Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 8th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image: out of scope Takeaway (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HtooMyint (talk · contribs)

[edit]

contains additional embedded data (CSD#F9)

NinjaStrikers «» 05:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik wil mijn beeld hier niet voor vrijgeven. Ik wou enkel en alleen een beeld toevoegen aan een pagina van iemand en heb dit verkeerd gedaan. Graag zsm verwijderen. Manon van der Zwaal (talk) 12:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Delete per G7. --Rrburke (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio. From Facebook, and available elsewhere online: [1]. Has on-image credit to a third party. Rrburke (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad license. Poster does not originate from Fiji. Presumably it originates from Pakistan, where it is still in copyright. Rrburke (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Wrong license. Otherwise fair use is not allowed on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nelson Beltran Espinoza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded new file with correct licenses. Gurusingh (talk) 13:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly created instead of category KpokeJlJla (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (Dec 19, 1993 - Sports Illustrated) WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. -- 32X (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't need it anymore 2602:306:8B5F:C9B0:E40D:FC23:8E9C:9C69 15:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 18:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not need this anymore 2602:306:8B5F:C9B0:1542:7739:35CB:C557 19:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 20:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by myself in error. After creation I found Automobile wire wheels exists Malcolma (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty & dupe, author's req. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorised blured selfie with unfathomable description. This photo is one of a number of similar pics uploaded by variations of this user's name. Probably out of scope Acabashi (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorised selfie with unfathomable description. Probably out of scope. This photo is one of a number of similar pics uploaded by variations of this user's name. Acabashi (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 10:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - personal image lNeverCry 22:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bengt Nyman as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Incorrect file Yann (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Marcus Cyron: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bengt Nyman as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Bad file Yann (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Marcus Cyron: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily. Attack image, and probably a copyvio. Cross-wiki upload (from enwiki) by an editor blocked there as a vandalism only account. --Reventtalk 09:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

me excedí en la cantidad de fotos para un concurso Iravazzoli (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James-94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO nominated here instead of speedy due to volume; File:Chihab news sayoud.jpg-c0-0-520-390-s320-240.jpg is here; File:A1 36 sayoud.jpg is here; File:Omar a kooora 43 2016-07-06 102910.jpg-c0-0-421-316-s320-240.jpg is here; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 17:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by James-94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk upload of non-trivial football club logos with no sourcing and bogus self claims. Serial copyvio uploader (See above, user talk and deleted contribs)

Эlcobbola talk 18:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Violation RagingCleric (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requested it Be Taken Down RagingCleric (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requested it Be Taken Down RagingCleric (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requested it be Taken Down RagingCleric (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requests it be taken down RagingCleric (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Violation RagingCleric (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Violation RagingCleric (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Violation RagingCleric (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requested it Be Taken Down RagingCleric (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested it be taken down RagingCleric (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. So I see no objection to fulfill the uploader request. Kathisma (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright Violation RagingCleric (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete seems fictive and not used => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as hoax. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Подложная лицензия.Персона родилась и умерла в России, в 1967 году в Ленинграде. Дата создания фото и автор неизвестны, страна обнародования, скорее всего Россия. Dogad75 (talk) 02:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fairuse content not permitted here. --Sealle (talk) 18:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful ownership by uploader, as EXIF credits "EG MEDIUM/EVERGREEN PUBLISHER" as copyright holder. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful ownership by uploader, as EXIF credits "EG MEDIUM/EVERGREEN PUBLISHER" as copyright holder. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Lamptey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO - File:Tony-Adam-Adjei.jpg is here; File:Jay foley.jpg is here; etc. (see also watermarks, low res, no camera EXIF)

Эlcobbola talk 17:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Lamptey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 16:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Balablitz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work as claimed (http://www.barry-wehmillerinternational.com/sfimages/default-source/bwinternational/barry-wehmiller-international.png?sfvrsn=2). Non-free image PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not used, no info why this is in scope -> out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - unused image of non-notable person; uploaded for use in since-deleted vanity article on en.wiki. Also likely copyvio (low res, no camera EXIF, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a screenshot and not uploaders work, see navigation elements of some media viewer captured. XXN, 23:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: photo of a child used in page deleted from en:wp JohnCD (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bruxa Escarlate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free content.

XXN, 23:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. XXN, 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted - we have plenty of high-quality images of Big Ben lNeverCry 23:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted - we have plenty of high-quality images of Big Ben lNeverCry 23:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted - we have plenty of high-quality images of Big Ben lNeverCry 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted - we have plenty of high-quality images of Big Ben lNeverCry 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luciano Gonzalez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think these logos are above COM:TOO.

XXN, 23:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CivicJiang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Test uploads? Out of scope.

XXN, 23:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Jcb (talk) 23:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João Vitor Garcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Portuguese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in 2013 as spam. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 23:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/logo lNeverCry 20:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. XXN, 20:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirzefu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures. Out of project scope.

XXN, 21:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirzefu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files

Apocheir (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MohdNabiyein2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures. Out of project scope.

XXN, 21:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images, without categories or without plausible categories, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 21:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Out of project scope. XXN, 21:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JOOHIC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

|Derivative works.

