Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 5th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official promo image already circulating on the web. Uploader will need to send confirmation to Commons:OTRS to verify ownership or permission to upload to Commons. DAJF (talk) 10:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 10:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright promotional photo published on the individual's official agency site (http://skycorporation.co.jp/page.php?tl_id=241). Verification that the uploader is actually the copyright owner will need to be sent to Commons:OTRS. DAJF (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Josve05a: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 21:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 06:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:GRAFFITI Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Portugal as this work of art is permanently situated in public places, in this speciic case the Parque Mayer. Even more this graffiti is not illegal but is clearly legal as they were made in the context of 2011 Writers Delight, encouraged by the Minicipality of Lisbon and the president of the civil parish where this mural is situated.
So Elisfkc, next time you nominate a file to deletion take some minutes doing some research instead of making a sloppy deletion nomination as this would show you that: 1) There is a thing called Freedom of Panorama; 2) That this mural is permanently situated in a public place; 3) And contrary to your claims this work of art is legal. Tm (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: Sorry about that, just saw it was graffiti and forgot to check the other stuff. Withdrawing request. Elisfkc (talk) 06:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Withdrawing nomination Elisfkc (talk) 06:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. kovox90      21:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Published here in 2013. Site is "©Derechos reservados 2015 Ecuavisa". It qualifies as {{Speedy}}. Ankry (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy. --Ankry (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr uploader appears in this photograph and is obviously not the author. As indicated by the metadata, the author is Lester Cohen/WireImage. WireImage's terms do not permit sublicensing, so the license on Flickr is invalid. LX (talk, contribs) 20:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Paraguay.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Nothing to discuss – it's a crap. --jdx Re: 12:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, only 20×10 pixels. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdgobio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. According to its description, this image seems a screenshot from an unfree TV show. Uploaded by the same uploader in a short period of time, and cannot provide original links or OTRS info. --TechyanTalk11:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sidelity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

Sidelity uploaded more images after this deletion request. Please consider delete other images that haven't listed on this page as well. And seems that Sidelity hasn't respond this deletion request yet. In August 6th, Sidelity edited the descriptions of those images. This user changed the source of the images from something like "screenshot", "TV shows" to "own work"(in Chinese). See Special:Contributions/Sidelity. And Sidelity deleted deletion templates. That may violates commons' policies. --TechyanTalk12:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored the DR notices (and all the other 'no permission' notices on the files not here). Reventtalk 22:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zendexter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT - self-promotion

INeverCry 00:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - dark, low-quality family snapshot INeverCry 00:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - blurry and view into the room is too restricted INeverCry 00:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - tiny 8kb thumb - no EXIF - only upload of user INeverCry 01:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proyecto3manual (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Assekebe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo as it can be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT - self-promotion

