Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 17th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader owns the license to this company's logo DMacks (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader owns the license to this university logo DMacks (talk) 04:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at en:File:Rider University shield.png, it seems the license is likely owned by the university (no surprise there) and is not as free as claimed. DMacks (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly COM:COPYVIO: small size, no EXIF, with watermark. KurodaSho (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope, com:advert. unused McZusatz (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this template is useless on Commons, as we cannot host fair-use material. It needs to be uploaded locally. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo/icon likely passes COM:TOO. Storkk (talk) 13:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yep, way above TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable crop of professional shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Bogus own work claim, all over the web for years. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio or non-permission media.  Yo, Jacobo.: 16:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, we do not delete license or source texts unless a valid replacement is present Denniss (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, we do not delete license or source texts unless a valid replacement is present Denniss (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation updated. No need to delete now. :-) --Praveen:talk 18:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept, we do not delete license or source texts unless a valid replacement is present Denniss (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality and unreal, no educational value /St1995 21:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's low quality and I agree it may have very limited educational value. I can't agree with "unreal", the reason the photo was taken was because of the intense colors of the sunset. The photo has not been knowingly modified or filtered. Craig Mayhew (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The three crests are copyrighted (and attributed to someone else) on another website ([1] [2] [3]). Eusebius (talk) 16:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. Not the uploaders own work and not freely licensed. Martin H. (talk) 12:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guedloy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 22:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Guedloy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. File:Informaçaõ Atualizada.jpg unlikely "own" work. "Angola Facebook case"

Gunnex (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

on the photo, the "uçk" graffiti can be sean. That represents an offensive usage because "uçk" was a paramilitary terrorist group in Kosovo. I recommend the photo to be retouched or deleted. 109.122.89.123 23:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Didym (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission for Iranian Air logo. Fry1989 eh? 23:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope collection of logos, some of which may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 23:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Definitely useless. Stas (talk) 23:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brendo102x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brendo102x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small film regarding "Practice of zoophilia between a pony and a woman" and two related screenshots. Uploaded by "Meu nome é Brendo e tenho 13 anos" / My name is Brendo and I am 13 years old.

Gunnex (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 04:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description: "bom". Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either self promotion or something without permission, or both. Not in use, regardless. Tom-L (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a private server of Runescape, and I don't think Jagex released their artwork in the public domain. Tom-L (talk) 11:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, low quality, (possibly COM:COPYVIO), and not famous person's photo. KurodaSho (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 13:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include:


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Fenerli1978 (talk) 10:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

______________________________

Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope The Photographer (talk) 14:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional The Photographer (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, seftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, seftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, seftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, seftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, seftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keirahudsn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of no apparent educational value, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gegedanish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caleb tecas miguel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, as well imho selfy for 'promotional' use, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader own license for this film poster (presumed to be owned by studio/ad-corp). DMacks (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests Grind24 (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Please remove this photo. - rameshinform


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test upload George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acpinc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesariza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarac989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked. Uploaded in a row on 17.08.2015 for it:Gianluca Mosole.

Gunnex (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another tag removal by Amitie 10g this time removing a tag by Yann for "not own work, no permission". Removing the tags of other editors without fixing the files is not helpful to the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file was copied from en:File:Festinger.jpg, where it is under fair use. No source, no date, no author, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused alternative flag, out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was published earlier, May 2012. If uploader is the copyright holder, we need documented permission. – czar 18:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format (imho a montage) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, as well 'selfy-style', Roland zh (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange blurry unused photo of no apparent educational utility, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uused logo, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused illustration, logo - out of COM:SCOPE due to lack of educational utility Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious screenshot, software unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from here. Yann (talk) 19:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indicaiton of user's own work on this Facebook sized apparently professional image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful "own work" /St1995 19:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify as not in use since June 2012, Roland zh (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extracted from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGkwOFguzDA maybe I'm wrong but I see nothing that say this video can be published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported and also it is certainly not an own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, as well imho kind of 'selfy' that's not in use since 2014, Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - unsourced collage INeverCry 00:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dandioso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files without EXIF doubt its own work by uploader. You can see one of the photos Here. Also this image has www.kl-photo.com listed as author in exif.

