Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/01/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 24th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner. Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TICKET #: 2015122510009859

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Thinkpinkfloyd.com logo is not free at source :http://www.thinkpinkfloyd.com/index.htm Yann (talk) 00:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner. Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TICKET #: 2015122510009813

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Thinkpinkfloyd.com logo is not free at source :http://www.thinkpinkfloyd.com/index.htm Yann (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:National Library of Poland

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was uploaded accidentally. It also has no use, as it is of a fictional country with no international standing. I am the uploader too. -User:Deonyi 06:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader nomimation. --JuTa 16:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cumple con los requisitos para estar en Wikimedia Commons


Deleted: per nomination. Alan (talk) 18:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was not for Wikipedia or Wikimedia, sorry RonalT Troost (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Socilo Xeriff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence at source that this is freely licensed Basvb (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo shows Karl Otto Koch (Lagerkommandant Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen und KZ Majdanek), not Karl Shultz as a graphic called. Moreover, not specified source and author. MAx 92 (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner. Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TICKET #: 2015122510009831

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Thinkpinkfloyd.com logo is not free at source :http://www.thinkpinkfloyd.com/index.htm The logo can be easily removed. Yann (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission received, file description could use a little cleanup. --Basvb (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in several sites ([1] and [2] for example) and no OTRS release approval has been received for its release. It has no place in the Commons in this situation Ldorfman (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 21:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baklol125 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I fail to see any use for these within the terms of the project. They are actually simple text files effectively.

Herby talk thyme 11:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — T. 23:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Deleted, User:Denniss mass deleted all uploads of Gloriamuliro. Taivo (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bielibob as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (newer)scupltures do not come clearly under the freedom of panorama, creator is not only Bielibob, no permisson by artist, so this should be deleted Yann (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Why wouldn't this fall under FOP? This is in Germany. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about this?
Possibly copyrighted in the U.S.

This work may not be available under a free license in the United States because it is based on an artwork or sculpture that may be protected by copyright under U.S. law. (Commons is hosted in the United States and as such U.S. law is applicable.)
  • In the source country of the artwork or sculpture, taking photographs of such works permanently located in a public place does not generally infringe on their copyright, under a principle known as "freedom of panorama".
  • In U.S. law there is no freedom of panorama for artwork or sculpture, and under the choice-of-law principle lex loci protectionis U.S. courts might apply U.S. freedom-of-panorama standards to this work, rather than the standards of the source country. However, in practice it is unsettled whether and how this approach would be applied in real world U.S. legal cases involving freedom-of-panorama elements.
The current policy on Commons is to accept photos of artwork and sculptures that are covered by freedom of panorama in their source country. This policy may change in the future, depending on the outcome of community discussions and new case law.
This is not a valid license tag on Commons; this file must be usable under freedom of panorama in its source country or it will be deleted.

català  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  македонски  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

So Sculptures cannot be licensed under CC properly. --Bielibob (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reason for deletion. That text block is only a hint that reusing this image in the US might result in some copyright issues. Images that fall under freedom of panorama in their source country are accepted on commons. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by А. Янышев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these are own work of uploader... highly variable sizes, and content, only 2 have camera meta data, no similarity of style, color, or white balance, probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by А. Янышев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Inconsistent or missing EXIF data (7 DSLR), user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serezha1999-35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bielibob as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (newer)scupltures do not come clearly under the freedom of panorama, creator is not only Bielibob, no permisson by artist, so this should be deleted Yann (talk) 01:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Why wouldn't this fall under FOP? This is in Germany. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about this?
Possibly copyrighted in the U.S.

This work may not be available under a free license in the United States because it is based on an artwork or sculpture that may be protected by copyright under U.S. law. (Commons is hosted in the United States and as such U.S. law is applicable.)
  • In the source country of the artwork or sculpture, taking photographs of such works permanently located in a public place does not generally infringe on their copyright, under a principle known as "freedom of panorama".
  • In U.S. law there is no freedom of panorama for artwork or sculpture, and under the choice-of-law principle lex loci protectionis U.S. courts might apply U.S. freedom-of-panorama standards to this work, rather than the standards of the source country. However, in practice it is unsettled whether and how this approach would be applied in real world U.S. legal cases involving freedom-of-panorama elements.
The current policy on Commons is to accept photos of artwork and sculptures that are covered by freedom of panorama in their source country. This policy may change in the future, depending on the outcome of community discussions and new case law.
This is not a valid license tag on Commons; this file must be usable under freedom of panorama in its source country or it will be deleted.

català  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  македонски  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

So Sculptures cannot be licensed under CC properly. --Bielibob (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FoP-Germany. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bielibob as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (newer)scupltures do not come clearly under the freedom of panorama, creator is not only Bielibob, no permisson by artist, so this should be deleted Yann (talk) 01:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Why wouldn't this fall under FOP? This is in Germany. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about this?
Possibly copyrighted in the U.S.

