Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 9th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorgemvd23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per source/author info - taken from internet

INeverCry 03:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Doesn't show permission to use files, clear delete as per nom.

Deleted: Blatant copyvio FASTILY 07:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de rédaction ==> Category:Chastenay (Yonne) François GOGLINS (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PLease do not use {{Delete}} for routine housekeeping. {{Speedy}} uses less human and computer resources .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Derivative work. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cccçcvgvghç112234556789€&'gvK.,.,,,i((?()€)€€!?)(&@!€?!€?(7)();///,,(?€!€$8988€8€&'kjknkbh 80.11.143.189 10:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense reuest JuTa 20:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. I hope that User:Matanya will check their flickr transfers before uploading them to Commons

High Contrast (talk) 11:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm sorry, and took care of the files. matanya talk 13:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

кувпппавпапв 80.94.239.130 09:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandal nomination russavia (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FRRPOGTFTGPR 79.47.14.65 15:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason given. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason Julo (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2013-05-30T11:35:32‎ (UTC)


Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 01:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this was the wrong adress. The pic is replaced by the name File:Baarn Karseboom Laanstraat 121.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atsje (talk • contribs) 2013-06-07T19:07:22‎ (UTC)


Deleted: processed as duplicate JuTa 22:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the image Ciell (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted since it's copyright violation: "Foto Tom Sebastian - LinkedIn profiel juni 2013" Trijnsteltalk 10:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant and bad quality GreenpointX (Diskussion) 15:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC) GreenpointX (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 22:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RonaldoLand237 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio from different sport sites

Ray Garraty (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deletion / copyright violation Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows 7 screenshot — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

clear copyvio - copyvio template set. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted by an admin as copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational objective, self promotional Jmvkrecords Intra Talk 02:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) And:[reply]

 Delete as nominated. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of project scope per nominator PierreSelim (talk) 17:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal photo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Cacatua tenuirostris -Sydney-8d.jpg. (own upload) Vensatry (Ping me) 06:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of autorship 91.66.152.55 06:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution and no EXIF data from camera. It seems to be a screenshot. —Bill william comptonTalk 06:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution and no EXIF data from camera. It seems to be a screenshot. —Bill william comptonTalk 06:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

تمامي حقوق محفوظ و به پايگاه اينترنتي سازمان خلیج فارس میراثی کهن و جاودان تعلق دارد. McZusatz (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The website says "استفاده از تمام مطالب و تصاویر این وب سایت با ذکر منبع آزاد است." (http://parssea.org/?page_id=112 Content is Open Source) but does not include a licence like CC-BY-SA-3.0. Therefore it is not suitable for commons. --McZusatz (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:118x14 = 10 uploads = 7x copyvio, 1x OTRS-pending (IMHO a fake, could be considered as copyvio via (example) http://hockeyattheforks.com/2011/09/08/jets-top-10-prospects-5-arturs-kulda/, 2011, © 2011-12 Hockey at the Forks & FanSided, or grabbed from internet) and 1x File:Peter Mannino 2.jpg which might be really own work, considering the low quality. Gunnex (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly created a gallery page when I meant to create a category page. I have now created the category, and at present there is no need for a gallery page. Steve Morgan (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, apparently a video screenshot. Exif is faked and file might be cropped (as in other copyvios). Gunnex (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: (derivated) art work from 1965 (uploader info) of en:Jess Collins (August 6, 1923 – January 2, 2004). Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong image and have now also uploaded the correct one Krudeforth (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to rather bad image quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be composite or rearrangement of [1], a site that is not free. DMacks (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs a valid OTRS-permission; image appears also here High Contrast (talk) 11:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't seems at all an own work. In addition this user had uploaded a lot of photos with copyright saying that were own work, and should be blocked. JaviP96 11:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=misnamed category - should have been Railway lines in Wisconsin |subpage=Category:Rail lines in Wisconsin |day=9 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjrmtg (talk • contribs) 2013-06-09T04:28:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=Unencyclopedic |subpage=File:Abandoned nuclear power station in Tatarstan (7948763846).jpg |day=31 |month=May |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandrz (talk • contribs) 2013-05-31T08:19:48‎ (UTC)


 Keep I disagree: It shows quite effectful that this abandoned power station is currently used by many people as a short trip destination for doing picnic or the like. --High Contrast (talk) 11:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Being unencyclopedic or encyclopedic is totally irrelevant. What matters is scope and the title shows it all about scope. Tm (talk) 03:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Takashi Nakayama died in 1978. Takabeg (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=outside of scope |subpage=File:Esbr nhgjkñkjhngfvxdcsadfghjkmlñ. -.kmjhngfdcsxsfcgvhnjkml,ñ..png |day=29 |month=May |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2013-05-29T16:25:03‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not clear whats the source of the photos of this "galery". Out of scope as well. JuTa 12:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

want to delete my own voice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neogeolegend (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T06:50:42‎ (UTC)


