Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
-(C)_Paramount-New_Line_2013-09-13_18-45.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
-est-compose-aux-2-3-par-des-eleves-du-conserva.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously posted here in a lower resolution so potentially copyvio. Stefan4 (talk) 23:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
My fault: I got the date wrong. It was here a few months earlier. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)}}
.JPG){kind=link}
File:Censored pic of Julianna Guill in Friday the 13th (2009)-(C) Paramount-New Line 2013-09-13 18-45.jpg
[edit]-(C)_Paramount-New_Line_2013-09-13_18-45.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-(C)_Paramount-New_Line_2013-09-13_18-45.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Clearly a derivative work; not PD, not even fair use. But, uploader not notified of speedy. I've now notified of DR. Elvey (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Notifying is good, but not not notifying shouldn't mean that an obvious copyright violation shouldn't be speedy deleted. Garion96 (talk) 00:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Garion, even the nominator kwows it is a copyvio. Tbhotch™ 03:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
is not in source that is listed MarioNovi (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: See page 215 in the pdf source (Plate LV, Fig. 2, p. 440). Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in France, this is a 1993 artwork Dereckson (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in France. Built in 1993 by Odile Mir and Robert Quedot. Note: I've created the DR instead to process to a immediate deletion to categorize the media in the relevant FoP deleted category. Dereckson (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a spam by www.humanstatuebodyart.com.au with their advertising and telephone number. There are more such spam from User:Russavia. Akim Dubrow (talk) 15:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep It's within the scope of Category:Body painting. russavia (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)- Keep: Obviously. Akim, where exactly do you see a phone number or anything spammish in this photo? -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- An obvious Keep for a photo well within scope of Category:Body painting. In addition, I am somewhat appalled by your usage of the word "spam" and describing it with Russavia's work, Akim Dubrow. Please be more careful when putting files up for deletion. Please see COM:SCOPE, it is allowed. Without starting a big fight, it should be withdrawn or closed as keep. My 2 cents on the table=
Done WorldTraveller101 21:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- But there it was: PROMO... PRODUCT LAUNCHES, FASHION PARADES & EVENTS Body art - bodypaint can be used in many forms for events. Entertainers and entertainment - 100s of entertainers ready for your special event. Please visit: www.humanstatuebodyart.com.au or telephone head office: (02) 9713 8933 --Akim Dubrow (talk) 11:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- The rationale is still very weak. Russavia may know much about it, but Russavia has over 300,000 edits here and is one of the most respected members on Commons and he would never spam. Please don't make frivolous deletion requests, and I'd recommend withdrawing this deletion nomination...you're only putting more work and stress on yourself...it's clear that this isn't going to gain consensus for deletion. That's my recommendation. WorldTraveller101 13:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- But there it was: PROMO... PRODUCT LAUNCHES, FASHION PARADES & EVENTS Body art - bodypaint can be used in many forms for events. Entertainers and entertainment - 100s of entertainers ready for your special event. Please visit: www.humanstatuebodyart.com.au or telephone head office: (02) 9713 8933 --Akim Dubrow (talk) 11:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: WorldTraveller101 16:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non-notable person (look st en:User:Vareba) Taivo (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I somehow doubt all of the images (including the MS Windows interface) are copyrighted to the uploader. Eleassar (t/p) 22:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Attributed to 'GFMesstechnik' in the original upload log; no evidence of permission. Eleassar (t/p) 22:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Seem to be spam. Used only in the Persian and Tamil Wikipedias, in their articles for "banner", there placed by the uploader. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep because w:Vertex Pharmaceuticals is a big player, but, delete because uploader has claimed: This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality .... and this is not true. 91.66.153.214 08:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused image, superseded with .svg Taivo (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 14:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
personal unuseful photo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Banfield Alan (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
personal unuseful photo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Banfield Alan (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm this person, i dont authorize this photo on the web. Laurentdanish (talk) 03:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Consider also File:Alvaro Dias Huizar.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted 2 pics, COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Cipyvio, taken from http://www.adressa.no/kultur/tv/article6478313.ece Blue Elf (talk) 08:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 00:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Most probably copyvio, used on several websites Blue Elf (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused smiley with bad quality Taivo (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
No educational value Torsch (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal logo. — TintoMeches, 01:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, a similar logo is used on de.wiki, decide if it's worth of keeping or deleting it. — TintoMeches, 01:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This is almost used in de.wiki and therefore in scope. The logo itself is very simple. I changed the licence into PD-textlogo. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo Alan (talk) 00:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
According to w:Pakistan Army Armoured Corps, the branch of the army which created this was founded in 1947. Per {{PD-Pakistan}}, the copyright term of the badge seems to be 50 years from publication, and we don't know whether this was already created in 1947 or whether it was created later. In either case, it appears to be too recent for URAA. Stefan4 (talk) 20:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
The uploader asserts ownership of the image, but the credit on the image states otherwise. The image has appeared in the NY Times and elsewhere. The same applies to this image: File:BINA48.jpg -- Diannaa (talk) 02:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence this was ever published under a free licence by any Australian government department, and I doubt the original uploader is the copyright holder. russavia (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per russavia Alan (talk) 00:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
This is not covered by COM:FOP#Australia. russavia (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete should point out that given other images in the Flickr account this was probably taken in Oxford (UK) but would fail COM:FOP#United Kingdom as well as COM:FOP#United States . LGA talkedits 02:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per russavia Alan (talk) 00:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Brazilian municipality pt:Progresso (Rio Grande do Sul) founded in 1987, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983". Non-trivial text logo, failing PD-whatever. Per above reason, nominating also:
Gunnex (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Brazilian municipality pt:Vale do Anari founded in 1994, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983". Non-trivial text logo, failing PD-whatever. Gunnex (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused smiley with bad quality, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Posted here before it was posted on Flickr in 2012. Presumably Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Brazilian municipality pt:Santa Cruz de Minas founded in 1995, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983". Non-trivial text logo, failing PD-whatever. Gunnex (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photo about non-notable people Taivo (talk) 09:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I see two possible issues with this image. First, there is the COM:FOP issue as it relates to the Santa statue. Second, there is the COM:IDENT issue, in that requirements for the UAE aren't known. The photo itself would be in scope, particularly as it relates to Christianity and the celebrating of Christmas in Islamic societies. It's a shame that the statue issue basically prevents us from keeping this image. russavia (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
nonfree screenshot of a web site DHN (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW Alan (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Try wikibooks or wikiversity or something like that. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
A "worldwide innovation", released with an OTRS ticket 91.66.153.214 08:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- What exactly is your rationale? “Out of scope”? --Leyo 09:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think, it's tricky. With an OTRS ticket you can better advertise your products, i.e. a so called "Weltneuheit" :-). 91.66.153.214 09:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation. This is an album coverpaper. (In very unlikely situation, when uploader is copyright holder, bigger file is needed. So small file is not readable.) Taivo (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- There's an OTRS template on there, so it might not be - if you suspect it's a copyvio you should ask at COM:OTRSN. It is also possible to release a file under a free license only for certain low resolutions. darkweasel94 10:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket:2008071010038799, which was given valid by OTRS agent Nagy Alan (talk) 01:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
No author or permission credited 91.66.153.214 17:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that the researcher has used his own photographs 91.66.153.214 11:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused advertisement, the uploader's only contribution. Out of scope. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Taivo Alan (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Own Work? Suspect watermark in the left corner. 91.66.153.214 09:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
"Hector" is the uploader or a buddy of the uploader, right? (not used) 91.66.153.214 07:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused photo about unidentified person, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I think, this scan from a website needs an OTRS ticket. Also File:Diptico.jpg. 91.66.153.214 06:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion File:Diptico.jpg and File:AMAURY GUTIERREZ.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- @ File:AMAURY GUTIERREZ.jpg Keep. It`s a fine pic (12,67 MB), which has not the problems as the other both files. 91.66.153.214 11:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- It seems to me, that File:AMAURY GUTIERREZ.jpg is cut out from File:Diptico inside.jpg and as such derivative work from copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and Taivo Alan (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader indef'd on :en for vandalising BLP articles.[1] -- Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader indef'd on :en for vandalising BLP articles.[2] -- Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader indef'd on :en for vandalising BLP articles.[3] -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Lacking possible educational usage, unlikely to be identified due to the poor quality Convallaria majalis (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The fungi are identifiable, but unnatural colors decrease educational value. Taivo (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A photo of Hericium coralloides not of decent quality, not usable for educational purposes. Convallaria majalis (talk) 13:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader indef'd on :en for vandalising BLP articles.[4] -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of lots of text. Stefan4 (talk) 23:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Stefan4 Alan (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright vio. Rapsar (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot from a website. Rapsar (talk) 21:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Taken from a video probably, copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Photoshopped, so is likely to be copyright by a person other than the uploader despite appearing to feature the uploader. Proof of right to upload via OTRS is required. Timtrent (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Photoshopped, so is likely to be copyright by a person other than the uploader despite appearing to feature the uploader. Proof of right to upload via OTRS is required. Timtrent (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This image is used only in en.wiki in user page, which is written not in English, but in unknown language. The user page has speedy deletion tag due to promotionality. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, taken from http://2009.nitokongressen.no/2009/09/25/viktig-a-lytte-til-ungdom/ Blue Elf (talk) 08:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Fastily Alan (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
personal unuseful photo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Banfield Alan (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rodhullandemu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted text; no FOP for 2D works in the UK Stefan4 (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, image of unidentified person used for vandalism on enwp [5] (it is not w:Lucy Boynton). January (talk) 11:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. Could be found on many other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot of some webpage. Besides copyright protected logo of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, copyright status of profile pictures is unknown. —Bill william comptonTalk 11:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW Alan (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for sculptures in the US. This statue was installed in 2007 [6]. January (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks January, for pointing that out to me, I'll be more careful, and sorry for the trouble. 213.246.135.23 11:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC) (I wasn't logged in - Bouktin (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC))
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Accidental upload via Commons Uploader. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
this image is licsenced under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike ad it says on the link http://www.kscopemusic.com/no-man/promo/ Dman41689 (talk) 06:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal doodles with no foreseeable educational use. Outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality Concern - given the puma outline.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation, see : www.radiomit.com. Nemesis III (discuter) 20:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
"Scan was done in 2012 by ISTI - CNR". There's no OTRS-confirmed evidence of permission. Eleassar (t/p) 23:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination - probably nothing copyrighted here (faithful digital replicas of pd objects are pd). --Eleassar (t/p) 23:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: - true. No copyright issue here, and, just to be sure, I, as the author of the image, I have sent a mail to OTRS) ALoopingIcon (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
This school logo is unlikely to be the property of the uploader. We already have a copy on en.wiki for fair use. Diannaa (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
This school logo is unlikely to be the property of the uploader. To make it complicated:Looks like a logo that was earlier removed and now re-uploaded or a removed logo with a new but dufferent logo with the same name. The Banner (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and protect please, for the same reasons exposed in the other file form this school. Non-free logo. And also, the filename is too generic and I suggest to protect this name. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- ((Keep))
I was unsure of naming it and hence it became too generic. However, I assure you that this is my original work. Please keep.
