Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/12/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(6663011297).jpg){kind=link}
![23 File:Debbie Reynolds Auction - Ingrid Bergman signature full suit of armor with chain mail vest from "Joan of Arc" (2).jpg](#File:Debbie_Reynolds_Auction_-_Ingrid_Bergman_signature_full_suit_of_armor_with_chain_mail_vest_from_"Joan_of_Arc"_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_Ariel_Ivanovna_Kazakofski.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![82 File:Sri. K D George, receiving the Best Feature Film award for editing "CHEMMEEN" from the President.jpg](#File:Sri._K_D_George,_receiving_the_Best_Feature_Film_award_for_editing_"CHEMMEEN"_from_the_President.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Dallas_Piece_-_Henry_Moore_1.jpg){kind=link}
_Harrow_-_Linnea_Glatt.jpg){kind=link}
_Gateway_Stele_-_Jesus_Bautista_Moroles_(detail).jpg){kind=link}
_Journey_to_Sirius_-_George_Smith.jpg){kind=link}
_Venture_-_Alexander_Liberman_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
кувпппавпапв 80.94.239.130 09:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Vandal nomination russavia (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Análisis Y Perspectivas De Crecimiento Económico-Social Por La Construcción Del “Túnel Bonanta”.pdf
[edit]no cumple las normas Jfsotoe (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Jfsotoe does something strange in the talk page of file, I do not understand Spanish, but I suppose, that he wants to delete the file. This is uploader's request, so I close it. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Wunsch der abgebildeten Person per Mail vom 22.12.2013 ST ○ 17:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied due to wish of uploader on day of upload and expressed wish of depicted person. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Análisis Y Perspectivas De Crecimiento Económico-Social Por La Construcción Del “Túnel Bonanta”.pdf
[edit]no cumple las normas Jfsotoe (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Jfsotoe does something strange in the talk page of file, I do not understand Spanish, but I suppose, that he wants to delete the file. This is uploader's request, so I close it. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Análisis Y Perspectivas De Crecimiento Económico-Social Por La Construcción Del “Túnel Bonanta”.pdf
[edit]no cumple las normas Jfsotoe (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Jfsotoe does something strange in the talk page of file, I do not understand Spanish, but I suppose, that he wants to delete the file. This is uploader's request, so I close it. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_(6663011297).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6663011297).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have some doubt about the permission to have this here. This image is a derivative of pictures with unknown author(s) and unknown date(s). Yann (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_(6663011297).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Derivative. The original photos are uncredited and undated, although two of them seem to be from 1992 during the shooting of a French film. No information is provided to determine their copyright status. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as per nom and as per upload cleanup russavia (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_(6663011297).jpg){kind=link}
{{Duplicate|011 Kanapees und belegte Brötchen aus Sanok.JPG}} Tatewaki (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied deleted as duplicate — billinghurst sDrewth 23:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
{{duplicate|026 Kanapee am Spieß.jpg}} Tatewaki (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as duplicate — billinghurst sDrewth 23:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
uploader request. I have uploaded a better version, Sayur asem.JPG. SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per Uploaders request. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted Cambalachero (talk) 16:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
appears to be crop of album art for "Hot Couture" see: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/hot-couture-single/id475061264 or https://www.tineye.com/search/be958ca92e5e4ea700af40e900a8bb566c9f3b01/ 69.24.174.220 22:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 23:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright fehlend M 93 (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
The image comes from this page [1] and this recording. There, the watermark was cut off at the bottom of the screen to disguise the URV. Otherwise, it's exactly the same motif, spots on the image, trees, leaves everything the same. 217.246.197.12 19:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- See the Deletion log on german wikipedia --217.246.197.12 20:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
This file is not a official documents of state government. The file doesent show state symols or news report. It was deleted yesterday 217.246.217.84 22:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep photo from news report, stop trolling around --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep as per above --41.65.38.225 12:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
InfoThe information of this file is that the page [2]. the source is. This is a gallery of images and not a news report. --217.246.223.42 09:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Welcome to the 21st century, where news reports also contain pictures. RIA Novosti is, as its name implies, a news agency and not an art gallery. They publish news reports. --Matrikelpartikel (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. This is not an official document. Yann (talk) 07:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
This was uploaded and being used for vandalism on the English Wikipedia (by being transcluded through w:Template:OSM relation) by a now-blocked account. Imzadi 1979 → 04:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: I would have to agree with Imzadi1979, plus also I would consider this image to be Out of SCOPE for commons. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
출처에 명확한 주소가 기재되어 있지 않습니다. Nhero2006 (talk) 06:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused file.File seems to be uploaded for promotional use. 레비Revi 09:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 15:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused. 레비Revi 09:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. unused McZusatz (talk) 15:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Promo or cover shot w watermark; unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
copyvio (http://jcy.zhenjiang.gov.cn/zjjj/jcyjj/200911/t20091105_235776.htm) DHN (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
copyvio (http://www.panoramio.com/photo/6728937) DHN (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Unknown date, unknown source, unknown author: too many uncertainties... Yann (talk) 18:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unsourced, undated, uncredited. No information is provided to determine the copyright status. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PRP McZusatz (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Somewhat unlikely original work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- What do you mean unlikely original work? User:Youresit
- Sorry, I find it somewhat doubtful that you have shot the original photography. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: we need permission McZusatz (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Debbie Reynolds Auction - Ingrid Bergman signature full suit of armor with chain mail vest from "Joan of Arc" (2).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derative of a copyrighted poster Natuur12 (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: The derivative poster takes up a large portion of the picture. Maybe 50-55%. It is safer to delete here. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and this too; File:Debbie Reynolds Auction - Theadora Van Runkle costume design sketch of Samantha Eggar from Doctor Dolittle.jpg. --레비Revi 03:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
A mistake on my part. The photo was on my PC, but I'm not the photographer. Billboa (talk) 09:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File is very likely a copyright violation (not user's own work; appears to be a screenshot from a music video?); used solely for vandalism on Wikipedia ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 07:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete AGree with nominator this is some kind of screenshot and unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused private image => out of scope Torsch (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
This picture is a selfie with no encyclopedic value Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 09:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
-2013-12-22T09:53:00.000Z-File:Irfan_Qurashi,_and_his_chins..jpg){kind=link}
Comment: This picture has a pending DR already, Mr. WMF. The fact that said DR being a mess of its own is not helped with the coumpounded mess of having two simultaneous DRs affecting the same file. (Is this how Foundation staff works? Seriously? I’ll remember this next time a donation or election comes around.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)- Delete I only see one deletion request on the page, so I'll vote Delete here and if I see it again, I'll vote delete there too. It's outside of COM:SCOPE. I'm not arguing but pointing out just on the merits of this request, this picture needs to be deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
non-removable watermark and non-free license text present. Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 10:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
-2013-12-22T10:09:00.000Z-File:Nachtmann-franz-xaver-1799-184-a-lady-wearing-black-dress-wit.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Licence texts and non removable watermarks are valid deletion reasons? By the way the problems are solved. --Ras67 (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Image source clearly says "© 1986-2013 Invaluable, LLC.". Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's only copyfraud. --Ras67 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It is not copivio, painting created before 1846, illegal watermark removed yet (thanks to Ras67).--Хомелка (talk) 08:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are welcome. --Ras67 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. Yann (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation (both files) 79.237.166.92 10:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the picture is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation (all three fles) 79.237.166.92 10:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the picture is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
the file it so blurred and additionally distorted by a huge watermark beyond repair and therefore not useful for any purpose Andy king50 (talk) 07:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete There is no evidence of permission from the photographer of this 3d-object. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
has 2 watermarks, is blurry, and displays text that implies not-free license Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 10:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation 79.237.166.92 10:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a Google+ profile picture. --Taichi (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
image has irreparable scanning artifacts that make it unusable. Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 10:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
-2013-12-22T10:43:00.000Z-File:Plan_de_Metz_avec_ses_projets_1737.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Problem fixed. --Ras67 (talk) 02:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. Yann (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation 79.237.166.92 10:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This image is marked in such a way to indicate a poster, or screen shot of an event, probably not the uploader's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Purely promotional and out of scope. Being created by sockpuppet for page that keeps getting deleted. Bgwhite (talk) 08:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Purely promotional and out of scope. Being created by sockpuppet for page that keeps getting deleted. Bgwhite (talk) 08:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
On this webpage the image is atttributed to Jeannie O'brien. There is no evidence the uploader is the same person. In mu opinion an OTRS verification is necessary. Ww2censor (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! The Photographer (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Can't see the advert. Useful for illustration of gurning or face-pulling (before and after shots like this are in short supply). --Fæ (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I lolled my ass out!! Don't delete ! =D Orrlingtalk 18:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: INeverCry 19:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
This is a image is a selfie with no encyclopedia value Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 09:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
-2013-12-22T09:54:00.000Z-File:This_be_me.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Nothing changed since the previous DR discussion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: See also: File:Irfan Qurashi, and his chins..jpg, extracted from the right side panel, with 2 (!) DRs pending. -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I only see one deletion request on the photo page, and so I'll vote delete for it. It's a personal image, and a compound image, with no encyclopedic value. Please forgive if I am compounding any problems, I don't see any reason for this photo to be on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Unauthorized movie screenshot 79.237.166.92 10:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by INC. Yann (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
shopping.daum.net is not original creator and original author have never licensed these photo under CeCILL nor CCL. 레비Revi 09:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
_Ariel_Ivanovna_Kazakofski.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ariel_Ivanovna_Kazakofski.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seems derivate work of copyrighted anime. 레비Revi 09:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stadio Giuseppe Meazza
[edit]There is no FOP in Italy.
