Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I used the wrong title accidentally when uploading the image, need to reupload with correct name, wrong title used in upload of image Customshouseportadelaide (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doubless2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads are images copied from websites metal profile and furniture stores - http://metall-24.ru/list-stalnoy-25-mm-gk, http://clear66.ru/profili_komandor/, http://korporacia.ru/лист-1мм-рифленый, http://www.klusdesign.com - clear copyvio and false "own work".
- File:Alyuminievyy-profil1.jpg
- File:Alyuminievyy-profil.jpg
- File:Metallicheskyy list(1).jpg
- File:Metallicheskyy list.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Tatewaki (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
File:0544 441 00 55 atakum , samsun atakum günlük kiralık evler, samsun günlük kiralık daireler, 0544 441 00 55 samsun günlük kiralık 0544 441 00 55.jpg
[edit]
Appears to be an advert. out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Gone - blantant advert (& a number more files) - abuse of Commons Herby talk thyme 09:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful fo an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete deleted beforeMotopark (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. It's the same file that was deleted several times already and now uploaded again by "another" user! Ies (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: spam, vandalism --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. It's the same file that was deleted times and again now uploaded again by another sock puppet. Ies (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising, out of scope. Gone again, file protected, user blocked. Thanks Ies --Herby talk thyme 15:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Якин Александр Владимирович.jpg
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data?
Это рутинное заявление на маленькой фотографии без EXIF-данных. Является ли загрузчик действительно фотографом? Почему фотография такая маленькая? Можете ли загрузить эту фотографию с большими размерами, например, 2000×1500 пикселов? Можете ли загрузить эту фотографию с EXIF-данными? Taivo (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)- User Саша222 is not author this photo - https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&sa=G&hl=ru&q=%D1%8F%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD+%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80+%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjgEaiwELEKjU2AQaBggXCD0IQgwLELCMpwgaYApeCAMSKMQawxrIGq8fyxq1Gr4aqh_1HGoYdhiWhP8guhyWyLp8voj-5LoUlsS4aMJlvyyMpIbISeD2QCfMy9tjzi-t3lRDU2YYwvcAyOykgsCMIU8hsGzcsja_11uL_1zagwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBKQPJ0EM&ved=0CBkQ2A4oAWoVChMI7OTMmc6AyAIVYqhyCh1NPg9z&biw=1536&bih=709 83.237.105.4 12:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.237.105.4 as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. The file is not speedily deleted, because it has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- User Саша222 is not author this photo - https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&hl=ru&q=%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B0+%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjgEaiwELEKjU2AQaBggACD0IQwwLELCMpwgaYApeCAMSKOsYnw7sGPsZwhqIDoYZiRmEGY4OszHeO7UxuDHcJfsw-jC2Mf0wizIaMJk5E02zS4I3CHBMQ0_1I6s3ePZtUavXI4YfGmALbefv1MtIC8-GOk8HmhsdLOtbHbAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBEWi-oYM&sa=X&ved=0CBkQ2A4oAWoVChMIu8jM3syAyAIVIRFyCh2U_gKe&biw=1536&bih=709 83.237.105.4 12:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.237.105.4 as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. I do not want to delete speedily, if nominator is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- User Саша222 is not author this photo - http://forum.nashtransport.ru/index.php?showtopic=39276 83.237.105.4 12:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.237.105.4 as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. I do not want to delete speedily, if nominator is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- User Саша222 is not author this photo. This frame - from old Soviet movie "Семь стариков и одна девушка" -
https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&sa=G&hl=ru&q=%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8C+%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2+%D0%B8+%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0+%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjgEaiwELEKjU2AQaBggXCD0IQgwLELCMpwgaYApeCAMSKMMazRrIGssazhr6D_10PxBrJGoEQhSWiP4QlzDrbOqE_1si66Lt46ny8aMDwSKvfYHfQ3hWl819Sb-Yi1Meto3rRraEmzkw5z1M724F93WL1lDhYzshPscpzF6wwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBGYlq-4M&ved=0CBkQ2A4oAWoVChMIgLy53c2AyAIVRJ5yCh2cCQXe&biw=1536&bih=709 83.237.105.4 12:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.237.105.4 as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. I do not want to delete speedily, if nominator is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- User Саша222 is not author this photo - https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&hl=ru&q=%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjAEaiQELEKjU2AQaBAgXCD0MCxCwjKcIGmAKXggDEiiFH5AaxBrTGbsavhqdH68fsR-CGusk3SXWOpA7jTvpJOwkvi_16MI87GjCCEujeLnH5i8xYAM9Wb2xRDlReoxlDWiOJFYQoSuYZblgOIAs4yMO6iaq9SVcJxzQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgT46jnEDA&sa=X&ved=0CBkQ2A4oAWoVChMIw4KNss2AyAIVhqpyCh1T1glc&biw=1536&bih=709 83.237.105.4 12:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
this photo is not the TF30 Jet Engine. The photo is a F100-PW-100 Jet Engine. I worked on the TF30 in the air force 72.208.186.31 09:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: No reason to delete an User page. Please nominate the file instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
This the wrong chemical structure - it doesn't match what is described in the reference at w:en:annonamine and doesn't match what is given at ChemSpider: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.28289744.html Ed (Edgar181) 20:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Image also did not match doi:10.1248/cpb.60.257, ref cited in the en.wp article for the identity of this chemical. Did, because I redrew the structure according to the ref and replaced the bogus one here. So
Keep because it is now correct. DMacks (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The image has now been fixed. Thanks, DMacks. Ed (Edgar181) 20:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M armaghan rai (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files are low resolution and missing exif data. Google Image Search shows that they seem to have been copied from the internet. Possible copyright violations.
