Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 20th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copy vio NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yep. JuTa 20:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted as part of a mass deletion; all iamges from this uploader appear to be copyvios HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, speedily deleted as vandalism. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and overexposed. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, low quality vulva. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too blurry to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file was so blurry, that without filename I could not see two people (only one). Taivo (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, it's really hard to see the details of this vagina. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, low quality vulva. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by File:Flag_of_German_Reich_(1935–1945).svg. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not out of scope (see id:Valentino Simanjuntak), but definitely a copyvio. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no permission (no permission since) MPF (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Do we? Taivo (talk) 13:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's the flag of Suriname, of course we do! Do you think I'm so lazy that I would just say that without checking or knowing for sure first? Fry1989 eh? 18:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, superseded by File:Flag of Suriname.svg. There was nowhere word "Suriname" neither in file page nor in deletion request. Generally would be better, when you show replacement file in every your deletion request of duplicates. Taivo (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Road-Marking-Machines.jpg CombatWombat42 (talk) 03:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not actually duplicate, you cropped it and removed watermark. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture and it's titles were incorrectly listed. Jdaish002 (talk) 04:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution and the uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is almost certainly not the work of the person in the image, as claimed. Source links to an European Facebook equivalent that indicates no authorship or license. Image therefore lacks adequate source and author information. Also, image has no metadata, making it further suspect as a copyright infringement. KDS4444 (talk) 05:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Schnaxvit claimed the author to be Elvira T, this is the uploader's only contribution ... no need to wait, this must be copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed Digital2social (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file Digital2social (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Screenshot of news broadcast. Wylve (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, file description is "Screen capture". This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sure about copyright permission Cincell (talk) 09:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I am also not sure, this can be in public domain due to age, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its company logo and I am going to upload it from uploading logos section. M Umair Hashmi (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Jcb due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" ???? 24.134.38.2 10:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Blogspot is not uploader's own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gujarati newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader stated: "Date – No idea, But too old. Source – News Paper. Author – don't know. Other versions – No. Permission – no." This is not good. If the photo consists newspaper website address, then it is definitely not old photo. In addition, this is not a true story, but a hoax. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, published in Soviet Union in 1978 -> not free. Taivo (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As of a 3/27/12 court case (against WMF), stamps in Germany are not PD. If the image of Einstein is PD, then this stamp would be OK, but that will have to be proven. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Photo by Fred Stein (1909-1967) taken in 1946 in Princeton. The estate of Fred Stein claims the copyright. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, obviously not OK. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, only used on user page, similar svg version available File:Kynurenine.svg. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 11:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree media, see google images Indeedous (talk) 12:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Jcb due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big photo, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The uploader is not photographer, but the person depicted on photo. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, photo about young man, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, so small photos (108×144 pixels) are useless. No metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, photo about child, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file format, low quality, incorrect structure, unused as of time of deletion request, superseded by file:Synthesis of QR.jpg. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, both. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. In addition very bad quality, I do not understand even, what kind of sport is this. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope, vandalism, unlikely to be own work Indeedous (talk) 12:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I do not see any vandalism here, but the photo is small and has no metadata, the uploader's only contribution, ordinary photo about a man. Taivo (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, big photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Very bad composition, nothing recognizable. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer required 2.97.161.109 12:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, stupid request. The file is used 122 times in 33 projects. Taivo (talk) 20:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small file with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Nothing special in my opinion. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also no camera data. Taivo (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, a lot of non-notable young people. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small selfie with bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, very beautiful couple. I hope, that they live luckily together a lot of years. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Bad quality, promotional. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, beautiful people, but ... Commons has a lot of photos about beautiful people. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has an (incorrect) copyright notice on the actual file; we have two copies of the file without the notice in Category:Christ in the House of Simon by Dieric Bouts Fram (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je viens de voir votre message; je ne comprends pas où est le problème. Pourquoi la notice de copyright est-elle incorrecte ? Parce que je n'ai pas spécifié que l'œuvre est vieille ? Ou pour une autre raison ? Merci de m'informer pour que je m'améliore. Il y a deux autres exemplaires du même tableau, provenant de sources différentes, et cela est-il gênant d'en avoir un troisième ? Cordialement, --ManiacParisien 18:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Commons has a lot of photos about cute babies. Taivo (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivated work ; from various origin (see http://www.shutterstock.com/fr/pic-85522312/stock-photo-serious-students-sitting-for-an-examination-in-an-amphitheater.html ) --MGuf (d) 15:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Yann due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by HJ Mitchell. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 17:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by HJ Mitchell. Taivo (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist. (Bad childish drawing.) Taivo (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 24.134.38.2 17:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, "© LITRA" in lower left corner. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contriburion. Taivo (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not the best wife, although maybe the best lunch. The uploader's only contribution. File has no metadata. Taivo (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution and no metadata. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. I delete also File:EŞREF ŞAHİN 2014-01-02 22-06.jpg, which is also out of scope. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image (or at least no information about that person), out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the photo is not big and it has no metadata. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution, vandalistic filename. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution, bad composition (and no wife on photo). Taivo (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like personal image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Was in use in kowiki, however file title says it is from facebook, so copyright violation. —레비Revi 09:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no metadata, inadequate description, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no metadata, tghe uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, here are Ded Moroz (Old Frost, Santa Claus) and Snegurochka (Little Snowflake, Santa's Little Helper), but the third person between them makes the photo out of scope. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems copied from http://www.urbanrail.net/am/reci/recife.htm Ale Sasso (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Jcb due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems copied from http://www.urbanrail.net/am/reci/recife.htm Ale Sasso (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Jcb due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I delete also File:Lethikasenthilkumar 2014-01-19 01-54.jpg. Neither of them is big, they have no metadata and they depict sitting girl. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, at first become famous, then come back. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, at first become famous, then come back. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. In addition, the cups on photo can be copyrighted artworks. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big photo, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что это случайность Dibaal2804 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution (except this deletion request). Taivo (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also no metadata and the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, image promotes to visit the uploader's facebook page and to e-mail him. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. There is website address in lower left corner. Taivo (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Young man sits behind chessboard and looks on viewer. There are white chesspieces on beginning position. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, vandalism, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no vandalism here, simply small blurry photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. This clothing is unsuitable for weddings. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, vandalism, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no vandalism here, but the photo is not big and has no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, another young man hugging his guitar. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big photo, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no information, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, blurry photo with no metadata. A young man hugging a guitar. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, big blurry photo about 3 guys, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, usually rappers show another finger. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, two students sleeping during lecture, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Superseded by almost similar, clearer image File:Vistas de Alicante.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, деколте видно, новый год нет. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry images of Michaelertrakt, Vienna by Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram

[edit]

the images are blurry, and unusable as we have a set of much better ones in Category:Michaelertrakt of the same subject. COM:SCOPE

Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata and bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aigrisse Yohan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self-promotion, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, but one KEPT, because quite surprisingly this was used in pl.wiktionary. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asifali186 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused selfportraits

24.134.38.2 17:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EVGENIYA DEDE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Советую личные фотографии складывать не сюда, а в Фейсбук или в куда-нибудь такое место. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very heavy self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private images, missing essential information, nonsense-categorization

Indeedous (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If I recall correctly I nominated some files with some similar names in the past for deletion. I suggest blocking the uploader, and, of course, all of these pictures should be deleted because of their self-promotional nature. --küñall (nütramyen) 05:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Looks ads like. --Achim (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Krd 17:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Can't be own work if uploader is visible on images. No use for Commons due to lack of information about what the photos depict / location / etc..

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted as before. --Krd 12:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HMDT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos, presumably copyrightable.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, they are not simple logos. All are unused. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrleministre33204 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wine label and bottle "product shot" style is a possible COM:COPYVIO. The two logos are more complicated than plain text and one of them is over written "www.alisorossi.com" making these promotional images and possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photos have no metadata. Probably they are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. Maybe the best pink nails, but no salon here. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, big photo with no metadata. Quality is bad (color balance, photo is very red). An old man with reindeer horns (such cap). Taivo (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no Deepika Padukone here (or maybe the sunglasses are Deepika Padukone)? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. Man sits on hill slope. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image or useless, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, very blurry, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, boy with guitar, bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, scaled-down File:Serra at an autograph signing in December 2013- 2014-01-26 18-18.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. A young man making handbra. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, blurry, bad composition. Great teachers usually don't look like that. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. A man holding a black box in hands. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big, no metadata, watermark, ®™, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, low quality selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, low quality selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, big photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. This is not a selfie (both hands in pockets). Taivo (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, not big, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, promotional filename. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution, does not look like bad guy at all. But maybe future mad scientist? Taivo (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The image is in use on the uploader's en.wiki page, which would generally be sufficient to keep the image. However, the custom of allowing a minimal number of personal images is made in the spirit of community building. Given that this user is indef blocked on the Commons for copyvios and sockpuppetery and that his en.wiki contributions are so bizarre that they may be vandalism (e.g., [1],[2],[3]), I'm not convinced this user is here genuinely to be a member of the community. I don't see any reason to host the image at this time. Эlcobbola talk 21:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, this image is the small image with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion; article has been deleted from English Wikipedia, see links from en:User_talk:Amit.shekhar66 Fayenatic london (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Most likely derivated from a TV/film/video exhibition. Gunnex (talk) 08:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. I suspect copyright violation Taivo (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine deletion request for small photo with no metadata. Is Jameswenfanclub really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version? Taivo (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Just some bill, not likely to be used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Per Commons:Project scope. The file is a invoice. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sounds not very encycopedic 24.134.38.2 16:22, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution, horrible quality. Taivo (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, so copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product shot of recognizable wine labels may be COM:COPYVIOs. Image is unused and categorized in a non-existent category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-AR-Movie}}-fail ("At least 50 years have passed after the death of the script writer, producer and director of this movie") related to the 1958 Argentine film es:El trueno entre las hojas, considering es:Armando Bó (director, 1914—1981) and/or es:Augusto Roa Bastos (script writer, 1917—2005). Not in PD in Argentina or elsewhere. Gunnex (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 24.134.38.2 09:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Bogus license. Yann (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to have this file deleted as I believe this image is subject to copyright. I uploaded this image when I was a minor and from my memory have tried to have this image deleted on the basis that I never took it (from memory a friend took it and then I used it) and also on the basis that I was a minor at the time when I uploaded this, hence would like to have it voided on the basis that I was a minor at the time, and took no steps to affirm the contract as an adult (from memory, I even tried to delete it). As such, my licence is voidable, especially since it is entirely negative against me. 7physc (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the Gingerbread Man from the movie franchise "Shrek" for chrissakes, it's obviously under copyright. "reviewed on 30 December 2011 by the FlickreviewR robot and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0." Well that robot needs an oil change. Herostratus (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: a selfie Capmo (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And what about the four images in Category:Monument to Bulhakov in Bucha? Jee 12:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing problem. Uploader is propably not the author, needs permission via OTRS-system. Htm (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can the author be anonymous, if the author is A.M. Remizov? When Remizov died? Is it really published in USA, although made in France? Taivo (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The author, Aleksey Mikhailovich Remizov, died in 1957. The portrait was done in France in 1930. INeverCry 19:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot for [[4]] YouTube film, unlikely to be uploader's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fuera de los objetivos del proyecto. Imágen sin contexto- Facu89 (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof for license. FunkMonk (talk) 02:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per File:Miley Cyrus 2009 VH1 Divas 3.jpg (this image was uploaded under a false claim to ownership while the other image is released under a cc-by-sa-2.0 license. This image should be removed. Lady Lotus (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, no date. Yann (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine deletion request for small photo with no metadata. Is Launchpadx really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version? Taivo (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wine lable and bottle "product shot" style is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Ljubljana: non-free graffito. Eleassar (t/p) 22:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork created by uploader. Questionable educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" ???? 24.134.38.2 11:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not big photo, no metadata, author is mdl70, but uploader is Danzig82. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep sorry, file in use --Indeedous (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Fastily as no license. INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a scan from unknown newspaper/magazine (details from the reverse side visible). Gunnex (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine deletion request for small photo with no metadata. Is Maxkloot the real photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version? Taivo (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely own work. maybe copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wine lable and bottle "product shot" style is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not used amywhere and not likely to be used Mbch331 (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Well, there is a license, but this is small photo with no metadata, this is the uploader's only contribution and I do not want to believe, that the photo is made in current century. Taivo (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, but this is apparently modern relief. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, bad quality Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonnotable, self-promotional content, with no educational value under Commons:Scope. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing problem. Uploader is propably not the author, needs permission via OTRS-system. Htm (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern stained glass from Ljubljana Cathedral (work either by I. Vurnik, d. 1971, or S. Kregar, d. 1973), copyrighted. Eleassar (t/p) 21:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no infos provided, could be private photo Indeedous (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a video screenshot taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFpjXo1H9Yg (07.2011, by victoriangeles, around 03:20) Gunnex (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't have a context. Facu89 (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Big photo with metadata, can be used as stock photo. I added Category:Men at work. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INeverCry 19:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be primarily a picture of a copyrighted sculpture ("Hammering Man"). No FOP for sculptures in the U.S. Jmabel ! talk 16:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be primarily a picture of a copyrighted sculpture ("Hammering Man"). No FOP for sculptures in the U.S. Jmabel ! talk 16:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably spam Facu89 (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image has been used in her official web site. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

