Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_(26).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_de_Joaquim_Mir.jpg){kind=link}
because it has help hack my movement online 75.137.180.12 12:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. No reason for deleting an User page by an IP address user. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure).
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
jmh;gtkfletp[y;rj'pmk lwelo5oewj5p[67 9[wed9u536io i439oijy6t5390itop[t4l\ 124.123.33.159 15:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure).
.jpg){kind=link}
Self promotional (picture of himself), not educational in any conceivable way Exonie (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that it is 'own work' as it mentioned in the description. − Meiræ 17:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that it is 'own work' as it mentioned in the description. − Meiræ 17:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Орзельская.jpg
Probably non-free, dubious licence claim. Found elsewhere on the internet here. Other uploads by user are dubious. Letartean (talk) 18:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 20:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image with claim of Facebook source, but permission is wrong. Notice also this image has been uploaded over a prior image which is not the same at all as this one. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete Well, out of scope too. — revimsg 15:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://stephaniehochet.net/images/sampledata/sources/photos/hochet_fb.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Picture by Roberto Serra, no permission. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 06:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation. JuTa 10:43, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 11:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Suppression demandée par l’auteur de la photo Secrétariat.fli (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Green Giant. JuTa 11:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
personal photo used for vandalism https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barnesville,_Minnesota&diff=prev&oldid=633620022 Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 11:56, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
nicht schön geworden Christian1311 (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:EugeneZelenko. JuTa 12:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 04:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JustinBalan15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - private photos of a non-notable individual
- File:Coke justin balan.jpg
- File:Stand by justin.jpg
- File:Cat justin.jpg
- File:Cat jsutin.jpg
- File:Justin Balan 123.jpg
- File:Justin B Piuc.jpg
- File:Justin Balan Facebook.jpg
- File:Justin Balan Selfie.jpg
- File:Justin Balan On Japanese Garden.jpg
- File:Justin Balan Stolen Shot!!!.jpg
- File:Justin Balan facebook b.jpg
- File:Siting pouse justn b.jpg
- File:Eyes Justin b.jpg
- File:Justin Balan 15.jpg
- File:118 n.jpg
Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photos of a non-notable individual
Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Very low resolution, no EXIF, the original uploader has very few edits on en.wp. Most probably a copyvio russavia (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused article without references or citations. Not within the scope of the commons project. Richard Avery (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused image that is superceded by many others of better quality. Richard Avery (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused artwork by uploader. Not acceptable in Commons project Richard Avery (talk) 08:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused icon, either uploader artwork or copied, either way out of scope. Richard Avery (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused image with no obvious educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded by 1-upload user Punki1315 (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo is a cropped version (watermarks removed) of posterior published http://busarg.com.ar/fotogaleria/displayimage.php?album=12&pos=51 = http://busarg.com.ar/fotogaleria/albums/userpics/103411.JPG (exif available), credited to "© Alfredo Carballo". Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope as it is not meant to inform, but to entertain. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete-out of scope.Animalparty (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Empty svg file, which is not used. Brateevsky {talk} 10:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused vanity image of non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 10:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camilitayque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Both files uploaded in 12.2013:
- File:Guillermo Dietrich (político).jpg --> per exif a copyrighted work by "LUCAS DESIMONE"
- File:GUILLERMO-DIETRICH.png --> previously published via official Facebook https://www.facebook.com/guillermodietrich/photos/a.386774108053115.88752.367500703313789/406456516084874/?type=3&theater (2012)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Permissions needed.
Gunnex (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Uploader is not "the copyright holder of the work", it's a photo of a poster drawn by artist David Shrigley. McGeddon (talk) 10:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused, text only, not within scope. Richard Avery (talk) 10:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Logo uploaded from www.bpn.com.pl without OTRS registetred permission Pnapora (talk) 10:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Likely that this is not 'own work'. Sources are broken and cannot be confirmed. Richard Avery (talk) 10:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Undescribed image, sources broken, unable to find source, unlikely to be by Alexei Maximov. Richard Avery (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Likely personal artwork, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Oksioksi7 = 4 uploads in a row on 11.12.2013 = 2x copyvio. File:Dominican Church.jpg mysteriously watermarked.
