Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_-Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-Billed_From-_Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-_2014-05-01_18-46.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_on_YouTube,_he_is_a_tech_YouTuber,_his_videos_went_viral_after_the_CEO_of_Apple_shared_his_video_on_Twitter-_Overnight_that_video_got_50,000_views-_Currently_he_has_70_2014-05-01_16-50.jpg){kind=link}
![45 File:Who put the "P" in pullin?-- Ever since 1100 B-C, everyone has been wondering - who put the "P" in pullin? Pullin's from all walks of life, have sesrched high and low to discover the ageless question who did p 2014-05-08 18-48.jpg](#File:Who_put_the_"P"_in_pullin?--_Ever_since_1100_B-C,_everyone_has_been_wondering_-_who_put_the_"P"_in_pullin?_Pullin's_from_all_walks_of_life,_have_sesrched_high_and_low_to_discover_the_ageless_question_who_did_p_2014-05-08_18-48.jpg){kind=link}
_(1977).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
no reason given for license, as uploader is not photographer h-stt !? 15:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Keep I am Nicole Graack and i am the photographer. The photo is a cutting of this photo: [1]. You will find my Name in the Header. You can send me a message via my contact form, i will confirm your message -- CNGFunWorld ! 17:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)- Keep until the OTRS request closes. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission now available. →Nagy 17:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Birth Name- Murad Ibrahim Al-hijazi-Born- March 15, 2001 (Age 13) -Jeddah, Saudi Arabia-Billed From- Jeddah, Saudi Arabia- 2014-05-01 18-46.jpg
[edit]_-Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-Billed_From-_Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-_2014-05-01_18-46.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-Billed_From-_Jeddah,_Saudi_Arabia-_2014-05-01_18-46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality, unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Die Datei verstösst angeblich gegen Urheberrechtsbestimmungen Ludecus (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Die Staatsbibliothek hat geschrieben:
„Bilder, die in Wikipedia bereitgestellt werden, werden in den „public domain“ überführt. Im Falle von Wikepedia bedeutet dies, daß eine kommerzielle Nachnutzung dieser Bilder erlaubt ist. Für eine solche kommerzielle Nachnutzung ist normalerweise eine Genehmigung der Bildagentur für Kunst, Kultur und Geschichte der Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz erforderlich, die jedoch nicht immer eingeholt wird, eben weil die Bilder bereits verfügbar sind. Auch die einhergehende Zahlung eines Nutzungshonorar ist in solchen Fällen nicht oder nur eingeschränkt möglich. Aus diesen Gründen darf die Dateigröße für Bilder, für die eine Veröffentlichungsgenehmigung in Wikipedia beantragt wird, nicht größer sein als 600 x 800 Pixel bei 72 dpi. Für die normalerweise kleinen Bilder in Wikipedia reicht diese Dateigröße aus, für eine kommerzielle Verwendung meist nicht.“
Wir bitten Sie daher, die Bilddatei von Thering in der Wikipedia auf 600 x 800 Pixel bei 72 dpi zu verkleinern.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Wolfgang Hamm
Handschriftenabteilung, Referat Einblattmaterialien, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz Diese Frage sollte diskutiert werden --Ludecus (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: obviously pd-old, copyfraud Didym (talk) 00:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Blurred image of something unidentifiable, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete It could be a closeup of fruit, i see no sense in this composition without clarification & intention. --Ras67 (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please delete it. --Luxetowiec (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Previously used to vandalise a page - this is not Adam Butcher the actor according to Google Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lupo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: election poster; no FOP for posters in Germany (not permanently installed) Yann (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as Lupo. Yann (talk) 10:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused selfie. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
No educational value, advertisement or unused user page image (Commons:Project scope). Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Uploaded accidentally Susannaanas (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The page in Flickr clearly states "All rights reserved by L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science 2014" José Gnudista (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Jalal Ahmed as known as (Zoom Ultra Tech) on YouTube, he is a tech YouTuber, his videos went viral after the CEO of Apple shared his video on Twitter- Overnight that video got 50,000 views- Currently he has 70 2014-05-01 16-50.jpg
[edit]_on_YouTube,_he_is_a_tech_YouTuber,_his_videos_went_viral_after_the_CEO_of_Apple_shared_his_video_on_Twitter-_Overnight_that_video_got_50,000_views-_Currently_he_has_70_2014-05-01_16-50.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_YouTube,_he_is_a_tech_YouTuber,_his_videos_went_viral_after_the_CEO_of_Apple_shared_his_video_on_Twitter-_Overnight_that_video_got_50,000_views-_Currently_he_has_70_2014-05-01_16-50.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Flag of uploader's fictional country. Qwertyus (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Map of uploader's fictional country. Qwertyus (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This is probably PD, but in any case, Chilean law requires that the author and source be acknowledged. It is certainly not in the power of the uploader to put a CC license on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim
Please, no delete, because this photograph is my , and is not copy.
