Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![117 File:Кафе"Апшалас" 2013-04-24 22-04.jpg](#File:Кафе"Апшалас"_2013-04-24_22-04.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low image quality means this is educationally unusable. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Cock sucking wanker bellend 2013-05-01 17-17.jpg
- File:Deccy doo 2013-05-01 17-14.jpg
- File:Sly hound 2013-05-01 17-13.jpg
- File:The Boxman 2013-05-01 17-12.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted as per nom; deleting part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored 2014. INeverCry 01:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 23:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work. All images are wallpapers, all are obtained from internet, presumably from a page dedicated to wallpapers. Possible copyvio.
- File:Wp 1920x1200 W8 flower.jpg
- File:Wp 1920x1200 W7fish.jpg
- File:Wp 1920x1200 Isolation.jpg
- File:Wp 1920x1200 W7.jpg
- File:Wp 1920x1200 Arius Logon.jpg
- File:Wp 1680x1050Consola.jpg
- File:Wp 1600x1200 AlienwareBlue.jpg
- File:Wp 1440x900 BlueNeon.jpg
- File:Wp 1440x900 W7.jpg
- File:Wp 1280x800 Blue.jpg
- File:Wp 1024x768 AbstractBlue.jpg
- File:Wp 1024x768 Nfs2U.jpg
- File:Wp 1157x895 Mac Leopard.jpg
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- imagenes descargadas y modificadas en color forma tono calidez luz etc --Mcemiaj (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hola. Modificar una imagen con los derechos reservados es una obra derivada, una evidente violación de copyright. Puedes leer más sobre este asunto en Commons:Trabajos_derivados. Las imágenes aun así deben ser eliminadas por violación de copyright.
Delete: Derivative work --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hola. Modificar una imagen con los derechos reservados es una obra derivada, una evidente violación de copyright. Puedes leer más sobre este asunto en Commons:Trabajos_derivados. Las imágenes aun así deben ser eliminadas por violación de copyright.
Deleted: Copyright violations. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
1800s photo as own work? Maybe PD-old or PD-anonymous? Taivo (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Another upload by User:Body Mack with bogus source/copyright claim. Original photo might or might not be PD for some reason or another, but without any actual info on source, date, context, it has little potential for in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment Delete COPYRIGHTED WORK
Hello Wikipedia team,
This is Sriram Hariharan. I take full ownership and credit for the above image that has been posted by Faheem9333. I have clicked this picture myself at Coimbatore International Airport on October 26, 2012 while departing to Delhi on IndiGo flight 6E 286, and this image can be found at the following places online:
- Jetphotos.net: http://jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7499071
- Skyscrapercity Forum: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=97863578&postcount=828
- Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/41731083@N08/8233262355
I request Wikipedia team to remove this image as it contains my watermark. Should you need the image, I can provide an unwatermarked one.
Copyrighted work Sriramhari.iyer (talk) 07:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Oprhaned image for a non-notable organization. Commons isn't an advert space or a storage site for non-encyclopedic content. Sarah (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Black male penis.JPG -mattbuck (Talk) 11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I think that in this case the closeup crop isn't needed on Commons Sinnamon Girl (talk) 17:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Does not provide additional useful information to Wikimedia Commons Hazmat2 (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Delete Not useful. --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN, we do have tons of images, nothing new. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted by Alan. Yann (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality & eww. - Corn cheese (talk) 04:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality testicles. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
No cumple licencia Paz-imperfecta (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Non educational. Not in use. Out of scope Alan Lorenzo (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- It appears to be a screenshot from a TV series. See: River Tam. Jespinos (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: screencap Denniss (talk) 01:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Someone's hand (?) is on the left. Same picture without the hand is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar picture with a bit better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I doubt that these photographs with watermarks are really {{Own}}.
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dcocaro4.JPG
- File:Dcocaro3.JPG
- File:Dcocaro2.jpg
- File:Dcocaro1.jpg
- File:Danilococaro.JPG
- File:~749 4 180x0.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Images from internet. Not own work obviously.
