Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 19th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrotic9gerian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Patrotic9gerian. Also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 05:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrotic9gerian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Szm0001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flags created by a sockpuppet of globally locked user 020730szm, hoax flags and unused, false autor + missing permission.

Ks [在这里找到答案] 09:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Szm0001 is globally locked for sockpuppetry and creating hoaxes. I'll delete all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD - Creative Commons - NC, is there an OTRS for this? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author has since published it as PD: https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/pig-and-the-box-goes-public-domain/3549 ~nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 12:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn- But I would suggest contacting the author, to get a formal confirmation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Withdrawn by nominater ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaiziszm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked Kaiziszm indefinitely for sockpuppeting and creating hoaxes. The flags are all unsourced; they do not exist. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User's req. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User's req. --Achim (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User's req. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User's req. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User's req. --Achim (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rights reserved image is not compatible with licensing policy 49.215.48.70 04:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in palese copyviol (vedi metadati). Danyele (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk: Copyright violation; see COM:L. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any information that photos of BNTNews are CreativeCommons. 178.203.234.160 20:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 21:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 00:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishwajeet Gudadhe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khanbhaiasif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ixplod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 06:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 18 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas de droits d'auteur Canh33 (talk) 15:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, coporate logo uploaded as own work, see http://www.oitabank.co.jp/ Ralth Galth (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

著作権侵害をしているため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)  Delete per uploader's request. --Dwy (talk) 10:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Excelsam.Wiseman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NeuTraL Farid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - tiny & unreadable INeverCry 00:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiz cabreiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 5x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 18:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaborigen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works + out of scope due to bad quality

/St1995 18:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seen elsewhere on the web in unmodified form with no proof of uploader's authorship Proud User (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyrighted artwork from book cover behind text, improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo used for a joke article on frwiki, out of scope — 0x010C ~talk~ 19:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not belong to the uploader her Instagram credits it to twistimages also on software used it says Instagram in the metadata and the event was in May not December as the summary states. https://www.instagram.com/p/BEyt2QZQ_kI/ 80.235.147.186 19:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation does not belong to the uploader they have already uploaded another violation of Roff here user is also likely Wikileakexplosion with another violation here. 80.235.147.186 20:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not from flickr, photo of official site of Noboa in better res: http://www.alvaronoboa.com/ 186.135.129.223 20:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, with clarification that the image given as source here includes more than the cropped version uploaded to flickr & commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 20:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex torres carvalho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysterioulsy watermarked. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded on 26.04.2016. Considering also (higher res) https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-p/0a/ee/f1/36/farol.jpg (last modified: 18.04.2016).

Gunnex (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 21:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Band rock limbah got (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images/bandspam

INeverCry 21:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunny lovely munda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the US - 2006 sculpture/monument INeverCry 22:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeff.jbf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image/bandspam INeverCry 22:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ca21de21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful - looks like a collection of images from various sources

INeverCry 22:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmh.mohsin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emxed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tedwillett (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.Monirul Islam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gianco98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope Edslov (talk) 23:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - altered image INeverCry 23:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - no meta data image looks to have been scanned from a magazine / book FOX 52 (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yesenia Paris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs Promotional or self-promotional uploads including webheader and pictures from at least one modeling shoot. No indication of user's own work on the images, nor permission from actual photographers.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Housekeeping: 25 June 2016 Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:It was a nice shoot.jpg (Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yesenia Paris) --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion Edslov (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very probable copyvio : http://www.tineye.com/search/bc05ee9669f0cffca3999d9a49a8a6ba51ba5166/?pluginver=chrome-1.1.4 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked and unlikely to be uploaded by copyright holder as claimed. Image is a press release photo from the 90s that's all over the internet. (eg. http://hk.yohoboys.com/news/index-5007-103001-0.html) Underbar dk (talk) 08:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam jdx Re: 08:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without EXIF 2003:45:5C6F:A801:CC3A:605:31E5:DF15 08:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "Own work": copyvio PamD (talk) 09:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "Own work": copyvio PamD (talk) 09:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "Own work": copyvio - and many other images uploaded by this editor are likely to be incorrectly described PamD (talk) 09:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image maybe copyrighted easily available on the web. verify Jim Carter (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very popular file on the web, most presumably not own work, not Gashi River in Tropoja in Albania Albinfo (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pankajjyotiborah2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files

