Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 21st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self user page request deletion. B dash (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jianhui67. --B dash (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder 2013 Chiaki Nozu 176.239.93.1 06:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Stoevno1 (talk) 23:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader requested deletion immediately after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alix Bénézech en 2017.jpg Hystrix (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Com:DW at best, but likely copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. See also:

Nik Deleter (talk) 15:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 06:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is as per license cc-by-nc-nd 2.0 which is not allowed in commons, it's my mistake please delete this file and please don't mark any copyright violation to me... i'm sorry

license given cc-by-nc-nd 2.0, my mistake please delete, KingDiggi KingDiggi (talk) 11:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 06:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only this picture available on the Flickr account where it has been found. Very dubious. The low resolution and the absence of metadata are also bad signs. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete No proof that the Flickr account belongs to the copyright holder, the copyright holder must contact OTRS for verification. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ne pas supprimer: Emilie Carpuat est bien l'auteur de la photo, un mail a été adressé à Permissions- Wikipédia francophone le 17 octobre à 17h01 indiquant comme il se doit qu'elle était l'auteur de la photo et qu'elle donnait son autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0 ci-après

je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des droits d'auteur attachés à l'œuvre publiée à l'adresse : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlixBenezech.jpg et sur la page wikipedia suivante : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alix_Bénézech Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0. Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.

Mardi 17 octobre 2017, Emilie Carpuat Samsara95

Bonjour, je suis Samsara95 2 choses à savoir : Emilie Carpuat est bien sur Flickr avec plusieurs photos. Ce nouveau compte Flickr "Carpuat Emilie" a été créé pour la mise en place de cette photo à ma demande. D'autre part un mail a été adressé à Permission Wikimédia Francophone, le 17 octobre à 17h01 indiquant comme il se doit qu'elle était l'auteur de la photo et qu'elle donnait son autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

--Samsara95 (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Samsara95[reply]



Kept: OTRS confirmed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reason to believe that any of these are PD -- see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-ARGov for discussion of Arkansas state government images.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunnharagh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

By sock-puppets there is promotion going on about the subject and others. All are screenshots of copyrighted TV series. Uploader most likely is sock-puppet.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 18:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: terrible quality, spammy copyvios. --Guanaco (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, low image quality. 219.79.127.161 07:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb. --B dash (talk) 06:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве MisterXS (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikeky to be own work. Small size, no metadata. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright tv show logo, not cc-sa Drakosh (talk) 09:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the source internet site allows this use. 176.239.93.1 12:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1993 (see: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=226615). No Permission. See also other files of this user:

Nik Deleter (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, see watermark down left, or maybe copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright breach Deror avi (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright breach Deror avi (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright breach Deror avi (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 00:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 00:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 00:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.LETO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 00:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silagu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE

Ryan5970 (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 00:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hridoy Khan Lx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 00:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is mine and i really wanted to delete this on wikimedia, my friends search my name just for to look for this. 112.200.106.145 01:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi there, my boy. Kids of that age may be cruel and even laugh at their friends for nothing. Please do not pay much attention to that. Tell them that you've had the civic courage to participate at this voluntary project. As regards deleting your pic, no problem, let's do it. However, I see that it is added to a user page in EN:WP. Therefore it should first be removed from that user page. If you are the user (as you write without logging in) please first do that. Then I will ask a friendly admin to delete the file. OK? Best wishes. --E4024 (talk) 09:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: userpage was out of scope (deleted that too). --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused image, with a black shadow on the picture. --B dash (talk) 03:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sciortino99@gmail.com PIETROSCIORTINO (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NasserAbuLeila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical movie posters and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. When I uploaded the file, I did not know the date of death of its author, Emilio Coutaret (d. 1949) so the emblem will not be in the PD until January 1, 2020 (70+ years after death according to Argentine copyright law, art. 5°).- Fma12 (talk) 00:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is a derivative work of copyrighted artwork (artist d. 2002). There is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for sculpture in the USA. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I will re-upload for the appropriate pages on Wikipedia. The photo in question is CC licensed and can be used by WP on pages such as Sun God and Stuart Collection (for which the sculpture depicted is the subject of the article in question). Go ahead and delete.