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom - will delete this as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom - will delete this as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom - will delete this as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP does not apply in Norway. PD in Norway in 2014-01 Themightyquill (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom - will delete this as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored 2014. INeverCry 01:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Too little light. Almost similar picture (different face expression) with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar shot is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Too black picture. Image of same man (hand in different posture) with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image Taivo (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image Taivo (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image Taivo (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, very bad quality Taivo (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image. Taken in a private place, and the description (as funny as one may see it...or not) does not give us good reason to believe that this is a good faith upload. russavia (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't find any valid reason to keep this image on Commons. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep It can be argued that it is redundant with File:Snarl2006.JPG, however, since only two images are of angry smile on Category:Facial expressions it's safe to keep both. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please read COM:IDENT. russavia (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Too bad quality for that. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
The picture source is not specified (plus missing EXIF). It seems obscene and potentially libelous. Steven Andrew Scarface220995 (talk) 15:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I wouldn't say "obscene", but dubious sourcing and questionable in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I do not understand, what is scandalous or obscene here, but quality is so bad, that probably it is better to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Author requests deletion at OTRS 2013050310001291. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Blurry, uncat since Sept; no in scope importance evident. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image of an unidentified dog breed. Single upload by user since Feb 2012. Quality (lighting, shading, etc) makes it hard to forsee encyclopedic value per scope. Sarah (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo, not in use, not educational Alan Lorenzo (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the tube map. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
blurry, small, not in use, imho out of scope, Roland 16:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
imho non-free content, Roland 16:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
What is it? How to use it? Uploader's other contribution is also listed for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Look at the EXIF :-) Delete as copyvio. Lupo 18:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Non educational. Low quality. Not in use. Personal photo. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope. this will not be used for any educational purpose. Tortie tude (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned image of a fake game controller drawing thing. Unclear what the encyclopedic quality of this is. Probably can safely be deleted (and we're not a storage site!) Sarah (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work, seethis site with same image. Uploader has other questionable uploads. Sphilbrick (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work, seethis site with same image. Uploader has other questionable uploads. Sphilbrick (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in South Korea. See here: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Korea_.28South.29 Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality (I am the photographer, no discussion needed) Manuela (talk) 10:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Taivo (talk) 11:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality (I am the photographer, no discussion needed) Manuela (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Taivo (talk) 11:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality (I am the photographer, no discussion needed) Manuela (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Taivo (talk) 11:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality (I am the photographer, no discussion needed) Manuela (talk) 10:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Lean towards Keep, no particular problem evident; seems a photo of not much seen nor photographed bit of infrastructure of major city. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- weak Keep per Infrogmation. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is rarely a valid reason to delete, this file is usable especially as a thumb on other wikis PierreSelim (talk) 06:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Same picture now uploaded under new username File:Kanal_Wien_3._Mann_Tour_(05).JPG please delete this version, Manuela (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Duplicate --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality Manuela (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Taivo (talk) 11:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Tagged by Eleassar as derivative work without source and was deleted because of this. Restored and tagged for deletion instead as this needs a broader audience to discuss and verify or disprove the claim of derivative work Denniss (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I see no reason why Quizimodo's claim of own work should not be believed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Seems the earliest source file.Perhelion (talk) ℗ 15:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see a valid reason to delete; we assume good faith. A claim of derivative work should identify the work it's derivative of; the nomination reason appeared to be a bit confused originally. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion, no reason not to assume own work PierreSelim (talk) 06:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
imho too blurry for use, Roland 22:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete Too dark, nothing recognizable Taivo (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Too small for educational value. His other contribution is also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
single use account, only 1 upload. spam Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, {{BadJPG}}. Leyo 17:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Dubai. russavia (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not used, replaced by <math> BDijkstra (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Another promotional item for a non-notable musician. Out of scope. Sarah (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio. This image was used in the official website of Türkiye PEN Merkezi on 17 November 2008. There is no proof of {{Own work}}. Takabeg (talk) 10:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. A lower resolution version can be found here, which is associated to an article dated June 26, 2012. Jespinos (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality is worse than File:Petro lock-your one stop shop for all your fuel and lubricant needs 2013-04-26 16-03.jpg, which is also presented for deletion. Also, the file is not used. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
imho non-free content, see https://plus.google.com/photos/106434928922042558611/albums/5618494538712306497/5618502153014603266, Roland 23:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
OTRS ticket 2013030610010082 only allows for use in one specific (non existing) article. Jcb (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image. His other uploaded image is also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Looks like it's a scan from a newspaper. Most likely, the uploader doesn't have permission to license this picture under CC. Badzil (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete Very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned out of scope text that doesn't appear to bring any encyclopedic value to Commons & related projects. Sarah (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal name is shown on sign board of left edge of this photo. M yanagisawa (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete it is uploader request --Vantey (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar picture with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Useless without location description. The uploader's other contributions are also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
![11:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/03#c-Taivo-2013-05-03T11:42:00.000Z-File:Кафе"Апшалас"_2013-04-24_22-04.jpg){kind=link}
- Self-promotion. Delete. Clarissy. 16:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
![00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/03#c-INeverCry-2013-05-10T00:15:00.000Z-File:Кафе"Апшалас"_2013-04-24_22-04.jpg){kind=link}
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal file Taivo (talk) 13:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anwar Ibrahim
[edit]These six files have been Flickr washed. File:Anwar Ibrahim 2008.jpg has EXIF stating the copyright holder is "FOTO SINAR HARIAN (DIGI)". (this is their site). File:Anwar Ibrahim-edited.jpg is a derivative of that copyright violation. The other four photos are from the same Flickr stream, with no EXIF, low resolution, etc, etc. COM:PRP applies to those.
