Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 16th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation copyright source : http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Younes+Belhanda/Morocco+v+Cape+Verde+2013+Africa+Cup+Nations/gKjjv3daN72 Remy34 (talk) 07:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.elkhadra.com/news/21798 Remy34 (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.asmonaco.com/fr/joueur/fares-bahlouli-2356.html Remy34 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright https://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&biw=1440&bih=773&tbs=sbi%3AAMhZZivvnrzDgh3OCCwCqLha6sfzOgAMgxjaTvdqncHG1NPpGtMX0jQs2egSn2FtmOe_12jznmaKjPuc-q4yxOql0pd3YdBJExnrK8Cd6d0I3QDgmjfMDX7g2tFPjiJnWBBPFh3NMVgaozr5QASpviW48YTEqz5oBk68AyrHtywI4-XV3KM3PSHm3ETYI9iXEWcJidiXG1SpXOIlzNx5QX7e0-xhO3KdN-wrnyV5VY8-_1zkjFl-WTWyMFn57HltEfTS0X1WyeMHL8kYjecqVknTfar0CwxhMFMg6I-a1vicW4epMwwWy-mVB1A64xKMnDNfVBzduEoj24mERez9JA-vT9fU4-mfPqe--YFyU-9b0cZjZCvjKcnNkpOZI1DDBuGnrFAGO_14n5Vnnl6u0dkSunXaQGBdhz45KfV9yP35Siyahh7ZjWecan8w-hVDFli7OQXIw4EFofP0agf2cvJ4v_1qWbhVIqNYeNBhwMLRIx0C4Fqho4GhnlHXwzv9q7h2HTvxO3HL05uNotCEBL2jz8WWslrcY0uqaVPieIZLY32f2qlWrOuLqnikjeWIfJqPgUb5ltKBA-9QdgWJNjRlT876c6IrBOl7vhPlumgaX43Bo4jQhtiEM3iczWoTXW9-wjR-HHoRPiOVAVs2p0pwKNuHEcFQIZNda3mAC6tquFtg9QdZ7TL1RvzB7sto-wdV6Vre-G5RC3-_16xhMypWXMqcNFg95RgGcGbEGlIdoTKoPiheBNkR4bba78oUaWHkiYZ7b_1TdPdkCCo1OASs8wYpKlGtWFuOk13oiOXyYty5SFcsh-2wzJ-hUfO_12r0Lqn7a_1cBeRKfGMxtiDhxnWi0H-DYoEq8wtRkOBzh_1hhk7teJ42Cz9hsUwa-kAC14mnrvtwai2TQaGQlkgQ3---rAz8hGoTUXvndp5oxIHEV4aksqUSekHllHXQOFW8_1mDeE1IFG-OSdvVGPl-t-gTpqjWkwbNFTp_1PX3vi9wmFxfMx4hgHniXM3bfMipHuiwIcgBDNIeDEbGojNYft1MxJiYhboMUX7TbMDb-RmkhuFHxt8jPz3daHpBkZANI644r4JorihBIpw-Fy_1iF_1HJAX-wRTdD2QuDxl1X7ii2ZH6k5-8WsvRZjS2S-3FgsNPoT6SYswqS7pHkYofdvKe55yu8LZtMP6QtgTYiy0f5X6m1Ca6ks9Ywn3oh-kA3qatQLcYWRoy_13M7DGI9grEK_1RkDQ1dob9AUOuchgOaj-JPLIwLnYmhbSMO40XN8QThd9MrsaHUOmKFMNjjvOYmDvIUOuCAjbYrmp71njjcfMkLapHbuWT_1IUq-YbTrnxEzg29YcQKO59Qzqajb3SZ6QNRdOO-4YZKEdDVA4h8NHoJvv-hRwjYEinEoo9-WnnhX6N7M51ycABQUwuvDKbSUUmECUAr5dRQAHU-Wvv8522vRIsivMfxD2HhDDQVyErtmFxQU1eOMysv9_1CQsM&q=Lazaar+achraf&oq=Lazaar+achraf&gs_l=serp.12..0l2j0i22i30l8.23117.23117.0.24701.1.1.0.0.0.0.100.100.0j1.1.0....0...1c..64.serp..0.1.100.m-VaPQuntsc Remy34 (talk) 07:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted S. Plaine (discuter) 07:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.losc.fr/actualites-foot-lille/les-internationaux-lillois-sur-la-br%C3%A8che Remy34 (talk) 07:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.atlasinfo.fr/Le-Marocain-Abdelaziz-Barrada-nouveau-meneur-de-jeu-de-l-OM_a54750.html Remy34 (talk) 07:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.online-instagram.com/media/1015846256191449061_1957683304 Remy34 (talk) 07:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.sofoot.com/nabil-bentaleb.html S. Plaine (discuter) 07:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.algerie-focus.com/blog/2014/11/nouvelle-nomination-pour-yacine-brahimi/ S. Plaine (discuter) 07:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.feanonline.nl/nieuws/7864/geen-zorgen-om-ziyech-miljoenen-twente-heeft-geen-betalingsachterstand-.html copyright Remy34 (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2874959/Mehdi-Abeid-miss-five-games-Newcastle-United-selected-Algeria-s-Africa-Cup-Nations-squad.html S. Plaine (discuter) 07:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.competition.dz/article/51276/mehdi-tahrat-un-reve-de-gosse-qui-se-realise.html S. Plaine (discuter) 07:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.welovebuzz.com/les-10-footballeurs-dorigine-arabe-les-plus-sexy-de-lunivers/ S. Plaine (discuter) 07:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted : http://www.yabiladi.com/articles/details/36387/mercato-omar-kaddouri-interesse-l-om.html S. Plaine (discuter) 07:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyrighted (all contributions of this user are copyrighted) S. Plaine (discuter) 07:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A source of this picture is maybe here. It was made in 1981. Not PD in USA and China. Ashtray (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anaysports (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is the signature of a well known film and theatre director, and having it in public can effect misusages. Many thanks for your kind help in advance! Váradi Annamária (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Wikimedia Common's role to ensure that no misusage is done with its files. Many other famous and living people's signatures are online here, I don't see why this one in particular should be deleted. --K'm (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason to delete presented Pitke (talk) 15:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is the signature of a well known film and theatre director, and having it in public can effect misusages. I write you this on behalf of Kornél Mundruczó himself. We kindly ask you to remove his signature from Wikipedia! Thank you for respecting our wish and for helping us regarding that! Váradi Annamária (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC) Váradi Annamária (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Already nominated and resolved as kept. Signature is not protected by copyright, therefore, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le nom est insultant pour une marque 78.216.134.163 19:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We can rename files. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Philmonte101 (talk) 23:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Request. Unused and uploaded today. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion of a poor quality image that is demeaning to the subject. There is nothing in the article that says that this moment is in any way significant or typical for the subject. Sjö (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is purposely being uploaded on behalf of the Sheriff's opponent by Jwes115 to slander the Sheriff leading up to his October 24th 2015 election. Please remove immediately. JohnWesleyHampson (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of own work, image is widely available on the internet. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no proof of licensing for use on Wikipedia Commons. Livelikemusic (talk) 23:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, fair use is prohibited in Commons. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images and songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photos of the user to show them in the gallery in the personal space. Wiki is not a hosting.

