Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/07/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 29th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo indiscriminately uploaded that provides no educational content about the World Trade Organization. Senator2029 07:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agreed, will delete this russavia (talk) 07:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I regret having uploaded the file and wish to have it deleted. Danmarks Akkrediteringsinstitution (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Speedydeled; uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --heb [T C E] 11:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's Wrong IndustryBase (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's Wrong IndustryBase (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be unused non-comercial license Jarekt (talk) 18:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete it. -- Edinwiki (talk) 18:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uncontroversial McZusatz (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.notrecinema.com/images/filmsi/david-l-endurant_371896_32772.jpg Gajolen (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 19:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of http://www.banglanews24.com/detailsnews.php?nssl=bd439194e7f892d3052e0a47eb0ffbf7&nttl=2011050934153 Ctg4Rahat (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo too complex Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo too complex Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An useless test. Yanguas (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: it seems that the flickr user used her camera to snap a photo of a printed postcard. This is clear, looking at the zoomed image and the user's photostream. Geraki TLG 06:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work as stated. JuTa 07:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of work by living american painter[1]. No evidence of permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of work by living american painter[2]. No evidence of permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of work by living american painter[3]. No evidence of permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking at the source this picture is likely to be copyright, so not appropriate here Timtrent (talk) 08:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chinese calligraphy is maybe too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}? BrightRaven (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern architecture (1938). No evidence that it would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 09:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

minecraft is copyrighted 89.249.2.53 09:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif data. The other images uploaded by this user were copied from non free website. Looks like a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, not simple text EliOrni (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif data. The other images uploaded by this user were copied from non free website. Looks like a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prva lopata za temelje NUK 1936.jpg‎: no evidence that the publication right has expired for this photograph. Eleassar (t/p) 09:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building on the right side (marked as Licej, now known as Mladika) is work by Max Fabiani (d. 1962). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, it is not free for Commons yet. Eleassar (t/p) 10:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://s7days.com/entertainment/stars/208622.html Gajolen (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false picture Tepold (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"False" in what sense? darkweasel94 22:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stereochemical detail missing (N on C), which is key aspect of this reaction and likely of the product itself. Unused, and have File:Camphorsultam synthesis.png (which omits the "LiAlH4" chemical because the use-case discusses other chemicals as well). DMacks (talk) 10:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this painting is PD in Brazil because Latour died in 1942, it was not PD there on the URAA date and therefore will be under copyright in the US until 95 years after publication -- 2035 if it was published in the year it was created. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC) I do not agree with this suggestion, because the main public to this project is Brazilian people an all the works belong to my own project [not museums, institutions or heirs of the artists] and the photo was made by me as an artist. So, this suggestion does not consider a photo as a work of art itself. In this case, we should discuss all the contemporary artists that work with appropriation of images made ​​by other artists.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this painting is PD in Brazil because Bento died in 1929, it was not PD there on the URAA date and therefore will be under copyright in the US until 95 years after publication unless it was painted before1923. Since no date is given, we must assume that it is post 1923. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC) I do not agree with this suggestion, because the main public to this project is Brazilian people an all the works belong to my own project [not museums, institutions or heirs of the artists] and the photo was made by me as an artist. So, this suggestion does not consider a photo as a work of art itself. In this case, we should discuss all the contemporary artists that work with appropriation of images made ​​by other artists.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this painting is PD in Brazil because DaCosta died in 1930, it was not PD there on the URAA date and therefore will be under copyright in the US until 95 years after publication -- 2025 if it was published in the year it was created. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC) I do not agree with this suggestion, because the main public to this project is Brazilian people an all the works belong to my own project [not museums, institutions or heirs of the artists] and the photo was made by me as an artist. So, this suggestion does not consider a photo as a work of art itself. In this case, we should discuss all the contemporary artists that work with appropriation of images made ​​by other artists.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted {{PD-Brazil-URAA}} Abzeronow (talk) 23:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gfiztpweasxcvbnm, 78.98.28.24 11:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I assume the 1937 death given here is that of the subject, not the painter. In order for the icon to be PD, the painter would have to have died before 1943. That seems very unlikely, since the subject would probably not yet have been beatified. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this painting is PD in Brazil because Alexandrino died in 1942, it was not PD there on the URAA date and therefore will be under copyright in the US until 95 years after publication unless it was published before 1923. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC I do not agree with this suggestion, because the main public to this project is Brazilian people an all the works belong to my own project [not museums, institutions or heirs of the artists] and the photo was made by me as an artist. So, this suggestion does not consider a photo as a work of art itself. In this case, we should discuss all the contemporary artists that work with appropriation of images made ​​by other artists.


