Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/10
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Packard did never use a swan as a motive, but it did use a cormorant from ca. 1932-1957Chief tin cloud (Diskussion) 16:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Chief tin cloud (talk) 16:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- This cormorant was a well-known Packard senior model (or deluxe) hood ornament; at last in a highly stylized design. I have already transferred the pictures that were in this category to Category:Packard hood ornaments (Cormorant). No intention to annoy fellow wikipedians; just try to correct an easy to proof error.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily, because the category was empty. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not self-created: author is claimed Sandra Kastås, but the uploader is UllmanPR. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Claim of "own work" for this hybrid image including icons of many companies seems very unlikely. Also, no obvious reason it would be in scope. Jmabel ! talk 02:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, maybe the row of icons is even de minimis, but I delete it as unused personal image. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as per nominated. Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, They were deleted by Nick. Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 11:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
There is a copyright notice in the lower right of the original version of the image, which the uploader has cropped out of the final version. Neither the uploader nor the underlying source provides any information about the date or manner of publication.Uploader's claim that it was published without a copyright notice is unsubstantiated at best. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, "© 1939" in lower right corner of original. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, so small photos (113×113 pixels) are useless. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure it's legal to publicly label children as porn addicts and post their such labeled photos on the Internet Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Lupo as an attack image. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright claimed under OTRS ticket 2014051010004398. Further details awaited to verify claim Nthep (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn. Sufficient details given to establish that image is still in copyright - now tagged for speedy deletion as copyvio. Nthep (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Better and correct named Version is the File:Leonardo-socorro de brisach.jpg.--Docteur Ralph (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
The Picture shows the socorro di Brisach in 1633 by the duke of Feria an not the siege of Brisach in 1638 by Berhard von Weimar.--Docteur Ralph (talk) 14:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
"I took this image" (uploaded 09.2013, Facebook res) versus (example) http://www.supergoodmovies.com/639/tollywood/manisharma-s-son-to-be-directed-by-puri-jaganath-news-details (2009, Copyright © 2014 supergoodmovies.com. All rights reserved.) = (high res) http://cdn1.supergoodmovies.com/Filesone/9ccda98a461648ed948cb642ebe4a9fd.jpg (last modified: 2012) = unlikely to be own work Gunnex (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Possibly salvageable, but there needs to be a clear credit & indication of rights status for the underlying photo. Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, no need to wait, all the uploader's contributions are deleted and this is the last one. Unused logos of non-notable websites are out of scope. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Appears to have been a user page image that has not been in use since 2010, from a user whose only edit since 2007 was to basically blank the user page that had this photo. See https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/Borntofrag. Jmabel ! talk 03:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
inapropriate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florentin Munsch (talk • contribs) 2014-05-09T13:53:43 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal file, the uploader's only contribution. In addition, this is text-only file, but it is very out of scope anyway. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Redirección previa a un error de título ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 15:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
uploaded solely for vandalism, see de:Spezial:Beiträge/IBoy01, presumably uploader doesn't care about copyright etc. Schniggendiller (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio due to copyright violation, because the file was found elsewhere in the internet and it was unlikely to be own work. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. out of scope. Meisam (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Very small image, no metadata: unlikely to be own work. Moreover, it is out of scope (non notable person). BrightRaven (talk) 09:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, so small photos (150×150 pixels) are useless. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Blurried, practically unuseable. Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 02:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, photos made in rock concerts have typically bad quality, but this photo has too bad quality even for rock concerts. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Nick with reason: "Mass deletion of out of project scope images added by user NairAliaga". Taivo (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 13:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture (S. Batič). Eleassar (t/p) 13:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Advertisements and posters even though in 'public space' are generally copyrighted by their creators, as long as they are no permanent installations (FOP). FDMS 4 17:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculptural/architectural work. Eleassar (t/p) 15:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. Uploader added {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} later, which looks not very valid here. JuTa 01:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Sports logo. No indication that the uploader owns the rights.
Logo deportivo; nada sugiere que la persona que subió el archivo tiene los derechos. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep PD-ineligible. - Fma12 (talk) 03:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: seems like pd simple FASTILY 00:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Corrupt file (jagged harmonica on lower half). Replaced with File:Universitario Sucre.svg. OAlexander (talk) 07:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, thank you, Alexander. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by uploader. Gunnex (talk) 20:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, This is the uploader's only contribution, so it is unlikely, that (s)he will come here to show sources for every file. No one of these 11 original photos had source or author other than own work. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
"Own work" seems almost impossible. Jmabel ! talk 02:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, actually I tend to believe own work, but I speedy delete it due to promotionality and advertizing. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Is it copyrighted screenshot? I suspect copyright violation. Some can argue, that so simple screenshot does not surpass threshold of originality, but in my opinion this is not the case. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- No it's not a copyvio, Psiphon is free software. Palosirkka (talk) 07:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: GPL software screenshot −ebraminiotalk 12:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adonlzz as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Yann (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Boderline. Is it simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 06:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, PD-textlogo should be fine for: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Resonate_company_logo.png Would like to appeal the delete nomination. Adonlzz
Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
No license provided. copied from here ~ Nahid Talk 13:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation JuTa 21:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hard to see how uploader can claim "own work": the relevant work here is the photos on the plastic bottles. Jmabel ! talk 07:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree: really hard to see, why the user decided to claim own work. The design is clearly copyrighted. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Unknown origin of the collage parts and so copyright violation. A.Savin 23:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, none of the parts had any source or author other than "own work". In addition, two collage parts (one in top left corner, the other in center right) depicted modern buildings, but there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
probably speedy but i don't understand the source lang. copyed from here ~ Nahid Talk 13:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: very likely a copyright violation. JuTa 20:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque; no COM:FOP in Oman.
