Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/12/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![4 File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg](#File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
![178 File:"L'ormeau" (début du XX° siècle).jpg](#File:"L'ormeau"_(début_du_XX°_siècle).jpg){kind=link}
![179 File:Le château du XVII°s - "Eth Casthet".jpg](#File:Le_château_du_XVII°s_-_"Eth_Casthet".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![201 File:Le lavoir de "La Hounte".jpg](#File:Le_lavoir_de_"La_Hounte".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_medal.png){kind=link}
,_Corn_Soup.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the source it has been copied from the "Enciclopedia de México" 2005 edition, therefore it's a copyright violation. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
You can not just a screenshot of a software! FritsHG Question? 17:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Koramangala☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Bannerghatta Road☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services BTM Layout☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services HSR Layout☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Bellandur☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services ITPL☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Whitefield☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Marathahalli☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Jayanagar ☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services JP Nagar ☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services Madiwala☻.jpg
- File:❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ ℂall Giℝls ღ ℰsℭℴℛts Services In Bangalore ☻.jpg
- File:Caℒℒ Giℝl*~*-❾❶❻❹❶❹❺❼❺❶ -*~*) eScoℝt Seℝvices & caℒℒ Giℝls in Bangalore.jpg
_eSco%E2%84%9Dt_Se%E2%84%9Dvices_%26_ca%E2%84%92%E2%84%92_Gi%E2%84%9Dls_in_Bangalore.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Per nomination. These aren't useful for an educational purpose, and yes, the phone number and name in there are spammed in the files too. DLindsley Need something? 19:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg
[edit]
It hurt the religious feeling of Islam Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not censored. If it offends you, don't look at it. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Pls delete it rightnow Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, nagging isn't going to work. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
either a new cartoon war will be start on internet Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion either. If you don't like war, don't wage it. And again, one request would have been plenty. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Kept. As no valid reason for deletion within the deletion policy has been provided. --Dferg (talk · meta) 07:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Attacks Islamic Religious Thoughts Kmniyas (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Purely disruptive re-nomination with no new arguments. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)- Speedy keep. Agree with prior analysis given. -- Cirt (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Closed as Keep. INeverCry 18:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
Under "Photographs of identifiable people" section of "Commons:Deletion policy" this image has an unethical objective, i.e., to pervert freedom of expression. This image is unacceptable as it mocks the prophet, whose no real photograph is available till date. Further, the author of this image has no consent to draw this picture from the prophet's heirs (i.e. his descendants, the people of Quraish). Chintu6 (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Per my comment on the IP's nomination below. DLindsley Need something? 18:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Commons:Photographs of identifiable people deals with photographs of identifiable, living people. This is not a photograph, and Muhammad is not alive. He died nearly 1200 years before the creation of the earliest surviving camera photograph and 1378 years before this drawing was created. None of your other points have any basis in Commons' policy or applicable laws or bring up anything that wasn't already addressed in the numerous deletion discussions that you were told to read before starting yet another round of this. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Speedily kept as no valid reason within Commons policy has been advanced. NPOV, Verifiability and OR do not apply to Commons; "unethical, mischievous and provocative" are opinions not based in policy and so irrelevant here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
This image just kills Wikipedia's "neutral point of view". In addition it lacks "verifiability" and has "no original research" 14.139.234.86 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Please understand that Commons is not Wikipedia, which means that here at Commons, we don't have to rely on Wikipedia rules such as the rules you mentioned, which are "neutral point of view" and "no original research". I'm also going for a Keep vote per the above arguments in the archived debates. DLindsley Need something? 18:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, because whoever our anonymous friend one four dot one three nine dot two three four dot eight six is, he or she failed to cite any relevant Commons policies, and there is already an ongoing deletion discussion. As the very first sentence of Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view states, "Commons is not Wikipedia, and files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view and No original research requirements imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites." At this point, repeated deletion nominations of the same file without bringing up any new, relevant arguments is entirely unhelpful, and piling on multiple concurrent deletion discussions is particularly disruptive. Speedy non-admin closure, because there is plenty of precedent here as well as another open discussion. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