The original paper is my and I am the owner.
I m waiting you answers Thanks
--Historiador1923 (talk) 22:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It turns out this is a speddy -- it has been deleted before for the same reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
copyvio (see watermark) -- Kaganer (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: you know the template {{Copyvio}}? JuTa 01:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
copyvio from http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ag/20040903a&page=6 -- Kaganer (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: you know the template {{Copyvio}}? JuTa 01:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Flag of uploader's fictional country, only serves to illustrate a hoax on enwiki. Qwertyus (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
copyvio from http://venominon.deviantart.com/art/Ziz-King-of-a-Thousand-Birds-294543424 -- Kaganer (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: you know the template {{Copyvio}}? JuTa 01:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Daily typical low quality penis spam by exhebitionists - in no way in an educational way usable.
Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused photo. Out of scope. Meisam (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:This is Jhoyce Ann Deguzman Pare- 12 years old girl- Born on March 09,2002- 2014-05-08 23-06.jpg
[edit]
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:This is cameron isaiah Roane-he is a real ass niggah and he always fuck bitchess and get money 2014-05-08 20-12.jpg
[edit]
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Who put the "P" in pullin?-- Ever since 1100 B-C, everyone has been wondering - who put the "P" in pullin? Pullin's from all walks of life, have sesrched high and low to discover the ageless question who did p 2014-05-08 18-48.jpg
[edit]
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Very low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation 178.10.104.124 17:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Complex logo JurgenNL (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation of media photo at [2]. MCaecilius (talk) 00:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:AndrewClaborn is a Male model-MMA fighter-Age 19-birthday 09-17-1993 -Height 6'4-Heritage Puerto Rican & black & Indian- 2013-11-21 00-58.jpg
[edit]
Unused user page image (Commons:Project scope). Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 02:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyright-protected non-free elements of Microsoft Windows. In addition, Firefox license is incompatible with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 10:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Probably de minimis. Suggested solution: removing Windows taskbar. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely not de minimis. Computer icons of File Explorer at full resolution and Windows Taskbar: Both are previously uploaded to Commons, the former is deleted through {{Copyvio}} and the latter through COM:DR. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Here is the link to deletion discussion that deleted taskbar: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 8 Taskbar.PNG. Oh, and since we already have equivalent screenshots without the controversial section, I advise adhering to the precautionary principle and delete this anyway. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot. FDMS 4 10:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lupo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: election poster; no FOP for posters in Germany (not permanently installed) Yann (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- This poster would qualify as {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- IMO, no. Delete Lupo 09:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Creative design. -- Meisam (talk) 13:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- IMO, no.
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright. --i.е. v-mail 13:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
bestaat in tegenstelling wat wordt vermeld niet enkel uit geometrische vormen Meerdervoort (talk) 07:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - {{PD-textlogo}} is van toepassing, bestaat slechts uit een paar letters met een contour - Jcb (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- De letter Q lijkt geen simpele geometrische vorm. --Meerdervoort (talk) 09:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Volgens ons beleid zijn lettertekens niet vatbaar voor copyright. Ook niet als ze een extra krulletje bevatten. Jcb (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- De letter Q lijkt geen simpele geometrische vorm. --Meerdervoort (talk) 09:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: looks like pd-text FASTILY 21:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Complex logo. JurgenNL (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete US-law ignores fonts but the Dutch law doesn't and the letter Q is complicated enough to have a copyright. most likely com:TOO in The Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by إسماعيل العلوي (talk · contribs)
[edit]User claims Own work but the images seem to be copyvios.
