Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 27th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mohammed Galib Hasan as Speedy (Speedydelete). I deleted a lot of the user's uploads as copyvios, because they were found on external sites with at least the same resolution. I did not find this, but probably that's also copyvio. Small size, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


check this link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lalbagh_Kella_%28Lalbagh_Fort%29_Dhaka_Bangladesh_2011_57.JPG Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy per Mohammed Galib Hasan. -- ~ Nahid Talk 16:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rapper hais Rapper hais (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reasoning for nominating for deletion? Seems very suspect to me. --Emergencyninja (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kaldari (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Philips E160.jpg Khanhlong566 (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and block the nominator please. --E4024 (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file name Sree Sannapureddy (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to SilenceKBY (talk) 00:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


(non-admin closure) Kept due to vandalism.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no value to Wikipedia KJP1 (talk) 08:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Please ignore this. I hope I have undone the request. I was trying to nominate another image (see below). KJP1 (talk) 08:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Editor has withdrawn their request.--A09 (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soul.jpd.jpg Nyxaros (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. See here. Wikicology (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Even the Flickr page states it is copyrighted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable organisation. Out of project scopeç Rapsar (talk) 19:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 08:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 08:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 08:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photographs not realistically useful for an educational purpose, outside project scope.

Voltteri (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the opinion of this user, the following unused media do not possess realistic educational value or purpose and are thus outside project scope.

Voltteri (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope: promotional content

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorized unused personal images

[edit]

All of these images are unused low quality personal images without categories.

Basvb (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused media without realistic educational purpose, outside project scope.

Voltteri (talk) 00:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatality megumi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isnt the right part of the second one a movie snapshot and hence a copyvio? --Don-kun (talk) 10:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatality megumi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads contain copyright violations, and out-of-scope personal images.

Takeaway (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but No FoP in Ukraine. A.Savin 07:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Zhovten Cinema in Kiev, Ukraine, was erected in the 1920's. I have not been able to determine who the architect was and if he died more than 70 years ago but I very much doubt that there is a problem here. From a personal point of view, for this file as for others, attempting to promote my work through nomination for Quality Image was a mistake that I badly regret.--Albert Bergonzo (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Albert Bergonzo: I've found this website stating that Valerian Rykov (died 1942) is the architect. Sorry for the mistake, I'm going to withdraw the request. --A.Savin 21:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn, per above. --A.Savin 21:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 22:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted document. Copyrights of the document are belonged to the instute, not the person himself.Rapsar (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 22:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 22:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 22:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yauza02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All material taken from various websites without permission.

A.Savin 21:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete without permission means delete. user must not upload copyrighted images without permission. --173.55.239.44 03:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, subject not identifiable, it cannot be useful to anyone... LamBoet (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque me eliminaron el articulo por no cubrir con los requisitos de wikipedia, luego no tiene sentido que la foto siga arriba Jotr2323 (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjanee.pandey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lifkha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted INeverCry 03:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjeevkumarmandal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theissueof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images/bandspam

INeverCry 03:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this being permanently exhibited in a public place? ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by Friedhof Rohr, 002.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 05:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source / copyright details for the original image. --ghouston (talk) 06:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted company advertisement material. MKFI (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If indeed "own work", then out of scope because self-created artwork. It not "own work", possible copyright violation in addition to being artwork of unidentified significance. Takeaway (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: WIkimedia Commons is not a webhost for personal images. Takeaway (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thepurplenoise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violations. Two studio portraits taken with different cameras, one also previously published at Google+: https://plus.google.com/photos/photo/107396868043126994109/6162139541995530674?icm=false. Third image has no EXIF.

MKFI (talk) 07:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masoodrah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four paintings by a still living artist Hanieh Mohammad Bagher, copyrighted. Last image is a photo of the artist which has been published previously: http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/hanieh-mohammadbagher.html.

MKFI (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by News1pp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused and unidentified small resolution images of a child (selfies?). Out of COM:Scope.

