Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/08/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2014-08-01_06-50.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![20 File:@spacegodwizard created of "space god wizard" 2014-07-31 10-37.jpeg](#File:@spacegodwizard_created_of_"space_god_wizard"_2014-07-31_10-37.jpeg){kind=link}
![54 File:Titel "Schöne Welt" 9-1978.jpg](#File:Titel_"Schöne_Welt"_9-1978.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1714.JPG){kind=link}
reason for deletion Bhasad (talk) 02:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedyly. User talk page will not get deleted. You may empty it if desired. JuTa 21:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
_2014-08-01_06-50.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-08-01_06-50.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Might also be a movie screengrab; not sure. Lupo 06:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
_2014-08-01_06-50.jpeg){kind=link}
- Deleted-Not out of scope, picture of a Taiwanese actor, however is a copyvio screen grab from the film "Meeting Dr Sun".--KTo288 (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake pls delete it asap Rahulazm (talk) 15:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
uoloaded by mistake pls delete asap Rahulazm (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
uoloaded by mistake pls delete asap Rahulazm (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
please delete I uploaded wrong file Rahulazm (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please delete. Copyright violation! Jonas Steinhöfel (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 23:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file includes a copyrighted file, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Smokeycover.jpg , which makes this file ineligible for release under a free license. 172.56.9.26 00:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete, unless the uploader (as a WMF employee) removes the non-free/fair use contents from these PDFs. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Keep The use of this file (on pages 13 and 14) appears to be incidental to the overall slide deck, I believe COM:DM applies. -Pete F (talk) 14:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)- Indeed, this is de minimis within both Commons policy and more importantly copyright law as I understand them. I am also disappointed in the suggestion that we should lie about the contents of community-written articles, or lie about presentations made at Wikimania, for point-scoring. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment: De minimis does not apply in the contents of these PDFs, because are part of the main scope of the documentation. One of your files uploaded has been deleted and the other nominated ones will be deleted, too. Avoiding this is really easy: Use only free contents on the WMF documentation. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)- Pinging @Mike Peel: per request -- another PDF file that could be an easy "keep" if you could redact a copyrighted image. -Pete F (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: As Mike Peel (talk · contribs) removed the non-free contents of the PDF, this DR may be closed. Therefore, Administrators, please delete the previous versions after closing this DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Problematic material deleted. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Night images of the Eiffel Tower are copyrighted. Leoboudv (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Night picture without the light are not copyrighted.--Paris 16 (talk) 00:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Actually it isn't the night images that are copyrighted, but the different illuminations that can be viewed during night time. As can be viewed in this image, none of these illuminations can be viewed. Josve05a (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Improbable that San Diego Air and Space Museum has the right to declare no known copyright on this image, when RIA Novosti claims copyright here: http://visualrian.ru/en/site/gallery/index/id/620549/ — Huntster (t @ c) 01:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
added wrong photo by mistake Bhasad (talk) 02:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Fake licence, source unknown. Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.5.170 06:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture; super blurry. Lupo 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
![06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/11#c-Lupo-2014-08-11T06:55:00.000Z-File:@spacegodwizard_created_of_"space_god_wizard"_2014-07-31_10-37.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
![00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/11#c-INeverCry-2014-08-18T00:43:00.000Z-File:@spacegodwizard_created_of_"space_god_wizard"_2014-07-31_10-37.jpeg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Not out of scope. But seems not important to Wikimedia. Has no purpose at all --Saviour1981 (talk) 11:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Sometimes you have to go thru some certain stuff in order to achieve someone on life- 2014-08-01 20-30.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
File:MAIN UCHHATI KA RAHANE WALA HOON--SRI LAXMI NARAYAN JHA MERE DADA HAI--MERE PITA SRI RAMA KANT JHA HAI- 2014-08-02 09-19.JPG
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Gena Daniels -A young smart, cute, athletic, and nice girl- She is very misunderstood--But she is extraordinary- She makes other people lives great- 2014-08-03 22-16.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- NOT unused... two paged in usage of this file. But file should have much more description and should be categorized as well --Saviour1981 (talk) 11:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- The two pages "using" this file are bot-created tracking pages for mobile/web uploads! Otherwise it is unused. Lupo 11:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oh! If so, then we don't need it anymore to create some new space for better upload --Saviour1981 (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Per title: might also be a copyvio from BBC 1. Lupo 07:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: self-created artwork and private images only used on user page of a contributor without useful contribution to the project. Files uploaded for the purpose of attack (very likely).