These images lack neutral point of view, verifiability and original research besides being unethical, mischievous and provocative (see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons) Chintu6 (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Speedily kept as no valid reason within Commons policy has been advanced. NPOV, Verifiability and OR do not apply to Commons; "unethical, mischievous and provocative" are opinions not based in policy and so irrelevant here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:D: Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack. Also for COM:SCOPE as it can not be used for education. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 02:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Withdrawn by nominator (me)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_by_User:JSDX_from_fr.wikipedia#mediaviewer/File:Logojsdx.png 93.15.243.242 19:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-closed as being without valid rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Essendone il proprietario ne chiedo la cancellazione grazie Alematrox (talk) 12:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%B1%84%EC%9D%80%EC%A0%95
this is me. im chae eun jung (real name is Lee eun jung i hate this photo here. please delete it
Enjel8238 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- The photo is File:이지혜, 채은정 출연 58년 전통의 양념 소갈비 중구 을지로 맛집 조선옥 (식신로드 Gourmet Road) eps 21-2 채은정.jpg and was uploaded by Puramyun31. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
_eps_21-2_%EC%B1%84%EC%9D%80%EC%A0%95.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: nominate the picture, not the policy page. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Its a disturbing image which holds back all my work and private life. Melissa sneekes (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, page is not an image. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hybrid_image_decomposition.jpg 2601:42:702:2B5B:516F:7ED9:57D2:1CC2 20:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
cessation d'activité Sauvageot (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, it's a proposal/draft, which doesn't necessarily require "activity", but still has value per the ideas/rules drafted by its editors. Where is the need to delete it? --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded incorrect file/video and this is not my own work- ie. copyright violation Stuart Anthony Halpin (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: kept this page, but deleted File:Educational video of interracial oral sex.webm (this user's only upload), as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
I created it by mistake; correct name = Category:Surrender of Germany after World War II Rcbutcher (talk) 04:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Mistake MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
jgfvjc gwekfhugfwkhjzhsufqwdgzehftgwhshfwŮPTRHG7Ý6ZJZ6 78.110.208.218 09:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. If there really is a reason to delete this, please re-request with reasons MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Probably coming from a social network account of the French radio/television animator Enora Malagré like the others uploads of Cteamenora29 (talk · contribs), so probably copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Any source, any author, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Selfie, out of scope, probably coming from a social network account of Enora Malagré, so probably copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, coming from a social network account of one of Virgin Radio animators, so copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded by serial copyright violator Squinge (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright infringement MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded by serial copyright violator Squinge (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright infringement MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Has been deprecated since March, and all uses of it have finally been removed Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Support! --Ricordisamoa 21:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: Deprecated. HTML library schould be used instead. Steinsplitter (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Image scanned from newspaper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons sibi (talk • contribs) 2014-12-19T09:13:34 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyrights violation - seems to be taken from the architect's site with no OTRS permission Ldorfman (talk) 23:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio matanya • talk 08:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Das Eigentumsrechts am Grundstück inkl. dem daraus resultierenden Hausrecht wurde verletzt. Für eine Veröffentlichung haben sie von mir keine Erlaubnis bekomen. Ist das Bild am 15.01.2015 noch im Netz, mache ich eine Anzeige bei der Polizei! Das ist ein Privatgebäude und somit liegt eine Verletzung des Persönlichkeitsrecht des Gebäudebewohners Eigentümers vor! Sie haben keine Genehmigung von uns erhalten! Axeo174 (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep photo seems to be made from public street Rosenstraße; ownership and copyright of the building is irrelevant in this case. Ankry (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason given Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Das Eigentumsrechts am Grundstück inkl. dem daraus resultierenden Hausrecht wurde verletzt. Für eine Veröffentlichung haben sie von mir keine Erlaubnis bekomen. Ist das Bild am 15.01.2015 noch im Netz, mache ich eine Anzeige bei der Polizei! Das ist ein Privatgebäude und somit liegt eine Verletzung des Persönlichkeitsrecht des Gebäudebewohners Eigentümers vor! Axeo174 (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep photo seems to be made from public street Rosenstraße; ownership and copyright of the building is irrelevant in this case. Ankry (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason given Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Das Eigentumsrechts am Grundstück inkl. dem daraus resultierenden Hausrecht wurde verletzt. Für eine Veröffentlichung haben sie von mir keine Erlaubnis bekomen. Ist