Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 5th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esto no es aporpiado Alvaranstrong (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request on day of upload; unused image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor taken photo. Not valid as FoP in Spain Elisardojm (talk) 13:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy closure per Spanish COM:FOP. Alan (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor taken photo. Not valid as FoP in Spain Elisardojm (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy closure per Spanish COM:FOP Alan (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File Not Free Can be ascertained through Google (Google Translate)ابوهايدي (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy, copyvio Tarawneh (talk) 15:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gay sex acting 3.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Couple 69 oral sex position on bed.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penis 7.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

amateur porn 68.185.89.231 17:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Kept per above. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No medical or academic value. Pornographic material. If it needs to be kept for records of sexual activities, it should be removed from medical sections and records of purely male genitals. 49.197.107.232 12:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per mattbuck. However, if the categories are wrong, please correct them. Ruthven (msg) 16:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2guys.jpg and the uploader's talk page, which is full of copyvio notifications. E4024 (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted per history of copyright violations of the uploader. --rubin16 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious own work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gay sucking penis.jpg. E4024 (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a penis, like the other uploaded files of Lolly. It was reuploaded by Romeo971. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: unique image. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep A long term photograph and the only one currently on Commons showing ejaculation as part of homosexual fellatio. Noting that the single purpose account was blocked soon after this nomination, for raising a large number of invalid DRs in a pattern that indicates attempted censorship. -- (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Perfectly within scope. As an aside, anyone know why DR categories are suddenly showing above the content rather than below?. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORNSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 02:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A long term photograph and the only one currently on Commons showing ejaculation as part of homosexual fellatio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by a user whose talk page has several other notifications of deletion. E4024 (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Websize, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vietnamese male penis ejaculatory.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male penis and sperm.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jithukayalur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 18:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quiero cambiarla Jordi Simón Casulleras (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the President of Colombia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with copyright, from Panoramio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodelar (talk • contribs) 2014-11-04T16:16:50‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 22:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with copyright, from Panoramio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodelar (talk • contribs) 2014-11-04T16:17:00‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 22:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche datei hochgealden PatriciaHorwitz (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Requested speedydeletion.    FDMS  4    18:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears to be taken from a promotional site, therefore possibly making this file out of Commons' scope. DLindsley (My talk page) 00:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 21:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte qulität PatriciaHorwitz (talk) 11:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: an a clear copright violation. JuTa 21:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vickyta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal CV

Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vickyta (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour Ce fichier a été deposé sur votre base de données a mon insus. Cette image n'est d'aucune utilité. me representant moi meme sans mon autorisation, je vous pris de la supprimer. merci L.RAVET. 171.16.210.2 15:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:KTo288. JuTa 21:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My rookie attempt at WikiSource uploading, superceded by complete PDF version at File:The Theory of Evolution as an Aid to Faith and God.pdf Animalparty (talk) 00:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My rookie attempt at WikiSource uploading, superceded by complete PDF version at File:The Theory of Evolution as an Aid to Faith and God.pdf Animalparty (talk) 00:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My rookie attempt at WikiSource uploading, superceded by complete PDF version at File:The Theory of Evolution as an Aid to Faith and God.pdf Animalparty (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is the work of the UK government. russavia (talk) 01:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If a picture of military aircraft is taken in such short distance in flight, it is very likely to be from another military aircraft. But I did not find any further evidence, when I moved it from en.wiki to commons - believing the original licensing information. --JuergenKlueser (talk) 07:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AP image, check the watermark in the bottom right corner 太刻薄 (talk) 02:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source [1] does not say that this is a 18th century painting. Could well be a modern painting Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.135 07:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.135 07:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.135 07:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© G. Zimmer (sculptor) 91.65.49.135 07:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 91.65.49.135 07:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What means "own work" and why are you the copyright holder? 91.65.49.135 07:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:5964_Lettre_abri_cap_blanc.JPG. Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bibs2091 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1. crv 2. unused personal file

