,但同個網站為何有不同區分原因不明,或許需要寄信詢問?--KOKUYO (talk) 14:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO#Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs.29_4 --Discasto talk 20:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO#Files_uploaded_by_KOKUYO_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs.29_4 --Discasto talk 19:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per KOKUYO. Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am Sandra Lázaro, author of photography and as indicated by it accreditation it has Copyright, not a CC license. The eldiario.es licence said : http://www.eldiario.es/licencia/ "Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: - No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular. - Los dibujos de los viñetistas también son Creative Commons, aunque no podrán ser reproducidos con fines comerciales (cc-by-nc). " Therefore the works of third parties do not share their license. I request your erase quickly 95.125.169.3 21:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sandra Lázaro, do you work for eldiario.es as an employee or as a third party? --Wcam (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Ankry. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyio (see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bellezze_in_cielo_(Down_to_earth)_(1m).jpg) Karsten11 (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose + geolocation obviously wrong Joschi71 (talk) 18:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Jmabel. Geolocalization can be corrected. Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't read Ukrainian, so I don't know exactly what this PDF is, but it appears to be an extended article about a small Ukrainian village. I see two problems:

First, we keep very few PDFs -- as a general rule only text documents that are needed for Wikitext or other WMF projects. This is an extended article. If it would be useful for WP:UK, it should be written there in Wiki markup so that it can be edited as needed.

Second, the PDF contains many photographs. Some of them are of copyrighted objects -- buildings, sculptures, drawings, printed materials from other sources. All of those photographs infringe on the copyrights belonging to the creators of the objects shown in them. I doubt very much that whoever created this document actually has a free license from each of those creators. I also wonder whether the author of the document has licensed the photographs themselves. That may have been OK for this document under fair use, but for the document to remain on Commons, there must be free licenses from all of the creators and photographers represented.

Put in other words, the CC-BY license given in the document can only cover the work of the writers and of any contributors who gave the writers explicit written licenses for their creations and their photographs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if some pepople upload image on their site and says that they are authors (e.g. sent permission to OTRS as author of site), we trust them until otherwise not proved. This situation is similar I think. Authors claims that they are copyright holders and until we do not prove that they are not copyright holders we consider them copyright holders.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - I agree with both points of Jim. Different from Anatoliy, I think that we should not blindly follow claims from people claiming to be the copyright holder. I have seen thousands of false/mistaken copyright claims. Jcb (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment First of all, thank you for the comments. Though I do believe that we should be more understanding while dealing with newcomers in our projects, I understand that you all are frustrated with everybody coming in and uploading files that might be violating the rules and laws. The file is used on Wikimedia projects - it is an illustration for Wikipedia articles about the village and the author. And it will be used to be featured in the blog post about promoting free licenses and freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The pictures used in the files are mostly by us ourselves, the authors of the book, and we decided not to be mentioned in the book - and I believe that is our right - but I shall add the information to the file description. I shall try to obtain the permissions from the copyright holders for those objects that are modern, but in the meantime we shall upload the version without the pictures with NoFOP objects and without clear copyright --Нестеренко Оля (talk) 11:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please be aware that the usage of a PDF article is really depricated, because it bites the essence of the way Wikipedia works, with articles that can be freely editted on any detail by anybody. Jcb (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't understand why this file should be deleted. Firstly, there is an appropriate permission from authors, and I don't think there is a doubt that they provided this permission in good faith. Secondly, it is not a copy of a Wikipedia article, it is a book published by two authors. When authors of an already published book agree to provide it under a free license, it is usually a good thing for Wikimedia movement and not something useless. Thirdly, while a book in PDF may not be useful for Wikipedia, it is very useful for Wikisource which uses books exactly in PDF or DJVU formats — NickK (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Seems to be out of scope, as it's pdf file and not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was doctored by software (particularly the hat of the individual on the right). I attached the actual image in the file description for reference. Please delete, this is weird and misleading, and also unused on Wikipedia. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. A strange map. All countries shown by members of only one organization (e.g. the African Union or the Arab League). I think it is better to use maps of FTA (like this one). File page intended to be an encyclopedic article. Map only used in Gujarati wikipedia (article about civilization) and one talk page. -- 109.238.80.85 14:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, at least until it's no longer in use. --bjh21 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Online translator said that in Guajarati Wiki this was a map of Religious organizations. But I didn't believe it and was replaced with a map File:Trade blocs.png. Yes it's a bit outdated, but admits that the country may participied of several trade agreements. So, the nominated map is now not used in the main space, and, in my opinion, it would be better if will never happen in future. --109.238.80.85 08:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. Armenia and Kyrgyzstan joined EAEU in 2015. There is the actual map of EAEU. -- 109.238.80.85 17:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & image was on a declined submission for lack of notability. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [9], this image is CC BY except for the logo. I'm not sure such a situation qualifies for de minimis. Guanaco (talk) 11:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's de minimis. If not, it could be blurred without affecting the usefulness. --ghouston (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's also a variant of File:Coat of Arms of Australia.svg, which is quite old and out of copyright. --ghouston (talk) 11:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the threshold of originality in Australia is absurdly low. The best solution would be to find a publication with this exact logo from 1966 or earlier, if such an example exists. Guanaco (talk) 11:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM. P 1 9 9   00:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]