Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![1 File:Wells as 'Mary Ann Summers' in "Gilligan's Island" 2014-02-08 21-05.jpg](#File:Wells_as_'Mary_Ann_Summers'_in_"Gilligan's_Island"_2014-02-08_21-05.jpg){kind=link}
_Wikiproyecto_Teatro_(español).jpg){kind=link}
_o_mnichele_da_firenze,_madonna_col_bambino,_02.JPG){kind=link}
,_stemma_03.JPG){kind=link}
_Call_and_Post_Newspager,_ca_1966.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_official_photo_2014-02-07_01-31.jpg){kind=link}
_2014-02-07_21-07.jpg){kind=link}
![153 File:Memorial tragedies on "Kursk" Submarine.JPG](#File:Memorial_tragedies_on_"Kursk"_Submarine.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work-copy at retrojunkie website. We hope (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
![02:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/09#c-We_hope-2014-02-09T02:16:00.000Z-File:Wells_as_'Mary_Ann_Summers'_in_"Gilligan's_Island"_2014-02-08_21-05.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Blatant copyright violation: http://tineye.com/search/9cdcccf0651381dd1c36bb8842ad29ce218bab0b/?sort=size&order=desc High Contrast (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
![15:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/09#c-High_Contrast-2014-02-09T15:29:00.000Z-File:Wells_as_'Mary_Ann_Summers'_in_"Gilligan's_Island"_2014-02-08_21-05.jpg){kind=link}
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: \ FASTILY 09:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos quite identical : File:Siene River 30 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 31 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 32 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 33 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 34 2012-06-28.jpg File:Siene River 35 2012-06-28.jpg . I plan to keep File:Siene River 36 2012-06-28.jpg where is palais du Trocadero Tangopaso (talk) 08:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Eurovision would appear to hold the copyright over this image rather than Disney Romania unfortunately. Disney Romania should not have licensed this image freely on their picasa account. Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I'm sorry, you right, I do a terrible mistake, by not reading the rules, you can delete the file. Excuse me again, I will try to be more attentive next time. A nice day! Vlad 22222 (talk)
Deleted: per nom Jcb (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Taoist Triad.jpg Jonund (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Use {{Duplicate}} next time. —레비Revi 05:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of com:SCOPE. Only used for a promotional article at nl wiki. Logo is probably a copyrightviolations as well.
Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
It is unlikely that the base maps are hiw own work and they are probably copyrighted. Evidence of permission is missing.
Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Where already nominated for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Scope Alpertron (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Scope Alpertron (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Scope Alpertron (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Twitter Bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted image Alpertron (talk) 13:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Looks like Flickrwashing. See for example this page which contains one of the images in the collage and predates the upload to Flickr. Stefan4 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Or (as indicated) via http://www.4shared.com/folder/rZs3Q2tL/_online.html (2012, by "paulo K.", Copyright © 2005-2014 4shared.com) = http://dc585.4shared.com/img/HKjdejv4/s7/1390701c098/7_Sorriso_MT_FOTO_REVISTA_NOTC.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Pinoso Atlethic F-S Infantil, Campeón de Liga, Campeón Privincial y 3º de la Comunidad Valenciana- 2014-02-08 14-01.jpg
[edit]
Fuera del alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; out of COM:SCOPE unless used on a userpage. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; out of project scope unless used on a userpage. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
A photoshopped image, and a poorly photoshopped image at that. Who created the original images? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality; better images exist: Category:Saint Patrick's Day in Chicago Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
please delete Reddog11223 (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Not self-created; see COM:DW. Probably doesn't fall below COM:TOO#China. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This doesn't look like a text logo to me. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Site says its contents are copyrighted. We hope (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Photo on this page. Site says its contents are copyright 2011 at bottom of page. We hope (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Mingpao (明報) photo, check the watermark 太刻薄 (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The reflection by the window of train car is obvious. そらみみ (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: It's usable. Quality is not a reason to delete the only image we have. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia for 3D art. Leoboudv (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is a sculpture then the image cannot be kept since there is no COM:FOP in Russia Leoboudv (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Metadata shows originally from Getty images, non-free fancrap upload IndianBio (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Metadata shows belongs to Getty images, non-free work claimed as own IndianBio (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Metadata shows the image being created through JPEG formatter, not own work per the data IndianBio (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Found the antecedent: it's cropped from a predated image at http://gagaimages.org/thumbnails.php?album=2184 (site declares itself copyrighted and does not appear to declare free license of its images). I tagged the image for speedy-deletion as copyvio (one of several apparent ones by the uploader User:Mister Alvaro). DMacks (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb as copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, undated and sourced with "Revista Rolling Stone" = en:Rolling Stone which is published in Argentina by Publirevistas S. A. only since April 1998. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia for modern 3D sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) "años 1970"/1970s and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Per file title, Argentine band es:Aquelarre (banda) related, formed in 1971. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
no evidence that the uploader is the author 24.134.38.140 08:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) "2007" and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Source is 404. Most likely taken after 1970, without further details not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere. Gunnex (talk) 08:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Eliopianista33. Copyrighted with "Music Fest Vancouver" versus "own work". Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Russia for modern 3D art. Leoboudv (talk) 09:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
from pc-controllers.ru; no evidece of a free license Avron (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
from pc-controllers.ru; no evidece of a free license Avron (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
no source, "public" license ??? Avron (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
source and author "public" ??? Avron (talk) 10:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Tough case, but I'm willing to give it a try in name of Rory. She states: "I'm desperately trying to get rid of some very unflattering photos that were posted years ago as a result of an ex-manager trying to get back at me. I've tried everything to get them taken down, and my last resort has been to upload lots of new/better more relevant photos, in the hopes that these old ones would be considered outdated and irrelevant." (read ticket) We should cut her some slack, since she's been uploading better photos to our servers. Grashoofd (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Tough case, but I'm willing to give it a try in name of Rory. She states: "I'm desperately trying to get rid of some very unflattering photos that were posted years ago as a result of an ex-manager trying to get back at me. I've tried everything to get them taken down, and my last resort has been to upload lots of new/better more relevant photos, in the hopes that these old ones would be considered outdated and irrelevant." (read ticket) We should cut her some slack, since she's been uploading better photos to our servers. Grashoofd (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyright vio. Rapsar (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
out of scope. no permission. McZusatz (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This map is wrong. The arabic spoken region is spread too much in this map. Arabic language in Iran is not spoken in all the regions of Khuzestan. In the south of Iran arabic language is rare. This map has spread the arabic language even to the Fars province!! "Oman sea" is correct not "Arabian sea" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diako1971 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-09T08:15:06 (UTC)
- Delete I have not seen this much of phony information in a single map. However even if the information was correct (it is not), we needed reliable sources to prof it. --danghula (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
This map has false information. Iran has a minority of arab population. the guy who created this map has malevolent intention toward Iranians. Template:Unsigend
The main language in Iran is Persian or Farsi whole country speak Farsi. Iran has ethnic minority communities who can speak other languages in addition to Farsi. The ethnic minorities spread over the country. Furthermore, the sea in the south of Iran is Oman Sea not Arabian sea The creators uploaded this map without any valid references. So, this map is false. The creators are abusing Wikipedia to get unfair aim and deserve their political targeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moirani (talk • contribs) 2014-02-09T18:09:15 (UTC)