- File:1908 commedia.jpg
- File:2009-08 Derby- AC Milan vs Inter at San Siro.jpg
- File:219579.jpg
- File:219580.jpg
- File:ACMilan tifoseria.jpg
- File:ACMilanultras2006curvasud.jpg
- File:Colonna tetto sansiro.jpg
- File:Curva Interista.JPG
- File:File-Omaggio Gabriele Sandri - San Siro 2 maggio 2009 - 2.jpg
- File:Giuseppe-Meazza-Stadion DSC00354.JPG
- File:GiuseppeMeazzaNeazzurro.jpg
- File:Grazie curva nord inter 15.jpg
- File:Il terzo anello e il tetto di sansiro da fuori.jpg
- File:Inter - Curva Nord in festa, scudetto 2008-2009.jpg
- File:Inter Manchester.jpg
- File:Luci a San Siro.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 1.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 2.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 3.jpg
- File:Milano San Siro partita.jpg
- File:Luci a San Siro.jpg
- File:Milan - Barca 2006.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 1.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 2.jpg
- File:Milan - Chievo 04-2006 3.jpg
- File:Milano stadio Meazza vista esterna.jpg
- File:MilanoSanSiro02.JPG
- File:MilanParma.jpg
- File:Omaggio Gabriele Sandri - San Siro 2 maggio 2009.jpg
- File:PAOLO009.jpg
- File:PAOLO011.jpg
- File:Preparazione concerto di zucchero a san siro.jpg
- File:S.Siro esterno.jpg
- File:S.Siro1.jpg
- File:San Siro - cropped.jpg
- File:San Siro Giuseppe Meazza - La cattedrale del calcio - soccer cathedral.jpg
- File:San Siro stadium in Milan-feve.jpg
- File:San Siro vue extérieur.JPG
- File:San Siro wide.jpg
- File:San Siro.jpg
- File:San Siro1.JPG
- File:San Siro2.JPG
- File:Sansirbici.JPG
- File:Sansiro in the sky.jpg
- File:Sansiro rampe e scale.jpg
- File:Sansiro188.JPG
- File:Scudo2009.jpg
- File:Stadio Giuseppe Meazza a Milano DSC00011.JPG
- File:Stadio Giuseppe Meazza.jpg
- File:Stadio San Siro, Milano, 2012.jpg
- File:Stadio San Siro.jpg
- File:Stadio SanSiro Gate 14.jpg
- File:The San Siro Sunshine.JPG
- File:Way to San Siro.jpg
LGA talkedits 09:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Milano San Siro partita.jpg dosen't cover all part of the stadium and focused on football match!151.233.133.212 18:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have cropped out the architecture, can the closing admin revdel the original. LGA talkedits 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Grazie curva nord inter 15.jpg is a little different. I am not the original uploader, I just found bigger better copies to expand upon the original. It is a picture of the fans in the stands and some other people on the field, framed by the architecture above the stands, focused on the fans and the simple geometric designs and one word "GRAZIE" (Italian for "Thank you", probably text art) they are forming as a group, plus the people on the field spelling out "INTER" with balloons (which I think also qualifies as text art). It is used in some Wikipedia articles on the team (ar, bg, de, sh), but also in one article on the stadium itself (de, where it is captioned "Kurve der Inter-Fans" or "Curve of the Inter fans", so still not about the architecture), as well as for decoration on various user pages. The architecture above the word "GRAZIE" could be cropped out without problem, but I would consider the depiction of the rest of the architecture to be de minimis. Plus, the look of the stands from the camera's perspective is a design from thousands of years ago as demonstrated by the Colosseum, which surely has passed out of copyright, as it was built 1933 years ago. I'm surprised File:San Siro wide.jpg isn't in the list above, it's got lots more architecture. In fact, all the Commons images in article de:Giuseppe-Meazza-Stadion and its translations should be examined for inclusion in this request. Thoughts? — Jeff G. ツ 04:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry forgot to extend VFC so missed a number, I have now added them. as for File:Grazie curva nord inter 15.jpg I will crop the roof out and then re-upload. LGA talkedits 06:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 13:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry forgot to extend VFC so missed a number, I have now added them. as for File:Grazie curva nord inter 15.jpg I will crop the roof out and then re-upload. LGA talkedits 06:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: -- apart from the images that were either DM (focused on match or fans' banners) or with too low resolution for being usable anywhere else SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stadio Giuseppe Meazza
[edit]There is still no FOP in Italy but it seems more of these images have been uploaded since the last DR despite the notice on the category page.
- File:San Siro (15817752319).jpg
- File:San Siro 2005.jpg
- File:San Siro 2009 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:San Siro 2009 2.jpg
- File:San Siro 2009.jpg
- File:San Siro by Night.jpg
- File:San Siro Corner.jpg
- File:San siro esterna 2.jpg
- File:San Siro Night 2008.jpg
- File:San Siro.jpg
- File:Stadio San Siro - Milano 06-2006 - panoramio - Zhang Yuan (1).jpg
- File:Stadio San Siro - Milano 06-2006 - panoramio - Zhang Yuan.jpg
- File:StadioGiuseppeMeazza2013.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Green Giant (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Frankly, a single note in the category is not enough to warning uploaders about the FoP in Italy. Maybe there needs to be a patch in the UploadWizard to try to tackle this situation. Cheers --Oscar_. (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination... photographs of modern architecture in Italy, where there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
As of this request, these are unused on any project, and thus fall out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Horsemanship.jpg
- File:Shotgun Cartridges.jpg
- File:Pheasant Shooting.jpg
- File:Foxhound Image.jpg
- File:Fly Fishing Rods.jpg
- File:Foxhunting.jpg
- File:Charles Sainsbury-Plaice.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: also low quality McZusatz (talk) 15:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baher fawzy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal images, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baher fawzy (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos
Vividangel (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardo Montalvo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 04:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardo Montalvo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy delete These were deleted previously. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:DavidMehnertYorubaHat.jpg
- File:BananaphoneElGreco.jpg
- File:GeorgeSandover.jpg
- File:OprAh'sFavoriteAfricanDictatorSantaHat.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal images, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:A Nice Pic Of Vishnu From Office Serial 2013-12-22 12-38.jpg
- File:A Nice Pic Of Vishnu From Office Serial 2013-12-21 00-07.jpg
- File:Niveda Thomas Cute Pic 2013-12-13 23-41.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already gone McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of company with questionable notability.
- File:-"Teacher’s Consultancy Services" (TCS) is an exclusive ‘Educational Consultancy’ based at Indore; India- It is an educational Consultancy Firm-----Visit -- www-teachersconsultancy-com--Facebook -- www- 2013-12-20 23-30.jpeg
- File:-"Teacher’s Consultancy Services" (TCS) is an exclusive ‘Educational Consultancy’ based at Indore; India- It is an Education Consultancy firm-- -TCS Deals With Faculty requirement, Faculty recruitment a 2013-12-20 23-22.jpeg
_is_an_exclusive_%E2%80%98Educational_Consultancy%E2%80%99_based_at_Indore;_India-_It_is_an_educational_Consultancy_Firm-----Visit_--_www-teachersconsultancy-com--Facebook_--_www-_2013-12-20_23-30.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_is_an_exclusive_%E2%80%98Educational_Consultancy%E2%80%99_based_at_Indore;_India-_It_is_an_Education_Consultancy_firm--_-TCS_Deals_With_Faculty_requirement,_Faculty_recruitment_a_2013-12-20_23-22.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thesupermat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded with just a {{PD}} license tag, which is invalid. Should be changed to i.e. {{PD-self}} or something similar of the choice by the fotografer.
File:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 030.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 029.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 028.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 027.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 026.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 025.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 024.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 023.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 022.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 021.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 020.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 019.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 018.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 017.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 016.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 015.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 014.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 013.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 012.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 011.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 010.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 009.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 008.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 007.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 006.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 005.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 004.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 003.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 002.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 001.jpg- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 015.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 014.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 013.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 012.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 011.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 010.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 009.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 008.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 007.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 006.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 005.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 004.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 003.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 002.jpg
- File:Ninjaman Japan - Japan Expo 2013 - 001.jpg
JuTa 11:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded with just a {{PD}} license tag, which is invalid. Should be changed to i.e. {{PD-self}} or something similar of the choice by the fotografer.
File:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 062.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 061.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 060.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 059.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 058.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 057.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 056.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 055.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 054.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 053.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 052.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 051.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 050.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 049.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 048.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 047.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 046.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 045.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 044.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 043.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 042.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 041.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 040.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 039.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 038.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 037.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 036.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 035.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 034.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 033.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 032.jpgFile:Dempagumi.inc - Japan Expo 2013 - 031.jpg
JuTa 13:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- C'était si compliqué que ça de me contacter directement et de me signaler mon erreur de licence ? Au lieu de ça, on lance une procédure de suppression, le culte du grand n'importe quoi dans sa splendeur.--Thesupermat (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for applying valid license tags to most of the images. I kept and striked out those. But you still forgot some. Can you please reinvestigate. regards. --JuTa 23:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- JuTa , you forgot to apologise for this DR. Why didn't you ask Thesupermat directly? He's mentioned as the author; it fits the EXIF; all signs show the pictures were perfectly OK and that it was a simple mistake. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for applying valid license tags to most of the images. I kept and striked out those. But you still forgot some. Can you please reinvestigate. regards. --JuTa 23:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Please give the uploader, Thesupermat, time to change the license for the other images. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: All OK now. Yann (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
i uploded this file by mistake and I need to upload that truly reflects its name Juanerices (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you want to change file name, you can use {{Rename}}. --레비Revi 11:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused and superseded by better-quality File:Seven Golden Stars 2012.svg. Alkari (?), 22 December 2013, 01:07 UTC 01:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Not realistically useful as very poor quality image (subject unsharp, cropped, obscured) per COM:SCOPE. We have much better images of the species among a large collection of ca.100 images. ELEKHHT 01:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
If, as claimed, this is the own work of the uploader, it is clearly not a 13th century image. It is clearly not what it purports to be, and serves no useful purpose 86.185.148.199 01:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The coat of arms -- the blazon -- was awared around 1200. This representation is recent, as claimed. There is no inconsistency here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John de Holcombe Castillo blanco (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: see former DR. Ruthven (msg) 13:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
text only, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 01:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete out of scope; content likely not useful for educational purposes. File is not used on any Wikimedia project. --High Contrast (talk) 12:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: .. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
text only, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 01:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete out of scope; content likely not useful for educational purposes. File is not used on any Wikimedia project. --High Contrast (talk) 12:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
text only, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete out of scope; not useful for educational purposes. File is not used on any Wikimedia project. --High Contrast (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
As of this request, this is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Person on the photo has no article on Dutch wikipedia, because there was not enough information to make him relevant for an encyclopedia. There will be little chance the photo will be used. Mbch331 (talk) 09:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
As of this request, this is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
As of this request, this is a personal image that is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As of this request, this is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Regardless of the fact that the subject of this photo is bordeline notable, and that on the other hand an article about him was just now deleted in w:en, and that on a third hand that such deletion might have been more for unsuitableness of the article itself (cached text refers the subject as «boyishly handsome») and not for lack of notability (which brings us to square one: likely notable); and also regardless of the fact that this photo may lack a reliable permission and that its copyright status may be questionable — I need to point out to the nominator that, in the nomination sentence above, the word "thus" is gravely misused. The linked text, COM:SCOPE, states clearly that Commons is not only a mere repository of illustrations for WM projects — the whole rationale («not used ∴ off scope») is thusly unbased. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK, fine. Let me restate: this image was used for purely promotional purposes, and it's unclear if it has any educational value. Now, have I worded it more to your liking? Or do you have a need to go another diatribe attacking my nomination on the technicality of the words instead of actually discussing whether we should keep the image? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
As of this request, this is a personal image that is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image, fails COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.vodkaycaviar.com/lang-en/buy-online-liquor/771-licor-midori-melon.html Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
That's NOT the same image. I took this one in my kitchen and I have the original untouched photos to prove it. Although that's not really necessary since you can easily spot differences on the highlights. AndreasArgirakis (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Independent creation. See the top of the label vs the liquid line inside. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence on source page that this would be freely licensed, or that uploader would be license holder. ELEKHHT 05:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
There's a source now. Please quit the template of no sources. --
FOBOS | algo que decirme 
17:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: THe source, PNAS, has a strongly worded copyright policy. ARR . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
no mention of Creative Commons license at the source, OTRS needed Sealle (talk) 05:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