Gunnex (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
found here http://wadmag.com/words/breaking-news/archives/2013/02/ Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
many results on tineye http://www.tineye.com/search/show_all/098e4196eca6e18fb06c7f090ea0cee4d8458033/065715163c27a1b8955394f73b310976e317edefd4df95ab927ea5329f959f8b/www.bodyandco.com/1 Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Picazocamille (talk · contribs)
[edit]not own files, found several using tineye
- File:HOM LOGO BLANC CARTOUCHE NOIR 071212.jpg
- File:HOM H13 IA e.Go Graffitart.jpg
- File:HOM H13 IA Sport Stadium Boxer.jpg
- File:HOM H13 IA Black Addict Grid.jpg
- File:Hom H13 IA Business HO1Limited Edition.jpg
- File:Maquette-print15112013v1.jpg
- File:Morphing.jpg
- File:HOM-LOGO-HDNEW2013.jpg
- File:HO1 Stadium.jpg
- File:V1 brand bible.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor-lpls (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Editor-lpls
Gunnex (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
no copyrights Swiftvictor (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
delete images from wikimedia common Swiftvictor (talk) 09:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Common Good (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Cette photo est une copie de d'une photo trouvée sur internet ici : http://www.setif.info/article8899.html sans autorisitation 57.250.229.136 12:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://stephaniehochet.net/images/sampledata/sources/photos/hochet_fb.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.65.50.127 12:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Personal image unused since 2010, out of scope, bad image quality (red eyes) --StefanMeister (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Cette photo est une copie sans autorisation d'une photo trouvée sur internet : http://staifi1900.skyrock.com/photo.html?id_article=1792618482&id_article_media=-1 . 57.250.229.136 12:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.50.127 13:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 91.65.50.127 13:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
dubious "own work" (12 KB, no EXIF) 91.65.50.127 13:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
no evidence to show that the original logo has CC-BY-4.0 copyright status GeoWriter (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Change it to {{Non-free logo}}
Non-free logo|image has rationale=yes --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOO#Australia. BrightRaven (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, uploaded by 1-upload user Rob90 (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 14.08.2010. This is the official logo of the Miss Universe 2010 in Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, held on 23.08.2010. Most likely copyrighted by broadcaster NBC + Telemundo or http://www.missuniverse.com/ (©2010 Miss Universe L.P., LLLP. All Rights Reserved). Gunnex (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
No permission given by the university. 193.5.216.100 13:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
One of several screenshots => probably a copyvio. 193.5.216.100 13:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, selfie of non-notable person, claimed as "This is an image of food". -- Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by North South Centre (talk · contribs)
[edit]If these are work for hire, then policy requires that we get a license from an authorized official of the employer using the procedure at OTRS. If they are not work for hire, then we will need a license from each of the photographers, also using OTRS. In either case we cannot keep them without a formal license.
