Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Duplicate of "File:Giovanni Paolo Panini (Italian, Piacenza 1691–1765 Rome) - Ancient Rome - Google Art Project.jpg" Craigboy (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Except it's not a duplicate. Different size, etc. – SchroCat (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's the exact same image, yours is slightly uncropped.--Craigboy (talk) 10:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Not duplicate files; one has the edge of the canvas, one doesn't. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- That's pedantic. Both images come from the exact same source.--Craigboy (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Please don't revert to name calling. There is a great difference between including the frame and not. These are different images at different resolutions. - SchroCat (talk) 10:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- No one has reverted to name calling. They both come from the exact same source, one is merely slightly uncropped and has washed out colors.--Craigboy (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's not pedantic, it's policy. Read COM:Duplicate: "exactly the same content (colours, quality, etc)" (emphasis mine). Any differences eliminate "duplicate" from consideration. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per above comments, and also both files in use.
- And also, you done significative modifications to the picture older picture without community consensus (that are not actually improvenemts and may break the scope of the file). This file is a duplicate of the original file uploaded through DcoetzeeBot, but for now both files should be kept as are. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy kept this isn't going anywhere. In use, in scope, featured picture, etc, we're keeping both copies. @Craigboy: please read our policy pages like COM:Duplicate and COM:OVERWRITE. Multichill (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of "Panini, Modern Rome.jpg" Craigboy (talk) 08:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Except it's not a duplicate. Different size, etc. – SchroCat (talk) 10:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Not duplicate files; one has the edge of the canvas, one doesn't. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- That's pedantic. - Craigboy
- Please try and remain civil. This isn't pedantry: there is a massive difference between the two images. - SchroCat (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's policy. Read COM:Duplicate: "exactly the same content (colours, quality, etc)" (emphasis mine). Any differences eliminate "duplicate" from consideration. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Please explain the differences.--Craigboy (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I did. One has the edge of the canvas, one doesn't. You said it was pedantic, but that is a difference. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: First, this is a Featured Picture in Wikipedia.
- Second, you done significative modifications to the older picture without community consensus, that conbert that in a Derivative Work. Then, there a a need to use the original picture and therefore reupload that.
- Please stop assuming that the other users assumes bad faith when you modified the file without actual improvements. Both files should be kept for now. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy keep, policy clearly states that it must be identical (or scaled-down identical) to be considered a duplicate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
no obvious purpose to this ill framed picture. Out of scope. Timtrent (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Herby talk thyme 15:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
fdsgdddsdbfdggfd 2A01:E34:EE2D:FB30:8C07:196D:992B:62D8 19:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-kept as obvious vandal nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Planets
[edit]This is hard. --210.23.85.5 10:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsensical nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
bad quality low resolution, better files in Category:Cosimo de' Medici portrait by Pontormo Oursana (talk) 00:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 04:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
simply shows a black field - lacks content Verne Equinox (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Poor image lacking any apparent context or infomational value. Verne Equinox (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:RyK.jpg
- File:RyK..jpg
- File:Shaynder cantando.jpg
- File:Shaynder y abigail.jpg
- File:Shaynder y belgica.jpg
- File:Shander arias.jpg
- File:Shaynder aria..jpg
- File:Shaynder arias.jpg
- File:Shaynder.jpg
- File:Shaynder arias pñ.jpg
- File:Shaynder Arias..jpg
- File:Shaynder Arias.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
out of scope: facebookery Qwertyus (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sylvesterchoreographer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:CORPORATE & MARRIAGE EVENTS CHOREOGRAPHED BY SYLVESTER.jpg
- File:MEDIA PRINTS.jpg
- File:EVENTS CHOREOGRAPHED BY SYLVESTER.jpg
- File:WORK PROFILE.jpg
- File:ABOUT THE CHOREOGRAPHER SYLVESTER.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 11:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 11:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. En.wiki says, that Robert Paneque is school vice-principle. This does not make him notable. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Herby talk thyme 14:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and copyrights status. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
unused, out of scope. Hang9417 (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
unused, out of scope Hang9417 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adrián Elicheix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused low resolution photos of pets and house plant.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malik Liaqat 77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images. not useful for education purpose. out of scoope
- File:Malik Liaqat Aliaa.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Aliss.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat a1.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali211.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Alias.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali33.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali31.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali30.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali29.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali28.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali27.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali26.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali25.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali24.JPG
- File:Manzoor Ali21.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali23.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali22.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali20.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali21.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali19.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali17.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali16.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali15.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali14.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali13.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali12.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali11.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali10.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali9.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali55.JPG
- File:Manzoor Ali1.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali6.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat a.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat north.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat A.jpg
- File:Malik Liaqat Al.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat.JPG
- File:Malik Liaqat Ali.JPG
Saqib (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Umairkhan029 (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images are of out of scoope..