Dudek1337 (talk) 00:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Every single one of this user's uploads has been falsely claimed as his own work. http://listas.20minutos.es/lista/women-of-the-fashion-universe-3-ronda-la-chica-de-las-palabras-387141/ 2602:301:77FE:26A0:2424:78A6:9858:4AE6 06:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag from a (what seems to be now-defunct) MMO game. The Spanish Wikipedia article to which the description links (w:es:Dolmatovia) has been repeatedly deleted. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 07:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator's will 최광모 (talk) 08:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator's will 최광모 (talk) 08:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juninhokroth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, both mysteriously watermarked, File:Juninho Kroth.jpg grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/234847479986366/photos/pb.234847479986366.-2207520000.1439802940./328583953946051/?type=1&theater. Uploaded for pt:Juninho Kroth. Despite of having a similar username, "Juninho Kroth" is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established + permissions from the original photographers needed.

Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photo of a photo. If uploader is the original photographer/copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile screen, Out of scoop and no EXIF data Vikoula5 (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-text logo, not own work?, copyrighted logo, need OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This game was made with RPG Maker VX, not a free software, and with its standard graphic set, which is not free either. http://waywardprophet.com/ptdk/?ckattempt=1 Tom-L (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from the game Habbo Hotel, which is not in the public domain. PHRPG stands for Pokemon Habbo Role Playing Game. Tom-L (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moved from File:10371718 10154087871405394 9022663774789507087 n.jpg, copied from FB Yann (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, low quality, dupl. of File:Cloud cover 0.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 13:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits a "Rolando Cabrera". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, promotional The Photographer (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.kozielski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2mwuhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cellurl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexstufff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no information on that website that the file is licensed as cc-by-3.0 Dudek1337 (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the content of the source is copyrighted http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/more/photos/view/stills/parties-and-events/id/1805395 Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Didym (talk) 18:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely TV still Storkk (talk) 13:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Irrelevant for article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Innobrain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not realistically useful for an educational purpose Cloverleaf II (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaishnaviartworld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parcaeconseil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality, no educational value /St1995 22:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official band photo. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, weird inset text. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its an artistic picture taken in Photographic studio Mahdi Mousavi (talk) 22:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from facebook & low resolution Adilswati (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Er. Avinash Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nayshel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional The Photographer (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor writing, promotional The Photographer (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 22:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sisfo pila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 陳禕倫 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of ownership or license. Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of ownership or license. Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmdigital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small, no EXIF data, all other uploads are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Retrait par son auteur KPilates (talk) 03:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a book, copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 14:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a recent statue. No FOP for sculptures in Russia. BrightRaven (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 20:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

parce que jen e m'en sert plus. Veuillez supprimer les images importées LyrecoLCM (talk) 13:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 20:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a book, copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreslopgal3112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused symbols of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreslopgal3112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Out of Commons:Project scope, unused trivial logo.Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not necessary & source description is not suitable.So, uploader request to delete this file -- Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Delete per uploader request, test page. Wdwd (talk) 18:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio [4] Wdwd (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by KurodaSho as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: found on the web: [5] Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could be PD by age, license, source and author wrong. No idea which Guzman this one is supposed to be. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Wrong author, unknown date/source/description. Deleted per COM:PRP Wdwd (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hjbarber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios (covers/music label, no permission via OTRS) Wdwd (talk) 18:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ariaamiri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata and previous publications.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And since the uploader continued to upload multiple copyright violations instead of commenting here, you can add the following to the list:
LX (talk, contribs) 10:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ariaamiri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Recent pictures, bogus license, no permission.

Yann (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I talked to the user in his native language in Persian Wikipedia fa:بحث کاربر:Ariaamiri#کپی‌رایت but he seems to have no understanding of copyright issues and even is not willing to learn! 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per nomination/discussion. Different external sources, no permission.Wdwd (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ariaamiri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The {{PD-Iran}} claim needs evidence. There is no evidence that these are indeed in public domain in Iran. The images do not seem that old. Attempts to obtain permission from the culture office of Sabzevar have failed as far as I know.