Kept: Free license is irrevocable. File is in use. INeverCry 00:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a very good picture, unfortunately the Wikimedia Commons Android App didn't offer to just store the picture for later review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasten (talk • contribs) 2013-05-07T18:58:59‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a very good picture, unfortunately the Wikimedia Commons Android App didn't offer to just store the picture for later review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasten (talk • contribs) 2013-05-07T18:58:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a very good picture, unfortunately the Wikimedia Commons Android App didn't offer to just store the picture for later review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasten (talk • contribs) 2013-05-07T18:58:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Derivative work. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Derivative work TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France and not de minimis in this case. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, non-encyclopedic person; possibly cyber harrasment MoiraMoira (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent sculpture (inaugurated in 1989). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent sculpture (inaugurated in 1989). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=Unencyclopediac |subpage=File:Brahmi Script Fonts.PNG |day=25 |month=May |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srkris (talk • contribs) 2013-05-25T22:58:29‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, like the rest of this guys submissions, delete those as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2013-06-04T12:20:45‎ (UTC)

which are:

All images likely nor own work of the uploader and copyright violations:  Delete --JuTa 13:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though the image was uploaded from flickr in good faith, I don't believe the flickr user is the original creator. It appears to be a promotional item released by the SSTL (Surrey Satellite Technology Limited) and the USSC (University of Surrey Space Centre). See [2], for example, which credits it as such. [3] credits it to "Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd". UserB (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded from flickr in good faith, but the Flickr page credits the photo to "CubeSat on display, at the March 2009 meeting of the Central Coast Astronomical Society, Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA. Photo by Cuesta College Physical Sciences Division instruction Dr. Patrick M. Len." Unless flickr user "Waifer X" is Dr. Patrick M. Len, we can't accept his license from him. The camera used for photos credited to Dr. Len at this meeting does not match the camera that "Waifer X" used in his other photos. UserB (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a photo of some other work (painting or photo, I can't tell). No info on the copyright status of that other work, so it's an impermissible Derivative Work GrapedApe (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is a USAF photo, as opposed to a news media photo (or a photo from just about anyone else) UserB (talk) 14:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No good source given. The source website - which has moved to http://spaceref.com/nasa-hack-space/titan-i-hgm-25a-overview.html - just credits Wikipedia for the article and gives no source for the image. This image could be a PD photo from the government or it could be a news media photo or from anywhere else. UserB (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like collection of promo photo, not own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user page image without license, out of scope Didym (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a 2-D work by Biggibilla. No evidence of permission, and no way that the artist would have allowed it to be reproduced here. Osiris (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is massively used under copyright since before September 25 2012. There is strictly no clue that the user who uploaded this pic is the author, as he claims it. It is therfore likely that this file violates the Wikimedia commons policy. Skiper (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a mere proposal for a public transport network in Vienna. That proposal is not notable by any standard; the only site that seems to cover it is the original uploader's own private fan site ([4]). This map doesn't seem realistically useful for an educational purpose, sorry - otherwise we could upload everything we'd like to see in some city's transport network. darkweasel94 15:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. The sculpture will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Restored in 2014. odder (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Themightyquill. By PD you mean Public Domain right? Sorry I'm not that familiar with the abbreviations. By the way is there any link where I can read about why it will be PD in Norway by January 2014. And does that mean if January 2014 already comes I can reupload these photos? Thanks for you reply. --Nickrds09 (Talk Page) 10:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, yes. FOP is freedom of panorama which grants you the right to photograph and republish works of art if they are in public spaces. Many countries have laws that allow this. Norway does not. PD is indeed Public Domain. Vigeland's copyrights expire this year because he died in 1943 (70 years ago) which is the legal requirement in Norway. As to whether you can upload them next year, it's problematic. Unfortunately, because Wikimedia Commons is based in the United States, they have decided to follow US copyright law. Since the US has a much longer post-death requirement, I believe these sculptures will NOT be PD in the USA in January. I know, it all seems ridiculous to me too. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it really seems ridiculous. Anyway so what I understand is that it will still not be allowed here in commons but maybe I can upload it in Norwegian Wikipedia since it is already PD there by 2014. Is my understanding correct? Thanks. --Nickrds09 (Talk Page) 03:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Restored in 2014. odder (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Restored in 2014. odder (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. This sculpture will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found 5 matches on TinEye and http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/the-pretty-reckless/images/15139825/title/pretty-reckless-light-up-booklet-scans-photo, unlikely that this is own / free work Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niemti (talk • contribs) 2013-05-16T15:01:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This doesn't look useful. I'd say that it's out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 18:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building appears to be from 2012, so it's still copyrighted. Stefan4 (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The article w:SM Aura Premier tells that the building is from 2013, so the architect hasn't been dead for 50 years yet. Stefan4 (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que lo subí teniendo una descripción inapropiada Henry Fuerza Delta (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This currently already exists as File:Kosovo with flag of Serbia.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valide licence 91.44.226.124 19:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio. Work by living artist (Dan Colen, American, b. 1979) Seidenstud (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio from show's official Facebook account, per a Google Images search. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused lower-res version of File:Lenacil structuur.png DMacks (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has spammed a large number of copyrighted images related to Big Brother on en-wp and here. While I cannot find an original source for this particular image, I think it's very unlikely that uploader holds the rights to this image. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work as claimed; see e.g. this site which predates upload and attributes the images to a different name. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The download location does not specify any license, or any statement about use 'free of rights' (rechtenvrij) and only shows 'alle rechten voorbehouden' (all rights reserved') at the bottom of the page. Unless this can be viewed as 'pd-textlogo', I don't see how this image is suitable for Commons. Pbech (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of autorship 91.66.152.55 20:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DP-shape is not reasonable here, and there is no other indication that this logo can be used under a free license or in the public domain. Pbech (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not copyright holder of the work. No indication that this logo is in the public domain or even under a free license. Pbech (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although some will argue that the sign is de minimis, the categorization and descriptions make it clear that the sign is the principal subject of the image. The image infringes on the sign's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality and there are much better fotos by now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morray (talk • contribs) 2013-06-03T12:30:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a very good picture, unfortunately the Wikimedia Commons Android App didn't offer to just store the picture for later review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasten (talk • contribs) 2013-05-07T18:58:18‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted Animated GIF. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence given for the claim that this image is the work of the Federal government. The source website does not give any attribution and it could be from the news media or even just some guy with a camera. UserB (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence given for the claim that this is the work of the Federal government. Just because a physical object is at a government facility doesn't mean that a photo of it was taken by the government. UserB (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website says, "Credit: Photo by Eric Long, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. For print or commercial use, please contact: Smithsonian Institution. Reproductions are not currently available. If you would like to use this image as-is, please submit a permission request." The copyright status of Smithsonian images has been a subject of great dispute and I do not care to re-litigate it. However, unless it can be demonstrated that Eric Long is an employee of the federal government and not a contractor, volunteer, etc, we can't just assume this to be a public domain photo. UserB (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this image is from NASA. The source website credits "Ordway/Wakeford". en:Frederick I. Ordway III did work for NASA for a time, but we can't just assume it belongs to NASA. I'm guessing/assuming that the image might be from this book, in which case NASA would very possibly not own the copyright. UserB (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website says that the article is taken from "American Spacemodeling Magazine". It does not have credits for this photo nor does it give any reason to believe that it is a NASA photo. Some photos on this page are explicitly credited to NASA, but not this one. UserB (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website does not provide attribution for this photo and there is no reason to believe it is from NASA, as opposed to a news media person or some guy with a camera. Plenty of other photos on this site are attributed to NASA, but not this one. UserB (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't read Italian, but I think that http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Malindi_Station_Luigi_Broglio_antenna.png is saying they are using this image under a claim of fair use (a dubious claim of fair use at that ... if an Italian Wikipedian sees this, you should probably take out the trash there as well). UserB (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website is a museum (not a Federal government-owned one) and it does not give attribution for the image. While it seems highly likely that it was a government image, we can't just assume that. UserB (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website is a museum (not a Federal government-owned one) and it does not give attribution for the image. While it seems highly likely that it was a government image, we can't just assume that. UserB (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website is a museum (not a Federal government-owned one) and it does not give attribution for the image. While it seems highly likely that it was a government image, we can't just assume that. UserB (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as PD-ineligible ... that seems rather dubious UserB (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:StEdmundsburyAbbeyPanorama.jpg. Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photo here tagged "photo by Ben Kimball" but the uploader says it is own work! And the name and description of the photos are wrong. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website explicitly says it is a separate organization, not a part of the DOD. UserB (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as PD-ineligible ... that seems dubious UserB (talk) 22:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absurd claim of PD-ineligible UserB (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page in desuse Eduardo P (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

请求删除原因 低质量或低分辨率的文件 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 颐园新居 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-11T02:19:26‎ (UTC)

 Keep Good image of in scope subject. Tm (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

图像非常模糊,不清晰,本页面/分类中的已有更好的图像 Tyg728 (talk) 03:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - image not in use/superior images available. --Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

请求删除原因 低质量或低分辨率的文件 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 颐园新居 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-14T17:17:28‎ (UTC)

 Keep Good image of in scope subject. Tm (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

请求删除原因 低质量或低分辨率的文件 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 颐园新居 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-14T17:17:56‎ (UTC)

 Keep Good image of in scope subject. Tm (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

请求删除原因 低质量或低分辨率的文件 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 颐园新居 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-11T02:18:09‎ (UTC)

 Keep Good image of in scope subject. Tm (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

请求删除原因 低质量的文件,已有类似图片 File:DF4D 3108 in Guilin.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 颐园新居 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-11T02:16:56‎ (UTC)

 Keep Good image of in scope subject. Tm (talk) 03:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haberstr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, apparently grabbed from the Flickr washing account Parmida. Example: http://www.flickr.com/photos/parmida/5969555422/, uploaded 24.07.2011 = cropped (watermark removed) from .html = http://media.farsnews.com/Media/9005/ImageReports/9005011507/4_9005011507_L600.jpg (last modified: 23.07.2011). Or http://www.flickr.com/photos/parmida/5897681960/ (watermark: "www.President.ir") etc. Files in here Flickr stream are mostly without exif and coming with small/inconsistent resolutions...