- Can you prove that you are the owner? It is far more likely that the school is the owner. The Banner (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Souvent-premier-le-college-saint-exupery-(lyon-4-e)-est-compose-aux-2-3-par-des-eleves-du-conserva.jpg
[edit]-est-compose-aux-2-3-par-des-eleves-du-conserva.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-est-compose-aux-2-3-par-des-eleves-du-conserva.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be out of scope. No description provided. Leyo 12:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused photo about non-notable person, the uploader's almost only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material Blue Elf (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Matt314 Alan (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Uploader indef'd on :en for vandalising BLP articles.[7] -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Most probably copyrighted material, in use on several websites Blue Elf (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Source image on en.wiki says "the subject and author gave the image of Winchinchala to me and I created the collage which her people and she herself use as her public image. Previously published: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=545641378815694&set=a.132305976815905.28925.118602868186216&type=1&theater" which means the uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Diannaa (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
The uploader is not the original creator of this picture, and the production date of the picture is unknown. Rapsar (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Date unknown and copyrighted many places.--i.е. v-mail 21:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of Mus52
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Mus52:
The first is unused photo about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki). The others are logo of non-notable organization (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 10:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of Saint Anne on Bilgroix cape
[edit]These photos are about statue of Saint Anne on Bilgroix cape in Category:Arzon:
There is no freedom of panorama in France. I opened the first photo with full size and inscription is very badly seen, but it seems to me, that year begins with "MM", which means 21st century. Modern sculpture. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Dr. Tajamul Islam
[edit]Here are all photos, uploaded by User Dr. Tajamul Islam:
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 01.JPG
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 02.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 03.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 04.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 05.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 06.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 07.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 08.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 09.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 10.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 11.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 12.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 13.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 14.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 15.jpg
- File:Dr Tajamul Islam Shah 16.jpg
- Category:Tajamul Islam Shah
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. COM:PS Alan (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Hrohland
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Hrohland:
- File:Altmarkt 1.jpg
- File:Malersaal.jpg
- File:Ostraallee 1.jpg
- File:Ostraallee 2.jpg
- File:Rathaus auf dem Altmarkt Dresden.jpg
They are all pictures with unknown authorship and unknown creation time. Therefore we cannot be sure, how long time the author is dead. All these files are tagged {{PD-old}}. This can be untrue. (For the last image, creation year 1332 is apparently incorrect. 1332 is year, when the house was built. The drawing is much younger.) Taivo (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Nenablueeyes
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by User Nenablueeyes and not yet presented for deletion:
They are both unused files. The first can be copyrighted poster. The other depicts group of non-notable people. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Dresden, Polierstrasse Nr. 19, Aufriss.jpg
- File:Dresden, Polierstrasse Nr. 19, Grundriss.jpg
- File:Dresden, Frauenstrasse Nr. 14, Erker, Seite, erbaut von Johann Christoph Knöffel für den Böttchermeister Joh. Köhler, 1750.jpg
- File:Dresden, Frauenstrasse Nr. 14, Erker, erbaut von Johann Christoph Knöffel für den Böttchermeister Joh. Köhler, 1750.jpg
- File:Dresden, Frauenstrasse Nr. 14, Fassade, quer, erbaut von Johann Christoph Knöffel für den Böttchermeister Joh. Köhler, 1750.jpg
- File:Dresden, Frauenstrasse Nr. 14, Fassade, erbaut von Johann Christoph Knöffel für den Böttchermeister Joh. Köhler, 1750.jpg
- File:Dresden, Palais Boxberg, Vestibül.jpg
- File:Dresden, Palais Boxberg, Gartensaal.jpg
- File:Dresden, Boxberg' sches Palais, Deckengemälde von A. F. Oeser.jpg
INeverCry 22:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
A comprehensive photo collection of the political life (hand shakes etc.) of ru:Нигматулин, Нурлан Зайруллаевич, a Kazakh Statesman, Chairman of the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, uploaded by Antilong in 2012 & 2013. After identifying some multiple personalities issues (see User talk:Antilong, exif´s with different photographers = "Saylau Maylybayev" and "Ismalov Kuanysh", these files are already tagged with no-permission and are not part of this DR), it is highly unlikely that Antilong ever pulled the trigger to take all these pictures, considering
- an arsenal of different digicams (NIKON D3X, Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Canon EOS 1100D, NIKON D90, Noritsu QSS-32_33)
- a high number of files with small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF
- and
- 3. some mysterious temporal context and other stuff, which indicates that here are several photographers involved, e.g.:
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Абдулла Гюль.jpg (uploaded 13.06.2013), previously published (even in lower res) via (example) http://tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_news/nigmatulin-vstretilsya-v-ankare-s-prezidentom-turtsii--235927/ (11.06.2013, credit: "Фото с сайта www.parlam.kz" = Photo from www.parlam.kz) = http://tengrinews.kz/userdata/news/news_235927/thumb_b/photo_92438.jpg (last modified: 11.06.2013). http://www.parlam.kz itself is "© 2013 Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan all rights reserved."
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин 190613.jpg (uploaded 19.06.2013, 14:37), previously published (even in lower res, but with exif = "Copyrights: Saylau Maylybayev") via http://www.inform.kz/rus/article/2567630 (© 2013 IA "Kazakhstan Today" Use of materials of IA "Kazakhstan Today" without the prior written permission) = http://www.inform.kz/fotoarticles/20130619130846.jpg (last modified: 19.06.2013, 09:08)
- File:ННЗ и Ж.М.Баррозу.jpg (uploaded 03.06.2013), previously published (even in lower res, but with exif = "Author: Zhaslan Kuspanov, Copyrights: IC HOZU PARLAMENTA RK") via http://www.inform.kz/rus/article/2562951 (02.06.2013) = http://www.inform.kz/fotoarticles/20130602133630.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и В.Згоня.jpg (uploaded 22.05.2013), but on same day available via http://www.inform.kz/rus/article/2559964 = http://www.inform.kz/fotoarticles/20130522154329.jpg (lower res, but exif: "Author: Saylau Maylybayev, Copyright: IC HOZU PARLAMENTA RK")
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин 280613.jpg (uploaded 02.07.2013, cropped), previously published (even in lower res, but with exif = "Author: Saylau Maylybayev, Copyright: IC HOZU PARLAMENTA RK") via http://www.megapolis.kz/art/Kto_kuda_a_deputati_na_kanikuli (01.07.2013, © «Megapolis» 2004-2013) = http://www.megapolis.kz/files/modules/Articles/27083/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%81%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8.JPG (last modified: 30.06.2013)
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Асилбек Жээнбеков.jpg (uploaded 10.06.2013, 15:47), previously published (even in lower res) via http://inform.kz/eng/article/2565094 = http://www.inform.kz/fotoarticles/20130610122927.jpg (last modified: 10.06.2013, 08:29) or (high res version) via http://ortcom.kz/ru/news/ukreplenie-mejparlamentskogo-sotrudnichestva-kazahstana-i-kirgizstana.1458 (10.06.2013, © 2013 — Central Communications Service for the President of Kazakhstan) = http://ortcom.kz/media/upload/112/2013/06/10/7cf88b5e939673942fd2e1d6c961b770.JPG (exif available)
- File:Зайрулла Гершанович Нигматулин.jpg --> this seems to be an unsourced painting
- File:Поездка в ЗКО 10-11.01.13.jpg (uploaded 30.03.2013), but previously published via (example) http://www.parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis/news-details/id8300/1/1 (01.2013, © 2013 Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan all rights reserved) = http://www.parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis/News/GetImageNews/8300?locate=1&size=medium (lower res) or http://www.parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis/News/GetImageNews/8300?locate=1&size=max (identical res)
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Октай Сабир оглы Асадов.jpg (uploaded 10.06.2013, 15:47), but previously published via http://ortcom.kz/en/news/majilis-speaker-met-with-azerbaijani-colleague.1459 (10.06.2013, credit: "photo press service of the Kazakh Majilis",
© 2013 — Central Communications Service for the President of Kazakhstan) = http://ortcom.kz/media/upload/112/2013/06/10/1e066de803006ea0b4fbd04590c4ef76.JPG (last modified: 10.06.2013, 12:13, high res version with exif)
- File:Н.Нигматулин и С.Варси.jpg (uploaded 03.05.2013) but on same day available via http://ortcom.kz/ru/news/spiker-majilisa-n-nigmatulin-vstretilsya-s-pervim-zamestitelem-mid-velikobritanii-baronessoio-s-varsi.1241 (credit: "ҚР Парламенті Мәжілісі баспасөз қызметінің фотосуреті", © 2013 — Central Communications Service for the President of Kazakhstan) = http://ortcom.kz/media/upload/112/2013/05/03/5d1017d1a689892d829d2f047558c8cc.jpg (high res version with exif)
- etc. etc. etc. (a image site search of ortcom.kz / parlam.kz and inform.kz with "Нигматулин" as keyword will certainly produce more results)
It seems that - by some means - Antilong has access to the parliamentary photo/press service but this does not give him the right to publish these images (as indicated above taken by several photographers/organizations) as "own work". So, unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence (by whomever: inform.kz/parlam.kz/ortcom.kz/etc.) indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons.