- File:Bierepepes.jpg
- File:PhilippeBouge.JPG
- File:PhilipeSommeil.JPG
- File:Philippe Pepes - Sommeil.JPG
BrightRaven (talk) 07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comes Cake (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
BrightRaven (talk) 07:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
It shows the full address of someone Solaborate (talk) 08:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted company logo from http://www.polotv.pl Pnapora (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 17:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Not own work and very poor quality. jdx Re: 10:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Already survived a DR, bellow the Threshold of originality and in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Closed and now please stop nominating those PD-textlogo files - Jcb (talk) 12:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
It's unused on other Wikimedia projects, and is lower resolution than File:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg (needless duplication IMO) AJF (talk) 23:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as dupe.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, obviously visually inferior version, has substantial rescaling artifacts (look at the wrinkles in the nose) Revent (talk) 23:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Redundant. Natuur12 (talk) 21:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 08:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Not so simple logo. Arrangement of typographic elements is copyrightable. Meisam (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, text only Motopark (talk) 08:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted mask. Natuur12 (talk) 08:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be his own work, see Google. 12345danNL (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
In the description it says "(c) Andreas Tischler / Vienna Press" which means it is AAR, and that the flickr-accound don't own the copyright. Josve05a (talk) 10:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Not PD. The author is Munetsugu Satmomi, who died in 1996. See e.g. http://www.cabq.gov/culturalservices/albuquerque-museum/images/japan-japanese-government-railways.jpg/view Sushiya (talk) 10:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- The work was done for Japanese Government Railways, wouldn't this then fall under the "organization" criterium mentioned at the end of the PD-Japan template? - Anonimski (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- That exception applies to "a work bearing the name of a juridical person or other corporate body as that of its author" (Article 53(1), Copyright Act of Japan, translation by www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp). In this case Japanese Government Railways ordered the artist to create the work and the artist supposedly licensed JGR to use the work, but the work clearly bear the name of Satomi (in the bottom left corner). So, I do not think the work falls under the "organization" rule. --Sushiya (talk) 02:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It's unfortunate, but as per Sushiya's explanation above, the artist's name is known, so this does not (yet) fall into public domain. --DAJF (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
In the description it says "(c) Andreas Tischler / Vienna Press" which means it is AAR, and that the flickr-accound don't own the copyright. Josve05a (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
In the description it says "(c) Andreas Tischler / Vienna Press" which means it is AAR, and that the flickr-accound don't own the copyright. Josve05a (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
In the description it says "(c) Andreas Tischler / Vienna Press" which means it is AAR, and that the flickr-accound don't own the copyright. Josve05a (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted magazine cover. 77.184.134.241 10:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
![10:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/11#c-77.184.134.241-2014-08-11T10:50:00.000Z-File:Titel_"Schöne_Welt"_9-1978.jpg){kind=link}
- Source mandatory to clear the copyright --Saviour1981 (talk) 11:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
![00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/11#c-INeverCry-2014-08-18T00:47:00.000Z-File:Titel_"Schöne_Welt"_9-1978.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 11:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rao.ravi89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
- File:For just for fun in raigarh park-- 2014-04-25 05-09.jpg
- File:Working on monnet ispat 2014-04-25 05-04.jpg
Meisam (talk) 11:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Although the author of this image is unknown, "unknown" is not "anonymous". Keeping the image will require proving that the author intended to be anonymous as it is much too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Missing evidence that the photographer is anonymous. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- I believe all these scans come from page 178 of Durruti in the Spanish Revolution, by Durruti's official biographer Abel Paz. There it says that the picture was taken on July 1927 in Paris, at the offices of w:fr:Le Libertaire, the main Anarchist magazine in France at that time. I have tried to find the archive of Le Libertaire online, to no aval. After having campaigned during months for the freedom of the three anarchists, one would think that a picture taken at their offices would be published at Le Libertaire, but if we need a proof, we don't have it yet.--QuimGil (talk) 09:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Pure advertising. Till (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
promotional, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
promotional, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unverifiable source. A single-purpose-account claims that some family owns the copyright and released it to the public domain. Damiens.rf 14:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unverifiable source. A single-purpose-account claims that some family owns the copyright and released it to the public domain. Damiens.rf 14:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unverifiable source. A single-purpose-account claims that some family owns the copyright and released it to the public domain. Damiens.rf 14:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unverifiable source. A single-purpose-account claims that some family owns the copyright and released it to the public domain. Damiens.rf 14:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ames-frankfurt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement catalog from a financial company. Not freely licensed, would need a release from that company, "Balz Finanzservice AG" (apparently today called "AKESTOR AG"[1]).