no permission Sealle (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Completely inaccurate depiction of w:en:Rayleigh_scattering as would be seen from the moon. This makes it "Not educationally useful" according to commons deletion policy. Timl (talk) 09:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- See here for more discussion. Timl (talk) 09:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Its pretty, but unhelpful. Tomruen (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Various WP editors disagree. It is in use in several places and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
obviously not own work of the uploader Krd 09:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: "obvious" to you, perhaps, but not to me. We need a better reason. It is true that this is the only upload from this editor, but we Assume Good Faith when own work is claimed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Flickr file uploaded on 20.12.2013. Initially tagged with FlickreviewR: failed All Rights Reserved but 90 min. converted in License review passed by Ww2censor. Flickr source http://www.flickr.com/photos/fashionistasca/10306443174/ still configured with "All rights reserved". Gunnex (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- At the time I did the review the licence was as stated and that is why I passed it. I am always very diligent about such matters, so very much doubt I made a mistake. I've no axe to grind on this one, so just delete it if you wish. Ww2censor (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- When I edited the image for flickrreview, flickr site stated All Rights Reserved for the image. So I expected the image would be deleted after it failed to pass license check. Later I was very surprised to find that someone tagged it passed cc-by-2.0. Maybe he made a mistake. The image has been All Rights Reserved all the time. No license changed ever. It should be deleted. --Leedkmn (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I am reluctant to doubt Ww2censor, but there is no evidence of any reason why the Flickr license was changed temporarily. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I think based on these three pics uploader has actually never been a photographer at Haiti in 2010. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
obviously not taken by uploader DHN (talk) 10:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: cropped from an image at India Today . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't meet the criteria of PD North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
image is too blurry to be usable. Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
-2013-12-22T10:39:00.000Z-File:Seimetz.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Agree with nominator, this one is very blurry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: It is one of only two works by this artist on Commons and is, in fact, in use, contradicting the nom. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2023 (95 years after publication). JuTa 11:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Sri. K D George, receiving the Best Feature Film award for editing "CHEMMEEN" from the President.jpg
[edit]
Looks like a scan. No evidence that the uploader is the actual copy-right holder —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a scan. No evidence that the uploader is the actual copy-right holder —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2026 (95 years after publication). JuTa 11:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Self promotor - 13 year old boy who thinks he would be a pastor... - not really done anything for a Wikimedia project. But Commons is not Webspace for self promotors.. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: That's true, but as long as WP:EN allows it to stay, we can;t delete it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Self promotor - 13 year old boy who thinks he would be a pastor... - not really done anything for a Wikimedia project. But Commons is not Webspace for self promotors.. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: That's true, but as long as WP:EN allows it to stay, we can;t delete it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Self promotor - 13 year old boy who thinks he would be a pastor... - not really done anything for a Wikimedia project. But Commons is not Webspace for self promotors.. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: That's true, but as long as WP:EN allows it to stay, we can;t delete it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2025 (95 years after publication). JuTa 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2048 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2027 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2055 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2033 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2034 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2024 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2046 (95 years after publication). JuTa 12:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Hartmut Honka ist Inhaber der REchte und mit der Veröffentlichung unter einer freien Lizenz einverstanden.("anbei der Originalbild unserer Pressestelle für Wikipedia.") seems to imply this is for wikipedia only, not general release. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Pictures of bronze mirrors taken from Weibo, and incorrectly licensed as {{PD-Art}} and {{PD-old-100}}. The images are not old and are not photographic reproductions of 2D art (mirrors are 3D objects), so the licenses are invalid. No evidence that the photos have been released under a suitable license by their copyright holder. BabelStone (talk) 13:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Old photograph taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the photograph has been released under a suitable license by its copyright holder or is out of copyright. BabelStone (talk) 13:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Fointain is from 1941, there is no FOP in France and the artist died in 1972 so it is not pd either, Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was uploaded to commons in 2010 but has already appeared in this 2004 version of the Enciclopedia de los Municipios de México, where no Ariel Tenorio is credited and where the copyright status is given as "© 2001. Centro Nacional de Desarrollo Municipal". Ariel Tenorio's only contributions to Wikimedia seem to be two pictures from this Mexican government project's website and the article es:Sultepec ([3]), widely copied from that very site, where he is not mentioned. → «« Man77 »» [de] 14:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was uploaded to commons in 2010 but has already appeared in this 2004 version of the Enciclopedia de los Municipios de México, where no Ariel Tenorio is credited and where the copyright status is given as "© 2001. Centro Nacional de Desarrollo Municipal". Ariel Tenorio's only contributions to Wikimedia seem to be two pictures from this Mexican government project's website and the article es:Sultepec ([4]), widely copied from that very site, where he is not mentioned. → «« Man77 »» [de] 14:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope. Promocional/conflicto de interés. Leitoxx 14:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fointain is from 1941, there is no FOP in France and the artist died in 1972 so it is not pd either. Natuur12 (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Artist died in 1987 so the painting is still copyrighted. Natuur12 (talk) 14:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ymblanter, closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2055 (95 years after publication). JuTa 15:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: poster
Converted by me to DR, as this looks like a 19th-century drawing and thereby is likely out of copyright already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: died 1913 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: poster
Converted by me to DR, as this looks like a 19th-century drawing and thereby is likely out of copyright already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 1895 drawing, to recent for me to assume artist died before 1943 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Doubt on the author: I have a book published in november 2008 where that picture is credited to Marketa Navratilova/KPZ:*Jean-Michel Marchand (préf. Bernard Thévenet), Figures du cyclisme nivernais : 1900 - 2008, Varennes-Vauzelles, novembre 2008, 286 p. (ISBN 9-782953-316803), p. 170.
Converted by me to DR, as this needs a bit of discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio,
- Would it have been better I used DR instead of Copyvio template?
- Thanks, --Aga (d) 15:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- No, you did nothing wrong. It's just that in case of images that have been on Commons already for a while and are not totally blatant copyvios, IMO a bit of "discussion" is merited, even if only to learn why we didn't detect the copyvio earlier. --Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, in addition to Agamitsudo's findings, it's the only upload of this user and the username is identical to the name of the depicted cyclist — more likely it's just a fan than the depicted himself. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As far es I can see not free. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep both seem to be uploaded by the same person there and here, at least it is quite probable, because both call themselves "Rajib". So in this case i see no reason do have doubts about the "own work" tag. Andy king50 (talk)
Deleted: I think Andy is probably correct, but the ARR tag on the other site means that we need a license using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from badges design. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
copyvio (http://www.jcy.gansu.gov.cn/news/jcwh_sfsy/2010/23/1023104030252868HA8C0GJE0503B0.html) DHN (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
uploader has history of appropriating others' work as his own DHN (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Small, low-res, grindy image, Better resolution image avalaible here . Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
If this image is from google as the uploader claims, can Commons use this image...or is it from a free website? Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Source is (c) . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
If this image is from google as the uploader claims, can Commons use this image...or is it from a free website? Leoboudv (talk) 20:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in the US (Minnesota, here) for modern signs. Leoboudv (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Dallas_Piece_-_Henry_Moore_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dallas_Piece_-_Henry_Moore_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Statue by Henry Moore, who died only in 1986, and thereby likely still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_Dallas_Piece_-_Henry_Moore_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Dallas_Piece_-_Henry_Moore_1.jpg){kind=link}
_Harrow_-_Linnea_Glatt.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Harrow_-_Linnea_Glatt.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If this is considered a work of art, it is likely still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_Harrow_-_Linnea_Glatt.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Harrow_-_Linnea_Glatt.jpg){kind=link}
_Gateway_Stele_-_Jesus_Bautista_Moroles_(detail).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Gateway_Stele_-_Jesus_Bautista_Moroles_(detail).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This looks to be recent and thereby likely still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_Gateway_Stele_-_Jesus_Bautista_Moroles_(detail).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Gateway_Stele_-_Jesus_Bautista_Moroles_(detail).jpg){kind=link}
_Journey_to_Sirius_-_George_Smith.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Journey_to_Sirius_-_George_Smith.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If this is considered a work of art, it is probably still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_Journey_to_Sirius_-_George_Smith.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Journey_to_Sirius_-_George_Smith.jpg){kind=link}
_Venture_-_Alexander_Liberman_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Venture_-_Alexander_Liberman_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This statue looks to be recent and thereby likely still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
_Venture_-_Alexander_Liberman_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
_Venture_-_Alexander_Liberman_1.jpg){kind=link}
This appears to be a modern sculpture in Rhodes, Greece. Since Greece has no Freedom of Panorama, can Commons keep this image or is it of generic design...that is not copyrightable? If not the image must be deleted unfortunately. Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: does not look to me as PD-trivial Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
The photo subject thinks it is horrible. Eyes are deformed due to the glasses. Declared here: [5] Paracel63 (talk) 22:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Cannot argue with that, but still no reason to delete. -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: We have only three images of this man. ONe has severe distortion from wide angle lens (huge nose), second has mike in front of face, this is the best of the three. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I do not see any evidence that this image is below the threshold of originality in the ROC. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: seems to be above the threshold Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.youscribe.com/catalogue/rapports-et-theses/savoirs/science-de-la-nature/nouveau-procede-pour-obtenir-la-liquefaction-de-l-oxygene-1515261
Converted by me to DR, as this looks like a 19th-century drawing and thereby is likely out of copyright already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: OK. Yann (talk) 00:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: poster
Converted by me to DR, as this looks like a 19th-century drawing and thereby is likely out of copyright already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I guess we need a french speaker to look at the description. --McZusatz (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art. Yann (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP: all other uploads by this user = copyvio. Same photo constellation available via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=109426002 (11.2013, by "marte") = http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/5845/hwo0.jpg, but here without the black aerea above. Gunnex (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
...--> forget this info. File was uploaded on 10.2013 at Commons. skyscrapercity-source is from 11.2013. Gunnex (talk) 10:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 19:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture taken from the website of the Capital Museum, Beijing. No evidence that the picture has been released under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://ekladata.com/w9x4-fnXvoiCiCSlfZvaBsvrnq8.jpg
Converted to DR by me. As the depicted died in 1913, the photo is likely from the 19th century and thereby likely PD-old already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Old enough Yann (talk) 00:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: poster
Converted by me to DR, as this looks like a 19th-century drawing and thereby is likely out of copyright already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: ok Yann (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
trebisove velke len probemi 88.159.68.102 19:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion given High Contrast (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
no educational use, pervert stuff Andy king50 (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed with above. Not educationally useful and user just seems to be using this as a dumping ground for low-quality images of his genitals. I am admittedly new here, and the line between "not censored" and "not useful" seems blurry. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- please dont delate this image, because, we haven't so much pictures with insertion in human male uretra in an ereected penis. I'm proud of my training to strech my uretra. I'm not interesstet to show my genitals in public, because i have much pictures online too. So please dont delate this image.
- Keep - I must concur with the uploader, we don't have many photos of urethral insertion (this one makes 4). And it is a recognised fetish, even if it is scary as fuck to most men. Perversion is no reason for deletion. I have nominated some of the user's other uploads for deletion on grounds of low quality, but that is only a consideration if it is something we have plenty of. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This is the same image as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harnröhreneinführung bei steifem Penis.JPG. darkweasel94 12:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PDD - previously deleted dick. Same cock, different day. Batteries not included. Alison ❤ 04:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
uploader has history of uploading others' work as his own DHN (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
uploader has history of appropriating others' work as his won DHN (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture was taken by me (User:Dapopewarrior), and I nominate this image for deletion. 77.103.114.138 18:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep At first, Dapopewarrior is blocked now and cannot make anything in Commons. The anonymous user must be blocked for block evasion. At second, the file is used in simple.wiki and therefore cannot be deleted in any other reason than copyright issues. At third, no reason for deletion is given. Uploader's request is not enough, because free licences are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: As per Taivo. Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I don't like this picture. Dapopewarrior (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I don't like this DR. Is there any objective rason to delete the image?--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept --Denniss (talk) 21:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I do not like this picture because I don't like it. Dapopewarrior (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
I do not like this picture can it be deleted? Dapopewarrior (talk) 11:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Fourth nomination! File still in use, and also CC licenses are irrevocable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Although the way in which it is nominated a fourth time without any new arguments makes it quite naggy I believe this file could be considered for deletion under commons:Courtesy deletion also in line of this WMF resolution. The image could be considered quite private and we can easily find another image of a leg. On another note the author mentioned (a high school) seems a bit weird. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 23:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: 4th nomination doesn't change the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. In use on two projects. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Fointain is from 1941, there is no FOP in France and the artist died in 1972 so it is not pd either.