- File:Lake Saif ul Malook (Frozen) (Horse Riding Track)111.JPG
- File:Lake Saif ul Malook (Frozen) (Horse Riding Track)222.JPG
- File:Lake Saif ul Malook (Frozen) (Horse Riding Track)333.JPG
- File:Lake Saif ul Malook Track View.JPG
Saqib (talk) 19:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
nom somme a la commine 41.107.157.236 11:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Obvious vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Incomprehensible and abusive deletion request. Jospe (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: vandalic DR George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a drawing by fr:Paul Poncet, who died in 1962, so it is still protected by copyright until January 1, 2033. Rosenzweig τ 20:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Abusive request. File published by Gallica under the label "Domaine public" (Public Domain) and already kept after a deletion request less than 6 months ago. Jospe (talk) 08:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is certainly not an "abusive request". The file was previously kept because there was no deletion rationale given. That Gallica claims the drawing to be "domaine public" is irrelevant, they are obviously wrong here because the author has been dead for less than 70 years. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination. No permission for shown artwork.; Without permission from legal successor: Undelete in 2033.Wdwd (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Exact duplicate already exists at File:2015 May 1 Turkey 4.jpg Nub Cake (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: "Ankara May Day protests 2015.jpg" is redirect link, NOT a duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnny27102710 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 09:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary art object, no FoP for sculpture in Russia. A.Savin 09:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leo4394628 (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images. out of Commons scoop. not useful for education purpose
Saqib (talk) 11:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Seems copyvio due to title, size and quality Saqib (talk) 12:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
seems copyvio due to, size and quality. the user uploaded several copyvios. Saqib (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
seems copyvio due to, size and quality. the user uploaded several copyvios. Saqib (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
seems copyvio due to, size and quality. the user uploaded several copyvios. Saqib (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
For collages, source and license of every single image is needed. In addition, there is no freedom of panorama in Iraq and some photos in the collage violate architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation - https://www.google.com.au/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuy2Tn1_1JnRRr7UQqEBKWpsVebmAaXKVX-7dSmVuY4s-fPRY7U4Zk32eUwqXO_1uVmmlCE8DS8CujSZ-NXGy9LGq97RwaChsWnIGpWhTeW58r0oSud0GnuaBTwJPLArLCic5RyCT4tgLzPlJdWw0kjv14PmrqpQG_1HbPFa9s_1kZLh3cPIDOFw6VGMh1TIjjf-auTeDWAv0oloiKLWe_1FfcmVP8ZVF6lA44tAmRAqRNCk_1aVyGRGmcEfyjSUI33Nj7AcHHfaRLwdY2H0WVNSknaiue55vkBI8JTWCl60dG3SsqGcty3Rpq-gwPck0wZRFJaBmlXoiyTIBBFxNWthICJNnfw_1BPluzHlrVv7IugOwCMtcZZYLkYcsmQ4Pm_1fGMzxhKMc47xPUFsIJ5AGrWxqFh8NCAIUfu_1Ph324b244quVzVFwr-oV7lq7VyN4grqnLNJCxWnCxa6ihARNTPpWU2uqSZRVov7ly1szt4OGRxUxliBvGNL8Gllo6LoieQtPzqRYFlpLNnM8mi5euLCDONlN4TGOvpUtQFCzQF-ClSiJciwsaJSUvC5bggogjlZrXWqSuZoKH3dtdWhFTR-hrHH1gHg_1GOXA0mFTKJ0eJoPWQtLY1cBEmdSQT8fLu73dbZKyrWPgOFA1HmYJsZetTcS7GsEu_1_1lppn2cHEKlkDXuZXtFBR0IN9sNvv4j9_1w2uQw3ktqMobGJVUhTsWKzw9O0TcDyNBEKckOFrxdKURjeB9dGl4IhFSOrCaWfeW356-ESRv4hLASVHC0VjvloRr6LgS40s8v91_14LjxikPA_10He_1kwlD9on2K4hmerS61Lu5mC3v-fKd26w5qOtbEGUvcWuvC2rIQC38GTtbVwdM6UrOk_1xGHb7bM0C5Bc9sLuQenVLWlXERb1MT0JQ95dnxXtrgUrJ2bnp_1a5xPvK0fx6g34wQkBYAJLOA4SrD1Hjs4s3gjXTb0skDyvwDNSYff4h1LNhiNeN8B0lnmQLD_1GXtFnnc03cd4EfIaJAwsaGfUHOVKM_19Wr8N8cc4wWG574_1GDvn3Pj9B_1FT_1lXLN5EDFGz-5GcpRzpCAbrspOhPyHs5ZgxlwBykZc1ufBK4cK5tWg2bDA08321TEbTwzf3D6vSTMqAup14y2qt7xLZhPkzDdejaLjLAYNOk7ZHnyZ9uvD5NCeY4LEnVjxR5cjuEJXjedGRJP6iGk_1pB8vPDWJQpmP1DrVkZED3YFOVRt3wkJUn3cvJbcR4Pe_1odfVkOFJYluU9bqnZQ-D3OpnE4WmgFZTjREY6qzAKbmIBMhAd6cKXjG8wwHshBmU2KBvXVvQ0iPTe7Si6pAKZZknjiwBSqmrWiz4efY8Hu-DuQ0L1MpmuYYwFh-zW9fBtTIrs9NPcA9OIjAx_1g3HRFt6PGWRPWW3hqwzevhi346XCHwmeFOCEXU5_1HShbggmBWN7M9typ57an9hPTGDqOQS-ZAEEiFy2GExgrZxLo7YVjgWzKbE7-XAeF622lPwdMifQMsbv8yI Kahiltna (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Likely a case of Flickr-washing (license-laundering). Though the image was uploaded to Flickr in 2010, it is available in higher resolution and since 2006 at http://www.photosled.com/showphoto.php/photo/22007/size/big. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF Hang9417 (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Ramon Castro.jpg
- File:Ramón presentando los Premios Pepsi Music 2014.jpg
- File:Ramoncastro77.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. Not used.
George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Sometime cover.png
- File:Tattoo Renato Cabrera.jpg
- File:Renato Cabrera 2.jpg
- File:Renato Cabrera.jpg
- File:Crushed cover.png
- File:Sky Runner cover.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
possibly copyvio:http://chessman.com.mo/artist-mo-page-priscilla.php Hang9417 (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Fastily Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
possibly copyvio:http://chessman.com.mo/artist-mo-page-rico.php Hang9417 (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Fastily Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Taken from a TV series, copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Professional logo; not self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a product packaging with original, copyrightable artwork. De728631 (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Top Europe news (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Khaled arabi katbi.jpg
- File:Khaled arabi katbi 3.jpg
- File:Khaled arabi katbi 1.jpg
- File:Khaled arabi katbi 2.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
possibly copyvio. user uploaded many copyvio Saqib (talk) 19:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmoodulhassan12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]user uploaded 2 copyvios which was speedy deleted and i suspect these files as copyvio as well because it seems the user edited files in application and made some changes due to which google images cannot trace if images are on web… no meta data and diff file sizes..
