Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![12 File:Claudia "Paola s2" Paola.jpg](#File:Claudia_"Paola_s2"_Paola.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05.JPG){kind=link}
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
_-_04.JPG){kind=link}
_2014-06-08_00-46.jpg){kind=link}
_-_07.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
_-_17.JPG){kind=link}
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
))_2014-06-08_19-52.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_2010_(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, have File:Boiling point vs molar mass graph.png from same uploader. This .pdf is less usable because it is a large-margin container around the same image, and displays at poor resolution via wikimedia rendering engine. DMacks (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Wikia is not a reliable source for image. Doubt of authorship by uploader. Also found at http://www.setcelebs.com/img/derek-klena-01.html. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: very likely a copyright violation. JuTa 20:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Wikia is not a reliable source for image. Doubt of authorship by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Fake and infringement of personal rights NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Also a copyright violation. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Steinsplitter. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
useless image TheLongTone (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as vandalism, and block the uploader. See the user's contributions on English Wikipedia: en:Special:Contributions/GlennyG. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Better speedy this. Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Way out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
PNG copy of File:Flag of Louisiana 2006.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused duplicate Lupo 20:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Don't want it displayed and it is blurry EurovisionNim (talk) 10:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request poor quality image Gnangarra 00:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Way out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sedar Group of company (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, self promotion by nonnotable company
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 08:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per crosswiki spam. --Taichi (talk) 08:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of a unknown person and per the watermark of questionable legitimacy. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
![08:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/08#c-Túrelio-2014-06-08T08:36:00.000Z-File:Claudia_"Paola_s2"_Paola.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
![08:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/08#c-Morning_Sunshine-2014-06-15T08:42:00.000Z-File:Claudia_"Paola_s2"_Paola.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, how many Claudia Paolas I must delete? This is the fourth! Taivo (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 15:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Moreover it looks like a copyvio: note the shopping cart! Ies (talk) 10:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Suspected magazine scan like File:CARLOS MAMA.jpeg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be work (painting of es:Encarnación Rosal) by Aqquila (talk · contributions · Statistics). Historical paintings may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional material INeverCry 15:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
looks like a screenshot from TV 91.65.49.207 20:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Low resolution photo of domesticated cat. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. I recogonise the image as a scene from Dual Survivor. The user that uploaded the image to Flickr is questionable at best. His account has a number of other images that appear to be screencaps from VHS tapes and I have asked for his account to be blacklisted at Commons:Questionable Flickr images. Zellfaze (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Though I may have been mistaken taking a look at some of his other images. This image appears to be of him and Cody Lundin, so perhaps I am wrong about that one. Would anyone be willing to contact the user? Zellfaze (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding youI have contacted the flickr user before, but that was to change the license on the image so i could upload it. I can contact him again if needed though.
Keep I didn't see the image used elsewhere prior to me uploading it to Commons. If it is used elsewhere now it could be because it's now on Commons and can be found easier, google, etc. Seeing his other pictures, like you point out, with Cody Lundin himself is what led me to believe they are genuine and why I asked him if I could upload it to Commons to be used on Wikipedia, etc. If requested I'll provide the contents of the messages between the Flickr user and I if it helps this Deletion request. Regards, Dainomite 18:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I'll take your word on good faith. The image looked familiar (I watched a lot of dual survivor), but he did have other images of himself with Cody and you did talk to him, so I think this is most likely a good photo and I was just mistaken. Zellfaze (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)- Related discussion: Commons_talk:Questionable Flickr images#Kevin_Noonan_.28kevinnoonan.29 Zellfaze (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by the nominator Morning ☼ (talk) 08:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Wrong size Andiamo (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
No valid reason for deletion. The file has sufficient size for articles. Also, the file may be useful, so Keep until you provide a valid and strong reason for deleting the file, as you as uploader. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Please delate. There is another fole with the same picture which has been used. See 'Portrait Fritz Stuber'. Andiamo (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Portrait Fritz Stuber 2008.jpg is of significantly lower size and quality. I'm adding superseded template to it now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.158.11.172 (talk • contribs)