XXN, 21:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable doctor lNeverCry 21:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 21:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - personal art lNeverCry 21:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JustinSu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

lNeverCry 21:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmfundo388 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

lNeverCry 22:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of user:Cristinatorre

[edit]

Almost certainly copyvios; in use on Spanish Wikipedia. User has previous deletions for copyright violations --Imedeiros (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional images

lNeverCry 22:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acaravnonovisad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 22:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justin Peter oficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 19:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timthewriter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justpetra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images of non-notable musician - none in use

lNeverCry 20:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Metro ciu 222.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kunjesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 00:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidharth K A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful lNeverCry 00:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beast Avi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

lNeverCry 00:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishekfuture (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mandloiabhishek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhisheksinghrajputlis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shihab Abir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images - two are sourced to Facebook

lNeverCry 01:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork? Abstract expressionism? Test upload? Pick one or more and consider out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChancelNk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zuhayer Bishal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred selfie with incomprehensible description, not linked, but added to a major cat. Suggest out of scope. Acabashi (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred selfie (reduced size of the same pic also nommed for deletion... https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASHUTOSH.jpg), with useless description, and not linked. Suggest out of scope. Acabashi (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational selfie, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 11:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 06:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: selfie not in use Imedeiros (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation - has Getty Images watermark and I found no evidence of the Creative Commons license at the source URL. Alex Cohn (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Cohn: should have been marked with {{copyvio}}. I did it. Elisfkc (talk) 04:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted as copyvio. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: selfie not in use Imedeiros (talk) 03:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lambo boyz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It appears that these images were never put into use. The subject's article on the English Wikipedia was speedily deleted as non-notable twice in 2012. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 06:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advice Media

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted twice as spam. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 06:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wil Emling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I do not see any own work in these images. I see product shots (Anderson Windows and Doors), I see a Championship ring and an award. I see some booth shots from sports television. I see Banksy artwork in New York where there is no Freedom of Panorama, but what I don't see is anything showing own work, no useful metadata, no reasonable file sizes, and some of these get hits on TinEye showing they've been published before (esp. Renewal by Anderson ... images).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vidyasagar biomedica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional contents (COM:ADVERT)

NinjaStrikers «» 08:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image. This SVG file is having trouble properly rendering within the wiki, and is currently licensed CC-BY-SA-NC-4.0. I'd like to re-upload the image with a more permissive license (CC-BY-SA-4.0), and I'd like to try improving the file so that it renders properly. Rezmason (talk) 08:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per request. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant spam. jdx Re: 10:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elpilotovlogs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Selfies used in deleted autobio pages en:Eyoniel Wawoe , en:El Piloto and en:User:Elpilotovlogs.

JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don not sant it 2003:D9:7BC8:D5F:ECB4:D73E:F852:E217 12:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Our of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 13:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: selfie by user whose autobio pages have been deleted from en:wp JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Also likely copyvio – a random photo grabbed from Facebook. jdx Re: 13:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploaded after 2 tries were blocked for having embedded extra data (size tried was 535539183 bytes) Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo out of project scope. Rrburke (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bkcchokwatana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This album image (uploaded by 'Seven Main Sins band'... anyone can make up a user name), is most likely copyvio, per the 'All rights reserved' embedded lettering. Acabashi (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo image (uploaded by 'Seven Main Sins band'... anyone can make up a user name), is most likely copyvio, per the 'All rights reserved' embedded lettering. Acabashi (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dee Ann Rose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 01:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiz.godoy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional or advertising upload for a user's manual. No indication of own work, but there are contact info and telephone numbers on each page.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiz.godoy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality content – mostly mugshots of people with no apparent notability and some promotional graphics – apparently uploaded for promotional purposes based on the uploader's Portuguese Wikipedia user talk page. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to do some cleanup of File:Godoy.png. LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all. I added for deletion a lot of files, uploaded after LX created the request. Small photos without metadata, own work is doubtful, probably real photographers' copyright violation. Some unused .pdf-files with unclear notability, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user uploaded several non-free images of same author's work, I am doubtful that this one is not copyrighted TAnthony (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio, see watermark Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonecohen6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suspect all images by this user are copyright violations of various wrestlers. File:Iron Empire.jpg is from http://nwasmokymountain.com/nwa-world-champions/.

MKFI (talk) 07:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the permission from these wrestlers to use these pictures for online media such as Wikipedia. Some of them I even took myself with my camera. Others, I have permission for if you need me to list their Facebook accounts so you can ask them yourself, that is no problem. I can even have written permission for these pictures signed by these various wrestlers.

Jasonecohen6 I have dates and written documentation that I took the pictures in question and will submit them if necessary Jasonecohen6

Jasonecohen6, please send and OTRS ticket so we have a confirmation of the permission. Note that the wrestlers need to include an explicit free license such as CC-BY-SA. MKFI (talk) 06:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted the OTRS ticket and have submitted the free licenses by email to Wikimedia Commons and are awaiting their decisions Jasonecohen6


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasonecohen6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jasonecohen6 I have been targeted once again for supposed copyright violations. This is ridiculous because all of the images I upload I have taken with my own cameras and either uploaded directly or edited and then uploaded. I do not know what I have to do to prove to you people that I own these copyrights. I upload these pictures for people I work with in wrestling as a favor to them, I receive no compensation for this and do not know why these pictures keep getting flagged for copyright violations. If someone were to claim to own them that would be one thing, but no one does because I own them! This is beyond ridiculous that someone can say I don't own the pictures because they think I don't. These people do now know me or the wrestlers in the pictures. Any of these wrestlers are easily reachable through our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/nwasupreme. They will all tell you I own the pictures and they have given me permission to post any picture I take.


Deleted: please contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lx3h (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YdugqajrhDw/VvYWQpS40kI/AAAAAAAARkw/rRw6MTXsQPsDYrGX7EQCmCM2NkOQG8GlQ/s1600/SAN_0196.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HelenOnline (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Africa.

