Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![191 File:Jaime Menéndez "El Chato", su mujer Avelina Ranz y su hijo Jimmy.JPG](#File:Jaime_Menéndez_"El_Chato",_su_mujer_Avelina_Ranz_y_su_hijo_Jimmy.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal unused files, per COM:NOTHOST. Also the information on authorship is likely to be mistaken.
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Teles: The user asked to upload a picture of himself to use in his profile, and said to me he was the photographer (which doesn't seem to be the case here, unless those are selfies). I'll try to get more information about those files with him.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @DarwIn: I just sent him a specific message in Portuguese about that.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook
Motopark (talk) 05:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Transmitindo favor 2016.jpg
- File:Bebe passando pela porta 2016.jpg
- File:Equação de segundo grau cm uma icognita.jpg
- File:EZINALTE ANDREZA FERREIRA.jpg
- File:Artista marciais.jpeg
- File:Miste nate 2016.jpg
- File:MISTE NATCHUECK.jpg
- File:1357000038-picsay.jpg
- File:1357002319-picsay-1-2.jpg
- File:Ezinalte Ferreira brasileiro.jpg
- File:1357002629-picsay-1-1.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private / self-ptomoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Miste nate em luanda2016.jpg
- File:Ezinalte o artista plastica.jpg
- File:Miste nate o wikipedista.jpg
- File:O colaborador e editor.jpg
Ies (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miste nate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
--ghouston (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Low quality copy of poster Kattenkruid (talk) 22:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Not sourced. Fry1989 eh? 17:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Fake flags - Using VisualFileChange.
Seemingly a copyrighted porn image. This is not a serious contribution, note the nonsense category! Ies (talk) 19:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Copyright violation: not own work: https://www.google.de/search?tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSkAEajQELEKjU2AQaBgg9CEMIGAwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKMARmhqbGukcxBGcGuocqBrSEawayjzJPJgysTycMpYytTK0Mp0ysjIaMKX5LEnB-y-8kQcChzEaz742fkojgJUZKCxBxN06ZOLGNHeWM6HQVQTq...
Copyrighted company logo IagoQnsi (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops, I meant to tag this for speedy deletion with {{Copyvio}}. I'll do that now; ignore this deletion request. -IagoQnsi (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb as a copyright violation. ★ Poké95 03:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Copyright violation: picture was released as CC BY-NC-ND 2.0: http://www.anp-archief.nl/page/5377/nl Tekstman (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
This is indeed a mistake, ik misread the copyight text at ANP and it should be deleted. I'm sorry about that. Frodo29
Speedy delete Copyvio, not public domain in its source country, Netherlands. I tagged the file as speedy, as the uploader seems to agree with the deletion. --★ Poké95 07:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Work draft, replaced by file:LIGO schematic (multilang).svg ↔ User: Perhelion 00:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- No need to discuss it, I added the speedy deletion template. --mfb (talk) 07:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality of image is too poor to be useful. BD2412 T 03:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope ★ Poké95 04:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ★ Poké95 04:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 07:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CastingMind Services (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 08:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
user's self-portrait not used in any user pages Quenhitran (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Worldt20game (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Worldt20game (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Worldt20game (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Worldt20game (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Lowest quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Extremely low quality picture
Edgars2007 (talk) 10:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KARYNEHENRY33 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Karyne Henry, National PR & Crisis Management Executive.jpg
- File:Karyne Henry, PR & Crisis Management Executive.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dwayneshurinum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phillemone23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
No contexts and Out of scope Thatonewikiguy (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Sismarinho (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Another selfie from this contributor. Sismarinho (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Senapa (talk) 16:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo of non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Laberkiste (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, unused personal photo Threeohsix (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. Out of scope logo, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
identical photo exists (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canadian_Airlines_A320_C-GOCA.jpg) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep Please process as a duplicate, so that external re-users are not affected Tenscrazy (talk) 13:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)- Template:COMMENT PLEASE CLOSE THIS AS FILE HAS BEEN PROCESSED AS DUPE AND THIS IS THE FILE THAT IS LEFT Venezuelanmaraca (talk) 10:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Quality is enough. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, although the aircraft is totaly out of focus the image is relevant in the categories, I added two of them. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality, low resolution (smallest side under 1500 pixels), blurry, poor lighting PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Quality is enough, and file is properly categorised. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep 1500 pixels is not "low resolution" for Commons, not even close. We do not make "better" judgements as that can depend on the intended use. The file is usable in an educational context, and is licensed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not the best quality but acceptable. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
Pretty obvious that this is not a free image. Pichpich (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
It is taken from Google Maps data, which is copyrighted. epicgenius (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Image is a derivative work of an image copyrighted to the state of Alabama. No evidence that Alabama has released their license plate under a CC license. — Fourthords | =/\= | 23:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this kind of designed license plate is not free in Alabama. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Image is a derivative work of an image copyrighted to the state of Alabama. No evidence that Alabama has released their license plate under a CC license. — Fourthords | =/\= | 23:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this kind of designed license plate is not free in Alabama. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Sourced from Google image search so is more likely than not to be a copyrighted work. KevM (talk) 18:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. (source) Hibm98 (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Odder. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work ElYolero6 (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Revenge DR. I did not even claim this as own work. --Didym (talk) 20:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.wvusports.com/content/images/Index/general/Caridi-Main-112815.