- File:Anwar Ibrahim 2008.jpg
- File:Anwar Ibrahim-edited.jpg
- File:AnwarTurki.jpg
- File:Turki Anwar Ibrahim.jpg
- File:Hadi Awang and Anwar.jpg
- File:Wan Azizah.jpg
russavia (talk) 07:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture;[1] may be uploaded locally where appropriate. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia.
- File:Cerkev Košaki notranjost.JPG
- File:Cerkev Košaki spredaj.JPG
- File:Cerkev Košaki zadaj.JPG
- File:Košaki zvonik.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 12:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Panjshera
[edit]These files are uploaded by user Panjshera:
They are both unused personal photos. All his other contributions are also presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandraclarke94 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.
- File:Age structure of bellerby 2011 %.png
- File:Age structure of bellerby 2011.png
- File:Bellerby Census data.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anonimo1230 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Appear to be some kind of.. marketing materials? Does anyone know what these are? Or why they might be in scope?
- File:Spectrumatauder.jpg
- File:Spectrumconstituencies.jpg
- File:Spectrumotcsvdevices.jpg
- File:Spectrumtier1.jpg
- File:Spectrum technology.jpg
- File:Marcom spectrum atauder.jpg
- File:Marcom spectrum.PNG
–moogsi (blah) 17:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete all Taivo (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Avinashega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenwhots.
- File:Qb-registered.jpg
- File:Prelogin.png
- File:New-user.jpg
- File:Login-loading.png
- File:Qb-login.jpg
- File:Link-existing-account-with-password.png
- File:Link-new-account.png
- File:Link-esisting-account-without-password.png
- File:Forgot password.jpg
- File:Facebook-login.png
- File:Bypasslogin.jpg
- File:Change-password.jpg
- File:Edit-email.png
- File:Addcard.jpg
- File:Add-first-traveller.jpg
- File:Add-traveller.jpg
- File:Flow Diagram.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enrique martínez bañuelos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Text documents with images of unknown origin.
- File:El lente de agua.pdf
- File:Asteroide en rusia.pdf
- File:La regla de las tres erres.pdf
- File:Palabras nahuatl.pdf
- File:Lentes divergentes.pdf
- File:La propagación del sonido y sus implicaciones.pdf
- File:El gato con botas.pdf
- File:Los Poderes de la Unión.pdf
- File:Dolor de estomago.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per User talk:Juancho11: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
Gunnex (talk) 15:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
strongly doubt own work. no notability. -> out of scope
- File:Tennison peter.jpg
- File:Yohan halli.jpg
- File:Moses k.jpg
- File:Vinit ahalle.png
- File:Manoj bhore.jpg
- File:Bishop sir.jpg
- File:Mrs bishop.jpg
- File:N rodgres.jpg
- File:Ramesh gaikwad.jpg
- File:Mr. bishop.jpg
- File:Joseph udgir.jpg
- File:Asha wood.jpg
- File:Sudhir soneri.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete They can be own work, but none of them is used. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis sayago (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mandy-pixels (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo photos, not own work.
- File:Martin-Cilia-band-02-WEB.jpg
- File:The-Atlantics-WEB-3987.jpg
- File:2013-Martin-Cilia-WEB.jpg
- File:2011-Martin-Cilia-WEB.jpg
- File:The Atlantics 2013.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I believe own work. All these files are used. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios, images come from facebook or the band website [2] PierreSelim (talk) 06:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo eduardo amaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 01:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedrinhoSantos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sebastian Leivas Muslera (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images are from internet.
- Examples:
Copyright violations.
