Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 16th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, taken in 2007, uploaded in 2014, smaller copies on the Net, user with bad history. Yann (talk) 12:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: se file history. Yann (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was just a joke, but some people dont like it Holgerfreund (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Insult of another user. NNW 12:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation from vgolos.com.ua, no evidence of permission NickK (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Anatoliy (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately the source website (see version at the time of upload) allows only reuse but not modification (При передруці інформації у друкованому або електронному вигляді, посилання на "Всеукраїнське об'єднання "Батьківщина" обов'язкове. = Reprint of the information by electronic or printed means requires providing link to Batkivschyna website), which is not enough for hosting this file on Commons NickK (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. No permission for commercial usage. Anatoliy (talk) 17:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 16:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as the uploader agrees with deletion, I speedily close that request. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file McZusatz (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete and thank-you. Lfahlberg (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested McZusatz (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not used anywhere and not likely to be used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 10:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fantastically out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:FOP#Japan Rybec (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Russia. The file name and the description both tell that the principal subject is the recent arena building. Stefan4 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP. Can't be de minimis so only option is to delete. MGA73 (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely CC/"own" work at Flickr. Uploaded on Flickr on 27.01.2014 by Flickr user Sam Churchill the photo (small size/no exif, transferred to Commons by Spetsnaz1991 (talk · contributions · Statistics) is a cropped version from previously published via (example) http://www.olympic.org/news/hot-cool-yours-get-ready-for-sochi-2014/219110 (07.01.2014, © Copyright 2015. All rights reserved.) = http://www.olympic.org/Global/Images/News/2014-01/07/Sochi_600_6_Costal_Cluster.jpg (last modified: 07.01.2014, watermarked with "© sochi 2014").

Nominating also the duplicate:

transferred by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contributions · Statistics) Gunnex (talk) 10:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Belgium JurgenNL (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've been waiting for a deletion request. I discovered - unfortunately after uploading the file - this so called FoP in general and specifically in Belgium, but could not figure out how to delete the file. BTW what a rule, I wonder if there is more people benefiting from it than the opposite. Presumably the latter I guess. SejHing (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think to keep this file is more people benefiting.--Akira123 (talk) 04:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a no brainer; we've deleted many pictures of this for having no FOP. Prosfilaes (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted: same image was deleted one day before upload. JurgenNL (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaelafoley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are not likely to be of educational use per COM:EDUSE and appear to be lower quality duplicates of GIFs found at various websites, but of uncertain copyright status. The Van Gogh gif can be found at giphy.com, the Macintosh gif at huffpost.com, the fire gif at kym-cdn.com, and the flag gif at picasion.com.

Green Giant (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedydeleted, copyvio. Same files were deleted for the same reason before. JurgenNL (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nearly identical duplicate of [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredlyfish4 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-16T04:21:03‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is very unlikely that the photographer of this has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is very unlikely that the photographer of this has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0284.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is very unlikely that the photographer of this has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is very unlikely that the photographer of this has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This infringes on the copyright of the post card and, probably, also the copyright of the stamp. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louis Mortamet died in 1956. No FoP in France. Moreover a picture seems to have been uploaded to WpFr according exception related to recent buildings. Aga (d) 14:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louis Mortamet died in 1956. No FoP in France. Moreover a picture seems to have been uploaded to WpFr according exception related to recent buildings. Aga (d) 14:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louis Mortamet died in 1956. No FoP in France. Moreover a picture seems to have been uploaded to WpFr according exception related to recent buildings. Aga (d) 14:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an accepatable Commons licnese. No author. Not a work by Eva Hesse (who is still in copyright, d. 1970). Coat of Many Colours (talk) 14:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not {{PD-UKGov}} as tagged, credited to en:Elliott & Fry which was a private photographic studio. January (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not {{PD-UKGov}} as tagged, credited to en:Elliott & Fry which was a private photographic studio. January (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-US-not renewed}}-fail (film still from en:Copacabana (1947 film)) as the copyright seems to be renewed in 1975 ("R606036"), considering I = II = copyrighted till the end of 2042. Gunnex (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Uploader is part of a sock farm. Gunnex (talk) 08:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No acceptable considering PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 15:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of company with questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful origin: likely a copyright violation from bprice.ua: image available on the same website and was uploaded 2 years earlier. No evidence of permission NickK (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Яцуба В. Г..JPG: doubtful origin, likely a copyright violation from bprice.ua: image available on the same website and was uploaded 2 years earlier. No evidence of permission NickK (talk) 16:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 16:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF −ebraminiotalk 16:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission: at the time of upload the website of ministry had no information about Creative Commons license NickK (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Solomatin D A.jpg: no evidence of permission, at the time of upload the website of ministry had no information about Creative Commons license NickK (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. unused badJPEG McZusatz (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (possibly com:advert) McZusatz (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (possibly com:advert) McZusatz (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is actually "own work", as claimed, then it is out of scope personal art. If not, it is a copyvio. Either way it cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is actually "own work", as claimed, then it is out of scope personal art. If not, it is a copyvio. Either way it cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is actually "own work", as claimed, then it is out of scope personal art. If not, it is a copyvio. Either way it cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful if the uploader is really the photographer and/or the copyright holder of this image. The Sany Group uses the same image on their homepage which is copyrighted. JorgeRodriguez, did you take this image with your camera? High Contrast (talk) 17:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not ok according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 19:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I can not find the rule you mention, you can indicate me the url reference. Thanks. petrohs (gracias) 15:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
My opinion is that image cannot be published with the PD-Text licence ({{PD-textlogo}}) cause geometric shapes are not so "simple". I can be wrong. --Aga (d) 15:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the url. I'm not upload the image as the original logo. It is an close up of that I take a photograph and use it for purposes of an article. It is a picture of an embroidery on the uniform. petrohs (gracias) 17:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC) (sorry, my English is poor)