Lupo 14:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Low-res, no EXIF; looks like a TV screengrab. Lupo 14:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Beautiful Britain - The Isle of Wight - by G.E. Mitton - 9 GROUND-PLAN OF CARISBROOKE CASTLE.jpg
[edit]
First published in the UK in 1911, but no valid UK tag given; no date of death given for the named author, potentially still in copyright in the UK Hchc2009 (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Lets AGF: a good faith contribution, but bordering on vandalism, especially since added to en:Dusicyon cultridens. (See also es:Dusicyon cultridens.) This child's drawing is by no means a "reconstruction" of an extinct animal. (The species, although extinct, appears to be genuine, see e.g. [2] or [3].)
Delete this well-meant but misguided attempt. Lupo 15:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Low-resolution bleached-out photo of some fungi (possibly Armillaria sp. but impossible to make a certain guess). Lacking possible educational usage as there are loads of better photos of mushroom clusters. Convallaria majalis (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted company logo from http://stopklatka.tv Pnapora (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted company logo from http://abc.tvp.pl Pnapora (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyrighted 3D-work. (DW) Josve05a (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravi Ralph (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
- File:Vinod 2013-04-18 14-53.jpg
- File:R-r 2013-04-18 11-42.jpg
- File:Ravi ralph on party 2013-04-18 11-38.jpg
- File:Ravi ralph 2013-04-18 11-20.jpg
- File:Ravi ralph 2013-04-18 11-17.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Self-promotion is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
author: Georg Mandahl-Barth (1910-1994), published in Denmark in 1949, will be public domain in the source country in 2064. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-10T22:39:33 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
author: Georg Mandahl-Barth (1910-1994), published in Denmark in 1949, will be public domain in the source country in 2064. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-10T22:39:33 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
author: Georg Mandahl-Barth (1910-1994), published in Denmark in 1949, will be public domain in the source country in 2064. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-10T22:39:33 (UTC)
- Please copy to en-wiki using en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad before deletion (this vastly simplifies cleanup, as en-wiki only evaluates under US copyright); otherwise, I think this is a clear delete. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
author: Georg Mandahl-Barth (1910-1994), published in Denmark in 1949, will be public domain in the source country in 2064. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-10T22:39:33 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
author: Georg Mandahl-Barth (1910-1994), published in Denmark in 1949, will be public domain in the source country in 2064. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-10T22:39:33 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This image is suspicious to me. It it looks like professional image, but it is the only one upload of this user. Then I found this [4] image on the company website. It is not exact the same image, the logo is in other place and there is a different magazine. For me it seems like the same basic photo is used in this case as basis for this two images. So it is questionable that this is own work of the uploader. Avron (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
![[4]](http://www.czub.cz/zbrojovka/czech-guns/CZ_75_B.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561659860).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15746509615).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Arcs de la Mosquée Hassan-II.jpg
- File:Hassan II Mosque - Grande Mosquée Hassan II.jpg
- File:Mosque Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco, 摩洺哥.jpg
- File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg
- File:Mosquée Hassan II -2.jpg
- File:Mustapha ennaimi - 23768064204.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Casablanca, Morocco (51256636929).jpg
- File:الدار البيضاء مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg
- File:جامع الحسن الثاني.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#France for architectural works. The building is the main subject. 67.87.46.39 00:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC) En effet l'arche de la Defense ne se situe pas à Paris mais dans Banlieuz. Je n'avais pas vue qu'il y avait un paragraphe "la Défense".