das Bild am 15.01.2015 noch im Netz, mache ich eine Anzeige bei der Polizei! Das ist ein Privatgebäude und somit liegt eine Verletzung des Persönlichkeitsrecht des Gebäudebewohners Eigentümers vor! Axeo174 (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a cultural heritage monument according to de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Hoyerswerda. --Achim (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Antrag abgewiesen: Die Abbildung eines Gebäudes von der Straßenseite (= öffentlicher Raum) ist keine Verletzung des Hausrechts, da kein Zutritt auf das Privatgrundstück erfolgte. Auch ein irgendwie geartetes „Eigentumsrecht“ ist davon nicht betroffen, genausowenig wie das Persönlichkeitsrecht, da keine Person abgebildet ist. -- 32X (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Copied from http://img.cdn.svenskafans.com/Image/7/262953/Alexander-Bonsaksen.jpg Squinge (talk) 13:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 08:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kreyooons17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted image, see "source=Google"
Ies (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Materialscientist; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 12:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused, sole contribuion Pibwl (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
seems out of scope, unused, no category, sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused (the only activity of the user was to add his page and a couple of personal photos) Pibwl (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused (the only activity of the user was to add his page and a couple of personal photos) Pibwl (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused, one of user's two uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
some TM logo, unused, one of user's two uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
screenshot, unused, out of scope, copyrighted? Pibwl (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
unlikely own work, one of user's 3 uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
some logo, out of scope?, one of user's 3 uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
self-portrait from user with 1 edit. Not in use. Out of SCOPE Shakko (talk) 23:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
copyvio; invalid claim of authorship Andy Mabbett (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Re: File:ScottPageAutographCropWiki.jpg and File:ScottPageAutographCrop.jpg, I'm concerned the photograph I submitted for the article on musician Scott Page is nominated for deletion and would like to request that this request be declined and the image's good standing be fully restored. Specifically, the file of his autograph of a copy of "A Momentary Lapse of Reason."
- There are two files I uploaded - this was largely due to a mistake on my end that I wasn't sure how to correct. The following file can be deleted as it was not my intention to duplicate the submission of that specific photograph; as such, it is appropriate to delete: File:ScottPageAutographCropWiki.jpg
- That said, I am concerned File:ScottPageAutographCrop.jpg is nominated for deletion, seeing as it is being used appropriately for the article on musician Scott Page:
- 1) The picture file is low resolution, which is what is expected of album covers. 2) The picture provides vital information about the artist by showing his autograph on one of the most important albums he contributed to in the course of his career - I feel this is stating the obvious but I fully understand that this is one of the requirements for posting album covers in the context of an article, as in the case of Pink Floyd and Storm Thorgerson each - each of the pages feature low resolution photos of the album covers that help crystallize the narrative in each of the article to whom these items are relevant. 3) The article is nominated for "invalid claim of authorship." I took the picture and am not uploading a copy of the album cover as my own work - it is a low resolution PORTION of that album cover.
- Wikipedia is a great resource - but I am concerned that the institutionalization of a culture where editors look for ways to invalidate work rather than to collaborate in finding a solution to help sustain it is going to run the effort into the ground (I find this article illustrates this point well: http://www.psmag.com/navigation/books-and-culture/killed-wikipedia-93777/). I'm just hoping that rather than starting this from scratch you can help me find a solution to this problem: based on what I have stated above, my effort meets all the necessary criteria for the work to be upheld as legitimate, valid, and informative. In fact, it is not unlike the following file, which meets the exact same standards and has never faced this type of deletion challenge that I can discern: File:Bob Marley's autograph on LP Rastaman Vibration 1978.jpg
- Can you please consider the information I have provided to withdraw the deletion nomination for File:ScottPageAutographCrop.jpg (as opposed to my erroneous submission of File:ScottPageAutographCrop.jpg, which can be deleted as it was not intended to remain in the Wikimedia Commons system)? I would appreciate help with this as I know my addition to the article is valid.--MarieLopezPhotographer (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 01:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: album cover not created by uploader, fair use is not allowed on commons Didym (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Didym there was only a PORTION of the album cover and low resolution - which is the standard practice for use of album covers in any article. I find the approach to this deletion exceptionally unprofessional and against the grain of what we are all supposed to bring to Wikipedia: the file was nominated for deletion and there should have been a discussion. This was anything but a discussion and it is baffling that anyone is given this latitude: ALL ALBUM COVERS ARE REPLICATED IN RELEVANT ARTICLES UNDER SO LONG AS THEY ARE LOW RESOLUTION. In the case of autographs, using a PORTION of the album covered that is signed is yet further caution to not violate the copyright. This was an unfair, unwarranted deletion.