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Streetworkout-wb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete At least one of the pictures is on their Facebook page [1] and I think getting permission from the photographer might be easy, but without a Wikipedia article about this group or company I don't see how the pictures can survive. Dontreader (talk) 06:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria lluiza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://41.media.tumblr.com/d7ad0ba991fbe348eca809a1090999c6/tumblr_nw2zr7LdvF1shxvtoo1_500.png.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete The picture named Carly Rose sonenclar seems to be a copyright violation based on this Twitter picture [2]. She seems to indicate that the photographer is @ngalai , who is a professional photographer called Noam Galai [3]. The other picture has a logo of what seems to be a professional photography company [4]. Dontreader (talk) 06:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in scope : image used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Grabbed from (example) http://www.innov8.work/about-us/ (© 2016 Innov8 All Rights Reserved.) = http://www.innov8.work/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ritesh-1.jpg (2015, last modified: 01.2016) = cropped from https://www.facebook.com/innov8.work/photos/pb.726341320803715.-2207520000.1459283141./764794006958446/?type=3&theater (2015). Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PauSalamancaRo (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:Nocion de principio y valor.pdf
- File:Noción de valores y principios según la corte constitucional-Reseña.pdf
- File:Noción de Principio y valor.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation: photographer and uploader are different. No OTRS. 128.68.57.154 17:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low resolution (640 × 480 pixels) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
poor quality, low resolution PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
pas d'image Cymbella (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Picture is correctly rendered as PNG, and GIMP opens it without errors. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- The xcf format type file is an open sources file type generated with GIMP 2.8 all; this card is uploaded to benefit the community, wikimedia algeria or other users group, if they want to use this model, they just need to modify the thext with gimp; all content are with the CC --Bachounda (talk) 09:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright claim "own work" is contradicted by notation "credit Team Photogenic" in description. It seems likely that the uploader does not understand Wikipedia's copyright requirements. Brianhe (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality, subjet is low resolution, lighting terrible PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The motif in this photo is the runway, the aircraft, and the water. No reason for deletion Tenscrazy (talk) 13:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep We do not make "better" judgements as that can depend on the intended use. It may be poor to illustrate the aircraft itself but that is far from the only possibility. The file is usable in an educational context, and is licensed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
blurry, low resolution, poor quality PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I see clearly the Boeing 747, quality is enough. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
subject of photo (aircraft) is barely visible, aircraft is poor quality PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes, the airplane is too small, but the file is also categorized under category:San Francisco Bay, therefore in scope of the San Francisco Bay, at least. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as per Amitie Tenscrazy (talk) 13:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion given. Just because an image is a poor way to illustrate something which is a small detail in the overall photo does not mean there are not other uses. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
siehe Bildbeschreibung: "nur für die Wikipedia" geht nicht und widerspricht der Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 27 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Files in Category:Brusnika
[edit]Out of project scope, promotional content.
- File:Engineering сenter Brusnika.jpg
- File:Видный-Тюмень.jpg
- File:Европейский берег.jpg
- File:Европейский в Тюмени ночью.jpg
- File:Европейский в Тюмени.jpg
- File:Европейский-Тюмень.jpg
- File:Каменный ручей ЕКБ.jpg
- File:Каменный ручей.jpg
- File:Каменный-ручей.jpg
- File:Микрорайон Европейский.jpg
- File:Новин Тюмень.jpg
- File:Новин.jpg
Sealle (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- The photos of newly-built apartment houses were originally used in a Russian-language aricle and thus were eligible for hosting on Commons. The illustrations in the said article were removed by Sealle, but their use is being currently discussed on the talk page. This nomination is quite premature. --Gruznov (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment The fact that the "first purpose" (the creation) of the images was for advertising is not relevant here. Images of buildings properly categorized are fully in scope. The images have big resolutions and almost have EXIF (except one) from the same camera model. FoP is ok for buildings in Russia. If there is no other rationales for the deletion, I'm going to kept. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Formation of Thiazole Starter Unit during Epothilone Biosynthesis.png that is large and high-quality DMacks (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}} and following up from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Epoth Retrosyth.gif, now replaced by File:Construction of building blocks for Nicolaou's total synthesis of epothilone B (1997).png DMacks (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Claimed to be the uploader's own work, but as this image is clearly scanned and shows a person who died in 1953, it should be deleted perm the precautionary principle unless a suitable permission is presented. Rosenzweig τ 14:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS recieved. --Didym (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:AVL(-08).png
- File:AVL(CN2).png
- File:AVL(CSB).png
- File:AVL(CN4).png
- File:AVL(CN3).png
- File:AVL(CN1).png
- File:AVL(30).png
- File:AVL(29).png
- File:AVL(28).png
- File:AVL(27).png
- File:AVL(26).png
- File:AVL(25).png
- File:AVL(24).png
- File:AVL(23).png
- File:AVL(22).png
- File:AVL(21).png
- File:AVL(20).png
- File:AVL(19).png
- File:AVL(18).png
- File:AVL(17).png
- File:AVL(16).png
- File:AVL(15).png
- File:AVL(14).png
- File:AVL(13).png
- File:AVL(12).png
- File:AVL(10).png
- File:AVL(11).png
- File:AVL(09).png
- File:AVL(08).png
- File:AVL(06).png
- File:AVL(05).png
- File:AVL(03).png
- File:AVL(02).png
- File:AVL(04).png
- File:AVL(01).png
- File:AVL(07).png
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand why these files should be deleted? --GilPe (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Most of these are redirects, which I have deleted. Their targets, and the rest of these, are in use,. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Luxembourg. In order to keep these, we will need a license from the architect.
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (1).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (3).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (2).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Grund (4).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Luxembourg.
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (109).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (108).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (107).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (106).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Luxembourg.