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file includes a fair use file, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Friday_night_dinner.png , which makes this file unsuited for release under a free content license. 172.56.9.26 01:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, unless the uploader (as a WMF employee) removes the non-free/fair use contents from these PDFs. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep While I think it might have been better to choose an example article with no fair use images, I do think COM:DM applies here; the photo is not specifically important to what the slide deck is trying to communicate. -Pete F (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed, this is de minimis within both Commons policy and more importantly copyright law as I understand them. I am also disappointed in the suggestion that we should lie about the contents of community-written articles, or lie about presentations made at Wikimania, for point-scoring. Further, note that I didn't create the file, I just transferred it here (as the file page clearly states) from MediaWiki.org. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Jdforrester (WMF): , actually, Wikimedia Commons policy is more important than copyright law (of what country?) to this decision. I have in the past invited you to improve the Commons policy, since you do seem to know more about relevant law(s) than I do; but you did not respond. (Please note, there is an open RfC on the matter here: Commons talk:De minimis#Is this policy being interpreted correctly?) It's important to respect the policies as they are written, even if we do not personally agree with them. I'm not sure what you mean with your comments about lying and scoring points, but they sound to me like topics better avoided in the interest of making a decision in a mellow way. -Pete F (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: De minimis does not apply in the contents of these PDFs, because are part of the main scope of the documentation. One of your files uploaded has been deleted and the other nominated ones will be deleted, too. Avoiding this is really easy: Use only free contents on the WMF documentation. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I've uploaded a version where the fair-use images have been blanked out. This is fairly trivial to do (I just used Preview on Mac OS to do so) - so I would recommend doing this directly rather than nominating the file for deletion. The freely licensed images used in this file do need attribution, though, which is a separate issue. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks @Mike Peel: . I actually was trying to do that (I tried using Inkscape on Lubuntu Linux) but was unable to find any way to do it. I'm glad to know it's possible with the free Preview tool on MacOS. Unfortunately I don't have a Mac right now, but it's good to know this is an option for future issues. -Pete F (talk) 20:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Aww, crap. This should be possible on Linux, but I don't know how. It should just need a good PDF editor. :-/ If you encounter similar problems in the future, please give me a ping and I'll see if I can help. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks @Mike Peel: . I actually was trying to do that (I tried using Inkscape on Lubuntu Linux) but was unable to find any way to do it. I'm glad to know it's possible with the free Preview tool on MacOS. Unfortunately I don't have a Mac right now, but it's good to know this is an option for future issues. -Pete F (talk) 20:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: When opening the new file version in Adobe Reader, it appears that the fair use content was "removed" by placing a white block over the fair use images. Adobe Reader allowed me to remove the white block, exposing the image underlying, thereby enabling me to create a free content derivative. If I understand correctly, this contravenes Commons policy. In addition, the phrase "Testing testing 123..." is overlaid onto the pages at least twice. It is interesting to note that the original and the botched replacement were both uploaded separately by people who really should know better. 172.56.9.221 21:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's a problem. :-/ Can you suggest a means of removing the fair use content that won't lead to a white block cover? (I don't know where the "testing" message came from...) I'm doing my best to fix the problem - the botching is unintentional. :-( Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- This "should know better" stuff is counterproductive, especially coming from behind a veil of anonymity. Mike is clearly trying to do good stuff, as was James. There are systemic problems here, to be sure -- but please, let's refrain from leveling unnecessary attacks on individuals acting in good faith. -Pete F (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's a problem. :-/ Can you suggest a means of removing the fair use content that won't lead to a white block cover? (I don't know where the "testing" message came from...) I'm doing my best to fix the problem - the botching is unintentional. :-( Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: As Mike Peel (talk · contribs) removed the non-free contents of the PDF, this DR may be closed. Therefore, Administrators, please delete the previous versions after closing this DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: As Mike Peel (talk · contribs) points out, the copyrighted material remains in the file, and 'can easily be undone', thus enabling anyone to create a free content derivative from copyrighted material. I see that Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs) closed one of the other deletion requests, claiming that the copyrighted material has been addressed. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikimania 2014 - VisualEditor — helping users edit more easily.pdf should be unclosed, and speedily deleted as a copyright violation. Now that I am aware of the {{copyvio}} tag, perhaps this kind of thing could be sorted more competently. I am shocked that it takes this much diligence on my part to get fair use material removed from Commons, especially when the material was uploaded by Foundation employees, one of whom requested that these copyright violations remain on Commons for a few more weeks, because this copyrighted material is important to the mission... of free content. I am at a loss. 173.85.198.82 20:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nobody has promised perfection at Commons, and if an elected administrator has determined that the copyrighted material has been sufficiently obscured, that is probably enough. It is not possible for Commons to prevent every reader from doing anything illegal with our content, so your idea that we have to live up to a standard of total perfection is unreasonable. (When it comes to trademark and personality rights, for instance, there are endless possibilities for reusers to get themselves in trouble.) If you like, though, you may file a deletion review. -Pete F (talk) 20:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Pete, it's not about perfection. It's about policy. 173.85.198.82 21:47, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's always about policy. An elected administrator has judged those PDFs to be compliant with policy in their present form. If you disagree, again, you are welcome to start a deletion review. -Pete F (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Mike Peel (talk · contribs) is as much a member of this community as Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs), but in this case, Mike Peel has stated outright that there is copyrighted material in this file:
- It's always about policy. An elected administrator has judged those PDFs to be compliant with policy in their present form. If you disagree, again, you are welcome to start a deletion review. -Pete F (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Pete, it's not about perfection. It's about policy. 173.85.198.82 21:47, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nobody has promised perfection at Commons, and if an elected administrator has determined that the copyrighted material has been sufficiently obscured, that is probably enough. It is not possible for Commons to prevent every reader from doing anything illegal with our content, so your idea that we have to live up to a standard of total perfection is unreasonable. (When it comes to trademark and personality rights, for instance, there are endless possibilities for reusers to get themselves in trouble.) If you like, though, you may file a deletion review. -Pete F (talk) 20:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
(PDF blanked, but with caveats)
:::: I've blanked the image out in the PDF, although please note that the PDF isn't 'flattened' and so with the right program (Apple Preview / Adobe Acrobat) the blanking can be easily undone. I can't figure out how to flatten a PDF on a mac without changing the page size at the same time... I can't do anything to help with the video, I'm afraid. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Offending content removed. Nothing left to do here. -FASTILY 03:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The concerns in the original nomination have not properly been adressed, although blanked the affected fair use file is still present and may easily be restored with Adobe Acrobat or similar programs. This renders the cc-by-sa license invalid. The fair use file HAS to be removed or replaced to be compliant with the CC license. Denniss (talk) 07:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Please can you post the steps needed to restore the fair use image in Adobe Acrobat? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Even if the image had not been blanked out, I believe this file can be kept per Commons:De minimis. See my argument at this similar deletion request. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I've redacted the fair use file using a new method - see User:Mike Peel/PDF redaction - that means the file should be completely gone now (if the older version I uploaded is deleted). If that isn't the case, then please let me know. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: the file is fixed. If someone can still extract the image please let Mike Peel know and I a sure that he will fix it. Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- File:Ottoman borders largest .png
- File:Ottoman largest borders.png
- File:The largest territory of the Ottoman Empire.png
- File:D2.png
This unsourced map is not accuracy and includes a gross exaggeration. Maybe this map was created under the influence of Neo-Ottomanism :) Takabeg (talk) 23:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: We do not take sides. You may add {{Disputed map}}. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Cette carte présente un Empire Ottoman beaucoup plus étendu qu'il ne l'était dans la réalité - il s'agit donc d'une carte mensongère. Kirchhofulf (talk) 09:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See above -- Commons does not take sides in disputes over maps. This map is in use in eight places on two WPs, so it cannot be deleted for any reason but copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Bad name, the official name is "canal latéral à la garonne" Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: A bad name is not a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. However, this gallery was empty, and that is a reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr- Tareq Suheimat 2014-07-31 11-14.jpg. Lupo 10:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
A derivative of the photo is listed as copyrighted and a color copy is listed at Corbis as being copyrighted. We hope (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Archived ebay auction for black & white derivative.
- photo
- closeup of Warner Bros copyright mark on derivative.
- uncropped Commons upload
- Corbis indicates there's a copyright.