- File:Ceiling of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque I.JPG
- File:Ceiling of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque II.JPG
- File:Dome of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque wirh Swarovski crystal chandelier.JPG
- File:Mihrab of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.JPG
- File:Muscat flickr07.jpg
- File:Muscat, Grand Mosque (6857863253).jpg
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (1).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (10).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (13).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (20).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (22).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (27).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (3).jpg
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (30).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (31).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (32).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (33).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (39).jpg
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (40).jpg
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (41).jpg
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (42).JPG
- File:Muscat-Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque (9).jpg
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (1).JPG
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (2).jpg
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (3).jpg
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (5).jpg
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (6).JPG
- File:Muscat-Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque-Library (7).jpg
- File:Oman-Muscat-Grand-Mosque-14.jpg
- File:Oman-Muscat-Grand-Mosque-18.jpg
- File:Oman-Muscat-Grand-Mosque-7.jpg
- File:Sultan Qaboos Mosque Court Muscat Oman.jpg
- Sorry; a duplicate of Commons:Deletion requests/Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. Jee 15:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
File:سید رضا بری اسکویی-متولد 1991 سپتامبر (شهریور 1370) در شهر تهران-مدارک تحصیلی - لیسانس تکنولوجی عمران-حرفه- شاعر , خوانند 2014-04-30 16-44.jpg
[edit]Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, very good quality, but not big and no metadata. Suspicious. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. out of scope Meisam (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
All: blurred, low quality, bad light.
Some: selfies, out of scope
Some: missing permission
- File:DC100411053021.jpg
- File:DC100314055658.jpg
- File:DC100206050659.jpg
- File:DC100126042510.jpg
- File:DC100126042532.jpg
- File:1 (2)fangruida images..jpg
- File:3 (2)fangruida photos..jpg
- File:DC120425032031.jpg
- File:DC120425031716.jpg
- File:DC120425031651.jpg
- File:DC120425031624.jpg
- File:DC120425031619.jpg
- File:DC120425031559.jpg
- File:DC120425031553.jpg
- File:DC120425031359.jpg
- File:DC120425031300.jpg
- File:DC120425031120.jpg
- File:DC120425031110.jpg
- File:DC120425031053.jpg
- File:DC120425024146.jpg
- File:DC120425024121.jpg
- File:DC120425024107.jpg
- File:DC120425024048.jpg
- File:DC120425022852.jpg
- File:DC120425022922.jpg
- File:DC120425022931.jpg
- File:DC120425022945.jpg
- File:DC120425022952.jpg
- File:DC120425024035.jpg
- File:DC120425022841.jpg
- File:DC120425022835.jpg
- File:DC120425022800.jpg
- File:DC120425022746.jpg
- File:DC120425022719.jpg
- File:DC120425022702.jpg
- File:DC120425022623.jpg
- File:DC120425022705.jpg
- File:DC120425022610.jpg
- File:DC120425022554.jpg
- File:DC120326042805.jpg
- File:DC120326042717.jpg
- File:DC110209040635.jpg
- File:DC110416042737.jpg
- File:DC110209034651.jpg
- File:DC110410055542.jpg
- File:DC110410054947.jpg
- File:DC110410054923.jpg
- File:DC110209041500.jpg
- File:DC110310024507.jpg
- File:DC110311063314.jpg
- File:DC110209033130.jpg
- File:DC100526023757.jpg
- File:DC100513051121.jpg
- File:DC100423053742.jpg
- File:DC100410033822.jpg
- File:DC100206042628.jpg
- File:DC100404062603.jpg
McZusatz (talk) 11:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, all the files were unused, blurry and self-promotional. These were the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ocantoralh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely all files grabbed from Facebook or screenshotted from sites with unknown copyright status, involving multiple copyright issues: Mixture of album covers (example), collages of album covers (example), concert tour covers (example), site screenshots, wallpapers and banners I + II, mysteriously watermarked images etc, all uploaded in a row on 03.09.2013.