- File:Manzilat.jpeg
- File:Hammad.jpeg
- File:Maliki.jpeg
- File:Ahl sonna.jpeg
- File:El marghrawi.jpeg
- File:Teatr de marrakech.jpeg
Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused file with seemingly no purpose or source NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 14:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
_(1977).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1977).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
_(1977).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
_(1977).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution, possible promo image. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Species could not be identified, many better images of Lucilia existing. File is in use on identification page in german Wikipedia, where I asked for help to identify the fly and see whether the image may be useful. Biodehio (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Es lo que los incas creía que existía el cielo ,la tierra, el infierno o hanan pacha, kay pacha, ucu pacha 2013-11-21 22-19.jpg
[edit]
Poor quality image, maybe out of scope. Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, found a low resulation on here (http://www.sinemalar.com/sanatci/459204/caroline-ohara) ~ Nahid Talk 19:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused, low quality drawing of a house with many better alternatives available NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 14:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
first publicated here before : http://le-poulailler-gr.forumactif.org/viewimage.forum?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.servimg.com%2Fu%2Ff55%2F16%2F98%2F47%2F60%2Fcoq_bo25.jpg 78.234.174.105 08:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
This image is one of company's logo(homepage link http://www.inclux.com/ ). I think It couldn't being CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. DangSunM (talk) 00:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused file with vector alternative NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 16:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
unused file with vector alternative NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 16:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Not any part of the image is in focus. It's of too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Species could not be identified, many better images of Lucilia existing. File is in use on identification page in german Wikipedia, where I asked for help to identify the fly and see whether the image may be useful. Biodehio (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Dorian FitzGerald, La salle du trône, palais national de Queluz, Sintra, Portugal (2009).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
not a good picture; a better portrait picture showing Johannes Kornhuber was recently uploaded; please delete Chigejo (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The poor-quality filter removes any “educational purpose” this image may have (that’s why this image is not used on any project). There are much better alternatives. Fitoschido (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Viole le droit d'auteur. Thomas1313 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted film poster - no indication that this is releasable under a free license by the uploader. Storkk (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Some of the (presumably copyrighted) desktop theme is displayed under the transparent Aero theme (top) and unknown copyrighted icons plus user profile picture are shown at bottom left. Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 10:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by SVG, the original JPG pixel version is also present. Perhelion (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free post-WWII verses (author unknown). Eleassar (t/p) 20:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too fuzzy image depicting nothing educationally useful. Niklem (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Complex logo.
- File:FunX Logo.svg
- File:Radio 10 Gold logo.png
- File:Radio 10 Netherlands.png
- File:Radio 10.svg
- File:Radio 2 Logo.svg
JurgenNL (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, I have verified each of these 5 files and I'm afraid we disagree on the complexity of these logos. They are all PD-textlogos and PD-shapes. Cordially, Romain Rousseau (talk) 00:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Shading, color gradients, non basic shapes. Definatly com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep File:Radio 2 Logo.svg, the logo is basic shapes and text, the gradients aren't anything fancy enough to change that. The others should be deleted though. Fry1989 eh? 01:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted all excpet File:Radio 2 Logo.svg which may be simple enought. As I'm not sure for this file whether the TOO has been reached I prefer to keep and wait for a discussion focused only on this file. PierreSelim (talk) 09:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