- File:Fontaine du Square Suzanne Buisson Paris 18e.jpg
- File:P1060373 Paris XVIII square Suzanne-Buisson fontaine rwk.JPG
- File:P1060374 Paris XVIII square Suzanne-Buisson statue de Saint-Denis rwk.JPG
Natuur12 (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pauline Peugniez
[edit]Artist died in 1987 so the paintings are still copyrighted.
- File:Après la naissance.jpg
- File:Ateliers d'art sacré.jpg
- File:Canal à Venise.JPG
- File:L'Ange priant.jpg
- File:La basilique St-François à Assise.JPG
- File:La Psyché.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, Au piano.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, Florence et la campagne toscane.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, la Chambre Verte.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, La lecture 1921.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, Scène de cueillette en Toscane.jpg
- File:Pauline Peugniez, Vue romaine.jpg
- File:Reunion de famille.jpeg
- File:San Francesco della vigna, Pauline Peugnuez, 1934.jpg
- File:Venise, la Toge rouge.JPG
Natuur12 (talk) 14:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: at this point copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
No FoP on South Korea. Buildings here cannot be older than 70 years.
- File:Centum City.jpg
- File:Marine City and Gwangan Bridge.jpg
- File:Haeundae IPark.jpg
- File:Marine City.jpg
레비Revi 10:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
The works of art are made by Roland Moed]. He is still alive. The artworks are not permanantly stated in a public place so the pictures are not covered by [FOP]. File:Das Portrait, R.O.M. Roland orlando Moed.JPG has no exif data, location unknown, definatly not a public place
The picture of the statue displayed in File:Amikus, 1984 R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.jpg is on display in a museum in Berlin according the the article at the German Wikipedia. The file: File:Der Mann, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed, 2013.jpg only displayes the painting and is displaued at a gallary in Berlin I don't know where File:Glasfiguren, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.jpg is displayed but in the year 2011-2013 he only had expositions in Germany and Switserland. Fop in Switserland does not cover 3D art and it is not displayed in a public place File:Die Individualität, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.JPG only displayes the artwork, location unknown. Picture is taken in 2011 and in that year he had an exposition in Berlin
- File:Der Mann, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed, 2013.jpg
- File:Glasfiguren, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.jpg
- File:Amikus, 1984 R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.jpg
- File:Das Portrait, R.O.M. Roland orlando Moed.JPG
- File:Die Individualität, R.O.M. Roland Orlando Moed.JPG
Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www3.bienpublic.com/dossiers/minisites/retro/20eme/1913.html
Converted to DR by me. As the depicted died in 1913, the photo is likely from the 19th century and thereby likely PD-old already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: ? FASTILY 23:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://ekladata.com/52rzy3e2BTctKtg-3YZ0dcKe2Ec.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.christaldesaintmarc.com/pour-le-centenaire-de-la-mort-de-louis-cailletet-une-superbe-expositio-a97770963&h=820&w=500&sz=139&tbnid=aIdjexkSrY--YM&tbnh=288&tbnw=175&zoom=1&usg=__nIzz0foQjAc7Rf-5YxuvmN8-q84=
Converted by me to DR, as this image looks to be from the 19th century and thereby might be PD-old already. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Sieht nicht schön aus Canon97 (talk) 15:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused and superseded by better-quality File:Aaron Nicholson's New Zealand Flag.svg. Alkari (?), 22 December 2013, 01:10 UTC 01:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: poster
Converted by me to DR, as this image might be PD-old or go by PD-Art. See http://www.old-print.com/mas_assets/full/N3151923189R.jpg. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Picture by Olive Edis Galsworthy (1876-1955), c.1900, cf. [6]. Or would it be OK if published in USA? Yann (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: seems to have been published in the UK Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1926 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2021 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1926 385 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.jpg
- File:DR 1926 393 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.jpg
- File:DR 1926 378 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 379 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 380 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 381 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 382 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 383 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 384 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:DR 1926 387 Friedrich Schiller.jpg
- File:DR 1926 389 Ludwig van Beethoven.jpg
- File:DR 1926 390 Friedrich der Grosse.jpg
- File:DR 1926 391 Immanuel Kant.jpg
- File:DR 1926 392 Ludwig van Beethoven.jpg
- File:DR 1926 394 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing.jpg
- File:DR 1926 395 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.jpg
- File:DR 1926 396 Johann Sebastian Bach.jpg
- File:DR 1926 397 Albrecht Dürer.jpg
JuTa 12:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose: The base pictures of these 1926 stamps are older than the stamps were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). This is true with no doubt for Goethe (Orininal painting from 1828), Kant (Original may be this one, this one or others published before 1925), Schiller (Original), Dürer (File:Duerer01.jpg), Friedrich II. (:File:Friedrich Zweite Alt.jpg|Original]]), Bach (File:Bach.jpg), Leibnitz (Original) and should be right for Lessing, Schiller and Beethoven (did not find the originals by now). The only picture I don't have an idea on is the Flugpost Adler but this seems to be a PD-shape-case. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 13:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1927 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2022 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1927 409 IAA Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.jpg
- File:DR 1927 403 Paul von Hindenburg Nothilfe.jpg
- File:DR 1927 404 Paul von Hindenburg Nothilfe.jpg
- File:DR 1927 405 Paul von Hindenburg Nothilfe.jpg
- File:DR 1927 406 Paul von Hindenburg Nothilfe.jpg
- File:DR 1927 407 IAA Ludwig van Beethoven.jpg
- File:DR 1927 408 IAA Immanuel Kant.jpg
- File:DR 1927 A379 Flugpost Adler.jpg
- File:Paul von Hindenburg Stamp 1927.jpg
JuTa 12:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose: The base pictures of these 1927 stamps are older than the stamps were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). This is true with no doubt for Goethe (Orininal painting from 1828), Kant (Original may be this one, this one or others published before 1925) and should be right for Beethoven (did not find the original by now). For Hindenburg it is not that easy to find out the original portrait but it may be this picture released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv but with not known photographer and date; This picture shows Hindenburg at the same age and was made 1914 -so I would think the original picture for the stamp also was at around that time. The only picture I don't have an idea on is the Flugpost Adler but this seems to be a PD-shape-case. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 13:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1928 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2023 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1928 410 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 411 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 412 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 413 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 414 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 415 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 416 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 417 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 418 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 419 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 420 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 421 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1928 422 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1928 423 Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1928 424 Zeppelin.jpg
- File:Oberschlesien.jpg
JuTa 12:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose: The base pictures of these 1928 stamps are older than the stamps and were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). For Hindenburg it is not that easy to find out the original portrait but it may be this picture from 1916 released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv but with not known photographer; This picture shows Hindenburg at the same age and was made 1914 - so I would think the original picture for the stamp also was at around that time. For Ebert the base picture ist this photograph from 1923, also released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 13:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2029 (95 years after publication).
- File:1936 Reich 30Pfg Reinickendorf Mi523.jpg
- File:1936 Reich Mi518 Elbing Elblag.jpg
- File:1938 Reich3Pg Zehdenick Mi513.jpg
- File:DLZ129 pc 030537.jpg
- File:DR 1934 513 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 514 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 515 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 516 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 517 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 518 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 519 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 520 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 521 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 522 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 523 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 524 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 525 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 526 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 528 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1934 529 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 530 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 531 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 532 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 533 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 534 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 535 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 536 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 537 Luftpost.jpg
- File:DR 1934 538 Luftpost Otto Lilienthal.jpg
- File:DR 1934 539 Luftpost Ferdinand von Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1934 540 Franz Adolf Eduard Lüderitz.jpg
- File:DR 1934 541 Gustav Nachtigal.jpg
- File:DR 1934 542 Carl Peters.jpg
- File:DR 1934 543 Hermann von Wissmann.jpg
- File:DR 1934 544 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1934 545 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1934 546 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1934 547 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1934 548 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 549 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 550 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 551 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 552 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 553 Hindenburg Trauerrand.jpg
- File:DR 1934 554 Friedrich Schiller.jpg
- File:DR 1934 555 Friedrich Schiller.jpg
- File:DR 1934 556 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 557 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 558 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 559 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 560 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 561 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 562 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 563 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 564 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1934 KZ22 (516) Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR-D 1934 134 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934 135 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934 138 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934 139 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934 140 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934 143 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-132 1942-166 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-133 1942-167 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-136 1942-170 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-137 1942-171 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-141 1942-175 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:DR-D 1934-142 1942-176 Dienstmarke.jpg - com:TOO
- File:Germany-nazibusinessman-1934.jpg
- File:Germany3pf1934KaBe.jpg
- File:Postkarte250-Hitler+Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 178 Abtei Tholey.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 195 Volksabstimmung, Flugpost Breguet 14.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 196 Volksabstimmung, Flugpost Focke-Wulf A 17, Flughafen Saarbrücken.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 197 Volksabstimmung, Flugpost Breguet 14.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 198 Volksabstimmung, Flugpost Focke-Wulf A 17, Flughafen Saarbrücken.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 199 Ludwigskirche, Carlo Luca Pozzi - Liebe.jpg
- File:Saar 1934 200 Ludwigskirche, Carlo Luca Pozzi - Sorge.jpg
- File:Uetersen Sonderstempel 700 Jahre sw.jpg
- File:Uetersen Sonderstempel 700 Jahre.jpg
- File:Гинденбург на марке рейха.jpg
_Paul_von_Hindenburg.jpg){kind=link}
JuTa 13:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This page has the main discussion of U.S. copyright, but this is actually a series of deletion nominations, some of which also have keep/delete comments about individual stamps. This should be kept in mind by whoever closes the discussion. 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. I've noted this on each of the deletion pages; Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Those I have marked with com:TOO (a simple shape on colored background is not protected) --McZusatz (talk) 15:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Question: As regards U.S. copyright: Wouldn't any copyright interest, under U.S. law, have passed through the Alien Property Custodian? Who owns the copyright to these stamps in Germany? Does the private Deutsche Post AG own the pre-privatization copyrights of the Deutsche Bundespost, or does the German government retain copyright on stamps of the Deutsche Bundespost? How far privatized was Deutsche Post on January 1, 1996? (If the copyright was "ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian" and the German "government or instrumentality thereof" owned the copyright on January 1, 1996, the URAA doesn't apply. On the other hand, if the works are still copyrighted in Germany today, I would assume that Commons policy says that we respect German copyright regardless of U.S. status.) --Closeapple (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Who holds the copyright to German stamps, Deutsche Post or the individual artists? According to § 5 KUG and § 134 UrhG, Deutsche Post appears to be the copyright holder to stamps published anonymously before 1966, but what about stamps which weren't published anonymously? The Alien Property Custodian special case is only potentially relevant if the copyright holder is the German government, so if the copyright is held by the various artists (or their heirs), it won't help us at all. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I do not understand why CANCELLED stamps, especially on a large area, would retain copyright status. I ask a justification for maintaining a US opnion on European cancellations.