- File:GE Congress 2012 3.jpg
- File:GE Congress 2012 2.jpg
- File:Mollina 2014 5.jpg
- File:GE Congress 2012.JPG
- File:Mollina 2014 4.jpg
- File:Mollina 2014 3.jpg
- File:Mollina 2014 2.jpg
- File:MedUni 1 - first panel.JPG
- File:Med Uni 1.jpg
- File:Mollina 2014.jpg
- File:MedUni 2.jpg
- File:SuzannaJabbour.jpg
- File:13UYD grouphoto.JPG
- File:HH AgaKhan.jpg
- File:Call9.JPG
- File:Bureau.jpg
- File:FBbanner.jpg
- File:Conference femmes 2011.JPG
- File:Youth activities.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Two problems here. First, "North-South Centre photographers" is not a sufficient identification of the photographer. We will need a license from the photographer or other copyright holder of the image using OTRS. Second, the sculpture itself has a copyright, and the image infringes on the rights of the sculptor. Keeping it will require a separate license from the sculptor, also using OTRS. Note that it is extremely unlikely that the North South Centre owns the copyright to the sculpture, although it may think it does. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality Cernunnos54 (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Havingalook2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:JEK Cutts logo.pdf
- File:J E K Cutts In Very Older Years.pdf
- File:JEK Cutts 13 VIII 1911.pdf
- File:J E K Cutts May, 1909.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thevanayagam Thevananth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dipukush.180 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Video clips. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Phir Mohabbat (Murder 2).webm
- File:'Mast Magan' 2 States Video Song ft' Arijit Singh Arjun Kapoor, Alia Bhatt abhfHD 1080p.mp4ancr VP8.webm
- File:Aa Bhi Ja Mere Mehermaan feat. Atif Aslam - Official Video Jayantabhai Ki Luv Story - YouTube libtheora.ogv
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dipukush.180 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Songs/video clips. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:---Tirsuli Bagey6 sa-la-la-Army Movie Song - YouTube VP8.webm
- File:Enar banaouchu by Yash kumar.webm
- File:Punarjanma TEKEN DAHAL new nepali pop song.webm
- File:Timro Aankhama - New Nepali Movie - STUPID MANN - YouTube(1).webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 02:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Newspaper/magazine articles. No evidence of permission(s)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
It's a good file, A View.pdf, since it contains a sound essay on a defition of intelligence and other relevant stuff. So, please do not delete my file, A View.pdf.
Thanks!
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 02:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Ripoll E.7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo/fan photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Discografía.pdf
- File:Daniel Ripoll en el Canal Enlace.jpg
- File:DRE7.jpg
- File:Daniel Ripoll.jpg
- File:Andres Oñate (acordeon) y Anuar Eljadue (Teclado).jpg
- File:Daniel Ripoll y Anuar Eljadue (tecladista).jpg
- File:Daniel Ripoll Visitando la Isla Aruba (2014).jpg
_y_Anuar_Eljadue_(Teclado).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC) Hi Eugene, How I can proof this picture is my own work? Could I provide anothe one with more resolution? Thanks, Alefer72
- Yes, you could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Videos-so-9dadess (talk · contribs)
[edit]Song. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused image of male taken from Facebook, probable COM:COPYVIO as it's not a selfie - you can see the man's hands. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Copy of file at http://shahmuhibbullahallahabadi.blogspot.ca/p/about-allahabad_5709.html - apparently a modern photograph with no indication that it is public domain. The claimed author, Muhibbullah Allahabadi, died in 1648. This seems to be a photo of a place dedicated to him. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The claim of own work is registered to the name Source Own work Author Iva Kučerová Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused image of unidentified male, listed as "facebook image" and unlikely to be user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
If the picture is from Facebook, there's no way the author has been dead 70 years plus, highly likely COM:COPYVIO. User's only upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The source goes nowhere, and I can't find this image online to determine the licensing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
As stated by uploader this image is from Facebook and is not uploader's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- ? The license is {{PD-shape}}, so it is irrelevant where else a blue circle with a white mark on it can be found. The SVG file is made by myself in Inskape as stated. Yes, I was checking the geometrical proportions to ones found at Facebook. If this particular combinations of shapes should be treated as a creative work with copyright to Facebook then it is all another topic of discussion (wrong PD status). It might be entertaining to discuss some day with the nominator the Facebook copyright violations by Youtube (white mark part reproduced), Odnoklassniki (clearly a derivative work) and a web-wide number of other cases of color circles and marks :-) For the time being I would stay for cancelling this DR as an absurd one. --NeoLexx (talk) 16:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- How about a larger and perhaps more useful size then? The upload instructions say the largest possible one you have, and this one is extremely small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ellin, this is SVG thus a vector format. The nature of vector formats is that you can set any physically reasonable size without any distortions — this is the key difference from raster formats (like PNG, JPG or GIF). So for vectors there is no such thing as size, there is the "formal size" only — thus the size used by default. And I set it to such way so to use by default as a small mark, without additional settings. Yet sure one can set a vector for 500px or 2000px or 10000px without any quality loss. Say 300px: [[:File:MoA-Facebook.svg]]
