Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 29th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked with website, copyvio? Mjrmtg (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, yoinked from website, copyviol Infrogmation (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.galgadot.co.uk/photos/212643-Gal-Gadot/ Copyright 2009 - 2013 © Gal Gadot Fan Website. Gal Gadot photos, images and video. Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, photo yoinked from web, blatant copyright violation, false info -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg was renamed File:IL Highway 50 06 2012-03-17.jpg. Due to a mixup, it was renamed back to File:Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg and this redirect was created. I have requested the move to be reversed on the 404 page. @Efrat (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Renamed. This is a Deletion request, use {{Rename}}. Alan (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked with website, copyvio? Mjrmtg (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Infrogmation. Copyvio. Alan (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3D computer graphics: Impossible for the author to have died 70 years ago. El Grafo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. Copyvio. Alan (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of a high-quality photograph, probably not "own work". El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - here in 2010, and higher resolution Эlcobbola talk 17:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, copyvio ? Can be found on many wallpaper websites like http://nevseoboi.com.ua/oboi-wallpapers/puteshestvie/6631-types-of-the-saarbrucken-city-35-oboev.html Pleclown (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Elcobbola Alan (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of http://bucket.lanacion.com.ar/anexos/fotos/61/1623261w620.jpg from La Nación newspaper, Buenos Aires, Argentina Alexf (talk) 23:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Way too complex for {{PD-ineligible}}. See w:Special:PermanentLink/557397351 where it is listed as unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's not PD-ineligible, I had to use that to work around CommonsHelper to bring it to Commons under PD-NZ which does apply. Do you often instantly nominate transfered images without even waiting for their descriptions to be cleaned up and proper licenses added???? Most people at least have the courtesy to wait for that process to be done.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 19:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now it has a template which says that this flag, created in 1968, was published before 1963. Could you indicate where it was published before 1963? Also, for {{PD-US}}, you would have to indicate a publication before 1946. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The En-Wiki version of PD-NZ and the Commons version are different, the Commons version of the license does not require a PD-US explanation. The coat of arms is older then the flag, they were granted previously. The flag itself is too simple, the coat of arms is the only thing that matters. Fry1989 eh? 19:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You always have to show that something is free in the United States. How do I verify that this representation of the coat of arms is older than the flag? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, you do not. There are thousands, if not millions, of images on Commons without a US-specific license or US-specific reasoning for their PD-"ness". Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Item is obviously covered by copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of score — Stas1995 (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Personal image uploaded by indef-blocked user. INeverCry 18:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DVD-/Bluray-Cover → most probably copyrighted El Grafo (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

копиво http://contents.img.rugion.ru/_i/sites/v1.ru/rich2010/c/34/bondarenko.jpgRedboston 20:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

копиво: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivsr9SsQnxaaAM3PhLG1cAxdkEEUV6HJiVPrSj-xtZZuImjFJgenkPMO0lq99tfaJV1-3mdrKwUZim2l_1ZlyJoZ6H5lTXnyBeYYniut3C2T9O5G7sKRw6rzqOhUfZQjpuuxAzvU1KTuuZ5lsdhAHxMSZR54HTjPuwU28KcJETL5OTj2vDfUU_1He6QYDbVAYOJnjs5xIzSwUNUZIF41xles39_122dmXNSESN9IALos8JKwg3tHsKD3Kq-b1mhOx8G-cY5PgRYjNjliM4JOyNMGGApLbnEA41xHOGy-GWxETIoH8CG58cnVYGcaoEgjPePR8DkHa9WRgQbSMgajTh9yP76UyGbjuaKX2Xdbp5fcpjA5VdzwXOApI594HGrLlba3xeOcdfFk9Wt2n85xjpG54g3jtPNbGasLf63lNzn1JiEYuTMzVVqNoe1ZJ9V40zteVcnVgdXOXVmNvQ3S8H5CQvU1AMrJjRzP9TCFymfRsQtqmHDxfeQoVyhmqxzJgI1tIOAnIwq7eBQks-abSwgSJWSz2r0B7ZYDCDxl2VKKqL0AKpnQvkMPd77BfbZfEJ1o_1BjtXOnVxdtOdIHTq1OY64jrIHbnrdvye5FryIUBq5Nuv5uzZTqJYHb8Kao2bGAe5K-t8_1rpS78YsJ6xb2Jl5Exrn1FnZwwzTgtSBRhm11T1e-Qm1V4EJkuFz3mpSHvFRwTKT7oDA9WsuECGRenmhwimn9U4M9A4qp4fh-VjYvopxbOdN1WO8kLWH0axxgBRfI5TSad8oFAf03Op1rsKCuNcYFEdZolihwlay_1Tj8zxx0gNhANnD_1_1Mm3wv3IxrnCD5suuhPO85CpHBcjXMjW00EpKjgEB3wRhF6vEFJEy-1S6tzpn3Mxg7k2PkuIYCIrf2T3mhecv9P2ogLLW3-5HTXoSz948Wns2PtZ_1GSOx0jzEtZxlWD8WDBYP3RWUYXLeZRhXftXpOh33jFStfDS9JcDqvj6Pb6LTTyeXDLCRvw75XuBtaxsDWdVG3S2oUDGgPVJPV57x8hliunfDLOz4mcJMRA0MXv2zO4GyVsx7mxdjR7kSgZB9HYE9E_18S2eqokOS_1W8KqgIWPJu2qRBgnXf2_1WTGk7haJOvnnFzf3rjzsW4TDKQpzTAOmLG1dzNacpGh5KK9pbAZnkUAEihMMHKe0Td6nu80XoDdkN1ceJia12KeVV9DbSWAFTJC-Jxtfy50TOWwKGXyZk_1ezJBZX1AY30TjXYSSIemiX8GRA-WdSkMuU1xmGGab_1vRJVoKbVwdiIBV33V6CWlBXBFCTFPTRF9S7Ci70Ltwebhb_10gk8Ikot2XR27qByyUVq6hZdmq65fHrWZlUVoU_16klGVEQtnT-3zLDOxcsg0XET6mgaJNaqlb12XROj4M4IsUEYnLPTzLzz1WkqyS6IV1YmWxdapxEgRedboston 20:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