Deleted: A com:DW of a copyrighted logo Natuur12 (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. The image of the same people with more light is File:WLM2013UkraineAwardsDSC 0166.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. The image of the same persons with more light is File:WLM2013UkraineAwardsDSC 0166.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is copyrighted. The author of the artwork died in 1977 in Spain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kippelboy (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T21:08:18‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superfluous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uleli (talk • contribs) 19:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Objection made by the family Philippe de Segovia (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion since the file is in the public domain. Please see com:PD-Art Natuur12 (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, fictional. Fry1989 eh? 20:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been added solely to promote uploader's SEO website Trivialist (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Hmmm I believe that this logo is com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal info, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and self-promotion... --Indeedous (talk) 21:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some song; uploaded by a cross-wiki abuser; clearly not an audio version of the mentioned Wikinews article MF-W 21:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation: same photo in different resolutions and differently cropped is available on a number of websites, most notably here NickK (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, many better versions in Category:Anthracene. Leyo 22:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Ornithine. Leyo 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only serves to promote uploader's autobiography on enwiki Qwertyus (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only serves to promote uploader's autobiography on enwiki Qwertyus (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only serves to promote uploader's autobiography on enwiki Qwertyus (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Well, he is clearly not the photographer Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait of the uploader, no value for Wikimedia Qwertyus (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait of the uploader, no value for Wikimedia Qwertyus (talk) 23:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait of the uploader, used in spam for his company on enwiki Qwertyus (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 23:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Logo is com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: sculptures made out of lego's Vera (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See PD-textlogo Aga (d) 09:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope (small devastation from a "hurrican", but private property Cholo 3 (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file did not upload properly in 2 atempst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simiprof (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T16:44:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 17:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not used anywhere and not likely to be used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF, file name suggests it is from Facebook. Yann (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep A Google Image search came up dry. The size is 960x460. If this editor didn't have a history of uploading copyrighted information I would request a speedy close. Since we cannot assume good faith by the uploader, I'm calling this "weak keep" but only due to lack of evidence that this image was copied from any particular place. If there is any specific reason to think this was copied or cropped from someplace other than the uploader's camera or someplace else that the uploader legally owned the copyrights of, then change this to a non-discussion "speedy" delete, as was done with most of his other images. Davidwr (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 17:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pbhavin91/sandbox). MER-C 12:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This infringes on the copyright of the post card. Also, the status of stamps in Switzerland is not shown at Commons:Stamps/Public_domain, but the stamp is likely also a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing, copyrighted images. Kyro (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user file 91.66.63.139 12:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I uploaded this file upon being asked to by Wikipedia -- I assumed or understood at the time that I recorded it that it would at some point be uploaded on my behalf .. of course the only person who can submit a recording of my voice .. would be me ?

Anyway, if I have missed something out regarding uploading of this file so that it is publicly available then please advise me what I must do. If you can make it publicly available already, then please do this.

Kindest regards Alistair

alistair@alistaircasey.com 310 562 4549


Deleted: INeverCry 17:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata and the fact that all other files uploaded by Vidal101 have been blatant copyright violations. LX (talk, contribs) 14:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that the permission is not sufficent. Yann (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also included is File:Dragan Djilas.jpg. Yann (talk) 09:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark background. Superseded by similar image with more light File:Docudays2013Closing IMGP9742-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Retorno de Carmem Miranda ao Brasil, Julho de 1940.jpg (most likely the same photo) = "Taken in Brazil in 1940 by ABI photographer "Ferreira Júnior" (ABI stands for pt:Associação Brasileira de Imprensa), licensed with {{PD-Brazil-media}} (1940 + 1 + 70 = 2011). Not in PD in Brazil on URAA-date 01.01.1996, copyrights restored +95 years = [till the end of] 2035." Gunnex (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted artwork -- Asclepias (talk) 15:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is a work on the public street. This photo is used is a lot of sites of Wiki Pedia, I don't understand the art for deleting! We can put the name of the artist by the picture. Why delete the picture, so you can delete all pictures on this site! (Dickelbers) 20.27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

[edit]

Deleted: derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons FASTILY 07:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in good faith, but the right of panorama in Denmark only extends to buildings, not 2D or 3D artwork, which comprise the majority of this image. The images of the boat and the viking seem, therefore, to still be in copyright of the artist. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But this photo is not from Denmark, but from New Zealand, so we have to check what the New Zealand right of panorama says. / Achird (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies - my mistake. According to the Commons guidance pages, New Zealand laws follow the UK, in allowing photographs of 3D sculpture in public places, but not 2D images such as this. Hchc2009 (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Does it matter that the 2D ship only makes up 4 % of the picture and that the 2D Viking only makes up 12 % of the picture? / Achird (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a defence called de minimis, which applies when the copyrighted item is a small by-product of an image. This applies if, say, you took a photograph of your partner and a copyrighted image like a Coca-Cola sign appeared in the background, but was not the main focus of the shot. Given that the entire of this photograph is the sign, with the Viking and the ship extremely prominent, with nothing else in the shot, it is hard to see that applying.
(NB: It is always worth remembering what the licensing is saying on this sort of file, and why respecting the underlying copyright is always important: it allows someone to freely take and use the image for whatever purpose they like, without permission. As uploaded, I could, for example, photoshop out the picture of the Viking and reuse it for my company's own marketing at a profit, without paying the original artist anything. That wouldn't be right, as they haven't agreed to that, and they own the copyright on their own work.) Hchc2009 (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DM clearly does not apply here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

company advertising Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivated work of Brazilian stamps, emitted in 1984. Fails also {{PD-BrazilGov}} ("prior to 1983"). Gunnex (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size from professional camera, user with bad history. Yann (talk) 13:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private data - advertisement ?? - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Provides no verifiable or reliable source/s for the map. Is being disputed on List of countries where Spanish is an official language where someone has wanted to replace it with this file (also lacking sources other than 'own work'). Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see discussion for Official Spanish language in the World.svg for further information regarding the deletion request as both have been nominated for the same reason, and a redirect for both to Spanish Language Map.svg be put in place. Thank you. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old picture with wrong date, not own work. No source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The class year on this photo is correct. The photo is from 1923, but is of the class of 1925. It is a scan of the Hotchkiss yearbook of that year, a work in the public domain. If I have used the wrong licensing for this work, I will correct it (I own the yearbook, but obviously did not create the picture). Inertia77


