Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/07/24
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
Surely there must be some kind of policy against uploading similar photos? Underlying lk (talk) 07:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ummm, can you please explain your nomination reason? Do we have a similar photo to this on Commons? russavia (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's photo of a clearly identifiable nude woman washing herself. And looking at the surroundings, I don't think she was doing it outside because she had a desire to be photographed by some guy, and in fact she seems unaware of that. Or is it perfectly acceptable to upload a picture of an unsuspecting person while he/she's taking a shower?--Underlying lk (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete On the COM:IDENT basis, which I've only just seen, yes we should be deleting this, and I will do so now. russavia (talk) 09:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:IDENT -- although the photographer does have great photos of Haiti, this photo is problematic as in the person would have an expectation of privacy russavia (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Can not imagine a use for this. Moros y Cristianos 12:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . Martin H. (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Moros y Cristianos 12:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . Martin H. (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Poor Quality Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 06:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
No educational value; self-promotion Staszek Lem (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable organization or company logo, out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure this was simply grabbed from another website. The image has no metadata, and a previous upload from this user has been deleted. Zagalejo (talk) 00:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Regrettably, we do not choose the most strange mugshot. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
album cover, copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 01:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
no educational value, dont know what this is, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Go ahead and delete this; I wasn't aware it had uploaded (I was playing with the Commons uploader app and didn't mean to upload it).--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Das sollte eigentlich "pregnant" heissen, aber wenn dir das bild nicht gefällt, lösche es doch einfach! Gruss ----Martin1009 -the Seeker 10:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 03:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Google map. Cobija (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 04:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Text-only contribution, but please look at Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:LIONOMICS.pdf also for author comment. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Would meet COM:TOO under UK law, so it is likely to meet the same threshold under Irish law. russavia (talk) 07:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Most probably the uploader is not copyright holder of this school logo. At least some proof is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I've seen thsi image before. I doubt this is the uploader's own work. DragonZero (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry but this is not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. JuTa 07:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Own work? 91.66.249.98 08:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work, and therefore wrong licence. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the US for statues/sculptures. russavia (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Copy right violation - :this photograph is taken from the website http://www.ism.kerala.gov.in/index.php/photo-gallary/list/4.html & Copyright © 2011 Indian Systems of Medicine Jose Arukatty (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This is logo artwork, which is clearly over TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Logo artwork clearly over TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
no evidence of permission from the web page author darkweasel94 10:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chris655 as Speedy (Löschen)
Converted by me to DR, as nominations for bad-quality should go through DR, as especially for older uploads. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 11:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, out of focus Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 11:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Just another random image. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that the clothing design would be PD in Slovenia, the source country (per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 11:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This is album cover. We need some proof, that the uploader User DjAMIR121 is also copyright holder. Also, request for creating an article about the artist failed in May. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Request for creating an article about the subject failed in May. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I will upload a new version without orthographic mistakes, and less margin Silent sentry (talk) 12:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
If this photo is made in France, then this is copyright violation, because this is a modern building and there is no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Contains Derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Contains Derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality and contains derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- delete it. my mistake --Manojk (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Contains derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:IRDP Meela, Thrissur DSC 1821.JPG--Manojk (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Contains derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- dolls ? it's publically displayed in the onam festival market. don't think anyone claim a copyright on that :) --Manojk (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The dolls are most probably copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Info Manoj, unless the creator explicitly state the free license, the work is copyrighted to him by default. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, previoulsy circulating via Google image, including http://www.fknovipazar.net/klub-stadion.php (Copyright © 2012 FK Novi Pazar 1928. Nezvanični sajt. All rights reserved = official site of related football club) = http://www.fknovipazar.net/slikecontent/stadionpanorama2.jpg (lower res but credits: "senko...", last modified: 05.2012). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Wrong file, replaced by another with the proportions of the drawing correct. Sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This is simply a black & white version of Guy Webster's cover photo for the Byrds' Turn! Turn! Turn! album ([[1]]), and is presumably copywrited to him or to Sony Records. 81.157.88.173 15:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
File is from the Associated Press, see http://www.cleveland.com/books/index.ssf/2012/10/hilary_mantel_wins_2nd_booker.html. At AP it is credtied to Lefteris Pitarakis. Picasa user Attila Simon isnt the author. Martin H. (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This maps is given in typical web resolution. I assume it was just taken from the web and uploaded here - false authorship claims. Almost the same map can be found here which was also uploaded on Commons by the same user. --High Contrast (talk) 18:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This maps is given in typical web resolution. I assume it was just taken from the web and uploaded here - false authorship claims. Almost the same map can be found here which was also uploaded on Commons by the same user. High Contrast (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Flickr licence is inconsistent with Commons (non-commercial) An optimist on the run! 18:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 18:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Strongly doubt own work claim. Size looks more like a website thumb. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Strongly doubt own work claim. Size looks more like a website thumb. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Likely not within the project scope High Contrast (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Uploader requested. I no loner require this file. Fry1989 eh? 18:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The uploader's all other contribution is presented for deletion due to advertising. Therefore I think, that this unused logo needs also deleting. This is not a simple logo and I guess, that he is not copyright holder of this logo as claimed. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of one image (Commons:Deletion requests/File:WOC test lights.JPG) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, File:Buenos Aires Skyline.jpg is missing. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
claims the image is in the public domain; however, the reason for this is unclear - so if the reason is unknown, precautionary principle should be applied. Masur (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded in 25.07.2011 by User:Gonza777. 28 uploads = 26 copyvios or otherwise deleted images - btw, blocked indefinite in enwiki since 2009 and most likely (per upload perfil, Disney related) a sock of User:Gonza77, blocked since 2007 in Commons. This is the remaining, critical file. Derivated & mounted & photoshopped from 3 images previous circulating via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=81649636&postcount=485 (18.07.2011, credits: a friend of local uploader "juan_boca_lugano") and the result is identical to (next post) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=81667120&postcount=486 (18.07.2011 by "pachecohv") = http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/425/panorama1sr.jpg (lower res). Permission from the "friend of local uploader "juan_boca_lugano" needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Related: Sock User:Gonzabar77, per User talk:Gonza77#Sockpuppet. Gunnex (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
imho authorship not clear [see missing metadata and date], Roland zh 19:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 19:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Very bad composition. We have better photos about Dalai Lama. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Abusive flickr washing by uploader. The upload on Flickr is from July 16, the upload to Commons is from July 16. This is evidence for me that the flickr user is the Commons user and that the flickr account is created soley for this kind of abusive license laundering. The watermark on the file - or the rest of it - suggests clearly that the photographer is not the Commons uploader User:Ibrahim Tales or his flickr meme Lyon Leandro but someone else. -- Martin H. (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=611098075581871. Found it in https://www.facebook.com/grupolivrariascuritiba/photos_stream. --20:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete If watermark is cut in half, then this is clear sign of copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Ticket 2010042010039672 does not release the file into a compatible license, it explicitly doesn't. I'm puzzled why this was marked as confirmed. The ticket is actually a complaint, in the copyvio queue. Jcb (talk) 20:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