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (09 ADR).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (08 LSAP).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (07 Déi Gréng).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (05 Déi Lénk).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (04 KPL).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (02 Piraten).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (01 DP).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (10 CSV).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (101).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Sorry but fan art is out of COM:SCOPE. Has no relevance to signature or notable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, therefore in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 22:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Appears to just be a photo of a relatively meaningless tweet. Doesn't really add anything of value to Commons. Logan Talk Contributions 05:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fouad51200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Innocent childhoodالطفولة البرئية .jpg
- File:Inaba ar.jpg
- File:Image of User Abdulaziz2580.jpg
- File:Imamlyes.jpg
- File:ImagesCAXILS7Z.jpg
- File:Hédi Guella.JPG
- File:Ibrahem Alrdai.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep All are COM:INUSE on arwiki, but the local copies haven't been deleted yet. We shouldn't disrupt the Commons transfer process by deleting files before local communities get the time to delete the local copies. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Mass upload of files without any information. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation.
- File:Ibnelsalah.jpg
- File:Horuseye.jpg
- File:Hmod bin suit aldhferei.PNG
- File:Howwara more than 100 years ago.JPG
- File:Kuwait1867.jpg
- File:Knyazigor.jpg
- File:Kitab-i Javidan-i Durr-i Yatim Ast miftah-i huruf-i.jpeg
- File:Khalkhali manazil.jpeg
- File:Khalkhali daira.jpeg
- File:Khayyam-paper-1ar.jpg
- File:JRivaAguero01.jpg
- File:Irani man.jpg
- File:Hassansalameh.jpg
- File:Habibullah-alrashti.jpg
- File:Hackett Lowther ambulances.jpg
- File:Fuel-assembly pwr.gif
- File:First Page of Sirajiah - copy circa 1300H.JPG
- File:Fiat-3000b-light-tank-01.png
- File:Fidid2.JPG
- File:Fawzi.gif
- File:Fatwa mardin.jpg
- File:Fatih Cursive (1)Image.jpg
- File:Fatih Cursive (2)Image.jpg
- File:Falhusene.JPG
- File:Exercitatio Anatomica Cover.gif
- File:Eg Gods1.jpg
- File:Ebrahim&Mostafa&Aal.jpg
- File:Eduardo Lopez de Romana.jpg
- File:Doyle125.jpg
- File:Dosya-Washington Coffee New York Times b.PNG
- File:DIDOUCHEMOURAD.jpg
- File:Dersim 1937 02.png
- File:Darawish.jpg
- File:Dalkey Atmospheric Railway1844.jpeg
- File:Craxi berlusconi.jpg
- File:Comet-ISON-November-131.png
- File:Colfo Persico 1565.gif
- File:Borabora tahaa raiatea.jpg
- File:BNF، Mss fr 68، folio 340.jpg
- File:Berka qaser - benghazi 1912.JPG
- File:Benghazi rook 1896.JPG
- File:Bank misr.jpg
- File:Baghdad School.jpg
- File:BABIKER BADRI.jpg
- File:Badawi dirani 1378.jpg
- File:Azahri..jpg
- File:Aref abderazak.jpg
- File:ArabNo.jpg
- File:Arabian gulf.jpg
- File:Arab world 1662.jpg
- File:Antun Saada.jpg
- File:Anthony-johnson.jpg
- File:Ancient Masjed Eshkanan.jpg
- File:Anabta 1936.jpg
- File:An 036a.jpg
- File:An 035b.jpg
- File:An 035a.jpg
- File:An 034c.jpg
- File:An 034b.jpg
- File:Amman River.jpg
- File:ALTIJANI YOSSIF BASHIEER.jpg
- File:ALKHALIFA ABD ALLAH DEATH.jpg
- File:Ali Pasha Mubarak's biography by Dr Muhammad Dorry (1894).jpg
- File:Akbarlarge.jpg
Image.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Image.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jcb (talk) 23:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- The File:Anabta 1936.jpg file is in use, (on the Anabta page), and is under a {{PD-Israel-Photo}} licence, Huldra (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- The file description page does not contain any information to be able to see whether this PD license applies. Picture could e.g. have been taken by a foreign journalist, who first published it outside Israel. Jcb (talk) 22:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- The File:Anabta 1936.jpg file is in use, (on the Anabta page), and is under a {{PD-Israel-Photo}} licence, Huldra (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
this map is not an "own work" but was scanned from the "History of the II World War 1939-1945" (issued 1973-1982) [5] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Basvb (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joaojesusautor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, watermarks, and the uploader's history.