Deleted, I'll delete the smaller file and keep the bigger. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, holiday snap BertSeghers (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Not below COM:TOO. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney-channel-logo.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Junior Logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Jr logo.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I also add to the nomination the File:Disney-Channel-Logo-2014.png --Mega-buses (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- uploader notified on 10 June 2014. Storkk (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete File:DisneyChannelDaytimeHD2014.png this one too. Storkk (talk) 12:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_05.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_05.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_05.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 15:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_20.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_18.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - logo of non-notable company INeverCry 15:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal image used for vandalism Acroterion (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 15:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal image; out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_04.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_04.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_04.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_04.JPG){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-06-08_00-46.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-06-08_00-46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://myspace.com/klmbmodel7 Dwpaul (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-06-08_00-46.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-06-08_00-46.jpg){kind=link}
_-_07.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_07.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_07.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_07.JPG){kind=link}
copyvio (see tineye, google images, for example http://www.tokodrum.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=17_72&product_id=123) Drakosh (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 16:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Uploader extensively vandalized the enWiki page Bill Heiser, then added this image to that page (now removed). Believed not to be an image of the Bill Heiser described there, possibly not of a Bill Heiser anywhere. Dwpaul (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not educationally useful, holiday snap BertSeghers (talk) 15:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo of a non notable band. Out of scope and copyrightviolation Natuur12 (talk) 22:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 16:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 16:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 16:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_20.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_20.JPG){kind=link}
Also found here under higher resolution: https://myspace.com/lapizconciente1 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_03.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_03.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
_-_17.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_17.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_17.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_17.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope - promotional image/logo INeverCry 16:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_18.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but the U.S. have freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_18.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 17:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 17:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unless this photograph is of this Pamela Martinez (and I don't think it is), then this is just a personal photograph. See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio ? No EXIF. Pic probably taken here : http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1469020/resumephotos?v=me8096168111 and copyrighted with a name (Bjoern Kommerell) really different of the user's. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Probable copyvio. Scaled down version without EXIF of a professional photo displayed on the internet in larger version [1] and with the credit to the photographer [2]. Although professionals sometimes upload copies to Commons, which gives them visibility, it does not seem credible that the photographer uploaded his photo under an unrelated pseudonym without even crediting his name. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
![[1]](http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjA3OTE5NTY4Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTYxNjgxMTE@._V1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image/unused personal img INeverCry 17:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Is this logo too complex to be free of copyright? It looks a bit complex. Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 17:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HVL (uploader) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bad image. --HVL talk 12:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Didym (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- The picture is too blurry and currently is not used. Therefore, Delete per author's request. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Additionally: File:Planck satellite.jpg
Per http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2007/01/Front_view_of_the_Planck_satellite this is an ESA-produced image with associated copyright. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only file which should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Bilderna tillhör Swedenstyle34 och han som gjorde sidan heter Swedenstyle34
Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I created this for myself but do not need it more. So want to delete this Zafarrathore (talk) 15:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
See the conditions for when an image is free in Mexico. The author is not known, and as a government work, it is not more than 100 years old. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality penis. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PORN – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
This is a derivative work protected by copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Sammer ood , outfits details-mum's jeans from topshop-Shirt from charity shop-Shoes from zara 2014-06-08 10-21.jpg
[edit]
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality penis. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PORN – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Oyt of project scope: personal image used to spam non-notable individual Acroterion (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lokesh Giri (Singer) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self prommotional or spam picture(s), out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Don't forget the reams of other images uploaded by this guy: [3]. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lokesh Giri (Singer) (talk · contribs)
[edit]2nd nomination (per above): Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Lokesh Giri (Picture - 4).png
- File:Lokesh Giri (Picture - 3).png
- File:LOKESH.jpg
- File:Lokesh Giri (Singer).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and block user, still uploading outside the project scope files. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aracay-lulu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios - works of w:Antonio Ladislao Alcantara who died in 1991
- File:Caracas Valley Hacienda (1910's).jpg
- File:Antonio Alcantara Caracas Valley (1920's).jpg
- File:Young Antonio L. Alcantara.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 15:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIFs (3x), multiple personalities, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jorgeosma.