The eBay link for the upload is dead and no back was uploaded re: no copyright marks on back; original upload says the author of the photo is "unknown". We hope (talk) 11:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Not useful in terms of understanding concepts Tekksavvy (talk) 22:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not your private web host and this image is here for anyone who might need it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Per Jim.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep completely understandable and educational. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy keep no new reason given. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - no source for the three images given, unlikely that all were made by the authour as they are radically different in composition. Also requested deletion by author on my enwp talkpage. Acather96 (talk) 12:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- This is a very weak reason. It should be pointed the copied source of some of the images or their parts.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Actually it is both a new and a very good reason. While the first image -- the underwater baby, appears on Commons, the second, the weightlifter, I could find only on copyrighted clip-art sites. Since the first image makes it clear that the uploader is not the author, as claimed, we need to known where all three came from. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted' . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Too complex to be PD. JurgenNL (talk) 12:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. Fry1989 eh? 03:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
It is a patented information and should be removed from public domain. 116.202.70.46 12:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that it is patented is irrelevant. However the image comes from a site with an NC license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
"life of the author plus 70 years"? Who is the author? 77.184.134.172 12:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: 1928 is far too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
It is a patented innovation and request you to delete from the public domain. 116.202.70.46 12:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that it is patented is irrelevant. However the image comes from a site with an NC license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
It is a patented innovation and request you to delete from the public domain. 116.202.70.46 12:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that it is patented is irrelevant. However the image comes from a site with an NC license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individuals Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
por error en la escritura Jesús Moreno Fernandez (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: gog_and_magog.pdf, 2009 UK work copyrighted from creation with website labeled "The Purpose of Life website ministry Copyright © Gerry Watts 2000-2014". "Own work" claim appears to be false: Claims to be "Rejin Babu Kottyam" when pasting in previous edits, and now claims to be "own work" by Gerry Watts in this upload. Closeapple (talk) 21:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per my own nomination: Description contains false claim of "own work", therefore false permission, therefore false license. --Closeapple (talk) 21:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Slowking4 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: subject requests deletion; not in use JuTa 21:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete, no reason to not speedy imho. Amada44 talk to me 07:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- comment i have been speedying, when requested by photo subject, and not in use. (given personality rights) although most of the shots are in public places, and on stage. if this is not the process you want me to follow, please indicate the one you want. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 08:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevand and unused for a long time JuTa 21:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Probl. a copyvio of this website, but since I'm not start this DR. Josve05a (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 22:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted-Better to lose a file and keep the goodwill of current and future contributors.--KTo288 (talk) 01:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Low quality exhibitionism Grayfell (talk) 23:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
invalid SVG (consists entirely of an embedded raster image), and can be replaced by an existing image KCAuXy4p (talk) 13:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: This file is currently used in 86 pages! Before nominating for deletion, is important to edit (almost) all the pages and replace the correspondient links to the file that supersedes this bad, raster SVG. Therefore, Keep until all the pages are edited (or see bellow).
- Another alternative is speedelly deleting this file and making a redirection to the correct SVG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected per discussion Krd 17:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Mislead unneeded orphaned page. → User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Claes Oldenburg
[edit]Works by Claes Oldenburg, often made together with Coosje van Bruggen. Coosje van Bruggen died in 2009, but Claes Oldenburg is still alive. The images violate FOP and can be undeleted 70 years after the death of Claes Oldenburg. Unless a year is indicated on the file information page, works in the United States are either from the mid-1980s or from 1999, meaning that they are unpublished.
- File:Crusoe umbrella.jpg
- File:DeYoung08.jpg
- File:FreeStamp.jpg
- File:Teaspoonbridge with Cherry-Minneapolis Sculpture Garden.jpg
- File:Tokyo Big Sight Saw Objet.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 20:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Claes Oldenburg
[edit]No FoP in the US - these are modern sculptures done in the 80s by Claes Oldenburg (living) and Coosje van Bruggen (1942-2009) - the Cherry and Spoon is in Minnesota and the Button is in Pennsylvania
- File:Aspoon.jpg
- File:Spoon and cherry Oct 2005.jpg
- File:Spoonbridge Cherry.jpg
- File:WTP A01 youcanlookitup 2.jpg
INeverCry 18:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not NGC 2363, NGC 2363 is irregular galaxy while this is background spiral galaxy. I couldn't even find it in PGC catalogue, which contains almost million of galaxies. For reference see: http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1207/ and http://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc23a.htm#2363 Pikador (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I found it's 2MASX J07284539+6912186 17.1 magnitudo galaxy. Pikador (talk) 19:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: A bad name is not a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]- File:Atomium pic-.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-001.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-002.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-003.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-004.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-007.JPG
- File:Atomium, Helsey Park, Brussels, Belgium.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. The Atomium is © SABAM 67.87.46.39 15:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not that it matters, but Atomium seems to be © fr:André Waterkeyn's heirs. SABAM is a legal entity representing copyright holders in certain situations. For example, legal claims may come from SABAM on behalf of the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
These images show a building by w:André Waterkeyn. Belgian law doesn't allow photos of buildings without the permission of the architect unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:AtoniumEvening BrusselsB.JPG
- File:AtoniumNightView BrusselsB.JPG
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:AtomiumBrusselsBanner.JPG
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all images. The Atomium is clearly the subject of these photos. 67.87.46.39 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom russavia (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No freedom of panorama in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
Derivative works of texts around and/or inside Atomium.