- Watermarked posters
- Postage stamps
- Photo portraits
- Building photo
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete the only image for which I AGF is the building photo because it actually has believable matadata. As far as I know Pakistan stamps are copyright for 50 years and Indian stamps are definitely copyright for 60 years, one issued in 2012 and the other in 1990, need to go. The first two portraits might be old enough if real sources were provided but the 3rd subject was only born in 1977 (used in a multiple- declined draft) and the same image, though cropped closer, is found on his linkedIn page without any evidence of permission. Ww2censor (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Note that instead of commenting here, the uploader has chosen to continue to upload blatant copyright violations with fraudulent authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
this map is scanned from the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1969-1978) [6] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
ُThis photo uploaded with a different license earlier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tecomella_undulata_tree_in_Alamarvdasht,_Fars,_Iran,_by_Hadi_Karimi.jpg HaDi (talk) 08:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Category:DB Baureihe E 44.5 Bahnfan44789 (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x + 1x speedy deleted. If IN scope, permission needed, considering " Foto de Cesar Lugnani (...)". Gunnex (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Watermarking and low resolution suggests likely copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data, and white background (along with user's other uploads) all suggest copyright violation Themightyquill (talk) 09:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Not own work, grabbed from here, on the web at least since 2012. --Achim (talk) 15:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: scope ok, own work doubts. --Basvb (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
OTRS permission from the book author is needed. ★ Poké95 11:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Too small to be original. No EXIF. Macucal (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright? DirkVE (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely below com:TOO, but out of scope as unused logo/incorrectly attributed. --Basvb (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sadenlyliu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:AODI Charger Products lines.jpg
- File:AODI Charger Production.jpg
- File:AODI Charger Production lines.jpg
- File:AODI Charger Factory.jpg
- File:AODI QAS series HF PFC on board battery charger for JLG,Genie,Skyjak lifts.jpg
- File:AODI charger introduction.pdf
- File:AODI QA charger series for Golf cart.jpg
- File:AODI QA 24V25A battery chargers for Aerial work platforms.jpg
- File:2016 AODI Company brief.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. --★ Poké95 23:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: some could be useful, but concerned with own work and missing permission. --Basvb (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caissa Touristic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caissa Touristic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://xinbao.de/xinbao/d/file/xinbaoimg/xinbaopic201510/1501.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Removed link to pdf and replaced with reference link to source page --Logoguru (talk) 09:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, bitte doch nicht löschen der Urheber dieses Modells, Joachim Schaffer-Suchomel möchte es doch in dieser Form auf WIKI lassen! Danke Joachim Schaffer-Suchomel (Talk) 14:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Was der Urheber des Modells möchte, ist kein Argument. Dient das Bild dem Zweck von Wikipedia, eine Enzyklopädie zu erstellen? Wenn nicht, was soll das Bild dann hier? Wenn ja, wo wird es genutzt?
- English short version of the protest above: the inventor of the model wants to keep it for unspecified reasons. --mfb (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Basvb (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alcira margarita seguin perez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:PCGE Final111008.pdf
- File:TRATAMIENTO CONTABLE GRATIFICACION CONTABLE.pdf
- File:PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES 2012.pdf
- File:TRIBUTARIO.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Used in WWU's Student Tech Center for workshops, as well as in the upcoming 2016 Building Bridges conference: http://www.buildingbridgeswatech.com
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to serve an education purpose: non-notable person NottNott talk|contrib 15:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- As long as her article on :en isn't deleted, her image is in scope. --Túrelio (talk) 16:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: however missing permission. --Basvb (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant image, File:Chevron-frigate Hetman Sahaydachniy-(U130)-1.svg PsichoPuzo (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
-1.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Personal photo, out of scope. 128.68.57.154 17:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see user page, not a personal image. --Basvb (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File:HI-320.svg; this version has misaligned numbers. Rschen7754 18:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 08:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Thie file is unuseful 양념파닭 (talk) 05:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Screenshots/logo of proprietary software w:en:Timeless Project Tracking.
- File:Status Update Screenshot.png
- File:Extended Permissions Screenshot.png
- File:Risks Screenshot.png
- File:Custom Fields Screenshot.png
- File:Dashboard Screenshot.png
- File:Backlog Report Screenshot.png
- File:WebTE.PNG
- File:Timesheet.PNG
- File:TimerAlert.PNG
- File:BuiltinReports.png
- File:TimeTrackingPane.png
- File:Billing.PNG
- File:AddMultiple.PNG
- File:Timeless Time & Expense Logo.png
BethNaught (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
dubious own work - small size and bad quality, no exif /St1995 18:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Has fair use rationale in enwiki [7] but uploader claims this could be eligible for public domain as it is not a creative art. Teemeah (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
![[7]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blackboad_pattern_system_structure.png){kind=link}
- Keep: Too simple. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Amitie. Green Giant (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia. Photographer may give the photo to public domain, but the building is not his to decide. Pildirüüstaja (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
I am shocked to see my photograph circulated on your website.You must remove it immediately. This photograph was not for publication but to help the cameraman do light and expose settings.It was taken at my former workplace in off-duty during my private lunchbreak time and neither I nor Oberois have given consent to publish it outside the Oberoi group. The Commons Copyright permission was never by photographer on Flicker, it was all rights reserved. After my complaint the photographer has also removed my image permanently from Flicker. Under Indian law citizens are entitled to privacy at their place of work and to not be harassed by such publications 117.240.209.48 20:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oops! Photographer's mistake. releasing photograph without personality rights or disclaimer. --Ekabhishek (talk) 13:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Flickr source no longer exists. Green Giant (talk) 23:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Re-opened and file undeleted per this comment. The complainant will have to go through COM:OTRS. I will leave this to be closed by another admin. Green Giant (talk) 08:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Surely asking an originator (complainant) who has opted to use the public dispute review process suggested in COM:IDENT to instead use the private discreet method of OTRS "to confirm her identity" is against the letter and spirit of WMF's transparency position and the WMF "privacy policy". In any case, the comment you on relied to restore this DR on has been deleted from the talk page, there was edit warring there and the talk page is now protected. 