Gunnex (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also think the images are not free as I uploaded Jalili's photo before but was deleted. But can you please wait until 16 June 2013 when election toke place? We need a photo of him. Thanks. Tabarez2 (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NatySmile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mass copyvio by user NatySmile: all files grabbed from internet

Gunnex (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samsung1980 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion (considering also: "Dodge caravan1997 en buenas condiciones 134.000 miles quiero 2900" = "Dodge Caravan 1997 in good conditions (...) I want 2900 [currency] --> File:Snapshot 2013608.jpg, Snapshot 2013608 (3).jpg, Snapshot 2013608 (4).jpg, Snapshot 2013608 (5).jpg. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikashsingh vicky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album ("my baby", "my friend" etc.) + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Said photo was found here after I double checked since I swore that I saw it before. Ominae (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 72.65.238.157 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted team jersey

Nothing copyrightable here, apart from the uploader's drawing which is claimed to be freely licensed. Stefan4 (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nothing copyrightable here FASTILY 09:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non original logo. Is this simple enough to be in PD? Ralgis (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A more accurate map has been uploaded by me. Diverman (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A question: Is the drawing at the top section of the sign too creative to likely not be covered by US FOP? Leoboudv (talk) 08:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture needs to be deleted as it was part of a larger file of pictures uploaded with incorrect copyright information. THey are in violation of copyright. 140.211.64.234 08:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not OTSR. — Redboston 09:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

weil die Datei doppelt gespeichert ist Diewicki (talk) 10:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=remplacé par Italia_1861-fr.svg |subpage=File:Italie 1861.jpg |day=2 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramzan (talk • contribs) 2013-06-02T05:32:30‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason= new version : Italia 1866-fr.svg |subpage=File:Italie 1866.jpg |day=2 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramzan (talk • contribs) 2013-06-02T05:55:32‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason= new version : Italia 1870-fr.svg |subpage=File:Italie 1870.jpg |day=2 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramzan (talk • contribs) 2013-06-02T05:57:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=new version : Italia mars 1860-fr.svg |subpage=File:Italie mars 1860.jpg |day=2 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramzan (talk • contribs) 2013-06-02T05:53:19‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopediac — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srkris (talk • contribs) 2013-05-25T22:59:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some guy made this jpg of a Newsweek headline. No, it's not an actual image of the headline, he made it in MS Paint to be a decoration on Brad Hendricks. This is bizarre, to say the least. It should be deleted as vanity and general bizarreness GrapedApe (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original file on de-wiki is tagged with "No permission" or similar. I nominated the file for deletion so I/we won't forget to check the result on de:Datei:Kölner Philharmonie-Bühne.jpg. MGA73 (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eu não preciso mais usar essa imagem. Fábio Stanger (talk) 15:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I forgot to blur the license plate — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChengH (talk • contribs) 2013-05-20T02:29:56‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My bad, not Chun-Li. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niemti (talk • contribs) 2013-05-17T12:05:31‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgsg (talk • contribs) 2013-04-27T17:11:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of agreement of copyright holder. See umpolader's talk page for similar uploads — Racconish Tk 17:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have improve a new image to according to the historical information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murashel (talk • contribs) 2013-06-09T15:06:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have improve a new image to according to the historical information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murashel (talk • contribs) 2013-06-09T15:07:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete photo with me, analogical Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meeting9-09-2007-8.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeaWr77 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-03T16:56:40‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete photo with me, analogical Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meeting9-09-2007-8.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeaWr77 (talk • contribs) 2013-05-03T16:56:18‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission; possible copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nataev (talk • contribs) 2013-05-12T20:41:52‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgsg (talk • contribs) 2013-04-27T17:10:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is the wrong number,44ab should be 34B. photo is already replaced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atsje (talk • contribs) 2013-05-26T10:54:38‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded by File:Evangelios SinópticosO.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albedo-ukr (talk • contribs) 2013-04-27T19:41:26‎ (UTC)