- File:Нигматулин и Си Цзиньпин.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин 280613.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин 190613.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Абдулла Гюль.jpg
- File:Подписание Меморандума о сотрудничестве между Парламентами Казахстана и Турции.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Асилбек Жээнбеков.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Октай Сабир оглы Асадов.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Джемиль Чичек.jpg
- File:ННЗ и Ж.М.Баррозу.jpg
- File:ННЗ и А.Берзиньш.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и В.Згоня.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Вольфганг Гроссрук.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и О.Тузель.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и С.Варси.jpg
- File:Встреча с Вендерлих.jpg
- File:Встреча с Рубиновым.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и С.Ниинистё.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин - 24.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин - 23.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин - 22.jpg
- File:Заседание МПА СНГ 2.JPG
- File:Н.Нигматулин и В.Рыбак.JPG
- File:Н.Нигматулин и Ж-К.Миньон.JPG
- File:Заседание МПА СНГ.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин в Актау.jpg
- File:Футбол-2.jpg
- File:Футбол-1.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и М.Киннунен.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и И.Кобзон -1.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и Н.Ламмерт.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и И.Кобзон -2.jpg
- File:Вручение кубка Президента РК по хоккею с шайбой.jpg
- File:Зайрулла Гершанович Нигматулин.jpg
- File:Поездка в ЗКО 10-11.01.13.jpg
- File:Футбол.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и В.Казарян 07.02.13.jpg
- File:Встреча Н.Нигматулина и В.Казарян 07.02.13.jpg
- File:Нигматулин 23.jpg
- File:Sovet obschaya.JPG
- File:Нигматулин 22.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и С.Нарышкин 22.11.12.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и А.Жээнбеков 22.11.12.jpg
- File:Конференция о роли Первого Президента 1.jpg
- File:Конференция о роли Первого Президента 2.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 021.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 019.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 020.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 018.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 017.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 016.jpg
- File:127 Ассамблея Межпарламентского Союза, г.Квебек, Канада, октябрь 2012 года.jpg
- File:127 Ассамблея Межпарламентского Союза, г.Квебек, Канада, октябрь 2012 года - 1.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 015.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 014.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 012.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич 013.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
(c) Kuspanov Zhaslan/IC UMTO RK, missing permission.
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Нурдинжон Исмоилов. Подписание Меморандума.jpg
- File:Международная парламентская конференция, посвященная Дню Первого Президента Республики Казахстан.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
I suspect there is deception going on with this user regarding authorship. The file they uploaded here contains their username in the metadata as the author, Patrick Rogel nominated it for speedy containing this link. I downloaded the images from the source and Commons to compare the metadata, In the original source, it does not mention their username whatsoever in the metadata.
_%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%8B_%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9A%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%9A%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8,_29_%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0_2016_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
If this DR is to pass, I highly recommend blocking this user indefinitely for license laundering and deception.
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин Председатель Мажилиса.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан - спикер Мажилиса.jpg
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин.jpg
- File:Встреча Нурлана Нигматулина и Нурдинжона Исмоилова.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Нурдинжон Исмоилов. Подписание Меморандума.jpg
- File:Международная парламентская конференция, посвященная Дню Первого Президента Республики Казахстан.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Нурдинжон Исмоилов.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин на Политсовете партии Нур Отан 010618-5.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин на Политсовете партии Нур Отан 010618-4.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин на Политсовете партии Нур Отан 010618-1.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин на Политсовете партии Нур Отан 010618-3.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин на Политсовете партии Нур Отан 010618-2.jpg
- File:Nigmatulin Nurlan Нигматулин Нурлан.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 10.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 11.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 09.jpg
- File:Nurzhan Nurlanov.jpg
- File:Встреча Председателя Мажилиса Парламента Н.Нигматулина со Спикером Гос. Думы России В.Володиным.jpg
- File:Встреча Президента Казахстана Н.А.Назарбаева со Спикером Государственной Думы России В.Володиным.jpg
- File:Встреча Председателя Мажилиса Парламента Н.Нигматулина со Спикером Государственной Думы России В.Володиным.jpg
- File:Встреча Президента Казахстана Н.А.Назарбаева со Спикером Гос. Думы России В.Володиным.jpg
- File:Открытие второй сессии Парламента РК второго созыва, 1 сентября 2016 года.jpg
- File:Встреча Н.Нигматулина с вице-председателем Парламентской Ассамблеи ОБСЕ Азаем Гулиевым, 30 августа 2016 года.jpg
- File:Встреча Н.Нигматулина с Председателем Межпарламентского союза (МПС) Сабером Чоудхури, 29 августа 2016 года.jpg
- File:Встреча Н.Нигматулина со спикером Нитиджелы (Парламент) Республики Маршалловы острова Кеннетом Кеди, 29 августа 2016 года.jpg
- File:Выступление на совместном заседании палат Парламента. 30 июня 2016 г.jpg
- File:Выступление Нурлана Нигматулина на международной конференции по ядерной безопасности 29 ноября 2013 года.jpg
- File:Нигматулин - награждение орденом Первого Президента.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Ханнес Герман.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Кобзон 2.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Кобзон 1.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Октай Асадов.JPG
- File:Нигматулин -Встреча в БГУ.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Ээро Хейнялуома.JPG
- File:Нигматулин и Рокас Бернотас.JPG
- File:Нигматулин в КГУ Ауэзова.JPG
- File:Нигматулин в Кентау.JPG
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Пэк Чу Хён.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Анатолий Ничкасов.jpg
- File:ОДКБ 281113.JPG
- File:Нигматулин - Нарышкин 281113.JPG
- File:Конференция 26 ноября 2012 года -1.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 07.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 08.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 06.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 05.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 04.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 01.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 02.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 03.jpg
- File:Конференция 26 ноября 2013 года.JPG
- File:13 съезд НДП Нур Отан.jpg
- File:Нур Отан 251112.JPG
- File:Нур Отан 251112..JPG
- File:Международная конференция 110413 -1.JPG
- File:Международная конференция 110413 -2.JPG
- File:Международная конференция 110413 -3.JPG
- File:Нигматулин Жанаозен 03042013.JPG
- File:Нигматулин Актау 03042013.JPG
- File:Нигматулин с Аурелией Бушез 12.03.13 год.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Джон Рассэл Бэрд.jpg
- File:Конференция о роли Первого Президента 2.JPG
- File:Конференция о роли Первого Президента 1.JPG
- File:Н.Нигматулин и С.Нарышкин 22.11.12.jpg
- File:Н.Нигматулин и А.Жээнбеков 22.11.12.jpg
- File:Собрание фракции Нур Отан.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Ноэль Кинселла.jpg
- File:127 Ассамблея Межпарламентского Союза.jpg
- File:Foot-2.jpg
- File:Foot-1.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Чыонг Тан Шанг.jpg
- File:Пленарное заседание Мажилиса 120912.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Матвиенко.jpg
- File:Открытие второй сессии Парламента пятого созыва.jpg
- File:Конференция 27-28 августа 2013.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Абдул Рауф Ибрагими.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Сапиев.jpg
- File:Жастар – Отанга.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Председатель Совета Кантонов Парламента Швейцарской Конфедерации Филиппо Ломбарди.jpg
- File:С Чрезвычайным и Полномочным Послом Чешской Республики в Республике Казахстан Бедржиха Копецки-1.jpg
- File:Совместное заседание палат Парламента РК 29 июня 2012 года-1.jpg
- File:Совместное заседание палат Парламента РК 29 июня 2012 года-2.jpg
- File:Сергей Евгеньевич Нарышкин председатель Государственной Думы Российской Федерации-1.jpg
- File:Сергей Евгеньевич Нарышкин председатель Государственной Думы Российской Федерации.jpg
- File:Совет межпарламентской ассамблеи СНГ 26-27 марта 2012 года.jpg
- File:На 13 съезде НДП Нур Отан.jpg
- File:На 13 съезде НДП Нур Отан-1.JPG
- File:Ten 2.jpg
- File:Hok 1.JPG
- File:Hok 2.JPG
- File:Ten 1.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Ласло Кёвер.JPG
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Си Цзиньпин.JPG
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Чжан Дэцзян.JPG
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин и Лэ Юйчэн.JPG
- File:Нигматулин Нурлан Зайруллаевич.jpg
- File:Нигматулин и Ферринг, 270913.jpg
- File:Павлодар 250913-1.jpg
- File:Павлодар 250913-5.jpg
- File:Футбол.jpg
_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%A7%D0%BE%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%85%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8,_29_%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0_2016_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1989 (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artur Pirojkov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative of potentially copyrighted content, no info on original author, no permission.