Bilderling (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Şəkildə göründüyü kimi, şəkillər mənə məxsusdur. Sadiq Fəyyazov isə mənim qardaşımdır. Как вы видети на картинке, фотографии принадлежат мне. Садиг Фаязов - мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted Sadiq Fayyazov is uploader's Masalli qasimli's brother. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: commons is not a webhost. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Passport scans of a granddaddy - sensitive data

Bilderling (talk) 08:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bu fayllar mənə və mənim ailəmə məxsusdur. Sadəcə faylları mənə qardaşım göndərib. Эти файлы принадлежат мне и моей семье. Просто эти файлы отправил мне мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is passport of Soviet Union. Soviet Union does not exist since 1991. All those data are public and do not consist any secret, also during more than 25 years from issuing some data in the passport aren't correct anymore. Being more specific, the passport belongs to person, who was born in 1921 and died in 1998, so his privacy does not need to be protected very much. The files are used in az.wiki in article nameroom, so they are in scope too. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope, fan art, some derivative works, videos with non free sounds/music and in some pictures the author seems to be the subject of the photograph.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bu fayllar mənə məxsusdur. Eyni zamanda meta məlumatlar da qeyd olunub. Silinməyə heç bir səbəb yoxdur. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These files belong to me. At the same time, meta data, and records were. Delete there is no reason. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think private pictures in user pages should be kept in the minimum. Having said that general opinion (that we can delete "excess" personal files although used in user space) we must check if some of these files are used here and there, in pages not belonging to users. (For example the last file...) --E4024 (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no english language. Yes Azerbaijani, Turkish and Russian language. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you please do not delete these photos as this photos was done by me and genuine.

--Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • E4024, teşekkür ediyorum. Ama ben özel hayatımı kimsenin önüne sermiyorum. Yuxarıda olan dosyaları sile bilirsiniz ama, bu

dosyalar az vikide makaleler için çok önemli. Lütfen o dosyaları silmeyin. Hürmetle: --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun imzası.png ({{PD-trivial}}, in use in az.wikipedia), File:Images.PO.jpg (plausibly an own photo / похоже на собственную фотографию).
 Delete 13 files above as deception / обман / kandırma. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вот именно Images.PO.jpg только и является собственной работой. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: what do you mean with «deception»? -- Tuválkin 09:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin: I mean forgery of authorship records. A ≈ 14-years-old youth claiming authorship of photographs made decades ago. Are you happy with all this rampage of deceptive forgers (like this) on Commons?! Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: thanks for explaining your apparently random accusation; it’d be good to be clear the first time around. And of course I’m not happy with uploaders being deceptive, why should I? -- Tuválkin 10:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incnis Mrsi, Так они все является собственной работай. В том числе: File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg --Masalli qasimli (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg является сканом старой фотографии, а старая фотография не могла быть сделана юношей, позирующим с надписью «Азербайджан». Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Incnis Mrsi, I did not cheat. When i was a kid shot this picture. Poor english language.

