Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 20th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzmlt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to restrictions imposed by the author, this image is not eligible for release under CC license. Kelsey.chris (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as clear-cut case and per wish by uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (photographers must be named) 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 11:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page crated instead of category. Result of a mistake. Ed88 (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio: This is a copyrighted image. Will be reuploaded properly for the page "RJR - Radio Jeunes Reims" on the french Wikipedia

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio: ошибочно загружена

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, похоже на кадр из фильма. Dogad75 (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted movie still, not own work. --Sealle (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: original has been deleted Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If the original was a copyvio, so is this as a derivative. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons takes image with flickr licenses that have attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication only. Best, Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, please, It was uploaded in error. I have uploaded to Wikipedia where it is used under fair use conditions. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdulrahmanayub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 我愛黃路梓茵 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Reason for deletion. At least one File was in use in wikipedia. Did you even check this? --Itu (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qront (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are only used for promotion of user's own organisation. No possible education value. Images are not used anywhere. These are the user's only contributions ever. In light of this and the promotional username, it's clear that this user is a single-purpose account used only to promote an organisation.

JIP (talk) 08:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shariqueahmadceo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary redirect Kopiersperre (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / unnecessary redirect.--Fanghong (talk) 08:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 14:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renish singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this photo, because it pictures me and I don't want photos of me in your database. 87.88.93.230 15:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, en général c'est la personne photographiée, ici Olivier Bocquet qui demande la suppression d'une photographie le représentant. Ce n'est pas moi qui trancherais pour savoir qui est 87.88.93.230 et donc si cette demandes est fondée ? Elle a été prise dans le cadre d'une manifestation culturelle avec une bonne centaine d'autre et plusieur de cette personne. Il y avait deux personnes qui m'ont demandé de ne pas les prendre en photographie, une me proposant un dessin de poisson pour la représenter et une autre me demandant de ne pas. Ce n'était pas le cas ici. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 10:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted / Out of scope and unused. Commons is not private photo album even 87.88`s demandes n'était pas fondée.--Fanghong (talk) 09:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request - too dark and blurry to be of COM:EDUSE INeverCry 20:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy violation child — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoiraMoira (talk • contribs) 2016-03-11T10:24:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal files Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted woman in pink pic. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: private photo, unused, out-of-scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal files Amitie 10g (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Milanmiloske as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This article was supposed to be an intern joke among a group of friends Amitie 10g (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudiofausti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 22:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 10:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arielbarrionuevo15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 10:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 22:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused blurry personal image INeverCry 22:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused tiny 2kb thumb INeverCry 23:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of the unknown BBS Forum without any contexts Thatonewikiguy (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing. Another photo from a Glenn Close fan on Flickr. Flickr claims that this photo was taken on May 20, 2013, with no further details and no EXIF data. This is in fact a photo from Glenn Close's appearance on fashion designer Stella McCartney's 2013 fall fashion presentation on January 8, 2013. Thuresson (talk) 00:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 03:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too tiny to be of use. Fry1989 eh? 20:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No licence. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly out of project scope, please see COM:PS. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nuonbora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Fanghong. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure (it's a glucoside, should be hydroxymethyl on lower-left corner of left ring rather than just hydroxyl). Have File:Scilliroside structure.png DMacks (talk) 20:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 21:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image, OTRS needed Shev123 (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 20 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 20 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 20 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: promotional content: Only for advertisement. - Earth Saver (talk) at 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Yasu (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 10:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is claimed that this is a photograph taken by Igor Loginov in 1940, but Igor Loginov's death year is unknown, so there is no way to verify that he was already dead by 1946 as stated. Most people who were able to take photographs in 1940 were still alive in 1946. Stefan2 (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ever heard of World War II? Andy Mabbett (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It was an event only a bit more than 70 years ago, so most people who were alive at that time were still alive 70 years ago. Also, Russians who died during that event sometimes get a change of copyright term from 70 years from death to 74 years from death, from what I've understood. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of unknown site. Includes a photographic image that is itself problematic (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr.B.R.Ambedkar.jpg). DMacks (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Babasaheb Ambedkar.jpg as another version of this same underlying original. DMacks (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this black and white halftoned photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivate work (scan), no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence or info for a copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope personal image, unsed. --Wdwd (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope personal image, unsed. --Wdwd (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe a screenshot FNDE (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechter Datenschutz bei pdf-Dateien. Es exisitert eine gleiche Datei Streckenprofil Narentabahn.png Plutowiki (talk) 22:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced by File:Streckenprofil Narentabahn.png. --Wdwd (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristian Monzon Swich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joannaqrs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable people