2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 13:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lens pattern is probably a fake - that Zeiss Sonnar 50mm F1,5 from 1932, to which the (deleted) author refers from the literature, consists of seven lens elements, and not eight; the right lens group is originally a triplet, a lens group as a quartet is unknown. ---hoep (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I see, there is no reasoned argument for the use of the file dubious contents. I therefore ask for deletion.-----hoep (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own"work (small size, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 14:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 14:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 14:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 14:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:F9EF:B8DF:D126:4429 14:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof of authorization is not sufficient TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Weell Silva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 17:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucianoalembrito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: too blurred to be of any educational use MPF (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Commercial use needs special permissions" 70.53.99.39 18:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy violation. Image used for cyberbullying ("I am a slut"). ErikvanB (talk) 02:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 18 June 2016 Wutsje (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Yennis Dylano.jpg (Vandalism: attack image) (view/restore). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ciliasanz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. One also deleted for no license since 19 June 2016. Green Giant (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 19 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Out of Commons:Project scope" - says which rule? "Unused chart" - blatant misinformation: https://pcd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia "Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful" - as long as it isn't converted to SVG (you care to do it?), it cannot be replaced by an SVG. 91.9.119.96 16:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion--in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://tulasmi.ru/content/uploads/2015/08/20150811-bulatov.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ousswai hopl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/084/383/anteater.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: small resolution image taken with good DSRL. MKFI (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author Anna Labedzka". MKFI (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher res version here: http://patch.com/maryland/annearundel/anne-arundel-lights-bay-opens-new-displays-5k-race-and-scavenger-hunt MKFI (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also Older. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author: Cosmin Baltoi CO2STUDIO.RO 0744989237 Copyright holder: Cosmin Baltoi #tel:0744989237 www.co2studio.ro". MKFI (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, COM:PS Ras67 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution : probable copyvio. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncropped versions can be found on the Internet. Therefore it's a probable copyvio. Authorization needed. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

impossible own work of 2016, author unknown, no permission Krd 16:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Szm1422954669 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hoax flags created by a sockpuppet of globally locked 020730szm, unused files

Ks [在这里找到答案] 16:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a derivative work of something, but I have no idea what. Does anyone know the source of the images used to create this? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: too blurred to be of any value MPF (talk) 18:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from twitter Arjayay (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernanda Caiado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MMCoelho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, most likely scanned, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:MMCoelho. Uploaded in a row on 07.04.2016 for Portuguese architect pt:José Deodoro Troufa Real

Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NORDINEAMIOUR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Pour la photo avec copy rights, pas de problème, elle devrait peut-être même déjà être supprimée, les autres fichiers qui semblent être de la meme conference ont peut de chances de ne pas être sous les meme restrictions mais certainement importees après recoupage donc sans l'EXIF accusateur. --Cqui (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Considering also http://screentouchonline.com/registeredusers/artists/stp_207119123.jpeg (last modified: 2015) Gunnex (talk) 05:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

smaller, out-of-focus equivalent to File:ラミクタール100mg錠PTP.JPG DMacks (talk) 07:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded in error Brentwater (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion... In use, uploaded 13 versions of this image, hard to believe all 13 were "in error". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rigi to Rigi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works

2003:45:5C6F:A801:CC3A:605:31E5:DF15 09:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, the uploader's history, and previous publications found elsewhere, e.g. https://edwinfernandito.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/house-indonesia-bandung/. LX (talk, contribs) 10:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is absolutely not a self-made file, it's a copyrighted work of the EBU and can't stay on Commons. Gce (talk) 10:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's absolutely not a self-made opera, it's a copyrighted work of EBU and can't stay on Commons. Gce (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ahtsham Khan Qazi). MER-C 12:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia DE article isn't existing any more DavidJ (talk) 12:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no longer a existing a german wikipedia article for musikcube DavidJ (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

333 Svkov2 (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, coporate logo uploaded as own work, see http://www.oitabank.co.jp/ Ralth Galth (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

著作権侵害をしているため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 15:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)  Delete per uploader's request. --Dwy (talk) 10:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, coporate logo uploaded as own work, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iq36i2dWGo (CF of Sanwa Bank, 1m29s) Ralth Galth (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

著作権侵害をしているため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)  Delete per uploader's request. --Dwy (talk) 10:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, coporate logo uploaded as own work, see https://web.archive.org/web/20020802082930/http://www.mitsubishi-trust.co.jp/index.html Ralth Galth (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