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph from a book cover. It's unlikely that the Flickr uploader is the legitimate copyright holder of this photo. According to http://www.as-coa.org/events/homage-jorge-eduardo-eielson, the real author is Maria Mulas. LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its true, I looked for a photo of Eielson in the Flickr Commons repository. i guess like the original photo of "Feria del Libro Ricardo Palma" (Lima books Faire) was in "some right reserved" copyleft mark it was possible to upload to wikicommons. Sincere apologies --Eduzam (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Congonacongo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious license laundering. All the files were transferred to Commons on the same day they were uploaded to Flickr – all from the same Flickr account. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tokosssgang; these are obvious sockpuppets.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tokosssgang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious license laundering. All the files were transferred to Commons on the same day they were uploaded to Flickr (with the sole exception of File:Fally Ipupa au Trace Urban.jpg) – all from the same Flickr account. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Congonacongo; these are obvious sockpuppets.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is 59 years old. We don't know who took the original photograph, but this version has been copied using an iphone in 2017. -Uhooep (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niteshkumar8040 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is no private photo album, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:RossCA

[edit]

These files are all uploaded as "own work" by RossCA (talk · contribs), yet most have watermarks of different names. Many appear to have been previously published at http://southerncaliforniakingsnakes.weebly.com/baja-ca.html or other subpages of the site, yet a blanket copyright notice is not stated, nor are any individual permissions of free license indicated. -Animalparty (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Volf.mn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal low-quality photos of subject with no apparent notability despite the rambling walls of text in the file descriptions. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 20:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality and very low resolution. Hddty. (talk) 00:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio http://makassartoday.com/2015/10/14/kisah-sukses-sandiaga-uno/. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Dreamstime.com Pitpisit (talk) 04:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the copyright holder quoted in the metadatas must send a permission to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has the wrong source. Leoboudv (talk) 05:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 05:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What does the text of a poem serve Commons? 176.239.93.1 06:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work: http://talent.adpromanagement.com/Type/Actors 176.239.93.1 06:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work: http://www.fashionandflick.com/tammy-bartaia-international-actress-model-tv-presenter/ 176.239.93.1 06:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image is directly used from manufacturer website; licensing is not properly secured for image SteveCof00 (talk) 07:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a book, not own work, does not qualify for {{PD-text}}. jdx Re: 12:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Speedy delete. I have nominated the file for regular deletion by mistake. --jdx Re: 12:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itfc-commons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of non-free content. The Flickr website isn't published under the Mozilla Public License.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This capture of telephone or electronic pad screens seems to me violating privacy rights of the persons'photos captured in it and copyright laws of websites Pierre cb (talk) 12:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visual calligram (policeman with shield, helmet and stick) above the threshold of originality in France. — Racconish ☎ 12:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use --Bukhari Talk 13:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - seems out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the USA. Infringes on the copyright of the Lion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Jim's. --Discasto talk 20:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 13:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the 5 pictures. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No image found --Bukhari Talk 14:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Jcb. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artdirectr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ضیا موسوی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baitbai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://cache.marriott.com/propertyimages/t/ttnrt/ttnrt_main01_r.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Triana Alar Cervantes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - "FBMD" in the metadatas of an image = grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bloncogh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JAlone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the purported licence claim is correct (image is taken from an online newspaper article with no indication of CC licensing) ElKevbo (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nazrul islam nirov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self image but not selfie. How can it be an own work? 176.239.93.1 06:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takainfinity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images were previously published on Twitter, so they were tagged copyvio. However, the copies on Commons have EXIF metadata and the Twitter images do not.

Guanaco (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of portrait paintings of women with big boobs require the painter's permission. Maybe you should also ask the consent of the model, for personal concerns. 176.239.93.1 10:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not per mistaken comment. In use files are not out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. While Commons rules allow active contributors to have a few user page images, "active" and "contributor" must come first. This is this users only contribution to Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 10:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again: unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 10:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bestinita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are professional shots and should have the photographer release the images.

Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boulfekhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akojenu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete upload Cosal (talk) 22:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload. Cosal (talk) 22:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (selfie without any educational usefulness).    FDMS  4    22:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NEOtheONE1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    23:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken from here on Flickr, uploaded in 2011, it has today a CC-BY-NC license there. We need evidence of permission to use the image with commercial purposes. UAwiki (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. See others uploaded user ChisomG. Nik Deleter (talk) 15:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    22:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Burcu Kütük and Selda Terek Bilecen: Any comments?   — Jeff G. ツ 12:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Wikipedia notability is irrelevant for judging whether a photograph meets COM:Scope. The portrait photo is a good quality and useful for illustration of anyone wanting to present information about this author or a related group, such as food/diet writers. BTW, they are a real person and have an internet footprint that includes some commentary in news articles. I am aware of the related use on Wikidata, however I have ignored that as the person creating it has commented here, so we need to be cautious to avoid self-referential loops. -- (talk) 08:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fæ --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SurrogateSlav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


SurogateSlav (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Yeah, you can go ahead and delete them both. They are both the result of a glitch.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - nonsense map of course. It's unconfirmed whether Youtube is censored in e.g. Dominican Republic?!? LOL!. --Jcb (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small, i'm sorry! Thank you! Great11 (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request deletion of a recently uploaded and unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused image, with a big stroke on the picture. --B dash (talk) 03:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, several alternatives available. P 1 9 9   16:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much personal data 176.239.93.1 05:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version available, I see no reason to keep. Carl Ha (talk) 08:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Девушка с гребнем в волосах.png. P 1 9 9   16:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded from a Wikipedia and not used 176.239.93.1 08:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Stole from official web 106.69.133.212 09:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

link: http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/first-team-squad/juan-foyth/ Matthew hk (talk) 06:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

similar to File:UnterlindenRésurrection.jpg but low quality Gzen92 [discuter] 09:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. B dash (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. B dash (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused and better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   17:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tippfehler - ist die 48 Derbrauni (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Use {{Rename}} next time. P 1 9 9   17:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos from gasi0308.tistory.com

[edit]

The post is tagged as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, but the photographer also states "2차가공, 로고크롭 금지", which translates as "Secondary processing (derivatives), logo crop prohibited", contradicting the Creative Commons license. These images are not acceptable. xplicit 00:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio image. Greenbörg (talk) 07:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per NitinMlk: seems the original publication of the photo is from Commons. Ruthven (msg) 08:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned image. Falls under copyvio. Greenbörg (talk) 08:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The above one is the oldest & the highest resolution image available on the net. I am not sure that the image's copyright holder loses their copyright if they upload its scanned version. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: a scan from a paper photo. Permission needed from the original author. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned image. Falls under copyvio. Greenbörg (talk) 08:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment:The above image of 4190x2993 pixels is the highest resolution image on the internet by a country mile. So, the above image's uploader has the original pic. In fact, the highest resolution image available on the net is this one, which is just of 608x434 pixels & was published on this copyrighted site. But that image was uploaded on 14 August 2010, i.e. prior to the above image's upload to the Commons. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: a scan from a paper photo. Permission needed from the original author. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art by a living artist (en:Vladimir Yankilevsky), no freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 08:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS in processing. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art by a living artist (en:Vladimir Yankilevsky), no freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 08:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS arrived. Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing art requires artist's permission. 176.239.93.1 09:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This drawing is my own work. And I don't upload to anywhere. Jerjer Li (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's good to assume good faith but Jerjer Li's denying the upload and closing the discussion hastily could also give some suspicion about that good faith. Couldn't they? Drawing the picture of a person who betrayed his wife with another married woman could also be suspected. Maybe this user is the betrayed wife, or her familiar, or the husband of the other woman etc. Why has Jerjer Li decided to upload four pictures suddenly? The other three are just porno or do they depict one of the women in this case? Maybe life made me be more suspicious of people's goodwill. Sorry. --176.239.93.1 12:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per B dash. Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appear to be digital conversion of Internet images with no permission and dubious license information. B dash (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy. ~riley (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kurt Tucholsky is not the photographer. And John Heatfield died in the 1968. If you look in the book you may find another photographer, who is in fact the copyright holder Mutter Erde (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