- File:Баннер Аграрной партии России.jpg
- File:Баннер Гражданской Платформы (3).jpg
- File:Баннер Гражданской Платформы (2).jpg
- File:Баннер Гражданской Платформы (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 21:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chaklasiyaharsh (talk · contribs)
[edit]imho partially Copyright protected content, not 'own work', out of scope of WLM 2013, as well as imho 'advertisements',
Roland zh 19:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, most likely scanned from unknown source.Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.PD-status of unsourced book covers unclear.
- File:Міяковський.png
- File:Дорошенко Вол.Вікт..png
- File:Kochubey form.jpg
- File:Orientstudie.jpg
- File:Східний світ-1 2013.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all. All these images are younger than 70 years and so copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:L Alan (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - scans from modern books, etc - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Zittelsches Haus, an der Frauenkirche 20, Dresden, ornamentales Detail des Mittelrisalits, Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:Köhlersches Haus, Frauenstraße 14, Dresden, Fassade.jpg
- File:Adamsches Haus (Stadtwaldschlößchen) an der Sophienstraße 1 in Dresden.jpg
- File:Hôtel de Pologne (Schloßstraße und Brüdergasse). Das Eingangsportal befindet sich auf der Brüdergasse (Mittelteil des Hauses).jpg
- File:Сасів, Миколаївська церква (St.-Nikolaus-Kirche, Sassiw).jpg
- File:Saulsches Haus (Ministerhotel), Seestraße 18 in Dresden, Fotografie um 1900.jpg
- File:SASIV (also Sasov, Sassow), Ukraine. Wooden synagogue, exterior. Ink drawing 1902.jpg
- File:Haus an der Frauenstraße 7 (Chiapponisches Haus), Dresden, Federzeichnung um 1761.jpg
- File:Köhlersches Haus, an der Frauenstrasse Nr. 14 in Dresden, Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:Johann Christoph Knöffel, Entwurf zur Fassade des Altstädter Rathauses in Dresden.jpg
- File:Palais Boxberg, Waisenhausstraße Dresden, vor dem Abbruch 1899.jpg
- File:Schloss Choren bei Döbeln, erbaut nach Entwürfen von Samuel Gotthelf Locke ( 1710 -1793 ).jpg
- File:Zimmermannsches Haus (Hotel Stadt Rom), Neumarkt 10 in Dresden, Entwurf von Andreas Adam um 1739.jpg
- File:Zittelsches Haus, an der Frauenkirche 20, Dresden, ornamentales Detail des Mittelrisalits.jpg
- File:Adamsches Haus (Stadtwaldschlößchen), an der Sophienstraße 1, Dresden, Dekor am Hauptportal, Fotografie um 1900.jpg
- File:Palais Vitzthum-Schönburg, Moritzstraße Dresden, vor dem Abbruch 1885.jpg
- File:Palais Vitzthum-Schönburg, Moritzstraße Dresden, vor dem Abbruch 1885, Grundriss.jpg
- File:Haus Große Meißner Gasse 11 und 13 in Dresden, 1748 nach Entwürfen von Samuel Locke erbaut, beherbergte den Meißner Stadtkeller.tif
- File:Große Meißner Straße 13, um 1750 durch Samuel Locke, beherbergte den Meißner Stadtkeller.tif
- File:Chabonisches Haus Frauenstraße 7 in Dresden, 1745, Entwurf von Samuel Gotthelf Locke (1710-1793) Schüler von Johann Christoph Knöffel.jpg
- File:“Hotel Pologne” an der Schloßgasse zu Dresden, nach Entwürfen von Samule Locke aus der Schule Knöffels im Stil des Rokoko erbaut (Zeichnung um 1830, J.C.A. Richter).jpg
- File:Schloßgasse zu Dresden, Blick in Richtung Altmarkt, rechts am Rand “Hotel Pologne” nach Entwürfen von Samule Locke aus der Schule Knöffels im Stil des Rokoko erbaut (Zeichnung um 1830, J.C.A. Richter).jpg
_an_der_Sophienstra%C3%9Fe_1_in_Dresden.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Das_Eingangsportal_befindet_sich_auf_der_Br%C3%BCdergasse_(Mittelteil_des_Hauses).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Seestra%C3%9Fe_18_in_Dresden,_Fotografie_um_1900.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Ukraine._Wooden_synagogue,_exterior._Ink_drawing_1902.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Dresden,_Federzeichnung_um_1761.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Neumarkt_10_in_Dresden,_Entwurf_von_Andreas_Adam_um_1739.jpg){kind=link}
,_an_der_Sophienstra%C3%9Fe_1,_Dresden,_Dekor_am_Hauptportal,_Fotografie_um_1900.jpg){kind=link}
_Sch%C3%BCler_von_Johann_Christoph_Kn%C3%B6ffel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Thomas Mar Eusebius.jpg
- File:Baselios Cardinal Cleemis.jpg
- File:Cardinal Moran Mor Baselios Cleemis Catholicos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Images taken from all over the web and perhaps other sources. No evidence of the uploader being the author or having permission to upload here under the licenses given.
- File:Grand Mosque Roundabout.jpg
- File:Jalan Jenderal Soedirman.jpg
- File:Nusa Indah Terminal.jpg
- File:Jembatan Ampera dalam Rekayasa, 1973.jpg
- File:Jalan Gubernur H. Bastari.jpg
- File:Great Mosque of Medan, circa 1994.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge Get Renovation.jpg
- File:CRJ-1000NG Garuda Indonesia in Kendari.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge in Engineering.jpg
- File:Agung Mosque Roundabout 1989.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge Caused Engineering.jpg
- File:Monpera, Circa 1989.jpg
- File:PK-GRC Coming to Delivery.jpg
- File:Musi III Bridge specification.jpg
- File:PK-GRA-Garuda Indonesia Canadair CRJ-1000 Cockpit.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge, circa 1989.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge, circa 2002.JPG
- File:Ampera Bridge Has Yellow Colour.jpg
- File:Ampera Bridge Has Yellow Colour 2.jpg
- File:PT. Semen Padang, July 1985.jpg
- File:Internasional Plaza prior in 1992.jpg
- File:Jakarta in 1979 (Animated version).gif
- File:Massacre in Palembang.jpg
- File:CRJ-1000NG Garuda Indonesia prepared for flight route Makassar - Kendari.jpg
- File:Old Guitar Oma Irama Film Cover.jpg
- File:Terminal 1 circa 1987.jpg
- File:PK-GRA Arrived.jpg
- File:Jembatan Ampera Sedang Dibangun.jpg
- File:Palembang During Tragedy 20th Century Breakdown.jpg
- File:Judi Cover.jpg
- File:N20904.jpg
- File:Sepinggan Under Construction.jpg
- File:JA8984 AT HND.jpg
- File:KNIA Under Construction.jpg
- File:T3 Acces Road.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 00:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
All of these images are clearly taken from other sites, without permission to upload here with license given, and uploader claimed this to be his/her own work. 2 files are illegally taken from a forum.
- File:Tol Belmera.jpg
- File:Inside the Terminal 2E.jpg
- File:Pekanbaru-Dumai Toll Road Planned.jpg
- File:Jakarta Inner Ring Road.JPG
- File:BI Office Tower Construction.jpg
Sabung.hamster (talk) 03:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and block the user, who has uploaded nothing but copyright violations. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted and blocked. --Alan (talk) 00:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HugoMaraton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private logos used to spam es.wiki (see es:Club Atlético Lerdo, deleted on May 4, 2010).
— TintoMeches, 00:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work, not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and Taivo Alan (talk) 00:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations with false authorship claims.
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files related to uk:Крушельницький Мар'ян Михайлович - a Russian theatre director. Unlikely "own work". Historical photos may be in public domain in Russia and U.S. but relevant info must be provided.
- File:М Крушельницький Щасливцев.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Швандя.jpg
- File:М Крушельницький Платон Кречет.jpg
- File:М Крушельницький Буличов.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Тев'є.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Дай серцю волю.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 07:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- File:М.Крушельницький-Бухгалтер.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Ватутін.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Лір.JPG
- File:М Крушельницький Народний Малахій.jpg
Delete all. These photos are made from 1926 until 1949 and claimed too old for copyright. No information about photographer is given and therefore we cannot be sure, that he is dead enough long. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:L Alan (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:КЛюП логотип.png + File:Поэтическая Лига.jpg = unsourced logos with unclear copyright status.
- File:Марія Китаєве.jpg
- File:Вистава "Андреленовый эликсир".jpg
- File:Софія Фрунзе.jpg
- File:Грязов Андрей Борисович.jpg
- File:Андрій БОрисович Грязов.jpg
- File:КЛюП логотип.png
- File:Поэтическая Лига.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rohan von Indien (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some uploads of this user were blatant copyvio. I strongly doubt that the rest of his contributions is really own work. It looks like professional images made for promoting a company's products and there is no evidence the uploader has the permission of the authors of the files.