著作権侵害をしているため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)  Delete per uploader's request. --Dwy (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

movie preview poster, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats likely not own workof the uploader. JuTa 06:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but thats likely not own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 06:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but thats likely not own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 06:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure about the copyright. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure about the copyright. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, not own work Pippobuono (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD - Author died in 1968 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. On this page, this book is specified as being in the public domain. Gtaf (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That page may be incorrect, I was using actual details about the author concerned, and I've found other works marked as PD on archive.org that were not, based on the publication dates and location. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of the deleted file Commons:Deletion requests/File:ROC-CKSMH Fraternity, Dexterity, Sincerity by Chiang Kai-shek 20131127.jpg Wcam (talk) 12:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source the file is not licensed under the Open Government License. The source (http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/work.aspx?obj=20641) says the copyright belongs to the artist. The site http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/copyright.html says that the OGL not extends to Images of works of art on that site. Martin H. (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source the file is not licensed under the Open Government License. The source (http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/work.aspx?obj=34018) says the copyright belongs to the artist. The site http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/copyright.html says that the OGL not extends to Images of works of art on that site. Martin H. (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a copyrighted multimedia presentation at the ISKCON Temple in New Delhi. No indication of permission. Laser brain (talk) 13:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in palese copyviol. Danyele (talk) 14:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kantavtor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jferran3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Songs. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free 3D art Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag has no section on Yugoslavia or its proceeding republics. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:29:29‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:37:40‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:38:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:30:40‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an adapation of a copyrighted work of this study (Underhill 2009)[1]. So it violates Commons:Fair use Userius (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Орден За Храброст

[edit]
  1. File:3-1 Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 1 клас, 1941г..jpg
  2. File:3-2 Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 2 клас, 1915г..jpg
  3. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ II степен, емисия 1915 г. (реверс).jpg
  4. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ III степен, емисия 1915 г. (аверс).jpg
  5. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1912 г. (реверс).jpg
  6. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1915 г. (реверс).jpg
  7. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1917 г. (реверс).jpg
  8. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1912 г..jpg
  9. File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1915 г..jpg
  10. File:Орден “За Храброст” I степен, емисия до 1915 г.jpg
  11. File:Орден “За Храброст” голям кръст на великия магистър.jpg
  12. File:Орден „За Храброст“ II ст. до 1915г..jpg
  13. File:Орден „За Храброст“ II ст.jpg
  14. File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1917 г.jpg
  15. File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст., 2-клас 1941 1.jpg

Photoworks of 3D object. Free status of photoworks must be proved despite PD status of decoration. Alex Spade (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not from flickr, same image in better resolution: https://www.google.com.ar/search?tbnid=GtbIszuX6nUChM:&docid=KvK2hc7tSIUbHM&bih=667&biw=1366&tbs=sbi:cs&ei=xvhmV5LJEYGDwgTs5rDABg&start=0&sa=N&tbnh=0&tbnw=0 186.135.129.223 19:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not from flickr: official photo from Eduador goverment https://www.google.com.ar/search?tbs=sbi%3Acs&tbnid=dqz1qBO5r2w-0M%3A&docid=XCXszqgiqa-wZM&bih=667&biw=1366&ved=0ahUKEwjS8oCo8LTNAhUDQpAKHbckC4MQiBwICQ&dpr=1 186.135.129.223 19:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in better quality: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikidata_Query_Service_Introduction.webm Jonas Kress (WMDE) (talk) 20:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photography has been taken in France but is alleged to be public domain. No source. No clear indication uploader is the photographer ("self photographed" would be a positive element, but then we have 'La redac', which means the C'est pas sorcier team, and not the name of the uploader as author ) Dereckson (talk) 20:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This DR also applies to cropped version File:7 d'or.jpg. --Dereckson (talk) 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license information. Hardly dated on 1 January 1900. He was born in 1882. The portrait most probably belongs (at least) to the 1940s... Asqueladd (talk) 21:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eugène Dodeigne is dead in 2015. No FoP in France. 82.124.189.240 21:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yet another penis - there are enough of them D-Kuru (talk) 21:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the user claims own work, the source for the image seems dubious. Even on the source, the license is not proper Coderzombie (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The building is the dominent subject of the photo. 68.193.210.74 23:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. An OTRS ticket is present but it may not contain permission from the building's architect. 68.193.210.74 23:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. An OTRS ticket is present but it may not contain permission from the building's architect. 68.193.210.74 23:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This poster by the Soviet tourist agency Intourist was uploaded to Flickr by the Boston Public Library with a CC license. How would the BPL be able to grant a valid CC license for such a work? Until someone comes up with a satisfactory explanation, we have to assume that it simply cannot and that the CC license is therefore invalid.

