Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/10/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 2nd, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some private album picture, commons are not facebook Motopark (talk) 03:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some private album picture, commons are not facebook Motopark (talk) 03:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Einreichungsort angegeben (Steiermark statt Tirol) WOKRIE (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from the net, http://gid-str.ru/montazh-myagkoj-cherepicy-svoimi-rukami Bilderling (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privatsphäre verletzt! Mikamari200 (talk) 01:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Invalid deletion reason - see also OTRS ticket number 2014100210014061 Jcb (talk) 14:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privatsphäre verletzt! Mikamari200 (talk) 01:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: See the description, this is an architectural monument. And also Freedom of panorama in Germany. (Behalten: Dies Bild ist im Rahmen der Panoramafreiheit von öffentlichem Grund aus aufgenommen worden, es werden auch keine weiteren Rechte wie das Persönlichkeitsrecht verletzt.) --Ajepbah (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)--[reply]

Kept: Invalid deletion reason - see also OTRS ticket number 2014100210014061 Jcb (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete unused personal image looks entirely COM:SCOPE and licence was removed by anonIP who did add a Flickr source url. Ww2censor (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Another attempt of this user to upload a file which is not okay. Natuur12 (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Copied from internet like all this users other uploads Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Salem Depot (Boston & Maine).jpg. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted as per policy for duplicates  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution photo of File:Salem Depot (Boston & Maine) Side View.jpg. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted as per policy for duplicates  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This only needs to be uploaded once. Superior version at File:Sistema Brasileiro de Televisão (logo).png. Fry1989 eh? 18:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its a screenshot from youtube 2003:4D:2C20:5F0C:81D6:7DD9:2052:7C98 19:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que si Maylin mercedes cespedes (talk) 23:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://ostroykevse.ru/Krovlia/Krovlia_page_30.html Bilderling (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Personal image with biography fails COM:SCOPE. Ww2censor (talk) 23:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Personal image fails COM:SCOPE. Ww2censor (talk) 23:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and Requested by the uploader EurovisionNim 08:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 15:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and Requested by Uploader EurovisionNim 08:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 15:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very substanded unused image and requested by uploader EurovisionNim 08:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 15:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Ciara+Bravo+Nickelodeon+26th Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 15:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error, myself Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: typo. JuTa 15:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2014 - P J Films Entertainment by P J Studio http://www.pjfilmsentertainment.com/ Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 15:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This only needs to be uploaded once. Superior version at File:Sistema Brasileiro de Televisão (logo).png. Fry1989 eh? 18:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:EugeneZelenko. JuTa 15:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo metadata contains personal information Kmachs (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Taivo. JuTa 15:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution image not being used - possibly revenge shots Ballofstring (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 15:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Semi-naked selfie which may be a revenge shot posted by someone else - not being used Ballofstring (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 15:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naked selfie which may have been posted by someone else - possibly a revenge shot Ballofstring (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 15:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BRIAN JOSUE VAZQUEZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 03:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BRIAN JOSUE VAZQUEZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal pictures without educational use. Commons is not a personal photo book.

· Favalli01:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


All files seem to have been deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BRIAN JOSUE VAZQUEZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of personal photos.

Juggler2005 (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


All files seem to have been deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship/copyright claim needs to be checked. File is attributed to the subject, Pierre de Meyts, but according to the source [1] it is actually by a different artist. Fut.Perf. 10:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An email has been received at OTRS from the actual artist who says he has happy to let the image be used in anyway. However, I am going to ask him to send a full license so we have no ambiguity. Green Giant (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS Permission received Green Giant (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been uploaded as new version of Bab Ballads 083.png Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern monument in Russia - not covered by {{FoP-Russia}} INeverCry 00:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Heavily photoshopped. User with bad history. Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Giuseppe Grondona here. Yann (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Video screenshot for en:Ruslan Ashuraliyev (1950—2009), a Soviet wrestler, taken most likely from a TV transmission which is available also on Youtube via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGGGgNozMj8 (+/- 00:37 min). Further details and/or permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 08:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Utkarshgroup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files (uploaded in a row on 24.01.2014) were most likely grabbed from https://www.utkarshindia.in. Examples: File:Larger Dia Pipes 2014-01-24 12-16.jpg taken from https://www.utkarshindia.in/msgi/msgipipes.htm = https://www.utkarshindia.in/images/largediapipes.jpg (last modified: 2012). File:RH Section 2014-01-24 12-16.jpg taken from https://www.utkarshindia.in/rhs/RH_sections.htm = https://www.utkarshindia.in/images/RH_sections.jpg (last modified: 2012). Apart from needing permission all files may be out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Obs.: The user is blocked (spam) at enwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 08:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