This is another abomination of the US and British and France to grab the oil region in middle east like Iraq and we oppose of any meddling above country to change. US is very anxious to dominate the world by creating chaos in that region, she already dominated the opium and lithium of Afghanistan and Enron in Iraq’s OIL and 5th fleet in the PERSIAN gulf for transporting the oil and sell it for their thirst of the greedy War Monger. Enough is enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.117.33.83 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-09T18:43:57 (UTC)
- Delete The information in this map is not correct. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 09:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Please remove this incorrect map from Wikipedia. The creator of this map is gaining political benefits by producing false information about the languages spoken in south and north east of Iran. Also The Oman Sea has been mistakenly called the Arabian Sea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Payam Arian (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T02:55:39 (UTC)
Kept: This map is widely used. Commons policy is that we do not make decisions on the accuracy of disputed maps. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
another version with better quality already exist at File:Manjil - iran -manjil news 3.JPG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZxxZxxZ (talk • contribs) 2014-02-09T10:18:00 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Reprint of the game manual image that is commercially available.--KAMUI (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It seems an infringement of copyright. --Shiro0922 (talk) 07:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
_Wikiproyecto_Teatro_(espa%C3%B1ol).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Wikiproyecto_Teatro_(espa%C3%B1ol).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Error en fechas. Ya se ha subido un archivo nuevo con los años correctos Tolijote (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
_Wikiproyecto_Teatro_(español).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
_Wikiproyecto_Teatro_(español).jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. There was a copyright notice at 0:21 in the trailer (link at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtPPSV3o3Zg). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep While it's true that there is a copyright notice at 0:21, it is a notice for the film, not the trailer, and it is identified clearly as such as a film copyright notice. The trailer itself was not copyrighted, so the "no notice" PD exception applies. If it doesn't, if we're applying the criteria so strictly that any kind of copyright notice takes it out of the public domain, than hundreds if not thousands of images are going to have to be deleted. I think it's fair to say that the vast majority of vintage film trailers show the title of the movie with the copyright notice for the movie underneath. I really "other stuff exists" is not a defense to anything, but in this case I think it illustrates that the trailer is in fact in the public domain. Coretheapple (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- The notice doesn't say "This applies only to the film" or "This does not apply to the trailer". It just says "Copyright MCMXLVII by xxx", which is all that was required by US copyright law at the time. The trailer was still copyrighted. — Crisco 1492 (talk)
- I'm not sure I agree, but I am hampered by an absence of knowledge of copyright law! I'll look for a fair-use image. Thanks. Coretheapple (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- This may be useful. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Very. Thank you! Coretheapple (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I agree, but I am hampered by an absence of knowledge of copyright law! I'll look for a fair-use image. Thanks. Coretheapple (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Notice is notice. It is not clear what the intentions of the studio were, but if they intended to have the trailer PD, the notice could have been removed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical is File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat14.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)- Delete Too similar. There is no reason to keep two similar (almost identical) images. So this is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: These are two images taken one second apart at exactly the same angle. While they are nominally different, keeping both just clutters up Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar is File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The other image is a bit more clear. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar (a bit better straightened) image is File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
-He repeatedly does the same mistakes just to increase number of edit. Check his gallery....-Krish Dulal (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It's better to keep only the other picture, because it is better straightened. So this can be deleted, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. (See the scope policy here.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat04.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is clearly more blurred and the other image is clearly better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar is File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat04.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The other image is a bit less blurred. So this more blurred image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This image is no longer being used. Hsuc (talk) 12:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's not true. It is used on four pages on two Wikipedia projects. Even if it were true, it would not be a valid reason for deletion. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution, personal image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The same image was uploaded to enwp in 2012 as en:File:Brookspiano.jpg with Laura Meek credited as the author, where it was deleted as OTRS permission was never received. Also previously published here, clarification needed of whether the uploader is the author. January (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
_o_mnichele_da_firenze,_madonna_col_bambino,_02.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_o_mnichele_da_firenze,_madonna_col_bambino,_02.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Filippo brunelleschi (attr.) o mnichele da firenze, madonna col bambino, 01.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
_o_mnichele_da_firenze,_madonna_col_bambino,_01.JPG){kind=link}
- similar but not the same...--Sailko (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
,_stemma_03.JPG){kind=link}
,_stemma_03.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Similar image (with more light and maybe more natural colors) is File:Palazzo comunale di pontassieve (sansoni trombetta), stemma 02.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
,_stemma_02.JPG){kind=link}
,_stemma_03.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There is no reason to keep two similar images. This is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Different exposures show different details -- both could be useful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
,_stemma_03.JPG){kind=link}
com:DW. There is no evidence that the portrait is in the public domain. Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Editorial Supporting John W.E. Bowen III in (Columbus, Ohio Edition of) Call and Post Newspager, ca 1966.jpg
[edit]_Call_and_Post_Newspager,_ca_1966.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Call_and_Post_Newspager,_ca_1966.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is it true, that every article from an American newspaper, which have no "All rights reserved" note, is free to use for commons ???? 24.134.38.140 13:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not true. In a periodical, a single notice, usually on the masthead, covers all editorial material (everything but adveritsements) in the whole periodical. In order to keep this, the uploader would need to prove that there was no notice in the newspaper, which is highly unlikely. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of image that was deleted for copyright. Zeimusu (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Por que no representa la realidad, la supuesta comida mexicana expuesta en esta foto, no lo es tal. Esta foto, presenta una visión y versión estadounidense que no tiene que ver con la realidad 96.127.194.90 14:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Jcb (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Weil keine Genehmigung der Hauseigentümer Nr. 6 und 8 vorliegen, dieses Bild zu veröffentlichen! 93.219.241.84 14:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Permission by the owners of the houses is not needed, and furthermore, the picture appears to have been taken from public ground (street). Lupo 22:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Weil keine Genehmigung der Hauseigentümer Nr. 6 und 8 vorliegen, dieses Bild zu veröffentlichen! 93.219.241.84 14:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Permission by the owners of the houses is not needed, and furthermore, the picture appears to have been taken from public ground (street). Lupo 22:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
maybe copyvio (see watermark) /St1995 14:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - this photograph is on Google, in lower resolution, in another tint. And the subject is w:Adah Sharma. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Este es Juan Pablo Sanchez Doval cumple el 23 de Febrero, es un famoso cantante romantico--No le gusta la hipocrecia ni las mentiras y quiere solo paz y amor--Es romántico con todas las mujeres del mundo 2014-02-06 16-16.jpg
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
_official_photo_2014-02-07_01-31.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_official_photo_2014-02-07_01-31.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
_official_photo_2014-02-07_01-31.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: probably copyvio . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
_official_photo_2014-02-07_01-31.jpg){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