broken image. should reupload or delete. Slick (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
License seems notto fit. This is either public omain because of govermental work (I don't know about the laws in Iraq) or its a non permitted derivate work. JuTa 21:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Personal image, lacking sufficient context to be of educational value. 63.251.123.2 21:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The quality is bad, but the photo is used in en.wiki on user page and everybody is allowed to use some personal photos on her user page. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep That makes sense. Changing my vote to keep. I don't know if this is sufficient to close the DR, but I thought it worth mentioning. 63.251.123.2 18:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
copyvio from minecraft. copyrighted 80.161.143.239 21:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
copyvio from minecraft. copyrighted 80.161.143.239 21:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
copyvio from minecraft. copyrighted 80.161.143.239 21:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
minecraft skin. out of scope 80.161.143.239 21:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
copyvio from minecraft. copyrighted 80.161.143.239 21:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
copyvio from minecraft. copyrighted 80.161.143.239 21:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unidentified logo Jcb (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
No evidence given why this image should be in the public domain 178.10.108.162 21:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Photo from 1939. I am not sure, that the photographer died before 1943, as licence claims. For example, even photographer's family name is unknown. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Looks a bit suspicious to me - low resolution, no exif. I can't find it anywhere else, but welcome comments. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted-uploaded-will be deleted. Looks very out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Per [2], the church was built in 1926 by Tone Kralj (d. 1975) and Umberto Cuzzi (d. 1973). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, it is still copyrighted and can't be reproduced for commercial purposes. Eleassar (t/p) 14:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Lim Oudom study's in bispp--Likes-football and basketball--Born in 2001 age 12 l--Oudom almost becomes the worst kid at his school but one time he tries to study and he is almost the smartest guy in the world --Mom- Sea 2013-05-12 17-40.jpg
[edit]unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Postojna
[edit]No evidence that these works would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Postojna (1) (4011177457).jpg
- File:Postojna (100) (4011195905).jpg
- File:Postojna (101) (4011962104).jpg
- File:Postojna (102) (4011196621).jpg
- File:Postojna (105) (4011197749).jpg
- File:Postojna (108) (4011198437).jpg
- File:Postojna (111) (4011176873).jpg
- File:Postojna (6) (4011944160).jpg
- File:Postojna (81) (4011957332).jpg
- File:Postojna (94) (4011960140).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I like very much photo 6, but even this has a copyrighted doll in the middle ... Taivo (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ravne na Koroškem
[edit]No evidence that these works would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia / out of scope: photos of oneself or their friends.
- File:Ravne (8626539619).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626576221).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626577165).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626580101).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626626545).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626629175).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626652181).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626659691).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626660141).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626661871).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626662727).jpg
- File:Ravne (8626664661).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627670704).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627683770).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627686774).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627687752).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627696028).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627696774).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627739478).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627740544).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627749694).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627762898).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627764594).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627766914).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627769412).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627769832).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627771136).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627772418).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627773954).jpg
- File:Ravne (8627774400).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ruše
[edit]No evidence these works would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Ruse (8621577161).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621609065).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621625361).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621668395).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621669745).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621672305).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621677213).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621678341).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621680759).jpg
- File:Ruse (8621714373).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622707184).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622724594).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622728606).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622770340).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622774860).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622777018).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622778060).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622779270).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622782836).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622817260).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622840432).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622842284).jpg
- File:Ruse (8622843456).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 07:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Strunjan
[edit]No evidence these images would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia / out of scope: photos of oneself or their friends.
- File:Strunjan (8624968959).jpg
- File:Strunjan (8626071920).jpg
- File:Strunjan (8626072656).jpg
- File:Strunjan (8626074864).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Žužemberk
[edit]No evidence that these would be free works per COM:FOP#Slovenia. For the church, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:SvMinF,Zuzemberk.JPG.
- File:Zuzemberk (14) (3979594862).jpg
- File:Zuzemberk (15) (3979594946).jpg
- File:Zuzemberk (17) (3978834071).jpg
- File:Zuzemberk (18) (3979595252).jpg
- File:Zuzemberk (23) (3979596082).jpg
- File:Zuzemberk (7) (3978832861).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 10:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files of Christian Chamorro
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Cristian Chamorro:
- File:Rocas de Quintero.jpeg (personal photo)
- File:Calle New York de Santiago de Chile.jpeg (too bad quality, also bad composition)
- File:Expo Inacap 2012.jpeg (non-notable car race, also bad composition)
They are all unused photos. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files of Costaricasingers
[edit]Here are all files uploaded by User Costaricasingers:
- File:Marivi masis 1.jpg
- File:Marivi masis v.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 3.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 4.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 5.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 6.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 7.jpg
- File:Marivi masis 8.jpeg
- File:Marivi masis 9.jpeg
- File:Marivi masis 10.jpeg
- File:Marivi masis 11.jpeg
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Basharesearch
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by User Basharesearch:
- File:Cafetinnovafounders.jpg
- File:Hafeezbasha.jpg
- File:Hafeezbashapentagram.jpg
- File:Hafeezbashawcset2012.jpg
- File:Hafeezbashawcset2013.jpg
- File:IEEE Student Branch of SCET in 2007.jpg
- File:Josepproushafeezbasha.jpg
- File:Jsraohafeezbasha.jpg
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:BieberFever-.ILoveAvalanna
[edit]Here are all files uploaded by User BieberFever-.ILoveAvalanna:
- File:Amor de Idolo a Fans 3.jpg
- File:Beliebers Latinas 3.jpg
- File:Cumpleaños numero 19.jpg
- File:Concierto en Zocalo.jpg
- File:Conciertos en Latino america.jpg
- File:Muestras de afecto.jpg
They are all unused photos, either personal or worthlessly small. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files under Category:Statue of People in Peace
[edit]- File:24eyes-heiwanogunzo 01.jpg
- File:Statue of People in Peace Shodo Island Kagawa pref Japan01n.jpg
- File:Statue of People in Peace Shodo Island Kagawa pref Japan02n.jpg
- File:Statue of People in Peace Shodo Island Kagawa pref Japan03n.jpg
- File:Tonosho port03s3200.jpg
The statue is an artwork by the sculptor Hidenori Yano (矢野秀徳, 1907 - 1996) [3]. The copyright is still in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover sculptures. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The photos of the building are not the uploader's own work; they come from this website. Same goes for the organization's logo. The webiste is "All rights reserved". The logo can be uploaded to Wikipedia under fair use, but not the photos of the building.
Senator2029 23:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adoor prasad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:'ഗോഡ് മസ്റ്റ് ബി ക്രേസി 1 & 2',.jpg
- File:'റെഡ്'.jpg
- File:'വണ്സ് അപോൻ എ ടൈം ഇൻ അമേരിക്ക'.jpg
- File:'ബ്രെത്ത്ലെസ്സ്'.jpg
- File:'നൈഫ് ഇൻ ദ വാട്ടർ'.jpg
- File:'ക്രിസ്റ്റൊ ഇൻ ഡൽഹി'.jpg
- File:'ആന്ദ്രെ രുബ്ലെവ്'.jpg
- File:'ദ സക്രിഫൈസ് '.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benjamín Gutiérrez Hassan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of advertisement, TV screenshots and logos, not own work.