Wikicology (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept some, because there is nothing problematic to see in the pictures. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:NOT. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF biographies are out of scope. There is no evidence that the uploader is either the author of the text or the photographer. There is no free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused Ciaurlec (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, replaced with File:Harper and Brothers publisher mark.png  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarahç (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion educational value is too weak. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Juan Larios

[edit]

All images are copyrighted and appear to be taken from the websites [www.siatechschools.org/] and [2]. Unsure about whether the logo falls into public domain as a collection of simple shapes or not — it seems a bit too complex for that, but I don't know well. --Appable (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, low quality Stuchka (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded probable non-free image File:The Boy Who Made God Smile.jpg as well, I am doubtful that he/she is copyright holder of this one. TAnthony (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by INeverCry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYVIO Uploader's username matches the original author at 500px username. Raising a normal DR for further discussion and get proof of authorship. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: permission via OTRS needed. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded probable non-free image File:The Boy Who Made God Smile.jpg as well, I am doubtful that he/she is copyright holder of this one. TAnthony (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded probable non-free image File:The Boy Who Made God Smile.jpg as well, I am doubtful that he/she is copyright holder of this one. TAnthony (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded probable non-free image File:The Boy Who Made God Smile.jpg as well, I am doubtful that he/she is copyright holder of this one. TAnthony (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Impulsandoacademy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT: promotional uploads.

XXN, 23:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I rarely question self licensed work that I can't find a copy of elsewhere, but there is no way this is the work of the uploader. Elisfkc (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a professional promotional image which appears at several locations online, including a larger version here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just a re-uploaded PNG version of this file: File:LagrangeMultipliers2D.svg InverseHypercube 23:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stego as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: old photograph; no exif data; low resolution; almost impossible to be "own work"; and: https://tineye.com/search/f568e0e9c78873a9ccb0f5bc755bfcebd0071db5/?sort=size&order=desc Amitie 10g (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly suspect that the copyright holder, who according to the metadata is one Roy Peters, has not given his permission for this image to be used under a CC licence. I have emailed Mr Peters to inform him that the photograph is being made available in this way. Slim cop (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: I have received the following email from Roy Peters (aka Mahasiddhi):

"You are right I have not given my permission for this usage. The photo in fact was taken under my Buddhist name Mahasiddhi and I didn’t correct the metadata on that occasion but the photographer is one and the same!

Thank you for your vigilance.

I have given my permission loads for using images I have Stuart but it always has to be preceded by seeking permission. So thank you once again and for initiating the deletion."

--Slim cop (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & update. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all prior uploads from the uploader of this subject have been deleted as copyvios, I can't see if this is the same image or a different one, but unless there's some real proof of ownership, this should be deleted —SpacemanSpiff 17:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. At first, file description does not show subject's notability and categories are missing. I feel, that the photo is out of project scope. At second, Indian freedom of panorama covers only permanently situated trophys. Here OTRS-permission from trophy maker is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How the photo is own work, if author is Peder? I'm afraid, that OTRS-permission from Peder is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably copyvio, see watermark on image. XXN, 20:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. XXN, 21:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo has been previously published at several locations online, such as here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution, probably not uploaders work, copyvio. XXN, 21:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unknown copyright situation. Where does this map come from? Jcb (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, low quality, unidentified place Stuchka (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising. P 1 9 9   03:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wish to avoid duplication Hadashm (talk) 09:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand Hadashm reason; but this picture was taken from here. this is copyright violation Hanay (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   03:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, low quality, no educationnal. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster art, Willing to assume good faith, but this isn't necessarily own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   03:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons Outlookxp (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unsed Ciaurlec (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional upload, this and the other image were taken from https://www.k-net.fr/nosagences Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in meta, no indication of user's work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also can be found with google. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) in the photoshow at http://dunyaschool.az/foto/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) in the photoshow at http://dunyaschool.az/foto/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) in the photoshow at http://dunyaschool.az/foto/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aziz hommane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook or less sized images, no indication of own work. At least one has overprinting showing it's from a media source.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per "FBMD" in the metadatas. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pictures are derivative works. No evidence of permission

Discasto talk 19:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaffar Theekkathir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images has some issues such as non-COM:EDUSE, COM:ADVERT, COM:NOTSOCIAL, COM:NOTHOST

~AntanO4task (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What issues are there specifically for each of the images? Your deletion rationale is much too general.  Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: These photographs seem to document the campaign and rallies related to an elected politician, U. Vasuki. I don't think a reasonable argument has been made that these are out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. This flag is false, because Darién doesn't have a flag. FoTW contacted directly to the provincial authorities in 2009, but responded that doesn't have a flag. Also FoTW shows a cyan-green flag (maybe another hoax). A 2015 note in La Estrella de Panamá newspaper explained a list of provincial flags in Panama, showing exceptions to Panama Oeste (created in December 2015) and Darien (see 5th paragraph, "...no se precisa fecha de la de Darién"). Taichi (talk) 06:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also is a bad duplicate of File:Flag of Darién (Valle del Cauca).svg, a Colombian town named Darién. --Taichi (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment FoTW statement dates back to 2003. "La Estrella de Panamá" states that there's a flag but no creation date was known ("...no se precisa fecha de la de Darién": ... Darien flag (creation) date is not specified"). Best regards --Discasto talk 01:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a hoax, just badly categorized. Please use {{Superseded}} for those versions you believe are superseded. --Storkk (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pxttyh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Freedom of panorama for architectural works does not exist in South Korea. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Korea_.28South.29, which forbids commercial use of derivative works of publicly displayed works, including buildings. See also Category:South Korean FOP cases, containing many images of buildings in South Korea deleted for lack of FOP. Hammersoft (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Architecture is copyrighted and South Korea does not have a Freedom of Panorama exemption. --Storkk (talk) 10:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by QQQQ0923 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work claims, 3 files marked: photographer 小杉朋子氏にがKazan office.依頼して撮影してもらったもの。 E-mail:kosugitomoko@fmail.com Httos://tomokoosugi.oetit.cc

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from school website. Uploader doesn't know what he/she is talking about as this photo is of Northwest CTA, not East CTA as he/she claims. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 16:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 10:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kipala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Iran.