Tuvalkin, I thank colleagues. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incnis Mrsi, Mən heç kimi aldatmıram. Mən uşaq olanda çəkilib o şəkil. İngilis dilini zəif bilirəm.

Tuvalkin, Təşəkkür edirəm həmkar. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The 2 keep "votes" were for DW that were claimed as own work but had no proper source and author. P 1 9 9   19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a blue thing, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a semi-transparent jigsaw piece used to modify the Wikipedia logo from my user page or talk page there, and so needs to be uploaded to either here or Wikipedia (which I believe only hosts images to be used in the encyclopedia itself). I know it won't reach Featured Picture status, but it's still valuable to me, and, following COM:INUSE it falls within scope by custom, as do other freely-licensed user-space images. ‑‑mjgilsonT (formerly editing as user:xensyria) 16:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not in use, but we will give User:Mjgilson some time to put it to use. P 1 9 9   13:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion request by creator/uploader. File no longer in use, as new SVG version uploaded at File:Yodin Wiki Piece.svg. ‑‑mjgilsonT 23:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Ankry (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful 105.66.26.139 00:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful 105.66.26.139 00:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful 105.66.26.139 00:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kunalverma800 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is composed by this files:


Kept: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed under a free license). Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Como puedes culpar alguien si no tienes ninguna prueba? Has encontrado en otro lugar estas imagenes?

Como respuesta te mostrare los archivos, pero es injusto lo que estas haciendo.

--Bogdan Muraru (talk) 07:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by a sock operator, Kulvir97, who is trying very hard to spam his useless blog at the English Wikipedia. Articles created on this subject have been deleted and salted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files are post 1923, and thus probably in copyright in the United States. Elcock died in 1952, so he's also in copyright in the UK. Some files might be valid for fair use on English Wikipedia, but they can't be hosted here.

Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahim Jahaani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Rahim Jahaani (serial copyright violator: Panoramio/Facebook grabber/file cropper & watermark remover). All-he-can-get-grabber for en:Faisalabad, uploaded in a row on 19.09.2015.

Gunnex (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eventually related: Sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:JunaiPatak + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. Gunnex (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pcitures are mine!!! You deleted them all?? --Rahim Jahaani (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about... (example) File:Faisalabad City Holiday Snaps 14.jpg, uploaded by you in 09.2015, but already published via (example) https://www.facebook.com/FaisalabadRocksOfficial/photos/pb.162944590414245.-2207520000.1445362442./572087712833262/?type=3&theater (© by "Faisalabad Rocks" in 2013? Gunnex (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Or File:Faisalabad City Holiday Snaps 12.jpg + File:Faisalabad City Holiday Snaps 13.jpg --> same procedure, previously published via https://www.facebook.com/FASTfsd/photos/a.693473390685526.1073741859.352301768136025/693477894018409/?type=3&theater and https://www.facebook.com/FASTfsd/photos/a.693473390685526.1073741859.352301768136025/693478460685019/?type=3&theater (both: 2013, © by "FAST-NU, Chiniot-Faisalabad Campus"). Gunnex (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nayaab Bibi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bilal Raja Nazeem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem (serial copyright violator: Facebook/Panoramio/Flickr/etc. grabber, file cropper/watermark remover). See also (eventually related) mass copyvioer User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:CharlieButton1 + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:Trevor Qubec + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Update: Appears to be a sockfarm...

Gunnex (talk) 23:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Philmonte101 (talk) 23:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CharlieButton1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing (Facebook) EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:CharlieButton1 (serial copyright violator). Most likely part of a sockfarm via User talk:PGLIqbal + User talk:Rahim Jahaani + User talk:Chaudry Liaqat + User talk:Bilal Raja Nazeem + User talk:RanaNadeem444 + User talk:Payyal Gujjar + User talk:Trevor Qubec + User talk:Rabiya Kareem + User talk:Patak Jalander + User talk:MochiSardar + User talk:KalaShah112345 + etc. = all uploads related to en:Faisalabad, a city in Pakistan.