- But there wouldn't be any technical sense behind it. --NeoLexx (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep PD-simple. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for the information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)- Keep Too simple to be under copyright. Fma12 (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
The circle icon for Facebook, cannot be this user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, this is part of an own made circle icons. It consists of two parts: the circle and a letter F, it doesn't matter what filename I choose, it's still my own work. --House (talk) 22:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Please upload (as it says in the upload instructions) the largest one you have as this one is too small and I would suggest a renaming if indeed you mean to have a circle icon that wasn't precisely from "Facebook". Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think you don't understand how the SVG format works, it has a nominal size of 20x20 but it can be scaled to any size, I don't need to upload anything else. Also, the icon is meant as a reference to Facebook, so the filename is correct. It doesn't matter however, because the file is already in the public domain. For further information, look here. --House (talk) 04:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Please upload (as it says in the upload instructions) the largest one you have as this one is too small and I would suggest a renaming if indeed you mean to have a circle icon that wasn't precisely from "Facebook". Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD-simple. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- de:Wp. Thanks for the information. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
No apparent purpose is served by this photo of a car with snow on top and initials scraped out of the snow. Unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Corporate logo, "created for wikipedia home page": it indeed doesn't match the logo on interstyle.ca, so it's of no use. Qwertyus (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Corporate logo, "created for wikipedia home page": it indeed doesn't match the logo on interstyle.ca, so it's of no use. Qwertyus (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status ("author=Unknown") / out of scope. FDMS 4 15:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 15:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted album artwork visible. (Not sure whether file is valuable enough to remove them.) FDMS 4 16:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
fake, del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
fake, pers. rights, del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
fake, del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
fake, del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and of poor quality. Yestadae (talk) 07:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used The Photographer (talk) 17:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
personal image, not used The Photographer (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
personal image, not used The Photographer (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Album Cover The Photographer (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
_(26).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(26).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed/poor quality. Buxtehude (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
_(26).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
_(26).jpg){kind=link}
Out of focus, unused. Buxtehude (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Actually, it is used. Please ignore. Buxtehude (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Empty page. Buxtehude (talk) 18:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
As usual it is a part of a book, an the numbering should be consistent, therefore empty pages are accepted --Jörgens.Mi Talk 18:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Empty page (note that the page numbering in the file names is continuous). Buxtehude (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC) As usual it is a part of a book, an the numbering should be consistent, therefore empty pages are accepted --Jörgens.Mi Talk 18:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Excessive camera movement/poor quality. Buxtehude (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal gallery, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
dup with cat 최광모 (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: redirect Natuur12 (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
No {{FoP-Taiwan}} - 1992 work Josve05a (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominate again. This time TIPO finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). The artwork shown was authored by w:zh:楊英風 (a.k.a. 呦呦) who died in 1997. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
No {{FoP-Taiwan}} Josve05a (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 19:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=598759974#File:IMAG1123.jpg){kind=link}
See this Village Pump/Copyright discussion. Latest correspondences from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) reaffirmed that the non-commercial restriction for Taiwanese non-architecture extends to photographic reproductions like this image file. Since this photo shows the artwork intentionally, this cannot benefit from Taiwanese de minimis (in which the artwork must be incidental or at background). Correspondences in Chinese: [2] and [3]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