Wikicology (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image has nothing to do with Iran. Where do you get that idea from??? The place is clearly indicated. IF it were Iran - they have no copyright at all so far. But it is not Iran. It is Tanzania, stemming from 1927. Author Stevenson is more than 70ys dead. Why does user:Wikicology not first find out what the whole thing is about, and read the description before he starts posting deletion requests?? Besides there are other images of the same monument on commons. Not noted? Kipala (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad! That image was obviously nominated in error. Feel free to close the debate or ask someone else to close it as I am currently on a mobile device. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{FoP-Tanzania}}. --Storkk (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Game logo, tap the partial image at top of http://forum.blackdesertonline.com/index.php?/profile/17814-xpl0it/&tab=activity to see whole picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: r American Ginseng - www.instagram.com/americanginseng - americanginseng.deviantart.com Yann (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Ginseng, the creator and copyright holder of this illustration, published it under the right license.
I fail to understand why Ellin Beltz tagged this file as Copyvio, without having attempted to contact its author for the avoidance of doubt.
Therefore, this procedure is not justifed.
--Guise (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The source as given doesn't lead to the image itself nor to a copyright statement in keeping with the license given here. The user's gallery on Deviant Art leads obviously to http://americanginseng.deviantart.com/art/Leggy-Blonde-276453038 where this image is clearly marked "©2011-2016 AmericanGinseng". Thus it's previously published by the original artist and subsequently uploaded here without source or permission. The markings on the original have been cut off and replaced which may have kept you from finding it in reverse google search. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your answer, Ellin Beltz.
Please tell us what American Ginseng must do in order to prove he's the creator and copyright holder of the file ? Regards. --Guise (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe send a permission to OTRS, or just assumme good faith and believe that the uploader is the copyright holder (and the owner of the Instagram and DA ccounts). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, my name is Benjamin Drake, I'm the creator of the Legolas Greenleaf illustration. I'm not accustomed to Wikimedia Commons at all so I apologise if this isn't the proper method of reply. I uploaded the illustration in response to a very kind request from Guise and this notice of copyright violation is an unpleasant surprise. As it is an old work I thought I would touch it up a little and give it my new signature before uploading it to Wikimedia, which explains the discrepancy between the Wikimedia upload and the DeviantArt source. The signature on the DeviantArt upload is the Elvish characters "B" and "D" for Benjamin Drake and "11" for 2011. The stamp on the Wikimedia upload is a Chinese seal meaning "American Ginseng's work", which I now mark all my work with, https://www.facebook.com/americanginseng.art/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1347594035275405. I recently renamed my DeviantArt account to American Ginseng. If it helps, I can replace the original source image on DeviantArt, and on my old blogspot here: http://benjamindrake.blogspot.com.au/2011/12/leggy-blonde.html, which are the only two locations I ever uploaded this piece. If necessary I can provide scans of the original drawing. I'm not experienced with copyright procedures on Wikipedia and apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Thank you very much for this clarification, Benjamin.
Ellin Beltz : in the light of the above, we could follow Amitie 10g's advice and assume good faith from American Ginseng, don't you think ? ;-)
The fact is, after permission was granted, I uploaded already a lot of Tolkien-related artworks thanks to generous artists.
Besides, I uploaded myself a (rather crude) artwork without any problem.
Last but not least, I have raised copyvio matter myself when some contributors uploaded John Howe's and Alan Lee's artworks (or, more recently, Ted Nasmith's depiction of Gondolin) on Wikimedia Commons.
Therefore, I assume we could put an end to the present procedure.
Best regards. --Guise (talk) 11:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS : Ellin Beltz, just a word. Of course, there is nothing at all personal about this ! Well, I was a bit surprised and annoyed at first but you were always courteous, and I know Wiki Commons volunteers have a difficult task in order to review hundred of various files. :-)
Guise, Amitie 10g did not say to assume good faith and forget about it, he gave the correct answer which is to follow the simple process at COM:OTRS. Since all Wiki user accounts are anonymous, even the ones composed of names (like mine), have to be linked to be sure there is no spoofing or impersonation. At no time was the Good Faith of the uploader or commentators questioned. The system engaged to provide proper permissions for copyrighted artwork from the Deviant Art website as it should. There have been times when users signed up with artists' names and proceed to upload copyrighted artworks. Obviously, that's wrong, so in all good faith and honoring the rights of the original creator, we are careful even with accounts of the Same Name uploading images of the Same Name's work. Especially if it's previously published with an obvious (C) mark on it as it was at Deviant Art. That the two licenses here and there were different was also a flag. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As you as admin, you know that the {{Copyvio}} tag should be applied only to obvious cases, and this isn't. Since the uploader's username matches the user at Instagram and DeviantArt, there is enough reason to believe that the uploader is the copyright holder; in doubt, a normal DR should be opened from the begin. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: Can you please just comment on the case at hand? Either the guy above needs to send OTRS permission or not. Other than that you need to stop your "as an admin you should know" harassment campaign. You promised to stop doing this when I blocked you, especially toward Ellin Beltz. If you keep harassing Ellin like this, I'm going to take this to AN/U and see if we can have you blocked indef for violating the promises you made after your last block. lNeverCry 19:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I promised that, but this does not mean that the users (specially trusted users like admins) can use the speedy tags for cases where a normal DR is more apropiate. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You made a direct promise. The promise had no exceptions. If it continues, I will bring it to AN/U. Besides, if you've corrected something, the problem's fixed. Ellin is doing her best, so repeatedly pointing out a minor mistake she makes now and then isn't very helpful and just bothers her in the end. She does a large amount of DR work, so mistakes are going to happen. As a community, we help each other out. lNeverCry 21:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Unless OTRS permission is provided by the copyright holder. This avoids any doubt as to copyright. We rarely assume good faith when it comes to copyright. lNeverCry 19:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Notice that the license at DeviantArt was changed from ARR to CC-BY, therefore, more proof of authorship. Also, there is an ongoing message to OTRS, so the deletion can be delayed (unless the shift admin is so hurry to get rid this file). --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is good. The issue will likely soon be resolved. Admins won't close a contested DR right away. lNeverCry 21:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Ticket:2016121010001123 is still in the queue awaiting processing, but license was changed to CC-BY on DeviantArt. --Storkk (talk) 10:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced copy of the book cover in the London image from the one sent to speedy: > "Español: Tapa de un libro del escritor y abogado uruguayo Gabriel Pombo ; el diseño gráfico de esta portada fue realizado por el ilustrador y portadista Alejandro Colucci." Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Something's not right here; this and Prs1594a.jpg were taken at the same place and time (he's wearing the same shirt, the backgroud is the same etc), but the images have been uploaded by two different editors, both claiming authorship, and claiming to have taken the shots on different days. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The two aacounts are the same person. I have blocked the more recent of them. I think this is just a newbie mistake, so I'm assuming good faith on the "own work" claim. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains two derivative works: the statue and the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Español: COMENTARIO: Si es que llego a entender bien, se objeta esta foto pues contiene dos trabajos derivados, la estatua y la foto del cuadro. Muy bien, reconozco que tengo poca experiencia en cuanto a derechos de autor, y además, mi nivel de inglés es bastante bajo, así que no puedo expresarme en inglés, y tengo mucha dificultad para entender inglés. PERO PREGUNTO, conozco al director del museo, y fue precisamente el director del museo que me autorizó a sacar esa foto, y es ese museo el propietario de la foto en el cuadro y de la estatua. Serviría que él escribiera una carta o llenado un formulario, indicando que me conoce, y que autoriza a Commons a tener esta foto en sus registros con licencia tal y tal. GRACIAS POR CONTESTAR.
--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 02:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Juan C Anselmi: Thank you for your reply. Please read COM:L and Freedom of Panorma - Uruguay which are available in Spanish. For this image, it appears there may be one or two copyrights which need to be understood. (a) Who made the statue and when? If the artist is still living would they be willing to provide COM:OTRS permission? (b) Who took the photo and when? If that artist is different than the sculptor and still living they can also provide permission via COM:OTRS. To own a picture or a statue is not the same thing as owning the copyright of the picture or statue, so the museum director probably cannot release copyright. Gracias por su respuesta. Por favor, lea [COM: L]] 'y' Libertad de Panorma - Uruguay 'que están disponibles en Español. Para esta imagen, parece que puede haber uno o dos derechos de autor que necesitan ser entendidos. (A) ¿Quién hizo la estatua y cuándo? Si el artista sigue viviendo estarían dispuestos a proporcionar permiso COM: OTRS? (B) ¿Quién tomó la foto y cuándo? Si ese artista es diferente al escultor y aún vive, también puede proporcionar permiso a través de COM: OTRS. Poseer una imagen o una estatua no es lo mismo que poseer los derechos de autor de la imagen o la estatua, por lo que el director del museo probablemente no puede liberar los derechos de autor. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, never used by the pre-1966 Chilean Liberal Party, there's no sources mentioning it Sfs90 (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is widely used, so it cannot be dleted except for copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, never used by the pre-1966 Chilean Liberal Party, there's no sources mentioning it Sfs90 (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - please refrain from removing usage from Wikis where you don't form part of the community, just to support your nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request; there's no evidence about the existance of that logo, and therefore is a fake logo Sfs90 (talk) 23:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @ Sfs90 Please clarify one thing: Are you saying that File:Partido Liberal (Chile, 1988-1994).png is also fake? Or are you saying that the logo is correct (for PL 1988-1994) only when it includes the yellow triangle background as in File:Partido Liberal (Chile, 1988-1994).png, but it becomes "fake" when it is not on that particular background? Isn't it possible that both versions are variants and were used at some point by PL 1988-1994? The file can be deleted if there's an essential part of the logo missing, but the wrong years "1849-1966" can be removed from the file name if it's the concern. (Sidenote: IMO, your claim of copyright on the image is surprising, but that's not the issue.) -- Asclepias (talk) 15:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment about the previous discussion: There's nothing wrong for a user to honestly correct a mistake in articles even if he's not a regular contributor. Things like logos are very often simply reused from one project to another. In the present case, this image, uploaded by the nominator, likely had its primary connection with es.wikipedia. It is almost certain that it was reused by someone on nl.wikipedia simply because it was available, not after a discussion of the political history of Chile on nl.wikipedia. Users on es.wikipedia eventually noted that it is not a logo of that party (PL 1849-1966). And the uploader agrees that it was a mistake. It makes complete sense for someone who knows what he's doing to remove it also from the nl.wikipedia articles where it obviously constitutes a mistake where used in relation to PL 1849-1966. It makes even more sense for the contributor who had made the original mistake, to responsibly clean up the consequences of it. He should be thanked for it. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's it. It's simply that this logo was never used for the Liberal Party that existed from 1849 until 1966. The yellow triangle logo was used for another Liberal Party that existed from 1988 to 1994 (not a successor of the 1849-1966 Liberal Party) and it was always used with the symbol inside the yellow triangle, not as a separate one. I recognise that I made a mistake stating (at the time I uploaded this file) that this was also the logo of the previous Liberal Party (I'm a long-time researcher about Chilean political history, and in recent times I discovered that the only symbol that used the 1849-1966 Liberal Party in their advertisings and campaigns was a generic torch). It looks that the nl.wikipedia translated the es.wikipedia "Liberal Party-related" articles (and copied their respective images) at the time when the wrong logo was still published in the es.wikipedia articles. To make it more clear, I will do a table with the symbols/logos and their respective Chilean Liberal Parties that used them:
Logo/Symbol Party
File:Torch.svg Partido Liberal (1849-1966)
No logo or symbol used Partido Liberal (1983-1987)
File:Partido Liberal (Chile, 1988-1994).png Partido Liberal (1988-1994)
File:Bandera Partido Liberal 2001.png Partido Liberal (1998-2002)
According to that is why I'm stating that this file should be deleted, because this logo was never used (and it was never created) by the 1849-1966 Liberal Party, and the 1988-1994 Liberal Party never used it without the yellow triangle. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, there's no sources indicating that this was the logo of the Liberal Party used before 1966. Sfs90 (talk) 00:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused duplicate (except for background color) of widely used version. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to http://www.pap.gov.pk/ , but the only photo of this subject on this site is on the page http://www.pap.gov.pk/index.php/members/profile/en/20/1035 . EXIF reveals source as Facebook. Attributed to Ashiq Ali: no evidence of permission from creator. Rrburke (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HarolR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an art installation by Karen Chekerdjian without permission from the artist, see http://www.thenational.ae/arts-life/home-garden/karen-chekerdjians-exhibition-respiration-in-paris-shows-beirut-through-her-eyes for story about the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from discussion pageI took this photo myself (source: iPhone 6; date: Tuesday May 31, 2016) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taniarw (talk • contribs) 09:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't doubt you took the photo, but you can't release the artworks shown in the photo because you're not the artist. The objects in your picture have copyright. We need permission from the artist via the COM:OTRS process. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bandspam / https://syntheticblast.bandcamp.com/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:MichaelaHiston