Deleted: This is not "own work" as claimed. It may be PD from lack of notice or lack of renewal, but the uploader has not mentioned either notice or renewal. For notice, a simple statement that there is no copyright notice in the yearbook will suffice (it's usually on the back of the title page), but if there is notice, proving non-renewal will required tedious search through three or four years of renewals. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image without overexposed background File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0032.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de licence - non libre XoLm56 (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de licence - non libre XoLm56 (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author, date or publication date given; could well still be in copyright in the UK, depending on when it was made Hchc2009 (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brazilian work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1937, licensed with {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+ 70 years), not in PD in Brazil at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2032 (+95 years). Obs.: For Brazilian works finished before 01.01.1937 = {{PD-BR-1937}}. Gunnex (talk) 12:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Uploader is part of a sock farm. Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Why {{PD-Brazil-media}} does not apply? Dantadd 21:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See above. The file entered in PD in Brazil in 2008 (1937 + 70 + 1) but was not in PD in Brazil at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 = not in PD in US = copyrights restored +95 years = {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} = COM:L: "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media (...) that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.". Gunnex (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed with {{PD-Brazil-media}}, not in PD in Brazil at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Original image was removed by te same reason. -GM83 (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SCOPE Rybec (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to my observations it is generally accepted when users waste a little space on Internet memes (e.g. Polandball comics). It is a personal image and at the moment it is even used on someone's userpage. mate2code 11:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 16:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is still alive according to the discription so PD-art doesn't apply and permission from the painter is required. Natuur12 (talk) 12:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better straightened image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0025.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, organization logo uploaded by account apparently clamining to represent organization. Logo visible here: http://www.espoirsdemainsn.hostoi.com/ djr13 (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Russia has no freedom of Panorama for modern architecture and 3D art, I think. Leoboudv (talk) 04:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de licence - non libre XoLm56 (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0103.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, in which is more light on the object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0108.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0074.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with better light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0087.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0105.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, in which is more light on the object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0110.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, in which the background is not overexposed: File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0094.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The green object is a bit dark. Superseded by image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0052.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0112.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0118.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0114.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0096.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0271.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0264.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0265.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0268.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar image is File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0332.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by a bit brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0294.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0274.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0335.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the object (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0336.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0322.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0297.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0275.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (details of this component better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0321.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0311.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with better light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0314.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0318.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0281.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Details of this thing are better shown in the photo with flash: File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0288.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0325.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter photo File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0308.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0303.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0299.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0283.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The object is a bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0302.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image of the same paper: File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0411.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar kind of image of the same object is File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2774.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0398.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light (the airplane is more clearly shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0341.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better image (details better shown) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0393.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with better light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0389.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with better light File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0396.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark background. Superseded by similar image (more light on the background): File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0404.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image of the same flowers (maybe a bit better focused): File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2747.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0338.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar image is File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2754.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (too dark, hard to identify the specie). And similar kind of image of the same bird exists: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2798.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0415.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (too dark, hard to identify the specie). And almost similar already exists: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2798.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0344.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by an image of the same poster without the flash reflection File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0350.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. We have other image of this same poster File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0350.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image without the flash reflection File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0350.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar image (maybe a bit more light) is File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2774.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0309.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0301.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Similar image with more light is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0289.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better focused image File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2913.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar with more light on the car File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0307.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark and the bird is poorly shown. Superseded by this (the same bird shown more clearly): File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2853.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The car interior is a bit dark. Similar image with more light on the car is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0296.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar is File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2813.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by an image of the same object with more light File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2822.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by an image, in which the flower details are better shown due to the lower exposure time: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2937.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by almost similar image with a bit more light File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2822.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2899.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar image (maybe a bit more light) is File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2939.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better focused image File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2946.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0297.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by almos similar image with more light File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2908.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0300.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the bird. Superseded by this: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2804.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (hard to identify the bird). Superseded by this: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2804.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the bird. Superseded by this: File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2804.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0318.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0331.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0309.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the car. Better image: File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0360.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused. Better focused is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0312.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0320.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0324.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by clearer image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0331.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0328.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with better light on the car File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0337.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The car is too dark. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0346.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0335.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0341.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0350.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image without the white spot on the bottom of the photo: File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0344.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0340.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0316.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0332.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0355.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0357.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0399.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar with better light is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0369.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the car. Almost similar is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0383.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused anywhere. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0388.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the car File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0404.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar (more light on the car) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0361.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the car. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0383.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better focused File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0392.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe a bit dark. Almost similar (maybe better) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0381.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with better light File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0372.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0379.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused anywhere. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0383.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too dark. The same car with more light: File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0377.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image of the same car with better light File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0413.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with better light File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0413.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0413.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0367.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0395.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 02:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pics of friends are not educationally useful per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a game (final fantasy), which is subject to copyright. bobrayner (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful origin: probably a copyright violation from Liga website, uploaded to the website in the same resolution and as a part of a series of photographs NickK (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, which is maybe a bit better focused on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9429.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar image is File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9380.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9393.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9401.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, organization logo uploaded by account apparently clamining to represent organization. Logo visible here: http://www.pompiers-solidaires.org//site-wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/CHARTE-PSID-Pompiers-Solidaires.pdf (PDF) djr13 (talk) 06:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9387.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image without the blurred man on the right side of the photo File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9399.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9416.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9388.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image, which is maybe a bit better focused on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9419.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9409.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9395.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Magnolia677 (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 11:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not ok according PD-textlogo. Aga (d) 09:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