book cover? cd cover? Lupo 08:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Image is likely a copyvio from http://www.mjemagazine.com/photos-yvonne-nelsons-munalisa-chinda-look-rukky-sandas-movie-premiere/ (Copyright 2014 - MJEMagazine. All Rights Reserved.) The uploader had the original image cleverly horizontally flipped, which resulted in no recognition by Google-Images. However, when I flipped to image back, it yielded a number of hits on Google[3]. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The animal figure in the logo may be over Commons:Threshold of originality. Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 22:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Sadly, this Hong Kong Government work in 1956 would be officially copyrighted through 2006-12-31 after the URAA copyright restoration in 1996, while not considered edict of government at s:zh:Wikisource:侵犯版权 dated in March 2014. An email from Hong Kong Government being sent to OTRS suggests that claiming longer USA copyright is possible, so I suggest moving this file to Canadian Wikilivres through 2051 and add Template:Wikilivres page when deleting here.:-( Jusjih (talk) 05:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Request temporary undeletion The file has yet to be transferred to Canadian Wikilivres.--Jusjih (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
not a simple text logo. Lupo 04:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina. Smooth_O (talk) 15:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Sculptural composition of 1992 by Tom Otterness. No FoP applicable. Niklem (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
copy of print article , so copyviol Bramfab (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Less than 70 years old to be PD in European Union and author of the art is alive. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
copy of print article , so copyviol Bramfab (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Less than 70 years old to be PD in European Union. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy of print article , so copyviol Bramfab (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Delete Less than 70 years old to be PD in European Union. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
copy of print article , so copyviol Bramfab (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Less than 70 years old to be PD in European Union and author of art is alive. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
copy of print article , so copyviol Bramfab (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Less than 70 years old to be PD in European Union. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Press image, copyvio of screen contents to begin with. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Screen content is PD-text. // Liftarn (talk)
- No it is not. It contains complex iconography. Besides, the image is a press image to begin with (dead giveaway is the placeholder carrier name) ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Why didn't you say so in the first place? Then it's a different matter. // Liftarn (talk)
- The fact that is a press image, and probably not user made, trumps any argument over pd-ineligibility. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Why didn't you say so in the first place? Then it's a different matter. // Liftarn (talk)
- No it is not. It contains complex iconography. Besides, the image is a press image to begin with (dead giveaway is the placeholder carrier name) ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Merian - Kranj.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 19:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
From [4] (in use at [5]). Not "own work", but I have no idea what the license should be, or whether this is just a copyvio. Is there something in Indian copyright law that would make such a map "free"? It was apparently produced by the "Sikkim State Council of Science & Technology" (stamp bottom left). Lupo 08:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
![[4]](http://ceosikkim.nic.in/images/Pictures/cons_f5.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, this image is copyrighted but I uploaded it to request map at Graphics Lab. Once new map is created, i would have requested deletion myself. Here:request Please keep until new map is created at Graphics Lab to replace current one. -Nizil Shah (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AxelHH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wie aus der Dateibeschreibung ersichtlich hat der Benutzer Micheal Gäbler das Foto aus dem Buch "Wilfried Rogasch: "Victoria & Albert, Vicky & The Kaiser. Ein Kapitel deutsch-englischer Familiengeschichte." Verlag Gerd Hatje, Ostfildern-Ruit 1997." gescannt. Und irrtümlich angenommen, der Hersteller des abgebildeten Gegenstandes ist über 70 Jahre tot. Es geht aber hier um den Urheber des Bildes, das nicht vor über 70 Jahren aufgenommen wurde, da noch kein Farbfilm. --AxelHH (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Yann (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Picture is a scan of a foto in a book. --AxelHH (talk) 10:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Und mit welcher Begründung? Es ist ein Urheberrechtsverstoß, Fotos aus einem Buch zu scannen, die nicht über 100 Jahre alt sind. --AxelHH (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well the image is definatly not a hundred years old. The ornaments are pd of course. Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Patent application is from 2005, and only applications before 1989 is PD →AzaToth 21:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment – can we see a link to info supporting the statement about what patent drawings are PD? Dicklyon (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