INeverCry 01:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emmy Award.JPG. This is a 3D-award/artwork, and thereby copyrighted. Josve05a (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW KEEP - The award was given to me, therefore I own it, my name is on the award, and I shot and uploaded the photo. It also qualifies under fair use. It's as legal as a scan of a Rembrandt painting. Atsme 📞 02:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let me break this down.
Josve05a (talk) 02:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can get a copyright release from the American Saddlebred Horse Association. I may already have one at OTRS for a photograph of that same image. I will look in my files. At the very least, it would also qualify the same as the Oscar which is non-free art. Atsme 📞 03:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict)
  • en:File:Academy Award trophy.jpg is not allowed on Commons for just this reason. Hencey why it is uploaded locally on English Wikipedia under fair use.
  • If you can find an OTRS-ticket, please mention it here, so an agent can review it if it applies for this image and add it to the file.
Josve05a (talk) 03:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment - an image of the award shown on page 75 of the materials I submitted to permissions was licensed properly under Ticket#2016031510021735. Atsme 📞 03:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't checked that ticket, but if this award is included in the magazine without the 'Awards' permission, or without the awards artists permission, then the magazine may be violating copyright in this case, unless the image in the magazine is COM:DM (I may licnese a photo I take under cc - does not mean I'm allowed to license everything shown in that picture under a free license). But as I said, haven't checked the magazine or the ticket (yet). Josve05a (talk) 03:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The magazine is owned by the American Saddlebred Association, the award design was commissioned by the American Saddlebred Association who owns the rights to reproduce others if they so choose, and as far as that is concerned, I provided you with an OTRS Ticket # which includes emails from the copyright holders and they licensed the image of the award under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is all that is required. I own the actual award pictured in the image but you can't have that - only a picture of it. Nothing more needs to be added or disclosed. Atsme 📞 05:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick link to ticket for OTRS agents. I have looked at the ticket and I would have to agree with Josve05a's analysis so far. I'm still trying to find a copy of the materials as they were not attached with the ticket. Right now, we need to know a few things. Was this a work for hire and is the copyright legally "corporately" owned or owned by the sculptor? If it is owned by the sculptor then the ticket is invalid and this would fall under "needs to be fair use" which means it can't be on Commons. That is fine. A quick transfer and filling out the fair-use rationale is easily done if necessary. If it is corporately owned, which corporate? The magazine or the award organization? If corporately owned the release sent in the ticket has to be from the correct corporate. Finally, if it is the correct corporate, is the image included on the pages listed in the ticket? Since the pages were not attached I can't confirm that right now but I am still searching. --Majora (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I provided you with a ticket #, and see no reason for me to go through this drill again. You already made one overzealous claim thinking the :File:KanwalAmeen2.jpg image I uploaded was a copyvio, and now you're questioning another of my images. What's going on? Is there a target on my back, or what? When did it become part of OTSR's volunteer work to dig into the names of sculptors, quiz uploaders whether the award is corporately owned, etc.? Your only concern is whether or not the uploaded images were properly tagged with the right CC license, and in the case of both questioned images, they are ticketed and permissions has the emails. Your work here is done, and I've got work to do. If you still feel there's an issue, perhaps Yann might be able to help. The emails that were submitted by myself and the copyright holder of the American Saddlebred Horse award states specifically: "All copies including the images contained within are licensed for use per CC-BY-SA-4.0", which covers what you need to know - there are no copyvios here. Atsme 📞 04:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    You clearly do not understand the role of OTRS nor do you understand how your comment is exceedingly troubling. It matters if the photos are properly licensed. It matters if copyright is being honored. It matters if the release is given by someone who can actually release the photos. It matters so much more than what you think it does. Permissions is not a rubber stamp that allows you to upload whatever the hell you want as long as you send something in that claims rights. That is not how it works and that will never be how it works. As for a "target on you back" don't be melodramatic. I was asked to take a look. I looked. I gave my opinion. Nothing more. If you have work to do, please go and do it. This DR will continue with or without you. --Majora (talk) 04:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Atsme took the photo, what else is needed? Montanabw (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Montanabw: Since it is a 3D-artwork (just as a scupture) we need the artists permission, since they own the copyright of the object, otherwise it is a COM:DW-copvyio. Josve05a (talk) 09:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Josve05a please read the submission to permissions which clearly states - and I repeat what was said in my post above - "The emails that were submitted by myself and the copyright holder of the American Saddlebred Horse award states specifically: "All copies including the images contained within are licensed for use per CC-BY-SA-4.0", which covers what you need to know - there are no copyvios here." You have everything you need. Atsme 📞 19:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • I, as an OTRS agent, will not comment publically on the content of that ticket. However, two OTRS-agents has said that that is not enough (see Majora's comment above). A photo may be freely licened, but the sculpute (award/3d-work) may still have copyright. Josve05a (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • I am aware of that. You are misreading what Atsme just said - she said that the copyright holder OF THE SCULPTURE also gave permission. Now if someone lost the OTRS ticket, or attachments, or scans of written permission, obviously we can't discuss that publicly, but it can be presumed that you can email the OTRS source (which I presume is Atsme) and double-check. If all copyright holders have granted permission, then it's golden. IF there is some limit, then you need to let the OTRS person know -- presumably so that if needed, they can port the image to en.wikipedia, which does allow images with some more limits than commons. Montanabw (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
            • No, Atmse quotes (which I will not confirm or deny) that all images in the ticket are freely licensed, that does not mean that the underlying copyright for the 3D-work in this image is free. Josve05a (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
              • The photographed images and tearsheets (see ticketed license which states including the images contained within specifically naming pg 75) have been properly released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 by the copyright holder of both the 2-D IMAGE of the award which includes the artwork and design of the physical award in my possession. This is not the same as a registered trademark like with the Oscar, nor is it about creating physical awards based on a single copyright release for a particular image of a particular award with my name on it. The release is for digital IMAGES of that award ONLY -Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. I also granted license because my name is on the plate in the image and it is my award in my possession, and yes, that does mean something. All of the copyright holders involved have correctly granted a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license for the digital IMAGE of that award. I don't understand what part you don't comprehend about the IMAGE license. Perhaps you should contact legal to clear-up the confusion, and when you do, submit all of the documents we've provided. If somebody takes a picture of a DVD, and licenses that picture under CC-BY-SA 4.0, it does not grant anyone the right to reproduce whatever is on the DVD. Atsme 📞 23:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Also having read over the OTRS ticket, I don't have any issue with the permission released for image, I think that's been satisfied. However, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States:
... any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork.
Atsme, you've said that the copyright holder of the images is also the copyright holder of the artwork in the award as well. If you'd like, I can reopen the ticket and e-mail the copyright holder and simply ask them to verify this, because I think the phrase including the images contained within can be interpreted a few ways. Let me know if you'd like me to start that conversation. I think a decision on deletion can probably wait until we get a response back on the matter. That said, if they are not the owner of the artwork, and there is no permission from the artist, Montanabw's suggestion of a non-free use rationale on en.wikipedia may be possible. I JethroBT (talk) 23:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I JethroBT, I already sent the copyright holder an email request before I read your comment here, but please do whatever you think is necessary to help get this issue resolved. I'm also ok with moving the image over to en.Wikipedia since it's specific to an article over there. Thank you! Atsme 📞 05:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. OTRS-ticket invalid. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pikhmikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vijesh rana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JV04 Arif Nur Setiawan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue is still under copyright and the artist is known for prosecuting copyright violations Nunabas (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader also has other bull pictures that also need to be deleted, by the way. Holy Goo (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danielsilvapinon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 02:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 02:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Khilletzbal (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Khilletzbal (talk) 04:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Khilletzbal (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Capporap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

