Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/09/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 28th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal pic of a non-notable individual who doesn't seem to know that sideburns are no longer cool. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 05:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Incheon_AsianGames_Swimming_48.jpg Fetx2002 (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think I've told nominator to use {{Duplicate}} for several times... — revi^ 06:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Kept: The other one deleted. — revi^ 06:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sollte Category werden - Schreibfehler. Gerd Eichmann (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyrighted logotype appears to be the main subject of this photo. There is no reason to believe that the copyright holders of the logo approved this use or the publication under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 12:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per CSD criteria #1 for files. The Steal your face logo is copyrighted. I obtained the image from Flickr, where it is labeled as Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic. I initially thought it would be all right, since it's a painting on a side of a building. However, upon further consideration, it has to go due to the logo being copyrighted. I've added the speedy deletion template to the file page. Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless name, no description, no notable people. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added some descriptions but then had to log off; meanwhile Tm intervened. -- Tuválkin 00:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Scope self evident. If the name is meaningless ask to change it or change it, contact the uploader (me in this case) to add a description instead of wasting everyones time. Tm (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Was not evident, but OK now. Yann (talk) 04:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Aristide Maillol is not yet in the public domain and there is no liberty of panorama in France. Culex (talk) 18:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done VIGNERON (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 02:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fake NASA license. JuTa 07:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 02:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fake NASA license. JuTa 07:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:VPC#Template:Free--PublicOnFacebook. Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. The Facebook disclaimer only covers the uploading of pictures but does not address authorship. Public photos at Facebook have not necessarily been produced by the user that hosts them; not to mention group sites where there is no single responsible user and various press photos are prone to be circulated. This is not a free licence by Wikimedia standards. De728631 (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. In general, I would prefer no uploads from Facebook at all, as the authorship/copyright status is simply unclear in most cases. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Such permissions are usually considered as a permission for non commercial use. Jee 04:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity photo. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, non-notable band. I delete all the uploader's contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfree MGA73 (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, can be written to some wikipedia, if needed Motopark (talk) 04:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 06:23, 28 September 2014 Krd (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Ungesühnt (Film) Anschreiben des Fördervereins der Alten Synagoge Kitzingen.jpg (Derivative of non-free content) MGA73 (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood the copyright, it is not 2.0 but "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)" Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 04:45, 4 October 2014 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Jersey Central Lines NJ 1967, geogre lane.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) MGA73 (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 05:00, 29 September 2014 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Kuronokun.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) MGA73 (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 05:00, 29 September 2014 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Nishikunn.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) MGA73 (talk) 10:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrughtstatus チンドレ・マンドレ (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 05:00, 29 September 2014 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Katoumasaru.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) MGA73 (talk) 10:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anca7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small resolution, no EXIF. The user have uploaded files under false license claims, included cropped versions, which are difficult to google (File:Notaria-anolaima.jpg, File:Tena-cundinamarca-iglesia.jpg).

Juggler2005 (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flabarros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 06:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy available here. Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Save-Elephants (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ataliva Roca Paz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 06:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 07:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misheck treck ngulube (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of unused personal photos.

Juggler2005 (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djdredd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No author's permission (1) + derivative work (2).

Sealle (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality, and plenty of alternatives. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused essential dup of File:Thalidomide-racemate2DCSD.svg, but with poorer spacing of the in-image captions DMacks (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. Wdwd (talk) 19:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is the very reason for this request? I licensed the image as my own work (as it is, of course), so I don't see the problem here. --Bartleby08 (talk) 09:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The case is the shown artwork. Please take a look at Commons:FOP#Italy and the warning text in Category:Siegesdenkmal_Bozen.--Wdwd (talk) 20:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But on this assumption you would have to delete most of Italian pictures... Please consider the fair use-rule and consider also, that the monument has been build in 1928, more than 80 years ago. --Bartleby08 (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, fair use is not allowed on Commons. The monument "Siegesdenkmal Bozen" has been build in 1928 by Marcello Piacentini who died in 1960. -> 54 years ago. His work will be in the public domain in the European Union in the year 2031 (year of death plus 70 years)--Wdwd (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's simply crazy, but there must be some reason in that madness :-) --Bartleby08 (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Monument is PD-ItalyGov. Abzeronow (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fawaz alwasmi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Fawaz alwasmi/user logs.