This work may not be available under a free license in the United States because it is based on an artwork or sculpture that may be protected by copyright under U.S. law. (Commons is hosted in the United States and as such U.S. law is applicable.)
  • In the source country of the artwork or sculpture, taking photographs of such works permanently located in a public place does not generally infringe on their copyright, under a principle known as "freedom of panorama".
  • In U.S. law there is no freedom of panorama for artwork or sculpture, and under the choice-of-law principle lex loci protectionis U.S. courts might apply U.S. freedom-of-panorama standards to this work, rather than the standards of the source country. However, in practice it is unsettled whether and how this approach would be applied in real world U.S. legal cases involving freedom-of-panorama elements.
The current policy on Commons is to accept photos of artwork and sculptures that are covered by freedom of panorama in their source country. This policy may change in the future, depending on the outcome of community discussions and new case law.
This is not a valid license tag on Commons; this file must be usable under freedom of panorama in its source country or it will be deleted.

català  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  македонски  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

So Sculptures cannot be licensed under CC properly. --Bielibob (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FoP-Germany. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sukhwinder singh djsam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Half are unused personal images, the other half are advertisements.

Basvb (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pics of IllumiNations: Reflections of Earth from 1 March 2015 Files

[edit]

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait of NN person Andre Engels (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Krd 07:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some person's dogs Andre Engels (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unspecified person making an unknown hand gesture Andre Engels (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, taken from offical website Antemister (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS required. --Krd 07:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait of NN person Andre Engels (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can find no evidence that this image is released under a CC license. Whpq (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not own work - http://cdn.bn.banglanews24.com/media/files/June_2015/June_07/bg_plz_590370844.jpg Whpq (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work but this uploader is using that for image uploads that are clear copyright violations. This looks to be a posed publicity shot. Whpq (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work but this editor has made the same claim for images which are clear copyright violations. This image looks iffy. The top right corner looks to have the remnants of some sort of watermark, and the cropping was done badly as the left edge shows an offset of the image. Whpq (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope (and the uploader is not an author) Pibwl (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused children's photo, out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, as well as other uploads File:Terrain Adventure Screenshot.png, File:Skeleton Hotel Logo.JPG Pibwl (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Homevisionsolutions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with descriptions bordering advertisement. More important there is no exif on these images and we would need permission given their professionality.

Basvb (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Homeandstyle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of the images by this user are uploaded with advertorial descriptions. Given the size, no exif and the professionality of the images it is likely that these image are made by a professional photographer and we would need permission to use them. If kept please remind me to fix the descriptions.

Basvb (talk) 11:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The credibility of this page is compromised with broken links to both Temperature and Sunspot data. 69.163.90.217 15:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons generally does not wade into such disputes. We are of the view that it is up to the local wikis if they want to include the map. See Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Magog the Ogre - file is (widely) in use and deletion reason is therefor invalid. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights infringement of this image. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion. No educational purpose. Fixertool (talk) 00:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader is not author, named author is subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, no description, no identification of this bird. Grand-Duc (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. MPF identified it as Jacana jacana. Nevertheless, there is no need for images without description and with such quality, especially if many better analogs exist. Stas (talk) 09:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Keep - it's poor quality, but there's many far, far worse pics on Commons (take a look through e.g. Category:Unidentified Laridae!); it is identified, and the locality is in the filename (just needs copying into the file description), so could be used for e.g. an article about the locality - MPF (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Description added - MPF (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Two of three points (description, ID) were treated, but I want to nevertheless upheld my DR. The wording of Commons:Project_scope#Discussion is clear: "New and existing files of poor or mediocre quality may or may not be realistically useful for an educational purpose depending on what they illustrate and what other files we have of the same subject. Where a subject is rare and/or difficult to capture, even a poor quality file may be of significant educational value, especially if Commons has very few or no similar files already. On the other hand, poor or mediocre files of common and easy to capture subjects may have no realistic educational value, especially if Commons already hosts many similar or better quality examples." Existing examples and bad quality should suffice for a deletion (and I'll take a look and those seagulls mentioned above...). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barmuta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mass copyvio of images published at http://ca-esquivel.wix.com (clearly not under CC license, as marked © 2015 esquivelfilm)