коммерческий логотип, несвободный — Redboston 20:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree logo, re-uploaded 2 days after deletion from Commons Taivo (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Redeleted, false license. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan from 1970 – I guess there's no chance that this is in the Public Domain? El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken from Google. The uploader clearly does not hold the copyright over the picture in this case. Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Molly Polly.jpg

out of scope, personal image Pleclown (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all --JuTa 22:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a newspaper with missing/wrong license, source, date and author (en:Salvador Del Rosario is the person in the image, so he can't be the author/photographer). El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a newspaper with missing/wrong license, source, date and author (en:Salvador Del Rosario is one of the persons in the image, so he can't be the author/photographer). El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Noelbabar

[edit]

User Noelbabar has uploaded these files:

They are all newspaper scans from 1982 and so newspaper copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speed delete Copyright violation MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoffmann died in 1945, the painting is under German copyright until 31 Dec 2015, file can and should be restored 1 Jan 2016 Museumsinsulaner (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: As per nom, deleting as part of upload cleanup, undelete in 2016 russavia (talk) 09:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational use - out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitmap copy of : Chaouia-Ouardigha.svg. False attribution. Indif (talk) 04:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue from 1949, still under copyright. Artist fi:Alpo Sailo died in 1955. COM:FOP#Finland is for buildings only. MKFI (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:FOP#Finland not for statues Ezarateesteban 22:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dharmadhyaksha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uncropped here

Sending to DR because the enwp records show an upload date of 3 September 2010, around three months before the Times of India article Courcelles 05:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Ezarateesteban 22:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this Google-search somewhat unlikely own work of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architects are Louis Debrouwer et Pierre Drobecq. Pierre Drobecq died in 1944 and Louis Debrouwer in 1967. Not freedom of panorama in France. Hercule (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Mozambique. Mozambique copyright law instituted in 2001 states that copyright subsists for 70 years following completion for "works of applied art" which appears to cover stamps. --Cekli829 (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect is Jean Boissel, who died in 1951. Not freedom of panorama in France. Hercule (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Includes File:La Poste.jpg. --JuTa 17:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect is Jean Boissel, who died in 1951. Not freedom of panorama in France. Hercule (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Includes File:La Poste.jpg. --JuTa 17:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, we're not facebook Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, minor educational use Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio? i belive googlestreetview is (c)google Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational use Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 10:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 08:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution version of File:Six Nations survivors of War of 1812.jpg (unless I am missing something). Skeezix1000 (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad copy of File:Sprofanowany pomnik polskich profesorów we Lwowie..jpg Taivo (talk) 11:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational use Wer?Du?! (talk) 13:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://postcards.delcampe.com/page/item/id,66153463,var,Manila-PHILIPPINES-1900s-Post-Card-Normal-School-Women-Students,language,E.html; might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://thriftytraveller.wordpress.com/2011/04/26/walking-tour-of-old-manila-part-2-intramuros/ , might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://muog.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/intramuros-the-walled-city-of-manila/, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.flickr.com/photos/johntewell/6187731209/, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://philphilately.blogspot.de/2013/03/1963-philippine-folk-dances.html, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is mistaken for article namespace at Wikipedia, an advertisement of a non-notable person, and as such the photo is not of illustrational value in any topic. + personality rights issues 91.208.196.21 13:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC) This was nomintaed by me, just accidentally forgot to log in. Teemeah (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.de/2008/08/filipino-costumes.html, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.watawat.net/early_flags_and_symbols_-_1.html, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://filipinoforum.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4852&start=15&view=print, might be PD due to age or missing TOO, but is surely not own work of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=54334475, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader, as opposed to his claims. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, no realistic educational use, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality genitalia, Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo - FC Nantes' copyright violated Malpass93 (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple problems:

  • This image shows a 1936 statue by fi:Emil Cedercreutz (1879-1949). The statue enters the public domain in Finland in 2020 and in the United States in 2032. Photos of the statue can't be hosted on Commons without permission from the sculptor's heirs before 2032.
  • Although the photographer's contributions are in the public domain in Finland, there is no evidence that the photographer's copyright has expired in the United States. For example, this would require that the photo was published before 1 March 1989, but there is no information about the publication history of the photo.
  • There is a licence which states that "The downloadable photographs from the Wartime Photograph Archive can be used by anyone." However, it doesn't say that anyone can modify the photos, so we don't know whether the licence allows modification. Also, it isn't clear whether this is a perpetual licence or not. Stefan4 (talk) 17:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Miguеl (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Uploader's request. I do not believe anyway, that he is copyright holder, so we can delete that. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal file Pleclown (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal image, used for self-promotion Pleclown (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational value. Pleclown (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned periodical - see scanner EXIF and visual characteristics. All other user uploads are blantant copyvios claimed as own work (see talk page/deleted contribs) Эlcobbola talk 18:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Samuel Richardson by Joseph Highmore.jpg, which is higher quality and correctly licensed/sourced (nominated image claims to be "own work"; all other user's uploads are copyvios). Эlcobbola talk 18:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a scan or a photo of a document which most likely is copyrighted. Mys 721tx (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a scan or a photo of a document which most likely is copyrighted. Mys 721tx (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Majority of the screenshot is dedicated to thumbnails of copyrighted websites. Not de minimis. Can be re-created with only free pages ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work: at w:File:Ripu Daman giving the Award to Gambhir at the IPL.jpg it is claimed to be a TV screenshot. Stefan4 (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a place to advertise; also not really sure about the consent of the person Isderion (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a place for advertisement Isderion (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map already exists as File:LGBT adoption in the world.png. Fry1989 eh? 20:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are some differences though; do you know why? Is one more recent? Handcuffed (talk) 01:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We have one map that is constantly updated when things change. Some users are impatient however and "go it alone" uploading a separate map with the recent changes in the law. I've nominated dozens of these things, it's always the same. Fry1989 eh? 02:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay.  Delete then. Handcuffed (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A map for Latin America already exists as File:Gay Adoption South America.png. Fry1989 eh? 20:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikley to be the work of the uploader source found at http://nsa19.casimages.com/img/2010/11/21/101121063727994752.jpg at http://www.casimages.com also see http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=454006 MilborneOne (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads have been copyright images from others MilborneOne (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morsi & Abdullah Gül.jpg Kmeleon59 (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morsi & Abdullah Gül.jpg Kmeleon59 (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morsi & Abdullah Gül.jpg Kmeleon59 (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morsi & Abdullah Gül.jpg Kmeleon59 (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morsi & Abdullah Gül.jpg Kmeleon59 (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the image description, this photo comes from Hunter Darrouzet Photography, which claims "All content copyright © Hunter Darrouzet". There is no indication on the site that anything is released under a free license. – Quadell (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Not a media file, no allowable PDF content. Also copyright concerns with the photo. Rosenzweig τ 21:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this? Delete as non-notable logo. Rosenzweig τ 21:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:05, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus PD claims. Photo can also be found at https://www.myspace.com/michaelhutchence. Rosenzweig τ 22:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The same user has uploaded two more images:

All photos are unused. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused wothless photoshopped picture Taivo (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Not a media file, no allowable PDF content. Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this? Delete as non-notable logo. Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Please no advertising. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Somehow interesting photo, but I cannot think up, how to use it, and the subject is apparently non-notable rock duo. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who are these people? Delete as non-notable. Rosenzweig τ 22:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Chrome Cats Live.JPG. --Rosenzweig τ 22:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Not a media file, no allowable PDF content. Rosenzweig τ 22:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aren't album covers copvio? Mjrmtg (talk) 23:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, commons is not a personal photo gallery Mjrmtg (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared previously on the internet [1] High Contrast (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some text in (apparently) Chinese. Out of project scope: Not a media file, no allowable PDF content. Rosenzweig τ 23:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not look like own work, and the image is of such bad quality that it is hardly useful for anything. Rosenzweig τ 23:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not quite sure what this user intended with this image and the second "do not use" version. As it is, with no description, it's hardly useful anyway. Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It means I made a mistake. I do not want my images on Wikipedia:

I don't like it that you allow commercial use.

I don't like it when I am not able to remove my own picture. The point-of-no-return os very unclear.

Who do you think you are? Facebook? Twitter? Google+? Somewhere Wikipedia lost contact with decensy.

Besides images sold to customers and placed on Wikipedia by this customers I will not tollerate my images on Wikipedia.

It is a shame that Wikipedia has this policy. I wanted to support Wikipedia with a number of images, but with this set of rules you will get nothing.

Ko van Leeuwen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.123.106.213 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 30. Mai 2013‎ (UTC+02:00)

 Delete No proper licence. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Please see OTRS ticket 2013052910001205 and the trademark registration document at http://trademarks.justia.com/781/93/air-america-78193680.html .) It is highly debatable that this image is the work of the CIA. The CIA had a similar logo (you can see it on File:AirAmericaPilotCap.jpg) but this one is distinctly different (albeit based on the CIA one). I am not comfortable with claiming that this image is not protected by copyright. UserB (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'm sorry but it's pretty obvious that it is a derivate of the old Air America logo and with that not copyrightable. A trademark registration is not a condition for copyright. Who and what is written in that OTRS?--Sanandros (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Too old in the US. Fry1989 eh? 18:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy delete, also reqeusted via OTRS. FASTILY 06:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old slide, poor quality compared to digitals. Alternative shots are in Category:Waverley, NSW. 27.99.97.16 08:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://www.newseria.pl/news/h_wirth_prezes_kghm,p1910678918 (copyright violation) Michał Sobkowski (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of newseria.pl has just sent a proper agreement to OTRS. Polimerek (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS will restore the file once they process the permisisons email. FASTILY 06:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Belgium

Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

These images show a building by w:André Waterkeyn. Belgian law doesn't allow photos of buildings without the permission of the architect unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years.

Stefan4 (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

No FOP in Belgium

russavia (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

No freedom of panorama in Belgium.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

No FOP in Belgium

russavia (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

The architect died less than 70 years ago.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Atomium

Derivative works of texts around and/or inside Atomium.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nothing copyrightable shown in the image: all of them fall under {{PD-ineligible}} and/or {{PD-text}}. No FOP-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no chance that something as long as this is {{PD-ineligible}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Stefan, I'm at least as respectful of literary copyright as you are, but I'm not sure about these. Although presented in sentence form, they amount to lists of names (in the first and third cases) and lists of dimensions (in the second case). I think these would fail copyright in the USA -- I don't really have any idea about the TOO for literary works in Belgium, but I think we can keep them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, PD-text or PD-ineligible --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Belgium.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Belgium.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free architecture.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in Belgium --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the source country. The author of the artwork is ja:中村晋也 (1926 - )

Nightingale (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the source country. The author of the artwork is ja:中村晋也 (1926 - )

Nightingale (talk) 00:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in the source country. Unknown author to my knowledge. The statue was put up in 1989-12 ja:矢作橋

Nightingale (talk) 01:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This silver statue of en:Toyotomi Hideyoshi (ja:豊臣秀吉) at the Endoji shopping street (ja:円頓寺商店街) in Nagoya City was placed in 2013. [2] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This is not art. monument. KKPCW (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Djxvillain

[edit]

User Djxvillain has uploaded these files:

They are both unused personal files without description, their purpose is unclear. They are probably superseded by File:Qemu error.png; this is used file. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Mike9377

[edit]

User Mike9377 has uploaded these files:

All the uploader's other contributions are also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Леонид Лисичкин

[edit]

User Леонид Лисичкин has uploaded these files:


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdolfoFerrer13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What are these? Delete as logo and calling cards of non-notable company.

Rosenzweig τ 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axel III (talk · contribs)

[edit]

very likely copyvio see https://www.facebook.com/pages/Zara-Whites/453340181403835

Wer?Du?! (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chiara Gomez Me (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is this? Delete as photos (one a montage) of non-notable person.