К сожалению, в России пока нет свободы панорамы для памятников. Unfortunately, Russia still does not have FoP for monuments. Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

К сожалению, в России пока нет свободы панорамы для памятников. Unfortunately, Russia still does not have FoP for monuments. Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date for this license. Yann (talk) 08:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usfkorea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. File:한국대학생포럼 이정현 회장 2014-01-24 21-13.JPG (high res & exif avialbale) is - per metadata - attributed to photographer "LEE", belonging copyrights to "NEWDAILY" (= most likely http://www.newdaily.co.kr). File:한국대학생포럼 이정현 회장 '대안을 제시한다!' 기자회견 중 2014-01-24 21-09.jpeg (low res, no exif, eventually a video screenshot) is mysteriously watermarked with "Yonhap News". en:Yonhap is South Korea’s largest news agency. Both files uploaded on 24.01.2014.

Gunnex (talk) 08:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar images can be found at http://www.alpinetec.co/ (e.g. [2]). Looks like this was either taken from there directly or derived from one of those. We would need a written permission from the copyright holder vie COM:OTRS El Grafo (talk) 09:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status as the photo (high res & exif available) is watermarked with "Stefan Zamisch Photography", a professional photographer (http://www.stefan-zamisch.at/). Uploaded by Lukas und Falco (talk · contributions · Statistics) who might be "Lukas Pratschker" with his dog "Falco", winner of the 2013 edition of en:Das Supertalent, a German talent show. May be a work for hire, nevertheless a permission should be provided. Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 09:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree album pitcure Yger (talk) 09:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen personal. Yortez (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K9 BRAZIL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aydın Əlizadə (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old pictures, unlikely to be own works. Bogus license, wrong date.

Yann (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image. See Category:South side of the Taj Mahal for more usable files. BrightRaven (talk) 12:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swatantrasingh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, not used, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 12:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of project scope Aftab (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by U3099729 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-text.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, last remaining file of serial copyright violator Greg krfc72 (talk · contributions · Statistics), per COM:PRP, considering user logs Gunnex (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from sign text (images looks to be in public domain). Text is long enough to be copyrighted. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image of a non notable artist. BrightRaven (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alhayki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in 02.2014. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, appears to be video screenshots. For File:الشيخ جمال خرفوش 2014-02-09 22-10.jpg: previously published (even watermarked) via http://www.jmal-khrfosh.com/news/photos/medium/13668907114.jpg (last modified: 2013), available somewhere at http://www.jmal-khrfosh.com/.

Gunnex (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, Source does not lead to image, all images by that photographer on Flickr are copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Published July 17, 2007 at http://theoriginalbeast.blogspot.com/2007/07/critically-acclaimed.html, watermarked "(C)" 2007 by original photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, Image "CAMPUS FROM INSIDE ----- ARYABHAT BHAWAN" found at http://jiitadmissions.blogspot.com/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A creative commons license for these banknotes is not proper, since they are derivative works. Dutch copyright law doesn't make an exception for currency. Some of these might be PD-old.

Vera (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All of them seem to be pd-old.... Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know for sure these are pd-old, as the design of the notes is owned by the government and they have placed it in the public domain. Dqfn13 (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks like the copyright has expired. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 07:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Yann (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If these are photographs, then they are not covered by {{FoP-Nederland}}. Let's discuss. Yann (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FOP doesn't apply to advertisements, since they are not permanently placed in the public space. --Vera (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, photo was taken in Lihuania, a non-FOP country. --Vera (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not covered by FoP-Nederland. @1Veertje: Next time DR for such FOP cases pls. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 17:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 17:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely taken by photographer "Heini Kangasluoma", considering a similar shot available on MTV via http://www.mtv.fi/viihde/ohjelmat/duudsonit-tuli-taloon/uutiset/artikkeli/duudsonit-jukka-ohjelman-3-kaudesta-itseanikin-on-pelottanut/3094566 (mouse over image to see credit). Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture, out of scope. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T17:26:46‎ (UTC)

 Keep Extremely simple, PD-textlogo. Fma12 (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Me The Money (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:27:14‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per Fry. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T17:25:54‎ (UTC)


Kept: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Me The Money (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:28:14‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per Fry. Green Giant (talk) 23:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete my personal (private) image. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Cengmezo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.72.166.79 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T17:39:19‎ (UTC) JuTa 19:51, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Torreya1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely cropped, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Torreya1995.