Tatewaki (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image of Rosalind Franklin is in copyright. Copy of version of w:File:Rosalind Franklin.jpg which is marked a copyrighted image. Compare with [3]. Other component images may also be non-free. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own works ? 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 08:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity image of non-notable person. Outside scope. Richard Avery (talk) 08:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 08:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usable quality

Avron (talk) 09:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work if the photograph was taken in 1940s 176.83.252.204 09:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use, CD cover 176.83.252.204 09:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

given description this image is used as advertisement, own work questionable Basvb (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by PierreSelim: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Homeandstyle

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear advertisement Basvb (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omo Obatalá (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused selfies of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears not to be freely licensed despite the Flickr CC-BY-SA license claim. According to the metadata: "PHOTO: DOES NOT HAVE UNLIMITED USE ! ! ! [...] For 3. party users: This picture has limited publication rights. Please call +4790025255 / +4722360300 or send an e-mail to foto@kolonihaven.no in order to ensure that you may print the image." Kjetil_r 14:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure how you find this information. When I go to the Flickr page ([4]) and click on the licensing, I come to a CC BY-SA 2.0 explanation. I do not claim that you are wrong, only that I did not find that information when I transfered the file to Commons, and that I still do not see it. If this is the case, then the licensing is wrong, and it should be deleted from Commons. It must be said, however, that whoever uploaded the file to Commons had made it difficult to understand what license is right if both what you are quoting and the CC BY-SA information is given... 3s (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Click "Show EXIF", and you'll see it. See also a screenshot here. And I certainly don't blame you for for not spotting it, it took me a while to see it as well. Regards, Kjetil_r 20:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. That's a well hidden warning! I agree with your nomination for deletion, as the licensing for this Flickr upload is too blurry for the file to be used on Commons. I'm sorry for not noticing it when I transfered the file to Commons. I acted in good faith, and really had no idea that there could be any problem with the file. 3s (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the first two -- the Flickr license is clear. The metadata does not contradict it -- a CC-BY-SA license does have restrictions and the comments in the EXIF are entirely consistent with them. On the other hand, I have deleted the third image. Commons has no place for faked up images of two people together that were not together when the photographs were taken. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • more files can be affected by this del req, however I haven't looked for them thoroughly.

I wanted to ask for the opinion. As the Legal Notice states ([5]): " is authorised, for personal use or for further non-commercial or commercial dissemination, provided that the entire item is reproduced". And, as I understand - if we have the clause " the entire item is reproduced" it is equal to non-derivative, hence not suitable for Commons. What do you think? Masur (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That's an ND license, which we do not permit. It also seems to be revocable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beaumonthealth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claims to have personally created these photographs, which seems unlikely based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and previous publications elsewhere. The uploader's name suggests that they may be a paid editor representing Beaumont Health, in which case they should read Commons:Guidance for paid editors.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CESDagency (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hadeel191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myavrum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EPFL-SB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Books. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prensacaracas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 derivative works and 3 out of scope unused personal images

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sacta777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Owning a paper copy of a photo in a family archive does not make you the owner of the copyright -- that almost always remains with the photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk 1

[edit]

Copyright violations, not own work. Many taken from here, therefore the rest also likely taken from other websites. All images are without EXIF data. File:Sorsogon Street Scene 1905.jpg is also claimed to be "own work", but is a photo by Harry Fowler Woods who died in 1955, so not yet PD.

P 1 9 9   13:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the first 9 files are clear copyright violations. The last two with a date of photography of 1905 are possibly in the public domain, but with the incorrect author and source claims this can not be verified. If those are reuploaded please provide the correct information.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lacks of sources for these photomontages

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeonorfolk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery of images is composed of images with "FBMD" in the meta, images which are smaller than facebook but not marked, images which are even smaller than that, maps, and the only unifying theme is the town where the pictures come from. It's highly unlikely that any single person took these images - especially as there are no camera meta data and the ones I checked of the right sizes had "FBMD" in meta, it's more likely they're culled from internet than own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking image, no metadata, rather low resolution. --Denniss (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking image, no metadata, rather low resolution. --Denniss (talk) 09:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from http://www.parati.com.ar/lo-nuevo/celebs/carina-zampini/16051.html Ytoyoda (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from the subject's Twitter avatar: https://twitter.com/leoleiterj Ytoyoda (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not facebook:  Delete --GeoTrinity (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет ссылки. Приведенной ссылки нет изображение. 109.252.101.165 04:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that it is in the public domain. Pre 1923 in US and pre 1917 in Russia {{PD-RusEmpire}}. What rule is it being PD because it is 130 years old based on? Rybkovich (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with heavy editing and unused mainly featuring the uploader: promotional content.