copyright protected, according to http://www.gvvv.nl/contact/disclaimer-%C2%A9 Miho (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The file is a collage of images. There is no evidence given that the uploader holds the copyright to all (or indeed any) of these individual images. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I don't believe that this is the own work of the uploader and this image can be found on the internet through Yahoo and Google searches. Charterville (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This image is not the own work of the uploader because it comes from this website, http://inquisitr.com/1130948/ariana-grande-collaborates-with-japanese-beatboxer-hikakin/ 172.12.81.237 19:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.145.42 15:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurry. Poor quality. Not much scope. Bala(blitz) 20:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not as useful as File:Satyam Satamraju.jpg, the file it seems to be cropped down from. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Reprint of video package image that is commercially available.-KAMUI (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It seems an infringement of copyright. --Shiro0922 (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Image is claimed as the "own work" of Skinfarm, however images such as this are typically taken as official promotion while on the set and therefore it seems more likely that the self claim of copyright is invalid. Hasteur (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC) This image is a snapshot - not a promotional photo. --Skinfarm (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC) Snapshot was taken by Christina Fritz and given to me by Christina Fritz, parent of Kaitlyn Fritz.--Skinfarm (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- OTRS assertion of copyright now received. Template:OTRS ticket--Sphilbrick (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Sphilbrick: And this copyright grant came from? If it came from Skinfarm, I don't think we can trust the assertion. If it came from Fritz then there might be some validity? Hasteur (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- It came from Christina Fritz.--Sphilbrick (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Sphilbrick: And this copyright grant came from? If it came from Skinfarm, I don't think we can trust the assertion. If it came from Fritz then there might be some validity? Hasteur (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, it came from a gmail address claiming to be Christina Fritz. However, given that Skin farm has first claimed the image is "own work" and now says that it came from Christina Fritz, perhaps we should discount the OTRS permission. I must admit I am on the fence, so I will not close this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Jim on this one. This ticket should have better been processed. Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
_2014-02-07_21-07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-02-07_21-07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Community Manager- Representante de la marca en el entorno digital y gestor de emociones 2014-02-07 19-49.jpeg
[edit]
private image, self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
I am replacing it with a tif, because this jpeg does not give enough resolution Frank Layden (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: okey Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Heavily watermarked image. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
unused, unrecognizable mass of pixels with webside add - no reuse possible Andy king50 (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical is File:Makeevka 045.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better focused image File:Lvov 008.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The other similar image is clearly better focused. So this worse one is out of scope, because realistically it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Lvov 131.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of late Soviet sculpture, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Very likely not an own work but a copyright violation, the image is found in same or higher resolutions numerous other places, e.g. party website or newspaper interview NickK (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1980 and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, which is configured with a double condition: "Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created (= 
OK: es:Edgardo Donato died in 1963 = before 1971 which is the relevant URAA-limit, considering URAA-date 01.01.1996), and it was first published at least 20 years ago (= 
Not OK: 1980 + 20 years = 2000 = after URAA-date 01.01.1996)" = {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1965, unlikely own work by the uploader A.Savin 20:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Scan of late Soviet photography, unlikely taken by the uploader A.Savin 20:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:Кладбище немецких военнопленных 074.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There is no reason to keep two similar images. The similar image add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. Thus according to scope policy it's not realistically educationally useful. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no reason to keep two essentially identical images -- the second one is just clutter. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not used anywhere and not likely to be used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Eurocoins are not public domain. You need a license to use a picture of them on the internet. Mbch331 (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Dark, personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of late Soviet sculpture, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 21:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of modern 2D artwork; no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
![21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/09#c-A.Savin-2014-02-09T21:24:00.000Z-File:Memorial_tragedies_on_"Kursk"_Submarine.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
![19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/09#c-Natuur12-2014-02-17T19:07:00.000Z-File:Memorial_tragedies_on_"Kursk"_Submarine.JPG){kind=link}
Derivative of modern 2D artwork; no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of 2D artwork (plaque with relief) created after 1992, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 21:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Seems that "International Press Exchange" is/was the owner due to a stamp on the back of each pic, notifying the owner: Photo for your publication only. Since the former owner is passed away, now I'm the new one, and publish them on wiki commons. - My idea to justify the pics under another licence. - On the other hand all of them were published in the US definetly before 1923, because a) of the WW I situation and b) because of a written text in the collection album showing that it was created in november 1920, soon after WW I. After searching on WWW I did not find any Intl. Pess Exchg. Maybe someone has an idea, so I could contact anybody if it's still alive and ask for permission? --Cramunhao (talk) 10:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If you can prive that it was published in the USA before 1923, then it can be restored, but guessing that it would have been is not sufficient. Otherwise you need to show that the photographer died before 1944. The stamp on the back means nothing -- it applies only to the original user, who had a written agreement with the source. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Maybe obvious copyright violation since date of newspaper article is blacked out. Pechristener (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- This self-made swiss investigator is lying about a "blacked out" date, because what is "blacked out" is a comment about the left picture cut out.
„Special for Swiss Wikipedia-investigator Pechristener I upload this pic to prove that I didn't black-out any date. As everybody can see, there is instead of a date a comment of the left pic what isn't shown, that's the only reason why I wanted to show only the other comment, linked to the photo. I'm horrified with users like Pechristener who is the real reason why nobody wants to work on wikipedia anymore.“
– see:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_World_War0123.jpg
- He could help me to find the right licence instead of accusing my person in this way. --Cramunhao (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: "Lying" is an unpleasant word that is not correct here. The nom made a mistake, but he was not "lying". Such accusations have no place on Commons. The image must be deleted because c1916 is thirty years too late to assume that the photographer has been dead for the required 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this image would be fine for social media, fails COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This interesting picture has a wrong license. Picture is taken from an unknown author approximately 1916. It is therefore not clear that the author is for sure more than 70 already dead. Pechristener (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image with more light File:Flower ju.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I see no reason to keep two essentially identical images -- the second is just clutter. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Image is out of focus for Common's use Leoboudv (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this image fails COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Unneeded (and unused) bad quality ({{Badjpg}}) and probably misleading (for oudated/incomplete) version of File:Common Raccoon range.png. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Non-free mask. Eleassar (t/p) 22:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
manifestement non libre Tiraden (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Border at the top of the image suggests it is not an original piece. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: no evidence that this building is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 22:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
According to EXIF data, flickr description, and flickr file's watermark, this seems to be COM:FLICKRWASHING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady Lotus (talk • contribs) 2014-02-07T16:05:02 (UTC)