John Heartfield died in 1968 Mutter Erde (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission 176.239.93.1 10:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art by uk:Олег Пінчук in Moscow, no freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 11:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that this is in the public domain. Does not match any of the four items listed in {{PD-BulgarianGov}}. LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cambio de nombre Jeezy-043 (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal file. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol, see font Threecharlie (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no free license in the source page. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camille AUCLAIR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission from the copyright holder "Etienne RUGGERI" (see EXIFs), + likely out of scope despite the use on a user subpage

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kandrex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (the two photos that have metadata were taken with different cameras), and the nature of the images. File:Sin Plan de Vuelo eSePeDeVe.jpg appears to be an album cover, and it's unlikely that it and the photographs (which vary wildly in photographic ability) were created by one person.

LX (talk, contribs) 20:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In case; OTRS ticket. Ruthven (msg) 10:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Pattrön on Flickr Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Safarov's picture on a trash barrel.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files credited to flickr user "vesnamarkoska" Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not public domain. It is copy-right and property of the Clay Local School District. 44 Clay High St, Portsmouth, OH 45662. http://clay.k12.oh.us. It has wrongly been attributed as open source and reusable. 2607:FCC8:FE06:AE00:F84D:8CA1:C042:CAE1 14:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Original uploader on de.wikipedia is a blocked notorious copyright violator. The photograph is claimed to be from the ship owner. I don't believe that de:User:Friedjof has had a permission to upload it.

Also affected:

I don't believe that User:Friedjof himself has taken all these photographs in so many different countries. Despite of many other copyright violations of this user I would delete them according to the "precautionary principle".
-- Zaccarias (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 12:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info A képen nem Kolozsvári Grandpierre Emil látható, hanem Grandpierre Emil. A forrásként megjelölt dokumentumban sincs Kolozsvári Grandpierre kapcsolat, csak Grandpierre név. A képen jól láthatóan nem egy 31 éves ember van, hanem egy idősebb úriember, márpedig Kolozsvári Grandpierre Emil 1938-ban (a kép legkésőbbi lehetséges elkészültének éve) 31 éves volt. Továbbá Kolozsvári Grandpierre Emil nem volt politikus. Elekes Andor rendszeresen töltöget fel emberekről képeket úgy, hogy fogalma sincs róla, hogy kik szerepelnek az általa feltöltött képeken. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: A forrásként citált írás 2006-ban jelent meg, ha nem ismert a kép korábbi nyilvánosságra hozatalának időpontja, akkor, mivel a szerző ismeretlen, az első nyilvánosságra hozatal + 70 év a közkinccsé történő válása. 2006+70=2076, azaz legkorábban 2077-ben válik közkinccsé. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Grandpierre Emil regényíró, jogtudományi és politikai író, Kolozsvári Grandpierre Emil és Grandpierre Edit apja. Szócikk a magyar wikipédián fénykép nélkül URLː https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandpierre_Emil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elekes Andor (talk • contribs)

Az, hogy kiknek az apja nem indokolja a jogsértést. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by QHRP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

missing permission via COM:OTRS

Hystrix (talk) 18:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All copyrights are reserved to Dr Eman Khalifa and members of the QHRP


Deleted: please send written permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable license. See [3] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, low-re, identity of Cb16061997 should be verifyied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, from twitter. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another Lenin statue in Russia, by en:Matvey Manizer (d. 1966). No freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hyolee2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.weibo.com/1418100113/FkLgg3KTp?pcfrom=msgbox&type=comment#_rnd1508572734153 Guanaco (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see this page→http://weibo.com/1418100113/FkLgg3KTp?pcfrom=msgbox&type=comment&sudaref=commons.wikimedia.org&retcode=6102#_rnd1508573270074 the phototaker has allowed this photo be copyed. as: 外语民工吴师傅:好漂亮。。。之前在高楼迷看到大尺寸的,拿来做电脑背景了。。。请问带水印的图传到日文版的维基百科“武汉”词条里可以么???[允悲](10月11日 22:43) 玩摄堂:恩(10月12日 08:10) 玩摄堂:回复@外语民工吴师傅:可以啊(10月12日 08:32) --Wuchernchau (talk) 08:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC) (copied from file talk page)

