Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 21st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not E. leuraensis, but a common Eulamprus. Sarshag7 (talk) 02:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete, tag for rename instead Denniss (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old logo of the ICL. The new one can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Chemicals_LtdLogo.png 67.209.225.167 07:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we don't delete old Logos Denniss (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is such low resolution I cannot believe that it is the uploader's own work. It looks like an enlarged "web-resolution" version of some other image. DS (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with File:Madipally buruju.jpg and File:Madipally_school.jpg. DS (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Images sourced from one website - no evidence of permission - other uploads from this editor clear copyright violations. Per precautionary principle, these images have been deleted also. Nick (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use anywhere(out of scope),wrong file format Anningia (talk) 08:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Carats cy logo.png. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chilipepper25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality genetalia images COM:PENIS etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chilipepper25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:BORING_SEX_BODY_PART_PHOTOS, not needed.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with wrong title DJScully (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders reuquest. JuTa 23:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 22:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, promotion Rosario Berganza 04:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 04:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LUISPIU2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope

Rosario Berganza 05:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 03:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandor Cleganne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope

Rosario Berganza 05:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, just an unknown group of people facing the water, only the title and description connect this photo to birding Rosario Berganza 05:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HUGUITO493 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, private photo album

Rosario Berganza 05:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 05:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karla345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope

Rosario Berganza 05:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned vanity photo, low quality, out of scope, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 18:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In use here --Mbdortmund (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 05:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Deleted out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 06:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teleprogramm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused plain text "logos", promotion

Rosario Berganza 06:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelysq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal artworks

Rosario Berganza 06:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, promotion Rosario Berganza 06:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Devinstrobe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, promotion

Rosario Berganza 06:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, promotion Rosario Berganza 06:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XD TEAM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, promotion

Rosario Berganza 06:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, plain text Rosario Berganza 06:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider this out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider this out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

odnaklasniki 85.238.35.197 08:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandalic nomination George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file -- Deadstar (msg) 12:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sameer Sakkariya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of personal images of a man, out of COM:SCOPE lacking in educational utility. These sorts of images are more suitable for Facebook or other promotional social-media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused reversed image, out of COM:SCOPE, lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ellasexygandara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No inidication of user's own work, no metadata, two head shots and a group shot, out of COM:SCOPE, personal images go well on Facebook or other social media, not Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soportepyme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two personal images more suitable for Facebook or Social media, Commons isn't personal album.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saeed gujar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons isn't a personal photo album, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of a pen tip, not in use, possible test edit, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text autobiography, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, please see our project scope! — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 12:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file -- Deadstar (msg) 12:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file -- Deadstar (msg) 12:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heber1697 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos.

Buxtehude (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Buxtehude (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tom Boakai Tombekai, I (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tom Boakai Tombekai, I (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    15:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope. Commons is not for publishing own books. P 1 9 9   18:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image of non-notable band, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Labeled "performance poster" this isn't a selfie and isn't in use, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and File:Adelaide Eldridge, Swing Dance Singer.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EugeneZelenko (talk • contribs)
 Comment The one nominated by Eugene is most likely a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of "remedy", out of COM:SCOPE . Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused head shot of male. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of a man at a desk, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, too dark image of roses in plastic with ribbons, out of COM:SCOPE, looks like a personal upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry unused image of a pub sign which isn't even the whole sign, part of it was cut off, out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot de software privativo Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as a copyright violation by NahidSultan at 18:20, 21 April 2015. Green Giant (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is E. heatwolei, not E. quoyii. Sarshag7 (talk) 02:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is no a reason for deleting. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a rename. Green Giant (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is E. heatwolei, not E. quoyii. Sarshag7 (talk) 02:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a rename. Green Giant (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not E. quoyii. Also the distinguishing head marks cannot be seen as it is a bad photo, sorry. Sarshag7 (talk) 02:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a rename. Green Giant (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted see:http://ulrikaolund.com/press/ -- Christian Ferrer 05:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need evidence that the file was licensed by the copyright holder. Green Giant (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivorytaylor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