- File:Pakistan cultural celebrations.jpg
- File:Uch-monuments.jpg
- File:Uch sahref.jpg
- File:TRUCK decoration.jpg
- File:Tomb shah rukn e alam.jpg
- File:Desi khana.jpg
- File:Pakistan Bull Race Punjab Pakistan.jpg
- File:Road side juice.jpg
- File:Jewlry.JPG
- File:Jalebi-in-suger-syrip.jpg
- File:Desertt.jpg
- File:Ghanta ghaar.jpg
- File:Derawarfortcover2.jpg
- File:Culture-6.jpg
- File:Chrage.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete -- All of these are clearly copyvios. Some of the photos were uploaded last year in Wiki Loves Monuments. I have tagged all of them for speedy deletion. --Saqib (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Saqib Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: appears to be copied from http://www.rubyyadav.com/gallery.php, no evidence of permission. BethNaught (talk) 21:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Professional photo but author claim by user who has uploaded other copyright violations. Hekerui (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation following comments by uploader. Hekerui (talk) 14:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dahou Yasser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
questionable own work - user's only upload with no information about who took this photo or where it came from Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, per COM:NOTHOST eurodyne (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 00:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kassiopeia777 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable
Motopark (talk) 02:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity (publicity?) photo of non-notable individual better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value IMO Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality. --Achim (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
What kind of educational value is here? Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of project Fenerli1978 (talk) 10:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of project Fenerli1978 (talk) 10:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable singer, out of scope. Maybe not even "own work" (missing EXIF data). P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. but if somebody wants to keep it as stock photo, then I am agree. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused screenshot without context or educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not anyhow useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Trends.jpg
- File:Rrrrrrrrrrrrrr1.jpg
- File:Rerr.jpg
- File:Whoo.jpg
- File:Tkk.jpg
- File:Tftutuy.jpg
- File:Yuyuiu.jpg
- File:Rrrrrrt.jpg
- File:Street trends.jpg
- File:Reerr.jpg
- File:IMeeeee.jpg
- File:Walk over.jpg
- File:Op345.jpg
- File:Light34.jpg
- File:Simple trends.jpg
- File:Tkopopoopop.jpg
- File:Swagger.jpg
- File:Pop23.jpg
- File:Tko.jpg
- File:Tkopoopop.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Not in use, Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Was used for "my pretty kitten" article (wiped out). Bilderling (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Not in use, Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Was used for "my pretty kitten" article (wiped out). Bilderling (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Not in use, Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Was used for "my pretty kitten" article (wiped out). Bilderling (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Not in use, Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Was used for "my pretty kitten" article (wiped out). Bilderling (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Not in use, Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Was used for "my pretty kitten" article (wiped out). Bilderling (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- But seems to have better quality than majority of our cats. By the way, this category really needs a good cleaning... Stas (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused and unusable poor-quality tiny image of recording studio, superseded by many better ones at Category:Recording studios. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused tiny promotional poster, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
All unused tiny and self-promotional images of CD's and logo, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.
- File:Logo Versterking Medezeggenschap.jpg
- File:Ob cd.jpg
- File:Tlf fua.jpg
- File:Tlf bua.jpg
- File:Tlf cd.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rick.vandijk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and maps of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value. Likely not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal cartoon, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Hedwig in Washington George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No source (“personal sites”), no author (“unknown”); most likely a copyright violation — Le Loi (talk) 07:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Available on the web as early as 2010. Not own work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No source, no information about the author — Le Loi (talk) 07:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, all over the web beginning at least 2014, maybe earlier Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
“Unknown“ source and author — Le Loi (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Source my pages and author unknown. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No reason has been provided to believe authors have agreed to publish this picture as CC0. — Le Loi (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. Photo by Graham Hughes / Canadian Press agency [1] (in the slides). -- Asclepias (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Asclepias Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
“Unknown“ author → no reason to believe it’s CC0 — Le Loi (talk) 07:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. From EXIF: Photo Jason Kryk / The Windsor Star. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The Windsor Star is a for-profit newspaper. Not a typical CC0 organisation :-) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe it’s CC0 (“author unknown”). — Le Loi (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. Photo by Paul Chiasson / Canadian Press agency [2] (in the slides). -- Asclepias (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Asclepias Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe it’s CC0 (“author unknown”). — Le Loi (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. Not from 2015. Was already on the internet in 2011 [3]. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Asclepias Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe it’s CC0 (“author unknown”). — Le Loi (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: all over the web, not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe it’s CC0. — Le Loi (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: all over the web, wallpaper sites etc... Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
unsharp, includes text inside picture Motopark (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Magog the Ogre Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
and File:Los signos de puntuacion.pdf.