No {{FoP-Taiwan}} - The station itself was opened in 1982. Josve05a (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Strong possibility of plagiarism and copyright violation. This copy of the photograph is identical to the one published on the inn's website [4], [5]. Besides, the EXIF data in the Commons page state that the photograph was created by the professional studio zabellphoto. The uploader to Commons claims to be the author of the photo but the uploader's name or pseudonym is not listed in the list of the collaborators of the studio [6], [7]. The uploader created a wikipedia article (which was deleted) about the inn, so he might be associated with the client, the inn. Still, that would not change the situation. The copyright policy of the photography studio [8] states explicitly that although clients are allowed to use the photos made for them, "all copyrights are owned by Zabellphoto in perpetuity". So, there seems to be serious doubt about the claims by the uploader, unless OTRS validation is obtained from the photo studio to the effect that the studio either mandated the uploader to release the photo under a free license, or made an exception to its copyright policy and transferred the copyright to the client (and in that case a second OTRS validation would also have to be obtained from the inn to the effect that it mandated the uploader). Asclepias (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
![[4]](http://latourdulac.ca/wp-content/gallery/galerie/013-zabelphotogalerie.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Self-posted photo of a minor of dubious notability. No apparent realistic educational use per COM:EDUSE Animalparty (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ibgies/logs (2 related uploads = copyvios). Gunnex (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of probably unfree sculpture: no FoP in Belgium, creator died in 1961 (undelete in 2032). A.Savin 21:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hornet Driver. Split into indivudal DR for independent discussion, if applicable. FastilyClone (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a perfectly good photo, well in scope. The only reason to delete it was a serious concern to assume bad faith from the uploader, based on the notion that the disparity of cameras and scanners reported in the EXIF data of his/her uploads implies copyright violation of third parties. That kind of concern cannot be evaluated in separate, isolated DRs such as this one, and indeed, upon exemplary (if seldom) questioning, the uploader proven to satisfaction personal authorship of most (if not all) uploads. No concievable reason to even file a separate DR for this one. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn -FastilyClone (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
no permission, PD-Coa-Switzerland does not apply Krd 17:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 02:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:MAS Museum aan de stroom
[edit]According to Wiki, built in 2011: contemporary architecture above the originality threshold, no FoP in Belgium.
- File:20110616 antwerp44.jpg
- File:Belgien-antwerpen museum-aan-de-stroom 281112-01.jpg
- File:Esthetisch Horizontale lijnen.JPG
- File:MAS Antwerp by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg
- File:MAS Antwerpen facade 1.jpg
- File:MAS Antwerpen facade 2.jpg
- File:MAS en Bonapartedok 30-05-2012 13-33-27.JPG
- File:MAS in opbouw.jpg
- File:MAS Museum Antwerpen.JPG
- File:MAS, Antwerpen.jpg
- File:MAS.jpeg
- File:Museum aan de Stroom (2).JPG
- File:Museum aan de stroom 2013-05-20, 1.JPG
- File:Museum Aan de Stroom.JPG
- File:Museum aan de Stroom.JPG
- File:Sluishuisje Oostendekaai met MAS op de achtergrond.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
A.Savin 21:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
This is just a temporary advertising structure, now demolished, and disappearred forever ... et cette structure n'existera plus pour les siècles des siècles, sauf peut-être sur Wikimedia. Il semble, par ailleurs, rôder sur Wikimedia quelques remarquables spécimens d'enculeurs de mouches :-))
- As it repeats the design of the original building, I didn't know why it cannot be protected same way. --A.Savin 23:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
very low quality, alternative present (File:1,3-diossolano struttura.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 22:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
very low quality, alternative present (File:Benzo(d)(1,3)dioxole 200.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 22:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
(1,3)dioxole_200.svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Davenowhere (4 uploads on 11.12.2013 = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 22:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
much better version available (File:Dimefox.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Only one we have with certain layout details (orientation of groups around the central P) but the overall quality is poor (very small letters, bonds colliding with text). If someone really wanted this layout choice, would be easy to draw it more cleanly on demand. DMacks (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