- File:FOTO SDV.jpg
- File:Wallpaper.jpg
- File:Perc. 7.jpg
- File:SDV PORTADA 2.jpg
- File:DIOS AMOR.jpg
- File:Promoción 3.jpg
- File:Integrantes del Coro.jpg
- File:LOGO 1.jpg
- File:Nominacion.png
- File:Teclad.jpg
- File:Guitarrista 1.jpg
- File:SDV Panama.jpg
- File:Telonero 3.jpg
- File:Bajo.jpg
- File:Banda SDV.jpg
- File:Telonero 2.jpg
- File:Premios AMCL.jpg
- File:Baterista.jpg
- File:Nominacion Premios Arpa.jpg
- File:SDV PTY Coristas.jpg
- File:SDV PTY.jpg
- File:Lanzamiento n2.jpg
- File:SDV wallpaper 3.jpg
- File:Concierto 4.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, none of the photos had metadata, none had author other than "own work". No one of them was used: apparently they depicted non-notable persons. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Small pictures with no metadata. There is a clear case of copyvio in the uploads of this user. "Own work" unlikely. Moreover, some pictures are DW of recent works of art.
- File:Antenne 2.JPG
- File:Antenne 1.JPG
- File:2 plateau.JPG
- File:Mappa 2.JPG
- File:1 mappa.JPG
- File:1 plateau.JPG
BrightRaven (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
The user has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal image, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
This is small photo without metadata and this does not look like selfie, but is claimed own work. I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Afrazali (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
SnowMasterSarah (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal image, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
ADNAN MIR (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Mad Ade (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal image, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
FOP in Japan does not cover artistic works. Moreover, the photograph does not seem to be the uploader according to the "source" field. BrightRaven (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Image grabbed from the artist's website [1]. The watermark was probably removed by the uploader or added after the upload. BrightRaven (talk) 09:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
HackStud (talk · contribs) did userpage in en.wiki and uploaded a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his other contributions got deleted due to different reasons, including advertizing. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a small photo without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also, the uploader is Gina Martin, but the uploader is Viviana niño, so this can be also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Obsolete, no longer needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonKTemplar (talk • contribs) 2014-05-08T11:32:37 (UTC)
- No reason for request a deletion. If you are the uploader, just upload a newer picture, or use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Still in use on user page PierreSelim (talk) 07:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the nature of the photo and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:06, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, all files uploaded in a row on 04.09.2013. Appears to be all grabbed from internet. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. File:محمد عبده - Mohammed Abdu 70's.jpg + File:Abdu70.jpg = cropped from an album cover, File:Mohammed Abdu - 90's Abha 1998.png + File:Mohammed Abdu - Geneva 1988.png + File:T.V. Days.jpg = video/TV screenshots, File:BM5QzvKCUAAH 4u.jpg = unsourced collage, etc.
- File:محمد عبده, بدر عبدالمحسن - Mohammed Abdu, Badr bin AbdulMohsen.jpg
- File:Khaled Alfaisal, Mohammed Abdu - محمد عبده, خالد الفيصل.jpg
- File:Mohammed Abdu - 90's Abha 1998.png
- File:Mohammed Abdu - Geneva 1988.png
- File:محمد عبده - Mohammed Abdu 70's.jpg
- File:T.V. Days.jpg
- File:Abdu70.jpg
- File:BM5QzvKCUAAH 4u.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anluiponce (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Bjoernleisten
[edit]- File:Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 2.JPG
- File:Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 3.JPG
- File:Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 1.JPG
- File:Aussicht vom Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 1.JPG
- File:Aussicht vom Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 2.JPG
- File:Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal in Porta Westfalica 6.JPG
- File:Maersk Guardian.JPG
- File:Weser in Minden und Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal an der Porta Westfalica.JPG
- File:Gabelweiher Espelkamp.JPG
- File:Bahnhof Espelkamp 1.jpg
- File:Gabelweiher Espelkamp 2.JPG
- File:Eberswalderstraße (Berlin).jpg
- File:Alexa (Einkaufszentrum, Berlin).jpg
- File:S-Bahn Potsdamer Platz 2.jpg
- File:Bahnhof Potsdamer Platz.jpg
- File:Tucan3.jpg
- File:Apples2.jpg
These Images should be deleted because they are all my own work and I don't wan't them to appear on Wikimedia or any other page --Bjoernleisten (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Björn Leisten
Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are non-revocable. JurgenNL (talk) 07:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Pifa14
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by Pifa14 (talk · contribs) and not yet deleted:
- File:Escultra barroca p 392.JPG
- File:Escultura barroca 439.JPG
- File:Escultura barroca p 624.JPG
- File:Escultura barroca pag 435.JPG
They are out of project scope as unused text-only files. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abram Tinodo E (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walter Riso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: Per file description taken from an exhibition in Venezuela of photos by living en:Raymond Depardon (1942—), a French photographer (...). Questionable if in or out of COM:DM-scope. Fails also COM:FOP#Venezuela.
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 012.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 011.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 010.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 006.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 008.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 007.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 004.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 003.jpg
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 005.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 001.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 002.JPG
- File:Museo de Bellas Artes 2013 000.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all as derivative works of copyrighted photos. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Taivo, derivative works PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work. (I already deleted 2 files where I was able to find the unfree sources.)