derivative work from the ad covering the bus Lupo 08:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Would you explain why my photo is up for deletion?--Nascarking (talk) 23:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- The ad covering the whole bus is a copyrighted work. Photos of that ad could be published under a free license only if the copyright owner on the ad agreed, or if the ad was only incidentally included in the photo (see de minimis). This is not the case here. Lupo 05:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I meant to upload it under a license to put it into the public domain but the Commons app on my phone won't let me change it. Can I change it from the file page or should I upload it again with the public domain license?--Nascarking (talk) 12:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you are the copyright owner of the advertisement, send a formal release via OTRS. Otherwise, your re-licensing won't change anything. "Public domain" is a kind of free license, too, and would again need the consent of the copyright owner of the ad. Lupo 13:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Close, but different from the actual version. Also, very bad quality. —Andrei S. Talk 08:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Otberg as Speedy (SLA) Yann (talk) 09:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- The map ist obviously nonsense, propaganda without any sources - such a "modern Greater Israel" does not exist at all --Otberg (talk) 09:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a map of Israel in 1982, just before the end of the Lebanon war and before the return of the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt --Hruska (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
The name is wrong, this card is true but (read above) --Hruska (talk) 10:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- This is no map of Israel, it is just propaganda. Do you realy think Israel conquered and controlled the whole Lebanon in 1982? --Otberg (talk) 17:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Otberg. No instructional purpose, does not accurately depict any moment in time. --GRuban (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/8b/20140509033007%21Mayores_-_Liguilla_80-81.jpg Garrasta (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- What is the reason of the nomination? --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 11:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- A valid cause would be, that the photographer is definetly not 70 years dead, so the image is not free (there is nothing said in the desriptions of a special case, that would cause the freedom). But the link is a bad joke as cause. Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As above but the statement of the nominator is not correct Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Jpeg format unsuitable for this type of logo (transparency, ...). Also incorrect interpretation (correct s. File:America FC-SJ (A1) - SP.svg). OAlexander (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
_-_SP.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Derivated from File:Neil Armstrong pose.jpg: out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Ferdinand Runk - most na Savi pri Črnučah (kolorirana jedkanica, 1815).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 23:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Jpeg format unsuitable for this type of logo (transparency, ...). Replacment available: File:América Futebol Clube (SP) logo.svg). OAlexander (talk) 13:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AxelHH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wie aus der Dateibeschreibung ersichtlich hat der Benutzer Micheal Gäbler das Foto aus dem Buch "Wilfried Rogasch: "Victoria & Albert, Vicky & The Kaiser. Ein Kapitel deutsch-englischer Familiengeschichte." Verlag Gerd Hatje, Ostfildern-Ruit 1997." gescannt. Und irrtümlich angenommen, der Hersteller des abgebildeten Gegenstandes ist über 70 Jahre tot. Es geht aber hier um den Urheber des Bildes, das nicht vor über 70 Jahren aufgenommen wurde, da noch kein Farbfilm. --AxelHH (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Yann (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Picture is a scan of a foto in a book. --AxelHH (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Und mit welcher Begründung? Es ist ein Urheberrechtsverstoß, Fotos aus einem Buch zu scannen, die nicht über 100 Jahre alt sind. --AxelHH (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well the image is definatly not a hundred years old. The ornaments are pd of course. Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
File:William Wilberforce01.jpg Jonund (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Image to different, invalid reason (especially no reason). -- Perhelion (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused user page image (Commons:Project scope). Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Although being a low-resolution image, it can be used and it isn't blurred like some other images. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
File without a description by a one-time uploader. I cannot understand why not deleted before. E4024 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
This is probably PD, but in any case, Chilean law requires that the author and source be acknowledged. It is certainly not in the power of the uploader to put a CC license on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim
Please, no delete, because this photograph is my , and is not copy.
The original paper is my and I am the owner.