Info Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miley Cyrus going to the studio (cropped).jpg. Original source might be (even with a different watermark) http://www.x17online.com/gallery/view_gallery.php?gallery=mcyrus062812_X17 (Copyright ©2014 X17, Inc. All rights reserved) = http://www.x17online.com/gallery/galleries/2012/06/mcyrus062812_X17/full/mcyrus062812_07.jpg (identical exif), posted on 29.06.2012 versus 24.07.2012 upload date at Flickr. Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
wrong information 105.224.84.53 22:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason to delete -- whatever is wrong can be changed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyright information is doubtful, and there's a cursor icon in the image. It's currently replaceable by File:Washington 1861-24c-1861b.jpg. ALH (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright is not an issue -- the stamp never had one and the image is not eligible. However, the cursor makes in unusable and why keep two? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Savhñ 17:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
No metadata, low quality; likely copyvio. Savhñ 05:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Savhñ 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: and protected. Alpertron (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Richard Gillar died in 1939. It is not possible that Bobrifax took the photo himself. So there is no source nor authentification about who the persons on the picture are.Rabanus Flavus (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It is certainly possible the he took the photo himself -- some of us are older than you think -- but I agree that it is very unlikely. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Richard Gillar died in 1939. It is not possible that Bobrifax took the photo himself. So there is no source nor authentification about who the persons on the picture are. --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted In an OTRS message, Bobrifax tells us that he or she is the great-grandson or daughter of Gillar. However, it is evident that he does not know who the photographer was and it is unlikely that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
The artist has asked me to delete this photo of him and to upload another photo Franspruced (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The artist has asked me to delete this photo of him and to upload another photo Franspruced (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Although we don;t generally delete images at the request of the subject, in this case there is no evidence that you had permission to upolad this in the first place. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Rory Uphold
[edit]
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 1.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 2.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 3.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival day 2 2.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold, Juliette Harris at Cinema City Film Festival 1.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival day 2 1.jpg
Invasion of Rory Uphold's privacy rights. Morrismusiclaw (talk) 22:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - appears to be on a red carpet and posing, so I don't think there is any expectation of privacy. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment ticket:2012111410000144 relates to this DR. The requester cites privacy concerns and has been advised that they can discuss the DR here. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 07:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep File:Rory Uphold, Juliette Harris at Cinema City Film Festival 1.jpg shows a name card being held up in front of her -- it seems pretty clear that not only was she posing, but this was an arranged photo shoot at which a variety of people were posing. Our firm policy is that we do not take down images of public people just because they don't like them. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 1.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 2.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival 3.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival day 2 2.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold, Juliette Harris at Cinema City Film Festival 1.jpg
- File:Rory Uphold at Cinema City Film Festival day 2 1.jpg
It's a lousy photo. I've uploaded better ones from 2012. Lukecford (talk) 03:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy kept - put simply, we don't care. That you think these photos are bad is unfortunate, but they are within our project scope and are appropriately licensed. Unlike your photos which look to all be copyright violations. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete It's ok that you don't care. But this photo is, in fact, a copyright violation because the license permission is defective. Please read the permission email chain. The photo's alleged author never provided permission under a Creative Commons or other license to Wikimedia.
"Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed."
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.76.192 (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- Lukeford.net has a blanket OTRS ticket which licenses all images as CC-BY-SA-2.5. I see no reason to argue with OTRS here, especially since you cannot have read the ticket yourself. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Tough case, but I'm willing to give it a try in name of Rory. She states: "I'm desperately trying to get rid of some very unflattering photos that were posted years ago as a result of an ex-manager trying to get back at me. I've tried everything to get them taken down, and my last resort has been to upload lots of new/better more relevant photos, in the hopes that these old ones would be considered outdated and irrelevant." (read ticket) We should cut her some slack, since she's been uploading better photos to our servers. Grashoofd (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- These count as unflattering? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- I guess. They're not so bad if you ask me, but she thinks so. Grashoofd (talk) 07:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Read the two DRs above -- this is getting tedious. Images from the entire life of a notable person can be useful, so there is no such thing as an "outdated image" for Commons. For better or worse, our firm policy is that Commons is not censored, especially not by the subjects of images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
These have been replaced in all instances and do not conform to Template:SVG locator maps (location map scheme).
- File:Bahia MicroBarreiras maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroBomJesusDaLapa maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroCatu maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroCotegipe maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroEntreRios maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroItaberaba maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroItapetinga maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroJacobina maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroJequie maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroJeremoabo maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroJuazeiro maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroLivramentoDoBrumado maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroPauloAfonso maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroPortoSeguro maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroRibeiraDoPombal maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSalvador maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSantaMariaDaVitoria maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSantoAntonioDeJesus maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSeabra maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSenhorDoBonfim maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroSerrinha maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroValenca maploc.png
- File:Bahia MicroVitoriaDaConquista maploc.png
Mahir256 (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Musicians from Argentina with a URAA-problem
[edit]Argentine works, published/created or sourced with (as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US (+95 years).
- 1971
- 1972
- File:Dana - Arco Iris - En el disco Sudamérica (1972).jpg
- File:Juan Darienzo.JPG
- File:Vida (álbum de Sui Generis).jpg (album cover)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- 1974
- File:Alejandro Medina mordisco 1.jpg
- File:Banda aquelarre 1 mordisco 1.jpg
- File:Banda invisible mordisco nro 1.jpg
- File:Cesar Isella.jpg
- File:Rodolfo Gorosito - 1974.JPG (album cover)
- 1976
- File:Alejandro De Michele.jpg (album cover)
- File:Atiliostampone.jpg
- File:Carlos Cutaia.JPG (cropped from File:Charly y la maquina de hacer pajaros 2.jpg)
- File:Chico Navarro.JPG
- File:Los Chalchaleros.JPG (obs.: image caption via es:Los Chalchaleros = 1966. Band was active until 2003)
- File:Mariano Mores.jpg
- File:Oscar Moro.JPG (cropped from File:Charly y la maquina de hacer pajaros 2.jpg)
- File:Pastoral Humanos.JPG (album cover)
- 1979
- File:Desconocidosdesiempre-1979.jpg (album cover)
- File:RodolfoGorosito.jpg (album cover)
- File:Dantegrela.jpg
- 1980
- File:Carlosgarcia.jpg
- File:Carlosgarcia cropped.jpg
- File:Manuelabrodos.jpg
- File:Sergiomorero.jpg
- File:DanielBinelli.jpg
- 1981
- 1982
- 1983
- File:Jorge Durietz.JPG (album cover)
- 1984
- File:Alejandro De Michele.jpg
- File:Alejandro Medina mordisco 1.jpg
- File:Atiliostampone.jpg
- File:Banda aquelarre 1 mordisco 1.jpg
- File:Banda invisible mordisco nro 1.jpg
- File:Carlos Cutaia.JPG
- File:Carlosgarcia cropped.jpg
- File:Carlosgarcia.jpg
- File:Cesar Isella.jpg
- File:Chico Navarro.JPG
- File:Dana - Arco Iris - En el disco Sudamérica (1972).jpg
- File:Daniel Curto.jpg
- File:DanielBinelli.jpg
- File:Dantegrela.jpg
- File:Jaimetorres.jpg
- File:Jorge Durietz.JPG
- File:Juan Carlos Paz.JPG
- File:Juan Darienzo.JPG
- File:Los Chalchaleros.JPG
- File:Manuelabrodos.jpg
- File:Manuelrego.jpg
- File:Mariano Mores.jpg
- File:Desconocidosdesiempre-1979.jpg
- File:RodolfoGorosito.jpg
- File:Oscar Moro.JPG
- File:Pastoral Humanos.JPG
- File:Rodolfo Gorosito - 1974.JPG
- File:Rubén Goldin.jpg
- File:Sergiomorero.jpg
- File:Vida (álbum de Sui Generis).jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Passports of Australia
[edit]Non-free Australian Crown Copyright. Some of the files are claimed to be under a non-derivative licence, although the link is broken.