different copyright holders

2003:45:5C6F:A801:6C8B:1FD6:83E3:C17E 04:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisa wac22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:6C8B:1FD6:83E3:C17E 04:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bondoso Humorist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small resolutions, no EXIF: OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:6C8B:1FD6:83E3:C17E 04:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:6C8B:1FD6:83E3:C17E 04:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:6C8B:1FD6:83E3:C17E 05:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image description page has no required attribution: "Vaping360.com (Vaping360)", as required at www.flickr.com/photos/127173209@N05/15249922438. This violates CC-BY 2.0 license. A5b (talk) 05:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    • required by author attribution is not by name, but by website. Now we have {{cc-by-2.0|http://the-best-electronic-cigarette-review.com}} in the File:E-cig-range-hero CC by 2.0.jpg page, and when the image is viewed in some language wikipedia, this link is shown after click on image. Why this link? Author had required other URL for attribution, the Vaping360.com. `A5b (talk) 05:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

almost certainly not the uploader's own work, considering Lin Feng-jiao's age these photos were taken in the 1970s Timmyshin (talk) 05:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image description page (and image usage) has no required attribution. The page www.flickr.com/photos/ecigclick/17679064871/ REQUIRES to "attribute to www.ecigclick.co.uk." when image is used; if it is used without attribution, this usage may violate CC-BY-SA 2.0 license (Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, ... If supplied, you must provide the name of the creator and attribution parties, a copyright notice, a license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material. ) A5b (talk) 05:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