Rosenzweig τ 22:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daido082 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in the source country. Not acceptable unless free license is provided by the author of the artwork.

Nightingale (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diyako_kazm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. The user took images from books, websites and uploaded them as his/her own work.

Takabeg (talk) 09:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Diyako kazm (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 17:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Diyako kazm (talk · contribs)

This uploader uploaded many copyrightviolations and many where connected with com:LL. Uploads with different EXIF, different quality's, plain copyrightviolations you name it. Those other files should be deleted under the com:PCP.

Natuur12 (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iccic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyrighted Disney characters. copyvio

Nightingale (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy Logan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jojagal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This seems to be a current museum poster or brochure which was scanned. I don't see any indication that the uploader was authorized to do so or that the museum relinquished its rights.

Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matsudadaisuke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted character, "Kumamon", copyvio; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kumamon

Nightingale (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nawasiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly likely copyvio. same photo found on Twitter. https://twitter.com/yasuyuki_info

Nightingale (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SK2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted character. This is not acceptable unless acceptable free license is provided.

Nightingale (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Semsem hi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Hazem Mohamed Emam and Shenawy have metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TapChivas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Posters are not permanently installed.

Jespinos (talk) 23:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Sohaib NEF

[edit]

A bunch of files uploaded with {{PD-art}} without parameters. None of them qualifies for PD-art, and none of them looks like it might be out of copyright for any other reason. --El Grafo (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free painting. Eleassar (t/p) 08:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The mascot may be free, but the rest of the work is not. Works of fine art are protected for 70 years in the source country (Slovenia) (Article 5, No. 8; Article 59) and this is a recently created work of fine art. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
However, this seems to be a new application of what is considered subject to copyright, as far as Wikimedia Commons is concerned. Is there anything in that law that would suggest that "fine art" provisions specifically cover 3rd-party photographs of things such as body-painting, beach sandcastles, or crop circles? AnonMoos (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The act does not explicitly mention body art as one of the copyrighted things, but does include temporary things in Article 5 and does not mention body art or other transitory works among free works, discussed in Article 9. Works that are free in Slovenia are the following: a) ideas, principles, discoveries; b) official legislative, administrative and judicial texts; c) folk literary and artistic creations. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Folk" means "traditional". This is not traditional art of Slovenia. For some examples of traditional body painting, see e.g. Category:Puli Kali etc. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Eleassar - Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 06:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks very much like a scan from a book or something like that, so the uploader might be the scanner but is probably not the original author of the map. El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Извините, не знаю как изменить источник этого изображения. Просьба не удалять — Preceding unsigned comment added by Светлана Ворон (talk • contribs) 09:01, 3 June 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

translation: Sorry, I do not know how to change the source of the image. Please do not delete --El Grafo (talk) 09:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 06:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3D computer graphics: Impossible for the author to have died 70 years ago. El Grafo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy|The copyrights were misunderstood}}— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohaib NEF (talk • contribs) 10:06, 29 May 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you would like to have the file deleted speedily, you need to put the "{{speedy|The copyrights were misunderstood}}" on the file description page, not here. Greetings, --El Grafo (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 06:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted sculpture from 1966, included in the image on purpose, therefore not DM. Work by Vladimir Štoviček (1896-1989).[3] Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 11:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crop the statue out and  Keep the image, IMO. — Yerpo Eh? 11:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, it won't be very usable. However, if you wish, crop it. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My wishes don't factor here. I made a constructive suggestion on what can be done to preserve at least a part of a fellow Wikipedian's effort (which I may not currently be able to). We are doing what we can here to enable presentation of encyclopedic content from our country as far as legally possible, right? — Yerpo Eh? 18:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your suggestion. I appreciate it and I also appreciate the effort of the uploader, but the photographer's identity has no bearing on the copyright status of the image. Unfortunately, I also don't have any more possibility to crop the image than you do, because I'm working from a public computer. Therefore, if the uploader cares about this image, he will have to do it. He has been notified about this DR. In any case, I think that a crop wouldn't be very useful and a better image of this house can be created (if I go to Krško in the nearby future, I'll make it, otherwise sooner or later someone else will). In the meantime, File:Valvasor-Mencinger House, Krško.jpg can be used to illustrate it. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Cropped out statue FASTILY 06:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United States Stefan4 (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 06:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=87825014&postcount=18967, might be PD due to age, but is surely not own work of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-old. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept, but tagged nsd FASTILY 06:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: 'The aim of Wikimedia Commons is to provide a media file repository: that makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all.... The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".' What possible educational value or knowledge does this file provide? This is yet another case of someone abusing Commons to satisfy their exhibitionism. — Scott talk 14:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No realistically educational use is possible. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Definitely in scope, shows the male body as it's cycling. I could see it used for kinesiology. Certainly not much different (except in artistic quality) than a Muybridge animation. Handcuffed (talk) 21:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per Taivo and Mattbuck. As amusing as this gif is, it is entirely uneducational. Yet another case that highlights the need for urgent commons reform. And as Matt says, this is only one of thousands of useless penis images uploaded daily. And not a particularly special one at that -- Hillbillyholiday
    Someone uploaded a useless image. We get that 1000 times a day. Why does this one mean anything special, other than it having a penis? -mattbuck (Talk) 06:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To me this shows at least two things: a) The search engine is mental here. b) These sort of images shouldn't be making it onto commons until they've been checked. By qualified professionals perhaps? -- Hillbillyholiday
It obviously means something to you Matt. I found the gif on your page. -- Hillbillyholiday
Those pages are created by bots scanning new uploads for sexuality categories. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Useful how? Fitness-freak fapping-fodder? -- Hillbillyholiday