MKFI (talk) 07:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion policy#Self-promotion or vandalism/attack: Advertising or self-promotion; the uploading user, OurMayors, shares the name of the website of the group (website link later on). Possible copyvio, see http://ourmayors.org/. Out of Commons:Project scope: Logo of questionable notability.Godsy (talkcontribs) 20:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the file is use, so scope is OK. Question here is whether it is below or above COM:TOO, I doubt about which one it is here. Basvb (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Basvb. Green Giant (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer in use (the article which contained this image has been deleted). Though I expressed other concerns in the previous nomination, this is now clearly out of Wikipedia Commons scope. Godsy (talkcontribs) 07:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but No FoP in Ukraine. A.Savin 07:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but No FoP in Ukraine. A.Savin 07:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonimo 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image seems not to be a self-portrait but photographed by someone else. zhe Uploader claimed "own work", what would be a copyvio. --Stefan Bellini (talk) 17:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harpreet Sandhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Obviously scanned from a record or poster. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subrojit Sinha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if the uploader is the creator of the logo, permission via OTRS is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pixelo Rivox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 09:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massive upload of content generally taken from social media - nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. For example, File:المقر.png is here, File:ريم العبدالله.png is here, File:ذي عين.png is here, etc.) Others appear to be obvious derivative works (e.g., photos of photos - File:ياسة الكويتية.jpg, File:ابتسام لطفي - 1.png and photos of screens - File:منى_شداد.jpeg, File:ابتسام لطفي - 2.png)

Эlcobbola talk 18:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Twitter/Instagram/Facebook/etc.) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:مجووود العدواني/logs (serial copyright violator/266 copyvios, also per previous mass DR a social media grabber. IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Most of the uploads are somehow manipulated (photoshopped, cropped, watermarks removed etc.), considering also:

etc. Ignoring some higher res (without exif) files and files taken with a Samsung GT-I8262, which are revealing the photographer real (technical/etc.) skills, compared to the nominated ones.

Gunnex (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2016-07-15/doc-ifxuaqhu0438361.shtml 122.90.97.61 09:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Siberian husky 2016.jpg
Eclair siberian husky
Aurplm (talk) 09:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use. created by me Saqib (talk) 09:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ARM1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly copyrighted packaging. Due to copyright reasons similar images have been deleted in the past.

Ies (talk) 10:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Only with OTRS permissions.--Ar Sog1985 (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work considering uploaded 17.10.2013 by Hejazi Israeli (talk · contributions · Statistics) versus https://www.flickr.com/photos/king0sami/5425416763/ (2011, © All rights reserved by "SAMI BIN SAGER"). Also per file talk: "I made ​​a mistake, this is not the pic that I want to upload, I upload the Wrong one it is similar to mine .Hejazi Israeli"

Further details and/or permission from "SAMI BIN SAGER" needed. Gunnex (talk) 10:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Qurying un-renewed status - http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/doctitles.cgi?V3552D186 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Querying un-renewed staus - given its mention here - http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/doctitles.cgi?V3552D186 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Querying not renewed status, found RE0000351735 / 1987-10-23 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sbi3i (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sbi3i and File:معهد الرياض العلمي.gif + (identical) File:ALM3HD-AL3LMi.jpg --> taken from (example) http://www.alriyadh.com/109777 (2005) = http://www.alriyadh.com/media/article/2005/11/22/img/221505.jpg. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 10:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted packaging? Taivo (talk) 11:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's only uploaded photo, maybe copyright violation. Depicted man is not mentioned in ru.wiki, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qamar zaman toor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://a2.images.thrillophilia.com/image/upload/s--T-yeMN2k--/v1/images/photos/000/024/671/original/GIO_Kedar_1.jpg.jpg?1458194574 Indrajit Das 12:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data. special instructions field in metadata begins with FBMD: probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of photo with unknown origin. Depicted person died in 1891 and the photo must be older, but Mexico demands 100 years from photographer's death and I am not sure, that this condition is fulfilled. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is the portrait digitized put yourself in the public domain of the person with more than 100 years after the fact. --NINITMIMIN (talk) 06:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC) {{PD-old}}[reply]