Gunnex (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building by Ieoh Ming Pei. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Ieoh Ming Pei ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement explicite de l'auteur, a fortiori pour une publication sous licence libre (pas de liberté de panorama). Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cobija (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cobija (talk) 20:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cobija (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cobija (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Cobija (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been diesigned by Pierre Pinsard (1906-1988), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. As there's no freedom af panorama in France, this work can't be considered as free and this picture should be removed from Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in the source TOC which provides for a free license, let alone GFDL.[1] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building pictured here has been created by Henri Chomette (1921-1995), an architect who died les than 70 years ago. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France, and this building can't be freely photographed. For this reason, this picture should be removed from Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been created by Marcel Breuer (1902-1981), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. As there's no freedom of panorama in France, this picture can't be freely shared under a free license and this picture should be removed from Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been created by Marcel Breuer (1902-1981), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. As there's no freedom of panorama in France, this picture can't be freely shared under a free license and this picture should be removed from Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 21:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough information about date/authorship given to confirm whether this is public domain. January (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A file with the same name was just deleted due to lack of evidence of permission on English Wikipedia. The deleting admin, Ronhjones (talk · contribs), tells that the file on Commons is the same file, so it may also lack evidence of permission. Note that this appears to be a work for hire (see authorship claim in the EXIF metadata). Stefan4 (talk) 22:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inccorect structure (see note), alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

attribution and copyright uncertainty. Richard Avery (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Largely text, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity image of non-notable person. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 07:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information to make this unused image educationally useful Richard Avery (talk) 07:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 07:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, most likely grabbed somewhere from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + the source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed somewhere from social media sites. Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot, big doubt about the licence. M0tty (talk) 08:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough information to make this unused image useful Richard Avery (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, appears to be a scan of a filmcover/marketing stuff for en:Sachin! Tendulkar Alla, a 2014 Indian Kannada film. Gunnex (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by 1-upload user MAXtanigawa (talk · contributions · Statistics) for ja:真島一男 (1932—2001), a Japanese politician. Gunnex (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 10:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files with building interiors in Germany, Part 1

[edit]

No FoP indoors in Germany

--ACBahn (talk) 13:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A few kept, the rest deleted. INeverCry 01:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image at http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/fotos/ Takeaway (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/in-de-pers/ Takeaway (talk) 14:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; created for use in a hoax article. Paul_012 (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clear advertising and out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused demonstration font. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poster of little educational value Richard Avery (talk) 15:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertisisng as can be seebn from the caption. Zenwort (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private touristy snapshot of no encyclopaedic value. No useable information provided in caption. Not linked. Zenwort (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advetrising for a local commercial enterprise as can be seen from the caption. Zenwort (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krmakokoe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason given for the assumption that this magazine archive is in the public domain. The magazine has a copyright notice [2]. Uploader also added PD-self but there is no supporting evidence for this either. January (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, some unknown person, see description Motopark (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of this image was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dag Hammarskjöld cropped.JPG. I wonder why that DR does not concern this image also. Ankry (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality, and plenty of alternatives. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have other images from this uploader which approximate this entirely nonnotable subject Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that it is "own work", no EXIF data, other images of this person have been previously deleted for copyright violation. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 19:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

purely promotional image for a nonnotalbe artist, other images exist for the person w/o the promotonal content Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal pic of a non-notable individual Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Novaguitarra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

web harvest that shows up on Google image search

Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

later restored: as OTRS received. OTRS process ongoing. --JuTa 19:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Toy protected by copyright. Techman224Talk 03:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemically incorrect. First eq deprotonates the OH, second deprotonates alpha CH; it's not just multiple colours of the neutral diphenylacetic acid molecule DMacks (talk) 03:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not very large and a little pixelated at full res; unused and have File:1-propanol.svg as higher-quality replacement DMacks (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted derivative image. Leoboudv (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Josve05a (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a tv or video still of unidentified people in an unidentified event. Little use for educational purposes Richard Avery (talk) 07:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Vigucool) MER-C 11:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unknown person, home picture gallery Motopark (talk) 11:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

home picture gallery picture, self promotional Motopark (talk) 11:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo. Juggler2005 (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"My grandfather's photo." It's not own work, I guess. Juggler2005 (talk) 11:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file with text ony; trolling content: off scope. -- Tuválkin 12:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serhiy LS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It's monuments of Soviet and post-Soviet period. There is no FOP in Ukraine.