As for the copyright status apart from that license: There simply is not enough information to determine it. The Flickr page has "Date issued: 1910-1959 (approximate)". That won't do at all – the USSR wasn't even founded until December 30, 1922, and Intourist was founded in 1929. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This poster by the Soviet tourist agency Intourist was uploaded to Flickr by the Boston Public Library with a CC license. How would the BPL be able to grant a valid CC license for such a work? Until someone comes up with a satisfactory explanation, we have to assume that it simply cannot and that the CC license is therefore invalid.

As for the copyright status apart from that license: There simply is not enough information to determine it. The Flickr page has "Date issued: 1910-1959 (approximate)". That won't do at all – the USSR wasn't even founded until December 30, 1922, and Intourist was founded in 1929. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source or copyright details for the depicted poster.

--ghouston (talk) 02:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The poster photo is by Yui Mok, staff photographer with the Press Association (PA) [2] [3]. --ghouston (talk) 03:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: this picture is not a mere reproduction of the poster photo. There is no infringement of the copyright on the poster photo, which is not the main subject of the picture; the whole memorial (flowers, handwritten messages, candles and this picture) is the main subject. --LeJC (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Actually, there is no de minimis on the depicted photo. Flowers aren't the only elements. The photo within is itself the most emphasized. The subject of the photo is showing the image within to display mourning of the person. --George Ho (talk) 01:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The photograph of Jo Cox, which is copyrighted, occupies major part of these images. "de minimis" couldn't be applied. – Kwj2772 (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a screenshot from YouTube. OTRS-permission from the author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I sent a message to the file's uploader. Pro patria semper (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 23:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author wants, bad image, bad quality, here is better File:Communication tower in Tuuri, Alavus 2016.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2016-06-18T11:54:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 23:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carlos simpson (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Carlos simpson (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion of own personal photo. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have no publication history... how can we show the copyright was not registered or renewed? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this about 6 years ago, and, frankly, have no memory of where I found it or what its provenance might be. I'll do a little looking around. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per my comments on en.wiki, I cannot find anything about the history of this image, or what led me to believe it was PD not renewed. I'ce converted the en.wiki version to a non-free image, and I suggest that this Commons version be deleted until this can be settled. I'll continue to look. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I found the picture here (http://www.ericrobersonmusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/abercrombie3_392697-300x193.png).
But I didn't find any information about the history.
--Johnny Peter Smith (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That link goes directly to the image and doesn't contain any evidence of publication before 1964 or lack of renewal of that publication. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Link to site: http://www.ericrobersonmusic.com/2012/12/04/the-50-greatest-menswear-brands-of-all-time/
Link to image: http://www.ericrobersonmusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/abercrombie3_392697-300x193.png
But as you wrote there is unfortunately no history.
--Johnny Peter Smith (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of non-renewal of copyright. --Stifle (talk) 08:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improper categories Monopoly31121993 (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. howcheng {chat} 16:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improper categories Monopoly31121993 (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. howcheng {chat} 16:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo nazwa firmy motoryzacyjnej powinna być pod logiem. 77.254.61.186 15:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bo nazwa firmy motoryzacyjnej powinna być pod logiem. 77.254.61.186 15:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nazwa powinna być pod logiem. 77.254.61.186 15:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. A license was added later b w 3rd user. this should be confirmed. JuTa 06:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader didn't provide any license. --Sanandros (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. A license was added by an IP. The license and the author should be confirmed by the uploader. JuTa 06:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader didn't confirm license. --Sanandros (talk) 19:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation by User:EugeneZelenko, see frp:Special:Whatlinkshere/File:IUCN_LC.png. And we are happy if he creates an SVG to replace the PNG. 91.9.123.145 06:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File is in use. --Sanandros (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corde tangente calcul.svg > Angle corde tangente.svg Pdebart (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The old versions should be kept for history. --Sanandros (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:38:54‎ (UTC)


Kept: per Jmabel. --Sanandros (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is invented and should not be used. Zoupan (talk) 21:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm sorry for that. Do it as you want. Samhanin (talk) 22:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In dubio pro reo. As there is also no legal problem. --Sanandros (talk) 20:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2011.png. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too sophisticated for PD-German-logo? If yes, we need permission. RE rillke questions? 15:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Opel logo 2009 .png RE rillke questions? 15:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