Deleted: per Guanaco, moreover on Weibo the images are watermarked "All rights reserved". Ruthven (msg) 22:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Assuming that the uploader is the subject, I'd be surprised if he took the photo himself. The subject has recently had a spot of bother with a copyright issue relating to a You Tube video - see his article on en-WP. Sitush (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the photograph. Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painter died in 1952. How is this a free image either in his country of origin (NZ) or where he worked (UK)? Have the heirs released it under cc-by-4.0? The source link is rotten. Nyttend (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The painting is owned by the Royal Society, presumably still on display. I am unsure why the link no longer works, there is a B&W version still displayed in the catalogue, though I believe the site is 'rebranding' in November so stuff may start to move.
I doubt that copyright of the painting was transferred, even if it was a Society commission at the time. If anyone were very keen to use the image, I would suggest writing to the archivist in the RS in the first instance, to confirm if they think it's public domain. Their views would be highly credible as it's always been part of their collection.
If you can track down OCLC 594318507, the painting is described as being on prominent display in the Royal Society rooms (p.343). -- (talk) 04:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that this is in the public domain. Does not match any of the four items listed in {{PD-BulgarianGov}}. LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that this is in the public domain. Does not match any of the four items listed in {{PD-BulgarianGov}}. LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, found in Interten in more size. See also File:The betis stadium paronamic.jpg Nik Deleter (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from [5] and [6] resp. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Donor Coutinho wanted this photo deleted. Hansmuller (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weitere Begründung auf der Diskussionsseite des Antragsstellers. --Hystrix (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

Die Fotos wurden ursprünglich von Hansmuller zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Ich sah keinen Löschgrund und habe es Hansmuller auf seine Diskussionsseite begründet. In der Antwort darauf („Please remove this file and the others i requested. The donor simply wants them removed, as i indicated. We don't have to speculate why. I think we should grant wishes of a donor of 750+ images. Otherwise they won't donate another time with good reason. For Commons they are not important files anyway (no encyclopedic value).“) hat er allerdings nochmals für mich nachvollziehbare Gründe für die Löschung dargelegt. Hystrix (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hystrix asked me to comment. I should have explained better: the images I wanted deleted are part of a large and important donation of images of Guinea-Bissau during the war of independence with Portugal in 1973-1974, see Category:Guinea-Bissau_and_Senegal_1973-1974_(Coutinho_Collection) and Commons:Guinea-Bissau and Senegal 1973-1974 (Coutinho Collection). There are unique images for instance of the Cuban medical help, part of Fidel Castro's worldwide policy of help to rebels. The photographer of these images, Dutch medical prof. Coutinho, donated them and I uploaded them to Commons in 2016. Prof. Coutinho asked me to delete the few not very encyclopedic images listed above of a house in Ziguinchor, Senegal (27_01 - 27_03) and of some soldiers (4_03): there are many such photographs in this collection. I think we should as much as possible respect the reasonable wishes of content donors, also because otherwise they will think twice before donating content again. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 07:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I deleted the two that looked reasonably Out of Scope, but kept two valuable images. @Hansmuller: License agreements are irrevocable, please explain that to the generous prof. Coutinho. What if the files were already in use in some project? Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this image of NO encyclopedic value. Deletion was requested by its donor. It is part of a large and important donation of images of Guinea-Bissau during the war of independence with Portugal in 1973-1974, see Category:Guinea-Bissau_and_Senegal_1973-1974_(Coutinho_Collection) and Commons:Guinea-Bissau and Senegal 1973-1974 (Coutinho Collection). The photographer of these images, Dutch medical prof. Coutinho, donated them and I uploaded them to Commons in 2016. Prof. Coutinho asked me to delete a few not very encyclopedic images of a house in Ziguinchor, Senegal Hansmuller (talk) 05:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV von http://en.president.az/administration Verzettelung (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