Juggler2005 (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As NickK says, this mass DR is a bit too hard to handle in its present form. I've kept all of them so that individual cases can be addressed more easily. It also looks like a decent number of these may not require a second request per the arguments of NickK. INeverCry 02:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only PDF file; off scope content (non-notable musing about love). -- Tuválkin 12:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The usefulness of this unused image is not easily seen. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 12:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Orphaned Richard Avery (talk) 12:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content seems interesting (Artículo académico acerca de la décima (estrofa) en el Grupo Orígenes (1944-1956).) but a PDF file is not the suitable format for this kind of content. -- Tuválkin 12:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, indistinct image with little educational use Richard Avery (talk) 12:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with very limited educational use. Richard Avery (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : poor quality personnal image. Florn (talk) 13:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : personal images of a non-notable individual Florn (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : personal image of a non-notable individual Florn (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no description, not a useful image, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, undescribed document, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 13:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Moreover, the image appears to have been taken by someone other than the uploader. This suggests the claim of "own work" is invalid. While it's not impossible for it to be a selfie of sorts, added to the other concerns, that makes it a delete in my book. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 13:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously black bordered, most likely a screenshot from an unknown video source, most likely taken somewhere from atlantafalcons.com (2013). Gunnex (talk) 13:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/promos/ Takeaway (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/menu/breads-olives/ Takeaway (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/in-de-pers/ Takeaway (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with not enough information to make it useful. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/fotos/ Takeaway (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/contact/ Takeaway (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Touristy picture of a person of no encyclopaedic relevance, not conveying useful information. Not used on any wiki. Zenwort (talk) 14:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/fotos/ Takeaway (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private touristy picture of people of no encyclopaedic relevance. Not linked in any wiki. Zenwort (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional image - out of scope - copyrighted @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/menu/salades/ Takeaway (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image of unclear copyright status. used on tripadvisor, probably promotional image Takeaway (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/menu/pizza-classico/ Takeaway (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown copyright status, company logo @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/promos/ Takeaway (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified art work. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicates File:Milano mappa servizio ferroviario suburbano.svg. I'm the author of both Friedrichstrasse (talk) 16:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing evidence of permission from the government which created the passport. Stefan4 (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing evidence of permission from the government which created the passport. Stefan4 (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 23:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that the uploader, a relative of Louis Antonelli see diff, is the copyright holder of this image. GB fan (talk) 00:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 00:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 00:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was uploaded without proper research about the procedures for uploading on Wikimedia commons.. Emgeeisu (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perconal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF info, most likely a web harvest copyvio Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at facebook or twitter. --Achim (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nikolay Bukharin was posthumously rehabilitated in 1988, so his drawings will be in public domain in 2058. +70 years to rehabilitation date according to the Russian laws. See Template:PD-Russia

--Pianist (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


On the German template there is not written any thing of a rehabilitation and that the copyright is restored for another 70 years ager rehabilitation.--Sanandros (talk) 15:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Attention! If the author of this work was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously, countdown of copyright protection began not from the death date, but from the rehabilitation date.
There is the same text in German, I checked it in Google Translate.
See the text of the law in Russian.

4. Если автор произведения был репрессирован и посмертно реабилитирован, срок действия исключительного права считается продленным и семьдесят лет исчисляются с 1 января года, следующего за годом реабилитации автора произведения. Full Text of Fourth Part of Civil Code of Russia.