- File:Ukash.png
- File:Telev.png
- File:Fact.png
- File:Iave.png
- File:PServicios.png
- File:Envios.png
- File:Ekofon.png
- File:Creditos.png
- File:Cinemex.png
- File:Cinepo.png
- File:Recargas.png
- File:Linea del tiempo del crecimiento de MTCenter.png
- File:Logo MTCenter.png
- File:MTCenter SA de CV.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Probably the best is to Delete all. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete There is "@ Szer pour Satellitfax" in lower right corner of one photo. These words are cropped out for second photo. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iranescence (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete File:Peyman ghasemkhani.jpg has in lower left corner "@ Psalda Zabihi". Taivo (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
In Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/12#User:NAINTOUR was raised some doubts about User:NAINTOUR and the related uploads. Identified as "a serial copyright violator on Wikitravel" it was speculated that "Is it possible the uploader is from the site http://www.naeinsun.ir ("Na'in Tours")? (...) and its main internet source does seem to come from the above site here (http://www.naeinsun.ir/?page_id=13), although it has a January 2012 date on that site". The problem is, that http://www.naeinsun.ir/?page_id=13 (dated actually with "admin - 11 26th, 2011 + Copyright 2011, Na'in Tourism Budget Services.", but the files in this gallery were all last modified in 01.2012) itself is apparently grabbing files from other sources. Examples: http://www.naeinsun.ir/wp-content/gallery/nain-photo-1/39976571.jpg = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39976571 (2010, © Alle Rechte vorbehalten von Hussein Mosahebi, identical exif & res), http://www.naeinsun.ir/wp-content/gallery/nain-photo-1/jame-z.jpg = most likely grabbed from (example) http://young-architect2011.mihanblog.com/post/392 (06.2011) = http://www.shahrenaein.com/Images/galori/majeg/14.jpg (last modified: 2009, larger res), http://www.naeinsun.ir/wp-content/gallery/nain-photo-1/shahrenaein-com-rigare-mohammadieh.jpg (unlikely work of "Na'in Tours", watermarked with "www.shahrenaein.com" = http://www.shahrenaein.ir/Galri/rgare/page-2.htm = http://www.shahrenaein.ir/Images/galori/rigare/566.jpg (last modified: 2009) etc.. So even with a potential permission of http://www.naeinsun.ir via User:NAINTOUR, the CC-license is doubtful because "Na'in Tours" "may have gotten rights to use them on their site but we'd need to hear from the copyright owners before assuming a CC license.".
Additionally info:
- File:NA'IN CARPET 3.jpg - most likley grabbed from http://www.persiancarpetguide.com/sw-asia/Rugs/Persian/Nain/Naein_Rugs.htm (credits: "Pictures and text by Ehsan Afzalzadeh Naini of Iran Rug Co.") = http://www.persiancarpetguide.com/sw-asia/Rugs/Persian/Nain/images/Iran_Rug_Company_Nain_4.jpg (last modified: 2009)
- File:NA'IN CARPET 2.JPG - most likely grabbed from http://www.mprugs.com/homepage/bild_orientteppich_persische_teppiche.htm (Copyright © Mike Panah) = http://www.mprugs.com/images/persische_teppiche/nain_persische_teppich_1192.JPG (identical exif & res, last modified: 2010). See also a different carpet but same location & source uplaoded at http://wts.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:NA%27IN_CARPET_1.jpg.
- File:BAzzar0001.jpg - previously published via (example) http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39977757 (2010, © Alle Rechte vorbehalten von Hussein Mosahebi, but lower res)
- File:Jame z.jpg - most likely grabbed from (example) http://young-architect2011.mihanblog.com/post/392 (06.2011) = http://www.shahrenaein.com/Images/galori/majeg/14.jpg (last modified: 2009)
- File:Do 111112.jpg - previously published via (example) http://naeinpajoh.blogfa.com/8910.aspx = http://naeinpajoh.persiangig.com/naeinpajoh%202/naeinpajoh10.JPG (last modified: 2010, larger res, but watermarked)
All the following files were previously published at http://www.naeinsun.ir/?page_id=13. Nominating only files with (mostly) 600*X or X*600 res and mostly (except File:NA'IN CARPET 2.JPG, see above) without exif. Nominating also File:Windtowers forest.jpg with a mysterious watermark. Ignoring for now the high res files File:Jame mosque basement.JPG, File:Mohammadieh Na'in.JPG, File:Na'in 40dokhtaran neighborhood.jpg etc.
- File:Windtowers forest.jpg
- File:PirNia museum 1.jpg
- File:PirNia museum.jpg
- File:Narenj1111.jpg
- File:NA'IN CARPET 3.jpg
- File:NA'IN CARPET 2.JPG
- File:Mosala111112.jpg
- File:Mosala1111.jpg
- File:Naeen 11111.jpg
- File:Mohammadieh3333.jpg
- File:Mohammadieh111112.jpg
- File:Loom11112.jpg
- File:Huseynieh 11111.jpg
- File:Fatemi0001.jpg
- File:Fatemi000002.jpg
- File:Do 111112.jpg
- File:Moving sands00001.jpg
- File:BAzzar0001.jpg
- File:Water reservoir000001.jpg
- File:Jame z.jpg
- File:Jame0001.jpg
- File:Jame 4.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scottsdale85260 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal photos
- File:Faith Hibbs-Clark.jpg
- File:Jordan Hibbs and Isabella Hibbs Thanksgiving 2012.jpg
- File:Jordan Hibbs-Scottsdale, AZ.JPG
- File:Isabella Hibbs.JPG
- File:Jordan Hibbs-ASU-Tempe,AZ.jpg
russavia (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, still not in use -Pete F (talk) 18:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scottsdaleaz85260 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal photos
- File:Jordan Hibbs - Arizona State Unversity Student.jpg
- File:Jordan Hibbs - Tempe, AZ.jpg
- File:Jordan Hibbs - ASU Pitchfork Awards.jpg
- File:Jordan Hibbs.jpg
russavia (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Sanuario LAH.jpg
- File:Elementos del Taller.jpg
- File:Libro Art et Espiritualite.tif
- File:Taller Cité des Art, Paris.jpg
- File:LAH - Catedral.jpg
- File:De la tradición viviente..jpg
- File:Correspondencias con la Noche..jpg
- File:De la palabra y sus símbolos..jpg
- File:Políptico de Sankt Augustin..jpg
- File:Gran Mandala..jpg
- File:Poliptico de Sankt Augustin.jpg
- File:Sankt Augustin-Alemania.jpg
- File:El laberinto de Gerona.jpg
- File:De La Geografia Sagrada II -MaríaLionza.jpg
- File:Danza de la Muerte.jpg
- File:De enigmas y silencios..tif
- File:Del canto de la Luna..tif
- File:Relicario - CloseUp.jpg
- File:LAHTallerSanJose.jpg
- File:Taller Paris, Detalle Mano.jpg
- File:LAH Laberinto.jpg
- File:Luis Alberto Hernández.jpg
- File:Detalle AzulIndigo.jpg
- File:Detalle PinceladaBlanca.jpg
- File:LAH 37.JPG
- File:LAH 34.JPG
- File:LAH 28.JPG
- File:LAH 16.JPG
- File:LAH 10.JPG
- File:LAH 06.JPG
- File:LAH 09.JPG
- File:LAH 4.JPG
- File:LAH 3.JPG
- File:LAH 01.JPG
- File:Altar LAH.JPG
- File:LAH Biblioteca personal.JPG
- File:El Taller.jpg
- File:Luis Alberto Hernández, Detalle de la Obra..jpg
- File:LHA B&W-Color.jpg
- File:Hojilla de Oro.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steveyoovirdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. I corporate permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. Also may be out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 black.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 image up.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 images.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 image side.jpg
- File:ACF100 image.JPG
- File:AC-F100 image.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 image.jpg
- File:AC-F100 picture.jpg
- File:ACF100 picture.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100 picture.jpg
- File:AC-F100.jpg
- File:AC-F100 with smart phone technology.jpg
- File:ACF100.jpg
- File:VIRDI AC-F100.PNG
- File:VIRDI AC-F100.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sudharsankg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Madero plaza.jpg
- File:Ciudadmadero.jpg
- File:Playa miramar puesta de sol.jpg
- File:Playa miramar.jpg
- File:Tec 3.jpg
- File:Gym tec.jpg
- File:Elefantes del tec.jpg
- File:Tec maderense.jpg
- File:Tec.png
- File:PosgradoITCM8.jpg
- File:Tec madero.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
After today identifying around 10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-accounts, blogs, news sites etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. As all the other already deleted files (15 + 10 actual copyvios, see also above) the images are mostly related to es:Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Madero (TEC, a technological institute in Mexico).