Jacquesverlaeken (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1933 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1935 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1936 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1937 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1938 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1939 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1940 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1941 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1942 stamps of Germany
- Is protecting the copyright of Category:Stamps of Nazi Germany in the United States really the most important issue for Wikimedia Commons? Bureaucracy gone mad. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Those too simple for copyright kept. Rest deleted per COM:PCP FASTILY 12:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1935 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2030 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1935 565 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1935 566 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1935 567 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1935 568 Saarabstimmung.jpg
- File:DR 1935 569 Heldengedenktag.jpg
- File:DR 1935 570 Heldengedenktag.jpg
- File:DR 1935 571 Reichsberufswettkampf.jpg
- File:DR 1935 572 Reichsberufswettkampf.jpg
- File:DR 1935 573 Heinrich Schütz.jpg
- File:DR 1935 574 Johann Sebastian Bach.jpg
- File:DR 1935 575 Georg Friedrich Händel.jpg
- File:DR 1935 576 Ostropa.jpg
- File:DR 1935 577 Ostropa.jpg
- File:DR 1935 578 Ostropa.jpg
- File:DR 1935 579 Ostropa.jpg
- File:DR 1935 580 Eisenbahn.jpg
- File:DR 1935 581 Eisenbahn.jpg
- File:DR 1935 582 Eisenbahn.jpg
- File:DR 1935 583 Eisenbahn.jpg
- File:DR 1935 584 Welttreffen der Hitlerjugend.jpg
- File:DR 1935 585 Welttreffen der Hitlerjugend.jpg
- File:DR 1935 586 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1935 587 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1935 588 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Ostpreußen.jpg
- File:DR 1935 589 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Schlesien.jpg
- File:DR 1935 590 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Rheinland.jpg
- File:DR 1935 591 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Niedersachsen.jpg
- File:DR 1935 592 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Kurmark.jpg
- File:DR 1935 593 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Schwarzwald.jpg
- File:DR 1935 594 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Hessen.jpg
- File:DR 1935 595 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Oberbayern.jpg
- File:DR 1935 596 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Friesland.jpg
- File:DR 1935 597 Winterhilfswerk Trachten Oberfranken.jpg
- File:DR 1935 598 Hitlerputsch.jpg
- File:DR 1935 599 Hitlerputsch.jpg
- File:DR 1935 600 Olympische Winterspiele Eisschnelllauf.jpg
- File:DR 1935 601 Olympische Winterspiele Skispringen.jpg
- File:DR 1935 602 Olympische Winterspiele 4er Bob.jpg
- File:Ostropa front.jpg
- File:Stamp Reichsparteitag 1935.jpg
- File:Stamp Die Saar kehrt heim 1935.jpg
- File:Stamp Gedenke des 9. November 1923 1935.jpg
JuTa 13:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 13:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1936 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2031 (95 years after publication).
- File:Briefmarke Olympia 1936 6Pf.jpg
- File:D-LZ129 Deutchlandfahrt March 26-29 1936.jpg
- File:DR 1936 527 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1936 603 Flugpost.jpg
- File:DR 1936 604 Gottlieb Daimler.jpg
- File:DR 1936 605 Carl Benz.jpg
- File:DR 1936 606 Flugpost.jpg
- File:DR 1936 607 Flugpost.jpg
- File:DR 1936 607 Flugpost.png
- File:DR 1936 608 Otto von Guericke.jpg
- File:DR 1936 609 Olympische Sommerspiele Reckturnen.jpg
- File:DR 1936 610 Olympische Sommerspiele Turmspringen.jpg
- File:DR 1936 611 Olympische Sommerspiele Fussball.jpg
- File:DR 1936 612 Olympische Sommerspiele Speerwurf.jpg
- File:DR 1936 613 Olympische Sommerspiele Fackellauf.jpg
- File:DR 1936 614 Olympische Sommerspiele Degenfechten.jpg
- File:DR 1936 615 Olympische Sommerspiele Rudern.jpg
- File:DR 1936 616 Olympische Sommerspiele Jagdspringen.jpg
- File:DR 1936 617 Gemeindekongress.jpg
- File:DR 1936 618 Gemeindekongress.jpg
- File:DR 1936 619 Gemeindekongress.jpg
- File:DR 1936 620 Gemeindekongress.jpg
- File:DR 1936 621 Bl 4 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1936 621 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1936 622 Weltkongress Freizeit und Erholung.jpg
- File:DR 1936 623 Weltkongress Freizeit und Erholung.jpg
- File:DR 1936 632 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1936 633 Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1936 635 Winterhilfswerk Luftfahrtministerium.jpg
- File:DR 1936 636 Winterhilfswerk Ehrenmal Nürnberg.jpg
- File:DR 1936 637 Winterhilfswerk Saalebrücke.jpg
- File:DR 1936 638 Winterhilfswerk Deutschlandhalle.jpg
- File:DR 1936 639 Winterhilfswerk Alpenstraße Mauthäusl.jpg
- File:DR 1936 640 Winterhilfswerk Führerhaus München.jpg
- File:DR 1936 641 Winterhilfswerk Mangfallbrücke.jpg
- File:DR 1936 642 Winterhilfswerk Haus der deutschen Kunst.jpg
- File:DR 1936 Block 5 Olympia.jpg
- File:DR 1936 Block 6 Olympia.jpg
- File:Hindenburg Olympiafahrt 1936.jpg
- File:Luftschiff Graf Zeppelin 1936.jpg
- File:LZ129 Hindenburg Zepps C57 C58.jpg
- File:DR 1936 634 Winterhilfswerk Autobahn.jpg
- File:Stamp 10 Jahre Lufthansa.jpg
- File:Stamp Reichsparteitag 1936.jpg
- File:Winterhilfswerk36.jpg
JuTa 14:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 13:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
The author is unknown to us, not that it was released by an anonymous person and therefore is unknown for the world (the club knows who created it for sure). The logo was used until 2001 so it is likely to be re-registered multiple times. Tbhotch™ 00:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The reason of the nomination is not clear.... the author is unknown and the logo was first released in 1941 so this is more than 50 years old. We don't know how many times it could have been re-registered, but IMO this does not change the status of the logo. - Fma12 (talk) 03:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Copyright law of the EU protects works until 70 years after the death of the author. Just because you don't know who the author is, doesn't mean the work is therefore "anonymous", as "anonymous" doesn't mean "unknown" in law--it is known for Real Madrid Club de Fútbol. The nomination is clear, you simply don't understand law terms, and unless you prove the work was released by its author as anonymous or the author died before 1944, this is not a PD work. Tbhotch™ 20:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- I recommend you to read, and understand, Commons:Anonymous works#Comparison to comprehend the difference between "An anonymous work is a work published by its author, who wishes to remain anonymous" and "The fact that you don't know who the author is doesn't make it an anonymous work", even the author may be the club itself, Real Madrid Club de Fútbol, or someone working for them. Tbhotch™ 20:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advises, but don't worry so I understand copyright laws; this is not the first time I upload a file to Commons. If you nominate a file under the suspiction it is not "anonymous", you should indicate (or at least, to prove) who the author is (if you know this, of course). What are you based on to suppose that Real Madrid knows who is the author of the logo? p.e. there are several clubs whose former logos authorships are not known. I have searched for this information but I couldn't find anythind, could you?
- When you recommended me to read Commons:Anonymous works#Comparison you ommited to include this: "In most European Union countries due to the harmonization of copyright terms, an anonymous work is given 70 years of protection from the day it was published (which can often make anonymous works published before 1943 be considered to be in the public domain)." If the author was the club itself, this logo is also free or copyright because it was published in 1941 (almost 73 years ago). - Fma12 (talk) 23:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Basically all your arguments are "as I don't know who the author is, I can assume it is an anonymous work". Your argument is saying that this is PD because of two reasons: {{Anonymous-EU}} and because of this {{PD-1996}} applies. Your "solid" argument is that just because you are ignorant of the designer, who is not credited (in your reference), it is anonymous, and therefore "an anonymous work is given 70 years of protection" (something I didn't miss to say, as once again this is not an "anonymous work", unless it is proved by the uploader). Your arguments are poor; first, you uploaded the work, then you are the person who has to prove you got the right to upload it, not the community. Can I upload File:Escudo de oaxaca.png as PD because I think the author either: has died, is anonymous or don't mind about it; I'm automatically right because other people can't prove I'm wrong? This is your attitude right here, right now.
- Also, if Real Madrid knows their history since 1902, common sense indicates they know who designed all their logos (It took me a few seconds to find why they designed their 1909 logo pg 96 "On 14 March 1909...")--the person who created the logo was a designer: pg. 45 "¿Sabe usted que instituciones deportivas en el mundo han acudido a diseñadores gráficos para rediseñar y establecer parámetros en sus identidades corporativas?"-- is like if you question "how do you know they know who founded the club?". Considering your source, which includes no information, why we don't upload this, it neither says who is the author and I can assume it was published before 1950 because it is a B&W and the zone seems old. You can contact the team and ask about their logo, but you won't do it, because regardless you are right or not, you don't want this file to be deleted as if you are wrong you would look bad because of a lame edit-war in Wikipedia. BTW, you uploaded an incorrect logo: "Tras la Guerra Civil, llega el nuevo régimen, y vuelve la corona a formar parte del escudo. Se modifican los colores, reemplazando en muchos casos el dorado al azul marino. Este diseño se mantendrá sin apenas modificaciones hasta casi finales del Siglo XX.", the frange must be dark blue, not purple. Tbhotch™ 00:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Your arguments are still weak. You wrote a lot of text based on suppositions, but you could not provide any fact about the author of the logo. It is not a discussion about graphic designers, it is a discussion about copyright although I appreciate the link to Funandi monography, which would surely be a good bibliography for a graphic designer like me (and also written in my native language) but I really doubt this work can help me in this debate. On the other hand, you came up with an assumption of an "edit war" that never existed because that discussion was not about this 1941 logo but the last version (2001-present). The "war" stated when other editor removed the complete gallery instead of quitting only the last logo. In other words, you are wrong. If I uploaded an incorrect logo because of its colors, you can replace it with the version you suppose right, as I did with many other files that needed color adjustments. But this is not the point. The point is that this version was published before 1943 with no authorship known, so it should be considered "anonymous" (common sense). You say "You have to prove who is the author of the logo". Why? I was searching for this information and I didn't find anything, did you? You did not give further information than me about the author.
- Other issue: your comparison with the coat of arms of Oaxaca is not valid so this is a coat of arms which is not elegible for copyright (as a state symbol according to Mexican copyright law; this works similar to Argentina). Unlike Oaxaca's, Real Madrid logo is just an emblem of a club protected by copyright (and regulated by a different law). Therefore both logos have no point of comparison. About the source you are claiming for, I just put the URL where the image was taking from (a direct link to the emblem) but I also searched here, here and here and none of those websites tell anything about the author. By the way, if you want to edit the description and to add any of those sources, you are welcome. Or I can add them myself, there is no problem.