Gunnex (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahir007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: taken from facebook Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV, EXIF says AP-Photo Xgeorg (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 13:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not only is this from 1923, so probably not out of copyright in the U.S., but Elcock died in 1952, so it is not out of copyright by PD-Old-70 either. I believe all the images in Category:Howard Elcock will fail by the same logic, will double check at home Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1952? Link for bio? --Rumensz (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.artbiogs.co.uk/1/artists/elcock-howard-keppie I'd suggest reuploading anything being used on English Wikipedia (within reason) there with a fair use rationale. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
May as well roll this into Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Howard Elcock - I had hoped some of the files would predate 1923, and thus be a special case. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Krd 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DannyMossori (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. PS: Mostly (if not all) grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/JaamalNomad/photos_stream

Gunnex (talk) 18:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by VR0 as Fair use (fair use) Yann (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a waterrmark copyright notice, naming a creator, who is apparenly not the uploader Andy Mabbett (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:DW. Stefan4 (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aftab.Sind (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Aftab.Sind / logs (serial copyright violator: Panoramio/Flickr grabber + file cropper and watermark remover)

Gunnex (talk) 19:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be in scope. Stefan4 (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Consists of four images. Individual images seem to exist in higher resolution elsewhere[1][2][3] which puts doubt on the own work claim. Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a license laundering, This photograph (Final Embrace) is taken by Taslima Aktar, was awarded third prize in the World Press Photo third prize (single) in the 'spot news category' ~ Nahid Talk 20:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly doubt if this image is taken by the uploader. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly doubt if this image is taken by the uploader. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaqueagency (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelrodrigues87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from book or newspaper, no permission. Yann (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaimedavila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable official match photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, obvious crop of probable professional team portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. missing EXIF, thumbnail-format, Roland zh (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, as per File:Lawrence Mukkuzhy.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown copyright 105.66.26.139 03:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 105.66.26.139 04:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

my picture 105.65.253.101 11:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you have choice to remove my picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noskilomaticha (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis Raymond Depardon et je ne veux pas que cette photo me représente Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What? Can you say it in English please? Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Google Translation: "I am Raymond Depardon and I do not want this photo represents me" Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: File widely in use, including Wikidata, so a courtesy deletion is very hard. If you're actually Raymond Depardon, please contact to the photographer (who hold the Copyright, that is not the same than the Personality rights), considering that CC licenses are irrevocable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Il faudrait d'abord savoir ce qui pose problème dans cette photographie : a priori, je ne vois pas de problème. O.Taris (talk) 14:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The same user claims to be at the same time Raymond Depardon and Claudine Nougaret. Yann (talk) 21:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nous sommes Claudine Nougaret et Raymond Depardon et nous ne voulons pas que cette photo nous représente Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The same user claims to be at the same time Raymond Depardon and Claudine Nougaret. Yann (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cornava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status considering modern artworks by several painters, needing permission:


Gunnex (talk) 10:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Materialscientist. Yann (talk) 21:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. the source link don't work. 2. facebook content is copyrighted --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : very small image without EXIF, the only upload of the user --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Selfie used in repeatedly-deleted en:Smeezy Carter JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not simple enough for PD, no evidence for permission to release as CC. Should be hosted (moveable?) on en-Wiki. GermanJoe (talk) 11:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Commons is not a phot album Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - the photograph is now in use by the uploader. Oddly, the caption for the photograph is "hermosa", meaning "pretty." Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of being taken in a public place or of subject's consent to publication for free reuse. Description "eawzsrxfvybh" is insufficient to help decide if the image is in scope. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walid aissani dz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ganunankaayo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sasasaul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scan of a magazine or newspaper, ownership uncertain. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture already seems to have been distributed elsewhere in 2009, two years before it was uploaded here. Stefan4 (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a photo screenshot of a book given the source information, and thus a derivative work. I don't have access to that work, is there evidence that the underlying work is freely licensed or PD? PS: If this file is free after all en:File:Julio_Ramón_Ribeyro.jpg should probably be tagged as {{subst:rfu|reason=Commons file on the same topic and under the same namewas deemed a free image}}, otherwise the shadowscommons tag removed Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE (assuming the uploader even took it - no metadata, small size.) Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of man in figurative teeshirt. DW on the teeshirt art and out of COM:SCOPE, just another guy standing in front of what could have been a nice photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this Facebook sized image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published: Facebook, Twitter, photobucket (see source) Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of poster behind men, Notice Non-sense description and fiel title. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of poster at center of image. Notice nonsense title and description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

falsche Beschriftung, nicht in cancun dronepicr (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The shown painting on the stamp itself is copyrighted, look at http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Bilderstrecken/Sondermarken/Programm_2012/Januar12Bildergalerie.html?notFirst=true&docId=204696&countIx=2. Copyright holder is Kerstin Enderlein, who was alive in this year, look http://www.kerstin-enderlein.de/index.php/impressum. So it can't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 09:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not create the award in the picture - also no metadata. COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Wdwd (talk) 23:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused receipt of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 23:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sysop Yann think it could use {{PD-textlogo}}.But I think it is a logo of a company,and its copyright belongs to this company.Also it part of this. Stang 15:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clear PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: simple enough for pd-textlogo. Wdwd (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noble ADOUNKPE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ies, i just read your reasons for suggesting these photos as deletable. Yes, they are low quality, private images and so on. Fact is that this is my first time ever even opening a Wikimedia account; first time adding photos for this type of competition. A real pain even finding the edit button to give my opinion and respond to this. I've been on your page and seen the merits and all (8 years), good!! Fact is once again that, not like you i don't have a high quality webcam or camera nor have i tried this before... Newbie, no experience...