- File:Lbdpvspeñarol.jpg
- File:Lbdpvsestudianteslp2009.jpg
- File:Telon18.jpg
- File:Bandragigantenacional2013.jpg
- File:PiTeR pAnC.jpg
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tagahanga1962 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, non educational. Family album.
- File:Avelino Samboy Lim.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and his relatives.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim in Chicago, IL.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and family.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and relatives.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and cousins.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim with sister and niece.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and parents.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim with Jamie.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim with nephews.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and sister Maricor Lim.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and niece Danielle.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and daughter Jamie.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and his sisters.jpg
- File:Samboy Lim and siblings.jpg
- File:AVELINO SAMBOY LIM the PBA's SKYWALKER.jpg
- File:The Skywalker Samboy Lim.jpg
- File:PBA HALL of FAME Awardee - Samboy Lim.jpg
- File:Avelino Lim Jr.jpg
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
it is not the current version - I uploaded a more recent version but it is not showing when I search for it and this older incorrect version shows instead. Melmoth the wanderer (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to contain copyrightable album covers. --ghouston (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by McZusatz Natuur12 (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Commons is not a private album hosting service. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep It is used. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- It is used but wrongly. Put on the article page by the same user as the uploader here on Commons or perhaps by someone who is close to both the subject and the uploader. This is certainly a patent private album photo. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete The photo was taken by someone other than the uploader, which means that the image is not 'own work' as claimed. We need to delete this unless the uploader can provide permission via OTRS. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- NOTE: The file, as was to be expected, is no longer in use and, therefore, out of scope. Rahul Bott (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work as claimed (uploader is the subject of the image) MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
connais pas 173.177.245.96 20:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep I do not understand the reason, but the file is used. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Use facebook instead High Contrast (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in scope, and promotion MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
insufficient quality (I am the photographer, no discussion needed) Manuela (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- I would not delete it, it is imho useful for illustration. But if it is the explicit wish of the author I would support deletion. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- O.k. all deletion requests for the pictures of the sewer tunnel withdrawn --Manuela (talk) 08:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Request withdrawn MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Same picture now uploaded under new username File:Kanal_Wien_3._Mann_Tour_(07).JPG please delete this version, Manuela (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Question Could you explain the reason for the re-upload, please, and also for the author field being different between the two images? Thanks, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I can. I want these pictures off my primary account, and an admin advised me to do so (upload pictures with a different account) because the request for deletion was rejected. I do not want my name on these pictures in case they are reused so I removed my name from the EXIF-data and released it under CC-0. I hope I could make clear what I mean, if not don't hesitate to ask, thank you, --Manuela (talk) 05:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused duplicate image deleted as requested by uploader. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work as claimed. No evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Probably not own work as claimed obviously no, but is part of a promotional article, possible from a single-purpose account. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angel Lázaro Medina Rodríguez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo photos/album covers. No evidence of permission.
- File:Chacal & Yakarta - Pretty + Full Akanch.jpg
- File:Chacal & Yakarta - El Harakiri.jpg
- File:Chacal & Yakarta - La Masacre Musical.jpg
- File:Chacal & Yakarta (Cantantes Cubanos).jpg
- File:Chacal & Yakarta - En Concierto.jpg
- File:Chacal & Yakarta - El Clave.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
No promo photo, error. --Angel Lázaro Medina Rodríguez (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'll speedy delete them if you don't mind. The author claims to own the pictures since he's promoting the band(self-promotion). The article on es.wiki has been erased, so there is no need to keep the pictures. Alhen .::··¨ 13:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted except one which has an OTRS tag MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
remplacement photo P.danseur6.2 (talk) 04:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar picture with better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another image that I uploaded Safety Cap (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:41, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:41, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:41, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:42, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Duplicación del logotipo (Duplication logo) ⇒ See link to page teleмanίa (discusión) 09:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
error de usuario Mcemiaj (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
error de usuario Mcemiaj (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
error de subida Mcemiaj (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
中文维基上的页面显示此文件为合理使用。 Yvtou (talk) 10:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Similar pic with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Same view with a bit better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. Vantey (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
por que viola la identidad de michelin Wilalucard (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Statues in Japan installed in 1995. No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Vantey (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Statues in Japan installed in 1998. No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Vantey (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio. Derivative work of copyrighted signboard. Vantey (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Not in Public Domain as claimed. This images were shot and published in 1948-1960
- File:이학구.JPG
- File:김익렬.JPG
- File:김좌진 건국훈장 대한민국장.JPG
- File:토벌대에 체포된 주민들.JPG
- File:이승만.JPG
- File:김영삼 학도병.jpg
- File:압록강에서 물을 수통에 담고있는 6사단 7연대 병사.jpg
- File:1960-04-18고대생습격사건.jpg
- File:혁명재판 사형수 최후모습.jpg
- File:이화룡.jpg
Robot Monk (talk) 10:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Screenshots from videos whose copyright status is unknown.