- File:AVE 102 en Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg --> work by "Jorgeosma"
- File:Aparcamiento Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg + File:Paneles en Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg + File:Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel de noche.jpg --> works by "Jorgeosma Reyes Martínez"
- File:AVE 102 en Cuenca.jpg + File:Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg --> works by "Mario Ortega"
- File:InauguracionEstacionCuencaAVEg.jpg --> most likely grabbed from http://www.fomento.gob.es/MFOMBPrensa/detalleRecurso.aspx?t=i&r=bb583b99-22f5-730a-edb0-49c8f8d4c13b&p=1ee979d6-a494-4b67-9f30-5e1af003a03b (© Ministerio de Fomento) = http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/1ee979d6-a494-4b67-9f30-5e1af003a03b/96267/InauguracionEstacionCuencaAVEg.jpg, published on same upload date (see related press release .pdf created 23.11.2010, 18:08)
Exif-History:
- Canon EOS 7D: 18:28, 23. Nov. 2010 (3x)
- Canon EOS-1D Mark II, 18:46, 23. Nov. 2010
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 12:58, 15. Dez. 2010 (File:Inauguración del AVE Madrid-Cuenca-Albacete.jpg, copyvio)
- File:AVE 102 en Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg
- File:Aparcamiento Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg
- File:Paneles en Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg
- File:Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel de noche.jpg
- File:InauguracionEstacionCuencaAVEg.jpg
- File:AVE 102 en Cuenca.jpg
- File:Cuenca-Fernando Zóbel.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Houston Young Professionals (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Freddy Goerges, CEO & Founder Houston Young Professionals.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals at Fashion Houston Audi.jpg
- File:@hypcc Houston Young Professionals.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals Fashion Houston.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals at Prohibition.jpg
- File:@hypcc.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals @hypcc.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals at The Grove.jpg
- File:Houston Young Professionals at Hotel ZaZa.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mama21mama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - no educational value
INeverCry 15:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:SIGPAC
[edit]Permission was stated to be present in OTRS ticket number 2010032310036304, but this permission contains a clear NC restriction and is therefore invalid.
- File:Base General Morillo.jpg
- File:BICVistaAereaPravia-2.JPG
- File:Cabezo de Alcalá - Vista Aérea.jpg
- File:Castrelo do Val SIXPAC.jpg
- File:Castro Cerneda, Abegondo.jpg
- File:Castro de Vizoño, Abegondo.JPG
- File:Castro Maior, Abegondo.jpg
- File:Cerrolobo.jpg
- File:Encoro Cecebre.jpg
- File:Estadio Balaídos.JPG
- File:Estadio Municipal de Barreiro.JPG
- File:Mosteiro de Santo Estevo de Ribas de Sil, SigPac.jpg
- File:Pazo da Pastora, Vigo.jpg
- File:Pazo de Torrecedeira SIGPAC.jpg
- File:Salamanca2001.jpg
- File:Vista aérea Castro de Troña.JPG
- File:Vistaaereaambasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereabasconesgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereabayograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereaberciograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereacastañedograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereacoallagrao.JPG
- File:VistaAereaCozuelosDeFuenduenia.png
- File:Vistaaereafresnograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereagurullesgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerealamatagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerealasmuriasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerealasniellagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerealasvillasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerealoredograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereaperedagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereapeñaflorgrao.JPG
- File:VistaAereaPravia.JPG
- File:Vistaaereapumaringrado.JPG
- File:Vistaaerearañecesgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaerearestiellograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaerearodilesgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereasamagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereasantamariagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereasantianesgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereasantoadrianograo.JPG
- File:Vistaaereasorribasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereatolinasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereavigañagrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereavillamaringrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereavillandasgrao.JPG
- File:Vistaaereavillapañadagrao.JPG
Jcb (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Question "a clear NC restriction". Are you sure of this? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 19:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the exact wording in the ticket is: "Que el FEGA, no cede los derechos de utilización de las imágenes de las ortofotos del SIGPAC para actividades comerciales y por lo tanto, estar en uso de la licencia indicada, no posibilita el uso con fines comerciales de estas imágenes. " - Jcb (talk) 19:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Support I haven't been able to find any kind of copyright note on the website. If the ticket is the only information we have, I'm voting for deletion.--ecelan (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artem Spitsyn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images of non-notable company
INeverCry 15:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
The real person on the photo does not want this photo to be shown on the web. Please delete this file. Constvita (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request & Personality rights issue. – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arturo.estigarribia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:CarlosS.jpg = grabbed from (as indicated) http://web.archive.org/web/20090709073709/http://www.telefuturo.com.py/menchi/Staff.asp (Copyright © 2008 - MENCHI EL SHOW)
Gunnex (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BossharTong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Wellness Paket 2014 dt.jpg
- File:Schwarze Rüebli-Himbeere.jpg
- File:500ml 02.jpg
- File:Rüebli-Mango.jpg
- File:Gelbe Rüebli Birne T Umstellung frei.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Manublume (mass copyvioer). Not nominated: photos taken with " iPod touch ", most likely uploader's work.