91.65.49.135 08:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as typical holiday-shot, hardly usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, hardly usable shot of a likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as a typical holiday-shot, hardly usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, hardly usable due to low resolution and destructive watermarking. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.135 08:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, non-notable persons, hardly usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, 3 non-notable persons, hardly usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre 46.218.9.198 08:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work of art looks rather recent and is likely still copyrighted. Regrettably, Argentina has Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.65.49.135 08:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (11KB, no EXIF) 91.65.49.135 08:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These recent stamps are unlikely under a free license. Thereby this photo is a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image on the left half of this booklet is unlikely under a free license. Thereby this photo is a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 91.65.49.135 09:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (11 KB, no metadata) 91.65.49.135 09:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 91.65.49.135 10:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only simple logos are allowed on commons 91.65.49.135 10:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 91.65.49.135 10:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission was granted for use on Wikipedia page only - author did not realise it would be put on Wikimedia Commons J Jellema (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, without licensing information of the original ones Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeriosusAlex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

more or less personal files without descriptions, all unused

91.65.49.135 10:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal images. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope Krd 13:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 10:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 10:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 10:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational purpose. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 10:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

никому не нужен Rotinov (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, probable copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the many pics of an erection. Doesn't add anything to the pics we already have. Also per Template:Nopenis. Trijnsteltalk 10:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a photo of me I want off the platform Jimmyp12 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diya4all (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(probably) derivative works

91.65.49.135 11:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 91.65.49.135 11:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sources 91.65.49.135 12:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of the photograph is unknown, but it was almost certainly not taken by the FBI since he has never been in FBI custody, see Glen Stewart Godwin. In 1991, when the photo is said to have been taken, he was arrested in Mexico, so the photo is probably a Mexican mug shot. Mexican government works have a 100 year copyright. The drawing, while made by the FBI, is an age enhanced version of the photograph and is, therefore, a DW of the photo and has the same copyright problem as the photo.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afaxas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS ticket required

91.65.49.135 12:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image (still frame from tv series) Primaler (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [2]: photographer is not "unknown", it was Ferdinand Urbahns. Either father or son; personally, I think the son is more likely. The father died 1944, so the image would be copyrighted at least until December 31, 2014. The son died 1978, so if he took the image, it would remain in copyright in Germany until December 31, 2048. Lupo 13:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatly while I mostly hope that the photographer, after due diligence, is not found and remains anonymous, sometime it doesnt work out. I hope we find proof that this is the senior work (December 31, 2014 is not that far away). I would be sorry to see it go. I never bother to try to seek permission from the family, to much trouble.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

boilderplate number unpixeled, superseded by File:Bus 56B und Hietzinger Friedhof.jpg, own work (mine) Hietzinger Friedhof (talk) 13:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 13:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image is copyrighted (http://www.jylla.fi/ajankohtaista/jyllakuvat). This image needs an OTRS permission from the original owner. Msaynevirta (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free: relief is not a not a two-dimensional work of art (also, we have a free alternative) Primaler (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who uploaded this image I have no objection to its being deleted given that the free alternative shows more detail. Scribblingwoman (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't know who took the photo or when. There's not enough here to prove it has no possibility of copyright. We hope (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The author is listed on the template as unknown and there's a estimate of it being around 1960. There's also no back to the photo which may have helped prove lack of copyright and possibly dating. We hope (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willowbl00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused posters of questionable notability and usability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eugene, are you saying that information-dense visualizations of topics, named concisely so that it is clear what topics are covered, in many cases about topics that have their own wikipedia or mediawiki article, is out of scope for Commons? --SJ+ 20:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry - it’s difficult to tell ‘’where’’ comments go. I had brought up points on this discussion page and on EugeneZelenko's talk page. Coincidentally, I would usually draw through this to show the different components — this helps me far more, just like the many other visual thinkers out there, than a wall of text.
You say these don’t look like “educational drawings.” Fair enough, but brings two questions: 1) How do we make new traditions? 2) What sort of legitimacy would sway you? My drawings have been used by government institutions, Ivy League school instructors, and by large-scale NGOs. I’m happy to point to how these drawings fulfill those, to the purpose of creating new traditions.
Thanks! Willowbl00 (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 02:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2014-11#File:MediaWiki Vagrant Visualization.jpg (And possibly other files uploaded by Willowbl00). Yann (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willowbl00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused artworks

George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, not again... @George Chernilevsky: Did you see the previous nomination and restoration? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann. I really think that it out of project scope. Some of sketches are not clearly illustrative wihthout a large comments, not categorized and all unused. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See [3]. Already kept, and some of them in use in MediaWiki; The other unused files may be still useful for MediaWiki and general purposes. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't had time for cleanup recently, but will try to set aside time soon for more categorization. I'll make a point of pulling out any which aren't academic in scope. It does seem strange to have this brought up a second time, after having already processed thru the first time, tho... Willowbl00 (talk) 07:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Still not updated description and not categorized. -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept My first inclination was to delete these as personal art. They are very dense, and in most cases will need explanation -- they were, I think, mostly created for use as slides in presentations, and are difficult to grasp without more background. I think it is unlikely that many of them will be used anywhere (on or off WMF) unless Willowbl00 spends the necessary time to provide descriptions, context, and useful categories.