INeverCry 22:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Out of project scope. The people on the pictures are not necessarily non-notable, but they are all unidentified, so it is unlikely that the pictures will be useful for any purpose. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnybermudez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcorbal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permisson of the woman with red leather boots hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 23:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem, because a woman can not be identified. --Jan Polák (talk) 05:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Coordinadoric (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The movie has a copyright notice. Uploader was a mistificator. Please delete all the files from Category:Alfred Hitchcock's cameo appearances Odessey (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jude Bosco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-0 licence on source website HighFlying (talk) 23:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PernickyJan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused low-quality personal drawings

INeverCry 23:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Produçãoeqp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs... Duplicates of files already nominated for deletion: File:Wilha Ronaldo Png.jpg claimed own work by Produçãoeqp was previously uploaded as File:GCMEsQJv.jpg by Wilha Ronaldo... also File:3RsjB2v1.jpg uploaded by Produçãoeqp is identical to File:Wilha_Ronaldo_.jpg previously claimed own work by Wilha Ronaldo. The claims of own work of both uploaders are dubious, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wilha Ronaldo, this reversion diff and the article to which these are attached which is red-tagged at pt:wiki, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilha_Ronaldo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --XXN, 13:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF data credit the photo to "Shan Qiao, © 2013 CNW/Health Canada", not to "Beardog3". -- Asclepias (talk) 01:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of Beardog3 are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unliekly to be own work. Complain via OTRS (Ticket#2016031910006405). Per claims in ticket: File is from 1950, which means that copyright still exists. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unliekly to be own work. Complain via OTRS (Ticket#2016031910006405). Per claims in ticket: File is from 1950, which means that copyright still exists. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Iran: architect's death year unknown. Also, File:Sakhteman markazi01.jpg violates the attribution requirement.

Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DSfaruk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope test upload.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD. This image is not a work of a United States Department of State employee. Ashtray (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not from us but from thai site. Clear evidence of US employee is needed. --Basvb (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request - blurry lights - I've lived in Reno for 40+ years, and I'd have a hard time saying what this is - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 01:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo used here six year before the stated creation date—no evidence of author's permission czar 01:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism on Wkipedia, not educationally useful. We already have plenty of photos of thumbs up signs, males, and caucasians. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograhy is not pearsonal work. This author is newspaper[1] or Vietnamese government. Ashtray (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albayrak58Murat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images of men were made by uploader, some are obvious rephotographs, none have metadata. Most likely COM:COPYVIOs culled from various sources, see facebook sizes and web resolutions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kingogafire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. More TICS spam. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong description, not used Kareyac (talk) 05:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sourcing is insufficient to prove the license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (22 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 06:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: per COM:PRP, considering User talk:A.hotter/logs (last remaining file) and a high res/exif available version circulating at official site via http://www.cssg.info/the-launch-april-2011/ (Copyright © 2015 CSSG) = http://www.cssg.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The-launch-Copy.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vincent Sunny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images do not appear to be uploader's work. Disparate resolutions and technical qualities, some images are obviously screenshots (see File:Taste Media, Germein Sisters.jpg and File:Ella Germein Video.jpg - video even in the title) and others are blatant copvios (nominated seperately as speedies: e.g., File:Germein Sisters b105.jpg is here, File:Germein Sisters Live.jpg is here, etc.) DUCK copyvios.