Gunnex (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jlgarciadecal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Per exif File:Beatriz escudero 2.jpg ("Copyright (c) 2006, Vicens Gimenez. All Rights Reserved") and creation date (08.11.2006) both files possibly works of Vicens Gimenez, a professional photographer. Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aapp11081900 (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these is correctly licensed. I deleted most of this user's uploads as copyvios, but these few might be free by reason of age.
- File:Um dos primeiros times.jpg
- File:Gol de monga e torcida pontepretana.jpg
- File:Ponte Preta - Hino do Clube em 1929.jpg
- File:Cartaz hino.jpg
- File:Miguel do carmo ponte preta-431528-51491a3d32262.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lettore Anonimo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-notable personal upload; see COM:SCOPE/it.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyrightviolation, mass deletion of inapropriate material
- File:قبتان تظلان ميضاءتا الجامع.png
- File:منبر الجامع 3.jpg
- File:منبر الجامع 2.jpg
- File:سرايا الجامع.jpg
- File:سقف المحراب.jpg
- File:موقع المسجد.png
- File:تصميم الجامع.jpg
- File:موقع الجامع.png
- File:مئذنة الجامع.jpg
- File:منبر الجامع.jpg
- File:النقيشة 2.jpg
- File:محراب الجامع.jpg
Natuur12 (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bennycahyadicitro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - collection of personal images - I've tagged the promo en.wiki page these are used on for speedy deletion
- File:Benny, Pulau Kayu Angin Bira, Indonesia, July 2012.jpg
- File:Benny at Satonda Islands March 2012.jpg
- File:Benny Cahyadi Citro on Komodo Sail March 2012.jpg
- File:Benny Cahyadi Citro.jpg
INeverCry 15:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal & promotional images (w:Brio2007); see COM:SCOPE.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elfamosomarvin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:FBI Academy Cesareo Carvajal.jpg
- File:Cesareo Carvajal SLP.jpg
- File:Cesareo Carvajal y Vicente Fox.jpg
- File:Cesareo Carvajal Guajardo Helicoptero.jpg
INeverCry 15:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- These seem to be taken from http://cesareocarvajal.blogspot.com/. -- Paddu (talk) 15:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 16:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Промоутермиллиардова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Википедия.jpg
- File:EOMLwj7-Jk4.jpg
- File:Копия zOBJdA8sC3gпппеепееп.jpg
- File:Копия zOBJdA8sC3g.jpg
INeverCry 15:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Myhomebills (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 17:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Margo (Dancer) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Too big collection for user page.
- File:Tamargo, J C-6573.jpg
- File:Jane Cale Tamargo.jpg
- File:Jane C. Tamargo.jpg
- File:Born to be different.jpg
- File:Jane Tamargo.jpg
- File:1980641 479720548838530 143398n.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by William bernasko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE.
- File:HI&RH Prince Petsir 2014-06-08 19-28.jpg
- File:HI&RH Prince Petsir 2014-06-08 19-24.jpg
- File:HI&RH Prince Petsir of Ghana Empire -Head of the house of (Dynasty) Bernaezquo-Dlamini-Moshesh-Cissezulu-Ghayana 2014-06-08 14-02.jpg
_Bernaezquo-Dlamini-Moshesh-Cissezulu-Ghayana_2014-06-08_14-02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Used in repeatedly-deleted hoax article en:HI&RH Prince Petsir. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 17:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vlc 18 (Panoramio-grabber). 2x photos with " RICOH R10 " in high res not nominated = most likely uploader's own work. All files related to es:Daimuz, a Spanish city.