With that said, the creator is a notable person. While she does not have a WP:EN article, she probably should. It is clear that people in various important places listen when she speaks -- or at least when she draws. I think, therefore, that we should keep these.

Willowbl00, please spend the necessary time to categorize and explain these. I also think that some of them should be removed -- they are so specialized that they are very unlikely to see use and you are the best judge of that. Yann or I can do that for you easily. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward and Yann: I just did a pass of around 10, adding in links to conferences where the drawing happened, and suggesting about half be deleted as they're not within scope of Commons. I'd love feedback as to if I'm doing it right, need to add in more detail, etc. Thanks for the hand-holding. Willowbl00 (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ringer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and book covers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ringer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This long list of files includes newspapers, magazines, posters, maps, logos and headshots; many are copies of images on other wiki projects - however they share a common problem. They're not "own work" and there is insufficient information on either the wiki page or the Commons page to attempt to fix this. Some may be ok due to age, again there's not enough information to assist with the licenses.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, possible copyright issues. not uploader's own work Richard Avery (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Philippines doesn't allow commercial usage without approval. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table and flag image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ram Charitra Dwivedi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Also logos of questionable notability. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, text only image which is probably date critical Richard Avery (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisferyavila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(apparently already deleted) Unused, text only, appears to be a short story. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qadir9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arcoiris de Marruecos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional infomation, see description

Motopark (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nxtgenwiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, erroneously described image. Not of any educative value without context Richard Avery (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 91.65.49.135 16:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image probably copied from a website. No photographic details Richard Avery (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 91.65.49.135 16:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The POSTAL STAMP have small resolution and the POSTAL STAMP is a duplicate of file File:1960 CPA 2391.jpg with the same POSTAL STAMP. There is no reason to store bad scans of POSTAL STAMP when there is a good scan of the same POSTAL STAMP Krd 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The POSTAL STAMP have small resolution and the POSTAL STAMP is a duplicate of file File:1960 CPA 2448.jpg with the same POSTAL STAMP. There is no reason to store bad scans of POSTAL STAMP when there is a good scan of the same POSTAL STAMP Krd 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The POSTAL STAMP have small resolution and the POSTAL STAMP is a duplicate of file File:1960 CPA 2471.jpg with the same POSTAL STAMP. There is no reason to store bad scans of POSTAL STAMP when there is a good scan of the same POSTAL STAMP Krd 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The POSTAL STAMP have small resolution and the POSTAL STAMP is a duplicate of file File:1960 CPA 2470.jpg with the same POSTAL STAMP. There is no reason to store bad scans of POSTAL STAMP when there is a good scan of the same POSTAL STAMP Krd 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miquel Adroer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of nonfree content