Jespinos (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Screenshots, and not own work as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB-Ruby_laser_pumping_cavity_assembled_and_disassembled.JPG Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Incorrect filename "Файл-Ruby laser pumping cavity assembled and disassembled.JPG" in Commons. File with correct name "Ruby_laser_pumping_cavity_assembled_and_disassembled.JPG" in Commons is presented. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused duplicate of File:Ruby laser pumping cavity assembled and disassembled.JPG. Lupo 15:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
All images are from Russia (Krasnodar). See Commons:Fop#Russia, Russia don't have FoP with commercial use allowed.
- File:Ленин Краснодар Газоаппарат.JPG
- File:Скульптура Шурик и Лида в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Памятник "Человек-созидатель" в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Памятник "Гость" в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Бюст В.С. Высоцкому в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Обелиск воинам-освободителям в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Памятник Щербине в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Бюст М.М. Корницкого в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Коваленко мемориал.jpg
- File:The monument of I. Repin in Krasnodar.JPG
- File:The monument of General Lavr Kornilov in Krasnodar.JPG
- File:Столыпин - памятник в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Памятник Столыпину в Краснодаре.JPG
- File:Lenin on Stasova Str. in Krasnodar.jpg
- File:Lenin On Caucasus.jpg
- File:Lenin in KubSAU.jpg
- File:Marx's monument in Krasnodar.jpg
- File:Lenin Krasnodar extra.jpg
- File:Vsesvyatskoe cemetery - near ost entrance.JPG
- It is a crypt in the cemetery dating back to the Russian empire (before 1917 - PD Russian Empire) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, this is valid. Is in PD by antique. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Suvorov Krasnodar.JPG
- File:Lenin kozh.jpg
- File:Lenin KSK.jpg
- File:Kostylev - Memorial board in Krasnodar.JPG
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- All images is non-commercial use. In compliance of article 1246 of Part IV of Civil Code of the Russian Federation:
- "Free Use of Work Permanently Situated in Place of Public Resort
- Reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable shall be allowed, without the author's or other copyrightholder consent or payment of royalties, of photographic work, work of architecture or visual art, that permanently standed in places of public resort..."
- All images is photo of monuments "Permanently Situated in Place of Public Resort" in Russia (Krasnodar).
- User:MrYantit 20:01, 04 May 2013 (UTC+4)
- Hi MrYantit. The Wikimedia projects, Commons in this case, requires commercial use allowed. More info: Commons:L. Greetings. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, Alan Lorenzo. And what to do with image ih this case? Upload in wikipedia?
- User:MrYantit 21:49, 04 May 2013 (UTC+4)
- I think... The only three options are; pass to the public domain by antique, sculptures authors permissions to OTRS or (absurd option) change the laws. I'm sorry. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Alan, when this files will be deleted by you? User:MrYantit 22:50 (UTC+4), 13 May 2013
- I think... The only three options are; pass to the public domain by antique, sculptures authors permissions to OTRS or (absurd option) change the laws. I'm sorry. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Russia don't have FoP with commercial use allowed. (File:Vsesvyatskoe cemetery - near ost entrance.JPG not deleted) Steinsplitter (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Violación de derechos de autor (Copyright violation) ⇒ See link to page teleмanίa (discusión) 09:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: {{Pd-textlogo}} applies here. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Emblem of the 2018 Winter Olympics - Copyrighted 195.169.141.54 12:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I have recreated the file in en.wikipedia. Hektor (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Most olympic logos are very complicated and therefore copyrighted. This one is not. The olympic rings we already have on Commons, the rest is extremely simple rectangles and an asterisk. Keep Fry1989 eh? 15:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- And you have a something, a statement by the PyeongChang organizing committee for instance, to support your assertion that this logo is not copyrighted ? I notice for instance that on the PyeongChang website the logo has a ™ attached to it but that it has conveniently been edited from the image posted on Commons Hektor (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to have something from an organisation specifically stating they're logo or symbol is PD. We have tonnes of logos on here without such a written notice saying they're PD. PD-textlogo, PD-shape and PD-simple all apply. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- No they don't. This logo has no ground to be in Commons. And we are dealing with an organization, the IOC, which is very protective of intellectual and artistic property. Hektor (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, they absolutely do. Are you aware that the olympic rings are already here? So take them out of this image. Do you really believe what is left, that 4 rectangles forming a very nondescript shape and an asterisk, are enough to form a copyright? I'm sorry to burst your bubble but this is a case of "sad day for them". They chose a logo that is too simple, it is PD. Fry1989 eh? 22:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to burst YOUR bubble but the IOC had the Sochi 2014 logo removed from Commons and it was far less complicated than this one. Hektor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have been doealing with copyright on Commons for 3 years, I know what is simple and not. Sochi's was removed because it uses a distinct font that was specifically created for the logo. This one does not. This is PD simple, PD shape and PD textlogo. Sad day for them, you can't protect