is there --— Mouh2jijel [Talk] 10:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar with File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9430.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9494.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, in which is more light on the vehicle (the vehicle's details better shown): File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9500.jpg Kulmalukko (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9445.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9480.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9456.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9453.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9435.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar is File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9457.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar is File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9457.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image without the blurred person the right side of the photo: File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9483.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9464.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9443.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9492.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with more light on the vehicle File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9517.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9485.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar image: File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9504.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by a bit brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9483.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9496.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar (a bit more light on the bike) is File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9592.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar to File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9602.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with a bit more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9557.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9584.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9518.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, similar with this: File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9547.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9578.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9598.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with a bit more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9562.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9580.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bike File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9559.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image, in which the whole bike is shown File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9573.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with more light on the object File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9546.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark bike. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9566.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the object File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9612.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar is File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9618.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9625.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image with more light on the vehicle (vehicle's details are better shown) File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9538.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Superseded by File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9542.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the bikes File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9604.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable due to extreme blurry image Andy king50 (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.poscope.com/PoKeys56U Copyright 2005-2012 PoLabs. All Rights Reserved. Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in good faith, but a 2D painting is not covered by the Right of Panorama in the UK, and is almost certainly still in copyright by the artist concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, web resolution. Uploader has a history of copyright issues.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Provides no verifiable or reliable source/s for the map. Is being disputed on List of countries where Spanish is an official language where this file is currently being used (also lacking sources other than 'own work'). Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It could be based on the sources in that list couldn't it? If it's on that list, it should be on the map. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both this and the other map I've marked for deletion have had their accuracy questioned several times in the past and are finally seriously under discussion on the List of countries where Spanish is an official language talk page (as well as user pages). It has been established that, according to verifiable and reliable sources, they are both misrepresentations. Instead, user Kwamikagami has come up with an alternative map which does accurately represent the sources.
As both of these maps are currently being used globally (and in checking the talk pages of the corresponding non-English article) they have also been consistently questioned on those wikis. Perhaps, redirects to the Spanish Language Map.svg could be put in place when the misleading maps are deleted?

Kept: This map is widely used on WPs and therefore cannot be deleted for the reasons given. It is the firm policy of Commons that we do not delete maps because someone thinks they are inaccurate, unless that inaccuracy is obvious and undisputed and the map is not used. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not same than in the wrb-side http://starwars.com/, we will have right logo here File:Star Wars Logo.svg Motopark (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - in use at ES wiki in article space, making this deletion reason invalid. Jcb (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Can be easily change to same than other wikipedias use in same article.--Motopark (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but that's not our task. File is in use in article space, so there is no valid reason to remove it. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not in use, and the common version in use is located at File:SW.png The Haz talk 02:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-BrazilGov}}-fail ("prior to 1983") as this Brazilian stamp was emitted in 2009. Might be (eventually) derivated by a PD-photo/art work but further infos needed. Gunnex (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Per byline "Benício" most likely a work of Brazilian designer & illustrator pt:Benício (1936—). Gunnex (talk) 11:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small unused image - unusable Cholo 3 (talk) 12:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, not used Motopark (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyvio: google findings from before 2010 Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Uploaded in 12.2013 and licensed with {{Cc-by-3.0-br}}, the source http://www.fundaj.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=250&Itemid=238 is configured with "Copyright © 2014 Fundação Joaquim Nabuco - Todos os direitos reservados." (see also archive). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file never was good for anything. It never has been used in any context. It is completely useless. I don't want it any longer to belong to my contributions. Gerd (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a photo of wild strawberries. This does not appear to be a photo of a plant in the Fragaria genus. This is a jumble of leaves of different plants, with some protruding berries, possibly of the Rubus genus. Fritzflohrreynolds (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is a not a reason to delete. Please try to correctly categorize it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is original political art, not a documentation of political messaging as found outside the Commons. Commons is not a webhost for original art by non-notable artists. no articles use this image, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Genocide (theory) (2nd nomination) was deleted. I had previously nominated the category White Genocide for deletion, but no discussion resulted. My previous statement about these files was incorrect, based now on a better understanding of Commons policy on original art. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified street (in Germany?) - unusable, out of scope Cholo 3 (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author claims own work, but is the original PDF own work? Mbch331 (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by almost similar image with more light File:Ботанічний сад 111.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative works, no freedom of panorama in Iran and the pictured artworks could be recent enough to be copyrightable

Rybec (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the objects is not includ CP right. u are western people cant find that " ART IS POPULAR THING IN THE EAST" . i want an iranian administator .--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sonia, please pay attention: Iranian law itself says that if you take a photo of a photo or of a painting etc, the latter’s copyright is retained. Fortunately the items shown in the rest of your excellent photo collection are exempt from copyright (ancient enough architecture, items on permanent public display, utilitarian objects). -- Tuválkin 07:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Photos of photos, clear case:

 Delete: Photos of artwork, would need proof of public domain or licensing:

 Keep: Mostly utilitarian objects, de minimis:

 Keep: Utilitarian objects:

-- Tuválkin 07:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the analysis in Tuvalkin's second post (not the first); sorry for nominating the photos of the pottery. Rybec (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
i just agree with an analysis of an Iranian administator(or any administator from middle east).so,Thousands bowl evey day made in caravanserai for seling, for money , nobody in that place thinking to CP right.pottery objects made in kiln . the object are just