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:MichaelaHiston. I believe they should be deleted because I do not really believe they were made by that user after I had a look at “her” deleted edits. For example File:08.jpgx.jpg (showing a female to female anilingus) has been uploaded as Source=self-made although there’s a watermark “© 2005 SapphicErotica.com” at the top left corner. The two butt photos are described as showing the uploader and photographed by the uploader, which is probably false in both cases. All other uploads of that user have already been deleted. -- 32X (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. No evidence that uploader is its author as he claims in file description. XXN, 20:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prakashfotos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images has some issues such as non-COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTSOCIAL, COM:NOTHOST and advert

~AntanO4task (talk) 01:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What issues are there specifically for each of the images? Your deletion rationale is much too general.  Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep absurd to say these images have no educational value etc. One could well crop out people from these images to illustrate them in their Wikipedia, for example. Indopug (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deleted three DWs, kept the rest. I defer to the discussion as I think there are far more almost identical photos here than we actually need. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image show the statue of the late First Lady, Pat Nixon. The source says that the statue was dedicated in 1997, one year after the city council approved the statue. The image should be either deleted or modified to omit the statue. George Ho (talk) 03:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the file does not qualify for {{PD-Textlogo}}, jdx Re: 08:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0. Abul Kalam Azad is a living photographer, and I don't think he is the one who licensed the photo. The "Abul Kalam Azad" account was created this December, meaning that is a new account. We need an OTRS permission from Abul Kalam Azad to confirm this. Poké95 10:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the flickr page https://www.flickr.com/photos/abulkalamazad_pattanam/with/31225301012/ He is uploading his images and appears that this smaller size is for public use. Most of the other images are not for public use. Abul is a regular blogger and a lot of his images are online - a simole google search brings many images. Thank you TASKLA (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a simole google search brings many images If that's so, then this is a possible case for Commons:License laundering, which means that this Flickr image is stolen from a legitimate site and uploaded to Flickr as "Abul Kalam Azad". Again, we need a OTRS permission from Abul Kalam Azad to confirm that they released their photos under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.0 Generic License. Poké95 06:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. How to get the OTRS? TASKLA (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not you who will send an email to the OTRS, it is Abul Kalam Azad who is the photographer of the image. If you are really (please don't lie, otherwise both times of our volunteers and yours will be wasted) Abul Kalam Azad, please follow the instructions here. Thanks, Poké95 12:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pokéfan95, I am not Abul Kalam Azad. I am a regular contributor to wiki and have contributed articles, edited pages of photographers and artists. Unfortunately, I missed my password and in the absence of an attached email, I was unable to retrieve it. Last week, I came across an exhibit of his works in google and decided to start editing again, as I have some time now. Thank you. TASKLA (talk) 08:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0. Abul Kalam Azad is a living photographer, and I don't think he is the one who licensed the photo. The "Abul Kalam Azad" account was created this December, meaning that is a new account. We need an OTRS permission from Abul Kalam Azad to confirm this. Poké95 10:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A much better picture of the same stela is available on Commons, here. I'm the uploader of the version which I'm nominating, and I have already updated the description in the better one. Khruner (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Source: http://www.maureenmcghee.com/about/history-of-bog-oak/ M. Krafft (talk) 14:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NMaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files mentioned may be derivative work.