- File:Centro de Convenciones de Tampico.png
- File:Maderoo.png
- File:Unidad Academica de Geociencias.png
- File:Main street.png
- File:El aula antigua.png
- File:Clases de maestro 2012.png
- File:VEHICULO DEL TEC.png
- File:Itcm viejo.png
Gunnex (talk) 07:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WeisseMensch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of advertisement, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I do not believe, that the uploader is copyright holder of film with Brigitte Bardot Taivo (talk) 07:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Inadvertent duplication (by me) of an existing file under a different name ([[:File:St. George's Church and Rectory, Beekman Street, New York City.png). My apologies. Hamblin (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
not necesary file / archivo innecesario Jorge Abellán (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
doublons, j'ai envoyé le fichier 2 fois, pensant que la première fois n'était pas passé. En fait je voulais le mettre avec le fichier audio pour l'accompagner mais je ne sais pas encore le faire 9temps (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
En su día se eliminaron estas imágenes de otras estaciones, sustituyéndolas por texto. Laukatu (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
En su día se eliminaron estas imágenes de otras estaciones, sustituyéndolas por texto. Laukatu (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
En su día se eliminaron estas imágenes de otras estaciones, sustituyéndolas por texto. Laukatu (talk) 16:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por Laukatu (talk) 16:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por Laukatu (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por Laukatu (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por Laukatu (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por Laukatu (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Baja calidad, no aporta información y no está siendo utilizada en ningún artículo. Laukatu (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
The creator of the digital file does not want the image uploaded. Siddharth Patil (talk) 18:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1940s or later monument to WW2 hero - no author info - no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
modern building in Kazan - no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
modern building in Kazan - no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
accident. Sorry Martina talk 20:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Too mouch metadata and bad license. Sorry Clement.nuss (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia logo is not the uploader's "own work". Which means he copied it from somewhere, probably from Commons. Which means we already have this file. Senator2029 23:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Subsequently re-identified and uploaded as File:Porzana carolina - Sora XC107690.ogg. Explanation given in the description. Fæ (talk) 06:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
The author of this work is Donna J. Neary, it's highly unlikely to have been published before 1923 and there's no evidence that it was made by or for the USMC. Underlying lk (talk) 06:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Delete [4]
- Seems to be a misunderstanding between copyright of the commissioning body and the artist. Ownership by the USMC doesn't imply that a PD-USGov is applicable.
- There's a possibility (common under UK law) that as a 'work for hire' then copyright might reside with the commissioning body, but even that would need a clear statement by the artist transferring such. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
is a bad version Ostiudo (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Actually, I do not understand, why this version is bad, but there exists a lot of copies of this coat of arms, so we can delete this one. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Watermarks , see 1 and 2. 91.66.249.98 07:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- See also
- File:TankBund As Seen Ffom Jalavihar.JPG
- File:Rides At Jalavihar.JPG
- File:Inside Jalavihar 2.JPG
- File:Inside jalavihar.JPG
- File:Jalavihar parking Place.JPG
- File:Jalavihar Front Logo.JPG
- File:Reliance fresh Burning.jpg 91.66.249.98 07:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all. Also, please look File talk:Bus Station, Chevella.jpg for author comment. And I add here for deletion File:Reliance fresh Burnt.JPG, which has the same copyright notice. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Unterschrift (VW Stippvisite) DSCF7858 (1).JPG Martina talk 20:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Unterschrift Edmund Stoiber (VW Stippvisite) DSCF7859.JPG -- Martina talk 20:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
The monument has been erected in 1999. Per COM:FOP#Tajikistan, ineligible for Commons. Evil Russian (talk) 21:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Пожалуйста, не правьте чужие реплики. --Evil Russian (talk) 05:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Файл является моей собственной работой и был сфотографирован в г. Гафурове. Файл может быть использован на страницах связанных с г. Гафуровым и Исмаилом Самани.--Хабибулло Холджураев (talk) 00:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Памятник, изображенный на снимке, защищен авторским правом, а так как в Таджикистане отсутствует свобода коммерческой панорамы, то данное изображение является несвободным и не может быть загружено на Викисклад без разрешения автора или авторов памятника. --Evil Russian (talk) 05:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Celje
[edit]Modern apartment buildings; no FOP in Slovenia (see COM:FOP#Slovenia).
- File:Celje Nova vas 002 2011-06-24 06.26.24.jpg
- File:Celje Nova vas 003 2011-06-24 06.27.06.jpg
- File:Celje Nova vas 004 2011-06-24 06.26.58.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 01:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. No copyright violation. Road and parking lot, buildings in the background. -- PhJ (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as per PhJ. Yann (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Celje
[edit]I'm renominating the above three files. Unlike what has been stated, the apartment buildings are well visible and copyrighted, whereas the car park is obscured and unimportant (de minimis). The images may be compared to File:BS3Ljubljana.jpg, which was made in the same manner and has been deleted.