File:Opel logo 2011.png

Does not meet the threshold of originality? You're kidding me. False license. Woodcutterty (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Striked out the nomination for now, might get back on it later. Image does not qualify for use on nl-wiki though. Woodcutterty (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn --Denniss (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It has been suggested in earlier deletion discussions that this logo is not copyrighted, because it's just a combination of a circle and a blitz and therefore does not meet the threshold of originality. This is obviously false: not only is it not just a combination of a circle and a blitz (it's a circle, a blitz, the words 'opel' and the slogan 'Wir Leben Autos' in a chrome design), it is generally accepted (at least in European jurisprudence) that even though the individual elements of a work might not be eligible for copyright protection, the combination of these elements may constitute a work of art. I believe that is the case here, so I propose to delete it, taking into account the precautionary principle. Woodcutterty (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is a German logo, where the threshold is not as high as the UK or East European countries. This has been renominated ad nauseum (this logo and other similars) that frankly there is no valid reason for users to nominate it over and over again; the only valid reason to nominate it is because an Adam Opel AG legal representant makes a complain, and that would be through WMF legal department, not here. Tbhotch 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(1) The threshold of originality is the same across the European Union and has been at least since the Court of Justice determined in 2009 that it's been harmonized; COM:TOO is outdated to the point of being preposterous. (2) The fact that it is a German logo does not mean German law dictates the threshold of originality. That is to say, if it doesn't meet the threshold in Germany (which it does), that doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world. Anyone with a basic understanding of international private law will tell you that. Waiting for the copyright holder to complain is obviously contrary to the precautionary principle. Woodcutterty (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating the same logo for 5 years in a row is obviously disruptive for the project. From Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany: Note: Some of the information in this section may be outdated due to a 2013 German Federal Supreme court ruling on the TOO for applied art; see this English summary for details." This logo was published way before the 2013 ruling, whichever this is, and this logo is clearly not "applied art". Whichever the ruling is now for Germany, the ruling at the time of the creation was that simple logos were not copyrighted, ergo, this is not grandfathered to copyright by default. Also, "doesn't mean it's not protected anywhere else in the world" is irrelevant. Commons allows to host logos that are in the public domain/free licensed in both, the country of origin and the US ("Wikimedia Commons only accepts media {...} that are explicitly freely licensed, or {...} that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.") And finally, the precautionary principle states, and I cite: "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." You haven't provided minimal evidence that there is "significant doubt about the freedom" of German laws at the time of the publication (a 1968 emblem) of the Opel bolt logo (or all the Opel-logos that where nominated by the same IP editor). Tbhotch 04:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't know that a finding by a court that the threshold of originality is lower than was previously assumed works retroactively, then there's really no point in explaining anything to you. Whether or not a creation is eligible for copyright protection is not solely determined by the standards at the time of creation. Woodcutterty (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As per others. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism – no valid reason. --jdx Re: 12:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos. 77.254.61.186 14:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 87.105.137.253 18:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because beside the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos. 78.10.135.248 12:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Was just kept, the exact same reasoning was deemed "no valid reason for deletion". --Rosenzweig τ 12:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo jak jest logo, to nie powinno być napisu Wir leben Autos, i to logo nie jest na przezroczystym tle. 77.254.61.186 14:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos i nie jest ono na przezroczystym tle. 87.105.137.253 19:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason – his reason translated into English is "Because under the logo there is unnecessary phrase Wir leben Autos and the background is not transparent". Also this and other nominations of this guy look like vandalism to me so I've already reverted them. --jdx Re: 19:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism (and edition reverted by Jdx and IP blocked). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bo pod logiem jest niepotrzebny napis Wir leben Autos i to logo nie ma przezroczystego tła. 78.10.135.248 12:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before: no valid reason for deletion. This is a photo of some trade fair or similar, so obviously the slogan was used there. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author, I want to erase this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T00:39:41‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Machncheese69

[edit]

No longer accurate, wrong false information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macncheese69 (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T20:28:09‎ (UTC)

Affected files:

 Keep I can't see any false information and it seems to be licensed correctly.--Sanandros (talk) 20:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, creator and copyright owner is H. R. Giger, {{PD-textlogo}} doesn't fit Hasenläufer (talk) 22:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why does PD-textlogo not fit? This image consist some simple geometric shapes only. H. R. Giger was a swiss surrealist painter, but the painting is a logo from a UK based rock band. (UK has a very low COM:TOO). Hmm, in my opinion weak  Keep.--Wdwd (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know nothing about UK or Swiss law, but this would not be copyrightable under U.S. law (see File:Best Western logo.svg). AnonMoos (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Where was it first published, cause for CH it's defiantly PD for USA imho the Best Western logo is more complicated.--Sanandros (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment If that is just a ventilation then this is a techichal work an no artwork and so PD.--Sanandros (talk) 20:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already better image is present in same category — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopala Krishna A (talk • contribs) 2016-06-19T12:06:26‎ (UTC)