I m waiting you answers Thanks
--Historiador1923 (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry but... I doubt very seriously you were the photographer, unless you're 137 years old. Obviously this is a derivated work. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Markus Pernhart - Triglav III.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 19:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AxelHH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wie aus der Dateibeschreibung ersichtlich hat der Benutzer Micheal Gäbler das Foto aus dem Buch "Wilfried Rogasch: "Victoria & Albert, Vicky & The Kaiser. Ein Kapitel deutsch-englischer Familiengeschichte." Verlag Gerd Hatje, Ostfildern-Ruit 1997." gescannt. Und irrtümlich angenommen, der Hersteller des abgebildeten Gegenstandes ist über 70 Jahre tot. Es geht aber hier um den Urheber des Bildes, das nicht vor über 70 Jahren aufgenommen wurde, da noch kein Farbfilm. --AxelHH (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Yann (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Picture is a scan of a foto in a book. --AxelHH (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well the image is definatly not a hundred years old. The ornaments are pd of course. Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Jpeg format generally unsuitable for this type of logo (transparency, artefacts, ...). Disputable author information. Replaced with File:CE Lejaedense (RS).svg. OAlexander (talk) 06:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Not a reason to delete the original file to me. Just add the template {{Vector version available|File:CE Lejaedense (RS).svg}} (or {{SVG available|File:CE Lejaedense (RS).svg}} as shortcut) to File:Lajeadense Escudo.jpg. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Due to lack of features like transparency Jpeg is an unsuitable for this type of logo, especially as it is round. I also wsh to annotate, that this logo only served as preview image on the vector download site. Transferring varying types of vector logos to the required SVG format is not everybody's forte. I appreciate the initial upload of the Jpeg insofar, as it made a halfway decent logo for the infobox available where there otherwise would have been none. I don not think, that essentially useless legacy object should be retained forever, as also they take time to administer when labeling properly, categorising, etc. This logo is not even worth the time to annotate it with a tag that a better version is available. It a waste of time. This logo has no whatsoever realistically conceivable future use, apart from reaching 22 million objects on Commons a few seconds earlier. OAlexander (talk) 14:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AxelHH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wie aus der Dateibeschreibung ersichtlich hat der Benutzer Micheal Gäbler das Foto aus dem Buch "Wilfried Rogasch: "Victoria & Albert, Vicky & The Kaiser. Ein Kapitel deutsch-englischer Familiengeschichte." Verlag Gerd Hatje, Ostfildern-Ruit 1997." gescannt. Und irrtümlich angenommen, der Hersteller des abgebildeten Gegenstandes ist über 70 Jahre tot. Es geht aber hier um den Urheber des Bildes, das nicht vor über 70 Jahren aufgenommen wurde, da noch kein Farbfilm. --AxelHH (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Yann (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Picture is a scan of a foto in a book. --AxelHH (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Und mit welcher Begründung? Es ist ein Urheberrechtsverstoß, Fotos aus einem Buch zu scannen, die nicht über 100 Jahre alt sind. --AxelHH (talk) 20:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well the image is definatly not a hundred years old. The ornaments are pd of course. Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lupo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: election poster; no FOP for posters in Germany (not permanently installed) Yann (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- This poster would qualify as {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- IMO, no. Delete Lupo 09:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- IMO, no.
Deleted: Already deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This is probably PD, but in any case, Chilean law requires that the author and source be acknowledged. It is certainly not in the power of the uploader to put a CC license on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim Please, no delete, because this photograph is my , and is not copy. The original paper is my and I am the owner.
I m waiting you answers Thanks
--Historiador1923 (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
This is probably PD, but in any case, Chilean law requires that the author and source be acknowledged. It is certainly not in the power of the uploader to put a CC license on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim Please, no delete, because this photograph is my , and is not copy. The original paper is my and I am the owner.
I m waiting you answers Thanks
--Historiador1923 (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victorious (sitcom)
[edit]Maybe fair use as per en:File:Victorious-logo2.png.
Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nathalie kate reca ranque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused user page images (Commons:Project scope).
Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Regardless of not having been added to the user’s page, these are nonetheless interesting and valuable images of a subject for which we do not have enough items featuring non-celebrities in everyday situations, such as these two photos. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Tuválkin is right, we can use them in several categories. --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 02:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Cool, but you need
{{withdraw}}, not{{vk}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)- Done. Thank you, Tuválkin! --Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Cool, but you need
Deleted: Withdrawn Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nathalie kate reca ranque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal images outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Additional comment: I fail to see any self-identification by the person with the subject. In such case we definitely should delete it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Six months later, I cannot find the mentioned self-identification, I may have confused this with something else. In which case, I’d agree with Dharmadhyaksha and support the deletion of File:Reca ranque wash day.jpg, as a trivial snapshot, and the keeping of File:Reca ranque.jpg, which is nontheless interesting, even if the subject is non-notable in any other way. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Six months later, I cannot find the mentioned self-identification, I may have confused this with something else. In which case, I’d agree with Dharmadhyaksha and support the
Deleted: the first image, kept the second image. Natuur12 (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edwansogamoso (talk · contribs)
[edit]All other uploads deleted as (c) vios. I doubt that the remaining three are own work as claimed.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amararshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused user page images (Commons:Project scope).
Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
edit conflict:
- Keep File:Ahmad Ammar Azzam.jpg, at least while it is the only one we have showing the Istambul Crowne Plaza hotel.
- Keep File:MTD.jpg: This is an interesting posed shot, akin to several others and usable for many situations concerning young personell and their civilian elder kin. We need more info about this photo, though: I cannot even ascertain if it is in Malaysia or in Indonesia.
Eitherway, kudos to Varied Surf Igloo for nominating unused profile page photos only months after they were uploaded, not from yesterday’s batch, like some people do. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not a photo album. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amararshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep File:Ahmad Ammar Azzam.jpg, at least while it is the only one we have showing the Istambul Crowne Plaza hotel.
- Keep File:MTD.jpg: This is an interesting posed shot, akin to several others and usable for many situations concerning young personell and their civilian elder kin. We need more info about this photo, though: I cannot even ascertain if it is in Malaysia or in Indonesia.
Out of scope personal images -FASTILY 22:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. Based on an old png which was incorrectly identified as public domain (tagged as PD-self but actually from http://www.tinganes.fo). The Faroe Islands made it very clear that this is copyrighted at http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=94&artikel=5541510 and http://www.svt.se/nyheter/regionalt/ostnytt/vapenkrig-mellan-faroarna-och-gotland (where they were complaining about derivative uses here and on Wikipedia). Lokal_Profil 15:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
I've replaced most of the images which were derived from this but the following are still left:
File:Escudo_de_Huerta_de_Arriba.svg by @Asqueladd:(replaced by free alternative)- File:Flag_of_Gotland_lan.png by @Juergenk59:
- File:Gotland_flag.svg by @Fornax:
The last two are however unused and largely superseded by File:Gotlands län vapenflagga.svg which is based on a free image. /Lokal_Profil 15:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
@Lokal Profil: Hi. I don't really know about the procedure here. Should I upload a new version using a ram from a free source in the same filename, or should I upload it under another name? Cheers.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Asqueladd: I would replace the current one with one using a ram from a free source (you can use the new one at File:Gotland vapen.svg if you think it's ok), and upload it under the same filename. /Lokal_Profil 14:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Done@Lokal Profil: I've already replaced that ram by another ram edited by me from the ram appearing in File:Escudo de Mestanza (Ciudad Real).svg (by Erlenmeyer). Thanks. :) (File:Escudo de Huerta de Arriba.svg)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep The coat of arms is a derivative itself ancient origin (coat of arms of Gotland) and the blazon dates back to at least the 15th century. The link provided by Lokal Profil actually confirms this derivation. It is too old. Fry1989 eh? 01:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- The blazon is old but this drawing is very much modern (2003) and under copyright (as my links point out). The reason for why the images in the second link look similar is because the Gotland CoA shown there is one which Wikipedians made based on the Faroe CoA which is now being nominated. Making an original interpretation of something old never the less gives that new artwork copyright protection. /Lokal_Profil 17:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if it's a modern drawing if it is a derivative work of the coat of arms of Gotland which is PD-old, and it is. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- A derivative (with sufficient originality) of a PD-old work gains full copyright protection, there is nothing special about Coat of Arms which changes this. As an example take Disney's Aladdin or Pride Predjudice and Zombies which are both based on a PD-old works. As for sufficient originality that bar is painfully low so even if your image is restricted to containing a silver ram on a blue field there are plenty of original ways of making such an image.