This is Africa, i am African and this was my way of showing it.. Personal, okay, i admit it was a selfie, but i wanted it to mostly reflect the clothing thus titling it Local Sunday and describing it as Beninese Local/Traditional Clothing. Well, thanks for the discouragement.


Deleted: private photos, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 23:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Camille Pissarro - L´Oise à Pontoise temp gris - 1876.jpg, heavily cropped. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, dupilcate image, +redir.Wdwd (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: architecture by Vinko Glanz (d. 1977).

Eleassar (t/p) 12:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure why these fotos have to be deleted. Is there a law against taking fotos of public buildings?--Trygve W Nodeland (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in the case the architect died after 1945. The copyright expires in 70+1 year after their death. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, per nom.Wdwd (talk) 23:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of Commons. The building is copyrigted to Vinko Glanz (d. 1977). See COM:FOP Slovenia.

Eleassar (t/p) 19:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by Category:Vinko Glanz (1902–1977).

Sporti (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a film poster, and is over threshold of originality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivate work. no permission. Wdwd (talk) 23:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a person who died in 1991. No reason to assume that the photographer died more than 70 years ago. Stefan4 (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. +unknown author, unknown date of photograph. Wdwd (talk) 23:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice overprinting at bottom right of image. Without source or author, it is impossible to verify license which claims author has been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no author, unclear source. Unknown copyright status. per com:pcp Wdwd (talk) 23:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

soll neu eingegeben werden Wilfried Wulf (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean upload a new version? Then, please use Upload new version of this file instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He is a new user. Now I help him. I repair all information at this image. It is an old postcard, so it is public domain. Don't delete the images. -- sk (talk) 14:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dibashthapa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality, unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's contrubution (a conctruction company). Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable organization is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DarxMaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Includes big poster in the background which copyright are unknown, fair use picture are not allowed in Commons

Motopark (talk) 11:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brunomoos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JuTa Alan (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Saint-Saëns is dad in 1979. No FoP in France. 82.124.62.146 14:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of painter who was alive in 1990, not dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US. This image shows an artwork outside a gallery. The artwork is not attributed, the image dates to 1968 so artist cannot have been dead 70 years if the work was in progress in 1968. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:ME VERÁS VOLAR.wav.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : for the people images : no quite notable musical band/unused personal images, for the artworks: lacks of permissions/unused personal images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex logo, above Com:TOO (shading, gradients) Revent (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I converted this because it's one of those 'odd' British cases.. I entirely agree that this is probably copyrightable under UK law, but I don't think it's really a 'speedy'... because the UK is wierd, I'm not crazy about not seeking multiple opinions. If someone cares to close this quickly, though, I won't object... it's just the the normal interpretation of the 'TOO' is not really suited for British copyrights. Revent (talk)
I tend to agree that the logo is above TOO but a regular DR seems indeed better than a speedy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 07:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No objections, your honor. :-) IMHO way above what we can get away with in Britain. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfortunately above the very low TOO in the UK (and this is a British company). BrightRaven (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque realicé mal los pasos 3-030 7º DE CABALLERÍA (talk) 00:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure to understand the rationale of the nomination however there is not FOP for sculptures in Argentina --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be the source, though more likely that it's a news photo based on quality and low resolution. No evidence of ownership. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source's license is cc-by-nc-nd—those last two clauses are not compatible with Commons. – czar 04:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality personal photo, unused. out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Sanandros (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Sanandros (talk) 06:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Sanandros (talk) 06:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Madge Tennent (1889 in Dulwich, London – 1972 in Honolulu) has not been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Sanandros (talk) 06:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt auch eine Kategorie mit gleichem Namen. In dieser Kategorie ( Category:Südfriedhof Leipzig) befinden sich ebenfalls Grabstättenfotos. Besser?: die Fotos von dieser Seite mit in die Kategorie verschieben? Oder dort eine Kategorie mit Grabstätten anlegen? Canon55D (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Eine Kategorei macht eine Gallerie nicht obsolet. Sanandros (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Win 724C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these four images was taken by uploader. No metadata, very small and variable sizes, subject matter, etc. More likely COM:COPYVIOs from unnamed sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fingal8888444 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical images. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from here, no evidence of ownership or license. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing to add: That said, the EXIF data credits Danny Meyer, who appears to have been a photographer for the Air Force Academy around the same time and the photograph might be in public domain, but I haven't been able to locate the photo anywhere other than fanbase.com, a crowd sourced site. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently the uploader didn't think this was worth keeping. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SDSS isn't NASA. Their image use policy is free for non-commercial use only - http://www.sdss.org/collaboration/#image-use --ghouston (talk) 02:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: License is now OK. Yann (talk) 01:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bicause it is not properly shown. Digambarmaharaj2015 (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bicause it is not properly shown Digambarmaharaj2015 (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bicause it is not properly shown Digambarmaharaj2015 (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bicause it is not properly shown Digambarmaharaj2015 (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source has a cc-by-nc-3.0 license—the "nc" part being incompatible with Commons. – czar 04:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Armação dos Búzios regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Armação dos Búzios emancipated in 1995 (see also http://www.buzios.rj.gov.br/historia_municipio.aspx), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Carapebus regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Carapebus emancipated in 1997, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Carapebus regarding official symbols