182.156.90.58 14:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I hold my hands up and admit that I should have asked the IP to contact OTRS in the first place. I could have been stubborn and stuck to my decision but in the interests of transparency I've re-opened the DR so there can be further input. Privacy concerns are better addressed in a "confidential email" to OTRS than by having the person divulge personal details on a public website. Once they've been confirmed it is fairly straightforward to have the file deleted. Scott's comment being deleted doesn't change the fact that the issue has been raised. Green Giant (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't see anywhere in policy that you can now ask this complainant to reveal her details via OTRS. The usual procedure (in law) is that assuming everything the party moving the motion alleges is true, would the prayer be granted, especially when the privacy policy is crystal clear that personal details shall not be required in such cases. If Scott has any hard evidence that this is a false complaint he can send it to OTRS and they could reopen it - unlikely considering WMF's position on him. Unfortunately what has now happened is that a much larger sized image of an identifiable complainant is once again accessible and could be misused on troll sites as evidence that Wikipedia invades privacy. BTW, the Nepal thing is an error, most other such sites geolocate that IP to India. I wouldn't rule out a joe-jobber updating that website to point to Nepal. 182.156.90.58 15:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bearing in mind that this image has been on here for four years and there are numerous other copies on the internet, I think that ship sailed a long time ago. Green Giant (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- PS: The red dot on the forehead indicates she is married. I would estimate her age as in her early thirties. 182.156.90.58 15:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't see anywhere in policy that you can now ask this complainant to reveal her details via OTRS. The usual procedure (in law) is that assuming everything the party moving the motion alleges is true, would the prayer be granted, especially when the privacy policy is crystal clear that personal details shall not be required in such cases. If Scott has any hard evidence that this is a false complaint he can send it to OTRS and they could reopen it - unlikely considering WMF's position on him. Unfortunately what has now happened is that a much larger sized image of an identifiable complainant is once again accessible and could be misused on troll sites as evidence that Wikipedia invades privacy. BTW, the Nepal thing is an error, most other such sites geolocate that IP to India. I wouldn't rule out a joe-jobber updating that website to point to Nepal. 182.156.90.58 15:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I hold my hands up and admit that I should have asked the IP to contact OTRS in the first place. I could have been stubborn and stuck to my decision but in the interests of transparency I've re-opened the DR so there can be further input. Privacy concerns are better addressed in a "confidential email" to OTRS than by having the person divulge personal details on a public website. Once they've been confirmed it is fairly straightforward to have the file deleted. Scott's comment being deleted doesn't change the fact that the issue has been raised. Green Giant (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete COM:OTRS is mainly for verifying permissions. The alleged complainant is clearly not interested in granting permission / consent for this image and is being directed to the wrong venue (where this is a 51 day backlog and 16 year old volunteers - deemed to children under Indian law - could access such confidential requests). The complaint is very specific in its allegations and grounds for deletion under existing Commons/WMF policy and applicable law. NB: The IP address geolocates to New Delhi from most public geo-locate sites (including the WMF alternate link at [8]) corresponding to the image location specified in the description, so the Deletion Review requester is misinformed. Finally, this reopen does not reflect the statement of the uploader highlighting the photographer's error and contravenes a WMF global block (applicable on all WMF sites) to block precisely such disruptive and threatening harassment of users [9], [10]. Unfitlouie (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS is used for a number of things including but not limited to permissions. It is the only place we can direct people to apart from the WMF Office. The backlog is always going to be there irrespective of whether there is one more email. Green Giant (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment For closing admins: Under Indian laws such complaints are to be processed within 5 working days. As this woman depicted is clearly identifiable from the image, work uniform and its description/location of her workplace, the applicable Section 3(2)(v) of the "The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013" prohibits / criminalises any "humiliating treatment likely to affect her health or safety". Unfitlouie (talk) 04:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Noting that the DR had been open for 23 days before I closed it, I think we passed that limit at the start of the month. Green Giant (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: file has been on our servers for almost 7 years with a proper license - there is no way for us to know whether nominator is indeed the depicted person - and "sexual harassment"? Well, I think Indian people have sex in a different way than in Europe then. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Why is the file republished now ? If you do not delete it within 48 hours I will approach the police and cyber law authorities. What you sick people are doing is wrong and a crminal offence. I have already told you that photo is uploaded here with wrong permission and this makes it criminal harassment of women by privacy violation to torment by publishing it on website besides filthy pictures of children, animal and human pornographiy 117.240.187.35 19:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per reasons stated in previous DR. This IP´s and SP accounts are trolling this file, giving no sustained and clear reasons to deletion , making empty legal treats and they should know that making false and empty legal threats, without legal intentions of seeking legal venues, can be by itself be punished in several countries. So state what legal system you are talking about and what specific laws and articles this image is supposedly breaking, and above else, explain in detail why said articles are being violated, instead of throwing some disconnected and unrelated laws. All else is nonsense! Tm (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader is (apparently) an identifiable Indian, and the legal notices of remedies available (but not invoked) being made by the IP are not hollow but specific and clearly directed against the uploader. The uploader is presently unable to produce a consent/model release which identifies the subject. Per COM:EVID the burden is on the uploader to provide this permission for a COM:IDENT public DR. Under WMF's privacy policy this IP user (complainant) is not required to provide any personal identification (or even to respond further) especially when Commons policy places the onus of proof solely on the uploader. The fact that a WMF globally banned user (using a meatpuppet) has instigated and reversed the earlier deletion of the image by an site admin is another serious reason for speedy deletion. Even if a model release is produced, Indian law now also includes judgments saying prior consents/permissions for publication of photographs of private citizens are not binding unless and until there is a law which permits it. In other words photographs of private persons can only be published with their consent (implied or explicit) or under a law. Once an objection is made (and IP editors are not anonymous) the burden of proof immediately shifts to the accused. Unfitlouie (talk) 23:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The first IP (117.240.209.48) was shown to be lying about its identity, as claiming in an previous DR of another image to be the mother of the depicted children (the image was taken 1500 km from this hotel) and then claimed to be this employee doing namaste. Then came the trolls: the sockpuppet Tttrrrwww, 182.156.90.58 and now 117.240.187.35.