- File:AUSSIEPASSPORT.jpg
- File:Australia ePassport chip page.jpeg
- File:Australian ePassport.jpeg
- File:Australian ePassports Information page.jpeg
- File:Australianpassport Lseries.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Passports of Australia
[edit]Missing permission from the Australian government.
_of_a_P-Series_Australian_passport,_issued_in_July_2014.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files on Chessington World of Adventures Resort
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the United Kingdom.
- File:Chessington World of Adventures 001.jpg
- File:Leatherhead Road, Chessington - geograph.org.uk - 2841801.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chirawatpat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:NinaProfile.jpg
- File:Miss Nina Lamsam Ligon.png
- File:Nina's Awards.JPG
- File:GoldAsiaGame.jpg
- File:Nina Lamsam Ligon.jpg
- File:Nina Lamsam Ligon Olympic 2012.jpg
- File:NenaHT2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Collection of movie posters and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:2013 - Luce sul Polesine.jpg
- File:2011 - nulla accade per caso.jpg
- File:2011 - il professore film.jpg
- File:2009 - avanti sempre sempre avanti.JPG
- File:2010 - confine senza fine.JPG
- File:2005 - Polesine.JPG
- File:DE LAURENTIS FERDINANDO.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
crowns drawn by Arnaud Bunel
[edit]copyvio: crowns taken from http://www.heraldique-europeenne.org/Regions/Benelux/Couronnes_Belgique.htm (mix of marquess and viscount crowns).
- File:Blazon-Miclescu-wiki.png
- File:Blazon-Manu-wiki.png
- File:Blazon-Kristescu-wiki.png
- File:Blazon-Miclescu.png
- File:Blazon-Manu.png
- File:Blazon-Kristescu.png
- File:Wappen-Rascanu.png
Kathisma (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Collection of album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dimkalgr.jpg
- File:Ping Pong.jpg
- File:Tanirama.jpg
- File:Two steps from the sand.jpg
- File:Kathodon.jpg
- File:Contrabando.jpg
- File:Stone years.jpg
- File:Senza tempo.jpg
- File:Something is happening here.jpg
- File:Sudden love.jpg
- File:Dies Iraes.jpg
- File:Angel Small album cover.jpg
- File:Lord of the powers.jpg
- File:The story teller II.jpg
- File:The story teller.jpg
- File:The garden with the statues.jpg
- File:Love songs.jpg
- File:Maran atha.jpg
- File:Nestor's dream.jpg
- File:Nestorscompanys.jpg
- File:Lets listen together.jpg
- File:To the first musician.jpg
- File:Promitheass.jpg
- File:Looking backs.jpg
- File:Colours of iris.jpg
- File:Beautiful liess.jpg
- File:Stamatis Spanoudakis.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Looks like collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Lampara de Piso.jpeg
- File:Platero para meseta Barnizado$10.00CUC.jpg
- File:Logo Principal Fondo Cuadrado.jpg
- File:Palo para Cartera.jpg
- File:Organizador Grande $5.00CUC.JPG
- File:Paltero con gaveta.jpg
- File:Organizador de Oficina $5.00CUC.jpg
- File:Organizador de Madera $4.00CUC.jpg
- File:Organizador Casita Modelo No.5 $50.00MN.jpg
- File:Organizador Casita Modelo No.4 $50.00MN.jpg
- File:Organizador Casita Modelo No.2 $3.00CUC.jpg
- File:Organizador Casita Modelo No.3 $60.00MN.jpg
- File:Mesa de Cocina con Botellero Barnizado$50.00CUC.jpg
- File:Organizador Casita Modelo No.1 $3.00CUC.jpg
- File:Mesa-desayunadoraarrime2-estantes-rejilla-y-cajon Barnizado$35.00CUC.jpg
- File:Librero en Cubos $25.00CUC.jpg
- File:Lampara de Tela.jpeg
- File:Lampara de Pie con Repizas.jpg
- File:Lampara de madera con panel plastico nevado $10.00CUC.jpg
- File:Lampara de Pared.jpg
- File:Lampara de madera con panel de tela.jpg
- File:Lampara con panel azul de tela 30x30cm $15.00CUC.jpg
- File:Lampara con panel azul de tela 20x40cm $12.00CUC.jpg
- File:Lampara con panel azul de tela 20x20cm $10.00CUC.jpg
- File:Lamapra de Techo.jpg
- File:Lampara China.jpg
- File:Incensario.jpg
- File:Estantes Casitas para Especies $8.00CUC.jpg
- File:Estante.jpg
- File:Estante para Microwave.jpg
- File:Estante doble con gavetas y pequeño platero para platos de tazas de cafe $25.00cuc.jpg
- File:Especiero de esquina $4.00CUC.jpg
- File:Especiero con Gaveta $10.00CUC.jpg
- File:Estante Casita para Especies $8.00CUC.jpg
- File:Especiero Casa 50cm ancho $8.00CUC.jpg
- File:Especiero 2Pisos con Gavetas30cmancho 50cmaltura$10.00CUC.jpg
- File:Especiero 2pisos 30cm ancho $5.00CUC.jpg
- File:Cuchillos Grandes $50MN.jpg
- File:Copero para 10copas con Estante Estilo Balcon $20.00CUC.jpg
- File:Adornos de Madera Parquecito.jpg
- File:Casita con Pinito.jpg
- File:Casita 2 $75.00MN.jpg
- File:Casita 1 $100.00MN.jpg
- File:Bandeja Rustica Sencilla con Tecnica Decoupe $4.00CUC.jpg
- File:Bandeja Grande para desayuno $8.00CUC.jpg
- File:Banco para baños70x50x25cm $20.00CUC.jpg
- File:Adorno de Madera $4.00CUC.jpg
- File:2Platero $15.00CUC.jpg
- File:Platero sencillo $10..0CUC.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elisabet bertran (talk · contribs)
[edit]TV-program-related images. No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:19808 oliver-y-raul-como-tronistas-en-mujeres-y-hombres-y-viceversa.jpg
- File:Yanirapretendientes-640x359.jpg
- File:Emma García presentadora del programa.jpg
- File:Tronistes.jpg
- File:Emma García.jpg
- File:Mhv.jpg
- File:Ml70eltifihemhio274d79f89238c6a mujeres-y-hombres-y-viceversa-logo m.jpg
- File:2v1uhoy.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kateclappofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kateclappofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots+logo which are out of scope (+probably COM:ADVERT).
--XXN, 00:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, out of project scope.