[edit]

Per prrevious DR (see above).

Gunnex (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cardoso Moreira regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Cardoso Moreira emancipated in 1993 (see also http://www.cardosomoreira.rj.gov.br/portal/nossa-historia-pagina-7-2-7), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Coat of arms and flag were created — per http://www.cardosomoreira.rj.gov.br/portal/simbolos-oficiais-pagina-8-2-8 — by municipal law "Lei nº 004/93, em 22 de abril do ano de 1993" (22.04.1993), a work by "Aílton Nunes Guimarães and José Natalício Gouveia Gonçalves". Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Iguaba Grande regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Iguaba Grande emancipated in 1995 (see also http://www.iguaba.rj.gov.br/2015/a-cidade/historia/), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Here created — per http://www.iguaba.rj.gov.br/2015/legislacoes/lei-ordinaria/ — by municipal law no. 63 on 20.10.1997 ("INSTITUI O BRASÃO E A BANDEIRA DO MUNICÍPIO DE IGUABA GRANDE, E DÁ OUTRAS PROVIDÊNCIAS"). Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"A drawing […] by Philippe Geluck" (not by Algo), likely copyrighted by the band or the cartoonist Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be free. Spamer's. Bilderling (talk) 09:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Above TOO Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis claudine Nougaret et je demande le retrait de cette photo Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello : I am the photographer of this picture taken during a public event. At this time, I don'now that Madam Nogaret was hill, I have no opinion about the validity of the request in deletion but I apologize if I have caused any dammage to Caudine Nogaret.
  • Bonjour, je suis le photographe auteur de ces images prises lors d'une manifestation publique. A ce moment, je ne savais pas que madame Nogaret était malade. Je n'ai pas d'avis au sujet de la validité d'une demande en suppression mais je présente mes excuses à madame Nogaret si j'ai pu lui causer involontairement un quelconque dommage. - Siren-Com (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Siren-Com: Vu que cette image n'est pas utilisée, je propose de la supprimer par courtoisie si vous êtes d'accord. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Je ne vois pas d'obstacle à la voir supprimer, ainsi que les autres représentant C.Nougaret, mais je suis opposé à la suppression de celle de monsieur Depardon, lui même photographe, cela me semble excessif et peu réaliste. (j'aimerai qu'une page globale sur les 6 ou 7 suppression soit ouverte afin qu'on y voit plus clair et que le débat soit lisible) - Siren-Com (talk) 22:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


je suis claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cdette photo soit publiée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 15:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jesuis Claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cette photo de moi prise quand j'étais très malade soit montrée cette photo me porte préjudice Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je suis Claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cette photo prise quand j'étais très malade soit montrée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

je suis claudine Nougaret et je ne veux pas que cette photo soit publiée Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis Raymond Depardon photographe et je ne veux pas que cette photo me représente Palmeraieetdesert (talk) 09:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vous ne pouvez être à la fois Raymond Depardon et Claudine Nougaret. Merci de ne pas vous faire passer pour qui vous n'êtes pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After deleting other uploads of the user speedily, this is the last. Maybe the file is enough old for public domain. But who is the photographer and when (s)he died? Also Santa Cruz de Tenerife is situated in Spain, so not 70, but 80 years from death is needed. Or OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: File:The Tinker Bell Triplet.jpg. The file is bigger than proposed replacement, maybe the other file should be deleted instead. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: HAs been here since 1007 Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image is not own work. If this image is not own work, this image is a copyvio (except if the image source is in public domain or licensed in a free license) Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you show me an evidence that the images in your collage comes from Commons? Also, you need to provide a link and the author of the original file if it comes from Commons. Thanks. Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nancy Lara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely own works considering User talk:Nancy Lara = mostly deleted per copyvio on 09.10.2015 and reuploaded on same day, like [4] + [5] + etc. Most likely sockpuperty involved considering Petterson009 (talk · contributions · Statistics) / logs.