MCMLXXXIX 15:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The wallpapers are under a free license: https://asteroidos.org/wiki/licenses/ ~nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 16:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The cited page is extremely vague. I have no confidence that the site actually has the right to freely license the images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NMaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly a copyvio: The video shows copyrighted book covers.

Ies (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NMaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duplicated, see Category:Wikipedia stickers

~nmaia d 19:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NMaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

these files are duplicated

~nmaia d 11:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NMaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Originally videos, but flickr2commons made them into still images

~nmaia d 15:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: alreade deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Freedom of panorama for architectural works does not exist in Ukraine. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Ukraine. Thus, any images such as this of architectural works in the Ukraine are subject to copyright by the author until 70 years past their death. Given the building was finished in 2010, this is impossible. Hammersoft (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After further review, we would prefer that this sysstems image not display on the wiki page, only our corporate logo. Cytoviva (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: What may or may not appear on the WP:EN page is not up to you as you are not permitted to edit that page. However, this image is a copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for architectural works. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Philippines. This image is derived from File:Cebu City after dark.jpg, and while an argument can readily be made that the temple in that image is de minimis to the overall image, in this cropped image it most certainly is not. Hammersoft (talk) 16:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The temple is clearly the main subject of both images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 14:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for architectural works. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Philippines. This image is derived from File:Manila Philippines Temple at Christmas.jpeg, and while an argument might be able to be made that the temple in that image is de minimis to the overall image, in this cropped image it most certainly is not. Hammersoft (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I put "http://www.datalinkuniversity.com/" into my browswer and got a link page but no content. This image was not found. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see DataLink University College. However, this image is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Base image is Public Domain CC0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/spacex/23808740049/ do not delete Ericmachmer (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/forget-blue-origin-vs-spacex-the-real-battle-is-between-old-and-new-ideas/ SpaceX image with advertising applied on top. Uploader did not create base picture and cannot license it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope -- personal art. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image, derivative work of http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35061471 (NASA for the astronaut), but no indication where the image of Saturn came from nor the cover of the DVD, nor all the logos at the bottom, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The base images are NASA CC0, the logos at the bottom are part of the concept artwork itself. Original images were not from the BBC of course but NASA. Ericmachmer (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal art is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was used online long before it was uploaded here, see http://homeonmars.factualfiction.com/p/sponsors.html for one use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