- File:Michael Nativel, à la recherche du corbeau blanc.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, le son du jazz-carte blanche.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, la traversée de l'existence.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, gens miam-miam.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, chez monsieur Robert.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, librement inspiré.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, le désert des automates.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, évangile.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, thank you Hollywood.JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (14).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (12).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (11).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (13).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (10).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (8).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (9).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (7).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (5).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (6).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (4).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (3).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (2).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel11.JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (1).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (15).JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, 2008, gif sur yvette.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, presse locale 2008 -1.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Ha Oui 2013.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Panorama 2010.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, presse locale 2010.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Parisien 2012.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Républicain.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Chez Monsieur Robert.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (fr:Utilisateur:M-nativel/Brouillon).
- File:Michael Nativel, au coeur des Ulis.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, à la Daunière.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, mains d'écrivain et de travailleur.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, présentation.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel en pleine écriture.JPG
- File:Lesulis tv.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel, Téléssonne en 2013.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel, écrivant.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Téléssonne en 2012.jpg
- File:Gens miam-miam, Cécile Bouillet & Corentin Nativel & Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Chez Monsieur Robert, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Évangile, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Le son du Jazz- Carte Blanche, Didier Gérardin-Michael Nativel.JPG
- File:Librement inspiré, d'après Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Thank you Hollywood, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Le désert de automates, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:À la recherche du corbeau blanc, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:La traversée de l'existence, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Michael nativel.JPG
- File:Photo de l'auteur ulisssien.jpg
- File:Gardien du château de Ballainvilliers.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, 2008.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, année 2008.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, 2010.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour le journal Le Parisien, 2012.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour le journal Le Républicain, 2012.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Collection of album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:WET.jpg
- File:WET cover.jpg
- File:Bleed-Scream.jpg
- File:AYRTR.jpg
- File:Eclipsesecondtonone.jpg
- File:Eclipse-12b2 (6).jpg
- File:The Truth And A Little More.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Punkyhippo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, promotional cards with non-notable people.
- File:00011W - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:00011P - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:00013C - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:00012P - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:00012A - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:00010H - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001VO - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001VA - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001TJ - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001UP - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001OR - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001P7 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001OE - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001O0 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001NL - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001MT - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001L9 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001L0 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001HR - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001KL - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001K5 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001JU - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001JC - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001I5 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001GM - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001FL - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001HI - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001FE - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001F2 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001EB - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001DY - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001DL - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001D2 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001CT - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001C0 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001CH - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001C9 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001AQ - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001BR - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001B4 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000ZL - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000Z6 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001AF - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001A3 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000XK - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000Y0 - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000XD - картичка от www.punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000WV - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000WD - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000VN - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000UW - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000VZ - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000UJ - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000U6 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000TQ - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000TC - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000SA - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000T2 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000RR - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000QV - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000R7 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000PW - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000PI - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000P6 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000M3 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000OF - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000OW - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000MJ - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000LO - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000LA - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000KW - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000IO - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000JK - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000J5 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000HU - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000HF - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000IA - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000FY - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000G7 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000GL - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000F1 - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000FP - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000EB - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000DC - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000CY - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0000CQ - Картичка от Punkyhippo com.jpg
- File:0001WD картичка от Punkyhippo.jpg
- File:0001WK картичка от Punkyhippo.jpg
- File:0001WL картичка от Punkyhippo.jpg
JurgenNL (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Socialhumanity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not seeing how any of this is in project scope. Two images are advertising only. The rest are photographs of a private meeting which doesn't appear to have a page anywhere on any of the wikiprojects.
- File:Docathon Team.jpg
- File:Fsmk summer camp-2013.png
- File:FSMK Winter Camp-2013.jpg
- File:Discussion with Prof. Ramanujam @ fsmk office.jpg
- File:FSMK - Mock Docathon @IISc.jpg
- File:Fsd celebration @ fsmk office.jpg
- File:FreeSoftware Activist's Laptop.jpg
- File:FreeSoftware Activist's laptop.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded in row on 11.12.2013 and all related to es:Alejandro Toledo (músico). Unlikely to be own work, taken from different authors (see also details of 5 copyvios via User talk:UKSustain, grabbed from Flickr, Facebook, etc.), 4 images with exif "Canon EOS 5D Mark II", most likely taken by "picture by Xi Yang" (as sometimes indicated). Permission needed.
- File:Dr. Alejandro Toledo 2014.JPG
- File:Alejandro Toledo saxophonist Ph.D.jpg
- File:Alejandro Toledo Argentinian musician.JPG
- File:Alejandro Toledo by Xi Yang.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded in 2009, all files taken from http://ensamblemusicalargentino.blogspot.de/2008/05/qu-es-ema-y-por-qu.html + http://ensamblemusicalargentino.blogspot.de/2008/05/fotos.html (2008) = .jpg I + .jpg II + .jpg III (identical exifs). Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitrubius32 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works. Historical photos (related to Honduras) may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. See also Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory#Honduras.
- File:General Vicente Tosta.JPG
- File:General Ferrera.jpg
- File:Palacio Obrero.jpg
- File:Buque Comayagua.jpg
- File:Muelle Puerto Cortés.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Does not respect precisely PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 00:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture taken the 15 of June 1952 [1]. Photographer (unknown) cannot be died for 70 years. Aga (d) 13:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
fictional + not in use => out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
rest of a deleted article 24.134.38.140 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich möchte das selbe Bild in SVG-Format hochladen. Sonneninfo (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich möchte das selbe Bild in SVG-Format hochladen. Sonneninfo (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Die Stadt Eschweiler führt diese Flagge File:Flagge_Eschweiler.svg Juergenk59 (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Die Stadt Eschweiler führt diese Flagge File:Flagge_Eschweiler.svg Juergenk59 (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Uploader with a history of copyvio issues. Different EXIF than other contributions. Doubtful s/he created this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in the United States. See Commons:FOP#United_States. Alan (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lantus (talk • contribs) 2014-02-02T10:57:47 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
It's bad. It was replaced with File:Castello Piccolomini Gagliano .. tif Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is not the same image as deleted above, but it is the same uploader and the same subject. The same reasons apply for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Dateibezeichnung entspricht nicht realen Gegebenheiten Pmuehlich (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I have to apologize. Instead of setting up a deletion request on Produktion Balaenenweg Aarau.JPG, I caught this site. --Pmuehlich (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Ich möchte das selbe Bild in SVG-Format hochladen Sonneninfo (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. (Translation: "I want to upload the file in svg") --Indeedous (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
ORDAT FOSS Teilsysteme.jpg Doktor Wegel (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. Raymond 08:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Ersatz durch eine korrekte Datei desselben Autors Klaumich49 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
ich will es so haben danke Remisxanto (talk) 21:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Die Interessensgemeinschaft, die dort abgebildet ist, möchte dieses von mir erstellte Bild nicht mehr sehen. Dory171 (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: obvious error. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
This and File:Rick James.JPG should be deleted because of a higher quality photo of Rick James at file:Rick James in Lifestyles of the Rich 1984.JPG. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that it's really, really not a good photo (I tidied up this version, and it's still poor). However, to the best of my knowledge we don't normally automatically delete images simply because a slightly better (non-identical) one is available. Might be different in this case, as this is an obviously low-quality image that would have been tolerated while nothing else was available. However, this one shows James in the mid-90s, appearing somewhat different to the 1984 photo, so I still think it should be kept on that basis.