couldn't upload عبد المؤمن (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't have a context Facu89 (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern stained glass from Ljubljana Cathedral (work either by I. Vurnik, d. 1971, or S. Kregar, d. 1973), copyrighted. Eleassar (t/p) 21:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Xthjan

[edit]

Here are both photos, uploaded by Xthjan (talk · contribs):

They are not big and they have no metadata. In addition, author of the photos is Fernando Bolaños Cruz, not Xthjan. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Sachidananda Saikia

[edit]

Here are last files, uploaded by Sachidananda Saikia (talk · contribs) and not yet deleted:

They are small photos with no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnnyBree (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused self-promotional images.

Jespinos (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Tunisian boy

[edit]

Here are both photos, uploaded by Tunisian boy (talk · contribs) and not yet deleted:

They are small and have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. The uploader is person depicted on photos and they are not selfies. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Tim5285

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by Tim5285 (talk · contribs):

They have no metadata and they are not big. All files have different resolution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Zarghun11

[edit]

Here are the last files, uploaded by Zarghun11 (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:

They are small photos and they have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:El Lider Del Romance

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by El Lider Del Romance (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:

These photos are in scope, because depicted person is notable. However, the photos are not big and they have no metadata. The uploader is not photographer, but person depicted on photos. They can be copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jimmy Jefferson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected License laundering.

Jespinos (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrickjohannes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old pictures, no date, no source.

Yann (talk) 08:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Theborderdweller

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by Theborderdweller (talk · contribs):

They are not big photos and they have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation.


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danny Glover K (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private image, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Zak abdi

[edit]

Zak Abdi (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are small photos with no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:אילן קוסטיקה

[edit]

אילן קוסטיקה (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

I think, that police officer Yoram Ochayon is a non-notable person. The last is a derivative work of apparently copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Actresses from Argentina with an URAA-problem

[edit]

Argentine works, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years.

1970-1979 ("1970s")
1972
1975
1976
1977
1979
< 1980 ("anterior a 1980"/before 1980)
1980
1981
1982
< 1983 ("anterior a 1983"/before 1983)
1984