something that is too simple for copyright in the first place. Fry1989 eh? 23:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to burst YOUR bubble but the IOC had the Sochi 2014 logo removed from Commons and it was far less complicated than this one. Hektor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, they absolutely do. Are you aware that the olympic rings are already here? So take them out of this image. Do you really believe what is left, that 4 rectangles forming a very nondescript shape and an asterisk, are enough to form a copyright? I'm sorry to burst your bubble but this is a case of "sad day for them". They chose a logo that is too simple, it is PD. Fry1989 eh? 22:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- No they don't. This logo has no ground to be in Commons. And we are dealing with an organization, the IOC, which is very protective of intellectual and artistic property. Hektor (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to have something from an organisation specifically stating they're logo or symbol is PD. We have tonnes of logos on here without such a written notice saying they're PD. PD-textlogo, PD-shape and PD-simple all apply. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- And you have a something, a statement by the PyeongChang organizing committee for instance, to support your assertion that this logo is not copyrighted ? I notice for instance that on the PyeongChang website the logo has a ™ attached to it but that it has conveniently been edited from the image posted on Commons Hektor (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Most olympic logos are very complicated and therefore copyrighted. This one is not. The olympic rings we already have on Commons, the rest is extremely simple rectangles and an asterisk.
- Keep: As Fry1989 mentioned, {{Pd-textlogo}} applies here, because the simple forms in the logo does not meet the treshold of originillaty. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple logo, even I am able to do that. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Recreated after deletion for an Administrator. Copyrighted Olympic logo. And remember that you are individually responsible for what you upload. Hektor (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- It was immediately restored because it is too simple for copyright. Denniss may not understand that, but Fastily did. You also don't understand copyright. This is too simple. PD-textlogo, PD-Shape and PD-ineligible ALL apply.
- Anybody new to this DR should be aware that while the image was initially deleted by Denniss, a proper reasoning was not provided and the image was immediately restored through unDR. Fry1989 eh? 01:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Further to what Fry mentioned. 99.229.41.79 01:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy close: the logo is in the public domain. I actually undeleted per a formal undeletion request. The logo is a textbook instance of failure to pass the threshold of originality because it consists of geometric shapes which are too simple in nature to qualify for copyright protection. -FASTILY 07:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The image is an incorrect reproduction of the original logo. The ™ sign next to 2018 has been omitted. Hektor (talk) 10:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Speedily, this is an abuse of the DR process and a trivial reason to nominate an image. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy close yet again, same reason as above. -FASTILY 18:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
An svg version is keep without deletion request 2605:BA00:4138:155:FD66:6234:D89A:C194 21:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
speedy kept (non-admin closure) Not a reason for deletion, see COM:DUPE and COM:INUSE. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fczarnowski as Speedy (ek: Plik zdublowany przez autora. Do usunięcia - istnieje nowsza i lepsza wersja)
Converted by me to DR, as image was uploaded half a year ago. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, because I uploaded a new set of pictures regarding to Pontificia Facolta, I decided to delete that one, old and a bit worse quality image (Facolta Seraphicum Roma fc00.jpg). The new set (7 pieces) is located here: Category:Pontificia Facolta Teologica San Bonaventura. --Fczarnowski (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same picture now uploaded under new username File:Kanal_Wien_3._Mann_Tour_(01).JPG please delete this version, Manuela (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader request. Martin H. (talk) 19:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
AtomicGagou (talk) 09:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- FR : Rien ne permet de vérifier que cette photographie a été prise par Floris. Dans le doute il convient donc de l'écarter. — EN : Nothing ensures that this photograph was taken by Floris. In doubt should therefore be disregarded. — Delete — AtomicGagou (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- This picture is the original of File:King Willem-Alexander, Queen Maxima and their daughters 2013.jpg. For the discussion about this picture see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:King Willem-Alexander, Queen Maxima and their daughters 2013.jpg Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Early-closed as an obviously abusive nomination without any valid evidence for the alleged "copyright uncertain". -- Túrelio (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
This was only used to dispute a ridiculous DR for another upload. See [3] and [4] No need to keep this original here, the cropped version [5] is better. Floris2132 (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:King_Willem-Alexander,_Queen_Maxima_and_their_daughters_2013.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:King_Willem-Alexander,_Queen_Maxima_and_their_daughters_2013.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Fine with me! Sarah (talk) 22:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per Uploader request. Uploaded only for providing evidence. --Martin H. (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The only image of sitting asleep on somebody's shoulder that I can see at Category:Sitting asleep. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, no permission from the subject and unused. Bidgee (talk) 01:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