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no provenance, plus filename implies that user downloaded this image from somewhere and then re-uploaded it DS (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no provenance, plus filename implies that user downloaded this image from somewhere and then re-uploaded it. PLUS, this is the second (completely different) file with this name uploaded in a week; I request that this filename be salted to prevent further pics from being uploaded to it. DS (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Jim Ritchie (born 1929), no FoP in France. X-Weinzar (talk) 13:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oddly-drawn (inconsistent use of lines vs adjacency for C–C bonds, font-size changes); small/low-res. Have File:Dimethylpropane.png and others in Category:Neopentane. DMacks (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree. We don't need it any more.

--Vchorozopoulos (talk) 14:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is [4] which does not contain an attribution-only license. This is a copyright violation. Imzadi 1979  14:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. May instead be uploaded to the English Wikipedia, after article is in place. Rybec (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an old postcard, but statet as "own work" Avron (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope unuse personal photo, with no educational purpose nor foreseeable wiki project use Michaela den (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has low definition. So I want to delete. Blackj0221 (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo http://www.mixer.com.br/en/imagens/mixer.png Can not considered as PD-simple IMO −ebraminiotalk 15:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, and poor quality: crooked and blurred Fayenatic london (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no useful content for the encylopedia. Fayenatic london (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image in the given url ( © Chesterfield Showroom. All rights reserved) Sonty (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope unused logo Jarekt (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused picture with no educational or other value. Uploaded as part of a series to promote the gentleman's business ventures Timtrent (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content without any clear educational value. The company in question (website: aquademica.se) does not have a Wikipedia article on the Swedish/English versions.

This file was used on an entry on the Swedish Wiktionary, but it has now been deleted twice, since it was just ads for the company.

This same file was previously uploaded, though in a larger version. See also that deletion request. Skalman (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of permissions User:Mlpearc/Template:Font 17:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanning does not make the uploader the author of this photograph. Leyo 17:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanning does not make the uploader the author of this photograph. Leyo 17:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanning does not make the uploader the author of this photograph. Unlikely old enough. Leyo 17:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De minimis? Noooo. 178.123.166.255 18:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of webpage. At least is derivative work of copyrighted images. 178.123.166.255 18:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of webpage. At least is derivative work of copyrighted images. 178.123.166.255 18:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of webpage. At least is derivative work of copyrighted images. (see File:Capa Blog.jpg.) 178.123.166.255 18:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of webpage. At least is derivative work of copyrighted images. (see File:Capa Blog.jpg.) 178.123.166.255 18:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as stated. JuTa 20:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo, out of scope. P199 (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use Lymantria (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal selfie for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 19:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More than a selfie I see a collage, an OOS collage. DELETE anyways. 186.174.114.142 21:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake while I was uploading this image and is a wrong file, copyrighted, and It was a mistake when I was selecting the file. An apology Ar.rosales (talk) 17:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake while I was uploading this image and is a wrong file, copyrighted, and It was a mistake when I was selecting the file. An apology


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Julo as duplicate and the most recent rationale was: duplicate File:Poltavskaya guberniya.jpg Julo (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Except for coloring a lower resolution duplicate Lymantria (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded with a copyvio. Took the tag off and uploaded a new image and said that it was their own. I suspect that this new image is also a copyvio from AFP Flickrworker (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first picture belonged to the AFP (thus a copyvio) but the second does not belong to the AFP! You have evidence who say the contrary? Cordially --Reda benkhadra (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Would you care to prove that it's not as it seems to be identical.Flickrworker (talk) 22:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The first picture does not look like the second. Cordially --Reda benkhadra (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped from free image Lymantria (talk) 15:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andriel duran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

different image sices, different qualities, different metadata. At least File:M60A1.gif ist clearly a copyright. I don't think we can trust this user.