Basvb (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per What Wikimedia Commons is not this files are out of project scope COM:PS. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I can find nothing on this name in Google, other than website of uploader. Therefore: Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for all files at Category:Camaal Mustafa Sikander, which I propose we delete too. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    12:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Visibly all out of scope, as discussed in the previous debates above. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Also promotional description. Basvb (talk) 12:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eukoli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images/advertisement.

Basvb (talk) 12:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individuals. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. DAJF (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individuals. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly advertorial content, in use on user page namespace. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by PierreSelim: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Graphikamaal

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertorial content, the uploader has loads of images with issues (large watermarks etc.). Basvb (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by PierreSelim: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Graphikamaal

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well, it's not mine but i had the oral authorisation, we were in the same concert... But i didn't know how commons works, so, i haven't any right on it ! I will get another photo that i have took myself, it will be in lower quality but at least in public domain :/ (sorry !) GrandCelinien (talk) 13:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bielibob as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (newer)scupltures do not come clearly under the freedom of panorama, creator is not only Bielibob, no permisson by artist, so this should be deleted Yann (talk) 01:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No indication given why FOP wouldn't apply here. Bielefeld is in Germany and these statues don't usually move. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about this? {{Not-free-US-FOP}} So Sculptures cannot be licensed under CC properly. --Bielibob (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bielibob, I don't understand your point. The template you cited makes it clear that we do accept images of copyrighted works if FOP applies. The CC license applies to the photograph.
However there is the question if FOP does, in fact, apply. In Germany, the photographer must be standing in a public way, street or place. File:Gnadenstuhl StJodokus Bielefeld und Durchgang.JPG, shows the sculpture standing in a churchyard. In the subject image, the photographer's shadow makes it clear that he or she is standing quite close to the sculpture -- almost certainly within the churchyard, which is not a place that qualifies for FOP.
I'm not closing this as a delete because I'd like Yann and PaterMcFly have a chance to comment. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep AFAIK, churchyards would qualify as a public place. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Basvb (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly cropped. Out of scope Rhadamante (talk) 01:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use as user page image. --Basvb (talk ) 16:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Basvb: a definitively blocked user, for vandalism... Rhadamante (talk) 04:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to renominate for that reason, I did not see it. It could be argued that the user page should first be deleted on enwiki, but I also don't see a problem about deleting it for the reason it is a non returning vandal. Next time please mention it in the request. Basvb (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful: oversized and overly denoised image out of a phone camera a bridge camera (bad quality in full res), likely a vanity by the owner of this cat, does not add enough to the extant collection of black-and-white patterned cats. Grand-Duc (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC). Grand-Duc (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's not a quality image, but it is not bad quality at all. --Basvb (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyright belongs to Jetwing hotels. Image unlikely to be "own work" as the uploader claims. Takeaway (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful due to bad quality (noise and sharpness, especially in comparison to the other stills in the category). Grand-Duc (talk) 02:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep At high resolution sure there is noise and sharpness issues, but at lower resolutions it is still relatively useful. There's only 4 photos of this aircraft in the museum. No real need to delete. 220.253.244.208 23:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Well, the wording of Commons:Project_scope#Discussion is nicely clear (emphasis added by me): "New and existing files of poor or mediocre quality may or may not be realistically useful for an educational purpose depending on what they illustrate and what other files we have of the same subject. Where a subject is rare and/or difficult to capture, even a poor quality file may be of significant educational value, especially if Commons has very few or no similar files already. On the other hand, poor or mediocre files of common and easy to capture subjects may have no realistic educational value, especially if Commons already hosts many similar or better quality examples." The file that I proposed for deletion does not compare well to those two: A, B. True those two are smaller, but the larger size of the nominee cannot be exploited due to its quality deficiencies. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Image is in scope and of good quality. Only four images exists of this plane in this museum so this is not an common subject and none at the same angle. Tm (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: quality is not perfect but ok. --Basvb (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to contain various screenshots from an unattributed source. Also out of scope. — ξxplicit 02:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used in article Drokas created by its subject, which was deleted over four years ago. Out of scope. — ξxplicit 02:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from http://allthingsdinkadzubur.blogspot.com/2013/09/dinka-dzubur-in-dige-fine-jewellery.html Ytoyoda (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...and that blog in turn probably got it from http://www.modamo.info/index.php/bh-moda/interview/8074-INTERVJU-Dinka-D%C5%BEubur,-glumica-i-manekenka (slightly higher resolution, earlier publication).  Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. LX (talk, contribs) 11:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 05:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Self-promotion of products Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A supposedly funny version of File:BurjKhalifaHeight.svg. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also a copyright infringement, as the uploader failed to credit Rama and Astronaut as required by the licensing terms. LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not so simple "PD-textlogo", above the TOO in my opinion. Fma12 (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps or other presumably non-free mapping service. LX (talk, contribs) 13:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text should be set using Wiki markup, not as an image. I recognize that this is in use, but that doesn't change the rule. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is it possible to use Wiki markup to write a text in devanagari? I mean that was not properly a text...
--DonatoD (talk) 16:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Granger: Just because it is in use, it mean it should be kept. Jim already said that he recognize that the file is in use. But he also said that text should be set using Wiki markup. Poké95 09:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, just because it's in use does mean that it should be kept. According to COM:INUSE, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose". —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 13:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource.
Therefore, this image is included in the excluded educational content, so it is out of scope. -- Poké95 10:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The text that you've quoted is followed by an exception: "Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects", which applies here, as the file is in use on other WMF projects. —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 13:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 16:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know whether this is a book cover or a poster, but the image appears on the Web without a free license. The uploader's username is same as the name on the image, but, of course, that proves nothing. It may also violate COM:ADVERT. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior (unused) duplicate (not editable text with typos) of multilingual File:TheTransneptunians 73AU.svg. (requested on De Graphic Lab) ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, keep redir (file dupe). --Wdwd (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo out of scope as advertisement Basvb (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational usability. Out of Com:Scope. Basvb (talk) 11:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational usability. Out of Com:Scope. Basvb (talk) 11:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Advert. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational usability. Out of Com:Scope. Basvb (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational usability. Out of Com:Scope. Basvb (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (complex logo). --Wdwd (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need evidence of permission send to Com:OTRS Basvb (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 20:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 11:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Seems to be a blue note album cover or inside booklet photo. Sylenius (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also delete the derivative works: File:Christophe Wallemme (cropped).jpg and File:Pierre de Bethmann (cropped).jpg. Thanks. Sylenius (talk) 12:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 12:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 12:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. An anonymous user, who may be the uploader, attempted to blank out the file description and replace it with "I WANT DEL All . I NOT SAVE PASS. I DEL GMAIL", which I presume means "I want to delete all my uploads (there is only one), but I do not remember my password, and I cannot access my GMail account." LX (talk, contribs) 12:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of possibly unfree software. Basvb (talk) 12:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots of derivatives, need lots of permissions. Basvb (talk) 12:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Basvb (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable educational use. Out of Commons:Scope. Also above TOO. Basvb (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, complex logo. --Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of low quality Basvb (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 12:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence from source page that image is licensed as claimed MilborneOne (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No OTRS ticket, no category, no personality rights box, plus an assumed copyvio. GeoTrinity (talk) 14:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: coopyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused inferior duplicate of File:Yandex.svgUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, unused text logo. --Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated "own work" which can't be true since it's a book cover. No permission to release it marked CC-BY-SA 4.0; clear copyvio/infringement, deletion debate in the German project pending for the corresponding article. GeoTrinity (talk) 14:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior file foramt, repaced by File:Coat of arms of Kazlu Ruda (Lithuania).png and File:Coat of arms of Kazlu Ruda (Lithuania).svgUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: logo/file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