 Keep and  Delete File:Evangelios SinópticosO.svg that is only a scaled version of the first. Something totally unnecessary in vector graphics. If you want to make a new version of a file, you shouldn't upload it with a new name and ask them to delete the previous one, eliminating authorship history. --Metrónomo (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted second one, kept first FASTILY 09:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless image, two persons shown from behind, hardly possible to identify them. Denniss (talk) 14:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Useless RfD. Impressions are sometimes also pictures from behind. Commons is for more than one use. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 09:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken with a timer, or by someone else? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The person whose finger pushed the button on the camera owns the copyright. All other cases need to go through COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP does not apply in Norway. Sculptures will be PD in Norway in January 2014 Themightyquill (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Norwegian law reads:

"§ 24. Works of art and photographic works which form part of a collection or which are exhibited or offered for sale may be depicted in catalogues of the collection and in announcements of the exhibition or sale. Works of art and photographic works may also be depicted when they are permanently located in or near a public place or thoroughfare. However, this shall not apply when the work is clearly the main motif and the reproduction is exploited commercially."

So perhaps the fountain and statues are not the main motif here? Thoughts? - Themightyquill (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in Norway FASTILY 09:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo for a video collage and I don't authorize it to be used. 64.62.244.54 18:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Any proof that you (an USA ip) is the author or copyright holder of this image uploaded by an user that is german speaking user and that is still active in De Wikpedia? Tm (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please login to edit FASTILY 09:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_cebu_4d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:38:36‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_cebu_5d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:38:19‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_leyte_1d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:37:50‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_leyte_2d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:37:31‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_leyte_3d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:37:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_leyte_4d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:36:58‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_leyte_5d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:36:36‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_zamboanga_del_norte_1d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:35:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_zamboanga_del_norte_2d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:35:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already with a better rendered image File:Ph_fil_congress_zamboanga_del_norte_3d.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namayan (talk • contribs) 2013-04-24T01:34:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashed image. I have no idea what the original source is, but putting it on your own flickr page and claiming to license it doesn't make it so. UserB (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep when in com:scope as {{PD-text}}, otherwise  Delete. --McZusatz (talk) 11:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: seems out of scope FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier a été recréé par Bourrichon File:Réserve naturelle régionale de la carrière des Nerviens map-fr.svg et remplacé dans la page wikipédia Réserve naturelle régionale de la carrière des Nerviens. Elle n'a plus lieu d'être. Les autres cartes restant sur la page WP seront remplacées peu à peu par Bourrichon. Merci. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lovelido (talk · contribs)

[edit]