- On the other hand, the source that *both* the above images are clipped from was deleted as a copyvio (see File:Rick james and kevin ross.jpg). If that's true, both derivative versions should be deleted on that basis, but I'd be curious to know how the original was found to be a copyvio...? Ubcule (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP FASTILY 23:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Almost a duplicate of File:Interior de la Escuela 2.jpg. Given numbers are pointless as not explained in the image's description. Torsch (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope. See w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FitriTeganuKelateOffficial.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Rama (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maps of Wayne County, Michigan
[edit]These have near-identical counterparts with near-identical names save for the capitalized 'H' in 'Highlighted', allowing for redundancy and possible misdirection.
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Belleville Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Canton Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Dearborn Heights Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Dearborn Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Detroit Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ecorse Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Flat Rock Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Garden City Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Gibraltar Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Ile Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Farms Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Shores Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Hamtramck Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Harper Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Highland Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Inkster Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lincoln Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Livonia Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Melvindale Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Northville Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Plymouth Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Plymouth Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Redford Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas River Rouge Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Riverview Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rockwood Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Romulus Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Southgate Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Taylor Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Trenton Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wayne Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Westland Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Woodhaven Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wyandotte Highlighted.svg
Mahir256 (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Many of these are in use. DR rationale unclear. INeverCry 08:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maps of Wayne County, Michigan
[edit]I am renominating because I have replaced all of these files (mostly in the Swahili Wikipedia), such as File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park Highlighted.svg, with their equivalents which are used in other wikis, such as File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park highlighted.svg. Notice that the two filenames are not identical, differing only by a single capitalization--this is the case for all the files which I am nominating. When one looks in the category (and in Category:Maps of Oakland County, Michigan), one notices that about half of the locator maps are completely unnecessary and hence should be deleted. The differences, while significant to an automatic diff of the files, are negligible for the purposes of transmission of information. Before one decides to press that 'Kept' button, one should consider whether the redundancy matters in the context of COM:SCOPE: there is no difference in what is being emphasized between the two sets of images which I wish to distinguish. I hope I have made my rationale clearer than before.
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Belleville Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Canton Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Dearborn Heights Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Dearborn Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Detroit Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ecorse Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Flat Rock Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Garden City Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Gibraltar Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Ile Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Farms Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Shores Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Grosse Pointe Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Hamtramck Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Harper Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Highland Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Inkster Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lincoln Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Livonia Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Melvindale Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Northville Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Plymouth Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Plymouth Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Redford Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas River Rouge Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Riverview Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rockwood Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Romulus Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Southgate Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Taylor Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Trenton Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wayne Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Westland Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Woodhaven Highlighted.svg
- File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wyandotte Highlighted.svg
Mahir256 (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical is File:Birupakshya at Aryaghaat14.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too similar. There is no reason to keep two similar (almost identical) images. So this is out of scope, because realistically it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:Kaymakli underground city 8940 Nevit Enhancer.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment File:Kaymakli underground city 8940 Nevit.jpg is the original and Enhancer is tone mapped modified version. The darkness in original files is not due to exposure error, but due to extremely difficult lightning conditions. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- There is no reason to keep the darker image, because it is superseded by better quality version. --Kulmalukko (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image with more light File:Kaymakli underground city 8894 Nevit Enhancer.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment File:Kaymakli underground city 8894 Nevit.jpg is the original and Enhancer is tone mapped modified version. The darkness in original files is not due to exposure error, but due to extremely difficult lightning conditions. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- There is no reason to keep the darker image, since it is superseded by better quality version. --Kulmalukko (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
better version on File:Second World War Europe 1939-1942 de.webm.
The svg-Version is large and not performing well. Some browsers have problems with the animiation-tag in the svg-file. Users think mistakenly that the svg-File is a static image. The webm-Version ist better (small and performing well) and more user-friendly (user can see intuitively that it is not a static image). San Jose (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maps of Oakland County, Michigan
[edit]- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wolverine Lake Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wixom Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas West Bloomfield Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Waterford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Walled Lake Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Village of Clarkston Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Troy Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Sylvan Lake Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Southfield Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas South Lyon Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Royal Oak Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rochester Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rochester Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Pontiac Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Pleasant Ridge Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Oxford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ortonville Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Orchard Lake Village Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Oak Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Novi Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Milford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Madison Heights Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Leonard Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lathrup Village Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lake Orion Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lake Angelus Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Keego Harbor Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Huntington Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Holly Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Hazel Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Franklin Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ferndale Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Farmington Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Farmington Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Clawson Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bloomfield Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bloomfield Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Birmingham Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bingham Farms Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Beverly Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Berkley Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Auburn Hills Highlighted.svg
All of these display the exact same, if not less or more, information as their counterparts without the capitalized 'H' in 'highlighted' (with a few exceptions). --Mahir256 (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Many of these are in use. Also, the rationale is a bit strange: if not less or more - what does that mean exactly? INeverCry 07:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't want to type this again, so see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maps of Wayne County, Michigan. The exceptions I found still apply as per my previous nomination.
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Auburn Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Berkley Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Beverly Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bingham Farms Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Birmingham Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bloomfield Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bloomfield Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Clawson Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Farmington Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Farmington Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ferndale Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Franklin Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Hazel Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Holly Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Huntington Woods Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Keego Harbor Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lake Angelus Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lake Orion Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Lathrup Village Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Leonard Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Madison Heights Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Milford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Novi Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Oak Park Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Orchard Lake Village Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Ortonville Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Oxford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Pleasant Ridge Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Pontiac Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rochester Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Rochester Hills Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Royal Oak Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas South Lyon Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Southfield Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Sylvan Lake Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Troy Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Village of Clarkston Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Walled Lake Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Waterford Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas West Bloomfield Township Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wixom Highlighted.svg
- File:Oakland County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Wolverine Lake Highlighted.svg
Mahir256 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
DR to decide of this qualifies as simple logo. The only copyrightable element seems to be the crown, though it doesn't look that original (If I well recall we have a lot of identical crown drawings here in Commons under a free license) Darwin Ahoy! 00:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Nominating this for deletion again. I'm not buying this is below COM:TOO in most countries, let alone Brazil, where we don't know what the level is. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nana Ntumba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (en:Wikipedia:Nana Ntumba/sandbox).