Эlcobbola talk 17:47, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vincent Sunny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works (small resolutions, no EXIF)

2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 07:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect Charles Venner is dead in 1981 => still copyrighted. No freedom of panorama in France 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 08:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not PD. Ministry of National Defence All rights reserved. Ashtray (talk) 10:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Ashtray (talk) 10:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://vovworld.vn/fr-CH/actualites/do-ba-ty-recoit-ruben-remigio-ferro-778575.vov
This is not the same image as the linked page. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The comment is correct -- it is not quite the same, but it was taken at the same time and place, is very small, and has no EXIF, so deletion is the correct measure. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Ashtray (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not CC BY-SA 4.0. Ashtray (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not CC BY-SA 4.0. Ashtray (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not CC BY-SA 4.0. Ashtray (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not CC BY-SA 4.0. Ashtray (talk) 10:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (7 KB) 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 10:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a document about the South Korean Democratic Republican Party. It is unlikely that the United States Government created documents in Korean about Korean political parties. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I published this from what can now be found here and it was originally in a different format (notice my file is larger resolution) that led Wikipedia newbie me (back in 2007) to think it was US Government propaganda (thus public domain) but from meta data I read now, it seems to be made by Korean government. That said, I seem to remember that Korean governmental works are public domain? No? That's the real question. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Only certain kinds of works (not these). Though in any case it seems these were technically published by the DRP and not the government. Nizolan (talk) 00:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See comment: No source -- how do we know it's a photo taken in Iran? It could be from the US, as Mina Bissell has been living for more than 35 years in the US. Stefan2 (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Com:PCP assumption is not Ok, OTRS needed. --Basvb (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of the unknown BBS Forum without any contexts Thatonewikiguy (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of the unknown Arab games without any contexts Thatonewikiguy (talk) 11:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://planeta.tv/news/view/Anelia-za-tvoia-sum-i-novite-proekti-v-Avtograf Лорд Бъмбъри (talk) 11:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have not found any source which confirms this is indeed the logo of the Budapest bid for the 2024 Olympics. Hektor (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: if official attribution is incorrect. --Basvb (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steinexpo - Das Original (talk · contribs)

[edit]

tiny files, mostly without EXIF, various cameras, useless without descriptions

2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 12:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except for D3 which is in use. --Basvb (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License and date photographed are obviously wrong. Just because a clock was made for the US Navy, it does not mean the Navy is the source / author of all photographs of the clock. This site has numerous photos of this clock from several angles with same carpet background. Uploader likely lifted the image and resized it prior to upload to commons. They have had a number of other images deleted for similar reasons. -- Dual Freq (talk) 12:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it's the first image in the link. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dbious "own" work (1940 !) 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 13:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license. Cropped from a political cartoon drawn by Jim Berryman (1902-1971) and published in the Washington Evening Star in 1943. Likely still in copyright. -- Dual Freq (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 12:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikkihair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Own" works from the 1940s-1950s

2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 13:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs proper attribution. --Basvb (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a picture of Long Herdon Meadow Dudley Miles (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request/scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file with "Hscitysine-map.png" 오모군 (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality duplicate. --Basvb (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedic contents Thatonewikiguy (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no categorisation, use is unclear. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedic contents Thatonewikiguy (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: good categorisation, no issues. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjiv12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of software of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: clearly 1800s image the info is all in the description. Please take a look at the description field before nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong attribution. --Basvb (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1960 file. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use!. --Basvb (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yacky0316 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Software screenshots. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBH2M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused spreadsheet screenshots of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free map base


Deleted: source for map unknown. --Basvb (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lizmil70 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS. --Basvb (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://wwww.taz.de/picture/1050678/624/Kuebra_Guemuesay_Portrait_.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: bild: reuters on source. --Basvb (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF: Copyright holder: andre walther / vodafone 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 15:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not convinced on this one. Not unlikely this is an own photo, and only absent EXIF data points to copyvio. If that is enough we should delete everything without EXIF. --Basvb (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://images.fandango.com/r99.9/ImageRenderer/1040/650/redesign/static/img/noxsquare.jpg/p478410/images/masterrepository/performer%20images/p478410/ben-falcone-f.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by Carlos Pascual

[edit]

All these paintings are copyrighted so their author, Carlos Pascual, was born in 1938, as stated on Pascual official web.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 15:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The chosen template does not include the European Union, the United States, India, and Russia 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 15:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: incorrect source info (it describes the depicted subject). --Basvb (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me equivoque en escribir Felipe23 (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Basvb (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swordofsunnah

[edit]

Images are quite obviously not own work but professional work. Hekerui (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist id out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable violation de copyright Salsero35 (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image uploaded. Image slightly blurred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohini (talk • contribs) 2016-03-20T17:03:35‎ (UTC)


Deleted: uploader request. --Basvb (talk) 19:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is very poor. If it was the only example of this particular model, it might be worth keeping after sharpening and brightening... but it isn't.