uploader and author have different names, no notability, no description. Out of project scope, no educational value.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Concerning copyright - the description page implies that Sharon Grimes is the real name of user Lovelido, so that shouldn't be a problem; we have no evidence that it's not an own work. Concerning scope, photos of certain beaches (or in general: certain places) do seem educational enough to me; I think deleting this would set a precedent I would prefer not to have, with the next step being deleting photos showing how e.g. certain village centers look like just because there's a lot of them in the world. Should however certainly be categorized, possibly also geotagged. darkweasel94 15:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Exactly! It implies only. I rather have proof. I can't see the educational value right now, since there is no description, and no location. I am all for keeping what can be used, but the author/uploader discrepancy has to be adressed. Otherwise somebody might get into trouble using those images, we have to protect our users from copyright pitfalls as much as we can. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As for description/location, this might be en:Lido Isle, Newport Beach. Or does anyone know that place and can tell for sure it's not? I've asked on en:Talk:Lido Isle, Newport Beach. As for copyright - I think linking to one's own userpage with a name that looks like a real name doesn't really raise significant doubts. darkweasel94 06:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Google Earth, the buiding visible on File:19209374lido small (640x427).jpg looks like the one at 33°36'36.07" N 117°54'52.35" W. I will categorize the images appropriately. darkweasel94 09:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Grimes == Lovelido apparently -FASTILY 08:59, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Open Government Licence" doesn't apply to this photograph since it has "Crown Copyright" (See the file's EXIF data) Bidgee (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Anything under a free license (one with restrictions like attribution) has to be copyright—otherwise, it would be public domain, entirely free of restrictions. Like most content under the OGL, its copyright is owned by the Crown, and it is released under the conditions of this license. —innotata 17:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Unlike the other files which only have "Crown Copyright" in the copyright holder field and are marked with a green tick (meaning it's licensed under the OGL) on the Ministry of Defence's image repository, however this photograph has this in the copyright holder field "Crown Copyright: This image may be used for current news purposes only. It may not be used, reproduced or transmitted for any other purpose without first obtaining a copyright license available from the MoD, Crown Copyright Unit. ipr-cc@dpa.mod.uk" and can't be found in the Ministry of Defence's image repository. Bidgee (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's not what you said in your deletion nomination, as you implied that OGL content is not Crown Copyright. Look at the source: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/19th-regiment-royal-artillery-becomes-the-scottish-gunners says "All content is available under the Open Government Licence, except where otherwise stated" like all pages on gov.uk, and there is nothing stating that the image is not under the OGL. EXIFs can be and often are plainly wrong—the metadata could have been added prior to release under the OGL and not updated. —innotata 02:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • If you had of read the "(See the file's EXIF data)", you'll would have noticed it. DR's are not the end of the World, they are used to discuss whether or not the file is free or not and in this case I felt that it isn't. Since the photograph doesn't state whether it is free or not, regardless of a broad site statement, the EXIF data has greater weight. As per MOD Copyright Statement, it's likely this photograph's licence falls under Crown Copyright MOD News Licence. Unless you can find it with a green tick in the repository, I'll stand by my position. Bidgee (talk) 02:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • There is a broad site statement: "All content is available under the Open Government License, except where otherwise stated." Do you dispute this fact?? The image is not from Defence Imagery, and instead was been published on gov.uk, which is clearly freely licensed. —innotata 04:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In [6] this image is marked as "Corporal Richard Cave RLC, Crown Copyright/MOD 2012", and in [7] it reads that this blog is under Crown copyright but it links to an deleted page (but archived in [8]). On the contrary on the Homepage of MOD it says that "All content is available under the Open Government Licence, except where otherwise stated" and on its right said says "Crown Copyright" so it appears that an image could be OGL and Crown Copyright at the same time, per [9]. Tm (talk) 03:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the nature of the license, content under the OGL has to be Crown Copyright (or something very similar—Crown-owned copyright or local government copyright), and that's the case here. Presumably, it was not released under the OGL until it was copied over to gov.uk. —innotata 04:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
reading this I see the statement from the MOD "All content is available under the Open Government Licence, except where otherwise stated" the key point is highlighted as the image is tagged Crown copyright/MOD2012 then obviously the licensing has been otherwise stated and would therefore be under Crown copyright..we cant make presumptions about licensing if its not clearly released under a free license then must be deleted... Gnangarra 11:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing on the website that says that this isn't under the OGL. And again, most content under the OGL is under Crown copyright, so just the statement "Crown copyright" is not a contradiction. The only contradiction is in the EXIF, not the webpage: "This image may be used for current news purposes only. It may not be used, reproduced or transmitted for any other purpose without first obtaining a copyright license available from the MoD, Crown Copyright Unit." EXIFs do not magically reflect every release of rights on a work, and this one was not updated. So you'll see incorrect copyright statements on some images from the MOD's website that clearly say they're under the OGL, other U.K. agencies, and even on American government photos. I'll ask for more opinions on this, though. —innotata 15:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that a mod (Bidgee maybe) contact HM Government and ask for a definitive ruling on this - it will keep coming up - OGL is potentially an important resource for Wikimedia and we neede to use it correctly and not upset HM Government who have been very good to us so far. Rcbutcher (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked about this via gov.uk. Now, we might not get a good response from some quarters, since most people don't know a lot about copyright (in the British government too), as previous queries have shown. According to Jdforrester, who previously worked on something connected to the OGL at the National Archives, the government's intention at least was for virtually all works of the U.K. government to be under the OGL automatically, including photographs by the MoD by putting the National Archives in charge of licensing. The public websites about this aren't crystal clear as we found out earlier: it looks like for most agencies, TNA decides the copyright status of their works, and they're all under the OGL regardless of what they say; it's not clear if the MoD is one of them. So, I've again asked James if he can clear this up. —innotata 16:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This has been published under a free licence ("Open Government Licence") by the copyright holder ("Crown Copyright"). Nothing wrong here. De728631 (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: image in this resolution not available at the source link, Exif notice contradicts the website notice. BTW it may have been under OGL 2.0, not 1.0 Denniss (talk) 08:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This mural seems to be located in France, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, as you may know, owner is not equal to author. Actually, we aren't even sure whether the painter is the original author, as the painting may be a close copy of a photo. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of that. But the "Demeure du Chaos" (or Adobe of Chaos in English) is a collective work where it's sometimes hard to know who did what, and the owner of the place is part of the artists + a specialist in art selling, so I don't think he would publish artwork with such licences if he wasn't allowed to do so. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Official flickr account published it as freely licensed FASTILY 20:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from MarcRic's flickr

[edit]