Deleted: Commons is not pornhub FASTILY 06:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange permission : "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" with no OTRS ticket El ComandanteHasta ∞ 16:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software; the text is copyrightable as is the apple, which is probably Apple's copyright Prosfilaes (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 06:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:EFY iOS Jailbreak software.png

Spam 134.108.63.44 09:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also m:Vandalism_reports#de:User:Maragon220. --MF-W 13:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - either not self-made (see watermarks) or just uploaded for advertizing. --Denniss (talk) 11:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a painting of a person who died in 1940. It is quite likely not the uploader's own work from 2008 as claimed, but more likely somebody else's work from when the person was alive or recently dead. Given the depicted person's year of death 1940, the author could have lived well beyond 1942, which would make the painting still protected by copyright Rosenzweig τ 21:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The original painting is my own property. --Bizarria (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That may well be, but the physical possession of a painting does not make one also the owner of the copyrights to it. Who painted it and when? --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The painting was painted in 1935, the painter is unknown, he is surely dead becuse 70 years have passed, the copyright doesn't exist any more.--Bizarria (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is the painter really "unknown" in a legal sense or is it just that you don't know who painted it? A person who lived in 1935 could very well still have lived in 1960. Copyright ends 70 years after the death of the author. --Rosenzweig τ 22:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information but I know that paitings owners, are also owners of copyrigth.