- File:Chitral Gol National Park.jpg
- File:Chitral Gol.jpg
- File:Sunset and Toyota.jpg
- File:Lakes of Chitral.jpg
Saqib (talk) 19:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
last time this was not own work as now claimed. Compare Special:Undelete/File:Mhsscoe_1.jpg (admin link only). JuTa 20:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Wrong title S5switch (talk) 02:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
It’s not fit for purpose, I would like to remove it. Bigenthusiasm (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.5.38 09:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.5.38 09:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
derivative work 37.5.5.38 09:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Bad file. Low quality. Own work. --HVL talk 13:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
falscher Eintrag Gumfrey (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't want to keep it Gandhara-Bactria-Centralasia (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, not in use Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
A large proportion of this image is composed of photos that are not by the Flickr-user. The file cannot be hosted on Commons unless the actual copyright holders license them. FredWalsh (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of copyrighted works Ymblanter (talk) 16:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
A large proportion of this image is composed of photos/posters that the Flickr user cannot license because they are by other people. FredWalsh (talk) 18:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of copyrighted works Ymblanter (talk) 16:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
this recording slipped through with the batch, it only contains noise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85jesse (talk • contribs) 2015-05-05T11:34:49 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
not well vectorized, replaced by File:Phenyl ethanal Structure V.1.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 12:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 13:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Prof. Dr. Hofmann wants another picture uploaded. TobiasVetter (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 19:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal photo. C messier (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment It is used in en.wikipedia. --C messier (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Psychogerd
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belgium. Therefore these images infringe on the architects' copyrights and cannot be kept here without a license from them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 2015-05-04T23:22:39 (UTC)
- File:Expo 1958, Brüssel , deutscher Pavillon.jpg
- File:Expo 1958, Brüssel , Eingangshallel.jpg
- File:Expo 1958, Brüssel , russischer Pavillon.jpg
- File:Expo 1958, Brüssel , thailändischer Pavillon.jpg
- File:Expo 1958, Brüssel , tschechischer Pavillon.jpg
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
The poster in the background is not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 22:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped version without copyvio section. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Commercial material based on original research. There's no place for such files in Wikimedia projects. Ldorfman (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I understand the problems of commercial content. I could ask the author to make a version without her contact information. About the original research, this is indeed a problem... Because it is a lecture in education, I think it can fit a category like Category:Open educational resources. That is, although it is not suitable for use on Wikipedia, it can give access to professionals who can use it in other contexts. What do you think about this possibility? Chenspec (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This PDF file include many copyrightable parts which need separate permission to each part. for example the photo in page 3 can be found her (צילום: אייל פישר). Also, the promotional content have to be removed as the media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. -- Geagea (talk) 23:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license and this logo looks to be sufficiently complex to not be PD-ineligible (unless the iconified globe is from a PD source) B (talk) 01:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't think this qualifies for PD-texlogo, chiefly due to the complexity of the trophy element in the logo. Michael Barera (talk) 03:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works (all grabbed & cropped from Internet, uploaded in a row on 30.09.2014). WWII photos (of ME 262 + ME 163, source country most likely Germany), historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Me.163 Komet s raketami R4M Orkan.jpg
- File:Raket R4M na letounu Me.262 připravené k použití.jpg
- File:R4M.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely that Jaimes86 (talk · contributions · Statistics) is the creator and copyright owner of these 4 official symbols (most likely mounted from several sources) of a Colombian governmental organization. Gunnex (talk) 07:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cirt as no permission, but I could not find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 08:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject of photo, Franklin, is in the photo. Would need permission from the photographer. -- Cirt (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Given the username of the user who uploaded the image, I believe that the subject of the photo is in fact the user. They would need permission from the photographer, or evidence that they own the copyright to upload it. Tiptoety talk 09:14, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 06.07.2014, all files (related to the Bulgarian university en:Plovdiv Medical University) are licensed with an unspecific {{Copyrighted free use}} license and can be found on Web earlier, needing permissions from the copyright owners.