net copyvios

Rosario Berganza 05:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Please use speedy deletion for copyvios. Green Giant (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddamrilwan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 05:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of the statue is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. -- DAJF (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of the statue is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. -- DAJF (talk) 06:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of creation is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright bust. Presumably not the work of the uploader. DAJF (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably erected after 1978 (the death of the subject), but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only diagram with no description. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 06:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date the statue was created is not clear, but COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 06:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 07:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The problem is not with the stone, but with the plate and photograph, which is clearly the main subject of the photograph. The monument was apparently erected in the 1990s, so is still covered by copyright. --DAJF (talk) 00:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art. DAJF (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of modern outdoor works of art such as monuments. DAJF (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painter en:Jack Levine died 2010. The painting is probably still copyrighted. I am not sure, that Portland Art Museum has right to publish the photo under free license. Taivo (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider the photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider the photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with deletion of the other chair also. Nothing irreplaceable. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now nominated for deletion. BabelStone (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof that this file is actually PD is missing. No author is named nor is there any indication that attempts were made to research the author. Source is also missing. If this postcard was scanned by the uploader, it would have been helpful to check both sides for a signature of the photographer or the publisher. AFBorchert (talk) 08:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no proof given that this file is in the public domain in its country of origin (Germany). The previous deletion request researched the publisher and his year of death but no apparent attempt was made to research the photographer (who is not necessarily the publisher). AFBorchert (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This statue is in Ukraine which has no Freedom of Panorama for modern works of art. Leoboudv (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. We need evidence of who created it and when. Green Giant (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ukraine has no Freedom of Panorama for modern works of art. Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. We need evidence of who created it and when. Green Giant (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, no FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Duplicate processed. Green Giant (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Duplicate processed. Green Giant (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Duplicate processed. Green Giant (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Duplicate processed. Green Giant (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Emilie40 (talk) 11:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Duplicate processed. Green Giant (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture with no obvious use on wikicommons Jajabis (talk) 11:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture with no obvious use on wikicommons Jajabis (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture with no obvious use on wikicommons Jajabis (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture with no obvious use on wikicommons Jajabis (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture with no obvious use on wikicommons Jajabis (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gyanrajs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themmjk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs & out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't for self-promotion, promotion or storing a pile of personal images. Besides the newspaper clippings, this series of images are not selfies, but marked as own work. Subject is 90% "Aran Glenn" the remaining images are logos with "Aran" on them, a poster of some kind and a photograph of some old book spines which have been modded to read "Aran". Variable metadata, from no camera data, to NikonD300s, DSC-W29, F1027, Nikon D50, Kodak Easyshare, Canon Powershot, etc. etc. There's even a blackberry phone photo. Also various sizes including (720x by Facebook) .

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image of the book cover as well as screen logos, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yellybelly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely COM:COPYVIOs, A series of personal and/or promotional uploads which include an unsourced portrait (repeated on a biography page), a newspaper clipping, a photo of a "family museum" derivative of sign, a group shot of a family and two pictures of art by an apparently living artist. The group shot of the family might be user's own work, but is a personal image and out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catheter2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS, a series of uploads with black borders showing most likely copied from somewhere else...

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Terryyes15 sockpuppet Catheter2 (talk · contribs) (NSFW)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the fact that the likely copyright holder of a photo taken in a medical institution is the institution (not the subject) as well as the uploader's history, including several dozen deleted uploads, abuse of multiple accounts (Terryyes15, Suprapubic catheter, Tom Catheter, Catheter2). Precedents are clearly established by Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2014-07#File:ArcSoft Image100.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suprapubic Catheter Image 105.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:ArcSoft Image106.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suprapubic Catheter Image 01.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suprapubic Catheter Image 03.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Catheter2. These files do not differ in any significant way from the previously deleted ones. For the avoidance of doubt, whether or not the ArcSoft notice is present in the metadata is irrelevant. A webcam software vendor does not hold copyright to files created with full versions or trial versions of the software, and that's not why those other files were deleted.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hum. I guess they could have taken it with a timer if it was by themself. Or they may be taken by someone else who then uploaded the images. Google image search comes up with no other uses.
The institution does not "own" photos taken within it. They are owned by the individual photographer. Additionally this is a long standing catheter rather than a newly inserted one. There is a really good chance this photo was taken at home. I have been meaning to take a photo of a suprapubic catheter and will the next time I do. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete image is missing all metdata meaning upload should be required to submit it threw the Commons:OTRS system to have it uploaded. Additionally, I think this falls under Commons:Nudity (i.e. New files of low resolution or poor quality, which provide little descriptive information, of a subject we already have files of, may be nominated for deletion).--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear (c) status, needs OTRS verification. Com:PCP. Socks don't make anyone Com:AGF --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meraje (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs: A series of promotional or advertising uploads, containing unsourced images, not user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kielloggs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Obvious pages copied from magazines or books, see the off-center white borders and bent pages... and then a series of dramatically colored images of various sizes none of which has any metadata, and was taken in Manila Philippines, Seoul South Korea, some place with a LOT of snow, an image of the Incheon bridge also in South Korea. No indication of user's oown work other than an iPhone 5a appears in all the old image copying and on the bridge photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kielloggs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Issaawe~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of personal images more suitable for Facebook or other socia-media... Out of COM:SCOPE and with no indication of user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIOs on the head shots as well.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faxinalense (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 21:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't for promotion or self-promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Horco16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, a series of personal images of young men.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Huge text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identity photo, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this very small low quality image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded in 03.2015 by 1-upload user Bruno Key II (talk · contributions · Statistics), most likely a sock of Bruno Key (talk · contributions · Statistics), a Facebook grabber. Gunnex (talk) 23:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a TV screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie zostało zastąpione NOWYM!!! Mateuszgdynia (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