All 20 uploads of en-Wiki user Stanekzai11 have been deleted on en-Wiki as clear copyvios or as very dubious. Per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Commons can't trust this license statement. GermanJoe (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- A note for clarity: this is not about the user, who transferred the image from en-Wiki to Commons in good faith. It is solely about the original en-Wiki uploader and his/her upload of multiple copyvios. GermanJoe (talk) 22:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Link to en-Wiki upload log [[9]] for reference. GermanJoe (talk) 22:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Very low resolution. Buxtehude (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Very low resolution. Buxtehude (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Very low resolution. Buxtehude (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal photo Animalparty (talk) 23:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal photo Animalparty (talk) 23:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Orientation incorrect (correctly oriented image at File:VirginieBoutaudMetrô.jpg. Buxtehude (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal photo Animalparty (talk) 23:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal photo. Animalparty (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal photo. Animalparty (talk) 23:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Editor blocked at English wikipedia for being a sockpuppet of a banned user there (Nuklear which is the listed author here). The user was banned for repeated copyright violations. Per this comment, the editor saying "I just wanted to tell you that the reason why I post the .png instead of .svg is that with my copy of CD" which indicates that he did not actually create the images (and not be author). Listing just the first one but there's a number of images. -Ricky81682 (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Regardless the uploader is blocked in any WMF project, no reason for deleting a simple chemical structure, that may be useful (unless if it is superseded by an SVG). --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: It is not clear to me that a schematic of a relatively simple structure has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Description contains inappropriate language. Consider reviewing. 68.226.181.232 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Vandalism by 2601:c:9600:434:61e:64ff:fef0:eb38. I have reverted it back to the previous version, keeping the nomination template. Hopefully an administrator will be happy to see this. DLindsley (My talk page) 01:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- @68.226.181.232, a deletion request to report vandalism is slightly unusual. If you stumble over a similar case in the future, please check out if you can open the "history", verify that only the last version was vandalized, and if that's the case try undo, and report the issue directly on COM:ANV = Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism. Some users not limited to admins could then act faster, and the procedure should be also less trouble for you. Ignore me if undo doesn't work without login, I haven't tested it recently. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- This is not 68.226.181.232, but this dynamic IP, 2601:C:9600:434:61E:64FF:FEF0:EB3, has only made 1 edit, so no need to report it on COM:AN/V. DLindsley (My talk page) 13:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I failed to figure out how a CIDR check with IPv6 works (the vandal has at least 64K IPv6s to "play" with), and the CIDR function is in the preferences for logged in users, 68.226.181.232 couldn't use it directly even if it works (somehow). –Be..anyone (talk) 04:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- This is not 68.226.181.232, but this dynamic IP, 2601:C:9600:434:61E:64FF:FEF0:EB3, has only made 1 edit, so no need to report it on COM:AN/V. DLindsley (My talk page) 13:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: clearly educational, Valued image, used in many projects. Animalparty (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
PNG of a file that I nominated for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in The United States - 2009 statue by living artist Nina Kaiser at Santa Anita Park in California INeverCry 06:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Whoops, my bad! Didn't check that out. Montanabw (talk) 06:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in The United States - The 2 busts at right were created by living artist Nina Kaiser and are displayed at Santa Anita Park in California - the bust at right was created in 2006 and the one next to it in 1992 INeverCry 06:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Seems that it's a sculpture garden of sorts with mixed work, but just in case, I also created File:Longdon and Shoemaker.jpg that are the two busts on the left, both deceased people by a deceased artist, installed prior to 1977, Hope that will work. Would also appreciate guidance on the point at which FOP becomes inapplicable (i.e. statue 100 feet away? 200 feet away? Small pixel in image? ) as obviously there are situations where a sculpture is incidental to a shot of a building or something... Montanabw (talk) 06:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Any copyrighted element would have to be COM:DM for an image to be ok. In the above image the subject/focus is plainly the 4 busts, so those aren't DM. INeverCry 07:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- OK, I guess that makes sense. Montanabw (talk) 06:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Any copyrighted element would have to be COM:DM for an image to be ok. In the above image the subject/focus is plainly the 4 busts, so those aren't DM. INeverCry 07:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Guten Morgen - ich bin noch neu im wiki, habe dummerweise eine Datei mit zwei unterschiedlichen Dateinamen eingestellt. Dabei auch noch die Lizenz nicht richtig angegeben. Bitte dieses Duplikat daher zu löschen. Eine richtig lizenzierte Version befindet sich ja dann noch in meiner Liste. Bitte den Fehler zu entschuldigen. Mit Grüßen, Veit Barrystapp (talk) 07:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like an very similar version was copyrighted in 2003 - see http://www2.birthbalance.