- File:Celje Nova vas 002 2011-06-24 06.26.24.jpg
- File:Celje Nova vas 003 2011-06-24 06.27.06.jpg
- File:Celje Nova vas 004 2011-06-24 06.26.58.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 16:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep all three are clearly photos of a wider area rather then a specific building. (but maybe you'll get lucky and Jim will close this DR too, so why not try again)--Sporti (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- What wider area? All the wider area is occupied by the apartment blocks. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- The wider area with bus stop, road, sidewalk, grass and car park. --Sporti (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. It was surely the grass that the uploader was interested in. Or the bus stop. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, it was the whole composition, rather than a single part (I know this is very hard to understand). --Sporti (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I believe that it is very hard to understand for you, because you seem to miss it. What I wanted to say is that although it's true that the bus stop, the grass, and the sidewalk are there, the main recurring theme on all three images are the apartment blocks, which are copyrighted and not de minimis. ---Eleassar (t/p) 16:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. It was surely the grass that the uploader was interested in. Or the bus stop. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- The wider area with bus stop, road, sidewalk, grass and car park. --Sporti (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- What wider area? All the wider area is occupied by the apartment blocks. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as above. I also believe than renominating the images a few hours after the DR was closed without any new valid reason is abusive. Yann (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- I believe that your closures as keep, when it is clear a file should be deleted (like here or here-where it should be deleted per COM:COA), are abusive. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you have better arguments than mimicking what I say? It does not show a capacity to analyse a complex copyright situation. You should refrain from opening and commenting on DRs unless you understand that. Admins have better things to do than taking care of your DRs. Yann (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- I also find this comment of yours arrogant and abusive. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep calm. --Miha (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Judged by the message by Yann and the message on meta by you, I'm actually the only calm person here. I suggest that you two do some work instead of posting flaming messages. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- I also find this comment of yours arrogant and abusive. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you have better arguments than mimicking what I say? It does not show a capacity to analyse a complex copyright situation. You should refrain from opening and commenting on DRs unless you understand that. Admins have better things to do than taking care of your DRs. Yann (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- I believe that your closures as keep, when it is clear a file should be deleted (like here or here-where it should be deleted per COM:COA), are abusive. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per others. No matter, whether it is de minimis or not, this is an example of a generic arhitecture, see also my argument here and lengthier general comment on these DR. --Miha (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- See also the comment here, which I personally find more solidly based and argumented than your flaming messages on meta. Can you provide a source for the claim that this is generic architecture? It certainly doesn't look like that. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I can. Try searching Google Images for "bloki" (Slovene for block of flats) or "stanovanjsko naselje" (housing estate/appartment complex) and you will see that they are all almost the same. I don't know here you've been living but this kind of arhitecture is generic, widely spread and common in the past few decades. --Miha (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but your original research doesn't satisfy me. The buildings listed here look pretty different. As to your comment, I've been living in Slovenia for all my life, so I pretty much know which architecture here is generic and which not. You'll have to try harder. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Since Sporti thinks he knows how I would close these -- he or she is right -- I'll leave these for someone else to close. Two things are clear. If we cropped the buildings out of these we'd have a mass of low tech asphalt paving, so any argument that buildings are not central is specious. In fact, most of us would prefer them if most of the asphalt were cropped out. Second, the Slovenian copyright law is much more explicit about the copyright on architecture than any other that I know well, so we must assume that it was the intention of the Slovenian legislators to protect all
- "works of architecture such as sketches, plans, and built structures in the field of architecture, urban planning, and landscape architecture;".
- These buildings would certainly be protected in the USA; I can see no reason why they would not be protected in Slovenia, given the more comprehensive law there. France is the only country that we know of that withholds copyright from very simple architecture. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think France is the only place where there is a threshold for architecture. On the opposite, I think that there is a threshold everywhere, and it is certainly higher in countries where there us no FOP, for obviously practical reasons. Yann (talk) 21:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, there is also something called cultural frame of refference. This type of buildings might seem unfamiliar to you, which might result in percieving it as something original - and therefore suitable for a copyright protection. But in fact it is not so rare here - there is in fact a very similar complex in Trzin and Škofljica (unfortunately I don't recall the street name) and in Ljubljana (for example Celovski dvori). @Eleassar: try with "stanovanjski bloki", apparently we get different results based on my current location. --Miha (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- "Stanovanjski bloki" are very diverse too; see here. For comparison, "Celovški dvori".[5] --Eleassar (t/p) 21:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept - no protectable design/artwork. The image shown as example for deletion could be seen as showing something creative/protectable if you see the arangement of all buildings but hardly if you only see one of them.. --Denniss (talk) 03:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Celje
[edit]No evidence the depicted works would be free per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Celje (8626257821).jpg
- File:Celje (8626258687).jpg
- File:Celje (8626331793).jpg
- File:Celje (8626376349).jpg
- File:Celje (8626390197).jpg
- File:Celje (8626398901).jpg
- File:Celje (8626444595).jpg
- File:Celje (8626448853).jpg
- File:Celje (8626450557).jpg
- File:Celje (8626451225).jpg
- File:Celje (8626462511).jpg
- File:Celje (8626463423).jpg
- File:Celje (8626476559).jpg
- File:Celje (8626477541).jpg
- File:Celje (8626486963).jpg
- File:Celje (8626498655).jpg
- File:Celje (8626499683).jpg
- File:Celje (8626500753).jpg
- File:Celje (8626504605).jpg
- File:Celje (8626506301).jpg
- File:Celje (8626507211).jpg
- File:Celje (8626509687).jpg
- File:Celje (8626510471).jpg
- File:Celje (8626512817).jpg
- File:Celje (8626516115).jpg
- File:Celje (8626522365).jpg
- File:Celje (8626530287).jpg
- File:Celje (8626532623).jpg
- File:Celje (8626534661).jpg
- File:Celje (8627368428).jpg
- File:Celje (8627369462).jpg
- File:Celje (8627422582).jpg
- File:Celje (8627458452).jpg
- File:Celje (8627461978).jpg
- File:Celje (8627467266).jpg
- File:Celje (8627471076).jpg
- File:Celje (8627485904).jpg
- File:Celje (8627491320).jpg
- File:Celje (8627492210).jpg
- File:Celje (8627499866).jpg
- File:Celje (8627504748).jpg
- File:Celje (8627551094).jpg
- File:Celje (8627552000).jpg
- File:Celje (8627554398).jpg
- File:Celje (8627555228).jpg
- File:Celje (8627574672).jpg
- File:Celje (8627587894).jpg
- File:Celje (8627588640).jpg
- File:Celje (8627592938).jpg
- File:Celje (8627595980).jpg
- File:Celje (8627597114).jpg
- File:Celje (8627598032).jpg
- File:Celje (8627598804).jpg
- File:Celje (8627600552).jpg
- File:Celje (8627605024).jpg
- File:Celje (8627614448).jpg
- File:Celje (8627620254).jpg
- File:Celje (8627621032).jpg
- File:Celje (8627622674).jpg
- File:Celje (8627623300).jpg
- File:Celje (8627624046).jpg
- File:Celje (8627628566).jpg
- File:Celje (8627634698).jpg
- File:Celje (8627638082).jpg
- File:Celje (8627639890).jpg
- File:Celje (8627644250).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 06:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- File:Celje (8626504605).jpg – what is copyrighted here?
- The aerial photograph on the left side of the image. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- File:Celje (8626506301).jpg – what is here protected with copyright? The drawings on wall are made imitating very old buildings.
- Yes, however the imitation is an individual creative work and as such copyrighted. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- File:Celje (8627458452).jpg shows a very old window, its copyright is expired.
- The stained glasses of Celje Cathedral have been created by Stane Kregar (d. 1973).[6] --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- File:Celje (8627587894).jpg – nothing copyrightable here.