- File:The light weight magnetic drill from BDS, Germany.jpg
- File:Shows the functioning of the arbor and the core drill attached together..jpg
- File:Magnetic core drilling machine MAB 825 manufactured by BDS Maschinen GmbH, Germany..jpg
- File:Hole drilling in pies and tubes with magnetic.jpg
- File:Magnetic core drilling machine made by a German manufacturer BDS Maschinen gmbH.jpg
- File:Magnetic core drilling machine BDS MAB 845 with swivel base.jpg
- File:High Speed Steel (HSS) core drills.jpg
- File:Tungsten Carbide Tipped (TCT) core drills.jpg
- File:Advantages of core drilling technology.png
- File:Save time and money.png
- File:Applications of portable drilling mchines.png
- File:Pnematic drive magnetic drill AirMAB 5000 small.jpg
- File:Railway track drilling machine.jpg
- File:Pneumatic driven portable drilling machines AirMAB 5000.jpg
- File:Operations performed by magnetic core drilling machine.jpg
- File:Operations performed by a magnetic drill.jpg
- File:Metal core drilling process with BDS HSS hard coated core drills.jpg
- File:Four main components of a magnetic core drilling machine.jpg
- File:BDS MAB 825.jpg
_core_drills.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_core_drills.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 07:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Nuked per COM:PRP and COM:L, also blocked 1 week Alan (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - scans from modern books - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:The synagogue in Wloclawek ( hebrew בית הכנסת בולוצלאבק).jpg
- File:Dresden, Zechsches Haus (Schössergasse 27).jpg
- File:Dresden, Stuckdecke im Zechschen Haus, entstanden um 1660 (italienische Künstler), Aufnahme um 1900.jpg
- File:Dresden, Palais Boxberg, Waisenhausstraße Nr. 33, Hauptfassade, 1752 nach Entwürfen von Julius Heinrich Schwarze im Stil des Rokoko errichtet, 1899 abgebrochen.tif
- File:Dresden, Palais Boxberg, Waisenhausstraße Nr. 33, Hauptfassade, Ausschnitt aus dem Mittelrisalit, 1752 nach Entwürfen von Julius Heinrich Schwarze im Stil des Rokoko errichtet, 1899 abgebrochen.tif
- File:Haus von Herzog August von Sachsen-Weissenfels an der Schloßgasse 34, Giebel des Manierismus.jpg
- File:Dresden, Palais im Großen Garten, Stuckarbeiten des Gabriele Minetti, 1660.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Aufnahme_um_1900.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by W560ppdgeq (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - scans from modern books - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Zittelsches Haus, an der Frauenkirche 20 in Dresden.gif
- File:Dresden, Terrassenufer 9 (Schwarzer Bär).jpg
- File:Zittelsches Haus, an der Frauenkirche 20, Dresden, ornamentales Detail.JPG
- File:Dresden, Königsstrasse 5.jpg
- File:Dresden, Seestraße 18.jpg
- File:Dresden, Zahnsgasse 9.jpg
- File:Dresden, An der Frauenkirche 17.jpg
- File:Dresden, Grosse Brüdergasse Nr. 25.jpg
- File:Dresden, Plauensche Strasse Nr. 16 (Josephinenstift).jpg
- File:Dresden, Thielemannsches Haus an der Großen Meißner Straße 13.jpg
- File:Dresden, Rampische Straße 4, Fotografie um 1900.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by W560ppdgeq34562 (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - scans from modern books - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Dresden, Börnersches Haus an der Frauenkirche 17.jpg
- File:Adamsches Haus (Stadtwaldschlößchen) an der Sophienstraße 1 Ecke Postplatz in Dresden (Entwurf Andreas Adam, 1745).jpg
_an_der_Sophienstra%C3%9Fe_1_Ecke_Postplatz_in_Dresden_(Entwurf_Andreas_Adam,_1745).jpg){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - scans from modern books - questionable licensing - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Dresden, Moritzstr. 6.jpg
- File:Dresden, Moritzstraße 6.jpg
- File:Dresden, Landhausstraße 4 .jpg
- File:Dresden, Landhausstr. 4.jpg
- File:Adamsches Haus (Stadtwaldschlößchen) an der Sophienstraße 1 in Dresden, Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:Adamsches Haus (Stadtwaldschlößchen) an der Sophienstraße 1 in Dresden, Ausschnitt .jpg
_an_der_Sophienstra%C3%9Fe_1_in_Dresden,_Ausschnitt.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_an_der_Sophienstra%C3%9Fe_1_in_Dresden,_Ausschnitt_.jpg){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per INC Alan (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded here at 2013-06-24T15:04:25 and to w:File:Bramley Rotherham.jpg at 2013-06-24T15:10:29. Different uploaders and only 6 minutes between the uploads, so something looks suspicious. Maybe the uploaders found the image at some third place somewhere. Stefan4 (talk) 23:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
It is a duplicate Chesipiero (talk) 15:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence as to the date or manner of publication. Just an image found online, of unknown provenance. Without knowing the date of publication or the original copyright holder, there is no way to verify the nonrenewal claim, either. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
PD-Old-100 but author= unknown - image from 1900 - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina INeverCry 22:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Dresden, Landgerichtsgebäude Pillnitzer Straße, erbaut 1876 bis 1878 von Carl Adolph Traugott Canzler (1818-1903) .jpg
[edit]_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PD-Old-70 but author = unknown - image from 1905 - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina INeverCry 22:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence as to the date or manner of publication. Just an image found online, of unknown provenance. Without knowing the date of publication or the original copyright holder, there is no way to verify the nonrenewal claim, either. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence as to the date or manner of publication. Just an image found online, of unknown provenance. Without knowing the date of publication or the original copyright holder, there is no way to verify the nonrenewal claim, either. In addition, the photograph is misattributed - Lester Glassner was the collector who the physical image, and there is no reason to believe he had any authority to authorize publication or otherwise license the image. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
This is fake. No sources. Created by the uploader for fun. Augustine.konn (talk) 05:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Bad PNG derivative of SVG file which is superseded by File:Dielectric responses zh hans.svg McZusatz (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The file is still used in zh.wiki and needs substituting at first. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done. --McZusatz (talk) 20:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
English Wikipedia says "Author: Lyubomir Ivanov Source: the author". This wording suggests that the uploader is someone other than the photographer as it suggests that "the author" handed the photo over to the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- The file description has been appended to underline that the author is indeed the uploader in this case. Apcbg (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The wording "Author: Lyubomir Ivanov Source: the author" on English Wikipedia suggests that "the author" has handed over the photo to the uploader and thus that that "the author" and the uploader aren't the same person. Stefan4 (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- The file description has been appended to underline that the author is indeed the uploader in this case. Apcbg (talk) 05:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Unclear permission "Having been approached by a number of organisations concerning this matter, RBH offers the design above which may be freely used by interested parties."
Are uninterested parties not allowed to use the image? Are modifications allowed? Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Are you reading that sentence in OTRS? --89.249.2.53 11:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of any OTRS ticket for this image (and in either case I don't have access to OTRS myself). The permission field in the {{Information}} template links to http://www.berkshirehistory.com/odds/arms.html which contains the permission statement. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Are you reading that sentence in OTRS? --89.249.2.53 11:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep "May be freely used by interested parties" simply means if you like it, you can use it. Are you seriously trying to suggest that uninterested parties would be prevented from using something they're not interested with in the first place??? Don't play word games, Stefan4. Fry1989 eh? 05:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept, licence is enough clear. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
imho it may be doubted to be 'own work', maybe a scan or taken from website/magazine etc, Roland zh 18:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- the uploader has stated: "I take it by snapshot" and that's exactly how it looks Keep 91.66.153.214 11:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept, looks like really taken by snapshot. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Collage involving non-free images due to the lack of freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, коллаж придётся удалить, так как он содержит несвободные фотографии. Памятники в России охраняются авторским правом до смерти скульптора и ещё 70 лет после неё. Ymblanter (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Все вошедшие в коллаж фотографии сделаны мной. Указать это дополнительно и/или загрузить их сюда также? Nonexyst (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Проблема в том, что, когда Вы фотографируете несвободный памятник или здание, фотография будет несвободной, и её сюда нельзя загружать.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Понятно, в таком случае, какие фото мне с коллажа убрать, чтобы получить приемлемый файл?
- И ещё, здесь, как я вижу, очень много фото с сооружениями, где с момента смерти скульптора прошло менее 70 лет, например, фото памятника Ленину на Московской площади, интересно, почему их до сих пор не удалили. Nonexyst (talk) 18:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Боюсь, только две горизонтальные фотографии можно оставить (в принципе, с мостом можно придраться и начать выяснять, кто и когда его строил, но на это, думаю, можно дать ответ, что всё равно никаких деталей не видно). Касательно других фотографий, видимо, просто на глаза никому не попались. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Согласно ВП:Свобода панорамы, загружать на Commons возможно, если "произведение не является основным объектом фотографии; или если фотография используется в пространстве статей, но не является основным объектом какой-либо статьи или страницы" и "не является основным объектом фотографии (например, оно не занимает её бо́льшую часть)". Таким образом, нужно определиться, является ли изображение памятника в Киришах основным объектом статьи про Кириши (я так понимаю, нет), и занимают ли фото бОльшую её часть (в таком случае, я могу в ближайшее время взять вырезки с моих фотографий бОльшего размера и использовать их в коллаже). Nonexyst (talk) 19:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Попробуйте, но если на фотографии, кроме памятника, ничего нет, будет довольно сложно аргументировать, что она не нарушает свободу панорамы.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Согласно ВП:Свобода панорамы, загружать на Commons возможно, если "произведение не является основным объектом фотографии; или если фотография используется в пространстве статей, но не является основным объектом какой-либо статьи или страницы" и "не является основным объектом фотографии (например, оно не занимает её бо́льшую часть)". Таким образом, нужно определиться, является ли изображение памятника в Киришах основным объектом статьи про Кириши (я так понимаю, нет), и занимают ли фото бОльшую её часть (в таком случае, я могу в ближайшее время взять вырезки с моих фотографий бОльшего размера и использовать их в коллаже). Nonexyst (talk) 19:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Боюсь, только две горизонтальные фотографии можно оставить (в принципе, с мостом можно придраться и начать выяснять, кто и когда его строил, но на это, думаю, можно дать ответ, что всё равно никаких деталей не видно). Касательно других фотографий, видимо, просто на глаза никому не попались. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Проблема в том, что, когда Вы фотографируете несвободный памятник или здание, фотография будет несвободной, и её сюда нельзя загружать.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, В России нет свободы панорамы. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Moderationwiki
[edit]
These images seems to be taken from the Intenet, and in my opinion only File:Logo+viacao+cometa+preview.jpg could be {{PD-textlogo}}. --JaviP96 10:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, but one kept as textlogo. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - scans from modern books - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Dresden, Zittelsches Haus, an der Frauenkirche 20 (Fotografie um 1900).jpg
- File:"Blauer Stern", an der großen Meissner Gasse 11 in Dresden.jpg
- File:Saulsches Haus (Ministerhotel), Seestraße 18 in Dresden, Fassade (Fotografie um 1900).jpg
- File:Saulsches Haus (Ministerhotel), Seestraße 18 in Dresden, vom Hauptthor, Detail.jpg
- File:Saulsches Haus (Ministerhotel), Seestraße 18 in Dresden, vom Hauptthor.jpg
- File:Saulsches Haus (Ministerhotel), Seestraße 18 in Dresden.jpg
- File:Landhausstraße 4 "Die drei Goldenen Römer" (Fotografie um 1900).jpg
- File:Dresden, Frauenstraße 7, Chiapponisches Haus, Oberer Teil der Fassade (Fotografie 1908).jpg
- File:Dresden, Altstädter Rathaus am Altmarkt 1 (Döringsches Haus), Fotografie um 1900.jpg
- File:Haus Goldene Sonne, Neustädter Markt 5 in Dresden.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Seestra%C3%9Fe_18_in_Dresden,_Fassade_(Fotografie_um_1900).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Seestra%C3%9Fe_18_in_Dresden,_vom_Hauptthor,_Detail.jpg){kind=link}
,_Seestra%C3%9Fe_18_in_Dresden,_vom_Hauptthor.jpg){kind=link}
,_Seestra%C3%9Fe_18_in_Dresden.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Fotografie_um_1900.jpg){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unclear copyright situation. If appears, that the photos are in public domain, it is possible to undelete the files. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 892ßzhskl3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - source info indicates this was scanned from 2007 book - no indication of why PD-Old-100 would apply - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina
- File:Gasthaus "Zum Schwarzen Bär", Terrassenufer 9 in Dresden.jpg
- File:Gasthaus "Zum Schwarzen Bär", Terrassenufer 9 in Dresden, Ausschnitt.jpg
INeverCry 22:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unclear copyright situation. If appears, that the photos are in public domain, then it is possible to undelete the files. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
PNG images of a 3 star evaluation
[edit]Superseded PNG files, substituted by File:Stars310.svg, File:Stars320.svg and File:Stars330.svg respectively.