Souvenir .--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for the second list. See w:Intellectual_property_in_Iran#Copyrights if you need clarification. Don't forget that copyright is automatic. You do not need to apply to a government agency for it. The exception is that since Iran does not respect international copyright law, any registered copyright in Iran automatically loses its standing in the United States. Nonetheless, as long as it's copyrighted in one country, it does not belong on Commons. The Haz talk 02:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Utilitarian objects do not have a copyright, but the elaborate painting on them certainly does. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by an image of the same tree with more light File:Дуб Вітовта 1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). This candle monument was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). This candle monument was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted work of a stll living cartoonist --79.214.241.53 17:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 79.214.241.53 17:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not FOP in Ukraine. Built 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of authorship. The author has not given any proof that the Image wasn't copied from http://www.prachachat.net/news_detail.php?newsid=1372921481 . Paul_012 (talk) 10:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashanisanket (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not educationally useful, there are already plenty of pics of male genitalia.

Green Giant (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chavez chavez miguel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-US-no notice}}-fail (film screenshots of en:Nancy Goes to Rio, 1950) as the copyright was renewed via "R653082" in 02.1977. Copyrighted till the end of 2045.

Gunnex (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, the original trailer is available via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ1rhES7h2o and has a copyright notice (around 0:30). I am unsure if a "trailer" is treated as a separate work, needing a separated renewal. In my understanding, a trailer is composed by selected scenes of the film (so to say: a crop) and a renewal for the whole film would also cover the trailer. Gunnex (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright renewed: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nancy Goes To Rio + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carmen Miranda in Nancy Goes To Rio (1950).jpg. Reuploads (most likely the same files) by ptwiki confirmed sock of Category:Sockpuppets of Clécio Brito.

Gunnex (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo martinez rubio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshay swami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aftabbanoori (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are not educationally useful per COM:EDUSE

Green Giant (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The authors of these ca. 1937 to 1939 photos/videos are not even named. So how can the uploader claim they are dead for at least 70 years?

Rosenzweig τ 23:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We need certain evidence for Template:Anonymous-EU. Just because there is no photographer or filmer named on Commons is not sufficient for this license. --High Contrast (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ShinePhantom: That the website from which you took the files does not name their authors does not mean that the images/videos are "anonymous" in a legal sense. You would have to dig quite a bit deeper than that. --Rosenzweig τ 17:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Try google and find at least one author. Just for example. It was more than seventy years, and names did not known yet. And File:Execution of Eugen Weidmann.ogv is officially unknown. Police department in France try to investigate the autho's name but unsuccessfully ShinePhantom (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Try Google" is not enough, you'll have to do research in files, books, magazines etc. As to the video: Where are the research results of the French police documented? How did the film reach the public if the author is unknown? Who distributed it? Etc. --Rosenzweig τ 12:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom and Commons:Anonymous works. Natuur12 (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter died in 1953 so those paintings are still copyrighted untill 2024.

Natuur12 (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Belgian artist died in 1953, so his works are not in the PD in Belgium yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2024 (or later when they are from later than 1928).

Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could you explain the "later than 2028" rule for this case? Jean Brusselmans lived, worked, published and died in Belgium. As he died in 1953, all his work will be Public Domain in 2024, according to Belgian copyright law. If I look at Commons licensing US PD, the same goes for the US, as his copyright was not renewed in the US, as far as I can see. Vysotsky (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:URAA-restored copyrights and Commons:Licensing: “Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed, or [...] that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.”. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
URAA? No kidding. Time to start a court case about copyright on files like these. Vysotsky (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There already were two, among them one that reached the US Supreme Court, see en:Uruguay Round Agreements Act#Challenges to the URAA restorations. The URAA was upheld by the court. --Rosenzweig τ 08:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I can see the juridical reality. But it feels odd that images by a Belgian artist, in the Public Domain in 2024, can't be featured on the Dutch language Wikipedia because US laws forbid us to do so. I can print any book with works by Jean Brusselmans (in 2024), but not show one image in Wikipedia. Vysotsky (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Whatever we think of the URAA issue, it's undisputed that these works are not free in the source country before 2024. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gizemsoysaldı (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Southernchoppa

[edit]

Southernchoppa (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: private images with no clear encyclopedic value. Originally uploaded to support joke edits to English Wikipedia. – Wdchk (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gsanchezmolina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gontaruk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Firstly, these are clearly two different files that have been (pointlessly) Photoshopped into a further three variants. Secondly, they appear to be copyvios; once the garish background is removed and cropped, the Maxell UD-C90 is the same as this higher resolution version and the Intersound tape is virtually identical to this one (except the strange rectangle on the uploaded version). Note the white dust spot on both versions of the Maxell and the identical position of the tape (through the window) on the Intersound, even with the same loose piece of tape.

One might question whether a scan is copyrightable, but these are also very low resolution images, probably uploaded for self-indulgent reasons (as the lettering looks very Photoshopped-on).

Ubcule (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artificialchess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BigBlueParrot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional, maybe copyvio

Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colour My Style (talk · contribs)

[edit]

company advertising. blocked in enwiki

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures of various dates with 4 different cameras, or without EXIF data; personal images; copyvios or out of scope, or both.

Yann (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this gallery, three cameras in meta, but only on three pictures, one duplicate and facebook or smaller sizes on the majority.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MR.Futbol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF.

Yann (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misatur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused COM:OOS personal photos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misatur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, no educational value, unused personal photos.

doclys (❀) 05:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 00:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mario.castilloca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF, user with bad history.

Yann (talk) 09:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahtec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files depict the logo of a company, which appears to reserve all rights on its website, which is in Portuguese but has the words "Todos os Direitor Reservados", although there maybe a spelling error in the third word.

Green Giant (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pt.GauravGautam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion [3].