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Not anyhow useful fo an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Thibaut120094 Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from alum covers. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Hekerui (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khaledtahhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khaledtahhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:خالد طحان khaled tahhan 14.jpg
- File:خالد طحان khaled tahhan 09.jpg
- File:خالد طحان khaled tahhan 07.jpg
- File:خالد طحان khaled tahhan 05.jpg
- File:خالد طحان khaled tahhan 01.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
is actually cc-by-nd, not cc-0 as other musopen content. oops… Morn (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Stefano Ligoratti - G. F. Haendel - Suite n. 5 in E dur - 4. Air Mit 5 Variationen (2008).ogg
[edit]is actually cc-by-nd, not cc-0 as other musopen content. oops… Morn (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, author's request. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
How a signature of a third person can be licensed under {{Own}}?! — Le Loi (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Agree - the author of the signature is the person who uses it to sign his name; those who merely scan or photograph two-dimensional drawings cannot claim copyright for the image because it does not pass the threshold of originality.
- However trivial signatures are not eligible for copyright protection either, according to the Wikimedia policy: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag --DmitryKo (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Tagged as no source. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Media without a license as of 27 September 2015 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
eBay item no longer has photos. No information re: where photo came from or dating. We hope (talk) 17:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- eBay link no back and front of photo available here or archived since eBay link photos are gone. No idea when the photo was taken, by or for who and whether it had copyright marks. We hope (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- The front of the original unprocessed photo is available in the file history, and it has no copyright notes or any other marks. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/47/20131013050602!Roy_Orbison_-_1960s.jpg --DmitryKo (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP This appears to be merely a print of a studio portrait, from a private archive of such things (per the ebay description) There is nothing to indicate that it was ever actually published. Revent (talk) 10:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
This is a derivative of File:Roy Orbison - 1960s.jpg currently at DR. We hope (talk) 17:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per the other DR. Revent (talk) 10:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
This is a derivative of File:Roy Orbison - 1960s.jpg now at DR. We hope (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per the other DR. Revent (talk) 10:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil
[edit]Die Cephalopoden was published by Verlag von Friedlander & Sohn in Berlin, 1921 and in a further edition in 1923. The images are considered public domain in the USA (per {{PD-1923}}) and are available freely through the Smithsonian, BHL and other digital archives, with the BHL Flickrstream used as the upload source releasing them as CC-BY. The book was published in Germany, so the rule of life+70 applies in the source country. The author Adolf Naef died in 1949 and consequently under COM:L, Commons should be able to host the images in five years time, after 2019.
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 1) (7447771468).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 10) (7447780610).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 11) (7447781558).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 12) (7447782692).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 13) (7447787794).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 14) (7447788638).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 15) (7447789534).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 16) (7447790482).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 17) (7447786104).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 18) (7447784860).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 19) (7447784022).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 2) (7447772898).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 3) (7447773862).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 4) (7447774738).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 5) (7447775520).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 6) (7447776618).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 7) (7447777558).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 8) (7447778404).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.1 Tafel 9) (7447779344).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 1) (7447791646).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 10) (7447800500).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 11) (7447801224).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 12) (7447802024).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 13) (7447802878).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 14) (7447803792).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 15) (7447804758).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 16) (7447806036).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 17) (7447806938).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 18) (7447808864).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 19) (7447809846).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 2) (7447793064).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 20) (7447810836).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 21) (7447811790).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 22) (7447813468).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 23) (7447814826).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 24) (7447816400).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 25) (7447817440).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 26) (7447818334).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 27) (7447819258).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 28) (7447820122).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 29) (7447821046).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 3) (7447793804).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 30) (7447822002).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 31) (7447822676).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 32) (7447823826).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 33) (7447824872).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 34) (7447826130).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 35) (7447826966).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 36) (7447827736).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 37) (7447828668).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 4) (7447794632).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 5) (7447795878).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 6) (7447796772).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 7) (7447797682).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 8) (7447798916).jpg
- File:Die Cephalopoden, I. Teil (Bd.2 Tafel 9) (7447799624).jpg
_(7447771468).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447780610).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447781558).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447782692).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447787794).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447788638).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447789534).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447790482).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447786104).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447784860).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447784022).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447772898).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447773862).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447774738).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447775520).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447776618).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447777558).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447778404).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447779344).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447791646).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447800500).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447801224).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447802024).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447802878).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447803792).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447804758).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447806036).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447806938).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447808864).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447809846).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447793064).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447810836).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447811790).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447813468).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447814826).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447816400).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447817440).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447818334).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447819258).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447820122).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447821046).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447793804).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447822002).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447822676).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447823826).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447824872).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447826130).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447826966).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447827736).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447828668).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447794632).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447795878).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447796772).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447797682).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447798916).jpg){kind=link}
_(7447799624).jpg){kind=link}
Fæ (talk) 10:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks for adding Category:Undelete in 2020. Hekerui (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Restored VIGNERON (talk) 12:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
These are all artworks by a contemporary artist (per w:zh:傅文俊) but they are all marked as own work by the uploader. It's likely that all these files are copyvio.