????? - It is attributed to Ecig Click and source is Ecig Click's upload on flickr. Let me put it another way: It is made absolutely clear that this image comes from the author and thus it is attributed. If A5b has any nick-picky problem with this just go ahead and add from the given sources whatever you think is missing instead of requesting deletion of a file that you know is absolutely legit to have here on commons.TMCk (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
author requires attribution to the website, not to name. Check also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-by-2.0 - "Parameter 1 - the attribution string as specified by the licensor, that re-users are obliged to name" `A5b (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Lal Kakkattiri is needed. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:29, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 06:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 06:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user ; photo reloaded (2018) after regular deletion (2016) Civa (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wheat Blast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works (small resolutions, no EXIF)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 06:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for the project. The watermark advertises somerthing. Ruthven (msg) 07:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Otto frihd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status considering artworks by living German painter de:Nora Schattauer (1952–), needing COM:OTRS-permission. Uploaded on 19./20.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 07:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work with a watermark 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 07:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Youtube channel spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related dewiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own" work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayrale Bustamante (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works (small resolution. no EXIF)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 08:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gromulya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works (small resolutions, no EXIF)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1. "Own" work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Don't know what source this is from. Most likely personal collection. --173.55.239.44 06:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private personal photo of that chil which is definately the centre of that pic. It should be out of the scope of the Commons 217.94.100.214 08:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? (with a watermark) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndrePeltier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permission

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DragonEhwit3i (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akronstout2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a flag/logo of a third party organisation, without clarifications from the uploader, I fail to see how this can be self/own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a tilte-card from a TV production, The background makes it non-simple, and without clarifcation I fail to see how it's self/own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attributed to a different source [1] at English Wikipedia, I fail to see how it can be an own/self license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be recent poster art, English Wikipedia gives [2] as a source, without clarifcations I fail to see how this is an own/self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishabht006 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused vanity photos of non-notable individual better suited to an SNS. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 08:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a thrid party organisational logo, without clarifcation I fail to see how it's self/own. It may be too simple to be copyright though. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The concern here is that the logo portion, namely the gradiented tear-drop, is too complex for a simple tag. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See previous nomination on the Vodafone image here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg. The image is a UK logo which has a very very low TOO. Majora (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-resolution image of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English Wikipedia has the same image attributing [3] as the source, I fail to see (without clarifcation) how this is own/self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 08:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The concern here is that the stylised Virgin script portion of the logo, is above threshold of originality. (Origin is UK?, which has a lower thrreshold than the US). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO Concern, in respect of the stylised Vrigin script. Additionaly this is tagged as self, when it's a third party logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO concern in respect of the stylised Virgin portion of the logo ( Country of origin UK?). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is doubt as to whether this tiny (315x225px) image is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed, since another similar image uploaded (File:アトリエ 02.jpg) was a blatant copyright violation. The uploader should either upload the original full-size version or send confirmation of ownership to Commons:OTRS. -- DAJF (talk) 09:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the quality is a joke Kopiersperre (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope; only usage on uploader's user page that was speedy-deleted by criteria G11 & U5 Maximilian Reininghaus (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

شعار محفوظ الحقوق «izoozo» talk 09:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير حرة «izoozo» talk 09:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gvapolanda Respublika (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Dj spam] Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related dewiki entry 3x speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/839855849402592/photos/a.839856036069240.1073741825.839855849402592/940347756020067/?type=1&theater (01.2016) Gunnex (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under suspition of copying this photo without permission. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 09:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ハレメカ009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and what appears to be number plate and facial blurring false positives. These are probably screenshots from Google Streetview of some similar service.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader responded on talk page of the request. Google translates this as "What do you want to delete". I suspect, that there is nothing to do with the file. Taivo (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused poor-quality selfies of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these two images, one of which looks very professional and the other one has overprinting.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, INeverCry blocked uploader indefinitely with reason "nothing but copyvios and self-promotion". Taivo (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free license, please see sourse: http://smolhramspb.ru/clergy we can see below © 2016 Храм Смоленской иконы Божией Матери, but not CC BY SA Cap1000 (talk) 10:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GNM-MA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, considering (per EXIF) multiple authors involved: "Monika Runge" + "Dirk Messberger" + "Sebastian Tolle" + "Jürgen Musolf" + "Georg Janßen" + "Günther Kühnel" + etc., mostly taken from related entries of http://objektkatalog.gnm.de which is (per http://objektkatalog.gnm.de/impressum) a copyrighted catalogue of the de:Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Germany's largest museum of cultural history. Uploaded since 21.07.2016 by GNM-MA (talk · contributions · Statistics) who may be eventually (somehow) connected to de:Germanisches Nationalmuseum. File:Germanisches Nationalmuseum.png can be found earlier on web and is most likely a photoshopped version of a copyrighted work by http://studio-messberger.de/albums/museum/ (© Studio Messberger) = http://studio-messberger.de/storage/cache/images/000/227/GNM-Haupteingang,xlarge.1429011935.jpg.