Gunnex (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo ( http://www.centrodemocratico.com/ ) Felviper (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
out of scope 217.186.207.61 11:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo ( http://www.partidodelau.com/ ) Felviper (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
))_2014-06-08_19-52.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
))_2014-06-08_19-52.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private / nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
))_2014-06-08_19-52.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
))_2014-06-08_19-52.jpg){kind=link}
Файл не соответствует правилам сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Не соответствует правилам сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: NC license Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
no such license in http://www.hdwallpapers.in/copyright.html Bultro (talk) 08:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: does not seem to be the property of the site it wa taken from Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cheddar_Gorge_1890s_2.jpg with incorrect author information 86.164.37.76 06:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the permission on this image is satisfactory. The provided evidence for the permission is the copyright holder replying "sure!" without specifying any license for it to be released with. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- But he allows us to use it, what more permission do you want? 94.215.179.89 16:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- The way that permission was requested would make him assume it's a request to be used on Wikipedia, and Wikipedia only. There's no evidence saying it's actually released under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission is for WP only. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cheddar_1890s.jpg with incorrect author information 86.164.37.76 06:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
image is a screencap from Make Mine Mink which is a British film not from the U.S. it may not be public domain 69.124.39.237 06:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Ghnjdc unsung 41.38.76.204 10:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given for deletion -- I don't think "Ghnjdc" is a word in any language that WMF recognizes. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
?--Amadscientist (talk) 00:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate (other than being of different tone and lower quality) of File:Alexander Piorkowski.jpg. Therefore, considering that the latter appears to be a higher quality image, this one should be deleted. Hoops gza (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Cover of a book, so probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
this image looks like copyviolo because is small and have not Metadata. Este archivo parece violar los derechos de autos es pequeña y falta información de origen ,metadatos.--EEIM (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cheddar_Cliffs_Hotel_1890s.jpg with incorrect author information 86.164.37.76 06:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
logo with copyright Yger (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the file by mistake in the Wikipedia Commons. I will upload the file with the correct licensing in the English wikipedia. 194.154.147.13 00:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- File deleted for missing permissions 06/15/14.
Deleted: File deleted for missing permissions 06/15/14. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I think that this file should be deleted because it's obsolete and there's an updated version of this file: Burger king world locations.png --Grachifan (talk) 05:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: We routinely keep time series files so that, for example, a researcher can look at changes from time to time. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cheddar_Gorge_1890s.jpg with incorrect author information 86.164.37.76 06:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The MMRDA licence quoted is non-free, as derivative works are not allowed. The licence says "the material [be] reproduced accurately." -- Paddu (talk) 15:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- <squeeze>
Comment Affected: 121 files uploaded by BigJolly9 for a total of 164 files. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)- </squeeze>
- Comment: Hi, this has been discussed before, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mumbai Monorail train at platform.jpg. BigJolly9 (talk) 08:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I disagreed then and do even now with the result of the DR which BigJolly9 has provided above. Various other DRs were also closed in same way then. These images must be deleted just like the result of Commons:Deletion requests/files from the Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Also, note that 150+ such image need to be deleted which come from same source of mmrda.maharashtra.gov. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as this is not a sufficient license for two reasons:
- The license requires that the image is being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Yann has stated in the previos DR that this is not a license/copyright restriction, however the source website clearly states that the permission is subject to the aforementioned clause. This makes it clear that this is part of the license.
- The license only allows use of the material, not creating derivative works. A permission for derivative works needs to be part of the license; if it is absent it can not be assumed that derivatives are allowed.
- Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all Licence is a -ND and the "not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context" is a restriction that is not compatible with COM:L. LGA talkedits 04:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per ChrisiPK. The wording is incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Green Giant (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Some of these files may pass the fair use rationale of the English Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Is there a standard method to port these files to the English Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects? -- Paddu (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fair use is allowed on many Wikipedias. But transporting from here to there has no advantage over some willing editor directly uploading it there under the fair-use rationale. The advantage in direct uploads is that the editor who uploads it there is usually active on that respective wiki and can participate in discussions that happen there, if there are any. Also, mass fair-use rationale for similar objects is not allowed. In fact, on English Wikipedia am pretty confident that not a single image of an existing running monorail in Mumbai, from where many Wikipedians come (including me) would be kept under any viable reason for fair-use. The train is out there in public and anyone can and they have gone and taken spans of it already. We do have free images of the monorail here on Commons. So i doubt fair-use label would stay longer on active wikis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- I was not asking for a mass fair-use rationale. I am not sure free alternatives can be made to MMRDA's maps like the file I nominated for deletion, which include future plans. If another map is made using the info. in this map I felt that could be considered a derivative work. If direct uploads are the preferred method, it's fine then. -- Paddu (talk) 03:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fair use is allowed on many Wikipedias. But transporting from here to there has no advantage over some willing editor directly uploading it there under the fair-use rationale. The advantage in direct uploads is that the editor who uploads it there is usually active on that respective wiki and can participate in discussions that happen there, if there are any. Also, mass fair-use rationale for similar objects is not allowed. In fact, on English Wikipedia am pretty confident that not a single image of an existing running monorail in Mumbai, from where many Wikipedians come (including me) would be kept under any viable reason for fair-use. The train is out there in public and anyone can and they have gone and taken spans of it already. We do have free images of the monorail here on Commons. So i doubt fair-use label would stay longer on active wikis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is used for the Obscurity Wikipedia entry, it is the correct quality for that project and is the highest possible quality of this image. MatthewFiler (talk) 11:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The image is a copyvio from a copyrighted film. There is no "Obscurity Wikipedia Entry" -- the draft was turned down for lack of notability. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine. Built in the XXI century. SteveR (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
promotional picture published by Weicherding on facebook. Is user Redfox Weicherding? There is no information about 81.242.182.149 08:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
_2010_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2010_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 2010. SteveR (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
_2010_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
_2010_(1).jpg){kind=link}
This is a photo of the unknown girl shot with the monument is not known where. The description says that this girl really wants to get a prize game about vampires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuchka (talk • contribs) 2014-06-07T22:39:46 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio of sculpture, out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The file should be renamed by using "prostitutes" (sexual laborers) instead of "Comfort women" (sexual slaves for the Japanese military until 1945). Stephane mot (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support - The common English usage of "comfort women" is to describe sexual slaves only. STSC (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: A bad name is not a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Construction Motif.png
- File:Models and Branding.png
- File:A montage of one of Addiction's A-twinkz.png
- File:The Addiction Image....jpg
- File:The Lambda Logo.png
These are all highly promotional images for Addiction Apparel taken directly from the company's advertisements and uploaded by a user named Addictionapparel. They are only used on a highly promotional page on English Wikipedia. Also, since they are taken from a copyrighted website, there needs to be some evidence of permission to relicense them under the Creative Commons license. PCock (talk) 11:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- It seems some of the same or related files under different names have already been deleted once. PCock (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Road_through_Cheddar_1890s.jpg with incorrect author information 86.164.37.76 06:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, File:Babahoyo.jpg (uploaded on 16.09.2012, most likely grabbed from Facebook), previously published via (even in lower res) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=93753293&postcount=756 (07.2012, by luis8686) = http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg195/scaled.php?server=195&filename=entrada3v.jpg&res=landing. The photo is also embedded in http://tafullturistico.blogspot.de/2012/08/mi-babahoyo.html (08.2012) = http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/561039_274426582665735_177684183_n.jpg (404). File:CDVenecia.png, a logo of a football club in Ecuador, unlikely own work. Unclear if in scope of PD-whatever.
Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Both are in scope since they are used in Wikipedias.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Sorry, I misunderstood your statement about scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)- Both files were most likely not created by the uploader. The photo File:Babahoyo.jpg is most likely a copyright violation. The logo File:CDVenecia.png (obviously not work of the uploader) could be alternatively licensed with a PD (public domain)-license, arguing that 1. the design doesn't cross a line given by Commons:Threshold of originality OR 2. due to its age (for this, further details are needed). Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Empty the deleted pages or raised author and contributor to only one person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I come from hk (talk • contribs) 2014-06-07T09:50:13 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
This image of a living person presents the person in a disparaging light, as the singer is shown sticking out her tongue. The picture is most probably a screenshot from one of the band's live concert DVDs, and therefore the decision of the uploader to show the singer with her tongue stuck out must have been deliberate. Wikipedia's policy on Images of living persons does not permit uploading such inappropriate pictures. -77.4.134.33 22:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- I apologize. I haven't correctly read the policy and I'm really sorry. I'll try to upload another image of this artist. Thank you very much for the advice.
