Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 9th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lacks of date/author/country to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused artwork on non-notable artist INeverCry 01:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image is not available under a license compatible with Commons licensing requirements. See source, and note non-commercial license. Hammersoft (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apologies. The non-commercial use requirement doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Wikimedia doesn't monetize the images, right? Anyway I'll delete them. Thanks for clearing it up. Volman92 (talk) 02:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image is not available under a license compatible with Commons licensing requirements. See source and note non-commercial license. Hammersoft (talk) 02:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image is not available under a license compatible with Commons licensing requirements. See source and note non-commercial license. Hammersoft (talk) 02:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barnstar-camera.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dan Notter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"no commercial" at the source provided http://desarrolloydefensa.blogspot.fr/2014/11/sistema-mlrs-tipo-90-china.html

Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear the subject is notable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:David Gelsinger at Bohemian grove Medicine Lodge circa 2011.jpg same picture, different uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: SPA upload. --INeverCry 16:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, terrible quality (looks like it was copied from a YouTube or other video), claimed as own work, uploaded as part of a series but with no indication of user's own work. Note photo is dated 9/11 in one place and 7/16 in another, etc. No metadata other than HP, probably a scanner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:DAVID GELSINGER IN THE BOHEMIAN GROVE.pdf uploaded on same day by different named user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: SPA upload/likely copyvio. --INeverCry 16:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Map by David Gelsinger, but uploaded by Abilicom. Needs COM:OTRS from Mr Gelsinger to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPA upload/likely copyvio. --INeverCry 16:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO No indication of user's own work on this image, no metadata, small size, terrible quality. Shows multiple copies of an unposed "not identification style" photograph, unattributed. Plus there is no apparent COM:SCOPE to this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPA upload/likely copyvio. --INeverCry 16:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abilicom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three *.pdf and two *.jpg documents, all out of COM:SCOPE. These apparently relate to a lawsuit of some sort and it seems promotional/self-promotional or "Pointy" in nature. Additionally the timecard document contains a personal attack.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPA/inappropriate uploads. --INeverCry 16:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded a png version of the file. The jpg was uploaded mistakenly and will now not be used in any article. Črkonoša (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete As per user request. --jdx Re: 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --INeverCry 17:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, watermarks, and the uploader's history.

Watermarked posters
Postage stamps
Photo portraits
Building photo

LX (talk, contribs) 09:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the only image for which I AGF is the building photo because it actually has believable matadata. As far as I know Pakistan stamps are copyright for 50 years and Indian stamps are definitely copyright for 60 years, one issued in 2012 and the other in 1990, need to go. The first two portraits might be old enough if real sources were provided but the 3rd subject was only born in 1977 (used in a multiple- declined draft) and the same image, though cropped closer, is found on his linkedIn page without any evidence of permission. Ww2censor (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that instead of commenting here, the uploader has chosen to continue to upload blatant copyright violations with fraudulent authorship claims. LX (talk, contribs) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black d 1001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmoP_7hXgAEFEji.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 17:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is an image taken from www.films.lk. It has the website's watermark all over the image. Dan arndt (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 00:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an image taken directly from The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). http://www.sundaytimes.lk/980111/pl2b.jpg Dan arndt (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 00:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 00:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 00:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Lagunensis31 (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on day of upload. --JuTa 08:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo usurpée!Loulette89 (talk) 19:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

usurped file, I am the owner 103.4.75.5 21:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material. The file is probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 08:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Web site screenshot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dcapillae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The image was uploaded to a wiki with a GFDL license after November 1, 2008 and subsequently transferred here (see Commons:GFDL 1.3 relicensing criteria)

Discasto talk 22:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dcapillae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images were uploaded to an external wiki and were assigned a GFDL license (explicitly or implicitly, that is, without license) after November 1, 2008. Such images were transferred subsequently to commons. Thus, they are not eligible images (see Commons:GFDL 1.3 relicensing criteria)

Discasto talk 17:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de création KAPour les intimes 13:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of copyright release - copied from http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2014/01/27/trent-reznor-feels-disrespected-by-grammys-after-performance-is-cut-short/ , which says it's a Getty image Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted, copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Παραβιάζει τους όρους περί πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων. Ioannes Ntouros (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer being linked to by any article, I was original uploader, I now wish to delete. Phantomwiki (talk) 12:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Mae Fah Luang University 2009.jpg in an inferior format; this file should be deleted and redirected. 101.109.201.245 13:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The DR doesn't look like a vandalism, but on the other side. does anyone understand what DR's author wants? --jdx Re: 07:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivate work of Clarin logo, argentine newspaper, Not educational value. 186.135.129.116 00:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear subject, Bad quality, unused, the only file uploaded by the user. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A larger version of the photo appears here credited to the ANI (presumably the Asian News International agency). So I don't think the US government owns the copyright on this photo. Diannaa (talk) 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation of http://www.fullhdimages.net/myadmin/img/timthumb.php?src=1382953266_ms-dhoni-hd-photo.jpg&h=270&w=392&zc=0 117.192.165.236 01:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation of http://static.itsonlycricket.com/itsonlycricket/res/uploaded/top10/2010/02/26/yuvraj-singh-270210.jpg 117.192.165.236 01:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fariaanzum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Firepaintings (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks - if in scope, we need permission from the artist(s) or an evidence for why the images can be free

Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Firepaintings (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks - if in scope, we need permission from the artist or an evidence for why the images can be free

Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal promotional image, out of project scope Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

or it is a personal text work likely out of scope, or it was writen by a notable people and likely the text is copyrightable Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunilshegaonkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If the images are in our project scope, then we need an OTRS permission from the artist or an evidence for why they can de be free licensed

Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D graphic works in the UK do not have FOP protection. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 06:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. This is possibly the uploader himself. Wikicology (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. The uploader is probably not the copyright holder of the art work Wikicology (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. Uploader is probably not the copyright holder of the art work Wikicology (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Harisson Souza

[edit]

Copyrighted materials. Uploader is probably not the copyright holder of the works. --Wikicology (talk) 07:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User: Vamshi519

[edit]

Copyrighted materials. The uploader is not the copyright holder of the works. The first file is a statue and work of an artist which I believe not to be the uploader. The second file belongs to this person who is likely to be the owner of this twitter account. The third file looks like the work of a professional photographer with no metadata. The fourth file was probably obtained from here, and the fifth file was obtained from here or here. --Wikicology (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material. The file is probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance for encyclopedia; image placed by a dutch local organisation that loans toys to kids which was deemed not to be of encyclopedic value MoiraMoira (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. The file must have been obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 08:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material. It is not clear who owns the art work. Wikicology (talk) 08:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like not a free work. In source: "Reconstruction <by text description> by D. Schorr, 2007". And see the original image. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material Wikicology (talk) 08:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

Author given at upload-form (VonWolfen) isn't similar to credit at work ("Carolina Biegun-Röckle") nor "veritas". Additional the work has several copyrighted pictures and trademarks and logos from several products. So additional permissions from this copyright holders are necessary, but I think they will not come. Quedel (talk) 10:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional: I cannot see, what the purpose of thise file should be, I think "not in scope", but "advertising" somewhat ever. --Quedel (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Mistake on license. / Pas de liberté de panorama en France. Erreur de licence. Bzh-99 (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Austrian FOP only covers works of visual art; this publicly visible text is not covered. darkweasel94 10:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a simple explanatory text on the artwork in the park. Can there really be copyright issues on that? -- Clemens 13:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Austrian FOP only covers works of visual art; this publicly visible text is not covered. darkweasel94 10:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a simple, explanatory text on the name of the park. Can there be copyright issues on this? -- Clemens 13:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 서영오 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the images seem copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the ownership of the uploader. Nothingserious (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторских прав (автор - по ссылке; загрузивший фото участник о АП не знал) Uragan. TT (talk) 12:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque está duplicado Lagunensis31 (talk) 12:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable (and unfixable) poor quality. The intended subject can barely be made out and it's hard to tell much about his appearance from this. Ubcule (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilya.bloom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of non-notable young boy from Israel. Out of project scope.

-- Geagea (talk) 13:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How do we feel about the quality of images like this? Is it acceptable, or even usable? We can tell that it's a string quartet, but the faces are a complete disaster. At best you can tell it's a female face (leftmost figure), at worst there's literally no recoverable highlight detail there (centre figure), not even if you pull the gamma *way* down. Ubcule (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, better alternatives already present in Category:FC St. Gallen. Leyo 13:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded small version of logo already present in Category:FC St. Gallen. Leyo 13:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, many places on the internet already with tineye Mjrmtg (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyvio from http://www.rfjvorarlberg.at/%C3%BCber-uns/vorstand/ . The uploader has not enclosed any reasonable evidence stating his permission to upload the picture as a CC-BY-SA 4.0 licenced work. Neither has he proven in any way that he is the original author of the picture, as stated with the picture. Plani (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licenza CC incompatibile con questo marchio registrato, file caricato su Commons in violazione di copyright. Danyele (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam image and text Takeaway (talk) 14:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam image and text Takeaway (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam text in file description. Image too blurry to be of use. Takeaway (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree, delete it. GeoTrinity (talk) 21:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam text. Probable copyright violation (very low resolution and no exif). Uploader has history of spam and copyvio uploads. Takeaway (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://tribwpix.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/wantaughschool.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, https://i1.sndcdn.com/visuals-000053381023-rTBeH0-original.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://animalsandbiomes.weebly.com/uploads/1/7/5/8/17586563/9750519_orig.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikitobal2010 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jayprakash kamat caps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jayprakash kamat caps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Krd 07:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is a dominent subject in the photo and fails COM:DM. 68.193.210.74 14:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saifsatan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://minbaralhurriyya.org/images/stories/sanaa%20sha'alan.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beto Contábil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused web banners and trivial logos of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jblama09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jblama09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-eANyJkMgcpA/T-3nMit5aAI/AAAAAAAAErA/SXdN6i0pwrM/s1600/265124_197598140292291_3899757_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jblama09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are the second group of uploads on same subject by same uploader. The first batch was sent to "no source" and this group of images were uploaded about a week after the no source tags were applied. There is no indication of own work on these images, widely variable sizes (one FB), and no metadata on the three photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Los escudos fueron hechos por mí. Las imágenes son de mi propiedad y fueron editadas en Photoshop por eso no tienen metadata. No son contenido disponible en ninguna otra página web. Por favor revisar esto.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from computer program created by Noble Empire Corp which own rights on it. AnimusVox (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from computer program created by Noble Empire Corp which own rights on it. AnimusVox (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from computer program created by Noble Empire Corp which own rights on it. AnimusVox (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion/advertisement. Not used pictures, out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 15:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also 2 files on same object (File:Ese-.jpg) from this user:

File:Loits.jpg
File:Maagiline ese.jpg

Same reasons for deletion as mentioned above--Estopedist1 (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work of a non free image (It's just a photo of a copyrighted picture), the uploader isn't the author. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 15:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. The map by imhd.sk is copyrighted, see the small note in the bottom right corner. 87.123.167.199 15:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Travis Sanders (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright statement Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jadu.jpg (uploaded while the nomination was open) Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False "own work", picture or fan art of anime character (don't know the specific series but published in a number of places e.g. http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=21765919) with added name. Tatewaki (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yelyzaveta Ukraïna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the nature of several of the photos.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark on this image essentially makes the image unusable. 101-main (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this team headshot. Also nominated File:Ochieng Headshot.jpg for same reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DasDinga82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these pictures are own work of uploader, two have no camera data, two are Canon EOS-1DX and the last one is a different version of that camera. Uploader's previous uploads were speedied as having all been copied from Facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is Olier Mordrel, dead in 1985. Thus, it isn't PD. / L'auteur est Olier Mordrel, mort en 1985. Donc, ça ne fait pas parti du DP. Bzh-99 (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size image without metadata. Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny, blurry image, looks more like a screencap or from youTube. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misenig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these three images of men. One has no meta, the other two have different cameras, no consistency in size, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created as self-promotion and no encyclopaedic value. Removed from Wikipedia.en Just Chilling (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused older photo of some houses in New Jersey, seems to be out of COM:SCOPE as it hasn't been used in almost a decade. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salman.naveed10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no EXIF, nature of photos would indicate that own work is doubtful.

101-main (talk) 17:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted Disney characters 101-main (talk) 17:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the coat of arms design is in the public domain, specific realizations aren't and a explicit permission is required Discasto talk 18:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the design of a coat of arms is in the public domain, specific realizations aren't and therefore require a permission Discasto talk 18:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is in a building in Hungary. It was made after 1976 (year of Zoltán Latinovits's death). Regasterios (talk) 18:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NEENA BONEYFUS A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely own work and lacks of infos to determine copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NEENA BONEYFUS A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pm1234_Cauchy.svg

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif may think in a Facebook picture. Regards. Ganímedes (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frgetgbet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is no private photo album. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:JamesByrne.jpg.