- The design of advertisements is copyrightable. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- File:Celje (8627634698).jpg consists advertising for concerts of Lehar, Paganini and Strauss. They are all long dead, their copyrights are expired. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I read the years 1956 and 2009 on these posters, which are creative works by themselves. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. These files cannot be freely licensed. -FASTILY 19:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Metlika
[edit]No evidence the depicted works would be public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Metlika (19) (3996040746).jpg
- File:Metlika (22) (3996041674).jpg
- File:Metlika (23) (3996041974).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 07:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment What is copyright protected on photo 19? Chairs? Tableclothes? Both are de minimis here. Floor covering? Lamps? Also de minimis. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is the overall interior design and architecture of the place. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution artwork, unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:中国云南元谋土林.gif
- File:翠浪叠金-.gif
- File:寒垣翠微-.gif
- File:戍楼雁静-.gif
- File:6044中国昆明古桥——龙会桥.gif
- File:6039中国昆明古桥——昌隆桥.gif
- File:6037中国昆明古桥---兴龙桥.gif
- File:6048中国昆明古桥——安留桥.gif
- File:6042中国昆明古桥——永盛桥.gif
- File:6011昆明小巷.gif
- File:6035昆明宝象金秋.gif
- File:6001 云南昆明金刚古塔.gif
- File:61*91cm.gif
- File:51*76cm.gif
Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment All pictures are very well drawn, made by professional artist. Some proof is needed, that the uploader is the author, as claimed. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
There is no legal basis. Cobija (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Copy of File:Brestskaja krepost'.jpg same autor. IGW (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Let's delete the copy with wrong filename. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in France. 84.61.172.89 07:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment It looks to me like the majority of the photo is of a body of water, with the shape of the hotel (I presume that's the problem?) visible in the distance. Infrogmation (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep The image is an overview and the building is only a part of it. So, the image doesn't violate COM:FOP#France --Civa (talk) 16:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by User:Gonza77 = blocked indefinite since 10.2007 in Commons. This is the remaining, critical file, as I detected another copyvio today of an upload from 2007 (File:Blizzard-beach.jpg), grabbed from Panoramio. Additionally I raised today a sockpuppet suspect via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Estadio padre ernesto martearena.jpg, regarding an upload of User:Gonza777, most likely a reincarnation of User:Gonza77. Summarizing: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so this one (per COM:PRP, considering also upload behaviour = +40 copyvios/otherwise deleted files) can't be believed either. Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
WW2 era sulpture in Kazan - no author info - no FoP in Russia INeverCry 19:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Probably made in 1967 or soon after, so copyrighted sculpture. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid, that this self-made unused image falls outside of scope. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I started to think: if this sign denotes a no-terror-zone, then outside it must be a ... terror-allowed-zone? Taivo (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- Only if saving files in a suitable format is terror. ;) darkweasel94 14:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
The door design surpasses the TOO. There is no evidence it would be public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Most probably not a work of art. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Izola
[edit]No evidence these works would be public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Izola (1) (3957480221).jpg
- File:Izola (2) (3957480411).jpg
- File:Izola (20) (3957483111).jpg
- File:Izola (24) (3957483667).jpg
- File:Izola (33) (3958256580).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 07:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the last photo, number 33. I do not understand, why is it presented for deletion. The car design is probably worked out outside of Slovenia. The wooden railing design is folk art and thus ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- What about the design of the dog toilet? --Eleassar (t/p) 14:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Dog toilet? How do dogs get into this toilet? Are there some flying dogs? There is certainly no room for bigger dogs. I think, that this thing is not meant for consisting dogs and its purpose is unclear. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- No, the owners of dogs pick up excrements and throw them into this bin. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. 8-) --Eleassar (t/p) 06:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I understand now. I started to suspect something like this after saving my comment. In Estonia nobody calls them toilets. But in Tallinn these public trashbins look quite similar (except colors, of course) and this seems for me like trivial design. And blue-black coloring looks childish and does not give them copyright, in my opinion. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- What about the design of the dog toilet? --Eleassar (t/p) 14:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 06:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lipica
[edit]No evidence these works would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Lipica (54) (3992032773).jpg
- File:Lipica (63) (3992033765).jpg
- File:Lipica (68) (3992034605).jpg
- File:Lipica (69) (3992793840).jpg
- File:Lipica (74) (3992035179).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep photos 69 and 74. The main focus of these photos is on white horses and there riders, who are not copyrighted, and all other is de minimis. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: two kept, rest deleted FASTILY 06:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of Wikipedia:File:RUR.jpg and Wikipedia:File:Cap Badge of the Ulster Defence Regiment.jpg, neither of which appears to be free (see the two corresponding entries at Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 July 18) Psychonaut (talk) 14:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- These are both sketches so they are free use, or so I've been told. Plus, the sketch of the RUR badge isn't of the image used on the RUR page and the UDR badge sketch is very different from any other badges or images being used. My next move is to replace the badge on the RUR article with a Crown Copyright badge. SonofSetanta (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Badge at Wikipedia:File:RUR.jpg now replaced as outlined. I'm sure you'll let me know if there's anything wrong with it. SonofSetanta (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, derivatives of non-free works are also non-free. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- It seems that the only thing which is going to satisfy the guidelines are original images of both badges on a non-free licence with a rationale for each usage - am I right? SonofSetanta (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- No. See the many previous discussions for more details, I see no reason to rehash them here. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- It seems that the only thing which is going to satisfy the guidelines are original images of both badges on a non-free licence with a rationale for each usage - am I right? SonofSetanta (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's ok for you to say that but Crown Copyright seems to be a complicated area and I am slowly learning about it. May I politely remind you that I have a free image available for the right hand badge? I am also in touch with the British National Archives and am being advised of their requirements so I have today uploaded what I think is a free version of the left hand badge. I have asked another copyright editor to check it out for me. SonofSetanta (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- With the number of free images in my possession growing it is likely that I will redesign this image. SonofSetanta (talk) 11:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's ok for you to say that but Crown Copyright seems to be a complicated area and I am slowly learning about it. May I politely remind you that I have a free image available for the right hand badge? I am also in touch with the British National Archives and am being advised of their requirements so I have today uploaded what I think is a free version of the left hand badge. I have asked another copyright editor to check it out for me. SonofSetanta (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivatives of non-free works are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 22:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT; there is no assertion that this file was taken in a public place, or without an expectation of privacy; no assertion of the subject's permission to broadly publish the photo. Pete F (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep If a person dresses himself that way, then he surely does not expect much privacy. No expectation of privacy for such photos is neither needed nor required per COM:IDENT. It would be better, when somebody, who understands Portuguese, will translate the photo description. Maybe the photo is made in public place, for example, public library. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep (Rough) online translation of summary: "Writer Alcione Sortica in the cocktail of launch of the book "Bank of Dam", 2013". A PR presentation of the book is public enough to keep (with implied consent per Brasilian case law). GermanJoe (talk) 11:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 22:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Contains Derivative works. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Its de minimis --Sreejith K (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I do not consider them de minimis. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivatives of non-free works are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 22:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as no permission (no permission since) missing permission because of ?!? Denniss (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Eleassar means permission from architect and sculptor. But this is not Slovenia, this house is situated in Spain and there is freedom of panorama in Spain. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Eleassar wanted an OTRS verified permission for this image because uploader (Amazone7) is not the author of the photo (Lea Z.).— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 20:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader states he/she is the author, just used real name instead of username in author field. --Denniss (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is not the uploader's real name (which is stated e.g. here) and COM:L demands a clear OTRS-confirmed or otherwise verifiable licensing by the copyright holder himself (or herself). --Eleassar (t/p) 06:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Lea Z. is close enough to Ines Z. to render your argument BS. --Denniss (talk) 09:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'll leave to the concluding administrator to decide about this. I have just pointed out that the file does not have a proper license by its author, as demanded by COM:L. Per COM:L, for all images, the license must be stated explicitly by the copyright holder. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is not the uploader's real name (which is stated e.g. here) and COM:L demands a clear OTRS-confirmed or otherwise verifiable licensing by the copyright holder himself (or herself). --Eleassar (t/p) 06:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader states he/she is the author, just used real name instead of username in author field. --Denniss (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Eleassar wanted an OTRS verified permission for this image because uploader (Amazone7) is not the author of the photo (Lea Z.).— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 20:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing clear evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 22:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Poor Quality Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 13:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Can be useful to depict light painting --Sreejith K (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete But this light painting is protected by copyright. Even if the house is old, the light painting is not. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivatives of non-free works are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 22:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eleassar as no permission (no permission since) - I have actually no idea why there's a mising permission. Denniss (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Eleassar means permission from architect. But this seems an old building and architect's rights are most probably expired, so this permission is not needed any more. Taivo (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I believe Eleassar demands an OTRS verified permission for this image. Since Schneider & Aistleitner are labelled as authors and only one of them uploaded the file Eleassar thinks OTRS permission from the other photographer is needed. ℳ₪Zaplotnik 20:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Many/all own work images from the uploader are tagged this way so there's no visible problem with it. --Denniss (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The file was tagged with 'no permission' after this conversation. It is unclear whether the file is free in Austria, therefore, in accordance with COM:PRP and COM:EVID, I've tagged it as missing permission. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- There is freedom of panorama in Austria, so the photo is free in Austria. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is irrelevant, because the discussion was not about the freedom of panorama but about the licensing by the photographer. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- And your argumentation is irrelevant as well as all own images were uploaded with this tag, recent uploads indicate both are married because just using Marion & Christoph Aistleitner. You'd should better not always assume bad faith, especially for users which are inactive for a long time.--Denniss (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'll leave this to the concluding administrator. You should not accuse me of assuming bad faith just because I have pointed out that the file does not have a proper license by all of its authors, as demanded by COM:L. A similar case has been closed here as missing permission, therefore not eligible for Commons. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- The file was tagged with 'no permission' after this conversation. It is unclear whether the file is free in Austria, therefore, in accordance with COM:PRP and COM:EVID, I've tagged it as missing permission. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Many/all own work images from the uploader are tagged this way so there's no visible problem with it. --Denniss (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I believe Eleassar demands an OTRS verified permission for this image. Since Schneider & Aistleitner are labelled as authors and only one of them uploaded the file Eleassar thinks OTRS permission from the other photographer is needed. ℳ₪Zaplotnik 20:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing clear evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 22:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por File:Metrobilbaol1.png Laukatu (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete historical plans. They are also needed to show history of this metro line. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to indicate that this is an outdated image. Per Taivo, historical maps are well within scope and should be kept. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
sustituido por File:Metrobilbaol2.png Laukatu (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete historical plans. They are also needed to show history of this metro line. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to indicate that this is an outdated image. Per Taivo, historical maps are well within scope and should be kept. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I´ve uploaded this file in another wiki with a license who doesn´t allows to use this here. -Krabat der Zauberlehrling (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Weißt Du, dass Du als Urheber Deine Dateien unter beliebig vielen Lizenzen veröffentlichen kannst? // Did you know that you as the author can license your files as under many licenses as you desire? -- Commons:Multi-licensing.
- Die einzige Ausnahme bilden Exklusivverträge. // The only exception is an exclusive usage right. -- Rillke(q?) 10:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request FASTILY 20:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Poorly-Photoshopped image, with no explanation given as to the purpose of the obvious fakery... AnonMoos (talk) 14:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- If it is poorly or not is arguable. It is a montage made to this article es:Lindsay y Melanie. There is no reasonable reason to delete it. The only fakery is in AnonMoos's mind, the sourses were clearly in the image summary. --Osado (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's fake because it designed to give the impression that two people were side-by-side when they were not side-by-side, and it's poor-quality because the lighting is completely different on the right-hand person than the lighting in the rest of the photograph, with little or no effort to adjust or compensate for the fact. AnonMoos (talk) 23:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep in actual use. darkweasel94 22:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't in use when I nominated it for deletion... AnonMoos (talk) 23:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as a misleading collage. This should be replaced in the article either with side-by-side but separate images of the two actresses, or by a fair-use screenshot of the characters if allowed by eswiki guidelines. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:51, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, borderline vandalism. FASTILY 22:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
book cover, imho may be copyright protected, Roland zh 18:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I, Vinay Jalla, creator of the image and the author of this book hold the copyright for this image. I'm also the publisher of the book 'Warp and Weft'. So I don't see any reason for deletion.
- Please email COM:OTRS with an adequate permission. darkweasel94 22:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 22:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grad, Grad
[edit]No evidence these works are free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia / out of scope: photos of oneself or their friends.
- File:2009 Grad na Gorickem (16) (5320794723).jpg
- File:Grad na Gorickem (10) (5321391390).jpg
- File:Grad na Gorickem (24) (5320800563).jpg
- File:Grad na Gorickem (26) (5321404500).jpg
- File:Grad na Gorickem (52) (5321426734).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 10:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I added to photo 16 Category:Potters and Category:Men at work. In my opinion, this photo is valuable addition for these categories. Photo 24 consists only old items, nothing is copyrighted there. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- These paintings seem modern to me. I think you should provide a reliable source if you believe they're so old to not be copyrighted anymore. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Slovenia and/or out of scope FASTILY 22:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Koper
[edit]No evidence these works would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Some are out of scope: photos of oneself or their friends.