--Pianist (talk) 16:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Indeed, the exception about the rehabilitation applies hereYmblanter (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small/low-res; have File:Neral Citral B.svg has high-quality replacement DMacks (talk) 04:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except image-page lists Wikipedysta:Malarz pl/szablony/Związek chemiczny infobox/35, but that link only goes to a page that doesn't exist? DMacks (talk) 04:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: replacement I gave differs in implicit/explicit methyl style, but there are also others in Category:Neral with the same style if someone prefers it for some use. DMacks (talk) 04:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding File:Geranial.png, which is likewise replaceable by File:Geranial Citral A.svg (and others in Category:Geranial). DMacks (talk) 04:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 22:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Essential duplicate of File:Thalidomide with numbering and segregation of ring systems (higher-res).png (the "higher res" file is only 1KB larger in size, negligible advantage to the nom'ed file in the apparent purpose of having both). Neither in-image caption is really correct (both boxed areas include the N between the respective two carbonyls, so they are en:imides, not just the phthaloyl (two carbonyls on the benzene ring) or an amide (N on a single carbonyl). DMacks (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There are problems with both, but no reason to keep both either. Ed (Edgar181) 22:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Still protected bu the « droits d’auteurs ». The author, Jaume Plensa, is still alive.
Français : Toujours couvert par les droits d’auteurs. L’auteur fr:Jaume Plensa, est toujours en vie.
VIGNERON (talk) 07:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The picture is a derivative work of a copyrighted. We need permission from copyright holder of the artwork. PierreSelim (talk) 21:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wird ersetzt durch aktuelle Version Penelope72 (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has violated the privacy of the owner of the car. 円周率3パーセント (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image edited, old version deleted. Yann (talk) 17:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a copyrighted book Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, no es un libro con copyright Barlaan
Todos los libros tienen derechos de autor, ¿en qué te basás para afirmar que este no los tiene? --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 18:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Worldcat lists it as © 1989. [3] Of course, if it was under a free license, Worldcat probably wouldn't tell us. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect House (This is Anthony M McColl house in Woodward, IA) Cubsftw (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, watermark, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the picture is authentic, but its heavily touched and the uploader slammed his name on it, lets bring that to his attention and see if he can upload a better version. --Uwe a (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation and/or out of scope. JuTa 17:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong house. I am original photographer/contributor and I uploaded wrong file for wrong listing. Z28scrambler (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: if desired please request a {{Rename}} of the file. JuTa 17:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of the drawings. Stefan4 (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • With a little less zoom we could have talked about de minimis but this looks in fact like it has to be deleted. De728631 (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This was taken on board of a ship of the Colombian navy which is presumably not always accessible to the general public. If this had been photographed on a passenger ship like a ferry, would FoP apply to such derivative works? De728631 (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Most ferries are not permanently installed anywhere. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • But liferafts are permanently installed on ferryboats that are open to the general public (i.e. until someone dumps them into the sea for training or in distress). With the ship itself being subject to the jurisdiction of country X I could imagine that FoP would apply to such installations. Anyhow, this is a but off topic here and should better be discussed at the Village Pump's copyright board. De728631 (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • Unless the location of the liferaft is fixed relative to the Earth, it is not permanently installed. If the ship ever moves, then the liferaft is not permanently installed. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • The phrase "permanently installed" says nothing about whether anything is fixed relative to the Earth. darkweasel94 05:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
            • A thing like this would presumably count as a portion of the ship, requiring the ship to be permanently installed in a harbour. A ship is presumably not publicly accessible anyway, as you can't embark or disembark at any time you like. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 17:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and undescribed image. Uneducational. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wikivoyage:Special:Diff/113935 is a clue to its intended use. It looks like the article still has a broken link to the image. LX (talk, contribs) 15:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed description and category. JuTa 18:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colonna_dei_Francesi_particolare_nord_ovest.jpg Ediemme (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request of a recent unused upload JuTa 18:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reason: no source (probably [http://1000aircraftphotos.com/Contributions/11402.htm JOSEF KRAUTHAEUSER COLLECTION No. 11402. Letov Š 19]); watwrmarked image. --Gampe (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. No evidence of release under CC-BY-SA on the club website or the club's Facebook page. Huon (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info – A SVG derivative version of this file exists at en:File:Des Moines Menace Logo.svg. Perhaps it should be moved to English Wikipedia instead of being deleted? Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 09:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 18:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsourced image, clearly a fake (the Korean phrase on the flag makes no sense.) Elmor (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source, out of scope. JuTa 18:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto with a Person in it, I did load that and made that mistake Schmeissnerro (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader made a mistake, there is a much better image of the same subject File:Ludwig Mooser Orgel Pfarrkirche St Laurentius Altheim OOe.jpg. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: yep. JuTa 18:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad and useless image. --Tomcsy (talk) 11:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Bad quality, useless. --Pallerti (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not too bad. JuTa 18:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Domenico Trezzini C 01.jpg vlsergey (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: very different crop. This one is B&W the other one coloured. JuTa 18:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: what are you talking about? It's not about cropping or color -- it is just wrong image! Check the ralted discussion, please. -- 46.39.230.230 02:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then request a rename of the image. --JuTa 08:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect attribution; duplicate; unused. This is not a Trezzini, but another architect - Francesco Rastrelli, see his portrait by Rotari. -- Kaganer (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now a redirect. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good content for Wikiversity, I think, but not as a PDF file. -- Tuválkin 12:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 18:38, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernandogeek78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Good content for Wikiversity, I think, but not as PDF files.