- File:《他心通》No.5.tif
- File:《退场——从何而来，从何而去》.jpg
- File:《幻化》No.4.jpg
- File:《万国园记——德国》.jpg
- File:《添加剂》.jpg
- File:《红与黑》.tif
- File:《午后的红茶》.tif
- File:《退场——再次守望》.jpg
- File:《他心通》 No.2.tif
- File:《没有苹果的那天》.jpg
- File:《十二生肖·羊》.jpg
- File:《歌德巴赫猜想》No.6.tif
- File:《街房邻居－人文生态的文献》.jpg
- File:《幻化》No.8.jpg
- File:傅文俊.jpg
- File:《万国园记——俄罗斯》.jpg
- File:《无界》No. 1.jpg
- File:《回响》No.10.jpg
- File:《图腾Ⅱ》No. 1.jpg
- File:《图腾Ｉ》Ｎo.10.jpg
- File:《信手拈来》系列作品之钟馗出海.jpg
- File:《失之交臂》.jpg
Wcam (talk) 01:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
These works are providied by the artist. I have contacted him to send the written permissions to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Shall we wait for more days? Thank you very much for your attention. --Chaonan (talk) 07:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
No permission email was found (per [4]). After deletion of some of the images above, same images with slightly different filenames were uploaded by User:Chaonan. These files are:
- File:信手拈来——钟馗出海.jpg
- File:午后的红茶.tif
- File:万国园记——俄罗斯.jpg
- File:无界 No.1.jpg
- File:退场——再次守望.jpg
- File:图腾I Ｎo.10.jpg
- File:图腾Ⅱ No.10.jpg
- File:添加剂.jpg
- File:他心通 No.2.tif
- File:街房邻居－人文生态的文献.jpg
- File:十二生肖·羊.jpg
- File:失之交臂.jpg
- File:回响 No.10.tif
- File:幻化 No.8.jpg
- File:红与黑.tif
and now User:Chaonan claims that they are from Flickr, but on Flickr the corresponding images were uploaded June 28 ([5], [6] etc.) by a recent created user account. This is obviously license laundering. Permission email sent to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org is still necessary, or these files should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 14:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pumkinlight are also related:
--Wcam (talk) 20:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chaonan Mys 721tx (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Per COM:SCOPE: non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills. The vast number of uploaded images is obvious advertising and promotion.
- File:《故乡的云》 No.5 观念摄影 110X140cm 傅文俊 2013.jpg
- File:《故乡的云》 No.12 观念摄影 110X140cm 傅文俊 2013.jpg
- File:《游戏——法国》，观念摄影，100X100cm，2013.jpg
- File:《游戏——加拿大》，观念摄影，100X100cm，2013.jpg
- File:《游戏》，观念摄影，100X100cm，2013.jpg
- File:《游戏——奥地利》，观念摄影，100X100cm，2013.jpg
- File:《游戏——巴西》，观念摄影，100X100cm，2013.jpg
- File:《十二生肖——蛇》.jpg
- File:《歌德巴赫猜想NO.3》.tif
- File:《回响 No.1》.tif
- File:《任务》.jpg
- File:《无界 No.4》.jpg
- File:《无界 No.7》.jpg
- File:《图腾II NO.12》.jpg
- File:《万国园记——意大利》.jpg
- File:《万国园记——法国》.jpg
- File:《图腾I NO.5》.tif
- File:《信手拈来——北纬38度》.jpg
- File:《回响》No.10.jpg
- File:《他心通》No.2.jpg
- File:《午后的红茶》.jpg
- File:红与黑 2011.jpg
- File:歌德巴赫猜想 NO.6.jpg
- File:信手拈来——钟馗出海.jpg
- File:午后的红茶.tif
- File:万国园记——俄罗斯.jpg
- File:无界 No.1.jpg
- File:退场——再次守望.jpg
- File:图腾I Ｎo.10.jpg
- File:图腾Ⅱ No.10.jpg
- File:添加剂.jpg
- File:他心通 No.2.tif
- File:失之交臂.jpg
- File:回响 No.10.tif
- File:没有苹果的那天.jpg
- File:《他心通》No.5.tif
- File:《退场——从何而来，从何而去》.jpg
- File:《幻化》No.4.jpg
- File:《万国园记——德国》.jpg
- File:《添加剂》.jpg
- File:《红与黑》.tif
- File:《午后的红茶》.tif
- File:《退场——再次守望》.jpg
- File:《他心通》 No.2.tif
- File:《没有苹果的那天》.jpg
- File:《十二生肖·羊》.jpg
- File:《歌德巴赫猜想》No.6.tif
- File:《街房邻居－人文生态的文献》.jpg
- File:《幻化》No.8.jpg
- File:《万国园记——俄罗斯》.jpg
- File:《无界》No. 1.jpg
- File:《图腾Ⅱ》No. 1.jpg
- File:《图腾Ｉ》Ｎo.10.jpg
- File:《信手拈来》系列作品之钟馗出海.jpg
- File:《失之交臂》.jpg
Wcam (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis herles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. It seems unlikely that logos of multiple different football clubs would be created and copyrighted by one single person. The authorship claims for the photos are also questionable based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the fact that the uploader seems to either not understand or not care what the terms "author", "own work" or "copyright holder" mean. Some of the logos may be too simple to be protected by copyright, but keeping them would require identification of the relevant jurisdiction and comparison with the established threshold of originality there as well as cleanup of the file descriptions with removal of the false source, authorship, copyright and licensing claims.