- To conclude: you are nominating a file which is clearly {{Anonymous-EU}} and {{Anonymous work}} (based on copyright rules in Spain) and your arguments are: "you did not provide the name of the author" as if I had deliberately ommited that information. But you can't add any evidence that proves this emblem must be under copyright. End of the discussion for me. - Fma12 (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm going to take it from "The point is that this version was published..." You say "it should be considered "anonymous" (common sense)". According to your previous comment you are a designer or are interested in design, ergo, you are not a lawyer. You can contact a lawyer, and s/he will tell you what I have already said, unknown is not the same as anonymous, the first means "unidentified" while the second means "whose name is withheld". You also asked me why "You have to prove who is the author of the logo", it is as simple as it is your obligation. You've been here for a while and you haven't readen Commons requirements? From Commons:Project scope#Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence." You've done none; as you have searched the person but you didn't find it, you can assume "it is anonymous", when I have told you the club has a contact e-mail, did you ask them if it was anonymous? No, why, you haven't answered yet, are you afraid of the club? It is just a club. The worst case is they suing you for violating the copyright of the copyholder(s) of the logo, but if you are right, you can settle the case.
- While I have provided three reasons why your upload was unfounded to Wikimedia Commons policies (Commons:Project scope#Evidence, Commons:Anonymous works and Commons:Project scope#Precautionary principle), your "keep" reasons are not supported by real evidence and are just assumptions that, as you couldn't find the name in the first 100 Google results, it is "impossible" to know who was the creator(s) or desiger(s). Remember that Commons is not the en:USPTO and a place to decide arbitrarily what's PD or not. And BTW, regardless the Oaxaca flag and Mexican law, I'm sorry to inform you you are wrong. Argentina and Mexico laws may be similar with their Government-owned works, but Mexico has contradictory laws. The seal File:Compromiso, Gobierno que cumple.png is PD according to Mexican copyright law, but according to the 2006-2012 State of Mexico Government it is copyrighted. So by one hand they are ineligible of copyright, but on the other hand they can be registered? (see also Our Lady of Guadalupe case). You need to know as much as you can of the image your are about to upload in case it ends at COM:DR, it is not as simple as "I uploaded it, other people must investigate". Tbhotch™ 12:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- As I said before, you can see the references where the sources (not only the URL to the file but the websites listing the evolution of the logo) are properly indicated (which I had cited before your nomination). The logo was published more than 70 years ago in Spain (EU) and the author is not known (neither by you nor by me) and there is no evidence about who he was (because he is "not known". As much as I know, this makes a work "anonymous"). It's easy to nominate a file saying "you didn't provide it is anonymous". Instead of sending me to contact the club to search for the history of the logo, why haven't you done it yet? At least to support your arguments a little better. Do you know if I have the time to do it or not? My modus operandi is not "I upload files, other people must investigate" as you maliciously affirm. What I say is "I provide the sources (see references again), the sources indicate "released in 1941 for the first time" but do not refer to an author. Then, I searched more information with no successful results... where do you presume bad faith from me? The reason of your nomination is based on "you did not searched enough", what is a complete fallacy.
- If I consider a file is "PD" based on this information and all the other sources cited before (put before you nominated the file), try to keep a level of discussion without considering the other person "an ignorant" or pressuming bad faith from the other part. I can discuss whatever you want but not in the way you want, I prefer to be polite and I demand the same level of respect from the other side. Not to be so arrogant would be a solution to keep on this debate. - Fma12 (talk) 20:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- As I said before, you are not a lawyer and you cannot decide when something is legally "anonymous" under your understanding of copyright laws. If I (for reference a company) ask you to draw a logo for me, and you (a designer) do it and include your signature (for example), but for marketing reasons I decide to remove your signature, is your work now "anonymous" because I a) publicly never said who designed it, b) you never registered with your name, and c) you never publicly said you designed it, despite the fact you wanted your name in it? Of course not, being unknown to us legally won't make it "anonymous" for copyright offices. I haven't contacted Real Madrid because, once again, it is your (legal) responsability to demostrate there are no legal issues to the Foundation thanks to your uploads. When someone decides to play a lawyer role, the WMF has legal repercussions, called cease and desist letters, subpoenas, legal threats and sues. BTW, I know "if [you] have the time" to reply to me here and dozens of edits per day (only in Commons) you obviously have the time to go to your e-mail provider and request to atencionpublico@corp.realmadrid.com about their logo's history, it won't take you more than 15 minutes (their answer otherwise may take more time). Tbhotch™ 05:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- As I also said before, if you nominate a file, give valid reasons to determine why this should be deleted from Commons. This was published 73 years ago (more than 70 years - PD in the EU, what part haven't you understand yet?) and there is not a known author of the logo. Do I need to be a lawyer to know this? I don't think so. This logo has not a signature, there is not a known author and there has not been a claim for copyright, either. Instead of giving me the R.M. e-mail address, you could write to them to satisfy your inquires. If they reply, you could get better argument to support your DR. I'm not the person who has to take the time to do it. About my free time, I'm in fact an old contributor to the Commons and have made a lots of edits, clearly. But... what sort of authority have you to determine what I have to do with my time?: as far as I know, you are not my boss (at less, I'm still not concerned about that). Discussing in such terms is not polite so please don't get involved in personal attacks and try to support your arguments with respectful.
- Considering how extensive this debate became (and being you the other part of this), if you had enough time to write all thouse statements, you clearly will be plenty of time to search for more information to support your reasons. So take your "15 minutes" to write to R.M. and ask them for the information needed. And, for the next entry, please try not to come up with personal attacks and be a little less arrogant. It would really be helpful not only for this debate but for any discussion you might have at Commons. - Fma12 (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- And who wants to be your boss? Arrogant and unproductive people like you are replaceable people. Congratulations in your "lots of edits", but absolutely no one is important for this site, if you don't upload the images or create the categories, or whatever you do here, another person will eventually do it, don't feel like as if the world needs you. You simply asked "why do you think I have time", and I gave you the reason why you do have the time, and now you go with your "who do you think you are to tell me what I do with my time?" arguments, just bullshit. I've e-mailed them, and if the club takes legal actions against you, dear, it is not my problem and neither Wikimedia Foundation's. I received a subpoena once, and with it, our lawyer informing us (because it was sent to many people) that the WFM will not help with such actions. If you are right (about its PD status) you shouldn't worry, but if you are wrong, it'd be better that you contact a lawyer. Tbhotch™ 22:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your arguments talking about "the club taking legal actions about me" is really hilarious. All my contributions here were assuming good faith and I don't really thing that Real Madrid CF sue an individual subject who uploaded a logo with the real convincement it is PD. I'm also sure that the club has more important things to do that persecuting logos uploaders around the world. On the other hand, if you have e-mailed them, could you tell us what the club replied to you about the authorship of the logo (unless you have written RM for other reasons). This would be really a "productive" (citing your own words) contribution to this debate, don't you think?.
- About our personal issue, the only arrogant and unproductive person are you, who have tried to bullying me since this debate began. YOU was the person who carried this discussion to my private life referring to my free time and other duties (who the hell are you to interfere in my personal life? Did I allow you to do it? No, I didn't). The only thing I'm sure about is you are a complete unpolite person, with no education enough to discuss without being agressive to the other part. This debate has been completely derived to a personal matter between us, all of this because of your unpolite behaviour and bad manners.
- Referring to my contributions, I'm absolutely convinced that nobody is indispensable here, neither you nor me, don't distort the meaning of my words when I just replied your inappropriate argument about my free time. I'm with my feet on the ground. When I have to support an argument or idea at a debate, I don't underestimate other users trying to attack them in a personal way or sending them to write e-mails. And you know that I tried to persuade you not to make this personal, but evidently you didn't care about my message and came out with more war. I will continue contributing to the Commons if an admin delete this file, this is not the problem here. What I can't stand is an user who didn't understand what "good education" refers to. I'm specifically talking about you. - Fma12 (talk) 20:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- And who wants to be your boss? Arrogant and unproductive people like you are replaceable people. Congratulations in your "lots of edits", but absolutely no one is important for this site, if you don't upload the images or create the categories, or whatever you do here, another person will eventually do it, don't feel like as if the world needs you. You simply asked "why do you think I have time", and I gave you the reason why you do have the time, and now you go with your "who do you think you are to tell me what I do with my time?" arguments, just bullshit. I've e-mailed them, and if the club takes legal actions against you, dear, it is not my problem and neither Wikimedia Foundation's. I received a subpoena once, and with it, our lawyer informing us (because it was sent to many people) that the WFM will not help with such actions. If you are right (about its PD status) you shouldn't worry, but if you are wrong, it'd be better that you contact a lawyer. Tbhotch™ 22:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- As I said before, you are not a lawyer and you cannot decide when something is legally "anonymous" under your understanding of copyright laws. If I (for reference a company) ask you to draw a logo for me, and you (a designer) do it and include your signature (for example), but for marketing reasons I decide to remove your signature, is your work now "anonymous" because I a) publicly never said who designed it, b) you never registered with your name, and c) you never publicly said you designed it, despite the fact you wanted your name in it? Of course not, being unknown to us legally won't make it "anonymous" for copyright offices. I haven't contacted Real Madrid because, once again, it is your (legal) responsability to demostrate there are no legal issues to the Foundation thanks to your uploads. When someone decides to play a lawyer role, the WMF has legal repercussions, called cease and desist letters, subpoenas, legal threats and sues. BTW, I know "if [you] have the time" to reply to me here and dozens of edits per day (only in Commons) you obviously have the time to go to your e-mail provider and request to atencionpublico@corp.realmadrid.com about their logo's history, it won't take you more than 15 minutes (their answer otherwise may take more time). Tbhotch™ 05:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 00:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1930 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2025 (95 years after publication).
- File:Aachener Dom-Deutsches Reich.JPG
- File:DR 1930 435 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1930 437 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1930 438 Zeppelin Südamerikafahrt.jpg
- File:DR 1930 439 Zeppelin Südamerikafahrt.jpg
- File:DR 1930 440 Bauwerke Kölner Dom.jpg
- File:DR 1930 444 Friedrich Ebert Abzug aus dem Rheinland.jpg
- File:DR 1930 445 Paul von Hindenburg Abzug aus dem Rheinland.jpg
- File:DR 1930 450 Nothilfe Bauwerke Aachen.jpg
- File:DR 1930 451 Nothilfe Bauwerke Brandenburger Tor.jpg
- File:DR 1930 452 Nothilfe Bauwerke Marienwerder.jpg
- File:DR 1930 453 Nothilfe Bauwerke Würzburg.jpg
- File:DR 1930 Block 1 IPOSTA.jpg
- File:DR 1930 IX Bauwerke Burg Rheinstein (Fälschung).jpg
- File:Flugmarke Hessische Segelflugpost 1930.jpg
- File:IPOSTA Block gestempelt.jpg
- File:Leipzig 1930 Internationale Pelzfach- und Jagd-Ausstellung, Poststempel.jpg Officiell German document, free --Kürschner (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Президент Гинденбург. Надпечатка 30 июня 1930.jpg
- File:DR 1930 436 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
JuTa 12:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose for Ebert and Hindenburg: The base pictures of these 1930 stamps are older than the stamps and were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). For Hindenburg it is not that easy to find out the original portrait but it may be this picture from 1916 released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv but with not known photographer; This picture shows Hindenburg at the same age and was made 1914 - so I would think the original picture for the stamp also was at around that time. For Ebert the base picture ist this photograph from 1923, also released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2025 FASTILY 09:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1931 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2026 (95 years after publication).