Marcric (talk · contribs) has uploaded a number of rocket drawings sourced to his own flickr profile. Because he has colorized them, google image search is mostly not helpful in identifying other copies ... but the rightmost rocket at File:UR-100 200 700 900 shapes.png, for example, I found at http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/ur900.htm crediting (c) Mark Wade. File:Atea1 rocket shape-01.jpg even has a URL right on the rocket itself. So I have very little confidence that he actually drew these rockets. A few of the simpler ones might be PD-ineligible, but otherwise, unless a good explanation is forthcoming, something needs to be done. Not also that there's a whole slew of these ... I have only gone through the first page (150) of his uploads, but there's a LOT more if anyone is feeling bored. --UserB (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 20:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Bordered Without border In deletion request Original
File:Flag of Algeria (bordered).svg File:Flag of Algeria.svg
File:Flag of Altai Republic (bordered).svg File:Flag of Altai Republic.svg File:Flag of Altai Republic (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Bahrain (bordered).svg File:Flag of Bahrain.svg
File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1992-1998 (bordered).svg File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998).svg File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1992-1998 (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Bulgaria (bordered).svg File:Flag of Bulgaria.svg
File:Flag of Bulgaria with border.svg File:Flag of Bulgaria.svg File:Flag of Bulgaria with border.svg
File:Flag of Chile (bordered).svg File:Flag of Chile.svg
File:Chinese Taipei Olympic Flag (bordered).svg File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Olympic games.svg
File:Flag of county Kildare - bordered.svg File:Flag of county Kildare.svg File:Flag of county Kildare - bordered.svg
File:Flag of Cyprus (bordered).svg File:Flag of Cyprus.svg
File:Flag of Cyprus with border.svg File:Flag of Cyprus.svg File:Flag of Cyprus with border.svg
File:Flag of Czech Republic with border.svg File:Flag of the Czech Republic.svg File:Flag of Czech Republic with border.svg
File:Flag of the Czech Republic (bordered).svg File:Flag of the Czech Republic.svg
File:Flag of Czechoslovakia (bordered).svg File:Flag of the Czech Republic.svg
File:Flag of England (bordered).svg File:Flag of England.svg
File:Flag of Estonia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Estonia.svg
File:Flag of the Faroe Islands (bordered).svg File:Flag of the Faroe Islands.svg File:Flag of the Faroe Islands (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Finland (bordered).svg File:Flag of Finland.svg
File:Flag of First Slovak Republic 1939-1945 bordered.svg File:Flag of First Slovak Republic 1939-1945.svg
File:Flag of France (bordered).svg File:Flag of France.svg
File:Flag of Georgia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Georgia.svg
File:Flag of Georgia with border.svg File:Flag of Georgia.svg File:Flag of Georgia with border.svg
File:Flag of Greenland (bordered).svg File:Flag of Greenland.svg File:Flag of Greenland (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Guernsey (bordered).svg File:Flag of Guernsey.svg File:Flag of Guernsey (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Hungary with border.svg File:Flag of Hungary.svg File:Flag of Hungary with border.svg
File:Flag of Indonesia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Indonesia.svg
File:Flag of Ireland (bordered).svg File:Flag of Ireland.svg
File:Flag of Ireland with border.svg File:Flag of Ireland.svg File:Flag of Ireland with border.svg
File:Flag of Israel (bordered).svg File:Flag of Israel.svg
File:Flag of Japan (bordered).svg File:Flag of Japan.svg
File:Flag of Jersey (bordered).svg File:Flag of Jersey.svg File:Flag of Jersey (bordered).svg
File:Flag of the Kingdom of France (1814-1830) with border.svg File:Flag of the Kingdom of France (1814-1830).svg File:Flag of the Kingdom of France (1814-1830) with border.svg
File:Flag of Lebanon (bordered).svg File:Flag of Lebanon.svg File:Flag of Lebanon (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Madagascar (bordered).svg File:Flag of Madagascar.svg
File:Flag of Malta (bordered).svg File:Flag of Malta.svg
File:Flag of Malta with border.svg File:Flag of Malta.svg File:Flag of Malta with border.svg
File:Flag of Mexico (bordered).svg File:Flag of Mexico.svg
File:Flag of Monaco (bordered).svg File:Flag of Monaco.svg
File:Flag of Monaco with border.svg File:Flag of Monaco.svg File:Flag of Monaco with border.svg
File:Flag of Netherlands with border.svg File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg File:Flag of Netherlands with border.svg
File:Flag of the Netherlands Antilles (bordered).svg File:Flag of the Netherlands Antilles (1986-2010).svg File:Flag of the Netherlands Antilles (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Oman (bordered).svg File:Flag of Oman.svg
File:Flag of Pakistan (bordered).svg File:Flag of Pakistan.svg
File:Flag of Poland (bordered).svg File:Flag of Poland.svg
File:Flag of Poland (bordered 2).svg File:Flag of Poland.svg
File:Flag of Poland with border.svg File:Flag of Poland.svg
File:Flag of Qatar (bordered).svg File:Flag of Qatar.svg
File:Flag of Russia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Russia.svg
File:Flag of Russian Federation (bordered).svg File:Flag of Russia.svg
File:Flag of Singapore (bordered).svg File:Flag of Singapore.svg
File:Flag of Slovakia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Slovakia.svg
File:Flag of Slovenia (bordered).svg File:Flag of Slovenia.svg
File:Flag of South Korea (bordered).svg File:Flag of South Korea.svg
File:Flag of Taliban (bordered).svg File:Flag of Taliban.svg
File:Flag of Wales (bordered).svg File:Flag of Wales.svg
File:Flag of Wales 2 (bordered).svg File:Flag of Wales.svg File:Flag of Wales 2 (bordered).svg
File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg File:Flag of Wales.svg File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg

All these images are duplicates. They are old, now is available the possibility of using the parameter "border". --Metrónomo (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  • Well, I thought they were obsolete six years ago. FWIW, please see a deletion nomination at en where my request to delete one of the bordered images was objected to because it was used in the flagicon template. I clicked on a several of these images and a LOT of uses of these images still exist, so before deleting anything, the uses need to be cleaned up and any templates that assume the existence of a (bordered) image need to be modified to instead use the Wikimarkup feature to generate a border. --UserB (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the reason is not enough, "would have a lot of work to replace them all". In the same way, there are here deletions request from these images that led to the deletion (example). If required to do cleanup work first, I offer to do it (where I can edit). Also this request is to determine whether these images should or should not be eliminated, rather than to determine when. --Metrónomo (talk) 04:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The only question is "Are they useful for an educational purpose in its broad meaning?" and the answer is a clear "Yes". In addition some of them are in use, which should mean an automatic 'keep'. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment. I'm nominating for being nonidentical duplicate files. --Metrónomo (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. I created some flags as a precaution for my wikibook Wikijunior Europa because flags with white areas were not displayed properly. The original versions work now using the "border" parameter. That concerns: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hungary, Ireland, Czech (as well as Vatican, see example above). I'll look whether other flags are concerned, too. As soon as the links are cleaned up the "wrong" flags may be deleted. -- Juetho (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Some files are used thousands of times, e.g. File:Flag of Bulgaria (bordered).svg. Cleanup may be done by a bot. -- Juetho (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Why is File:Flag of Slovakia (bordered).svg not included in this request? 213.54.169.42 18:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are too many, I'm tagging slowly. I have a very poor internet connection that I can't do much per day. --Metrónomo (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Nuke them all, we have the ability to add borders without this. Fry1989 eh? 18:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • These are now entirely redundant; there is a simpler (and more scalable) way to add borders. They are also problematic in that they have a tendency to diverge from their unbordered counterparts: see several examples above where subsequent changes to the unbordered version have not been reflected in the bordered one. Delete, but not until all uses of them have been replaced. Alkari (?), 12 June 2013, 22:53 UTC
 Keep File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg should be kept though, it's not related to the border images. Fry1989 eh? 03:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Yes, they should be deleted, because they are duplicates of existing images, just with borders. But these borders are totally unuseful, because the border can be added using the parameter "border". But the images are still widely used, so before deleting, someone needs co clean-up all the pages where they are used and to switch to the use of unbordered flags, adding "border" parameter. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please specify an exhaustive and complete list of the places that use at least one file that is to be deleted. This list must specify Wikimedia projects, all other sites that may use the file, and printed media that has ever been published that refers to it. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Delete and mass replace with their unbordered equivalents (with a border specified, if that's possible). I agree with Fry about File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg, it should be kept. It has a different rendering. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Please avoid duplicates.--Antemister (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There is no Bot to replace. User:CommonsDelinker dont work since 2013-05-10 --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  16:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. These images are not duplicates. And they are in use. Geagea (talk) 00:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete These are nothing but duplicates now. Per Alkari: entirely redundant; there is a simpler (and more scalable) way to add borders. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep You have to tink about much wider. The argument, wikimedia-software can display a border itself is correct. But files here are not only for wikimedia-software-related projects. See Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use: „The emphasis here is on realistic utility, either for one of the Wikimedia projects or for some other educational use.“ Or at this link, too: „Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content [...] to all. It acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation, but you do not need to belong to one of those projects to use media hosted here.“ So, all users, most of software, many homepages, blogs etc. that were not hosted by a wikimedia-software cannot add a border. So, if I as a teacher (or my pupils) want to make a presentation on white background or white paper need a border. If this files were deleted, we have to re-add it. Unnecessary work. The files listed above are educational and they are needed (not only within wikimedia-projects, but outside, too). So there are only reasons to not delete this files. --Quedel (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per Alkari, but keep File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There are people outside wikipedia who reuse the files and might need the border. Plus the memory space is gone anyway.--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


Temporary decision

  • Kept We have to keep all in-use flags for now as we currently have no way for a proper on-wiki replacement due to the CommonsDelinker failure. Also fiddling with flags is highly problematic because of usage in protected templates or strange infoboxes sometimes requiring them to have a specific name. Flags should be individually checked/replaced and nominated for deletion once Delinker (or a properly working replacement) are available to us. I will not close this DR for now to enable further discussion. And a comment: I don't see a need to delete the bordered flags, they could still co-exist as a variant but all on-wiki usage should be changed to standard flag with border option (if possible, depends on wiki usage).--Denniss (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1) Technical reasons replacement not easy without CommonsDelinker and there's a good chance to break some flag templates 2) No real reason to delete them as they may still have use. One may want to check the duplicate bordered flags - don't see a need for two almost identical bordered flags. Denniss (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]