- File:Masb.jpg
- File:Rosquilla.jpg
- File:Cartagenaa.jpg
- File:Tolimaa.jpg
- File:Huila.jpg
- File:Nacionall.jpg
- File:Juniorr.jpg
- File:Emvigado.jpg
- File:Cortulua.jpg
- File:Autonoma.jpg
- File:Santa few.jpg
- File:Millossw.jpg
- File:Medellins.jpg
- File:Equidad.jpg
- File:Jaguaress.jpg
- File:Descargaa.jpg
- File:Cucutaa.jpg
- File:Calia.jpg
- File:Alianzaa.jpg
- File:Caldas.jpg
- File:L3Zhci93d3cvdmhvc3RzL25hcmluby5nb3YuY28vaHR0cGRvY3MvaGlzdG9yaWNvL2ltYWdlcy9zdG9yaWVzL3ByZW5zYTIwMTItMi9BYnJpbC84Mi5qcGc=.jpg
- File:Estadio libertad.jpg
- File:Barra estadio.jpg
- File:Deportivo pasto.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Us Elections 2016 Donald Trump Psychic Predictions ebook by Clairvoyant Dimitrinka Staikova and Clairvoyant Ivelina Staikova.png
[edit]
linkspam, use of copywritten content JoshuaKGarner (talk) 00:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
What is reflected in the car is the Chateau Saint Jean in Dorlisheim, France, ie the headquarters of Bugatti SAS. Therefore it seems to me highly likely that the picture has been indeed created by Bugatti Automobiles SAS Hektor (talk) 07:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete very likely copyvio. I was unable to find the original copyright owner, but here is an article from 1.7.2013 [7], while the claimed date for the image is given as 8.9.2013. MKFI (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Should be speedy deleted, this webpage [8] credits Bugatti as copyright owner with a much better resolution. Also, there are more pictures of the same car in the same location. As well there is this webpage [9] with a article and the same picture dated of the 2nd jan. 2011. Quite a clear case of copyvio. --Druschba 4 (talk) 14:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
No references, no citations, totally speculative. Sultan Galiyev (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agree Fenerli1978 (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agree --Kibele (talk) 11:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.--Rapsar (talk) 19:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Morrines.jpg.jpg moved to File:Morrines.jpg
- File:Sergio Torres Félix.JPG
- File:Gerardo Vargas Landeros 15.jpg
- File:Pintor gvlsin2015.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP Alan (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Beat the System with Mark Tremonti.jpg
- File:Beat The System in New York.jpg
- File:Beat The System during a recent Indonesian press conference.jpg
- File:Diana Meltzer with Gerald Sellan of Beat The System.JPG
- File:Stewart during one of Beat The System's concert.jpg
- File:Diana Meltzer.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 18:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Advertisement Till (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
we posted information about the business to see what it would look like, the actual information we wanted to post about the business (the history and story behind it) is no different than any of the other companies listed on the site.
case in point https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toshiba https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-Mobile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Panasonic_camcorders#Panasonic_AG-DVC7 this is a whole page of advertisements for various products
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S5 this is about a cell phone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
please tell me what makes these other companies telling their story different than Prestigious Travel and Consulting telling our story?
- This is about the image file, not any Wikipedia article that the file might be used in. I don't see how logos of such companies as Coca-Cola and Toshiba are similar to the image in question. Here I fail to see a logo, it seems to be some part of a website. --Till (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete advertisement. MKFI (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 18:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
No information about author, license probably invalid. Bigger copies available elsewhere, cf. [10], [11]. here is a 2004 post which credits it to "NASA /Don Davis". Yann (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
![[11]](http://usercontent1.hubimg.com/6632008_f520.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as duplicate of File:Coast Impact.jpg. MKFI (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Bigger picture here: http://fr.cdn.v5.futura-sciences.com/builds/images/thumbs/8/80f965f1ab_8015_Serval.jpg
- Also posted on felina-land.forum-actif.net on 27 Dec. 2007. Yann (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
It's the wrong one that was supposed to be uploaded. I have my own one,however,that I was supposed to upload. I did not get permission from this one,but again,I have my own version. So,please,delete this file. Thank you. A Wikipedian on Wikipedia (talk) 00:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
It's also a PDF. --A Wikipedian on Wikipedia (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Accidental upload CRoslof (WMF) (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
-2015-09-18T00:33:00.000Z-File:WMF_Staff_Photo_(Square).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 00:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Twenty-first harmonic on C.mid. Uploader request. Hyacinth (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Twenty-first harmonic on C.png. Uploader request. Hyacinth (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Twenty-first harmonic on C.mid. Uploader request. Hyacinth (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Uploader request, redirect. Hyacinth (talk) 03:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The second image (Rajendra Chola) is missing source and I'm not able to find it either. Someone might have to clip that out and replace with a PD image to retain this. —SpacemanSpiff 04:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status unclear. Source is a direct link to the image on a website. Unverifiable author, copyright status, or date of publication — ξxplicit 07:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:С.А.Попов-Госдума.jpg + copyright violation (taken from the Duma site) — Le Loi (talk) 07:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by HiW Alan (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG version +mt 08:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Maybe the file is out of project scope, you cannot see much here. The photo is used in es.wiki on userpage, but I think, that this does not count, because the user has no edits in es.wiki outside of userpage. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
COM:TOYS does not allow photos about toys into Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The newspaper is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm afraid, that the map is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As creator of this image I am not satisfied that it's quality is representative of my work - I uploaded it with the intention of reviewing it and deleting it later if I decided I was unhappy with it (not realising that I couldn't delete it myself!) Declan Geraghty (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The uploader provided either false license or incorrect data on the source. The work cited was originally published in Europe, Adolf Naef died in 1949. PD-US is inappropriate for this case. Mithril (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Несоблюдение авторского права. Ни в блоге, ни на странице не написано о CC Higimo (talk) 10:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- User:Alan: basefile File:Edinaya_Rossiya_poster_v2.png has a OTRS-ticket. --Itu (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Restored per new info provided by @Itu: --Alan (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Uh, what now turns out is: This file does