Even at the time this was uploaded, we had numerous better images of this generation of the Ford Transit. Is there anything particularly notable that warrants keeping this example? Ubcule (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Absolutely atrocious. OSX (talkcontributions) 06:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, there are several other maps at Category:Linguistic maps of the Albanian language. Zoupan (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality file with low resolution; moreover it is not Paul (Kratirov). It was Spephan (Andriashenko); see File:Иерархи-тихоновцы в Харькове. ок. 1926 год.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Чръный человек (talk • contribs) 2016-03-16T16:19:18‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Costa Rica.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong pronunciation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azureus (talk • contribs) 2016-03-11T17:15:04‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry image of a limestone bas relief of 18th dynasty Egypt. A much better image in our collection is File:Spaziergang im Garten Amarna Berlin.jpg. The image nominated for deletion is smaller than the other, blurrier, not as high quality and not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong pronunciation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azureus (talk • contribs) 2016-03-11T17:15:32‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use, please discuss on polish wiktionary. --Basvb (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --Basvb (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong pronunciation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azureus (talk • contribs) 2016-03-11T17:16:02‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use, please discuss on polish wiktionary. --Basvb (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong pronunciation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azureus (talk • contribs) 2016-03-11T17:16:30‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use, please discuss on polish wiktionary. --Basvb (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable artist's doodle art is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle art by non-notable artist Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of logos, incluing copyrighted twitter bird. Fry1989 eh? 21:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jovanadeobaldia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

INeverCry 23:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sech11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal artworks

INeverCry 23:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not PD. Ashtray (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license information. Not personal work. Ashtray (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified statue. The country of the statue needs to be identified so that it can be determined if freedom of panorama applies or not, and the death year of the sculptor needs to be identified if freedom of panorama does not apply. Stefan2 (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified statue. The country of the statue needs to be identified so that it can be determined if freedom of panorama applies or not, and the death year of the sculptor needs to be identified if freedom of panorama does not apply. Stefan2 (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Looks to be USA. --Basvb (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: by Ankry, {{FoP-Ireland}}. TentingZones1 (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue of Kiichi Aichi

[edit]

Churyo Sato (ja:佐藤忠良), the creator of the statue, died in 2011 [3]. Copyright is still in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image quality suggests that this is a newspaper scan. There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focus of pic is on a copyrighted photography --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative of unfree work. --Basvb (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author died in 1972, not in public domain F (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a person who was born in 1958, so the photographer can't have died before 1946 as stated in the copyright tag. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to have been taken in 2005, so it is unlikely that the photographer died before 1946 as stated in the copyright tag. Note that the copyright holder in the watermark doesn't seem to match the photographer in the information template. Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a person who was born in 1970, so it is unlikely that the photographer died before 1946 as stated in the copyright tag. Stefan2 (talk) 16:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prior publication here would require OTRS permission to verify self-work. However, this appears to be an out-of-scope personal image that doesn't need to be retained either way. Nick (talk) 17:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution. Lacks EXIF data. Appears to be photoshopped out of a bigger image. Self-work claim is suspect without the full image being uploaded with appropriate resolution and metadata. Image is more likely to have been cropped from a video screenshot or something. Nick (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS permission. --Basvb (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: multiple 2013 sources with upload in 2014. --Basvb (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by file with other name Gerd Leibrock (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested.--Fanghong (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal files Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal files Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal files Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edmundlou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims to have personally created these photos and designed these logos, but that seems unlikely given the different cameras involved, and the logos will require verified permission from the organisation in question (assuming they are within our project scope; they are currently unused).

LX (talk, contribs) 12:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a screenshot, and the uploader on WP has had issues for uploading non-free screenshots Fz981 (talk) 09:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photograph uploaded by mistake Antiquary (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Antiquary: is renaming and changing the description not an option? Or don't you want to release this particular image? Basvb (talk) 19:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That might have been an option when I first made that mistake, if only I'd thought of it, but since then I've uploaded an almost identical photograph at File:Bramber Castle from Bramber churchyard.jpg, which makes the file we're discussing redundant. --Antiquary (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Bramber Castle from Bramber churchyard.jpg. P 1 9 9   16:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paraded Category:Missiles of Iran by Tasnimnews