- File:Joanne Galea, will represent Malta in this year's Miss World- 2014-05-10 00-57.jpg
- File:Antonella Vella, represented Malta in Miss World 2004 2014-05-10 00-52.jpg
- File:Shanel Debattista, represented Malta in beauty contest Miss World 2009 2014-05-10 00-50.jpg
Didym (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Blurred unused user page image. Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Pitke (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Pitke (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom; unused personal photo Pitke (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: user image currently in use on en.wikipedia, no photo album type misuse detected Pitke (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Currently not used. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Mybe private photo & no educational value. ~ Nahid Talk 20:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Pitke (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Owner is aspire4sport & uploader has no right to release under CC. ~ Nahid Talk 15:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Screen cap; no indication that uploader is copyright owner (see http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/dri-archer-runs-426-dash/story?id=22647434). discospinster (talk) 23:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Despite bad quality, the file is used in hi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep One of our current whopping total of two animations/videos of progress of penile erection. --Pitke (talk) 16:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
COM:PENIS. This is an exceptionally low quality animated gif of the penile erection process. It's an enormous file, very blurry, full of artifacts, and moreover redundant to the actual videos of the erection process we have in Category:Videos of penile erection. The circumstances have changed since the last DR. It's time to get rid of this. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep in use, so automatic keep. --Fæ (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept per Fæ and per prior discussion, this file is in use and has been for some time. If and when the editors of hi.wp choose to replace this with a "better" file, there might be something to discuss here; but until then, the decision is clear. -Pete F (talk) 01:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Image available on the official website of Jerusalem, and would not be the first copyright violation of the uploader. FDMS 4 14:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: Дуже погана якість
Converted by me to DR, as this should go through regular DR. Google translates the Russian deletion-rationale into "very bad". -- Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The quality is not good, but not exceptionally bad either. But there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The church can be old, but can be new also. The original request for speedy was written in Ukrainian, not in Russian. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently a new building, there is no FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality ({{BadJPG}}), orphaned. Leyo 19:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The file is used in 3 categories. I looked through all of them. I did not notice a replacement file. Is there any at all? Taivo (talk) 10:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- If a structure of this compound is needed at some point, it may be drawn in high quality within a minute. In addition, if someone creates an article for this compound, (s)he is unlikely to find the present (low quality) image in the Commons jungle. --Leyo 10:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, especially considering we have file:Leptophos.svg as replacement (in-use in the 4 *.wp articles on this compound). DMacks (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for showing a replacement file. I added all three categories. Is it good? Taivo (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 11:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like scan from a possible copyrighted book. ~ Nahid Talk 16:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The book isn't the focus, the ring and the heart shape formed by its shadow is. Though I admit I would be happier if the book used were clearly public domain. --GRuban (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept, actually the text is not readable. But if somebody retakes the photo, using book, which is in public domain, then I am agree to delete the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, this was the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is not big and it has no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:とある白い猫#Your_edits_to_archives. Probably {{G6}}, applies, but there's no rush, and could use a second set of eyes. Elvey (talk) 20:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I am commenting because my talk page is linked as the rationale as I felt the need to clarify that I do not support this nomination. I feel this nomination is trying to fix a problem that does not need to be fixed. Furthermore, I'd strongly urge against deleting archives, particularly to preserve the archive history.
- The archive has so little activity so I do not see the point of archiving by year.
- This is why I merged them into one page a while back ago in the first place as there was a somewhat noteworthy level of archiving backlog.
- In the current setup archives are divided into groups of 250K and all of the content hasn't reached this number yet which is why content is limited to the first archive.
- Dividing archives by year also breaks automatic linking to the archive pages which will cease to work at all if the redirects are deleted.
- I'd ask the closing admin to correct the current problem.
- Page and its history was moved to Commons talk:Upload Wizard/Archive 2012 by the nominator and should be moved back to Commons talk:Upload Wizard/Archive 2.
- Ideally page histories can be merged under Commons talk:Upload Wizard/Archive 1 which would make everything tidy but I can understand if the admin thinks this would be a waste of time (which is why I didn't bother requesting it when I merged the two pages).
- The archive has so little activity so I do not see the point of archiving by year.
- -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- This user doesn't understand what the problem is, though I think explained it in plain English; seems to be a language barrier. For some reason the user replied by copying the thread to my talk page; I have replied there. Please review the discussion there and decide.--Elvey (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping FASTILY 08:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio, a low resolution found here ~ Nahid Talk 19:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusably low image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, all the user's uploads have very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roger Colt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status of files regarding en:Serge Houde, a Canadian film and television character actor, both files uploaded by Roger Colt (talk · contribs) on 06.09.2013. Multiple copyright issues involved, needing permissions:
- File:Serge Houde.jpg (high res, but no exif) --> per http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2624235776/nm0396369?ref_=nmmi_mi_all_pbl_6 (2012, cropped) credited with "Photo by Stephanie Ribeiro"
- File:Composite Photo of Actor Serge Houde 2013 Tiff.tiff --> the source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Some - if not all parts - grabbed from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0396369/mediaindex?ref_=nm_phs_md_sm = (examples) http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3568010240/nm0396369?ref_=nmmi_mi_all_pbl_30 (2010) + http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1849004032/nm0396369?ref_=nmmi_mi_all_pbl_46 (2008, "Photo by James Gray"). Update: See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photo Composite of Actor Serge Houde 2013.jpg.