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yanniesu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are of poor quality. They are all orphaned (except of File:Fe Habcd.jpg that is not in the list).

Leyo 23:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the object File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0075.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar (maybe the object's details are clearly shown) image is File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0036.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:MotoBike-2013-IMGP9462.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 01:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar image, in which the object is better distinguished from the background, is File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0258.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0250.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0248.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by image with more light on the cameras File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0210.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter images File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0207.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0205.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0204.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by better straightened image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0190.jpg Kulmalukko (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0184.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0183.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0181.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image (the objects are maybe better distinguished from the background) File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0178.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Superseded by File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0161.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar without the camera flash reflection is File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0157.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0155.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0150.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0149.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0147.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter: File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0143.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0134.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by clearer image File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0128.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0125.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. And the image of these same trees is File:Duby IMGP9945-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. An image of the same trees with a bit more light is File:Duby IMGP9945-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by a bit better straightened image of the same tree File:Hrusha Ivaschenko IMGP9833-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearer image of this car interior is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8396.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark, better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8392.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused, better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8392.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by clearer image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8388.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8382.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by brighter image File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8381.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Non-blurred is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8377.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Less dark is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8369.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8368.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused, better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8368.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused, better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8363.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost similar (the car is more visible) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8358.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar (the car is more visible) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8356.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The front part of the car is dark. Better image is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8353.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Similar with a bit more light is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8349.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused anywhere. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8343.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the car. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of this image is a bit dark. Not focused on the car. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. Better focused image is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8338.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark, not focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8335.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8330.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8327.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8327.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP8324.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0495.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost similar is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0493.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark (the details of the car bottom are not visible). The image (with different view) of the same car is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0485.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. The image with different view angle of the same car (more light) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0481.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark. The image of the same car with more light (different angle of view) is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0481.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0479.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0468.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0463.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark. Similar view with more light is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0457.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark, better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0443.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0443.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0439.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not focused on the car. Superseded by File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0430.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0424.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. Better is File:KyivRetroAuto IMGP0424.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark. The image with better light of the same people in the same position is File:Wikimeetup in Kyiv 25-05-2013 004.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly focused. The image of the same flower (maybe a bit better focused) is File:BotGardenFomin DSC 0238-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant and poorly focused. Almost similar already exists: File:BotGardenFomin DSC 0228-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by a bit clearer image File:BotGardenFomin DSC 0155-1.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visible Numberplate - sensible Information i would not share! Fstuerchler (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work is in artist's copyright (Eva Hesse died in 1970). Coat of Many Colours (talk) 14:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Yes, FOP covers it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Cc-zero}}- fail as the source (a Brazilian museum) is not configured with a CC or whatever license. Most likely an US work. Needs further infos. The related film en:Copacabana (1947 film) sems to have his copyrights renewed in 1975 --> Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carmen Miranda - Copacabana (1947).jpg. Gunnex (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by the image in which also the bottom part of this building is visible: File:Вiрменська Дзвіниця, Кам'янець-Подільський 03.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo d’une retransmission sur grand écran. Les droits sont ceux du réalisateur de la captation filmée. Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-US-not renewed}}-fail (film still from en:Copacabana (1947 film)) as the copyright seems to be renewed in 1975 ("R606036"), considering I = II = copyrighted till the end of 2042. Gunnex (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (same context and uploader)

Gunnex (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brazilian work (pt:Banana da Terra (filme)), published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1938 (or - per IMDB and ptwiki - 1939), licensed with {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+ 70 years), not in PD in Brazil at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2034 (+95 years). Obs.: For Brazilian works finished before 01.01.1937 = {{PD-BR-1937}}.

Nominating also (same context and uploader)


Gunnex (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not public domain in country of origin (Zimbabwe); should probably be deleted under precautionary principle Cliftonian (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Cc-zero}}- fail as the source (a Brazilian museum) is not configured with a CC or whatever license. Most likely a Brazilian work. Grabbed somewhere - as indicated - from http://www.museusdoestado.rj.gov.br/sisgam/index.php?pagina=4&busca=carmen%20miranda&museu=&operador=and. Needs further infos. Taken in 1955 would fail also {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+ 70 years). Gunnex (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 21:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-free painting -- Asclepias (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is a work on the public street. This photo is used is a lot of sites of Wiki Pedia, I don't understand the art for deleting! We can put the name of the artist by the picture. Why delete the picture, so you can delete all pictures on this site! (Dickelbers) 20.27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 Delete Fair use image. FoP does not apply to street art in Canada. By law it is still under copyright unless the author releases it into the public domain or licenses it properly. In either case we would need permission via OTRS. The Haz talk 02:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ローカルで再度アップロードする BigBang19 (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from image's subject was not given to photographer. Frommeyer (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission by depicted people not needed. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't want this released to commons anymore. Both the uploader AND subjects are requesting the deletion. Frommeyer (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Invalid deletion reason, release is not revocable. Jcb (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license is not revocable. JurgenNL (talk) 14:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requesting a courtesy deletion. It's a personal family photo our dad uploaded - without our knowledge or permission. It's a first page result when our last name is googled and, frankly, it's irritating and weird to have friends find it, copy the link, and then send it to us with a "tee-hee." I'm asking for some compassion here. Please. Delete it? Frommeyer (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Speedy closed, twice is enough - Jcb (talk) 17:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for speedy closure without addressing the concerns.
Delete. Out-of-scope small picture of non-notable persons. If the picture was only to show his children on the user's personal userpage on en.wikipedia, which userpage is now deleted, there's no particular point in keeping the picture. It is an example of a personal photo that Commons would probably want to delete even if the deletion wasn't requested by the persons in question. There is no reason to keep it just to annoy the user and the persons pictured. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 06:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No evidence of being free. In my opinion, it crosses Commons:TOO enough that it cannot be considered free by that standards. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by similar image with more light on the object (details better shown): File:KPI Polytechnic Museum DSC 0371.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The second image is made with flashlight, this image not. The quality of the second one is not better than this one, also you don't know which one has correct colors. --Denniss (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 09:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Photo of Brazilian comedian en:Chacrinha (1917-1988), derivated via a CC-Flickr source in 03.2010 from (example) http://www.onordeste.com/administrador/personalidades/imagemPersonalidade/b965b4cbb88045830999e6a80d32e4cf973.jpg (last modified: 2009) and highly circulating before Flickr via internet. Alternative licenses would fail: Unlikely {{PD-BR-1937}} (before 1937) and {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+ 70 years) would fail COM:URAA.