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sejjil Missile by Tasnimnews.jpg—no FoP in Iran for the ones on show, and no permission for the missile models (if they are models). Others might be eligible too.

czar 20:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Czar: . If I can prove you, these missiles (in military parade) are real and not models, you approve to save the pictures of weapons?Saman-1984 (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question: If I show you datasheets of the missiles and you compare dimensions (approximately) with pictures, are you convince to save the pictures?Saman-1984 (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that would prove that they're not models, as Jim said in the first, linked discussion. I think it would be helpful if you could prove that they are not sculptures and thus not copyrightable works (unless armaments somehow count as copyrightable work?) Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Iran Iranian copyright isn't exactly my forte. czar 20:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Czar: If you ask a request, you should open your doors. You don't know how I can convince you! This is not fair.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My doors are open czar 23:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nasi-1

Hi @Czar: you can see other images of the missile in source link. Also this link introduces some specifics: weight: 350 kg - lenght: 3.5 - diameter: 30. this specifics are close to missiles in source link of image.

S200

in this link, you can see original launcher and capsule of S200 missile in Iran. All sizes of the missiles in two pictures are close to operational version. So, why we can assume subjects of the pictures are model?Saman-1984 (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward (per your comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sejjil Missile by Tasnimnews.jpg) @Saman-1984, did any source say outright that they were real and not models? czar 00:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
model in Persian language means: ماکت. If you can find this word, I did wrong! also, missile model means: ماکت موشک, Also missile system means: سامنه موشکی
Always in Iran, Armed Forces of Iran, used operational versions of weapons in military parades of: 1-Army Day 2-Holy Defence Week.Saman-1984 (talk) 06:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored my closing of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sejjil Missile by Tasnimnews.jpg. I was misled by the file name. It turns out that the missile shown is not a Sejjil, which is 18.2 meters long, but a Sedjeel, which is much smaller. Therefore my reason for deletion was wrong. I see no reason to believe that any of these are models. They all appear to be about the right size..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • With the model part resolved (and no creative copyright claim to the missiles themselves), I'd be fine to keep these as long as they're cropped (to mind Iran's lack of freedom of panorama) czar 11:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Czar: thank you for cooperation. I uploaded an example: File:Zoubin Missile by Tasnimnews.jpg. Is this OK?Saman-1984 (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also this.Saman-1984 (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know which element in this picture is critical?Saman-1984 (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would just use the tools:croptool to remove everything but the missile (unless it would be useful to have crop with all the dignitaries). That way we can preserve the permissions that were already verified, etc. czar 16:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Czar: . Most of the pictures, have been taken in Iran Army Day, It's better we save military parade conditions and faces of military commanders.Saman-1984 (talk) 10:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine by me (though I think the faces are too small to be useful)—the issue is the stage. We'll be fine as long as the stage or the copyrighted works/photos attached to the stage are removed (so the subject is just the missile, person, etc.). Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Iran czar 19:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination czar 11:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK @Czar: . What elements of these three pictures: [4], [5] and [6] have copyright?Saman-1984 (talk) 10:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those crops are probably okay. It might be good to crop to just the missile in the first one so the image of the clouds isn't included. I'm not sure whether the stage construction itself would be copyrighted... or if it's too simple to count as an original work—would probably go to a freedom of panorama expert for that. czar 11:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Czar: . If you have doubt, please ask other users to help us. I think the stage construction is not a 3D art or architectural work. Thanx.Saman-1984 (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward, do you have any thoughts on FoP re: the stage in these images? czar 19:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Our summary says there is no FOP in Iran. I'm a little uneasy about the stage, in particular the two photographs on either side of it. I don't read Farsi, but if the writing on the proscenium is more than just slogans, it might have a literary copyright as well. I don't think we need worry about the stage itself. I'd be happier with these images if they were more tightly cropped on the missiles. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jameslwoodward: . I removerd portraits of Ali Khamenei and Ruhollah Khomeini in pictures. Also the test under the flag of Iran, is a sentence from Qur'an. The test on the banner is a quote from Ali Khamenei that means: The Army is God's army and protector of the religious (Islam) and humanity. I don't think these text have right? If it has, I can remove the words! Please stop minimizing the valuable military photos. What is your final vote?Saman-1984 (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't know what you mean by "Please stop minimizing the valuable military photos." First, I have been working hard with you to save them, Second, the fact that they are valuable is not important here if they are copyright violations. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:53, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD. The author of this photography is not NSA. NSA do not publish it. It is published only in Vietnamese media. Ashtray (talk) 01:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, there is no confirmation that it is actually an NSA work. --Storkk (talk) 12:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safone96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If you are the photographer, please confirm by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safone96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Again, unlikely/obviously false authorship claims. Instead of commenting on the previous deletion discussion, the uploader continued to charge ahead with even more problematic uploads. Obviously, he or she either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "author", "own work" or "copyright holder" mean.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La licence n'est pas mentionné sur le site source. Si l'original était sur dans le domaine public alors elle serait depuis longtemps sur Wikimedia. La page de discussion de l'auteur est pleine de demandes de suppression d'image. Jerome misc (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Jerome - I am the author of the image that you're trying to get deleted. It was created by me on the basis of a public domain image from the 1940s - I added the text and the coloring. Well out of standard copyright, too. So as the creator I had the right to attach the CC license, as I see it. Frankly, it should not be used as a picture of Raymond Chandler - it was meant to be a piece of art, not a photo profile! I first published it on my tumblr blog, I think, where you will find many images like it - always based on public domain images or images with no copyright restrictions: http://speh-kunst.tumblr.com. About your comment "La page de discussion de l'auteur est pleine de demandes de suppression d'image" - this is a little indirect. Did you look at the reasons for the deletion requests? Copyright violation is not the issue. The pages that you find on my discussion page, which were deleted were all deleted because they were text only - I used to take pictures of flip charts in class and upload them to wikimedia commons. Why the commons finds it necessary to delete these I do not know. But I don't object either. I just thought this is worth commenting upon. I hope this clarifies the issue - now, do as you please. Cheers from Berlin.--msb (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"on the basis of a public domain image" So, where is the original and how do you know it is a public domain ? If it is really, why don't you upload the original ? Regards. --Jerome misc (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@@Birkenkrahe: , msb: please provide more detailed source info on the PD-image, the image seems to be a ca. 1950s image and PD for such an image is not obvious. As the image is a creative work not the most suitable for the articles on wikipedia uploading the original (with source info) would also be greatly appreciated. Basvb (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no evidence has been given demonstrating the PD-status of the underlying photo, which seems to be credited here to Cordon Press. --Storkk (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Russian inscription "natural science". Out of scope. MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Titles in Russia