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-12396, Wohlfahrtsbriefmarken der Winterhilfe.jpg
- File:DR 1931 454 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1931 455 Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1931 456 Zeppelin Polarfahrt.jpg
- File:DR 1931 458 Zeppelin Polarfahrt.jpg
- File:DR 1931 459 Nothilfe Bauwerke Dresdner Zwinger.jpg
- File:DR 1931 460 Nothilfe Bauwerke Breslau.jpg
- File:DR 1931 461 Nothilfe Bauwerke Heidelberger Schloss.jpg
- File:DR 1931 462 Nothilfe Bauwerke Holstentor Lübeck.jpg
- File:Zeppelinmarke Polarf.jpg
JuTa 13:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose for Hindenburg: The base pictures of these stamps are older than the stamps and were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). For Hindenburg it is not that easy to find out the original portrait but it may be this picture from 1916 released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv but with not known photographer; This picture shows Hindenburg at the same age and was made 1914 - so I would think the original picture for the stamp also was at around that time. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2026 FASTILY 09:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1932 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2027 (95 years after publication).
- File:1932 Reich 12Pfg Berlin Weissensee Mi476.jpg
- File:DR 1932 463 Nothilfe, Dresden.jpg
- File:DR 1932 464 Nothilfe, Breslau.jpg
- File:DR 1932 465 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:DR 1932 466 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 467 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 468 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 469 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 470 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 471 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 472 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 473 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 474 Nothilfe Burgen und Schlösser Wartburg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 475 Nothilfe Burgen und Schlösser Schloss Stolzenfels.jpg
- File:DR 1932 476 Nothilfe Burgen und Schlösser Burg Nürnberg.jpg
- File:DR 1932 477 Nothilfe Burgen und Schlösser Schloss Lichtenstein.jpg
- File:DR 1932 478 Nothilfe Burgen und Schlösser Schloss Marburg.jpg
- File:KZ Dachau-Reichspogromnacht.jpg
JuTa 13:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Partly oppose for Ebert and Hindenburg: The base pictures of these 1930 stamps are older than the stamps and were in public domain before URAA (published before 1925). For Hindenburg it is not that easy to find out the original portrait but it may be this picture from 1916 released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv but with not known photographer; This picture shows Hindenburg at the same age and was made 1914 - so I would think the original picture for the stamp also was at around that time. For Ebert the base picture ist this photograph from 1923, also released to CC-by-sa from the German Bundesarchiv. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- My argument for the 12Pfg Berlin Weissensee Mi476 is that the design is cancelled by a clear, central cancellation.
Jacquesverlaeken (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2027 FASTILY 09:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1933 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2028 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1933 479 Friedrich II. (Preußen).jpg
- File:DR 1933 480 Friedrich II. (Preußen).jpg
- File:DR 1933 481 Friedrich II. (Preußen).jpg
- File:DR 1933 496 Graf Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1933 497 Graf Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1933 498 Graf Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1933 499 Nothilfe Wagner Tannhäuser.jpg
- File:DR 1933 500 Nothilfe Wagner Fliegender Holländer.jpg
- File:DR 1933 501 Nothilfe Wagner Rheingold.jpg
- File:DR 1933 502 Nothilfe Wagner Meistersinger.jpg
- File:DR 1933 503 Nothilfe Wagner Walküre.jpg
- File:DR 1933 504 Nothilfe Wagner Siegfried.jpg
- File:DR 1933 505 Nothilfe Wagner Tristan und Isolde.jpg
- File:DR 1933 506 Nothilfe Wagner Lohengrin.jpg
- File:DR 1933 507 Nothilfe Wagner Parsifal.jpg
- File:DR 1933 508 Nothilfe aus Block2.jpg
- File:DR 1933 509 Nothilfe aus Block2.jpg
- File:DR 1933 510 Nothilfe aus Block2.jpg
- File:DR 1933 511 Nothilfe aus Block2.jpg
- File:DR 1933 512 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Germany-Stamp-1933-Chicago WorldsFair Zeppelin.jpg
- File:Hindenburg3er.jpg
- File:Lohengrin1933.jpg
- File:Meistersinger1933.jpg
- File:Nothilfeblock.jpg
- File:Parsifal1933.jpg
- File:PontdeGard1931.JPG
- File:Rheingold1993.JPG
- File:Siegfried1933.jpg
- File:Tannhauser1933.JPG
- File:Tannhauser1993.JPG
- File:Tristan und Isolde.jpg
- File:TristanandIsolde1933.jpg
- File:Wagner1933set.jpeg
- File:Walkure1933.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
JuTa 13:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1935 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1936 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1937 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1938 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1939 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1940 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1941 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1942 stamps of Germany
- Is protecting the copyright of Category:Stamps of Nazi Germany in the United States really the most important issue for Wikimedia Commons? Bureaucracy gone mad. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Can you please leave a link to evidence, or quote from a source? I can't readily believe that such copyright protection still exists in the US. SteveStrummer (talk) 23:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Oh I see now: well, in this case I am in agreement with the user above: this seems to be unnecessary enforcement. The historical value of these relics should trump any copyright concerns, and I truly doubt that the 1996 signatories had this in mind.... SteveStrummer (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2028 per URAA FASTILY 09:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1937 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2032 (95 years after publication).
- File:Danzig 1937 270 DAPOSTA.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 271 DAPOSTA.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 274 Wappen, Danziger Dorf.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 275 Wappen Danzig und Magdeburg.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 Block 1 DAPOSTA.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 Block 2 DAPOSTA.jpg
- File:Danzig 1937 Block 3 Danziger Leistungsschau.jpg
- File:DR 1937 643 Luftschutz.jpg
- File:DR 1937 644 Luftschutz.jpg
- File:DR 1937 645 Luftschutz.jpg
- File:DR 1937 646 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1937 647 Adolf Hitler Briefmarkenausstellung geschnitten.jpg
- File:DR 1937 648 Adolf Hitler Kulturspende.jpg
- File:DR 1937 649 Das braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1937 650 Adolf Hitler Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1937 651 Winterhilfswerk Rettungsboot Bremen.jpg
- File:DR 1937 652 Winterhilfswerk Feuerschiff Elbe 1.jpg
- File:DR 1937 653 Winterhilfswerk Fischerboote.jpg
- File:DR 1937 654 Winterhilfswerk Wilhelm Gustloff.jpg
- File:DR 1937 655 Winterhilfswerk Viermastbark Padua.jpg
- File:DR 1937 656 Winterhilfswerk Dampfer Tannenberg.jpg
- File:DR 1937 657 Winterhilfswerk Fährschiff Schwerin.jpg
- File:DR 1937 658 Winterhilfswerk Schnelldampfer Hamburg.jpg
- File:DR 1937 659 Winterhilfswerk Schnelldampfer Europa.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 10 649 Das braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 10 649 Herzstück Das braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 11 Adolf Hitler Reichsparteitag.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 7 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 8 Adolf Hitler Briefmarkenausstellung.jpg
- File:DR 1937 Block 9 Adolf Hitler Kulturspende.jpg
- File:Hitlerblock.jpg
- File:Stamp Luftschutz.jpg
JuTa 14:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2032 per URAA FASTILY 09:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1938 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2033 (95 years after publication).
- File:Danzig 1938 281 Arthur Schopenhauer.jpg
- File:Danzig 1938 282 Arthur Schopenhauer.jpg
- File:Danzig 1938 283 Arthur Schopenhauer.jpg
- File:DR 1938 660 Machtergreifung.jpg
- File:DR 1938 661 Machtergreifung.jpg
- File:DR 1938 662 Volksabstimmung Österreich.jpg
- File:DR 1938 663 Volksabstimmung Österreich.jpg
- File:DR 1938 665 Turn- und Sportfest.jpg
- File:DR 1938 666 Turn- und Sportfest.jpg
- File:DR 1938 667 Turn- und Sportfest.jpg
- File:DR 1938 668 Turn- und Sportfest.jpg
- File:DR 1938 669 Ferdinand von Zeppelin.jpg
- File:DR 1938 670 Zeppelin LZ 129.jpg
- File:DR 1938 671 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1938 673 Theater Saarpfalz.jpg
- File:DR 1938 674 Theater Saarpfalz.jpg
- File:DR 1938 675 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 676 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 677 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 678 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 679 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 680 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 681 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 682 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 683 Winterhilfswerk.jpg
- File:DR 1938 684 Volksabstimmung Sudetenland.jpg
- File:DR 1938 685 Volksabstimmung Sudetenland.jpg
- File:DR-D 1938 144 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1938 147 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1938 148 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1938 151 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1938 152 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 156 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 157 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 160 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 161 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 164 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 165 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:Graf Zeppelin II 1938 no digital watermark.jpg
- File:Graf Zeppelin II 1938.jpg
- File:Katapultpost-DR-Auktion109-Los319.jpg
- File:Katapultpost-DR-Auktion109-Los319-Detail.jpg
- File:Winterhilfswerk36.jpg
JuTa 14:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2033 per URAA FASTILY 09:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1939 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2034 (95 years after publication).
- File:Danzig Gregor Mendel 10 Pf 1939.jpg
- File:Danzig Robert Koch 15 Pf 1939.jpg
- File:Danzig Wilhelm Konrad Röntgen 25 Pf 1939.jpg
- File:DR 1939 698 70 Jahre Deutsches Derby.jpg
- File:DR 1939 691 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1939 692 Gartenschau.jpg
- File:DR 1939 693 Gartenschau.jpg
- File:DR 1939 694 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1939 699 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1939 700 Tag der Deutschen Kunst, Junge Venezianerin von Albrecht Dürer.jpg
- File:DR 1939 701 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1939 702 Reichspost Kundgebung.jpg
- File:DR 1939 703 Reichspost Postwissenschaftliche Woche.jpg
- File:DR 1939 704 Reichspost Reichsberufswettkampf.jpg
- File:DR 1939 705 Reichspost Nachwuchslager.jpg
- File:DR 1939 706 Reichspost Leistungswettkampf.jpg
- File:DR 1939 707 Reichspost Begabtenauslese.jpg
- File:DR 1939 708 Reichspost Geländefahrer.jpg
- File:DR 1939 709 Reichspost Postsport.jpg
- File:DR 1939 710 Reichspost Postschutz.jpg
- File:DR 1939 711 Reichspost 100 Segelflugwerkstätten.jpg
- File:DR 1939 712 Reichspost Postkutsche.jpg
- File:DR 1939 713 Reichspost Königstein Taunus.jpg
- File:DR 1939 714 Wiedereingliederung von Danzig.jpg
- File:DR 1939 715 Wiedereingliederung von Danzig.jpg
- File:DR 1939 728 Danzig.jpg
- File:DR 1939 729 Danzig.jpg
- File:DR 1939 730 Winterhilfswerk Elbogen an der Eger.jpg
- File:DR 1939 731 Winterhilfswerk Drachenfels.jpg
- File:DR 1939 732 Winterhilfswerk Kaiserpfalz Goslar.jpg
- File:DR 1939 733 Winterhilfswerk Grazer Uhrenturm.jpg
- File:DR 1939 734 Winterhilfswerk Frankfurter Römer.jpg
- File:DR 1939 735 Winterhilfswerk Ständehaus Klagenfurt.jpg
- File:DR 1939 736 Winterhilfswerk Burgruine Schreckenstein.jpg
- File:DR 1939 737 Winterhilfswerk Feste Salzburg.jpg
- File:DR 1939 738 Winterhilfswerk Hohentwiel Singen.jpg
- File:DR 1939 Z738 Zeitungsmarke.jpg
- File:DR 1939 Z739 Zeitungsmarke.jpg
- File:FPK-RPT-1939.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 1 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 10 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 11 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 12 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 13 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 2 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 3 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 4 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 5 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 6 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 7 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 8 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1939 9 Paul von Hindenburg.jpg
- File:HindenburgOSTENOverprint.jpg
- File:NaziGauePostcard1939-10-06-back.jpg
- File:Paul von Hindenburg Deutsches Reich - 10.4.1939.jpg
- File:Sonderstempel2.jpg
- File:Stamp Deutsches Reich, Postkutsche, ab 1939.jpg
JuTa 14:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I do not understand how can works unprotected in Germany (country of their origin) be protected in the US under URAA? The German copyright law clearly sets protection as 70 years after the year of death of the author or the YEAR OF PUBLICATION if the author is unknown. As far as I can see authors of at least some stamps here are unknown. Before deleting en masse these stamps, the years of death of their authors should be checked. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. "US under URAA" ?? Germany print. --Vizu (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- The U.S. copyright problem talk is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. The URAA is very weird. --Closeapple (talk) 01:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- See also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1933 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1935 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1936 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1937 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1938 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1940 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1941 stamps of Germany
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1942 stamps of Germany
- Is protecting the copyright of Category:Stamps of Nazi Germany in the United States really the most important issue for Wikimedia Commons? Bureaucracy gone mad. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}? 1996-70=1926. Or is Mogelzahn saying that all works by corporations before 1966 were public domain by 1996 in Germany? (Google Translate is not very good with this.) And: Does this relate to Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review? --Closeapple (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Per URAA, likely copyrighted until 2034 FASTILY 09:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per request on COM:UNDEL. Trijnsteltalk 17:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1940 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2035 (95 years after publication).