- And comenting now on you, Unfitlouie, you continue to use the same arguments of the previous DR discussion here and in other discussions like this and this , claiming to "know some laws of India". However your arguments about laws of India are rooted in an empty and abstract quoting and reasoning to Indian law, or misquoting and misusing unreleted and unimportant laws and case laws, never explaining why they apply in each one of the cases in discussion, never giving relevant jurispridence, or legal opinions or doctrine. Essentially, like the discussion in my talkpage, empty arguments no stated in law or legal opinion. If you dont come with some arguments rooted in actual relevant laws or jurisprudence, your arguments are bollocks. Tm (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- The complainant's comments definitely indicate a criminal action for sexual harassment in India directed at the uploader. I suppose this is exactly what this banned user Russavia intends to happen considering his pathological hatred of WMF.
- It is quite obvious that IP (117.240.209.48) and IP (117.240.187.35) are the same person using a BSNL mobile internet connection. I can't say anything about TTRRRWW because the edits are revdelled. The other 182.xx IP resolves to TataTele (another Indian mobile services ISP). It is probable that many Indian Wikipedians are following this case since it is also being discussed off-wiki over at Wikipedia Sucks. Because the IP edits were 15 days apart it is not certain if the 2 complaints are the same person, and this complainant has never claimed to be the other one. The IP also edited the Japanese Wikipedia, so its usage is consistent with being a dynamic mobile IP. Therefore it is clear you are playing fast and loose with the truth. The rule of law is that everything the complainant alleges is taken to be true until you can DISPROVE it. Unfitlouie (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- First Russavia was banned by WMF in a Office action, for unknown reasons to those users outside of WMF structure, possibly for good reasons, possibly not, but this user didnt had and has not a "pathological hatred of WMF", that can be well be showned by its hundred of thousands contributions, mainly in freeing images of the russian presidency, prime-ministry and military, pursuit of free licensing hundred of thousands of images related to aviation, just to name a few, and its continuous good editions (dispite being bannned). Do you know in abstract or known someone what was wictim of sexual harassement. Unfortunely, knowing someone that was victim of sistematic, relentless and brutal sexual harassement and stalking in the workplace, your statement that "criminal action for sexual harassment in India" is plainly wrong, as this image is not by a long shot a case of sexual harassement in every country, but speciffically in India that has the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Again you fail to show case law, jurisprudence or legal opinions that support your statements.
- About the IPs you claim that "quite obvious that IP (117.240.209.48) and IP (117.240.187.35) are the same person", making edits 16 days apart. How can you be so sure, as you claim that "many Indian Wikipedians are following this case since it is also being discussed off-wiki over at Wikipedia Sucks"? Yet you claim that 117.240.209.48 (the one that opened this DR for the first time), making edits also 17 days apart and making in both this DR and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Republic Day Event 2013 06.JPG the same claims of this photos being published without consent. Dont you see the contradictions your entering? Also until now no one was proven that any of this IPs is indeed the person depicted. Tm (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Also it is funny that you accuse others of meatpuppetry when yourself are a sockpuppet, blocked in En wiki since 2014 precisely for being a sockpuppet, having created your accounts in En wiki and Commons, exactly in the same day: September 27 2013.
- I think it says everything about your personal credibility. Tm (talk) 00:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't respond to personal attacks. Do you even know what a WMF global account is ? FYI, I was never found guilty of any actual sockpuppetry on En:WP, it was only suspected and they lied that no checkuser was done because the IPs/machines of myself and the other editor were totally different. Actually I was a victim of political repression over there for supporting a short-blocked editor and I shall always defend/support any other victim of rogue admin tyrants / overlords. Now, if you (or anyone else) have a copy of any verifiable consent/model release for this picture please upload it into the licence / OTRS and don't waste our time. If there is anybody here who is trolling and making ad homimem attacks to evade the Commons Community's evidentiary burden, it is you. Unfitlouie (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Do you know what banned user makes the same arguments of being banned as a "victim of political repression"? It was Russavia! Funny isnt it?
- Also you claim that "no checkuser was done because the IPs/machines of myself and the other editor were totally different" but you are lying as "CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse." and all other reasons stated, dispite your rants. So your personal credibility is equal to ZERO, even by your own admission of being the one blocked in the english wikipedia.