imho not own work, see http.//nithyananda.org..., Roland 15:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
In the album http://nithyananda.org/photo-gallery/public-images, the owner of the image - Nithyananda.org - has indicated that the image is free for use under a CC license. Is this not sufficient? Acnaren (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violation. Bidgee (talk) 01:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Is de minimis applicable here? Leyo 17:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello no as I have the required permission to use the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.108.17.180 (talk • contribs)
- The permission needs to be sent via OTRS. --Leyo 11:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Info Sent to OTRS thanks for pointing me towards to correct page to submit.
- Permission received on OTRS system. ticket:2013050410005481. This permission is for a photo, not mentions nothing about painting. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 15:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment I am almost sure, that de minimis cannot be applied here. We have now OTRS permission, but the photo is used only in article proposal, which failed a request for creating article. Probably Nicky Taylor is not enough notable. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not deminimis. Would need OTRS confirmation from Nicky Taylor. Lupo 18:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Still copyrighted in U.S. Law referenced is from 1999. After 1996, the URAA date. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 23:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Before 1999, the Lebanese law about copyright was the "Law No. 2385 of January 17, 1924". If the photos were in public domain under this law, they can probably be kept.--Underlying lk (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Law No. 2385 of January 17, 1924 (the old Lebanese copyright law), photographs were copyrighted for 50 years since publication (article 153). So, even under that old Lebanese law, this photo, which was taken in 1958, was copyrighted in 1996, and thus is copyrighted in the U.S. I suggest replacing the image with the second photo from here, which also show U.S. Marines walking in file in Beirut, and is a U.S. Marine Corps photo and thus PD. Lupo 19:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Beirut's Martyrs' Square during celebrations marking the release by the French of Lebanon's government from Rashayya prison on November 22, 1943, the day of Lebanon's independence. Adib Ibrahim.jpg
[edit]
PD in Lebanon on 1999 because of law referenced, before URAA date of 1996. So not PD in U.S. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Before 1999, the Lebanese law about copyright was the "Law No. 2385 of January 17, 1924". If the photos were in public domain under this law, they can probably be kept.--Underlying lk (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per Law No. 2385 of January 17, 1924 (the old Lebanese copyright law), photographs were copyrighted for 50 years since publication (article 153). This photo was taken in 1943, and presumably published shortly after it was taken. So it would have been PD in Lebanon before 1996, and thus not subject to the URAA restorations in the U.S. Lupo 19:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep Different. The one you want to keep seems to be a retouched version of the other one, with some elements removed. We should keep the original one, although it would be nice to have the retouching explained in description and the original image linked.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is better. I've deleted another one --Butko (talk) 09:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep They aren't duplicate. In fact they can't be duplicate, because of the mobile nature of water and leafs. We can't make sure that one of the two images is the best for all conceivable educative uses of these images, nor, at least, that both of them are absolutely equivalent. Then, we should leave users and reusers to chose which one they prefer for their intended educational use, inside or outside WMF projects.
For example: If Kulmalukko were to need an image of this pair, he would have used the one he is not nominating to deletion, but the nominated one seems less aligned to me. Therefore, if we want to provide the best possible image to reusers like Kulmalukko and reusers like me, we should keep both. The benefit of keeping might be small, but there is no harm in keeping them.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep They aren't duplicate. In fact they can't be duplicate, because of the mobile nature of water and leafs. We can't make sure that one of the two images is the best for all conceivable educative uses of these images, nor, at least, that both of them are absolutely equivalent. Then, we should leave users and reusers to chose which one they prefer for their intended educational use, inside or outside WMF projects.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fabian RRRR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ORUBEN ist probably not T. Rector http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0661.html and PD-NASA sould show a NASA page and not own work as source –moogsi (blah) 15:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is clearly a Hubble image from 2001 - I'm uncertain about the licensing on these... hopefully someone knows if this is an obvious copyvio –moogsi (blah) 15:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint - you are probably refering to: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2001/12/image/c/ but this has a lower resolution, is credited to Travis Rector (NOAO) and has a blue rectangle in the image and no copyright clearence: http://hubblesite.org/about_us/copyright.php states
However, for credit lines listing individuals from other institutions, you will need to contact that institution listed in the credit line to advise you on the copyright policy for that image.