Krd 17:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image is copyrighted (http://www.jylla.fi/ajankohtaista/jyllakuvat). This image needs an OTRS permission from the original owner. Msaynevirta (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image is copyrighted (http://www.jylla.fi/ajankohtaista/jyllakuvat). This image needs an OTRS permission from the original owner. Msaynevirta (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image is copyrighted (http://www.jylla.fi/ajankohtaista/jyllakuvat). This image needs an OTRS permission from the original owner. Msaynevirta (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo/vandalism [4]. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, no EXIF, low res. The user uploaded non-free pictures. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, as maybe 'self advertising', please also see some uploads of same contributor, Roland zh (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, as maybe 'self advertising', please also see some uploads of same contributor, Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is credited to a Flickr account, but this is unlikely to be the original author, making the license invalid. No publication or authorship details are given, and it may still be in copyright in the UK. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect date. Incorrect source. Incorrect author. Incorrect permission. . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work - see also File:2011 RegentsLogo Schools.png Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File seems to be out of Commons' scope. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems like TV screen shot, not an own work Ezarateesteban 22:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it not will erased! --Danrolo (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 22:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mathias karl estress. Uploaded on 23.09.2014 by Mathias karl estress (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo was previously published on 13.09.2014 via http://blogestresz.blogspot.de/2014/09/the-brazilian-driver-marcelo-monte-in.html, a blog maintained by "Mathias Karl Estress". The photo itself is manipulated: The stickers "Greenpeace" and "Café do Brasil" are obviously photoshopped. Despite the permission via COM:OTRS an upload of the unmanipulated original would be appreciated. Gunnex (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mathias karl estress has a history of being dishonest because the only other picture that he has uploaded to Commons was copyrighted, yet he claimed it was his own work. When that picture was deleted, he uploaded it a second time, claiming again that it was his own work despite a block warning when he was caught the first time. Therefore, it's clear that the image that is being discussed here might not be his own work either. I suspect he scanned it from a book or a magazine since he is definitely a big fan of motorsports, based on his blog entries. I don't know if the scanning theory would be consistent with Gunnex's findings. Anyway, in my opinion, the image should be deleted, and the user should be asked to provide strong evidence that he took that picture if he tries to upload it again. As an anecdote, according to Marcelo Monte's Wikipedia article, he was born in 1958, and the user who uploaded the image claims to be 38 years old in his blog. That means that the user was probably born in 1976. Marcelo Monte appears to be 30 or younger in that picture, so I'm guessing the user would have been 12 years old or younger when he supposedly took that picture. Highly unlikely. Dontreader (talk) 23:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur d'importation, fait doublon avec https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festival_de_Cornouaille_2014_-_Merzhin_-_07.jpg Kergourlay (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque la imagen no corresponde a la Bandera Oficial del Municipio de La Cumbre- Valle/Colombia que se puede verificar en la página lacumbre-valle.gov.coCoordinador de Turismo (talk) 22:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Can be corrected. Fry1989 eh? 02:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 03:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not 25 years old, according to the date in the description. Yann (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not 25 years old, according to the date in the description. Yann (talk) 23:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality unused image with much better analogs (1, 2) Stas (talk) 23:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is a composite of other photographs on Commons and not correctly attributed. Humetheresa (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It would be great if you provide real attirubution on DR so we can check it.  revimsg 04:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete (I've uploaded this file by mistake, will upload a new edition). Thanks. Hausratte (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request.  revimsg 04:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AryoMAsambas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - collection of tiny thumb images of non-notable people - none in use

INeverCry 18:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.  revimsg 04:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nim.  revimsg 04:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MigNov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value/promotional

INeverCry 18:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.  revimsg 04:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.  revimsg 04:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.  revimsg 04:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.  revimsg 04:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a single source author is named, that's a license violation + the self tag needs to be removed from the license Denniss (talk) 20:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems OK now.  revimsg 04:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr uploader is not the photographer. He has changed the licence (nowːAll rights reserved) 91.65.49.135 08:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The CC-BY license that was on the Flickr account in 2012 cannot be revoked, so the fact that it has been changed is not important. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph is a combination of photographs already on Commons and not properly attributed Humetheresa (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph is a combination of photographs already on Commons and not properly attributed Humetheresa (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph is a combination of photographs already on Commons and not properly attributed Humetheresa (talk) 11:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vanhempi konstaapeli.png > File:Vanhempikonstaapeli.svg 85.76.149.6 11:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete pre-existing PNGs when an SVG is created. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yrsari (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Komisario.png > File:Komisario .svg 85.76.149.6 11:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete pre-existing PNGs when an SVG is created. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yrsari (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ylikonstaapeli new.png > File:Ylikonstaapeli.svg 85.76.149.6 11:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete pre-existing PNGs when an SVG is created. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yrsari (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jacket is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: THat is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jacket is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jacket is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jacket is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jacket is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pant is not made of pvc. It's made of pu. Ralph Schulz (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree with A. Savin .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, unusable, there is a much better one by the same photographer: File:Abtenau (Markt 5-4).JPG Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wegen der Überbelichtung bin ich nochmals hingefahren und habe das andere Foto gemacht. Dieses kann gelöscht werden,