Gunnex (talk) 12:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to this manifesto published by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation on February 20 [5] "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices". Banfield - Amenazas aquí 18:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As nominator (and one of the - currently - most active URAA-Argentina related analyzer), just my two cents: 1st of all --> URAA is clearly a mess for Commons. The main and/or most important discussion involving URAA-issues took place in 02.2012 via Commons:Deletion requests/All files copyrighted in the US under the URAA. The output of the discussion was "we do not want to delete all tagged files en masse", apparently based on all transclusions of Not-PD-US-URAA (3475 files in 02.2012). Discussion archived in 02.2012, WMF added meta:Wikilegal/Use of Foreign Works Restored under the URAA on Commons in 12.2013 to this request, resuming "(...) Unless permission is given by the author or copyright holder, these works should not be posted on Commons pursuant to US law and community policies." The problem is: The {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}-transclusions are unreal. Since 12.2013 my main focus is working on Argentina-related categorized files and - apart from the +hundreds of non-URAA-related copyvios detected - there are hundreds (if not thousands) of Argentina related files with an URAA-problem —> NOT tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} (and where I mostly closed my eyes —> my DR´s are created quite arbitrarily in this matter). Only in the 119 sub-categories of Category:Actresses from Argentina (not part of this DR) I suppose +30-50 50-100 files which could have an URAA-problem. Resuming: URAA-impact most likely underestimated + lack of practical WMF-orientation over several years. Gunnex (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The paragraph cited express an opinion/statement, but the legal situation is the same. As far as I know, the US Supreme Court did not change the verdict so the copyrights restored are still into force. Furthermore, the same article clear that the WM servers are located in the US. - Fma12 (talk) 03:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: These files are still protected by copyright FASTILY 00:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of the depicted advertisement poster. Italy has no FOP exemption. Thereby a copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is not de minimis. The poster is main object. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern sculptural work. Eleassar (t/p) 22:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - not a sculptural work. --Sporti (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is a 3D-design and is decorative, therefore a sculpture. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Natuur12 (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either this is public domain by virtue of being "simple" or it is a non-free logo. If the outcome of the discussion is "delete" check to see if it is in use on an article in the English Wikipedia. If it is, please copy it over there before deleting it. Of course, if it is free, then close as "free" and change the licence and add an appropriate trademark template. Davidwr (talk) 22:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Kimmyfari

[edit]

Here are all files, uploaded by Kimmyfari (talk · contribs) and mot yet presented for deletion:

Twice here are small files with no metadata and I suspect copyright violation. And I do not believe, that the uploader is author of school logo. The logo surpasses threshold of originality, so OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC) I have no idea of the terms that you are using. There is no copyright violation if you want i can forward the number of the school and the ministry of education of jamaica so you can talk to someone on this matter. it is open i run the page for the school hence i have access. what else![reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Structures of naphtalene in 2D in PNG format

[edit]
Unused
With any use

Superseded by File:Naphthalene-2D-Skeletal.svg, File:Naphthalene.svg and File:Naphthalin.svg. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 21:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S3b4s5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, multiple personalities (author = "maria.luzi", "Mariana Verdún", "Emilce Ro").

File:Carta orgánica de Posadas.png most likely grabbed & cropped from misionesonline.net (2010, © 2000-2014 Misiones OnLine All rights reserved Todos los derechos reservados) = http://molstatic1.com.ar/uploads/videos/h/JURA%20NUEVA%20CARTA%20ORGANICA.jpg (internal error)