not even have the bearhas the bear only as a very simple, partial border-shape compared to the template, and the rest is clearly below ToO , so --> PD-uneligible. --Itu (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 182.66.74.204 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <Spam-pure self promotional content>. This is small photo without metadata and copyright violation is possible. The original uploader in en.wiki has multiple copyright violation warnings in his talkpage. But the file is not speedily deleted, because it has been in Commons multiple years and is used. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Shailendra Banka.jpg
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 180.215.87.197 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <Biased-self promotional content,No use or utility for encyclopedia>. Small photo without metadata, but I do not delete speedily, if nominator is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 182.66.74.204 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <Biased-self promotional content,No use or utility for encyclopedia>. This is wrong, because depicted person is notable, but the photo has no metadata and the uploader is overall suspicious, copyright violation is possible. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Propre ajout, photo pas très intéressante Asmoth (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/tink_norfolk/14748460603 124.182.39.140 13:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
hidden: two previous discussions concerning a meanwhile deleted file of the same name
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuvalkin Alan (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unused personal photo, out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Uploading user is inactive since nearly five years. AFBorchert (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC) I just notice that this has been nominated & kept before. Please consider the uploader wrote “pacar” in the description field. Google translate understands this as “girlfriend”. This is confirmed by the corresponding Wiktionary entry. Hence, this is apparently not a selfie. This has been photographed in a private setting, the uploader's name appears to be a real name, the title of the photo could be the given name of the depicted person. All this is very problematic in regard to COM:PEOPLE and the inexperienced uploader (this was the very only edit in all our projects) was very likely not familiar with free licenses and personality rights. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low quality personal image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am renominating this file as the last DR was closed with delete but subsequently restored on base of this discussion outside the DR. In my opinion neither the closure nor the restoration addressed the point that this picture is not a selfie as the uploader's description designates the depicted person as “pacar”, i.e. as girl-friend. This is problematic as this photo has been taken in a private setting and we have no proof that this photo was published with the consent of the depicted person, see COM:PEOPLE#The right of privacy. This is a serious problem, most legislations protect the right of privacy. AFBorchert (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC) |
Commons proje kapsamında olmayan kişisel fotoğraf. E4024 (talk) 09:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:E4024, why file this DR with a rationale in Turkish when the photo was taken in Mozambique? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: This is a multilingual project where everyone is free to use any language. Google Translate delivers Personal photographs not covered by the Commons project. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- AFBorchert, thanks for your explanation of what Commons’ laguage policy is; you have however wasted your time, as I am quite aware of it, and I do not question User:E4024’s right to express himself in the language of his choice. I however have the right to criticize that choice. This is not a case of User:E4024 exercising his right to use the language he prefers: User:E4024 user is proficient in English and the image subjected to this DR has an English language description, therefore chosing Turkish to compose this DR is either a copy&paste blunder (that should be corrected) or an attempt to confuse and hostilize the uploader.
- As for the meaning of the sentence, well, I can use Google Translater too (not to mention that I share lodgings with a native speaker of a Turkic language), and I knew what that sentence means; it’s a lie, regardless of the language it is conveyed in.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:E4024, why file this DR with a rationale in Turkish when the photo was taken in Mozambique? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment This is another photograph by another user which is not related to the previous deletion requests. But this (and the other uploads of the same user) appear to be personal photos which are unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. Looks like that the tendency to file DRs on photos depicting brown people is so pervasive it even affects twice the same filename by sheer happenstance. As for the rest, User:AFBorchert, most of Commons is «personal photos which are unused» (and that’s not a bad thing.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Meanwhile I took a look at the mentioned other uploads of User:Kigona. @AFBorchert: you really think that photographic material documenting Agronomy studends’ field work at the most important university in Mozambique to be off scope, don’t you?… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: In scope. (How many photos of class lectures being prepared we have? And in Africa?) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was discussed before and deleted/kept in various occasions. (If there was another file with this same name sorry about that.) The last time the closing admin, P 1 9 9, said: "Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it." I am sure no individual user would like to impose an own preference on others, but let us leave it apart. This is a small file without camera EXIF and which means it is a dubious "own work". We do delete many files everyday for only this "precaution". (Personally I see no educational use, or scope, in the image, but that is not so important now. For some reason the image is not used.) E4024 (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously: I have nothing more to add to the previous DR, other than correcting my typo *"studend" with "student". (Please note, as said, that a different file with the same filename was similarly the target three DRs; this DR is the second affecting the current file). The amount of bad faith being heaped on here is staggering, but its motivation is transparent. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: There’s nothing dubious about the own-work claims in Kigona (talk · contribs)’s uploads. The lack of metadata might not be due to a copyright pirate’s devious machinations, as the OP implies, but merely to the use of a cheap feature phone (such as post-Microsoft pseudo-Nokias made by HMD Global). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note for the closing admin: The uploader's camera EXIF may be seen at their selfies, for example File:Bioshar 03.jpg. Therefore they did not take this pic. Also if you notice any personal attacks here, please kindly deal with them. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, oh admins — if you note any personal attacks or any other kind of ethically reproacheable activities, please kindly deal with them, or even unkindly. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: Why is your argument in support of your precaution claim directed to the closing admin? Isn’t it passible of general discussion? I’d say it is: So the four