Gunnex (talk) 11:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, photoshopped, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 12:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.papaworldtour.com/ PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality concern (Non free at Engllish Wikipedia). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Fair use (Fair use). Does it surpass threshold of originality? Taivo (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that football uniforms, when presented as sets, were considered copyrighted intellectual property. Then again, I can see how this particular uniform set has a fairly generic design and neither of the logos used (the Brigham Young "Y" and the MWC conference patch) appears eligible for copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: AboveTOO Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality concern in respect of packaging artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by G4ng3r (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, user's other uploads were copyvios.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with author and source unknown, this formerly printed image cannot be licensed as "author dead 70 years" Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has been taken more than 100 years ago! So keeping it!--Orgelputzer (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Orgelputzer[reply]

Kept: Old enough Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With both author and source unknown, there is no way to know if the author has been dead 70 years as claimed on the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has been taken more than 100 years ago! So keeping it!--Orgelputzer (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Orgelputzer[reply]

Kept: Old enough Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation . It is derived from this picture. Stang 13:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation . It is derived from this picture. Also ,please view File:SEHSHD.Png . Stang 13:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://isaacsartcenter.hpa.edu/artist-gallery-name/jules-tavernier PD-old? (artist died in 1889) Didym (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Did you delete the file on purpose or accidentally? --Didym (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Accidentally, sorry!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree to undeletion. However, contrary to the current description, the uploader is surely not the creator, instead it seems to have been copied from http://isaacsartcenter.hpa.edu/artist-gallery-name/jules-tavernier. Thereby, the CC-BY-SA license is bogus. It should probably be PD-Art, as there is no evidence that the reproduction of the original painting is under a free license. Instead, the source site claims "© Hawaii Preparatory Academy (all rights reserved)". --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I would go with PD-art Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence this coat of arms (blurry and small) is user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks advising incorrect licensing & this image derives from Burke's Landed Gentry and is available at www.burkespeerage.com (unfortunately, but hopefully understandably, a subscription website). However, this doesn't alter the fact that these are Colonel Edward Bolitho's arms as granted to a patrinileal ancestor for descendants' use and display; as explained elsewhere, this image is not "owned" by Col. Bolitho, "Burke's", me or anyone else for that matter - another version can be seen at: heraldryonline.wordpress.com in case of interest. Please advise - many thanks M Mabelina (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PEr nom Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, doesn't mean "I own the print". This scan is very small and has no publication details. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mabelina

[edit]

Hi Natuur12 - I have just written to Ellin Beltz regarding my uploads on Wiki Commons and providing clarification re West Hall, High Legh. Please guide me as to how my original upload was wrong insofar as the image in any event dates from 1882 (which could easily be verified by anyone interested) and I also see another Admin has recently been so kind as to approve my own family coat of arms! Since these two items have struggled/are struggling to pass Wiki Commons vetting, it doesn't make me feel very welcome - is it worth my bothering with Wiki Commons from now on (altho I should like to)? Many thanks. M Mabelina (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS. please assist should you encourage my further contribution & advise whether your comments re Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applied to me?

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this very small crest or seal. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Tony Angell.JPG. We don't need two files exactly the same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: text document, not own work. Yann (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Page 265 of something unidentified, uploaded as "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, not own work, but I think a proper DR is better here. This may be old enough. Yann (talk) 19:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: May be but we need evidence of that Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These screenshots are from a book that is freely licensed overall, but they are not themselves freely licensed. Please note that a few of the screenshots are freely licensed (e.g. WikiEducator, OER Africa); I have tried to select accordingly, but any effort to double-check my work would be appreciated.