А floorplan designed by an architect who died in 1959. Retired electrician (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Авторское право Higimo (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 12:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (misplaced atom labels), orphaned. Leyo 14:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misplaced hydrogen (top right), correct alternative available: File:Solanidine.svg. Leyo 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure (see file description page), orphaned. Leyo 14:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbdessalemJerad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 14:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riveroman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nirjal stha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused WMF projects screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability used only on user pages. Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons does not allow non-free media, may qualify as fair use on English Wikipedia. Buxtehude (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kosovo is not a country, but a province of Serbia. Laws that a self-proclaimed Kosovan government enacts are about as valid as those of other joke countries like Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, etc. Liliana-60 (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Kosovo territory is disputed. Mentioning that these disputed territories a joke countries is a huge lack of neutral point of view (defending the position of a State or the International Community as the only valid), which exceeds the scope of a PD template. Taiwan is also a good example of territories disputed between the RoC and the PRC, and there is a PD template that belongs to the whole China.
At the moment, the template is valid. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So does that mean that since we accept laws of joke countries, I can declare a law which makes all works PD in my home village, and it will be accepted on Commons? -- Liliana-60 (talk) 11:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Short answer: No, because you aren't a legislator of any State.
Long answer: You still supporting the position of only a one State (Serbia), ignoring the position of the most countries of the UN (108/193), including the US and the most of the members of the EU. If you still disagree, just ask to your government to change its mind about recognitions of countries, or elsewhere, edit Kosovo with your biased point of view and metioning it as a joke country, and it will be vandalism... that is ridiculous!
Commons is a Multimedia repository, not an entitie to recognize countries; that job belongs to the International Community. The Commons (and the most the whole the WMF) community should keep the NPOV in politics (regardless there is not an official NPOV policy, unlike Wikipedia); Commons will not change its policies, copyright/PD templates, etc, by the opinions of a pro-serbia (or pro or anti anything) user, without founded arguments.
By contrast, the Republic of China (founded at the begin of the XX century) lost the recognition from most of the countries (supporting the PRC), but is still a good example. That converts the RoC as a joke country? I seriously think you're just trolling. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're ignoring the fact that the International community does not recognize Kosovo as a separate country. The UN makes it clear that Kosovo is a province of Serbia, see the UN resolution 1244. This was confirmed by the International Court of Justice in 2010. What individual countries do is irrelevant, they can do whatever they want. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 23:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, there is no reason for deleting a PD template, that has been used on files that are effectivelly in the PD during before 2010. Unless the President and functioneers of the Government of Kosovo are monkeys, Speedy keep.
All files tagged with this template are copyright violations. Photographs are not PD in Kosovo. And in any case, the government doesn't even control all of the country - how are you gonna use a PD template if the law isn't even enforcable in all of the country? -- Liliana-60 (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This needs further discussion, but deleting a PD templated used in files years ago is not easy as mentioning Kosovo is a joke country (that is only a pro-Serbia opinion and not a fact). A Country (aka. State) is not the same as its territories, specially if are disputed. Who is right? Kosovo or Serbia? The Republic of China or the People Republic of China? --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This DR is not worth discussing. Nations that control a chunk of land in defiance of another nation's claim over that land, yet lack any real type of international recognization, are unfortunately common, but they aren't jokes, especially not to the people who live there, and are forced to follow the law of the groups that control that land, not the groups the international community say official control the land.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