becouse of not interested Hassankeinan (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

because of not interested Hassankeinan (talk) 15:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded and unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 20:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viveknama999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Vivek nama" claims own work on non-selfie photos of himself. Does he really own the photos, or did someone else take them? Cross-wiki upload for a spam page on English Wikipedia.

BethNaught (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photos, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this image does not add any value beyond countless nude images already present in Commons. Furthermore, the categorization that the creator User:Mmacbeth made seems suspect: he added the image to Category:Cristina, which is for a Brazilian city, and to Category:Mobile phones, although mobile phone is far from the focus of the image. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  KeepWith all due respect I'm not really sure what Mr. Polansky finds objectionable about this photograph. Doubtless there are many nude images in Wiki Commons, but there are many images of all types in Commons. If I'm not mistaken that is the purpose of Wiki Commons, to provide a repository of all types of images. The question of the "value" of any given image in Commons whether nude or not depends entirely on who is viewing that image. This woman "Cristina" is well known in the World Naked Bike Ride world. She participated in the London ride in 2010, 2012, and 2014 and gained some notoriety. The image has been removed from the categories Mr. Polansky finds objectionable. "Cristina" indeed is a city in Brazil, but it is also a city in Spain and a very common given name. --mmacbeth (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2016

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and other uploads by this user. Corporate documents. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iago brum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:07:58‎ (UTC)

???? What policy? --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete per com:personality rights Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
N.B.: The uploader commented on that page. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:09:01‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Subject request deletion. Per Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Removal_requests. (see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Megan Wacha 090712.jpg). --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:09:38‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:10:06‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:10:39‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:11:05‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete it is customary to delete upon photographer and subject request, especially when not in use. see also Commons:Personality rights

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:11:36‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC) please delete per megs and geraldshields11 Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastian Misico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 21:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Visualband (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artwork, not used, not in scope

Avron (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 08:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also photomontage without sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work ? Probably stolen from here: http://www.imam1.net/vb/showthread.php?t=20658 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 09:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 09:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission at the source provided, it is also a photo of a photo (DW). Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work ? 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 09:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photomontage without sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Domdomegg as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All other files of this uploader were stolen from the FaceBook and it's a slim chance that this one, considering its strange name and no EXIF, plus low quality is his work. I delete it according to the precautionary principle. As the uploader is Polish speaking, I will help him undelete it, if I'm proven to be wrong. --Masur (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since Casey Neistat isn't the uploader, we'd need a COM:OTRS permission for this image to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep. I'm the uploader who received the notice of license from the copyright holder directly. I've tagged the file OTRS pending and will request the email confirmation. Mrtea (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket:2016012910013972. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 06:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright Coda-UK 2005. All rights reserved worldwide 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 06:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright Coda-UK 2005. All rights reserved worldwide 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 06:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The label is prominent in the image, and it contains artwork that is likely copyrighted. We also have other acceptable images of Bay Rum so this isn't essential. Themightyquill (talk) 08:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Product packaging. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture seems to be recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no Freedom_of_panorama in Denmark for non-buildings. Uploader never answered question (User talk:Jensfoto) about creator of the depicted sculpture. Thereby, this image likely violates copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture seems to be recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no Freedom_of_panorama in Denmark for non-buildings. Uploader never answered question (User talk:Jensfoto) about creator of the depicted sculpture. Thereby, this image likely violates copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 11:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One source image has been deleted, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 11:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gerrit Rietveld has died in 1964. This chair is still copyrightable Basvb (talk) 11:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One source image had been deleted, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 11:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See talk. This map uses administrative divisions of other countries than Yugoslavia. No educational use whatsoever. Zoupan (talk) 10:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 15:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by File:Yugoslavia (1946-1990) location map.svg. I have replaced its former use. Zoupan (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of file uploaded in 2009: File:NSRW Tesla Nikola.jpg. Zoupan (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Normally you don't need a DR for a nearly identical duplicate - just mark it with the {{Dupe}} template. BMacZero (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license, copyvio, see en:File:Microsoft Project icon.png WindEwriX (talk) 20:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure succinic acid is snow-white. The picture is misleading due to pinkish color of the crystals. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a minor (in Italy) uploaded for an already deleted promotional page. No educational purpose then. Vituzzu (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Site states: © Copyright 2001-2013 Government of The Gambia. All Rights reserved. Gambiaisl (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Chaz Guse was given permission to use this file when he was invited by the Gambia President and commissioned to create the Kunta Kinte sculpture. This information can be verified directly with the office of the Gambian President.User:TheTroubadour


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 141119 (15759189331).jpg. No information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior unused copy of File:Wappen Landkreis Saalfeld-Rudolstadt.png and File:Wappen Landkreis Saalfeld-Rudolstadt.svgUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 21:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If inferior, there's no need to retain it, if usages updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 141215 (15575890597).jpg. No information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