- This file should not have been deleted based on Non-free media information and use rationale – non-free album cover. "The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original cover. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable as artwork on pirate versions or other uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork. As musical cover art, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the packaging of the music would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary. As musical cover art, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the packaging of the music would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary. Using a different image would be misleading as to the identity of the work. Use of the cover art in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law as described above."--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
copyvio; invalid claim of authorship Andy Mabbett (talk) 23:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
includes big posters on the bottom whos copyright owner are unclear Motopark (talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unfree posters certainly not de minimis Didym (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diego diaz apagueño (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfies, out of scope.
- File:DiazApagueño.jpg
- File:DDA.jpg
- File:DiegoDA.jpg
- File:DiegoDiaz.jpg
- File:Diego diaz apagueño.jpg
- File:DiegoDiazA.jpg
- File:DiegoDiazApagueño.jpg
Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Private vanity image. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 04:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Low quality nonsense image Ies (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete unused private image, out of scope. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thejunglejim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Asymetrical poor quality drawing, non important artist and not used The Photographer (talk) 12:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, low quality (size and overexposed), not used The Photographer (talk) 12:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used, low quality The Photographer (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used, low size The Photographer (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used, low quality The Photographer (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:TerceS toFred.PDF
- File:RALLETS.PDF
- File:CD BURN.PDF
- File:PVM YR.PDF
- File:Hematome retro-placentaire.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text files, charts, text with background graphics of unclear copyrights status.
- File:PHY-2AS LPH-C1-14-15.pdf
- File:المفعول.jpg
- File:Ouarsenis-4e713a2cfc.jpg
- File:211ufd.png
- File:Maxresdefault40400.jpg
- File:23gh.JPG
- File:25565.jpg
- File:30.JPG
- File:29.JPG
- File:Biltin.jpg
- File:Aayyy.jpg
- File:Molahadat.png
- File:Mithal.png
- File:Program de cour.jpg
- File:الرزق.jpg
- File:نصيحة.jpg
- File:الرجل و الزوجة.jpg
- File:Nizaar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
unreadable dross and clutter 68.185.89.231 17:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Since it was published a century ago I'm sure most of the textual content may be completely outdated - however some of the illustrations might be useful. Christopher Fynn (talk)) 19:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Contributions from this IP seem consistently unhelpful to Commons. --Fæ (talk) 09:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
unreadable dross and clutter 68.185.89.231 17:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Unless this rationale is fleshed more out, I'd say Keep -- Rillke(q?) 21:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Contributions from this IP seem consistently unhelpful to Commons. Trying to delete texts published by Dickens as "dross" looks like plain old trolling to me. --Fæ (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140731 115305.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140731 115257.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140708 214723.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140708 214705.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140618 204012.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140618 204009.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140608 210410.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140608 210412.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140515 181701.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140515 181653.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140327 152042.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140327 152034.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140320 171643.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140212 144047.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140212 134934.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140206 192918.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20140115 182622.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131226 155148.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131223 143814.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131209 133545.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131209 133540.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131128 160106.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT - WIN 20131128 160053.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 16.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 15.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 14.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 13.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 12.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 9.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 8.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 7.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 6.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 4.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 5.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 3.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 2.JPG
- File:PTITCHAT 1.JPG
Ies (talk) 18:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material out of project scope, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 19:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Album cover? Yann (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Christopher Fynn (talk)) 13:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep File moved to File:Pilgrim at Kalachakra empowerment, Ladakh (1).jpg and within scope of that event. russavia (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Poor writing, non important people, self promotion and private information, non relevant for wikimedia projects The Photographer (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
File:RIO TAMANDUATEÍ, NO PARQUE DOM PEDRO, APOS RECEBER AS AGUAS DO FAMOSO RIACHO IPIRANGA , ONDE DOM PEDRO PRIMEIRO DEU O GRITO DA INDEPENDENCIA, HOJE É SÓ UM ESGOTO LARGO.jpg
[edit]
Sorry, the name too long Gapatas (talk) 01:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: That's not a valid reason to nominate a file for deletion. DLindsley Need something? 18:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Also, this is a case where you can request renaming of your files. DLindsley Need something? 18:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Without further clarification copyvio via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18213379 (2009, © All rights reserved by Valdizar Lima) --> does not match uploader's name Gapatas (talk · contributions · Statistics) . Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 03:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete - out of focus. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Own work, bad quality Piponwa (talk) 07:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Own work, bad quality. Piponwa (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Y.haruo as no license. His reason was Please provide the first publication details.. JuTa 10:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
There are none first publication details. Ta
Deleted: INeverCry 04:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Is the uploader the author of the picture? Otherwise we need an OTRS permission of the painter Ezarateesteban 13:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
too blurry; Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
too small; Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erwan Corre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Recent artworks. Unfortunately, there is no FOP in France.