- Of course if you can find the original PD-old image then that would be free to use. /Lokal_Profil 17:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Per the link you yourself provided, it's the exact same drawing as the coat of arms of Gotland minus the banner that the animal is holding. There is nothing new, nothing original. Fry1989 eh? 18:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if it's a modern drawing if it is a derivative work of the coat of arms of Gotland which is PD-old, and it is. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- The blazon is old but this drawing is very much modern (2003) and under copyright (as my links point out). The reason for why the images in the second link look similar is because the Gotland CoA shown there is one which Wikipedians made based on the Faroe CoA which is now being nominated. Making an original interpretation of something old never the less gives that new artwork copyright protection. /Lokal_Profil 17:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per Lokal Profil.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Lokal_Profil's source does not show what they claim it shows, but rather the opposite. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- I can tell you that is not a 15th century ram. And I don't even have a special eye for sheep.--Asqueladd (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be, it is a derivative and there lies the importance. Fry1989 eh? 20:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- But the process of creating a derivative work usually creates new authorship rights. If it isn't a scan, a trimming, or some other process with little originality (per sweat of the brow), of course. Or so I thought.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Not if there is not anything new, and I don't see anything new. All they did was change the shield and take away the banner. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Fry: Not sure if you fully understand. The two images shown at [6] are the same yes. The one to the right was made by a Wikipedian based on the one to the left. The one on the left is the one being nominated for deletion because that is the one which was made by a professional artist in 2003. (meanwhile the one on the right has been replaced with a new version). /Lokal_Profil 08:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- What I understand is that the coat of arms of Gotland is PD and that it and the coat of arms of the Faroes are (essentially) the same. Therefore the Faroes coat of arms, which was only adopted in 2004, would be a derivative of the older Gotland image, and PD as such. Fry1989 eh? 18:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The contents of the CoA are PD (it's a simple textual description) but the only PD designs of it here are File:Gotlands läns vapen.png and File:Gottlands vapen - Nordisk familjebok.png. Neither of which bears much resemblance to the image nominated for deletion. Your argument if taken out of the Coat of Arms situation is one where if there is one PD image of the Statue of Liberty then all other images of it are (essentially) the same and must therefore be PD, an argument which does not hold. /Lokal_Profil 07:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- No, my argument is that taking something that is already PD and removing one element (as opposed to adding a new element) does not garnish it new copyright. That's a very strong argument. Fry1989 eh? 17:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- The contents of the CoA are PD (it's a simple textual description) but the only PD designs of it here are File:Gotlands läns vapen.png and File:Gottlands vapen - Nordisk familjebok.png. Neither of which bears much resemblance to the image nominated for deletion. Your argument if taken out of the Coat of Arms situation is one where if there is one PD image of the Statue of Liberty then all other images of it are (essentially) the same and must therefore be PD, an argument which does not hold. /Lokal_Profil 07:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- What I understand is that the coat of arms of Gotland is PD and that it and the coat of arms of the Faroes are (essentially) the same. Therefore the Faroes coat of arms, which was only adopted in 2004, would be a derivative of the older Gotland image, and PD as such. Fry1989 eh? 18:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Fry: Not sure if you fully understand. The two images shown at [6] are the same yes. The one to the right was made by a Wikipedian based on the one to the left. The one on the left is the one being nominated for deletion because that is the one which was made by a professional artist in 2003. (meanwhile the one on the right has been replaced with a new version). /Lokal_Profil 08:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Not if there is not anything new, and I don't see anything new. All they did was change the shield and take away the banner. Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- But the process of creating a derivative work usually creates new authorship rights. If it isn't a scan, a trimming, or some other process with little originality (per sweat of the brow), of course. Or so I thought.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be, it is a derivative and there lies the importance. Fry1989 eh? 20:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- I can tell you that is not a 15th century ram. And I don't even have a special eye for sheep.--Asqueladd (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Lokal_Profil's source does not show what they claim it shows, but rather the opposite. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
![[6]](http://www.svt.se/cachable_image/1369222568/svts/article1241878.svt/alternates/large/vapenkrig.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no good reason to believe that these could be potentially copyright FASTILY 21:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