4nn1l2 (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify "http://photos.filmibeat.com/ph-big/2013/07/hemanth-kumar_13730068460.jpg", Roland zh (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unknown author, external source, no permission Wdwd (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense again, but DR as per File:Hemanth Kumar.jpg by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unknown author, external source, no permission Wdwd (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 17:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fry1989 Using under "Fair use." Added permissions data to the file. FelixSeba7 (talk) 03:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination/discussion. Wdwd (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gtgvc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvios.Wdwd (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UFO or Aliens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: book cover, no permission Wdwd (talk) 19:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped/overlayed image that is quite hard to make out. SounderBruce 00:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Well of course it hard to make out --- that's part of the point. It's a capture of the excitement at the moment when the crowd reacts after the Portland Timbers clinched the cup. There is fireworks, colored smoke, & flags waving. Any photograph capturing this moment would be similar. I am not convinced that it was photoshopped. I think that there was a lot of flashes, reflections, & movement too quick for the particular speed of the camera.
If there is a better picture, then I would welcome it. Right now, at Category:Cascadia Cup, this is the most colorful & lively of the bunch, the best resolution, & the only photograph that shows a stadium name. It is also the only picture at Rivalités dans le soccer en Cascadia & the better one of two at Cascadia Cup.
Peaceray (talk) 02:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 21:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader indicated that the image was picked up from the source at Fermilab (http://tdserver1.fnal.gov/AcceleratorSupport/ProtonSource/400MeVLambertson/). By going to the earliest archive on Wayback Machine in 2004 (https://web.archive.org/web/20041016124433/http://tdserver1.fnal.gov/AcceleratorSupport/ProtonSource/400MeVLambertson/), the page was last updated on 11 November 2002. At the end of that page, it had "Legal Notices" which linked to http://www.fnal.gov/pub/disclaim.html. By going to the Wayback Machine on the closet date after 11 November 2002, there is a disclaimer page on 4 December 2002 (https://web.archive.org/web/20021204200447/http://www.fnal.gov/pub/disclaim.html). It indicated that the page was copyrighted material. The license indicated that it was restricted the use to the US Government and others acting on its behalf only. Therefore, this is not a public domain. See the full text here with the restriction highlighted: "Documents authored by Fermilab employees are the result of work under U.S. Government contract DE-AC02-76CH03000 and are therefore subject to the following license: The Government is granted for itself and others acting on its behalf a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in these documents to reproduce, prepare derivative works, and perform publicly and display publicly by or on behalf of the Government."

Also noted that Fermilab is part of the US national laboratory facilities. However, the national laboratories are not managed by an agency of the US government. The US Department of Energy has a contract at each national laboratory to be managed by a private entity. In case of Fermilab, the entity at the time was "Universities Research Association, Inc.". That was a private incorporated entity. Therefore, the work done by Universities Research Association, Inc.'s employees was not subject to be in the public domain. Unless there is a specific license or anything to indicate that Fermilab release this specific photo to the public domain, we cannot use this PD-USGov tag. Z22 (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MegaAlex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved(2010-2015 Всички права запазени)|source=http://radiofresh.bg/usloviia-za-polzvane.html Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO {{PD-ineligible}} {{Trademark}} --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sorry above TOO Natuur12 (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insufficient information, plus duplicate of File:New-Zealand-in-NSW -- cropped.jpg Shudde (talk) 07:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:Sveriges län med namn.jpg Pegy22 File:PEGY22LOGO.jpg message 08:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, derivative of photograph of unknown origin and copyright status: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: the source provides with CC-BY-SA licence but it may be Commons:License laundering. This is official image and found on the web [8] ([9]). KurodaSho (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Svema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

wrong filename

Svema (talk) 14:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please request a rename the next time. For now the new files have been uploaded and those files are merely duplicates. Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mnadel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awanish yadav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, only active on own user page