Further details and/or (multiple) COM:OTRS-permission(s) needed. Ignoring 3 uploads which are already in PD by other reasons (example I + II).

Gunnex (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katysp ksp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All 6 images taken from aquaviva.ru (see images description) Clear copyright © ИА "ВОДА ЖИВАЯ" 2011-2013 detected in aquaviva. CC BY SA is fake license

Cap1000 (talk) 10:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, what is depicted here. File description did not help. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Website spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related dewiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the author, and doesn't provide any proof that the file was released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 Gyrostat (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author MrRunsheeg1 is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work from Shutterstock Gyrostat (talk) 11:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 11:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad T Abu Salah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mohammad T Abu Salah = 2 photos derived from paintings by unknown authors and 1 obvious TV video screenshot, probadly similar to File:"Vlcsnap-2015-05-17-21h18m53s77.jpg".png

Gunnex (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its no use to anyone and i dont know why i posted the information in the first place Aj236s (talk) 11:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awadhesh118 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images and logos of non-notable company

INeverCry 05:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awadhesh118 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work: can be found here since 2011. Florn (talk) 12:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BRatAxalta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely all files taken from https://secure-stage.axaltacs.com/corporate/en_US/about-axalta/history.html, needing permission. Uploaded in a row on 25.07.2016 for en:Axalta Coating Systems, a US coatings company headquartered in Philadelphia.

Gunnex (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused; no purpose obvious due to poor description; can easily replaced by TeX if really needed in an article Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 12:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, private picture MMFE (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think I have taken the image from a copyrighted source. Doersoffame (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think I have taken the image from a copyrighted source. Doersoffame (talk) 12:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think I have taken the image from a copyrighted source. Doersoffame (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless patchwork, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 12:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why this file is proposed to deletion. This image was created to show some common empiric formulae in the Proteopedia page 3D Molecular Models. The purpose of including this image is to illustrate some types of molecular representations used before 3D molecular modeling was possible. Alejandro Porto 18:30 9 August 2016 (ECT)

My reply given there is analogously valid here, too. --Leyo 19:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless patchwork, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 12:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why this file is proposed to deletion. This image was created to show some common structural formulae in the Proteopedia page 3D Molecular Models. The purpose of including this image is to illustrate some types of molecular representations used before 3D molecular modeling was possible. Alejandro Porto 18:30 9 August 2016 (ECT)

You may rather make use of the gallery function, e.g. as follows or similar:
--Leyo 17:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless patchwork, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 12:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why this file is proposed to deletion. This image was created to show some common empiric formulae in the Proteopedia page 3D Molecular Models. The purpose of including this image is to illustrate some types of molecular representations used before 3D molecular modeling was possible. Alejandro Porto 18:30 9 August 2016 (ECT)