- File:Fresque murale place Saint-Germain à Rennes - Décembre 2014.jpg
- File:Fresque murale place Saint-Germain à Rennes -Juin 2014.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erwan Corre (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS
- File:Fresque Mectoub - Maurepas - Gros-Chêne - Rennes - Mai 2019 - 02.jpg
- File:Fresque de Mectoub - Quartier de Maurepas - Gros-Chêne - Rennes - Mai 2019 - 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work based on a map by uncredited source. Also out of scope as very poor quality drawing which was properly redone and uploaded as File:Dolina Siedmiu Mlynow szkic.svg. The deletion of this version of the file was requested by the author here. Jarekt (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankit nauwag (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Old pictures. Are they really own work?
BrightRaven (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The artist, Emily Warren, only died in 1956. The licence is not valid. BrightRaven (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Recent artwork located in Herentals, Belgium, where there is no FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 16:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogs license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogs license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogs license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
File:A Royal Canadian Air Force CC-150 Polaris Airbus aircraft, top, with the 437th Squadron, refuels a CF-18 Hornet aircraft with the 409th Squadron on the way to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, for 130825-O-ZZ999-001-CA.jpg
[edit]
Photo EXIF shows "Canadian Air Force photo/Cpl. Vicky Lefrancois" we need to get permission from the RCAF here :( russavia (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
![17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-Yann-2014-12-21T17:50:00.000Z-File:"L'ormeau"_(début_du_XX°_siècle).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
![04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-INeverCry-2014-12-28T04:06:00.000Z-File:"L'ormeau"_(début_du_XX°_siècle).jpg){kind=link}
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
![17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-Yann-2014-12-21T17:50:00.000Z-File:Le_château_du_XVII°s_-_"Eth_Casthet".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
![04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-INeverCry-2014-12-28T04:06:00.000Z-File:Le_château_du_XVII°s_-_"Eth_Casthet".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Scan, not own work. Wrong source, bogus license. Français : Mauvaise source, mauvaise licence. Yann (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
in the picture will be read all right reserved Motopark (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Smaller duplicate of File:Pavle-jurisic-sturm.jpg. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Widely used. INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Logo Deutsche Bahn.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Ter.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Fry1989 eh? 18:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Fry1989 eh? 18:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
You can delete all these logos, I thought I would need them because I'm updating all the luxembourgish railway pages. Thanks!
Duplicate of File:SNCB logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Trade mark. Copyright violation 83.60.89.226 19:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Trade mark. Copyright violation 83.60.89.226 19:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Trade mark. Copyright violation. 83.60.89.226 19:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Trade mark. Copyright violation 83.60.89.226 19:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
In absence of a date this would quite obviously be a "Flickrwashed" copyvio, regardless of Flickr user's claimed license. While the pre-1977 date and *apparent* lack of a copyright notice would render it non-copyrighted *if* it was published in the US, there's no indication as to the image's origins, and without this evidence it should be deleted. Ubcule (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The spelling of technology is wrong. Auqib.anwari (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong copyright owner ?, old paper picture, who has taken this picture ? Motopark (talk) 20:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, are you sure that is an own work? No source provided Ezarateesteban 20:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Image scanned from newspaper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons sibi (talk • contribs) 2014-12-19T09:15:23 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Image scanned from newspaper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons sibi (talk • contribs) 2014-12-19T09:15:09 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
author unknown, newer version of an old map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalima (talk • contribs) 2014-12-05T13:29:49 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Ultrasound of a club foot
[edit]- File:Ultrasound of club foot.jpg
- File:3D ultrasound of club foot 1.jpg
- File:3D ultrasound of club foot 2.jpg
- File:3D ultrasound of club foot 3.jpg
Unfortunately, obtaining the consent from mother was not successful. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a photogrph of a picture : we can see a piece of adhésive under the picture in the up left corner ; no EXIF. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
![20:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-Llann_Wé²-2014-12-21T20:37:00.000Z-File:Le_lavoir_de_"La_Hounte".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
![04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/21#c-INeverCry-2014-12-28T04:13:00.000Z-File:Le_lavoir_de_"La_Hounte".jpg){kind=link}
Scan of a picture of a magazine or newspaper : we can see the dots of printing. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably scanned from a newspaper or a magazine : we can see printing stripes : no EXIF. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Source is OWN ? Scan of an old postacard ; no autor known, no permission. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio is possible ([1]), I don't sure that is author's own work.--Ferdinandus (talk) 10:57, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Extremely low quality, upsampled. A number of alternatives exist here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 2014-12-16T17:31:53 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Probably screen print of Google Views as some other of this user. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