Didym (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, all other uploads are copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La hice yo pero ahora no sirve para nada ademas no es una d mis mejores fotos ni d lejos Campeones 2008 (talk) 17:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nouche09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javier De Alba Bejarano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho 'out of scope': imho advertisements and not in use since 2011, Roland zh (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work / out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is Elena Mortara. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, but Elena Mortara gave me the rights over her photo. In this case, asking me specifically to use it for the Lina Unali's profile page....— Preceding unsigned comment added by Leles rm (talk • contribs) 18:24, 22 August 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leles rm (talk · contribs). Does she understand that you are allowing other people to use the photo for commercial purposes (a term of all licenses we accept here)? If so, that would be great! Please read and follow the instructions on COM:OTRS#If_you_are_not_the_copyright_holder. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but to make things easy I decided to use another photo which I like more (for the profile's page of Lina Unali). So this photo can be cancelled. I shall upload another photo with the same name and extension as soon as this has been removed. Thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Leles rm (talk • contribs) 16:29, 23 August 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D graphic works are regrettably not covered by FOP exception in UK. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No FOP in UK Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The RTP (graphic set) of RPG Maker XP is not PD. http://www.rpgmakerweb.com/download/additional/run-time-packages Tom-L (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image does not violate Enterbrains EULA. I got response from Enterbrain support saying it is ok to post screenshots of games using RTP to Wikipedia. Here is their current EULA: http://www.rpgmakerweb.com/support/information/eula Isopaha (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Wikipedia, perhaps, where it can be a fair use image. But Wikimedia Commons requires the file to be free. Also, the links you posted are not the EULAs of RPG Maker XP, but even then it says it grants a "non-exclusive, non-assignable, fee-free license to use the RTP SOFTWARE only for the purpose to play the game created". As for RPG Maker XP, it clearly also says: "ENTERBRAIN retains all title, copyright and other proprietary rights in, and ownership of, the RTP SOFTWARE." and "ENTERBRAIN grants to Licensee a non-exclusive, non-assignable, fee-free license to use the RTP SOFTWARE only for the purpose to play the GAME created" and "Further, Licensee shall not sell, distribute, assign, lease, sublicense, encumber, or otherwise transfer the RTP SOFTWARE and/or its data without any prior written consent of ENTERBRAIN." Tom-L (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said I've got permission straight from Enterbrain itself. Feels free to confirm this by contacting them with this form: http://www.rpgmakerweb.com/support/contact-us.

Here is what I asked: Hi! I've uploaded image of map I made with RPG Maker XP to Wikipedia over 8 years ago. This image is used in multiple Wikipedia pages defining what RPG maker is. Do you feel like your copyright is violated by this image? This files has been today marked for deletion as your RPG Maker XP RTP is not public domain, but I think using your RTP to create map and take screenshot of it is quite fair use as it benefits you and other Wikipedia users. Link to image is here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Kisakuva.jpg

Here is what I got as answer: Thank you for contacting RPG Maker Customer Support!

We did not flag the pictures. This is not a violation of our ELUA, and we are fine with you posting screenshots to the Wiki like this. You can refer the Wiki editors to our ELUA http://www.rpgmakerweb.com/support/information/eula or the RTP ELUA which is accessible from the link I just gave you.

If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us again.

So please, stop trying to prove something wrong without first confirming your sources. Isopaha (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest reading my earlier reply and reading through the policies of Wikimedia Commons before putting such blame on me. The burden of proof lies with you. If what you claim is true, you must send proof of Enterbrain specifically releasing this under a free license to OTRS. What you have pasted here is both unverifiable, and insufficient, especially since you have lied to them and supplied them false information. This leads to my belief that you are rather confused about Commons copyright policy, though not with bad intentions.
You said to them that you believe this is fair use (it is quite fair use as it benefits you and other Wikipedia users), and that is what this mail responds to. Allowing screenshots to be uploaded to Wikipedia as fair use is a common practice that benefits Enterbrain (Wikipedia policy). Except, as I had already told you, fair use is not sufficient for Wikimedia Commons. What we need here is an unambiguous release of their assets used in your screenshot in one of our recognized free licenses, meaning that everyone can reuse them without paying Enterbrain by cutting it out from your screenshot, even for commercial games, and in the case of the public domain, without having to even attribute Enterbrain. This line of thought does not fit at all with the restrictive license requirements in their EULA.
Please also see Commons:Screenshots. Tom-L (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After reading your earlier reply and this one it makes sense. I'm sorry I let my anger cloud my logical thinking. Like you said I think I'm confuced about Commons copyright policy and I felt like this coming as sort of attack towards me as image has been here for so long but now I know it's not the case.

So, you're right, this image needs to be deleted because of reasons provided by you. Isopaha (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you came to see it that way. I did not mean to give the impression that I was attacking you either. I am an avid user of Enterbrain's products as well, and I have contributed to a free replacement of the RPG Maker 2000/2003 RTP specifically because of the license/EULA issues. Tom-L (talk) 10:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that is nice to know, I will definitely check these out as I've been always interested of free alternatives for RPG Maker. Keep up the good work! --Isopaha (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