— TintoMeches, 01:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
The main logi is in PD, it was created and widely circulated from 1897. But, not sure about the text below (i.e. "Ramakrishna Mission with orange yellow design). The original logo was something like this. Seems to be a derivative work. Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 06:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: the derivative work is below the threshold of originality (short text and simple shape). BrightRaven (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am unsure if the image is below TOO, but, we don't have any information on India in that page. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Main part (swan) PD, text below TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Low-resolution photo of some unidentified and unidentifiable fungi and plants. Out of scope as lacking possible educational usage. Convallaria majalis (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep As for resolution, I've seen worse. I'm sure some botanist or mycologist could identify the subject matter. As for usability, it's an example of species sharing an environment, but I defer to an ecologist as to its typicality. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I am not sure, that the fungus is identifiable. For example, I do not understand, is photographer here standing or squatting, therefore I do not understand, how big the mushroom is. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not usable, identification not possible Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This image is used in en.wiki in talk page. The image is quite different from other versions with more data. Simple deletion takes away a large bit of the discussion and pure substitution alters the image meaning. I do not know, what to do. Maybe talk page is not worth of retaining the image? Taivo (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Superseeded. Use on talk page archive page 73 only. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The image is used in more than one projects and should be substituted before deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Different data set of original vs. newer file. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The image is used in more than one projects and should be substituted before deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Different data set of original vs. newer file. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Author and sole editor requesting deletion; image superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_EmpStatsBLS_Jan09-Aug13.png —Eustress talk 15:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The image is used in more than one projects and should be substituted before deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Different data set of original vs. newer file. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The assertion "This file is in the public domain, because booking photos/records are public records and public records are not copyrighted" is clearly wrong. Many public records have copyrights. Booking photos have copyrights if published after 1989 or before 1989 with notice. The question which needs to be answered is when this 1974 image was first published. If before 1989 without notice, then the license will be PD-no notice. Otherwise it has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I went by this from mugshots.com: "Booking records are considered and legally recognized as public records, in the public domain." I figured they'd know what they were talking about. Looking further now I see conflicting information. If you're aware of anything definitive, I'd love to see it. In the meantime we can change the wording of the license to "because booking records are considered and legally recognized as public records, in the public domain." Or... I think it's safe to assume the mugshot was "published" around 1974 so we could go the PD-no notice route you suggest. I can't imagine a mugshot having a copyright notice. Further, since you've shown an interest and profess relevant knowledge, rather than nominating for deletion mugshots piecemeal, as an admin you might wish to add something to Commons guidelines covering mugshots (COM:CB or COM:PRS). That would certainly be helpful. – JBarta (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- First, public records may or may not be PD. While that may seem logical, it simply isn't so in most places. Laws and court decisions are PD almost everywhere in the world. Beyond that, it depends entirely on the jurisdiction. In most countries, including the USA, photographs published by the government have a copyright. There is an exception for photographs actually taken by Federal agencies and those taken by jurisdictions in Florida and California whose laws provide, like Federal law, that the work of all state and local government employees is PD. Note that even this does not extend to photographs taken by third parties -- if the FBI publishes a "Wanted" poster with a photograph from a non-Federal source, the photograph has a copyright and cannot be kept on Commons. Thus there is no reason to believe that a New York booking photograph is automatically PD for any reason.
- That leaves us with a 1974 image that may have a copyright. As you say, a copyright notice is very unlikely, so if it was published before 1989, it is almost certainly PD. If you can show that is the case, then it's a keep. However, as you know, on Commons the burden of proof is on those who want to keep an image, so you must provide the manner and date of publication in order to show that it is PD from publication without notice. For first publication after March 1,1989, notice was not required for a copyright. It is entirely possible that the first publication of this image was at mugshots.com.
- All of this is just basic copyright law -- no different from the handling of a photograph of the governor of New York published by his office or any other government photograph. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Somebody here who can decode the description or the file name? 91.66.153.214 16:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete File description is HADJOUT. Hadjout is not a familiy name. This is a city and commune in Algeria. I'm afraid, that nobody will identify the man. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unidentifiable person, no description
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
It is evident from the original ebay listing that this is a trimmed image, with most of the margins physically removed. Copyright notices were often placed in the margin areas.Since the deleted material cannot be examined, we cannot conclude that the image was published without a copyright notice. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Identical photo shown in the composite which says it's from Paramount in 1983 and indeed has a copyright notice. We hope (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- That is not the same photo - it's a compilation of four different photos with one notice. You will need to do a search for any copyright for this "individual" still, which is identified by title, date and subject. I did, and found nothing. --Light show (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
+0mUg~~60_57.JPG){kind=link}
From copyright.gov:
- Type of Work: Motion Picture
- Registration Number / Date: PA0000200419 / 1984-02-10
- Application Title: Youth in Asia; The Eight; Last river to cross; The Seven; They’re alive; Missing in action.
- Title: Uncommon valor / produced by John Milius & Buzz Feitshans ; directed by Ted Kotcheff.
- Imprint: New York : Paramount Pictures Corp., c1983.
- Description: 5 film reels : sd., col. ; 35 mm.
- Notes: Deposit includes descriptive material (1 v.)
- Cast: Gene Hackman, Fred Ward, Reb Brown et al.
- Credits: Written by Joe Gayton; music by James Horner.
- Copyright Claimant: Paramount Pictures Corporation
- Date of Creation: 1983
- Date of Publication: 1983-12-02
- Authorship on Application: Paramount Pictures Corporation, employer for hire.
- Previous Registration: Some musical compositions prev. reg.
- Basis of Claim: New Matter: "portions of the screenplay as included in this motion picture photoplay, remaining musical compositions & other soundtrack, and cinematographic material."