- File:Medical University of Plovdiv - Best University Award.jpeg
- File:Medical University of Plovdiv - Auditorium.jpeg
- File:Medical University of Plovdiv - logo.png
Gunnex (talk) 09:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pennamehere17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status: COM:TOO passing logs uploaded on 15.04.2014, per File:Mobile Mondays! NYC Logo.png: "(...) I hold the copy rights to created for Mobile Mondays NYC". This seems unlikely considering (example) https://www.718unlimited.com/ = (higher res) .jpg (last modified: 2013, exif available) or official https://twitter.com/mobilemondays + Facebook (01.2014). Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
It is stated in the description that "everyone is allowed to use this file as long as it is not modified". This violates the requirements of Wikimedia Commons. Furthermore, by now we do have images of Ignatius Joseph III Younan with Commons compatible licenses. Gugganij (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dzevdet Halilovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.
- File:Polar array tutorial.webm
- File:Array tools in AutoCAD 2012 ab.png
- File:Path array AutoCad 2012.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dzevdet Halilovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 22:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FelixLuckner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhhoang71hp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical images. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pina Gatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pina Gatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader is not the author of these old photographs. OTRS permission is necessary.
- File:Ettore Bonfatti Sabbioni e alcuni compagni della Scuola del Libro.jpg
- File:Ettore Bonfatti Sabbioni il giorno delle nozze.JPG
BrightRaven (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
The license rationale is not valid. See Template:PD-Russia-2008. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
This statue was made by Albert Poels, who died in 1984. Belgium has no panorama freedom, see COM:FOP#Belgium. ComMonster (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Grcampbell (talk) 06:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Sculpture is from 1962; no FoP in Belgium. (Has previously been deleted) Whaledad (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 22:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Sculptor is still alive; no FOP in Belgium; no signs of permission form sculptor. Whaledad (talk) 17:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Carla Kamphuis-Meijer is a Dutch sculptress and Blaricum is a village in the Netherlands. So what's the problem, there is freedom of panorama in Netherlands. Gouwenaar (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Keep. My mistake. Whaledad (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Sculptor is still alive; no FOP in Belgium; no signs of permission form sculptor. Whaledad (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Carla Kamphuis-Meijer is a Dutch sculptress and Laren is a village in the Netherlands. So what's the problem, there is freedom of panorama in Netherlands. Gouwenaar (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Keep. My mistake. Whaledad (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
I could not verify, when the photographer G. Hervio died. This is 1923 photo, if he lived 22 years more, then the photo is not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of this copyrighted poster. The file seems to be promotional. Fabyrav (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
lower quality scan of File:David Logan (Oregon).png Pete F (talk) 22:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:49, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Violate copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by M00nmystery (talk • contribs) 2015-05-05T12:39:27 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per nominator's rationale. MBisanz talk 04:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Violate copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by M00nmystery (talk • contribs) 2015-05-05T12:27:39 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per nominator's rationale. MBisanz talk 04:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
nie podoba sie 90.208.28.11 13:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep WTF? --Leyo 13:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This is not the reason for removal. :) --sasha (krassotkin) 18:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep --Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: non-sense request. JuTa 18:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
JV JACKSON 2603:8080:C400:4845:DDCF:FC85:28D5:A44A 19:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep No reason for deletion has been given. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 06:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, clearly a period promotional photo mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It appears that this photo's copyright has expired in Japan, if it was published before 1965, per Copyright law of Japan: "Works authored anonymously or pseudonymously, as well as works authored by corporations, where the individual author or authors are unknown, are protected for fifty years following publication." But it doesn't appear to be PD in the US per Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the USA. So it doesn't appear to be eligible for Commons, and should be deleted. We now have plenty of other photos of this model at Category:Mazda R360 Coupe. --Pete Tillman (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This is an image of Dione, colored red, not an artist's impression. 210.23.85.5 09:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This is not an artist's impression of Nemesis, it's the red giant, glows bright. 210.23.85.5 09:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