Gunnex (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. PS I: Related ptwiki-entry, created by uploader, spam speedy deleted. PS II: Most likely background unreal and photoshopped. Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Uploader added GFDL/CC tags later. But thats unlike own work of the uploader. JuTa 20:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously black bordered, most likely cropped, appears to be a screenshot from an unknown video/TV-source, uploaded by 1-upload-user Northjokers (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 02.2014. Gunnex (talk) 21:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol from Google maps Threecharlie (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New edited version named "file:Kena Amoa 2014.jpg", but uploaded again as a new image. So please remove this old one. Michael-schilling (talk) 09:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, exact copy, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res, high quality photo appears to be taken from the Oregonian: http://blog.oregonlive.com/pac10/2009/01/post_117.html Ytoyoda (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have accidently loaded two identical images. Please delete this one. GTHO (talk) 03:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seems to be copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underexposed rubbish, tells us nothing about the subject matter at all, and it's my shot so I should know, good riddens. 27.99.121.26 10:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Forgot to log in yesterday.Sardaka (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputable license. Got from network, it's a commercial book's frontpage. Bilderling (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputable license. Got from network, it's a commercial book's frontpage. Bilderling (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputable license. Got from network, it's a commercial book's frontpage. Bilderling (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis trompé de reference pouvez vous l effacer! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis tromper de reference,pouvez vous effacer cette photo que j ai installé sur votre site! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis trompé de reference, pouvez vous supprimer cette photo! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis tromper de reference,pouvez vous effacer cette photo que j ai installé sur votre site! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j ai fait une erreur de reference pouvez vous effacer cette photo! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 00:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis tromper de reference,pouvez vous effacer cette photo que j ai installé sur votre site! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, De quelle «référence» parlez-vous ? Et quelle serait la bonne «référence» ? -- Asclepias (talk) 21:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j ai fait une erreur de reference sur cette photo! merci de la suprimer Baronfuzz (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis tromper de reference,pouvez vous effacer cette photo que j ai installé sur votre site! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j ai fait une erreur de reference! pouvez vous effacer cette photo! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis tromper de reference,pouvez vous effacer cette photo que j ai installé sur votre site! merci Baronfuzz (talk) 13:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de reference! merci d'effacer cette photo Baronfuzz (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Could be useful, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author of illustration is Georges Dola (1872–1950) not public domain - pas dans le domaine public - https://www.imagesmusicales.be/search/title/toutes+les+femmes/ShowData/8/Submit/ Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Will be restored after copyright expiring in 2021. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data credits John D. Sperry, doesn't match uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was most probably taken from another website; ownership and free/fair use are questionable. 201.141.14.97 00:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non useful image only used for vandalism Brianhe (talk) 03:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Simple text, PD-textlogo. Fma12 (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too simple to be copyrighted. {{PD-textlogo}} for me. Fma12 (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too simple to be under copyright. Fma12 (talk) 19:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License on Flickr is CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic, and not the CC-BY stated in the file info. I JethroBT (talk) 06:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a cloth manufacturer. Can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 07:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Condition "This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." does not seem to be met. Also the tag is for works of which the author is unknown but the source (NPG) does mention an artist (Bassano Ltd). Wolbo (talk) 09:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Fjrdlp (repeated failed copyvios uploads related to Melissa Jiménez), mysteriously top black border, most likely screenshotted from an unknown video/TV-source. Gunnex (talk) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused image with little educational value. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity or promotional image of non-notable person Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputable license. Got from network, it's a commercial book's frontpage. Bilderling (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Austria for text, unfortunately darkweasel94 14:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Teporary non-free advertisement focussed.    FDMS  4    14:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure about COM:DM here. The speech bubble that is indeed somewhat focused probably doesn't meet COM:TOO. The rest behind it might be de minimis, or might not be; it's definitely a borderline case. The file is certainly usable as a mere railway photo as well. darkweasel94 14:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But the speech bubble is part of the copyrighted work – and you could break down every copyrighted work to parts which would fall below the TOO outside of a complex composition like this one …    FDMS  4    17:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree the advertsing are very likely de minimis, too.