Every file in Commons must be free in two countries: in USA and in source country. This file is free in USA as pre-1923 photo. But what about source country Mexico? Template PD-old says, that 70 years from photographer's death has been passed and I agree with that. Unfortunately Mexico is not satisfied with that. Mexico demands 100 years from death and the photo is not enough old to assume that without evidence. Taivo (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by w:de:Moses Solomonowitsch Nappelbaum [1] [2]. The photographer died in 1958 so it's not a PD-Old. 128.68.59.215 12:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know these sites. I did not find the authorship of the current image on the sites provided. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Enisfesci (bridges copyvioer), like File:YSSbridgeapril2016.JPG (currently protected, waiting for desblock, uploaded 04.2016) = copyvio via (example) http://www.ensonhaber.com/3-kopruden-15-bin-tir-gececek-2016-03-08.html (08.03.2016, Copyright 2005-2014 Ensonhaber.com) = http://i.cdn.ensonhaber.com/resimler/diger/2_1591_1.jpg (last modified: 08.03.2016) or grabbed from Internet Gunnex (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license tag is wrong, but it should be {{PD-simple}}, so no copyright issues here. The problem here is that as an unused company logo, it's not particularly in scope, because nobody's going to use the logo of a minor company except for the company itself. Nyttend (talk) 12:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ik wil dat niet zien meer 62.45.137.36 12:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

foto,s wil ik eruit hebben 62.45.137.36 12:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marked original link on U.S. Army website as dead and then added two live links. – Maliepa (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason – vandalism. --jdx Re: 19:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by w:de:Moses Solomonowitsch Nappelbaum [3] [4]. The photographer died in 1958 so it's not a PD-Old. 128.68.59.215 13:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be the same image used in this poster [5] which pre-dates the upload here. Possibly a screenshot judging the low quality, pixellation and lack of photographic metadata. January (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata mention "Author: S Fournier, Copyright holder: Images Distribution". Date is 1994. Small size. Dubious own work and copyright. Would need OTRS evidence that the uploader is the author S Fournier and that he represents the copyright holder Images Distribution. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich kann das genaue Datum des Fotos nicht mehr eruiren. Möchte daher das Foto löschen. viennpixelart Viennpixelart (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt keinen Grund, einen genaueren Zeitpunkt als den von den 60ern einzutragen. Damit ist der Löschantrag hinfällig. Was die Autorenschaft betrifft, so ist der User Rechtsnachfolger (Sohn) des Fotografen. Eine Information, eine Einverständniserklärung als Rechtsnachfolger per OTRS zu geben, ergeht. Viennpixelart ist informiert. Somit ist der Löschantrag aus meiner Sicht hinfällig. --Hubertl 06:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Low resolution video of domesticated cat. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ServiceplanPublic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low resolution photo of common interiors. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bala Arizalu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bala Arizalu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently completely made-up licensing claims and false PD rationales (files by non-government organisations with clear copyright notices systematically tagged with false {{PD-IDGov}} claims.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sisa dari file yang tidak saya berikan komentar dapat langsung dihapus dari Wikimedia. Bala Arizalu (talk) 08:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved these comments here, as they were originally made by changing my signed comment (please don't do that). I hope that the end result reflects what was intended to be communicated.
As for obtaining permission, please follow the procedure described at Commons:OTRS/id. As for {{PD-IDGov}} applying to File:Locomotive Remains on the Pekanbaru Death Railway 2.jpg because it comes from the website of a village, note that {{PD-IDGov}} only applies "unless [the Government published work is] stated to be protected". In this case, there is a "© Copyright 2019, Desa Lipatkain Selatan All Rights Reserved" statement at the bottom of the page. LX (talk, contribs) 09:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franciele da Rocha Krein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Franciele da Rocha Krein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jim Stinson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical posrtcards. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/45488046.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All are for deletion. I asked the uploader on BG Wikipedia and he said that they are from Internet [6]. Probably File:Rakovski old hospital.jpg and File:Rakovski Sekirovo old church 1.png could be kept as old. File:Ricardo toscani architect.png is as well probably around 1900 [7] and could be kept. --Мико (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Statement from the uploader

[edit]

The requested information updated. --Isip westboro (talk) 03:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hakob Henz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably derivative works. Permissions needed.