not clear if the person is in scope, unused, source different than author, which is different in the second contribution of this user Pibwl (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
the uploader is not an author, which is given as "municipality Ruse", and the author is different than in the second contribution of this user Pibwl (talk) 22:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
COM:DW. Yann (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
_medal.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_medal.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Permission says "Permission given by Megan Robertson to User:PalawanOz on 22 Apr 2007 for the use of this image in Wikipedia articles" - but it is not clear if this is permission includes permission for non-Wikipedia uses! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
_medal.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
_medal.png){kind=link}
This is a non-free logo with no evidence of permission. Diannaa (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a publicity shot for the Royal Opera house. Low resolution, an anonymous uploader, and no EXIF data. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Any proof for "appears to be"? Neither TinEye nor Google Images show any hint of the ROH. How is the uploader anonymous, and what does the use of a nickname and the absence of EXIF data or low resolution prove? None of these are mentioned at COM:D. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Without further clarification Delete considering uploaded 12.2012 by Madamabutterfly (talk · contributions · Statistics) versus previously published via (example) http://www.tutti-magazine.fr/test/detail/la-boheme-ROH-DVD-fr/ (+/- 2010, credit: "Photo © ROH/Johan Persson 2009" --> see also exif) = http://www.tutti-magazine.fr/upload/record/img/Teodor_Ilincai_Boheme.jpg (last modified: 2010, identical exif). Gunnex (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- In light of Gunnex's findings: Delete. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- In light of Gunnex's findings:
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Not own work, possibly a copyvio Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Re-uploaded non-free image/ COA, should be on wikis due to copyright Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be "own work" (photo from WW2) Pibwl (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Don't believe that this is the uploader's own work. Very low resolution, no EXIF, and 'unknown date' MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Photo stated to be by Felix Kunze, not the uploader. Very low resolution, no EXIF MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Not at all consistent with this user's other uploads and cameras used. Stated to be by Simon Harris - clearly not by the uploader. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Yann (talk) 22:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep US-Gov. Please explain why you doubt that this is gun camera footage, if not what is the source? --Fæ (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per {{PD-USGov}}. INeverCry 04:50, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
It appears to be a Google Street View image. Jespinos (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Also:
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Drawing from user with 1 edit, not in use, out of SCOPE: Commons is not for publishing own art work. Shakko (talk) 23:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The license is not right! The file consists of more than just general information! FritsHG Question? 07:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
maybe pd-old but I really doubt "own work" Avron (talk) 13:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: License and source fixed. Yann (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
mistake,not Kinpei Teraoka Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Very poor quality, not used. Yann (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Photo floue Ralph Hammann (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep ? similar case to File talk:Enormous Omelet Sandwich in wrapper.jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 09:50, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This image is distinguishable. The Burger King logo here is central, somewhat larger in proportions, not incidental to the image - see the image title / description. Not covered under De Minimus. This is also an image from Denmark where ToO is lower and font dependent. Precautionary principle. 71.81.154.113 14:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Drawings are de minimis. Yann (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
,_Corn_Soup.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Corn_Soup.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. The focus and scope of this image is th burger package. The other products can be cropped in to other pictures, but this picture should be deleted. Josve05a (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Going by past experience, I'd assume that the McDonalds logo- and text- are below the threshold of (copyrightable) originality, though the former is of course still a trademark. In theory, the box with the photo of a burger(?) and the cup with the footballer on it could be cropped out, and the tray liner beneath the meal may be de minimis becaue it's mostly obscured and the details aren't clearly legible, nor are they the focus of the image. (Disclaimer; I uploaded the sharpened version, but not the original.) Ubcule (talk) 18:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete the cornsoup and pack of fries are OK, but the central Burger package is within COM:PACKAGING the problem is not a logo but a printed photograph or drawing on the packaging which illustrates the contents 71.81.154.113 14:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
,_Corn_Soup.jpg){kind=link}
,_Corn_Soup.jpg){kind=link}
,_Corn_Soup.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
,_Corn_Soup.jpg){kind=link}
personal rights. Identifiable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coentor (talk • contribs) 2014-12-06T21:33:14 (UTC)
Kept: Within scope, no apparent copyvio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I requested deletion because an identifiable person appears on it. Nobody disagreed but was kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coentor (talk • contribs) 2014-12-19T20:50:42 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Not used. Yann (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apologies but I may not be alone in failing to understand this image's non-duplicate subject-matter see others of same name, and huge size. Adam37 (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 17:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See previous comment on those in like category Adam37 (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Lazy, cryptic DR rationale. Try again, this time with a sensible explanation, or a link to one. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Cpyrighted logo. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