Kept: FOP-Austria covers this. Yann (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wiki is not a hosting. Part of an self-advertising, article dropped. Bilderling (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (at least, there is no an OTRS ticket that validates this file here); copyrighted logo (See Archangels' blog), not a notable organization either. Fma12 (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete any and all information associated with American Archangels, Inc. We did receive our 501(c)3, though did not have enough funding in order to proceed with our desired projects. In response to the above statement, the American Archangels, Inc. logo was created by graphic artist Dan Stein, as is documented as our registered logo in our founding documents and 501(c)3 application. We were incorporated as a tax exempt 501(c)3 non profit organization within the state of Texas, though had to relinquish our exempt status as we were not able to get our organization up and running due to prior obligations.


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity image. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely inappropriate for Commons. This is the draft of an article, not an illustration for one. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image without descrition or intuitive educative or exemplar purpose. Richard Avery (talk) 18:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description is advertising the subjest of the unused image. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T18:42:01‎ (UTC)


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Additional, the image on the top right (the related festival poster?) might be affected by COM:FOP#India. Gunnex (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this picture is not captured properly by a camera. So I just want to delete this file now. Saadullah Bhatti (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la date et fausse — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.50.175.32 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T06:48:30‎ (UTC)


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the date if needed. Yann (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license . Uploader added a PD-old tag later. But the creating person ru:Тихомиров, Владимир Владимирович died 1994. That cannot be PD-old. JuTa 20:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality vanity shot which isn't being used Ballofstring (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity shot not being used Ballofstring (talk) 22:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 22:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 23:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture collection or album cover, if poicture collection, needs source pictures Motopark (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio of copyrighted image at https://www.flickr.com/photos/usmanjamshedstudio/422529787/in/photostream/ Takeaway (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Hmmm... keep: The username of the uploader (UsmanJamshed) is the same as the owner of the Flickr account (Usman Jamshed), and therefore, is highly likely to be the same person. But, the file uploaded by Usman Jamshed to Flickr in 2007 is not released under a free license, so, the file may need OTRS permission. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Perhaps the Flickr user and our uploader are the same, perhaps not. Requires OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture shows my family: husband, wife, son plus our car including the license plate. I don't want it to be published. The photographer did not ask for permission and we won't permit any publishment. If the picture is not deletd within 2 weeks I will sue the photographer. 188.103.202.47 03:22, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild zeigt öffentlichen Straßenraum, die Nummernschilder sind unkenntlich gemacht, bzw. nicht erkennbar. Wikimedia hat hierzu folgende Standardantwort:
Mit den Fotografien von Denkmälern möchten wir die Wahrnehmung dieser und das Bewusstsein für erhaltenswerte Gebäude stärken. Keinesfalls wollen wir damit ihr Persönlichkeitsrecht beschneiden. Daher haben wir uns im Vorfeld ausgiebig mit der Rechtslage beschäftigt, die im Zusammenhang mit Google Streetview mehrfach von Gerichten überprüft und bestätigt wurde.
In einem Urteil des LG Köln vom 13. Januar 2010 ( http://www.telemedicus.info/urteile/Datenschutzrecht/982-LG-Koeln-Az-28-O-57809-Fotos-von-Strassen-und-Gebaeuden-Bilderbuch-Koeln.html ) heißt es dazu: "Die Veröffentlichung von Fotos eines Wohnhauses stellt keinen Eingriff im das Allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht dar, wenn der Name der Bewohner nicht erkennbar ist und dem Betrachter des Fotos bildlich nicht mehr Informationen dargeboten werden, als demjenigen, der selbst durch die Straße geht oder fährt."
Ein "Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache" existiert in Deutschland nicht, wie der BGH in einem Urteil vom 9. März 1989 bestätigte: "Das ungenehmigte Fotografieren eines fremden Hauses und die gewerbliche Verwertung einer solchen Fotografie stellen dann keine Abwehr- und Zahlungsansprüche auslösende Einwirkung auf fremdes Eigentum dar, wenn die Fotografie - ohne daß das Hausgrundstück betreten wird - von einer allgemein zugänglichen Stelle aus angefertigt wird." (sog. Friesenhaus-Urteil, BGH, Urteil vom 9. März 1989, Az.: I ZR 54/87, Verwertung der Fotografie eines Privathauses - Friesenhaus, siehe auch https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Bundesgerichtshof_-_Friesenhaus)
Natürlich sind wir gerne bereit, persönliche Informationen aus den Bildern zu entfernen. Sollte dies der Fall sein, teilen Sie uns bitte mit, um was es sich handelt.
Die Drohung mit Klage ist üblich. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ich (der Fotograf des Bildes) habe eine neue Version meines Bildes erstellt, auf dem zusätzliche Bereiche unkenntlich gemacht wurden, und dieses in den Artikel eingebunden. Damit ist das alte Bild überflüssig und kann gelöscht werden. Leider besitze ich nicht die erforderlichen Rechte, die Löschung selbst vorzunehmen, und bitte daher einen Admimistrator, dies so bald wie möglich zu tun. --Uwca (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not respond to threats from anonymous users -- if we did, anyone could force the takedown of any image. Send a message to OTRS with the necessary identification and they will consider it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helsantos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files? Depicted person seems to be unknown to oogle