- Add to this your inability to show a single piece of case law, jurisprudence or legal opinions that support your statements, dispite being asked for the fourth or fifth time (and at least one more time by JCB and Poké95 in this discussion. Tm (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR. You need to confirm your identity via OTRS. And no legal threats please. --★ Poké95 05:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: No new evidence presented since presented since previous closure by Jcb. Please note that legal threats will not be tolerated, and they have been brought to the attention of Wikimedia's legal team. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Red Book
[edit]The Red Book is the work of Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961). It was created from 1913 until 1929, but was not published until 2009. It will not be PD until 2049 (120 years after its creation.) Both text and illustrations are Jung's work. These images all come from Flickr sources. There's no evidence that any of them have the right to freely license this work,
- File:Carl Jung's Red Book (14887035886).jpg
- File:Crocodile from Jung's Red Book (4716131358).jpg
- File:Death in Jung's Red Book (4715490407).jpg
- File:LiberNovusOriginal.jpg
- File:Mandala from Jung's Red Book (4716124338).jpg
- File:Mandala from Jung's Red Book (4716127266).jpg
- File:Map from Jung's Red Book (4715486635).jpg
- File:Random page from C.G. Jungs Red Book.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Neumím přesměrovat. Díky MONUDET (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Redirecting a file to a page is not acceptable. Green Giant (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The picture appears in other sites (such as this one). No OTRS release approval has been received, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The picture appears in other sites (such as this one). No OTRS release approval has been received, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The picture appears in other sites (such as this one). No OTRS release approval has been received, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The picture appears in other sites (such as this one). No OTRS release approval has been received, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlicensed derivative. WayneRay doesn't assume copyright ownership of this by taking a photograph of it. His other uploads are similar and should be gone through completely. The Master (talk) 00:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:DW. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
A professional photo with no OTRS release approval. This uploader added few pictures that appears in other sites. I believe this picture too, has no place in the Commons without any specific release note to the OTRS. Ldorfman (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- ??? Was this some kind of a response? Ldorfman (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
A professional photo with no OTRS release approval. This uploader added few pictures that appears in other sites. I believe this picture too, has no place in the Commons without any specific release note to the OTRS. Ldorfman (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Koohsar is an Iranian musician (here's the picture on his Facebook fan page [11] ) but he doesn't have an article on Wikipedia in any language - at least not yet. My advice to the uploader is to re-upload the picture (and with an appropriate name instead of numbers) when an article about Koohsar has been created, but keep in mind that you will have to prove that you took the picture, using COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by other admin. --Basvb (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
It's quite hard to believe this logo, including the sign in the circle with the B in the middle is too simple to be considered copyrighted. I guess someone on behalf of the vineyard, or just someone else, whoever is the uploader, just didn't understand the meaning of uploading it to the Commons. As no OTRS release approval has been received, it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Inferior version of file: LIGO schematic (multilang).svg ↔ User: Perhelion 00:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Inferior version of file: LIGO schematic (multilang).svg ↔ User: Perhelion 00:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, this is good enough implementation in multilang svg. Эээ (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright material Azcolvin429 (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright material Azcolvin429 (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 01:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg et al, imho also rather 'personal advertising', Roland zh (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it is used in an article, so the WP usage overrides any personal opinion — billinghurst sDrewth 01:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg, File:Ajay Prabhakar United Nations.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg, File:Ajay Prabhakar United Nations.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg, File:Ajay Prabhakar United Nations.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg, File:Ajay Prabhakar United Nations.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Dr Ajay.jpg, File:Ajay Prabhakar United Nations.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Doutbful own work. Seems to be a photo scanned from a magazine. Copyrighted in the US, it needs an OTRS ticket. - Fma12 (talk) 02:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
As per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flag_of_ASEAN.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Wjplyw User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: Isn't the organisation flag should be free from copyright as all of the Southeast Asian countries flags are free from such restrictions? Why the EU flag uploader release it on a public domain of their own? Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Flag_of_Europe.svg decided that, even though the EU has copyright of the flag, the age and also threshold of originality was too low to have this flag in copyright (2008 discussion). As for ASEAN, http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/asean-flag/ point six asserts the copyright and for the organization headquartered in Indonesia, their ToO is unknown. As for the neighboring countries flags, either the flags are very old (Thailand was 1917), Indonesia has a very simple design (which is covered by legislation, which is public domain in Indonesia) or legislation is exempt from copyright. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have tried to contact the organisation and yet they said "they will look into this matters" but I don't know for how long they will serious on this issues. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- I do not know anyone close to the Secretariat in Jarkata, but I know people in Bangkok that could ask. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have tried to contact the organisation and yet they said "they will look into this matters" but I don't know for how long they will serious on this issues. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Flag_of_Europe.svg decided that, even though the EU has copyright of the flag, the age and also threshold of originality was too low to have this flag in copyright (2008 discussion). As for ASEAN, http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/asean-flag/ point six asserts the copyright and for the organization headquartered in Indonesia, their ToO is unknown. As for the neighboring countries flags, either the flags are very old (Thailand was 1917), Indonesia has a very simple design (which is covered by legislation, which is public domain in Indonesia) or legislation is exempt from copyright. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Why didn't you just tag it for speedy deletion since it's been deleted before? There is no evidence that the flag is below the threshold of originality in its source country, whatever country that may be. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