There's nother same image that is better, is an svg image Cesaro2012 (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR rationale. MBisanz talk 18:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR rationale. MBisanz talk 18:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G S Palmer as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Smaller version of File:Coleophora nepetellae 34968 (1).jpg. JuTa 23:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per uncontested DR rationale. MBisanz talk 18:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Mappa ferrovia Como-Varese.png. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 03:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: author's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/55559889 Yann (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je suis l'auteur de cette photographie, qui, comme de très nombreuses autres, est présente sur WCommons et également sur un autre site. Cette situation qui existe depuis plusieurs années n'a jamais posé de problème jusqu'à maintenant. Est-ce contraire aux règles de WCommons ? A vous lire. Cordialement. Gregofhuest (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Kept Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Sostituito da File:Mappa ferrovia Mendrisio-Varese.png. Sono l'autore di entrambe Friedrichstrasse (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CelsoChaves2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not worth a penny, but Keep because of status 'user page image'. --Achim (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept. See COM:PS: "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace) of another project, but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CelsoChaves2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 07:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Little chances that this (the photos used in this artwork) is an own work by the author mentioned. Jee 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
What you say is not certain and it is a matter for Flickr to check whether it is his own work! FritsHG Question? 07:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Uploded on Flickr in 11.2012 by "Fabio Gaglini" versus derivated from (example) http://karencivil.com/2012/04/29/barack-obama-recognizes-his-thug-motivation/ (04.2012) = http://www.karencivil.com/home/karencivil/karencivil.com/2012/04/barack-obama.jpeg, per exif a copryrighted work by "Damon Winter / The New York Times". Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC) (Re inserting reverted comment; FritsHG, you will be reported to COM:AN/U, next time. Jee 10:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC))
Hi,I am Fabio Gaglini Byus71. A little explication: the composition is only a tribute. This poster is a merge from a my photo of New York, the slogan is a my creation with photoshop and the original portrait of Obama is a capture by this site: http://karencivil.com/2012/04/29/barack-obama-recognizes-his-thug-motivation/ I apologize to all those who may be offended or have lost time to comment on it.Byus71 11:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC))
Deleted: We can't keep, as it's been confirmed by Fabio that he was not the original photographer. It should be noted that it's not his fault that his image has been copied over to Commons. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Copyright violation from http://iv1.lisimg.com/image/3453638/600full-rati-pandey.jpg - not uploader's own work Squinge (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- This pic was taken by the uploader.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mypakikaki (talk • contribs)
Delete disproved. published 2.5 years prior to alleged creation date at [2] 71.81.154.113 13:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Artworks by Willem van Oyen (d. 2004). Imho none of them is covered by Dutch FOP, which is limited to the interior of transport infrastructures and does not inclue applied art. (The most dubious cases are the artworks located in town halls, but townhalls should be excluded from Dutch FOP imho.) Consequently, the permission of the legal successors of the artist is needed. Moreover, the authorship of the photographs could also be questioned (old photographs, no EXIF data).
- File:Glas-appliqué in Begeleidings Centrum v h Onderwijs Amsterdam 2.jpg
- File:Profeet. Zwevend glas in lagen gestapeld, niet verlijmd..jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué in gemeentehuis Dalfsen 2.jpg (located in a townhall)
- File:Glas-appliqué in gemeentehuis Stede Broec.jpg (located in a townhall)
- File:Glas-appliqué in Amsterdams Lucht en ruimtevaart laboratorium.jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué in gemeentehuis Zederik.jpg (located in a townhall)
- File:Glas-appliqué in gemeentehuis Dalfsen.jpg (located in a townhall)
- File:Glas-appliqué in Coöperatieve Begrafenis Onderneming Bussum.jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué.jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué detail.jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué in Begeleidings Centrum v h Onderwijs Amsterdam.jpg
- File:Glas-appliqué in Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis Den Haag.jpg (located in an hospital)
- File:Glas-appliqué in Gemeentehuis Emmen.jpg (located in a townhall)
- File:Glaswand Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven.jpg (located in a school)
- File:Miskelk Sint Willibrorduskerk buiten de veste.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Please be advised that these photographs were supplied and uploaded by the heirs of the artist (his sons). The photographs were originally made by the artist Willem van Oyen himself and his colleagues, and are now in possession of his heirs. Van Oyen was self employed. His business in which the artworks were created still exists today. He was succeeded by his sons, two of whom contributed to the execution of several of the artworks in town halls. His eldest son continues the business to this day. Information about the validity of the artworks can be obtained from this company, BEVO glaskunst, located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, or from the architects of the town halls who hired Van Oyen to design and execute the artworks.