http://www.solennebrugiroux.com/blankterritoriz/?project=pierre-badel indicates both ©Solenne Brugiroux and ©Blankterritoriz Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello I am the author of this picture and known as my real name Solenne Brugiroux & my photographer nickname Blankterritoriz! so please this picture has no reasons to be deleted! thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sob23 (talk • contribs) 10 mai 2015 à 14:20 (UTC)
- @Sob23: you can't clame "copyright" on your website and "Créative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International" here. If you want to share it on Commons, your website must indicate a licence compatible with Créative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I nbeleive the man in the cwnrter do meet the criteria for originality Yger (talk) 15:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Je me suis trompé dans le titre et je ne sais le modifier...Le "copie de" est en trop. Philippe HENRION (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
War nur zur Bestimmung hochgeladen - Foto ist schlecht bzw. nichts aussagend. Gilt ebenso für File:Biene mit weißem Brustring 6445.jpg. mfg uploader NobbiP 17:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
duplicate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilensija (talk • contribs) 2015-05-09T23:20:45 (UTC)
- Question: Duplicate of which image? And the first version shoul be kept seperatly... --JuTa 18:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: done, dup deleted. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
plik jest zbędny, gdyż istnieje lepszy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Przemek2547 (talk • contribs) 2015-05-09T10:22:50 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is not bad at all. Clear keeper. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters behind the model are not de minimis and need a license from their copyright holder(s). FredWalsh (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
ile with pages not in order and already replaced with a new and good one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvio Gallio (talk • contribs) 2015-05-08T18:24:52 (UTC)
- Now, no page links with djvu file, I removed the last link into wikisource. --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 07:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't see a Uruguay section for COM:TOO, and I see that several countries have a lower threshold than this logo. COM:PRP dictates we should delete it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Beyond the precautionary principle, I think this logo is below the TOO. Countries with a lower threshold have had court cases that in some way work as a paramether to determine which logo should be hosted here and which not (p.e. Denmark). But there are no recorded cases of litigiation in most of South American countries to establish a common criteria. In fact, in the category: Logos of Argentina there are a lot of emblems similar to AFE (with no precedent court cases also). Should be them deleted too?. - Fma12 (talk) 21:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Where is the graphical portion (the yellow and blue lightning bolts) of the logo from? That's not a simple gradient. I'm leaning to a Delete here unless someone can show something from Uruguay that makes it clear this is PD-ineligible. --B (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Magog. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The poster in the background is not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
No source, no author, proof that it is PD in France? Yann (talk) 08:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Leon Blum died in 1950, and the pucture has been taken and published in 1920 and the photograph is unknown (and absolutelly death at 2014). Then {{Anonymous-EU}} applies here unless the picture has been taken in the US. Anyway, the picture is already in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Could be, but more information needed. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a picture by Henri Martinie, who died in 1963. It will enter the public domain in 2034. BrightRaven (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Church of the Assumption in Vitsebsk was built in 2000s. However there is no Freedom of panorama in Belarus. The architect is Игорь Ротько who is still alive. 195.50.31.213 22:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Restored buildings in Belarus have the same status as the historical buildings. Legally, the year of construction of Assumption Church considered in 1803([1], code 212Г000062, Успенскі сабор), and the architect of the project is considered to be Józef Fontana. Igor Rotko not the author of the project, he is the author of working documentation for measured drawings, ie there is no creativity in his work (this would be contrary to the Venice Charter). --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Could one provide any confirmation legal documents to the fact that this Building is free to depict? --195.50.31.213 13:18, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- See above for a link to the State List of historical and cultural values of the Republic of Belarus, there is no reference to the year 2010 (year when the restoration of the temple was completed). This means that the author of the project can not be Igor Rotko, because he was not even born in 1803. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 08:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- The absence of his name in the list doesn't prove that the modern building has freedom of panorama. --195.50.31.213 22:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- See above for a link to the State List of historical and cultural values of the Republic of Belarus, there is no reference to the year 2010 (year when the restoration of the temple was completed). This means that the author of the project can not be Igor Rotko, because he was not even born in 1803. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 08:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Could one provide any confirmation legal documents to the fact that this Building is free to depict? --195.50.31.213 13:18, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The picture of the same church was removed here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vitsebsk Uspenski sabor.JPG. After this image wasn't deleted I started undeletion request: [2]. Both images show the same chuch. While one photo was removed and the second wasn't, I think that this one should be deleted. 195.50.31.213 22:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Restoration is not creativity. File:Vitsebsk Uspenski sabor.JPG must be restored. I have already pointed out that from a legal perspective it is believed that the building was built in 1803 - is fixed in official government documents. If you are not satisfied with the date 1803 - write a complaint to the Ministry of Culture of Belarus. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: the building was originally built in 1803. The recent restoration work is probably below the TOO. Even if it was considered above the TOO, it is de minimis. BrightRaven (talk) 10:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
محتوای غیر آزاد، وپ:تبلیغ: http://khorasannews.com/OnlineNews.aspx?category=All&newsid=1541228 ¤ Omid 21:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
مشکوک به نقض آشکار حق تکثیر، وپ:تبلیغ ¤ Omid 21:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 11:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
مشکوک به نقض آشکار حق تکثیر، وپ:تبلیغ ¤ Omid 21:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
مشکوک به نقض آشکار حق تکثیر، وپ:تبلیغ ¤ Omid 21:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
مشکوک به نقض آشکار حق تکثیر، وپ:تبلیغ ¤ Omid 21:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Very bad quality of a stamp which is originally in black, see File:Seal of the Black Hand.jpg. Redirect to the latter. Zoupan (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
same as File:Fowler Biblical School.png Njzjz (talk) 04:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis and unfortunately the model is sat right in the middle. FredWalsh (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The posters in the background are not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The poster in the background is not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The film posters in the background are not de minimis, particularly the Adam and Eve one. FredWalsh (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The poster in the background is not de minimis. FredWalsh (talk) 22:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
No reliable online source confirms that the city of Pensacola has any such flag, which is possibly a hoax. The city's own official website (www.cityofpensacola.com) makes no mention of a city flag. See the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flag_of_Pensacola,_Florida, which ended with the wikiarticle being deleted on 31 January 2014. The uploader of this flag to Commons has had many other uploaded images deleted as well, including a PNG version of the supposed "flag of Pensacola", which the uploader provides no source for: see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stepo114. I request that this image and any other unsourced, unverified "flag of Pensacola" images like it be permanently deleted. Textorus (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We have File:Flag of Pensacola.svg which is the same flag as this which is widely in use, including at Pensacola, Florida. It has been in use on that article for more than two years, so our nom has not done very much research here. We do not generally delete existing raster versions of files after the svg is created and the nom gives no valid reason to delete this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
I am the original creator of this image. It seems that people think this is the actual flag of Pensacola, which it is not. I made this image to illustrate Pensacola rather than be the flag of Pensacola, therefore I want to nominate it for deletion. Stepo114 (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete That appears to be correct. Pensacola is known as The City of Five Flags, see http://www.pensapedia.com/wiki/City_of_Five_Flags, and apparently flies all five where most cities would have one.
It follows that File:Flag of Pensacola.svg should be deleted also. I have tagged that file and notified the creator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I can't see a tag in File:Flag of Pensacola.svg, nor a note on the talk page of the creator. Did you mean another file by any chance? Well, while you're pinged anyway, could you please close this DR as well?
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
,_2008_NWMRT_Chester_Bus_Running_Day_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
2015PR.jpg){kind=link}
2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_technique_mixte.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Ancient_Rome_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
,_2008_NWMRT_Chester_Bus_Running_Day_(3).jpg){kind=link}
,_2008_NWMRT_Chester_Bus_Running_Day_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Horse_Riding_Track)111.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Horse_Riding_Track)222.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Horse_Riding_Track)333.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
2015PR.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2015PR.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2015PR.jpg){kind=link}
2015PR.jpg){kind=link}
2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2015.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2015.jpg){kind=link}
2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_technique_mixte.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_technique_mixte.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_technique_mixte.jpg){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_technique_mixte.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted My comment with respect to the SVG version appears to be incorrect. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)