Biosharphotos by this user were taken with an iPhone 6s, as per their metadata, while this one has no metadata therefore you conclude it was not the same uploader’s work? You can see it is the same person (which we assume is User:Kigona, per COM:AGF), and the photo has same exact pixel count. That suggests that this is also from an iPhone 6s (so I was wrong about it being a cheap feature phone) and the lack of metadata might be due to its loss caused by the use of subpar software for axis rotation or contrast correction or some such. The one photo from this uploader that is not obviously a selfie, File:Bioshar 01.jpg, seems to show intact metadata and might have been taken with timer and tripod. I frankly cannot see any good reason to chose COM:PRP over COM:AGF concerning this photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: Why is your argument in support of your precaution claim directed to the closing admin? Isn’t it passible of general discussion? I’d say it is: So the four
Kept: no reason to suspect copyvio: clearly a selfie in the same resolution as File:Bioshar 03.jpg. When some users see value in this photo and explain why, I will need to put aside my opinion and consider it in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Нарушение авторского права Higimo (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
wrong name 최광모 (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cinematiconline (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JOSENEAS FERREIRA DE SOUSA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:JOSE ENEAS.segundo.mandato.jpg
- File:JOSE ENEAS.canditado.prefeito.jpeg.jpg moved to File:JOSE ENEAS.canditado.prefeito.jpg
- File:JOSE ENEAS.primeiro.mandato.jpeg.jpg moved to File:JOSE ENEAS.primeiro.mandato.jpg
- File:JOSE ENEAS.terceiro.mandato.jpeg.jpg moved to File:JOSE ENEAS.terceiro.mandato.jpg
- File:JOSE ENEAS.set.2015.jpeg.jpg moved to File:JOSE ENEAS.set.2015.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Trata-se de fotos do arquivo pessoal de José Eneas de Sousa, pai deste subscrevente. Político brasileiro do Estado do Piauí que teve papel de suma importãncia na emancipação política de Alagoinha do Piaúi, sua terra natal. Como se trata de publicação sobre pessoa viva, os requisitos para para publicação são mais rígidos. Dessa forma, estou consultando fontes já produzidas a respeito para posterior publicação da página com rito enciclopédico e imparcial até o final deste mês de setembro/2015. Por essa razão, solicito que as fotografias não sejam eliminadas para serem utilizadas em futura publicação, preenchidos os requisitos exigidos pela wikipédia. JOSENEAS FERREIRA DE SOUSA (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 00:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of an unpublished photograph from a family archive by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, this file was kept as part of a mass deletion request, but it is a blurry unused crop of File:B P Mandal 19.jpg. There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to keep this crop as even the source file is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
flickr uploader is almost certainly not the copyright holder Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Recently uploaded, taken from http://blog.rushydro.ru/?tag=%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B9 Needs evidence of permission A.Savin 17:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Also:
Website owner from who's website those images were copied has no information on the copyright status of the photographs. He assumes that they are so old that the copyrights have expired, and offers "The picture is was taken from the New York Historical Society's archives, with their permission, and is well into the public domain period." However otherwise we have no information on the copyrights. Jarekt (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Assumes? Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete — When uploading files from a source that is not the original author of a work that claims the original is PD, Commons has a long practice of requiring the uploader to do their own copyright evaluation and pick an appropriate specific public domain tag when uploading files. Commons has made exceptions for a few source sites that Commons has determined make responsible evaluations of public domain status (examples include The Library of Congress, Flickr's "The Commons" participating institutions, the Getty Research Institute, etc.). In my opinion "johnrogers.info" is not such a site. Uploads sourced to johnrogers.info should be required to use a more specific tag. With additional information these might be able to use {{PD-1923}} (it's hard to tell without publication details or identify of the photographer). —RP88 (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 00:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No information provided regarding the date or manner of original publication. Indeed, given the preliminary film title shown, there's a reasonable likelihood this image was never actually published/distributed The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
no evidence that this was published without copyright notice Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Apparently this wasn't deleted two years ago even though the deletion request was closed as delete. Nom here is exactly right on the substantive issue. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
The source is not the author, license therefore invalid. Source may be [12] which leads to [13] (Jan 10, 2008; 4:05). Yann (talk) 20:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Yann Alan (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Questa immagine non rispecchia la motocicletta elencata in questa pagina di wikipedia. 93.48.216.10 20:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- No, invalid request. Nominating for deletion cancelled because the name was simply incorrect; so rename request (ZX-9R, not ZXR750). --Cjp24 (talk) 22:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
duplicated 최광모 (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 22:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant. File uploaded in 2010, and still educationally valuable. Also, too simple to meet the Threshold of originality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The description says "English: (c) John Webber, commissioned by Tania Peitzker. Webber is a former COUNTDOWN Magazine photographer." I believe we require a release from the copyright owner presented through the OTRS system to verify that the uploader is entitled to upload the material here. The copyright remains with the photographer regardless of who commissioned the picture. It is the onward licencing by the copyright owner that is important, not the commissioner of the shoot Timtrent (talk) 22:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
wrong name 최광모 (talk) 22:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