- Hello. Thank you for your message. The permission of the legal successors of Willem van Oyen should be sent through COM:OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 16:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- According to OTRS this is not necessary. Uploader is heir and owner of the pictures.
- Delete Uploader is one of several sons and no evidence that photographs were exclusively assigned to his business. When ownership by succession is joint, the OTRS permission must be from all heirs or through their authorized representative. 71.81.154.113 14:30, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We have no evidence that Saflieni is an heir of the copyright holders (either copyright in the photos or in the original works). If that can be proved, evidence should be submitted to OTRS. If the original copyright in the photographs is now jointly owned by the sons, we would need evidence of both ownerships to OTRS. We would need similar evidence regarding current ownership in the copyright in the original works. They are interesting images and it would be nice if the relevant evidence could be supplied. I am happy to help with more specific details of what would be needed if Saflieni would care to get in touch. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted on 30 January 2015 by Natuur12 preceding otrs:2015010710017814. Josve05a (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Glass art in the Netherlands
[edit]2 old photographs. On is dated 1957 and the other should be about the same age. Are they really own work?
BrightRaven (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes they are own work. In the pictures is the artist Willem van Oyen. Photographs were submitted by the heirs of Van Oyen.
- Delete. Copyright vests in the photographer, and not in the subject, unless the photographer was employed by the subject. Would need permission to OTRS for this case. 71.81.154.113 14:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We have no evidence that Saflieni is an heir of the copyright holder. If that can be proved, evidence should be submitted to OTRS. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Is this a blank SVG? Josve05a (talk) 16:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. It is a part of an animation −ebraminiotalk 20:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- ebraminio, where is this image used, please? There seems little point in Commons hosting a blank svg unless it is actively in use on a WMF project. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: blank −ebraminiotalk 22:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Ce fichier n'aurais pas dû être posté sur Wikimedia mais sur Flickr, il s'agit de mon propre travail relié à aucun article de wikipédia ou autre wiki. Sn59320 (talk) 13:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to be a privately-created logo. Not in use. Deleted per uploader request. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. An IP added a CC license later. But thats an old postcard or similar from 1930. Thats either PD by some reasons or not free. JuTa 19:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hallo JuTa, danke für die Hinweise und die Frage, ob diese Datei tatsächlich gemeinfrei ist. Die Vermutung, dass dies eine alte Postkarte sein könnte, kann ich nicht bestätigen, mir ist solches nicht bekannt. Ob das Foto jemals als Postkarte veröffentlicht worden ist, muss bezweifelt werden, denn in Archiven und bei Händlern ist das Bild nicht gefunden worden. Es handelt sich vielmehr um ein (mittlerweile qualitativ schlechtes, aber von mir aufgearbeitetes und in meinem Besitz befindliches) Foto eines unbekannten Fotografen von 1930 zu dem Ereignis. Die Text-Zeile war eingedruckt bzw. hineinreproduziert. Ich versichere, dass heute keinerlei Rechte an dem Foto geltend gemacht werden können, so dass ich es für gemeinfrei erklären kann. Sollte an der Codierung / Kategorisierung etwas nicht richtig sein, bitte ich um einen Hinweis, weil meine diesbezüglichen Erfahrungen noch nicht all zu groß sind. Klausronja 22.12.2014
Deleted: This is fifty years too recent to assume that the photographer died before 1945. The fact that the photographer is unknown may make this an orphan work, but it does not make it PD. (see COM:PRP #4) To prove that it is PD, you must prove that the photographer intended to be anonymous. The argument that no one is likely to sue is also explicitly forbidden by COM:PRP, #1. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Double-emploi avec File:Benfeld rChâteau 3a.JPG Ralph Hammann (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: different image from different date, no reason for deletion Krd 23:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist doppelt vorhanden. Siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Garderobenschild---Schweizer-Hof.jpg Der Barbar (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 23:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