- File:DR 1940 739 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1940 740 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1940 741 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1940 742 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1940 743 Briefmarkenausstellung.jpg
- File:DR 1940 744 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1940 745 Tag der Arbeit.jpg
- File:DR 1940 746 Das Blaue Band.jpg
- File:DR 1940 747 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1940 748 Eingliederung von Eupen, Malmedy und Moresnet.jpg
- File:DR 1940 749 Eingliederung von Eupen, Malmedy und Moresnet.jpg
- File:DR 1940 751 Winterhilfswerk Danzig.jpg
- File:DR 1940 752 Winterhilfswerk Thorn.jpg
- File:DR 1940 753 Winterhilfswerk Kaub (Rhein).jpg
- File:DR 1940 754 Winterhilfswerk Posen.jpg
- File:DR 1940 755 Winterhilfswerk Heidelberg.jpg
- File:DR 1940 756 Winterhilfswerk Trier.jpg
- File:DR 1940 757 Winterhilfswerk Prag.jpg
- File:DR 1940 758 Winterhilfswerk Bremen.jpg
- File:DR 1940 759 Winterhilfswerk Münster (Westf.).jpg
- File:DR 1940 760 Emil Adolf von Behring.jpg
- File:DR 1940 761 Emil Adolf von Behring.jpg
- File:Eupen-Malmedy.jpg
- File:Futschesreich.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 14 Aufdruck auf 319.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 15 Aufdruck auf 320.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 16 Aufdruck auf 325.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 17 Aufdruck auf 331.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 18 Aufdruck auf 331.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 19 Aufdruck auf 332.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 20 Aufdruck auf 332.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 21 Aufdruck auf 332.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 22 Aufdruck auf 335.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 23 Aufdruck auf 336.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 24 Aufdruck auf 338.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 25 Aufdruck auf 339.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 26 Aufdruck auf 340.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 27 Aufdruck auf 341.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 28 Aufdruck auf 342.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 29 Aufdruck auf 343.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 30 Aufdruck auf 348.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 31 Aufdruck auf 349.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 32 Aufdruck auf 350.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 33 Aufdruck auf 355.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 34 Aufdruck auf 355.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 35 Aufdruck auf P95.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 36 Aufdruck auf P96.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 37 Aufdruck auf P97.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 38 Aufdruck auf P98.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 39 Aufdruck auf P99.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 40 Florianstor in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 41 Sandomiersk Bastei der Burg in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 42 Krakauer Tor in Lublin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 43 Hof der Jagiellonen-Universität in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 44 Dominikanerkirche in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 45 Burg Wawel in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 48 Rathausturm in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 49 Burghof in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 50 Marienkirche in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 51 Brühlsches Palais in Warschau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 52 Rotes Kreuz, Hof der Jagiellonen-Universität in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 53 Rotes Kreuz, Burg Wawel in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 54 Rotes Kreuz, Rathausturm in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 55 Rotes Kreuz, Marienkirche in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 56 Junges Mädchen.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 57 Bäuerin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 58 Bauer.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 59 Winterhilfswerk, Bauer.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 60 Winterhilfswerk, Bauer.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 61 Winterhilfswerk, Bauer.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 62 Winterhilfswerk, Bauer.jpg
- File:Himmlerstamp.jpg
- File:HindenburgTimbre.jpg
- File:Hitlergirl1940.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 001.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 002.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 003.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 004.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 005.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 006.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 007.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 008.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 009.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 010.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 011.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 012.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 013.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 014.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 015.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 016.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 017.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 018.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 019.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 020.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 021.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 022.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 023.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 024.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 025.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 026.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 027.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 028.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 029.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 030.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 031.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 032.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 033.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 034.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 035.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 036.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 037.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 039.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 040.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 041.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 042.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 043.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JuTa 14:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Per URAA, likely copyrighted until 2035 FASTILY 09:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1941 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2036 (95 years after publication).
- File:Adolf Hitler Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DR 1941 764 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 765 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 766 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 767 Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 768 Wiener Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 769 Wiener Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 770 Wiener Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 771 Wiener Frühjahrsmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 772 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 773 Reichspost Nachwuchslager.jpg
- File:DR 1941 774 Reichspost Leistungswettkampf.jpg
- File:DR 1941 775 Reichspost Geländefahrer.jpg
- File:DR 1941 776 Reichspost Postschutz.jpg
- File:DR 1941 777 Reichspost 100 Segelflugwerkstätten.jpg
- File:DR 1941 778 Reichspost Postkutsche.jpg
- File:DR 1941 780 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1941 781 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 782 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 783 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 784 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 785 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 786 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 787 Adolf Hitler 2.jpg
- File:DR 1941 787 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 788 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 789 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 790 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 791 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 792 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 793 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 794 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 795 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 795A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 796 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 797 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 798 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 799 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 800 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 801 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 802 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1941 804 Wiener Herbstmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 805 Wiener Herbstmesse.jpg
- File:DR 1941 810 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.jpg
- File:DR 1941,1942 787,788,826,827 detail.jpg
- File:Fasces Mussolini-Hitler mark.jpg
- File:FDC-ReichskanzlerAdolfHitler.jpg
- File:FDC-ReichskanzlerAdolfHitler1.jpg
- File:Feldpost1.jpg
- File:FutschesReich-Vergleich.png
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 63 Barbakan, Torzwinger in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 64 Kloster Tyniec bei Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 65 Burg Wawel in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 66 Sandomiersk Bastei der Burg in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 67 Hof der Jagiellonen-Universität in Krakau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 69 Rathaus in Sandomierz.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 70 Brühlsches Palais in Warschau.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 71 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 72 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 73 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 74 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 75 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 76 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 77 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 78 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 79 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 80 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 81 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1941 82 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Gengouv.jpg
- File:Ghetto Warschau.jpg
- File:DR 1941 763 Benito Mussolini und Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Pernau20kop8july1941.jpg
- File:ReichskanzlerAdolfHitler-MHB-70.jpg
- File:Stamp Ostland.jpg
- File:Stamp Ukraine.jpg
- File:StampNoo1941Michel Ib.jpg
- File:StampOtepaa1941Michel2.jpg
- File:StampPernau1941(Tallinn).jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DR) 1941 , MiNr 788.jpg
- File:Stamps of Tartu(Estonia)1941.jpg
- File:Stamps of Tartu(Estonia)1941Michel4.jpg
- File:Stamps of Tartu(Estonia)1941Michel7.jpg
- File:StampTartu(Estonia)1941Michel5.jpg
- File:StampTartu(Estonia)1941Michel6.jpg
- File:StampTartu(Estonia)1941Michel8.jpg
- File:StampTartu(Estonia)1941Michel9.jpg
- File:StampTartu1941Michel1.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_1941_,_MiNr_788.jpg){kind=link}
1941.jpg){kind=link}
1941Michel4.jpg){kind=link}
1941Michel7.jpg){kind=link}
1941Michel5.jpg){kind=link}
1941Michel6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1941Michel8.jpg){kind=link}
1941Michel9.jpg){kind=link}
JuTa 14:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Per URAA, likely copyrighted until 2036 FASTILY 09:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per request on COM:UNDEL. Trijnsteltalk 18:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:1942 stamps of Germany
[edit]These images have a Commons:URAA problem. In the US they are still copyrighted until end of 2037 (95 years after publication).
- File:Deutsches Reich - Böhmen und Mähren.jpg
- File:Deutsches Reich - Generalgouvernement.jpg
- File:DR 1942 811 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DR 1942 812 Heldengedenktag.jpg
- File:DR 1942 813 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1942 814 Das Blaue Band.jpg
- File:DR 1942 815 Das Braune Band.jpg
- File:DR 1942 816 Goldschmiedekunst.jpg
- File:DR 1942 817 Goldschmiedekunst.jpg
- File:DR 1942 818 Wehrkampftage.jpg
- File:DR 1942 819 Peter Henlein.jpg
- File:DR 1942 826 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR 1942 827 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 162 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 163 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 168 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 169 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 172 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 173 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 174 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:DR-D 1942 177 Dienstmarke.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 100 Nikolaus Kopernikus.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 83A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 84A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 85A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 86A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 87A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 88A Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 89 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 90 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 91 Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 92 Altes Lublin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 93 Neues Lublin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 94 Altes Lublin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 95 Neues Lublin.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 96 Veit Stoß.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 97 Hans Dürer, Bildnis eines jungen Mannes.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 98 Johann Christian Schuch.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1942 99 Joseph Xaver Elsner.jpg
- File:Henlein.jpg
- File:Luftfeldpostmarke.jpg
- File:NaziRM10DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM12-30DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM123-60yearDuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM1DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM2DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM3DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM6DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM7DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM8-30DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:NaziRM8DuesRevenue.jpg
- File:Nazitagderbriefmarke6+24pf1942.jpg
- File:Sonderpostkarte.jpg
- File:Sonderpostkarte309.jpg
JuTa 14:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Main discussion of U.S. copyright is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1934 stamps of Germany. This is a series of deletion nominations: 1926, 1927, 1928, (no discussion of 1929), 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942. Some of the years have discussions of individual stamps for each year. --Closeapple (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Behalten: Nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei, weil vor 1966 veröffentlicht, ohne dass ein Urheber angegeben wurde. Da demnach auch zum URAA-Zeitpunkt (1996) bereits gemeinfrei, auch in den USA nicht geschützt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Per URAA, likely copyrighted until 2037 FASTILY 10:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)