@Ivtorov: , how do you see this file being used on one of the Wikimedia projects? Basvb (talk) 19:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, in Russian it is title for "general study subjects" - it is hard to show them in photo, so I made some titles for things like that. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: agree with P199 here, I had some doubts and am not alone in that. P199, I'd not say that everything in that category is out of scope, some are images of signs etc. --Basvb (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: много данных фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад, + судя по нику загрузившего фото, возможно автор загрузки и изображенный на фото спортсмен-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо разрешение автора фото (фотографа). Dogad75 (talk) 06:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader has a number of deleted files. Green Giant (talk) 09:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete These stamps are not de minimis so I'm sorry to tell you that stamps of Sweden are copyright for 70 years after the death of the engraver. In this case, the engraver, Sven Ewert died in 1959 according to this webpage and his initials are seen in the bottom right corner of the 1957 stamp. Also see Category talk:Stamps of Sweden. Ww2censor (talk) 13:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete These stamps 1957 are not de minimis so I'm sorry to tell you that stamps of France are copyright for 70 years after the death of the engraver. In this case, the engravers are Raoul Serres (died 1971), and Jean Pheulpin (died 1991), so the stamps are copyright until 70 years after the last one death which will be 2062 per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France. Detailed images can be seen Serres stamp and Pheulpin stamp. Ww2censor (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps!! Give me a break. Delete the whole damn thing. OMG I'll delete the whole category, without the front of the envelope it kinda ruins the fact that she wrote all over northern europe. WayneRay (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm sure you respect copyright of all images, so what sort of break would you like?. If there were no copyright stamps on the envelope there you would not a problem so you could blur the stamps in order to overcome the copyright issue but still keep the envelope as has been done previously. Ww2censor (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I had just come home and someone had broken into my garden shed and had stolen everything. I was still upset and i apologize for taking out on you and another reguest. Yes I could have blurred the stamp but aren't stamps out in the public? They were cancelled so could not have been counterfited? I put everything up for deletion anyway. Sorry. WayneRay (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can certainly understand your state of mind after someone has violated you properly and stolen it. While stamps of some countries are in the public domain, other countries have very strict copyright rules which apply to stamps whether they are used or not. Usage has no bearing on the copyright. BTW, your assumption that cancelled stamps cannot be counterfeit has been proven wrong in the past by philatelists who have found such items. Anyway, if you are putting them up for deletion so be it but blurring is a way out of the problem. You may not have noticed but I did not put File:CharlesMackenzie01.jpg up for deletion. Instead I added the appropriate copyright tag because that stamp is in the public domain. Good luck and hopefully you get some of your stuff back or the perpetrators get caught. Ww2censor (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Looks like it is all staying there.WayneRay (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by In2wiki as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image is not made By Tasnim. Tasnim News Agency watermarks photos and credits to the photographer in a black bar under image(read this discussion) like here.Also it's been published on another website 2.5 hours before Tasnim.|source=http://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1394/10/19/966384/عکسهای-جدید-شهاب-حسینی-و-ترانه-علیدوستی-در-فیلم-جدید-فرهادی . Agree with the foregoing, but also the derived image File:Taraneh-alidoosti-in-salesman(movie)-(cropped).jpg is affected. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC) this picture no problem becouse from tasnim and license . if this pic delete so must delete File:Taraneh Alidoosti in Khaneh Cinema.jpg Payammwiki (talk)[reply]