Gunnex (talk) 20:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
No EXIF data, quite small image resolution - typical web resolution. I strongly doubt that this aerial photograph is the uploader's work High Contrast (talk) 19:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is not big and it has no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
File:This is Xyler Jaden Murray born August 1,2001- His favorite color is blood red and his favorite show is all anime in general- 2014-05-10 14-07.jpg
[edit]Out of scope. Maybe private photo & no educational value. ~ Nahid Talk 19:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Possible copy violation Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that this image was uploaded on 29 April 2014 from an image digitised on 27 March 2014. However, consider "Tora is now" article published by Echo Net Daily in February 2014. It seems to have the same image.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 14:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- It was the band that supplied the photo to the newspaper agency. The band holds ownership of the original image and therefore is not guilty of copy violation. I know this because I'm in the band. Thedrunkenship 11:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Without permission from the photographer/owner via Commons:OTRS, this image can't be uploaded here. You've been warned in March and reuploaded the same picture 1 month later. If you satisfy one of the option from this section, please follow the procedure. Otherwise, this picture should be deleted. --SamuelFreli (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is not big and it has no camera data. In addition, this is the uploader's only contribution. Considering that, I am not sure, that Thedrunkenship has right to publish the photo under free license. If you are copyright holder, please send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded 09.2013. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, in lower res circulating since 07.2013. Gunnex (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is not big and it has no metadata, also it is the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only file which should be replaced with wiki-table. May be not relevant for article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep But the file is used in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This picture and other pictures at Category:Murals by Diego Rivera in the Palacio de Bellas Artes should be deleted. They are copyrightable; the author died in 1957, less than 70 years after life. Only one exception that should not be deleted is File:PBA Man at the Crossroads full view from above.JPG because it shows the interior view of the building/museum, not one of murals. George Ho (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Restored in line with the closing of Commons:Deletion requests/Murals by Diego Rivera. Natuur12 (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Used on en:Ignatius Arry Sy. Pitke (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Flickrwashed image. Frame from a video. enwiki uploader has had all uploads here deleted for same reason and account blocked. Peripitus (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
The file is not big and it has no metadata. In addition, there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. I suspect copyright violation.
Этот файл небольшой и не имеет данных фотокамеры как все остальные загруженные Конами файлы. По-этому считаю возможным, что фотограф не Конами, а кто-то другой. Нужно получить OTRS-разрешение от фотографа. Кроме того, в России нет свободы панорамы, так что фотографии о здании (если они не очень старые) можно загрузить в Викисклад только при разрешении архитектора. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Dies ist ein Rest eines fehlerhaften Uploads siehe[2] Das richtige Wappen befindet sich unter File:Wappen Freinsheim.svg. Dort wurde die eigentliche zum Redirect führende Version zusammengeführt und von Odder gelöscht (der dbzgl. auch ein paar Kommentare hinterließ). Der eigentliche Inhalt dieser Version ist zusammenkopiert (wie wahrscheinlich alle Wappen das Erstellers, aber egal), was auch dazu führte, dass der Ersteller "selbst" (ein paar Monate) später einen anderen Löwen für "besser" befand (der wiederum aus dem Nationalwappen Tschechiens kopiert war, vorhergehender Löwe stammt anscheinend von Wappen Pleystein.svg die Krone weit verbreitet als Element aus dem französischen Heraldik-Projekt (~2006), wie es auch sei der ganze Löwe ist in einer neueren Version unter besagtem Wappen in der History enthalten). (Hüben wir drüben keine Verwendung) Ergänzend: Das ganze ist nicht so offensichtlich aufgefallen da User:Foroa (einige Monate später) den fehlerhaften/unkonventionellen Redirect aus nicht ganz nachvollziehbaren Gründen wieder zu einer ganz anderen fehlerhaften Dateibeschreibung gewandelt hat. -- Perhelion (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- DeleteDas Wappen hat mit dem Wappen der Stadt Freinsheim lediglich die Blasonierung gemein. Egal ob in der Literatur bei Klemens Stadler (1966) und Karl-Heinz Debus (1988, in einer leicht vereinfachten Form), ob offiziell von Gemeinde/(mittlerweile) Stadt, oder in einer Publikation vom Ministerium der Finanzen (Ende der 1980er), die Formgebung des Löwen, der Trauben und des "F" sind mindestens bis zu Otto Hupp (1928) gleich. Die vorliegende Grafik ist eine komplette Neuschöpfung nach eigener Interpretation des Autors und entbehrt jeglicher Grundlage außerhalb von Wikipedia Commons. Ich plädiere daher klar für löschen. Ein Beibehalten einer seit fünf Jahren hier mitgeschleppten, inkorrekten Datei, die nicht benötigt wird, würde den Qualitätsanspruch auf Commons doch in Frage stellen. Fränsmer (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: Diese Datei stellt genauso das Wappen Freinsheims dar, wie dieses Wappen das Wappen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Fränsmer (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. This is not part of the Anefo collection that was released as CC-BY-SA, but from the Fotocollectie Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst Tekstman (talk) 21:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You're correct Natuur12 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to me to be in scope, but I'm ready to be convinced otherwise. Jmabel ! talk 02:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment If this is en:Cher's signature, then it is clearly in scope. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Any reason to believe it is? - Jmabel ! talk 18:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- It is very different from genuine autographs by "the" Cher. Favour of delete per nom. --Pitke (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio, not part of the ANEFO collection that was released as CC-BY-SA. Tekstman (talk) 21:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Greece. Commons needs either proof, that the house is old, or OTRS-permission from architect. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Title, in particular, makes me very suspicious this is a copyvio (refers to the size of the image rather than its content). If it is to be kept, it should be renamed appropriately. Jmabel ! talk 03:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
same Name in de-wiki. please rename to File:Gini_coefficient.svg Aleks-ger (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The files are similar, but I do not consider them replacements of each other. Do you want to delete or rename the file? The file can be deleted anyway as uploader's request on uploading day. If you want to rename the file, then you must choose another new name. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: As above Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Flickrwashed shot captured from a video by User_talk:tc1591 Peripitus (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Photograph of a work of art in a gallery in Shanghai. COM:FOP#China only covers work of art in outdoor public place. BrightRaven (talk) 09:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Ya ha pasado tiempo y quisiera borrar esta versión de la imagen Lfalarconu (talk) 18:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is big photo with camera data, quality is good. Free licenses are irrevocable. I added Category:Green neckties, this is the best photo in the category. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
The file is not big and it has no metadata. In addition, the author is claimed Skybolt101, but the uploader is Codepage. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope as unused simple logo of non-notable organization (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.editionshelenejacob.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Logo_noir_petit.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete These files are not duplicates, because Commons file is much bigger. But unused personal logos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.172.74 18:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Crop out the coin. // Liftarn (talk)
- Delete This is small photo without metadata. I suspect, that this is not own work as claimed, but photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Not Filmitadka.in's work to license. Non-free photo by Steven A Henry/Wireimage.[3] —LX (talk, contribs) 10:06, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. Not part of the ANEFO collection that was released as CC-BY-SA. Tekstman (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Elvazquez
[edit]- User:Elvazquez
- File:Adaptación del sol egipcio para el Vazquecitos.jpg
- File:EL VAZQUEZ CONSULTORES.png
Elvazquez (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpages in en.wiki and Commons and uploading two personal files. One of them is used on the userpage and the other nowhere. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You meant to nominate the userpage as well? Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Jasonspera
[edit]Here are all uploads of Jasonspera (talk · contribs):
- File:Aegis Demo Room Conveyor.jpg
- File:Aegis Headquarters.jpg
- File:Aegis Software Corporate Logo.gif
- File:Aegis Software Logo 2.gif
- File:Lobby-w-people.jpg
- File:Training-room.jpg
He has done nothing in Wikipedia except promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading some images, which are used nowhere except on the userpage. The photos are very small. The logos belong to non-notable company. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Richoptix
[edit]Richoptix (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons except userpage and uploading a portrait about himself, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE unused AI images.
- File:King Trump 6.png
- File:King Trump 3.png
- File:King Trump 4.png
- File:King Trump 5.png
- File:King Trump 2.png
- File:King Trump.png
- File:Ugly Trump —-.png
- File:Ugly Trump —.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The King Trump ones are high-quality caricatures with quite some meaning. This is in contrast to this "caricature of Donald Trump" that people here are seemingly desperate to keep and which is entirely inappropriate, not a caricature, and not useful or educational but out of scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Personal art and AI art is deemed out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Files of User:A31tya
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by A31tya (talk · contribs):
He has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki, an article about himself (now deleted) and uploading two photos about himself, which are used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. In addition, he uses two usernames in en.wiki (neither has useful edits), but this is not problem of Commons.