droits d'auteur JohnnyJane75 (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like flickrwashing Didym (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found here: http://www.letterone.com/media Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TreyY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Much prettyer alternative: -David23x (talk) 18:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator and uploader I support the deletion. This was meant as a Mock-up at a time where there was no alternative. -- Michael F. Schönitzer 19:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif and format, Roland zh (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, again, but as per File:Board at the Entrance to the Temple.jpg and File:Entrance to the Temple 03.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, again, but as per File:Board at the Entrance to the Temple.jpg and File:Entrance to the Temple 03.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Large file and similar to other images by same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was deleted on en.wiki because it is a derivative work of copyright material presented in a book. Please see en: Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 July 30#File:DEATHTRAPDUNGEON.jpg Diannaa (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unforntunately, the license for SVPOW is only for works created by the bloggers, and the skeletal diagram of apatosaurus is one of Greg Paul's works. IJReid (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is based on that diagram but include no skeleton details and the neck posture was changed. Couldn't it considered a legitimate derivative that can remain here? MathKnight (Talk) 18:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. I'll ping FunkMonk to see his opinion on the matter. But personally, since the silhouette was part of the skeletal, I would consider it to just be one part of the skeletal, and thus not enough of a derivative. IJReid (talk) 04:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Modified derivative works are still derivative works. FunkMonk (talk) 11:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Adding feet to a dinosaur diagram by Greg Paul is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in Hungary, author died 1985 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Előre was a Hungarian magazine published in the United States (fragments like "Hungarian Illustrated Weekly Magazine" or "Sunday" in the cover may suggest a... English-speaking-country?). The pic was published in 1916, before 1923. So it's in the public domain in the United States and also in the country where it was first published: the United States of America. Strakhov (talk) 12:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Never published outside the US? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it doesn't matter if it was published outside the US if it was published in the US for the first time... The guy was American since his 14th birthday. The guy in 1916 worked in America. The guy made illustrations for American publications (Jesus Christ, that was how he earned a living!). Előre was an American-written-in-Hungarian-publication. Come on, read the pdf. If we are gonna apply the methodic doubt and... doubt about everything with every image published in the USA before 1923: "but.. if it was published outside the USA before?" (?) when we have no reasons to think that... Strakhov (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like {{PD-1923}} applies here.  Keep --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-1923! Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since), but the file is labeled own work and is a large file. Converting to DN for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: what is there to get consensus on? The uploader never provided a license, and we only host licensed files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What I see is a new user with one upload that was done correctly (includes license), the other one isn't done correctly, but is stated to be own work. If we give this a few days more for me to try to contact the uploader, that will help with the consensus, I'd at least like to try to get the uploader involved. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not licensed on 17 Aug and still not licensed Herby talk thyme 10:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

similar found — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2015-08-10T08:58:11‎ (UTC)


Kept: "Similar found" with no other justification or pointers seems an inadequate reason for deleting Herby talk thyme 10:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be abandoned. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A draft which has had no work done to it in 8 years seems pointless - can always be undeleted if required. Herby talk thyme 10:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Updated by me already on 17 August [10] De728631 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the translation to reflect the changes. Have you considered noticing me about the changes instead of proposing the template's deletion? --Slomox (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Slomox, thank you for the translation! Many editors become inactive after a few years, and therefore I expected not to get many reactions when I'd contact previous editors of each translation. And IMHO having no translation at all in certain less-popular languages is much better than to have an incorrect or outdated text, but apparently Commons policy on template translations is different. Spinster (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Template text was updated to reflect changes. De728631 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Political self promotion Fixertool (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Seems to be a politician from one of the Mexico main political parties: en:Party of the Democratic Revolution. I might be relevant and therefore no need to delete his picture from commons. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 15:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment SPU account: Image for self promotion--Fixertool (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Whether the image has been uploaded for promotional purposes is not relevant provided that the image is in scope. The subject of the picture is a politician that belongs to one of the three main Mexican political parties and therefore, the picture is in scope. --Discasto talk 11:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation - seemingly from the same photoshoot as File:GAMALIEL GUTIÉRREZ ROMERO.jpg (note what looks like a reflector above his left shoulder), but uploaded by a different user. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this file does have metadata which suggests that the uploader is the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of spelling mistake Dassurojitsd (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's the exact problem? We can rename the file without any problem. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Faulty file names are not a reason for deletion. Please use {{Rename}} to suggest an alternative filename on the file page. De728631 (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