Avron (talk) 14:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted - copyright status unclear. Lymantria (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cccarlos111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Strongly doubt own work claim.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celinenuit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no notability

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deejay Santos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jandrestar1986 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, no notability

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lee paola jinki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mamaedamame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxim Prefab Co (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion watermarked images, out of scope, also possibly copyrighted work, uploaded images have low resolution and not EXIF

ebraminiotalk 21:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michelleypz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmydb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality penis photos.

-mattbuck (Talk) 16:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The file names (strings of boxes full of characters too small to read) suggest malice aforethought. I suggest to delete all files with that naming pattern and to look into other suspicious actions by same user.
- 217.255.170.192 05:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion withdrawn after mattbuck's reply.

217.255.131.63 10:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pcambal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramaxeneixe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suri21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no notability

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whinthehills (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright by National Firearms Museum so I really dobut it is own work.

Avron (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User MMMMadManiac

[edit]

As 4 others uploads of this user have been found to be (and deleted as) blatant copyvios and as the account has been identified as sock of a paid spammer[5], I nominate his remaining 3 uploads for deletion, though as of yet I didn't find immediate evidence for copyvio.

--Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:B design art

[edit]

Slightly complicated background to this but essentially permission for these files was given, via OTRS, by gregorysung. But now it has come to light that gregorysung isn't a person but a persona created to front for a design duo (see w:Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 July 25. I have been in discussion with one of the members of the duo on OTRS and he has now requested that for honesty and transparency that all the images are deleted as the original permission was invalid. Anyone with OTRS access can see the request at Template:OTRS ticket --Nthep (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Projekt-Mia-More (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising for a call-girl, out of project scope

Schniggendiller (talk) 22:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jama_Masjid,_Delhi&diff=560187676&oldid=560016892 probably from the same person 193.109.254.21 13:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Van Hecke (1924-2003), is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 82.124.117.227 23:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyvio of commercial series logo, unless this clearly falls under the "simple shapes and text" exclusion. Ubcule (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient evidence of ownership and/or permission to upload as free image. (This would probably be permissible as fair use *if* the Armenian Wikipedia- where it's used- permits fair-use images... but it doesn't belong here). Ubcule (talk) 23:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Related to a declined article submission on English Wikipedia (rejected 9 April 2013), not used elsewhere and no obvious educational use. Ubcule (talk) 23:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a declined article submission on English Wikipedia, not used elsewhere and no obvious educational use. Ubcule (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