given file description says it's "a first test". Unidentified building. Andre Engels (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in several sites and no OTRS release approval has been received for its release. It has no place in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Copyright holder photo: eytan@shouker.co.il" in metadata. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A "formal picture" without any OTRS release approval - it has no place in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "©Photo by Eytan Shouker +972-544-720027 " in metadata. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Thinkpinkfloyd.com logo is not free at source :http://www.thinkpinkfloyd.com/index.htm Yann (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Pink Floyd logo is (C). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Com:DW of Rocky movie The screen is quite blurry. Yann (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & promotional text in file template, including phone numbers and promotional contacts. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The medal's likeness can be assumed to be owned by the society that awards it, here: https://www.aps-spr.org/aps/awards/howland/. Nothing on that page suggests that the likeness has been released under a free license. Esrever (klaT) 02:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another low-focus, tightly-cropped, low res photo from user with history of poorly sourced photos. The uploader has claimed to be using a Galaxy phone, though unclear how no EXIF data is available despite using a fairly advanced smartphone. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - this image is listed as "own work, public domain", but it obviously isn't. It is an image from the original 1975 product brochure. You can see a copy of the full brochure at the foot of this page. I'm new to Commons procedure, so I hope I have filed this req for deletion correctly. Strolls (talk) 02:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-claimed work, but is taken from File:YG Entertainment building.jpg. Additionally, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for modern buildings. — ξxplicit 02:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO. Logo. The web where de logo was taken says: "© 2003 Copyright CAMBIO".--Roblespepe (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyright violation since the "logo" is only text with no specific format or copyrighted design applied. That's the reason of the "PD-textlogo" and "trademarked" licenses. The fact that a website have a copyright notice doesn't mean that the non-original images/logos should have that copyright too (a thing of common sense, you know?). Also, it falls under COM:TOO (same case, i.e., almost exactly as the Boeing logo presented at the beginning of the COM:TOO article). --Sfs90 (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. This is a computer-generated image that would require considerable expertise and data to generate. Possible source on Arizona State University website [7]. Uploader has uploaded several other images related to Rosalind Franklin that are clear copyright violations. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 필요하지 않아 삭제 요청합니다. Ojye00 (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inaccurate representation of the state size. sısɐuuǝɔıʌ∀ (diskuto) 08:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. She died in 1936! 176.83.252.204 09:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:E545:1A7:83C4:85D6 09:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work if it was taken in 1933 176.83.252.204 09:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is an artwork from the Austrian painter Martina Schettina - see other files on wikicommons Fishbone16 (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Here is the work given permission by the painter herself: [8] it is not ! an own work from Mr. Alex W --Fishbone16 (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to upload another copy of it claimed as own work when we have a validly licensed image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO. Logo. The logo is property of Propuesta Republicana party. The uploader do not represents Propuesta Republicana.--Roblespepe (talk) 09:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyright violation, since the logo it's only text and simple shapes (PD-shape and PD-textlogo), it falls under COM:TOO (same case, i.e., as the Boeing logo presented at the beginning of the COM:TOO article). --Sfs90 (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One source image had been deleted, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 11:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & file is unused anyway. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quiero cambiar la foto Hibiscus7 (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 14:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although we know this is from before 1965, that is far too recent to assume that the artist has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could very well be published early 1900s or pre 1900, early 1900s would be my first guess, but that's difficult as I'm not familiar with the culture/content. Basvb (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article created by a sockpuppet of Giovannigiulio - please see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Giovannigiulio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.18.28.133 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-23T21:30:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Image was of statues/manniquens of Aliens characters. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that this is entirely his or her own work, which seems questionable. The photo in the top right appears to have been grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/visitisrael/7368136310. Also, such promotional content is not realistically useful for educational purposes and is therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 16:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & collages require separate uploads. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is used on user page however user page images are allowed for contributors, all the contributions of the user are only for self promotion. Out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette enluminure provient d'une archive familiale qui m'appartient. Elle peut donc rester publiée. Merci. Jacques du Merle, 25 janvier 2016