As per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flag_of_ASEAN.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Wjplyw User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Already a better picture File:William H. Crook photographed by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg uploaded by the same person. Simeon Dahl (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE; Speedy close: This is the PNG of the JPEG linked. PNGs are re-editable; JPEGs aren't. Commons (Or is it Firefox?) currently has a bug that means some PNGs are displayed with incorrect colours on certain browsers. However, PNG files are lossless, meaning they're necessary for editing, but the Wiki thumbnailing software does not sharpen PNGs, so they look worse in thumbnail compared to JPEG. Otherwise, we could go full-PNG. The files are not redundant, and it is against policy ("it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image [etc]") to delete it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm still new to the rules around here at Commons, but as I read the policy I will agree with the statement above. The picture should not be deleted. Now I know that to next time. --Simeon Dahl (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Simeon Dahl: Don't worry about it. Sorry if I spelled things out a bit forcefully; it's one of those things where it can be difficult to fix if it is deleted and you don't spot it has been, so one tends to panic a little bit. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm still new to the rules around here at Commons, but as I read the policy I will agree with the statement above. The picture should not be deleted. Now I know that to next time. --Simeon Dahl (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE; Speedy close: This is the PNG of the JPEG linked. PNGs are re-editable; JPEGs aren't. Commons (Or is it Firefox?) currently has a bug that means some PNGs are displayed with incorrect colours on certain browsers. However, PNG files are lossless, meaning they're necessary for editing, but the Wiki thumbnailing software does not sharpen PNGs, so they look worse in thumbnail compared to JPEG. Otherwise, we could go full-PNG. The files are not redundant, and it is against policy ("it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image [etc]") to delete it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
doubtful license, wrong subject Ign christian (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Cropped small component of cited source. This component, formerly possibly de minimis of the original, is now the sole content. And it is apparently a logo of a commerical media product, surely nonfree. DMacks (talk) 05:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Logo for UEC Leonprimer (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: valid OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Logo for Swiss Cycling Leonprimer (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: valid OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This image was shown on my user page "SrishAkaTux" for which I requested a removal a few days ago. Thus, this image is no longer significant. SrishAkaTux (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @SrishAkaTux: it is still in use on ten.wikimedia.org. Basvb (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: probably not own work, no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
There are no pages that link to this file SrishAkaTux (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not every file has to be in use to be in Com:scope Basvb (talk) 19:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Brick Crafts advertising vehicle wrap installed by Absolute Perfection Vehicle Wrapping and Applied Graphics.jpg
[edit]
Derivative of the 2D artworks and logos displayed on the van. BethNaught (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio, own work unlikely. Tekstman (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright is with the subject on the photo, and I have his permission to use this photo. Frodo29
- @Frodo29: , please look at Com:OTRS and send permission for this file to OTRS. Basvb (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio, own work highly unlikely (promotional picture). Tekstman (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Copyright is with the subject on the photo, and I have his permission to use this photo. Frodo29
- @Frodo29: , please look at Com:OTRS and send permission for this file to OTRS. Basvb (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Recent buildings, no FoP in France. JeanBono (talk) 12:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ah merde... On peut pas considérer que la photo est prise de suffisamment loin et pas assez centrée sur lesdits bâtiments ? Sinon il va falloir vider pas mal de catégories... :-/ FredD (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ah en fait on dirait qu'il y a des exceptions : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Tour-Total.jpg. FredD (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: this is a skyline of which every building forms a small part, no infringement for the individual buildings. --Jcb (talk) 10:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
There's not enough information about the author of this image to keep, and "ca. 1920" is not enough to assume it's old enough to be in the PD in any case. Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This is derivative of a very copyrighted Simon Dewy painting. The Simon Dewy painting has current copyrights active. https://mylifeinzion.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/simon-dewey-the-lord-is-my-shepherd.jpg 97.126.206.82 14:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Info seems to be available in the description, any portuguese readers willing to take a look? 1932 file. Basvb (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no author information in the description. --Jcb (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
There's not enough information about the author of this image to keep, and "ca. 1920" is not enough to assume it's old enough to be in the PD in any case. Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete The quality of this image is suspiciously bad in terms of resolution. However, the photograph was taken from what seems to be a privileged position, suggesting that it was taken by a professional. The uploader will have to prove that he or she took this picture, using COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 02:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
![14:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/26#c-EugeneZelenko-2016-03-26T14:32:00.000Z-File:Jaime_Menéndez_"El_Chato",_su_mujer_Avelina_Ranz_y_su_hijo_Jimmy.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
![10:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/26#c-Jcb-2016-04-23T10:50:00.000Z-File:Jaime_Menéndez_"El_Chato",_su_mujer_Avelina_Ranz_y_su_hijo_Jimmy.JPG){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Redundant image of File:U500 Donbas.jpg PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Files are different --Butko (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Both are photos of the same object. But on the second it is better seen.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ipolani756 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment I can't find these pictures anywhere else on the Internet. The picture in color doesn't look professional, in my opinion, and it's being used in a Wikipedia article. The uploader might be a close friend. Without a strong reason to doubt that the uploader took the colored picture, as stated, I don't see why it should be deleted. It seems to me that other pictures in that situation are kept. However, the black-and-white picture does look professional to me, so I have stronger doubts about the owner. I would keep the colored picture. If the uploader is not a professional photographer then I don't see how he/she could prove ownership to OTRS volunteers. It might be a bit unfair to the uploader. Also, in my opinion there isn't a promotional issue with the pictures. Dontreader (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution duplicate of File:John Allsebrook Simon, Vanity Fair, 1911-10-18.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:John Allsebrook Simon, Vanity Fair, 1911-10-18.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, other version is far superior and includes orginianl text at top and bottom. Rcbutcher (talk) 01:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
derivative work from http://www.ballenpresse.tv/ 2003:4D:2C35:7019:C1DC:7339:755E:16D0 14:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant image, File:Chevron-frigate Hetman Sahaydachniy-(U130).svg PsichoPuzo (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept: see Help:SVG: "Once you have created an SVG image, upload it (under a new name), and tag the original raster image with {{Vector version available}}, but please do not delete the raster image or list it for deletion, as it still serves some purposes — see Commons:Superseded images policy for details.". --Jcb (talk) 10:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No FoP in Estonia. In case someone thinks this is not artistic enough, the design is based on a satiric literary work and so, pretty much one of a kind. Pildirüüstaja (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- If the design is based on work by Kreutzwald or earlier stories, then the copyright for design has expired, isn't it? Otherwise it's a rather simple example of a log house. Pikne 07:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Pikne. --Jcb (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Tento obraz je zobrazen asi zezadu Ivas1950 (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Most uploads by the user can be kept, but this is clearly not PD-art since not 2-dimensional. Anvilaquarius (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
chybně zreprodukováno Ivas1950 (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Toto je zadní strana obrazu Ivas1950 (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Perspektivně zkresleno Ivas1950 (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low resolution, poor quality PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}