Kept: Superseeding gifs are not a valid reason to delete this file. --Sanandros (talk) 10:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per further review, image is BY-NC-ND per British National Portrait Gallery and PD-UKGov does not apply EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can u provide a link?--Sanandros (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A photo of a picture in the gallery - http://www.npg.org.uk/about/faq/do-you-allow-photography-in-the-gallery.php Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The "Author" in metadata is "Bassano" - probably an unknown photographer at Bassano Studios in London. So the question is should it be PD as it's 80 years old? Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This answers the question if you are allowed to photograph in the npg, but house ruling can't influence copyright. And if Bassano is a juristical person or a pseudonym then this pic can be seen as a anonymous publication.--Sanandros (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
link to the original source and a link to the page that explains that the image is BY-NC-ND. Unless of course, I am mistaken, and you guys can help correctly tag the photo so it can be used. RegardsEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The BY-NC-ND has this background. The problem is with Template:PD-anon-70-EU that the US copyright law is protecting it, as it was in the 90es not PD (Com:URAA).--Sanandros (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Sanandros. --INeverCry 18:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por un error en el nombre y no se modificarlo Jaguiaro (talk) 06:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jesus aguiar ojeda Jaguiaro (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, very low resolution, better files File:Gustave Courbet - Jo, the Beautiful Irish Girl - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Gustave Courbet - Jo, la belle Irlandaise (Stockholm).jpg Oursana (talk) 12:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentThe Edges are not the same. I don't know if that is important or not.--Sanandros (talk) 19:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --INeverCry 18:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, very low resolution, better files File:Gustave Courbet - Jo, the Beautiful Irish Girl - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Gustave Courbet - Jo, la belle Irlandaise (Stockholm).jpg. Now all changed, no more in use, sorry Oursana (talk) 01:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --INeverCry 01:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

para que eu possa postar com resolução maior Denis Uiliam (talk) 14:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "simple geometry". grillo (talk) 16:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't know exactly the situation in Sweden but in Germany CoA are considered as PD because they are all so similar since several hundred years.--Sanandros (talk) 19:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source gives no indication that this image was published 50 years ago. In fact, it has a notice stating the work is copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It has to be taken before 1935, because the depicted building was demolished in that year. Therefore I find it very likely that the image was published at least 50 years ago. But I cannot prove it. By the way, a black-and-white version was uploaded to Thai Wikipedia under a PD licence in 2006 and the sepia version was used in a popular Thai chat forum in 2009, both before the entry on the Chulalongkorn University page (2010) that is stated as the image's source. So, the letter was at least not the first publication. --Bujo (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: As noted above, the source is most definitely not the first publication. And even if it were, this would place the image firmly in the Public Domain as the period of copyright protection is 50 years since first publication if the work was published within 50 years of creation, and 50 years since creation otherwise. (This should probably be clarified in the template.) In all likelihood, it's most likely that, given the status of the technology at the time, photographs back then were taken for a purpose and would have been published shortly after creation. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{PD-Thailand}} requires evidence of publication more than 50 years ago, which we do not have. Creation more than 50 years ago does not automatically imply publication more than 50 years ago. If the picture was first published in (say) the 1970s, then it's still copyrighted in Thailand, if created in the 1930s. Also, if it was first published in 2009, then it's still copyrighted in the United States (even if PD in Thailand) as the United States copyright to works which were created in the 1930s but first published in 2009 expires 120 years after the work was created.
Paul 012, where did you find that the copyright expires in Thailand 50 years from creation if the picture isn't published within 50 years from creation? The template suggests that unpublished photos are subject to perpetual copyright protection. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's in the text of the law (section 21), which is linked to in the template. To quote the translation:[4]

    Copyright in a photographic work, audiovisual work, cinematographic work, sound recording or audio and video broadcasting work shall subsist for 50 years as from authorship; if the work is published during such period, copyright shall subsist for 50 years as from first publication.

    This means that this photo would still have been copyrighted in 1996 only if it was first published between 1946 and 1985 (the latest limit based on the building's destruction). And we don't have evidence of that being so either. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Forgot to ping Stefan2). --Paul_012 (talk) 04:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 18:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]