It's so late, now! Good night!--Bizarria (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I know that paitings owners, are also owners of copyrigth": That is not the case. At least not automatically, you'd have to acquire those rights separately. --Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Rosenzweig. Owning a work of art does not make you the copyright holder FASTILY 06:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos take by the Salt Lake County Sheriff’s Office are not "work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties" nor are they "work of a United States Department of Justice", as the uploader clams under the chosen licenses. There is no evidence that a US Government employee took these images, instead of a Salt Lake County employee. Salt Lake County Sheriff’s Office mugshot are copyrighted images. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 21:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office a part of the overall "United States Government"? although at two different levels of government. Both a salt lake county employee and a federal US government employee are really part of the same public sector which usually doesn't copyright mugshot images, as mugshots of other famous people prove. Plus the case BDM did end up in a Federal district court so any mugshot and/or documents used before all went on to be used by the US Justice department, hence becoming its property. Wombat24 (talk) 02:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 06:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared previously on the internet [4] High Contrast (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The uploader left me a note on my talk page. He claims to be the copyright holder of this image. I think this is a COM:OTRS-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 06:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich bin auf diesem Foto abgebildet und ich möchte nicht, dass ein Foto von mir auf dieser Seite enthalten ist Andreperso (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Du scheinst mir jedoch eine relative Person der Zeitgeschichte zu sein. Zudem müsstest du nachweisen, dass du auch der bist, der du vorgibst zu sein, am besten über Commons:OTRS/de oder de:Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung. --Isderion (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel that your portrait should not be used within the article at german-language Wikipedia ("auf dieser Seite"), I recommend that you suggest the intended change there, as Commons does not editorialize other Wikimedia projects. If you generally object to your picture being stored at Commons, it might be helpful if you give some explanation why the image intrudes your privacy rights, although it seems to have been made at a public function with you being in an official role as jury member and although you generally could be considered a notable person, having a leading editorial position at a public broadcast channel. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 23:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Schreitmüller ist eine Person des Zeitgeschehens, damit ist das Recht am eigenen Bild eingeschränkt, da es mit dem Informationsbedürfnis der Allgemeinheit abgewogen werden muss. Im Internet sind mehrere Fotos der Person verfügbar. Demnach ist das Bild nicht zu löschen. --Usien Max (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Das Bild ist auch nicht abwertend in irgendeiner Art also gibt es keinen Grund zur Löschung. --Denniss (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mein Benutzerkonto inzwischen von Wikipedia verifizieren lassen, bin es also selbst, der hier abgebildet ist. Und ich ich glaube kaum, dass ich eine Person der Zeitgeschichte bin als TV-Redakteur und nebenamtlicher Professor. Zumal laut Wikipedia die Unterscheidung zwischen relativer und absoluter Person der Zeitgeschichte durch ein BGH-Urteil als obsolet erachtet werden kann. Auf den persönlichen Seiten von ARTE http://www.google.de/imgres?q=schreitm%C3%BCller&hl=fr&biw=1107&bih=578&tbm=isch&tbnid=zWhQ7endDcV4nM:&imgrefurl=http://www.arte.tv/fr/andreas-schreitmueller/2152916,CmC%3D6816330.html&docid=DUHmvdLfe1dDdM&imgurl=http://www.arte.tv/fr/6816134,property%253DimageData,v%253D2,CmPart%253Dcom.arte-tv.www.gif&w=720&h=406&ei=GLmvUdGWE7Kb0wWhj4DgBQ&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=63&page=1&tbnh=129&tbnw=230&start=0&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:9,s:0,i:108&tx=143&ty=75 und der Universität Konstanz http://www.litwiss.uni-konstanz.de/fachgruppen/medienwissenschaft/personal/detailseite-personal/schreitmueller-andreas-440/10688/41084/ ist keine Abbildung von mir zu finden. Andere Fotos im Internet sind - wie das Foto im Wikipedia-Eintrag - ohne mein Einverständnis eingestellt worden. Die Veranstaltung beim Filmfest München 2012, bei der das Foto entstanden ist, war keine öffentliche Veranstanltung wie etwa der Deutsche Filmpreis. Die Teilnahme war nur auf Einladung möglich und es gab keine Einverständniserklärung der Anwesenden zum Verzicht auf das Recht am eigenen Bild. Ich bitte daher um Löscung des Fotos.