GUROMETAL (talk) 05:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- This image of a living person presents the person in a disparaging light, as the singer is shown sticking out her tongue. Are you for real, User:77.4.134.33? At any rate, we do need stronger proof that this is not a copyvio. The Flickr source is obviously filled with material not of the uploader's. That's why I'm voting delete. 舎利弗 (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If the singer stuck out her tongue in public, then the reason given is not valid. However, it seems that the image is a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 00:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- It was a legal pavilion with information, explanation, leaflets etc. --StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I see this in scope, but DW. Delete. --Krd 14:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not evidently out of scope, though further information should be added to description to demonstrate within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of drawing (poster) and sculpture. Poster even carries a (C) note. The cartoonist's website (http://harmbengen.de/kontakt.html) carries a clear copyright note. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 00:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- It was a legal action with information, explanation, leaflets etc. --StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I see this in scope, but DW. Delete. --Krd 14:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not evidently out of scope, though further information should be added to description to demonstrate within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Mural crown and wheels not refered to city website Das Stadtwappen - missing contours Juergenk59 (talk) 15:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: being inaccurate does not put this out of scope, please utilise Template:Disputed coat of arms to manage file — billinghurst sDrewth 08:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry I have here is a wrong and raw file I have meanwhile improved file Toilet (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: author request — billinghurst sDrewth 08:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luca Ghio as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: File:Switched-fabric.svg Indeedous (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I read the policy and actually I was in doubt whether this case is "Duplicates" or "Redundant/bad quality". I tagged as duplicated because I noticed that the PNG version was uploaded after the SVG version and it looks like exactly the same picture just exported to PNG, so I think the PNG file is not needed.--Luca Ghio (talk) 20:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate image of preferred and preceding SVG; unused — billinghurst sDrewth 08:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.65.49.207 20:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: not evident that it is within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 09:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/consistent EXIF, per COM:PRP (IMHO untrusted user), considering User talk:DNI (mass copyvioer). Last upload from 10.2013 also copyvio (detected today). All living and deleted files related to es:Carabanchel, a district of Madrid, Spain. Nominating 4 files uploaded in 2009 (uploader was blocked in 2009) and 4 files from 2010+2013. Not nominating photos with exif "LGP350" and "FinePix JX200" (1x), mostly available in high res, presuming "really" own work by uploader.
- File:Blasco Ibañez.PNG --> mysteriously red bordered
- File:El Metro llega a Carabanchel.jpg --> a (cropped) scan (unknown source)
- File:Parque Sur Carabanchel.jpg --> scan (painting?)
- File:KarabanchelManda.jpg --> most likely cropped and the only one with exif "Canon EOS 40D"
- File:Solar Carcel de Carabanchel.jpg --> (aerial view) most likely grabbed from Panoramio
- File:Benedicto XVI en Carabanchel.JPG --> video screenshot
- File:Carabanchel.JPG --> cropped from unknown source
- File:Centro cultural Oporto, Carabanchel.jpg --> scan
- File:El Metro llega a Carabanchel.jpg
- File:Parque Sur Carabanchel.jpg
- File:Benedicto XVI en Carabanchel.JPG
- File:Blasco Ibañez.PNG
- File:Carabanchel.JPG
- File:KarabanchelManda.jpg
- File:Solar Carcel de Carabanchel.jpg
- File:Centro cultural Oporto, Carabanchel.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: kept one with exif data, removed those that have little evidence that they are sourced from user — billinghurst sDrewth 09:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Ce fichier n'est pas bien fait, on ne voit pas le passage piétons et vélos Téplileur (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- If there is no better image, then this should be retained. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francisco6261 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless without a description, categories ....