Gunnex (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please attend also the lost deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:S3b4s5 related to Uruguayan works configured with a 1968 source which are most unlikely PD in Uruguay (+50 pma or +50 publication by anonymous or pseudonymous). See also copyright notice at http://www.periodicas.edu.uy/o/Capitulo_Oriental/pdfs/Capitulo_Oriental_25.pdf (last page). Gunnex (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable school. Out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I think, that every school is notable and therefore every school logo is in project scope. But I do not believe, that this logo is uploader's own work. But nevertheless – maybe the logo does not surpass threshold of originality? I am not sure. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file is being used "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" Notability is not a Commons criteria  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of Scope, as spam del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.145.180 13:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is not de minimis. The euro coin has been added here intentionally. If it is removed, then the photo's encyclopedic value diminishes. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete or crop out the coin. Julo's comment "it is just for comparison of kaliumcyanide cristals size" means the coin is an intrinsic part of the image content. The ballpoint pen still provides some size reference if that's the reason we would want to keep this at all. We don't seem to have other pictures of this chemical itself (according to Category:Potassium cyanide), so keeping an image of it might be useful. We do have pictures of many chemicals (but I can't find a unifying cat for them) and most don't have coins or other reference items (sometimes in a petri dish or jar helps perspective, or next to the product bottle). Though I'm not sure how useful it is to have this one--so many generic-looking chemicals "yet another pile of whitish crystals"--but one could argue that having a free picture of a common chemical is within COM:SCOPE (if the image were free) even though it's trivial to get larger or smaller or powdered forms too. DMacks (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: item of concern has been deidentified  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking evidence of public domain status. According to w:Goa, the state was established in 1987, which makes it dubious that this was published before 1941, which is required for it to be in the public domain in both the United States and India. Stefan4 (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seal of Indian State, I fail to see how this can be by a German authority or court. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:41, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, strange unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.tsugi.fr/sites/default/files/styles/article_full_mobile_x1/public/mac_demarco.jpg?itok=RA5CSO0N Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fastily  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 14:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a video screenshot, per COM:PRP, considering Commons:Deletion requests/Some images of actors from Argentina (fan pics by several socks (...) "taken from probably non-free videos"), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Federico y Flor de Floricienta.png (" too much doubt about this") and File:Floricienta bertotti live.png ("clear screenshot, fake metadata"), most likely grabbed from a concert from 2004 broadcasted by unknown TV station (eventually Cris Morena Group, see also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kWjUt7v6r0, part 1). Gunnex (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with different copyright statement at w:File:Andrew Williams, British novelist.jpg. Needs OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False portrait without any historical nor artistical value. Created in 2004. See http://www.ohiostatehouse.org/Multimedia/MediaLibrary/Media.aspx?fileId=117260 Pompilos (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Keep}}. It's a work on display at state government building, and it's used on 29 different projects, so this is definitely within Commons' project scope. The fact that it's not contemporary is pretty irrelevant unless you also want to delete all biblical works of art as well. Please read Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. LX (talk, contribs) 18:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete But if this is work from 2004, then this is ... copyrighted by Anna Christoforidis? And there is no freedom of panorama in Greece. Taivo (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently this bust is not located in Greece, but in the Ohio House and Senate Chambers, which would be in the United States. But of course, the US doesn't have any proper freedom of panorama either. Then again, if it was a commissioned by the state, it's a work for hire, and the state of Ohio could release it into the public domain, as they appear to do in http://www.ohiostatehouse.org/Multimedia/MediaLibrary/Usage.aspx. Of course, we don't know whether that's the case. Complicating matters even further, that statement is contradictory in that it claims that the "photos are in the public domain and are not copyrighted", but at the same time that they "should not be used for profit", which is not a restriction they can impose if they're truly in the public domain. While I still think the original rationale is patently invalid, I'm inclined to lean towards deletion on copyright grounds unless these things can be cleared up. LX (talk, contribs) 21:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No FOP in US; site image policy says in public domain, and only should not be used, it is not a restriction of the licence  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a routine deletion request for small photo with no metadata. Object itself is, of course, public domain, but is Kim Traynor real photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload the same photo with bigger resolution? Can you categorize the file? Taivo (talk) 16:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright problem with this file. I photographed the two panels separately, but wanted to show the two together; so I placed them on PowerPoint and screen-captured them. That must be the reason for the file being smaller. I'm not too happy about the quality of definition on the male figure. I see the file has been removed from the article where I placed it, so no harm is done if it is deleted. Kim Traynor (talk) 17:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. It seems I didn't place that image on the intended article, so it was only posted to Commons and can be deleted. Kim Traynor (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image has clear historical value, and no copy of greater quality exists.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine deletion request for small photo with no metadata. Is WBeckon real photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload it with bigger resolution? Taivo (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Why is this photograph now listed as a suspected copyright violation? I clearly stated authorship: William Beckon. Why is there a question about my authorship? I included metadata, including date and location of photo; what more is needed? The photo is large enough to show individual barbs of each feather (and this is a rare bird); why is this not large enough? WBeckon (talk) 21:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: contributor affirms copyright, no evidence that claim is wrong  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is said to be Jan Bernhard Kokkoth, but the uploader Exanova claimed it own work. File has no metadata. This is the uploader's only contribution. This can be copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WTF, go to exanova.com and check who owns it. It is the SAME person (and you reported his name with errors here).