My reply given there is analogously valid here, too. --Leyo 19:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted text, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 13:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted text, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 13:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, too small, unuseable MMFE (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, too small, unuseable MMFE (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from the 1998 film Deep Rising. Russian Rocky (talk) 13:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 13:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused selfie, and no educational value. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 13:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was tagged as "{{flickrvio|Non-free photo by Todd Williamson/WireImage according to metadata.}}" by LX. Undeleted and converted to a DR to allow discussion (per talk). Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • So, the reason for deletion is that the EXIF has a stamp by Todd Williamson/WireImage. Todd Williamson is a professional photographer [4]. However, the Flickr user is USANA Inc. (or USANA Health Sciences), the Flickr album https://www.flickr.com/photos/usanainc/albums/72157623325049583 is 107 images of famous people at the USANA exhibit/booth/stand at the Golden Globes, all, by Todd Williamson. It seems possible that USANA hired Williamson to take these photos, making them "works for hire", so USANA would have the right to set the license to whatever they want... but, it's also possible that USANA bought these photos from Williamson afterwards, which purchase might or might not have included the right to release the photos. For example, here is another photo from Todd Williamson of a different famous person at the same event, but not at the USANA stand. I am afraid I can see it either way. If the Estella Warren article were a big deal to me, I'd write USANA, but it isn't, I just ran across this image browsing. --GRuban (talk) 14:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete again, obviously. This should have gone through Commons:Undeletion requests, and if it had, I'm certain it would have been denied unless OTRS gets some evidence that WireImage waived their standard terms and allowed sublicensing. (This and related cases have previously been discussed at User talk:Stemoc/2014#File:Estella Warren 2010 (cropped).jpg and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 12#User:Thedarkknightjc.) LX (talk, contribs) 19:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALEXANDRE MARIONNET (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorer filetype and missing some reagents compared to File:AmadoriRearrangement1.png. DMacks (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise File:Amadori Rearrangement.jpg. DMacks (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Azim93khan (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustratrions are claimed to be under non-commercial Creative Commons license. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song excerpt. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sahilskv11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paur 2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low resolution photo of common subject. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of common subjects. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9DkxiUt1h0A/TN2C3k7cbhI/AAAAAAAADpQ/szn1gglmZC4/s1600/morrisseyYoungHairstyle%255B1%255D.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.ingressorapido.com.br/ImagensSistema/Eventos/eI051756.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, needless rasterised copy of File:Fictitious Ottoman flag 3.svg. LX (talk, contribs) 19:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tangolavalleja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Congressman22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Congressman22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious licensing. No evidence of PD or free license.

Sealle (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edong1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhido99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://vid.alarabiya.net/images/2016/02/05/94c8886e-4f6c-430e-a5bc-0976ecc13eca/94c8886e-4f6c-430e-a5bc-0976ecc13eca.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://revolvy-cdn.revolvyllc.netdna-cdn.com/images/cache/8d/fa/55/8dfa5513084dc57ef77583df2b541727.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it cannot display correctly Tomoyo~zhwiki (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAASaAAAAJDM4ZGZkZGQxLTdjZWMtNDM2Ni1hYjE3LWY3NmIwNDNlNGU1NA.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MrJanzen1984 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photos themselves are OK. From L-to-R, they are File:Mountbatten.jpg, File:Samuel Wilder King (PP-74-9-002).jpg, and File:Joseph B. Poindexter (vol. 2, 1921).jpg. However, this image itself of a Wikipedia infobox is a hoax, as there was no such entity called the "Anglo-American Union". howcheng {chat} 16:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reading Associate 17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from logos and posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity; poor quality Zinnmann (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity; unused Zinnmann (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, since artist died in 1947. Listed for undeletion in 2018. Also:

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored after 70 years pma Platonides (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personnal image →‎ out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, artist died in 1956. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sophisticated logo that is above TOO in China which is very low. Wcam (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JesseW900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Calligraphic features are above TOO (COM:TOO#China (PRC)) therefore {{PD-textlogo}} does not apply.

Wcam (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JesseW900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING

Wcam (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JesseW900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Calligraphic features are above TOO (COM:TOO#China (PRC)).

Wcam (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JesseW900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious licensing, these logos probably are eligible for copyright.

Яй (talk) 04:08, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I marked with asterisk three logos, which in my opinion are simple. The rest are not. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Indeed, most of them are eligible for copyright. I follow here Taivo and have kept those files marked with a star. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicates of File:WIRTGEN Hamm Logo.png, no need to keep four extras.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JAISHANKAR DIRECTOR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these Three Visual Images, one of which has four copies (three of same size).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons is not Facebook. --jdx Re: 09:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am uploader of this file and I want it to be deleted Sex pictures (talk) 15:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploadd by Sagaeluart (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 22.07.2016. This appears, following the speedy deleted autobiographical enwiki entry "Aaron Sagaelu" an artwork by "Aaron Sagaelu, considering also https://www.facebook.com/aaron.sagaelu/photos/a.1765260983708066.1073741831.1761925844041580/1765262757041222/?type=3&theater (03.2016), needing COM:OTRS-permission. Per above, it may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non notable individual. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pabloacosta1001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (icons most likely derived from elsewhere copyrighted content) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 16:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Johannaderb1992 (identical files). Gunnex (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AngeLxUS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: This book cover is most unlikely the work of the uploader as claimed. The same resolution image if found on a Fiat discussion forum here. Google images search find lots of copies online. Ww2censor (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucash051 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Lucash051. Most likely grabbed & screenshotted from Youtube.

Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A Rico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, can be found earlier on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:A Rico: video screenshots, promo material, Getty images grabber lile File:Blac Chyna VMA's.jpg = http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/2016/05/09/blac-chyna.jpg (full exif available = "Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images") etc. for es:Blac Chyna, an American model and entrepreneur, uploaded since 06.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carloscabezas77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charly Serch Glez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (3 files = 1 duplicate) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pam Munoz Ryan, the author who is on the photo, has asked me to upload and use these photos for her wikipedia page. She actually sent me an email asking me to do this. The photos are also on her own website at the following page: http://www.pammunozryan.com/media/ If I need to do this in a different way, please let me know.

The uploader apparently does not own copyright. It is unclear if the person granting permission to use the picture (the subject of the photo) actually owns copyright on the photo, and the permission is not recorded in the proper way. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alinea as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, Picasso died 1973 Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, c'est une photo que j'ai prise moi-même à Toulouse. Mathieu Milhau — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.251.121.150 (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]
Ça ne veut pas pour autant dire que le tableau est dans le domaine public. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johannaderb1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (icons most likely derived from elsewhere copyrighted content). Identical to uploads on same day by obvious sock Pabloacosta1001 (talk · contributions · Statistics) via Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pabloacosta1001.

Gunnex (talk) 16:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Esterification of the Monosaccharide.jpg

Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 16:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to upload it without watermark Cvanheertum (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, hand-written; orphaned. Leyo 16:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 16:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 16:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, many better alternatives in Category:Cellulose. Leyo 16:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of CC licence, possibly unfree Meiloorun (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned document, not sure if the uploader is allowed to upload this under a free license. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement by private museum. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StepanStepanStepan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If those paintings are in public domain for some reason then the reason and the valid license tag should be provided. Or the permission(s) from the artist(s) must be send to OTRS. Otherwise the files should be deleted.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture uploaded Azim93khan (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture uploaded Azim93khan (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong picture uploaded Azim93khan (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture uploaded Azim93khan (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Truthraps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Screenshot of en:¡Hola!] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jwufvsuquis 123.108.244.49 18:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism --jdx Re: 18:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 01:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Porcellana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small photographs, no metadata, possible copyright violation.

Яй (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر Mahdi28 (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montage contains a deleted picture: File:Tokyo odaiba.jpg. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I have replaced the offending picture with another of the same location, though a night shot: Rainbow colored Rainbow Bridge at night.jpg Hogweard (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!  Keep then. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 06:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 01:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Luiscorradi/logs Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file Wikimasterbz (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation SuZumiya (talk) 19:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, available on web since 2014 [5] (see watermark), uploaded by user with multiple copyvios stated on their talk page. Яй (talk) 20:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD (and surely not PD-old-100 as uploader stated), since painter died in 1952. Undelete in 2023. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent to File:Červený fosfor2.gif, but with low-contrast background and in-image watermark. DMacks (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 21:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absurdist file, I must have been drunk when uploading it. Firedrop (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew Groosenberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry 2x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 21:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per en:Caesium titanate article on the substance, it is not monomeric. Was removed from that article years ago as being incorrec. DMacks (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: low resolution and no metadata, so this image is most unlikely to be the work of the uploader. It is found on this webpage. Ww2censor (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 22:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mbenitopuebla (with related files [video screenshots] deleted. Probadly a reupload: "Captura de pantalla" indicates also to a video screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomonating also:

Gunnex (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Escribano sin censura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