-- Tuválkin 12:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --JuTa 18:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text photographed on screen; off scope. Pls resubmit as text to the Spanish language wikipedia. -- Tuválkin 12:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ... and likely a copyright violation. JuTa 18:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by myself on 2014-06-28. A better version with full color information from the same source is now available at File:Riviergezicht Rijksmuseum SK-A-125.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as duplicate and redirected. JuTa 18:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license is wrong -- nothing about date of creation neither about author is specified. Serge Lachinov is not author of original work vlsergey (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work an no source provided. JuTa 18:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source account only has 7 images. Is this own work or not? Leoboudv (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. JuTa 19:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copies here and here. Yann (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann,
I am quite sure that proposal to delete this file is a misunderstanding and I would like to clarify it.
I am the author of this picture and you can see even my name at the bottom right corner of the image. My full name is Armando Jorge de Carvalho Ferreira. Regarding the two links that you mention where this picture is also available at internet, this is quite easy to explain. One of the pages, Moinhos de Portugal, is my personal web page. The other page, Caseiro.pt, was publishing this picture after my agreement.
Based on those facts I kindly ask you to remove deletion request for the image Moinho da Torre.jpg as makes really no sense to do it according the rules from Wikimedia Commons.
If you need further clarifications please let me know. Thank you very much for your understanding. Best regards. Armando Jorge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorge de Carvalho (talk • contribs)
 Comment: Is very easy to say I'm the copyright holder where the source does not indicate the actual copyright holder to a specific person (specially if the pictures have watermark). In this case, OTRS permission is needed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: verification through Commons:OTRS required. JuTa 18:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dies Foto von "Author Nina Annabelle Märkl", "Source Nina Annabelle Märkl" zeigt die Künstlerin "Nina Annabelle Märkl", sieht aber nicht nach Selfie aus. Damit ist es wohl eine URV, der Urheber (Fotograf) wird nicht genannt. Auch stimmt dann wohl die Lizenz nicht. Jbergner (talk) 07:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jbergner, dieses Bild hat mir Frau Märkl, mit der ich bekannt bin und in deren Gegenwart der Artikel über ihre Person erstellt wurde, zugesandt. Ich kenne den Namen des Fotografen selbst nicht. Da sie es mir zugesandt hat ging ich davon aus, dass es völlig in Ordnung ist. Da sie allerdings scheinbar nicht zu erreichen ist bzw. nicht reagiert, kann ich es dann nicht ändern, wenn es gelöscht wird. Es ist keine URV, da die Einwilligung vorhanden ist. Aber gut, wenn es gelöscht werden muss, dann ist das so. Gruß --Thomas Glintzer (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: verification through Commons:OTRS required. JuTa 18:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossible to verify that the copyright tag is correct as insufficient source information has been provided. Stefan4 (talk) 16:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Apperantly okay Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As pointed out in the previous discussion, it is impossible to verify that the copyright tag is correct as insufficient source information has been provided. Considering that the necessary information hasn't been provided, I'm not sure why this was closed with the rationale "Apperantly okay". Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: found an external source. Not perfect but IMHO better. --JuTa 19:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright logo @ http://www.woodstonepizza.nl/promos/ Takeaway (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: apparently {{PD-textlogo}}, but out of scope. JuTa 19:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a book (passport). Probable CopyVio. License calims "self" - not appropiate, uploader may have taken the picture, but not the copyright.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep-bad faith mass deletion bombing. Passports don't have copyright. The design is a standard of an international organization, and the illustration is a national coat of arms. It's a document, not a book.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:29, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My reply is at Commons:Deletion_requests/2011/05/12#File:Jersey_passport.jpg  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per this discussion. MacMed (talk) 22:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid closure. The person who closed the deletion request kept the file because a completely different passport cover image was published more than 50 years ago. However, no information has been provided about the publication date of this passport cover, or that the copyright term is 50 years from publication. Stefan4 (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: more information about the copyright status of Angolan passports required. --JuTa 18:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I, the author, do not want it to be on Wikipedia, since I was informed