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Aeislalvaro
[edit]Aeislalvaro (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Atores do Aprendendo a Ser um Caça Fantasma.jpg (800×600 pixels)
- File:Camisa do Aprendendo a Ser um Caça Fantasma com o Governador Eduardo Campos.jpg (640×480 pixels)
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Chak No38 sharki
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by Chak No38 sharki (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Derry form 2014-04-26 16-03.jpg
- File:Jamia masjid chak 38 sharki 2014-04-26 16-01.jpg
- File:Jatts of chak38 2014-04-26 15-58.jpg
They are small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:GalerieZH
[edit]GalerieZH (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Krajina vykoupení.jpg
- File:Krajina vykoupeni.jpg
- File:Krajina vykoupeni wiki.jpg
- File:Obraz.jpg
- File:Obraz Krajina vykoupeni.jpg
- File:Oltářní malba.jpg
The files need OTRS-permission from artist's heirs. The artist en:Zdeněk Hajný died on 1st of March 2014. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I dont think so. Someones death is not a reason for files deletion or need of OTRS. Note that here we are talking about photographs of someone else work. Also I dont understand, why you are proposint deletion and you dont contact Galery ZH to send such permission.--Juandev (talk) 18:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- The files are protected with copyright until artist's death and 70 years after that. They shouldn't be uploaded into Commons at all. As the paintings are 2-dimensional objects, the photographer has no copyright. And I contacted GalerieZH in his/her talk page, when creating this request. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, Ive been personally communicating with GalerieZH. They havent broke any rules. They uploaded images to which they hold at that time rights. If now the rights will be given to someone else, doesnt change the fact, that copyright holder released them under CC.--Juandev (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW of a copyrighted painting whis requires evidence of permisison via com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Sbirka
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by Sbírka (talk · contribs):
The files need OTRS-permission from artist's heirs. The artist en:Zdeněk Hajný died on 1st of March 2014. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Ivanovka000
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by Ivanovka000 (talk · contribs):
They are unused personal files, out of project scope. In addition, they are small photos without metadata, so copyright violation is also possible. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Source is given as Template:Www.ku.ac.th. Presumably it is link 8 at the top of http://president.ku.ac.th/web/history.php#. No reason to think it is available under the license claimed, and it strains credulity to imagine that, as asserted, the uploader is the copyright holder and is releasing it under this CC license. Possibly public domain (though I expect not); also, possibly, if we have to delete it and if the Thai wikipedia allows non-free use, we should transwiki, since it is used in an article there. Jmabel ! talk 07:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Tilantha hansanath bandara
[edit]Tilantha hansanath bandara (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons except userpage and uploading two pictures about himself, which are used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Abyssal'Nebulaze
[edit]Here are all contributions of Abyssal'Nebulaze (talk · contribs):
- File:Abyssal Nebulaze.jpg
- File:Abyssal Nebulaze pure form.jpg *
- File:La Rose des vents logo.jpg
- File:Mr.Nebulaze.jpg
- File:Mr.Nebulaze2.jpg
- File:Novusordo2.jpg
- File:Rosedesvents copy.jpg
One of them (marked with asterisk) is used in en.wiki on userpage, the others are unused. All his contributions in en.wiki (except userpage) are either deleted as article proposals about non-notable entities or simply reverted as vandalism. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mukuldoley
[edit]Here are all contributions of Mukuldoley (talk · contribs):
He has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading two photos about himself. One of them is used in the userpage and the other nowhere. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I just wonder if these images fail COM:DM due to the prevalence of the background.
- File:Abdel Aziz Mahmoud, ESC2014 01 (crop).jpg
- File:Abdel Aziz Mahmoud, ESC2014 01.jpg
- File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10.jpg
- File:Dilara Kazimova - Start a Fire presentation (English).webm
- File:Dilara Kazimova - Start a Fire presentation (Русский).webm
- File:Emma Marrone - La Mia Cittá presentation (English).webm
- File:Emma Marrone - La Mia Cittá presentation (Italiano).webm
- File:Freaky Fortune & Riskykidd, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 03.jpg
- File:Freaky Fortune & Riskykidd, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 04.jpg
- File:Freaky Fortune & Riskykidd, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 05.jpg
- File:Mariko, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 01.jpg
- File:Mariya Yaremchuk, ESC2014 Meet & Greet.jpg 05.jpg
- File:Tanja, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 09 (crop).jpg
- File:Tanja, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 09.jpg
- File:Twin Twin, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 20.jpg
- File:Ulla Essendrop, ESC2014 01 (crop).jpg
- File:Valentina Monetta, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 05.jpg
- File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10 (crop 2).jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 13:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, the focus is obviously on people, and background is clearly out of focus. Moreover, in most cases the background on these photos cannot be used for any purpose (for example, on File:Mariya Yaremchuk, ESC2014 Meet & Greet.jpg 05.jpg only hash tag and a few lines are visible, or on File:Valentina Monetta, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 05.jpg we can see that... well, there is a background behind). Even if there is something prominent and copyrighted, it is much better to crop it than to delete these files of obviously high encyclopedic value — NickK (talk) 20:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I accept the focus is on the people, and these are good quality, useful photos. But just because the focus is on something doesn't necessarily mean the photo is kosher copyright-wise. I deliberately chose these photos because I thought these were the most potentially problematic - there are 500 others which are fine, where the backdrop is less of a major aspect. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- AFAIK, the normal behaviour in the situation of something copyrighted which is not the main object of the image is cropping / blurring it. Looking at, say, File:Valentina Monetta, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 05.jpg, I hardly imagine how we can blur the background even more: hardly anything is visible at the moment. And thanks for the notion of kosher copyright-wise, it perfectly illustrates the idea of this DR — NickK (talk) 23:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- If that last sentence was sarcastic, then let me assure you it was a figure of speech, an analogy. Consider File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10 (crop 2).jpg - there is no way in which the copyrighted element is not a significant part of the image. The others are iffier I grant you, which is why I nominated them in the first place. The original of that file, File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10.jpg, it's less of an element than in the crop but it is still significant. File:Tanja, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 09.jpg - the photo is clearly framed to put her in front of the Eurovision backdrop, which makes it a major element. File:Mariko, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 01.jpg - again, clearly framed to show the Eurovision stuff, and besides it takes up 75% of the image! These are not minor elements. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- It is indeed clearly visible, but is it really usable? And wouldn't you put it the other way: that artist were at some sort of photo session in front of the Eurovision backdrop, or that the artists were posing volontarily in front of it. This is clear example of the case Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless) from COM:DM — NickK (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- If that last sentence was sarcastic, then let me assure you it was a figure of speech, an analogy. Consider File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10 (crop 2).jpg - there is no way in which the copyrighted element is not a significant part of the image. The others are iffier I grant you, which is why I nominated them in the first place. The original of that file, File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10.jpg, it's less of an element than in the crop but it is still significant. File:Tanja, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 09.jpg - the photo is clearly framed to put her in front of the Eurovision backdrop, which makes it a major element. File:Mariko, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 01.jpg - again, clearly framed to show the Eurovision stuff, and besides it takes up 75% of the image! These are not minor elements. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- AFAIK, the normal behaviour in the situation of something copyrighted which is not the main object of the image is cropping / blurring it. Looking at, say, File:Valentina Monetta, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 05.jpg, I hardly imagine how we can blur the background even more: hardly anything is visible at the moment. And thanks for the notion of kosher copyright-wise, it perfectly illustrates the idea of this DR — NickK (talk) 23:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I accept the focus is on the people, and these are good quality, useful photos. But just because the focus is on something doesn't necessarily mean the photo is kosher copyright-wise. I deliberately chose these photos because I thought these were the most potentially problematic - there are 500 others which are fine, where the backdrop is less of a major aspect. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per all of the above. Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep on the whole, I would recommend a crop for the following :
- File:András Kállay-Saunders, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 10.jpg everything to the left of subjects right arm;
- File:Mariko, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 01.jpg from the top of the head upwards;
- File:Tanja, ESC2014 Meet & Greet 09.jpg also from the top of the head upwards;
- and the rest can be kept as is. LGA talkedits 10:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Apperantly DM Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Is it copyrighted design? Taivo (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
This is used on several Wikipedias, so if we end up deleting from Commons but it is deemed still useful, it should be transwiki'd. The problems: (1) no coherent source given: the cited source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kisangani_Ville.png is just one small portion of the image. The image is tiny, but appears to be a photo of something, and whoever's work it is a photo of is uncredited. (2) I'm not aware of any basis for this being the coat of arms of Kisangani. The much simpler File:Kisangani_Ville.png claims to be that coat of arms; http://www.ngw.nl/int/afr/kisangan.htm also gives a variant quite unlike this one. http://www.stanleyville.be/histoire.html gives something quite like that (and unlike this) as the colonial-era coat of arms. I'm not sure deletion is the right solution: if issue 1 can be addressed, then issue 2 might just be a matter of description. Jmabel ! talk 02:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- At the last link above there’s a very similar image—about the same size but sharper, and with what might be a copyright notice at the bottom (“© Mayoralty of Kisingani“ ? my eyes aren’t what they were), apparently painted out of our version—not far below the colonial shields, and captioned “The arms used in 2009 (no further info at the moment).”—Odysseus1479 (talk) 08:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Lots of copyrighted GUI and symbols (see COM:SS) ... FDMS 4 13:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Info: Added File:How to add an image.ogv to this RFD. FDMS 4 13:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC) ... which has been nominated for deletion before by an IP. However, I do not think de minimis applies here.
Deleted: FASTILY 08:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
information boards
[edit]- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Die Ausgrabungen der Jahre 1937-1938 von Emil Vogt auf dem Lindenhof 2013-04-03 15-30-05.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Die Ausgrabungen der Jahre 1937-1938 von Emil Vogt auf dem Lindenhof 2013-04-03 15-33-00.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Die Ausgrabungen der Jahre 1937-1938 von Emil Vogt auf dem Lindenhof 2013-04-03 15-33-01.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Frühneuzeitliches Bürgerhaus 2013-04-03 15-24-20.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Mittelalterliche Pfalzburg 2013-04-03 15-25-18.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Römisches Gebäude 2.-3.Jh. (Turicum) 2013-04-03 15-15-42.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Übersicht Lindenhof-Altstadt 2013-04-03 15-18-38.JPG
- File:Lindenhof-Keller - Übersicht Lindenhof-Altstadt und Kastell-Pfalz 2013-04-03 15-17-08.JPG
Images of information boards in Switzerland may not be covered by the freedom of panorama rule, as for that ”it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.“ --Abderitestatos (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion request by User:Abderitestatos, imho misreading missinterpretation of fop by User:Abderitestatos of Category:Turicum related topics. Please see also User talk:Abderitestatos as of May 8/10, 2014 as well as Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems User:Abderitestatos: repeatedly vandalisms, trolling, personal attacks, disruptive actions or what else ?? as of 14:49, 10. Mai 2014. thx and regards, Roland zh (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Apparently ok, covered by Swiss FOP -FASTILY 10:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)