@Payammwiki: this image is not watermarked by Tasnim. SMPSP has watermarked it and all images of SMPSP are copyrighted. Tasnim watermarks images in bottom left corner12 and only images BY Tasnimnews.com have CC license Not images ON Tasnimnews.com. In2wiki (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD. The author of this photography is not Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS do not publish it. It is published only in Vietnamese Government site. Ashtray (talk) 01:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source indicates otherwise, but is not precise enough to check. @Yuna Ji Eun: please indicate a more precise sourcelink. Basvb (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and disputed/unverifiable source. Restorable if it can be shown to be a US government work. --Storkk (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even PD images need a reliable verifiable source per COM:SCOPE. How can it be verified that this is indeed an image of the person, or was created on the date mentioned ? Is this fairly small sized (why?) "scanned" image previously published somewhere, like in a book or on internet, as can be inferred by This photograph is considered as one of his last photographs. ? Unfitlouie (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info: Assuming that you tried to find Swami Vivekananda, he died in 1902, and as a notable artist, there is much time to be published before 1923.
Are you saying Vivekananda is the notable artist who created this "selfie" in 1902 ? There was also much time for the fake recording of 1893 [7] to be published before 1923. Unfitlouie (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • The photograph was taken in 1901 actually in Shillong. I'll make changes after the discussion. Swami Vivekananda died in 1902. The audio you are talking about, I know about it, I myself nominated a copy of the file for deletion, see this. But this is not a fake photo, see this. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. This book, however,is only published in 1999. Even if the photo was taken in 1901, it is possible that copyright still exists in both India and US. What does the book say about the source of the 1901 photo ? Unfitlouie (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • The book itself is a a highly rated scholarly work. How does the publication year of a book that is being used as reference matter here? See this. The photograph was published immediately after and was used in a 1910 book en:The Master as I Saw Him. --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • So far we have a 1996 book and a 2014 news report which contain this published image. These serve to deny PD status. For this file to be kept in Commons, it needs to be PD in both US and India and also out of URAA in USA (1996). So,at which page in the 1910 book is this image used, and who is credited there as the photographer ? Incidentally the 2014 picture is of a much higher resolution and quality. Unfitlouie (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
            • The Sister Nivedita book of 1910 (on archive.org) does not contain any such photo. However, on page 498 it does confirm that SV was in Assam at around the time, but that does not help us. Unfitlouie (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Titodutta: COM:EVID requires the uploader to provide sufficient evidence of the file being in the public domain or properly licensed. So far the earliest publication we found is the 1996 book and unknown source/author. The 1996 book on pg. 283 (footnote) recounts some (unreliable) hearsay that this photograph's negative was manipulated to present SV in a better way than he actually was. So also this is not a "faithful reproduction" of a 2D artistic work. Cheers. Unfitlouie (talk) 14:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader apparently didn't bother to add any suitable source information. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]