[Youtube channel spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own works by user Egor who is depicted on a photo and has uploaded the image in Russian Wikipedia. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple user image. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image of blocked sockmaster INeverCry 01:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herb Gminy jest nieaktualny Beatajaniuk (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Old version of this gmina's CoA. The file has been already renamed. --jdx Re: 10:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Jdx. P 1 9 9   14:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I keep thinking that this file cannot have a CC licence due to copyright of boxes (at least some of them). I'm not an expert, but i believe that if it would be permitted, then every single box side should also be permitted (and we would have an image for most of the Video games). I also doubt if De minimis could be applied to this photo, as it would be pointless without the boxes. PuchaczTrado (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per User:Prosfilaes. P 1 9 9   14:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission..... the stereopair is indeed found at the source, marked no copyright, but it was also found at Getty Images,

Converting speedy to Deletion Nomination for time to determine the status of the image. Any help will be appreciated! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Negative of the stereograph at Library of Congress: https://lccn.loc.gov/2002712108 LOC has labeled it with 'No known restrictions on publication. No renewal in Copyright office.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdmorga (talk • contribs)

Kept: as per User:Jdmorga. P 1 9 9   14:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Becuase its licensed by shutterstock by me . KaouroV (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KaouroV: : Are you saying that this is a photo from shutterstock, not taken by you, that you obtained from there? Or are you saying that this is a photo you took that you have now put on shutterstock and no longer wish to have on Commons? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pi.1415926535: :yes i'm saying that this is a photo taken by me that i have now put on shutterstock and no longer wish to have on Commons.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 01:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because its licensed on shutterstock Link: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=414441460 KaouroV (talk) 13:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KaouroV: : Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. When you put this photograph (that you say you took) on Commons, you permanently released it under the CC BY-SA-4.0 license. You cannot now decide that you no longer want to distribute it under that license - even if it was deleted from Commons, anyone can still use it elsewhere under the terms of CC BY-SA-4.0. That said, you still have every right to license it on Shutterstock as well - many commercial purchasers on Shutterstock would be inconvenienced by the attribution and sharealike restrictions, and would prefer to pay to have use of the image without those restrictions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Pi.1415926535 and previous DR. Multi-licensing is totally fine: You can still license the file at Shutterstock under the Standard and Enhanced Licenses, requiring feeds if apply (if someone purshased it, no attribution needed, just the restrictions of the License apply); the only file that is covered by the CC-BY-SA is this one (the individual is required to add the proper attribute and follow the same license). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IgO_8lRv6tY/VdtFJm3sTFI/AAAAAAAAAcA/PCvvZG_iplQ/s1600/yasser%2Bharrak%2Band%2Bjustin%2Btrudeau.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Important image for this page in relation with the Badil.info lobbying claim.( Nomination2016 (talk) 12:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC) )[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unverified permission, may be fixed via OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mo-yan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Not seeing any reason to doubt that all of the photos were indeed taken by the uploader in the late 1950s to 1960s as claimed. (None of them appears to have been published anywhere else on the web previously, and they all have precise dates and location details consistent with them having been taken by the same person.) --DAJF (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: The uploader properly declared that these photos are their own works and provided enough descriptions. No reason to doubt any possible copyright violation.--Tam0031 (talk) 04:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: I echo above two comments.210.160.37.27 05:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - inexperienced uploaders do declare random things when it comes to filling in forms - improbably copyright situation, see e.g. here, where we see this file. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Mr. or Mrs. Administrator

My Name Is Ndok Piniqi. My account on Wikipedia and Wikimedia is nopiAbat (actually Ndok Piniqi). All photos with this account are, photos taken by me, I am the author and photographer. These photos are also to www.Panoramio.com/ndokpiniqi. You have no reason to delete my photos, this is the second time. Please take a consideration my request, please don't delete my photos. If you have any questions send me E-mail to npiniqi@gmail.com.

Sincerely, Ndok Piniqi


Deleted: per nomination - please contact OTRS for verification. --Jcb (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity. Unused picture of yet another penis. Zinnmann (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unverified own work claim, uploader uploaded several different penisses. --Jcb (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity; unused and partly out of focus Zinnmann (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unverified own work claim, uploader uploaded several different penisses. --Jcb (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity; unused picture of yet another penis Zinnmann (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unverified own work claim, uploader uploaded several different penisses. --Jcb (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]