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Joss Diena.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana2.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with International Movie stars.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on set in Harare.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Idris Elba.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on an ARRICAM camera.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Troutsberg Zimbabwe.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Adonai TV studio.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep and Director friend.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep filming the nature.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming Mutodi.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep The Director testing the Sony DSR 570.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On set with the crew.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On the way to Kenya.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Directing TD Jakes Program.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep In Zimbabwe.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming in Zimbabwe.JPG
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, at least some: Regardless of the vanity in intent, at least some of these images do have educational value, namely illustrating professional camera and studio use in several places in Africa. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Besides these are all high quality shots, with sharp forcus and high resolution. Even the goofier ones, which argueably fit the nomination deletion rationale, are mostly well framed and composed. -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Notable people
[edit]- One more for our Category:Idris Elba, adding the 2nd of only two distinct detailed views:
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Idris Elba.JPG
- Kept two files extracted from this (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Our very first and so far only image of Justin Chadwick:
- Kept one file extracted from this (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep and Director friend.JPG
- Luba musician JB Mpiana (borderline notable):
- As you say, "borderline" (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana.jpg
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana2.jpg
- DRCongolese Joss Diena (borderline notable):
- As you say, "borderline" (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Zimbabwe businessman, musician, and politician Energy Mutodi (borderline notable):
- Borderline and back to camera (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
Filming
[edit]- Camera use
- We have more than 100 files in Category:People_with_movie_cameras and more than 400 in Category:People with video cameras (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on set in Harare.JPG (really good, this one)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming in Zimbabwe.JPG (really good, this one)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming Mutodi.JPG (ditto)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On set with the crew.JPG (ditto)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep filming the nature.JPG
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on an ARRICAM camera.jpg
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Troutsberg Zimbabwe.JPG
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep In Zimbabwe.JPG
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming in Zimbabwe.JPG
- Studios
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Adonai TV studio.jpg (our first in Category:Television studios in South Africa)
- Two unidentified people in a room with a lot of computer monitors -- not exactly a useful image. (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Backstage of Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom
- These might be useful if the "international movie stars" and "the director friend" were identified, but as they are, they are not useful. (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
Other
[edit]- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep.jpg: Portrait of non-noatble person, however good quality and interesting technique.
- So what -- good quality and interesting technique is not a reason to keep on Commons unless the image might qualify as a Picture of the Year. (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
- Keep File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On the way to Kenya.JPG: Nothing of note other that it is the only photo in 20 within Category:Airports in Kinshasa to show passengers.
- Poorly composed, shows two non-notable passengers, one of them with back to camera, but does not show anything of the airport -- indeed, I think it is not in Kinshasha at all, but shows a part of a plane whose destination is Kinshasha. (Jameslwoodward, 2014.02.08)
-- Tuválkin ✉ 03:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not Facebook. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Restored as per Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Commons:Deletion requests.2FFiles uploaded by Nana Ntumba. I think that deleting these was a bad idea. They are HR images, many of them have educational value, and could be used in Wikipedia. Beside we don't have that many images from Africa. We should encourage to upload more images from there. Last, if at least someone other user think that an image can be useful, we should not delete it on the rationale "out of scope". Yann (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nana Ntumba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal images. Commons is neither a means of self-promotion, nor is it a personal online photo album.
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Joss Diena.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with JB Mpiana2.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with International Movie stars.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on set in Harare.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Idris Elba.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep on an ARRICAM camera.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Troutsberg Zimbabwe.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep.jpg
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep and Director friend.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep filming the nature.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming Mutodi.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep The Director testing the Sony DSR 570.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On set with the crew.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep In Zimbabwe.JPG
- File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep Filming in Zimbabwe.JPG
FASTILY 08:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, speedily. There are images extracted from these files that are in use on Wikipedia, and I see no reason to fuss about the deletion of these if the nominator can't check that first.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, speedily. As per my comment above. Yann (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete These are simply self promotion. My comments on each group are shown in the first DR. It is true that there are parts of several of these images in use, but the crop was done before they were uploaded, so they are not a necessary part of the history of the in-use images.
- As an example of the promotional intent, look at File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with International Movie stars.JPG -- we're given the name of the person being promoted, but the "International Movie Stars" are not identified.
- While I think that they should all be deleted, I will admit that a few of them may be useful. I think, however, that the majority of them have absolutely no place on Commons. See, for example, File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep.jpg, which is simply a personal image with no reason for us to keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Replying a few points raised by Jim:
- «These are simply self promotion.» Yes, that’s clear from the filenames — however they were donated for any use. In Commons we curate vanity items and create from them usefulness for the world.
- «the crop was done before they were uploaded»… As far as I know all images of this DR are unedited originals. I made a few crops of some of them (obviously, after they were uploaded by the original contributor) and uploaded them under different names, marking them with {{Extracted image}} and {{Extracted from}}.
- I believe that in File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with International Movie stars.JPG the title is incorrect; the file description more credibly says «Long walk to freedom Movie crew». But even if these people are not “nameless” film technicians but indeed famous international movie stars it is not deleting this photo that will help us get them identified and, then, ascertain the value of this contribution. There is a category for unidentified actors, after all.
- «While I think that they should all be deleted, I will admit that a few of them may be useful.» Why would you want to delete also what you admit that may be useful? Besides, we’re talking about a (programmer’s) dozen files here, not a million. Why dont you list apart those you think that may be useful and vote to keep them?
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Replying a few points raised by Jim:
- Further replying a few of the points raised by Jim (and adding that I was shocked by his adding of unmarked, unsigned comments interspersed within someone else’s text; I felt forced to add SMALL tags, the date and a sig. link):
- «We have more than 100 files in Category:People with movie cameras and more than 400 in Category:People with video cameras.» Indeed we do, and these nine files are not only much better than most of those, but also double the number of those depicting a person of recent African ancestry holding said cameras.
- About File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep in Adonai TV studio.jpg (which used to be the single image we had in Category:Television studios in South Africa, now an empty category) Jim says that it shows «Two unidentified people in a room with a lot of computer monitors -- not exactly a useful image.» On the contrary this image is useful to show how does (a part of) a TV studio look like: a room with a lot of monitors. That’s the very definition of being educational.
- Concerning File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep and Director friend.JPG, Jim says that it «might be useful if the »(…)« "the director friend" were identified, but as they are, they are not useful.» The director in question is Justin Chadwick, as explained; Jim himself found this photo worth keeping a few lines above. (Yes, I split my argument by keep rationales and listed relevant files under each; some files show up more than once, those I think are worth keeping for more than one reason.)
- Concerning File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On the way to Kenya.JPG, Jim says i.a. that «I think it is not in Kinshasha at all, but shows a part of a plane whose destination is Kinshasha.» Jim and other admins have the ability to view deleted images and pages, which I lack, but if my memory serves me right, there’s enough on the photo and description to assume this was taken in Kinshasa (plane livery, maybe?). Filename says «On the way to Kenya», anyway, so surely the destination is not Kinshasa.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Further replying a few of the points raised by Jim (and adding that I was shocked by his adding of unmarked, unsigned comments interspersed within someone else’s text; I felt forced to add SMALL tags, the date and a sig. link):
- Keep My opinions didn’t change, either. -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all except for File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep and Director friend.JPG, File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep On set with the crew.JPG, and File:Venant Mambumina Imhotep with Idris Elba.JPG as those are currently seeing use somewhere. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Jim and TeleComNasSprVen. Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Jim and Fastily. Jee 06:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Some images are in use and have derivatives in use on Wikimedia projects, we have no idea how many have been found useful by reusers elsewhere. The educational value is demonstrated. If photographs have potential educational value and are not disruptive spamming, then being "self-promotional" is not of itself a rationale for deletion, nor does it make photographs of the "fan-photo" type out of scope. Nana Ntumba has done nothing wrong by sharing these photographs on Commons for their potential educational value, they are helping Commons to fulfil its aims. --Fæ (talk) 07:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept There isn't consensus for deleting the photos, and as Fæ said, a big number of photos were reused, so the material may be useful in the future Ezarateesteban 00:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)