by the serbian wikipedia officials that it does not comply to the rules of the "Wiki loves monuments" competition. Bogins (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. JuTa 19:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I, the author, do not want it to be on Wikipedia, since I was informed by the serbian wikipedia officials that it does not comply to the rules of the "Wiki loves monuments" competition. Bogins (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. JuTa 19:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in France. That means that recent architecture like this one remains copyrighted for 70 years past the death of the architect, and derivative works like photos must not be made. De728631 (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I didn't know this rule. You can delete this file. F123 (talk) 18:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. JuTa 19:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Earflaps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickruser:126499312@N03 might be a Flickrwasher. The account was recently created on Flickr and at least flickrphoto:15314701011 seems to have been written by someone other than the Flickr user. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surya Das Profile Picture.png.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your worries - I often contact copyright owners personally to ask for photos they'd be willing to release, and sometimes, as in this case, I recommend they use flickr to afford them more control (I find the site much more user friendly than Wikimedia). If talking with that person directly would help, feel free to let me know. I'm willing to privately reveal the copyright owner's email address to an editor with OTRS privileges, though would need instruction on how to go about it best. Earflaps (talk) 14:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For example, File:Dharma permission.jpg was created by Khenpo Jamyang Dorje whereas File:Ken dilgo khyentse rinpoche.jpg was created by Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche, and I don't see how the Flickr user can be both Khenpo Jamyang Dorje and Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche at the same time. As the authors are different, the copyright holder to File:Dharma permission.jpg is presumably not the same person as the copyright holder to File:Ken dilgo khyentse rinpoche.jpg, and therefore the Flickr user can at most be the copyright holder of one of the documents. As it is unclear exactly which of the files the Flickr user potentially holds the copyright to, I think that this needs to go through OTRS for verification. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, think I understand. I suppose I interpreted File:Dharma permission.jpg and File:Ken dilgo khyentse rinpoche.jpg to have been pictures of letters received by the same person (i.e. the flickr account owner), though I'm ignorant on the details of mail; would a photo of a letter automatically be the copyright of the receiver, or sender? Or maybe reserved for the photographer/scanner? Either way, OTRS couldn't hurt; I can request the owner forward a release form to OTRS (clumping all the photos together), so a conversation can be opened. If you wouldn't mind leaving the photos up until then (sometimes people take a few days to forward to wikimedia), I'd appreciate it. Earflaps (talk)
Got confirmation and just sent the owner directions; I assume the letter will be forwarded to wikimedia today or tomorrow (for searching, the raw url's are included in the email's body). Earflaps (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright holder to a letter is typically the person who wrote the letter, which is typically the same person as the one who sent the letter. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, if you'd like to promptly delete File:Dharma permission.jpg and File:Ken dilgo khyentse rinpoche.jpg please go ahead (not sure what File:Suryadasdocument.jpg is, would need to ask owner). I included wording in the release form that basically says "if my [the owner's] assumption that I own a document photo is incorrect, I understand that Wikimedia reserves the right to remove the correlating photo from their database". Earflaps (talk) 01:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean with "owner". I hope that you mean "owner of the copyright" as opposed to "owner of a copy of the photograph". The owner of the copyright to the photograph is normally the photographer. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the case of the documents I meant photographer Earflaps (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: confirmation through Commons:OTRS would be required. JuTa 19:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the OTRS file was sent, but I forgot the OTRS pending tag i think, so my bad. I'll have the owner send a more updated one without the documents included. Earflaps (talk) 15:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Rosalynwild.png. Has already been deleted once. Torsch (talk) 21:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as duplicate and redirected. JuTa 18:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cooldogsx5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal images of a non-notable individual

Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: en: article has been deleted as likely a hoax. JuTa 19:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bbtte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal pic of a non-notable, but pretty, individual

Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: likely in scope. No external source found. --JuTa 19:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]