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

www.com chiquititas 105.172.3.99 19:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What? Why do you think this image has to be deleted? It seems to be in public domain in Spain and in the United States. Best regards, IP.Totemkin (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image is being showed in the Main Page of Spanish Wikipedia. Just for the record.Totemkin (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Author died 1879. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me equivoque al subir la foto. No es la foto que quería subir Cactofotografia (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a beautiful photograph. You will have to tell us more about why you want your own work deleted, because the reason given above is not good. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Jim, no valid deletion reason given. Green Giant (talk) 23:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file Coisceimcullen (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep : the Commons uploader, the webmaster and the photographer are the same person ; and it's written on the footer of the website so there is no problem.
Same thing for following requests.
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 09:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stuff from http://www.t-u-f.net/ is copyrighted JeanBono (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Funi à Fourvière-Billy.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 19:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Kvardek du. Uploader is identified on source website. Green Giant (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Fernando (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although simple, the logo includes a defined code comprised by colors and an unfree front. --Fernando (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too simple for copyright. Fry1989 eh? 17:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The contest doesn't exist, therefore it is clearly a copyright violation in that the official image has been photoshopped/altered in order to create a fake contest logo. Wes Mᴥuse 22:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Poor quality. Yann (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrigth expired Ibirapuera (talk) 19:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion given Krd 09:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrigth expired Ibirapuera (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion given Krd 09:22, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrigrh expired Ibirapuera (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion given Krd 09:22, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrigth Expired Ibirapuera (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion given Krd 09:22, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and uploader are not the same so there must be autorisation by author 81.242.151.170 10:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In a mail, Laurent Zeimet gave me the authorisation to use the photo. --Corto lu (talk) 10:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Corto lu: Moien, Dir musst seng Autorisatioun just u permissions@commonswikimedia.org mailen an och gläich dës Schabloun {{OTRS pending}} bei d'Foto setzen. Méi Info hei --Jwh (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Corto lu: : Moien sou einfach wier wann de Laurent Zeimet d'Foto selwer gemaach hätt. Dat schéngt mer net de Fall ze sinn. Deemno misst d'Autorisrioun vum Fotograf iwwer ORTS geliwwert ginn. --Les Meloures (talk) 13:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ausser den Zeimet géing selwer all Droits besëtzen... --Jwh (talk) 21:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hun de Mail un permissions@commonswikimedia.org geschéckt; de Mail ass allerdings ob Lëtzebuergesch; an de Laurent Zeimet huet effektiv d'Rechter op dei Photoen dei hien fir seng Campagne mache geloss huet. --Corto lu (talk) 10:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Corto lu: Moien, souwäit ech wees ass keen an der OTRS-Equipe dee Lëtzebuergesch schwätzt. Ech mailen Iech den Owend ee Model vun engem Standard-OTRS deen de Laurent Zeimet da vun senger Adress misst u "permissions" schécken. Mëttlerweil hun ech den "OTRS pending" bei d'Foto gesat. --Jwh (talk) 14:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Wann den Här Zeimet d'Rechter huet da misst hien dat Schrëfstéck derbäi leeën an deem de Fotograf him all d'Rechter ginn huet. Perséinlech fannen ech et Quatsch fir mat onfräie Fotoen ze hantéieren, besonnesch wann et einfach ass fir eng fräi ze maachen, vu datt d'Persoun nach lieft an all Dag ze begéinen ass. --Les Meloures (talk) 08:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seng Erklärung sollt duer goen, e Lëtzebuerger Deputéierte mécht dach kee Faux. --Jwh (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for the moment as OTRS is pending. JuTa 21:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The index is not loading and uploading the fixed file is not working. Uploaded another: file3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubhashish (talk • contribs) 2014-11-05T14:00:41‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Aside from the technical issue, which I did not see, there is a copyright problem. We have a CC license from the estate of Jagannath Mohanty, but this work is a compilation assembled by him, but has the works of many others in it. There is no evidence offered that all of the works contained are either PD or freely licensed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ebola PPE videos

[edit]

These fourteen videos show the proper procedures for donning personal protective equipment when treating Ebola patients. They are undoubtedly good / useful videos. Unfortunately, there is a potential issue with the licensing that suggests that Wikimedia should not be hosting them.

They come from this site operated by the United States Centers for Disease Control. If that were the end of the story, we would be fine, since CDC is a US government agency and subject to PD-USGov.