URL of the picture: here. The other link is the Artikle were its used. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting from Stefan Riedl, no permission for shown artwork. Wdwd (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like the face was mounted into the picture of a man in uniform. Is this an authentic photograph or not, that is the question... 176.239.93.1 10:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely real. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". According to image info the uploader is depicted (see username). Likely a YT thumbnail (Google Reverse search), no educational value for a personal YouTuber channel image. GermanJoe (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, found in Interten in videofiles. Nik Deleter (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same image, albeit with a background and logo in a smaller resolution, appears on the business' LinkedIn page. It looks like this is probably a copyrighted work, rather than the uploader's work as claimed. Image: [7] Page: [8] NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

moved to File:Spoenationalratswahl.svg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 15:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV von http://en.president.az/administration/palace Verzettelung (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult: PD-Polish or COM:PRP. --Hystrix (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no author, can't keep. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult: PD-Polish or COM:PRP. --Hystrix (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no author, can't keep. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult: PD-Polish or COM:PRP. Hystrix (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, unbelievable claimes of authorship by uploader for this old & halftoned picture, can't keep. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult: PD-Polish or COM:PRP. --Hystrix (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no author, can't keep. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No information on first publication, so that the license is invalid. Jcb (talk) 23:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dantzig is a Polish town named now Gdansk. Photos taken in Dantzig before WWII follow the Polish laws. They are so in the public domain. --FLLL (talk) 15:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"They are so in the public domain." - that depends on how and when it was first published. Please provide such information, so that we can determine whether this file would be PD or not. Jcb (talk) 16:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Difficult: PD-Polish or COM:PRP. --Hystrix (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see that somes like to split hairs. This photo is on WP since 2008. If there was a copyright holder, he would have asked since this time to delete the photo. Keep PD-Polish .
That's nonsense of course. We often discover blatant copyright violations that have been on our servers for over a decade, while we only rarely receive take down requests. The official policy here is to delete files if the copyright situation cannot be established. Jcb (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Da muss ich Jcb zustimmen. Der Knackpunkt ist PD-Polish: Wir wissen nicht, ob es nicht vorher "ohne einen eindeutigen Vorbehalt der Urheberrechte" veröffentlicht wurde. Da dieses und andere Fotos auf verschiedenen Webseiten verwendet wird, und in mehreren Ausstellungen gezeigt wurde, könnte man eventuell weiteres herausfinden. (Translation via google) I have to agree with Jcb. The cracking point is PD-Polish: We do not know whether it was published before "without a clear reservation of copyrights". Because this and other photos are used on different websites, and shown in several exhibitions, you could possibly find more. Hystrix (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, there is no indication that this image was published, so even providing a source (which had no info), doesn't resolve the issues. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keine Freigabe ersichtlich, URV von http://lib.aliyev-heritage.org/en/7684672.html#2 Verzettelung (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, ©aliyev-heritage.org. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Signature doesn't necessarily apply to France. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep locally on English Wikipedia. DBZFan30 (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcose moussihighhea garvihe 63.143.114.139 17:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (vandalism). --jdx Re: 08:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo appears to be a fan creation. Worth noting is that no source was provided and that the user claims that this file is their "own work". As this is a US trademark, it should be on Wikipedia with a fair use rationale and should have come from an official source. This suggests that this file is, in fact, a fan creation and that it does not belong on Wikimedia Commons, let alone Wikipedia. 174.92.108.153 14:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable licensing claims. The Commons uploader claims to be the copyright holder even though the file comes from Flickr. (They do this with a lot of files.) The license is claimed to be a combination of licenses which isn't available on Flickr. The Flickr description indicates that the photographer is someone other than the Flickr account user, who is listed in the author field here. It's not clear that the legitimate author has agreed to publication under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons uploader has since changed the license to match the Flickr file, but that still does not address the issue that the Flickr uploader isn't the author and therefore cannot issue a valid license. In spite of previous warnings, the Commons uploader has blanked out the notice of this ongoing discussion twice, instead of participating in it. LX (talk, contribs) 18:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building in 1950th (see: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1360056 ID 61-101-0022). No Permission. And also others files in Category:Administrative corps Ternopil State Medical University. The house for download will be free after 2020! Nik Deleter (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: And also others files in Category:Administrative corps Ternopil State Medical University.--Nik Deleter (talk) 20:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A crude contemporary model of a XIX-century monument in Russia. The destroyed original is certainly PD, but there is an opinion on commons that models are 'works of art' in their own right and should be deleted. Retired electrician (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]