There's no proof this is a separate, not derivative, work from the film. We hope (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Per above copyright info, movies ("Motion Pictures") have their own separate copyright, while photographs use a different one. And stills are not derivatives (ie. frame shots). Read film still, which explains it, and some of which was mentioned to a deleting admin a while back without much success.--Light show (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- That should tell you something. We hope (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Oh, come on, Light show, We hope has just nailed this one. He found the original this was clipped from. There was no need to put multiple copyright notices on it, any more than a comic book needed separate copyrights for each panel! The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The evidence points strongly to the conclusion that the material published by the copyright owner has an obvious copyright notice and that the image was clipped from that copyrighted material. When material is published with a copyright notice and subsequently some unidentified person clips out that notice, that does not nullify the copyright. It is not reasonable to speculate that the image could have been separately published by the copyright owner, who then conveniently would have forgotten to put a copyright notice on it, when the evidence shows that the copyright owner placed a notice on the larger material and the image looks exactly like it was clipped from that material. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
imho it may be doubted to be 'own work', as well not respecting {personality rights} of a child, Roland zh 18:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: I.m.h.o., after checking a few photos by the same uploader, I don’t think it should be doubted that he’s the author. As for personality rights, tagging this photo with {{Personality}} is enough, as it was taken at a public event and doens’t depict anything that could cause embarrasment or raise safety concerns. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Tuválkin is right: nothing embarrassing happens here. And I do not doubt in own work. Simply unused photo about non-notable people. I could not think up, where to use this photo. Out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Taivo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
I am nominating this logo for deletion because I despite the flag on the logo may be a copyright. Blurred Lines (talk) 19:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The licence ("only simple geometrical figures)" is not correct. This is not a standard font. I add for deletion File:El Show de Cleveland (The Cleveland Show) Logo.png. Reason is the same: not a standard font. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Only consists of text, doubtful it's too complicated for the United States. Fry1989 eh? 20:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
_Logo.png){kind=link}
Kept: Simple shapes make up the text. Below TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The default sort key is too long and has spaces and punctuation Jennfinan (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This is really strange nomination. At first I wanted to write, that this is not a reason to delete. At second I wanted to write, that this is uploader's nomination in uploading day and should be deleted anyway. But I noticed, that after nominating the uploader deleted deletion template from file page. What if this was accidental/test nomination? Taivo (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Accidential nomination Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Not true SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Is it reason for deletion? We have File:Mn flag sukhbaatar aymag.png. Is it better file? Taivo (talk) 12:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Unless we have any reasonable expectation of the coat of arms on this flag being created, I'd say yes it's a reason to delete. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not true svg (logo is not) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image (the object is shown better) here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Really, bad photo. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
It says that this comes from a publication from London from 1915 and that the photographer is w:Frank Hurley. As the first publication was in the UK, the source country is the UK (despite the photographer being an Australian), and the copyright term to photos expires 70 years after the death of the photographer in the UK. The photographer hasn't been dead for 70 years yet. Stefan4 (talk) 20:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Kept:. I can't understand why this picture has no enough grants, while the rest of the Hurley production is on Commons, mainly under license {{PD-Australia}} ?. Probably when I uloaded, I did not select the correct permission, but in my opinion, this one has exactly the same circumstances as the rest, even if I get from a newspapers instead of any other source. What's the problem if I change the license now? Thanks. --amador (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- {{PD-Australia}} can only be used for photos which were first published in Australia. It seems that this was first published in the United Kingdom, so UK rules are used instead. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Who knows where was first ?. Who will claim ? the author ?, the newspaper ? No one when the rest of production of the photographer is free. In my opinion the interest to document the article(s) is more important than precission regarding where was published first. --amador (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:EI#Source. There is currently no evidence that it was published in Australia before it was published in the United Kingdom, and the British publication wasn't a very long time after the photo was taken. The British book was additionally written by someone who travelled on the ship's expedition to Antarctica, and people who were travelling on the ship may have had access to lots of previously unpublished photos. It is therefore not unlikely that the British publication was the first one. If you claim that the country of first publication is Australia, then you will have to show that it was first published in Australia by adding an earlier Australian publication in the source field. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Who knows where was first ?. Who will claim ? the author ?, the newspaper ? No one when the rest of production of the photographer is free. In my opinion the interest to document the article(s) is more important than precission regarding where was published first. --amador (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- {{PD-Australia}} can only be used for photos which were first published in Australia. It seems that this was first published in the United Kingdom, so UK rules are used instead. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
At http://www.amazon.com/Boney-James/e/B000APECQS the image has the image caption "Provided by the artist or their representative". Seems to be some kind of official photo of the person and presumably not the uploader's own work. Stefan4 (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader stated on my enwp talk page that he is the artist [8], I advised him to contact OTRS. January (talk) 08:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Errore nella trasmissione del file. Emanuele Schembri (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I do not see the error, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Not all objects are free (e.g. the silhouette of the man). Eleassar (t/p) 23:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- As the uploader, I am not sure how to respond to your complaint. The free re-use of this image is most likely permitted under Fair Use. However, I will attempt to contact Linden Lab to see what they can tell me. -- DMahalko (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- I raised your question on the Second Life support forums. You can see the discussion here:
- It appears the SL Machinima policy covers your concerns:
- As long as you comply with the terms and conditions below, both Linden Lab and the Residents of Second Life (collectively, “we”) grant you the following copyright licenses:
- * A License To Capture. You may take snapshots and capture machinima of the 3D content we created that is displayed in-world, and
- * A License To Use. You may use the resulting snapshot or machinima within or outside of Second Life in any current or future media.
- [....]
- (b) Avatar Consent for Machinima
- For machinima, you must have the consent of all Residents whose avatars or Second Life names are featured or recognizable in the machinima. This includes avatars who are featured in a shot, avatars whose names are legible, and avatars whose appearance is sufficiently distinctive that they are recognizable by members of the Second Life community. Consent is not required if an avatar is not recognizable and is merely part of a crowd scene or shown in a fleeting background. Consent is not required for any snapshots.
- Also, as recommended in the discussion, I have added the Second Life template to the article's Licensing section:
|
The content of this image is from Second Life. Per press release,[9] Linden Lab declared that all intellectual properties of an object in Second Life belong to the subscriber who created it. The software itself is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License.[10]
Note: this is not a copyright tag. Additionally a free license for the object shown is required!
|
- Does this adequately satisfy your concerns? -- DMahalko (talk) 03:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- This makes sense, but the licensing does not give the permission to creative derivative works. The copyright on the silhouette of the man is still unclear. --Eleassar (t/p) 05:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Parts of the image may be (c). Unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept Reuploaded with the possibly offending avatar removed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 02:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
This is a logo, not self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple. Fry1989 eh? 17:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept: pd simple FASTILY 06:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The logo is not an American logo, is Venezuelan. Regardless COM:TOO, there's needed evidence that Venezuela's copyright law qualifies this as "simple". Tbhotch™ 18:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I am not able to redraw that logo (I mean football in the middle), therefore I do not consider this a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple to be copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Still too simple. Fry1989 eh? 20:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: too simple, double DR. already kept by Fastily --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The central figure in this image is a copyrighted toy. russavia (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This matters are discussed at other Sites as well: http://brickfilms.com/topic/legal-considerations-of-brickfilms/ (without a concrete conclusion as far as I understood it.) I think any decision here would apply to the whole Category:Lego minifigures. --Jahobr (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I add here for deletion two more images: Taivo (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't say where it was first published, so the claims of publication without renewal and publication before 1923 can't be verified. The only source is a [dead link]. Stefan4 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The original source which is now unfortunately a dead link provided provenance for photo which was supposedly used to vett this photo when it was moved to Commons. As stated, the source is now a dead link, but the photo is available on Spokeo.com, absent the provenance. It seems as though we, editors here on Wikipedia, are continually seeking to delete photos that we previously accepted as public domain, but now no longer accept because the original source that we did accept is now a dead link. Is there another or better way to preserve these sources so that we don't eventually lose all media on Wikipedia? 166.214.164.186 16:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- The page you linked to does not contain any evidence that the photo was published without renewal. It is also questionable whether the person to the left really is below the age of two which would be required for publication before 1923. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I removed incorrect licence. The child is older than 2 years and therefore the photo is made after 1923. The licence US-not-renewed is possible, but not sure. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Dresden, Postgebäude am Antonsplatz, Albert Geutebrück und Joseph Thürmer, erbaut 1830 bis 1832, Ansicht um 1885.jpg
[edit]
PD-Old-70 license but author = unknown - uploader is a sockpuppet of Messina INeverCry 22:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hm. If this photo is really from 1885, it's very likely the author was dead by 1942. But given Messina’s dismal record regarding correct information about his sources, dates, authors etc., it’s probably better to delete it unless somebody can verify the file information. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- What about the scaffolding? Left, middle, and right. 1885 could be true. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the author has been dead for at least 70 years as claimed. The author's death year is not indicated. Stefan4 (talk) 23:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I changed the tag which was wrong, this should have been marked as PD-AR-anonymous because the author is unknown (in Argentina, the time limit is 50 years old, which has been widely surpassed). Moreover, the logo is PD-textlogo. - Fma12 (talk) 22:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- How do I verify that the logo is an anonymous work? What research have you done to establish its anonymous status? For example, was there some press release when the logo was first presented? If so, how do I find that press release so that I can check whether the designer is mentioned there or not?
- What evidence are you using to establish that this is below the threshold of originality of Argentina? Something like this would be copyrightable in for example the UK, Australia and Austria. Unless verifiable evidence is added to COM:TOO#Argentina, I don't think that we can assume that it is below the threshold of originality of Argentina. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- The logo is property of Club Atlético Boca Juniors which currently exists, so it can't be "PD-old". This was my mistake and I fixed it. The real point is that the designer is not known so it is supposed to be "anonymous" (unless you can come up with the documents that prove who the author was). Do you need to know what research have I done to affirm that? Well, I read many books about the history of Boca Juniors (as a strong supporter of the club) and none of them told anything about who was the author of the primary logos of the club. Enough?
- You have nominated many Argentine text-logos before. Most of them were kept at Commons as "ineligbles" for copyright. You can think whatever you want but, sincerely, I'm tired of discussing on this sort of nominations time after time. As I told in previous discussions you can check the Category:Association football logos of Argentina or Category:Logos of Argentina amongst others, and nominate all the logos contained there if you are convinced that the ToO does not apply there. - Fma12 (talk) 04:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Whether Club Atlético Boca Juniors currently exists or not is irrelevant to whether {{PD-old}} is correct. {{PD-old}} means that a natural person died before 1943, but Club Atlético Boca Juniors is a legal person.
- The designer of a logo is usually not credited on all documents containing the logo, but may often be credited in a press release published when the logo is announced. Therefore, it is essential to check whether any such press release was made.
- I do not know what other deletion discussions you are talking about. I do not see any other {{subst:fdw}} notifications posted by me on your talk page about logos. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The club website does not list this logo, and I am unable to confirm anywhere what the age of the logo might be. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The logo is anonymous so it can't be credited to a physical person because there are no evidences to prove who the author was. In the case of the last version of Boca's logo, the designer (a local studio) is not only known but it has published the work on the web (See here).