Unfortunately, the videos are slathered with five different logos: CDC, Johns Hopkins University Medical School, Miami University, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. The same list of collaborators is repeated on CDC's PPE training homepage [5], with the addition that Salesforce Foundation is also listed. In addition, the first video was clearly filmed at Johns Hopkins (their logo is on the wall in the background), and the documentation is suggestive that all of the videos may have been produced at JHU. In general, to establish that a work is free from copyright problems we need to establish that all potential copyright holders have been addressed and not just one. Further, the CDC's PPE training homepage says [6]: "These informational materials are made available for educational and informational purposes only...". To the extent that this statement can be read as an implicit license to use and distribute these videos, it doesn't seem to go far enough to meet Wikimedia's inclusion standards.

Without a more explicit statement that these videos have been placed in the public domain, or appropriately licensed for Wikipedia, I feel we need to remove them. It isn't sufficient that one of the several listed authoring organizations is US Government. That's a shame, since they are excellent videos, and we should certainly continue to link to and reference them. Dragons flight (talk) 03:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info I have requested a clarification via their website today, however they do state that "We are experiencing a high volume of inquiries and may be delayed in responding to your question." I'll post back any response I get. -- (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Fae: , if the CDC is being slow (which is understandable), you might try contacting someone at Johns Hopkins. The guy in the first video identifies himself as a associated with the Armstrong Institute at Johns Hopkins [7]. Perhaps they would give a quicker answer. Dragons flight (talk) 21:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for starting this discussion. It would be great if these videos were in the public domain as works of the US Federal Government because it would be nice to be able to remix them with subtitles in other languages. It would not be worthwhile to organize this kind of volunteer labor and distribution if these videos are a proprietary product. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hum. This is a medical disclaimer not a licensing byline "These informational materials are made available for educational and informational purposes only..." It means you cannot sue the CDC if you follow these video instructions and still get Ebola.
    • If the CDC is involved in creating stuff they usually require that it is in the public domain. But good idea to check.
    • It does say "Content source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" thus likely okay James Heilman, MD (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will contact someone at John Hopkins. James Heilman, MD (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am a Professor in the division of Infectious Diseases at Johns Hopkins (see my userpage here and my personal web page over there). I will be happy to help address this as JHU will want these to be useful broadly. What specific question should I ask? Since these were produced by JHU for the CDC my guess is that JHU cannot state they are in the public domain but they might, for example, be able to release any claims on them (I need to ask - I cannot speak with JHU's voice but I can find someone who can). Stuart Ray, M.D. soupvector (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
soupvector, thank you for offering to help. What Commons needs is someone in authority at JHU definitively saying either, (a) that the videos are PD because they were produced for the CDC or (b) that JHU owns the copyright and licenses it freely. The license form and e-mail address to be used in either case is at OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jameslwoodward Thanks very much. I've exchanged emails with my colleague Dr. Pronovost (featured in the first video) and the person in charge of these communications, and they are very supportive of getting this ironed out. I just need to get the right person to articulate the specific license, and the link you provided to OTRS gives me the right tools - just a matter of hours to days. Stuart Ray soupvector (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is well past the one week period for closure, I suggest we do not close this DR until at least next Thursday to give Soupvector time to get the license in place. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was copied on an email just sent from JHU to OTRS so I think this will be resolved presently. soupvector (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept OTRS #2014112210011257. Thanks again to soupvector for making this happen. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe una versión en formato .svg, siguiqndo la recomendación de transición a SVG de Commons, y no tiene ningún uso actualmente. Resumiendo es equivalente a "Tribunal Autobuses.svg" Mabema1 (talk) 16:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No objections Stifle (talk) 12:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: small size, no EXIF dataD Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, agree but it seems to be a mobile phone image. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No good reason to delete Stifle (talk) 12:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same but of better quality: File:Отель Золотая Орхидея.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-11-04T12:44:10‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Redirected to other image. Green Giant (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of a series of images uploaded with the author "taken by my brother for Wikipedia". As the uploader is still active, I think perhaps it would be a good idea for him to have his brother fill out an OTRS form to cover all these images.

I asked him to create his own account and add the missing information. I hope it's fine now. --Nicor (talk) 00:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold see User talk:Nicor. --Krd 05:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission achieved Krd 09:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]