May I also note that as per the w:Brussels Agreement (2013), Serbia does not treat the Kosovo government as a joke, merely its independence.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So where's our {{PD-Islamic State}}, then? Wars happen all the time and it's simply infeasible for us to determine which warlords controlled which villages at a given time, and in which village (or even in which house) a work was published to consider whether its copyright status is to be determined by the laws of warlords A or B. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If that ever gets to the point where they have a functioning government, pass copyright laws which have actual effect, and de facto control the territory for a while, then yes we may start to have that sort of thing. That has been the general result of these discussions for a while now (Palestine, etc.). We have {{PD-NKR-exempt}} for example. It may be more of a question of what law actually applies to the author in their location, or location of publication. There are messy situations to be sure, but we have generally tried to respect the laws that exist (Berne country or not). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does Iraq and Syria recognize the right for the Islamic State to control the territory it does, like the Brussels Agreement? Does any other nation recognize ISIS? 108 nations recognize Kosovo, and that UN resolution 1244 you mention is completely irrelevant as it predates the declaration of independence by a decade. The kicker here is that Serbia recognizes Kosovo law, if not Kosovo independence, as per the Brussels Agreement. Treating Kosovo as a province of Serbia actually does not make this template any less relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously there is a territory where the law supporting this PD status is enforced. What is debatable is if adding a Serbian copyright template to the same files would be OK or not - the same question could be also debatable for Taiwan and mainland China.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there some sort of Commons agreement (at least for Crimea) to make which copyright law to apply to works created in disputed territories depend on the citizenship of the creator?    FDMS  4    06:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This deletion request is malformed. The Berne Convention lists three things which identify the source country of a work: the country of first publication, the country of residence of the author and the country of citizenship of the author. If you sue someone in a court, the court would interpret the word 'country' according to the point of view of the country where the court is located. If the court is located in a country which recognises the statehood of Kosovo, then the court determines that the country of publication/residence/citizenship is Kosovo. If the court is located in a country which doesn't recognise the statehood of Kosovo, then the court determines that the country of publication/residence/citizenship is either Serbia or terra nullius, depending on the point of view of that country. What this means to the copyright status of the work depends on how the country treats works from Kosovo, Serbia and terra nullius. See for example this case where the term 'country' in the Berne Convention was interpreted by a Japanese court with respect to North Korea. Japan doesn't recognise the statehood of North Korea.
The problem for Commons is that Commons policy says that files on Commons must be free in the source country but that different countries identify different source countries for the same work. There is apparently a difference between the Berne Convention and the WIPO agreement in that the Berne Convention talks about 'countries' whereas the WIPO agreement talks about 'members', a difference which is important for one WIPO member, the w:Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.
There is a statement that some or all of the files using this template are not the kinds of works which are listed in the template. These files should be listed for deletion elsewhere. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide a summary of that Japanese case? Google Translate doesn't help much at all.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. See also the argument by Stefan4 that some of the files using this template may also need to be nominated for deletion Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A poor-quality (grainy, dark, sun flare etc) image that is duplicated by the image File:Tennozu isle sta a.jpg taken around the same time from the same angle. . DAJF (talk) 03:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: While File:Tennozu isle sta a.jpg is indeed superior there is no need to delete the other photograph as it shows a section of the street on the right hand side which is not to be seen on the better photograph. AFBorchert (talk) 21:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highlights overexposed - hardly usable. Many replacements on hand. Retired electrician (talk) 10:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Is in use at ru:Рогожская слобода and thereby within COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karanthamalai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from movie posters. Background should be removed to keep images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karanthamalai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