Achim (talk) 20:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Helmy oved as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation from https://www.flickr.com/photos/mathiasdueber/24957620136/ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by File:Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2015.svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S51438 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 9 July 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted images. probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 06:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - I don't see any evidence of it being a copyvio; it isn't the linked shutterstock photo. Of course any photo of the full moon will look about the same, it doesn't mean it is the same ;-) MPF (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:MPF. P 1 9 9   15:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is watermarked with a copyright mark (bottom right of the picture), with an attribution to a web site (URL) which is a U.S.-based commercial outfit selling the product shown (the image itself is clearly taken from the seller’s online catalogue). The English description of the file promotes the seller’s business (tellingly, it does not identify the workshop that produced the object shown; compare, for example, with File:Murano blue vase.jpg). Overall, this picture largely seems to be here for promotional purposes. The picture is also of fairly low quality (low resolution and web optimised, fuzzy, lack of detail, reflections), so it is probably not worth cropping or editing out the copyright notice (even if one assumed that the owner had genuinely licensed the work under the GNU free license, which may or may not be the case). Finally, since it represents a sample of modern production, it is not particularly unique or irreplaceable. Wlgrin 06:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC) (Edited: Wlgrin 05:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this photo is crown copyright, what about the photos of Churchill and Stalin? -mattbuck (Talk) 06:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a surf around to try to find this portrait of Churchill, but have yet to find it. It may or may not have been a wartime commission (and hence potentially copyright of the Crown, see other DRs at User:Fæ/email/IWM). Either way it looks like a good portrait that should be possible to track down online. -- (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright situation of the depicted portraits still unknown. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Picture is very blurry. Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep we have no better pictures of this shop's window displays Oxyman (talk) 12:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Picture is very blurry. Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep we have no better pictures of this shop's window displays Oxyman (talk) 12:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very indstinct, low quality image of a building of which Wikimedia has four other photos of better quality. Motacilla (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is the only image of the structure from this angle Oxyman (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
...and why this peculiar angle is so important? --Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source provided (http://archive.li/xcVZF/560fb02fa36b015f146f53fad1244380aca5aa3c.jpg) is a direct link to the image and has no evidence that the file is a product of the US Army. NBC News, WRCB, and Heavy all source this photo to "Facebook" with no mention of the Army. — fourthords | =Λ= | 16:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's a U.S. Army basic training photograph, all new recruits get one. You can see the same background used in these U.S. Army photos. The uniform is also missing a rank, meaning it was taken when he just arrived at basic training. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a Commons guideline (or something equitable) that states photos with certain hallmarks are assumed to be US Army products and therefore in the public domain? Does Commons have an allowance for such an assumption? I assumed that Commons would require verifiable evidence for licensing. — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It might be a photo from Basic Training, but it is one of those photos from a private vendor that arranges to take photos of the trainees as well as sell them the photos for an inflated price. Similar to photoday in school. Said photos are not made by a member or employee of the U.S. Government such as the case with pre-deployment/ISOPREP photos. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete delete unless there is proof that the photo is a product of the federal government. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep These photos are taken by the US army, and other websites have the only way to get this photo. From US army when he was there for training.
acagastya  📷 09:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have any actual evidence these are US Army products. Per Heyyouoverthere (talk · contribs), these could be the product of a third-party photographer who retains their copyrights. — fourthords | =Λ= | 16:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is not Facebook. Seems to be a personal picture. Apart from that, I can't see any educational aspect here, the picture is out of the scope of Commons. Plus, it's of low quality. It simply doesn't matter if the US Army is the copyright holder or not, it's of no use here. So, away with it. GeoTrinity (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I wasn't changing what other user said/didn't say but just added a vote icon as a summary that makes it easier for the admin in charge who will later on decide this case. With the situation present after your revert, Fourthords, one could come to the conclusion that there are more "keep" votes than "delete" votes which is not the case if I counted it right. Anybody taking part in nominations like this should use the icon system since there are roughly 5,000 single cases each month. We can't expect roughly 250 admins to read all the comments and should therefore make it a bit easier for the colleagues to do their job. Best, GeoTrinity (talk) 22:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find interesting that, when this discussion here is over, there will be no demand for seeing this picture anyways...--MisterSanderson (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The photo itself maybe a military photo but that does not mean it was taken by someone in the military and thus public domain. Those who never served and went through basic do not realize that the photos are actually taken by a third party (https://www.basictrainingphotos.com/ActivityPhotos.aspx?cn=4) who still retains copyright. In addition, the photo itself was uploaded with a creation date of 31 December 2008, well before Johnson arrived for basic training. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 23:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Do a FOIA request at the United States Army Reserve if the pic is done by a member of the Army within his official duties (and by that PD) or not.--Sanandros (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've labeled this upload as {{PD-shape}}, but I'm not sure if it's too complex for that and I'd appreciate other opinions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say PD shape is fine for this file.--Sanandros (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I do agree. --Ruthven (msg) 10:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to edit here this is the work of artist Wendy Sharpe. Not sure if the SPA putting this stuff up is Wendy Sharpe. Should the editor prove identity or should this just be deleted? Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the SPA also put up File:Black Sun - Morning and Night Triptych, 1986.jpg, File:East Timor 1999.tif, File:Self Portrait with Teacup and Burning Paintings, 2003.png, also identified as the work of artist Wendy Sharpe. Those should be looked at as well. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On this page User:Caughtknee is identified as Michael Amendolia. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, other uploads as well. --Jcb (talk) 18:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Worldbruce as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Historical newspaper article is not uploader's own work in copyright terms. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think Template:PD-US-no notice would apply here.--Sanandros (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why? That's an article by "Tony Bannon" (1943–) from (probaldy) en:The Buffalo News, published most likely with a copyright notice and (considering the publishing year 1966) copyrighted (+95 years) till the end of 2060. Gunnex (talk) 13:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's the reason to write "would" instead of "is".--Sanandros (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]