Nominating also the related collage:


Gunnex (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication in source that this is CC-BY-SA or another acceptable license.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am Japanese.Actually,I am not good at English.Therefore this sentence may have a mistake.This photograph was photographed and publicationed at the Philippines in 1954.The protection period of the copyright is expired in Japan and the Philippines and becomes the free use(2004).This photograph is used in Diaz's film IMELDA, but Diaz does not have a copyright.In addition, as for this use, even Philippine Copyright Law is accepted;

Philippine Copyright Law SEC. 184. Limitations on Copyright

184.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter V, the following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: (a) the recitation or performance of a work, once it has been lawfully made accessible to the public, if done privately and free of charge or if made strictly for a charitable or religious institution or society; (Sec. 10(1), P.D. No.49)(b) The making of quotations from a published work if they are compatible with fair use and only to the extent justified for the purpose, including quotations from newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries: Provided, That the source and the name of the author, if appearing on the work, are mentioned; (Sec. 11, third par., P.D. No. 49)(c) The reproduction or communication to the public by mass media of articles on current political, social, economic, scientific or religious topic, lectures, addresses and other works of the same nature, which are delivered in public if such use is for information purposes and has not been expressly reserved: Provided, That the source is clearly indicated; (Sec. 11, P.D. No. 49)(d) The reproduction and communication to the public of literary, scientific or artistic works as part of reports of current events by means of photography, cinematography or broadcasting to the extent necessary for the purpose; (Sec. 12, P.D. No. 49)

I am waiting for an answer of CineDiaz now.Thank you for your cooperation with the matters mentioned above.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1) That an image may be PD in its country of origin does not mean that it is PD in the US. Both need to be true for an image to be hosted on Commons. 2) None of section 184.1 appears to apply hear, as this is not "private", this is not a "quotation", this is not "for information purposes" (images on Commons may be reused for commercial purposes), and this is not a current event. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is in the public domain in Philippines because its copyright has expired, according to SEC. 213.5 of the Philippines Copyright Law 2009.

213.5. In case of photographic works, the protection shall be for fifty (50) years from publication of the work and, if unpublished, fifty (50) years from the making. SEC.213.5 This photograph which published in 1954 becomes public domain in 2004. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U. S. within days) and it was first published before without complying with U. S. copyright formalities or after without copyright notice and it was in the public domain in its home country Philippines on the Uruguay Round Agreements Act date (January 1, 1, 996}).

File:Not Rukiah but Sofia.jpg/Your upload file reference.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleteウルグアイラウンド協定法の理解が出来ました。ローカルで上げますので削除してください。--Y.haruo (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Y.haruo comments in her/his mother tongue that (s)he understands URAA and (s)he uploads the same file on ja:Wikipedia.--Hahifuheho (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The file in question is not on public domain in the United States. --Hahifuheho (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reliable details of when this was first published, the filedesc gives the publication as 1954 but gives a facebook page the source; however on closer examination of that page it gives the photo credit as Ramona S. Diaz's film IMELDA but that film only came out in 2003, if that was indeed the first publication then this image will still be in copyright in the US. Absent proof of how this image is PD in the US this needs to be deleted as per the COM:PCP. LGA talkedits 09:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to prove that Diaz is not the first publisher. You can look at here[4] and there[5]. Diaz photographed a magazine kept at the Lopez museum.Your claim is equal to saying that Diaz took a photograph of next Lyndon B.Johnson in that page[6].--Y.haruo (talk) 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But we need to have the exact details of first publication to establish if this image is indeed PD in the US. For example if it only published after March 1989 then it will be copyright in the US. 12:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


It is a fact that this file is photographed circa 1954, and it is a fact that this file is keeping at the Lopez museum. Typically, the magazine gravure is fresh. The photograph taken as the gravure of the magazine is published after photography inside a few months. The publication of the gravure picture does not need long duration of time.And This photograph stamped "(r)ough proof". This is a seal of the final stages before the publication. It is natural to think that this file is published circa 1954.In contrast your assertion is groundless. This proof is Probatio diabolica.

I specified the Lopez museum in the Philippines as this file source.I sent an email to confirm a copyright to Lopez museum and Cinediaz in a former deletion request, but there came no reply yet. I think that I was not able to use English well, or they was not able to prove that held a copyright. If you are doubt, You can ask them. You can find background information. I feel sad that a precious file is deleted by your behavior. If there is the reason that I can understand, I vote in a deletion vote by oneself.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, all we need is a confirmed date and location of publication to establish the US copyright status (see COM:L). LGA talkedits 21:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am adducing evidence already. This photograph was published circa 1954. Because, the symbol of the publication is included in a photograph. However You pretend to not see that. And you repeated that kind of remark. I only wait for a fair judgment afterward.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US copyright law defines publication in an exact way, and it is not indicated by a symbol. In what book, magazine or newspaper did this first appear ? LGA talkedits 21:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons -FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inertia77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF. Needs some explanation, at least.