- On the other hand, whether this logo belonged to the club or not, I don't see this complex enough to be copyrightable. That's what really matters here. - Fma12 (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Since we don't have a verifiable source, we can't determine the origins of the file so we don't know if it's above the TOO in it's country of origin FASTILY 07:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
EU copyright directive Article 2.2:
The term of protection of cinematographic or audiovisual works shall expire 70 years after the death of the last of the following persons to survive, whether or not these persons are designated as co-authors: the principal director, the author of the screenplay, the author of the dialogue and the composer of music specifically created for use in the cinematographic or audiovisual work.
w:Cheese Mites, or Lilliputians in a London Restaurant claims that the screenplay was made by w:Walter R. Booth (died in 1938) and that it was produced by w:Robert W. Paul (died in 1943). It would seem that Robert W. Paul is "the principal director" and that Walter R. Booth is "the author of the screenplay" and that this is copyrighted in the United Kingdom until both of them have been dead for at least 70 years. Thus, delete and undelete again next year.
Stefan4 (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. As explained here. CDPA applies to the author, Booth, who died in 1938, not the producer, Paul. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 13:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- According to the CDPA, the copyright expires 70 years after the death of the people listed in the Copyright Duration Directive. Maybe Booth is the sole "author" according to British law, but the Copyright Duration Directive is clear that the copyright term expires 70 years after the death of all of these four people, even if "the author" might happen to be someone else. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- As explained here, I am afraid your analysis contradicts paragraphs 9 and 10 of section 13B of the CDPA Act. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 17:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Can we just decide that we hold the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Robert W. Paul and that the closing administrator should read that discussion? It's getting messy when we're discussing the same thing at two places. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 06:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Can we just decide that we hold the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Robert W. Paul and that the closing administrator should read that discussion? It's getting messy when we're discussing the same thing at two places. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- As explained here, I am afraid your analysis contradicts paragraphs 9 and 10 of section 13B of the CDPA Act. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 17:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- According to the CDPA, the copyright expires 70 years after the death of the people listed in the Copyright Duration Directive. Maybe Booth is the sole "author" according to British law, but the Copyright Duration Directive is clear that the copyright term expires 70 years after the death of all of these four people, even if "the author" might happen to be someone else. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 04:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Robert W. Paul
[edit]EU copyright directive Article 2.2:
The term of protection of cinematographic or audiovisual works shall expire 70 years after the death of the last of the following persons to survive, whether or not these persons are designated as co-authors: the principal director, the author of the screenplay, the author of the dialogue and the composer of music specifically created for use in the cinematographic or audiovisual work.
The producer of these films, w:Robert W. Paul, died in 1943. Based on the above, it would seem that the copyright expires at the earliest 70 years after the producer's death.
- File:Artistic Creation (1901).ogv
- File:Scrooge or Marley's Ghost (1901).ogv
- File:The Haunted Curiosity Shop (1901).ogv
- File:The Magic Sword (1901).ogv
- File:The Over-Incubated Baby (1901).ogv
- File:The Unfortunate Policeman (1905).ogv
- File:Undressing Extraordinary (1901).ogv
- File:Upside Down ot The Human Flies (1899).ogv
Stefan4 (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I take File:Scrooge or Marley's Ghost (1901).ogv as a practical exemple : the film is available on the Internet Archive and is listed on The Public Domain Review as PD worldwide. I have removed the soundtrack from the upload. The applicable law, UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act does not grant the same protection as the EEC directive and the 70 years pma applies to the "dramatist" and not the producer (cf. section 13 of the CDPA Act, hence Booth who died in 1938. In any case, these films are at least as PD-US, per the arguments developed here. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 13:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- The "PD worldwide" claim is plain wrong. Check for example the warning in {{PD-old-70}}: "Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term." Neither Booth nor Paul died more than 75 years ago, so the film is clearly copyrighted in Colombia, Guatemala and Samoa. Also, I'm not sure where you find the stuff about the dramatist. The law is very clear:
Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the death occurs of the last to die of the following persons—
(a)the principal director,
(b)the author of the screenplay,
(c)the author of the dialogue, or
(d)the composer of music specially created for and used in the film;
subject as follows.
- Also, it's not clear if it is enough to remove a soundtrack and thereby ignore the date of death of the author of the dialogue and the composer of music specifically created for and used in the film; the EU copyright duration directive seems to suggest that the entire film is copyrighted until all four of them have died. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am afraid there is a misunderstanding about the soundtrack : obviously these are silent film with no soundtrack. Therefore any soundtrack postdates the original film. Please read carefully sections 9 and 10 of Article 13B of the UK CDPA Act : if any of the 4 persons cannot be ascertained, the copyright provision does not apply for such person. The notion I used of "dramatist" comes from this study of the European Audiovisual Observatory, p. 16, which also clarifies the differences between the revised CDPA and the European directive. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 17:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am reading the document differently. This is my interpretation:
- The copyright to a cinematograhic work expires in the UK 70 years after the death of the longest living of the people listed in the Copyright Duration Directive.
- Some cinematographic works may additionally be dramatic works. If a cinematographic work also is a dramatic work, then you need to wait until the dramatist has been dead for at least 70 years in addition to the term above. 70 years after the dramatist has died, you could maybe set up the film as a play at a theatre without needing any permission.
- If there is no dramatist and the people mentioned in the Copyright Duration Directive don't exist, or if the film is below the threshold of originality, then the copyright expires 50 years after the first fixation of the film.
- However, this seems to be a very messy area. There is not a big issue with these films as any interpretation seems to suggest that the copyright at least will be expired in three and a half month if not earlier, but it could be a big issue with other films. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I take it we now agree reference should be made to UK's applicable law, hence to the CDPA Act which is not the same as the EEC Copyright Duration Directive (I gave the reference of the IRIS study to shed light on this point) and does not make reference to the producer of the film. The matter is not so difficult as you seem to see it. We have at least clarified that Paul's death, which was your initial concern, is not to be taken into account, per the terms of the CDPA Act which are not the exact same as the EEC Directive : Booth is the only known individual to be identified as the director of these films, except The Unfortunate Policeman for which the director is unknown. No screeplaywriter is credited for these films and no composer nor author of dialogue should be searched as there were no music nor intertitles in these early silent films. See [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and [19]. Booth died in 1938, more than 70 years ago. Therefore these are PD in the UK. You can easily check the matter with Europeana's PD calculator. And they are also PD in the USA as they were published before 1923. Again, I stress that the Open Knowledge Foundation has selected one of these films, Scrooge or Marley's Ghost as an exemple of a PD film from the 1900s. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 06:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Wouldn't the producer be "the author of the screenplay"? Or is the director both "the principal director" and "the author of the screenplay" in these cases?
- The PDF document you linked suggests that the producer owns a related right for 50 years from creation, but that right has obviously expired a long time ago.
- File:The Unfortunate Policeman (1905).ogv states "Silent film of 1905 directed by Walter R. Booth and produced by Robert W. Paul". If that is wrong, please correct it.
- As I wrote above, the "PD Worldwide" claim at http://publicdomainreview.org/2012/12/10/scrooge-or-marleys-ghost-1901/ is wrong as the film is at least copyrighted in Colombia, Guatemala, Samoa and Spain. Therefore, I would pay no attention to the statement. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Stefan, there is no reason in the world to believe the producer was the screenplay writer. Charles Pathé or Louis Gaumont, for example, produced hundreds if not thousands of films but were never directly involved in the creative process. We cannot ascertain who is the author of the screenplay for these films, although it is highly probable it was Booth himself, therefore the related protection for the screenplay writer does not apply, which means, as far the screenplay is concerned, 70 years after publication. In that respect the applicable UK law and the EEC directive it interprets are perfectly congruent : there is no basis for assuming a creative responsability of the producer if he is not a "co-author". I have corrected the information for The Unfortunate Policeman. Now concerning Colombia, Guatemala and Samoa, I understand your point about the lack of application of the Bern convention, although bilateral treatises with the UK might exist. Doesn't {{PD-old-70-1923}}, currently applied to all these files, have the same caveat you mentioned about {{PD-old-70}} ? In practical terms, do you suggest a change to the current license ? Cheers, — Racconish Tk 15:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- I take it we now agree reference should be made to UK's applicable law, hence to the CDPA Act which is not the same as the EEC Copyright Duration Directive (I gave the reference of the IRIS study to shed light on this point) and does not make reference to the producer of the film. The matter is not so difficult as you seem to see it. We have at least clarified that Paul's death, which was your initial concern, is not to be taken into account, per the terms of the CDPA Act which are not the exact same as the EEC Directive : Booth is the only known individual to be identified as the director of these films, except The Unfortunate Policeman for which the director is unknown. No screeplaywriter is credited for these films and no composer nor author of dialogue should be searched as there were no music nor intertitles in these early silent films. See [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and [19]. Booth died in 1938, more than 70 years ago. Therefore these are PD in the UK. You can easily check the matter with Europeana's PD calculator. And they are also PD in the USA as they were published before 1923. Again, I stress that the Open Knowledge Foundation has selected one of these films, Scrooge or Marley's Ghost as an exemple of a PD film from the 1900s. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 06:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am reading the document differently. This is my interpretation:
- I am afraid there is a misunderstanding about the soundtrack : obviously these are silent film with no soundtrack. Therefore any soundtrack postdates the original film. Please read carefully sections 9 and 10 of Article 13B of the UK CDPA Act : if any of the 4 persons cannot be ascertained, the copyright provision does not apply for such person. The notion I used of "dramatist" comes from this study of the European Audiovisual Observatory, p. 16, which also clarifies the differences between the revised CDPA and the European directive. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 17:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Also, it's not clear if it is enough to remove a soundtrack and thereby ignore the date of death of the author of the dialogue and the composer of music specifically created for and used in the film; the EU copyright duration directive seems to suggest that the entire film is copyrighted until all four of them have died. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 04:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Undeleted in 2014. --McZusatz (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)