37.5.3.164 08:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo by Mark Husmann http://www.imdb.com/media/rm756473600/nm0517535?ref_=nm_ov_ph Yann (talk) 08:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See talk page. As it was published before being uploader, a permission from the photographer is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madasaged (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations (no 5) and dubious "own works" without metadata

37.5.3.164 09:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, undescribed image with little educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 09:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © 2014 Journal des Grandes Ecoles - Tous droits réservés .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, very unlikely to be own work. Copies here and here. Yann (talk) 10:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Iriska1314. Yann (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iriska1314 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Company promotional drawings, or small size pictures, no EXIF data. Needs COM:OTRS permission.

Yann (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strela-1.jpg. Yann (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernando Botero is alive. Colombian FOP does not cover the interior of museums imho. BrightRaven (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernando Botero is alive. Colombian FOP does not cover the interior of museums imho. BrightRaven (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal work about a non-profit organization. As far as I searched out, this organization never used this logo. Fma12 (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 16:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now the person editing from this account says that the family member is no longer using the account, "his family member is no longer contributing and/or editing this page, I am now doing so. I am a nuetral party, I do not know Mr. Antonelli personally," GB fan (talk) 10:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyright protected comic Yann (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FOP Germany probably covers this. Yann (talk) 16:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FOP doesn't trump unauthorized use of copyright protected works. --Vera (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a faithful reproduction of a copyrighted work (copyright Moulinsart, owner of rights on Hergé art), but a graffiti with likeness of Tintin as a folklore hero. I think copyright does not apply here (perhaps the graffiti painter moral rights ?).--Wuyouyuan (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So the FoP issue cleared, the question is "is this character a DW of the Tintin character?".
Let's see if we can establish matching between the Tintin character from Hergé, and this one.
  • I've asked on #wikimedia-commons “do you see Tintin or a random character with a passing similarity?” and got two opposite replies: one person sees Tintin, another one sees primarily other characters (from Family Guy for example).
  • On another Wikimedia IRC channel, I've asked shown the image with a non distinctive URL, and asked who he were, Tintin were the first answer, but with a question mark. When asked to choose between "Tintin, of course" or to keep his "Tintin?", he noted the specific hair (in French « houpette ») and the nose are significant enough to allow to recognize him.
  • Finally, on another non Wikimedia channel, I've asked the same way to a Belgian who reads Tintin. The answer were straightforward, "a fatter Tintin" (in French « Tintin en plus gros »)
So it seems this it's well a derivative work.
And the image doesn't seem a parody or a caricature. --Dereckson (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FOP does not apply to unauthorized use of a copyrighted character. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Yann (talk) 16:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{FoP-Netherlands}} may not cover this. Let's discuss. Yann (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: It's in a museum. At Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Netherlands, we have, "The parliament and the literature explicitly mention that schools, opera buildings, entrance halls of businesses, and museums are not public places for the purpose of article 18'. That seems very clear to me. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This historic plaque is after 1989 and Fair Use does not apply on Wikimedia Commons. TallBill (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This historic plaque is after 1989 and Fair Use does not apply on Wikimedia Commons. TallBill (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges Saupique is dead in 1961. No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.63.151 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of Tintin artwork. Futhermore, this is a tangible legal risk case, as the the Société Moulinsart is known to pursue people using any artwork related to Tintin.

Ces photographies contiennent partiellement ou comme sujet principal des œuvres inspirées de l'univers de Tintin. Nous sommes donc dans un cas d'œuvres dérivées. Il convient d'être particulièremet attentif sur des questions de de minimis, la Société Moulinsart étant connue pour poursuivre très abondemment sur ces questions de droit d'auteur. Il s'agit donc ici d'un risque légal réel, et non théorique.