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (19).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (20).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (25).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep Nothing copyrightable shown in the image: all of them fall under {{PD-ineligible}} and/or {{PD-text}}. No FOP-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's no chance that something as long as this is {{PD-ineligible}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Stefan, I'm at least as respectful of literary copyright as you are, but I'm not sure about these. Although presented in sentence form, they amount to lists of names (in the first and third cases) and lists of dimensions (in the second case). I think these would fail copyright in the USA -- I don't really have any idea about the TOO for literary works in Belgium, but I think we can keep them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, PD-text or PD-ineligible --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]See COM:FOP#Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]No FOP in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Aside from the Atomium, which is obvious, I also doubt that the copyright to all of the other images in this poster belong to the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]Non-free architecture.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Belgium --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kedzio89r as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: dodanie zamiennika w lepszej jakości JuTa 21:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: When and if the replacement has been added, we can consider deleting this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Passports of France
[edit]Missing evidence of permission from the French government.
- File:1988 France Passport.jpg
- File:2 passeports.JPG
- File:French ePassport.JPG
- File:French passeport.jpg
- File:Frenchpassport.jpg
- File:Passeport de service.jpg
- File:Passeport France 1947 intérieur.jpg
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 couverture.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp0-1.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp2-3.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp22-23 tampon entrée Maroc 2002.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp30-31 tampon sortie Maroc 2002.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp32-33.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp4-5.png
- File:Passeport français avant 2000 pp6-7.png
Stefan4 (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: there is no evidence that any permission is needed from the French government. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as Hegesippe. Furthermore, no illustrations inside the passport are subject to copyright, because they don't exceed the threshold of originality. - Bzh-99 (talk) 12:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Stefan4 : quand vous avez un doute (ce que vous avez régulièrement, et pas toujours à raison), vous demanderez à l'avenir directement par e-mail aux autorités compétentes afin d'être sûr et certain du bien fondé de votre requête en suppression. Parce qu'ici, comme pour Commons:Deletion requests/© CIT 1996, ça ne repose pas sur grand chose de concret, et ça a le don d'agacer les vrais contributeurs. JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 12:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: no evidence that any permission is needed from the French government; furthermore, no illustrations inside the passport are subject to copyright. cobra bubbles (talk) 12:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Same comment as the others. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep those files are regarding public documents, without identification of name of people. there is no permission to request. So, we can keep those. Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted some, kept some. All of the comments above ignore the Commons burden of proof. "No evidence that any permission is needed" is not sufficient. Commons requires that there be evidence that the subject is freely licensed. French law does not make any special provision for government works -- they have a copyright just as any private work does.
I am inclined to believe that the blank interior pages are below the ToO. However, those interior pages with text clearly have a copyright on the text. The covers also have a copyright -- please remember that each realization of a coat of arms has a new copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BigHead as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author requests courtesy deletion as file is not relevant to any article and is unused for a long time JuTa 21:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete Krd 17:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Mappa errata, di un servizio non esistente. Sono l'autore e ho sbagliato a crearla. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Only one picture like this is needed - Duplication with File:גלעד ארדן.jpg Ldorfman (talk) 23:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
_1714.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1714.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality, better file File:Largillière portrait de Jacques-Antoine Arlaud.JPG, no inscription in painting Musée d'Art et d'Histoire, Geneva Oursana (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
_1714.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
_1714.JPG){kind=link}
File:AK Party fans celebrating victory of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.jpg Cobija (talk) 08:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted, dupe exact dupe.--KTo288 (talk) 22:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
掲載することに、抵抗を感じたため Ssscx (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- deleted uploader request.--KTo288 (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This image named "Indian police service logo" uploaded by user "Shabin.shebi" seems to be a copyright and policy violation of Wikimedia Commons. How is the user who has no previous history of images in Wikimedia come up with this image? Factually, this is an image which is owned by Ministry of Home Affairs of India "Interior Ministry". The federal department has not given any permission "written or otherwise" to use this image for upload or otherwise. The user should prove his/her copyright hold on this or otherwise be deleted. 116.74.11.138 16:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Mappa imprecisa, sostituita da una corretta, più dettagliata, in formato svg (File:Mappa ferrovia Piacenza-Cremona.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alex Spade as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: In favor of File:Government.ru logo.png - same file without year "2011" at bottom JuTa 21:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