1900 drawing without an clear author and origin : no proof that this is in PD Mel22 (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly no selfie and no permission nor valid author of this picture present. Also no exif data MoiraMoira (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person that uploaded the photo to Wikiportret.nl, didn't ask the subject for permission. The photo was meant to stay private (according to the subject). So as a courtesy for the subject, please delete the photo. I uploaded the photo based on the upload from Wikiportret and I have no objections. Mbch331 (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support - as requested by both the "uploader" to WikiPortret and as it seems the depicted person as well. Besides that, the image is not really useful for a serious encyclopedia. Edoderoo (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject of the photograph is a video game, which is not release under a free license czar 18:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is uploaded without transparency, and so not used in the book on nl.wikisource WeeJeeVee (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheWhosVevo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope and derivative works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as image tagged "www.indianwildlifephotographer.com", Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by original File:Nikola Tesla Manufacturer & Builder.gif Zoupan (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, File:Nikola Tesla, The Manufacturer & Builder, edited.jpg.--Zoupan (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently scan, unknown authorship, out of scope anyway Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently scan, unknown authorship, doesn't seem too encyclopedic anyway Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no usable quality, no educational purpose Avron (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking image, no metadata, rather low resolution. --Denniss (talk) 09:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after analyzing contributions of the user (posters, watermarked files, all claimed own work), I decided, that the user is not trustable. Taivo (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking image, no metadata, rather low resolution. --Denniss (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after analyzing contributions of the user (posters, watermarked files, all claimed own work), I decided, that the user is not trustable. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking image, no metadata, rather low resolution. --Denniss (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after analyzing contributions of the user (posters, watermarked files, all claimed own work), I decided, that the user is not trustable. Taivo (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Musicianseditor called it own work, but the file is used in a draft in en.wiki, which claims "Photo by Toby Moors". No evidence, that they are the same person. Taivo (talk) 21:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Musicianseditor called it own work, but the file is used in a draft in en.wiki, which claims "Photo by Toby Moors". No evidence, that they are the same person. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 01:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Musicianseditor called it own work, but the file is used in a draft in en.wiki, which claims "Photo by Toby Moors". No evidence, that they are the same person. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Musicianseditor called it own work, but the file is used in a draft in en.wiki, which claims "Photo by Toby Moors". No evidence, that they are the same person. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark © Archivos estatales mecd 176.83.252.204 09:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've seen this file by chance and I have some remarks to make
    * The seal dates from the 1820s-1830s. I bit more than the 70 years after the death of the author, whoever (s)he was.
    * The seal is a public document.
    Other writings on the original document lack originality (who's copyrighted "106"?)
    * On a paper with these elements, somebody has place a copyright sign. The copyright of what? Of a seal from Fernando VII's time? Of some hand written words the so-selfproclaimed owner of the copyright didn't write? The copyright claim is invalid unless proven otherwise. B25es (talk) 11:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per B25es. Copyright has expired. Taivo (talk) 21:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Schister (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipüedia, except userpage in de.wiki and uploading some personal files, whish are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his/her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the book is written in Czech (or Slovak) language. There are numbers 1968 and 1970 on first page, so probably the book is younger and cannot be free due to age. No evidence, that uploader is the author. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by owner (Eupedia.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T13:46:38‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader Matias. S. Cutri called it own work, but author is Eupedia. The license is definitely wrong. Taivo (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by owner (Eupedia.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T13:45:54‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader Matias. S. Cutri called it own work, but author is Eupedia. The license is definitely wrong. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочная загрузка — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabota 13 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-20T17:26:03‎ (UTC)


 Kept, the file is used and cannot be deleted on that reason. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочная загрузка — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabota 13 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-20T17:29:06‎ (UTC)


 Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre Engels (talk • contribs) 2016-01-19T15:03:30‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work, compare File:Gjergj Fishta 1932.JPG and this. Altinzefi refers to his family archive as a source of the image but it remains unclear whether he inherited the copyright or just a physical copy of the photo. Judging from the title, this was taken during Fishta's exile in Italy and if it was first published there, {{PD-Italy}} would apply and probably {{PD-1996}} too. De728631 (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I think, that De728631 said proper licenses for the photo. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One source image had been deleted, compromising the whole collage. Collage is in high use so one should try to replace the image or the collage. Denniss (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just uploaded another version of the collage, having replaced the deleted source image with another properly licensed one. I hope the copyright issue is fixed now. --Xabier Armendaritz (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Xabier Armendaritz, as this stands it must be deleted. You cannot put a CC-BY license on a collage that includes CC-BY-SA images -- the license on the collage must be the most restrictive of the license on any of the constituents. If you change the license (which only you can do), I think we can keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. The license is CC-BY-SA now. --Xabier Armendaritz (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One source image had been deleted, compromising the whole collage Denniss (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adjutor101 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: uploader wants it removed. Once I declined speedy deletion, because uploader cannot usually remove any its uploads. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Bhagavad Gita is much older than the concept of copyright, so it never had one in Sanskrit. These, however, are English translations. Translations have copyrights. Without evidence that their copyrights have expired or a free license from the translators, we can't keep these on Commons.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Display issues: check out the right side of his face compared to File:George Washington Carver by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg - it lacks an embedded colour profile and so glitches in a way that makes it unusable.

That might be alright, but this is meant to be an "original" file, but changes the format. File:George Washington Carver by Frances Benjamin Johnston - Original.tif is the actual original file (admittedly, with the same glitch).

Between the two issues, I can't see this being useful to anyone. One could upload a JPEG version with the colour profile added - but who, exactly, would it be for? Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Its a .jpg version of File:George Washington Carver by Frances Benjamin Johnston - Original.tif uploaded 8 years ago. The tiff version is usefull for display, see COM:TIFF. I created the .jpg from the .tiff file long time ago with simple software, if the full size .jpg has errors you may created a new .jpg version from the .tiff file and overwrite it. --Martin H. (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Martin H.: Obviously, I'm not criticising it being uploaded at the time. TIFF display was only put in about 4 years ago, after all. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I don't see any reason for deletion. If there is any, please renominate with clear statement. --Krd 16:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]