- File:2009 Koper (9) (3958281224).jpg
- File:A little bit of the present, a little bit of the past... (8032153666).jpg
- File:Azamara from the streets of Koper.jpg
- File:Koper (101) (3957517143).jpg
- File:Koper (103) (3958293704).jpg
- File:Koper (104) (3958293836).jpg
- File:Koper (105) (3958294050).jpg
- File:Koper (107) (3958294370).jpg
- File:Koper (114) (3957529081).jpg
- File:Koper (120) (3958305524).jpg
- File:Koper (121) (3957529667).jpg
- File:Koper (128) (3958298008).jpg
- File:Koper (154) (3958300736).jpg
- File:Koper (155) (3958300830).jpg
- File:Koper (156) (3958300936).jpg
- File:Koper (159) (3958301298).jpg
- File:Koper (163) (3958301854).jpg
- File:Koper (166) (3958304124).jpg
- File:Koper (28) (3958283642).jpg
- File:Koper (33) (3957508009).jpg
- File:Koper (33).jpg
- File:Koper (36).jpg
- File:Koper (41).jpg
- File:Koper (52) (3958285998).jpg
- File:Koper (61) (3958287506).jpg
- File:Koper (66) (3957512119).jpg
- File:Koper (76) (3957513677).jpg
- File:Koper (84) (3957514725).jpg
- File:Koper (8622155967).jpg
- File:Koper (8622156027).jpg
- File:Koper, Slovenia (6843538205).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Would you please inform the public what could be the problem with the Azamara ship and the streets of Koper in this context? I am a great friend of Slovenia since 20 years, but your deletion frenzy disturbs me very much.--Szilas (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Which images exactly do you think are free? I'm not sure the ship design is free - I'll leave this to the community to decide. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think the photo in question is File:Azamara from the streets of Koper.jpg. You are not sure the ship design is free? So sad because you voted for the photo of the very same ship in the very same dock to be a featured picture in Slovene Wikipedia. I find your recent DRs fuzzy and incoherent. ℳ₪Zaplotnik 10:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo 66 is public domain, because all houses here are centuries old and their copyright is expired. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The advertising of the bakery is copyrighted, but probably de minimis. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- There is nothing copyrightable in photo 107. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nominated for the same reason as the rest in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Beers of Slovenia. Probably de minimis in this case. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo 156 consists also only old things (copyright is expired). Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo File:Koper (8622155967).jpg depicts building, which is copyrighted, but this does not mean, that every part of it is copyrighted. In this photo is only trivial part of house, no creativity was used when designing this part of building. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo File:Koper (8622156027).jpg is about apparently old building (I decide by location and overall style), its copyrights are expired. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Eleassar, it is a very strange working method that if you are not sure in something, you nominate it for deletion.--Szilas (talk) 16:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- It may be, but a ship's design may be regarded as an "intellectual creative creation" (naval architecture), and these are copyrighted according to the Slovene law. The image was taken in Slovenia, and if there is no evidence that it is free per the Slovene copyright act, it should be deleted in accordance with COM:EVID and COM:PRP. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep File:Koper (52) (3958285998).jpg and File:Koper (61) (3958287506).jpg: Medusa's face is a symbol originating in Greek's mythology (can be found on Athena's shield, for instance); therefore it is not copyrighted. See this (in Slovene) for more info. ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think you don't have to teach us about who or what is Medusa. This is a modern sculpture. Snail is a symbol of Višnja Gora and yet this image has been deleted. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep File:Koper, Slovenia (6843538205).jpg: nothing copyrightable because whole fountain is covered in water drops. Viewer can hardly predict the form and shape of the fountain. ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is the same case as here. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I propose to delete all the Slovenia-related images from the Commons just to be on the safe side. From now on I'll travel - if I need to at all - to Slovenia without camera to avoid these very unpleasant problems. All the best for your creative work, Eleassar.--Szilas (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 20:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kostanjevica na Krki
[edit]No evidence that these works would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia / out of scope: photos of oneself or their friends.
- File:2009 Kostanjevica (75) (3983687465).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (1) (3984316606).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (12) (3983566855).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (31) (3984336678).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (32) (3983576129).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (33) (3984337632).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (34) (3983577223).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (3984315966).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (48) (3984347200).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (50) (3983587107).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (53) (3983589369).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (54) (3983590263).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (55) (3984351814).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (57) (3984352996).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (7) (3983558463).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (70) (3983684837).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (78) (3984449114).jpg
- File:Kostanjevica (9) (3983562167).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo 31 is about old building (copyright is expired). There is a strange metal thing in lower left corner, this can be considered de minimis, but this can be cropped out also.
- Photo 32 is about landscape. All other is de minimis.
- Photo 33 is about trees or plantation. All other is de minimis.
- Photo 34 is about old building (copyright is expired).
- Photo 75 is about old thing (copyright is expired). The human face adds value to picture: it shows, how big the statue base is and how it is exhibited. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I am very bad in image processing, but nevertheless I cropped the statue out from photo number 31 and got File:Kostanjevica_(31)_cropped.jpg. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the invested time and effort. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Several kept as fixed, rest deleted as having copyright issues FASTILY 20:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Piran
[edit]No evidence that these works would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia.
- File:Piran (10) (3955631097).jpg
- File:Piran (13) (3955631927).jpg
- File:Piran (21) (3955634033).jpg
- File:Piran, Slovenia (6843573875).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep all. I do not understand, what is copyrighted in photo 21. White-black-red sign about tap is not copyrighted. All other photos are about old buildings (their copyright is expired) and all other things on these photos are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The design of the lamps and benches in the front is still copyrighted as is the design of the fountain. The last image is not about old buildings, but shows the street art. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- OK, sorry, there are really lamps and benches, so most probably Commons cannot host photos 10 and 13. But the last – this "street art" does not seem for me as street art and the photo does not show this "art" properly, so in my opinion focus of this photo is not on these drawings. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The paintings are in a very prominent position in the foreground, no matter whether shown under a right angle or not. I wouldn't say this is an unavoidable coincidence. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- The design of the lamps and benches in the front is still copyrighted as is the design of the fountain. The last image is not about old buildings, but shows the street art. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep at least (13) - a clear case of de minimis. — Yerpo Eh? 04:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: one kept, rest deleted as there is no FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 20:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Slovenska Bistrica
[edit]No evidence these works would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (104) (5305435041).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (41) (5306038626).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (42) (5306038770).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (43) (5305443397).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (44) (5305443579).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (45) (5306039188).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (46) (5306039356).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (47) (5305444061).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (48) (5305444213).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (49) (5306039906).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (50) (5306040092).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (55) (5306040810).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (56) (5306040944).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (6) (5305436689).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (79) (5306044850).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (8) (5306032614).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (90) (5305451121).jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (92) (5305451413).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Photo 8 is about old building (copyright is expired). At least in Tallinn there are some very similar buildings and their copyright is expired. But in left is a modern statue, which must be cropped out.
- Photo 55 consists old flags and a modern statue in left, which must be cropped out.
- Photo 104 is about old building, copyright is expired. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Although I am very bad in image processing, I cropped the statue out from two photos and got these two photos:
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (8) cropped.jpg
- File:Slovenska Bistrica (55) cropped.jpg. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the invested time and effort. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept: 3 kept, rest deleted as there is no FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 22:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Varkeyveliyath
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Varkeyveliyath:
- File:Kauthuka-park.jpg
- File:REVENUE MINISTER AT KAUTHUKAPARK.jpg
- File:TREE HUT.jpg
- File:TOURISTS-THEY ARE COMING TO KAUTHUKAPARK.jpg
They are all unused photos about Kauthuka park, but due to bad composition they give no information about the park. I do not present here the uploader's two other photos, because I consider them better. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the photos but not the text contribution - single details of certain locations in a park can be interesting IMHO. darkweasel94 22:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: All deleted as blatantly out of scope. FASTILY 22:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)