homeonmars.factualfiction.com is my website, I created the image and the blog, please do not delete...base images of course are also CC0 as per SpaceX and NASA policy, thank you Ericmachmer (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal art is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at http://factualfiction.com/marsartists/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/advertising-subsidized-ARKYD-mockup.png from 09/2013 on the internet, this upload was over three years later. Same size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FactualFiction.com/marsartists is my website, I uploaded this image here recently to write an article for wikipedia on the future of Advertising Subsidized Space Exploration...the image on Factual Fiction is of course also CC0 as are the base images from NASA and SpaceX per their policy of releasing all images CC0 Ericmachmer (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal art is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The context of "Own work" on Wikimedia Commons refers to works that you explicitly created yourself. The creator of this work needs to send permission to our support team Wikicology (talk) 19:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: The description says «Displaying my robot after designing.», so, is very very like that the robot is her own work, and even, is used in her User page at Meta. I don't see any reason to questionate its authorship. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Amitie 10g, this is not about the robot but about the person holding the robot. While her claim of "own work" may refers to the robot, I actually think the ownership claim is in the context of the photo as confirmed by her user page. Warm regards. Wikicology (talk) 17:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are three problems here. First, who took the photo? -- it does not look like a selfie as claimed. Second, who made the robot? It has a copyirght because it is not utilitarian. Third, Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. In Germany the PMA+70 rule applies. Paul Herre died in 1962. Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stego as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously noT "own work"; the exif data mentions "Google"... Exif mentions the software used, not Copyright information. Liddy Mignone born in 1891, and seems very young in the photo, so, is very unlikely that this photo has been published in Brazil after 1945 (but proof of publication is still needed). Amitie 10g (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that probably it is already in public domain. If I had noticed that she was born in 1891 I would do anything. I was convinced that the actress was much more recent. I only mentioned "Google" because that suggest that the image was grabbed via Google. Who owns the copyright hardly makes anything to the photo that puts "Google" in the Exif data. --Stego (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I agree that it is probably PD, but our standard of proof is "beyond a significant doubt", not "probably". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has wrong file name and is duplicate of File:Py orbital.png. Geek3 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use widely. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has wrong file name and is duplicate of File:Px orbital.png. Geek3 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use widely. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторсвте и лицензии, персона скончалась в 1975 году, скорее всего скан старого фото Dogad75 (talk) 02:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: дата создания и обнародования фото неизвестна, персона скончалась в 1969 году Dogad75 (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Дата создания и обнародования фото неизвестны, персона скончалась в 1977 году Dogad75 (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possibly copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Hikonyan (ja:ひこにゃん)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. (reference: http://hikone-hikonyan.jp/profile/ ) Ralth Galth (talk) 04:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото из семейного архива, персона скончалась в 1977 году, автор фото, скорее всего, неизвестен, фото сканировано и размещено родственником Dogad75 (talk) 02:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated version of File:US Presidential Recount 2016.svg. FallingGravity (talk) 07:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2003:45:5C77:9B01:8DA2:27D4:2146:714 as duplicate (dupe) and the most recent rationale was: File:P101711PS-0706 (6309655188).jpg Not an exact duplicate - the other one has had shadows boosted and saturation fiddled with. I agree that one or the other can probably be deleted, but this needs a DR. Storkk (talk) 12:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no objections raised. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asheshshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The file descriptions all advertise the photographer Ashesh Shah. He has used them on spammy user pages and galleries. They violate COM:ADVERT. See the related DR from his sockpuppet immediately above this, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ashesh Shah Photography.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment At least some of these are useful educational content. Yann (talk) 12:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I agree that some of them could be useful, but they need useful categories and descriptions. For example, File:Aseer garh Fort - photo by Ashesh Shah (1).jpg has a long description but the only category is Category:Forts which contains 382 images in the cat and thousands in its subcats. Without that being done, they are useless. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but that's not special to these files unfortunately... Yann (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: four images have already been deleted, also deleted the unused headshots of some businesspeople (COM:SCOPE), kept the landscape photos. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is missing far too much data to be useful in most contexts on WMF projects. Will withdraw if uploader re-renders the map correctly with complete dataset. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
14:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, incomplete map. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение правил 109.252.101.166 02:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 62.182.204.102 as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: Violation of copyright. Drawing from the book Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What book? Age of the original drawing? Author? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Srittau as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: Author Т. Гапурова (T. Gapurov). Previously kept. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, AFAIK the Gapurov is still alive. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error during the creation of this file Annabelleoliver (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand, what kind of error. Не понимаю, какого типа ошибка. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I undestand situation in ruWP, user wants to delete his contribution. This file is fragment of painting (artist Koptev Vasiliy, who lived in XVIII century, from 1732 to 1780-s); if info was real, photo was made in 2008, but no metadata. Who knows is it a real own work or publication without permission? Dmitry89 (talk) 06:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this file File:Василий Коптев, Архитектурная штудия с руинами и фигурами,1778.jpg had the same reason from uploader. Dmitry89 (talk) 06:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Assuming this is actually an 18th century painting, then there is no copyright here so we can keep it. However, it has no description, categories, or source, so it's useless unless someone adds those. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no apparent legal issues, in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not pd old: drawing is not original but artwork from 2012 Hans Erren (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to rename Myschkin Brateevsky {talk} 19:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already done by User:Butko. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quero editar de novo Dadilson Gervásio (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already done by User:Dharmadhyaksha. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Emblem of the Federal State of Croatia.svg  MaxxL - talk 23:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no objections raised, although the new file should probably receive the appropriate templates (license as official work, CoA) from the original. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Wappen Wesseling.png  MaxxL - talk 23:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Die Datei File:Hauptsatzung der Stadt Wesseling Wappen.png ist Teil einer Serie, der neben diesem Wappen auch das Dienstsiegel, die Hissflagge und das Banner, die alle aus der Hauptsatzung der Stadt Wesseling stammen. Dabei ist dieses Wappen nicht irgendein Bestandteil dieser Serie, sondern der zentrale Teil. Denn das Dienstsiegel zeigt als Siegelbild dieses Wappen; und Hissflagge und Banner sind als heraldische Flaggen von diesem Wappen abgeleitet. Dieses Wappen hat also eine Aussage für sich!
Die von dir genannte Datei File:Wappen Wesseling.png mag unbestreitbar von einer besseren Qualität sein. Sie ist aber gerade eben nicht aus der Hauptsatzung und kann nicht wirklich den Platz der anderen Datei einnehmen.
--ludger1961 (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete @Ludger1961: Mir ist schon verwundernd aufgefallen, dass du jetzt redundante Abbildungen von Hauptsatzungen hochlädst, eben nur weil sie aus der Hauptsatzung sind. Davon abgesehen, dass diese Abbildungen exemplarisch sind und nicht unbedingt zwingend (oft pixelig sind), ist hier eine fast identische Abbildung vorhanden, nur eben in wesentlich besserer Qualität. Daher ist hier schlicht kein Gebrauch für dieses "schöne" Setstuck: COM:DUPE MfG User: Perhelion 21:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Superseded and not used. The data of the serie cans simply be transfered on the svg version of the file. Kathisma (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by User:FixFixer, but it does not belong here. It is a temporary file used in an internal discussion. Jeblad (talk) 19:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File openly uploaded by Jeblad to public Wikimedia Foundation server, and published under CC-BY-SA-2.5, a license that is not revokable. It shows a screenshot of a webpage, generated by MediaWiki, which is software developped by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikimedia Commons stores several such screenshots, see Category:MediaWiki screenshots and this one is the first in 'nn' Category:MediaWiki screenshots in nn. The other Commons category it falls under is Category:Files moved to Commons from no.wikipedia. FixFixer (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FixFixer: What is this image used for? It is not used on any Wikimedia pages. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Srittau: It doesn't show up at Special:UnusedFiles. Do you have any proof that files have to be deleted if they are "not used on any Wikimedia pages", *currently*? FixFixer (talk) 13:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Not in use, easily recreated if needed. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How can screenshots of past situations on websites be easily recreated? 85.181.115.167 19:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Perfect content for Category:MediaWiki screenshots/Category:MediaWiki screenshots by language and the only file in Category:MediaWiki screenshots in nn. 85.181.115.167 19:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: This appears to be above the threshold of originality. Unless the uploader added his own styling to a simple logo - which is possible since I can't find it on Google - it is non-free.

Español: Este escudo aparece ser sobre el umbral de originalidad. A menos de que la persona que lo subió añadiera sus propios estilos a un logotipo simple (lo que es posible dado que no lo encontré en Google), no es gratis. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Español cumple con el criterio de texto y formas simples. Robslpy (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]