It is very obviously photoshopped. In addition, I believe the same fake image has been uploaded by the same user before: 2602:302:D14C:6860:0:0:0:48 23:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- The image can be found here. I don't see any obvious signs of photoshopping. Kingsindian (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- When using words like "obviously"; it would have been nice if (any) photoshopping actually *was* obvious; which it is not, Huldra (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The image quality is doubtful to me, and I primarily suspecting a copyright violation. It was not uploaded under M. Abed/AFP authorization. It is not even mentioned. --Point by point (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe it’s CC0. — Le Loi (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- The photo does seem to be taken from the State Duma web site http://www.duma.gov.ru/structure/deputies/131158/ , and while the web site does not use the CC0 license, it effectively offers a public domain dedication for all materials http://www.duma.gov.ru/about-site/copyrights/ as defined in the Russian Civil Code Part 4, Article 1233.5 (as amended by public law N 35-FZ from 12.Mar.2014). --DmitryKo (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Licence incorrecte : couverture par Meobius c'est-à-dire fr:Jean Giraud Habertix (talk) 13:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Неправильно оформлено (OTRS надо) Higimo (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I confirm that this picture (in it I raft on the Dudh-Kosi River in 1991) made by one from local sherpa men. I am the copyright holder of this work. I allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification. Vladimir Lysenko--Vladimir Lysenko (I.) (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: please, send the permission to COM:OTRS for image undeletion Alan (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
this is at best a 'modern' netsuke (beginning XX th but truly i'll bet for a chinese one, that could be made "yesterday" as we use to say in the profession). The incrustation of the eyes, the meaningless subject, the poor quality of the engraving (hairwork, the "bag") and the poor relief or finishing of the whole form seen in global, (I can add this is clearly made with a flat base system, so no intention to be hang on the belt obi) Please choose another photo. Denis Naoki BRUGEROLLES, Galerie Yamato, Paris (France) Japanese Art Since 1979 If needed, I have a lot of photo of real netsuke because this the object that made me choose to continue my parent's gallery of Japanese works of art. And, not to be only a complainer, I found the article very good Only a little error occurs (on the french one, could be an unwanted one by the translation) with datation " said it originated in the XVI th in China (that may be true, i cannot tell) but then said it appears in XI th in Japan).. Many thanks anyway, so helpful Wiki workers and articles Denis Naoki
87.88.91.13 15:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of Soviet photographic work (estimatedly 1960s/1970s), needs evidence of author/permission A.Savin 17:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of Soviet photographic work (estimatedly 1960s/1970s), needs evidence of author/permission A.Savin 17:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of Soviet photographic work (estimatedly 1960s/1970s), needs evidence of author/permission A.Savin 17:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of Soviet photographic work (estimatedly 1960s/1970s), needs evidence of author/permission A.Savin 17:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Scan of Soviet photographic work (estimatedly 1960s/1970s), needs evidence of author/permission A.Savin 17:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This picture is copyright Lars Moeller and was published on his website. Although there is a download button on the website (which can be used after logging in), it is unclear whether the photographs are only meant for personal use or under which license they have been made available. Also, the author's name (Sapperloot) is a Dutch word, while the photographer is Danish. ErikvanB (talk) 17:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is the reproduction of the en:Order of Lenin, which is not protected by copyright according to the Russian Civil Code Part 4, Article 1231.1 (as amended by public law N 35-FZ from 12.Mar.2014).
- This personal photo is used on the user page only, which is permitted by the Commons policy even though it has little educational value. --DmitryKo (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Human body is not copyrighted, but sculpture of human body can be protected with copyright. Order of Lenin is not copyrighted, but sculpture of order can be protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- This sculpture is an enlarged copy of the Order of Lenin. Reproductions of public domain works do not pass the threshold of originality to warrant copyright protection (see en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. and Alva Studios, Inc. v. Winninger, [14] [15] etc. --DmitryKo (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Case of Bridgeman and Corel says: "exact photographic copies of public domain images could not be protected by copyright". This case is not applicable for sculptures, but only for photography. Sculpture is not photographic and it is not an exact copy. There are considerable differences between order and sculpture in size and used materials. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- This sculpture is an enlarged copy of the Order of Lenin. Reproductions of public domain works do not pass the threshold of originality to warrant copyright protection (see en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. and Alva Studios, Inc. v. Winninger, [14] [15] etc. --DmitryKo (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Human body is not copyrighted, but sculpture of human body can be protected with copyright. Order of Lenin is not copyrighted, but sculpture of order can be protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- The judical decisions cited separate originality from the labour required to create the work. If the Order of Lenin was transformed or used in some creative way within the sculptural composition, the latter would be protected. A faithful recreation is not an original work, no matter what fine materials and extensive techniques were employed. --DmitryKo (talk) 12:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c)status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
May be not old enough for {{PD-RusEmpire}}, unlikely own work by uploader, needs evidence of author, permission. A.Savin 17:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- The person in photo died in 1942 => anonymous work until 1943 => {{PD-Russia}}. 128.68.57.72 20:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-RU. But tagged as no source. Certainly not own work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I, the rightful owner of the picture, kindly ask you to delete the file since my approach of fotography has changed a great deal since this I took and published this picture. Indeed, I'm struggling to erase all tracks of former works to rebuild a more coherent website and give a better image of my activity to my clients, since I am going professional with my photography. I am aware that the deletion will not change the copyright it was published under. I'll do my best in compensation to publish more photographs under the same license, like personal works. Also this amateur work isn't of any value and many photographs of the place des Vosges it was taken at are available; the picture isn't even available on the monument page, nor than on any other page on wikipedia. 62.248.125.108 12:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