higher resolution available — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 2015-08-12T06:37:56‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Inferior duplicate of File:EddieSchneider DeathCertificate.gif De728631 (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no need in having a (localized) "see below" in the Permission field. Leyo 22:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but why replaces? --Leyo 23:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replaces by nothing. --Sebari (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replacing something with nothing, blindly and unchecked, accross multiple uses. Also known as bot-operated vandalism. -- Tuválkin 08:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please give an example of where it would be. Otherwise, your comment may be interpreted as “blind” claim. --Leyo 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unless it takes thousands of code lines and nearly qualifies as AI, a bot’s work is always blind. You, please, explain how you suggest to remove the current use with anything but the null string in cases it is warranted. You don’t think there is any case it is warranted? Well, then, metaphorical blindness. -- Tuválkin 17:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If {{See below}} is the sole content of the Permission field, there is no danger in having it removed by a bot. There are only [Permission+*%3D+*\{\{[Ssee+below\}\}.*\|%2F&fulltext=Search&ns6=1 very few uses outside of the Permission field]. --Leyo 22:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you are/were right, then all it has to be done is to have a bot going around replacing permission = {{see below}} (with all its case and blanks variations) with permission = (as it is actually happening), no need to delete the template as this could still be left alone for what you term «very few uses outside of the Permission field». Persisting in the deletion of this i18n template will only result in broken formatting and its eventual recreation. -- Tuválkin 23:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Eh... I don't see the harm in keeping it; it has been used in countless image pages and I'd probably keep it for the historical value even if it is no longer used. I know a lot of people think it's useless, but it doesn't bother me that much. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Carl Lindberg, is this a keep-vote? (looks like it!); can you add a {{Vk}}, then, please? -- Tuválkin 17:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment above. --Leyo 22:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I can't say why there are so few hits, maybe this string get removed by the well known cleanup script from Magog the Ogre.User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  13:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The texts are different! --Leyo 15:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'm going to say  Keep. I think this DR is being used as a proxy for whether it is appropriate for use in the Permission field of the Information template; that is a separate topic than the existence of the template. The usages can be removed even if the template is kept -- the work involved would be identical, actually. I think the historical usage of this template probably means it should be kept around, even if just to not make a mess when looking at old versions of files in the history. I actually think "See License section" text (with a hyperlink to the section header) would be more useful than this tag, but there could still be some valid uses of this tag in some situations. But the massive historical usage to me (and keeping the translations around if good uses are found) is enough to keep the template even if not used much anymore. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obvious. De728631 (talk) 18:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

заменить на более точную векторную карту file:Slovyanskyi raion locator map.svg. Artemka (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

А измененния 2015 года ( Светлодарск и Мироновский отошли к Артёмовскому району, а Виноградненский с/с к Мариуполю) вы не учли на карте.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, superseded. Taivo (talk) 20:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as here was no meaningful reply, I delete all the user's uploads with the same problems. But files with full EXIF data will stay. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This aircraft painting of Latam is not official, therefore should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monart (talk • contribs) 2015-08-10T13:51:58‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no corresponde I diaze1993 (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no corresponde I diaze1993 (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no corresponde I diaze1993 (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no corresponde I diaze1993 (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of an old photograph, not likely from 1999, uploader possibly not the copyright holder of the original photo. – czar 20:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo (125×179) without metadata, own work unlikely. Taivo (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It denotes WDSV, an epsilon-retrovirus as a simple retrovirus. It is really a complex retrovirus 130.39.50.131 21:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Phylogeny of Retroviruses.svg. Taivo (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hi! Sorry, I do not have enough time to translate this long text again. I think it is better to delete the current translation than asking someone to refresh it. Beroesz (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This translation is obsolete. The Tropenmuseum is now part of a larger museum - the National Museum of World Cultures. A new translation is welcome, but in the meanwhile I think it is best to delete the outdated info. Spinster (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the subpage but remove the language instance from {{KIT-license/lang}}. The subtemplate will then simply not be shown but can be kept "in the drawer" to be updated. De728631 (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The words contained in this template is a deliberate part-creative, part-selective misinterpretation [12][13] of the copyright law of Hong Kong (The Copyright Ordinance, Chapter 528) [14][15] in an attempt to justify otherwise obvious infringement of copyright of the works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong, called the Government of Hong Kong, which are by default, by local law (by local legislative ordinance), protected [16][17][18][19], and their copyright have not been automatically disclaimed whilst being automatically released into the public domain free of copyright. Unless Section 182 of the Copyright Ordinance were repealed, the Ordinance and the term "public records" therein obviously cannot be construed as meaning, or, interpreted to mean, all works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong (the Government of Hong Kong), and most works thereof presently found in Wikimedia Commons would certainly fall foul of the words and the provisions of Section 182. Urquhartnite (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. The words in the template are almost entirely verbatim quotation of Chap. 528 Section 58's two subsections. As such they cannot simultaneously be an intepretation or mis-interpretation. Any individual misapplication of a template does not invalidate the template and all other uses of it. –84.92.129.87 22:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I originally Deleted this but have reverted it to give more time to examine the photographs to which it was attached. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While copying public records is not copyright infringement, that is not the same thing as public domain. There are no implied commercial rights or in particular derivative rights. The scope of fair use or fair dealing on such works would therefore be pretty wide, but it is still not public domain. That is basically like a section in copyright law which allows libraries to use and copy works for limited purposes; this is a somewhat limited exception to allow anyone from the public to view and inspect public records (and copy them to allow others to do the same), but not necessarily use such works for any use they want. Note that public records often come from material outside the government (evidence in court cases etc.) and use of such works would definitely be restricted to uses related to their public record status. Even in the U.S., there are only a couple of states whose public record laws have been considered broad enough to basically defeat copyright protection; for most states we assume state government works are still copyrighted even though most are public records. Hong Kong basically inherited Crown Copyright for government works from UK law; other than bills which become law, it looks like, governments usually own copyright for 50 years from creation or publication depending on the circumstance. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Just another instance of conflating public access and public domain. If the premise of the template were to be true, the evidence from copyright lawsuits would be in the public domain, making such lawsuits rather pointless. LX (talk, contribs) 08:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Alan: There are now several hundreds files without a license. What to do? Yann (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR

[edit]

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR which no longer have a license. If any can be relicensed please relicense.--Jarekt (talk) 11:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are several files ending in "Pressure.gif", "Pressure.png", and "Wind.png" and a number of others which look like simple line graphs -- I think those are PD-ineligible. The related radar, wind, and precipitation files might be more based on the underlying map copyright. There are a lot of road signs... many of those may also be PD-ineligible, though probably not all of them. The flag and emblem ones (File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg, File:P Hong Kong.png, File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, File:Hong Kong Bauhinia Flag (Navy Blue).svg) look to be vectorizations made by a Commons contributor following a specification provided by the government... that gets into idea/expression divide territory, and I don't think I would delete those. The original license (on File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, the source of the others) was marked as PD-author by User:Zscout370, and that should probably be restored. There may well be a copyright on the vectorization in some countries and that tag should not have been removed. The bulk of the files though are those radar maps and the road signs. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep The Hong Kong road signs are mostly derivatives from British road signs (as former Coloniser) which are under OGL, or PD-shape, or a combination of both. I ask they be speedily kept and any that may be ineligible for those licenses be reconsidered individually. I have no comment on the other images listed here, except the national emblem. It's loss would be inexcusable. Fry1989 eh? 15:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have no idea which (if any) of these files I ever uploaded, but the road signs and File:Flag_of_Hong_Kong.svg would appear to be special cases... AnonMoos (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest that we close this as an unsuitable mass nomination and split it into several individual nominations based on what the image shows:
  1. Maps.
  2. Satellite photos.
  3. Data plots. Most probably PD-ineligible.
  4. Road signs. Fry says that many can be kept under OGL by virtue of the signs being very similar to British signs. If so, fine. A few signs also seem to be below the threshold of originality.
  5. Bauhinia × blakeana symbols (such as the flag). I hope that we can keep these as some of the files are heavily used.
  6. Other images probably nominated individually.
Also, can some images be migrated to PRC tags? I note that File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg is very similar to File:People's Republic of China Biometric passport.jpg. However, I'm not sure if the PRC tag covers anything which is not a textual document. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added better template to some simple road signs, crossed them in the list and removed them from gallery. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with closing this one and starting several smaller ones, or reorganizing this one into several separate DR's. I was trying to prevent the files being tagged individually with {{No license}} and deleted after a week. --Jarekt (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted -- superseded files are not grounds for deletion, in particular a bitmap superseded by a vector. That used to be made more clear at Commons talk:Superseded images policy though now it is buried in the deletion policy. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Restored. --Jarekt (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even the File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg is deleted now, which means an estimated number of 1,000+ articles is now affected by the deletion. --Lmmnhn (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the deletions seem botched. The flag/emblem SVGs were created by Commons contributors and should be kept under their original license. File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted again even though it's PD-ineligible; I should have fixed that before. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most as having no license. Kept some where another valid license was applied. --JuTa 17:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]