Pete F (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the OCW Consortium screenshot, because that web site's terms of use require CC BY 4.0. -Pete F (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If these files are taken from a file licensed as CC-BY-SA (which they were), then are they not all also CC-BY-SA simply by virtue of the SA condition on the original file's license? Or, does the original file need to be deleted, since it contains data which they are not able to publish as CC-BY-SA? Beleg Tâl (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beleg Tâl, I just noticed your reply above. Inclusion of an image within a freely-licensed work does not automatically confer any licensing status on the included image. (Another example is the English language Wikipedia, which is licensed CC BY-SA overall, but includes many thousands of non-free images, such as album covers and book covers.) We could discuss deletion of the entire book file; I would argue that the screen shots under discussion are covered by the de minimis principle; the main value of the book would not be impacted by blacking out the images, which constitute only a small portion of the book's value. If English Wikisource had a policy relating to non-free content similar to English Wikipedia, we could upload the screenshots there; but it does not. I'd be happy to discuss further if you like; please contact me on my talk page or by email if you'd like to go into more detail. -Pete F (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed on here Artur Ciechanowski (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can u explain for what it was used?--Sanandros (talk) 07:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Logo of non notable company Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork (video projection) under copyright, there is no Freedom of panorama in France.
L'œuvre présentée sur cette photo (projection vidéo) ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement explicite de l'auteur, a fortiori pour une publication sous licence libre (pas de liberté de panorama). Trizek from FR 18:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1941 photo, looks like a scan from a newspaper or some other publication. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is from the Junge familiar archive, scanned from the Junge familiar book that has no copyrights, has no ISBN and is only a paperprint from the nineties. Klaus Junge was the cousin of my grandfather Ingo Junge. I'm the creator, developer and supporter of the family online archive: http://de.familiajunge.cl/index.php?title=Hauptseite Rodrigo Carrasco Junge Rcarrasj (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the picture was first published in the 1990s, then the copyright seems to expire in 2048 in the United States. If the picture previously was published in a book, then I think that we need to receive explicit evidence of permission. If you are the copyright holder, then see COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oleksandert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Not own work by the uploader. Correct sources and copyright tags needed.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image of a U.S. dollar bill, there are other larger copies in our collection for example File:Dollarnote_hq.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of car with no source, author, date or metadata. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — this is definitely a Bull-Doser image (no evidence of copyvio), see previous discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bull-Doser. This image was uploaded a long time ago when the {{own}} tags, et cetera were not used, however, it was uploaded as {{PD-self}}. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Unused since "a long time ago". Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just because an image is unused does not mean we automatically delete it. You have provided no reason to delete the image other than its description page originally missing {{own}} tags and the author field not being filled in. OSX (talkcontributions) 22:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Benefit of the doubt Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist offensichtlich von pl:Anna Beata Bohdziewicz, daher braucht es hier eine Klärung der Rechte Goesseln (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work anyways Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With no source, it is impossible to verify that this is a U.S. Air Force image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United States. 2011 statue, see w:Forever Marilyn. Stefan4 (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

para cambiarlo Dbreijo (talk) 19:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Unmotivated DR Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given that we have File:SectorResearches.png, we don't seem to need this one. Stefan4 (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given that we have File:Marmore researches.PNG, we don't seem to need this one. Stefan4 (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The shown image on the stamp itself is a derivate of a copyrighted photo. You can see the original photo at http://joergboethling.photoshelter.com/image?&_bqG=0&_bqH=eJwzTQ7NDjTJtEx1TwoKzDJ19U0ty08zc3Eyswi1MjS0MjI1sDI0AAIrz3iXYGfb4sSi8sQ8NTAn3tHPxbYEyA4Ndg2K93SxDQUpzDYM9vVMrgwuNMpXi3d0DrEtTk0sSs4AAE5dH1o-&GI_ID=. So it can't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 21:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The shown silhouette figures on the stamp itself are copyrighted, look at http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Bilderstrecken/Sondermarken/Programm_2012/Juni12-Bildergalerie.html?notFirst=true&docId=210854&countIx=2. Copyright holder was Luise Neupert, who died in 2009, look http://www.scherenschnitt.org/neupert-luise/. So this file shouldn't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The shown photo on the stamp itself is copyrighted, look at http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Bilderstrecken/Sondermarken/Programm_2011/Oktober11Bildergalerie.html?notFirst=true&docId=204832&countIx=0. Copyright holder is the Klein und Neumann GbR in Iserlohn, Germany. So this file shouldn't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. Two of the shown photos on the stamp itself are copyrighted, look http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Bilderstrecken/Sondermarken/Programm_2011/Oktober11Bildergalerie.html?notFirst=true&docId=204836&countIx=2. Copyright holder of the left photo is Norman Bruderhofer and copyright holder of the photo in the middle is Wolfgang Maria Weber. So this file shouldn't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. Two of the shown photos on the stamp itself are copyrighted, look http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Bilderstrecken/Sondermarken/Programm_2011/Oktober11Bildergalerie.html?notFirst=true&docId=204838&countIx=3. Copyright holder of the left photo is the Emsa GmbH in Emsdetten, Germany and copyright holder of the photo in the middle is Erich Eggimann. So this file shouldn't be hosted here for longer. Correlatio (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The shown photo on the stamp itself is copyrighted by en:Robert Gendler, look here and here. So the copyright tags on this site are false and the file should be deleted. Correlatio (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The others had issues that were resolved but that resolution doesn't apply to this one I will follow up with the question

Files uploaded by Jeremyyablan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed to be own works, but these are pictures of the uploader, and not selfies. Permission needed.

Yann (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All photos taken with my cellphone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremyyablan (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That response is obviously not adequate. We have a permission statement sent in for most of these images but there are still some minor points to be resolved.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Permission now verified.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All but one include permission from OTRS. Yann (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The others had issues that were resolved but that resolution doesn't apply to this one, I will follow up with a question to the uploader.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I received a satisfactory response from the uploader regarding File:JEREMY YABLAN AT RED CARPET EVENT.jpg.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK now. Yann (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]