EXIF data indicates these were all found on Google.

Jc86035 (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stefan Salji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milosz1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milosz1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, AutoCAD is not a free software. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability used on user page. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of logos on this screenshot, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, no indication of user's own work. Some of user's other uploads were direct from the India Tourism program, others from various websites around the internet. COM:PRP this image - no confidence in this user's licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence this is user's own work, uploader's other images were copied from Indian websites of tourism and news. COM:PRP, no metadata, no indication this user is able to head shot public figures. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, uploads variable in size, quality and lightting. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Music bio1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Promo set for en:Daley (musician) uploaded in a row on 04.04.-06.04.2015, grabbed from TV sources (from The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon: File:Daley Fallon4.jpg + File:Daley & The Roots 1.jpg + etc., see also Facebook 01.2015) and Internet source (like File:Daley live at 930 Club - Washington, DC.jpg + crop File:Daley 930 Club - DC.jpg versus http://thekey.xpn.org/tag/daley/ (2014, gallery, credit: "Photo by Cameron Pollack", Copyright WXPN) = http://thekey.xpn.org/aatk/files/2014/04/Daley-16.jpg (exif available).

Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Music bio1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of promotional uploads, only two images have camera metadata, the rest are of variable sizes, lighting, styles, and etc. showing probable sources COM:COPYVIOs not own work. E.G. The image from the talk show is certainly not own work and also displays a book cover.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WorldlyVoice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three older images which if their real source were know might be ok to keep, but as they are currently licensed "self", - and they're obviously not all own work - they need their licenses fixed at a minimum. Please read up on COM:L for more information.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of living artist, for story see http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/438824/lifestyle/artandculture/the-sining-saysay-exhibit-a-15-minute-history-lesson-with-paintings Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously from a half-toned published source, not own work, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused cat image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's now in use. Legoktm (talk) 22:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now in use. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of artwork, not own work, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of artwork, not own work, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chart is most likely not user's own work, as it has a footer on it which suggests copying from another source, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privately owned and copyrighted, see EXIF info on the image's description page ɱ (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LUKERAVI. Gunnex (talk) 08:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 16:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright from kkhighschool.wordpress.com. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 17:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche Namensgebung Trierer48 (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you know the correct name, you may want to ask to get it renamed... --Jwh (talk) 07:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: one "s" too much, no reason for deletion. I'll rename it. Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i made an error of image Vatadoshu 20:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion Sreejith K (talk) 04:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely "own work". Probably scanned from a book Ganímedes (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of licence on source page It's early morn (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't this fall under some category of copyright of the screen? otherwise wouldn't everyone be taking pictures of an actor on screen and posting it? Lady Lotus (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. IJReid (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: undefined Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows the label for a plant that is not visible; what is visible looks like an Asparagus species and carnations; there is another photo that shows the plant in question, and its identification is not in doubt. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may please delete this. --Rameshng (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted material Wikifido (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not original author Andy.jackins (talk) 15:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's doubtful that {{PD-German logos}} applies here to begin with and even then, it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the US. Liliana-60 (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correct source is missing, possible copyvio. Buxtehude (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This postcard was published at the beginning of the 20th century and thereby before 1923 which makes it public domain in the United States. However, in its country of original, Germany, we have no proof yet that this photograph is in the public domain. There is no signature on the depicted side (just a caption which is quoted in the description). No information is given on the other side of the postcard. AFBorchert (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 20:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for edit and corrct a word in to file → grows →to → growth Mehdiesel (talk) 13:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion Krd 17:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras. See also user talk page.

Sealle (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I added camera model after every photo, really there was no two photos made with same camera model, so own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear that photographer has released this? Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong, The college owns the property of all photos taken by our contracted photographers, Gil Talbot is one of these. I shared this information and received approval from Wiki to upload this photo prior to uploading it. Please let me know if you need additional information or have more questions. Thanks! Dyan at SAC (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can you clarify what you mean by "received approval from Wiki"? A permission statement would need to be sent in to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, copyright holder (Kevin Harkins or Saint Anselm college) must send OTRS-permission. Please show in permission name of the (deleted) file. After that the file will be restored. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and IMHO out of scope of {{PD-textlogo}}. Gunnex (talk) 17:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'm afraid, that this is not a textlogo. This was the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Logradouro (Paraíba) regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Logradouro (Paraíba) emancipated in 1994 (see also http://www.logradouro.pb.gov.br/historia/), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally: Unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982) Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government.

Gunnex (talk) 17:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bust shows Han Bentz van den Berg who died in 1976, so the artwork itself should still be copyrighted. Freedom of panorama in the Netherlands excludes the interiors of museums and the like. Therefore this derivative photo is a copyright infringement. De728631 (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, not a map of the Morava River basin Zoupan (talk) 18:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I think, that the map can still be usable, although I am not sure, how. The whole month has passed and nobody has said, how to use the file. If somebody says that to me, then I will restore the file. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that this image looks like it is from https://www.flickr.com/photos/128421506@N08/17174124945/in/photostream/ and is not a valid license. There is relevant information at OTRS ticket 2014121810000328, specifically the messages on April 21. B (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PRP, the statement in OTRS ticket is not conclusive to keep the file. Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission, but I cant fin an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 18:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Single-contribution user, no exif data + appearing like an official portait or press image. --Denniss (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo does not show a Prosopis alba tree, it shows another tree specie. Raul Rivarola (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deleting the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice photoshoot, but not relevant for Wikipedia in any way Grashoofd (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Commons is not just for Wikipedia. --Abd (talk) 21:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, big photo with metadata, actually shows something beautiful ... Taivo (talk) 10:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice photoshoot, but not relevant for Wikipedia in any way Grashoofd (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, big photo with metadata, shows something beautiful. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old company logo, please delete. Jessrae (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, old logos are also useful to show history of company. The logo does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, low frame rate. Nick7cool (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, COM:PENIS. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplicata Vatadoshu 20:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guy Garnier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are two questions here.