Sealle (talk) 15:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonaex Manuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, see file name and description. Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused images, so there is no reason to keep them! --173.55.239.44 04:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says image is copyright Platon (and page is copyright Human Rights Watch), no indication of CC licence PamD (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture shows a pink disk with an arbitrary pattern superficially resembling the Sun in Hα light, without citing any observations or scientific theories for doing so. The file name associates the picture to Proxima Centauri while the label in the picture also lists other stars. Therefore, the picture pretends knowledge which in fact is not there. Also, no star emits pink light, thus it also presents false information. Any importance as artwork is not perceptible, as such pictures can be genetated by few mouse clicks with software like Celestia.. By all this criteria, this picture fails to adhere to the principle "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" listed on .https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope . Therefore, it should be deleted. Karl432 (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture shows a pink disk with an arbitrary pattern superficially resembling the Sun in Hα light, without citing any observations or scientifictheories for doing so. Therefore, the picture pretends knowledge which in fact is not there. Also, no star emits pink light, thus it also presents false information. Any importance as artwork is not perceptible, as such pictures can be genetated by few mouse clicks with software like Celestia. By all this criteria, this picture fails to adhere to the principle "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" listed on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope . Therefore, it should be deleted. Karl432 (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LebensArt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyrighted images. See here. The author of the second file is "MS".

Wikicology (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This man dead at 1982 and user couldn't make this photo at 2015. May be a copy. Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. See watermark. Wikicology (talk) 16:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. The is a watermark on one version File:Двери Dirkas .jpg. Wikicology (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. This image has no Exif data and uploader has a history of copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. See this. I am yet to find the original source of this image but uploader has a history of copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ze Ruela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not.

Wikicology (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not Wikicology (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC) It's myself. There is not a copyright holder.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. See here. Wikicology (talk) 17:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploaded without permission. Permission required from copyright holder. --173.55.239.44 03:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not my property ( posted by Aludars ) Aludars (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not my property ( posted by Aludars ) Aludars (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable youtuber from italy; placing himself cross wiki as promospam MoiraMoira (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторсвте и лицензии. Низкое разрешение, я вно взято откуда то, что даже не различима надпись внизу фотографии Dogad75 (talk) 17:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo borrowed from a friend and used without permission. Erik den yngre (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo borrowed from a friend and used without permission. Erik den yngre (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zelim da izbrisem ovu fotografiju, jer sam je poslao za foto konkurs Tragom Duse, a nije nominovana za isti. Radoje Vukovic (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zelim da izbrisem ovu fotografiju, jer je nisam ispravno poslao za konkurs Tragom Duse, zelim da je posaljem ponovo ali ispravno. Radoje Vukovic (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description "bobhovbjohjlbjhlbhjlbh" says all. Out of scope, along with rest of uploads File:Golden Autumn 1-29-2013.JPG, File:Broken dreams.jpg. One is used on a userpage, which was his only activity. Pibwl (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djlukas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juancroro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It really looks as a derivative of something, the source should be provided to determine copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Juancroro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