Die Bescheidenheit ehrt, aber bei einem Hauptabteilungsleiter eines öffentlich-rechtlichen Senders, der gleichzeitig als Stiftungsratsvorsitzender einer staatlich finanzierten Kulturstiftung fungiert, Träger eines hohen französischen Ordens ist und zumindest gelegentlich in Medieninterviews und Podiumsdiskussionen als Experte auftritt, fällt es mir schwer, eine Löschung auch bei hoher Bewertung des Persönlichkeitsrechts zu unterstützen. Das Foto entstand ja zudem offenbar während der Rede als Juryvorsitzender eines hochdotierten Filmpreises und nicht im persönlichen oder gar privaten Umfeld. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason given to delete FASTILY 20:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can a 1943 photo with unknown author be an "own work" and at the same time PD-old with the author being dead at least 70 years? Obviously, there's something wrong here, the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Unless the copyright situation can be satisfactorily resolved. Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The person in the photo is my father in law, it's my work because I restaured it throgh photoshop.--Bizarria (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That does not make it your work in a legal sense. The author is the photographer, who is not named. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I asked to get information,the author is the father,Edoardo Bocchini Padiglione, dead during the war in 1943.--Bizarria (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That would be the grandfather of your wife then? Please write this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ettore Bocchini Padiglione.jpg. I guess we normally accept photos from relatives as having permission, but you'd have to choose another license tag then. A CC license perhaps. Perhaps Template:PD-Italy, but I'm not sure if this is a "simple" photograph suitable for that license tag. A CC license would be better. --Rosenzweig τ 21:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Impossible licensing: it can't be licensed pd-old if you updated it, since you the uploader have not been dead for 70+ years right? ;] Feel free to re-upload the file, but pick out a Creative Commons or GFDL license ok? FASTILY 20:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, unused image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 18:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Commentyou might wanna deepen more into the Sinterklaas festivities in The Netherlands and or Belgium. this is a picture from me as being a "black jack" i know it's diifficult to expain this in english as others might not know this festivity in the Ntherlands and or belgium around the 5th of december this total festivity runs ussually 4 weeks before the 5th december. not to be mistaken by christmas and santa claus, hereby a dutch page about the sinterkaas festuvity's: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinterklaas so i myself don't see the problem Ricodol74 (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Whatever you decide, the same decision should be made for File:Ik als Norberto.jpg also. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It seems that you either make this request because you either don't understand what Sinterklaas is or feel like something else is up with the pictures, I then here by wanna aks and say that before anything is happening to these pictures to please first ask what is not understandable about my explanation about myself as zwartepiet (Blackjack this is a direct translation in English which is difficult to explain) if you read the sinterkaas page i sended in my previous comment you might understand it better, if not i do urge you to ask what is not understandable Ricodol74 (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy delete: out of scope, unless someone can figure out what this is and find a legitimate use for it FASTILY 19:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Features an image of a work by J. Plečnik (1872-1957), deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jože Plečnik. Eleassar (t/p) 07:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could the image be preserved if I would blurr out the regarding image? Otherwise I will just make new screenshot of the main page of the Slovene Wikipedia and then this image can be deleted. --Wiki13 talk 08:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem keeping this image if a new blurred revision is uploaded and the original one deleted. As far as I know, all other images are free. It would be welcome though if you also listed the licenses of the remaining images. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. I will blurr out the image which was deleted because it didn't met the COM:FOP in Slovenia. I'm going to try to find the autor of the other image in my screenshot, but thats going to be hard as it was a few months ago :P Regards, Wiki13 talk 08:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Found all the other big images in my screenshot and they are mentioned below the one for Wikimedia copyright. Will upload a new version soon to blur it out. --Wiki13 talk 09:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Blurring didn't seem to hide it. I just edited whole image out of the screenshot. Looks a bit weird now, but the violation should be gone if the image is purged by the servers of Wikimedia. --Wiki13 talk 09:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Every Wikipedia now shows it as white blank space. Only the image on the description page doesn't seem to purge. I think we'll need to wait sometime before it happens. I'll ask an administrator to delete older versions. --Wiki13 talk 10:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: old versions removed FASTILY 19:55, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those are photographs by British explorer en:Wilfred Thesiger, who died in 2003. Info on their respective museum pages here and here. Said museum knows nothing about the claimed CC licenses, but instead states "© Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford". The photos were apparently taken in 1946 in Saudi-Arabia, but does that make them PD-Saudi Arabia as claimed? It is unsure when and where they were first published. If Thesiger published them, I guess he did so in the UK, not in Saudi-Arabia.

Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also includes:

Sorry, I don't speak English! But I have question, why the wikicommons doesn't Delete this pic File:SulaimanKhel.jpg by en:Wilfred Thesiger!!? It is from 12th October?!--Zahiralbarqi (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently because nobody saw it yet as the copyvio it is. I have included it now in this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 00:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the pics of Wilfred Thesiger is public ownership by Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority http://web.prm.ox.ac.uk/thesiger/index.php/thesigers-journeys/9-thesigers-journeys-in-arabia-hejaz-saudi-arabia-1946.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zahiralbarqi (talk • contribs) 04:03, 30. Mai 2013‎ (UTC+02:00)
This is a curious theory. I find nothing to support it in the link you offered. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can Can ask Pitt Rivers Museum about the license here (Mail)! ms-photo.colls@prm.ox.ac.uk

--حامد البلوي (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I? Either they declare a license acceptable for Commons publicly, or the uploader manages to get it documented via COM:OTRS. This is not the obligation of anybody else. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 20:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All other images of Arab celebrities uploaded by this user were copyvios grabbed from somewhere on the web. Even if Google Image Search didn't find those, they are very likely from some board, Twitter or Youtube profile; they should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Please also look for empty categories after file deletions.

I'm not sure if the same is true for the landscape etc. images by this user; while there were some copyvios in the past, at least some of them cold be legit. Just for the record, User:Memomoon seems to be a sock of this user.

Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Zahiralbarqi/logs (+/- 100 copyvios since 1st upload in 2012) = 2x blocked serial copyright violator: photoshopper, file cropper, watermark remover, social media grabber (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.), Panoramio grabber and also a local serial copyright violator since 2012 (per local user talk). Most (if not all) local "own works" uploads most likely all grabbed from Internet. See also previous mass DR above.

Ignoring 3-4 high res uploads taken with a Samsung GT-I9300 due to short time between taken and upload date and some files (logos, etc.) in PD or which would be in PD anyways.

Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (per above) all local uploads by this user which were transferred to Commons:

Gunnex (talk) 18:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Having reviewed all above files (inc prev requests), I've blocked the user indef (two prev. blocks) and deleted all copyvios. ~riley (talk) 00:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]