First, although our uploader's user name is the same as the artist, we do not know that the uploader is actually the artist. Policy therefore requires that the artist send a free license to OTRS.

Second, the artist does not have an article on WP:FR or WP:EN and does not appear on the first Google page, except, possibly, on Facebook, and his own web page. Therefore he probably is not notable as we use the term here. We do not keep personal art from non-notable artists. Therefore I think we should delete these even if with a free license.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[copied from e-mail to JLW]

Bonjour Jim ,

à la suite de votre courriel je vous parvenir quelques liens glanés sur le web où apparaît mon travail dans des parutions ou médias .

http://www.autour-des-auteurs.net/magazine/magazine_n24.html http://www.revueobservatoire.be/spip.php?page=publication&id_produit=2 https://librebonimenteur.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/guy-garnier-colleur-de-papier/ http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17ydbb_funambule-guy-garnier-veronique-sauger-davidaz_creation http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xx1um1_lili-dring-ne-veut-pas-grandir-1-veronique-sauger-kreisler_creation http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyis7b_lili-dring-ne-veut-pas-grandir-2-veronique-sauger-kreisler_creation

Sincères salutations

Guy Garnier [copy ends]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiewiorka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files have no sources, no permission, and it seems that these people are imaginary (fake ?). On :fr, we had two discussions about articles created by Wiewiorka, about two of these people (fr:Discussion:Stanislaw-Karol Prymersky/Suppression and fr:Discussion:Henryk Prymerski/Suppression) : they were deleted, with suspicion of fake.--Sammyday (talk) 21:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by style I would say: fake. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify the license, source link is dead and source site has license "Copyright 2015 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved". Terms of use say here: "Everything on this website is copyrighted". Commercial use of files is strictly prohibited. The file has derivative work file:Dennis MacAlistair Ritchie .jpg.
The photo was first uploaded by en:User:Ems2 into en.wiki. I do not trust this user, he has multiply copyright violation warnings on his/her userpage en:User talk:Ems2 and (s)he has uploaded copyrighted logo en:file:Glenda-small.jpg as own work. But maybe this is work of US government? Maybe the source site had free license in 2006, during first upload? Taivo (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Clear copyvio, please try to replace this image and ping me for deletion of this one. --Denniss (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But also found on https://web.archive.org/web/19991008090022/http://www.doc.gov/opa/photo/techno.htm William Avery (talk) 12:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In case it's not clear: I think this points very strongly to it being the work of a US government employee in the course of their duties. William Avery (talk) 07:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hosting it on a .gov servers does not make it a fedgov work. They need to be clearly labelled as such. --Denniss (talk) 10:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Natuur12 (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the claim that anonymous works are not copyrighted in North Korea is highly doubtful at best. There is no reason why this should be PD. Liliana-60 (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Photo says it is 2000 work, must be copyrighted. — regards, Revi 14:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This postcard is dated from 1899 (see date of the message) and thereby published before 1923 which puts it into the public domain in the United States but unfortunately not in its country of origin, Germany, where we need a proof for its public domain status. The publisher is known (see signature on the left border, I transcribed it and put into the author line) but unfortunately we do not know yet the artist who created this lithography. This is possibly a case of {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. AFBorchert (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to keep this file, because the authors, i.e. the photographers or lithographers, are normally not mentioned on any postcards of the Gebr. Metz publishing house. I did a web search for them some time ago, and could not find any names of them, apart from the names of the two brothers themselves, who owned the publishing house. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can't think its true. Te card is older then 100 years with unknown authors. Keep it. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, as anonymous work. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

این پرونده تکراری می باشد poulad_pouladin (talk) 21:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dont know from which file but the copyright status of the current file is unclear Natuur12 (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]