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Cervical-Effacement-and-Dilatation-During-Labor-Judith-Haleck-How-to-Check-Your-Cervix-3.gif This image is featured on this internet page; http://www2.birthbalance.com/how-to-check-your-own-cervix/ The version on Commons was uploaded on 29 March 2010. Snowmanradio (talk) 08:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I wouldn't trust in anything on this site, the first link indentifies this as uploaded in 8/2013. It's unknown whether this copyright claim is valid or the image just taken from Commons with the claim slapped on it. --Denniss (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- http://rebirthnurse.blogspot.ca/2007/07/childbirth-ed-series-redux.html – The image appears in a blog entry dating back to 2007. The blog's GIF predates Fred's SVG. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- McKesson Health Solutions are these guys, FWIW. Casliber (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- http://rebirthnurse.blogspot.ca/2007/07/childbirth-ed-series-redux.html – The image appears in a blog entry dating back to 2007. The blog's GIF predates Fred's SVG. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
...sooo we need to delete it then? Casliber (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
,_de_Joaquim_Mir.jpg){kind=link}
,_de_Joaquim_Mir.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
These works or works by this artist may not be in the public domain, because the artist has not been dead for at least 80 years (Spain) 91.65.50.127 10:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
,_de_Joaquim_Mir.jpg){kind=link}
- Then the other paintings by Mir in this category must be deleted too? --Enfo (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: @Enfo -- yes, but a DR is necessary . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
,_de_Joaquim_Mir.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio, original here http://www.15min.lt/zmones/naujiena/pasaulis/serloko-zvaigzde-benedictas-cumberbatchas-veda-apie-suzadetuves-pranesta-senamadiskai-27-464544, photoshopped version, see face Motopark (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am the photographer. Thus, it's my work and I am freely giving my permission to use it for Hunter's profile.
- Send OTRS-permission--Motopark (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- OTRS Permission Email Sent, 13 November 2014 AdamBune (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I personally would wait until this Wikipedia SPI is over with [10]. Socks have done this before in regards to Benedict Cumberbatch, posing as a photographer to get an image uploaded. Seeing as how Hunter is his girlfriend, I wouldn't be surprised. Lady Lotus (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- OTRS Permission Email Sent, 13 November 2014 AdamBune (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Send OTRS-permission--Motopark (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Original picture are 765 x 1080 pixel, so bigger than this--Motopark (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- The image was uploaded by a confirmed en-wiki sockpuppet of User:Fairyspit. It's safe to say it's as much a copyright violation as the rest of their uploads have been.--Ponyo (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: the only crux is evidence of free usage license. Otherwise it can clearly be used to illustrate the technology. Animalparty (talk) 07:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It's in scope, but appears in several places on the Web. I doubt that it is own work. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: In scope copyvio . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with the "simple shapes and text" comment for this upload, there are clearly three illustrative icons down the side of the page, and this writer cannot release content created by Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality.--EEIM (talk) 02:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: With the icons, as it was when nominated, it is a copyvio. Without the icons, as it is now, it is a false representation of a Facebook page and cannot have any educational value. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement (watermark, links), self-promotion, license violation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F5Ka89ge-Q), video not needed (does not illustrate anything beyond what can be said with simple words in the text of an article) Exonie (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- No license violation anymore (he changed the licenses in the meantime) but the other issues remain --Exonie (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement, self promotion and not educational - anything in the video can be better represented in structured text. Exonie (talk) 15:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement (watermark, links), self-promotion, license violation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO3M2eRvle8) and not educational - anything in the video can be better presented in structured text. Exonie (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- No license violation (he changed the licenses in the meantime) but the other issues remain --Exonie (talk) 18:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Extremely improbable 94.221.91.89 16:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: From Flickr, requires Flickrreview, but is not on Flickr anymore. Flickr user has many copyvios, so even with Flickrreveiw, we probably couldn't keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I am not the author of the work, please take it down. Blackbow17 (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Your photo of the artwork has no copyright, so you have no right to request or demand its removal. The work has OTRS permission from the artist, Sarah Morris. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I am not the author of the work, please take it down. Blackbow17 (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Your photo of the artwork has no copyright, so you have no right to request or demand its removal. The work has OTRS permission from the artist, Sarah Morris. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I am not the author of the work, please take it down. Blackbow17 (talk) 21:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Your photo of the artwork has no copyright, so you have no right to request or demand its removal. The work has OTRS permission from the artist, Sarah Morris. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I am not the author of the work, please take it down. Blackbow17 (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Your photo of the artwork has no copyright, so you have no right to request or demand its removal. The work has OTRS permission from the artist, Sarah Morris. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The picture of a girl in the window: it is probably a copyrighted picture, and I doubt it can be seen as de minimis, so: derivative of copyrighted artwork/photo. A.Savin 21:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- ? The girl on the poster is not the main subject. The subject is the HopNstop bus in Antwerp. There is no law against taking pictures in the street, even if there happens to be a poster in sight. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 22:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- The poster's not the main subject, but it takes a considerable part of the frame and is in focus. Afaik, not negligible enough for DM. --A.Savin 23:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly not DM. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in France. The architect of this monument, Philippe Prost, is still alive. Jebulon (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Support Olivier LPB (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep For me the memorial cannot be really and easily understand with this picture. --Aga (d) 07:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please do not use Support in DRs, as it is not clear whether you support the deletion or support the image and want it kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in France. The architect, Philippe Prost, is still alive. Jebulon (talk) 22:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Support Olivier LPB (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The shape of the memorial cannot be understand. On the picture you can see...a wall. No contravention to FOP/France. --Aga (d) 07:06, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in France. The architect, Philippe Prost, is still alive. Jebulon (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The work of Philippe Prost cannot be understand through this picture... No contravention of FOP/France. --Aga (d) 07:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in France. The architect, philippe Prost, is still alive. This plaque is part of a work of art. Jebulon (talk) 22:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Can we be serious. It's just a plaque. Can you understand something of the work of Philippe Prost through this picture... --Aga (d) 07:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am serious. Please don't try to ridicule me or my opinion, it is equal to yours. Of course not, it is not just a plaque. Can you understand something about copyright ?--Jebulon (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Was not my goal. Sorry if you took it as an attack. Concerning the picture: for me it's a plaque which does not represent anything related to the architectural work of Philippe Prost. --Aga (d) 13:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Fine, thank you. Let's remain gentlemen in our disagreement!--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am serious. Please don't try to ridicule me or my opinion, it is equal to yours. Of course not, it is not just a plaque. Can you understand something about copyright ?--Jebulon (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of focus. Buxtehude (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Resolution and quality is enough. Commons generally don't delete blurry pictures unless if the are too blurry and have too small resolution, that this case is not. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Excessive camera movement. Buxtehude (talk) 23:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Resolution and quality is enough. Commons generally don't delete blurry pictures unless if the are too blurry and have too small resolution, that this case is not. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Urheber nicht mehr feststellbar. (Bildalter > 5 Jahre) Pressestelle TLKA (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 05:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
This file is a low quality image of a penis. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete- no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Animalparty (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Well then. I am then going to Support the deletion of this file as the nominator. DLindsley (My talk page) 03:11, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Well then. I am then going to
Deleted: per discussion Krd 05:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete with redirect to File:Tom Baker.jpg. This is a duplicate at lower resolution, and also with (originally) a watermark. Pete F (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Słaba jakość zdjecia Mateuszgdynia (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Schemat został zastąpiony nowym Mateuszgdynia (talk) 14:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Irrtümlich unter diesem Dateinamen hochgeladen Fränsmer (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Duplikat von DEU Wendelsheim COA.png Fränsmer (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