não vai ser utilizado Dermeval Corrêa de Andrade (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya no existe la página web que llevaba este logotipo José Luis Madroñal 14:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio unless falls under "simple shapes and text" criteria. Also, regardless of that, this image is *not* the uploader's creation or copyright as claimed. Ubcule (talk) 23:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не формат. Svetlana Ermakova (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La Dirección de la estampa es errónea y subiré la corregida Zaclobay (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Y no existe la pádina que llevaba este logotipo José Luis Madroñal 14:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya no existe la página web que llevaba este logotipo José Luis Madroñal 14:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is image is very likely not the uploader's own work. Is some PD-license appliciable? High Contrast (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raoul Hausmann (1886-1971) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 83.204.149.154 21:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvaise qualité Sapin88 (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent self-promotional upload with no clear educational use, and not in userspace usage. Ubcule (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solange Bertrand (1913-2011) is not in public domain. Unsourced private collection. Copyright violation. 83.204.149.154 21:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete (superior JPEG version exists) and unused. Kurzon (talk) 05:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia-Artikel gelöscht, Bild wird nicht mehr gebraucht, Bitte löschen! Enterpress (talk) 08:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unbrauchbar Xocolatl (talk) 22:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unbrauchbar Xocolatl (talk) 22:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Denali; it is Mt Hayes (13,000+') Denali is further to the west... Really. 137.229.78.6 21:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fictional coat of arms. The Commonwealth of England, did indeed used a shield with the cross of St. George but never bore it alongside the supporters shown here. It was only during the period of the Protectorate that Oliver Cromwell (quartering the cross with the saltire of St. Andrews and the Irish harp, and with an inescutcheon of his familial arms) bore any kind of supporters or crest. Sodacan (talk) 03:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No historical source => no encyclopedic value. (+ license infraction, as elements were released under CC-By-SA, derivative cannot be released under pd-self). Kathisma (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fictional copyvio. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was put in wrong category Johntcp (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can change categories at any time, I don't see the reason for deletion. darkweasel94 22:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No need to delete anything. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A lower-quality duplicate of File:Franz Kurz zum Thurn und Goldenstein - Ljubljana, Licej z nadškofijskim dvorcem in stolnico.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 10:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can use {{Duplicate}} for such cases. — Yerpo Eh? 19:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked Commons:Duplicate, which states: "If the file is the same file type and you're sure that it is exactly the same content (colours, quality, etc) tag it with {{duplicate|File:example.jpg}}". Because the file is not exactly the same content in regard to the colours and the quality, I've decided to rather nominate it. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I asked the uploader Sporti for a statement. Hold your horses until then. :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: According to uploader accidental duplicate. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

full picture with correct license available: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erlangen_Rhenania.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: O (висчвын) 05:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

full picture with correct license available: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kiel_Saxonia.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: O (висчвын) 05:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

full picture with correct license available: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%BCnchen_Brunsviga.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: O (висчвын) 05:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by วรวงศ์ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 20:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Soamanas Vadhanavadi.jpg -- this is a (presumably contemporary, or nearly-so) painting of a person who DIED IN 1851; easily pd old 2d art (& this is why i HATE mass-noms; for pity's sake, there are only 2 items, & they are HIGHLY divergent; with all due respect, could you not have nominated each separately?) also note that it is in-use & no alternatives seem to exist in our collection (thus far). Lx 121 (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't reply inside someone else's signed comments. I've taken the liberty to separate your comment from mine.
All I've had to go on was the uploader's claims. The divergent nature of the images is indeed further indication that the uploader's authorship claims are false, and therefore it makes sense to deal with them together (which doesn't mean that the outcome has to be the same). Being in use has no bearing on copyright concerns; we don't keep files that are not verifiably free just because they're useful, and you know that. Now, if you have truthful source information to show that it's verifiably (not presumably) in the public domain, please provide it. LX (talk, contribs) 15:37, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If sources can be provided that proves PD status, please file an undeletion request. O (висчвын) 05:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of existing commons fils File:Emir Faisal B01764.jpg Deanlaw (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own works? (2 different signatures) 91.66.56.175 12:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Smaller versions:
File:MINICUENTO Y POESÍA. Liga Latinoamericana de Artistas..jpg
File:Bustamante Zamudio y Garzón Pinto, colaboradores de la Liga Latinoamericana de Artistas..jpg. 91.66.56.175 12:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupt File 91.66.56.175 13:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I see perfectly the image here.--Coentor (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete but for being a duplicate of this other file.--Coentor (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has low definition. So I want to delete and replace it with other file. Blackj0221 (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can just upload over this one. darkweasel94 22:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader req FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: for the exactly same reason as File:Frančiškanska cerkev in Tiskarna Slovenije pred 1938.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category :Amar Ben Belgacem

[edit]

Amar Ben Belgacem (1979-2010) is not in public domain. No OTRS ticket. --90.44.67.133 20:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]