Dereckson (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

L'exposition a été réalisée avec la collaboration de la Fondation Hergé. Il s'agit d'une installation permanente destinée à augmenter l'intérêt de la visite du château de Cheverny pour les touristes, et la présence d'images sur Wikimedia ajoute à la renommée de l'exposition. Il ne semble pas impossible d'obtenir un OTRS pour des images de faible qualité, ce qui est le cas. --Wuyouyuan (talk) 13:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Avant de requérir une demande explicite de permission de la Société Moulinsart, car rappellons que la Fondation Hergé n'est en aucun cas détentrice de la propriété intellectuelle d'Hergé, je vous invite à obtenir préalablement un accord de Chatsam : le risque juridique de poursuite en lieu et place d'accord de l'autorisation étant réel. --Dereckson (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all but the suit of armor, which does not have a copyright, even if it is recent. It appears that most of images have more than one copyright holder, so one license will not be enough (ie, the ship model and the painting of the ship; the building and the two works on either side of it). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 23:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been uploaded as new version of Bab Ballads 081.png Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been uploaded as new version of Bab Ballads 082.png Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was uploaded by me but I need to delete it to have a redirect of an updated image. Best, AJona1992 (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of userpage file. Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawings appear to be from here. There's nothing on the source website to indicate that the sketches are in the public domain. Diannaa (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. No evidenceof having been released into the public domain. Green Giant (talk) 19:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esv (talk • contribs) 2014-10-01T11:01:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted: CC-BY-NC-SA type license is not acceptable for Commons. Green Giant (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC-BY-NC-SA type license is not acceptable for Commons. Green Giant (talk) 19:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems a copy from internet http://www.thebodychallenge.com/index.php Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  20:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per nom. Please do not nominate OTRS pending files for deletion when they have been pending for less than thirty days. There is a confidential verification process taking place. Feel free to ask at the OTRS noticeboard if thirty days go by and it is still OTRS pending. Green Giant (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (OTRS) from Sibylle Beer. 217.186.202.147 20:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per nom. Freedom of panorama in Germany permits photos to be taken of the outside of buildings without permission from the copyright holder, whether that is the architect or the building owner. Green Giant (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logo, no permission Krd 15:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak  Keep for me, the logo is simple but the gradients make me doubt. Fma12 (talk) 19:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted logo, no permission Krd 15:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark logo Petrov Victor (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logo, no permission Krd 15:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The too diverse colors in the top-sinister field, the year on the crown and the wrong number of towers on the crown (a commune should have three, while seven towers go only for cities that are county capital) first raised my eyebrow. In fact, this is not an actual coat of arms, as it has not been approved by a Government Resolution, so this is not only not in the scope of Commons, but it is also copyrighted work, not exempt according to Romanian law. —Andrei S. Talk 11:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. It seems that it's a book scan. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is a scan from a printed version of my photograph, I lost the original file due to hard drive failure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbendezu1992 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep sorry, file is in use --Indeedous (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INeverCry 17:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely a selfie made by "Sophie Indracusins", a popular musician from Thailand (+1000 selfies available at her Facebook and at related social networks). Gunnex (talk) 15:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 23:32, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non ho mascherato le targhe Stepas55 (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been uploaded as new version of File:Bab Ballads 084.png Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I've done a history merge. INeverCry 19:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request : Replaced by a new scan, smallest but cleaned : File:Caminha-Rua Direita-19670727.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvillafruela (talk • contribs) 2014-10-01T13:30:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 19:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploder request : Replaced by a new scan, smallest but cleaned : File:Caminha-Torre do Relógio-19670727.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvillafruela (talk • contribs) 2014-10-01T13:28:50‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 19:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mehdi as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-self}} tag. Looks like an improper transfer from persian wikipedia. JuTa 20:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original uploader in Persian wikipedia used http://sheykhlari.co.cc/ for image source but this website is not available and in other hand we don't have any OTRS ticket from this website! --MehdiTalk 12:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 19:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, plus unfortunately quite inaccurate. Unlikely to ever get reused.

   FDMS  4    13:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep These show the signage design of Vienna rapid transit stations, which has educational value. If by "quite inaccurate" you mean the fact that they have gradients (when the design itself doesn't), in fact the background lighting in some places actually does give them a very similar appearance to what these SVGs show. darkweasel94 13:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The first one shows nothing but text and an inaccurate (compared to the one actually used in Wikipedias) logo. The font, which even has shadows, quite obviously doesn't match the real one and the arrows look like MS Office ones. There are no "U2 Schottenring" signs (at least not with 2010-corners). Also, the other station signs are redundant.    FDMS  4    15:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]