- To judge from the meta-information of this image, no such contact had taken place, and the usual copyright from NOAO ( http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html ) states
Commercial Use: For copyrighted materials, permission should be obtained from the copyright owner, NOAO/AURA, prior to use.
- In omitting this, to my eyes we have here a copyright violation.
- We have already a similiar image (File:Paardenkopnevel.jpg), which has a copyright clearance.
- To summarize: this image is from KPNO, Travis Rector (NOAO), it is used in conjunction with the Hubble image during 2001, but has no copyright clearence in this resolution. Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't intended to be a clue.. I thought I'd put the link there! Obviously not. Thank you for your input :) –moogsi (blah) 20:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Этот файл является несвободным скриншотом. English: This file is non-free screenshot. Trilelea (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Что нужно сделать, что бы оставить этот файл? например как этот несвободный файл http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Yandex-Screenshot.PNG . Nikionik 19:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Смысл в том, что файл используется в одной русской википедии и вполне возможно перенести его туда.
Deleted: FASTILY 23:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
black image Alan Lorenzo (talk) 22:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Same reason as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pere prlpz. It's not black. It's a black stone with black cuts and black carving. It's not a great photo, but in my old laptop monitor I clearly see all this.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Too dark and unclear, the object is not recognizable. -Kulmalukko (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot see anything other than blackness. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
The copy of this image in en.wiki claims that the image is copyright by Graham Phillips and that there's an OTRS ticket pending. The version here on Commons seems to have been copied from there, but with different authorship information. Diannaa (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. I own the original copyright of the file - I'm a professional photographer who took the photo. Let me work to get the other uploader to remove their upload. Just a Ukraine Guy (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok then, better keep this one and delete mine, I didn't have proper copyright. Bensimo (talk) 12:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Bensimo uploaded, then later Just a Ukraine Guy came along and changed the license from "owned by someone else" to "owned by me." This appears to be a case of Bensimo uploading on behalf of Just a Ukraine Guy, who came and uploaded to English Wikipedia and to Commons. The claim is credible. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Adictoalatv
[edit]These files are uploaded by user Adictoalatv:
- File:Energy Televisión.png
- File:Telecinco 2012.png
- File:LaSiete 2012.png
- File:Energy 2012.png
- File:Nueve 2012.png
I am not able to produce such, so they are not simple logos. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pere prlpz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Black photos
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 22:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The sculpture is black, and therefore images of it shouldn't be blue, white, gray nor pink. Furthermore,
File:Espai-temps P1440544.JPGFile:Espai-temps P1440545.JPG is intentionally sillueted against a brighter background. And I suggest adjusting your monitor to see the details in File:Espai-temps P1440544.JPG (not a lot of details, but it isn't just a black picture). A piece of black stone with two cuts produces a black image with two darker lines. What else would you expect?--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC) - I'm confused - is this the same sculpture as the ones in Category:Espai / Temps? Because those images are quite clear. Looking at File:Espai-temps P1440544.JPG with full monitor brightness (zooming in and out) and I don't see anything but black. I downloaded it and increased brightness with an image editor, and still didn't see anything. Then I increased gamma, and finally I can make out the crossed lines and the circles of breasts. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the same - although the time of day is very different. In File:Espai-temps P1440544.JPG I can see details with my very old laptop, even without editing or increasing brightness. Black cuts appear very clear, and breast circles and other shapes are more subtle. I must admit it is not a great picture, but it is far from being just a black rectangle.
- Btw, I made a wrong link in an statement about one of the images. My apologies if it was confusing.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Too dark and unclear, the object is not recognizable. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot see anything other than blackness. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:39, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Statue of Gizo Kasuya
[edit]Derivative works of statue in Japan installed in 1975. No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artworks in Japan.
--Vantey (talk) 21:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I, who took and uploaded those photos, agree with Vantey. The statue seems still copyrighted now. --Ohgi (talk) 15:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)