PTRS permission from the author is required, or an evidence for why it is free

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Juancroro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

historical image : unclear copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 19:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is in the public domain. If not, then permission from copyright holder is needed. --173.55.239.44 03:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal snapshot of random person, the photo has no potential educational value and is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Insufficient permissions from copyright holder! --173.55.239.44 04:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kastor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fidangurrosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by G.draicchio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted text (taken from the official website of the school) and picture. Rapsar (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

somebody's art, unused, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's family - out of scope (and unlikely authorship of the uploader) Pibwl (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted text. Rapsar (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo of a group of people - out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Initiative HiH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image / maybe promotional : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable quality, user's only uploads with its copies: File:Bombero.jpg, File:Bombero2.jpg Pibwl (talk) 19:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, no cat - no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable website. Out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private child's photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private family tree, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artistic cat photo - no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent duplicate of File:Hazelnut.jpg but this one is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr is not author of the photo. Real photographer is needed. 1957 photos are usually still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable small size, unknown specific subject Pibwl (talk) 19:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, as well as File:1956 Din Lucey winning on Little Don.jpg and most of user's uploads Pibwl (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real educational use, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the opinion of this user, the following unused media do not possess realistic educational value or purpose and are thus outside project scope.

Voltteri (talk) 20:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 20:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although extensive work was done on this template in 2007 & 2008, not much has been done since and the documentation, at least, is severely inadequate. Also, it appears to duplicate the intention of the widespread Babel templates. Thank you for your hard work, and nice nomination tool! Geekdiva (talk) 21:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

실수로 올린 파일입니다. Jinbyeol kim 21:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The files were uploaded by mistake. The user did not intend to upload his files onto Commons because he did not want to do it. Jinbyeol kim (talk · contribs) 12:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, subject not identifiable, it cannot be useful to anyone... LamBoet (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, subject not identifiable, it cannot be useful to anyone. (NB. Not used anymore this time, renominating. LamBoet (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the fact that is has been in use is sufficient to show that the file is in scope. Removing its usage is no justification for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Belarus. Monument was built in 2015. Дима Г (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete permission from copyright holder required. --173.55.239.44 03:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable selfie. Kaldari (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Дима Г (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Дима Г (talk) 23:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if we need this. Appears to be a derivative work from Sunflowers by Vincent van Gogh. If kept, needs to be renamed. Дима Г (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't find evidence for permission at or near the linked source. Author information is lacking, and the source web page clearly contains images by many different photographers, many of which are very unlikely to be free (e.g. [8] = [9]). HaeB (talk) 00:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

投稿者依頼。間違ったファイルをアップロードしてしまったため Nyao148 (talk) 02:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HajiMoosaSuriya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo A. Correa Flores (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a mistake by Wellcome. They took the correct description of a file of Moritz Romberg = File:Dr Moritz Heinrich Romberg Wellcome V0005073.jpg and put it under this file (in fact Francesco Roncalli-Parolino, see http://www.facmed.unam.mx/deptos/historia/tesoro/foto8.jpg ) 2003:45:5C52:501:D44A:DAAF:4A5F:A785 08:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why not simply edit the file page to match the (now corrected) data at Wellcome? Reventtalk 10:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think, first Wellcome has to change the description, otherwise there might be lot of confusion https://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/image/V0005074.html . 2003:45:5C52:501:D44A:DAAF:4A5F:A785 11:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@2003:45:5C52:501:D44A:DAAF:4A5F:A785: I was looking at http://catalogue.wellcomelibrary.org/record=b1171916 which names the correct person, instead of the 'other' page that is still wrong. Still, we should just fix it and poke Wellcome to correct their information. Reventtalk 14:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Feel free to correct the text, it's a wiki. -- (talk) 10:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This would also require renaming of the page to reflect the content. Instead we should just upload a new version with the larger image from this page which does show Romberg's portrait as being described in the Commons file page. De728631 (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Except we already have both those images at File:Dr Moritz Heinrich Romberg Wellcome V0005073.jpg and File:Portrait of M.H. Romberg aged 40; after Schlesinger Wellcome L0011031.jpg; high resolution, original EXIF, and donated without the credit bars. :-) -- (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Who'd have thought?! Then it's still better to adjust the description and rename the file without redirect instead of deleting it for a clean upload. De728631 (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use for the project Takeaway (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with that, it's blurry to mask personnage.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sketch is stated to be in a UK publication and at the same time claimed to be out of copyright based on US copyright law. No source to support that the author has died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 10:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author, no source. 128.68.59.215 12:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - matches none of the options of PD-Russia. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]