Yann (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruce Dickinson, 2009.jpg

This one is copyrighted by Dave Hogan/Getty Images. No permission. Delete. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I misunderstood the licensing option of work found on internet. Please delete Frank Furness historical marker for this reason as well. Others are my own work.
Deleted. Yann (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Walt Whitman House, Camden, New Jersey.jpg

This one was taken from Flickr, where it is availaible with a Creative Commons license. I have corrected the source, the author and the permission. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this work. inertia77
OK, this one is fixed. Yann (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Walt Whitman House, Camden..jpg and File:Nathaniel Everts Revolutionary War Salisbury Lakeville Connecticuit.jpg

These two are from the same Flickr author as the one above, but aren't available with Creative Commons. Instead, they're marked as copyrighted. However, I think that these may be legitimate, because that Flickr author tagged some of his photos with inertia77, and it seems that he has or had an e-mail address starting with inertia77. I have posted comments to these two photos on Flickr asking the uploader to come here and comment. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author of both works, and the flickr account from which they came inertia77
@inertia77: Hi,
I think it will be fine, but since these are published on Flickr with "All rights reserved", we require that you send a permission (or that you change the license on Flickr). I would also suggest that you upload the highest resolution with EXIF data. This is just to protect your rights, since accounts here are pseudo-anonymous, we have no way to know if somebody else is copying your images. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one kept as ok, rest deleted FASTILY 09:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juniorpetjua (talk · contribs) with an URAA-problem

[edit]

Brazilian works, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+1+70 years), not in PD in Brazil at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Obs.: For Brazilian works finished before 01.01.1937 = {{PD-BR-1937}}.

1940
1943
1944 (still copyrighted, in PD in Brazil only in 2015)
1940-1949 (sourced with "anos 1940"/1940s)

Gunnex (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DISCOAWV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Photos from en:Life (magazine) regarding Brazilian superstar Category:Carmen Miranda, sourced with http://images.google.com/hosted/life (a service started in 2008 in cooperation with Time Warner Corp.) and configured with {{PD-US-not renewed}} which needs an evidence of publication between 1923 and 1963. The respective links offer only the shooting date meanwhile Google says: "Most [photographs] were never published and are now available for the first time" See also: "(...) About 97 percent of Life's archives have not been publicly seen, according to Life. (...) The photos can be printed out for free as long as they aren't being used as part of an attempt to make money.". http://images.google.com/hosted/life itself is accordingly configured with "© Time Inc. For personal non-commercial use only" (example). {{PD-US-unpublished}} fails here as the photos were taken between 1945-1950 and even presuming that these images were eventually published (which - as they are currently configured - is not confirmed) I have some doubts if the uploader was really concerned about renewed or not renewed copyrights or made sufficient efforts to clarify this issue. Surfing in some years of Catalog of Copyright Entries (1899-1978) Life registered and/or renewed copyrights periodically (e.g. renewing in 1965 or later editions from 1937-1938/1938-1939 (...) 1949. Anyway, without further information these files were published for the 1st time in at least 2008 and are still copyrighted.

Btw: All files are also available via Getty Images = http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/singer-carmen-miranda-drawing-the-winning-ticket-from-the-news-photo/50499369 + http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/long-haired-movie-star-carmen-miranda-urges-dubious-man-to-news-photo/50865927 + http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/singer-carmen-miranda-watching-the-pan-am-chess-tournament-news-photo/50499368.

Gunnex (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


That to say that a image is only considered public domain starting from his first publication? ie if an image produced in 1940 is published in 2008, is which said that their rights begin to be counted from this year (2008)?

LIFE magazine was founded on January 4, 1883. Do you think these photos were never published in some of its editions? Of course we were ... How am I going to have sources to prove this!

The very date of the photo is a PROOF!

If so, it is impossible to have any pictures in this program, because with the advent of Internet .. most photos from decades ago began to be published in a matter of 15 years ...

Then we will not have a decent image in public domain? DISCOAWV (talk) 11:01, December 2, 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DISCOAWV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{Cc-by-2.0-br}}-photos of (croppable) historical photos: Most likely out of scope of COM:DM. See also file titles ("fotografias", "Fotos"). Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worse-quality duplicate of File:Brežice Castle 1681 (2).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle des besseren Bildes?
Schon möglich, dass es sich hier um die Abbildung eines schlechteren Abzugs eines Vischer-Stiches handelt. Aber wir sprechen bei diesem Bild um einen von 495 Einzeldrucken der Faksimile-Ausgabe eines wissenschaftlich aufbereiteten Gesamtwerkes. Soll man das Gesamtwerk dadurch zerstören, dass man ein einzelnes Bild (welche somit inkomplett wäre) herausnimmt? Ich halte es für einen Unfug, das zu tun. Es sollten beide behalten, aber so umbenannt werden, dass sie in der Kategorie nebeneinander stehen. Es ist auch unklar, von welcher Quelle dieses "bessere Original" stammt. Es gibt im Übrigen auch mehrere Versionen einzelner Stiche in diesem Werk, da es jeweil mehrere Abzüge gibt. Es ist völlig unklar, ob diese bessere Version nachgearbeitet wurde, das von mir eingestellte Bild entspricht den Originalen, so wie sie heute noch in ca 13-facher Form (zum Teil unvollständig) vor allem in der Nationalbibliothek, dem Joanneum, dem steiermärkischen Landesarchiv u.a.O. gibt. Die beiden vorliegenden Stiche entsprechen dem Vischer-Register mit der Nummer 290 (nur eine Nummer für zwei Stiche!) Möchtest du dass man das Werk der Schönheit willen auseinanderbricht? Von dem gerade besprochenen Bild gibt es noch 10 Originale, von der Nummer 329 gibt es noch 7 Originale.
Bitte greif kein Gesamtwerk an! --Hubertl (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no reason to keep duplicates FASTILY 11:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: not a duplicat. Scanned from Topographia Ducatus Stiriae. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]