- File:Concurso regional 8.JPG
- File:Concurso regional 7.JPG
- File:Concurso regional 3.JPG
- File:Concurso regional 6.JPG
- File:Concurso regional.JPG
- File:Concurso regional 4.JPG
- File:Concurso municipal 4.JPG
- File:Concurso regional 2.JPG
- File:Concurso municipal 2.JPG
- File:Concurso municipal.JPG
- File:Concurso municipal 3.JPG
91.65.49.207 20:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Cette photo m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il paraisse sur Wikipédia, il doit être supprimer au nom du droit d'auteur qui me concerne (Carter79 étant Mathieu Chartier, auteur des recherches sur ce domaine archéologique) Mathieu Chartier (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - The user has no valid reason to submit this deletion request : he does not understand the licensing policy and he believes that it's "his" image. That said, I don't know what it's worth Michel421 (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Michel421 Ezarateesteban 22:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Je suis Mathieu Chartier, l'auteur et créateur et de ce plan que j'avais posté jadis sur Wikipédia. Aujourd'hui, je demande de le retirer au nom de mon droit d'auteur et parce que cela risque de faire conflit avec une publication officielle à venir et des travaux d'archéologie en cours. Mathieu Chartier (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
kept: In use. Natuur12 (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksmuthukrishnan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Older image of man and double image of woman from http://www.ukm.my/sari/images/stories/SariOnline/Journal/27_2/sari_27_2_12.pdf
from "Sari International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation 27(2) (2009):265-284" Article title "The Williams-Hunt Collection..." article by Elizabeth Moore.
Page 266 of report, Photo 1. Peter Darrel Rider Williams-Hunt during World War II (Photos courtesy of Tony Williams-Hunt), on page 2 of pdf file
Page 278 of report, photo 8, Wa Draman, wife of P.D.R. Williams Hunt. (page 14 of pdf file), making them COM:COPYVIOs as Ms. Moore would hold the copyright on a 2009 article. User's other uploads were speedy'd and I nominate the composite images under the COM:PRP having no indication that any of the three images is the work of the uploader and a pattern of uploading images from the web.
- File:Gifts from AmaniWikiEN.jpg
- File:Wa Draman WikiEN.jpg
- File:William Hunt WikiTA2.jpg
- File:Gifts from Amani.jpg
- File:Wa Draman WikiTA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image was transferred from Wikipedia, but the link to the source comes up 404 "page gone", there is no author information or way to decide if this photo is really by an agent of the US Government. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment:Do yow know Web Archive?. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Thank you for the link, I see nothing on that page which suggests the image was taken by a U.S. Government photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ce plan m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il paraisse sur Wikipédia, il doit être supprimer au nom du droit d'auteur qui me concerne (Carter79 étant Mathieu Chartier, auteur des recherches sur ce domaine archéologique) Mathieu Chartier (talk) 11:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - The user has no valid reason to submit this deletion request : he does not understand the licensing policy and he believes that it's "his" image. That said, I don't know what it's worth Michel421 (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Je suis Mathieu Chartier, l'auteur et créateur et de ce plan que j'avais posté jadis sur Wikipédia. Aujourd'hui, je demande de le retirer au nom de mon droit d'auteur et parce que cela risque de faire conflit avec une publication officielle à venir et des travaux d'archéologie en cours. Mathieu Chartier (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: This one is unused. Natuur12 (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Ce plan m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il paraisse sur Wikipédia, il doit être supprimer au nom du droit d'auteur qui me concerne (Carter79 étant Mathieu Chartier, auteur des recherches sur ce domaine archéologique) Mathieu Chartier (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - The user has no valid reason to submit this deletion request : he does not understand the licensing policy and he believes that it's "his" image. That said, I don't know what it's worth Michel421 (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Je suis Mathieu Chartier, l'auteur et créateur et de ce plan que j'avais posté jadis sur Wikipédia. Aujourd'hui, je demande de le retirer au nom de mon droit d'auteur et parce que cela risque de faire conflit avec une publication officielle à venir et des travaux d'archéologie en cours. Mathieu Chartier (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arno-nl as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: File:Mexico 1881 documents revenue F84A.jpg (not an exact duplicate) Indeedous (talk) 20:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Same stamp exists here, much better image -- Gwillhickers (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Correct. Also more precise file description.Arno-nl (talk) 07:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep one is digitally (artificially| cleaned, so both stand as valid images. Descriptions can be updated. Leave opportunity of choice to users, there is no issue in having variety of scans. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of our SVG image created by Sodacan. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: Please provide link to alternate image. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Coat of arms of Ghana.svg Natuur12 (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