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is redundant to File:2012 Lotus Sculpture in front of Earl March's estate.jpg. Not identical, but almost. I could not decide, which is better, and choosed to keep the file with better name. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: multiple files are okay, leave the choice to the user  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems copied from http://www.urbanrail.net/am/reci/recife.htm Ale Sasso (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Maybe the image does not pass threshold of originality? But maybe there is alternative in Commons? Taivo (talk) 12:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not exact duplicate, and the line itself would just be a shape file, just like others  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Yousuf Karsh (1908-2002) taken in 1948. The copyright is claimed by the estate of Yousuf Karsh [6]. I can't view deleted files but the photo is probably the photo already deleted from Commons at Image:Albert Einstein.jpg (one or several of the versions deleted in 2006 and 2007) per Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2006/07#Image:Albert_Einstein.jpg (and probably also Image:Albert Einstein by Yousuf Karsh.jpg). -- Asclepias (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the uploader removed the "no permission" tag an the source page states "all rights reserved". This might be {{PD-textlogo}}. JuTa 20:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added {{PD-self}} later. But this is not ow work an the source page doesn't indicate an free license. JuTa 20:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shot, not even used on his userpage. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Multiple nominations, has been deleted, and has been restored. Has been used on an enWP article which is grounds for keeping, and not for Commons to determine that usage.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shot - even since it was kept before does not change that it's a selfie without educational value. Achim Raschka (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deleted: not in use anymore. Natuur12 (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BEURK!!!!!! 128.78.255.58 11:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is no such word in my dictionaries. The file is enough big, properly licensed and has EXIF data. I tend to consider the file in project scope, but this is debatable. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Well, no valid reason for deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking explanation as to why this is believed to be in the public domain. According to w:Himachal Pradesh, the state was established in 1971, making it dubious that this was published by 1941, which would be required for this to be in the public domain in both India and the United States.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete (vectored file) - not a problem will move to WP for non-free use - FOX 52 (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete and upload File:Seal of Himachal Pradesh.svg to Wikipedia under fair use rationale. Illegitimate Barrister 21:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Note that apart from Wikipedia, some of the files are also used on Wikivoyage. Also, some of the Wikipedias using this file do not accept non-free files (or local files at all), so check local policies first before uploading there. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 01:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by German 7777 (talk · contribs) with an URAA-problem

[edit]

Argentine works, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Obs.: Freshly uploaded in 02.2014 by German 7777 = most likely sock of German 6666 (talk · contributions · Statistics) who already got infos about eventual URAA-problems earlier.

1981
1983
1986

Gunnex (talk) 13:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 01:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I am not sure. I added 3 categories due to road sign. Big file, camera data exists. Taivo (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 01:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain text decorated with a small number of not self-created images. Out of project scope, Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Contenido educativo excluido. The project to participate in writing articles is Wikipedia.

--Martin H. (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More

Martin H. (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of various publications, most probably not own work.

Yann (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment They are not scans, but original works. That can be checked to see that they are not photographs but generated files directly to PDF format. You can check this by opening any of them. For original works upload, permission in OTRS is required? I need to read them all, but seem to be valid sources for Wikipedia articles. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But (important!) all say: "Edición limitada sin fines de lucro. Prohibida la reproducción." In English: "Limited Edition nonprofit. Do not reproduce." This contradicts the license CC-BY-SA. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If these are his own works, then they are out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My analysis
 Keep Biography of Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega, journalist, broadcaster and governor of the w:Cotopaxi Province, Ecuador. Is not an autobiography and maintains a neutral point of view. Useful source of information for future article w:Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega.
 Keep Article about w:Rumiñahui Canton, source very useful.
 Delete Curriculum Vitae
 Delete Brief history of the city of w:Quito, totally useless and a little promo of the author.
 Keep History of w:Latacunga. 41 pages extract a more complete work of 540, very useful.
 Keep History of w:Cotopaxi Province, brief but useful source.
 Keep Lacatunga city during the war of independence of Ecuador.
 Keep Book "Mitas" (2010), 2nd edition. Source about w:Mita (Inca) with images in public domain.
 Keep History of the broadcasting in Cotopaxi Province, useful.
 Keep Biography of w:Victoria Vasconez Cuvi (1891-1939), Ecuadorian writer.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.
 Keep History of w:Salcedo Canton, very useful.
 Keep Source about w:Tungurahua volcano, useful.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.

--Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are maybe in scope of Wikipedia but out of scope of Wikimedia Commons. So File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf and other articles are not accepted here. For the rest: In absence of any source information or authorhip information and in absence of any evidence that a file is public domain we cant keep those. So Delete. If a file is PD we can also take it from the primary source, we not need it wrapped up in some trashy pdf. --Martin H. (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They are not articles, but publications that at the time were printed and the author now published under a CC license. Each correctly mentions the author, date of publication, and in some cases publishing and edition number. What I said is that these works are valid for use in Wikipedia and in some cases, very good quality sources. Also you can extract from them many images in the public domain, which can be displayed using just the page number of the file, instead of having to upload one by one. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf is not a CV, is a brief biography (not autobiography). But you can not compare to that file with others, as they are very different. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If there is useful text, it should be copied to Wikipedia. Individual pictures created by the uploader should be uploaded to Commons in JPEG format. As these are not peer-reviewed publications, they can't be used as references for Wikipedia. As such they are out of scope for Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Out of scope. Peer articles/publications do not belong on Commons -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per previous deletion requests, see here

Trijnsteltalk 16:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:EdwinMolina05

[edit]

EdwinMolina05 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

These photos are made in 1950-s and 1960-s. Twice the copyright holder is probably a local newspaper and once it is difficult to believe own work. The last two files are quite small and have no metadata. I suspect, that they are all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Taivo, i know what are you saying, i add in first 2 photos that are not on my work and include the newspaper of CopyRight, coppied from their webpage. The last 2 photos are of last year (2013) and really are of my own work, if you see troubles with first 2 photos, please help and if I failed on the CopyRights for the owner. Have a nice day :)


Deleted: the three newspaper images, retained the two photographs that uploader states are own work and were not found with reverse searching. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo is in the public domain. I added licenses for Italy and US. Taivo (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You could please correct the author and source (name of newspaper)? Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: flagged as missing source FASTILY 10:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan. Yann (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The text is free in US, because was published before 1923 (apparently 1917), but in source country (UK)? Taivo (talk) 21:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Date and license need to be corrected. Yann (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It is up to the uploader to provide the information for any reader to know the license. The uploader has contributed a pile of historic photos labeled "own work/husband family". The subject died in 1965, so some of them may be less than 50 years old. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 10:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The INETCO Insight logo is a registered trademark of INETCO Systems Ltd. -- it cannot be CC-BY-SA Akim Dubrow (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: probably okay FASTILY 10:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-By-SA ? Really ? Perhaps this file can stay on Commons, but tell me why ? --MGuf (d) 16:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonne question, je me trompe peut-être mais les images de catalogue ne sont-elles pas libres de droits? Sont-elles également soumises à la loi sur le droit d'auteur? Si c'est le cas, on peut donc la supprimer. Cordialement! --Guerinf (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
fr:Libre de droits ? Rien a voir ! Catalogue sous fr:licence libre ? Pourquoi donc ? Non éligible au droit d'auteur, à la rigueur, mais faut le démontrer... ----MGuf (d) 18:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Je n'y tiens pas. Si la photo n'est pas éligible, on la supprime. --50.100.157.197 00:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Oups, j'avais oublié de me connecter. --Guerinf (talk) 00:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 10:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Dd1495

[edit]

Dd1495 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are not own work and maybe they are not anonymous. They can be copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 10:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aromaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded by user "Aromaster" are printed "www.aromaster.com" around outside edge. Files are in various languages, but image is same throughout. These are likely outside of COM:SCOPE because Commons is not for self-promotion or promotion.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The files are really promotional and this is bad thing. But some of them are used now. Let's wait a week and look, are they still used then. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep These are charts of wine aromas. These kinds of charts look to be used widely in wine tasting. 2 of them are currently in use in wine-related articles, and the others could be used in future in the articles that correspond to the languages they're in. INeverCry 18:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment When I did the nomination I thought perhaps the images would be ok without the link to www.aromaster.com on each one. Today I spent a few minutes digging around in that site, and found the source file in English to be here at the aromaster site, marked "All Rights Reserved Aromaster 2010". I amend my nomination to probable COM:COPYVIO. The file was inserted into many pages unfortunately. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Likely someone from the site that uploaded these, but the uploader hasn't edited in the year and a half since, so asking for permission would be tough, unless someone wanted to email the site. I don't drink alcohol of any kind, so not interested in taking the time to do any emailing. INeverCry 18:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep the files can be trimmed, mark them with {{Watermark}} if you like; they are widespread, have been for years, not the original material of that publisher, so I am not sure how they could be considered copyrightable despite the claims that they make.  — billinghurst sDrewth

Apparently ok -FASTILY 10:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]